EP0217962B1 - Method of treating active sludge in waste water - Google Patents

Method of treating active sludge in waste water Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0217962B1
EP0217962B1 EP19860902031 EP86902031A EP0217962B1 EP 0217962 B1 EP0217962 B1 EP 0217962B1 EP 19860902031 EP19860902031 EP 19860902031 EP 86902031 A EP86902031 A EP 86902031A EP 0217962 B1 EP0217962 B1 EP 0217962B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
tank
sludge
digestion
digestion tank
reaction tank
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP19860902031
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0217962A4 (en
EP0217962A1 (en
Inventor
Takaharu Tomoyasu
Yuzaburo Kumagai
Shiro Honda
Hikoyoshi Kanayama
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd filed Critical Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd
Publication of EP0217962A1 publication Critical patent/EP0217962A1/en
Publication of EP0217962A4 publication Critical patent/EP0217962A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0217962B1 publication Critical patent/EP0217962B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/30Aerobic and anaerobic processes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/14Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
    • B01D61/145Ultrafiltration
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/14Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
    • B01D61/18Apparatus therefor
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/02Aerobic processes
    • C02F3/12Activated sludge processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/02Aerobic processes
    • C02F3/12Activated sludge processes
    • C02F3/1205Particular type of activated sludge processes
    • C02F3/1221Particular type of activated sludge processes comprising treatment of the recirculated sludge
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/02Aerobic processes
    • C02F3/12Activated sludge processes
    • C02F3/1236Particular type of activated sludge installations
    • C02F3/1268Membrane bioreactor systems
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W10/00Technologies for wastewater treatment
    • Y02W10/10Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage

Definitions

  • This invention relates to sludge treatment of waste water containing organic matter, wherein the waste water is purified by the use of activated sludge. More particularly, in a sludge treatment process where excess sludge formed in an activated sludge reaction tank (hereinafter called the reaction tank) is introduced into a sludge digestion tank (hereinafter called the digestion tank) to digest the excess sludge, the invention is concerned with lessening or completely inhibiting the ultimate formation of the excess sludge by employing specific conditions under which the process is carried out.
  • the reaction tank activated sludge reaction tank
  • the digestion tank sludge digestion tank
  • So-called activated sludge treatment processes which comprise intoducing waste water into the reaction tank in which activated sludge is present followed by aeration are widely used as the purification treatment process of waste water containing organic matter.
  • the amount of excess sludge formed is lessened in some cases by employing the so-called long time aeration process wherein the capacity of the reaction tank is sufficiently increased to reduce the sludge load.
  • the aerobic digestion process employed therefor which process effects the digestion of excess sludge under conditions where oxygen is sufficiently present, involves such a problem that the digestibility attained thereby is as low as about 2-4% per day and accordingly a large sized digestion tank must be used if the amount of excess sludge formed is large.
  • the digestibility attained is as high as about 10% per day.
  • This process involes such a problem that because undigested sludge aggregates and decreases in dehydration properties, disposal of the undigested sludge to be discarded becomes difficult, or a bad smell is emitted, or simplification of the equipment to be employed is hard to be contemplated.
  • waste water treatment process wherein waste water containing organic matter is introduced into an aerated activated sludge reaction tank and the excess sludge formed in the reaction tank is then introduced into a sludge digestion tank to effect the digestion of said excess sludge, characterized in that the digestion tank is aerated with air intermittently to propagate facultative anaerobic bacteria in said tank, a part of the digestion tank liquid containing digested sludge is separated in an ultrafiltration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane into a filtrate and a retentate containing digested sludge, the filtrate is removed from the system and the retentate is recycled to the digestion tank to maintain the amount of the digestion tank liquid at a definite level, and the digestion tank liquid is recycled to the reaction tank in an amount of (0.2-0.8)W1 where W1 is the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank.
  • the excess sludge from the reaction tank may be introduced into the digestion tank either continuously or intermittently according to
  • waste water containing organic matter is introduced into an activated sludge reaction tank to be treated therewith, the excess sludge resulting therefrom is introduced into a sludge digestion tank, this digestion tank is aerated intermittently to propagate facultative anaerobic bacteria and thereby to digest the excess sludge and, at the same time, the digestion tank liquid containing the digested sludge is separated through an ultrafiltration apparatus into a filtrate and the digested sludge, the filtrate is removed outside the system and, at the same time, the retentate is recycled to the digestion tank, and a part of the digestion tank liquid is returned to the aforesaid reaction tank.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic view illustrating a continuous process for the treatment of waste water with activated sludge in accordance with the present invention.
  • Waste water W containing organic matter to be treated is introduced by a feed pump P1 from a waste water storage tank 1 into an activated sludge reaction tank 2.
  • activated sludge which is a suspension of aerobic microorganisms, is present, and the reaction tank 2 is aerated with an air A1 to carry out an activated sludge treatment within the reaction tank 2.
  • excess sludge is formed within the reaction tank 2.
  • the excess sludge thus formed is introduced by a feed pump P2 from the reaction tank 2 into an activated sludge digestion tank 3.
  • the amount W1 of the reaction tank liquid containing the excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3 is desirably 1.5-20, preferably 3-10 times the amount (m3/day) obtained by converting the amount (dry weight) of the excess sludge formed in the reaction tank 2 without using the digestion tank 3 to the concentration of sludge of the reaction tank.
  • reaction tank liquid from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3 it is also possible to pass said reaction tank liquid through an ultrafiltration apparatus (not shown) attached to said reaction tank, thus it becomes possible to adjust with ease the concentration of activated sludge in the reaction tank.
  • the digestion tank 3 into which the reaction tank liquid w1 containing excess sludge has been introduced is aerated intermittently with air A2.
  • the aeration with the air A2 is effected by repeating a cycle such that the aeration time is 0.1-10, preferably 1-10 hours and more preferably 3-6 hours, and the non-aeration time is 0.06-10, preferably 2-10 hours and more preferably 4-7 hours. If the non-aeration time for the digestion tank 3 is less than 0.06 hour, the dissolved oxygen content in the digestion tank liquid is difficult to decrease to a level of less than 0.5 mg/l and the retention of facultative anaerobic bacteria which will be mentioned later becomes difficult.
  • non-aeration time it is not preferable to use such non-aeration time as no digestive ability can be maintained over an extended period.
  • the use of the non-aeration exceeding 10 hours is not preferable since putrefaction takes place in the digestion tank and foul odor is apt to emanate therefrom.
  • the facultative anaerobic bacteria are selectively propagated within the digestion tank, and the excess sludge is efficiently digested in the presence of the propagated facultative anaerobic bacteria.
  • the sludge concentration in the digestion tank 3 is adjusted desirably to 2000-20000 mg/l, preferably 8000-15000 mg/l.
  • the capacity of the digestion tank 3, i.e the real liquid volume [m3], is desirably 2-40, preferably 4-10 times the amount W1 of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced this digestion tank 3.
  • the lower limit of the sludge concentration within the digestion tank 3 is necessarily the sludge concentration in the reaction tank 2, and this lower limit is usually about 2000 mg/l.
  • the sludge concentration in the digestion tank 3 exceeds 20,000 mg/l, the digestion liquid excessively increases in viscosity and the filtration thereof becomes difficult, when subjected to ultrafiltration, thus attaining such a high sludge concentration in the digestion tank is not preferred.
  • the capacity of the digestion tank 3 is less than 2 times the amount W1 of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced into the digestion tank 3, it becomes difficult to maintain the balance of sludge concentration in the digestion tank as the amount of sludge to be digested is small.
  • the said capacity in excess of 40 times the said amount W1 is not preferred since the pH of the digestion liquid tank decreases to less than 4 and no digestive ability of the facultative anaerobic bacteria can be maintained for a long period of time.
  • the digestion tank liquid in the digestion tank 3 desirably has pH 4-8, preferably 5-7, and the temperature of the digestion tank liquid is desirably 10-40°C, preferably 20-35°C.
