EP0289553B1 - Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression - Google Patents

Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0289553B1
EP0289553B1 EP87907265A EP87907265A EP0289553B1 EP 0289553 B1 EP0289553 B1 EP 0289553B1 EP 87907265 A EP87907265 A EP 87907265A EP 87907265 A EP87907265 A EP 87907265A EP 0289553 B1 EP0289553 B1 EP 0289553B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sum
quadrants
return energy
difference
excitable elements
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP87907265A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0289553A1 (en
Inventor
Steven W. Bartley
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Raytheon Co
Original Assignee
Hughes Aircraft Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hughes Aircraft Co filed Critical Hughes Aircraft Co
Priority to EP92116842A priority Critical patent/EP0544081B1/en
Publication of EP0289553A1 publication Critical patent/EP0289553A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0289553B1 publication Critical patent/EP0289553B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q25/00Antennas or antenna systems providing at least two radiating patterns
    • H01Q25/02Antennas or antenna systems providing at least two radiating patterns providing sum and difference patterns

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an antenna system adapted for radar application using sum and difference signals for tracking a target including:
  • the invention relates further to a method of operating an antenna system adapted for radar application using sum and difference signals for tracking a target, including the steps of:
  • the invention relates to optimization of antenna sum and difference patterns, and in particular, to a sidelobe suppression arrangement for a monopulse antenna using sum and difference patterns to track targets.
  • a monopulse antenna may be subdivided into sections, for example, by using horns or quadrants, and the radar then senses the target displacement by comparing the amplitude and phase of the echo signal for each horn or quadrant.
  • the RF circuitry for a conventional antenna divided into quadrants subtracts the output of the left pair from the output of the right pair to sense any imbalance in the azimuth direction (azimuth difference pattern) and the output of the top pair from the output of the bottom pair to sense any imbalance in the elevation direction (elevation difference pattern).
  • azimuth difference pattern the output of the left pair from the output of the right pair to sense any imbalance in the azimuth direction
  • elevation difference pattern elevation difference pattern
  • a sum signal is generated and used as a reference signal, for video input, and for gain control.
  • Document US-3,711,858 is also concerned with a monopulse radar antenna using sidelobe suppression.
  • this antenna wave guide sections are provided in the four quadrants with adjacent ends of the wave guides in the quadrants being staggerd such that certain wave guides in one quadrant extend into the adjacent quadrant and vice-versa. Thereby the lobe of the transition in phase from one quadrant to the other is reduced.
  • an antenna system of the kind mentioned of the outset is characterized in that
  • the present invention is thus characterized, in that the sum signal is calculated as the sum of the return energy of all of the excitable elements; that the azimuth difference signal is calculated as the difference between the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the two left-handed quadrants and the left horizontal strip (i.e.
  • the elevation difference signal is calculated as the difference between the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the two upper quadrants and the top vertical strip (i.e., an upper segment), and the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the two lower quadrants and the bottom vertical strip (i.e., a lower segment).
  • a conventional five horn antenna for providing sum and difference signals.
  • five horn antennas A,B,C,D,E are arranged with antenna A, the left antenna; B, the top antenna; C, the right antenna; D, the bottom antenna; and E, the antenna filling the center space around which antennas A,B,C, and D are arranged.
  • An elevation difference signal is obtained by subtracting the return energy from antenna D from the return energy of antenna B and an azimuth difference signal is provided by subtracting the return energy of antenna C from the return energy of antenna A.
  • a sum signal is provided by the return energy of antenna E alone.
  • the antenna 10 is shown as having an aperture 12 circular in shape and as having an array of radiating and receiving elements 20.
  • the antenna is a broadband antenna designed to operate, for example, in a missile.
  • the aperture is partitioned into substantially equal and symmetrical quadrants 14, 15, 16 and 17.
  • Quadrants 14 and 15 define the top elevation hemisphere for aperture 12, while quadrants 16 and 17 define the bottom elevation hemisphere for aperture 12. More particularly, quadrant 14 defines the top left quadrant, quadrant 15 the top right quadrant, quadrant 16 the bottom right quadrant, and quadrant 17 the bottom left quadrant.
  • Strip 24 includes strip K, which contains elements which may be taken substantially equally from quadrants 14 and 17.
  • Strip 24 also includes strip I which contains elements which may be taken substantially equally from quadrants 15 and 16.
  • Strip 26 includes strip H, which contains elements which may be taken substantially equally from quadrants 14 and 15 and strip J, which contains elements. which may be taken substantially equally from quadrants 16 and 17.
