EP0601688B1 - Gasturbine engine flow mixer sound suppression means - Google Patents

Gasturbine engine flow mixer sound suppression means Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0601688B1
EP0601688B1 EP93306083A EP93306083A EP0601688B1 EP 0601688 B1 EP0601688 B1 EP 0601688B1 EP 93306083 A EP93306083 A EP 93306083A EP 93306083 A EP93306083 A EP 93306083A EP 0601688 B1 EP0601688 B1 EP 0601688B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
chute
chutes
airflow
exhaust gases
septum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP93306083A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0601688A1 (en
Inventor
William Hand Brown
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
General Electric Co
Original Assignee
General Electric Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by General Electric Co filed Critical General Electric Co
Publication of EP0601688A1 publication Critical patent/EP0601688A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0601688B1 publication Critical patent/EP0601688B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02KJET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F02K1/00Plants characterised by the form or arrangement of the jet pipe or nozzle; Jet pipes or nozzles peculiar thereto
    • F02K1/38Introducing air inside the jet
    • F02K1/383Introducing air inside the jet with retractable elements
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02KJET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F02K1/00Plants characterised by the form or arrangement of the jet pipe or nozzle; Jet pipes or nozzles peculiar thereto
    • F02K1/78Other construction of jet pipes
    • F02K1/82Jet pipe walls, e.g. liners
    • F02K1/827Sound absorbing structures or liners