  • the digestion tank liquid W 2a containing the digested sludge within the digestion tank 3 is introduced by a feed pump P3 into a filtration apparatus having a ultrafiltration membrane, wherein the digestion tank liquid is separated into a filtrate W4 and the remainder W3 containing the digested sludge, and this remainder W3 containing the digested sludge is circulated again into the digestion tank 3.
  • the filtrate W4 containing no sludge is excluded out of the system.
  • the amount of the filtrate W4 excluded from the digestion tank 3 through the filtration apparatus 4 is desirably maintained so that said amount becomes almost equal to a value obtained by deducting the digestion tank liquid W 2b to be returned from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2 as will be mentioned later from the amount W1 of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3.
  • the amount of the digestion tank liquid within the digestion tank 3 can be kept practically at a definite level.
  • the digestion tank liquid W 2b containing the digested sludge is returned, either continuously or intermittently, by a feed pump P4 from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2. Because the digestion tank 3 is aerated intermittently with the air A2, the digestion tank liquid W 2b contains large amounts of the facultative anaerobic bacteria and this sludge is easily activated in an aerobic atmosphere in the reaction tank 2 and, at the same time, said sludge is more activated by contact with fresh waste water containing organic matter.
  • the sludge of the digestion tank consists essentially of absolute anaerobic bacteria and said sludge is not activated even when it is returned to the reaction tank, exerting an adverse influence on the activated sludge reaction in the reaction tank.
  • the sludge of the digestion tank consists essentially of aerobic bacteria and hence the digestibility decreases.
  • the amount [m3/day] of the digestion tank liquid W 2b to be returned from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2 is desirably 0.2-0.8, preferably 0.3-0.5 times the amount W1 [m3/day] of the reaction tank liquid containing the excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3.
  • a selfdigestibility coefficient [day _1 ] of the excess sludge can be maintained at 0.01 [day _1 ] or higher, preferably 0.05 [day _1 ] or higher.
  • Waste water was introduced at a rate of 1.44 m3 day (60 1/h) containing 0.3 kg/day of BOD into a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 240 l, while maintaining a concentration of activated sludge in the reaction tank at 6000 mg/l.
  • a reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge was sent under pressure at a rate of 30 l/day to a digestion tank having a capacity of 120 l, while maintaining the sludge concentration at 15,000 mg/l.
  • a digestion tank liquid was returned at a rate of 6 l/day from the digestion tank to the reaction tank.
  • the digestion tank liquid was passed through a filtration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane (Iris®, a product of Rhone-Poulenc) to effect circulation filtration of the sludge of the digestion tank so that the concentration of said sludge is maintained, and filtrate was withdrawn therefrom at a rate of 24 l/day.
  • the aeration for 6 minutes and non-aeration for 4 minutes were repeated.
  • Waste water was introduced at a rate of 1.44 m3/day (60 l/h) containing 0.3 kg/day of BOD into a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 240 1, while maintaining an activated sludge concentration (MLSS) in the reaction tank at 6000 mg/l.
  • MMS activated sludge concentration
  • a reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge was sent under pressure at a rate of 30 l/day from the reaction tank to a digestion tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 120 1, while maintaining the sludge concentration at 15,000 mg/l.
  • A. digestion tank liquid was returned from the digestion tank at a rate of 6 l/day to the digestion tank.
  • the reaction tank liquid was passed through a filtration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane (Iris®, a product of Rhone-Poulenc) to effect circulation filtration of the sludge of the digestion tank so that the concentration of said sludge is maintained, and the filtrate was withdrawn therefrom at a rate of 24 l/day.
  • the aeration for 4 hours and non-aeration for 6 hours were repeated.
  • waste water containing 200 mg/l of BOD (0.288 kg/day), 10 mg/l of the total nitrogen, 2 mg/l of the total phosphate and no suspended solids was continuously supplied to a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 270 l at a rate of 1.44 m3/day for 24 hours.
  • the sludge concentration in the reaction tank was maintained at 5000 mg/l by passing a reaction tank liquid through an ultrafiltration apparatus (not shown in the drawing) attached to the reaction tank.
  • the filtrate passed through the ultrafiltration apparatus contained BOD of a value of less than 5 mg/l.
  • a reaction tank liquid was transferred from the reaction tank at a rate of 20 l/day to a digestion tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 120 1.
  • the filtrate obtained by circulating a digestion tank liquid to the ultrafiltration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane was withdrawn at a rate of 9 l/day outside the system, and the remainder was recycled to the digestion tank.
  • the digestion tank liquid was returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank at a rate of 11 l/day.
  • the activated sludge concentration in the digestion tank became 8000 mg/l, and although the withdrawal of excess sludge from the system to the exterior was not effected even once, the sludge concentration in the digestion tank maintained practically the same value for 4 months. If the digestion in the digestion tank was not carried out at all, the activated sludge concentration in the digestion tank was calculated to become 18000 mg/l, thus the sludge digestion system of the present invention was demonstrated to be effective.
  • the amount of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be withdrawn from the reaction tank every day was 2.5 l/day in order to maintain the liquid volume of the reaction tank and the activated sludge concentration at 5000 mg/l. Accordingly, the liquid amount of 20 l to be introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank corresponded to about 8 times the amount of excess sludge formed.
  • Example 3 the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank was 5 l/day and the amount of the digestion tank liquid returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank was 4 l/day, whereupon the sludge concentration in the reaction tank gradually increased.
  • Example 3 the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank was 40 l/day and the amount of the digestion tank liquid returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank was 6 l/day, whereupon the sludge concentration in the digestion tank gradually increased.
  • Example 2 when the waste water used in Example 2 was treated with only the reaction tank without using the digestion tank at all, the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge had to be withdrawn every day from the reaction tank at a rate of 10 l/day in order to maintain the liquid volume of the reaction tank at 240 l and the activated sludge concentration at 6000 mg/l.
  • the activated sludge treatment process of waste water of the present invention by virtue of treating waste water containing organic matter with the present process, the ultimate formation of excess sludge can be markedly reduced or completely inhibited. Accordingly, there is no need of dehydrating and drying the excess sludge, or there is no need of incinerating the dried excess sludge.
  • the activated sludge treatment process of the present invention is quite effective in treating waste water containing organic matter.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)
  • Activated Sludge Processes (AREA)
  • Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)