  • quadrants A, B, C, and D refer to the remainder of quadrants 14, 15, 16, and 17 in FIG. 2a respectively after taking the respective elements for strips 24 and 26.
  • strips 24 and 26 are selectively excluded in generating the difference pattern signals, resulting in a reduction in the sidelobes for the azimuth and elevation difference patterns as further explained below.
  • FIG. 2b there is shown a diagram of the sum and difference network for connecting the return signals from the quadrants and strips of FIG. 2b for achieving low difference pattern sidelobes.
  • the sum pattern to be used for the antenna of FIG. 2a, to be provided by the network of FIG. 2b, is (A + B + C + D) + ( H + I + J + K) ;
  • the azimuth difference pattern is (A + D + K) - (B + C + I) ;
  • the elevation difference pattern is (A + B + H) - (C + D + J) .
  • each quadrant and strip is selectively coupled with that of one other quadrant or strip at parallel hybrids 41, 42, 43, and 44.
  • the hybrids are standard commerically available sum and difference hybrids, i.e, sum and difference magic T's, commonly used in comparator circuits.
  • the coupling coefficient for each hybrid would vary depending on aperture design and would be chosen to provide, as close as possible, an ideal sum distribution pattern.
  • the returns from strips K and I are fed into hybrid 41.
  • the returns from strips H and J are likewise fed into hybrid 42.
  • the returns from quadrants A and D are fed into hybrid 43.
  • the returns from quadrants B and C are fed into hybrid 44.
  • K and I are combined at hybrid 41 to provide (K + I) and the difference is taken at hybrid 41 to provide (K - I).
  • the same process is repeated for H and J at hybrid 42 to provide (H+J) and (H-J); at hybrid 43 to provide (A + D) and (A -D); and at hybrid 44 to provide (B + C) and (B - C).
  • the outputs from hybrids 41, 42, 43, and 44 are selectively added and subtracted to provide further desirable combinations of quadrants A, B, C, D and strips H, I, J, and K.
  • the (K + I) output from hybrid 41 and the (H + J) output from hybrid 42 are combined in phase at hybrid 51 for providing at the output of hybrid 51 (H + J + K + I) .
  • the (B + C) output at hybrid 44 is subtracted from the (A + D) output of hybrid 43 at hybrid 52 for providing at the output of hybrid 52 (A +D)-(B + C) , and is combined in phase with (B + C) to provide (A + D + B + C) .
  • the (A-D) output of hybrid 43 is likewise combined with the (B-C) output of hybrid 44 for providing at the output of hybrid 53 (A + B) - (C + D) and is subtracted at hybrid 53 to provide at the output of hybrid 53, (A + C) - (B + D) which is not used and is therefore terminated.
  • hybrid 51 (H + J) + (K + I) is combined with the (A + B) + (C + D) output of hybrid 52 at hybrid 61 to provide (A + B + C + D) + (H + I + J + K) .
  • the (K - I) output of hybrid 41 is combined with the (A + D) - (B + C) output of hybrid 52 at hybrid 62 to provide (A + D + K) - (B + C + I) at the output of hybrid 62.
  • the (H - J) output of hybrid 42 is combined with the (A + B) - (C + D) output of hybrid 53 at hybrid 63 to provide (A + B + H) - (C + D + J) at the output of hybrid 63.
  • FIG. 4a and FIG. 4b Shown in FIG. 4a and FIG. 4b are comparisons of measured data for the original difference signals using the whole ("original") aperture return signal of FIG. 2a compared to the difference signals with the horizontal and vertical strips selectively excluded using the return in FIG. 2b.
  • the difference signals are for all practical purposes symmetrical on either side of boresight and the discussion below applies to the sidelobe patterns on both the right and left of boresight.
  • Fig. 4a Shown is the original configuration elevation sum and difference signals (left side figure) and the elevation difference signal with horizontal strips I and K excluded (right side figure). It is observed from Fig. 4a that the original elevation difference pattern has a near in sidelobe of around -15dB at around 20°. Compare this to the right side figure of 4a, which depicts the elevation difference pattern with the horizontal strip excluded. Here the near in sidelobes rapidly drop to near -25dB at 30° and form deep nulls.
  • Fig. 4b Shown are the original azimuth sum and difference signals (left side figure) and the azimuth difference signal with strips H and J excluded (right side figure).
  • the original azimuth difference pattern displays near-in sidelobes of - 15dB at around 25°.
  • the azimuth difference pattern with the vertical strip excluded is markedly different.
  • the near in sidelobes are -27dB at 25° and deep nulls are formed.
  • Fig. 3a shows an embodiment (not subject of the present invention) wherein a center section of the elements are selectively excluded in generating the difference patterns.
  • Fig. 3b shows a sum and difference network for providing the desired sum and difference signals.
  • the circuit of Fig. 3b has the advantage of using only five hybrids, which is of high utility for applications where space is very important (i.e., missile radar systems, etc.). Data for the embodiment shown in Figs. 3a and 3b is comparable to that for the embodiment shown in Fig. 2a and Fig. 2b.
  • one embodiment of the invention by selectively excluding a vertical strip of elements along the azimuth axis, can reduce the sidelobes for the azimuth difference pattern and, by selectively excluding a horizontal strip of elements along the elevation axis, can reduce the sidelobes for the elevation difference pattern.
  • excluding other predetermined cross section patterns of the aperture may permit further optimization of the signals, i.e., permit other combinations for reducing the sidelobes in the difference pattern while minimizing circuit complexity and maintaining sum signal quality.

