EP0774740A1 - Tags or labels useful in connection with an electronic article surveillance system - Google Patents
Tags or labels useful in connection with an electronic article surveillance system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0774740A1 EP0774740A1 EP96120857A EP96120857A EP0774740A1 EP 0774740 A1 EP0774740 A1 EP 0774740A1 EP 96120857 A EP96120857 A EP 96120857A EP 96120857 A EP96120857 A EP 96120857A EP 0774740 A1 EP0774740 A1 EP 0774740A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- frequency
- circuit
- eas
- articles
- tags
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/24—Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
- G08B13/2402—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
- G08B13/2405—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting characterised by the tag technology used
- G08B13/2414—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting characterised by the tag technology used using inductive tags
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/24—Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
- G08B13/2402—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
- G08B13/2428—Tag details
- G08B13/2431—Tag circuit details
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/24—Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
- G08B13/2402—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
- G08B13/2428—Tag details
- G08B13/2437—Tag layered structure, processes for making layered tags
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/24—Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
- G08B13/2402—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
- G08B13/2428—Tag details
- G08B13/2437—Tag layered structure, processes for making layered tags
- G08B13/244—Tag manufacturing, e.g. continuous manufacturing processes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/24—Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
- G08B13/2402—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
- G08B13/2428—Tag details
- G08B13/2437—Tag layered structure, processes for making layered tags
- G08B13/2445—Tag integrated into item to be protected, e.g. source tagging
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to so-called “electronic article surveillance”, and in particular, to a system which involves the use of electronically detectable tags or labels which are attached to articles of merchandise in order to protect these articles from unauthorized removal, such as by shoplifting.
- EAS electronic article surveillance
- tags or labels which contain an electronic circuit (e.g., a resonant circuit) for interacting with an applied (e.g., swept radio-frequency) electromagnetic field.
- a transmitter and accompanying antenna produce this field, and a nearby receiver and accompanying antenna detect variations in the received field caused by the presence of a tag.
- This transmitting and receiving equipment is positioned at the location or locations where it is desired to detect the unauthorized removal of tag-bearing articles, e.g., at the exit of a retail store.
- the tags attached to those articles whose removal is authorized are either physically removed from the articles, or deactivated, i.e. treated so that they become incapable of producing detectable variations in the received field. Otherwise, these tags will be detected and an alarm signal will be produced by the equipment.
- Commercial EAS systems as generally described above are available from manufacturers such as Checkpoint Systems, Inc. of Thorofare, New Jersey, among others.
- detectable tags were to be applied to articles of merchandise at their manufacturing stage, then a given product line would have to be processed in two different varieties, one tagged and one not tagged. Moreover, this segregation would have to be perpetuated throughout the subsequent distribution channels. The reason for this is that many--indeed most--stores do not yet use EAS. These non-EAS using stores would need to be reliably supplied with non-tagged articles; otherwise EAS tags would leave these stores, still attached to the articles being sold, and thereby create what is sometimes called "pollution" of the marketplace with EAS tags. Conversely, stores which do use EAS would have to be reliably supplied with tagged articles, or their EAS protection would become ineffective.
- EAS tags were to be applied at an intermediate distribution stage, this would require breaking the bulk packaging which is typically used at those stages, handling the individual articles, and repackaging them in bulk. Furthermore, subsequent segregation of tagged and not-tagged articles would again be required.
- tags which, at that stage, are not yet detectable by the EAS equipment with which they are ultimately destined to function. Furthermore, these tags remain undetectable through the subsequent distribution channel, until they reach that stage at which it is inherently determined that all the so-tagged articles in a given bulk package will be used in an EAS equipped store. This will typically occur at the merchandise receiving facility of such an individual store. At that stage, the tags previously attached to the individual articles are rendered detectable and the articles with the now-detectable tags attached, are then processed through the store in conventional manner.
- FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of the EAS tag treatment technique embodying the present invention.
- FIG 2 is a diagrammatic plan view of a tag which is useful in implementing the technique diagrammed in Figure 1.
- Figure 3 is a diagrammatic cross-sectional view of the tag of Figure 2, taken along the line 3-3 in Figure 2.
- Figure 4 is a diagram of the equivalent circuit of the tag of Figure 2.
- block 10 represents the manufacturing stage of the articles of merchandise which are to be subjected to the technique embodying the present invention.
- EAS tags are applied to these articles in conjunction with their manufacture.
- these tags are then in a state in which they would not be detectable by the particular type of EAS equipment with which they are designed to ultimately function.
- Block 13 represents the distribution channel through which these now-tagged articles then pass on their way to the retail stores.
- Block 14 represents the merchandise receiving facility of one of these retail stores.
- Block 15 represents means, located preferably at store receiving facility 14, for "activating" the EAS tags attached to the articles which reach receiving facility 14 from distribution channel 13. By “activating” is meant rendering these tags detectable by the store's EAS equipment.
- Block 16 represents the retail store in which the received articles, now bearing tags which are detectable, are displayed for retail sale.
- Block 17 represents the means, in store 16, for deactivating those tags which are attached to articles whose removal from store 16 has become authorized, by virtue of the fact that these articles have been properly checked out.
- Block 18 represents the EAS detection equipment with which the store 16 is equipped and the activity of detecting tags which have not been deactivated at checkout.
- the manufacturing stage represented by block 10 may be entirely conventional, with the sole exception that EAS tags are applied to the merchandise at that stage.
- this application can also be carried out by various, but well known and conventional means.
- an EAS tag may simply be adhesively attached either to each article itself, or to the individual package for that article. Since these EAS tags are typically similar in external configuration to a thick piece of paper, an inch or two square, and coated on one side with pressure sensitive adhesive, such application may involve nothing more than simply pressing them against a surface of the article or its individual packaging.
- the application procedure may be the same as would previously have been performed at the retail store, itself, except that it con now be performed more efficiently, and more reliably, by means of the same type of machinery which is conventionally used in manufacturing to apply other kinds of tags and labels to articles of merchandise.
