EP0879917B1 - Paper treatment composition - Google Patents

Paper treatment composition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0879917B1
EP0879917B1 EP98303925A EP98303925A EP0879917B1 EP 0879917 B1 EP0879917 B1 EP 0879917B1 EP 98303925 A EP98303925 A EP 98303925A EP 98303925 A EP98303925 A EP 98303925A EP 0879917 B1 EP0879917 B1 EP 0879917B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
paper
salt
treatment composition
toner
aluminate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98303925A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0879917A2 (en
EP0879917A3 (en
Inventor
David William Owen
Richard David Saunders
Derek Sutton
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Arjo Wiggins Fine Papers Ltd
Original Assignee
Arjo Wiggins Fine Papers Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Arjo Wiggins Fine Papers Ltd filed Critical Arjo Wiggins Fine Papers Ltd
Priority to DK98303925T priority Critical patent/DK0879917T3/en
Publication of EP0879917A2 publication Critical patent/EP0879917A2/en
Publication of EP0879917A3 publication Critical patent/EP0879917A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0879917B1 publication Critical patent/EP0879917B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03GELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G7/00Selection of materials for use in image-receiving members, i.e. for reversal by physical contact; Manufacture thereof
    • G03G7/006Substrates for image-receiving members; Image-receiving members comprising only one layer
    • G03G7/0066Inorganic components thereof
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/63Inorganic compounds
    • D21H17/66Salts, e.g. alums
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/21Macromolecular organic compounds of natural origin; Derivatives thereof
    • D21H17/24Polysaccharides
    • D21H17/28Starch
    • D21H17/29Starch cationic
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H21/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
    • D21H21/14Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties characterised by function or properties in or on the paper
    • D21H21/16Sizing or water-repelling agents

