EP0272092A2 - Acoustic printers - Google Patents
Acoustic printers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0272092A2 EP0272092A2 EP87311046A EP87311046A EP0272092A2 EP 0272092 A2 EP0272092 A2 EP 0272092A2 EP 87311046 A EP87311046 A EP 87311046A EP 87311046 A EP87311046 A EP 87311046A EP 0272092 A2 EP0272092 A2 EP 0272092A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- acoustic
- ink
- printer
- center
- lenses
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41J—TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
- B41J2/00—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed
- B41J2/005—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed characterised by bringing liquid or particles selectively into contact with a printing material
- B41J2/01—Ink jet
- B41J2/135—Nozzles
- B41J2/14—Structure thereof only for on-demand ink jet heads
- B41J2/14008—Structure of acoustic ink jet print heads
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41J—TYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
- B41J2/00—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed
- B41J2/005—Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed characterised by bringing liquid or particles selectively into contact with a printing material
- B41J2/01—Ink jet
- B41J2/135—Nozzles
- B41J2/14—Structure thereof only for on-demand ink jet heads
- B41J2002/14322—Print head without nozzle
Definitions
- This invention relates to acoustic printers and, more particularly, to sparse arrays of acoustic droplet ejectors for such printers.
- Acoustic printing is a potentially important, alternative direct marking technology. It is still in an early stage of development, but the available evidence indicates that it is likely to compare favorably with ordinary ink jet systems for printing either on plain paper or on specialized recording media, while providing significant advantages of its own. More particularly, acoustic printing has increased intrinsic reliability because there are no nozzles to clog. As will be appreciated, the elimination of clogged nozzle failure is especially relevant to the reliability of arrays comprising a large number of individual printing devices. Furthermore, small ejection orifices are unnecessary, so acoustic printing is compatible with a greater variety of inks than conventional ink jet printing, including inks having higher viscosities, and inks containing pigments and other particulate components.
- the radiation pressure which the beam exerts may reach a sufficiently high level to release individual droplets of liquid from the surface of the pool, despite the restraining force of surface tension.
- the acoustic beam advantageously is brought to focus on or near the surface of the pool, thereby intensifying its radiation pressure for a given amount of input power.
- Ultrasonic (rf) acoustic beams have been employed in known ink jet and acoustic printing systems for releasing small droplets of ink from pools of ink.
- K. A. Krause "Focusing Ink Jet Head," IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin , Vol 16, No. 4, September 1973, pp. 1168-1170 described an ink jet in which an acoustic beam emanating from a concave surface and confined by a conical aperture was used to propel ink droplets out through a small ejection orifice.
- US-A- 4,308,547 showed that the small ejection orifice of the conventional ink jet is unnecessary.
- spherical piezoelectric shells as transducers for supplying focused acoustic beams to eject droplets of ink from the free surface of a pool of ink, and acoustic horns driven by planar transducers to eject droplets of ink from an ink-coated belt.
- Classical line printing requires a separate acoustic droplet ejector for each of the picture elements ("pixels") that are needed to define a line of the printed image. This means that a very large number of densely-packed droplet ejectors must be provided to perform line printing at an acceptably high resolution. Acoustic lens arrays for printing at resolutions of 500 s.p.i. or even higher are believed to be feasible, but care has to be taken to avoid crosstalk among the lenses of such an array. The other known acoustic droplet ejection technologies, such as piezoelectric shell transducers and IDTs, are believed to be inferior to the acoustic lens for high resolution line printing, although they are fundamentally acceptable technologies.
- This invention responds to that need by providing sparse arrays of droplet ejectors for acoustic printing.
- Sparse droplet ejector arrays are capable of performing at higher print rates than single ejector printheads because of their parallelism, and they avoid many of the design limitations of ordinary page width arrays.
- the increased center-to center spacing of the droplet ejectors in these sparse arrays significantly simplifies the design of acoustic-lens-type arrays because larger lenses and transducers may be employed, thereby enabling the transducers to operate at lower power densities, permitting the use of thicker substrates for the lenses while maintaining the diffraction of the acoustic power at a negligibly low level, and increasing the permissible focal length of the lenses so as to permit the use of thicker layers of ink.
- the present invention provides an acoustic printer which is as claimed in the appended claims.