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to gas turbine engines, and, more specifically, to sound suppression of exhaust gases therefrom.
  • An aircraft gas turbine engine discharges exhaust gases in a jet at high velocity for propelling the aircraft in flight.
  • the exhaust gases expand into the ambient air upon discharge from the engine and generate considerable jet noise.
  • Various techniques are known for reducing jet noise including specially designed exhaust nozzles for reducing noise due to shock waves; convergent-divergent (CD) nozzles to reduce noise due to shock waves; suppressor nozzles to shift generated noise to frequencies that are more readily absorbed by the atmosphere or acoustic liners; ejectors for mixing the exhaust gases with ambient airflow to reduce the mean jet velocity and, thereby, noise; and porous plug nozzles to promote mutual cancellation between expansion and compression waves.
  • CD convergent-divergent
  • US-A-4 240 252 discloses a mixer for mixing gas turbine exhaust gases with air by means of alternating hot and cold chutes in order to suppress noise.
  • a gas turbine engine flow mixer includes at least one chute having first and second spaced apart sidewalls joined together at a leading edge, with the sidewalls having first and second traling edges defining therebetween a chute outlet.
  • the first trailing edge is spaced longitudinally downstream from the second trailing edge for defining a septum in the first sidewall extending downstream from the second traling edge.
  • the septum includes a plurality of noise attenuating apertures.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic representation of an exemplary turbofan gas turbine engine for powering an aircraft in flight which includes a sound suppression mixer in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a transverse, partly sectional view of the exhaust nozzle of the engine illustrated in Figure 1 showing in more particularity a plurality of spaced apart mixer chutes taken along line 2-2.
  • FIG 3 is a perspective view of an exemplary one of the chutes illustrated in Figures 1 and 2.
  • Figure 4 is a transverse sectional view of adjacent ones of the chutes illustrated in Figure 1 taken along line 4-4.
  • FIG. 1 Illustrated schematically in Figure 1 is an exemplary turbofan gas turbine engine 10 effective for powering an aircraft at subsonic and supersonic velocities.
  • the engine 10 includes in serial flow communication about a longitudinal centerline axis 12 conventional components including a fan 14, a compressor 16, combustor 18, high pressure turbine (HPT) 20, a low pressure turbine (LPT) 22, and an afterburner or augmenter 24.
  • the fan 14 is powered by the LPT 22 through a shaft extending therebetween, and the compressor 16 is powered by the HPT 20 through another shaft extending therebetween.
  • ambient airflow 26 enters the fan 14 and an outer portion bypasses the compressor 16 through an annular bypass duct 28, and an inner portion is compressed by the compressor 16.
  • the compressed airflow is then channeled to the combustor 18, mixed with fuel and ignited for generating combustion or exhaust gases 30 which flow through the HPT 20 and the LPT 22 which extract energy therefrom for powering the compressor 16 and the fan 14, respectively.
  • the exhaust gases 30 are simply discharged from the afterburner 24 through a conventional converging-diverging (CD) nozzle 32.
  • the exhaust nozzle 32 is a two-dimensional (2-D) nozzle in this exemplary embodiment, although in alternate embodiments it may be axisymmetric, and includes selectively positionable primary flaps 34 and secondary flaps 36 joined thereto for varying both the throat area and the discharge flow area of the nozzle 32.
  • additional fuel is added to the exhaust gases 30 in the afterburner 24 and ignited for generating additional thrust for propelling the aircraft powered by the engine 10 at maximum velocity.
  • the exhaust nozzle 32 also includes a conventional ejector 40 having an inlet 42 for receiving the ambient airflow 26 from outside the engine 10, with the ejector inlet 42 being disposed in flow communication through a suitable duct with the chutes 38 for channeling the airflow 26 therethrough for mixing with the exhaust gases 30.
  • each of the chutes 38 is generally U-shaped and has first and second longitudinally extending and transversely spaced apart sidewalls 44, 46 joined together at an arcuate leading edge 48 over which are flowable the exhaust gases 30.
  • the first and second sidewalls 44, 46 are generally parallel to each other in this exemplary embodiment and transversely spaced apart at a first width W 1 to define therebetween a first channel 50 for channeling the airflow 26 therethrough.
  • the first and second sidewalls 44, 46 further include respective first and second trailing edges 52, 54 defining therebetween an elongate chute outlet 56 for discharging the airflow 26 from inside the chute 38 for mixing with the exhaust gases 30 channeled outside the chute 38.
  • the chute first and second sidewalls 44 and 46 are generally triangular in this exemplary embodiment, and the chute leading edge 48 is inclined relative to the chute first and second trailing edges 52, 54 in an upstream direction from the bottom of the chute 38 to the top of the chute 38 at an inclination angle A of about 30°, for example, measured relative to the engine longitudinal axis 12 when the chute 38 is in its fully deployed position.
  • the first and second sidewalls 44, 46 have respective first and second top edges 58, 60 which extend from the leading edge 48 to the first and second trailing edges 52, 54, respectively, and are spaced transversely apart to define a chute inlet 62 disposed in flow communication with the ejector inlet 42 ( Figures 1 and 2) for receiving the ambient airflow 26 therefrom when required.
  • the chutes 38 are laterally or horizontally spaced apart from each other in a vertical plane with the chute inlets 62 being aligned in a common horizontal plane.
  • the chutes 38 are preferably disposed at an upstream end of the exhaust nozzle 32 and are conventionally selectively extendable inwardly into the exhaust gases 30 flowable through the exhaust nozzle 32, as well as being retractable therefrom.
  • the primary and secondary flaps 34 and 36 are selectively positioned by a conventional actuator for obtaining maximum discharge flow area, and the chutes 38 are selectively positioned to extend
  • the chutes 38 are retracted upwardly through the primary flaps 34, and the primary and secondary flaps 34 and 36 are repositioned for decreasing the discharge flow area of the exhaust nozzle 32.
  • the primary and secondary flaps 34 and 36 are conventionally configured and actuated for obtaining all required contours thereof as is conventionally known, and the chutes 38 extend through respective deployment apertures 64 in the primary flaps 34 as illustrated in Figure 2, and are conventionally selectively retractable and extendable relative to the primary flaps 34.
