EP0632141B1

EP0632141B1 - Surface treated steel sheet and method therefore

Info

Publication number: EP0632141B1
Application number: EP94110079A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Satoru C/O Intellectual Property Dept. Udagawa; Masaki C/O Intellectual Property Dept. Abe; Satoru C/O Intellectual Property Dept. Ando; Yasuhiro C/O Intellectual Property Dept. Matsuki; Toyofumi Intellectual Property Dept. Watanabe; Yukimitsu C/O Intellectual Prop. Dept. Shiohara; Masaya C/O Intellectual Prop. Dept. Morita; Akimasa C/O Intellectual Property Dept. Kido
Original assignee: NKK Corp; Nippon Kokan Ltd
Current assignee: JFE Engineering Corp
Priority date: 1993-06-29
Filing date: 1994-06-29
Publication date: 1998-03-04
Anticipated expiration: 2014-06-29
Also published as: KR960013481B1; DE69408739D1; DE69408739T2; KR950000925A; EP0632141A1

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a surface treated steel sheet having excellent corrosion resistance and being suitable for a steel sheet used for automobiles, building materials, electric equipment, and other applications, and relates to a method for producing thereof.

2. DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ARTS

Cold-rolled steel sheets and other steel sheets used in automobiles have been reducing their sheet thickness aiming at the reduction of car-body weight and the reduction of production cost. The reduction of sheet thickness, however, reduces the net thickness after corrosion, which induces a problem of insufficient strength of the car-body after corroded. One of the most simple means to improve the corrosion resistance of automobile steel sheet is the increase of coating weight of zinc. The means, however, results in the increase of cost, and also induces a problem of separation of coating layer during the steel sheet working to expose the steel base material which is vulnerable to corrosion. In addition, the coating weight gives a significant effect to the spot welding which is widely employed in assembling automobile parts. In concrete terms, the increase of coating weight enhances the degradation of weldability. The steel sheets used in automobiles are requested to have a good formability such as deep drawing capability, as well as low cost. Responding to that kind of requirements, various types of steel sheets have been introduced, but none has fully satisfied those requirements.

For example, Japanese Patent Unexamined Publication (hereinafter referred to simply as "JP-A-") No. 3-253541 discloses that a steel of Cu-P system with reduced C, adding slight amount of S, and adding a specified amount of Si and Ti exhibits excellent corrosion resistance under an environment of repeated dry and wet cycle. JP-A-3-150315 discloses a method for producing steel sheet using a Cu-P system with reduced C and adding slight amount of Ni to give excellent corrosion resistance and formability. JP-A-4-141554 discloses a cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent corrosion resistance and having a high strength and a method for producing the steel sheet. JP-A-4-168246 discloses a cold-rolled steel sheet containing P, Ti, Nb, etc. and having excellent formability and corrosion resistance.

However, the steel sheet disclosed in JP-A-3-253541 is a Ti-killed steel, and the steel tends to generate surface defects and tends to induce nozzle plugging during the slab production in a continuous casting line. The method disclosed in JP-A-3-150315 specifies the use of box-annealing as the recrystallizing crystallizing annealing to improve the formability. The box-annealing has, however, a tendency of cost increase and of segregation of P, which makes the steel brittle and degrades the workability.

The steel sheet disclosed in JP-A-4-141554 has disadvantages of the elongation (E1) of less than 40%, Lankford value (rm value) of less than 2.0, which indicates an insufficient press-formability. In addition, a steel containing Cu, P, and Cr has a disadvantage of poor resistance to pitting. The cold-rolled steel sheet disclosed in JP-A-4-168246 contains P, Ti, Nb, etc., and that type of steel induces the occurrence of NbC to degrade the corrosion resistance.

JP-A-63 312 960 relates to a plated steel sheet having superior workability, by applying, prior to hot dip galvanizing, preplating of Ni-P, Co-P, or Fe-P in which P content is specified, respectively. Preplating of Ni-P, Co-P, or Fe-P is applied to the surface of a cold-rolled steel sheet by >50mg/m² expressed in terms of P content. Subsequently, the sheet is passed through a hot dip galvanizing line and subjected to heating, reduction, and annealing, and then, this sheet is dipped into a zinc bath to undergo prescribed plating and is then heat-treated.

JP-A-04 006 259 relates to the production of a galvannealed steel sheet by applying hot-dip galvanizing to a low carbon steel sheet and subjecting this steel sheet to diffusion by heating, Si content in the low carbon steel sheet is regulated to 0.05-1.0% by weight, and further, the steel sheet is previously precoated by 0.5-5 g/m² with one kind among Fe, Fe-Ni, Fe-Mo, and Ni-P prior to hot-dip galvanizing. Subsequently gas heating reduction sheet temperature in the hot-dip galvanizing stage is regulated to 500-900°C, and further, the plating bath has a composition which contains, by weight, 0.01-0.15% Al and 0.05-0.5% Sb and in which 0.01-0.2% Mg, 0.01-0.05% Ti, and 0.001-0.01% B are added, if necessary, and the total content of inevitable impurities, such as Pb, is regulated to <0.02%.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The object of the present invention is to provide a surface treated steel sheet having excellent corrosion resistance and workability and to provide a method for producing thereof.

To achieve the object, the present invention provides in a first aspect a surface treated steel sheet comprising:

a steel sheet consisting essentially of:

0.001 to 0.005 wt.% C, 0.1 wt.% or less Si, 0.05 to 0.3 wt.% Mn, 0.02 wt.% or less P, 0.001 to 0.01 wt.% S, 0.004 wt.% or less N, 0.1 wt.% or less sol.Al, 0.05 to 0.3 wt.% Ni, 0.005 to 0.01 wt.% Ti, 0.05 to 0.3 wt.% Cu, 0.0002 to 0.002 wt.% B, and the balance being Fe;

S and Cu satisfying the following equation: (S wt.% / Cu wt.%) ≤ 0.1;

a diffused alloy layer containing Fe, Ni, and P, and containing optionally at least one element selected from W, Mo, Cr and Cu in an amount of up to 15 wt %, in which P is present in an amount of 8-18 wt.%, the diffused alloy layer being formed on at least one surface of the steel sheet in a coating weight of 0.05 g/m² to 8 g/m².

The surface treated steel may further comprise a zinc or zinc-alloy coating layer in a coating weight of 5-60 g/m².

Furthermore, the present invention provides a method for producing a surface treated steel sheet comprising the steps of
preparing a steel sheet as defined for the first aspect of this invention;

coating the steel sheet with an Ni-P coating layer containing 8 to 18 wt.% P and optionally at least one element selected from W, Mo, Cr and Cu in an amount of up to 15 wt.% on at least one surface of the pickled steel sheet;

heat-treating the steel sheet coated with an Ni-P coating layer at a temperature of 500 to 880°C in a non-oxidizing atmosphere to form on the steel base material a diffused alloy layer containing Fe, Ni and P;

optionally the step of forming a zinc or zinc-alloy coating layer on the diffused alloy layer in a coating weight of 5-60 g/m²; and

annealing the steel sheet.

Still further, the present invention provides in a second aspect a surface treated steel comprising:
a steel sheet consisting essentially of:

0.001 to 0.006 wt.% C, less than 0.35 wt.% Si, 0.05 to 0.5 wt.% Mn, 0.03 to 0.08 wt.% P, less than 0.01wt.% S, 0.01 to 0.1 wt.% sol.Al, 0.0035 wt.% or less N, 0.1 to 0.5 wt.% Cu, 0.1 to 0.5 wt.% Ni, 0.01 to 0.06 wt.% Ti, 0.003 to 0.015 wt.% Nb, 0.0002 to 0.002 wt.% B, and the balance being Fe;

the steel having the composition satisfying the following equations: (P wt.% / 200) ≤ B wt.%, 4 x C wt.% < Ti wt.% - (48/14) x N wt.% - (48/32) x S wt.%, 0.004 ≤ Nb wt.% x (10 x P wt.% + 2 x Cu wt.% + Ni wt.%);

The surface treated steel may further comprise a zinc or zinc-alloy coating layer formed on the diffused alloy layer in a coating weight of 5-60 g/m².

Furthermore, the present invention provides a method for producing a surface treated steel sheet comprising the steps of
preparing a steel sheet as defined in the second aspect of the invention

pickling the steel sheet for descaling;

coating the steel sheet with an Ni-P layer containing 8 to 18 wt.% P and optionally at least one element selected from W, Mo, Cr and Cu in an amount of up to 15 wt.% on at least one surface of the pickled steel sheet;

heat-treating the steel sheet coated with an Ni-P layer at a temperature of 750 to 900°C in a non-oxidizing atmosphere to form a diffused alloy layer containing Fe, Ni and P on the steel base material;

annealing the steel sheet.

