EP0309621A1 - Control of polynuclear aromatic by-products in a hydrocracking process - Google Patents

Control of polynuclear aromatic by-products in a hydrocracking process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0309621A1
EP0309621A1 EP87308545A EP87308545A EP0309621A1 EP 0309621 A1 EP0309621 A1 EP 0309621A1 EP 87308545 A EP87308545 A EP 87308545A EP 87308545 A EP87308545 A EP 87308545A EP 0309621 A1 EP0309621 A1 EP 0309621A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
stream
hydrocracking
zone
polynuclear aromatic
vacuum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP87308545A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0309621B1 (en
Inventor
Adrian J. Gruia
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Honeywell UOP LLC
Original Assignee
UOP LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US06/821,721 priority Critical patent/US4698146A/en
Application filed by UOP LLC filed Critical UOP LLC
Priority to AT87308545T priority patent/ATE62925T1/en
Priority to ES87308545T priority patent/ES2021720B3/en
Priority to EP87308545A priority patent/EP0309621B1/en
Priority to DE8787308545T priority patent/DE3769649D1/en
Priority to DD87307656A priority patent/DD262444A5/en
Publication of EP0309621A1 publication Critical patent/EP0309621A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0309621B1 publication Critical patent/EP0309621B1/en
Priority to GR91400477T priority patent/GR3001857T3/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G67/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only
    • C10G67/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only
    • C10G67/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by at least one hydrotreatment process and at least one process for refining in the absence of hydrogen only plural serial stages only including solvent extraction as the refining step in the absence of hydrogen
    • C10G67/0454Solvent desasphalting
    • C10G67/049The hydrotreatment being a hydrocracking
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G47/00Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a process for the hydrocracking of a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock having a tendency to form polynuclear aromatic (PNA) compounds, which can be carried out without excessively fouling the processing unit. More specifically, the invention relates to a process in which the problem arising from the effect of PNA compounds on a hydrocracking unit is solved by recycling these compounds to a fractionation zone preceding the hydrocracking unit.
  • PNA polynuclear aromatic
  • US-A-4447315 discloses a method for hydrocracking a hydrocarbon feedstock having a tendency to form polynuclear aromatic compounds which includes contacting the hydrocarbon feedstock with a crystalline zeolite hydrocracking catalyst, contacting at least a portion of the resulting unconverted hydrocarbon oil containing polynuclear aromatic compounds with an adsorbent which selectively retains polynuclear aromatic compounds, and recycling unconverted hydrocarbon oil having a reduced concentration of polynuclear aromatic compounds to the hydrocracking zone.
  • US-A-3619407 discloses a process to prevent fouling of the equipment in a hydrocracking process unit which comprises partially cooling the effluent from the hydrocracking zone to condense a minor proportion of the normally liquid hydrocarbons therein, thereby forming a polynuclear aromatics-rich partial condensate and withdrawing a bleedstream of the partial condensate. That patent acknowledges as prior art that the fouling problem may also be solved by subjecting the recycle oil (the heavy portion of the hydrocracking zone effluent), or a substantial portion thereof, to atmospheric distillation or vacuum distillation to separate a heavy bottoms fraction containing polynuclear aromatic compounds.
  • the present invention provides a hydrocracking process which minimizes the fouling of the catalyst and the equipment used in the hydrocracking process unit with polynuclear aromatic compounds which can, if uncontrolled, precipitate on the equipment surfaces, particularly in the cooling equipment, and foul the pores of the catalyst. This is accomplished by subjecting unconverted hydrocarbon recovered from the hydrocracking zone, and containing trace quantities of polynuclear aromatic compounds, to vacuum fractionation, thereby recovering a substantial portion of the polynuclear aromatic compounds in a slop wax side stream, which significantly minimizes the introduction of the polynuclear aromatic compounds into the hydrocracking zone when these recovered hydrocarbons are recycled thereto.
  • One embodiment of the present invention relates to a catalytic hydrocracking process which comprises (a) introducing a reduced crude into a fractionation vacuum zone to produce a vacuum gas oil stream, containing compounds having a tendency to form polynuclear aromatic compounds in a hydrocracking zone, a slop wax side stream, and a vacuum distillation column bottoms; (b) contacting the vacuum gas oil stream in a hydrocracking zone with added hydrogen and a metal-promoted hydrocracking catalyst at elevated temperature and pressure sufficient to provide a substantial conversion to lower boiling products; (c) partially condensing the hydrocarbon effluent from the hydrocracking zone, and separating the same into a low boiling hydrocarbon product stream, a stream containing unconverted hydrocarbons boiling above 650°F (343°C), and trace quantities of polynuclear aromatic compounds; and (d) introducing at least a portion of the stream containing unconverted hydrocarbons and polynuclear aromatic compounds into the vacuum fractionation zone, thereby leading to recovery of a
  • Another embodiment of the present invention relates to a process in which the vacuum distillation column bottoms are solvent deasphalted to produce a deasphalted oil stream which is passed to the hydrocracking zone with the vacuum gas oil stream.
  • the Drawing is a simplified process flow diagram of a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • polynuclear aromatic compounds could be effectively removed from the unconverted hydrocarbon effluent from the hydrocracking zone by fractionation to produce a heavy bottom fraction containing polynuclear aromatic compounds.
  • this method of polynuclear aromatic compound removal effectively precludes the use of the heavy bottom fraction to produce additional charge stock for the hydrocracking zone.
  • US-A-4447315 teaches the removal of polynuclear aromatic compounds from the unconverted hydrocarbon effluent before the unconverted hydrocarbon is recycled to the hydrocracking reaction zone, by does not teach or suggest the process of the present invention.
  • the slop wax side stream is a vacuum distillation column side cut taken from a point below the draw-off point for the heavy vacuum gas oil but above the vacuum distillation column bottoms draw-off point.
  • the slop wax stream is preferably characterized as a hydrocarbonaceous stream having a 90% boiling point above 1050°F (565°C) and an asphaltene concentration of at least 0.5 weight percent.
