EP0714576B1 - Interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion - Google Patents

Interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0714576B1
EP0714576B1 EP95911483A EP95911483A EP0714576B1 EP 0714576 B1 EP0714576 B1 EP 0714576B1 EP 95911483 A EP95911483 A EP 95911483A EP 95911483 A EP95911483 A EP 95911483A EP 0714576 B1 EP0714576 B1 EP 0714576B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sequentially scanned
video signal
motion
compensated
lines
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP95911483A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0714576A1 (en
Inventor
Gerard De Haan
Paul Willem Albert Cornelis Biezen
Olukayode Anthony Ojo
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Koninklijke Philips NV
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV filed Critical Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV
Priority to EP95911483A priority Critical patent/EP0714576B1/en
Publication of EP0714576A1 publication Critical patent/EP0714576A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0714576B1 publication Critical patent/EP0714576B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N7/00Television systems
    • H04N7/01Conversion of standards, e.g. involving analogue television standards or digital television standards processed at pixel level
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N7/00Television systems
    • H04N7/01Conversion of standards, e.g. involving analogue television standards or digital television standards processed at pixel level
    • H04N7/0117Conversion of standards, e.g. involving analogue television standards or digital television standards processed at pixel level involving conversion of the spatial resolution of the incoming video signal
    • H04N7/012Conversion between an interlaced and a progressive signal

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method of and apparatus for interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion of video signals to create a non-interlaced or progressively scanned image from an interlaced image.
  • a first aspect of the invention provides a conversion method as defined in claim 1.
  • a second aspect of the invention provides a conversion apparatus as defined in claim 2.
  • Advantageous embodiments are defined in the subclaims.
  • a first sequentially scanned video signal is furnished in dependence upon the interlaced video signal.
  • a motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal is furnished in dependence upon the first sequentially scanned video signal.
  • all video lines of the output sequentially scanned video signal are furnished in dependence upon both the first sequentially scanned video signal and the motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal to prevent inaccuracies in motion vectors used in the motion-compensated processing operation from resulting in visible distortions.
  • An interlaced video signal is a subsampled signal, in which each field contains only one half of the total number of lines. As is well known, this subsampling causes alias. For still pictures, the alias of the even lines and the alias of the odd lines are in antiphase, so that the alias does not result in visible distortions. However, moving pictures suffer from distortions caused by alias.
  • EP-A-0,475,449 (Attorney docket PHN 13,442) describes a motion-compensated frame rate conversion in which all output fields are obtained by means of a time-shifting operation which requires a smaller interpolation distance (5 ms in 50 to 100 Hz conversion) than the interpolation distance (10 ms in 50 to 100 Hz conversion) which would be required when interpolated fields are inserted between original fields.
  • This interpolation distance reduction results in reduced motion vector artifacts because smaller motion vectors are used.
  • there is no such interpolation distance reduction and motion vector shortening in the present invention there is no incentive for those skilled in the art to consider the teachings of EP-A-0,475,449 to solve the problem of the present invention.
  • an interlaced video signal IS is applied to a sequential scan converter 1.
  • the converter 1 may be a very simple intra-field line averager, which creates a pixel value on an additional line by taking the arithmetic mean of positionally corresponding pixel values of two neighboring existing lines.
  • the converter 1 may take the median of positionally corresponding pixel values of the two neighboring existing lines of the same field and the interjacent line of the preceding field.
  • the interjacent line of the preceding field may be obtained by a motion-compensated interpolation (connection shown in broken lines in Figs.
  • the first sequentially scanned signal SS1 outputted by the converter 1 is mixed by a mixer 3 with a motion-compensated signal MCS obtained from a motion-compensated interpolation circuit 5, 7, 9 to be described hereinafter.
  • the signals SS1 and MCS are mixed in the ratio k:(1-k).
  • k depends on the reliability of the motion vectors used in the motion-compensated interpolation circuit 5, 7, 9.
  • a known method of obtaining motion vectors compares a block of pixels in a present field with a plurality of blocks of pixels in a preceding field.
  • the motion vector obtained thereby is the vector pointing from the block in the present field to the block in the preceding field which has the smallest comparison match error. This smallest comparison match error can be used as a measure of the unreliability of the motion vector.
  • many other ways of obtaining a suitable mixing factor k are also possible.
  • the first sequentially scanned signal SS1 and the output signal of the mixer 3 are mixed in the ratio p:(1-p) by a mixer 11.
  • the mixing ratio p is the maximum of the mixing ratio k and a predetermined minimum value, for example 0.5, to avoid that a too small amount of the output signal of the converter 1 is applied to a first input of a motion-estimation comparator 9 which would result in a "hang-up" of the recursion loop.
  • the non-interlaced output signal of the mixer 3 is also applied to a full field memory 5 which delays all lines of the sequentially scanned mixer output signal by a field period.
  • the delayed signal from the field memory 5 is applied to a shifter 7 which contains several line- and pixel delays so that all pixels within a given window can be made available at the output terminals shown at the right-hand side of the shifter 7.
  • One of these shifter output terminals supplies the motion-compensated signal MCS to the mixer 3.
  • Another shifter output terminal is applied to a second input of the motion-estimation comparator 9.
  • the comparator 9 compares in known manner the block of pixels applied to its first input with several blocks of pixels from a previous field period as supplied by the shifter 7.
  • the output signal of the mixer 3 is supplied at a terminal 13 as the output sequentially scanned video signal SSS.
  • the output terminal 13 may be connected to the output of the field memory 5. It is a special feature of the current invention that all lines of the output signal SSS have been subjected to a motion-compensated processing. Consequently, the alias of the odd lines and the alias of the even lines are substantially in antiphase, so that previous visible distortions caused by alias are strongly reduced in the output signal according to the present invention.
  • Fig. 2 shows a second embodiment of an interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion circuit in accordance with the present invention.
  • the output signal SS1 of the sequential scan converter 1 and the motion-compensated signal MCS are mixed in a first mixer 31 in a mixing ratio ko:(1-ko), and in a second mixer 33 for the interpolated lines in a mixing ratio ki:(1-ki).
  • the first mixer 31 is operative for first lines positionally corresponding to original lines of a present field of the interlaced video input signal.
  • the second mixer 33 is operative for second lines positionally corresponding to interpolated lines between the original lines of the present field of the interlaced video input signal.
  • Output signals of the mixers 31 and 33 are applied to a multiplexer 35 controlled by a line-frequent switching signal FL to supply the appropriate mixer output signal as the output sequentially scanned signal SSS at the output terminal 13.
  • the multiplexer output signal is also applied to the full field memory 5 and to the first input of the motion-estimation comparator 9.
  • the embodiment of Fig. 2 corresponds to that of Fig. 1.
  • the advantage of having two separate mixers 31, 33 for original and interpolated lines, or of any other implementation of two separate mixing ratios, is that it provides the possibility of protecting first lines positionally corresponding to original lines (controlled by mixing factor ko) to a higher extent from being spoiled by unreliable motion vectors than the second lines positionally corresponding to interpolated lines (controlled by mixing factor ki). This is based on the recognition that original lines constitute the most reliable input information available to the filter.
  • the mixing factors ko, ki preferably depend on the motion vector reliability: the lower the reliability, the higher the mixing ratios in order to introduce more fresh input information which is not spoiled by unreliable motion vectors.
  • the six pixels may be three pixels on the line above the current pixels and three pixels on the line below the current pixel having the same horizontal positions as the first-mentioned three pixels.
  • At least the mixing factor ki for the interpolated lines depends on a vertical motion vector component, whereby a mixing factor ki used with odd vertical motion vector components exceeds a mixing factor ki used with even vertical motion vector components.
  • This modification is based on the following recognition.
  • With an even vertical motion vector component for example zero, when the lines are considered in the temporal direction, there is an alternation of original and inserted lines. Consequently, there is enough supply of fresh information and there is no danger that old information just keeps circulating in the recursion loop.
  • interpolated lines are followed by interpolated lines, so that with a small mixing factor, old information may be circulating in the recursion loop. Therefore, the mixing factor ki for odd motion vector components preferably exceeds that for even motion vector components to avoid such a "hang-up" of the recursion loop.
  • the invention can be used to great advantage in television sets operating with a standard of 525 lines per two interlaced 60 Hz fields, because there a progressive scan conversion yields the largest visible improvement.
  • the invention can also be used advantageously with non-interlaced matrix type displays.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Graphics (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Television Systems (AREA)

Abstract

In a method of converting an interlaced video signal (IS) into an output sequentially scanned video (SSS), a first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1) is furnished in dependence upon the interlaced video signal (IS). Subsequently, a motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal (MCS) is furnished in dependence upon the first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1). According to the invention, all video lines of the output sequentially scanned video signal (SSS) are furnished in dependence upon both the first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1) and the motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal (MCS) to prevent inaccuracies in motion vectors used in the motion-compensated processing operation (5-9) from resulting in visible distortions.