- acoustic printer 11 shown only in relevant part having a printhead 12 comprising a sparse linear array 13 of acoustic lenses 14a - 14i for ejecting individual droplets of ink 15 (Fig. 1) on demand from a free surface 16 of an ink supply, such as a pool of ink 17, to print an image on a suitable record medium 18, such as a sheet of plain paper.
- a transport 19 supports the record medium 18 at a small gap distance (e.g., 1 - 2 mm) from the free surface 16 of the ink 17, and the transport 19 advances the record medium 18 crosswise and lengthwise of the array 13 at preselected rates as more fully described below.
- the speed at which the ink droplets 15 are ejected from the free surface 16 of the pool of ink 17 is sufficiently high to propel them onto the record medium 18 with a well-defined and repeatable trajectory, so the picture elements ("pixels") of the image are printed on accurately-located centers.
- the droplet placement accuracy is sufficiently precise and repeatable that multiple droplets can be effectively deposited on top of each other in rapid succession, before the ink has time to dry, whereby the number of ink droplets 15 per pixel may be controlled to vary the size of the printed pixels, thereby imparting a gray scale shading to the printed image.
- the lenses 14a - 14i are defined by small spherical indentations or cavities which are formed in a surface of a solid substrate 21 on relatively widely separated centers, with the center-to-center spacing of the lenses 14a - 14i being selected to ensure that they are effectively acoustically isolated from each other.
- a piezoelectric transducer 22 is intimately mechanically coupled to the opposite surface of the substrate 21, and a controller 23 (Fig 2) is coupled across the transducer 22 to apply independently controlled rf drive voltages across spatially-separated sites along the transducer 22 during operation. These drive voltages locally excite the transducer 22 into oscillation, thereby causing it to generate spatially separated acoustic waves in the substrate 21, such as shown at 24a in Fig. 1, for illuminating the lenses 14a - 14i, respectively.
- the substrate 21 is composed of a material, such as silicon, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, alumina, sapphire, fused quartz, and certain glasses, having an acoustic speed (i. e., the speed of sound in the substrate 21) which is much higher than the speed of sound in the ink 17.
- the acoustic waves such as the wave 24a (Fig. 1), propagate through the substrate 21 at a relatively high speed until they impinge upon the lenses 14a - 14i, respectively, where they exit into a lower acoustic speed medium (i.e., the ink 17 or an intermediate medium) as converging acoustic beams, such as shown in Fig. 1 at 26a.
- the focal lengths of the lenses 14a - 14i which typically are approximately equal to their radius of curvature, are selected so that these acoustic beams come to focus approximately at the free surface 16 of the ink supply 17.
- the acoustic speed of the substrate 21 preferably is at least about 2.5 times higher than the acoustic speed of the ink 17, which is sufficient to ensure that the aberrations of the focused acoustic beams, such as 26a, are small. Indeed, an acoustic speed ratio of 4:1, or even higher, is readily achievable should it be necessary or desirable to reduce the aberrations to a negligibly-low level.
- the printhead 11 may be immersed in the pool of ink 17 as shown, or provision may be made for acoustically coupling the lenses 14a - 14i to an ink supply which is carried by a suitable transport, such as a thin film of 'Mylar' or like plastics material.
- a suitable transport such as a thin film of 'Mylar' or like plastics material.
- the piezoelectric transducer 22 has a relatively narrow band resonant frequency response characteristic, so the radiation pressures which the individual acoustic beams, such as the beam 26a, exert against the free surface 16 of the ink 17 may be controlled with respect to a predetermined threshold level as required for drop-on-demand printing by designing the controller 23 (Fig.
- Amplitude control, frequency control and pulse width modulation also can be employed to control the size of the droplets of ink 15 which are ejected.
- the threshold pressure for ejecting a droplet of ink 15 from the free surface 16 of the ink supply 17 is dependent on the particular ink that is employed, and can be determined empirically.
- the free surface 16 of the ink supply 17 advantageously is maintained at a substantially constant distance of about one focal length from the lenses 14a - 14i.
- Various techniques may be employed to accomplish that.
- the illustrated embodiment utilizes a closed-loop control system 31 comprising a laser 32 for supplying a light beam 33 which strikes the free surface 16 of the ink supply 17 at a grazing angle of incidence, together with a split photodetector 34 which intercepts the light beam 33 after it reflects from the surface 16.