  • the relatively small slop wax stream containing the polynuclear aromatic compounds which is a low value hydrocarbonaceous stream, may then be isolated from the hydrocracking unit, and thus any subsequent introduction and build-up of PNA compounds into the hydrocracking reaction zone may be conveniently prevented.
  • the fractionation zone bottoms stream becomes more suitable for upgrading into a deasphalted oil stream, which may then be suitably charged to the hydrocracking reaction zone.
  • trace quantities of polynuclear aromatic compounds preferably means a concentration of less than 10,000 parts per million (PPM), and more preferably less than 5,000 PPM.
  • the hydrocarbon charge stock subject to processing in accordance with the process of the present invention is suitably a reduced crude.
  • a reduced crude is generally prepared by the fractionation of a whole crude to produce a fractionator bottoms stream which boils at a temperature greater than 650°F (343°C).
  • a reduced crude is introduced into a fractionation zone to produce a vacuum gas oil stream containing compounds having a tendency to form polynuclear aromatic compounds on a hydrocracking zone, and a slop wax stream.
  • This vacuum gas oil stream may comprise a light vacuum gas oil stream and a heavy vacuum gas oil stream which are separately produced by the fractionation zone and are then subsequently mixed to produce the feedstock for the hydrocracking reaction zone.
  • the slop wax stream is a vacuum fractionation column sidecut taken from a point below the draw-off point for the vacuum gas oil as described hereinabove.
  • the resulting vacuum gas oil stream produced in the hereinabove described fractionation zone is introduced into a hydrocracking zone.
  • the hydrocracking zone contains a catalyst which comprises in general any crystalline zeolite cracking base upon which is deposited a minor proportion of a Group VIII metal hydrogenating component. Additional hydrogenation components may be selected from Group VIB for incorporation on the zeolite base.
  • the zeolite cracking bases are sometimes referred to in the art as molecular sieves, and are usually composed of silica, alumina and one or more exchangeable cations, such as sodium, hydrogen, magnesium, calcium, rare earth metals, etc. They are further characterized by crystal pores of relatively uniform diameter between 4 and 14 Angstroms (10 ⁇ 10m).
  • zeolites having a relatively high silica/alumina mole ratio between 3 and 12, and even more preferably between 4 and 8.
  • Suitable zeolites found in nature include for example mordenite, stilbite, heulandite, ferrierite, dachiardite, chabazite, erionite and faujasite.
  • Suitable synthetic zeolites include for example the B, X, Y and L crystal types, e.g., synthetic faujasite and mordenite.
  • the preferred zeolites are those having crystal pore diameters between 8 and 12 Angstroms, wherein the silica/alumina mole ratio is from 4 to 6.
  • a prime example of a zeolite falling in this preferred group is synthetic Y molecular sieve.
  • the natural occurring zeolites are normally found in a sodium form, an alkaline earth metal form, or mixed forms.
  • the synthetic zeolites are nearly always prepared first in the sodium form.
  • Hydrogen or "decationized" Y zeolites of this nature are more particularly described in US-A-3130006.
  • Mixed polyvalent metal-hydrogen zeolites may be prepared by ion-exchanging first with an ammonium salt, partially back-exchanging with a polyvalent metal salt, and then calcining.
  • the hydrogen forms can be prepared by direct acid treatment of the alkali metal zeolites.
  • the preferred cracking bases are those which are at least 10 percent, and preferably at least 20 percent, metal-cation-deficient, based on the initial ion exchange capacity.
  • a specifically desirable and stable class of zeolites are those wherein at least 20 percent of the ion exchange capacity is satisfied by hydrogen ions.
  • the active metals employed in the preferred catalysts of the present invention as hydrogenation components are those of Group VIII, i.e., iron, cobalt, nickel, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, iridium and platinum. In addition to these metals, other promoters may also be employed in conjunction therewith, including the metals of Group VIB, e.g., molybdenum and tungsten.
  • the amount of hydrogenating metal in the catalyst can vary over a wide range. Broadly speaking, any amount between 0.05 and 30 percent by weight may be used. In the case of the noble metals, it is normally preferred to use 0.05 to 2 weight percent.
  • the preferred method for incorporating the hydrogenating metal is to contact the zeolite base material with an aqueous solution of a suitable compound of the desired metal wherein the metal is present in a cationic form.
  • the resulting catalyst powder is then filtered, dried, pelleted with added lubricants, binders or the like if desired, and calcined in air at temperatures of, e.g., 700 to 1200°F (371 to 648°C), in order to activate the catalyst and decompose ammonium ions.
  • the zeolite component may first be pelleted, followed by the addition of the hydrogenating component and activation by calcining.
  • the foregoing catalysts may be employed in undiluted form, or the powdered zeolite catalyst may be mixed and copelleted with other relatively less active catalysts, diluents or binders, such as alumina, silica gel, silica-alumina cogels, activated clays and the like in proportions between 5 and 90 weight percent.
  • diluents or binders such as alumina, silica gel, silica-alumina cogels, activated clays and the like in proportions between 5 and 90 weight percent.
  • These diluents may be employed as such, or they may containing a minor proportion of an added hydrogenating metal, such as Group VIB and/or Group VIII metal.
  • Additional metal-promoted hydrocracking catalysts may also be utilized in the process of the present invention, for example, aluminophosphate molecular sieves, crystalline chromosilicates and other crystalline silicates. Crystalline chromosilicates are more fully described in US-A-4363718.
  • the hydrocracking of the hydrocarbonaceous feedstock in contact with a hydrocracking catalyst is conducted in the presence of hydrogen, and preferably at hydrocracking conditions which include a temperature from 450 to 850°F (232 to 454°C), a pressure from 500 to 3000 psig (3448 to 20685 kPa gauge), a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) from 0.2 to 20 hr. ⁇ 1, and a hydrogen circulation rate from 2000 to 10,000 standard cubic feet per barrel (355 to 1778 std m3/m3).
  • hydrocracking conditions which include a temperature from 450 to 850°F (232 to 454°C), a pressure from 500 to 3000 psig (3448 to 20685 kPa gauge), a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) from 0.2 to 20 hr. ⁇ 1, and a hydrogen circulation rate from 2000 to 10,000 standard cubic feet per barrel (355 to 1778 std m3/m3).
  • a product stream preferably boiling at less than 650°F (343°C) is separated and recovered, and a hydrocarbonaceous stream preferably boiling at a temperature above 650°F (343°C) is separated and recovered as a recycle stream.
  • This separation and recovery is preferably conducted in a fractionation zone associated with the hydrocracking zone.