Abstract

Method of treating the active sludge in the waste water, in which the organic substance-containing waste water is introduced into an active sludge reaction tank, from which the excess sludge occurring therein is introduced into a sludge digestion tank to be digested, whereby an object waste water-treating operation is carried out, this method being characterized in the following. During this waste water treating operation, air is introduced intermittently into the digestion tank to expose the sludge thereto, and a part of liquor in the digestion tank is introduced to a filter unit having an ultrafilter. The filtrate obtained through the filter is taken out of the system, and the remainder is circulated in the digestion tank to maintain the quantity of the liquor therein in a substantially constant level. If the liquor in the reaction tank is introduced therefrom into the digestion tank at a flow rate of W1, the liquor in the digestion tank is returned to the reaction tank at a flow rate of (0.2-0.8)W1. This method enables the excess sludge, which is to be treated outside the system, to be reduced to a low level or zero.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to sludge treatment of waste water containing organic matter, wherein the waste water is purified by the use of activated sludge. More particularly, in a sludge treatment process where excess sludge formed in an activated sludge reaction tank (hereinafter called the reaction tank) is introduced into a sludge digestion tank (hereinafter called the digestion tank) to digest the excess sludge, the invention is concerned with lessening or completely inhibiting the ultimate formation of the excess sludge by employing specific conditions under which the process is carried out.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • So-called activated sludge treatment processes which comprise intoducing waste water into the reaction tank in which activated sludge is present followed by aeration are widely used as the purification treatment process of waste water containing organic matter.
  • In the operation of the activated sludge treatment process, however, an excess sludge is formed inevitably in the reaction tank, necessitating treatment of the excess sludge by the use of the dehydrator. Because of the large amounts of excess sludge formed in the standard reaction tank, this process sometimes involves additionally the digestion treatment of the excess sludge under anaerobic and/or aerobic condition in a digestion tank. In this respect, refer to Journal of Sewage Association, 22 (248), 42 (1985), for example.
  • Alternatively, the amount of excess sludge formed is lessened in some cases by employing the so-called long time aeration process wherein the capacity of the reaction tank is sufficiently increased to reduce the sludge load.
  • In practicing the dehydration of sludge by the use of the dehydrator, however, the cost of initial equipment to be provided therefor is great and much skill is required in many cases for operating the dehydrator and, moreover, there is such a problem that for the disposal of the dehydrated sludge, there is no other alternative but to incinerate the dehydrated sludge to be disposed or use the same for land reclamation.
  • In practicing the digestion of excess sludge, on the one hand, the aerobic digestion process employed therefor, which process effects the digestion of excess sludge under conditions where oxygen is sufficiently present, involves such a problem that the digestibility attained thereby is as low as about 2-4% per day and accordingly a large sized digestion tank must be used if the amount of excess sludge formed is large.
  • Furthermore, in the anaerobic digestion process wherein the digestion of the formed excess sludge is carried out under conditions where oxygen is deficient, the digestibility attained is as high as about 10% per day. This process, however, involes such a problem that because undigested sludge aggregates and decreases in dehydration properties, disposal of the undigested sludge to be discarded becomes difficult, or a bad smell is emitted, or simplification of the equipment to be employed is hard to be contemplated. In either of the above-mentioned digestion processes, moreover, there is involved such a serious problem that the rate of digestion markedly decreases at the time when 45-50% of the excess sludge has been digested, and when the digested excess sludge exceeds 55%, the self-digestion coefficient decreases, resulting in practical nonfulfillment of digestive function.
  • On that account, the above-mentioned prior art processes have the problem that even when the excess sludge is digested by the use of the digestion tank, about half of the amount of excess sludge formed in the reaction tank remains undigested.
  • Where the long time aeration process is intended to treat the excess sludge, there is such a problem that a large-sized reaction tank must be used and consequently the space allotted to said reaction tank naturally becomes large and, moreover, a large energy consumption is needed for maintaining large amounts of aeration required for the purpose intended.
  • DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is intended to solve such problems associated with the prior art processes as mentioned above
  • Accordingly it provides a waste water treatment process wherein waste water containing organic matter is introduced into an aerated activated sludge reaction tank and the excess sludge formed in the reaction tank is then introduced into a sludge digestion tank to effect the digestion of said excess sludge, characterized in that the digestion tank is aerated with air intermittently to propagate facultative anaerobic bacteria in said tank, a part of the digestion tank liquid containing digested sludge is separated in an ultrafiltration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane into a filtrate and a retentate containing digested sludge, the filtrate is removed from the system and the retentate is recycled to the digestion tank to maintain the amount of the digestion tank liquid at a definite level, and the digestion tank liquid is recycled to the reaction tank in an amount of (0.2-0.8)W₁ where W₁ is the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank. The excess sludge from the reaction tank may be introduced into the digestion tank either continuously or intermittently according to a predetermined cycle.
  • According to the present invention, it is possible to reduce the amount of excess sludge to be treated outside the system or dispense with such excess sludge since in the operation of an activated sludge system in accordance with the invention, waste water containing organic matter is introduced into an activated sludge reaction tank to be treated therewith, the excess sludge resulting therefrom is introduced into a sludge digestion tank, this digestion tank is aerated intermittently to propagate facultative anaerobic bacteria and thereby to digest the excess sludge and, at the same time, the digestion tank liquid containing the digested sludge is separated through an ultrafiltration apparatus into a filtrate and the digested sludge, the filtrate is removed outside the system and, at the same time, the retentate is recycled to the digestion tank, and a part of the digestion tank liquid is returned to the aforesaid reaction tank.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic view illustrating a continuous process for the treatment of waste water with activated sludge in accordance with the present invention.
  • BEST MODE FOR EMBODYING THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is illustrated below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawing.
  • Waste water W containing organic matter to be treated is introduced by a feed pump P₁ from a waste water storage tank 1 into an activated sludge reaction tank 2. In this reaction tank 2, activated sludge, which is a suspension of aerobic microorganisms, is present, and the reaction tank 2 is aerated with an air A₁ to carry out an activated sludge treatment within the reaction tank 2.
  • When the operation proceeds in this manner, excess sludge is formed within the reaction tank 2. The excess sludge thus formed is introduced by a feed pump P₂ from the reaction tank 2 into an activated sludge digestion tank 3. The amount W₁ of the reaction tank liquid containing the excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3 is desirably 1.5-20, preferably 3-10 times the amount (m³/day) obtained by converting the amount (dry weight) of the excess sludge formed in the reaction tank 2 without using the digestion tank 3 to the concentration of sludge of the reaction tank. In introducing the reaction tank liquid from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3, it is also possible to pass said reaction tank liquid through an ultrafiltration apparatus (not shown) attached to said reaction tank, thus it becomes possible to adjust with ease the concentration of activated sludge in the reaction tank.
  • The digestion tank 3 into which the reaction tank liquid w₁ containing excess sludge has been introduced is aerated intermittently with air A₂. The aeration with the air A₂ is effected by repeating a cycle such that the aeration time is 0.1-10, preferably 1-10 hours and more preferably 3-6 hours, and the non-aeration time is 0.06-10, preferably 2-10 hours and more preferably 4-7 hours. If the non-aeration time for the digestion tank 3 is less than 0.06 hour, the dissolved oxygen content in the digestion tank liquid is difficult to decrease to a level of less than 0.5 mg/l and the retention of facultative anaerobic bacteria which will be mentioned later becomes difficult. Thus, it is not preferable to use such non-aeration time as no digestive ability can be maintained over an extended period. On the other hand, the use of the non-aeration exceeding 10 hours is not preferable since putrefaction takes place in the digestion tank and foul odor is apt to emanate therefrom.
  • By virtue of the intermittent aeration with the air A₂ of the digestion tank 3 into which the reaction tank liquid W1 containing excess sludge has been introduced, the facultative anaerobic bacteria are selectively propagated within the digestion tank, and the excess sludge is efficiently digested in the presence of the propagated facultative anaerobic bacteria.
  • The sludge concentration in the digestion tank 3 is adjusted desirably to 2000-20000 mg/l, preferably 8000-15000 mg/l. The capacity of the digestion tank 3, i.e the real liquid volume [m³], is desirably 2-40, preferably 4-10 times the amount W₁ of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced this digestion tank 3. By virtue of using the digestion tank having a capacity falling within the abovementioned ranges, the retention time of excess sludge in the digestion tank is decided and a favorable value of digestive efficiency can be attained.
