EP0275303B1 - Low sidelobe solid state phased array antenna apparatus - Google Patents
Low sidelobe solid state phased array antenna apparatus Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0275303B1 EP0275303B1 EP19870905342 EP87905342A EP0275303B1 EP 0275303 B1 EP0275303 B1 EP 0275303B1 EP 19870905342 EP19870905342 EP 19870905342 EP 87905342 A EP87905342 A EP 87905342A EP 0275303 B1 EP0275303 B1 EP 0275303B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- power modules
- groups
- zone
- gain
- sidelobe
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q21/00—Antenna arrays or systems
- H01Q21/06—Arrays of individually energised antenna units similarly polarised and spaced apart
- H01Q21/22—Antenna units of the array energised non-uniformly in amplitude or phase, e.g. tapered array or binomial array
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q21/00—Antenna arrays or systems
- H01Q21/0006—Particular feeding systems
- H01Q21/0025—Modular arrays
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to a solid state, phased array antenna according to the preamble of claim 1.
- Radar antennas are well known to radiate microwave radiation in a broad pattern which, for directed antenna, includes a narrow mainlobe and wide sidelobes of radiation.
- the mainlobe is the central lobe of a directional antenna's radiation pattern, the sidelobes referring to the lesser lobes of progressively decreasing amplitude on both sides of the mainlobe and often extending rearwardly of the mainlobe.
- Radar antenna aperture configuration generally determines the extent and relative magnitude of the associated sidelobes; however, the gain of the strongest one of the sidelobes is typically only about 1/64 that of the mainlobe. In terms of decibels, the strongest sidelobe gain is typically down about 18dB from the associated mainlobe gain. Gains of the other sidelobes are usually considerably smaller than that of the strongest sidelobe. Although sidelobe gain is typically much smaller than mainlobe gain, because of the large solid angle into which sidelobes radiate, as compared to the small solid angle into which the mainlobe radiates, typically about 25 percent of the total power radiated by a uniformly illuminated radar antenna are in the sidelobes.
- sidelobe radiation provides no useful function and in addition to representing wasted radiating power has other serious disadvantages.
- radar clutter from sidelobe returns increases the difficultly of discriminating targets from background.
- Another very significant disadvantage of sidelobe radiation is that such radiation can, in a military environment, be utilized by hostile forces for electronically jamming the radar and can also be used for positionally locating and for guiding munitions to the radar.
- mainlobe radiation is ordinarily much greater than sidelobe radiation, its relatively small solid angle of radiation and its directionality makes mainlobe jamming, radar location and munitions direction more difficult.
- the present invention is starting from a prior art solid state phased array antenna as it is known from "IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest", 15-17 June 1982, Dallas, Texas, IEEE (New York, US), D.N. McQuiddy Jr; "Solid state radar's path to GaAs", pages 176-178.
- This known solid state phased array antenna is comprising an antenna aperture formed of a large number of N individual, closely spaced radiating apertures and a number of N individual radiating elements, each of which is operatively associated with a corresponding one of the a.m. radiating apertures for radiating microwave energy therethrough.
- phased array antennas of that type A general problem of phased array antennas of that type is the suppression of sidelobe radiation; that is to say, the gain of sidelobe radiation should be much less than the gain of the mainlobe radiation. This is because the sidelobe radiation not only is a waste of radiating energy but also has other serious disadvantageous such as increased difficulty of discriminating targets. It, therefore, has already been proposed to suppress such sidelobe radiation in passive array antennas by "tapering" the illumination over the aperture so that individual radiating elements near the side edges of the array radiate less energy than elements which are closer to the center.
- the power modules are subdivided in a number of M groups, the number M being significantly less than the number N , these M groups of the power modules furthermore being arranged in a concentric pattern (see Fig.4) around a central point of the array, wherein the output voltage amplitude of the power modules is equal within each group, but different in different groups.
- a.m. measures it is possible to easily reduce the sidelobe gain to be at least 30 dB below the mainlobe gain by selecting the output voltage amplitude of each group of power modules and by in combination selecting a pattern dimension of each group.
- a sufficient sidelobe suppression can be obtain by merely using between 3 and 10 different types of power modules, neither production costs are substantially increased nor maintenance and logistical support problems are caused.
- US-A-3 760 345 there is disclosed a transducer array for receiving or transmitting acoustical or electromagnetic signals by means of uniform square transducer elements which each are coupled to associated shading resistances.
- This known array is of the passive type and, consequently, has not a plurality of power modules in the sense of feature [c] of the preamble of claim 1.
- FIG. 1 there is shown in FIG. 1, in exploded form, an exemplary, solid state, active array antenna 10 of the general type with which the present invention may be used to advantage.
- antenna 10 which is shown as an aircraft-mounted type, are an aperture assembly 12, a cooling liquid plate assembly 14, a solid state power module assembly 16 and a stripline feed assembly 18.
- aperture assembly 12 Included in aperture assembly 12 is a large number of small radiating elements 24, each of which has disposed therein a dielectric filler 26.
- a face 28 of aperture assembly 12 is a large number of openings 30, each of such openings being associated with one of radiating elements 24.
- Mounted on cooling plate assembly 14 are a number of loop assemblies 32, each of which is also associated with one of radiating elements 24.
- a large number of solid state power modules 34 comprise power module assembly 16, each such module preferably, but not necessarily, powering only a single associated radiating element 24.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a typical radiation pattern 38 associated with a radar carried by an aircraft 40.
- the airborne radar involved may, for example, comprise a solid state active array similar to array 10 depicted in FIG. 1.
- radiation pattern 38 comprises a narrow, beam-shaped mainlobe 42 and smaller, fan-shaped sidelobes 44 on each side of the mainlobe.
- Sidelobes 44 comprise several different lobes 46 which fan out at different angles, ⁇ , relative to a main beam axis 48; typically the sidelobes diminish in intensity as the angle, ⁇ increases. It can further be seen from FIG. 2 that some of lobes 46 extend rearwardly relative to mainlobe 42, the angles, ⁇ , associated therewith being greater than 90°.
- the present invention relates to a process for configuring a solid state, active array so that the far field sidelobe gain is at least 30dB down, from the far field mainlobe gain.
- the reduced sidelobes provided by the present invention is accomplished by tapering the radiating illumination in a relatively few, precisely determined steps.
- array 60 corresponds generally to array 10 (FIG. 1), insofar as general construction is concerned.
- array 60 has rectangular dimensions 2a and 2b, and has R rows and C columns of linearly polarized, rectangular radiating elements 62.
- element 6z Associated with element 6z is a power module 64 (shown in phantom lines).
- array 60 has an elliptically (instead of a rectangular) radiating aperture 66, it having been determined by the present inventors that array corner regions 68 contribute only negligibly to sidelobes.
- the far field, G, associated with radiating aperture 66 is considered, the far field at any point defined by angles ⁇ and ⁇ being generally identified as G( ⁇ , ⁇ ) in FIG. 3.
- a principal feature of the present invention is the dividing, for analysis purposes, of radiating aperture 66 into a relatively few, superimposed elliptical zones around a central point "A", and the selection of zone boundary axes a i , b i and the zone voltage amplitudes, E i , associated therewith in a manner providing a tapered illumination of the aperture which assures very low, far field sidelobes.
- the number of elliptical zones selected varies between 3 and about 10 and more preferably between 3 and only about 7. Insufficient illumination tapering is considered to be provided using less than 3 zones and although smoother tapering can be provided by use of more than about 7 zones, the cost of using more than that number of different types of power modules is costly and has moreover, been found by the present inventors to be unnecessary for achieving very low sidelobes.
- the number of zones shown and described is 5; however, any limitation to the use of about 5 zones is neither intended nor implied.
- First through fifth concentric, progressively larger elliptical zones 74, 76, 78, 80 and 82, respectively, are thus selected, the zones having semi-major and semi-minor axes equal, respectively, to a1, a2, a3, a4, and a5 and b1, b2 b3, b4, and b5 (FIG. 4).
- First zone 74 is the smallest zone and fifth zone 82 is the largest zone and completely fills aperture 66, dimensions a5 and b5 being, therfore, respectfully equal to aperture dimensions a and b (FIG. 3).
- zones 74, 76, 78, 80 and 82 are, for analysis purposes, considered as stacked (or superimposed) upon one another, with the fifth, largest zone 82 at the bottom and the first, smallest zone 74 at the top.
- a different voltage amplitudes, E i amplitude E1 being associated with zone 74, E2 with zone 76, E3 with zone 78, E4 with zone 80 and E5 with zone 82.
- the voltage amplitudes, E i are added to establish power module voltage.
- the combined voltage amplitude of the stacked zones 74-82 required to be provided by underlying power modules 60 is equal to E1 + E2 + E3 + E4 + E5 .
- the voltage amplitude required to be provided by underlying power modules 60 is equal to E2 + E3 + E4 + E5 ; in an annular region 88 of third zone 78 outside of second zone 74, the voltage amplitude required to be provided by the underlying power modules is equal to E3 + E4 + E5 .