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the use of a treatment composition for enhancing the suitability of paper for printing by so-called "colour digital presses" of the kind which use a liquid toner or ink.
  • Colour digital presses were first commercialised on a significant scale around the early 1990's. They are particularly suited to short printing runs for which traditional colour offset printing can be uneconomic and slow because of the high cost and time penalties involved in producing printing plates and setting up the press at the start of the run. By contrast, a colour digital press has no printing plates or comparable set-up costs. It therefore permits a rapid response to print orders ("fast turnaround"), and the cost per impression is not significantly influenced by the total number of impressions being made. These factors make a digital press ideal for short-run colour printing, say for up to about 3000 impressions.
  • variable and non-variable information can be merged between every consecutively printed copy, so that individual impressions within a print run can be personalised or customised so as to be specific to a particular recipient or reader.
  • Colour digital press technology is based on non-impact printing or imaging technology of the same general kind as is used in plain paper photocopiers and laser printers, i.e. on the use of an electrostatically-charged roll and charged toner particles for image formation.
  • An electrostatically-charged photosensitive roll (the "photoreceptor") is exposed to light in an imagewise configuration such that the surface electrostatic charge on the exposed areas of the photoreceptor is dissipated. Toner is then brought into contact with the photoreceptor, and adheres strongly to it in the unexposed (and thus still electrostatically-charged) areas of its surface, from which it can be transferred to the paper either directly or indirectly via an offset roll.
  • a single pass through the printing unit provides a monochrome image, but a colour print of a quality comparable to that obtainable by traditional colour offset printing can be achieved either by multiple passes through a printing unit using differently-coloured toners or by a single pass through an array of printing units each of which applies a differently-coloured toner.
  • Typically four passes or printing units are used, three of which apply coloured toners and the other of which applies a black toner.
  • the coloured toners are such that when used individually and in suitable combinations, they can provide a complete spectral range for the finished print, in much the same way as is achieved in conventional colour printing by the use of a black and three differently-coloured inks.
  • toners are of a fine particulate nature, with each particle comprising pigment particles bound together in a thermally-fusible polymeric binder matrix. Once the toner has been applied to the paper, heat is used to melt the polymeric binder component of the toner and so "fuse” the toner particles together and to the paper.
  • liquid toners comprise toner particles dispersed in a fairly high-boiling organic liquid vehicle, together with dispersed binder particles.
  • the toner is heated to an elevated temperature (typically 70 - 90°C) sufficient to convert the binder particles to a liquid state. Removal of the vehicle results in an increase in toner viscosity, which facilitates transfer of the toner to the offset roll (if used) and to the paper, with the paper surface absorbing the residual liquid vehicle.
  • the binder reverts to a solid state after the toner has been applied to the paper and so fixes the image (there is no subsequent "fusing" of the toner after its transfer to the paper, such as occurs in dry toner processes).
  • the paper used with colour digital presses must be carefully chosen if good print quality and runnability through the digital press is to be achieved.
  • the paper requirements are similar to those for plain paper copying and laser printing, primarily a smooth surface, good stiffness, a relatively low moisture content, good dimensional stability under conditions of variable humidity, compatibility with toner so as to permit good toner adhesion and ability to withstand the heat of the toner fusing stage without excessive curling, wavy edge production or blistering.
  • Such papers are readily available at acceptable cost, and so paper availability has not been a significant constraint on market penetration of dry toner colour digital press technology.
  • WO-A-96/06384 discloses the use of polyethylene imine or derivatives thereof or polyamides to impart a basic functionality to paper for use as an imagine substrate in a liquid toner printing process with the result that improved image adhesion is obtained.
  • US-A-5 522 968 discloses the use of an alkali metal salt coating to impart an alkaline pH surface value to an ink jet printing paper.
  • the invention resides in the use, for the purpose of enhancing the printability of paper by means of a liquid toner colour digital press, of a treatment composition comprising an aluminate salt or a salt of a weak acid and a strong base in an amount such as to impart an alkaline surface pH value to the paper.
  • the invention provides a method of printing paper by means of a liquid toner colour digital press, characterised in that the paper being printed has been surface treated with an aluminate salt or a salt of a weak acid and a strong base in an amount such as to give an alkaline surface pH value.
  • the treatment composition comprising the aluminate salt or the salt of a weak acid and a strong base preferably contains starch or another surface agent, so that the treatment composition also functions as a surface sizing composition. This reduces the cost of the treatment (since no additional paper processing is required beyond the normal size press treatment). It also facilitates uniform application of the active treating ingredient (the salt) across the whole surface of the paper, since the sizing agent functions as an extender.
  • the surface size is typically a starch, but could in principle be a latex, polyvinyl alcohol, gelatin, a cellulose derivative such as carboxymethylcellulose, or other known surface sizing material. Combinations of these materials can be used.
  • Size press application is a particularly convenient and therefore preferred method of applying the treatment composition, coating, spraying or other application techniques can be used.
  • Size-presses as referred to in this application include not only traditional size presses but also so-called “metered” size presses of the kind commercialised under the name "Speedsizer” by Voith, “Sym-Sizer” by Valmet, “Twin-HSM” by BTG and “Filmpress” by Jagenberg.
  • the aluminate salt is preferably sodium aluminate, and the salt of a weak acid and a strong base is preferably sodium hydrogen carbonate (sodium bicarbonate). Less preferred alternatives include disodium tetraborate, trisodium phosphate and sodium acetate.
  • Sodium salts have been referred to because they are the most readily available, but it will be understood that the corresponding potassium salts could equally well be used, as could calcium salts, provided that they are adequately soluble.
  • Sodium aluminate has so far been found to give the best results, possibly because the presence of polyvalent aluminium enhances affinity to toner materials.
  • the amount of aluminate salt or salt of a weak acid and a strong base to be used varies in accordance with the type of paper being treated, for example its absorbence and inherent hold-out characteristics and the level and type of internal sizing used. Guidance as to suitable treatment levels is obtainable from the Examples given below. Generally the amount of aluminate or salt of a weak acid and a strong base will be such as to produce an alkaline surface pH value, for example 8 - 8.5 or higher.
  • a small amount of pigment e.g. colloidal precipitated calcium carbonate
  • the treatment composition if the effect is not such as to change the fundamental character of the final treated paper, i.e. to convert it from what would be perceived as an "uncoated" grade to a conventional coated product.
  • a 10% solution was prepared of an oxidised maize starch of the kind conventionally used for surface sizing of paper. This solution was divided into five batches. One of these was used as a control and the others were each made up into treatment compositions according to the invention by the addition of respective salts as listed below: Salt Mix Designation Disodiumtetraborate, Na 2 B 4 O 7 .10H 2 O A Sodium acetate trihydrate, NaC 2 H 3 O 2 .3H 2 O B Trisodium orthophosphate, Na 3 PO 4 .12H 2 O C Sodium aluminate, Na 2 Al 2 O 4 D ----- Control
  • the addition level of the salts was 1% on a dry basis in each case, calculated as weight of dry salt present (as the hydrate form where indicated) in relation to the weight of dry starch present. Starch therefore made up 99% of the treatment composition.
  • Each treatment composition was airknife-coated on to a smooth wove-finish 100 g m -2 business letterhead base paper stock by means of an intermediate-scale pilot coater.
  • This base paper had been internally-sized with alkyl ketene dimer (i.e. it was neutral/alkaline sized) and had also been conventionally surface-sized.
  • Two different coatweights of treating composition were applied, namely ca. 3 g m -2 and ca. 2 g m -2 (dry, in both cases).
  • the resulting reels were then sheeted to SRA3 size and test printed on a liquid toner colour digital press (an INDIGO E-PRINT 1000 press supplied by Indigo N.V. of the Netherlands).
  • the extent to which the various samples accepted the ink in a satisfactory manner was assessed visually, and the level of toner adhesion was assessed by "tape pull" and "rub toner adhesion” tests.
  • a batch of 2201 of an 8% solution of cationic potato starch was prepared. 3kg sodium hydrogen carbonate were dissolved in this solution with stirring to produce a treating composition of which starch comprised ca. 85%.
  • the resulting composition was fed to the size press of a paper machine producing a 90 g m -2 rosin/alum internally sized wove printing paper. The resulting paper was sheeted, printed and tested in the same way as in Example 1.
  • Example 1 This compares the results obtained with a sodium aluminate treatment composition applied by means of an intermediate scale coater in two different ways, namely by airknife coating and by means of a size press coating head.
  • the treatment composition was prepared as described with reference to Mix D of Example 1 and the dry coatweight applied was ca. 2 g m -2 in each case (per side in the case of the size press treated paper).
  • the paper to which the compositions were applied had not been surface sized but was otherwise as in Example 2. After treatment, the paper was sheeted, printed and tested as described in Example 1.