  • At least a portion of the hereinabove described recycle stream is introduced into the hereinabove described fractionation zone utilized to produce the vacuum gas oil fresh feed. The amount thereof is typically selected to prevent the precipitation of PNA compounds on heat exchange surfaces of the hydrocracking unit, and in the preferred case substantially all of the recycle stream is passed back to the vacuum column.
  • the bottoms stream from the fractionation zone thereby becomes a more highly desirable stream for the production of a deasphalted oil, which is a suitable component of the charge stock for the hydrocracking reaction zone. It is preferred that a slop wax stream containing more than 50 percent of the polynuclear aromatic compounds introduced into the fractionation zone is produced and removed.
  • At least a portion of the bottoms stream from the fractionation zone is introduced into a solvent deasphalter, in order to produce a deasphalted oil which is subsequently charged to the hydrocracking reaction zone, and a pitch stream.
  • solvent deasphalting is the countercurrent extraction of an asphaltene-containing oil with a solvent, to prepare a deasphalted oil and a hydrocarbonaceous stream rich in asphaltenes and commonly referred to as pitch.
  • the fractionation zone bottoms stream is preferably countercurrent contacted with a hydrocarbon-selective solvent, in a solvent deasphalting zone, under deasphalting conditions selected to produce a solvent-lean asphaltic stream and a solvent-rich deasphalted hydrocarbonaceous stream.
  • the resulting solvent-rich deasphalted hydrocarbonaceous stream is fractionated to separate and recover the selective solvent, which may be recycled if so desired.
  • the solvent-free deasphalted hydrocarbonaceous stream is then charged to the hydrocracking zone.
  • the solvent deasphalting zone is preferably conducted at a temperature in the range of 50 to 600°F (10 to 315°C), at a pressure from 100 to 1000 psig (689 to 6895 kPa gauge), and with a solvent/charge stock volumetric ratio from 2:1 to 10:1. Suitable temperature and pressure conditions are preferably selected to maintain the deasphalting operations in liquid phase. Recently, solvent deasphalting zones have been operated at conditions wherein the solvent is in the supercritical state.
  • Suitable solvents include light hydrocarbons including ethane, propane, butane, isobutane, pentane, isopentane, neopentane, hexane, isohexane, heptane, the mono-olefinic counterparts thereof, and mixtures thereof.
  • a crude oil feedstream is introduced into the process via conduit 12 and passed into atmospheric crude distillation column 13 to produce a gasoline stream which is removed via conduit 14, a kerosene stream which is removed via conduit 15, a diesel stream which is removed via conduit 16, and a reduced crude stream which is removed via conduit 1.
  • the reduced crude stream is introduced via conduit 1 into vacuum distillation column 2.
  • a hydrocarbonaceous recycle stream which is derived in a manner hereinafter described is introduced into vacuum distillation column 2 via conduit 10.
  • a vacuum gas oil stream is removed from vacuum distillation column 2 via conduit 3 and is introduced into hydrocracking zone 8 via conduit 3 and conduit 7.
  • a hydrocarbonaceous slop wax stream containing polynuclear aromatic compounds is removed from vacuum distillation column 2 via conduit 11.
  • a vacuum distillation column bottoms stream is removed from vacuum distillation column 2 via conduit 4 and is introduced into solvent deasphalter 5.
  • a deasphalted oil stream is removed from solvent deasphalter 5 via conduit 7 and is introduced into hydrocracking zone 8.
  • a heavy pitch stream is removed from solvent deasphalter 5 via conduit 6.
  • a hydrocarbonaceous product stream is removed from hydrocracking zone 8 via conduit 9.
  • An unconverted hydrocarbonaceous recycle stream is removed from hydrocracking zone 8 via conduit 10 and is introduced into vacuum distillation column 2 as hereinabove described.
  • the vacuum distillation column bottoms stream was subjected to solvent deasphalting to produce the hereinabove mentioned 17.5 Kg/hr of deasphalted oil stream.
  • the feedstock comprising gas oil and deasphalted oil, and hydrogen was then contacted with two fixed beds of catalyst in a hydrocracking zone.
  • the first bed of catalyst comprises a silica-alumina support containing nickel and tungsten and is operated at a liquid hourly space velocity of 0.4 and an average catalyst temperature of 734°F (390°C).
  • the second bed of catalyst comprises an alumina-silica zeolite Y support containing nickel and tungsten and is operated at a liquid hourly space velocity of 1 and an average catalyst temperature of 660°F (349°C).
  • Both beds of catalyst are operated at a pressure of 2400 psig (16548 kPa gauge).
  • the effluent from the catalyst beds is cooled to 120°F (49°C) and then is passed to a high pressure separator which is maintained at 2000 psig (13790 kPa gauge).
  • a hydrogen-rich gaseous stream is removed from the high pressure separator and recycled together with fresh make-up hydrogen to the hydrocracking catalyst zone.
  • the liquid hydrocarbons from the high pressure separator were charged to a fractionator wherein 68.8 Kg/hr of normally liquid hydrocarbons boiling below 650°F (343°C) were separated and withdrawn as product.
  • the hydrocarbons boiling at a temperature greater than 650°F (343°C) in an amount of 24.5 Kg/hr and containing 115 weight parts per million (WPPM) of polynuclear aromatic compounds are withdrawn from the fractionator and recycled to the vacuum distillation column.
  • the resulting polynuclear aromatic compounds may be at least partially isolated and removed by the partial condensation of a portion of the normally liquid hydrocarbons leaving the hydrocracking catalyst zone.
  • the resulting polynuclear aromatic-rich partial condensate contains unconverted hydrocarbons, which will not be available to produce a valuable distillate product stream and therefore the loss of potentially valuable product represents a disadvantage of this prior art process.
  • Another prior art technique teaches that the fouling problem may be solved by subjecting at least a portion of the recycle oil to distillation to separate out a heavy bottoms fraction containing polynuclear aromatic compounds.
  • a fractionator sidecut stream commonly referred to as a slop wax stream.
  • the slop wax stream is a heavy, asphaltene-containing hydrocarbonaceous stream and, therefore, the removal of polynuclear aromatic compounds together with the slop wax stream minimizes, if not avoids, the disposal of gas oil and thereby permits the conversion of the gas oil in the hydrocracking zone, to provide valuable hydrocarbon product streams.
  • a greater proportion of the polynuclear aromatic compounds is purged from the system by discarding the slop wax stream than by discarding the fractionator bottoms.
  • this bottoms stream may then be deasphalted to provide a deasphalted oil stream which may then be charged to the hydrocracking zone in order to maximize the overall production of valuable hydrocarbon product.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Lubricants (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)