  • Figure 3 illustrates pivot apertures 66 at the upstream end of the chute 38 at which the chute 38 may be pivotally mounted to the primary flap 34 and suitably pivoted relative thereto by a conventional actuator which raises and lowers the chute 38 relative to the primary flap 34.
  • the chute first trailing edge 52 is spaced longitudinally downstream from the second trailing edge 54 relative to a longitudinal axis 68 disposed equidistantly between the first and second sidewalls 44, 46 for defining a perforated extension or septum 70 of the first sidewall 44 which extends downstream from or relative to the second trailing edge 54 for a longitudinal length L.
  • the septum 70 has a plurality of spaced apart apertures 72 for attenuating shock noise generated upon mixing of the exhaust gases 30 and the airflow 26.
  • the septum 70 and the remainder of the first sidewall 44 preferably join together at a common thickness T without discontinuity which may be obtained by manufacturing the entire chute 38 from a common piece of sheet metal or by casting.
  • the apertures 72 preferably extend completely through the septum 70, and the chutes 38 are preferably otherwise imperforate except for the apertures 72 in the septums 70.
  • the first and second sidewalls 44 and 46 of adjacent ones of the chutes 38 preferably face each other for defining therebetween a second channel 74 between each pair of chutes 38 for channeling the exhaust gases 30 therebetween.
  • the second channel 74 may have a constant flow area in the downstream direction; or may be a converging channel having a decreasing flow area; or, in the preferred embodiment, forms a converging-diverging channel 74 as shown in Figure 4, with a chute throat 74a defined between the sidewalls 44, 46 of adjacent chutes 38.
  • the chutes 38 are transversely aligned with each other with the aft most first trailing edges 52 of the chutes 38 being transversely aligned in a first common axial plane; the second trailing edges 54 of the chutes 38 being transversely aligned in a second common axial plane disposed upstream of the first common plane; and the leading edges 48 of the chutes 38 also being transversely aligned in a third common axial plane disposed upstream of the second common axial plane.
  • the septums 70 of adjacent chutes 38 face each other without obstruction from the chute second trailing edges 54 and are parallel to each other in this exemplary embodiment.
  • the chutes 38 are deployed inwardly into the exhaust gases 30, and the ambient airflow 26 is channeled through the ejector inlet 42 and through the chute inlets 62 for flow through the respective first channels 50. Accordingly, noise from the exhaust gases 30 is attenuated in part by the mixing action of the slower ambient airflow 26 discharged from the chute outlets 56, as shown in Figures 3 and 4, into the several second channels 74 through which the faster exhaust gases 30 flow. As the exhaust gases 30 flow through the second channel 74 they expand as their pressure is decreased since this pressure must eventually match that of the ambient airflow outside the exhaust nozzle 32 into which the exhaust gases 30 are discharged.
  • pressure or shock waves indicated schematically at 76 will be formed. These pressure waves 76 ordinarily will increase noise of the exhaust gases 30, but are attenuated by the septums 70 in accordance with the present invention.
  • the length L of the septum 70 in the flow direction is predeterminedly selected to ensure that the pressure waves emanating from the chute second trailing edges 54 are allowed to reflect against the septums 70.
  • the porosity, of the septum apertures 72 is the total area of the apertures 72 relative to the total area of the septum 70 including the apertures 72 and is selected for maximizing the attenuation of noise from the pressure waves 76.
  • the porosity of the apertures 72 may be up to about 10%, with the individual apertures 72 being sized and spaced apart for producing noise canceling reflection waves.
  • the pressure waves 76 will be compression waves which will reflect as expansion waves upon meeting the septum apertures 72 for canceling noise. If the exhaust gases 30 flowing through the second channels 74 are underexpanded relative to the airflow 26 flowing through the first channels 50, the pressure waves 76 will be expansion waves which will reflect as compression waves upon meeting the septum apertures 72 for also canceling noise. Of course, the pressure waves 76 which reflect off the flat portions of the septum 70 between the apertures 72 reflect therefrom without changing to the opposing canceling wave.
  • Each of the second channels 74 has a transverse width W 2 between the adjacent first and second sidewalls 44 and 46 of adjacent chutes 38 at the chute throat 74a, and the ratio of the septum streamwise length L to the second channel width W 2 is predetermined for each design application for allowing the pressure waves 76 generated at the chute second trailing edges 54 upon mixing of the airflow 26 and the exhaust gases 30 to reflect off the septum 70 for attenuating noise.
  • each of the septums 70 preferably extends inwardly for the full vertical extent of the first sidewall 44 and has a height H. In this way, sound suppression is provided for the full vertical extent of each chute 38 where the ejector airflow 26 mixes with the exhaust gases 30.
  • the ratio of the septum length L to the second channel with W 2 is greater than about 2 for allowing the pressure waves 76 to reflect off the septums 70.
  • the perforated septum 70 itself adds drag to the airflow 26 and exhaust gases 30 which flow over the opposite sides thereof and, therefore, the length L should be only as long as required for obtaining effective sound suppressing reflection of the pressure waves 76 which may be determined for each particular design application either analytically or empirically.
  • the chutes 38 having the perforated septums 70 as described above provide increased noise suppression when the exhaust gases 30 are imperfectly expanded in the second channels 74.
  • the chutes are relatively simple In structure and relatively thin for allowing the chutes 38 to be readily stowed when not needed for sound suppression, and when extended into the exhaust gases 30 the relative thinness thereof reduces drag penalties.
  • the thin septums 70 are also more dosely positionable to the source of pressure or shock waves emanating from the second trailing edges 54, with the plurality of septums 70 associated with the plurality of chutes 38 being effective for localizing noise attenuation where needed.
  • the chutes 38 cooperate in combination with the exhaust nozzle 32 and the ejector 40, they may be used in alternate forms and with different sources of the airflow 26.
  • the bypass airflow channeled through the bypass duct 28 may be suitably channeled through the chutes 38 for mixing with the exhaust gases 30 for attenuating noise.
  • the septums 70 may be added to a conventional daisy-type annular mixer assembly for suppressing sound generated at the confluence of the bypass air through the bypass duct 28 and the exhaust gases 30 discharged from the IPT 22.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Jet Pumps And Other Pumps (AREA)
  • Exhaust Silencers (AREA)