- the photodetector 34 is optically aligned so that the light beam 33 centers on it only if the free surface 16 of the ink supply 17 is at its desired set point level.
- any significant deviation of the surface 16 from that level imbalances the outputs of the photodetector 34, thereby causing a differential amplifier 35 to supply an error signal for energizing a motor 36.
- the motor 36 drives a plunger 37 of an ink-filled pump 38 to add or drain ink from the ink supply 17 via a supply line 39 as required to restore its free surface 16 to the desired set point level.
- a knife-edge liquid level control technique such as shown in US-A- 4,580,148 could be utilized.
- the acoustic waves such as the wave 24(a) are diffracted as they propagate through the substrate 21.
- the center-to-center spacing of the lenses 14a - 14i may be sufficiently great that the diffracted acoustic power has a negligible effect on adjacent lenses, either by reason of the substrate 21 having a thickness on the order of a Rayleigh length, or by virtue of the dissipation that occurs over the distance between adjacent lenses.
- Acoustic mismatch regions may be built into the substrate 21, but sufficient acoustic isolation of the lenses 14a - 14i can also be achieved in a sparse array by merely locating the lenses 14a - 14i on widely-separated centers.
- a 1mm center-to-center spacing of the lenses 14a - 14i may be employed to print a 500 s.p.i. image.
- the pixel diameter at 500 s.p.i. is 50 ⁇ m, so if the lenses 14a - 14i are on 1mm centers, each of them needs print only 20 pixels to form a solid line image lengthwise of the array 13. That compares favorably to a single ejector scanner which would have to print approximately 4000 - 5000 pixels to form a solid line image across a normal 8 ⁇ - 10 ⁇ imaging field at a resolution of 500 s.p.i.
- the transport 19 may comprise, for example, a drum 41 for supporting the record medium 18, and an actuator 42 for rotating and translating the drum 41 on an axis which is generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of the array 13.
- the drum 41 is rotated at a relatively high rate to advance the record medium 18 crosswise of the array 13, and is continuously or incrementally translated lengthwise of the array 13 at a much slower rate, so that the record medium 18 is longitudinally shifted approximately one pixel diameter with respect to the array per revolution of the drum 41.
- the image is composed by printing full lines crosswise of the array 13 and successive lines lengthwise of the array 13.
- Other transports will, of course, suggest themselves.
- a printhead 51 comprising a suitable frame 52 for supporting a sparse array of piezoelectric spherical shell transducers 53a - 53i may be utilized to carry out this invention.
- piezoelectric shell transducers have been unattractive for use in arrays because their diameters are too great to achieve the packing density needed for the simultaneous printing of abutting pixels.
- This invention overcomes that limitation and, therefore extends the utility of such droplet ejectors.
- the embodiment of Fig. 3 is generally the same as the embodiment shown in Figs 1 and 2, so like reference numerals have been employed to identify like features.
- the principles of the present invention may be extended to printheads comprising two or more rows of droplet ejectors. See, for example, the printhead 61 of Fig. 4.
- the present invention simplifies the design of acoustic printheads having arrays of droplet ejectors, while increasing the design options relating to the choice of droplet ejectors for use in such arrays. Moreover, it will be appreciated that the foregoing has been achieved, without significantly compromising either the pixel placement accuracy or the pixel size control which make acoustic printing such an attractive direct marking technology.
Landscapes
- Particle Formation And Scattering Control In Inkjet Printers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to acoustic printers and, more particularly, to sparse arrays of acoustic droplet ejectors for such printers.
- Substantial effort and expense have been devoted to the development of plain paper compatible direct marking technologies. Drop-on-demand and continuous stream ink jet printing account for a significant portion of this investment, but these conventional ink jet systems suffer from the fundamental disadvantage of requiring nozzles with small ejection orifices, which easily clog.
- Acoustic printing is a potentially important, alternative direct marking technology. It is still in an early stage of development, but the available evidence indicates that it is likely to compare favorably with ordinary ink jet systems for printing either on plain paper or on specialized recording media, while providing significant advantages of its own. More particularly, acoustic printing has increased intrinsic reliability because there are no nozzles to clog. As will be appreciated, the elimination of clogged nozzle failure is especially relevant to the reliability of arrays comprising a large number of individual printing devices. Furthermore, small ejection orifices are unnecessary, so acoustic printing is compatible with a greater variety of inks than conventional ink jet printing, including inks having higher viscosities, and inks containing pigments and other particulate components.