  • The lower limit of the sludge concentration within the digestion tank 3 is necessarily the sludge concentration in the reaction tank 2, and this lower limit is usually about 2000 mg/l. When the sludge concentration in the digestion tank 3 exceeds 20,000 mg/l, the digestion liquid excessively increases in viscosity and the filtration thereof becomes difficult, when subjected to ultrafiltration, thus attaining such a high sludge concentration in the digestion tank is not preferred. Where the capacity of the digestion tank 3 is less than 2 times the amount W₁ of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced into the digestion tank 3, it becomes difficult to maintain the balance of sludge concentration in the digestion tank as the amount of sludge to be digested is small. On the other hand, the said capacity in excess of 40 times the said amount W₁ is not preferred since the pH of the digestion liquid tank decreases to less than 4 and no digestive ability of the facultative anaerobic bacteria can be maintained for a long period of time.
  • The digestion tank liquid in the digestion tank 3 desirably has pH 4-8, preferably 5-7, and the temperature of the digestion tank liquid is desirably 10-40°C, preferably 20-35°C.
  • In this manner, the excess sludge within the digestion tank 3 is digested by the facultative anaerobic bacteria. In that case, the digestion tank liquid W2a containing the digested sludge within the digestion tank 3 is introduced by a feed pump P₃ into a filtration apparatus having a ultrafiltration membrane, wherein the digestion tank liquid is separated into a filtrate W₄ and the remainder W₃ containing the digested sludge, and this remainder W₃ containing the digested sludge is circulated again into the digestion tank 3. The filtrate W₄ containing no sludge is excluded out of the system.
  • The amount of the filtrate W₄ excluded from the digestion tank 3 through the filtration apparatus 4 is desirably maintained so that said amount becomes almost equal to a value obtained by deducting the digestion tank liquid W2b to be returned from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2 as will be mentioned later from the amount W₁ of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3. By virtue of maintaining the amount of the filtrate W₄ in this manner, the amount of the digestion tank liquid within the digestion tank 3 can be kept practically at a definite level.
  • In the present invention, moreover, the digestion tank liquid W2b containing the digested sludge is returned, either continuously or intermittently, by a feed pump P₄ from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2. Because the digestion tank 3 is aerated intermittently with the air A₂, the digestion tank liquid W2b contains large amounts of the facultative anaerobic bacteria and this sludge is easily activated in an aerobic atmosphere in the reaction tank 2 and, at the same time, said sludge is more activated by contact with fresh waste water containing organic matter.
  • In the case where the digestion tank is not aerated at all, the sludge of the digestion tank consists essentially of absolute anaerobic bacteria and said sludge is not activated even when it is returned to the reaction tank, exerting an adverse influence on the activated sludge reaction in the reaction tank. Where the digestion tank is continuously aerated, the sludge of the digestion tank consists essentially of aerobic bacteria and hence the digestibility decreases.
  • The amount [m³/day] of the digestion tank liquid W2b to be returned from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2 is desirably 0.2-0.8, preferably 0.3-0.5 times the amount W₁ [m³/day] of the reaction tank liquid containing the excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3. By virtue of maintaining the amount of the digestion tank liquid W2b in the above-mentioned range, a selfdigestibility coefficient [day_1] of the excess sludge can be maintained at 0.01 [day_1] or higher, preferably 0.05 [day_1] or higher.
  • The present invention is illustrated below with reference to examples, but it should be construed that the invention is in no way limited to these examples.
  • Example 1
  • Waste water was introduced at a rate of 1.44 m³ day (60 1/h) containing 0.3 kg/day of BOD into a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 240 l, while maintaining a concentration of activated sludge in the reaction tank at 6000 mg/l.
  • A reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge was sent under pressure at a rate of 30 l/day to a digestion tank having a capacity of 120 l, while maintaining the sludge concentration at 15,000 mg/l. A digestion tank liquid was returned at a rate of 6 l/day from the digestion tank to the reaction tank. The digestion tank liquid was passed through a filtration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane (Iris®, a product of Rhone-Poulenc) to effect circulation filtration of the sludge of the digestion tank so that the concentration of said sludge is maintained, and filtrate was withdrawn therefrom at a rate of 24 l/day. In the digestion tank, the aeration for 6 minutes and non-aeration for 4 minutes were repeated. As the result, facultative anaerobic bacteria were selectively propagated in the digestion tank, and an aerobic atmosphere was insured within the reaction tank. Even when the waste water of 1.44 m³/day was treated, the filtrate contained BOD of less than 5 mg/l with no sludge.
  • Moreover, although the excess sludge was not withdrawn even once during a 30-day operation outside the system, no change in the total amount of sludges in the reaction tank and digestion tank was observed.
  • Example 2
  • Waste water was introduced at a rate of 1.44 m³/day (60 l/h) containing 0.3 kg/day of BOD into a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 240 1, while maintaining an activated sludge concentration (MLSS) in the reaction tank at 6000 mg/l.
  • A reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge was sent under pressure at a rate of 30 l/day from the reaction tank to a digestion tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 120 1, while maintaining the sludge concentration at 15,000 mg/l. A. digestion tank liquid was returned from the digestion tank at a rate of 6 l/day to the digestion tank. The reaction tank liquid was passed through a filtration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane (Iris®, a product of Rhone-Poulenc) to effect circulation filtration of the sludge of the digestion tank so that the concentration of said sludge is maintained, and the filtrate was withdrawn therefrom at a rate of 24 l/day. In the digestion tank, the aeration for 4 hours and non-aeration for 6 hours were repeated.
  • As the result, facultative anaerobic bacteria were selectively propagated in the digestion tank, and an aerobic atmosphere was insured within the reaction tank. Even when the waste water of 1.44 m³/day was treated, the filtrate contained BOD of less than 5 mg/l with no sludge contained.
  • Moreover, although the excess sludge was not withdrawn even once during a 30-day operation outside the system, no change in the total amount of sludges in the reaction tank and digestion tank was observed.
  • Example 3
  • In a system similar to that of Example 2, waste water containing 200 mg/l of BOD (0.288 kg/day), 10 mg/l of the total nitrogen, 2 mg/l of the total phosphate and no suspended solids was continuously supplied to a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 270 l at a rate of 1.44 m³/day for 24 hours.
  • The sludge concentration in the reaction tank was maintained at 5000 mg/l by passing a reaction tank liquid through an ultrafiltration apparatus (not shown in the drawing) attached to the reaction tank. The filtrate passed through the ultrafiltration apparatus contained BOD of a value of less than 5 mg/l.
  • A reaction tank liquid was transferred from the reaction tank at a rate of 20 l/day to a digestion tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 120 1. The filtrate obtained by circulating a digestion tank liquid to the ultrafiltration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane was withdrawn at a rate of 9 l/day outside the system, and the remainder was recycled to the digestion tank.
  • In the digestion tank, the aeration for 4 hours and non-aeration for 6 hours were repeated.
  • The digestion tank liquid was returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank at a rate of 11 l/day.
  • As the result, the activated sludge concentration in the digestion tank became 8000 mg/l, and although the withdrawal of excess sludge from the system to the exterior was not effected even once, the sludge concentration in the digestion tank maintained practically the same value for 4 months. If the digestion in the digestion tank was not carried out at all, the activated sludge concentration in the digestion tank was calculated to become 18000 mg/l, thus the sludge digestion system of the present invention was demonstrated to be effective.
  • In this system, when the above-mentioned waste water was treated only with the reaction tank without using the digestion tank, the amount of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be withdrawn from the reaction tank every day was 2.5 l/day in order to maintain the liquid volume of the reaction tank and the activated sludge concentration at 5000 mg/l. Accordingly, the liquid amount of 20 l to be introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank corresponded to about 8 times the amount of excess sludge formed.
  • Comparative Example 1
  • In Example 3, the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank was 5 l/day and the amount of the digestion tank liquid returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank was 4 l/day, whereupon the sludge concentration in the reaction tank gradually increased.
  • Comparative Example 2
  • In Example 3, the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank was 40 l/day and the amount of the digestion tank liquid returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank was 6 l/day, whereupon the sludge concentration in the digestion tank gradually increased.
  • Comparative Example 3
  • In Example 2, when the waste water used in Example 2 was treated with only the reaction tank without using the digestion tank at all, the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge had to be withdrawn every day from the reaction tank at a rate of 10 l/day in order to maintain the liquid volume of the reaction tank at 240 l and the activated sludge concentration at 6000 mg/l.
  • INDUSTRIAL POSSIBILITY OF THE INVENTION
  • According to the activated sludge treatment process of waste water of the present invention, by virtue of treating waste water containing organic matter with the present process, the ultimate formation of excess sludge can be markedly reduced or completely inhibited. Accordingly, there is no need of dehydrating and drying the excess sludge, or there is no need of incinerating the dried excess sludge.
  • In this manner, the activated sludge treatment process of the present invention is quite effective in treating waste water containing organic matter.