Abstract

The suitability of paper for printing by so-called "colour digital presses" of the kind which use a liquid toner or ink is enhanced by the use of a treatment composition comprising an aluminate salt or a salt of a weak acid and a strong base in an amount such as to impart an alkaline surface pH value to the paper. The treatment composition preferably also contains starch or another surface agent, so that the treatment composition also functions as a surface sizing composition.

Description

  • This invention relates to the use of a treatment composition for enhancing the suitability of paper for printing by so-called "colour digital presses" of the kind which use a liquid toner or ink.
  • Colour digital presses were first commercialised on a significant scale around the early 1990's. They are particularly suited to short printing runs for which traditional colour offset printing can be uneconomic and slow because of the high cost and time penalties involved in producing printing plates and setting up the press at the start of the run. By contrast, a colour digital press has no printing plates or comparable set-up costs. It therefore permits a rapid response to print orders ("fast turnaround"), and the cost per impression is not significantly influenced by the total number of impressions being made. These factors make a digital press ideal for short-run colour printing, say for up to about 3000 impressions. Since the information to be printed is stored in electronic form ("digitised"), rather than physically on a printing plate, initial and repeat print-runs can be made "on demand" without the need for physical changes to the press. A further benefit is that variable and non-variable information can be merged between every consecutively printed copy, so that individual impressions within a print run can be personalised or customised so as to be specific to a particular recipient or reader.
  • Colour digital press technology is based on non-impact printing or imaging technology of the same general kind as is used in plain paper photocopiers and laser printers, i.e. on the use of an electrostatically-charged roll and charged toner particles for image formation. An electrostatically-charged photosensitive roll (the "photoreceptor") is exposed to light in an imagewise configuration such that the surface electrostatic charge on the exposed areas of the photoreceptor is dissipated. Toner is then brought into contact with the photoreceptor, and adheres strongly to it in the unexposed (and thus still electrostatically-charged) areas of its surface, from which it can be transferred to the paper either directly or indirectly via an offset roll.
  • A single pass through the printing unit provides a monochrome image, but a colour print of a quality comparable to that obtainable by traditional colour offset printing can be achieved either by multiple passes through a printing unit using differently-coloured toners or by a single pass through an array of printing units each of which applies a differently-coloured toner. Typically four passes or printing units are used, three of which apply coloured toners and the other of which applies a black toner. The coloured toners are such that when used individually and in suitable combinations, they can provide a complete spectral range for the finished print, in much the same way as is achieved in conventional colour printing by the use of a black and three differently-coloured inks.
  • Currently-commercialised colour digital presses can be divided into two groups according to the type of toner used, i.e. whether it is a "dry toner" or a "liquid toner". Dry toners are of a fine particulate nature, with each particle comprising pigment particles bound together in a thermally-fusible polymeric binder matrix. Once the toner has been applied to the paper, heat is used to melt the polymeric binder component of the toner and so "fuse" the toner particles together and to the paper. By contrast, liquid toners comprise toner particles dispersed in a fairly high-boiling organic liquid vehicle, together with dispersed binder particles. During the printing operation, most of the vehicle is thought to be removed and the toner is heated to an elevated temperature (typically 70 - 90°C) sufficient to convert the binder particles to a liquid state. Removal of the vehicle results in an increase in toner viscosity, which facilitates transfer of the toner to the offset roll (if used) and to the paper, with the paper surface absorbing the residual liquid vehicle. The binder reverts to a solid state after the toner has been applied to the paper and so fixes the image (there is no subsequent "fusing" of the toner after its transfer to the paper, such as occurs in dry toner processes).
  • The paper used with colour digital presses must be carefully chosen if good print quality and runnability through the digital press is to be achieved. Where the press is of the kind using dry toner, the paper requirements are similar to those for plain paper copying and laser printing, primarily a smooth surface, good stiffness, a relatively low moisture content, good dimensional stability under conditions of variable humidity, compatibility with toner so as to permit good toner adhesion and ability to withstand the heat of the toner fusing stage without excessive curling, wavy edge production or blistering. Such papers are readily available at acceptable cost, and so paper availability has not been a significant constraint on market penetration of dry toner colour digital press technology.