Abstract

The detrimental effects of polynuclear aromatic (PNA) by-products are controlled in a catalytic hydrocracking process by (a) introducing a reduced crude into a vacuum fractionation zone to produce a vacuum gas oil stream having a tendency to form detrimental PNA compounds in a hydrocracking zone, a slop wax side stream, and a vacuum bottoms; (b) contacting the vacuum gas oil stream in a hydrocracking zone with added hydrogen and a metal-promoted hydrocracking catalyst at elevated temperature and pressure sufficient to gain a substantial conversion to lower boiling products and to form trace quantities of PNA; (c) partially condensing the hydrocarbon effluent from the hydrocracking zone and separating the same into a low boiling hydrocarbon product stream and a stream containing unconverted hydrocarbons boiling above 650°F (343°C) and trace quantities of PNA compounds; and (d) introducing at least a portion of the stream containing the unconverted hydrocarbons and PNA compounds into the vacuum fractionation zone, thereby recovering a substantial portion of the polynuclear aromatic compounds in the slop wax side stream which significantly minimizes the introduction of the detrimental PNA compounds into the hydrocracking zone.

Description

  • This invention relates to a process for the hydrocracking of a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock having a tendency to form polynuclear aromatic (PNA) compounds, which can be carried out without excessively fouling the processing unit. More specifically, the invention relates to a process in which the problem arising from the effect of PNA compounds on a hydrocracking unit is solved by recycling these compounds to a fractionation zone preceding the hydrocracking unit.
  • US-A-4447315 discloses a method for hydrocracking a hydrocarbon feedstock having a tendency to form polynuclear aromatic compounds which includes contacting the hydrocarbon feedstock with a crystalline zeolite hydrocracking catalyst, contacting at least a portion of the resulting unconverted hydrocarbon oil containing polynuclear aromatic compounds with an adsorbent which selectively retains polynuclear aromatic compounds, and recycling unconverted hydrocarbon oil having a reduced concentration of polynuclear aromatic compounds to the hydrocracking zone.
  • US-A-3619407 discloses a process to prevent fouling of the equipment in a hydrocracking process unit which comprises partially cooling the effluent from the hydrocracking zone to condense a minor proportion of the normally liquid hydrocarbons therein, thereby forming a polynuclear aromatics-rich partial condensate and withdrawing a bleedstream of the partial condensate. That patent acknowledges as prior art that the fouling problem may also be solved by subjecting the recycle oil (the heavy portion of the hydrocracking zone effluent), or a substantial portion thereof, to atmospheric distillation or vacuum distillation to separate a heavy bottoms fraction containing polynuclear aromatic compounds.
  • The present invention provides a hydrocracking process which minimizes the fouling of the catalyst and the equipment used in the hydrocracking process unit with polynuclear aromatic compounds which can, if uncontrolled, precipitate on the equipment surfaces, particularly in the cooling equipment, and foul the pores of the catalyst. This is accomplished by subjecting unconverted hydrocarbon recovered from the hydrocracking zone, and containing trace quantities of polynuclear aromatic compounds, to vacuum fractionation, thereby recovering a substantial portion of the polynuclear aromatic compounds in a slop wax side stream, which significantly minimizes the introduction of the polynuclear aromatic compounds into the hydrocracking zone when these recovered hydrocarbons are recycled thereto.
  • One embodiment of the present invention relates to a catalytic hydrocracking process which comprises (a) introducing a reduced crude into a fractionation vacuum zone to produce a vacuum gas oil stream, containing compounds having a tendency to form polynuclear aromatic compounds in a hydrocracking zone, a slop wax side stream, and a vacuum distillation column bottoms; (b) contacting the vacuum gas oil stream in a hydrocracking zone with added hydrogen and a metal-promoted hydrocracking catalyst at elevated temperature and pressure sufficient to provide a substantial conversion to lower boiling products; (c) partially condensing the hydrocarbon effluent from the hydrocracking zone, and separating the same into a low boiling hydrocarbon product stream, a stream containing unconverted hydrocarbons boiling above 650°F (343°C), and trace quantities of polynuclear aromatic compounds; and (d) introducing at least a portion of the stream containing unconverted hydrocarbons and polynuclear aromatic compounds into the vacuum fractionation zone, thereby leading to recovery of a substantial portion of the polynuclear aromatic compounds in the slop wax side stream, which significantly minimizes introduction of the detrimental polynuclear aromatic compounds into the hydrocracking zone.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention relates to a process in which the vacuum distillation column bottoms are solvent deasphalted to produce a deasphalted oil stream which is passed to the hydrocracking zone with the vacuum gas oil stream.
  • Other embodiments of the present invention encompass further details such as types of feedstocks, catalysts, preferred fractionation and separation schemes, and preferred operating conditions including temperature and pressures, all of which are hereinafter disclosed in the following discussion of each of these facets of the invention.
  • The Drawing is a simplified process flow diagram of a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • It has now been discovered that a total recycle of unconverted oil can be maintained indefinitely in the above described hydrocracking process unit without encountering the above noted fouling or precipitation problems.
  • US-A-3619407 teaches that a small bleedstream of a polynuclear aromatic compound-rich partial condensate of the reactor effluent will minimize or eliminate the fouling or precipitation problem. However, the bleedstream contains unconverted charge stock, and when this stream is discarded, a portion of the potential recycle stream is lost, and the subsequent recovery of valuable lower boiling hydrocarbons, which could have been derived from the bleedstream, is forfeited.
  • As hereinabove acknowledged, the prior art has taught that the polynuclear aromatic compounds could be effectively removed from the unconverted hydrocarbon effluent from the hydrocracking zone by fractionation to produce a heavy bottom fraction containing polynuclear aromatic compounds. However, this method of polynuclear aromatic compound removal effectively precludes the use of the heavy bottom fraction to produce additional charge stock for the hydrocracking zone.
  • US-A-4447315 teaches the removal of polynuclear aromatic compounds from the unconverted hydrocarbon effluent before the unconverted hydrocarbon is recycled to the hydrocracking reaction zone, by does not teach or suggest the process of the present invention.
  • In accordance with the present invention, it has been discovered that when at least a portion of the unconverted hydrocarbon effluent from a hydrocracking reaction zone is introduced into the fractionation zone used to produce the original vacuum gas oil charge stock, a surprisingly unexpected amount of the polynuclear aromatic compound is recovered in a slop wax side stream which is removed from the fractionation zone. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the slop wax side stream is a vacuum distillation column side cut taken from a point below the draw-off point for the heavy vacuum gas oil but above the vacuum distillation column bottoms draw-off point. Traditionally, the slop wax stream is preferably characterized as a hydrocarbonaceous stream having a 90% boiling point above 1050°F (565°C) and an asphaltene concentration of at least 0.5 weight percent. As a result of this discovery, the relatively small slop wax stream containing the polynuclear aromatic compounds, which is a low value hydrocarbonaceous stream, may then be isolated from the hydrocracking unit, and thus any subsequent introduction and build-up of PNA compounds into the hydrocracking reaction zone may be conveniently prevented. Also, when a large proportion of the polynuclear aromatic compounds are removed from the fractionation zone via the slop wax stream, the fractionation zone bottoms stream becomes more suitable for upgrading into a deasphalted oil stream, which may then be suitably charged to the hydrocracking reaction zone.
  • In some instances when the concentration of foulants is small, only a portion of unconverted hydrocracking zone effluent oil may need to be introduced into the fractionation zone to recover a substantial portion of the polynuclear aromatic compounds in the slop wax stream in order to maintain the concentration of polynuclear aromatic compounds at a level below that which promotes precipitation and subsequent plating out on heat exchanger surfaces. The expression "trace quantities of polynuclear aromatic compounds" as used herein preferably means a concentration of less than 10,000 parts per million (PPM), and more preferably less than 5,000 PPM.
  • The hydrocarbon charge stock subject to processing in accordance with the process of the present invention is suitably a reduced crude. A reduced crude is generally prepared by the fractionation of a whole crude to produce a fractionator bottoms stream which boils at a temperature greater than 650°F (343°C).
  • In accordance with the process of the present invention, a reduced crude is introduced into a fractionation zone to produce a vacuum gas oil stream containing compounds having a tendency to form polynuclear aromatic compounds on a hydrocracking zone, and a slop wax stream. This vacuum gas oil stream may comprise a light vacuum gas oil stream and a heavy vacuum gas oil stream which are separately produced by the fractionation zone and are then subsequently mixed to produce the feedstock for the hydrocracking reaction zone. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the slop wax stream is a vacuum fractionation column sidecut taken from a point below the draw-off point for the vacuum gas oil as described hereinabove.
  • The resulting vacuum gas oil stream produced in the hereinabove described fractionation zone is introduced into a hydrocracking zone. Preferably, the hydrocracking zone contains a catalyst which comprises in general any crystalline zeolite cracking base upon which is deposited a minor proportion of a Group VIII metal hydrogenating component. Additional hydrogenation components may be selected from Group VIB for incorporation on the zeolite base. The zeolite cracking bases are sometimes referred to in the art as molecular sieves, and are usually composed of silica, alumina and one or more exchangeable cations, such as sodium, hydrogen, magnesium, calcium, rare earth metals, etc. They are further characterized by crystal pores of relatively uniform diameter between 4 and 14 Angstroms (10⁻¹⁰m). It is preferred to employ zeolites having a relatively high silica/alumina mole ratio between 3 and 12, and even more preferably between 4 and 8. Suitable zeolites found in nature include for example mordenite, stilbite, heulandite, ferrierite, dachiardite, chabazite, erionite and faujasite. Suitable synthetic zeolites include for example the B, X, Y and L crystal types, e.g., synthetic faujasite and mordenite. The preferred zeolites are those having crystal pore diameters between 8 and 12 Angstroms, wherein the silica/alumina mole ratio is from 4 to 6. A prime example of a zeolite falling in this preferred group is synthetic Y molecular sieve.
  • The natural occurring zeolites are normally found in a sodium form, an alkaline earth metal form, or mixed forms. The synthetic zeolites are nearly always prepared first in the sodium form. In any event, for use as a cracking base, it is preferred that most or all of the original monovalent metals be replaced by ion-exchange with a polyvalent metal and/or ammonium salt, followed by heating to decompose the ammonium ions associated with the zeolite, leaving in their place hydrogen ions and/or exchange sites which have actually been decationized by further removal of water. Hydrogen or "decationized" Y zeolites of this nature are more particularly described in US-A-3130006.
  • Mixed polyvalent metal-hydrogen zeolites may be prepared by ion-exchanging first with an ammonium salt, partially back-exchanging with a polyvalent metal salt, and then calcining. In some instances, as in the case of synthetic mordenite, the hydrogen forms can be prepared by direct acid treatment of the alkali metal zeolites. The preferred cracking bases are those which are at least 10 percent, and preferably at least 20 percent, metal-cation-deficient, based on the initial ion exchange capacity. A specifically desirable and stable class of zeolites are those wherein at least 20 percent of the ion exchange capacity is satisfied by hydrogen ions.
  • The active metals employed in the preferred catalysts of the present invention as hydrogenation components are those of Group VIII, i.e., iron, cobalt, nickel, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, iridium and platinum. In addition to these metals, other promoters may also be employed in conjunction therewith, including the metals of Group VIB, e.g., molybdenum and tungsten. The amount of hydrogenating metal in the catalyst can vary over a wide range. Broadly speaking, any amount between 0.05 and 30 percent by weight may be used. In the case of the noble metals, it is normally preferred to use 0.05 to 2 weight percent. The preferred method for incorporating the hydrogenating metal is to contact the zeolite base material with an aqueous solution of a suitable compound of the desired metal wherein the metal is present in a cationic form. Following addition of the selected hydrogenating metal or metals, the resulting catalyst powder is then filtered, dried, pelleted with added lubricants, binders or the like if desired, and calcined in air at temperatures of, e.g., 700 to 1200°F (371 to 648°C), in order to activate the catalyst and decompose ammonium ions. Alternatively, the zeolite component may first be pelleted, followed by the addition of the hydrogenating component and activation by calcining. The foregoing catalysts may be employed in undiluted form, or the powdered zeolite catalyst may be mixed and copelleted with other relatively less active catalysts, diluents or binders, such as alumina, silica gel, silica-alumina cogels, activated clays and the like in proportions between 5 and 90 weight percent. These diluents may be employed as such, or they may containing a minor proportion of an added hydrogenating metal, such as Group VIB and/or Group VIII metal.
  • Additional metal-promoted hydrocracking catalysts may also be utilized in the process of the present invention, for example, aluminophosphate molecular sieves, crystalline chromosilicates and other crystalline silicates. Crystalline chromosilicates are more fully described in US-A-4363718.
  • The hydrocracking of the hydrocarbonaceous feedstock in contact with a hydrocracking catalyst is conducted in the presence of hydrogen, and preferably at hydrocracking conditions which include a temperature from 450 to 850°F (232 to 454°C), a pressure from 500 to 3000 psig (3448 to 20685 kPa gauge), a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) from 0.2 to 20 hr. ⁻¹, and a hydrogen circulation rate from 2000 to 10,000 standard cubic feet per barrel (355 to 1778 std m³/m³).
  • After the hydrocarbonaceous feedstock has been subjected to hydrocracking as hereinabove described, a product stream preferably boiling at less than 650°F (343°C) is separated and recovered, and a hydrocarbonaceous stream preferably boiling at a temperature above 650°F (343°C) is separated and recovered as a recycle stream. This separation and recovery is preferably conducted in a fractionation zone associated with the hydrocracking zone. At least a portion of the hereinabove described recycle stream is introduced into the hereinabove described fractionation zone utilized to produce the vacuum gas oil fresh feed. The amount thereof is typically selected to prevent the precipitation of PNA compounds on heat exchange surfaces of the hydrocracking unit, and in the preferred case substantially all of the recycle stream is passed back to the vacuum column.
  • As a result of the discovery that a significant isolation and recovery of polynuclear aromatic compounds is unexpectedly achieved by the removal of a slop wax stream from the vacuum fractionation zone, the bottoms stream from the fractionation zone thereby becomes a more highly desirable stream for the production of a deasphalted oil, which is a suitable component of the charge stock for the hydrocracking reaction zone. It is preferred that a slop wax stream containing more than 50 percent of the polynuclear aromatic compounds introduced into the fractionation zone is produced and removed. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, at least a portion of the bottoms stream from the fractionation zone is introduced into a solvent deasphalter, in order to produce a deasphalted oil which is subsequently charged to the hydrocracking reaction zone, and a pitch stream.
  • The art of solvent deasphalting is well-known to those skilled in hydrocarbon processing. In essence, solvent deasphalting is the countercurrent extraction of an asphaltene-containing oil with a solvent, to prepare a deasphalted oil and a hydrocarbonaceous stream rich in asphaltenes and commonly referred to as pitch. In accordance with the present invention, the fractionation zone bottoms stream is preferably countercurrent contacted with a hydrocarbon-selective solvent, in a solvent deasphalting zone, under deasphalting conditions selected to produce a solvent-lean asphaltic stream and a solvent-rich deasphalted hydrocarbonaceous stream. The resulting solvent-rich deasphalted hydrocarbonaceous stream is fractionated to separate and recover the selective solvent, which may be recycled if so desired. The solvent-free deasphalted hydrocarbonaceous stream is then charged to the hydrocracking zone.
  • The solvent deasphalting zone is preferably conducted at a temperature in the range of 50 to 600°F (10 to 315°C), at a pressure from 100 to 1000 psig (689 to 6895 kPa gauge), and with a solvent/charge stock volumetric ratio from 2:1 to 10:1. Suitable temperature and pressure conditions are preferably selected to maintain the deasphalting operations in liquid phase. Recently, solvent deasphalting zones have been operated at conditions wherein the solvent is in the supercritical state.
  • Suitable solvents include light hydrocarbons including ethane, propane, butane, isobutane, pentane, isopentane, neopentane, hexane, isohexane, heptane, the mono-olefinic counterparts thereof, and mixtures thereof.
  • In the Drawing, the process of the present invention is illustrated by means of a simplified flow diagram in which such details as pumps, instrumentation, heat-exchange and heat-recovery circuits, compressors and similar hardware have been deleted as being non-essential to an understanding of the techniques involved. The use of such miscellaneous details is well known to one skilled in the art. With reference now to the Drawing, a crude oil feedstream is introduced into the process via conduit 12 and passed into atmospheric crude distillation column 13 to produce a gasoline stream which is removed via conduit 14, a kerosene stream which is removed via conduit 15, a diesel stream which is removed via conduit 16, and a reduced crude stream which is removed via conduit 1. The reduced crude stream is introduced via conduit 1 into vacuum distillation column 2. A hydrocarbonaceous recycle stream which is derived in a manner hereinafter described is introduced into vacuum distillation column 2 via conduit 10. A vacuum gas oil stream is removed from vacuum distillation column 2 via conduit 3 and is introduced into hydrocracking zone 8 via conduit 3 and conduit 7. A hydrocarbonaceous slop wax stream containing polynuclear aromatic compounds is removed from vacuum distillation column 2 via conduit 11. A vacuum distillation column bottoms stream is removed from vacuum distillation column 2 via conduit 4 and is introduced into solvent deasphalter 5. A deasphalted oil stream is removed from solvent deasphalter 5 via conduit 7 and is introduced into hydrocracking zone 8. A heavy pitch stream is removed from solvent deasphalter 5 via conduit 6. A hydrocarbonaceous product stream is removed from hydrocracking zone 8 via conduit 9. An unconverted hydrocarbonaceous recycle stream is removed from hydrocracking zone 8 via conduit 10 and is introduced into vacuum distillation column 2 as hereinabove described.
  • The following example is given to illustrate further the hydrocracking catalyst of the present invention.
  • EXAMPLE
  • 100 Kg/hr of a reduced crude having the properties presented in Table 1, and 24.5 Kg/hr of a hereinafter described recycle stream were introduced into a vacuum distillation column to produce 77.0 Kg/hr of vacuum gas oil, 5.5 Kg/hr of slop wax and 42.0 Kg/hr of vacuum distillation column bottoms.
    Figure imgb0001
    The resulting vacuum gas oil stream having a specific gravity of 0.9100, boiling in the range of 518 to 1049 °F (270 to 565°C) was introduced into a hydrocracking zone in admixture with 17.5 Kg/hr of a hereinafter described deasphalted oil and hydrogen in an amount of 1300 std m³/m³ of feedstock. The vacuum distillation column bottoms stream was subjected to solvent deasphalting to produce the hereinabove mentioned 17.5 Kg/hr of deasphalted oil stream. The feedstock comprising gas oil and deasphalted oil, and hydrogen was then contacted with two fixed beds of catalyst in a hydrocracking zone. The first bed of catalyst comprises a silica-alumina support containing nickel and tungsten and is operated at a liquid hourly space velocity of 0.4 and an average catalyst temperature of 734°F (390°C). The second bed of catalyst comprises an alumina-silica zeolite Y support containing nickel and tungsten and is operated at a liquid hourly space velocity of 1 and an average catalyst temperature of 660°F (349°C). Both beds of catalyst are operated at a pressure of 2400 psig (16548 kPa gauge). The effluent from the catalyst beds is cooled to 120°F (49°C) and then is passed to a high pressure separator which is maintained at 2000 psig (13790 kPa gauge). A hydrogen-rich gaseous stream is removed from the high pressure separator and recycled together with fresh make-up hydrogen to the hydrocracking catalyst zone. The liquid hydrocarbons from the high pressure separator were charged to a fractionator wherein 68.8 Kg/hr of normally liquid hydrocarbons boiling below 650°F (343°C) were separated and withdrawn as product. The hydrocarbons boiling at a temperature greater than 650°F (343°C) in an amount of 24.5 Kg/hr and containing 115 weight parts per million (WPPM) of polynuclear aromatic compounds are withdrawn from the fractionator and recycled to the vacuum distillation column.
  • A survey was conducted of selected hydrocarbon streams and the identity of the stream and the corresponding concentration of polynuclear aromatic compounds are presented in Table 2.
    Figure imgb0002
    This survey demonstrates that the reduced crude charge stock contains no detectable level of polynuclear aromatic compounds, while the recycle stream to the vacuum distillation column from the hydrocracking zone contained 115 ppm. It becomes apparent then that the hydrocracking zone generates polynuclear aromatic compounds which are known to be detrimental to the successful operation of the hydrocracking zone if they were to be introduced into the hydrocracking zone via the recycle of unconverted vacuum gas oil.
  • According to the teachings of US-A-3619407, the resulting polynuclear aromatic compounds may be at least partially isolated and removed by the partial condensation of a portion of the normally liquid hydrocarbons leaving the hydrocracking catalyst zone. The resulting polynuclear aromatic-rich partial condensate contains unconverted hydrocarbons, which will not be available to produce a valuable distillate product stream and therefore the loss of potentially valuable product represents a disadvantage of this prior art process. Another prior art technique teaches that the fouling problem may be solved by subjecting at least a portion of the recycle oil to distillation to separate out a heavy bottoms fraction containing polynuclear aromatic compounds.
  • It has now been discovered, as shown hereinabove that only a very small percentage of the polynuclear aromatic compounds is actually recovered in the heavy bottom fraction of a fractionator and that surprisingly and unexpectedly a major proportion of the polynuclear aromatic compounds is recovered in a fractionator sidecut stream, commonly referred to as a slop wax stream. The slop wax stream is a heavy, asphaltene-containing hydrocarbonaceous stream and, therefore, the removal of polynuclear aromatic compounds together with the slop wax stream minimizes, if not avoids, the disposal of gas oil and thereby permits the conversion of the gas oil in the hydrocracking zone, to provide valuable hydrocarbon product streams. Additionally, in accordance with the present invention, a greater proportion of the polynuclear aromatic compounds is purged from the system by discarding the slop wax stream than by discarding the fractionator bottoms. In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, since the fractionator bottoms have been found to contain only trace quantities of polynuclear aromatic compounds, this bottoms stream may then be deasphalted to provide a deasphalted oil stream which may then be charged to the hydrocracking zone in order to maximize the overall production of valuable hydrocarbon product.
  • The foregoing description, Drawing and example clearly illustrate the advantages encompassed by the process of the present invention and the benefits to be afforded with the use thereof.