Claims (9)

1. A waste water treatment process wherein waste water containing organic matter is introduced into an aerated activated sludge reaction tank and the excess sludge formed in the reaction tank is then introduced into a sludge digestion tank to effect the digestion of said excess sludge, characterized in that the digestion tank is aerated with air intermittently to propagate facultative anaerobic bacteria in said tank, a part of the digestion tank liquid containing digested sludge is separated in an ultrafiltration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane into a filtrate and a retentate containing digested sludge, the filtrate is removed from the system and the retentate is recycled to the digestion tank to maintain the amount of the digestion tank liquid at a definite level, and the digestion tank liquid is recycled to the reaction tank in an amount of (0.2-0.8) W₁ where W₁ is the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the amount W₁ of the reaction tank liquid to be introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank is 1.5-20 times the amount obtained by converting the amount of excess sludge (dry weight) formed, when the digestion tank is not used, to the concentration of sludge in the reaction tank.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the amount W₁ of the reaction tank liquid to be introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank is 3-10 times the amount obtained by converting the amount of excess sludge (dry weight) formed, when the digestion tank is not used, to the concentration of sludge in the reaction tank.
4. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the capacity of the digestion tank is (2-40) W₁ where W₁ is amount of reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank.
5. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the sludge concentration in the digestion tank is 2000-20000 mg/l.
6. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the sludge concentration in the digestion tank is 8000-15000 mg/l.
7. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the intermittent aeration with air of the digestion tank is effected in such a manner that the aeration time is 0.110 hours and the non-aeration time is 0.06-10 hours.
8. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the intermittent aeration with air of the digestion tank is effected in such a manner that the aeration time is 3-6 hours and the non-aeration time is 4-7 hours.
9. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the amount of the digestion tank liquid returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank is (0.3-0.5) W₁ where W₁ is the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank.
EP19860902031 1985-04-01 1986-03-28 Method of treating active sludge in waste water Expired - Lifetime EP0217962B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP6867885 1985-04-01
JP68678/85 1985-04-01