  • The position is rather different in the case of colour digital presses using liquid toners for image formation. Very good results are obtainable with pigment-coated printing papers, but ordinary commercially available uncoated printing and office papers do not give such good results. The main problems are the achievement of good transfer of toner to the paper and subsequent adhesion of toner to the paper. These constraints are serious, since for many applications or end uses the use of uncoated papers is preferred for aesthetic or other reasons.
  • There is therefore a requirement for a paper which is not conventionally pigment-coated but which nevertheless offers good print performance with liquid toner colour digital presses.
  • WO-A-96/06384 discloses the use of polyethylene imine or derivatives thereof or polyamides to impart a basic functionality to paper for use as an imagine substrate in a liquid toner printing process with the result that improved image adhesion is obtained.
  • US-A-5 522 968 discloses the use of an alkali metal salt coating to impart an alkaline pH surface value to an ink jet printing paper.
  • We have now developed a paper treatment composition which, when applied to a suitable base paper substrate, results in significantly enhanced suitability for printing by liquid toner colour digital presses.
  • In a first aspect therefore, the invention resides in the use, for the purpose of enhancing the printability of paper by means of a liquid toner colour digital press, of a treatment composition comprising an aluminate salt or a salt of a weak acid and a strong base in an amount such as to impart an alkaline surface pH value to the paper.
  • In a second aspect, the invention provides a method of printing paper by means of a liquid toner colour digital press, characterised in that the paper being printed has been surface treated with an aluminate salt or a salt of a weak acid and a strong base in an amount such as to give an alkaline surface pH value.
  • The treatment composition comprising the aluminate salt or the salt of a weak acid and a strong base preferably contains starch or another surface agent, so that the treatment composition also functions as a surface sizing composition. This reduces the cost of the treatment (since no additional paper processing is required beyond the normal size press treatment). It also facilitates uniform application of the active treating ingredient (the salt) across the whole surface of the paper, since the sizing agent functions as an extender. The surface size is typically a starch, but could in principle be a latex, polyvinyl alcohol, gelatin, a cellulose derivative such as carboxymethylcellulose, or other known surface sizing material. Combinations of these materials can be used.
  • Although size press application is a particularly convenient and therefore preferred method of applying the treatment composition, coating, spraying or other application techniques can be used. Size-presses as referred to in this application include not only traditional size presses but also so-called "metered" size presses of the kind commercialised under the name "Speedsizer" by Voith, "Sym-Sizer" by Valmet, "Twin-HSM" by BTG and "Filmpress" by Jagenberg.
  • The aluminate salt is preferably sodium aluminate, and the salt of a weak acid and a strong base is preferably sodium hydrogen carbonate (sodium bicarbonate). Less preferred alternatives include disodium tetraborate, trisodium phosphate and sodium acetate. Sodium salts have been referred to because they are the most readily available, but it will be understood that the corresponding potassium salts could equally well be used, as could calcium salts, provided that they are adequately soluble. Sodium aluminate has so far been found to give the best results, possibly because the presence of polyvalent aluminium enhances affinity to toner materials.
  • Surprisingly, we found that the best results were achieved with a reduced level of starch surface sizing agent compared with that used conventionally in the grades of paper concerned. Thus whereas a starch surface composition typically has a starch concentration of the order of ca. 8%, we found that better results were achieved with a starch surface size concentration of around 2%. Although the pickup of lower concentration surface sizing compositions is normally higher than for more concentrated compositions, the net result is a reduced level of surface size in the paper.
  • The amount of aluminate salt or salt of a weak acid and a strong base to be used varies in accordance with the type of paper being treated, for example its absorbence and inherent hold-out characteristics and the level and type of internal sizing used. Guidance as to suitable treatment levels is obtainable from the Examples given below. Generally the amount of aluminate or salt of a weak acid and a strong base will be such as to produce an alkaline surface pH value, for example 8 - 8.5 or higher.
  • Although the present invention seeks to avoid the need for the use of conventionally coated papers with a liquid toner colour digital press, a small amount of pigment (e.g. colloidal precipitated calcium carbonate) can be present in the treatment composition if the effect is not such as to change the fundamental character of the final treated paper, i.e. to convert it from what would be perceived as an "uncoated" grade to a conventional coated product.
  • The invention will now be illustrated by the following Examples, in which all parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified:
  • Example 1
