EP0505426B1 - Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator - Google Patents

Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0505426B1
EP0505426B1 EP91900972A EP91900972A EP0505426B1 EP 0505426 B1 EP0505426 B1 EP 0505426B1 EP 91900972 A EP91900972 A EP 91900972A EP 91900972 A EP91900972 A EP 91900972A EP 0505426 B1 EP0505426 B1 EP 0505426B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
gases
precipitator
water
dust particles
dust
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP91900972A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0505426A1 (en
Inventor
Kjell Porle
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
UK Secretary of State for Defence
ABB Technology FLB AB
Original Assignee
UK Secretary of State for Defence
ABB Flaekt AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by UK Secretary of State for Defence, ABB Flaekt AB filed Critical UK Secretary of State for Defence
Publication of EP0505426A1 publication Critical patent/EP0505426A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0505426B1 publication Critical patent/EP0505426B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03CMAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C3/00Separating dispersed particles from gases or vapour, e.g. air, by electrostatic effect
    • B03C3/01Pretreatment of the gases prior to electrostatic precipitation
    • B03C3/014Addition of water; Heat exchange, e.g. by condensation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03CMAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03C3/00Separating dispersed particles from gases or vapour, e.g. air, by electrostatic effect
    • B03C3/01Pretreatment of the gases prior to electrostatic precipitation
    • B03C3/013Conditioning by chemical additives, e.g. with SO3