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0217962A1 EP0217962A1 (en) 1987-04-15
EP0217962A4 EP0217962A4 (en) 1988-04-11
EP0217962B1 true EP0217962B1 (en) 1991-05-08

Family

ID=13380616

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19860902031 Expired - Lifetime EP0217962B1 (en) 1985-04-01 1986-03-28 Method of treating active sludge in waste water

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US4749494A (en)
EP (1) EP0217962B1 (en)
KR (1) KR930007806B1 (en)
DE (1) DE3679139D1 (en)
WO (1) WO1986005771A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (41)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5271845A (en) * 1991-03-20 1993-12-21 Sanexen Services Environmentaux Inc. Aerobic biological process for treating waste sludges
US5204001A (en) * 1991-10-09 1993-04-20 Zenon Environmental Inc. Membrane bioreactor system for treating synthetic metal-working fluids and oil-based products
US5558774A (en) * 1991-10-09 1996-09-24 Zenon Environmental Inc. Aerated hot membrane bioreactor process for treating recalcitrant compounds
JP2657763B2 (en) * 1993-09-07 1997-09-24 財団法人地球環境産業技術研究機構 Microbial hydrogen production
DE4412890A1 (en) * 1994-04-14 1995-10-19 Herhof Umwelttechnik Gmbh Method and device for cleaning water, in particular from a composting process
US5545326A (en) * 1994-12-27 1996-08-13 Petering; John L. Method and apparatus for the treatment of concentrated wastewater
AU6637296A (en) * 1995-08-28 1997-03-19 Kurt Ingerle Process for purifying waste water
FR2762834B1 (en) * 1997-05-05 1999-06-04 Ete Europ De Traitement Des Ea PROCESS AND PLANT FOR THE TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER AND THEIR APPLICATION TO WINE EFFLUENTS
JP4801256B2 (en) * 1998-03-04 2011-10-26 マント、ミッケル、ジー Surge anoxic mixed continuous batch reaction system
FR2789987B1 (en) * 1999-02-18 2001-04-20 Degremont IMPROVEMENTS IN THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL WATER BY ACTIVATED SLUDGE
NL1013097C2 (en) * 1999-09-20 2001-03-21 Wijngaart Adriaan J Van Der Manure processing and / or processing.
US6361695B1 (en) 1999-10-02 2002-03-26 Zenon Environmental Inc. Shipboard wastewater treatment system
PT1127849E (en) * 1999-10-26 2003-09-30 Rochem Ultrafiltrations System PROCESS FOR THE DEPURATION AND / OR TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC AND / OR INDUSTRIAL SERVED WATERS
EP1322558A1 (en) * 2000-09-07 2003-07-02 Procorp Inc Activated sludge wastewater treatment system and method
US6426004B1 (en) * 2000-09-14 2002-07-30 Basf Corporation Continuous flow completely mixed waste water treatment method
GB0110282D0 (en) * 2001-04-26 2001-06-20 Hamworthy Kse Ltd Liquid waste treatment system
EP1409419A4 (en) * 2001-05-31 2009-06-24 Biothane Corp Anaerobic digestion apparatus, methods for anaerobic digestion a nd for minimizing the use of inhibitory polymers in digestion
JP5197901B2 (en) * 2001-07-23 2013-05-15 三菱化工機株式会社 Waste water treatment apparatus and waste water treatment method
JP2003080298A (en) * 2001-09-10 2003-03-18 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Method of treating surplus sludge in wastewater treatment process
EP1441989A2 (en) * 2001-11-16 2004-08-04 Technocon GmbH Method for biological water treatment by addition of macromolecular carbohydrates
US6723245B1 (en) * 2002-01-04 2004-04-20 Nalco Company Method of using water soluble cationic polymers in membrane biological reactors
US20040168980A1 (en) * 2002-01-04 2004-09-02 Musale Deepak A. Combination polymer treatment for flux enhancement in MBR
US20030132160A1 (en) * 2002-01-11 2003-07-17 Khudenko Boris M. Membrane biotreatment
JP3753429B2 (en) * 2002-11-13 2006-03-08 東部町 Sludge recycling treatment method
JP2004216207A (en) * 2003-01-09 2004-08-05 Kuraray Co Ltd Wastewater treatment method
US8114293B2 (en) * 2003-10-29 2012-02-14 Zenon Technology Partnership Method of operating a water treatment plant with immersed membranes
US7879229B2 (en) * 2003-10-29 2011-02-01 Zenon Technology Partnership Water treatment plant with immersed membranes
US7118674B2 (en) 2004-10-14 2006-10-10 Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. Energy-efficient biological treatment with membrane filtration
US8017014B2 (en) * 2005-06-01 2011-09-13 Nalco Company Method for improving flux in a membrane bioreactor
US7531087B2 (en) * 2005-08-23 2009-05-12 Skyblue Waters Usa, Inc. System for treating wastewater
US20070045179A1 (en) * 2005-08-23 2007-03-01 Skyblue Waters Usa, Inc. System and method for introducing high pressure air into a wastewater treatment system
US7527735B2 (en) * 2005-08-23 2009-05-05 Skyblue Waters Usa, Inc. System for treating wastewater
US20070045178A1 (en) * 2005-08-23 2007-03-01 Skyblue Waters Usa, Inc. System and method for wastewater treatment
JP2008238042A (en) * 2007-03-27 2008-10-09 Unitika Ltd Method for reducing amount of organic sludge
US8889008B2 (en) * 2008-05-02 2014-11-18 Nalco Company Method of conditioning a mixed liquor containing nonionic polysaccharides and/or nonionic organic molecules
CN101885570B (en) * 2009-05-15 2012-04-04 江西金达莱环保研发中心有限公司 Sludge treatment method
US8999170B2 (en) * 2009-12-18 2015-04-07 Ovivo Luxembourg S.Å.R.L. Peak flow management in wastewater treatment using direct membrane filtration
CN102553456B (en) * 2011-12-26 2014-01-01 天津大学 Surface modification method of mesh-shaped and non-woven fabric membrane material used for water treatment and application of surface modification method
CN102674539A (en) * 2012-05-09 2012-09-19 浙江清华长三角研究院 Nitrified sludge efficient enriching culture system based on membrane bioreactor and method
CN103951063B (en) * 2014-05-27 2015-04-29 广州市市政工程设计研究院 Energy-saving type treatment device for MBR (membrane biological reactor) oxidation ditch sewage
CN105585117B (en) * 2016-03-09 2017-11-17 中国矿业大学 The device and its minimizing technology of jelly in a kind of Wastewater Treated by Activated Sludge Process lake water