Landscapes

  • Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

Radar system using sum and difference signals for tracking targets, wherein the system includes aperture means (10) having a cross sectional area for transmitting energy toward a target and receiving return energy; and circuit means for generating sum and difference signals, the circuit means being selectively coupled to said aperture means, with the sum signal being generated using energy from the entire aperture means and with the difference signals being generated using return energy from the aperture means exclusive of energy from a predetermined area (H, I, J, K). The invention permits simultaneous optimization of the sum and difference signals and also suppresses the near-in sidelobes in the difference signals.

Description

  • The present invention relates to an antenna system adapted for radar application using sum and difference signals for tracking a target including:
    • a) a monopulse antenna having
    • a1) a cross sectional area for transmitting energy toward a target and receiving return energy;
    • a2) an array of excitable elements symmetrically disposed about azimuth and elevation axes; wherein
    • a3) said cross-sectional area is divided into a left and a right horizontal strip along the elevation axis, a top and a bottom vertical strip along the azimuth axis, and four quadrants, each of said strips and quadrants containing several of said excitable elements;
    • b) circuit means coupled to said excitable elements, said circuit means generating a sum signal and azimuth and elevation difference signals using return energy from said excitable elements, wherein said azimuth difference signal is calculated excluding the return energy of said excitable elements in said vertical strips, and said elevation difference signal is calculated excluding the return energy of said excitable elements in said horizontal strips.
  • The invention relates further to a method of operating an antenna system adapted for radar application using sum and difference signals for tracking a target, including the steps of:
    • a) transmitting energy toward said target and receiving return energy with a monopulse antenna;
    • b) dividing a cross-sectional area of said monopulse antenna into a left and a right horizontal strip along the elevation axis, a top and a bottom vertical strip along the azimuth axis, and four quadrants, each of said strips and quadrants containing several excitable elements symmetrically disposed about said azimuth and elevation axes;
    • c) coupling return energy from said excitable elements of said monopulse antenna to circuit means,
    • d) generating with said circuit means
    • d1) a sum signal,
    • d2) an azimuth difference signal, thereby excluding the return energy from the excitable elements in said vertical strips,
    • d3) an elevation difference signal, thereby excluding the return energy from the excitable elements in said horizontal strips.
  • An antenna and a method of this kind are known from the publication "A Multielement High Power Monopulse Feed with Low Sidelobe and High Aperture Efficiency" by Nam San Wong et al., IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. AP-22, No. 3, May 1974.
  • More specifically, the invention relates to optimization of antenna sum and difference patterns, and in particular, to a sidelobe suppression arrangement for a monopulse antenna using sum and difference patterns to track targets.
  • As is generally known, a monopulse antenna may be subdivided into sections, for example, by using horns or quadrants, and the radar then senses the target displacement by comparing the amplitude and phase of the echo signal for each horn or quadrant.
  • The RF circuitry for a conventional antenna divided into quadrants subtracts the output of the left pair from the output of the right pair to sense any imbalance in the azimuth direction (azimuth difference pattern) and the output of the top pair from the output of the bottom pair to sense any imbalance in the elevation direction (elevation difference pattern). See Radar Handbook, Merrill Skolnik, McGraw Hill, 1970. The subtractor outputs, i.e., the difference patterns, are zero when the target is on axis, increasing in amplitude with increasing displacement of the target from the antenna axis.
  • A sum signal, usually representative of the energy received over the entire aperture, is generated and used as a reference signal, for video input, and for gain control.
  • There are many trade-offs in feed design and radiation patterns because optimum sum and difference signals, low sidelobe levels, polarization diversity, compactness, and simplicity cannot all be fully satisfied simultaneously, especially when using a single feed. Historically, a common approach has been to optimize the sum pattern and to tolerate the resulting difference pattern signal. However, it is generally regarded that optimizing undesirable features of the difference patterns are important in eliminating significant tracking problems. See Corlin, US 4,525,716; June 15, 1985. For example, high sidelobes in the difference signals increase radar susceptibility to interference from background clutter or other off axis sources of radiation which results in tracking error and loss of efficiency.
