EP0507025B1 - Intruder detection arrangements and methods - Google Patents

Intruder detection arrangements and methods Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0507025B1
EP0507025B1 EP19910307782 EP91307782A EP0507025B1 EP 0507025 B1 EP0507025 B1 EP 0507025B1 EP 19910307782 EP19910307782 EP 19910307782 EP 91307782 A EP91307782 A EP 91307782A EP 0507025 B1 EP0507025 B1 EP 0507025B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
detection means
detection
alarm signal
intruder
arrangement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP19910307782
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0507025A2 (en
EP0507025A3 (en
Inventor
Alan Henness
John Lindsay Galloway
Ian Alexander Owers
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Carrier Fire and Security UK Ltd
Original Assignee
Guardall Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guardall Ltd filed Critical Guardall Ltd
Publication of EP0507025A2 publication Critical patent/EP0507025A2/en
Publication of EP0507025A3 publication Critical patent/EP0507025A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0507025B1 publication Critical patent/EP0507025B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/18—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength
    • G08B13/189—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems
    • G08B13/19—Actuation by interference with heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength; Actuation by intruding sources of heat, light, or radiation of shorter wavelength using passive radiation detection systems using infrared-radiation detection systems
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/02—Monitoring continuously signalling or alarm systems
    • G08B29/04—Monitoring of the detection circuits
    • G08B29/046—Monitoring of the detection circuits prevention of tampering with detection circuits