  • A 10% solution was prepared of an oxidised maize starch of the kind conventionally used for surface sizing of paper. This solution was divided into five batches. One of these was used as a control and the others were each made up into treatment compositions according to the invention by the addition of respective salts as listed below:
    Salt Mix Designation
    Disodiumtetraborate, Na2B4O7.10H2O A
    Sodium acetate trihydrate, NaC2H3O2.3H2O B
    Trisodium orthophosphate, Na3PO4.12H2O C
    Sodium aluminate, Na2Al2O4 D
    ----- Control
  • The addition level of the salts was 1% on a dry basis in each case, calculated as weight of dry salt present (as the hydrate form where indicated) in relation to the weight of dry starch present. Starch therefore made up 99% of the treatment composition.
  • Each treatment composition was airknife-coated on to a smooth wove-finish 100 g m-2 business letterhead base paper stock by means of an intermediate-scale pilot coater. This base paper had been internally-sized with alkyl ketene dimer (i.e. it was neutral/alkaline sized) and had also been conventionally surface-sized. Two different coatweights of treating composition were applied, namely ca. 3 g m-2 and ca. 2 g m-2 (dry, in both cases). The resulting reels were then sheeted to SRA3 size and test printed on a liquid toner colour digital press (an INDIGO E-PRINT 1000 press supplied by Indigo N.V. of the Netherlands). The extent to which the various samples accepted the ink in a satisfactory manner was assessed visually, and the level of toner adhesion was assessed by "tape pull" and "rub toner adhesion" tests.
  • In the tape pull test, a length of medium-tack masking tape was applied to the printed area of each sample and then removed. The adhesive surface of the tapes and the areas of the paper from which they had been removed were then examined visually to see how much of the toner had been removed or retained respectively, and the results compared as between the different samples.
  • In the toner rub adhesion test, printed areas of each sample were rubbed with an ordinary pencil eraser (with the same force and for the same length of time for each sample). The extent to which the print had been dislodged was assessed visually and the results for each sample compared.
  • It was found that all the test samples gave better ink acceptance and toner adhesion than the control sample. Of the test samples, Mix D (using sodium aluminate) gave significantly better results than Mixes A to C. The lower coatweight samples (2 gm-2) gave better results than the higher (3 g m-2) for all the test samples.
  • Example 2
  • This illustrates application of the treatment composition by means of a size press on a full-size papermachine as part of a paper manufacturing operation, rather than in a separate coating operation as in Example 1. The salt used was sodium hydrogen carbonate, NaHCO3.
  • A batch of 2201 of an 8% solution of cationic potato starch was prepared. 3kg sodium hydrogen carbonate were dissolved in this solution with stirring to produce a treating composition of which starch comprised ca. 85%. The resulting composition was fed to the size press of a paper machine producing a 90 g m-2 rosin/alum internally sized wove printing paper. The resulting paper was sheeted, printed and tested in the same way as in Example 1.
  • It was found that the results obtained were comparable to those obtained with sodium aluminate in Example 1.
  • Example 3
  • This compares the results obtained with a sodium aluminate treatment composition applied by means of an intermediate scale coater in two different ways, namely by airknife coating and by means of a size press coating head. The treatment composition was prepared as described with reference to Mix D of Example 1 and the dry coatweight applied was ca. 2 g m-2 in each case (per side in the case of the size press treated paper). The paper to which the compositions were applied had not been surface sized but was otherwise as in Example 2. After treatment, the paper was sheeted, printed and tested as described in Example 1.
  • Both treated papers were observed to have better ink acceptance and toner adhesion properties than the control paper from Example 1. Of the two, the size press coated paper was the better, and was judged to be superior to any of the papers evaluated in Examples 1 and 2.
  • Example 4
  • This illustrates the use of sodium hydrogen carbonate with a smaller proportion of starch in the treatment composition than in Example 2.
  • 1300 1 of a 2% solution of cationic potato starch were made up. 6 kg of sodium hydrogen carbonate were dissolved in this with stirring to produce a treating composition of which the starch comprised ca. 81%. This was applied at the size press of a papermachine producing a 120 g m-2 business letterhead wove base paper sized with a proprietary mixture of alkyl ketene dimer and neutral rosin. The resulting paper was sheeted printed and tested as in previous Examples. The ink acceptance and toner adhesion performance was judged to be comparable to that of the sodium aluminate treated paper of Example 1.
  • Example 5
  • 1300 l of a 2% solution of cationic potato starch were made up. 3 kg of sodium aluminate were dissolved in this with stirring to produce a treating composition of which the starch comprised ca. 90%. This was applied at the size press of a papermachine producing a 100, 120 and 170 g m-2 business letterhead wove base papers internally sized as described in Example 4 but with a lower than conventional sizing level. The resulting paper was sheeted, printed and tested as in previous Examples. The ink acceptance and toner adhesion performance was judged to be very good, and better than that of previous Examples.

Claims (10)

  1. The use, for the purpose of enhancing the printability of paper by means of a liquid toner colour digital press, of a treatment composition comprising an aluminate salt or a salt of a weak acid and a strong base in an amount such as to impart an alkaline surface pH value to the paper.
  2. The use as claimed in Claim 1, wherein the surface pH value imparted to the paper is at least 8.
  3. The use as claimed in Claim 2, wherein the surface pH value imparted to the paper is at least 8.5.
  4. The use as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the treatment composition is a surface sizing composition also comprising an aluminate salt or a salt of a weak acid and a strong base.
  5. The use as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the surface size comprises a starch.
  6. The use as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the surface size comprises a latex, polyvinyl alcohol, gelatin, or a cellulose derivative such as carboxymethylcellulose.
  7. The use as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the aluminate salt is sodium aluminate.
  8. The use as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the treatment composition comprises sodium aluminate and a cationic
  9. The use as claimed in Claim 1 wherein the treatment composition comprises sodium bicarbonate and a cationic starch.
  10. A method of printing paper by means of a liquid toner colour digital press, characterised in that the paper being printed has been surface treated with an aluminate salt or a salt of a weak acid and a strong base in an amount such as to give an alkaline surface pH value.
EP98303925A 1997-05-20 1998-05-19 Paper treatment composition Expired - Lifetime EP0879917B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK98303925T DK0879917T3 (en) 1997-05-20 1998-05-19 Paper processing composition

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB9710282.6A GB9710282D0 (en) 1997-05-20 1997-05-20 Treated paper
GB9710282 1997-05-20

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0879917A2 EP0879917A2 (en) 1998-11-25
EP0879917A3 EP0879917A3 (en) 1999-11-10
EP0879917B1 true EP0879917B1 (en) 2004-09-01

Family

ID=10812668

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98303925A Expired - Lifetime EP0879917B1 (en) 1997-05-20 1998-05-19 Paper treatment composition

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0879917B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE275219T1 (en)
DE (1) DE69825938T2 (en)
DK (1) DK0879917T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2227775T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9710282D0 (en)
PT (1) PT879917E (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8252373B2 (en) 2004-05-24 2012-08-28 International Paper Company Gloss coated multifunctional printing paper
US9296244B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2016-03-29 International Paper Company Composition suitable for multifunctional printing and recording sheet containing same