  • It is thus a major goal of the present invention to provide an antenna system of the kind described above which simultaneously optimizes the sum and difference signals.
  • The publication by Nam San Wong et al., mentioned at the outset, describes an approach of optimizing the sum and difference signals in terms of sidelobe suppression. As a result of a mathematical model, the signals received from 32 elements are multiplied with excitation coefficients, i.e. weighted. The excitation coefficients are complicated fractional expressions and different for the calculation of the sum, the azimuth difference and the elevation difference.
  • Document US-3,711,858 is also concerned with a monopulse radar antenna using sidelobe suppression. In this antenna wave guide sections are provided in the four quadrants with adjacent ends of the wave guides in the quadrants being staggerd such that certain wave guides in one quadrant extend into the adjacent quadrant and vice-versa. Thereby the lobe of the transition in phase from one quadrant to the other is reduced.
  • The arrangement of antenna elements in a certain pattern, although for a different purpose (namely to switch a monopulse antenna between wide-beam acquisition mode and narrow-beam tracking mode), is already known from US 3,965,475.
  • DE-A-27 36 497 also deals with side lobe suppression. However, this publications aims primarily at the generation of a combined difference signal.
  • According to the present invention, an antenna system of the kind mentioned of the outset is characterized in that
    • c) said circuit means provide
    • c1) said sum signal as the sum of the return energy of all said excitable elements,
    • c2) said azimuth difference signal as the difference between
    • c2.1) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the left-hand two of said quadrants and said left horizontal strip and
    • c2.2) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the right-hand two of said quadrants and said right horizontal strip,
    • c3) said elevation difference signal as the difference between
    • c3.1) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the upper two of said quadrants and said top vertical strip and
    • c3.2) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the lower two of said quadrants and said bottom vertical strip.
  • Further, the method mentioned at the outset is characterized by the steps of:
    • e) generating said sum signal as the sum of the return energy of all said excitable elements,
    • f) generating said azimuth difference signal as the difference between
    • f1) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the left-hand two of said quadrants and said left horizontal strip and
    • f2) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the right-hand two of said quadrants and said right horizontal strip,
    • g) generating said elevation difference signal as the difference between
    • g1) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the upper two of said quadrants and said top vertical strip and
    • g2) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the lower two of said quadrants and said bottom vertical strip.
  • The present invention is thus characterized, in that the sum signal is calculated as the sum of the return energy of all of the excitable elements; that the azimuth difference signal is calculated as the difference between the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the two left-handed quadrants and the left horizontal strip (i.e. a left-hand segment), and the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the two right-handed quadrants and the right horizontal strip (i.e., a right-hand segment); and that the elevation difference signal is calculated as the difference between the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the two upper quadrants and the top vertical strip (i.e., an upper segment), and the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements in the two lower quadrants and the bottom vertical strip (i.e., a lower segment).
  • The effect of the above measures is that the sum and difference signals are simultaneously optimized. In the drawings,
  • Fig. 1
    is a conventional five horn antenna for providing sum and difference patterns;
    Fig. 2a
    is an embodiment of the invention showing an aperture having an array of elements partitioned into quadrants and strips;
    Fig. 2b
    is a sum and difference network for providing desired sum and difference signals for the embodiment of Fig. 2a;
    Fig. 3a
    is an alternative embodiment (not subject of the present invention) showing an aperture having an array of elements partitioned into quadrants and a selectively excluded center section;
    Fig. 3b
    is a sum and difference network for providing desired sum and difference signals for the embodiment of Fig. 3a;
    Fig. 4a
    is a comparison of the elevation difference pattern signals for the embodiment of Fig. 2a, before and after selectively excluding elements along the elevation axis in generating the signals, and
    Fig. 4b
    is a comparison of the azimuth difference pattern signals for the embodiment of Fig. 2a, before and after selectively excluding elements along the azimuth axis in generating the pattern signals.
  • Refer again to Fig. 1. There is shown a conventional five horn antenna for providing sum and difference signals. As shown in Fig. 1, five horn antennas A,B,C,D,E are arranged with antenna A, the left antenna; B, the top antenna; C, the right antenna; D, the bottom antenna; and E, the antenna filling the center space around which antennas A,B,C, and D are arranged. An elevation difference signal is obtained by subtracting the return energy from antenna D from the return energy of antenna B and an azimuth difference signal is provided by subtracting the return energy of antenna C from the return energy of antenna A. A sum signal is provided by the return energy of antenna E alone. This form of antenna feed and others have been used in tracking radar systems, but have suffered from the problem of achieving high sum gain while preserving low sidelobes in the difference patterns. Similar problems are encountered where the antenna consists of a single aperture containing an array of radiating elements and the difference patterns are similarly generated using one half the aperture minus the opposite half of the aperture.
  • Referring now to Fig. 2a, there is shown an embodiment of the invention. In Fig. 2a, the antenna 10 is shown as having an aperture 12 circular in shape and as having an array of radiating and receiving elements 20. The antenna is a broadband antenna designed to operate, for example, in a missile. The aperture is partitioned into substantially equal and symmetrical quadrants 14, 15, 16 and 17. Quadrants 14 and 15 define the top elevation hemisphere for aperture 12, while quadrants 16 and 17 define the bottom elevation hemisphere for aperture 12. More particularly, quadrant 14 defines the top left quadrant, quadrant 15 the top right quadrant, quadrant 16 the bottom right quadrant, and quadrant 17 the bottom left quadrant.
  • Also shown in FIG. 2a is a horizontal strip of elements 24 along the elevation axis and a vertical strip of elements 26 along the azimuth axis. Strip 24 includes strip K, which contains elements which may be taken substantially equally from quadrants 14 and 17. Strip 24 also includes strip I which contains elements which may be taken substantially equally from quadrants 15 and 16. Strip 26 includes strip H, which contains elements which may be taken substantially equally from quadrants 14 and 15 and strip J, which contains elements. which may be taken substantially equally from quadrants 16 and 17. As further shown in FIG. 2a, quadrants A, B, C, and D refer to the remainder of quadrants 14, 15, 16, and 17 in FIG. 2a respectively after taking the respective elements for strips 24 and 26.
  • In operation in this embodiment strips 24 and 26 are selectively excluded in generating the difference pattern signals, resulting in a reduction in the sidelobes for the azimuth and elevation difference patterns as further explained below.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2b, there is shown a diagram of the sum and difference network for connecting the return signals from the quadrants and strips of FIG. 2b for achieving low difference pattern sidelobes.
  • The sum pattern to be used for the antenna of FIG. 2a, to be provided by the network of FIG. 2b, is (A + B + C + D) + ( H + I + J + K)
    Figure imgb0001
    ; the azimuth difference pattern is (A + D + K) - (B + C + I)
    Figure imgb0002
    Figure imgb0003
    ; and the elevation difference pattern is (A + B + H) - (C + D + J)
    Figure imgb0004
    .
  • To achieve the necessary combination of returns to provide the desired sum and difference patterns mentioned above, initially the return of each quadrant and strip is selectively coupled with that of one other quadrant or strip at parallel hybrids 41, 42, 43, and 44. The hybrids are standard commerically available sum and difference hybrids, i.e, sum and difference magic T's, commonly used in comparator circuits. The coupling coefficient for each hybrid would vary depending on aperture design and would be chosen to provide, as close as possible, an ideal sum distribution pattern. As shown in FIG. 2b, the returns from strips K and I are fed into hybrid 41. The returns from strips H and J are likewise fed into hybrid 42. The returns from quadrants A and D are fed into hybrid 43. The returns from quadrants B and C are fed into hybrid 44. K and I are combined at hybrid 41 to provide (K + I) and the difference is taken at hybrid 41 to provide (K - I). The same process is repeated for H and J at hybrid 42 to provide (H+J) and (H-J); at hybrid 43 to provide (A + D) and (A -D); and at hybrid 44 to provide (B + C) and (B - C).