Still further, the present invention provides in a third aspect of this invention a surface treated steel sheet comprising:
a steel sheet consisting essentially of:

0.002 to 0.01 wt.% C, 1 wt.% or less Si, 0.05 to 1 wt.% Mn, 0.02 to 0.1 wt.% P, 0.01 wt.% or less S, 0.1 wt.% or less sol.Al, 0.004 wt.% or less N, 0.0005 to 0.002 wt.% B, 0.2 to 0.5 wt.% Cu, 0.1 to 0.5 wt.% Ni, 0.002 to 0.05 wt.% Sn, and at least one element selected from the group consisting of 0.005 to 0.1 wt.% Ti and 0.002 to 0.05 wt.% Nb, and the balance being Fe;

the steel having the composition satisfying the following equation: 2 ≤ 1000 x Sn wt.% x (2 x P wt.% + Cu wt.% + Ni wt.%) ≤ 20;

The surface treated steel sheet may further comprise a zinc or zinc alloy coating layer formed on the diffused alloy layer in a coating weight of 5-60 g/m².

Furthermore, the present invention provides a method for producing a surface treated steel sheet comprising the steps of:
preparing a steel sheet as definfed in the third aspect of this invention

pickling the steel sheet for descaling;

coating the steel sheet with a Ni-P layer containing 8 to 18 wt.% P and optionally at least one element selected from W, Mo, Cr and Cu in an amount of up to 15 wt.% on at least one surface of the pickled steel sheet;

heat-treating the steel sheet coated with an Ni-P layer at a temperature of 500 to 880°C in a non-oxidizing atmosphere to form a diffused alloy layer containing Fe, Ni and P on the steel sheet;

annealing the steel sheet.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a graphical representation showing the relationship between S/Cu and average corrosion depth of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a graphical representation showing the relationship between corrosion loss and maximum penetration depth of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a graphical representation showing the relationship between Nb content and maximum penetration depth divided by corrosion loss of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a graphical representation showing the relationship between Rz x S / ( 10 x P + 2 x Cu + Ni ) and corrosion loss of the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a graphical representation showing the relationships between 1000 x Sn x ( 2 x P + Cu + Ni ) and Lankford value, and between 1000 x Sn x ( 2 x P + Cu + Ni ) and average corrosion depth of the present invention; and

FIG. 6 is a graphical representation showing the influence of CT + 2000 x Sn on Lankford value and Index of intergranular segregation of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT EMBODIMENT - 1

A detailed description of the invention is given below.

Following is the experimental result which provides the basis of the present invention.

There prepared several steel sheets which have the basic composition of 0.001 to 0.005 wt.% C, 0.1 wt.% or less Si, 0.05 to 0.3 wt.% Mn, 0.02 wt.% or less P, 0.004 wt.% or less N, 0.05 to 0.3 wt.% Ni, 0.1 wt.% or less sol.Al, and the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities, and which further have a varied composition containing 0.2 wt.% or less S, 0.005 to 0.1 wt.% Ti, 0.025 wt.% or less Nb, 0.0002 to 0.002 wt.% B, and 0.3 wt.% or less Cu. On at least one surface of each steel sheet, a diffused alloy layer containing Fe-Ni-P as the main composition and further containing one or more of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu was formed. A zinc-system coating was applied on the diffused alloy layer. The corrosion resistance of thus prepared surface treated steel sheets was studied.

Each of the prepared steel sheets was exposed at non-painting condition under a corrosive environment of repeated dry/wet cycles combined with salt spraying for 60 days. The resulted corrosion depth on the surface was measured. The evaluation of the corrosion resistance was determined by the average depth of corrosion. The average depth of corrosion was determined by dividing the exposed area on the steel surface into segments of 10mm x 10mm unit area and by measuring the maximum corrosion depth in each segment for averaging the total values.

Fig. 1 shows the relation between the determined average corrosion depth and the weight ratio of S/Cu. Fig. 1 points out that the corrosion resistance of each steel increases with the decrease of S/Cu value. When the average corrosion depth is compared among Ti added steel, Ti and Nb added steel, Nb added steel, B added steel, and Ti and B added steel, it is clear that the Ti and B added steel having the S/Cu value of 0.1 or less significantly improves the corrosion resistance. The reason of the superiority of the Ti and B added steel is presumably that Ti forms TiC to inhibit the occurrence of carbon solid solution and that B segregates to grain boundaries to suppress the corrosion beginning from the grain boundaries.

The reason that the steels other than the Ti and B added steel is inferior in the corrosion resistance is speculated as follows. As for the B added steel containing solely B, B is an element to form a nitride so that the carbon solid solution remains in the steel. The carbon solid solution not only exists in the ferrite grains but also segregates to grain boundaries. The segregation makes B difficult to exist at grain boundaries.

As a result, the steel containing only B is inferior in the corrosion resistance. For a Ti added steel, no corrosion suppressing effect of B segregating toward the grain boundaries is expected, so the corrosion resistance is also poor. Regarding a Nb added steel, Nb forms NbC, and no carbon solid solution exists. Nevertheless, Nb does not segregate to grain boundaries so that Nb should not much affect the corrosion resistance. In this respect, the steel of this invention, which contains both Ti and Nb, leaves no carbon solid solution in the steel structure and allows to exist B at grain boundaries. The structure gives a significant effect of corrosion resistance, and clearly has the remarkably superior corrosion resistance to that of Ti added steel, Ti and Nb added steel and B added steel.

The reason of specifying the composition of steel is described below for the first aspect of this invention. The unit of % is wt.%.

C: Less C content is better for securing formability of steel sheet. The upper limit is specified as 0.005%. The C content of less than 0.001% increases the production cost. Therefore, the first aspect of this invention specifies the C content of 0.001 to 0.005%. More preferable range is 0.003% or less.

Si: Silicon degrades the chemical conversion treatment capability and gives bad effect to the post-painting corrosion resistance. Accordingly, less Si content is preferable. However, considering the production cost, the first aspect of invention specifies as 0.1% or less.

Mn: Less Mn content is better for improving the corrosion resistance, and first aspect of the invention specifies the upper limit at 0.3%. Considering the production cost, however, a substantial lower limit is 0.05%. Consequently, the first aspect of this invention specifies the Mn content of 0.05 to 0.3%.

P: Phosphorus tends to segregate to central region during hot working, so an excess addition of P induces cracks during working. Smaller added amount of P is better, and the first aspect of the invention specifies the upper limit as 0.02%.

S: Sulfur gives a significant effect on the corrosion resistance required by the invention. Sulfur bonds with Mn to yield MnS. The MnS acts as the nucleus of the initial stage rust which gives a bad effect to the corrosion resistance, so a lower S content is better for corrosion resistance. However, when the S content becomes below 0.001%, the production cost increases and the scale separating ability during pickling decreases. On the other hand, S content above 0.01% significantly degrades the corrosion resistance of the steel. As a result, the first aspect of this invention specifies the S content of 0.001 to 0.01%.

N: Less N content is preferred to improve the formability of steel. The invention specifies 0.004% as the upper limit to maintain the effect of first aspect of the invention. The most preferable upper limit is 0.003%.

sol. Al: Aluminum is effective as a de-oxidizing element for steel. However, the addition of 0.1% or more Al gives not much improving effect on the de-oxidation, so the first aspect of the invention specifies the sol. Al content as 0.1% or less.

B: Boron segregates to the grain boundaries and suppresses the propagation of corrosion from the boundaries. Since a very low carbon steel (IF steel) has particularly clean grain boundaries, the addition of B enhances the segregation of B to the grain boundaries, which is effective for improving the corrosion resistance. The B addition also strengthens the grain boundaries. However, the addition of less than 0.0002% B gives relatively small effects. On the other hand, B increases the thermal deformation resistance during hot working so that the addition of B over 0.002% likely induces the problems of defective shape and insufficient sheet thickness during hot rolling. Therefore, the first aspect of this invention specifies the B content of 0.0002 to 0.002%.

Ni: When Cu is added to a steel, the generation of surface defects increases during hot working owing to the included Cu. Nickel is effective to reduce the surface defect generation. The Ni content of less than 0.05% can not give the effect, and above 0.3% degrades the formability of steel and increases the production cost. Accordingly, the first aspect of this invention specifies the Ni content of 0.05 to 0.3%.

Ti: Titanium generates TiN, TiS, etc. to reduce N, S, etc. and plays an important role for improving the corrosion resistance. Also Ti decreases carbon solid solution in steel to improve the deep drawing performance. However, the Ti content of less than 0.005% gives not much effect, and the content of above 0.1% increases the production cost. Consequently, the first aspect of this invention specifies the Ti content of 0.005 to 0.1%.

Cu: Copper is a useful element for improving the corrosion resistance. The addition of Cu at, however, less than 0.05% gives no effective corrosion resistance, and the content above 0.3% gives not much improving effect for corrosion resistance and results in a cost increase and degradation of surface quality and workability. Accordingly, the first aspect of this invention specifies the Cu content of 0.05 to 0.3%.

Adding to the above described elements, the first aspect of this invention specifies the value of S/Cu, the ratio of the content of S which strongly affects the corrosion occurrence to the content of Cu which is effective to corrosion resistance. As described before, the existence of S and Cu at a ratio of 0.1 or less prevents the bad effect of S and effectively performs the Cu effect for improving corrosion resistance.