Definitions

  • This invention relates to intruder detection arrangements and methods. More specifically, though not exclusively, the invention relates to intruder detection arrangements and methods employing passive infra-red (IR) sensors.
  • IR passive infra-red
  • Intruder detection arrangements employing passive infra-red sensors have a field of view directed into one, or more, zones to be protected. Infra-red radiation emitted by an intruder entering the protected zone will be detected by the IR sensor and an intruder alarm signal is produced.
  • Infra-red radiation emitted by an intruder entering the protected zone will be detected by the IR sensor and an intruder alarm signal is produced.
  • Such arrangements are rendered ineffective if an object or material opaque to infra-red radiation is accidentally, or intentionally placed in view of the sensor.
  • IR radiation associated with the IR sensor.
  • This source directs radiation into the field of view with the intention that it will be reflected by any masking material present.
  • the so-reflected radiation would then be detected either by the passive IR sensor itself (see e.g. EP-A-289 621) or a separate, dedicated sensor, giving rise to an anti-masking alarm signal.
  • the source and sensor may operate in a wavelength range different from that of the passive IR sensor. Indeed, radiation other than IR radiation (e.g. visible or UV radiation) could be used.
  • the intruder detection arrangement is connected to a control unit.
  • known control units do not have a separate input for the anti-masking alarm signal.
  • the present invention provides an intruder detection arrangement enabling the system operator to cancel the anti-masking alarm signal but only if the passive IR sensor is not being obscured.
  • an intruder detection arrangement comprising first detection means for detecting the presence of an intruder in a predetermined zone of protection, second detection means for detecting obscuration of the first detection means and signal processing means responsive to outputs from the first and second detection means indicating detection of an intruder and an obscuration respectively, characterised in that the signal processing means is capable of latching an anti-masking alarm signal in response to an output from the second detection means, and in that said signal processing means cancel the latched anti-masking alarm signal provided the first detection means produces a respective output after production by the second detection means of the output giving rise to the latched anti-masking alarm signal.
  • the anti-masking alarm signal can be cancelled by the subsequent detection of an intruder in the protected zone, and the system operator can accomplish this by simply performing a walk-test in the protected zone. It will be understood, therefore, that the term "intruder" is intended to include a system operator performing such a walk-test.
  • Cancellation of the anti-masking alarm signal would enable the system operator to set an associated control unit in the alarm mode so that the latter can respond to an intruder alarm signal produced by the signal processing means in response to an output signal from the first detection means.
  • the first detection means may be a passive infra-red sensor
  • the second detection means may comprise a source of radiation (e.g. infra-red radiation) and a sensor responsive to radiation emitted by the source.
  • the signal processing means is operable in an operator-selectable test mode and has the capability to cancel the anti-masking alarm signal provided said test mode has been selected by the user.
  • the signal processing means has said capability to cancel a said anti-masking alarm signal after a preset delay following production of a respective output signal by the second detection means.
  • a method of detecting intruders comprising the steps of using a first detection means to detect for intruders, using a second detection means for detecting for obscuration of the first detection means and being characterised by using signal processing means responsive to said first and second detection means to latch an anti-masking alarm signal in response to detection of an obscuration and to cancel the latched anti-masking alarm signal provided an intruder is detected after detection of the obscuration.
  • the intruder detection arrangement includes a passive IR sensor 10 and an active IR anti-mask detection unit 20.
  • the passive IR sensor 10 views a field of view 11. If an intruder moves into the field of view, heat emitted by the intruder is detected by sensor 10, this heat resulting from the inevitable difference in temperature between the intruder and the immediate surroundings.
  • sensor 10 When sensor 10 detects heat due to the presence of an intruder or other unexpected or unauthorised heat source, it produces a first detection signal D1 on line 12 which is connected to a first input I 1 of a signal processing circuit 30. In response, the processing circuit 30 produces an intruder alarm signal on a first output line 13 which is connected to the alarm input of an associated control unit (not shown). Provided the control unit has been set in the alarm condition by the system operator the intruder alarm signal on line 13 will trigger an alarm relay in the unit.
  • the active IR anti-masking detection unit 20 detects for the presence of masking material (represented at M in Figure 1) such as paper, or paint from a spray, placed in the field of view of sensor 10. To that end, the detection unit 20 has a source 21 of IR radiation and a further sensor 22 for detecting source radiation reflected at an obscuration. Sensor 22 produces a second detection signal D2 in response to such reflected radiation and this signal is routed on line 23 to a second input I 2 of the signal processing circuit 30. In response, circuit 30 produces an anti-masking alarm signal on line 13 and also on a second output line 24, although the latter output line could, optionally, be omitted.
  • masking material represented at M in Figure 1
  • the detection unit 20 has a source 21 of IR radiation and a further sensor 22 for detecting source radiation reflected at an obscuration.
  • Sensor 22 produces a second detection signal D2 in response to such reflected radiation and this signal is routed on line 23 to a second input I 2 of the signal processing circuit 30.
  • circuit 30
  • the signal processing circuit 30 is programmed to latch the anti-masking alarm signal on line 13 until the system operator causes its cancellation in the manner to be described. Until such cancellation occurs the associated control unit cannot be set in the alarm mode by the operator.
  • the processing circuit 30 is suitably programmed to respond to a detection signal D1 on line 12 indicating that the sensor 10 is not being obscured.
  • the system operator can generate this detection signal by simply performing a walk-test in the field of view of the sensor. This arrangement has the advantage that it requires the operator to check that any obscuration of the IR sensor 10, that gave rise to the anti-masking alarm signal, is no longer present.
  • the associated control unit to which the detection arrangement is connected can be set in the alarm mode.
  • Figures 2(a) and 2(b) are flow diagrams illustrating the operational modes of two arrangements according to the invention having additional, optional security features.
  • the signal processing circuit 30 may be programmed to operate in an operator-selectable test mode and would only have the capability to cancel the anti-masking alarm signal provided the test mode has been selected.
  • This arrangement requires the active intervention of an authorised operator ensuring that the signal processing circuit 30 cannot be reset inadvertently or by unauthorised personnel.
  • the signal processing circuit 30 would have a test line, shown at L in Figure 1, and the test mode would be selected by activating this line.
  • Known intruder detection arrangements are already provided with such test lines. However, they are used for an entirely different purpose; that is, to enable an LED provided to assist in the initial placement of the sensors when the detection arrangement is being installed.
  • the signal processing circuit 30 can be so programmed to have the capability to cancel the anti-masking alarm signal but only after a preset delay following production of the second detection signal D2.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)

Description

  • This invention relates to intruder detection arrangements and methods. More specifically, though not exclusively, the invention relates to intruder detection arrangements and methods employing passive infra-red (IR) sensors.
  • Intruder detection arrangements employing passive infra-red sensors have a field of view directed into one, or more, zones to be protected. Infra-red radiation emitted by an intruder entering the protected zone will be detected by the IR sensor and an intruder alarm signal is produced. However, such arrangements are rendered ineffective if an object or material opaque to infra-red radiation is accidentally, or intentionally placed in view of the sensor.
  • Known intruder detection arrangements designed to deal with this problem employ a source of IR radiation associated with the IR sensor. This source directs radiation into the field of view with the intention that it will be reflected by any masking material present. The so-reflected radiation would then be detected either by the passive IR sensor itself (see e.g. EP-A-289 621) or a separate, dedicated sensor, giving rise to an anti-masking alarm signal. If a separate, dedicated sensor is used, the source and sensor may operate in a wavelength range different from that of the passive IR sensor. Indeed, radiation other than IR radiation (e.g. visible or UV radiation) could be used.
  • In use, the intruder detection arrangement is connected to a control unit. However, known control units do not have a separate input for the anti-masking alarm signal.
  • It would be possible to route the anti-masking alarm signal to the tamper input of the control unit. However, this input is usually monitored continuously and, in such circumstances, the anti-masking alarm signal could give rise to an alarm at any time of the day or night, even in response to accidental obscuration of the passive IR sensor. This arrangement therefore is unsatisfactory.
  • Instead, it is preferable to latch the anti-masking alarm signal and connect the latched signal to the alarm input of the control unit. This arrangement has the advantage that the anti-masking alarm signal would be discovered when the system operator attempts to set the control unit in the alarm mode in order to make the unit responsive to an intruder alarm signal, and the operator would need to cancel the anti-masking alarm signal before the alarm mode could be set.
  • The present invention provides an intruder detection arrangement enabling the system operator to cancel the anti-masking alarm signal but only if the passive IR sensor is not being obscured.
  • According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided an intruder detection arrangement comprising first detection means for detecting the presence of an intruder in a predetermined zone of protection, second detection means for detecting obscuration of the first detection means and signal processing means responsive to outputs from the first and second detection means indicating detection of an intruder and an obscuration respectively, characterised in that the signal processing means is capable of latching an anti-masking alarm signal in response to an output from the second detection means, and in that said signal processing means cancel the latched anti-masking alarm signal provided the first detection means produces a respective output after production by the second detection means of the output giving rise to the latched anti-masking alarm signal.
  • With this arrangement, the anti-masking alarm signal can be cancelled by the subsequent detection of an intruder in the protected zone, and the system operator can accomplish this by simply performing a walk-test in the protected zone. It will be understood, therefore, that the term "intruder" is intended to include a system operator performing such a walk-test.
  • Cancellation of the anti-masking alarm signal would enable the system operator to set an associated control unit in the alarm mode so that the latter can respond to an intruder alarm signal produced by the signal processing means in response to an output signal from the first detection means.
  • The first detection means may be a passive infra-red sensor, and the second detection means may comprise a source of radiation (e.g. infra-red radiation) and a sensor responsive to radiation emitted by the source.
  • In an embodiment, the signal processing means is operable in an operator-selectable test mode and has the capability to cancel the anti-masking alarm signal provided said test mode has been selected by the user.
  • In another embodiment, the signal processing means has said capability to cancel a said anti-masking alarm signal after a preset delay following production of a respective output signal by the second detection means.
  • In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of detecting intruders comprising the steps of using a first detection means to detect for intruders, using a second detection means for detecting for obscuration of the first detection means and being characterised by using signal processing means responsive to said first and second detection means to latch an anti-masking alarm signal in response to detection of an obscuration and to cancel the latched anti-masking alarm signal provided an intruder is detected after detection of the obscuration.
  • Intruder detection arrangements embodying the invention, and intruder detection methods according to the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • Figure 1 shows a block diagram of the arrangements; and
    • Figures 2(a) and 2(b) are flow diagrams illustrating two alternative modes of operation of the arrangements.
  • Referring to Figure 1, the intruder detection arrangement includes a passive IR sensor 10 and an active IR anti-mask detection unit 20.
  • The passive IR sensor 10 views a field of view 11. If an intruder moves into the field of view, heat emitted by the intruder is detected by sensor 10, this heat resulting from the inevitable difference in temperature between the intruder and the immediate surroundings.
  • When sensor 10 detects heat due to the presence of an intruder or other unexpected or unauthorised heat source, it produces a first detection signal D1 on line 12 which is connected to a first input I1 of a signal processing circuit 30. In response, the processing circuit 30 produces an intruder alarm signal on a first output line 13 which is connected to the alarm input of an associated control unit (not shown). Provided the control unit has been set in the alarm condition by the system operator the intruder alarm signal on line 13 will trigger an alarm relay in the unit.
  • The active IR anti-masking detection unit 20 detects for the presence of masking material (represented at M in Figure 1) such as paper, or paint from a spray, placed in the field of view of sensor 10. To that end, the detection unit 20 has a source 21 of IR radiation and a further sensor 22 for detecting source radiation reflected at an obscuration. Sensor 22 produces a second detection signal D2 in response to such reflected radiation and this signal is routed on line 23 to a second input I2 of the signal processing circuit 30. In response, circuit 30 produces an anti-masking alarm signal on line 13 and also on a second output line 24, although the latter output line could, optionally, be omitted.
  • The signal processing circuit 30 is programmed to latch the anti-masking alarm signal on line 13 until the system operator causes its cancellation in the manner to be described. Until such cancellation occurs the associated control unit cannot be set in the alarm mode by the operator.
  • In order to cancel the anti-masking alarm signal, the processing circuit 30 is suitably programmed to respond to a detection signal D1 on line 12 indicating that the sensor 10 is not being obscured. The system operator can generate this detection signal by simply performing a walk-test in the field of view of the sensor. This arrangement has the advantage that it requires the operator to check that any obscuration of the IR sensor 10, that gave rise to the anti-masking alarm signal, is no longer present.
  • When the anti-masking alarm signal has been cancelled in this manner, the associated control unit to which the detection arrangement is connected can be set in the alarm mode.
  • Figures 2(a) and 2(b) are flow diagrams illustrating the operational modes of two arrangements according to the invention having additional, optional security features.
  • Referring to Figure 2(a), the signal processing circuit 30 may be programmed to operate in an operator-selectable test mode and would only have the capability to cancel the anti-masking alarm signal provided the test mode has been selected. This arrangement requires the active intervention of an authorised operator ensuring that the signal processing circuit 30 cannot be reset inadvertently or by unauthorised personnel. In one implementation of this arrangement, the signal processing circuit 30 would have a test line, shown at L in Figure 1, and the test mode would be selected by activating this line. Known intruder detection arrangements are already provided with such test lines. However, they are used for an entirely different purpose; that is, to enable an LED provided to assist in the initial placement of the sensors when the detection arrangement is being installed.
  • Referring to Figure 2(b), the signal processing circuit 30 can be so programmed to have the capability to cancel the anti-masking alarm signal but only after a preset delay following production of the second detection signal D2.
  • Although, the invention has been described in relation to an intruder detection arrangement having an infra-red radiation detector, more specifically a passive infra-red sensor, it will be understood that the invention is also applicable to arrangements using other forms of detector, for example, microwave detectors.