  • Referring further to FIG. 2b, the outputs from hybrids 41, 42, 43, and 44 are selectively added and subtracted to provide further desirable combinations of quadrants A, B, C, D and strips H, I, J, and K. The (K + I) output from hybrid 41 and the (H + J) output from hybrid 42 are combined in phase at hybrid 51 for providing at the output of hybrid 51 (H + J + K + I)
    Figure imgb0005
    . The (B + C) output at hybrid 44 is subtracted from the (A + D) output of hybrid 43 at hybrid 52 for providing at the output of hybrid 52 (A +D)-(B + C)
    Figure imgb0006
    , and is combined in phase with (B + C) to provide (A + D + B + C)
    Figure imgb0007
    . The (A-D) output of hybrid 43 is likewise combined with the (B-C) output of hybrid 44 for providing at the output of hybrid 53 (A + B) - (C + D)
    Figure imgb0008
    and is subtracted at hybrid 53 to provide at the output of hybrid 53, (A + C) - (B + D)
    Figure imgb0009
    which is not used and is therefore terminated.
  • To provide the sum signal, (A + D + B + C) + (H + I + J + K)
    Figure imgb0010
    Figure imgb0011
    ; the azimuth difference signal, (A + D + K)-(B + C + I)
    Figure imgb0012
    ; and the elevation difference signal, (A + B + H) - (C + D + J)
    Figure imgb0013
    , the outputs from hybrids 51, 52, and 53 are further selectively combined.
  • To provide the sum signal, the output of hybrid 51, (H + J) + (K + I)
    Figure imgb0014
    is combined with the (A + B) + (C + D)
    Figure imgb0015
    Figure imgb0016
    output of hybrid 52 at hybrid 61 to provide (A + B + C + D) + (H + I + J + K)
    Figure imgb0017
    .
  • To provide the azimuth difference signal, the (K - I) output of hybrid 41 is combined with the (A + D) - (B + C)
    Figure imgb0018
    Figure imgb0019
    output of hybrid 52 at hybrid 62 to provide (A + D + K) - (B + C + I)
    Figure imgb0020
    at the output of hybrid 62.
  • To provide the elevation difference siganl, the (H - J) output of hybrid 42 is combined with the (A + B) - (C + D)
    Figure imgb0021
    Figure imgb0022
    output of hybrid 53 at hybrid 63 to provide (A + B + H) - (C + D + J)
    Figure imgb0023
    at the output of hybrid 63.
  • Shown in FIG. 4a and FIG. 4b are comparisons of measured data for the original difference signals using the whole ("original") aperture return signal of FIG. 2a compared to the difference signals with the horizontal and vertical strips selectively excluded using the return in FIG. 2b. The difference signals are for all practical purposes symmetrical on either side of boresight and the discussion below applies to the sidelobe patterns on both the right and left of boresight.
  • Refer now to Fig. 4a. Shown is the original configuration elevation sum and difference signals (left side figure) and the elevation difference signal with horizontal strips I and K excluded (right side figure). It is observed from Fig. 4a that the original elevation difference pattern has a near in sidelobe of around -15dB at around 20°. Compare this to the right side figure of 4a, which depicts the elevation difference pattern with the horizontal strip excluded. Here the near in sidelobes rapidly drop to near -25dB at 30° and form deep nulls.
  • Even more dramatic results are displayed in Fig. 4b. Shown are the original azimuth sum and difference signals (left side figure) and the azimuth difference signal with strips H and J excluded (right side figure). The original azimuth difference pattern displays near-in sidelobes of - 15dB at around 25°. The azimuth difference pattern with the vertical strip excluded is markedly different. The near in sidelobes are -27dB at 25° and deep nulls are formed.
  • In both cases, the sidelobes have been suppressed 10dB or greater. This is most significant in the case of the near in sidelobe which is critical to clutter and jamming concerns.
  • Fig. 3a shows an embodiment (not subject of the present invention) wherein a center section of the elements are selectively excluded in generating the difference patterns. Fig. 3b shows a sum and difference network for providing the desired sum and difference signals. The circuit of Fig. 3b has the advantage of using only five hybrids, which is of high utility for applications where space is very important (i.e., missile radar systems, etc.). Data for the embodiment shown in Figs. 3a and 3b is comparable to that for the embodiment shown in Fig. 2a and Fig. 2b.
  • Thus, it can be seen that one embodiment of the invention, by selectively excluding a vertical strip of elements along the azimuth axis, can reduce the sidelobes for the azimuth difference pattern and, by selectively excluding a horizontal strip of elements along the elevation axis, can reduce the sidelobes for the elevation difference pattern.
  • It can also be seen that excluding other predetermined cross section patterns of the aperture may permit further optimization of the signals, i.e., permit other combinations for reducing the sidelobes in the difference pattern while minimizing circuit complexity and maintaining sum signal quality.