- the distribution channel represented by block 13 in Figure 1 may be entirely conventional, comprising the various transportation means for moving merchandise to retail stores, the warehouses in which it is stored, etc. While in this channel, the merchandise is typically contained in bulk packaging, such as cardboard cases, each containing multiple units of the individual articles. In accordance with the present invention, these cases now contain articles to which not-yet-detectable EAS tags have already been attached.
- Store receiving facility 14 may also be conventional, in that it comprises the customary unloading location and material handling equipment used by retail stores to receive their merchandise.
- this receiving facility 14 there is also provided at this receiving facility 14 the means 15 for activating the heretofore not-detectable tags attached to the received merchandise. How this is done is described later in this specification.
- this received merchandise is treated in the same way as in any other EAS equipped store. That is, it is processed through store 16 in conventional manner, e.g. by being displayed in the merchandise display area and checked out after being selected by customers for purchase. As part of the checkout operation, the EAS tags are subjected to deactivation by means 17, or alternatively are detected by EAS detection equipment 18 upon unauthorized removal. All of this may be accomplished in completely conventional manner by completely conventional means.
- the conventional EAS equipment 18 used to detect EAS tags which have not been deactivated by means 17 may be of the so-called swept-frequency RF type.
- this type of equipment transmits a radio frequency (RF) signal whose frequency is periodically varied between, say, 7.4 and 9.0 MHz.
- the EAS tags for use with this type of equipment comprise an inductor-capacitor (LC) circuit which is resonant within that transmitted band, e.g. at approximately 8.2 MHz. The presence of the EAS tag distorts the RF signal and that distortion is detected by a nearby receiver which then gives an alarm.
- LC inductor-capacitor
- Such swept-frequency RF EAS-detection equipment is disclosed for example, in U.S. Patents No. 3,500,373, No. 3,810,147 and No. 3,828,337, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- this may also operate on a swept-frequency RF basis in the 7.4 to 9.0 MHz range.
- deactivating means is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patents No. 4,498,076 and No. 4,567,473, the contents of which are also incorporated herein by reference.
- FIGS 2, 3 and 4 these diagrammatically illustrate a kind of EAS tag which is suitable for use in the practice of the present invention, in conjunction with EAS equipment of the above-mentioned swept-frequency RF type.
- This tag 20 comprises a dielectric substrate 21, which may be made of polyethylene and which bears on each side a conductive pattern 22 and 23, respectively, which may be of aluminum.
- the angular spiral portion of pattern 22 defines an inductor 22a, while the square portion in the center defines one plate of a capacitor 24.
- the opposite plate of capacitor 24 is defined by the corresponding square portion of pattern 23 which is shown in phantom by broken lines in Figure 2.
- One plate of a second, smaller capacitor 25 is defined by the triangular portion at the upper right-hand end of the spiral portion of pattern 22.
- the opposite plate of this second capacitor 25 is defined by the corresponding triangular portion of pattern 23 shown in phantom by broken lines in Figure 2.
- a conductive path 26 (shown in phantom by broken lines in Figure 2) connects the plates of capacitors 24 and 25.
- the equivalent circuit of the EAS tag 20 shown in Figures 2 and 3 is seen to consist of a resonant circuit defined by inductor 22a and capacitors 24 and 25.
- the tag 20 is further provided with two indentations, 26a and 27.
- Indentation 26a is formed in capacitor 24, while indentation 27 is formed in capacitor 25.
- the EAS equipment 18 in Figure 1 by which tag 20 is to be ultimately detectable, and the deactivating equipment 17 by which tag 20 is to be ultimately capable of being deactivated, are both of the swept-frequency RF type previously mentioned, with transmitted signals varying in frequency between 7.4 and 9.0 MHz, then the values of inductor 23 and capacitors 24 and 25 are so chosen that tag 20 initially forms on LC circuit which is resonant at a frequency substantially above the 7.4 to 9.0 MHz range, e.g. at a frequency of approximately 18 MHz.
- inductor 22a and capacitor 24 are further so chosen that, if capacitor 25 is shorted out, then tag 20 forms an LC circuit which is resonant within the 7.4 to 9.0 MHz range, e.g. at approximately 8.2 MHz.
- the indentation 26a in capacitor 24 is provided for the very same purpose, namely for use in ultimately deactivating tag 20 at state 17 in Figure 1.
- the indentation 27 in the other capacitor 25 is provided for the exact opposite purpose, namely for use in activating tag 20, which had previously been not-detectable at the EAS detection stage 18 in Figure 1.
- the electronic equipment which is used at activation stage 15 in Figure 1 in cooperation with a tag 20 may be the same as illustrated and described in said U.S. Patents No. 4,498,076 and 4,567,473, with two exceptions.
- the frequencies at which it operates are in a range which includes the higher frequency (of approximately 18 MHz) at which tag 20 is initially resonant. This higher range may be from 16.5 to 19.5 MHz.
- this electronic equipment operates at a substantially higher power.
- the equipment By operating in the higher frequency range, the equipment becomes capable of shorting out the capacitor 25 via indentation 27. By operating at high enough power, it becomes capable of shorting out that same capacitor simultaneously in a plurality of tags 20, such as would be present in a bulk package containing multiple units of merchandise articles to which such tags had been attached at the manufacturing and tag application stage 10, 11 of Figure 1.
- Detection at stage 18 would result simply from having such an activated tag 20 present in the swept-frequency RF field, whose distortion by that tag is then sensed by the EAS receiver, causing an alarm.
- Deactivation at stage 17 would result from operating as disclosed in said U.S. Patents No. 4,498,076 and 4,567,473, namely by shorting out capacitor 24 via its indentation 26. With both capacitors 24 and 25 (see Figure 4) so shorted out via respective indentations 26, 27, the tag 20 again becomes undetectable at stage 18 of Figure 1.
- the activating means 15 in order to perform the simultaneous activation of the tags attached to all the articles in a bulk package of merchandise, in accordance with the present invention, it may be necessary to operate the activating means 15 at higher power than the deactivating means 17, which is typically used to deactivate only one tag at a time. Such higher power may exceed the limit imposed by regulatory agencies such as the United States Federal Communications Commission. If that should be the case, then a simple treatment is to provide an enclosure which contains the RF fields produced by the activating means and which is large enough to contain both that means and the EAS tag bearing merchandise, still in its bulk package. This enclosure may take any of various conventional forms, such as a metal box.
- the same treatment namely enclosure of the activating means and the bulk package, may also be used if the frequency range within which the activating signal is transmitted presents a problem in terms of regulatory requirements. That frequency range is preferably so chosen that it does not include integral multiples of the frequency range within which the deactivation signal is subsequently transmitted. That is to forestall the possibility that the activating signal may also cause deactivation of the now-activated tags due to possible spurious resonances at multiples of the resonant frequency of the activated tags.
- capacitor 25 is shorted out by the application of a sufficiently strong field at the initial frequency.
- the total voltage developed by this applied field will appear across the series combination of that capacitor 25 and capacitor 24 (see Figure 4). However, this total voltage will be distributed between those capacitors in inverse proportion to their plate sizes.
- capacitor 25 By making capacitor 25 substantially smaller than capacitor 24, the voltage across the former will always be substantially larger than that across the latter. In view of this, and in view of the fact that the indentations in both may be made substantially similar, capacitor 25 will break down before capacitor 24, as is desired.
- tags can now be applied to the individual articles of merchandise in a manner which would not be convenient for store tagging.
- the invention is not limited to use with articles for sale in retail stores.
- Other applications can also benefit, such as book stores, video stores, etc.
- the initial change in the tag's resonant frequency in order to "activate" it need not necessarily involve an indentation in a capacitor such as indentation 27 shown in Figures 2 and 3.
- the tags may be provided with two sets of capacitors connected by a fusible link, as disclosed more fully in U.S. Patent No. 3,967,161, whose contents are incorporated herein by reference.
- the fusible link may be opened at the activating stage 15 in Figure 1 in order to change the frequency to that which will then be detectable by the store's EAS system. The even higher power which would be required to open such a fusible link is then dealt with by enclosure in an RF confining box, as previously discussed.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
- Cash Registers Or Receiving Machines (AREA)
- Ultra Sonic Daignosis Equipment (AREA)
- Moving Of Heads (AREA)
- Labeling Devices (AREA)
- Credit Cards Or The Like (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates generally to so-called "electronic article surveillance", and in particular, to a system which involves the use of electronically detectable tags or labels which are attached to articles of merchandise in order to protect these articles from unauthorized removal, such as by shoplifting.
- For enhanced security and inventory control, the use of electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems has become increasingly widespread. These systems utilize tags or labels which contain an electronic circuit (e.g., a resonant circuit) for interacting with an applied (e.g., swept radio-frequency) electromagnetic field. A transmitter and accompanying antenna produce this field, and a nearby receiver and accompanying antenna detect variations in the received field caused by the presence of a tag. This transmitting and receiving equipment is positioned at the location or locations where it is desired to detect the unauthorized removal of tag-bearing articles, e.g., at the exit of a retail store.
- The tags attached to those articles whose removal is authorized (e.g., because these articles have been properly checked out) are either physically removed from the articles, or deactivated, i.e. treated so that they become incapable of producing detectable variations in the received field. Otherwise, these tags will be detected and an alarm signal will be produced by the equipment. Commercial EAS systems as generally described above are available from manufacturers such as Checkpoint Systems, Inc. of Thorofare, New Jersey, among others.
- An important consideration in the use of such EAS systems is the manner in which the detectable tags or labels are applied to the articles which are to be protected. Some retail stores, for example, wish to have tags applied to all the articles in their inventory, while others wish to have tags applied only to some of these articles, leaving others untagged. Likewise the selection of the kinds of merchandise to be tagged may vary from store to store, and from time to time within the same store. Even within a common "family" of stores, such as the member stores of a chain, these practices may--and frequently do--vary from one store to another. This variety, coupled with the absence until now of any practical technique for avoiding local tag application, has led to the common practice for users of EAS systems to tag articles locally, at each EAS equipped store.
- However, such "store" tagging is time consuming and labor intensive. Also, store tagging is often delegated to personnel who may be limited in training or interest. This can compromise the effectiveness of EAS, which is obviously significantly dependent upon proper tagging of the articles to be protected.
- In view of all this, theoretical consideration has previously been given to the possibility of performing the desired tagging of articles at some other point, upstream from the store itself in the distribution chain, such as at the merchandise manufacturing stage, or at some intermediate stage of warehousing or distribution. This theoretical possibility has not found practical realization because of certain formidable obstacles.
- If detectable tags were to be applied to articles of merchandise at their manufacturing stage, then a given product line would have to be processed in two different varieties, one tagged and one not tagged. Moreover, this segregation would have to be perpetuated throughout the subsequent distribution channels. The reason for this is that many--indeed most--stores do not yet use EAS. These non-EAS using stores would need to be reliably supplied with non-tagged articles; otherwise EAS tags would leave these stores, still attached to the articles being sold, and thereby create what is sometimes called "pollution" of the marketplace with EAS tags. Conversely, stores which do use EAS would have to be reliably supplied with tagged articles, or their EAS protection would become ineffective.
- If, on the other band, EAS tags were to be applied at an intermediate distribution stage, this would require breaking the bulk packaging which is typically used at those stages, handling the individual articles, and repackaging them in bulk. Furthermore, subsequent segregation of tagged and not-tagged articles would again be required.
- It is therefore the primary object of the present invention to provide a technique for protecting articles by means of EAS, without having to apply the necessary detectable tags or labels to these articles at the actual EAS-using stores.
- It is also an object of the present invention to provide a tagging technique which no longer requires a store to individually tag articles which are to be protected by EAS.
- It is also an object of the present invention to provide a tagging technique which can be performed without having to break the bulk packaging of the articles to be protected by EAS.