Claims (7)

1. A catalytic hydrocracking process which comprises:
(a) introducing a reduced crude into a vacuum fractionation zone to produce a vacuum gas oil stream containing compounds having a tendency to form detrimental polynuclear aromatic compounds in a hydrocracking zone, a slop wax side stream, and a vacuum bottoms and
(b) contacting the vacuum gas oil stream in a hydrocracking zone with added hydrogen and a metal-promoted hydrocracking catalyst at elevated temperature and pressure sufficient to gain a substantial conversion to lower boiling products and to form trace quantities of polynuclear aromatic compounds; characterized by
(c) partially condensing the hydrocarbon effluent from the hydrocracking zone and separating it into a low boiling hydrocarbon product stream and a stream containing unconverted hydrocarbons boiling above 650°F (343°C) and the polynuclear aromatic compounds; and
(d) introducing at least a portion of the stream containing unconverted hydrocarbons and polynuclear aromatic compounds into the vacuum fractionation zone.
2. A process according to Claim 1 characterized in that said hydrocracking zone is maintained at a pressure from 500 to 3000 psig (3448 to 20685 kPa gauge) and at a temperature from 450 to 850°F (232 to 454°C).
3. A process according to Claim 1 or 2 characterized in that the metal-promoted hydrocracking catalyst comprises synthetic faujasite, nickel and tungsten.
4. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 3 characterized in that the slop wax side stream contains more than 50 percent of the polynuclear aromatic compounds introduced into the fractionation zone.
5. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 4 characterized in that the vacuum bottoms is subjected to solvent deasphalting to produce a deasphalted oil stream which is subsequently charged to hydrocracking step (b).
6. A process according to Claim 5 characterized in that the solvent deasphalting is conducted at a temperature from 50 to 600°F (10 to 315°C), a pressure from 100 to 1000 psig (689 to 6895 kPa gauge) and a solvent to charge stock volumetric ratio from 2:1 to 10:1.
7. A process according to Claim 5 or 6 characterized in that the solvent deasphalting is conducted with a solvent selected from ethane, propane, butane, isobutane, pentane, isopentane, neopentane, hexane, isohexane, heptane, mono-olefinic counterparts thereof, and mixtures thereof.
EP87308545A 1986-01-23 1987-09-28 Control of polynuclear aromatic by-products in a hydrocracking process Expired EP0309621B1 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/821,721 US4698146A (en) 1986-01-23 1986-01-23 Hydrocracking and recovering polynuclear aromatic compounds in slop wax stream
AT87308545T ATE62925T1 (en) 1987-09-28 1987-09-28 CONTROL OF AROMATIC POLYNUCLEAR BY-PRODUCTS IN A HYDROCRACKING PROCESS.
ES87308545T ES2021720B3 (en) 1987-09-28 1987-09-28 CONTROL OF AROMATIC POLYNUCLEAR PRODUCTS IN A HYDROFRACTIONING PROCESS
EP87308545A EP0309621B1 (en) 1987-09-28 1987-09-28 Control of polynuclear aromatic by-products in a hydrocracking process
DE8787308545T DE3769649D1 (en) 1987-09-28 1987-09-28 CONTROL OF AROMATIC POLYNUCLEAR BY-PRODUCTS IN A HYDROCRACKING PROCESS.
DD87307656A DD262444A5 (en) 1986-01-23 1987-10-05 METHOD FOR CATALYTIC HYDROCRACKING
GR91400477T GR3001857T3 (en) 1987-09-28 1991-04-25 Control of polynuclear aromatic by-products in a hydrocracking process