Claims (8)

  1. An intruder detection arrangement comprising first detection means (10) for detecting the presence of an intruder in a predetermined zone of protection, second detection means (20) for detecting obscuration of the first detection means (10) and signal processing means (30) responsive to outputs from the first and second detection means (10,20) indicating detection of an intruder and an obscuration respectively, characterised in that the signal processing means (30) is capable of latching an anti-masking alarm signal in response to an output (D2) from the second detection means (20), and in that said signal processing means (30) cancel the latched anti-masking alarm signal provided the first detection means (10) produces a respective output (D1) after production by the second detection means (20) of the output (D2) giving rise to the latched anti-masking alarm signal.
  2. An arrangement as claimed in claim 1, wherein the first detection means (10) comprises a passive infra-red sensor.
  3. An arrangement as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the second detection means (20) comprises a source of radiation (21) and a sensor (22) responsive to radiation emitted by the source (21).
  4. An arrangement as claimed in claim 3, wherein the source (21) of radiation is a source of infra-red radiation.
  5. An arrangement as claimed in claim 3 or claim 4, wherein the sensor (22) responsive to radiation emitted by the source (21) is a passive infra-red sensor.
  6. An arrangement as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the signal processing means (30) is operable in an operator-selectable test mode, and has said capability to cancel said latched anti-masking alarm signal provided the test mode has been selected.
  7. An arrangement as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the signal processing means (30) has said capability to cancel a said latched anti-masking alarm signal after a preset delay following production of a respective output signal (D2) by the second detection means (20).
  8. A method of detecting intruders comprising the steps of using a first detection means (10) to detect for intruders, using a second detection means (30) for detecting for obscuration of the first detection means (10) and being characterised by using signal processing means (30) responsive to said first and second detection means to latch an anti-masking alarm signal in response to detection of an obscuration and to cancel the latched anti-masking alarm signal provided an intruder is detected after detection of the obscuration.
EP19910307782 1991-04-04 1991-08-23 Intruder detection arrangements and methods Expired - Lifetime EP0507025B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9107062 1991-04-04
GB919107062A GB9107062D0 (en) 1991-04-04 1991-04-04 Intruder detection arrangements and methods

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0507025A2 EP0507025A2 (en) 1992-10-07
EP0507025A3 EP0507025A3 (en) 1993-02-24
EP0507025B1 true EP0507025B1 (en) 1997-07-30