Definitions

  • the invention concerns a method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator to which hot dust-containing gases are conducted via a gas supply duct and through which the gases are conducted for dust separation, wherein the gas temperature is reduced and the gas humidity increased by the addition to the gases, before these are conducted through the precipitator, of water which evaporates in the gases.
  • electrostatic precipitators are made up of a plurality of successive precipitator units through which dust-containing gases are conducted for cleaning.
  • Each of these units has an inner chamber which is divided into a plurality of parallel gas passages by means of a plurality of juxtaposed vertical curtains of earthed steel plates forming the collecting electrodes of the unit.
  • a plurality of vertical wires, to which a negative voltage is applied, are arranged in each gas passage and form the discharge electrodes of each unit. Owing to corona discharges at the discharge electrodes, the gases are ionised in the electric field in the gas passages. The negative ions are attracted by the collecting electrodes and, when moving towards these, collide with dust particles in the gases, thereby charging the particles which are separated from the gases by being attracted by the nearest collecting electrode, where they deposit and build up a layer of dust.
  • dust separation efficiency increases with the voltage between the electrodes.
  • the voltage should, however, not be too high, since that may cause flash-overs between the electrodes. Too high a current per unit area towards the collecting electrode may entail that the dust layer is charged faster than it is discharged towards the collecting electrode. Then, this charging of the dust layer leads to sparkings in the layer proper, what is generally referred to as back-corona, and dust is flung back into the gases, thereby impairing the dust separation efficiency. Further, the risk of back-corona increases with the resistivity of the dust.
  • each precipitator unit has a separately controllable current and/or voltage supplying circuit with associated control equipment, such that the current and/or voltage supply to each unit can be separately controlled.
  • the current supply to the discharge electrodes of each unit is separately adjusted in such a manner that maximum dust separation efficiency is obtained.
  • Another method for reducing the risk of back-corona consists in adding water to lower the temperature of the hot gases and increase their humidity, thereby reducing the resistivity of the dust.
  • Such cooling of the hot gases by direct evaporation of water is usually carried out in a conditioning tower through which the gases are conducted before being conveyed to the electrostatic precipitator.
  • Such towers are very large, since all the water injected therein must be evaporated before the gases leave.
  • US-A-3,512,340 discloses a method in which dust particles and liquid are introduced separately at different locations into the gas supply duct. First, the dust particles are introduced, which are rapidly heated by the hot gases, and then the liquid is injected into the gas supply duct to be evaporated by heat exchange with the heated dust particles. The water is injected directly into the gas supply duct. In practice, it has been found that some of the water reaches the wall of the duct before it has been evaporated. In this manner, the wall is wetted, which in turn results in dust particles adhering to the wall as a deposit, which is a major problem. This problem has not been solved in a satisfactory manner, although this was one of the primary aims of the invention according to the US patent specification. Such a direct injection of water could apparently only be carried out with the aid of large conditioning towers.
  • the object of the invention is to provide a simple, inexpensive and practicable method for reducing the risk of back-corona on the principle of reducing the gas temperature and increasing the gas humidity by adding water which evaporates in the gases.
  • the larger dust particles are employed as carriers for the liquid, and are recycled.
  • the liquid-carrying and recycled dust particles are dust particles separated in the first precipitator unit.
  • the liquid suitably consists of water to which sodium has been added, preferably in the form of a sodium salt. In other applications, it suitably consists of water to which sulphur has been added, preferably in the form av sulphuric acid.
  • the drawing schematically illustrates a plant for cleaning dust-containing flue gases from a coal-fired boiler plant 1.
  • a preheater 2 is adapted to transfer heat from the hot flue gases to combustion air which, through a duct 2a, is supplied to the plant 1 by means of a fan 3.
  • the hot flue gases which may have a temperature of about 150°C, are conducted through a duct 4 to an electrostatic precipitator 5 made up of three successive precipitator units 5a, 5b, 5c through which the gases are conducted for cleaning.
  • the thus cleaned flue gases are conducted through a duct 6 to a flue gas fan 7 which conveys the gases through a duct 8 to a chimney 9 for emission into the atmosphere.
  • Each of the successive precipitator units 5a, 5b, 5c is of conventional type and has an inner chamber divided into a plurality of parallel gas passages by means of a plurality of juxtaposed vertical curtains of earthed steel plates, i.e. collecting electrodes.
  • a plurality of vertical wires, i.e. discharge electrodes, connected to a voltage of about -50 kV, are arranged in each gas passage.
  • the flue gases are ionised in the electric field in these passages.
  • the negative ions are attracted by the collecting electrodes and collide, when moving towards these, with dust particles in the flue gases, thereby charging these particles, which are separated from the gases by being attracted by the nearest collecting electrode, where they are deposited.
  • the dust particles deposited on the collecting electrodes build up a layer of dust which at regular intervals are dislodged. Then, the dust particles drop into the collecting hopper 10a, 10b and 10c of each precipitator unit.
  • the dust particles collected by the hopper 10b of the second unit 5b being smaller than those collected by the hopper 10a of the first unit 5a, as well as the dust particles collected by the hopper 10c of the third unit 5c, being smaller than those collected in the hopper 10b of the second unit 5b, are removed from the hoppers 10b and 10c by conveyor means 11b and 11c, shown only schematically.
  • Some of the dust particles collected by the hopper 10a of the first unit 5a are recycled in the system via a device 12 in a manner described in more detail below.
  • the remaining dust particles in the hopper 10a of the first unit 5a are removed by a conveyor means 11a (shown only schematically) and the conveyor means 11b and 11c.
  • the device 12 shown most schematically comprises a container 13 for intermediate storage of the dust particles which are to be recycled.
  • a valve device or gate-type feeder 14 is arranged below the container 13 and adapted to feed the dust particles to a screw conveyor 15, which transports the dust particles to a conduit 16 ending in the flue gas duct 4.
  • a strong air current (indicated by arrows) is blown through the conduit 16.
  • the dust particles are showered with water.
  • the water is supplied to the screw conveyor 15 through a connection 17, and conveyed to the conduit 16 jointly with the dust particles.
  • the dust particles serving as carriers for the added water are blown into the flue gas duct 4.
  • the water evaporates in the flue gases, thus reducing the gas temperature and increasing the gas humidity.
  • the amount of water admitted through the connection 17 is porportioned so as to bring about the desired reduction in temperature of the flue gases.
  • the water may in some applications contain sodium, added in the form of a sodium salt, or sulphur, added in the form of sulphuric acid.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Electrostatic Separation (AREA)
  • Cell Separators (AREA)

Abstract

In a method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator (5) to which hot dust-containing gases are conducted via a gas supply duct (4) and through which the gases are conducted for dust separation, the gas temperature is reduced and the gas humidity increased by the addition to the gases, before these are conducted through the precipitator (5), of water which evaporates in the gases. Thus, an amount of water proportioned to bring about the desired reduction in temperature is injected into the gas supply duct (4). A given amount of the dust particles separated in the precipitator (5) is employed as carrier for the water, and is recycled by being injected into the gas supply duct (4) jointly with the water carried by dust particles.