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP87308545A EP0309621B1 (en) 1987-09-28 1987-09-28 Control of polynuclear aromatic by-products in a hydrocracking process

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0309621A1 true EP0309621A1 (en) 1989-04-05
EP0309621B1 EP0309621B1 (en) 1991-04-24

Family

ID=8198049

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP87308545A Expired EP0309621B1 (en) 1986-01-23 1987-09-28 Control of polynuclear aromatic by-products in a hydrocracking process

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0309621B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE62925T1 (en)
DE (1) DE3769649D1 (en)
ES (1) ES2021720B3 (en)
GR (1) GR3001857T3 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0697455A3 (en) * 1994-07-22 1996-05-01 Shell Int Research Process for producing a hydrowax
CN1043051C (en) * 1994-07-22 1999-04-21 国际壳牌研究有限公司 Process for producing a hydrowax
EP0816473B1 (en) * 1991-06-25 2002-09-25 Exxonmobil Oil Corporation Use of non-carcinogenic bright stock extracts in printing oils
WO2006066857A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-29 Eni S.P.A. Process for the conversion of heavy charge stocks such as heavy crude oils and distillation residues
FR2906814A1 (en) * 2006-10-06 2008-04-11 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR CONVERTING DESASPHALTEE OIL
ES2552736R1 (en) * 2013-02-25 2015-12-21 Foster Wheeler Usa Corporation INCREASE OF FUEL PRODUCTION THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF VACUUM DISTILLATION WITH DISASSEMBLY WITH SOLVENTS

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR1411301A (en) * 1963-09-03 1965-09-17 Gulf Research Development Co Hydrocarbon treatment process
US4447315A (en) * 1983-04-22 1984-05-08 Uop Inc. Hydrocracking process

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR1411301A (en) * 1963-09-03 1965-09-17 Gulf Research Development Co Hydrocarbon treatment process
US4447315A (en) * 1983-04-22 1984-05-08 Uop Inc. Hydrocracking process

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0816473B1 (en) * 1991-06-25 2002-09-25 Exxonmobil Oil Corporation Use of non-carcinogenic bright stock extracts in printing oils
EP0697455A3 (en) * 1994-07-22 1996-05-01 Shell Int Research Process for producing a hydrowax
CN1043051C (en) * 1994-07-22 1999-04-21 国际壳牌研究有限公司 Process for producing a hydrowax
WO2006066857A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-29 Eni S.P.A. Process for the conversion of heavy charge stocks such as heavy crude oils and distillation residues
FR2906814A1 (en) * 2006-10-06 2008-04-11 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR CONVERTING DESASPHALTEE OIL
ES2552736R1 (en) * 2013-02-25 2015-12-21 Foster Wheeler Usa Corporation INCREASE OF FUEL PRODUCTION THROUGH THE INTEGRATION OF VACUUM DISTILLATION WITH DISASSEMBLY WITH SOLVENTS

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GR3001857T3 (en) 1992-11-23
ES2021720B3 (en) 1991-11-16
EP0309621B1 (en) 1991-04-24
ATE62925T1 (en) 1991-05-15
DE3769649D1 (en) 1991-05-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4698146A (en) Hydrocracking and recovering polynuclear aromatic compounds in slop wax stream
US6379535B1 (en) Hydrocracking process
US6379532B1 (en) Hydrocracking process
US5980729A (en) Hydrocracking process
US6190535B1 (en) Hydrocracking process
US6096191A (en) Process for hydrocracking a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock
US6623623B2 (en) Simultaneous hydroprocessing of two feedstocks
US6106694A (en) Hydrocracking process
US4954242A (en) Process for refractory compound removal in a hydrocracker recycle liquid
US7470358B1 (en) Integrated process for the production of low sulfur diesel
US7005057B1 (en) Hydrocracking process for the production of ultra low sulfur diesel
US7682500B2 (en) Hydrocarbon conversion process
US6638418B1 (en) Dual recycle hydrocracking process
US6451197B1 (en) Process for hydrocracking a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock
US5139644A (en) Process for refractory compound conversion in a hydrocracker recycle liquid
US4931165A (en) Process for refractory compound rejection from a hydrocracker recycle liquid
US6328879B1 (en) Simultaneous hydroprocesssing of two feedstocks
US5139646A (en) Process for refractory compound removal in a hydrocracker recycle liquid
US4921595A (en) Process for refractory compound conversion in a hydrocracker recycle liquid
US6361683B1 (en) Hydrocracking process
US7108779B1 (en) Hydrocarbon desulfurization process
EP0309621B1 (en) Control of polynuclear aromatic by-products in a hydrocracking process
WO2002034866A1 (en) A method to produce lube basestock
WO2002026917A1 (en) Hydrocracking process
CA2491012C (en) An improved hydrocracking process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE DE ES FR GB GR IT NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19890918

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19900523

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: UOP (A NEW YORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP)

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE DE ES FR GB GR IT NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 62925

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19910515

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3769649

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19910529

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: MODIANO & ASSOCIATI S.R.L.

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: FG4A

Free format text: 3001857

EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 87308545.0

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20010831

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20020830

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20020830

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20020903

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20020903

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20020927

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20020927

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20020927

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20021009

Year of fee payment: 16

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030928

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030928

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030929

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030930

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *UOP (A NEW YORK GENERAL PARTNERSHIP)

Effective date: 20030930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040402

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20030928

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040528

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20040401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20030929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050928