Claims (3)

  1. An antenna system adapted for radar application using sum and difference signals for tracking a target including:
    a) a monopulse antenna (10) having
    a1) a cross sectional area for transmitting energy toward a target and receiving return energy;
    a2) an array of excitable elements (20) symmetrically disposed about azimuth and elevation axes; wherein
    a3) said cross-sectional area is divided into a left and a right horizontal strip (K,I) along the elevation axis, a top and a bottom vertical strip (H,J) along the azimuth axis, and four quadrants (A,B,C,D), each of said strips (K,I;H,J) and quadrants (A,B,C,D) containing several of said excitable elements (20);
    b) circuit means coupled to said excitable elements (20), said circuit means generating a sum signal and azimuth and elevation difference signals using return energy from said excitable elements (20), wherein said azimuth difference signal is calculated excluding the return energy of said excitable elements (20) in said vertical strips (H,J), and said elevation difference signal is calculated excluding the return energy of said excitable elements (20) in said horizontal strips (K,I);
    characterized in that
    c) said circuit means provide
    c1) said sum signal as the sum of the return energy of all said excitable elements (20),
    c2) said azimuth difference signal as the difference between
    c2.1) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements (20) in the left-hand two of said quadrants (A,D) and said left horizontal strip (K) and
    c2.2) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements (20) in the right-hand two of said quadrants (B,C) and said right horizontal strip (I),
    c3) said elevation difference signal as the difference between
    c3.1) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements (20) in the upper two of said quadrants (A,B) and said top vertical strip (H) and
    c3.2) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements (20) in the lower two of said quadrants (D,C) and said bottom vertical strip (J).
  2. An antenna system according to claim 1, characterized in that said circuit means comprises a hybrid network (41-44; 51-53; 61-63).
  3. Method of operating an antenna system adapted for radar application using sum and difference signals for tracking a target including the steps of:
    a) transmitting energy toward said target and receiving return energy with a monopulse antenna (10);
    b) dividing a cross-sectional area of said monopulse antenna (10) into a left and a right horizontal strip (K,I) along the elevation axis, a top and a bottom vertical strip (H,J) along the azimuth axis, and four quadrants (A,B,C,D), each of said strips (K,I;H,J) and quadrants (A,B,C,D) containing several excitable elements (20) symmetrically disposed about said azimuth and elevation axes;
    c) coupling return energy from said excitable elements (20) of said monopulse antenna (10) to circuit means,
    d) generating with said circuit means
    d1) a sum signal,
    d2) an azimuth difference signal, thereby excluding the return energy from the excitable elements (20) in said vertical strips (H,J),
    d3) an elevation difference signal, thereby excluding the return energy from the excitable elements (20) in said horizontal strips (K,I),
    characterized by the steps of:
    e) generating said sum signal as the sum of the return energy of all said excitable elements (20),
    f) generating said azimuth difference signal as the difference between
    f1) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements (20) in the left-hand two of said quadrants (A,D) and said left horizontal strip (K) and
    f2) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements (20) in the right-hand two of said quadrants (B,C) and said right horizontal strip (I),
    g) generating said elevation difference signal as the difference between
    g1) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements (20) in the upper two of said quadrants (A,B) and said top vertical strip (H) and
    g2) the sum of the return energy of the excitable elements (20) in the lower two of said quadrants (D,C) and said bottom vertical strip (J).
EP87907265A 1986-11-17 1987-10-01 Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression Expired - Lifetime EP0289553B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP92116842A EP0544081B1 (en) 1986-11-17 1987-10-01 Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US93157186A 1986-11-17 1986-11-17
US931571 1997-09-16

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP92116842.3 Division-Into 1992-10-01

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0289553A1 EP0289553A1 (en) 1988-11-09
EP0289553B1 true EP0289553B1 (en) 1993-07-28

Family

ID=25460993

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP87907265A Expired - Lifetime EP0289553B1 (en) 1986-11-17 1987-10-01 Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression
EP92116842A Expired - Lifetime EP0544081B1 (en) 1986-11-17 1987-10-01 Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP92116842A Expired - Lifetime EP0544081B1 (en) 1986-11-17 1987-10-01 Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (2) EP0289553B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH0682980B2 (en)
DE (1) DE3786787T2 (en)
IL (1) IL84113A (en)
WO (1) WO1988004109A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0289553B1 (en) * 1986-11-17 1993-07-28 Hughes Aircraft Company Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression
JPH01268210A (en) * 1988-04-19 1989-10-25 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Antenna system
GB2279529B (en) * 1989-05-18 1995-05-31 Plessey Co Plc Radar
JPH0834382B2 (en) * 1989-09-01 1996-03-29 デイエックスアンテナ株式会社 Planar antenna for automatic tracking
JPH06100643B2 (en) * 1991-12-17 1994-12-12 宇宙開発事業団 Monopulse tracking device
FR2870992B1 (en) * 2004-06-01 2006-09-01 Amp C3C Sa TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA FOR TRACK ASSEMBLY
DE102004040015B4 (en) 2004-08-16 2006-12-07 S.M.S., Smart Microwave Sensors Gmbh Method and device for detecting an electromagnetic signal emitted by a transmitting antenna
US8593334B2 (en) * 2011-07-29 2013-11-26 The Boeing Company Split aperture monopulse antenna system

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3711858A (en) * 1971-02-24 1973-01-16 Westinghouse Electric Corp Monopulse radar antenna structure
US3965475A (en) * 1975-05-30 1976-06-22 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Switchable beamwidth monopulse method and system
DE2736497A1 (en) * 1977-08-12 1979-02-22 Siemens Ag Monopulse excitation system for radiation supplied antenna - has radiators which are placed on circle, and signal phases which are increased with radiator position
US4754286A (en) * 1984-10-18 1988-06-28 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Line-fed phase controlled antenna
EP0289553B1 (en) * 1986-11-17 1993-07-28 Hughes Aircraft Company Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Introduction to Radar Systems", 2nd Edition, M.I.Skolnik, 1984, Mc Graw-Hill, pp 162-163 *
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, volume AP-22, no. 3, May 1974, N.S. Wong et al."A multielement high power monopulse feed with low sidelobe and high aperture efficiency", pages 402-407 see figures 3,5; paragraph:"Description of 32-element monopulse feed", *
Patent Abstracts of Japan, volume 7, no. 258 (E-211)(1403), 17 November 1983, & JP, A, 58142607 (NIPPON DENSHIN DENWA KOSHA) 24 August 1983 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0289553A1 (en) 1988-11-09
WO1988004109A1 (en) 1988-06-02
EP0544081A1 (en) 1993-06-02
JPH0682980B2 (en) 1994-10-19
DE3786787T2 (en) 1993-11-18
IL84113A (en) 1991-08-16
DE3786787D1 (en) 1993-09-02
EP0544081B1 (en) 1995-11-22
JPH01502151A (en) 1989-07-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4720712A (en) Adaptive beam forming apparatus
Cheston et al. Phased array radar antennas
Agrawal et al. Beamformer architectures for active phased-array radar antennas
KR100871432B1 (en) Low altitude radar antenna
US20190041493A1 (en) Polarimetric phased array radar system and method for operating thereof
CA2283527C (en) Boxhorn array architecture using folded junctions
EP0289553B1 (en) Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression
US4766437A (en) Antenna apparatus having means for changing the antenna radiation pattern
US4146889A (en) Method and apparatus for sidelobe reduction in radar
US5025493A (en) Multi-element antenna system and array signal processing method
US4872016A (en) Data processing system for a phased array antenna
US6362774B1 (en) Cooperative radar system
US6094172A (en) High performance traveling wave antenna for microwave and millimeter wave applications
EP1320148B1 (en) Array antenna system having super high gain and method of controlling the same
US5030960A (en) Monopulse antenna with improved sidelobe suppression
Lin et al. Sidelobe reduction through subarray overlapping for wideband arrays
US6906665B1 (en) Cluster beam-forming system and method
US4103303A (en) Frequency scanned corner reflector antenna
Yu Advanced monopulse processing of phased array radar
US5216428A (en) Modular constrained feed for low sidelobe array
Fletcher et al. Derivation of orthogonal beams and their application to beamforming in small phased arrays
Kanno et al. Digital beam forming for conformal active array antenna
Mismar et al. Null steering using the minimax approximation by controlling only the current amplitudes
US5151705A (en) System and method of shaping an antenna radiation pattern
SHOKI et al. A pattern synthesis method for multibeam reflector antennas

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19880804

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19900927

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

XX Miscellaneous (additional remarks)

Free format text: TEILANMELDUNG 92116842.3 EINGEREICHT AM 07/06/88.

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3786787

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19930902

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: SOCIETA' ITALIANA BREVETTI S.P.A.

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 87907265.0

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19960924

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19960926

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971002

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980501

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19980501

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 87907265.0

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20010910

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20010914

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20010919

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20010924

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20021001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20021031

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20021031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030501

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20021001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20051001