Description

  • The invention concerns a method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator to which hot dust-containing gases are conducted via a gas supply duct and through which the gases are conducted for dust separation, wherein the gas temperature is reduced and the gas humidity increased by the addition to the gases, before these are conducted through the precipitator, of water which evaporates in the gases.
  • Usually, electrostatic precipitators are made up of a plurality of successive precipitator units through which dust-containing gases are conducted for cleaning. Each of these units has an inner chamber which is divided into a plurality of parallel gas passages by means of a plurality of juxtaposed vertical curtains of earthed steel plates forming the collecting electrodes of the unit. A plurality of vertical wires, to which a negative voltage is applied, are arranged in each gas passage and form the discharge electrodes of each unit. Owing to corona discharges at the discharge electrodes, the gases are ionised in the electric field in the gas passages. The negative ions are attracted by the collecting electrodes and, when moving towards these, collide with dust particles in the gases, thereby charging the particles which are separated from the gases by being attracted by the nearest collecting electrode, where they deposit and build up a layer of dust.
  • Generally, dust separation efficiency increases with the voltage between the electrodes. The voltage should, however, not be too high, since that may cause flash-overs between the electrodes. Too high a current per unit area towards the collecting electrode may entail that the dust layer is charged faster than it is discharged towards the collecting electrode. Then, this charging of the dust layer leads to sparkings in the layer proper, what is generally referred to as back-corona, and dust is flung back into the gases, thereby impairing the dust separation efficiency. Further, the risk of back-corona increases with the resistivity of the dust.
  • To reduce the risk of back-corona, especially in the separation of dust of high resistivity, while maintaining such a current supply to the discharge electrodes that evenly distributed corona discharges occur at these electrodes, the discharge electrodes are now usually supplied with current pulses. Each precipitator unit has a separately controllable current and/or voltage supplying circuit with associated control equipment, such that the current and/or voltage supply to each unit can be separately controlled. Thus, the current supply to the discharge electrodes of each unit is separately adjusted in such a manner that maximum dust separation efficiency is obtained.
  • Another method for reducing the risk of back-corona consists in adding water to lower the temperature of the hot gases and increase their humidity, thereby reducing the resistivity of the dust. Such cooling of the hot gases by direct evaporation of water is usually carried out in a conditioning tower through which the gases are conducted before being conveyed to the electrostatic precipitator. Such towers are very large, since all the water injected therein must be evaporated before the gases leave.
  • US-A-3,512,340 discloses a method in which dust particles and liquid are introduced separately at different locations into the gas supply duct. First, the dust particles are introduced, which are rapidly heated by the hot gases, and then the liquid is injected into the gas supply duct to be evaporated by heat exchange with the heated dust particles. The water is injected directly into the gas supply duct. In practice, it has been found that some of the water reaches the wall of the duct before it has been evaporated. In this manner, the wall is wetted, which in turn results in dust particles adhering to the wall as a deposit, which is a major problem. This problem has not been solved in a satisfactory manner, although this was one of the primary aims of the invention according to the US patent specification. Such a direct injection of water could apparently only be carried out with the aid of large conditioning towers.
  • In other prior art methods for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator, anhydrous sulphur trioxide gas (see US-A-7 533 364), a phosphoric acid component, ammonia or sodium are added to the gases before these are conducted through the precipitator. These prior art methods are, however, difficult to carry out and often expensive, since they require the provision of large plants, involving high operational costs, adjacent to the precipitators.
  • Thus, the object of the invention is to provide a simple, inexpensive and practicable method for reducing the risk of back-corona on the principle of reducing the gas temperature and increasing the gas humidity by adding water which evaporates in the gases.
  • This object is achieved by a method of the type stated in the introduction to this specification, which is characterised in that some of the dust particles separated in the precipitator are employed as carriers for an amount of liquid, chiefly water, proportioned to bring about the desired reduction in temperature, and are recycled by being injected into the gas supply duct jointly with the liquid carried by dust particles.
  • Preferably, the larger dust particles are employed as carriers for the liquid, and are recycled. When using a precipitator made up of several successive precipitator units, the liquid-carrying and recycled dust particles are dust particles separated in the first precipitator unit.
  • In some applications, the liquid suitably consists of water to which sodium has been added, preferably in the form of a sodium salt. In other applications, it suitably consists of water to which sulphur has been added, preferably in the form av sulphuric acid.
  • The invention will now be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawing schematically illustrating a plant for cleaning flue gases from a coal-fired boiler plant. The illustrated plant comprises equipment for carrying out the inventive method.
  • The drawing schematically illustrates a plant for cleaning dust-containing flue gases from a coal-fired boiler plant 1. A preheater 2 is adapted to transfer heat from the hot flue gases to combustion air which, through a duct 2a, is supplied to the plant 1 by means of a fan 3.
  • The hot flue gases, which may have a temperature of about 150°C, are conducted through a duct 4 to an electrostatic precipitator 5 made up of three successive precipitator units 5a, 5b, 5c through which the gases are conducted for cleaning. The thus cleaned flue gases are conducted through a duct 6 to a flue gas fan 7 which conveys the gases through a duct 8 to a chimney 9 for emission into the atmosphere.
  • Each of the successive precipitator units 5a, 5b, 5c is of conventional type and has an inner chamber divided into a plurality of parallel gas passages by means of a plurality of juxtaposed vertical curtains of earthed steel plates, i.e. collecting electrodes. A plurality of vertical wires, i.e. discharge electrodes, connected to a voltage of about -50 kV, are arranged in each gas passage. The flue gases are ionised in the electric field in these passages. The negative ions are attracted by the collecting electrodes and collide, when moving towards these, with dust particles in the flue gases, thereby charging these particles, which are separated from the gases by being attracted by the nearest collecting electrode, where they are deposited.
  • The dust particles deposited on the collecting electrodes build up a layer of dust which at regular intervals are dislodged. Then, the dust particles drop into the collecting hopper 10a, 10b and 10c of each precipitator unit. The dust particles collected by the hopper 10b of the second unit 5b, being smaller than those collected by the hopper 10a of the first unit 5a, as well as the dust particles collected by the hopper 10c of the third unit 5c, being smaller than those collected in the hopper 10b of the second unit 5b, are removed from the hoppers 10b and 10c by conveyor means 11b and 11c, shown only schematically.
  • Some of the dust particles collected by the hopper 10a of the first unit 5a are recycled in the system via a device 12 in a manner described in more detail below. The remaining dust particles in the hopper 10a of the first unit 5a are removed by a conveyor means 11a (shown only schematically) and the conveyor means 11b and 11c.
  • The device 12 shown most schematically comprises a container 13 for intermediate storage of the dust particles which are to be recycled. A valve device or gate-type feeder 14 is arranged below the container 13 and adapted to feed the dust particles to a screw conveyor 15, which transports the dust particles to a conduit 16 ending in the flue gas duct 4. A strong air current (indicated by arrows) is blown through the conduit 16. Before reaching the discharge end of the screw conveyor 15, the dust particles are showered with water. The water is supplied to the screw conveyor 15 through a connection 17, and conveyed to the conduit 16 jointly with the dust particles. The dust particles serving as carriers for the added water are blown into the flue gas duct 4. The water evaporates in the flue gases, thus reducing the gas temperature and increasing the gas humidity. The amount of water admitted through the connection 17 is porportioned so as to bring about the desired reduction in temperature of the flue gases. To further enhance dust separation efficiency, the water may in some applications contain sodium, added in the form of a sodium salt, or sulphur, added in the form of sulphuric acid.