Description

The invention relates to a method of and apparatus for interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion of video signals to create a non-interlaced or progressively scanned image from an interlaced image.
Such a method is described in the article "Time-recursive deinterlacing for IDTV and pyramid coding", by F.-M. Wang and D. Anastassiou, Signal Processing: Image Communication 2 (1990) pp. 365-374. A previously obtained sequentially scanned image is used in a recursive manner which involves a motion-compensated interpolation to create a subsequent sequentially scanned image. More specifically, the recursive interpolation process furnishes additional lines which are inserted between the already available lines of a field to obtain the sequentially scanned image. As the spectrum of the interpolated lines will almost always suffer from inaccuracies in the motion vector estimates, the alias resulting from the original interlaced, i.e. subsampled lines is not fully compensated for by the spectrum of the interpolated lines. The non-compensated part of the alias results in visible distortions.
It is, inter alia, an object of the invention to provide a method of and apparatus for interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion of video signals in which this disadvantage is mitigated. To this end, a first aspect of the invention provides a conversion method as defined in claim 1. A second aspect of the invention provides a conversion apparatus as defined in claim 2. Advantageous embodiments are defined in the subclaims.
In the conversion of an interlaced video signal into an output sequentially scanned video signal according to the present invention, a first sequentially scanned video signal is furnished in dependence upon the interlaced video signal. Subsequently, a motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal is furnished in dependence upon the first sequentially scanned video signal. According to a special feature of the invention, all video lines of the output sequentially scanned video signal are furnished in dependence upon both the first sequentially scanned video signal and the motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal to prevent inaccuracies in motion vectors used in the motion-compensated processing operation from resulting in visible distortions.
The invention is based on the following recognition. An interlaced video signal is a subsampled signal, in which each field contains only one half of the total number of lines. As is well known, this subsampling causes alias. For still pictures, the alias of the even lines and the alias of the odd lines are in antiphase, so that the alias does not result in visible distortions. However, moving pictures suffer from distortions caused by alias. Prior art progressive scan methods, in which only the additional lines in each field are interpolated while the lines already present are not subjected to any processing, do not succeed in removing the alias-distortions in moving pictures, because the alias of the interpolated lines and the alias of the original lines are not exactly in antiphase due to inaccuracies of motion vectors used in the interpolation process. However, if in accordance with the present invention, all lines of the output field have been subjected to the interpolation processing, the alias of the even lines and the alias of the odd lines are substantially in antiphase, so that a better picture quality is obtained.
It is noted that EP-A-0,475,449 (Attorney docket PHN 13,442) describes a motion-compensated frame rate conversion in which all output fields are obtained by means of a time-shifting operation which requires a smaller interpolation distance (5 ms in 50 to 100 Hz conversion) than the interpolation distance (10 ms in 50 to 100 Hz conversion) which would be required when interpolated fields are inserted between original fields. This interpolation distance reduction results in reduced motion vector artifacts because smaller motion vectors are used. As there is no such interpolation distance reduction and motion vector shortening in the present invention, there is no incentive for those skilled in the art to consider the teachings of EP-A-0,475,449 to solve the problem of the present invention.
These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from and elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter.
In the drawings:
  • Fig. 1 shows a first embodiment of a conversion apparatus in accordance with the present invention; and
  • Fig. 2 shows a second embodiment of a conversion apparatus in accordance with the present invention.
  • In the interlaced-to-sequential converter embodiment of Fig. 1, an interlaced video signal IS is applied to a sequential scan converter 1. The converter 1 may be a very simple intra-field line averager, which creates a pixel value on an additional line by taking the arithmetic mean of positionally corresponding pixel values of two neighboring existing lines. Alternatively, the converter 1 may take the median of positionally corresponding pixel values of the two neighboring existing lines of the same field and the interjacent line of the preceding field. As a further alternative, the interjacent line of the preceding field may be obtained by a motion-compensated interpolation (connection shown in broken lines in Figs. 1, 2), see US-A-5,280,350 (Attorney docket PHN 13,443), herein incorporated by reference. The converter may be edge-dependent (contour-dependent) as shown in US-A-5,001,563 (Attorney docket PHN 12,681).
    The first sequentially scanned signal SS1 outputted by the converter 1 is mixed by a mixer 3 with a motion-compensated signal MCS obtained from a motion-compensated interpolation circuit 5, 7, 9 to be described hereinafter. The signals SS1 and MCS are mixed in the ratio k:(1-k). Preferably, k depends on the reliability of the motion vectors used in the motion-compensated interpolation circuit 5, 7, 9. A known method of obtaining motion vectors compares a block of pixels in a present field with a plurality of blocks of pixels in a preceding field. The motion vector obtained thereby is the vector pointing from the block in the present field to the block in the preceding field which has the smallest comparison match error. This smallest comparison match error can be used as a measure of the unreliability of the motion vector. Of course, many other ways of obtaining a suitable mixing factor k are also possible.
    The first sequentially scanned signal SS1 and the output signal of the mixer 3 are mixed in the ratio p:(1-p) by a mixer 11. The mixing ratio p is the maximum of the mixing ratio k and a predetermined minimum value, for example 0.5, to avoid that a too small amount of the output signal of the converter 1 is applied to a first input of a motion-estimation comparator 9 which would result in a "hang-up" of the recursion loop.
    The non-interlaced output signal of the mixer 3 is also applied to a full field memory 5 which delays all lines of the sequentially scanned mixer output signal by a field period. The delayed signal from the field memory 5 is applied to a shifter 7 which contains several line- and pixel delays so that all pixels within a given window can be made available at the output terminals shown at the right-hand side of the shifter 7. One of these shifter output terminals supplies the motion-compensated signal MCS to the mixer 3. Another shifter output terminal is applied to a second input of the motion-estimation comparator 9. The comparator 9 compares in known manner the block of pixels applied to its first input with several blocks of pixels from a previous field period as supplied by the shifter 7. The best match results in a motion vector D which is applied to the shifter 7 to select the motion-compensated signal MCS applied to the mixer 3. Of course, any other motion estimation-compensation configuration will also do, but the embodiment shown is very simple because it requires only one full field memory 5 and only one shifter 7 for both motion-estimation and motion-compensated interpolation. Moreover, the field-memory 5 is used for both motion-estimation / compensation and deinterlacing. Reference is made to EP-A-0,574,068 (US application SN 08/73,403, Attorney docket PHN 14,079), herein incorporated by reference, for the common use of a field memory for both motion vector estimation and motion-compensated interpolation.
    A preferred motion-estimator has been described in "Motion Estimation and Compensation, an integrated approach to consumer display field rate conversion.", by G. de Haan, Eindhoven 1992, herein incorporated by reference.
    The output signal of the mixer 3 is supplied at a terminal 13 as the output sequentially scanned video signal SSS. Alternatively, the output terminal 13 may be connected to the output of the field memory 5. It is a special feature of the current invention that all lines of the output signal SSS have been subjected to a motion-compensated processing. Consequently, the alias of the odd lines and the alias of the even lines are substantially in antiphase, so that previous visible distortions caused by alias are strongly reduced in the output signal according to the present invention.
    Fig. 2 shows a second embodiment of an interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion circuit in accordance with the present invention. The output signal SS1 of the sequential scan converter 1 and the motion-compensated signal MCS are mixed in a first mixer 31 in a mixing ratio ko:(1-ko), and in a second mixer 33 for the interpolated lines in a mixing ratio ki:(1-ki). The first mixer 31 is operative for first lines positionally corresponding to original lines of a present field of the interlaced video input signal. The second mixer 33 is operative for second lines positionally corresponding to interpolated lines between the original lines of the present field of the interlaced video input signal. Output signals of the mixers 31 and 33 are applied to a multiplexer 35 controlled by a line-frequent switching signal FL to supply the appropriate mixer output signal as the output sequentially scanned signal SSS at the output terminal 13. The multiplexer output signal is also applied to the full field memory 5 and to the first input of the motion-estimation comparator 9. For the remainder, the embodiment of Fig. 2 corresponds to that of Fig. 1.
    The advantage of having two separate mixers 31, 33 for original and interpolated lines, or of any other implementation of two separate mixing ratios, is that it provides the possibility of protecting first lines positionally corresponding to original lines (controlled by mixing factor ko) to a higher extent from being spoiled by unreliable motion vectors than the second lines positionally corresponding to interpolated lines (controlled by mixing factor ki). This is based on the recognition that original lines constitute the most reliable input information available to the filter. While in accordance with the basic principle of the present invention the original lines and the inserted lines should undergo the same processing to ensure that the alias of the original lines and the alias of the inserted lines are in antiphase, even with motion vectors which are not completely correct, it appears that better results are obtained with motion vectors which are too unreliable, if a higher amount of fresh information from the original lines is used.
    As has been described with regard to the embodiment of Fig. 1, the mixing factors ko, ki preferably depend on the motion vector reliability: the lower the reliability, the higher the mixing ratios in order to introduce more fresh input information which is not spoiled by unreliable motion vectors. Preferably, ki = (1+√d)/16 and ko = (6+2√d)/16, with d = abs(difsum)/6 with difsum being the sum of the differences between six pixels surrounding the current pixel from the converter 1 and six positionally corresponding pixels from the motion-compensated signal MCS. The six pixels may be three pixels on the line above the current pixels and three pixels on the line below the current pixel having the same horizontal positions as the first-mentioned three pixels.
    In a further advantageous modification, at least the mixing factor ki for the interpolated lines depends on a vertical motion vector component, whereby a mixing factor ki used with odd vertical motion vector components exceeds a mixing factor ki used with even vertical motion vector components. This modification is based on the following recognition. With an even vertical motion vector component, for example zero, when the lines are considered in the temporal direction, there is an alternation of original and inserted lines. Consequently, there is enough supply of fresh information and there is no danger that old information just keeps circulating in the recursion loop. However, with an odd vertical motion vector component, interpolated lines are followed by interpolated lines, so that with a small mixing factor, old information may be circulating in the recursion loop. Therefore, the mixing factor ki for odd motion vector components preferably exceeds that for even motion vector components to avoid such a "hang-up" of the recursion loop.
    It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. While the preferred embodiments shown in the drawing are recursive, i.e. the output sequentially scanned signal SSS is applied to the motion-compensated processing means 5-11, it will be obvious that the gist of the invention is also realized in a non-recursive embodiment in which the inputs of field memory 5 and comparator 9 are directly connected to the output of the converter 1.
    The invention can be used to great advantage in television sets operating with a standard of 525 lines per two interlaced 60 Hz fields, because there a progressive scan conversion yields the largest visible improvement. The invention can also be used advantageously with non-interlaced matrix type displays.