- When an acoustic beam impinges on a free surface (i.e.. a liquid/air interface) of a pool of liquid from beneath, the radiation pressure which the beam exerts may reach a sufficiently high level to release individual droplets of liquid from the surface of the pool, despite the restraining force of surface tension. To control the droplet ejection process spatially , the acoustic beam advantageously is brought to focus on or near the surface of the pool, thereby intensifying its radiation pressure for a given amount of input power.
- Ultrasonic (rf) acoustic beams have been employed in known ink jet and acoustic printing systems for releasing small droplets of ink from pools of ink. For example, K. A. Krause, "Focusing Ink Jet Head," IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin,
Vol 16, No. 4, September 1973, pp. 1168-1170 described an ink jet in which an acoustic beam emanating from a concave surface and confined by a conical aperture was used to propel ink droplets out through a small ejection orifice. US-A- 4,308,547 showed that the small ejection orifice of the conventional ink jet is unnecessary. To that end, it discloses providing spherical piezoelectric shells as transducers for supplying focused acoustic beams to eject droplets of ink from the free surface of a pool of ink, and acoustic horns driven by planar transducers to eject droplets of ink from an ink-coated belt. - Classical line printing requires a separate acoustic droplet ejector for each of the picture elements ("pixels") that are needed to define a line of the printed image. This means that a very large number of densely-packed droplet ejectors must be provided to perform line printing at an acceptably high resolution. Acoustic lens arrays for printing at resolutions of 500 s.p.i. or even higher are believed to be feasible, but care has to be taken to avoid crosstalk among the lenses of such an array. The other known acoustic droplet ejection technologies, such as piezoelectric shell transducers and IDTs, are believed to be inferior to the acoustic lens for high resolution line printing, although they are fundamentally acceptable technologies. Unfortunately, raster scan printing with a single acoustic droplet ejector is too slow for many of the applications which are of interest. Accordingly, alternative printer design approaches are still needed to provide increased design flexibility for moderate speed acoustic printers, without sacrificing the pixel placement accuracy or the pixel size control capabilities which make acoustic printing such an attractive direct marking technology.
- This invention responds to that need by providing sparse arrays of droplet ejectors for acoustic printing. Sparse droplet ejector arrays are capable of performing at higher print rates than single ejector printheads because of their parallelism, and they avoid many of the design limitations of ordinary page width arrays. For example the increased center-to center spacing of the droplet ejectors in these sparse arrays significantly simplifies the design of acoustic-lens-type arrays because larger lenses and transducers may be employed, thereby enabling the transducers to operate at lower power densities, permitting the use of thicker substrates for the lenses while maintaining the diffraction of the acoustic power at a negligibly low level, and increasing the permissible focal length of the lenses so as to permit the use of thicker layers of ink.
- Accordingly the present invention provides an acoustic printer which is as claimed in the appended claims.
- This invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
- Figure 1 is a fragmentary, simplified isometric view of an acoustic printer having a printhead comprising a sparse array of acoustic lenses in accordance with this invention ;
- Fig. 2 a more-detailed cross-sectional view of the printer shown in Fig. 1;
- Fig. 3 is a fragmentary, isometric view of an acoustic printer having printhead comprising a sparse array of piezoelectric spherical transducer shells, and
- Fig. 4 is a fragmentary, schematic plan view of a printhead having a two-dimensional sparse array of droplet ejectors in accordance with this invention.
- Turning now to the drawings, and at this point especially to Figs. 1 and 2, there is shown an acoustic printer 11 (shown only in relevant part) having a
printhead 12 comprising a sparselinear array 13 ofacoustic lenses 14a - 14i for ejecting individual droplets of ink 15 (Fig. 1) on demand from afree surface 16 of an ink supply, such as a pool ofink 17, to print an image on asuitable record medium 18, such as a sheet of plain paper. Atransport 19 supports therecord medium 18 at a small gap distance (e.g., 1 - 2 mm) from thefree surface 16 of theink 17, and thetransport 19 advances therecord medium 18 crosswise and lengthwise of thearray 13 at preselected rates as more fully described below. The speed at which theink droplets 15 are ejected from thefree surface 16 of the pool ofink 17 is sufficiently high to propel them onto therecord medium 18 with a well-defined and repeatable trajectory, so the picture elements ("pixels") of the image are printed on accurately-located centers. Indeed, the droplet placement accuracy is sufficiently precise and repeatable that multiple droplets can be effectively deposited on top of each other in rapid succession, before the ink has time to dry, whereby the number ofink droplets 15 per pixel may be controlled to vary the size of the printed pixels, thereby imparting a gray scale shading to the printed image. - The
lenses 14a - 14i are defined by small spherical indentations or cavities which are formed in a surface of asolid substrate 21 on relatively widely separated centers, with the center-to-center spacing of thelenses 14a - 14i being selected to ensure that they are effectively acoustically isolated from each other. Apiezoelectric transducer 22 is intimately mechanically coupled to the opposite surface of thesubstrate 21, and a controller 23 (Fig 2) is coupled across thetransducer 22 to apply independently controlled rf drive voltages across spatially-separated sites along thetransducer 22 during operation. These drive voltages locally excite thetransducer 22 into oscillation, thereby causing it to generate spatially separated acoustic waves in thesubstrate 21, such as shown at 24a in Fig. 1, for illuminating thelenses 14a - 14i, respectively. - The
substrate 21 is composed of a material, such as silicon, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, alumina, sapphire, fused quartz, and certain glasses, having an acoustic speed (i. e., the speed of sound in the substrate 21) which is much higher than the speed of sound in theink 17. Thus, the acoustic waves, such as thewave 24a (Fig. 1), propagate through thesubstrate 21 at a relatively high speed until they impinge upon thelenses 14a - 14i, respectively, where they exit into a lower acoustic speed medium (i.e., theink 17 or an intermediate medium) as converging acoustic beams, such as shown in Fig. 1 at 26a. The focal lengths of thelenses 14a - 14i, which typically are approximately equal to their radius of curvature, are selected so that these acoustic beams come to focus approximately at thefree surface 16 of theink supply 17. In practice, the acoustic speed of thesubstrate 21 preferably is at least about 2.5 times higher than the acoustic speed of theink 17, which is sufficient to ensure that the aberrations of the focused acoustic beams, such as 26a, are small. Indeed, an acoustic speed ratio of 4:1, or even higher, is readily achievable should it be necessary or desirable to reduce the aberrations to a negligibly-low level. - The
printhead 11 may be immersed in the pool ofink 17 as shown, or provision may be made for acoustically coupling thelenses 14a - 14i to an ink supply which is carried by a suitable transport, such as a thin film of 'Mylar' or like plastics material. As a general rule, thepiezoelectric transducer 22 has a relatively narrow band resonant frequency response characteristic, so the radiation pressures which the individual acoustic beams, such as thebeam 26a, exert against thefree surface 16 of theink 17 may be controlled with respect to a predetermined threshold level as required for drop-on-demand printing by designing the controller 23 (Fig. 2) to modulate independently the amplitude, frequency or duration of the rf voltages it applies to thetransducer 22. Amplitude control, frequency control and pulse width modulation also can be employed to control the size of the droplets ofink 15 which are ejected. - The threshold pressure for ejecting a droplet of
ink 15 from thefree surface 16 of theink supply 17 is dependent on the particular ink that is employed, and can be determined empirically. To stabilize the droplet ejection control process, thefree surface 16 of theink supply 17 advantageously is maintained at a substantially constant distance of about one focal length from thelenses 14a - 14i. Various techniques may be employed to accomplish that. For example, as shown in Fig. 2, the illustrated embodiment utilizes a closed-loop control system 31 comprising alaser 32 for supplying alight beam 33 which strikes thefree surface 16 of theink supply 17 at a grazing angle of incidence, together with asplit photodetector 34 which intercepts thelight beam 33 after it reflects from thesurface 16. Thephotodetector 34 is optically aligned so that thelight beam 33 centers on it only if thefree surface 16 of theink supply 17 is at its desired set point level. Thus, any significant deviation of thesurface 16 from that level imbalances the outputs of thephotodetector 34, thereby causing adifferential amplifier 35 to supply an error signal for energizing amotor 36. Themotor 36, in turn, drives aplunger 37 of an ink-filledpump 38 to add or drain ink from theink supply 17 via asupply line 39 as required to restore itsfree surface 16 to the desired set point level. Alternatively, a knife-edge liquid level control technique, such as shown in US-A- 4,580,148 could be utilized. - The acoustic waves, such as the wave 24(a), are diffracted as they propagate through the
substrate 21. In keeping with this invention, however, the center-to-center spacing of thelenses 14a - 14i may be sufficiently great that the diffracted acoustic power has a negligible effect on adjacent lenses, either by reason of thesubstrate 21 having a thickness on the order of a Rayleigh length, or by virtue of the dissipation that occurs over the distance between adjacent lenses. Acoustic mismatch regions (not shown) may be built into thesubstrate 21, but sufficient acoustic isolation of thelenses 14a - 14i can also be achieved in a sparse array by merely locating thelenses 14a - 14i on widely-separated centers. For example, a 1mm center-to-center spacing of thelenses 14a - 14i may be employed to print a 500 s.p.i. image. The pixel diameter at 500 s.p.i. is 50 µm, so if thelenses 14a - 14i are on 1mm centers, each of them needs print only 20 pixels to form a solid line image lengthwise of thearray 13. That compares favorably to a single ejector scanner which would have to print approximately 4000 - 5000 pixels to form a solid line image across a normal 8˝ - 10˝ imaging field at a resolution of 500 s.p.i. There is a print rate penalty associated with selecting the center-to-center spacing of thelenses 14a - 14i so that it is much greater (typically, an order of magnitude or more) than the pixel diameter, but the wider separation of thelenses 14a - 14i greatly simplifies the fabrication of theprinthead 12. - As best shown in Fig. 1, the
transport 19 may comprise, for example, adrum 41 for supporting therecord medium 18, and anactuator 42 for rotating and translating thedrum 41 on an axis which is generally parallel to the longitudinal axis of thearray 13. Thedrum 41 is rotated at a relatively high rate to advance therecord medium 18 crosswise of thearray 13, and is continuously or incrementally translated lengthwise of thearray 13 at a much slower rate, so that therecord medium 18 is longitudinally shifted approximately one pixel diameter with respect to the array per revolution of thedrum 41. As a result, the image is composed by printing full lines crosswise of thearray 13 and successive lines lengthwise of thearray 13. Other transports will, of course, suggest themselves. - Other types of acoustic droplet ejectors may be employed to provide a sparse array in accordance with the present invention. For example, as shown, in Fig. 3, a
printhead 51 comprising asuitable frame 52 for supporting a sparse array of piezoelectricspherical shell transducers 53a - 53i may be utilized to carry out this invention. Heretofore, piezoelectric shell transducers have been unattractive for use in arrays because their diameters are too great to achieve the packing density needed for the simultaneous printing of abutting pixels. This invention, however, overcomes that limitation and, therefore extends the utility of such droplet ejectors. Apart from itsprinthead 51, the embodiment of Fig. 3 is generally the same as the embodiment shown in Figs 1 and 2, so like reference numerals have been employed to identify like features. - As will be appreciated, the principles of the present invention may be extended to printheads comprising two or more rows of droplet ejectors. See, for example, the
printhead 61 of Fig. 4. - In view of the foregoing, it will now be understood that the present invention simplifies the design of acoustic printheads having arrays of droplet ejectors, while increasing the design options relating to the choice of droplet ejectors for use in such arrays. Moreover, it will be appreciated that the foregoing has been achieved, without significantly compromising either the pixel placement accuracy or the pixel size control which make acoustic printing such an attractive direct marking technology.
Claims (8)
respective spherical acoustic lenses (53) which are substantially acoustically isolated from each other, and
piezoelectric transducers for supplying separate acoustic waves to the lenses.
the record medium is able to be advanced crosswise of the array at a relatively high speed and synchronously translated lengthwise of the array at a much slower speed, with the speeds being selected so that the translation of the record medium per cycle is approximately equal to the center-to-center spacing of the pixels.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US94470186A | 1986-12-19 | 1986-12-19 | |
US944701 | 1986-12-19 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0272092A2 true EP0272092A2 (en) | 1988-06-22 |
EP0272092A3 EP0272092A3 (en) | 1989-10-25 |
EP0272092B1 EP0272092B1 (en) | 1993-09-15 |
Family
ID=25481907
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19870311046 Expired - Lifetime EP0272092B1 (en) | 1986-12-19 | 1987-12-15 | Acoustic printers |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0272092B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS63166546A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3787453T2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0728584A2 (en) * | 1995-02-21 | 1996-08-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ink-jet printer |
US5898446A (en) * | 1993-01-29 | 1999-04-27 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Acoustic ink jet head and ink jet recording apparatus having the same |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2742077B2 (en) * | 1989-01-11 | 1998-04-22 | 株式会社リコー | Inkjet head |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2812372A1 (en) * | 1977-03-23 | 1978-09-28 | Ibm | INKJET PRINT HEAD |
US4308547A (en) * | 1978-04-13 | 1981-12-29 | Recognition Equipment Incorporated | Liquid drop emitter |
US4562900A (en) * | 1984-12-20 | 1986-01-07 | Varian Associates, Inc. | Lens system for acoustic transducer array |
EP0216589A2 (en) * | 1985-09-16 | 1987-04-01 | Xerox Corporation | Leaky Rayleigh wave nozzleless liquid droplet ejectors |
-
1987
- 1987-12-09 JP JP31180787A patent/JPS63166546A/en active Pending
- 1987-12-15 EP EP19870311046 patent/EP0272092B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1987-12-15 DE DE19873787453 patent/DE3787453T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2812372A1 (en) * | 1977-03-23 | 1978-09-28 | Ibm | INKJET PRINT HEAD |
US4308547A (en) * | 1978-04-13 | 1981-12-29 | Recognition Equipment Incorporated | Liquid drop emitter |
US4562900A (en) * | 1984-12-20 | 1986-01-07 | Varian Associates, Inc. | Lens system for acoustic transducer array |
EP0216589A2 (en) * | 1985-09-16 | 1987-04-01 | Xerox Corporation | Leaky Rayleigh wave nozzleless liquid droplet ejectors |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5898446A (en) * | 1993-01-29 | 1999-04-27 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Acoustic ink jet head and ink jet recording apparatus having the same |
EP0728584A2 (en) * | 1995-02-21 | 1996-08-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ink-jet printer |
EP0728584A3 (en) * | 1995-02-21 | 1997-05-14 | Toshiba Kk | Ink-jet printer |
US5912679A (en) * | 1995-02-21 | 1999-06-15 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ink-jet printer using RF tone burst drive signal |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0272092A3 (en) | 1989-10-25 |
JPS63166546A (en) | 1988-07-09 |
EP0272092B1 (en) | 1993-09-15 |
DE3787453T2 (en) | 1994-04-28 |
DE3787453D1 (en) | 1993-10-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0272899B1 (en) | Acoustic printheads | |
EP0272154B1 (en) | Acoustic printheads | |
US4751534A (en) | Planarized printheads for acoustic printing | |
EP0400955B1 (en) | Acoustic ink printing | |
US5229793A (en) | Liquid surface control with an applied pressure signal in acoustic ink printing | |
US4801953A (en) | Perforated ink transports for acoustic ink printing | |
JPH0645239B2 (en) | Acoustic ink printer | |
JPH0867004A (en) | Fluid feeding method | |
EP0273664B1 (en) | Droplet ejectors | |
EP0608879B1 (en) | Ink jet apparatus | |
US20020126166A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for high resolution acoustic ink printing | |
EP0272092B1 (en) | Acoustic printers | |
JPH0278559A (en) | Orifice plate for ink jet recording head, ink jet recording head using the same plate, and ink jet recorder using the same head | |
JPS6235852A (en) | Recording apparatus | |
JP2002283555A (en) | Recorder | |
JPH0255139A (en) | Nozzleless ink jet recorder | |
JP2002283545A (en) | Recorder | |
JP2644407B2 (en) | Nozzleless droplet ejection system | |
JPH08244238A (en) | Ink jet recording apparatus | |
JPH07276622A (en) | Acoustic ink jet recording head and recording device | |
JPH04107149A (en) | Manufacture of nozzle | |
JPH02187345A (en) | Ink jet recording head and its manufacture | |
JP2001150664A (en) | Acoustic lens, method of producing the same, molding die for acoustic lens, and acoustic ink jet recording head | |
JP2001206574A (en) | Ink-jet recorder | |
JPH06143561A (en) | Ink jet head |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19900411 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19911216 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3787453 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19931021 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19951206 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19951212 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19951214 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Effective date: 19961215 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19961215 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Effective date: 19970829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Effective date: 19970902 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |