EP0505426B1 - Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator - Google Patents
Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0505426B1 EP0505426B1 EP91900972A EP91900972A EP0505426B1 EP 0505426 B1 EP0505426 B1 EP 0505426B1 EP 91900972 A EP91900972 A EP 91900972A EP 91900972 A EP91900972 A EP 91900972A EP 0505426 B1 EP0505426 B1 EP 0505426B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- gases
- precipitator
- water
- dust particles
- dust
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03C—MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03C3/00—Separating dispersed particles from gases or vapour, e.g. air, by electrostatic effect
- B03C3/01—Pretreatment of the gases prior to electrostatic precipitation
- B03C3/014—Addition of water; Heat exchange, e.g. by condensation
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03C—MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03C3/00—Separating dispersed particles from gases or vapour, e.g. air, by electrostatic effect
- B03C3/01—Pretreatment of the gases prior to electrostatic precipitation
- B03C3/013—Conditioning by chemical additives, e.g. with SO3
Definitions
- the invention concerns a method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator to which hot dust-containing gases are conducted via a gas supply duct and through which the gases are conducted for dust separation, wherein the gas temperature is reduced and the gas humidity increased by the addition to the gases, before these are conducted through the precipitator, of water which evaporates in the gases.
- electrostatic precipitators are made up of a plurality of successive precipitator units through which dust-containing gases are conducted for cleaning.
- Each of these units has an inner chamber which is divided into a plurality of parallel gas passages by means of a plurality of juxtaposed vertical curtains of earthed steel plates forming the collecting electrodes of the unit.
- a plurality of vertical wires, to which a negative voltage is applied, are arranged in each gas passage and form the discharge electrodes of each unit. Owing to corona discharges at the discharge electrodes, the gases are ionised in the electric field in the gas passages. The negative ions are attracted by the collecting electrodes and, when moving towards these, collide with dust particles in the gases, thereby charging the particles which are separated from the gases by being attracted by the nearest collecting electrode, where they deposit and build up a layer of dust.
- dust separation efficiency increases with the voltage between the electrodes.
- the voltage should, however, not be too high, since that may cause flash-overs between the electrodes. Too high a current per unit area towards the collecting electrode may entail that the dust layer is charged faster than it is discharged towards the collecting electrode. Then, this charging of the dust layer leads to sparkings in the layer proper, what is generally referred to as back-corona, and dust is flung back into the gases, thereby impairing the dust separation efficiency. Further, the risk of back-corona increases with the resistivity of the dust.
- each precipitator unit has a separately controllable current and/or voltage supplying circuit with associated control equipment, such that the current and/or voltage supply to each unit can be separately controlled.
- the current supply to the discharge electrodes of each unit is separately adjusted in such a manner that maximum dust separation efficiency is obtained.
- Another method for reducing the risk of back-corona consists in adding water to lower the temperature of the hot gases and increase their humidity, thereby reducing the resistivity of the dust.
- Such cooling of the hot gases by direct evaporation of water is usually carried out in a conditioning tower through which the gases are conducted before being conveyed to the electrostatic precipitator.
- Such towers are very large, since all the water injected therein must be evaporated before the gases leave.
- US-A-3,512,340 discloses a method in which dust particles and liquid are introduced separately at different locations into the gas supply duct. First, the dust particles are introduced, which are rapidly heated by the hot gases, and then the liquid is injected into the gas supply duct to be evaporated by heat exchange with the heated dust particles. The water is injected directly into the gas supply duct. In practice, it has been found that some of the water reaches the wall of the duct before it has been evaporated. In this manner, the wall is wetted, which in turn results in dust particles adhering to the wall as a deposit, which is a major problem. This problem has not been solved in a satisfactory manner, although this was one of the primary aims of the invention according to the US patent specification. Such a direct injection of water could apparently only be carried out with the aid of large conditioning towers.
- the object of the invention is to provide a simple, inexpensive and practicable method for reducing the risk of back-corona on the principle of reducing the gas temperature and increasing the gas humidity by adding water which evaporates in the gases.
- the larger dust particles are employed as carriers for the liquid, and are recycled.
- the liquid-carrying and recycled dust particles are dust particles separated in the first precipitator unit.
- the liquid suitably consists of water to which sodium has been added, preferably in the form of a sodium salt. In other applications, it suitably consists of water to which sulphur has been added, preferably in the form av sulphuric acid.
- the drawing schematically illustrates a plant for cleaning dust-containing flue gases from a coal-fired boiler plant 1.
- a preheater 2 is adapted to transfer heat from the hot flue gases to combustion air which, through a duct 2a, is supplied to the plant 1 by means of a fan 3.
- the hot flue gases which may have a temperature of about 150°C, are conducted through a duct 4 to an electrostatic precipitator 5 made up of three successive precipitator units 5a, 5b, 5c through which the gases are conducted for cleaning.
- the thus cleaned flue gases are conducted through a duct 6 to a flue gas fan 7 which conveys the gases through a duct 8 to a chimney 9 for emission into the atmosphere.
- Each of the successive precipitator units 5a, 5b, 5c is of conventional type and has an inner chamber divided into a plurality of parallel gas passages by means of a plurality of juxtaposed vertical curtains of earthed steel plates, i.e. collecting electrodes.
- a plurality of vertical wires, i.e. discharge electrodes, connected to a voltage of about -50 kV, are arranged in each gas passage.
- the flue gases are ionised in the electric field in these passages.
- the negative ions are attracted by the collecting electrodes and collide, when moving towards these, with dust particles in the flue gases, thereby charging these particles, which are separated from the gases by being attracted by the nearest collecting electrode, where they are deposited.
- the dust particles deposited on the collecting electrodes build up a layer of dust which at regular intervals are dislodged. Then, the dust particles drop into the collecting hopper 10a, 10b and 10c of each precipitator unit.
- the dust particles collected by the hopper 10b of the second unit 5b being smaller than those collected by the hopper 10a of the first unit 5a, as well as the dust particles collected by the hopper 10c of the third unit 5c, being smaller than those collected in the hopper 10b of the second unit 5b, are removed from the hoppers 10b and 10c by conveyor means 11b and 11c, shown only schematically.
- Some of the dust particles collected by the hopper 10a of the first unit 5a are recycled in the system via a device 12 in a manner described in more detail below.
- the remaining dust particles in the hopper 10a of the first unit 5a are removed by a conveyor means 11a (shown only schematically) and the conveyor means 11b and 11c.
- the device 12 shown most schematically comprises a container 13 for intermediate storage of the dust particles which are to be recycled.
- a valve device or gate-type feeder 14 is arranged below the container 13 and adapted to feed the dust particles to a screw conveyor 15, which transports the dust particles to a conduit 16 ending in the flue gas duct 4.
- a strong air current (indicated by arrows) is blown through the conduit 16.
- the dust particles are showered with water.
- the water is supplied to the screw conveyor 15 through a connection 17, and conveyed to the conduit 16 jointly with the dust particles.
- the dust particles serving as carriers for the added water are blown into the flue gas duct 4.
- the water evaporates in the flue gases, thus reducing the gas temperature and increasing the gas humidity.
- the amount of water admitted through the connection 17 is porportioned so as to bring about the desired reduction in temperature of the flue gases.
- the water may in some applications contain sodium, added in the form of a sodium salt, or sulphur, added in the form of sulphuric acid.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Electrostatic Separation (AREA)
- Cell Separators (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention concerns a method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator to which hot dust-containing gases are conducted via a gas supply duct and through which the gases are conducted for dust separation, wherein the gas temperature is reduced and the gas humidity increased by the addition to the gases, before these are conducted through the precipitator, of water which evaporates in the gases.
- Usually, electrostatic precipitators are made up of a plurality of successive precipitator units through which dust-containing gases are conducted for cleaning. Each of these units has an inner chamber which is divided into a plurality of parallel gas passages by means of a plurality of juxtaposed vertical curtains of earthed steel plates forming the collecting electrodes of the unit. A plurality of vertical wires, to which a negative voltage is applied, are arranged in each gas passage and form the discharge electrodes of each unit. Owing to corona discharges at the discharge electrodes, the gases are ionised in the electric field in the gas passages. The negative ions are attracted by the collecting electrodes and, when moving towards these, collide with dust particles in the gases, thereby charging the particles which are separated from the gases by being attracted by the nearest collecting electrode, where they deposit and build up a layer of dust.