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2346157A (en) 1999-01-28 2000-08-02 Rexam Coated Products Limited Surface-treated paper for use as recording medium
WO2008073426A1 (en) 2006-12-11 2008-06-19 International Paper Company Paper sizing composition, sized paper, and method for sizing paper
DE102008029861A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2009-12-31 Vits Systems Gmbh Device for printing and impregnating/coating a web, comprises a delivery mechanism, a printing device, an impregnating tool, a drying device, a cooling device and a means for further processing of impregnating web
WO2010071637A1 (en) 2008-12-16 2010-06-24 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Liquid toner digitally printable media
DE102013105192A1 (en) 2013-01-22 2014-07-24 Bamberger Kaliko Textile Finishing Gmbh Textile substrate for printing with liquid ink in offset-like processes
CA2941943C (en) * 2014-03-12 2023-04-04 Ecolab Usa Inc. Waste water decontamination

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS61125879A (en) * 1984-11-22 1986-06-13 Hokuetsu Seishi Kk Thermal recording paper free of discoloration of recording layer surface during preservation and production thereof
JPH07100391B2 (en) * 1991-08-15 1995-11-01 日本製紙株式会社 Inkjet recording paper
WO1996006384A1 (en) * 1994-08-25 1996-02-29 Indigo N.V. Imaging method

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8252373B2 (en) 2004-05-24 2012-08-28 International Paper Company Gloss coated multifunctional printing paper
US9296244B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2016-03-29 International Paper Company Composition suitable for multifunctional printing and recording sheet containing same
US9981288B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2018-05-29 International Paper Company Process for manufacturing recording sheet

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9710282D0 (en) 1997-07-16
PT879917E (en) 2005-01-31
DE69825938T2 (en) 2005-09-15
ES2227775T3 (en) 2005-04-01
EP0879917A2 (en) 1998-11-25
EP0879917A3 (en) 1999-11-10
DK0879917T3 (en) 2005-01-10
ATE275219T1 (en) 2004-09-15
DE69825938D1 (en) 2004-10-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0890447B1 (en) Image receiving sheet for thermal transfer printing and method for manufacturing same
US6048575A (en) Coated paper stocks for use in electrostatic imaging applications
EP0747235B1 (en) Paper suitable for ink-jet or electrophotographic printing
KR0164636B1 (en) Printing paper and method of image formation employing the same
EP0424343B1 (en) Paper for use in ion deposition printing
EP0879917B1 (en) Paper treatment composition
US5888622A (en) Toner adhesion enhancing coating and coated paper
US4958173A (en) Toner receptive coating
EP2657772A1 (en) Recording material für electrophotographic printing methods
EP0587692B1 (en) Copying paper in sheet form
US20120251775A1 (en) Recording Material for Electrophotographic Printing Process
EP0098059B1 (en) Record material
CN1871131A (en) Pressure sensitive record material
US20060240343A1 (en) Digital press printing
JP3752104B2 (en) Aqueous polymer dispersion, method for producing the same, and electrophotographic transfer paper using the same
JP2003520914A (en) Production method of printed matter
Anderson Surface sizing
EP0620121A2 (en) Legume starch stilting material for carbonless papers used in offset printing presses and in copier/duplicators
JPH0699655A (en) Transfer sheet
JPH09281739A (en) Wet electrophotographic recording sheet
JP2005099652A (en) Recording sheet for wet electrophotography
JPH07172040A (en) Ink-jet magnetic composite recording sheet
JP2005134534A (en) Wet electrophotographic recording sheet
AU3732693A (en) Xerographable carbonless forms
JP2005134535A (en) Wet electrophotographic recording sheet

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB IE IT LI NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000122

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20000419

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB IE IT LI NL PT SE

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB IE IT LI NL PT SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69825938

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20041007

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: BRAUN & PARTNER PATENT-, MARKEN-, RECHTSANWAELTE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Effective date: 20041126

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2227775

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

ET Fr: translation filed
26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20050602

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20170412

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20170511

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20170424

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20170517

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20170530

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20170517

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20170502

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20170420

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20170517

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20170420

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20170531

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20170417

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20170515

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20170608

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PCAR

Free format text: NEW ADDRESS: HOLEESTRASSE 87, 4054 BASEL (CH)

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69825938

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EUP

Effective date: 20180519

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20180518

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MK9A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK07

Ref document number: 275219

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180519

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MK

Effective date: 20180519

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20180518

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20180519

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20180530

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20200803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20180520