Description

The present invention relates generally to gas turbine engines, and, more specifically, to sound suppression of exhaust gases therefrom.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
An aircraft gas turbine engine discharges exhaust gases in a jet at high velocity for propelling the aircraft in flight. The exhaust gases expand into the ambient air upon discharge from the engine and generate considerable jet noise. Various techniques are known for reducing jet noise including specially designed exhaust nozzles for reducing noise due to shock waves; convergent-divergent (CD) nozzles to reduce noise due to shock waves; suppressor nozzles to shift generated noise to frequencies that are more readily absorbed by the atmosphere or acoustic liners; ejectors for mixing the exhaust gases with ambient airflow to reduce the mean jet velocity and, thereby, noise; and porous plug nozzles to promote mutual cancellation between expansion and compression waves.
The prior art document US-A-4 240 252 discloses a mixer for mixing gas turbine exhaust gases with air by means of alternating hot and cold chutes in order to suppress noise.
These various noise suppression techniques operate at varying effectiveness and with varying penalties in terms of propulsion system size, weight, efficiency, performance, and cost, for example. Accordingly, improved sound suppression devices are desirable for effectively suppressing noise in a simple structural arrangement, with minimal drag losses and performance penalties while being readily manufacturable.
Summary of the Invention
A gas turbine engine flow mixer includes at least one chute having first and second spaced apart sidewalls joined together at a leading edge, with the sidewalls having first and second traling edges defining therebetween a chute outlet. The first trailing edge is spaced longitudinally downstream from the second trailing edge for defining a septum in the first sidewall extending downstream from the second traling edge. The septum includes a plurality of noise attenuating apertures.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The invention, in accordance with preferred and exemplary embodiments, together with further objects and advantages thereof, is more particularly described In the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of an exemplary turbofan gas turbine engine for powering an aircraft in flight which includes a sound suppression mixer in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 2 is a transverse, partly sectional view of the exhaust nozzle of the engine illustrated in Figure 1 showing in more particularity a plurality of spaced apart mixer chutes taken along line 2-2.
Figure 3 is a perspective view of an exemplary one of the chutes illustrated in Figures 1 and 2.
Figure 4 is a transverse sectional view of adjacent ones of the chutes illustrated in Figure 1 taken along line 4-4.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)
Illustrated schematically in Figure 1 is an exemplary turbofan gas turbine engine 10 effective for powering an aircraft at subsonic and supersonic velocities. The engine 10 includes in serial flow communication about a longitudinal centerline axis 12 conventional components including a fan 14, a compressor 16, combustor 18, high pressure turbine (HPT) 20, a low pressure turbine (LPT) 22, and an afterburner or augmenter 24. The fan 14 is powered by the LPT 22 through a shaft extending therebetween, and the compressor 16 is powered by the HPT 20 through another shaft extending therebetween.
During operation, ambient airflow 26 enters the fan 14 and an outer portion bypasses the compressor 16 through an annular bypass duct 28, and an inner portion is compressed by the compressor 16. The compressed airflow is then channeled to the combustor 18, mixed with fuel and ignited for generating combustion or exhaust gases 30 which flow through the HPT 20 and the LPT 22 which extract energy therefrom for powering the compressor 16 and the fan 14, respectively.
During dry operation of the engine 10, the exhaust gases 30 are simply discharged from the afterburner 24 through a conventional converging-diverging (CD) nozzle 32. The exhaust nozzle 32 is a two-dimensional (2-D) nozzle in this exemplary embodiment, although in alternate embodiments it may be axisymmetric, and includes selectively positionable primary flaps 34 and secondary flaps 36 joined thereto for varying both the throat area and the discharge flow area of the nozzle 32. In wet operation, additional fuel is added to the exhaust gases 30 in the afterburner 24 and ignited for generating additional thrust for propelling the aircraft powered by the engine 10 at maximum velocity.
During takeoff operation of the engine 10 for providing suitable thrust for takeoff operation of the aircraft, considerable noise is generated by the exhaust gases 30 discharged from the exhaust nozzle 32. In order to attenuate or suppress the noise from the exhaust gases 30, a plurality of transversely spaced apart chutes 38 are used in combination with the CD nozzle 32 for mixing the ambient airflow 26 with the exhaust gases 30 inside the nozzle 32. As shown in Figure 1, the exhaust nozzle 32 also includes a conventional ejector 40 having an inlet 42 for receiving the ambient airflow 26 from outside the engine 10, with the ejector inlet 42 being disposed in flow communication through a suitable duct with the chutes 38 for channeling the airflow 26 therethrough for mixing with the exhaust gases 30.
As shown in Figures 2 and 3, each of the chutes 38 is generally U-shaped and has first and second longitudinally extending and transversely spaced apart sidewalls 44, 46 joined together at an arcuate leading edge 48 over which are flowable the exhaust gases 30. The first and second sidewalls 44, 46 are generally parallel to each other in this exemplary embodiment and transversely spaced apart at a first width W 1 to define therebetween a first channel 50 for channeling the airflow 26 therethrough. The first and second sidewalls 44, 46 further include respective first and second trailing edges 52, 54 defining therebetween an elongate chute outlet 56 for discharging the airflow 26 from inside the chute 38 for mixing with the exhaust gases 30 channeled outside the chute 38.
As shown in Figure 3, the chute first and second sidewalls 44 and 46 are generally triangular in this exemplary embodiment, and the chute leading edge 48 is inclined relative to the chute first and second trailing edges 52, 54 in an upstream direction from the bottom of the chute 38 to the top of the chute 38 at an inclination angle A of about 30°, for example, measured relative to the engine longitudinal axis 12 when the chute 38 is in its fully deployed position. The first and second sidewalls 44, 46 have respective first and second top edges 58, 60 which extend from the leading edge 48 to the first and second trailing edges 52, 54, respectively, and are spaced transversely apart to define a chute inlet 62 disposed in flow communication with the ejector inlet 42 (Figures 1 and 2) for receiving the ambient airflow 26 therefrom when required.
In the embodiment of the chutes 38 in combination with the 2-D exhaust nozzle 32 as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2, the chutes 38 are laterally or horizontally spaced apart from each other in a vertical plane with the chute inlets 62 being aligned in a common horizontal plane. The chutes 38 are preferably disposed at an upstream end of the exhaust nozzle 32 and are conventionally selectively extendable inwardly into the exhaust gases 30 flowable through the exhaust nozzle 32, as well as being retractable therefrom. As shown in solid line in Figure 1, the primary and secondary flaps 34 and 36 are selectively positioned by a conventional actuator for obtaining maximum discharge flow area, and the chutes 38 are selectively positioned to extend
Inwardly from the primary flaps 34 into the exhaust gases 30. And shown in phantom line in Figure 1, the chutes 38 are retracted upwardly through the primary flaps 34, and the primary and secondary flaps 34 and 36 are repositioned for decreasing the discharge flow area of the exhaust nozzle 32. The primary and secondary flaps 34 and 36 are conventionally configured and actuated for obtaining all required contours thereof as is conventionally known, and the chutes 38 extend through respective deployment apertures 64 in the primary flaps 34 as illustrated in Figure 2, and are conventionally selectively retractable and extendable relative to the primary flaps 34. For example, Figure 3 illustrates pivot apertures 66 at the upstream end of the chute 38 at which the chute 38 may be pivotally mounted to the primary flap 34 and suitably pivoted relative thereto by a conventional actuator which raises and lowers the chute 38 relative to the primary flap 34.
Referring again to Figure 3, and additionally to Figure 4, the chute first trailing edge 52 is spaced longitudinally downstream from the second trailing edge 54 relative to a longitudinal axis 68 disposed equidistantly between the first and second sidewalls 44, 46 for defining a perforated extension or septum 70 of the first sidewall 44 which extends downstream from or relative to the second trailing edge 54 for a longitudinal length L. The septum 70 has a plurality of spaced apart apertures 72 for attenuating shock noise generated upon mixing of the exhaust gases 30 and the airflow 26. The septum 70 and the remainder of the first sidewall 44 preferably join together at a common thickness T without discontinuity which may be obtained by manufacturing the entire chute 38 from a common piece of sheet metal or by casting. The apertures 72 preferably extend completely through the septum 70, and the chutes 38 are preferably otherwise imperforate except for the apertures 72 in the septums 70.
Referring again to Figure 4, the first and second sidewalls 44 and 46 of adjacent ones of the chutes 38 preferably face each other for defining therebetween a second channel 74 between each pair of chutes 38 for channeling the exhaust gases 30 therebetween. The second channel 74 may have a constant flow area in the downstream direction; or may be a converging channel having a decreasing flow area; or, in the preferred embodiment, forms a converging-diverging channel 74 as shown in Figure 4, with a chute throat 74a defined between the sidewalls 44, 46 of adjacent chutes 38. The chutes 38 are transversely aligned with each other with the aft most first trailing edges 52 of the chutes 38 being transversely aligned in a first common axial plane; the second trailing edges 54 of the chutes 38 being transversely aligned in a second common axial plane disposed upstream of the first common plane; and the leading edges 48 of the chutes 38 also being transversely aligned in a third common axial plane disposed upstream of the second common axial plane. The septums 70 of adjacent chutes 38 face each other without obstruction from the chute second trailing edges 54 and are parallel to each other in this exemplary embodiment.
As shown in Figures 1 and 2, when sound suppression is desired, the chutes 38 are deployed inwardly into the exhaust gases 30, and the ambient airflow 26 is channeled through the ejector inlet 42 and through the chute inlets 62 for flow through the respective first channels 50. Accordingly, noise from the exhaust gases 30 is attenuated in part by the mixing action of the slower ambient airflow 26 discharged from the chute outlets 56, as shown in Figures 3 and 4, into the several second channels 74 through which the faster exhaust gases 30 flow. As the exhaust gases 30 flow through the second channel 74 they expand as their pressure is decreased since this pressure must eventually match that of the ambient airflow outside the exhaust nozzle 32 into which the exhaust gases 30 are discharged. If the exhaust gases 30 in the second channels 74 are either overexpanded or underexpanded upon reaching the chute second trailing edges 54 at which they meet the ejector airflow 26 discharged from the first channels 50, pressure or shock waves indicated schematically at 76 will be formed. These pressure waves 76 ordinarily will increase noise of the exhaust gases 30, but are attenuated by the septums 70 in accordance with the present invention. The length L of the septum 70 in the flow direction is predeterminedly selected to ensure that the pressure waves emanating from the chute second trailing edges 54 are allowed to reflect against the septums 70. The porosity, of the septum apertures 72 is the total area of the apertures 72 relative to the total area of the septum 70 including the apertures 72 and is selected for maximizing the attenuation of noise from the pressure waves 76. For example, the porosity of the apertures 72 may be up to about 10%, with the individual apertures 72 being sized and spaced apart for producing noise canceling reflection waves.
More specifically, if the exhaust gases 30 flowing through the second channels 74 are overexpanded relative to the airflow 26 being channeled through the first channels 50, the pressure waves 76 will be compression waves which will reflect as expansion waves upon meeting the septum apertures 72 for canceling noise. If the exhaust gases 30 flowing through the second channels 74 are underexpanded relative to the airflow 26 flowing through the first channels 50, the pressure waves 76 will be expansion waves which will reflect as compression waves upon meeting the septum apertures 72 for also canceling noise. Of course, the pressure waves 76 which reflect off the flat portions of the septum 70 between the apertures 72 reflect therefrom without changing to the opposing canceling wave.
Each of the second channels 74 has a transverse width W 2 between the adjacent first and second sidewalls 44 and 46 of adjacent chutes 38 at the chute throat 74a, and the ratio of the septum streamwise length L to the second channel width W 2 is predetermined for each design application for allowing the pressure waves 76 generated at the chute second trailing edges 54 upon mixing of the airflow 26 and the exhaust gases 30 to reflect off the septum 70 for attenuating noise. As shown in Fig.3, each of the septums 70 preferably extends inwardly for the full vertical extent of the first sidewall 44 and has a height H. In this way, sound suppression is provided for the full vertical extent of each chute 38 where the ejector airflow 26 mixes with the exhaust gases 30. In a preferred embodiment, the ratio of the septum length L to the second channel with W 2 is greater than about 2 for allowing the pressure waves 76 to reflect off the septums 70. Of course, the perforated septum 70 itself adds drag to the airflow 26 and exhaust gases 30 which flow over the opposite sides thereof and, therefore, the length L should be only as long as required for obtaining effective sound suppressing reflection of the pressure waves 76 which may be determined for each particular design application either analytically or empirically.
Accordingly, the chutes 38 having the perforated septums 70 as described above provide increased noise suppression when the exhaust gases 30 are imperfectly expanded in the second channels 74. The chutes are relatively simple In structure and relatively thin for allowing the chutes 38 to be readily stowed when not needed for sound suppression, and when extended into the exhaust gases 30 the relative thinness thereof reduces drag penalties. The thin septums 70 are also more dosely positionable to the source of pressure or shock waves emanating from the second trailing edges 54, with the plurality of septums 70 associated with the plurality of chutes 38 being effective for localizing noise attenuation where needed.
Although in the preferred embodiment disclosed above, the chutes 38 cooperate in combination with the exhaust nozzle 32 and the ejector 40, they may be used in alternate forms and with different sources of the airflow 26. For example, the bypass airflow channeled through the bypass duct 28 may be suitably channeled through the chutes 38 for mixing with the exhaust gases 30 for attenuating noise. And, the septums 70 may be added to a conventional daisy-type annular mixer assembly for suppressing sound generated at the confluence of the bypass air through the bypass duct 28 and the exhaust gases 30 discharged from the IPT 22.
While there have been described herein what are considered to be preferred embodiments of the present invention, other modifications of the invention shall be apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein, and it is, therefore, desired to be secured in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the scope of the invention as defined by the claims.