- It is also an object of the present invention to provide a tagging technique which can be performed without having to break bulk packaging, while still enabling individual stores to adhere to their individual practices with regard to which articles are to bear EAS detectable tags.
- It is also an object of the present invention to provide an EAS tagging technique which makes it unnecessary to create two segregated varieties of the same articles, one tagged and one not tagged, upstream from the stores in which these articles are to be retailed.
- It is also an object of the present invention to provide EAS tags or labels which are particularly suitable for the achievement of the above-stated objects.
- These and other objects are achieved in accordance with the present invention by tagging the articles in question, not at the individual EAS equipped stores, as heretofore, but upstream in the distribution chain, preferably in conjunction with their manufacture. This upstream tagging is performed by means of tags which, at that stage, are not yet detectable by the EAS equipment with which they are ultimately destined to function. Furthermore, these tags remain undetectable through the subsequent distribution channel, until they reach that stage at which it is inherently determined that all the so-tagged articles in a given bulk package will be used in an EAS equipped store. This will typically occur at the merchandise receiving facility of such an individual store. At that stage, the tags previously attached to the individual articles are rendered detectable and the articles with the now-detectable tags attached, are then processed through the store in conventional manner.
- By proceeding in accordance with the present invention, the time and labor required for store tagging is eliminated and the reliability of the tagging procedure greatly enhanced. Moreover, it becomes practical to tag articles in ways which are less visible to the shopper, thereby further improving the protection provided by EAS, and also overcoming possible esthetic as well as functional objections to the use of visible EAS tags.
- For further details, reference is made to the detailed description which is provided below, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
- Figure 1 is a flow diagram of the EAS tag treatment technique embodying the present invention.
- Figure 2 is a diagrammatic plan view of a tag which is useful in implementing the technique diagrammed in Figure 1.
- Figure 3 is a diagrammatic cross-sectional view of the tag of Figure 2, taken along the line 3-3 in Figure 2.
- Figure 4 is a diagram of the equivalent circuit of the tag of Figure 2.
- In the several figures, like reference numbers denote similar structure.
- Referring to the flow diagram of Figure 1,
block 10 represents the manufacturing stage of the articles of merchandise which are to be subjected to the technique embodying the present invention. - As indicated by block 11, in accordance with the invention EAS tags are applied to these articles in conjunction with their manufacture.
- Further in accordance with the present invention, these tags are then in a state in which they would not be detectable by the particular type of EAS equipment with which they are designed to ultimately function.
- Block 13 represents the distribution channel through which these now-tagged articles then pass on their way to the retail stores.
-
Block 14 represents the merchandise receiving facility of one of these retail stores. -
Block 15 represents means, located preferably atstore receiving facility 14, for "activating" the EAS tags attached to the articles which reach receivingfacility 14 from distribution channel 13. By "activating" is meant rendering these tags detectable by the store's EAS equipment. -
Block 16 represents the retail store in which the received articles, now bearing tags which are detectable, are displayed for retail sale. -
Block 17 represents the means, instore 16, for deactivating those tags which are attached to articles whose removal fromstore 16 has become authorized, by virtue of the fact that these articles have been properly checked out. -
Block 18 represents the EAS detection equipment with which thestore 16 is equipped and the activity of detecting tags which have not been deactivated at checkout. - In the flow diagram of Figure 1, the manufacturing stage represented by
block 10 may be entirely conventional, with the sole exception that EAS tags are applied to the merchandise at that stage. However, this application can also be carried out by various, but well known and conventional means. For example, an EAS tag may simply be adhesively attached either to each article itself, or to the individual package for that article. Since these EAS tags are typically similar in external configuration to a thick piece of paper, an inch or two square, and coated on one side with pressure sensitive adhesive, such application may involve nothing more than simply pressing them against a surface of the article or its individual packaging. In this regard, the application procedure may be the same as would previously have been performed at the retail store, itself, except that it con now be performed more efficiently, and more reliably, by means of the same type of machinery which is conventionally used in manufacturing to apply other kinds of tags and labels to articles of merchandise. - The distribution channel represented by block 13 in Figure 1 may be entirely conventional, comprising the various transportation means for moving merchandise to retail stores, the warehouses in which it is stored, etc. While in this channel, the merchandise is typically contained in bulk packaging, such as cardboard cases, each containing multiple units of the individual articles. In accordance with the present invention, these cases now contain articles to which not-yet-detectable EAS tags have already been attached.
-
Store receiving facility 14 may also be conventional, in that it comprises the customary unloading location and material handling equipment used by retail stores to receive their merchandise. - However, in accordance with the invention, there is also provided at this receiving
facility 14 themeans 15 for activating the heretofore not-detectable tags attached to the received merchandise. How this is done is described later in this specification. - Thereafter, this received merchandise is treated in the same way as in any other EAS equipped store. That is, it is processed through
store 16 in conventional manner, e.g. by being displayed in the merchandise display area and checked out after being selected by customers for purchase. As part of the checkout operation, the EAS tags are subjected to deactivation by means 17, or alternatively are detected byEAS detection equipment 18 upon unauthorized removal. All of this may be accomplished in completely conventional manner by completely conventional means. - In particular, the
conventional EAS equipment 18 used to detect EAS tags which have not been deactivated bymeans 17 may be of the so-called swept-frequency RF type. Briefly, this type of equipment transmits a radio frequency (RF) signal whose frequency is periodically varied between, say, 7.4 and 9.0 MHz. The EAS tags for use with this type of equipment comprise an inductor-capacitor (LC) circuit which is resonant within that transmitted band, e.g. at approximately 8.2 MHz. The presence of the EAS tag distorts the RF signal and that distortion is detected by a nearby receiver which then gives an alarm. - Such swept-frequency RF EAS-detection equipment is disclosed for example, in U.S. Patents No. 3,500,373, No. 3,810,147 and No. 3,828,337, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. As for the deactivating means 17, this may also operate on a swept-frequency RF basis in the 7.4 to 9.0 MHz range. Such deactivating means is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patents No. 4,498,076 and No. 4,567,473, the contents of which are also incorporated herein by reference.
- Commercial EAS detection equipment, as well as deactivation equipment of this swept-frequency RF type is available from Checkpoint Systems, Inc. of Thorofare, New Jersey, which is also the assignee of the present invention.
- Turning now to Figures 2, 3 and 4, these diagrammatically illustrate a kind of EAS tag which is suitable for use in the practice of the present invention, in conjunction with EAS equipment of the above-mentioned swept-frequency RF type.
- This
tag 20 comprises adielectric substrate 21, which may be made of polyethylene and which bears on each side aconductive pattern - As is particularly clearly visible in Figure 2, the angular spiral portion of
pattern 22 defines aninductor 22a, while the square portion in the center defines one plate of acapacitor 24. The opposite plate ofcapacitor 24 is defined by the corresponding square portion ofpattern 23 which is shown in phantom by broken lines in Figure 2. One plate of a second,smaller capacitor 25 is defined by the triangular portion at the upper right-hand end of the spiral portion ofpattern 22. The opposite plate of thissecond capacitor 25 is defined by the corresponding triangular portion ofpattern 23 shown in phantom by broken lines in Figure 2. Also inpattern 23, a conductive path 26 (shown in phantom by broken lines in Figure 2) connects the plates ofcapacitors - Referring to Figure 4, the equivalent circuit of the
EAS tag 20 shown in Figures 2 and 3 is seen to consist of a resonant circuit defined byinductor 22a andcapacitors - In accordance with the present invention, the
tag 20 is further provided with two indentations, 26a and 27.Indentation 26a is formed incapacitor 24, whileindentation 27 is formed incapacitor 25. - Given that the
EAS equipment 18 in Figure 1, by which tag 20 is to be ultimately detectable, and the deactivatingequipment 17 by which tag 20 is to be ultimately capable of being deactivated, are both of the swept-frequency RF type previously mentioned, with transmitted signals varying in frequency between 7.4 and 9.0 MHz, then the values ofinductor 23 andcapacitors tag 20 initially forms on LC circuit which is resonant at a frequency substantially above the 7.4 to 9.0 MHz range, e.g. at a frequency of approximately 18 MHz. The values ofinductor 22a andcapacitor 24 are further so chosen that, ifcapacitor 25 is shorted out, then tag 20 forms an LC circuit which is resonant within the 7.4 to 9.0 MHz range, e.g. at approximately 8.2 MHz. - The above-mentioned U.S. Patents No. 4,498,076 and No. 4,567,473 disclose the use of indentations such as 26a and 27 provided in
capacitors tag 20 in order to create a short circuit between the conductive patterns on opposite sides of the dielectric substrate. In these U.S. Patents, the shorting out is used to deactivate an EAS tag which is designed for use in conjunction with swept-frequency RF EAS equipment. - In the present invention, the
indentation 26a incapacitor 24 is provided for the very same purpose, namely for use in ultimately deactivatingtag 20 atstate 17 in Figure 1. However, in the present invention, theindentation 27 in theother capacitor 25 is provided for the exact opposite purpose, namely for use in activatingtag 20, which had previously been not-detectable at theEAS detection stage 18 in Figure 1. - The electronic equipment which is used at
activation stage 15 in Figure 1 in cooperation with atag 20 may be the same as illustrated and described in said U.S. Patents No. 4,498,076 and 4,567,473, with two exceptions. - One exception is that the frequencies at which it operates are in a range which includes the higher frequency (of approximately 18 MHz) at which tag 20 is initially resonant. This higher range may be from 16.5 to 19.5 MHz.
- The other exception is that this electronic equipment operates at a substantially higher power.
- By operating in the higher frequency range, the equipment becomes capable of shorting out the
capacitor 25 viaindentation 27. By operating at high enough power, it becomes capable of shorting out that same capacitor simultaneously in a plurality oftags 20, such as would be present in a bulk package containing multiple units of merchandise articles to which such tags had been attached at the manufacturing andtag application stage 10, 11 of Figure 1. - With their
capacitors 25 so shorted out, all thetags 20 in the bulk package at receivingfacility 14 in Figure 1 have now become activated, and have therefore become detectable atstage 18 in completely conventional manner. - Moreover, they have now also become deactivatable at
stage 17, also in completely conventional manner. - Detection at
stage 18 would result simply from having such an activatedtag 20 present in the swept-frequency RF field, whose distortion by that tag is then sensed by the EAS receiver, causing an alarm. - Deactivation at
stage 17 would result from operating as disclosed in said U.S. Patents No. 4,498,076 and 4,567,473, namely by shorting outcapacitor 24 via itsindentation 26. With bothcapacitors 24 and 25 (see Figure 4) so shorted out viarespective indentations tag 20 again becomes undetectable atstage 18 of Figure 1. - As previously noted, in order to perform the simultaneous activation of the tags attached to all the articles in a bulk package of merchandise, in accordance with the present invention, it may be necessary to operate the activating means 15 at higher power than the deactivating means 17, which is typically used to deactivate only one tag at a time. Such higher power may exceed the limit imposed by regulatory agencies such as the United States Federal Communications Commission. If that should be the case, then a simple treatment is to provide an enclosure which contains the RF fields produced by the activating means and which is large enough to contain both that means and the EAS tag bearing merchandise, still in its bulk package. This enclosure may take any of various conventional forms, such as a metal box. The same treatment, namely enclosure of the activating means and the bulk package, may also be used if the frequency range within which the activating signal is transmitted presents a problem in terms of regulatory requirements. That frequency range is preferably so chosen that it does not include integral multiples of the frequency range within which the deactivation signal is subsequently transmitted. That is to forestall the possibility that the activating signal may also cause deactivation of the now-activated tags due to possible spurious resonances at multiples of the resonant frequency of the activated tags.