- Generally, dust separation efficiency increases with the voltage between the electrodes. The voltage should, however, not be too high, since that may cause flash-overs between the electrodes. Too high a current per unit area towards the collecting electrode may entail that the dust layer is charged faster than it is discharged towards the collecting electrode. Then, this charging of the dust layer leads to sparkings in the layer proper, what is generally referred to as back-corona, and dust is flung back into the gases, thereby impairing the dust separation efficiency. Further, the risk of back-corona increases with the resistivity of the dust.
- To reduce the risk of back-corona, especially in the separation of dust of high resistivity, while maintaining such a current supply to the discharge electrodes that evenly distributed corona discharges occur at these electrodes, the discharge electrodes are now usually supplied with current pulses. Each precipitator unit has a separately controllable current and/or voltage supplying circuit with associated control equipment, such that the current and/or voltage supply to each unit can be separately controlled. Thus, the current supply to the discharge electrodes of each unit is separately adjusted in such a manner that maximum dust separation efficiency is obtained.
- Another method for reducing the risk of back-corona consists in adding water to lower the temperature of the hot gases and increase their humidity, thereby reducing the resistivity of the dust. Such cooling of the hot gases by direct evaporation of water is usually carried out in a conditioning tower through which the gases are conducted before being conveyed to the electrostatic precipitator. Such towers are very large, since all the water injected therein must be evaporated before the gases leave.
- US-A-3,512,340 discloses a method in which dust particles and liquid are introduced separately at different locations into the gas supply duct. First, the dust particles are introduced, which are rapidly heated by the hot gases, and then the liquid is injected into the gas supply duct to be evaporated by heat exchange with the heated dust particles. The water is injected directly into the gas supply duct. In practice, it has been found that some of the water reaches the wall of the duct before it has been evaporated. In this manner, the wall is wetted, which in turn results in dust particles adhering to the wall as a deposit, which is a major problem. This problem has not been solved in a satisfactory manner, although this was one of the primary aims of the invention according to the US patent specification. Such a direct injection of water could apparently only be carried out with the aid of large conditioning towers.
- In other prior art methods for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator, anhydrous sulphur trioxide gas (see US-A-7 533 364), a phosphoric acid component, ammonia or sodium are added to the gases before these are conducted through the precipitator. These prior art methods are, however, difficult to carry out and often expensive, since they require the provision of large plants, involving high operational costs, adjacent to the precipitators.
- Thus, the object of the invention is to provide a simple, inexpensive and practicable method for reducing the risk of back-corona on the principle of reducing the gas temperature and increasing the gas humidity by adding water which evaporates in the gases.
- This object is achieved by a method of the type stated in the introduction to this specification, which is characterised in that some of the dust particles separated in the precipitator are employed as carriers for an amount of liquid, chiefly water, proportioned to bring about the desired reduction in temperature, and are recycled by being injected into the gas supply duct jointly with the liquid carried by dust particles.
- Preferably, the larger dust particles are employed as carriers for the liquid, and are recycled. When using a precipitator made up of several successive precipitator units, the liquid-carrying and recycled dust particles are dust particles separated in the first precipitator unit.
- In some applications, the liquid suitably consists of water to which sodium has been added, preferably in the form of a sodium salt. In other applications, it suitably consists of water to which sulphur has been added, preferably in the form av sulphuric acid.
- The invention will now be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawing schematically illustrating a plant for cleaning flue gases from a coal-fired boiler plant. The illustrated plant comprises equipment for carrying out the inventive method.