Claims (10)

  1. A mixer for mixing airflow with exhaust gases generated in a gas turbine engine (10) comprising:
    at least one generally U-shaped chute (38) having first and second longitudinally extending and transversely spaced apart sidewalls (44, 46) joined together at a leading edge (48) over which are flowable said exhaust gases, and defining therebetween a first channel (50) for channeling said airflow;
    said first and second sidewalls (44, 46) further having first and second trailing edges (52, 54) defining therebetween a chute outlet (56) for discharging said airflow from said chute (38) for mixing with said exhaust gases; and characterized by:
    said first trailing edge (52) being spaced longitudinally downstream from said second trailing edge (54) for defining a septum (70) in said first sidewall (44) extending downstream from said second trailing edge (54), said septum (70) having a plurality of spaced apart apertures (72) for attenuating noise generated upon mixing of said exhaust gases and said airflow.
  2. A mixer according to claim 1 wherein said apertures (72) extend through said septum.
  3. A mixer according to claim 2 further comprising a plurality of said chutes (38) transversely spaced apart from each other with said first and second sidewalls (44, 46) of adjacent ones of said chutes (38) facing each other for defining therebetween a second channel (74) for channeling said exhaust gases therebetween; and wherein
    said first trailing edges (52) of said chutes (38) are transversely aligned in a first common plane;
    said second trailing edges (54) of said chutes (38) are transversely aligned in a second common plane disposed upstream of said first common plane; and
    said septums (70) of said adjacent chutes (38) face each other without obstruction from said chute second trailing edges (54).
  4. A mixer according to claim 3 wherein each of said septums (70) has a longitudinal length, and each of said second channels (74) has a transverse width between said adjacent first and second sidewalls (44, 46), and the ratio of said septum length to said second channel width is predetermined for allowing pressure waves generated at said chute second trailing edge to reflect off said septum (70) for attenuating noise.
  5. A mixer according to claim 4 wherein said ratio of said septum length to said second channel width is greater than about 2.
  6. A mixer according to claim 4 wherein said septum apertures (72) have an area porosity of up to about 10%.
  7. A mixer according to claim 4 wherein said chute first and second sidewalls (44, 46) are generally triangular, and said chute leading edge (48) is inclined relative to said chute first and second trailing edges (52, 54).
  8. A mixer according to claim 7 wherein said chute first and second sidewalls (44, 46) have top edges (58, 60) extending from said leading edge (48) to said first and second trailing edges (52, 54), respectively, and being spaced apart to define a chute inlet (62) for receiving said airflow.
  9. A mixer according to claim 8 in combination with a 2-D exhaust nozzle and wherein:
    said chutes (38) are laterally spaced apart with said chute inlets (62) being aligned in a common plane; and
    said chutes (38) are disposed at an upstream end of said exhaust nozzle (32) and are selectively extendable inwardly into said exhaust gases flowable through said exhaust nozzle (32).
  10. A mixer according to claim 9 wherein said exhaust nozzle (32) includes an ejector (40) having an inlet (42) for receiving ambient airflow from outside said engine (10), said ejector inlet (42) being disposed in flow communication with said chute inlets (62) for channeling said airflow thereto.
EP93306083A 1992-12-09 1993-08-02 Gasturbine engine flow mixer sound suppression means Expired - Lifetime EP0601688B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/987,833 US5291672A (en) 1992-12-09 1992-12-09 Sound suppression mixer
US987833 1992-12-09