- As previously noted, in order to activate
tag 20 by changing its resonant frequency from its initial value (e.g. approximately 18 MHz) to its second value (e.g. approximately 8.2 MHz),capacitor 25 is shorted out by the application of a sufficiently strong field at the initial frequency. The total voltage developed by this applied field will appear across the series combination of thatcapacitor 25 and capacitor 24 (see Figure 4). However, this total voltage will be distributed between those capacitors in inverse proportion to their plate sizes. By makingcapacitor 25 substantially smaller thancapacitor 24, the voltage across the former will always be substantially larger than that across the latter. In view of this, and in view of the fact that the indentations in both may be made substantially similar,capacitor 25 will break down beforecapacitor 24, as is desired. - By proceeding in accordance with this invention, it is not necessary to distinguish, in manufacturing or distribution, between products to be delivered to EAS equipped stores and others. Rather, all products can be tagged, and the EAS equipped stores themselves can then activate those which they receive, while other stores need do nothing at all.
- Moreover, these tags can now be applied to the individual articles of merchandise in a manner which would not be convenient for store tagging. For example, there would be no problem, at the manufacturing and tag application stage (10, 11 in Figure 1), to apply EAS tags on the inside of the "bubble pack" or on the inside of a cardboard box containing a particular article. This would have the advantage of concealing the EAS tag, so that a shopper would not even know that this particular article is protected.
- It will be understood that many other variations are possible, in accordance with the present invention, without departing from the inventive concept.
- For example, the invention is not limited to use with articles for sale in retail stores. Other applications can also benefit, such as book stores, video stores, etc.
- As another example, the initial change in the tag's resonant frequency in order to "activate" it, need not necessarily involve an indentation in a capacitor such as
indentation 27 shown in Figures 2 and 3. Rather, the tags may be provided with two sets of capacitors connected by a fusible link, as disclosed more fully in U.S. Patent No. 3,967,161, whose contents are incorporated herein by reference. The fusible link may be opened at the activatingstage 15 in Figure 1 in order to change the frequency to that which will then be detectable by the store's EAS system. The even higher power which would be required to open such a fusible link is then dealt with by enclosure in an RF confining box, as previously discussed. - Also, although the preferred application of the invention is to situations in which all the tagged articles in a bulk package are activated simultaneously, it will be understood that the same technique can be utilized to activate these articles after they have been subdivided into smaller quantities, or even one at a time. The other advantages which arise from having applied the tags in conjunction with the manufacture will then still apply.
- Accordingly, it is desired that the scope of the present invention be defined only by the appended claims.
Claims (11)
- A device (20) for interacting with an electronic article surveillance system (18), wherein said device (20) comprises a resonant circuit responsive to an applied radio-frequency field and includes means for interacting with said electronic article surveillance system (18) in a first mode of operation in which said resonant circuit is configured to resonate at a first frequency corresponding to an operative frequency of said electronic article surveillance system, and in a second mode of operation in which said resonant circuit is configured to resonate at a second frequency different from the operative frequency of said electronic article surveillance system, said interacting means being capable of interacting with said electronic article surveillance system for activation thereof, said interacting means including means for modification from said second mode of operation to said first mode of operation, said modification means being operative at said second frequency.
- The device (20) of claim 1 , wherein said resonant circuit is comprised of etched circuit portions (22, 23) formed on opposing sides of a substrate (21), and wherein said modification means is an indentation (26a), 27) formed at a first selected location along one of said etched circuit portions (22, 23) to define a narrowed space between said etched circuit portions (22, 23) at said first selected location.
- The device (20) of claim 2 , wherein said first location is selected to comprise a series resonant circuit operative at said first frequency following exposure of said device (20) to an applied radio-frequency field at said second frequency.
- The device (20) of claim 3 , wherein said device (20) further comprises means (17) for deactivating said resonant circuit following exposure of said device (20) to an applied radio-frequency field at said first frequency.
- The device (20) of claim 4 , wherein said deactivating means (17) is an indentation (26a, 27) formed it a second selected location along one of said etched circuit portions (22, 23) to define a narrowed space between said etched circuit portions (22, 23) at said second selected location.
- The device (20) of claim 5, wherein said second location is selected to develop a short circuit in said series resonant circuit following exposure of said device (20) to an applied radio-frequency field at said first frequency.
- The device (20) of claim 6 , wherein said device (20) is configured so that the indentation (26a, 27) provided at said first location will operate to complete said series resonant circuit before the indentation (26a, 27) provided at said second location will operate to develop a short circuit in said series resonant circuit upon exposing said device (20) to an applied radio-frequency field at said second frequency.
- The device (20) of claim 5 , wherein said series resonant circuit includes two capacitor elements (24, 25), a first of which defines said first location for an indentation (26a, 27) and a second of which defines said second location for an indentation (26a, 27), and wherein the first of said capacitor elements (27) is comprised of plate portions which are smaller than plate portions comprising the second of said capacitor elements (24).
- A device (20) for use in a system for providing a facility (16) with articles to which devices (20) have been attached which are capable of being detected by article surveillance equipment (18), said system comprising:means for attaching to said articles, before they reach said facility, devices (20) which are not capable of being detected by said equipment, but which are capable of being activated to become capable of being so detected;means (13) for supplying said articles to said facility (16); andmeans (15) for activating said devices (20) upon receipt at said facility (16), wherein the devices comprise electronic circuits which are resonant at a first frequency as supplied to said facility, and said activating means (15) comprises means for making said circuits resonant at a second frequency, said device comprising a resonant circuit having two capacitors (24, 25), whereby said circuit is resonant at said first frequency, and means (15, 26a, 27) for selectively disabling at least one of said capacitors (24, 25) whereby said circuit becomes resonant at said second frequency.
- The device of claim 9 , wherein said capacitors (24, 25) are of different sizes and said disabling means comprises an indentation (26a, 27) in one of said capacitors (24, 25).
- The device of claim 10, wherein there is also an indentation (26a, 27) in the other one of said capacitors (24, 25).