- The drawing schematically illustrates a plant for cleaning dust-containing flue gases from a coal-fired boiler plant 1. A preheater 2 is adapted to transfer heat from the hot flue gases to combustion air which, through a
duct 2a, is supplied to the plant 1 by means of afan 3. - The hot flue gases, which may have a temperature of about 150°C, are conducted through a duct 4 to an
electrostatic precipitator 5 made up of threesuccessive precipitator units duct 8 to a chimney 9 for emission into the atmosphere. - Each of the
successive precipitator units - The dust particles deposited on the collecting electrodes build up a layer of dust which at regular intervals are dislodged. Then, the dust particles drop into the collecting
hopper hopper 10b of thesecond unit 5b, being smaller than those collected by thehopper 10a of thefirst unit 5a, as well as the dust particles collected by thehopper 10c of thethird unit 5c, being smaller than those collected in thehopper 10b of thesecond unit 5b, are removed from thehoppers - Some of the dust particles collected by the
hopper 10a of thefirst unit 5a are recycled in the system via adevice 12 in a manner described in more detail below. The remaining dust particles in thehopper 10a of thefirst unit 5a are removed by a conveyor means 11a (shown only schematically) and the conveyor means 11b and 11c. - The
device 12 shown most schematically comprises acontainer 13 for intermediate storage of the dust particles which are to be recycled. A valve device or gate-type feeder 14 is arranged below thecontainer 13 and adapted to feed the dust particles to ascrew conveyor 15, which transports the dust particles to aconduit 16 ending in the flue gas duct 4. A strong air current (indicated by arrows) is blown through theconduit 16. Before reaching the discharge end of thescrew conveyor 15, the dust particles are showered with water. The water is supplied to thescrew conveyor 15 through aconnection 17, and conveyed to theconduit 16 jointly with the dust particles. The dust particles serving as carriers for the added water are blown into the flue gas duct 4. The water evaporates in the flue gases, thus reducing the gas temperature and increasing the gas humidity. The amount of water admitted through theconnection 17 is porportioned so as to bring about the desired reduction in temperature of the flue gases. To further enhance dust separation efficiency, the water may in some applications contain sodium, added in the form of a sodium salt, or sulphur, added in the form of sulphuric acid.
Claims (5)
- A method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator (5) to which hot dust-containing gases are conducted via a gas supply duct (4) and through which the gases are conducted for dust separation, wherein the gas temperature is reduced and the gas humidity increased by the addition to the gases, before these are conducted through the precipitator (5), of water which evaporates in the gases, characterised in that some of the dust particles separated in the precipitator (5) are employed as carriers for an amount of liquid, chiefly water, proportioned to bring about the desired reduction in temperature, and are recycled by being injected into the gas supply duct (4) jointly with the liquid carried by dust particles.
- The method of claim 1, characterised in that the larger dust particles are employed as carriers for the liquid, and are recycled.
- The method of claim 2, which is implemented in a precipitator (5) composed of several successive precipitator units (5a, 5b, 5c), characterised in that the liquid-carrying and recycled dust particles are dust particles separated in the first precipitator unit (5a).
- The method of any one of claims 1-3, characterised in that the liquid consists of water to which sodium has been added, preferably in the form of a sodium salt.
- The method of any one of claims 1-3, characterised in that the liquid consists of water to which sulphur has been added, preferably in the form of sulphuric acid.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
SE8904154A SE466581B (en) | 1989-12-11 | 1989-12-11 | SET TO REDUCE RISK BEFORE ETERNAL RADIATION IN AN ELECTROSTATIC DUST DISPENSER |
SE8904154 | 1989-12-11 | ||
PCT/SE1990/000817 WO1991008837A1 (en) | 1989-12-11 | 1990-12-10 | Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0505426A1 EP0505426A1 (en) | 1992-09-30 |
EP0505426B1 true EP0505426B1 (en) | 1996-02-28 |
Family
ID=20377727
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP91900972A Expired - Lifetime EP0505426B1 (en) | 1989-12-11 | 1990-12-10 | Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0505426B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE134533T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU635807B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2070661A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69025625T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2086527T3 (en) |
SE (1) | SE466581B (en) |
WO (1) | WO1991008837A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2338603A1 (en) | 2007-03-05 | 2011-06-29 | Alstom Technology Ltd | A method and a control system for controlling the operation of a last field of an electrostatic precipitator |
EP1967276B1 (en) | 2007-03-05 | 2019-05-08 | General Electric Technology GmbH | A method of estimating the dust load of an esp, and a method and a device of controlling the rapping of an esp |