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0601688A1 EP0601688A1 (en) 1994-06-15
EP0601688B1 true EP0601688B1 (en) 1998-02-25

Family

ID=25533609

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP93306083A Expired - Lifetime EP0601688B1 (en) 1992-12-09 1993-08-02 Gasturbine engine flow mixer sound suppression means

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US5291672A (en)
EP (1) EP0601688B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH076452B2 (en)
DE (1) DE69317098T2 (en)

Families Citing this family (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5613649A (en) * 1994-07-21 1997-03-25 United Technologies Corporation Airfoil noise control
US5761900A (en) * 1995-10-11 1998-06-09 Stage Iii Technologies, L.C. Two-stage mixer ejector suppressor
US5884472A (en) * 1995-10-11 1999-03-23 Stage Iii Technologies, L.C. Alternating lobed mixer/ejector concept suppressor
US5910094A (en) * 1996-09-10 1999-06-08 The Boeing Company Aircraft labyrinth fire seal
US5771681A (en) * 1996-09-17 1998-06-30 The Boeing Company Aircraft turbofan engine mixing apparatus
US5794434A (en) * 1996-10-09 1998-08-18 The Boeing Company Aircraft thrust reverser system with linearly translating inner and outer doors
US5717172A (en) * 1996-10-18 1998-02-10 Northrop Grumman Corporation Sound suppressor exhaust structure
US5884843A (en) * 1996-11-04 1999-03-23 The Boeing Company Engine noise suppression ejector nozzle
US5941065A (en) * 1996-11-04 1999-08-24 The Boeing Company Stowable mixer ejection nozzle
US5908159A (en) * 1997-02-24 1999-06-01 The Boeing Company Aircraft chute ejector nozzle
US5826794A (en) * 1997-02-28 1998-10-27 The Boeing Company Aircraft scoop ejector nozzle
FR2765272B1 (en) * 1997-06-26 1999-08-20 Snecma TURBOMACHINE EJECTOR AND MIXER REAR BODY
US6012281A (en) * 1997-08-18 2000-01-11 United Technologies Corporation Noise suppressing fluid mixing system for a turbine engine
US6050527A (en) * 1997-12-19 2000-04-18 The Boeing Company Flow control device to eliminate cavity resonance
US6112850A (en) * 1999-09-07 2000-09-05 Met Pro Corporation Acoustic silencer nozzle
US7055329B2 (en) * 2003-03-31 2006-06-06 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for noise attenuation for gas turbine engines using at least one synthetic jet actuator for injecting air
US7246481B2 (en) * 2004-03-26 2007-07-24 General Electric Company Methods and apparatus for operating gas turbine engines
US7412832B2 (en) * 2004-03-26 2008-08-19 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for operating gas turbine engines
US7334409B2 (en) * 2004-05-19 2008-02-26 Alltech, Inc. Retractable afterburner for jet engine
FR2896274B1 (en) * 2006-01-13 2008-04-18 Snecma Sa VARIABLE SECTION FLOW MIXER FOR DOUBLE TURBOREACTOR FLOW OF SUPERSONIC AIRPLANE
FR2904663B1 (en) * 2006-08-01 2012-02-03 Snecma DOUBLE FLOW TURBOMACHINE WITH ARTIFICIAL VARIATION OF ITS COLLEGE SECTION
FR2911922B1 (en) * 2007-01-26 2009-04-24 Snecma Sa VARIABLE SECTION FLOW MIXER FOR A DOUBLE FLOW OF A SUPERSONIC AIRCRAFT
US7578369B2 (en) * 2007-09-25 2009-08-25 Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Mixed-flow exhaust silencer assembly
US20090139823A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 Alden Joseph Dyer Handlebar clutch-lever assist
US8635875B2 (en) 2010-04-29 2014-01-28 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Gas turbine engine exhaust mixer including circumferentially spaced-apart radial rows of tabs extending downstream on the radial walls, crests and troughs
US8556027B2 (en) 2011-06-28 2013-10-15 United Technologies Corporation Eductor exhaust silencer assembly with bypass gasflow
US9896970B2 (en) * 2014-11-14 2018-02-20 General Electric Company Method and system for sealing an annulus
US10544755B2 (en) * 2016-09-20 2020-01-28 Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc. Variable infrared suppression system in a gas turbine engine
US10968760B2 (en) 2018-04-12 2021-04-06 Raytheon Technologies Corporation Gas turbine engine component for acoustic attenuation
US11346282B2 (en) 2019-01-18 2022-05-31 Raytheon Technologies Corporation Gas turbine engine component for acoustic attenuation