- each zone 74-82 can be treated separately as providing only a single, corresponding voltage amplitude E1-E5.
- the present process treats all zone axis dimensions, a i , b i , and zone voltage amplitudes, E i , as independent variables. At least one set of values for these variables is computed which will provide, as may be required, either minimum sidelobes or a sidelobe gain which is a preselected number of dB less than the corresponding mainlobe gain.
- a i , b i , E i standard techniques of gradient search can be employed.
- an initial set of parameters is chosen as a starting point, and a present maximum sidelobe level (such as -30 dB) is selected as a performance criterion.
- the antenna far field pattern with the initial set of input parameters can be calculated by using Equation (1).
- the total power of all the sidelobes that exceed the present level, being defined as the error is computed. After this a small variation of one of the parameters, either a positive or negative increment, is introduced and the error is recomputed.
- antenna pattern gain (in dB) against elevation angle, ⁇ as measured from the broadside axis. From FIG 7 it can be seen that the gains of all sidelobes 46 (shown shaded) are down at least about 36dB from the peak (0°) gain of mainlobe 42 over the entire visible radiation range.
- FIG. 8 which shows that the highest sidelobe gain is down at least about 37 dB from the peak mainlobe gain.
Landscapes
- Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates generally to a solid state, phased array antenna according to the preamble of claim 1.
- Radar antennas are well known to radiate microwave radiation in a broad pattern which, for directed antenna, includes a narrow mainlobe and wide sidelobes of radiation. By common definition, the mainlobe is the central lobe of a directional antenna's radiation pattern, the sidelobes referring to the lesser lobes of progressively decreasing amplitude on both sides of the mainlobe and often extending rearwardly of the mainlobe.
- Radar antenna aperture configuration generally determines the extent and relative magnitude of the associated sidelobes; however, the gain of the strongest one of the sidelobes is typically only about 1/64 that of the mainlobe. In terms of decibels, the strongest sidelobe gain is typically down about 18dB from the associated mainlobe gain. Gains of the other sidelobes are usually considerably smaller than that of the strongest sidelobe. Although sidelobe gain is typically much smaller than mainlobe gain, because of the large solid angle into which sidelobes radiate, as compared to the small solid angle into which the mainlobe radiates, typically about 25 percent of the total power radiated by a uniformly illuminated radar antenna are in the sidelobes.
- Ordinarily, sidelobe radiation provides no useful function and in addition to representing wasted radiating power has other serious disadvantages. For example, radar clutter from sidelobe returns increases the difficultly of discriminating targets from background. Another very significant disadvantage of sidelobe radiation is that such radiation can, in a military environment, be utilized by hostile forces for electronically jamming the radar and can also be used for positionally locating and for guiding munitions to the radar. In this regard, although mainlobe radiation is ordinarily much greater than sidelobe radiation, its relatively small solid angle of radiation and its directionality makes mainlobe jamming, radar location and munitions direction more difficult.
- For these and other reasons, the reduction or suppression of radar sidelobe radiation is, particularly in military radar, important and military procurement documents establishing rigid limits on sidelobe radiation are not uncommon.
- According to the preamble of claim 1 the present invention is starting from a prior art solid state phased array antenna as it is known from "IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest", 15-17 June 1982, Dallas, Texas, IEEE (New York, US), D.N. McQuiddy Jr; "Solid state radar's path to GaAs", pages 176-178. This known solid state phased array antenna is comprising an antenna aperture formed of a large number of N individual, closely spaced radiating apertures and a number of N individual radiating elements, each of which is operatively associated with a corresponding one of the a.m. radiating apertures for radiating microwave energy therethrough. There are further provided a number of individual solid state power modules in the form of "transient balanced power amplifiers", each of which is operatively associated with a corresponding one of the radiating elements for providing power thereto depending on the output voltage amplitude of these power amplifiers.
- The use of an individual solid state power module for each radiating element or for at least a subgroup of radiating elements - thus forming a so called "active" array - offers the advantage of an improved cooling ability over "passive" arrays in which there is provided only one central power supply; in addition, within a large active array, a comparatively large number of power modules can fail or malfunction without impairing the effectiveness of the antenna.
- A general problem of phased array antennas of that type is the suppression of sidelobe radiation; that is to say, the gain of sidelobe radiation should be much less than the gain of the mainlobe radiation. This is because the sidelobe radiation not only is a waste of radiating energy but also has other serious disadvantageous such as increased difficulty of discriminating targets. It, therefore, has already been proposed to suppress such sidelobe radiation in passive array antennas by "tapering" the illumination over the aperture so that individual radiating elements near the side edges of the array radiate less energy than elements which are closer to the center.
- It has already been proposed to adopt the a.m. scheme of tapering to active arrays by using a very large number of power modules which each have a different power output and are arranged to simulate a tapering. In practice, however, it has revealed to be impossible to use this method because there are needed much more than 20 different types of power modules; such a great number of different types of power modules, however, is increasing substantially the production costs of the array and, what is even more disadvantageous, causes subsequent maintenance and logistical support problems.
- It therefore is the object of the present invention to improve an active phased array antenna according to the preamble of claim 1 in such a way that there can be achieved an excellent suppression of sidelobe radiation without substantially increasing production costs or causing maintenance and logistical support problems.
- According to the present invention this object is solved by the advantageous measures indicated in the characterizing part of claim 1.
- Hence, according to the present invention, the power modules are subdivided in a number of M groups, the number M being significantly less than the number N, these M groups of the power modules furthermore being arranged in a concentric pattern (see Fig.4) around a central point of the array, wherein the output voltage amplitude of the power modules is equal within each group, but different in different groups. It has been found that by the a.m. measures it is possible to easily reduce the sidelobe gain to be at least 30 dB below the mainlobe gain by selecting the output voltage amplitude of each group of power modules and by in combination selecting a pattern dimension of each group. As in this way a sufficient sidelobe suppression can be obtain by merely using between 3 and 10 different types of power modules, neither production costs are substantially increased nor maintenance and logistical support problems are caused.
- Advantageous developments of the present invention are indicated in the subclaims 2 through 5; a preferred process for configuring an array antenna of that type is the subject-matter of claims 6 through 10.
- In US-A-3 760 345 there is disclosed a transducer array for receiving or transmitting acoustical or electromagnetic signals by means of uniform square transducer elements which each are coupled to associated shading resistances. This known array, however, is of the passive type and, consequently, has not a plurality of power modules in the sense of feature [c] of the preamble of claim 1.
- A better understanding of the present invention may be had by considerating the accompanying drawings in which:
- FIG. 1 is an exploded perspective of an exemplary solid state, active array antenna with which the present invention may be used to advantage;
- FIG. 2 is a pictorial drawing of the radiation pattern of a typical airborne radar, showing mainlobe and sidelobe portions of the radiation pattern;
- FIG. 3 is a diagram depicting the coordinate system used to specify the coordinatee of the far field relative to an radiating antenna;
- FIG. 4 is a diagram depicting the manner in which a generally rectangular solid state active array antenna is divided into a series of M concentric, overlapping elliptical power module zones, each such zone having a different power level;
- FIG. 5 is a diagram showing, relative to an array cross-section taken generally along line 5-5 of FIG. 4, how the aperature illumination taper is provided by superimposing different voltage levels of power modules in the different module zones of FIG. 4;
- FIG. 6 is a diagram, similar to right hand portions of the diagram of FIG. 5, showing, for a particular array configuration and sidelobe radiation requirement, normalized power levels for five power module zones, the corresponding, normalized zone boundary dimensions being also indicated;
- FIG. 7 is a graph plotting far field mainlobe and sidelobe gain vs angle from broadside axis for the conditions shown in FIG. 6; idealized, elliptical aperture zones being assumed; and
- FIG. 8 is a graph plotting far field mainlobe and sidelobe gain vs angle from broadside axis for conditions in which stepped zone boundaries corresponding to actual module lattice configuration are assumed.
- There is shown in FIG. 1, in exploded form, an exemplary, solid state,
active array antenna 10 of the general type with which the present invention may be used to advantage.Comprising antenna 10, which is shown as an aircraft-mounted type, are anaperture assembly 12, a coolingliquid plate assembly 14, a solid statepower module assembly 16 and astripline feed assembly 18. Included inaperture assembly 12 is a large number of smallradiating elements 24, each of which has disposed therein adielectric filler 26. Defined in aface 28 ofaperture assembly 12 is a large number ofopenings 30, each of such openings being associated with one ofradiating elements 24. Mounted oncooling plate assembly 14 are a number ofloop assemblies 32, each of which is also associated with one ofradiating elements 24. A large number of solidstate power modules 34 comprisepower module assembly 16, each such module preferably, but not necessarily, powering only a single associatedradiating element 24. - The present invention is principally directed towards providing preselected voltage operating levels of power modules (corresponding to modules 34) and the physical arrangement of such modules in an assembly (corresponding to module assembly 16) so that the far field radiation from the antenna exhibits very low sidelobes. With respect to sidelobes, FIG. 2 illustrates a
typical radiation pattern 38 associated with a radar carried by anaircraft 40. The airborne radar involved may, for example, comprise a solid state active array similar toarray 10 depicted in FIG. 1. As shown in FIG. 2,radiation pattern 38 comprises a narrow, beam-shaped mainlobe 42 and smaller, fan-shaped sidelobes 44 on each side of the mainlobe.Sidelobes 44 comprise severaldifferent lobes 46 which fan out at different angles, α, relative to amain beam axis 48; typically the sidelobes diminish in intensity as the angle, α increases. It can further be seen from FIG. 2 that some oflobes 46 extend rearwardly relative tomainlobe 42, the angles, α, associated therewith being greater than 90°. - As more particularly described below, the present invention relates to a process for configuring a solid state, active array so that the far field sidelobe gain is at least 30dB down, from the far field mainlobe gain. In general, the reduced sidelobes provided by the present invention is accomplished by tapering the radiating illumination in a relatively few, precisely determined steps.
- For purposes of further describing the invention, the more general case of a rectangular, solid state
active array 60, depicted in FIGS. 3-5, is considered.Array 60 corresponds generally to array 10 (FIG. 1), insofar as general construction is concerned. - Also, for purposes of illustrating the invention, it may be assumed that
array 60 hasrectangular dimensions 2a and 2b, and has R rows and C columns of linearly polarized, rectangularradiating elements 62. Associated with element 6z is a power module 64 (shown in phantom lines). - It is, however, assumed, for purposes of simplifying the following computations, that
array 60 has an elliptically (instead of a rectangular)radiating aperture 66, it having been determined by the present inventors thatarray corner regions 68 contribute only negligibly to sidelobes. For purposes of the following description, the far field, G, associated withradiating aperture 66 is considered, the far field at any point defined by angles ϑ and φ being generally identified as G(ϑ,φ) in FIG. 3. - A principal feature of the present invention is the dividing, for analysis purposes, of
radiating aperture 66 into a relatively few, superimposed elliptical zones around a central point "A", and the selection of zone boundary axes ai, bi and the zone voltage amplitudes, Ei, associated therewith in a manner providing a tapered illumination of the aperture which assures very low, far field sidelobes. - Preferably the number of elliptical zones selected varies between 3 and about 10 and more preferably between 3 and only about 7. Insufficient illumination tapering is considered to be provided using less than 3 zones and although smoother tapering can be provided by use of more than about 7 zones, the cost of using more than that number of different types of power modules is costly and has moreover, been found by the present inventors to be unnecessary for achieving very low sidelobes. For specific purposes of illustrating the invention, the number of zones shown and described is 5; however, any limitation to the use of about 5 zones is neither intended nor implied.
- First through fifth concentric, progressively larger
elliptical zones First zone 74 is the smallest zone andfifth zone 82 is the largest zone and completely fillsaperture 66, dimensions a₅ and b₅ being, therfore, respectfully equal to aperture dimensions a and b (FIG. 3). - As can be seen from FIG. 5, which corresponds to a transverse output voltage cross-section of
array 60,zones largest zone 82 at the bottom and the first,smallest zone 74 at the top. Associated with eachzone zone 74, E₂ withzone 76, E₃ withzone 78, E₄ withzone 80 and E₅ withzone 82. In regions where two or more zones 74-82 overlap, the voltage amplitudes, Ei, are added to establish power module voltage. For example, in a central,elliptical region 84, defined byfirst zone 74, the combined voltage amplitude of the stacked zones 74-82 required to be provided byunderlying power modules 60 is equal toannular region 86 ofsecond zone 76 outside offirst zone 74, the voltage amplitude required to be provided byunderlying power modules 60 is equal toannular region 88 ofthird zone 78 outside ofsecond zone 74, the voltage amplitude required to be provided by the underlying power modules is equal toannular region 90 offourth zone 80 outside ofzone 78, the voltage required to be provided byunderlying power modules 60 is E₄ + E₅; outside ofzone 80, in anannular region 92 offifth zone 82,underlying power modules 60 are required to provide a voltages amplitude equal only to E₅. However, by known principles of superposition, each zone 74-82 can be treated separately as providing only a single, corresponding voltage amplitude E₁-E₅. - The present process treats all zone axis dimensions, ai, bi, and zone voltage amplitudes, Ei, as independent variables. At least one set of values for these variables is computed which will provide, as may be required, either minimum sidelobes or a sidelobe gain which is a preselected number of dB less than the corresponding mainlobe gain. These independent variables ai, bi and Ei are computed, for numerous G(ϑ, φ) points, by the equation:
and further wherein J₁ (ui) is the first order Bessel function, ko is the wave number associated with the radiation and âϑ and âφ are the unit vectors in the sperical coordinate system. - To determine the optimum set of parameters (ai, bi, Ei) for low sidelobes, standard techniques of gradient search can be employed. In the optimization process an initial set of parameters is chosen as a starting point, and a present maximum sidelobe level (such as -30 dB) is selected as a performance criterion. Then the antenna far field pattern with the initial set of input parameters can be calculated by using Equation (1). Next the total power of all the sidelobes that exceed the present level, being defined as the error, is computed. After this a small variation of one of the parameters, either a positive or negative increment, is introduced and the error is recomputed. By examining the trend of the error, and hence the gradient (rate of change), one can decide which way the following step of variation should be implemented. The process is repeated for this parameter until a local minimum in the error is obtained. By the same procedure the iteration process is carried out for all other parameters until the error is reduced to an acceptable level. This optimization process can be readily accomplished by using a computer. By way of specific example, again with no limitations being thereby intended or implied, the present inventors have determined for M equal to 5 (that is, for five aperture zones), the optimum zone boundaries, ai, bi, and output voltage amplitudes, Ei. These values are shown below in Table 1, wherein
TABLE 1 a₁ .44 m a₂ .68 m a₃ .88 m a₄ 1.01 m a₅ 1.3 m b₁ .30 m b₂ .46 m b₃ .60 m b₄ .68 m b₅ .87 m E₁ 0.26 E₂ 0.22 E₃ 0.16 E₄ 0.16 E₅ 0.20 - FIG. 6, directly corresponds to the righthand half of FIG. 5 and depicts, relatively to scale and for the bi dimensions normalized to
zones zone 74, 3.06 dB withzone 76, 3.1 dB withzone 78 and 5.11 dB withzone 80. - For the computed ai, bi, Ei values listed in Table 1, there is plotted in FIG. 7 antenna pattern gain (in dB) against elevation angle, ϑ as measured from the broadside axis. From FIG 7 it can be seen that the gains of all sidelobes 46 (shown shaded) are down at least about 36dB from the peak (0°) gain of
mainlobe 42 over the entire visible radiation range. - In the foregoing, it has been assumed, for computations involving Equation 1, that the boundaries of the five
elliptical zones small power modules 64 distributed overantenna elements 62. In reality, however, each radiating zone intersects a finite, though usually large, number of radiatingelements 62 so that the zone boundaries are more accurately approximated by a discontinuous, stepped shape, (FIG. 4). The question then arises as to which of two adjacent zones the intersected radiating elements 62 (and corresponding power modules 64) should be allocated and also whether allocation to one zone or another makes any significant difference with respect to sidelobe gain reduction. - To answer this question, a specific array pattern, with actual element spacing and lattice structure taken into account, was used by the present inventors to compute aperture zone parameters ai and bi and voltage amplitudes, Ei. For such purposed, the actual geometric configuration of a proposed solid state radar array, having an array size of 2.6 by 1.75 meters and having 1188 rectangular radiating elements, was assumed. It was futher assumed that the zone boundaries followed actual boundries of the radiating apertures. Values of ai, bi and Ei for minimum sidelobes were obtained for such an array configuration by operation of Equation 1. The computed gain VS elevation angle is plotted in FIG. 8 which shows that the highest sidelobe gain is down at least about 37 dB from the peak mainlobe gain. A comparison of FIGs. 7 and 8 thus reveals that although the sidelobe pattern is slightly different in actual conditions (FIG. 8) as compared to that of the idealized conditions (FIG. 7), the sidelobe gains are nevertheless about the same in both cases.
Claims (10)
- A low sidelobe, solid state, phased array antenna apparatus having a far field mainlobe and a sidelobe radiation pattern, comprising:[a] an antenna aperture (12) formed of a large number of N individual, closely spaced radiating apertures (30);[b] a number of individual radiating elements (24), each of which is operatively associated with a corresponding one of said N radiating apertures (12) for radiating microwave energy therethrough; and[c] a number of individual solid state power modules (34), each of which is operatively associated with at least one of said N radiating elements (24) for providing power thereto depending on the output voltage amplitude (E) of the respective solid state power module (34);
characterized in that[d] said power modules (34) are subdivided in a number of M groups, the number M preferably being between 3 and 10 and being significantly less than said number N;[d.1] said M groups of said power modules (34) are arranged in a concentric pattern (Fig.4) around a central point (A) of said array;[d.2] said output voltage amplitude (E) of said solid state power modules (34) is equal within each group, but different in different groups; and in that[e] said output voltage amplitude (E) of each group and a pattern dimension of each group in combination are selected such that the sidelobe gain is at least 30 dB below the mainlobe gain. - The array antenna as claimed in Claim 1, wherein the number M is about 5.
- The array antenna as claimed in Claim 1 or 2, wherein the outer boundary of each of said M groups of power modules is elliptically shaped, each of said boundarys having a semi-major axis of length ai and a semi-minor axis of length bi, wherein the subscript "i" refers to the ith boundary.
- The array antenna as claimed in Claim 3, wherein the output voltage amplitudes and the arrangement of said M groups of power modules are selected by treating the M module group arrangements as comprising a superposition of M elliptically shaped, overlapping zones having the same boundaries as corresponding ones of said M groups of modules, each of said M zones having associated therewith a different voltage amplitude Ei, the voltage amplitude of the power modules in each of said M groups being selected by adding the different voltage amplitudes, Ei, of the corresponding overlapping zones, wherein the subscript "i" refers to the ith zone.
- The array antenna as claimed in Claim 4, wherein the voltage amplitudes, Ei, and semi-axis lengths, ai and bi, are selected by application of the following far field equation to cause the sidelobe gain to be down at least about 30dB from the mainlobe gain:
where: J₁ (ui) is the first order Bessel function, âϑ and âφ are unit vectors in the spherical coordinate system and ko is the wave number associated with the radiated field. - A process for configuring an array antenna according to the preamble of claim 1,
characterized by the steps of:[1] subdividing said power modules (34) in a number of M groups, the number M preferably being between 3 and 10 and being significantly less than said number N;[1.1] arranging said M groups of said power modules (34) in a concentric pattern (Fig.4) around a central point (A) of said array;[1.2] making said output voltage amplitude (E) of said power modules (34) equal within each group, but different in different groups; and[2] selecting said output voltage amplitude (E) of each group and a pattern dimension of each group in combination such that the sidelobe gain is at least about 30 dB below the mainlobe gain. - The process as claimed in Claim 6, wherein the number M is about 5.
- The process as claimed in Claim 6 or 7, including the step of arranging said M groups of power modules so that the outer boundaries thereof are substantially elliptically shaped, each boundary having a semi-major axis of length ai and a semi-minor axis of length bi, wherein the subscript "i" refers to the ith boundary.
- The process as claimed in Claim 8, including the steps of :[1] treating said M groups of power modules as comprising a superposition of M elliptically shaped, overlapping zones having the same boundaries as corresponding ones of said M groups of modules, each of said M zones having associated therewith a voltage amplitude, Ei, and[2] treating the voltage amplitude of the power modules in each of said M groups of power modules as an additive superposition of the voltage amplitudes, Ei, of the corresponding overlapping zones, wherein the subscript "i" refers to the ith zone.
- The process as claimed in claim 9, including the step of using the following far field equation to obtain values for the zone voltages amplitudes, Ei, and the zone semi-major and semi-minor axis lengths, ai and bi, which cause the far field sidelobe gain to be down at least about 30dB from the corresponding far field mainlobe gain:
where : J₁ (ui) is the first order Bessel function, âϑ and âφ are unit vectors in the sperical coordinate and ko is the wave number associated with the radiated field.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US89145686A | 1986-07-29 | 1986-07-29 | |
US891456 | 1986-07-29 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0275303A1 EP0275303A1 (en) | 1988-07-27 |
EP0275303B1 true EP0275303B1 (en) | 1993-10-13 |
Family
ID=25398223
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19870905342 Expired - Lifetime EP0275303B1 (en) | 1986-07-29 | 1987-07-21 | Low sidelobe solid state phased array antenna apparatus |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0275303B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH01500476A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3787797T2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1988001106A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5102620A (en) * | 1989-04-03 | 1992-04-07 | Olin Corporation | Copper alloys with dispersed metal nitrides and method of manufacture |
US5039478A (en) * | 1989-07-26 | 1991-08-13 | Olin Corporation | Copper alloys having improved softening resistance and a method of manufacture thereof |
GB2238176A (en) * | 1989-10-21 | 1991-05-22 | Ferranti Int Signal | Microwave radar transmitting antenna |
FR2659500B1 (en) † | 1990-03-09 | 1992-05-15 | Alcatel Espace | METHOD OF FORMING THE DIAGRAM OF A HIGH EFFICIENCY ACTIVE ANTENNA FOR ELECTRONICALLY SCANNED RADAR AND ANTENNA USING THE SAME. |
US5422647A (en) * | 1993-05-07 | 1995-06-06 | Space Systems/Loral, Inc. | Mobile communication satellite payload |
IL110896A0 (en) * | 1994-01-31 | 1994-11-28 | Loral Qualcomm Satellite Serv | Active transmit phases array antenna with amplitude taper |
US5539415A (en) * | 1994-09-15 | 1996-07-23 | Space Systems/Loral, Inc. | Antenna feed and beamforming network |
FR2783974B1 (en) * | 1998-09-29 | 2002-11-29 | Thomson Csf | METHOD FOR ENLARGING THE RADIATION DIAGRAM OF AN ANTENNA, AND ANTENNA USING THE SAME |
GB0213976D0 (en) | 2002-06-18 | 2002-12-18 | Bae Systems Plc | Common aperture antenna |
US7460077B2 (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2008-12-02 | Raytheon Company | Polarization control system and method for an antenna array |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3553706A (en) * | 1968-07-25 | 1971-01-05 | Hazeltine Research Inc | Array antennas utilizing grouped radiating elements |
US3760345A (en) * | 1972-08-28 | 1973-09-18 | Us Navy | Adapting circular shading to a truncated array of square elements |
US3811129A (en) * | 1972-10-24 | 1974-05-14 | Martin Marietta Corp | Antenna array for grating lobe and sidelobe suppression |
US4052723A (en) * | 1976-04-26 | 1977-10-04 | Westinghouse Electric Corporation | Randomly agglomerated subarrays for phased array radars |
-
1987
- 1987-07-21 DE DE87905342T patent/DE3787797T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1987-07-21 WO PCT/US1987/001755 patent/WO1988001106A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1987-07-21 EP EP19870905342 patent/EP0275303B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1987-07-21 JP JP50480387A patent/JPH01500476A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE3787797T2 (en) | 1994-04-21 |
DE3787797D1 (en) | 1993-11-18 |
JPH01500476A (en) | 1989-02-16 |
WO1988001106A1 (en) | 1988-02-11 |
EP0275303A1 (en) | 1988-07-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3352299B1 (en) | Wideband beam broadening for phased array antenna systems | |
US4316192A (en) | Beam forming network for butler matrix fed circular array | |
EP2556562B1 (en) | An rf feed network for modular active aperture electronically steered arrays | |
US4912481A (en) | Compact multi-frequency antenna array | |
US6661376B2 (en) | Tiled antenna with overlapping subarrays | |
US3868695A (en) | Conformal array beam forming network | |
WO1988008623A1 (en) | Multifunction active array | |
US4186400A (en) | Aircraft scanning antenna system with inter-element isolators | |
EP0275303B1 (en) | Low sidelobe solid state phased array antenna apparatus | |
US5233356A (en) | Low sidelobe solid state array antenna apparatus and process for configuring an array antenna aperture | |
EP0807992A1 (en) | Logarithmic spiral array | |
US3553706A (en) | Array antennas utilizing grouped radiating elements | |
EP1690318B1 (en) | Scanable sparse array antenna | |
US4872016A (en) | Data processing system for a phased array antenna | |
EP1250726B1 (en) | Antenna arrangement and method for side-lobe suppression | |
JP3061504B2 (en) | Array antenna | |
GB2034525A (en) | Improvements in or relating to microwave transmission systems | |
Rattan et al. | Antenna Array Optimization using Evolutionary Approaches. | |
EP0479507A1 (en) | Improvements in or relating to radar antenna arrays | |
US5943015A (en) | Layered antenna | |
GB2243491A (en) | Frequency-scanned antenna arrays | |
CN215816403U (en) | Four-beam Doppler radar microstrip planar array antenna | |
JPH07307617A (en) | Array antenna | |
Smith | Phased array fundamentals | |
CA1179055A (en) | Electronically scanned antenna system having a linear array of endfire elements |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19880328 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19910123 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3787797 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19931118 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: SOCIETA' ITALIANA BREVETTI S.P.A. |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19940609 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19940620 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19940627 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Effective date: 19950721 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19950721 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Effective date: 19960402 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Effective date: 19960430 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050721 |