Claims (5)

  1. A method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator (5) to which hot dust-containing gases are conducted via a gas supply duct (4) and through which the gases are conducted for dust separation, wherein the gas temperature is reduced and the gas humidity increased by the addition to the gases, before these are conducted through the precipitator (5), of water which evaporates in the gases, characterised in that some of the dust particles separated in the precipitator (5) are employed as carriers for an amount of liquid, chiefly water, proportioned to bring about the desired reduction in temperature, and are recycled by being injected into the gas supply duct (4) jointly with the liquid carried by dust particles.
  2. The method of claim 1, characterised in that the larger dust particles are employed as carriers for the liquid, and are recycled.
  3. The method of claim 2, which is implemented in a precipitator (5) composed of several successive precipitator units (5a, 5b, 5c), characterised in that the liquid-carrying and recycled dust particles are dust particles separated in the first precipitator unit (5a).
  4. The method of any one of claims 1-3, characterised in that the liquid consists of water to which sodium has been added, preferably in the form of a sodium salt.
  5. The method of any one of claims 1-3, characterised in that the liquid consists of water to which sulphur has been added, preferably in the form of sulphuric acid.
EP91900972A 1989-12-11 1990-12-10 Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator Expired - Lifetime EP0505426B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE8904154A SE466581B (en) 1989-12-11 1989-12-11 SET TO REDUCE RISK BEFORE ETERNAL RADIATION IN AN ELECTROSTATIC DUST DISPENSER
SE8904154 1989-12-11
PCT/SE1990/000817 WO1991008837A1 (en) 1989-12-11 1990-12-10 Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0505426A1 EP0505426A1 (en) 1992-09-30
EP0505426B1 true EP0505426B1 (en) 1996-02-28