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA659621A (en) * 1963-03-19 A. Grotz Charles Retractable noise suppressor for jet engines
GB849502A (en) * 1957-03-01 1960-09-28 Rolls Royce Improvements in or relating to jet propulsion nozzles
GB859994A (en) * 1958-06-20 1961-01-25 Boeing Co Noise suppressor for jet propulsion engines
US3053340A (en) * 1958-07-21 1962-09-11 Gen Electric Noise suppression nozzle
US3061038A (en) * 1959-10-30 1962-10-30 Boeing Co Jet engine noise suppression nozzle with multiple settings
US3543877A (en) * 1967-07-07 1970-12-01 Nationale D Etude De Construct Silencer device for an ejector-type jet propulsion nozzle
BE755612A (en) * 1969-06-18 1971-02-15 Gen Electric PROPULSION TUBES WITH IMPROVED NOISE CANCELLATION SYSTEM
US3534831A (en) * 1969-07-31 1970-10-20 Gen Electric Jet engine exhaust noise suppression
US3579993A (en) * 1969-08-04 1971-05-25 Rohr Corp Sound suppression system
US3815360A (en) * 1971-04-16 1974-06-11 Rohr Industries Inc Combined infrared and sound suppressor for aircraft jet engine
GB1409887A (en) * 1972-12-18 1975-10-15 Secr Defence Aircraft gas turbine engine noise suppression
US4199936A (en) * 1975-12-24 1980-04-29 The Boeing Company Gas turbine engine combustion noise suppressor
GB1535598A (en) * 1976-05-27 1978-12-13 Rolls Royce Turbofan aero engines and propulsion nozzles therefor
US4106587A (en) * 1976-07-02 1978-08-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Sound-suppressing structure with thermal relief
US4240252A (en) * 1978-01-19 1980-12-23 General Electric Company Acoustically-treated mixer for a mixed flow gas turbine engine
US4293053A (en) * 1979-12-18 1981-10-06 United Technologies Corporation Sound absorbing structure
US4422524A (en) * 1982-03-22 1983-12-27 Lockheed Corporation Variable shape, fluid flow nozzle for sound suppression
US5154052A (en) * 1990-05-07 1992-10-13 General Electric Company Exhaust assembly for a high speed civil transport aircraft engine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69317098D1 (en) 1998-04-02
JPH06173771A (en) 1994-06-21
JPH076452B2 (en) 1995-01-30
US5291672A (en) 1994-03-08
EP0601688A1 (en) 1994-06-15
DE69317098T2 (en) 1998-09-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0601688B1 (en) Gasturbine engine flow mixer sound suppression means
US5761900A (en) Two-stage mixer ejector suppressor
US5154052A (en) Exhaust assembly for a high speed civil transport aircraft engine
US4501393A (en) Internally ventilated noise suppressor with large plug nozzle
US9745918B2 (en) Gas turbine engine with noise attenuating variable area fan nozzle
US6094907A (en) Jet engine and method for reducing jet engine noise by reducing nacelle boundary layer thickness
EP1340901B1 (en) Noise attenuating segmented exhaust nozzle
EP1397586B1 (en) Exhaust flow guide for jet noise reduction
US5884472A (en) Alternating lobed mixer/ejector concept suppressor
US6360528B1 (en) Chevron exhaust nozzle for a gas turbine engine
EP0635632A1 (en) Fixed geometry mixer/ejector noise suppression system for turbofan aircraft engines
US5216878A (en) Mixed exhaust flow supersonic jet engine and method
US3946830A (en) Inlet noise deflector
US3648800A (en) Coanda expansion exhaust nozzle suppressor
US5222359A (en) Nozzle system and method for supersonic jet engine
US3592291A (en) Method and apparatus for suppressing the noise and augmenting the thrust of a jet engine
US6926232B2 (en) Variable cycle propulsion system with compressed air tapping for a supersonic airplane
EP0582424B1 (en) Noise-suppressed exhaust nozzles for jet engines
US3618700A (en) Retracted noise suppression system
CA2012228C (en) Means and method for reducing differential pressure loading in an augmented gas turbine engine
US20040244357A1 (en) Divergent chevron nozzle and method
WO1991018199A1 (en) Variable cycle gas turbine engine for supersonic aircraft
EP0916834A1 (en) Two stage mixer ejector for turbofan noise suppression
Brown Sound suppression mixer
US6178742B1 (en) Rear mixer ejector for a turbomachine

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19941215

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19970411

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

ET Fr: translation filed
REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69317098

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19980402

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: DRAGOTTI & ASSOCIATI S.R.L.

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20050727

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20050817

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20050930

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20060831

Year of fee payment: 14

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070301

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20060802

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20070430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060802

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070802