EP1967277B1 (en) * | 2007-03-05 | 2018-09-26 | General Electric Technology GmbH | A method of controlling the order of rapping the collecting electrode plates of an ESP |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CH408075A (en) * | 1962-05-19 | 1966-02-28 | Kloeckner Humboldt Deutz Ag | Method and device for cooling and humidifying a hot gas stream |
US4533364A (en) * | 1983-02-01 | 1985-08-06 | Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. | Method for flue gas conditioning with the decomposition products of ammonium sulfate or ammonium bisulfate |
-
1989
- 1989-12-11 SE SE8904154A patent/SE466581B/en unknown
-
1990
- 1990-12-10 ES ES91900972T patent/ES2086527T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-12-10 AT AT91900972T patent/ATE134533T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1990-12-10 WO PCT/SE1990/000817 patent/WO1991008837A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1990-12-10 AU AU69599/91A patent/AU635807B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1990-12-10 CA CA002070661A patent/CA2070661A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1990-12-10 DE DE69025625T patent/DE69025625T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1990-12-10 EP EP91900972A patent/EP0505426B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0505426A1 (en) | 1992-09-30 |
AU6959991A (en) | 1991-07-18 |
WO1991008837A1 (en) | 1991-06-27 |
SE8904154L (en) | 1991-06-12 |
CA2070661A1 (en) | 1991-06-12 |
ATE134533T1 (en) | 1996-03-15 |
DE69025625D1 (en) | 1996-04-04 |
AU635807B2 (en) | 1993-04-01 |
ES2086527T3 (en) | 1996-07-01 |
SE466581B (en) | 1992-03-09 |
DE69025625T2 (en) | 1996-08-01 |
SE8904154D0 (en) | 1989-12-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0424335B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for the purification of air, flue gases or the like | |
US4072477A (en) | Electrostatic precipitation process | |
US4435190A (en) | Method for separating particles in suspension in a gas | |
US3807137A (en) | Electrostatic gas-scrubber and method | |
US4162144A (en) | Method and apparatus for treating electrically charged airborne particles | |
US5547493A (en) | Electrostatic precipitator | |
JP4687595B2 (en) | Electric dust collector | |
JPH10174899A (en) | Dedusting device | |
EP2868384B1 (en) | Wet electric dust-collecting device and exhaust gas treatment method | |
US5380355A (en) | Airstream decontamination unit | |
EP0505426B1 (en) | Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator | |
US3365858A (en) | Combined heat interchanger and electrostatic precipitator | |
CA1042366A (en) | Electrostatic scrubbers involving charged liquid sprays and oppositely charged dust particles | |
US4619670A (en) | Apparatus for dielectrophoretically enhanced particle collection | |
WO1979000478A1 (en) | Spraybooth for use in electrostatic powder coating | |
US4431434A (en) | Electrostatic precipitator using a temperature controlled electrode collector | |
US7261764B1 (en) | System and method for spatially-selective particulate deposition and enhanced deposition efficiency | |
CN111672627A (en) | Electromagnetism stack dust removal dehumidification pipe and honeycomb tubular electromagnetism stack dust removal dehumidification device | |
US2764254A (en) | Electrostatic precipitator circuits | |
JPS6028545B2 (en) | Method and device for separating fine particles in gas | |
US2726730A (en) | Gas cleaning device | |
CN215744118U (en) | Star-shaped electrode for electrostatic dust collection of belt type conveying equipment and electrostatic dust collection system | |
Dalmon | Electrostatic precipitators for large power station boilers | |
CN113000215A (en) | Star-shaped electrode for electrostatic dust collection of belt type conveying equipment and electrostatic dust collection system | |
JP2687268B2 (en) | Dry type electrostatic precipitator |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19920529 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19931202 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19960228 Ref country code: LI Effective date: 19960228 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19960228 Ref country code: FR Effective date: 19960228 Ref country code: DK Effective date: 19960228 Ref country code: CH Effective date: 19960228 Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19960228 Ref country code: AT Effective date: 19960228 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 134533 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19960315 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: JACOBACCI & PERANI S.P.A. |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69025625 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19960404 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19960531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2086527 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19961231 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19971201 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19971222 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 19971230 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19981210 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19981210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19991001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19991211 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20000114 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20051210 |