Family

ID=20377727

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP91900972A Expired - Lifetime EP0505426B1 (en) 1989-12-11 1990-12-10 Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0505426B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE134533T1 (en)
AU (1) AU635807B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2070661A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69025625T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2086527T3 (en)
SE (1) SE466581B (en)
WO (1) WO1991008837A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2338603A1 (en) 2007-03-05 2011-06-29 Alstom Technology Ltd A method and a control system for controlling the operation of a last field of an electrostatic precipitator
EP1967276B1 (en) 2007-03-05 2019-05-08 General Electric Technology GmbH A method of estimating the dust load of an esp, and a method and a device of controlling the rapping of an esp
EP1967277B1 (en) * 2007-03-05 2018-09-26 General Electric Technology GmbH A method of controlling the order of rapping the collecting electrode plates of an ESP

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH408075A (en) * 1962-05-19 1966-02-28 Kloeckner Humboldt Deutz Ag Method and device for cooling and humidifying a hot gas stream
US4533364A (en) * 1983-02-01 1985-08-06 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Method for flue gas conditioning with the decomposition products of ammonium sulfate or ammonium bisulfate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0505426A1 (en) 1992-09-30
AU6959991A (en) 1991-07-18
WO1991008837A1 (en) 1991-06-27
SE8904154L (en) 1991-06-12
CA2070661A1 (en) 1991-06-12
ATE134533T1 (en) 1996-03-15
DE69025625D1 (en) 1996-04-04
AU635807B2 (en) 1993-04-01
ES2086527T3 (en) 1996-07-01
SE466581B (en) 1992-03-09
DE69025625T2 (en) 1996-08-01
SE8904154D0 (en) 1989-12-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0424335B1 (en) Method and apparatus for the purification of air, flue gases or the like
US4072477A (en) Electrostatic precipitation process
US4435190A (en) Method for separating particles in suspension in a gas
US3807137A (en) Electrostatic gas-scrubber and method
US4162144A (en) Method and apparatus for treating electrically charged airborne particles
US5547493A (en) Electrostatic precipitator
JP4687595B2 (en) Electric dust collector
JPH10174899A (en) Dedusting device
EP2868384B1 (en) Wet electric dust-collecting device and exhaust gas treatment method
US5380355A (en) Airstream decontamination unit
EP0505426B1 (en) Method for reducing the risk of back-corona in an electrostatic precipitator
US3365858A (en) Combined heat interchanger and electrostatic precipitator
CA1042366A (en) Electrostatic scrubbers involving charged liquid sprays and oppositely charged dust particles
US4619670A (en) Apparatus for dielectrophoretically enhanced particle collection
WO1979000478A1 (en) Spraybooth for use in electrostatic powder coating
US4431434A (en) Electrostatic precipitator using a temperature controlled electrode collector
US7261764B1 (en) System and method for spatially-selective particulate deposition and enhanced deposition efficiency
CN111672627A (en) Electromagnetism stack dust removal dehumidification pipe and honeycomb tubular electromagnetism stack dust removal dehumidification device
US2764254A (en) Electrostatic precipitator circuits
JPS6028545B2 (en) Method and device for separating fine particles in gas
US2726730A (en) Gas cleaning device
CN215744118U (en) Star-shaped electrode for electrostatic dust collection of belt type conveying equipment and electrostatic dust collection system
Dalmon Electrostatic precipitators for large power station boilers
CN113000215A (en) Star-shaped electrode for electrostatic dust collection of belt type conveying equipment and electrostatic dust collection system
JP2687268B2 (en) Dry type electrostatic precipitator

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920529

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19931202

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19960228

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19960228

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19960228

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19960228

Ref country code: DK

Effective date: 19960228

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19960228

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19960228

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19960228

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 134533

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19960315

Kind code of ref document: T

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: JACOBACCI & PERANI S.P.A.

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69025625

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19960404

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19960531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2086527

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

EN Fr: translation not filed
NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19961231

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19971201

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19971222

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19971230

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19981210

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19981210

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19991001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19991211

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20000114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051210