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US42941389A | 1989-10-31 | 1989-10-31 | |
US429413 | 1989-10-31 | ||
EP90915373A EP0541544B1 (en) | 1989-10-31 | 1990-10-04 | Method for tagging articles used in conjunction with an electronic article surveillance system |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP90915373A Division EP0541544B1 (en) | 1989-10-31 | 1990-10-04 | Method for tagging articles used in conjunction with an electronic article surveillance system |
EP90915373.6 Division | 1991-05-21 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0774740A1 true EP0774740A1 (en) | 1997-05-21 |
EP0774740B1 EP0774740B1 (en) | 2003-03-12 |
Family
ID=23703134
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP90915373A Expired - Lifetime EP0541544B1 (en) | 1989-10-31 | 1990-10-04 | Method for tagging articles used in conjunction with an electronic article surveillance system |
EP96120857A Expired - Lifetime EP0774740B1 (en) | 1989-10-31 | 1990-10-04 | Tags or labels useful in connection with an electronic article surveillance system |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP90915373A Expired - Lifetime EP0541544B1 (en) | 1989-10-31 | 1990-10-04 | Method for tagging articles used in conjunction with an electronic article surveillance system |
Country Status (15)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (2) | EP0541544B1 (en) |
JP (3) | JP3221876B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR0172100B1 (en) |
AT (2) | ATE234491T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU637418B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2064191C (en) |
DE (2) | DE69033093T2 (en) |
DK (2) | DK0774740T3 (en) |
ES (2) | ES2133272T3 (en) |
FI (1) | FI112553B (en) |
IE (1) | IE903893A1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX172162B (en) |
NO (1) | NO921564D0 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ235685A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1991006934A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1282889A1 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2003-02-12 | Checkpoint Systems, Inc. | Activatable/deactivatable security tag with enhanced electrostatic protection for use with an electronic security system |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DK166176C (en) * | 1990-11-23 | 1993-08-09 | Poul Richter Joergensen | PROCEDURE FOR MANUFACTURING CIRCULAR LABELS WITH A CIRCUIT CIRCUIT WHICH CAN BE ACTIVATED AND DISABLED |
US5218189A (en) * | 1991-09-09 | 1993-06-08 | Checkpoint Systems, Inc. | Binary encoded multiple frequency rf indentification tag |
US5237307A (en) * | 1991-11-27 | 1993-08-17 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Non-contact tamper sensing by electronic means |
FR2701146A1 (en) * | 1993-02-03 | 1994-08-05 | Boutonner Tranier Jean Marc | Radiomagnetic detection label |
US5751256A (en) * | 1994-03-04 | 1998-05-12 | Flexcon Company Inc. | Resonant tag labels and method of making same |
DE19947695A1 (en) * | 1999-10-04 | 2001-04-05 | Meto International Gmbh | Activating large numbers of electronic article security elements involves supplying coil with current pulses very much shorter than mains sinusoidal oscillations and decreasing amplitude |
DE19958466A1 (en) | 1999-12-04 | 2001-06-07 | Meto International Gmbh | Device and method for indicating the status of EM or AM security tags |
EP2264649A3 (en) * | 2003-07-07 | 2011-01-26 | Avery Dennison Corporation | RFID device with changeable characteristics |
EP2286391B1 (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2019-08-14 | Thin Film Electronics ASA | Surveillance devices with multiple capacitors |
US8912890B2 (en) | 2012-10-01 | 2014-12-16 | Thin Film Electronics Asa | Surveillance devices with multiple capacitors |
EP3113130A1 (en) * | 2015-03-08 | 2017-01-04 | Vitto Claut | Embedded alarm and safety system for artworks |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3500373A (en) | 1966-05-06 | 1970-03-10 | Nat Bank Of North America The | Method and apparatus for article theft detection |
US3810147A (en) | 1971-12-30 | 1974-05-07 | G Lichtblau | Electronic security system |
US3828337A (en) | 1973-08-20 | 1974-08-06 | G Lichtblau | Noise rejection circuitry |
US4021705A (en) * | 1975-03-24 | 1977-05-03 | Lichtblau G J | Resonant tag circuits having one or more fusible links |
US4498076A (en) | 1982-05-10 | 1985-02-05 | Lichtblau G J | Resonant tag and deactivator for use in an electronic security system |
CH672854A5 (en) * | 1987-03-01 | 1989-12-29 | Scanmatic Security Systems Ag | Security tag for controlled access to building - has LC circuit with capacitor set to valve by burn in at specific location |
Family Cites Families (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3493955A (en) * | 1968-04-17 | 1970-02-03 | Monere Corp | Method and apparatus for detecting the unauthorized movement of articles |
US4141078A (en) * | 1975-10-14 | 1979-02-20 | Innovated Systems, Inc. | Library circulation control system |
NL8501721A (en) * | 1985-06-14 | 1987-01-02 | Nedap Nv | DETECTION SYSTEM. |
US4745401A (en) * | 1985-09-09 | 1988-05-17 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | RF reactivatable marker for electronic article surveillance system |
US4682154A (en) * | 1986-02-12 | 1987-07-21 | E.A.S. Technologies, Inc. | Label for use in anti-theft surveillance system |
US4673923A (en) * | 1986-05-19 | 1987-06-16 | Checkpoint Systems, Inc. | Article surveillance using reactivatable resonant tags |
US4794470A (en) * | 1986-06-25 | 1988-12-27 | Media Security Incorporated And Associates | Security system for protecting information |
AU613817B2 (en) * | 1986-09-29 | 1991-08-08 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Deactivatable alarm tag and methods of making and deactivating it |
US4882569A (en) * | 1988-07-26 | 1989-11-21 | Security Tag Systems, Inc. | Deactivatable fequency-dividing-transponder tag |
GB8900398D0 (en) * | 1989-01-09 | 1989-03-08 | Scient Generics Ltd | Magnetic materials |
-
1990
- 1990-10-04 DK DK96120857T patent/DK0774740T3/en active
- 1990-10-04 KR KR1019920700724A patent/KR0172100B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1990-10-04 AU AU65426/90A patent/AU637418B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1990-10-04 WO PCT/US1990/005688 patent/WO1991006934A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1990-10-04 DE DE69033093T patent/DE69033093T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1990-10-04 AT AT96120857T patent/ATE234491T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1990-10-04 ES ES90915373T patent/ES2133272T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-10-04 ES ES96120857T patent/ES2194951T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-10-04 DE DE69034050T patent/DE69034050T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1990-10-04 JP JP51437390A patent/JP3221876B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1990-10-04 EP EP90915373A patent/EP0541544B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-10-04 EP EP96120857A patent/EP0774740B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-10-04 CA CA002064191A patent/CA2064191C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1990-10-04 AT AT90915373T patent/ATE179822T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1990-10-04 DK DK90915373T patent/DK0541544T3/en active
- 1990-10-15 NZ NZ235685A patent/NZ235685A/en unknown
- 1990-10-30 IE IE389390A patent/IE903893A1/en unknown
- 1990-10-31 MX MX023156A patent/MX172162B/en unknown
-
1992
- 1992-02-26 FI FI920847A patent/FI112553B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1992-04-23 NO NO921564A patent/NO921564D0/en unknown
-
2000
- 2000-03-13 JP JP2000069524A patent/JP2000315284A/en active Pending
-
2001
- 2001-11-15 JP JP2001350840A patent/JP2002197159A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3500373A (en) | 1966-05-06 | 1970-03-10 | Nat Bank Of North America The | Method and apparatus for article theft detection |
US3810147A (en) | 1971-12-30 | 1974-05-07 | G Lichtblau | Electronic security system |
US3828337A (en) | 1973-08-20 | 1974-08-06 | G Lichtblau | Noise rejection circuitry |
US4021705A (en) * | 1975-03-24 | 1977-05-03 | Lichtblau G J | Resonant tag circuits having one or more fusible links |
US4498076A (en) | 1982-05-10 | 1985-02-05 | Lichtblau G J | Resonant tag and deactivator for use in an electronic security system |
US4567473A (en) | 1982-05-10 | 1986-01-28 | Lichtblau G J | Resonant tag and deactivator for use in an electronic security system |
CH672854A5 (en) * | 1987-03-01 | 1989-12-29 | Scanmatic Security Systems Ag | Security tag for controlled access to building - has LC circuit with capacitor set to valve by burn in at specific location |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1282889A1 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2003-02-12 | Checkpoint Systems, Inc. | Activatable/deactivatable security tag with enhanced electrostatic protection for use with an electronic security system |
EP1282889A4 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2005-07-13 | Checkpoint Systems Inc | Activatable/deactivatable security tag with enhanced electrostatic protection for use with an electronic security system |
KR100754307B1 (en) * | 2000-03-20 | 2007-08-31 | 체크포인트 시스템즈 인코포레이티드 | Activatable/Deactivatable Security Tag With Enhanced Electrostatic Protection For Use With An Electronic Security System |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR920704248A (en) | 1992-12-19 |
FI920847A0 (en) | 1992-02-26 |
DE69033093T2 (en) | 1999-12-09 |
EP0774740B1 (en) | 2003-03-12 |
EP0541544A4 (en) | 1992-03-18 |
DE69034050D1 (en) | 2003-04-17 |
DK0774740T3 (en) | 2003-06-10 |
KR0172100B1 (en) | 1999-05-01 |
FI112553B (en) | 2003-12-15 |
EP0541544B1 (en) | 1999-05-06 |
IE903893A1 (en) | 1991-05-08 |
JPH05501320A (en) | 1993-03-11 |
NZ235685A (en) | 1993-04-28 |
ES2133272T3 (en) | 1999-09-16 |
JP3221876B2 (en) | 2001-10-22 |
ATE234491T1 (en) | 2003-03-15 |
JP2000315284A (en) | 2000-11-14 |
ATE179822T1 (en) | 1999-05-15 |
AU637418B2 (en) | 1993-05-27 |
EP0541544A1 (en) | 1993-05-19 |
JP2002197159A (en) | 2002-07-12 |
NO921564L (en) | 1992-04-23 |
DK0541544T3 (en) | 1999-11-01 |
DE69033093D1 (en) | 1999-06-10 |
CA2064191C (en) | 1996-12-24 |
NO921564D0 (en) | 1992-04-23 |
WO1991006934A1 (en) | 1991-05-16 |
ES2194951T3 (en) | 2003-12-01 |
AU6542690A (en) | 1991-05-31 |
DE69034050T2 (en) | 2003-12-04 |
CA2064191A1 (en) | 1991-05-01 |
MX172162B (en) | 1993-12-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5081445A (en) | Method for tagging articles used in conjunction with an electronic article surveillance system, and tags or labels useful in connection therewith | |
EP0463233B1 (en) | Activatable/deactivatable security tag for use with an electronic security system | |
US5182544A (en) | Security tag with electrostatic protection | |
EP0794520B1 (en) | Security tag | |
US5859587A (en) | Data communication and electronic article surveillance tag | |
US5990794A (en) | Apparatus for data communication and deactivation of electronic article surveillance tags | |
WO1998013804A9 (en) | A data communication and electronic article surveillance tag | |
EP0774740B1 (en) | Tags or labels useful in connection with an electronic article surveillance system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19961223 |
|
AC | Divisional application: reference to earlier application |
Ref document number: 541544 Country of ref document: EP |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: PICCOLI, ANTHONY F. Inventor name: GILL, PETER L. |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19991210 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC. |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AC | Divisional application: reference to earlier application |
Ref document number: 0541544 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: P |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20030312 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20030312 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69034050 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20030417 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: OK PAT AG PATENTE MARKEN LIZENZEN |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20030915 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20030916 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20031004 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20031215 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050501 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20050501 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20061025 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20061026 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20061027 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20061027 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20061124 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20061130 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC. Effective date: 20071031 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20071004 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071031 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080501 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20080630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071005 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20061017 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071004 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20071005 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071031 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071005 |