Family

ID=10692632

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19910307782 Expired - Lifetime EP0507025B1 (en) 1991-04-04 1991-08-23 Intruder detection arrangements and methods

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0507025B1 (en)
DE (1) DE69127068T2 (en)
GB (1) GB9107062D0 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9892617B2 (en) 2014-01-17 2018-02-13 Gojo Industries, Inc. Sensor configuration

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0772171B1 (en) * 1995-11-03 2003-01-08 Siemens Building Technologies AG Passive intrusion detector and its use
IL119372A (en) * 1995-11-03 2000-02-17 Siemens Building Tech Ag Passive infrared intruder detector
GB2339614B (en) * 1998-07-14 2000-06-21 Infrared Integrated Syst Ltd Detector-array sensor with mask warning
EP1061489B1 (en) * 1999-06-07 2004-08-25 Siemens Building Technologies AG Intrusion detector with a device for monitoring against tampering
GB0202467D0 (en) * 2002-02-02 2002-03-20 Qinetiq Ltd Sensor with obscurant detection
US7414236B2 (en) 2006-06-16 2008-08-19 Hong Kong Applied Science And Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. Monitoring devices and intrusion surveillance devices
EP2128832A1 (en) 2008-05-30 2009-12-02 Robert Bosch GmbH Anti-masking system and method for motion detectors
GB2506885B (en) * 2012-10-10 2017-04-12 Read Dale Occupancy sensor
US9324222B2 (en) * 2013-02-28 2016-04-26 Honeywell International Inc. Tamper resistant motion detector

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3928849A (en) * 1974-12-17 1975-12-23 Us Energy Intrusion detector self-test system
FR2574200B1 (en) * 1984-11-30 1987-01-23 Labo Electronique Physique DEVICE FOR DETECTING AN INTRUDER PROVIDED WITH AN ANTI-MASKING DEVICE
DE3573670D1 (en) * 1985-01-08 1989-11-16 Cerberus Ag Infrared intrusion detector
US4982094A (en) * 1986-10-31 1991-01-01 Takenaka Engineering Co., Ltd. Passive type crime-preventing infrared sensor provided with a mechanism of monitoring an obstruction for the visual field

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9892617B2 (en) 2014-01-17 2018-02-13 Gojo Industries, Inc. Sensor configuration
US10504355B2 (en) 2014-01-17 2019-12-10 Gojo Industries, Inc. Sensor configuration

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0507025A2 (en) 1992-10-07
GB9107062D0 (en) 1991-05-22
DE69127068D1 (en) 1997-09-04
EP0507025A3 (en) 1993-02-24
DE69127068T2 (en) 1998-01-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5093656A (en) Active supervision of motion-detection systems
EP0481934A1 (en) An anti-masking device for security systems
US5486810A (en) Infrared detector for detecting motion and fire and an alarm system including the same
US6909370B2 (en) Intruder detection device and intruder detection method
EP0507025B1 (en) Intruder detection arrangements and methods
WO1988003301A1 (en) Passive infrared burglar sensor equipped with visual field interruption monitor mechanism
US6351234B1 (en) Combination microwave passive infrared motion detector with anti-masking evaluation
US5420567A (en) Combination fire/intrusion alarm detectors using active infared elements
US6265970B1 (en) Event detection device with fault monitoring capability
EP3249623B1 (en) Intrusion detecting sensor and method
US6348863B1 (en) Method and apparatus for detecting moving objects, particularly intrusions
EP0375270B1 (en) Radiation detection arrangements and methods
US4719973A (en) Fire and explosion detection and suppression
EP0755551B1 (en) Fault monitoring event detection device
JPH1139574A (en) Combined sensor system
US7327224B2 (en) Vehicle security system
CA2300463C (en) Combination microwave passive infrared motion detector with anti-masking evaluation
IL126942A (en) Event detection device
JP2004157102A (en) Microwave sensor
JPH02121100A (en) Patrol system using noncontacting type card
KR20050064790A (en) Multi-detector having microwave detector and passive infra red detector
JP2875385B2 (en) Security system
JP3375956B2 (en) Security system
JP2521505B2 (en) Passive infrared security sensor with visual field obstruction monitoring mechanism
JPH0559591U (en) Security intruder detection device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19930715

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19950914

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GUARDALL LIMITED

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19970730

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69127068

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19970904

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20070816

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20070822

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20070808

Year of fee payment: 17

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20080823

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20090430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080901

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090303

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080823