Small amount of inevitable impurities such as Cr, Sn, and V which enter into the steel during steel making process is acceptable, and those inevitable impurities do no degrade the effect of the first aspect of this invention.

With the components described above, the steel sheet has an extremely high corrosion resistance. Nevertheless, as a steel sheet for automobile which is operated under a severe environment, further improved corrosion resistance is required.

For obtaining further corrosion resistance, this invention forms a diffused alloy layer consisting mainly of Fe-Ni-P on a steel sheet having the composition above described. The diffused alloy layer protects the base steel material from corrosion and, once the corrosion of the base steel sheet begins, makes the iron corrosion product promptly dense structure. As a result, the steel sheet obtains excellent corrosion resistance which could not attained in the prior arts.

The diffused alloy layer consisting essentially of Fe-Ni-P may further contain at least one element selected from the group consisting of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu. Those elements play a role of inhibitor to steel corrosion and show an effect to improve the denseness and stability of initial stage rust by the synergistic effect with Ni and P.

Following is the condition for producing the steel sheet of this invention.

According to the first aspect of the invention, a steel sheet having the composition described above undergoes descaling by pickling treatment, and is coated with Ni-P alloy layer containing P of 8 to 15 wt.%. The coating is applied before the annealing, and it may be applied immediately after the pickling at the exit of the pickling line before the cold rolling or may be applied after the cold rolling succeeding to the pickling. Particularly when the coating is given before the cold rolling, there appears an advantage that no pickling is required as the cleaning and activating the sheet before coating.

The Ni-P coating containing P of 8 to 18% forms an amorphous-like structure. When a steel sheet having that type of coating layer is subjected to heat treatment, a uniform diffused alloy layer is formed within a short period compared with the case of common crystalline coating layers. A Ni-P coating containing P of less than 8% forms a crystalline layer and gives non-uniform P distribution. As a result, that type of coating has non-uniform composition of diffused alloy layer when it is subjected to heat treatment, and the initial stage rust is insufficient in its uniformity and denseness, which gives unstable corrosion resistance. On the other hand, a coating containing P of above 18% makes the Ni-P alloy coating brittle and degrades the adhesiveness of the coating layer. A Ni-P coating containing P of less than 8% forms a crystalline layer and gives non-uniform P distribution. As a result, that type of coating has non-uniform composition of diffused alloy layer when it is subjected to heat treatment, and the initial rust is insufficient in its uniformity and denseness, which results unstable corrosion resistance. On the other hand, a coating containing P of above 18% makes the Ni-P alloy coating brittle and degrades the adhesiveness of the coating layer. As a result, the separation of coating layer tends to occur during cold rolling stage or the like. Therefore, this invention specifies the P content in the coating layer formed on the steel sheet in a range of from 8 to 18%. The more preferable range is from 10 to 13%.

As described above, the diffused alloy layer consisting essentially of Fe-Ni-P may contain at least one element selected from group consisting of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu to suppress the corrosion of steel and to further improve the denseness and stability of the initial stage rust. In that case, however, the Ni-P coating layer employs a composite of Ni-P with at least one element selected from group consisting of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu in an amount of up to 15%. The corrosion resistance increases with the increase of the content of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu. However, when the sum of the added amount of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu exceeds 15%, the adhesiveness of the coating layer degrades, and likely generates the separation of coating layer during cold rolling or the like. Therefore, the content of the sum of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu is specified as up to 15%. A preferable lower limit of the sum of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu to perform the effect of the addition is 0.5%.

The coating weight of the Ni-P alloy layer is specified as 0.05 g/m² to 8 g/m². The coating weight of less than 0.05 g/m² gives insufficient improvement of corrosion resistance, and the coating weight of above 8 g/m² degrades the workability of coating layer and induces separation of the layer. Furthermore, an excess coating weight needs to slow the line speed, which is a disadvantage in production yield.

Several methods for forming Ni-P alloy coating layer have been introduced. Among them, the electroplating or electroless coating (chemical coating) are preferred from the viewpoint of simplicity of operation and quality of obtained film.

The next step is the heat treatment of the steel sheet coated with Ni-P alloy layer in a non-oxidizing atmosphere to form a diffused alloy layer consisting essentially of Fe-Ni-P at the interface of the base steel sheet and the Ni-P coating layer. The heat treatment for diffusion also performs the ordinary annealing after the cold rolling, and the heat treatment may be done in a common annealing facility employed for annealing. In particular, a continuous annealing which offers a high productivity is preferred. The continuous annealing may be conducted in a continuous annealing facility for common rolled steel sheets or may be conducted in an annealing facility as the pre-treating unit of hot dip coating line. The continuous annealing preferably uses the heating by a direct firing furnace at a heating speed of 50°C/sec. or more.

According to the first aspect of the invention a preferred maximum steel sheet temperature during the heat treatment is from 500 to 880 °C, and more preferably from 800 to 880°C. The heat treatment at below 500 °C can not form a sufficient diffused layer between the Ni-P alloy coating layer and the steel sheet surface, and the insufficient dense-rust formation during the corrosion process gives only a small effect for improving corrosion resistance. On the other hand, the heat treatment at above 880°C tends to induce a pickup of coating material to the surface of the rolls in the heat treatment furnace, which may cause the surface flaw on the steel sheets. Furthermore, the annealing at above 880 °C induces the growth of coarse ferrite grains which may cause rough surface after press-forming. A preferred range of holding time at the maximum temperature of the steel sheet is 1 to 120sec., though the holding time depends on the temperature of the steel sheet. Too short holding time results in an insufficient diffused layer, which can not give the effect to improve the corrosion resistance. A holding time above 120sec. induces an excessive diffusion alloying, which results in a brittle interface layer to degrade the adhesiveness and workability of the coating layer. A preferable depth of appropriate diffused layer formed by the heat treatment is in an approximate range of from 0.1 to 20µm. During the heat treatment, an excessive aging for several minutes at a temperature range of approximately from 300 to 400 °C may be applied.

When a Ni-P alloy coating layer undergoes heat treatment, two types of coating structure appear. The one is that a part of the Ni-P alloy coating layer forms a diffused alloy layer and forms the steel sheet / diffused alloy layer / Ni-P alloy coating layer structure. The other is that all the Ni-P alloy coating layer forms a diffused alloy layer to give the steel sheet / diffused alloy layer structure. This invention includes both cases. After the heat treatment for diffusion, a temper rolling is conducted under an appropriate condition, at need.

The produced steel sheets of this invention following the method described above have excellent corrosion resistance and are applicable in a wide field including automobiles, building materials, and electric equipment where a high corrosion resistance is requested.

EXAMPLE

The following are embodiments according to the first aspect of this invention.

EXAMPLE-1:

The steels having the chemical composition listed in Table 1 were melted to form slabs, heated, and hot-rolled to prepare the hot-rolled steel sheets having the thickness of 4.Omm. The steel sheets were pickled and cold-rolled to obtain the steel sheets of 0.8mm thick. The cold-rolled steel sheets were coated by Ni-P layer shown in Table 2, and were subjected to diffusion-heat treatment which also acted as annealing, and to temper-rolling to obtain the test pieces.

The test pieces prepared were evaluated in terms of corrosion resistance and workability. The method and criteria of the evaluation are the following.

(Method and criteria of evaluation) (1) Corrosion resistance

The test piece without painting is allowed to stand for 60 days under the corrosive condition of repeated drying and humidifying combined with salt water spraying. The resulted corrosion depth was measured to evaluate in accordance with the criterion given below.

○ : the maximum corrosion depth is 0.2mm or less

Δ : the maximum corrosion depth is deeper than 0.2mm and not deeper than 0.4mm

X : the maximum corrosion depth is deeper than 0.4mm

(2) Workability

The test piece undergoes the 180 degree bending test to observe the damage of coating layer at the tip of bend. The evaluation was given in accordance with the following criterion.

○ : no damage or only fine cracks are observed

Δ : large crack is observed or partial separation of coating layer is observed

X : coating separation is observed in a wide range

The evaluation results are summarized in Table 3 through Table 7. The designation of "Example" in these tables means that the case fully satisfies all the requirements of this invention, and the designation of "Comparative Example" means that either one of the requirements of this invention comes out of scope thereof.

Those tables prove that Examples are superior to Comparative Examples in both items of corrosion resistance and workability.

EXAMPLE-2:

Among the steels shown in Table 1, the steels No. 1 through 3 which satisfy the requirement of this invention were melted to form slabs. The slabs were heated to hot-roll into the hot-rolled steel sheets of 4.0mm thick. After pickled, these steel sheets were cold-rolled to obtain the steel sheets of 0.8mm thick. The cold-rolled steel sheets were separately subjected to Ni-P coating of A through C, and M through O, which are given in Table 3. Then these steel sheets were treated by diffusion-heat treatment and refining-rolling to prepare the test pieces.

The test pieces prepared by the above procedure were evaluated in terms of corrosion resistance and workability using the method and criteria described above. The result is summarized in Table 8. Similar to Tables 3 to 7, the case designated by "Example" satisfies all the requirements of this invention, and the case designated by "Comparative Example" dissatisfies either one of the requirements of this invention.

As Table 8 clearly shows, Examples are superior to Comparative Examples in both items of corrosion resistance and workability.

According to this aspect of the invention, a steel sheet having the basic composition of controlled S content and small amount of Cu, B, and Ti, is employed, and a diffused alloy layer consisting essentially of Fe-Ni-P is formed on the steel sheet. With the structure, this invention provides a surface treated steel sheet giving a low production cost and having excellent corrosion resistance while maintaining the superior workability, and provides a method for producing the steel sheet.

	P wt.%	Other component wt.%	Coating weight g/m²
A	8	-	1.0
B	12	-	0.1
C	12	-	1.0
D	12	-	8.0
E	12	12% Cu	1.0
F	12	8% Mo	1.0
G	12	12% W	1.0
H	12	5% Cr	1.0
I	12	1% Mo-5% Cu	1.0
J	12	8% Cu-5% Cr	1.0
K	12	8% Cu-5% W	1.0
L	18	-	1.0
M	12	-	0.06
N	6	-	1.0
O	12	-	0.05
P	12	-	10.0
Q	12	16% W	1.0
R	12	16% Mo	1.0
S	12	8% Cu-16% W	1.0
T	12	8% Cu-16% Mo	1.0
U	-	-	-

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Corrosion resistsnce	Workability	I or C
1	1	A	○	○	I
2	2	A	○	○	I
3	3	A	○	○	I
4	4	A	○	○	I
5	5	A	○	○	I
6	6	A	○	○	I
7	7	A	Δ	○	C
8	8	A	Δ	○	C
9	9	A	Δ	○	C
10	1	B	○	○	I
11	2	B	○	○	I
12	3	B	○	○	I
13	4	B	○	○	I
14	5	B	○	○	I
15	6	B	○	○	I
16	7	B	Δ	○	C
17	8	B	Δ	○	C
18	9	B	Δ	○	C
19	1	C	○	○	I
20	2	C	○	○	I
21	3	C	○	○	I
22	4	C	○	○	I
23	5	C	○	○	I
24	6	C	○	○	I
25	7	C	Δ	○	C
26	8	C	Δ	○	C
27	9	C	Δ	○	C
28	1	D	○	○	I
29	2	D	○	○	I
30	3	D	○	○	I
31	4	D	○	○	I
32	5	D	○	○	I
33	6	D	○	○	I
34	7	D	Δ	○	C
35	8	D	Δ	○	C
36	9	D	Δ	○	C

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Corrosion resistsnce	Workability	I r C
37	1	E	○	○	I
38	2	E	○	○	I
39	3	E	○	○	I
40	4	E	○	○	I
41	5	E	○	○	I
42	6	E	○	○	I
43	7	E	Δ	○	C
44	8	E	Δ	○	C
45	9	E	Δ	○	C
46	1	F	○	○	I
47	2	F	○	○	I
48	3	F	○	○	I
49	4	F	○	○	I
50	5	F	○	○	I
51	6	F	○	○	I
52	7	F	Δ	○	C
53	8	F	Δ	○	C
54	9	F	Δ	○	C
55	1	G	○	○	I
56	2	G	○	○	I
57	3	G	○	○	I
58	4	G	○	○	I
59	5	G	○	○	I
60	6	G	○	○	I
61	7	G	Δ	○	C
62	8	G	Δ	○	C
63	9	G	Δ	○	C
64	1	H	○	○	I
65	2	H	○	○	I
66	3	H	○	○	I
67	4	H	○	○	I
68	5	H	○	○	I
69	6	H	○	○	I
70	7	H	Δ	○	C
71	8	H	Δ	○	C
72	9	H	Δ	○	C

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Corrosion resistance	Workability	I or C
73	1	I	○	○	I
74	2	I	○	○	I
75	3	I	○	○	I
76	4	I	○	○	I
77	5	I	○	○	I
78	6	I	○	○	I
79	7	I	Δ	○	C
80	8	I	Δ	○	C
81	9	I	Δ	○	C
82	1	J	○	○	I
83	2	J	○	○	I
84	3	J	○	○	I
85	4	J	○	○	I
86	5	J	○	○	I
87	6	J	○	○	I
88	7	J	Δ	○	C
89	8	J	Δ	○	C
90	9	J	Δ	○	C
91	1	K	○	○	I
92	2	K	○	○	I
93	3	K	○	○	I
94	4	K	○	○	I
95	5	K	○	○	I
96	6	K	○	○	I
97	7	K	Δ	○	C
98	8	K	Δ	○	C
99	9	K	Δ	○	C
100	1	L	○	○	I
101	2	L	○	○	I
102	3	L	○	○	I
103	4	L	○	○	I
104	5	L	○	○	I
105	6	L	○	○	I
106	7	L	Δ	○	C
107	8	L	Δ	○	C
108	9	L	Δ	○	C
109	1	M	○	○	I
110	2	M	○	○	I
111	3	M	○	○	I
112	4	M	○	○	I
113	5	M	○	○	I
114	6	M	○	○	I
115	7	M	Δ	○	C
116	8	M	Δ	○	C
117	9	M	Δ	○	C

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Corrosion resistance	Workability	I or C
118	1	N	Δ	○	C
119	2	N	Δ	○	C
120	3	N	Δ	○	C
121	4	N	Δ	○	C
122	5	N	Δ	○	C
123	6	N	Δ	○	C
124	7	N	×	○	C
125	8	N	×	○	C
126	9	N	×	○	C
127	1	O	×	○	C
128	2	O	×	○	C
129	3	O	×	○	C
130	4	O	×	○	C
131	5	O	×	○	C
132	6	O	×	○	C
133	7	O	×	○	C
134	8	O	×	○	C
135	9	O	×	○	C
136	1	P	○	×	C
137	2	P	○	×	C
138	3	P	○	×	C
139	4	P	○	×	C
140	5	P	○	×	C
141	6	P	○	×	C
142	7	P	○	×	C
143	8	P	○	×	C
144	9	P	○	×	C
146	1	Q	○	×	C
146	2	Q	○	×	C
147	3	Q	○	×	C
148	4	Q	○	×	C
149	5	Q	○	×	C
150	6	Q	○	×	C
151	7	Q	○	×	C
152	8	Q	○	×	C
153	9	Q	○	×	C

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Corrosion resistance	Workability	I or C
145	1	R	○	×	C
146	2	R	○	×	C
147	3	R	○	×	C
148	4	R	○	×	C
149	5	R	○	×	C
150	6	R	○	×	C
151	7	R	○	×	C
152	8	R	○	×	C
153	9	R	○	×	C
154	1	S	○	×	C
155	2	S	○	×	C
156	3	S	○	×	C
157	4	S	○	×	C
158	5	S	○	×	C
159	6	S	○	×	C
160	7	S	○	×	C
161	8	S	○	×	C
162	9	S	○	×	C
163	1	T	○	×	C
164	2	T	○	×	C
165	3	T	○	×	C
166	4	T	○	×	C
167	5	T	○	×	C
168	6	T	○	×	C
169	7	T	○	×	C
170	8	T	○	×	C
171	9	T	○	×	C
172	1	U	×	-	C
173	2	U	×	-	C
174	3	U	×	-	C
175	4	U	×	-	C
176	5	U	×	-	C
177	6	U	×	-	C
178	7	U	×	-	C
179	8	U	×	-	C
180	9	U	×	-	C

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating wt.%	Corrosion resistance 100 cycle	Workability	I or C
1	1	A	○	○	I
2	2	A	○	○	I
3	3	A	○	○	I
4	1	B	○	○	I
5	2	B	○	○	I
6	3	B	○	○	I
7	1	C	○	○	I
8	2	C	○	○	I
9	3	C	○	○	I
10	1	N	×	○	C
11	2	N	×	○	C
12	3	N	×	○	C
13	1	O	×	○	C
14	2	O	×	○	C
15	3	P	×	○	C
16	1	P	○	×	C
17	2	P	○	×	C
18	3	B	○	×	C

EMBODIMENT - 2:

Embodiment - 2 uses the steel sheets having the composition specified in Embodiment - 1 to form a diffused alloy layer consisting mainly of Fe-Ni-P. That type of diffused alloy layer protects the base steel from corrosion, and promptly densifies the iron corrosion product which is formed after the corrosion of the base steel begins. As a result, excellent corrosion resistance which could not be obtained in prior arts is achieved.

The diffused alloy layer consisting essentially of Fe-Ni-P may further contain at least one element selected from the group consisting of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu. Those elements play a role of inhibitor to the steel corrosion and also has an effect of improving the densification and stabilization of initial stage rust by a synergistic effect with Ni and P.

The formation of that type of diffused alloy layer gives an anti-pitting effect under a severe condition described before. However, it is not sufficient to suppress the rust generation resulted from a damage on external coating caused by jumping stone or the like.

To give a post-painting corrosion resistance, this invention applies a coating on the diffused alloy layer, which coating is Zn coating or a coating using Zn as the matrix and containing at least one metal of Ni, Fe, Co, Cr, Mn, Ti, Mo, Si or Al, or at least one oxide of Ni, Fe, Co, Cr, Mn, Ti, Mo, Si in a form of alloy or dispersed particles.

That type of coating contributes to the corrosion resistance during the process of coating corrosion owing to the sacrifice corrosion protection of the coating. It also gives an effect of stabilizing and densifying the base iron during the corrosion of base iron owing to the synergistic effect of the components in the Zn matrix and the components such as Ni and P in the diffused alloy layer.

A preferable zinc coating weight is from 5 to 60g/m². Too small coating weight can not give sufficient corrosion resistance, and excessive coating weight degrades the workability of coating layer and increases the production cost. The most preferable coating weight is from 5 to 45 g/m².

Following is the condition for producing the steel sheet of this invention.

According to the invention, the steel sheet having the composition described above undergoes de-scaling by pickling treatment, and is coated with a Ni-P alloy layer containing P of 8 to 18 wt.% to form a diffused alloy layer. The coating is applied before the annealing, and it may be applied immediately after the pickling at the exit of the pickling line before the cold rolling or may be applied after the cold rolling succeeding to the pickling. Particularly when the coating is given before the cold rolling, there appears an advantage that no pickling is required as the cleaning and activating the sheet before coating.

The Ni-P alloy coating containing P of 8 to 18% forms an amorphous-like structure. When a steel sheet having that type of coating layer is subjected to heat treatment, a uniform diffused alloy layer is formed within a short period compared with the case of common crystalline coating layers. A Ni-P alloy coating layer containing P of less than 8% forms a crystalline structure and gives non-uniform P distribution. As a result, that type of coating layer has non-uniform composition of diffused alloy layer when it is subjected to heat treatment, and the initial stage rust is insufficient in its uniformity and denseness, which gives unstable corrosion resistance. On the other hand, a coating layer containing P of above 18% makes the Ni-P alloy coating brittle and degrades the adhesiveness of the coating layer. Accordingly, that type of coating layer tends to separate from the base steel sheet during cold rolling or the like. Consequently, the P content of the coating layer formed on the steel sheet of this invention is specified in a range of from 8 to 18%. More preferable range is from 10 to 13%.

As described above, the diffused alloy layer consisting essentially of Fe-Ni-P may contain at least one element selected from the group consisting of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu to suppress the corrosion of steel and to further improve the denseness and stability of the initial stage rust. In that case, however, the Ni-P coating layer employs a composite of Ni-P with at least one element selected from the group consisting of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu in an amount of up to 15%. The corrosion resistance increases with the increase of the content of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu. However, when the sum of the added amount of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu exceeds 15%, the adhesiveness of the coating layer degrades, and likely generates the separation of coating layer during cold rolling or the like. Therefore, the content of the sum of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu is specified as 15% or less. A preferable lower limit of the sum of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu to perform the effect of the addition is 0.5%.

The coating weight of the Ni-P alloy layer is specified as 0.05 g/m² to 8 g/m². The coating weight of less than 0.05 m² gives insufficient improvement of corrosion resistance, and the coating weight of above 8 g/m² degrades the workability of coating layer and induces separation of the layer. Furthermore, an excess coating weight needs to slow the line speed, which is a disadvantage in production yield.

The next step is the heat treatment of the steel sheet coated with Ni-P alloy layer in a non-oxidizing atmosphere to form a diffused alloy layer consisting essentially of Fe-Ni-P at the interface of the base steel sheet and the Ni-P alloy coating layer. The heat treatment for diffusion also performs the ordinary annealing after the cold rolling, and the heat treatment may be done in a common annealing facility employed for annealing. In particular, a continuous annealing which offers a high productivity is preferred. The continuous annealing may be conducted in a continuous annealing facility for common rolled steel sheets or may be conducted in an annealing facility as the pre-treating unit of hot dip coating line. The continuous annealing preferably uses the heating by a direct-firing furnace at a heating speed of 50 °C/ sec. or more.

According to the first aspect of the invention a preferred maximum steel sheet temperature during the heat treatment is from 500 to 880 °C, and more preferably from 800 to 880 °C. The heat treatment at below 500 °C can not form a sufficient diffused layer between the Ni-P alloy coating layer and the steel sheet surface, and the insufficient dense rust formation during the corrosion process gives only a small effect for improving corrosion resistance. On the other hand, the heat treatment at above 880 °C tends to induce a pickup of coating metal to the surface of the rolls in the heat treatment furnace, which may cause the surface defects on the steel sheets. Furthermore, the annealing at above 880 °C induces the growth of coarse ferrite grains which may cause rough surface after press-forming. A preferred range of holding time at the maximum temperature of the steel sheet is 1 to 120 sec., though the holding time depends on the temperature of the steel sheet. Too short holding time results in an insufficient diffused layer, which can not give the effect to improve the corrosion resistance. A holding time above 120 sec. induces an excessive diffusion alloying, which results in a brittle interface layer to degrade the adhesiveness and workability of the coating layer. A preferable depth of appropriate diffused layer formed by the heat treatment is in an approximate range of from 0.1 to 20 µm. During the heat treatment, an excessive aging for several minutes at a temperature range of approximately from 300 to 400 °C may be applied.

When a Ni-P alloy coating layer undergoes heat treatment, two types of coating structure appear. The one is that a part of the Ni-P alloy coating layer forms a diffused alloy layer and forms the steel sheet / diffused alloy layer / Ni-P alloy coating layer structure. The other is that all the Ni-P alloy coating layer forms a diffused alloy layer to give the steel sheet / diffused alloy layer structure. This invention includes both cases.

After the heat treatment for diffusion, a temper rolling is conducted under an appropriate condition, at need.

The steel sheet treated by the above-described procedure is further subjected to zinc electroplating or zinc hot dip coating in a zinc coating line.

Zinc electroplating bath may be sulfuric acid bath or chloride bath which are widely used. For further improvement of corrosion resistance, a chromate treatment may be applied on the zinc electroplating layer, and further an organic composite resin coating may be applied. As for the chromate treatment, either one of reaction type, electrolysis type, and application type is applicable. The chromate film may contain organic compound such as acrylic resin, oxide colloid such as silica colloid and alumina colloid, acid such as molybdenum acid, salt, or other corrosion-resistance-improving agent. The organic resin film which coats the chromate film may use epoxy resin as the base resin. The organic resin film preferably further contains an inhibitor additive such as silica and chromate at an approximate range of from 10 to 60 wt.%.

The steel sheet of this invention treated as described above has an excellent corrosion resistance and an excellent deep drawing performance, and the sheet is quite suitable as an automobile material.

EXAMPLE:

The following is the description of the Example of this invention.

EXAMPLE - 3:

The steels having the chemical composition listed in Table 9 were melted to slabs, heated, and hot-rolled to prepare the hot-rolled steel sheets having the thickness of 4.0 mm. The steel sheets were pickled and cold-rolled to obtain the steel sheets of 0.8 mm thick. The cold-rolled steel sheets were coated by Ni-P layer shown in "A" through "Q" of Table 10, and were subjected to diffusion heat treatment which also acted as annealing, to temper-rolling, and to Zn coating shown in Table 11 to obtain the test pieces.

The test pieces prepared were evaluated in terms of corrosion resistance, paintability, and workability. The method and criteria of the evaluation are the following.

(Method and criteria of evaluation) (1) Corrosion resistance

The test piece without painting is allowed to stand for 60 days under the corrosive condition of repeated drying and humidifying combined with salt solution spraying. The resulted corrosion depth was measured to evaluate in accordance with the criterion given below.

○ : the maximum corrosion depth is deeper than 0.05 mm and not deeper than 0.1 mm

Δ : the maximum corrosion depth is deeper than 0.1 mm and not deeper than 0.2 mm

X : the maximum corrosion depth is deeper than 0.2 mm

(2) Paintability

The steel sheet is subjected to phosphate treatment and cation electrocoating. The coating layer is cut to the base steel surface using a knife, and the steel sheet is exposed to the environment of (1) for 100 days. The blister generated at the cut area is observed and evaluated in accordance with the criterion given below.

○ : the maximum blister width per side is 1 mm or less,

Δ : the maximum blister width per side is over 1 mm and 3 mm or less,

X : the maximum blister width per side is over 3 mm.

(3) Workability

The test piece undergoes the 180 degree bending test to observe the damage of coating layer at the tip of bent. The evaluation is given in accordance with the following criterion.

○ : no damage or only fine cracks are observed

Δ : large crack is observed or partial separation of coating layer is observed

X : coating separation is observed in a wide range

The evaluation results are summarized in Table 12 through Table 19. The designation of "Example" in these tables means that the case fully satisfies all the requirements of this invention, and the designation of "Comparative Example" means that either one of the requirements of this invention comes out of scope thereof.

As these tables clearly show, Examples are superior to Comparative Examples in all items of corrosion resistance, paintability, and workability.

EXAMPLE-4:

The steels having the chemical composition listed in Table 9 as the steel No. 1 to 3 were melted to slabs, heated, and hot-rolled to prepare the hot-rolled steel sheets having the thickness of 4.0 mm. The steel sheets were pickled and cold-rolled to obtain the steel sheets of 0.8 mm thick. The cold-rolled steel sheets were coated by Ni-P layer shown in A through C and K through M of Table 10, and were subjected to diffusion heat treatment which also acted as annealing, to temper rolling, and to Zn coating of "a" and "g" listed in Table 11 to obtain the test pieces.

The prepared test pieces were evaluated in terms of corrosion resistance, paintability, and workability by the method and criteria described before. The results are summarized in Table 20. Also in Table 20, similar to Tables 12 through 19, the designation of "Example" in these tables means that the case fully satisfies all the requirements of this invention, and the designation of "Comparative Example" means that either one of the requirements of this invention comes out of scope thereof.

EXAMPLE-5:

The steels No. 1 through 3 in Table 9, which have the chemical composition of this invention were melted to slabs, heated, and hot-rolled to prepare the hot-rolled steel sheets having the thickness of 4.0 mm. The steel sheets were pickled and cold-rolled to obtain the steel sheets of 0.8 mm thick. The cold-rolled steel sheets were coated by Ni-P layer A shown in Table 10, and were subjected to diffusion-heat treatment which also acted as annealing, to temper-rolling, and to Zn coating of h through 1 shown in Table 11 to obtain the test pieces.

The evaluation results are summarized in Table 21. Similar to Tables 12 through 20, the designation of "Example" in Table 21 means that the case fully satisfies all the requirements of this invention, and the designation of "Comparative Example" means that either one of the requirements of this invention comes out of scope thereof.

As clearly shown in Table 21, the steels No. 346 through 348 which contain excess Zn coating weight are inferior in the workability to Examples.

According to the first aspect of the invention, a steel sheet having the basic composition of controlled S content and small amount of Cu, B, and Ti is employed, and a diffused alloy layer consisting essentially of Fe-Ni-P is formed on the steel sheet. With the structure, this invention provides a surface treated steel sheet giving a low production cost and having excellent corrosion resistance with less coating weight while maintaining the superior workability, and provides a method for producing the steel sheet.

	P wt.%	Other constituent wt.%	Coating weight g/m²
A	8	-	1.0
B	12	-	0.1
C	12	-	1.0
D	12	-	8.0
E	12	12% Cu	1,0
F	12	8% Mo	1,0
G	12	12% W	1.0
H	12	5% Cr	1.0
I	12	8%Cu - 5%W	1.0
J	18	-	1.0
K	12	-	0.06
L	6	-	1.0
M	12	-	0.05
N	12	-	10.0
O	12	16%W	1.0
P	12	8%Cu-16%Mo	1.0
Q	-	-	-

	Coating type	Other component wt.%	Coating weight g/m²
a	Electrolytic Zn coating	100% Zn	20.0
b	Electrolytic Zn-Ni coating	12% Ni	5.0
c	Electrolytic Zn-Fe coating	15% Fe	10.0
d	Electrolytic Zn-Cr coating	12% Cr	10.0
e	Electrolytic Zn-Mn coating	60% Mn	10.0
f	Electrolytic Zn-SiO₂ coating	5% SiO₂	10.0
g	Electrolytic Zn-Co-Cr-Alℓ₂O₃ coating	1% Co, 1% Cr, 0.2% A ℓ₂O₃	10.0
h	Electrolytic Zn-Cr(OH)₃ coating	3% Cr(OH)₃	10.0
i	Alloy hot dip Zn coating	11% Fe, 0.13% Aℓ	45.0
j	Hot dip Zn coating	0.15% Aℓ	30.0
k	Alloy hot dip Zn coating	1% Fe, 0.13% Aℓ	60.0
l	Electrolytic Zn coating	100% Zn	70.0

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Zn coating	Corrosion resistance	Paintabitity	Workabilty
1	1	A	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
2	1	A	b	○	○	○
3	1	A	c	○	○	○
4	1	A	d	○	○	○
5	1	A	e	○	○	○
6	1	A	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
7	1	A	g	○	○	×
8	2	A	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
9	2	A	b	○	○	○
10	2	A	c	○	○	○
11	2	A	d	○	○	○
12	2	A	e	○	○	○
13	2	A	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
14	2	A	g	○	○	×
15	3	A	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
16	3	A	b	○	○	○
17	3	A	c	○	○	○
18	3	A	d	○	○	○
19	3	A	e	○	○	○
20	3	A	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
21	3	A	g	○	○	×
22	1	B	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
23	1	B	b	○	○	○
24	1	B	c	○	○	○
25	1	B	d	○	○	○
26	1	B	e	○	○	○
27	1	B	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
28	1	B	g	○	○	×
29	2	B	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
30	2	B	b	○	○	○
31	2	B	c	○	○	○
32	2	B	d	○	○	○
33	2	B	e	○	○	○
34	2	B	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
35	2	B	g	○	○	×
36	3	B	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
37	3	B	b	○	○	○

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Zn coating	Corrosion resistance	Paintabitity	Workabilty
38	3	B	c	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
39	3	B	d	○	○	○
40	3	B	e	○	○	○
41	3	B	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
42	3	B	g	○	○	×
43	1	C	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
44	1	C	b	○	○	○
45	1	C	c	○	○	○
46	1	C	d	○	○	○
47	1	C	e	○	○	○
48	1	C	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
49	1	C	g	○	○	×
50	2	C	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
51	2	C	b	○	○	○
52	2	C	c	○	○	○
53	2	C	d	○	○	○
54	2	C	e	○	○	○
55	2	C	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
56	2	C	g	○	○	×
57	3	C	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
58	3	C	b	○	○	○
59	3	C	c	○	○	○
60	3	C	d	○	○	○
61	3	C	e	○	○	○
62	3	C	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
63	3	C	g	○	○	×
64	4	C	a	Δ	×	○
65	4	C	b	Δ	Δ	○
66	4	C	c	Δ	Δ	○
67	4	C	d	Δ	Δ	○
68	4	C	e	Δ	×	○
69	5	C	a	Δ	×	○
70	5	C	b	Δ	Δ	○
71	5	C	c	Δ	Δ	○
72	5	C	d	Δ	Δ	○
73	5	C	e	Δ	×	○
74	6	C	a	Δ	×	○

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Zn coating	Corrosion resistance	Paintabitity	Workabilty
75	6	C	b	Δ	Δ	○	Comparative examples
76	6	C	c	Δ	Δ	○
77	6	C	d	Δ	Δ	○
78	6	C	e	Δ	×	○
79	1	D	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
80	1	D	b	○	○	○
81	1	D	c	○	○	○
82	1	D	d	○	○	○
83	1	D	e	○	○	○
84	1	D	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
85	1	D	g	○	○	×
86	2	D	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
87	2	D	b	○	○	○
88	2	D	c	○	○	○
89	2	D	d	○	○	○
90	2	D	e	○	○	○
91	2	D	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
92	2	D	g	○	○	×
93	3	D	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
94	3	D	b	○	○	○
95	3	D	c	○	○	○
96	3	D	d	○	○	○
97	3	D	e	○	○	○
98	3	D	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
99	3	D	g	○	○	×
100	1	E	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
101	1	E	b	○	○	○
102	1	E	c	○	○	○
103	1	E	d	○	○	○
104	1	E	e	○	○	○
105	1	E	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
106	1	E	g	○	○	×
107	2	E	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
108	2	E	b	○	○	○
109	2	E	c	○	○	○
110	2	E	d	○	○	○
111	2	E	e	○	○	○

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Zn coating	Corrosion resistance	Paintabitity	Workabilty
112	2	E	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
113	2	E	g	○	○	×
114	3	E	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
115	3	E	b	○	○	○
116	3	E	c	○	○	○
117	3	E	d	○	○	○
118	3	E	e	○	○	○
119	3	E	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
120	3	E	g	○	○	×
121	3	F	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
122	1	F	b	○	○	○
123	1	F	c	○	○	○
124	1	F	d	○	○	○
125	1	F	e	○	○	○
126	1	F	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
127	1	F	g	○	○	×
128	1	F	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
129	2	F	b	○	○	○
130	2	F	c	○	○	○
131	2	F	d	○	○	○
132	2	F	e	○	○	○
133	2	F	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
134	2	F	g	○	○	×
135	3	F	a	○	○	○	Examples the present invention
136	3	F	b	○	○	○
137	3	F	c	○	○	○
138	3	F	d	○	○	○
139	3	F	e	○	○	○
140	3	F	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
141	3	F	g	○	○	×
142	1	G	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
143	1	G	b	○	○	○
144	1	G	c	○	○	○
145	1	G	d	○	○	○
146	1	G	e	○	○	○
147	1	G	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
148	1	G	g	○	○	×

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Zn coating	Corrosion resistance	Paintabitity	Workability
149	2	G	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
150	2	G	b	○	○	○
151	2	G	c	○	○	○
152	2	G	d	○	○	○
153	2	G	e	○	○	○
154	2	G	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
155	2	G	g	○	○	×
156	3	G	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
157	3	G	b	○	○	○
158	3	G	c	○	○	○
159	3	G	d	○	○	○
160	3	G	e	○	○	○
161	3	G	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
162	3	G	g	○	○	×
163	1	H	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
164	1	H	b	○	○	○
165	1	H	c	○	○	○
166	1	H	d	○	○	○
167	1	H	e	○	○	○
168	1	H	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
169	1	H	g	○	○	×
170	2	H	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
171	2	H	b	○	○	○
172	2	H	c	○	○	○
173	2	H	d	○	○	○
174	2	H	e	○	○	○
175	2	H	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
176	2	H	g	○	○	×
177	3	H	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
178	3	H	b	○	○	○
179	3	H	c	○	○	○
180	3	H	d	○	○	○
181	3	H	e	○	○	○
182	3	H	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
183	3	H	g	○	○	×
184	4	H	a	Δ	×	○	Examples of the present invention
185	4	H	b	Δ	Δ	○

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Zn coating	Corrosion resistance	Paintabitity	Workability
186	4	H	c	Δ	○	○	Comparative examples
187	4	H	d	Δ	○	○
188	4	H	e	Δ	×	○	Examples of the present invention
189	5	H	a	Δ	×	○
190	5	H	b	Δ	Δ	○
191	5	H	c	Δ	Δ	○
192	5	H	d	Δ	Δ	○
193	5	H	e	Δ	×	○	Comparative examples
194	6	H	a	Δ	×	○
195	6	H	b	Δ	Δ	○
196	6	H	c	Δ	Δ	○
197	6	H	d	Δ	×	○
198	6	H	e	Δ	○	○
199	1	I	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
200	1	I	b	○	○	○
201	1	I	c	○	○	○
202	1	I	d	○	○	○
203	1	I	e	○	○	○
204	1	I	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
205	1	I	g	○	○	×
206	2	I	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
207	2	I	b	○	○	○
208	2	I	c	○	○	○
209	2	I	d	○	○	○
210	2	I	e	○	○	○
211	2	I	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
212	2	I	g	○	○	×
213	3	I	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
214	3	I	b	○	○	○
215	3	I	c	○	○	○
216	3	I	d	○	○	○
217	3	I	e	○	○	○
218	3	I	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
219	3	I	g	○	○	×
220	4	I	a	Δ	×	○	Examples of the present invention
221	4	I	b	Δ	Δ	○
222	4	I	c	Δ	Δ	○

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Zn coating	Corrosion resistance	Paintabitity	Workabilty
223	4	I	d	Δ	Δ	○	Comparative examples
224	4	I	e	Δ	×	○
225	5	I	a	Δ	×	○
226	5	I	b	Δ	Δ	○
227	5	I	c	Δ	Δ	○
228	5	I	d	Δ	Δ	○
229	5	I	e	Δ	×	○
230	6	I	a	Δ	×	○
231	6	I	b	Δ	Δ	○
232	6	I	c	Δ	Δ	○
233	6	I	d	Δ	Δ	○
234	6	I	e	Δ	×	○
235	1	J	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
236	1	J	b	○	○	○
237	1	J	c	○	○	○
238	1	J	d	○	○	○
239	1	J	e	○	○	○
240	1	J	f	○	○	×	Comparaive examples
241	1	J	g	○	○	×
242	2	J	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
243	2	J	b	○	○	○
244	2	J	c	○	○	○
245	2	J	d	○	○	○
246	2	J	e	○	○	○
247	2	J	f	○	○	×	Comparative examples
248	2	J	g	○	○	×
249	3	J	a	○	○	○	Examples the the present invention
250	3	J	b	○	○	○
251	3	J	c	○	○	○
252	3	J	d	○	○	○
253	3	J	e	○	○	○
254	3	J	f	○	○	×	Comparaive examples
255	3	J	g	○	○	×
256	1	K	a	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
257	1	K	d	○	○	○
258	2	K	a	○	○	○
259	2	K	d	○	○	○
260	3	K	a	○	○	○
261	3	K	d	○	○	○
262	1	L	a	○	Δ	○
263	1	L	d	○	Δ	○
264	2	L	a	○	Δ	○
265	2	L	d	○	Δ	○

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Zn coating	Corrosion resistance	Paintabitity	Workabilty
266	3	L	a	○	Δ	○	Examples of the present invention
267	3	L	d	○	Δ	○
268	1	M	a	Δ	×	○
269	1	M	d	Δ	×	○
270	2	M	a	Δ	×	○
271	2	M	d	Δ	×	○
272	3	M	a	Δ	×	○
273	3	M	d	Δ	×	○
274	1	N	a	○	○	Δ	Comparative examples
275	1	N	d	○	○	Δ
276	2	N	a	○	○	Δ
277	2	N	d	○	○	Δ
278	3	N	a	○	○	Δ
279	3	N	d	○	○	Δ
280	1	O	a	○	○	Δ
281	1	O	d	○	○	Δ
282	2	O	a	○	○	Δ
283	2	O	d	○	○	Δ
284	3	O	a	○	○	Δ
285	3	O	d	○	○	Δ
286	1	P	a	○	○	Δ
287	1	P	d	○	○	Δ
288	2	P	a	○	○	Δ
289	2	P	d	○	○	Δ
290	3	P	a	○	○	Δ
291	3	P	d	○	○	Δ
292	1	Q	a	×	×	○
293	1	Q	d	×	×	○
294	2	Q	a	×	×	○
295	2	Q	d	×	×	○
296	3	Q	a	×	×	○
297	3	Q	d	×	×	○

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Zn coating	Corrosion resistance	Paintabitity	Workabilty
298	1	A	a	○	○	○	Examples of the preswent inventiom
299	1	A	d	○	○	○
300	1	B	a	○	○	○
301	1	B	d	○	○	○
302	1	C	a	○	○	○
303	1	C	d	○	○	○
304	1	L	a	○	Δ	Δ	Comparative examples
305	1	L	d	○	Δ	Δ
306	1	M	a	Δ	×	Δ
307	1	M	d	Δ	×	Δ
308	1	N	a	○	○	×
309	1	N	d	○	○	×
310	2	A	a	○	○	○	Examples of the preswent invention
311	2	A	d	○	○	○
312	2	B	a	○	○	○
313	2	B	d	○	○	○
314	2	C	a	○	○	○
315	2	C	d	○	○	○
316	2	L	a	○	Δ	Δ	Comparative examples
317	2	L	d	○	Δ	Δ
318	2	M	a	Δ	×	Δ
319	2	M	d	Δ	×	Δ
320	2	N	a	○	○	×
321	2	N	d	○	○	×
322	3	A	a	○	○	○	Examples of the preswent the preswent inventiom
323	3	A	d	○	○	○
324	3	B	a	○	○	○
325	3	B	d	○	○	○
326	3	C	a	○	○	○
327	3	C	d	○	○	○
328	3	L	a	○	Δ	Δ	Comparative examples
329	3	L	d	○	Δ	Δ
330	3	M	a	Δ	×	Δ
331	3	M	d	Δ	×	Δ
332	3	N	a	○	○	×
333	3	N	d	○	○	×

No.	Steel sheet	Ni-P coating	Zn coating	Corrosion resistance	Paintabitity	Workability
334	1	A	h	○	○	○	Examples of the present invention
335	2	A	h	○	○	○
336	3	A	h	○	○	○
337	1	A	i	○	○	○
338	2	A	i	○	○	○
339	3	A	i	○	○	○
340	1	A	j	○	○	○
341	2	A	j	○	○	○
342	3	A	j	○	○	○
343	1	A	k	○	○	○
344	2	A	k	○	○	○
345	3	A	k	○	○	○
346	1	A	I	○	○	×	Comparative examples
347	2	A	I	○	○	×
348	3	A	I	○	○	×

EMBODIMENT-3:

Detail description of the second aspect of this invention is given below.

The following is the description of the reason to limit the composition of the steel (hereinafter the composition unit is expressed by wt.%).

C: The content of C is from 0.001 to 0.006%.

Smaller C content is preferred to maintain superior mechanical characteristics of the material. Accordingly, the upper limit of C content not degrading the effect of the invention is specified as 0.006%. Regarding the lower limit, an excessively low C content gives not much improve in the workability, and a very low C content needs to be compensated by the addition of other elements, which causes a cost increase. So the lower limit of C content is specified as 0.001%.

Si: The content of Si is less than 0.35%.

Silicon contributes to the strengthening of steel sheet as a solid-solution hardening element without degrading the press-formability. However, excess Si content degrades the formability and also degrades the coating capability, so the Si content is specified as less than 0.35%.

Mn: The content of Mn is from 0.05 to 0.5%.

Manganese is necessary to fix S which is unavoidably included in steel and to prevent red shortness. Accordingly, the lower limit is specified as 0.05%. Addition of more than 0.5% Mn significantly degrades Lankford value, and is disadvantage in terms of cost. So the upper limit is specified as 0.5%.

P: The content of P is from 0.03 to 0.08%.

Phosphorus is a most inexpensive element to strengthen the steel, and is an element to improve the corrosion resistance of the steel itself. When an IF steel is used as the base material and when P is included more than 0.1%, the steel increases the strength and tends to segregate P at grain boundaries, which induces a problem of poor secondary working. Therefore, the P content is specified as 0.08% or less. On the other hand, for the contribution to corrosion resistance, the P content of 0.03% is required, so the lower limit is specified as 0.03%.

S: The content of S is 0.01% or less.

The S content above 0.01% degrades the ductile property of steel and gives a bad effect to corrosion resistance. So the S content is specified as 0.01% or less. More preferably the S content is 0.007% or less.

sol. Al: The content of sol.Al is from 0.01 to 0.1%.

Aluminum is necessary for de-oxidation and for fixing N. However, excess addition of sol. Al increases the product cost and degrades the surface quality owing to the increase of alumina inclusion. As a result, the sol. Al content is specified in 0.01 to 0.1%.

N: The content of N is 0.0035% or less.

To attain a high Lankford value, less N content is preferred. The upper limit of N content is specified at 0.0035% as the range not degrading the effect according to this aspect of the invention.

Cu: The content of Cu is from 0.1 to 0.5%.

When Cu is added with P, it improves the corrosion resistance of steel itself. The effect appears at 0.1% or more of the content. An excess addition of Cu degrades the deep drawing performance, and tends to induce thermal cracks during hot rolling caused by a surface defect or by coexistence with Sn. So the upper limit is specified as 0.5%.

Ni: The content of Ni is from 0.1 to 0.5%.

Nickel is an effective element to reduce the surface defects caused by the addition of Cu, and to improve the corrosion resistance. Excess addition of Ni, however, degrades the deep drawing performance and increases the product cost. Accordingly, the lower limit is specified as 0.1%, and the upper limit is specified as 0.5%.

Ti: The content of Ti is from 0.01 to 0.06%.

Titanium is an essential element to prevent the degradation of material quality caused by C solid solution and N solid solution. For this purpose, the addition of 0.01% or more Ti is required. The addition of more than 0.06% Ti does not give further effect and induces disadvantage in cost. Therefore, the range of Ti content is specified from 0.01 to 0.06%. To precipitate and fix the C solid solution and N solid solution in steel completely, the following conditions have to be satisfied. 4 x C < Ti - (48/14) x N - (48/32) x S,

Nb : The content of Nb is from 0.003 to 0.015%, and the equation of 0.004 ≦ Nb x (10 x P + Cu + Ni) is satisfied.

Combined addition of Nb with Cu and P enhances the growth of passive film, improves the anti-pitting property, and decreases the anisotropy of rm value. The effect diminishes at the Nb content of less than 0.003%. When the Nb content exceeds 0.015%, the effect saturates and the re-crystallizing temperature of steel increases, and increases the cost. Consequently, the content of Nb is specified in 0.003 to 0.015%. The effect does not appear when Nb exists as a precipitate. In other words, Nb is necessary to exist as a solid solution in steel. In the steel according to this aspect of the invention, Ti reacts with C, N, and S, so all of Nb is in a state of solid solution in steel.

Less P, Cu, and Ni content weaken the passive film, so the amount of Nb to improve the anti-pitting characteristic is needed to compensate the insufficient amount of P, Cu, and Ni. In concrete terms, the necessary amount of Nb is defined as: 0.004 ≦ Nb x (10 x P + 2 X Cu + Ni).

As for the effect of Nb on anti-pitting performance, a test method described after in an example is employed to compare the ordinary steel sheet, corrosion resistant steel containing 0.4% Cu, 0.05% P, 0.2% Ni as the base (Comparative steel), with the steel further containing 0.010% Nb (Example according to this aspect of invention) for the maximum erosion depth and the mass loss. The result is shown in Fig. 2. The anti-pitting performance based on the ratio of the maximum erosion depth to the mass loss is compared between the corrosion resistant steel containing 0.4% Cu, 0.05% P, 0.2% Ni as the base (Comparative steel) and the steel with different Nb content (Example of this invention). The result is shown in Fig. 4. Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 show that the corrosion resistant steel sheet without containing Nb gives similar anti-pitting performance with ordinary steel sheet (SPCC) and that the corrosion resistant steel sheet containing Nb solid solution gives significantly superior anti-pitting performance.

B: The content of B is from 0.0002 to 0.002%, and is selected as (P/200) < B.

Boron is effective for improving the secondary working brittleness. A steel of this invention containing P tends to induce secondary working brittleness. Accordingly, B gives a significant effect to that type of steel. However, the effect is not performed below 0.0002% of P content. The P content of more than 0.002% hardens the steel so that the specified range of the B content is settled as given above. The reason to adopt the limitation, (P/200) < B, is to reduce the effect of P to make the steel brittle.

The above described composition of steel gives sufficient corrosion resistance to the steel sheet. However, the corrosion resistance is not satisfactory for automobile steel sheets which are used under a severe environment.

For obtaining further corrosion resistance and mechanical characteristics, this invention forms a diffused alloy layer consisting of Fe-Ni-P on a steel sheet having the composition above described. The Ni-P alloy coating containing P of 8 to 18% forms an amorphous-like structure. When a steel sheet having that type of coating is subjected to heat treatment, a uniform diffused alloy layer is formed within a short period compared with the case of common crystalline coating layers. The diffused alloy layer protects the base steel material from corrosion and, once the corrosion of the base steel sheet begins, makes the iron corrosion product promptly dense structure. As a result, the steel sheet obtains excellent corrosion resistance which could not attained in the prior arts.

A Ni-P coating containing P of less than 8% forms a crystalline layer and gives non-uniform P distribution. As a result, that type of coating has non-uniform composition of diffused alloy layer when it is subjected to heat treatment, and the initial stage rust is insufficient in its uniformity and denseness, which gives unstable corrosion resistance. On the other hand, a coating containing P of above 18% makes the Ni-P alloy coating brittle and degrades the adhesiveness of the coating layer.

As a result, that type of coating tends to separate from the base steel sheet during heat treatment. Therefore, the P content of the coating layer formed on the steel sheet of this invention is specified to 8 to 18%. Preferred range is from 8 to 15%, and more preferable range is from 10 to 13%.

The Ni-P alloy coating composition may further contain at least one element selected from the group consisting of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu to form a composite alloy coating. Those additional elements play a role of inhibitor to steel corrosion and show an effect to improve the denseness and stability of initial stage rust by the synergistic effect with Ni and P. Regarding the content of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu, a preferred content of the sum of them is not more than 15%. The corrosion resistance increases with the increase of the content of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu.

However, when the sum of the added amount of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu exceeds 15%, the adhesiveness of the coating layer degrades, and likely generates the separation of coating layer in the succeeding steps. Therefore, the content of the sum of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu is specified as 15% or less. A preferable lower limit of the sum of W, Mo, Cr, and Cu to perform the effect of the addition is 0.5%.

The coating weight of the Ni-P layer is not specifically defined. Nevertheless, a preferable range is from 0.1 to 8 g/m². The coating weight of less than 0.1 g/m² gives insufficient improvement of corrosion resistance, and the coating weight of above 8g/m² degrades the workability of coating layer and induces separation of the layer. Furthermore, excess coating weight needs to slow the line speed, which is a disadvantage in production yield.

When the steel sheets described above satisfy the condition of surface roughness given below, the corrosion resistance further improves.
Rz (µm) : 1 to 8, and Rz x S / (10 x P + 2 x Cu + Ni) ≦ 0.025. Increase of the surface roughness degrades the corrosion resistance. Therefore, Rz ≦ 8 µm is specified. However, Rz less than 1 µm only increases the cost and does not affect the corrosion resistance. Accordingly, Rz ≦ 1 µm is preferred. The effect of Rz on the corrosion resistance differs with steel composition, and when the condition, Rz x S / (10 x P + 2 x Cu + Ni) ≦ 0.25 is satisfied, the corrosion resistance further improves. The relation of Rz x S / (10 x P + 2 x Cu + Ni) and the mass loss is shown in Fig. 4. From the figure, the range of Rz x S / (10 x P + 2 x Cu + Ni) > 0.025 gives an inferior corrosion resistance. Also the figure shows that the steel No. 15 without Nb gives a slightly inferior corrosion resistance to the steels of this invention.

The following is a preferred condition for producing the cold-rolled steel sheets according to the second aspect of the invention which are described above. A steel having the composition shown before is formed into a slab by, for example, continuous casting method or ingot making method, and the slab is treated by the following procedure.