    Claims (8)

    1. A method of converting an interlaced video signal (IS) into an output sequentially scanned video signal (SSS), comprising the steps of:
      furnishing a first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1) in dependence upon said interlaced video signal (IS);
      furnishing a motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal (MCS) in dependence upon said first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1); and
      generating all video lines of said output sequentially scanned video signal (SSS) in dependence upon both said first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1) and said motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal (MCS).
    2. An apparatus for converting an interlaced video signal (IS) into an output sequentially scanned video signal (SSS), comprising:
      means (1) coupled to receive said interlaced video signal (IS) for furnishing a first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1);
      means (5-11) for furnishing a motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal (MCS) in dependence upon said first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1); and
      means (3, 31-35) for generating all video lines of said output sequentially scanned video signal (SSS) in dependence upon both said first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1) and said motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal (MCS).
    3. An apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein said generating means (3, 31-35) comprise means (31-35) for combining said first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1) and said motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal (MCS) to furnish said output sequentially scanned video signal (SSS).
    4. An apparatus as claimed in claim 3, wherein said combining means (31-35) comprise a first mixer (31) for first lines positionally corresponding to original lines of a present field of the interlaced video signal, a second mixer (33) for second lines positionally corresponding to interpolated lines between said original lines, and a multiplexer (35) for line-alternately selecting an output of the first mixer (31) or an output of the second mixer (33).
    5. An apparatus as claimed in claim 4, wherein at least a second mixing factor (ki) of said second mixer (33) depends on a vertical motion vector component, whereby a mixing factor (ki) used with odd vertical motion vector components exceeds a mixing factor (ki) used with even vertical motion vector components.
    6. An apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein said motion-compensated means (5-11) are coupled to receive said output sequentially scanned video signal (SSS).
    7. An apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein said motion-compensated means (5-11) are motion-vector-compensated means.
    8. An apparatus as claimed in claim 2, wherein said motion-compensated means (5-11) include means (7,9) for estimating motion vectors (D), and wherein said generating means (3, 31-35) include means for providing a weighted averaging of first sequentially scanned video signal (SS1) and said motion-compensated sequentially scanned signal (MCS) to generate said output sequentially scanned video signal (SSS), with weights depending on a reliability of said motion vectors (D).
    EP95911483A 1994-04-05 1995-03-29 Interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion Expired - Lifetime EP0714576B1 (en)

    Priority Applications (1)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    EP95911483A EP0714576B1 (en) 1994-04-05 1995-03-29 Interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion

    Applications Claiming Priority (4)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    EP94200920 1994-04-05
    EP94200920 1994-04-05
    EP95911483A EP0714576B1 (en) 1994-04-05 1995-03-29 Interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion
    PCT/IB1995/000214 WO1995027362A2 (en) 1994-04-05 1995-03-29 Interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion

    Publications (2)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP0714576A1 EP0714576A1 (en) 1996-06-05
    EP0714576B1 true EP0714576B1 (en) 1998-11-18

    Family

    ID=8216763

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP95911483A Expired - Lifetime EP0714576B1 (en) 1994-04-05 1995-03-29 Interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion

    Country Status (6)

    Country Link
    US (1) US5532750A (en)
    EP (1) EP0714576B1 (en)
    JP (1) JP4256471B2 (en)
    KR (1) KR100371039B1 (en)
    DE (1) DE69506076T2 (en)
    WO (1) WO1995027362A2 (en)

    Families Citing this family (37)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US5929919A (en) * 1994-04-05 1999-07-27 U.S. Philips Corporation Motion-compensated field rate conversion
    WO1997016923A1 (en) * 1995-11-01 1997-05-09 Philips Electronics N.V. Video signal scan conversion
    DE69602852T2 (en) * 1995-11-08 2000-04-20 Genesis Microchip Inc METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SUPPRESSING THE CELL ROPE FROM VIDEO HALF-IMAGES TO VIDEO IMAGES WITH PROGRESSIVE SCANING
    EP0860081B1 (en) * 1996-09-11 2003-04-02 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Adaptive picture delay
    US6269484B1 (en) 1997-06-24 2001-07-31 Ati Technologies Method and apparatus for de-interlacing interlaced content using motion vectors in compressed video streams
    AU1068899A (en) 1997-10-06 1999-04-27 Dvdo, Inc. Digital video system and methods for providing same
    US6094232A (en) * 1998-11-25 2000-07-25 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Method and system for interpolating a missing pixel using a motion vector
    US6909469B2 (en) * 1999-08-11 2005-06-21 Silicon Image, Inc. Interlace motion artifact detection using vertical frequency detection and analysis
    US6867814B2 (en) * 2000-04-18 2005-03-15 Silicon Image, Inc. Method, system and article of manufacture for identifying the source type and quality level of a video sequence
    US7116372B2 (en) * 2000-10-20 2006-10-03 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for deinterlacing
    US7072392B2 (en) * 2000-11-13 2006-07-04 Micronas Semiconductors, Inc. Equalizer for time domain signal processing
    JP2004516718A (en) 2000-12-11 2004-06-03 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ Motion compensated deinterlacing in video signal processing
    US7098957B2 (en) * 2000-12-20 2006-08-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for detecting repetitive motion in an interlaced video sequence apparatus for processing interlaced video signals
    US6940557B2 (en) * 2001-02-08 2005-09-06 Micronas Semiconductors, Inc. Adaptive interlace-to-progressive scan conversion algorithm
    US6829297B2 (en) * 2001-06-06 2004-12-07 Micronas Semiconductors, Inc. Adaptive equalizer having a variable step size influenced by output from a trellis decoder
    US7190744B2 (en) * 2001-06-07 2007-03-13 Micronas Semiconductors, Inc. Error generation for adaptive equalizer
    US7418034B2 (en) * 2001-06-19 2008-08-26 Micronas Semiconductors. Inc. Combined trellis decoder and decision feedback equalizer
    JP2005507618A (en) * 2001-11-01 2005-03-17 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ Edge-oriented interpolation of video data
    US20030122961A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 Motorola, Inc. Method for de-interlacing video information
    US7129988B2 (en) * 2002-02-25 2006-10-31 Chrontel, Inc. Adaptive median filters for de-interlacing
    US20030235259A1 (en) * 2002-04-04 2003-12-25 Jingsong Xia System and method for symbol clock recovery
    US20030206053A1 (en) * 2002-04-04 2003-11-06 Jingsong Xia Carrier recovery for DTV receivers
    US7272203B2 (en) * 2002-04-05 2007-09-18 Micronas Semiconductors, Inc. Data-directed frequency-and-phase lock loop for decoding an offset-QAM modulated signal having a pilot
    US7376181B2 (en) * 2002-04-05 2008-05-20 Micronas Semiconductors, Inc. Transposed structure for a decision feedback equalizer combined with a trellis decoder
    US7321642B2 (en) * 2002-04-05 2008-01-22 Micronas Semiconductors, Inc. Synchronization symbol re-insertion for a decision feedback equalizer combined with a trellis decoder
    US6995617B2 (en) * 2002-04-05 2006-02-07 Micronas Semiconductors, Inc. Data-directed frequency-and-phase lock loop
    US6980059B2 (en) * 2002-04-05 2005-12-27 Micronas Semiconductors, Inc. Data directed frequency acquisition loop that synchronizes to a received signal by using the redundancy of the data in the frequency domain
    CN100401763C (en) * 2003-05-16 2008-07-09 索尼株式会社 Motion correction device and method
    US7751484B2 (en) * 2005-04-27 2010-07-06 Lsi Corporation Method for composite video artifacts reduction
    EP2002650A1 (en) * 2006-04-03 2008-12-17 QUALCOMM Incorporated Preprocessor method and apparatus
    KR101522736B1 (en) 2007-02-20 2015-05-26 소니 주식회사 Image display device
    US8964117B2 (en) 2007-09-28 2015-02-24 Ati Technologies Ulc Single-pass motion adaptive deinterlacer and method therefore
    US8300987B2 (en) * 2007-09-28 2012-10-30 Ati Technologies Ulc Apparatus and method for generating a detail-enhanced upscaled image
    US8259228B2 (en) * 2007-12-10 2012-09-04 Ati Technologies Ulc Method and apparatus for high quality video motion adaptive edge-directional deinterlacing
    US8396129B2 (en) * 2007-12-28 2013-03-12 Ati Technologies Ulc Apparatus and method for single-pass, gradient-based motion compensated image rate conversion
    TWI392114B (en) * 2008-03-04 2013-04-01 Huga Optotech Inc Light emitting diode and method
    US8170370B2 (en) * 2008-12-04 2012-05-01 Cyberlink Corp. Method and apparatus of processing interlaced video data to generate output frame by blending deinterlaced frames

    Family Cites Families (10)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    NL8802365A (en) * 1988-09-27 1990-04-17 Philips Nv METHOD AND CIRCUIT FOR PROCESSING AN IMAGE SIGNAL
    US4989090A (en) * 1989-04-05 1991-01-29 Yves C. Faroudja Television scan line doubler including temporal median filter
    GB2231226B (en) * 1989-04-27 1993-09-22 Sony Corp Motion dependent video signal processing
    GB2246488B (en) * 1990-07-24 1994-04-20 Sony Corp Motion dependant video signal processing
    EP0474287B1 (en) * 1990-09-03 1995-11-22 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for processing a picture signal
    AU631504B2 (en) * 1990-09-14 1992-11-26 Nippon Steel Corporation Method and apparatus for sintering operation
    JP3271143B2 (en) * 1990-10-22 2002-04-02 ソニー株式会社 Video signal processing circuit
    US5159451A (en) * 1991-03-19 1992-10-27 Faroudja Y C Field memory expansible line doubler for television receiver
    CH683727A5 (en) * 1992-06-11 1994-04-29 Alcatel Str Ag Relay.
    US5412436A (en) * 1993-04-22 1995-05-02 Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. Motion adaptive video processing system

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    KR960702976A (en) 1996-05-23
    JPH08511406A (en) 1996-11-26
    EP0714576A1 (en) 1996-06-05
    JP4256471B2 (en) 2009-04-22
    DE69506076D1 (en) 1998-12-24
    WO1995027362A3 (en) 1995-11-23
    WO1995027362A2 (en) 1995-10-12
    KR100371039B1 (en) 2003-05-12
    US5532750A (en) 1996-07-02
    DE69506076T2 (en) 1999-06-10

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    EP0714576B1 (en) Interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion
    US5475438A (en) Five field motion detector for a TV scan line doubler
    JP2732650B2 (en) Vertical edge detection circuit
    EP0743788A1 (en) Automatic image scanning format converter with seamless switching
    EP1404130A1 (en) Method and apparatus for processing a video signal mixed with an additional image signal
    KR950009654B1 (en) Scan display system
    JP3514063B2 (en) Receiver
    JP2000165822A (en) Moving picture signal multiplexer, interlace progressive moving picture scanning converter, system and method
    US9241095B2 (en) Method and system for adaptive temporal interpolation filtering for motion compensation
    US5495300A (en) Motion-compensated picture signal interpolation
    EP0381222A2 (en) Decoder for subsampled video signal
    US4912556A (en) Apparatus for compensating contour of television signal
    US4901149A (en) Method and apparatus for providing an enhanced television signal
    US6191824B1 (en) Video signal processing apparatus
    EP1762092A1 (en) Image processor and image processing method using scan rate conversion
    KR930004822B1 (en) Television signal converting apparatus
    EP0273967A1 (en) Improvements relating to television.
    EP0574068B1 (en) Apparatus for motion-compensated picture signal interpolation
    EP1095522B1 (en) Chrominance signal interpolation
    US7142248B2 (en) Video signal processing apparatus and method, video display apparatus
    De Haan Large‐video‐display‐format conversion
    US7355651B2 (en) Method and system for minimizing both on-chip memory size and peak DRAM bandwidth requirements for multifield deinterlacers
    JP3265825B2 (en) Television signal processing circuit
    KR0153536B1 (en) Scanning interpolation generation circuit and method
    JP2732648B2 (en) Motion detection circuit and interpolation signal generation circuit

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 19960412

    GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

    17Q First examination report despatched

    Effective date: 19980211

    RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

    Owner name: PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.

    GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

    GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

    GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 19981118

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 69506076

    Country of ref document: DE

    Date of ref document: 19981224

    ET Fr: translation filed
    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    26N No opposition filed
    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: IF02

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: 746

    Effective date: 20021017

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: D6

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: 732E

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: TP

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Payment date: 20100324

    Year of fee payment: 16

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Payment date: 20100322

    Year of fee payment: 16

    GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

    Effective date: 20110329

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: ST

    Effective date: 20111130

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20110331

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20110329

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: TP

    Owner name: TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS (FAR EAST) LTD., KY

    Effective date: 20120418

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R082

    Ref document number: 69506076

    Country of ref document: DE

    Representative=s name: ,

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Country of ref document: DE

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R082

    Ref document number: 69506076

    Country of ref document: DE

    Representative=s name: ,

    Effective date: 20130305

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R081

    Ref document number: 69506076

    Country of ref document: DE

    Owner name: NXP B.V., NL

    Free format text: FORMER OWNER: TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS (FAR EAST) LTD., GRAND CAYMAN, KY

    Effective date: 20130305

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Payment date: 20130221

    Year of fee payment: 19

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R119

    Ref document number: 69506076

    Country of ref document: DE

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R119

    Ref document number: 69506076

    Country of ref document: DE

    Effective date: 20141001

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20141001