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3701727A (en) * 1971-07-19 1972-10-31 Rex Chainbelt Inc Two-stage aerobic and fucultative waste treatment
US3961078A (en) * 1973-01-24 1976-06-01 Stitt Paul A Soluble waste conversion process and pasteurized proteinaceous products
DE2722401A1 (en) * 1977-05-17 1978-11-30 Bayer Ag METHOD FOR BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF WASTE WATER
US4200523A (en) * 1978-03-23 1980-04-29 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for removing sulfate ions from aqueous streams
JPS603873B2 (en) * 1978-03-31 1985-01-31 東レ株式会社 Water treatment method
JPS584599B2 (en) * 1978-05-06 1983-01-27 三井造船株式会社 How to digest organic sludge
DE2852544C2 (en) * 1978-12-05 1982-11-04 Menzel Gmbh & Co, 7000 Stuttgart Process for stabilizing and largely sanitizing sewage sludge from sewage treatment plants
US4246101A (en) * 1978-12-28 1981-01-20 Pure Cycle Corporation Water recycling system
DE3024813A1 (en) * 1980-07-01 1982-01-28 Gebrüder Weiss KG, 6340 Dillenburg METHOD FOR COMPOSTING ROTTAGE FROM ORGANIC WASTE AND / OR CLEANING SLUDGE IN TWO PROCESS STEPS

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US4749494A (en) 1988-06-07
KR870700575A (en) 1987-12-30
KR930007806B1 (en) 1993-08-20
EP0217962A4 (en) 1988-04-11
EP0217962A1 (en) 1987-04-15
DE3679139D1 (en) 1991-06-13
WO1986005771A1 (en) 1986-10-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0217962B1 (en) Method of treating active sludge in waste water
US5399266A (en) Microbial media and waste water treatment method using same
US4162153A (en) High nitrogen and phosphorous content biomass produced by treatment of a BOD-containing material
US4431543A (en) Method of removing phosphorus from organic waste liquids
US4370235A (en) Method of treating excess sludge
CA1228433A (en) Removal of phosphates and bod from wastewaters
US5182021A (en) Biological process for enhanced removal of ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, and phosphate from wastewater
US6692642B2 (en) Organic slurry treatment process
US3957632A (en) Waste-water purification
US4443337A (en) Biological treatment of waste water
CA2093765A1 (en) Process for the biological treatment of wastewater
US5248422A (en) Process for treating wastewater to remove BOD and nutrients
US4552663A (en) Process for the removal of ammoniacal nitrogen in the BOD sorption zone of a wastewater treatment plant
US2562510A (en) Process for sewage treatment
US3794582A (en) Process for aerating biological suspensions
KR100271942B1 (en) Method for treating high density waste water and apparatus therefore using soil microbe with do controlling aeration tank
US4257897A (en) Process for reabsorption and retention of phosphorous by activated biomass
CA1219384A (en) Waste water treatment
JPH0947781A (en) Treatment of organic material related to bod, nitrogen and phosphorus in waste water
GB1589552A (en) Activated sludge process for waste water purification
JPH0461999A (en) Treatment of high concentration organic polluted waste water
JP2834765B2 (en) Wastewater treatment method
JPS59206092A (en) Treating process of waste water
JPS6356838B2 (en)
JPH044098A (en) Treatment of night soil-based sewage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19870216

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 19880411

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19890517

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3679139

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19910613

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Free format text: MITSUI SEKIYU KAGAKU KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA TRANSFER- MITSUI CHEMICALS, INC.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20020312

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20020327

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20020404

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20020412

Year of fee payment: 17

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030328

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030331

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20031001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20030328

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20031127

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST