EP0217962B1 - Method of treating active sludge in waste water - Google Patents
Method of treating active sludge in waste water Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0217962B1 EP0217962B1 EP19860902031 EP86902031A EP0217962B1 EP 0217962 B1 EP0217962 B1 EP 0217962B1 EP 19860902031 EP19860902031 EP 19860902031 EP 86902031 A EP86902031 A EP 86902031A EP 0217962 B1 EP0217962 B1 EP 0217962B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- tank
- sludge
- digestion
- digestion tank
- reaction tank
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F3/30—Aerobic and anaerobic processes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D61/00—Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
- B01D61/14—Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
- B01D61/145—Ultrafiltration
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D61/00—Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
- B01D61/14—Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
- B01D61/18—Apparatus therefor
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F3/02—Aerobic processes
- C02F3/12—Activated sludge processes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F3/02—Aerobic processes
- C02F3/12—Activated sludge processes
- C02F3/1205—Particular type of activated sludge processes
- C02F3/1221—Particular type of activated sludge processes comprising treatment of the recirculated sludge
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F3/02—Aerobic processes
- C02F3/12—Activated sludge processes
- C02F3/1236—Particular type of activated sludge installations
- C02F3/1268—Membrane bioreactor systems
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W10/00—Technologies for wastewater treatment
- Y02W10/10—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
Definitions
- This invention relates to sludge treatment of waste water containing organic matter, wherein the waste water is purified by the use of activated sludge. More particularly, in a sludge treatment process where excess sludge formed in an activated sludge reaction tank (hereinafter called the reaction tank) is introduced into a sludge digestion tank (hereinafter called the digestion tank) to digest the excess sludge, the invention is concerned with lessening or completely inhibiting the ultimate formation of the excess sludge by employing specific conditions under which the process is carried out.
- the reaction tank activated sludge reaction tank
- the digestion tank sludge digestion tank
- So-called activated sludge treatment processes which comprise intoducing waste water into the reaction tank in which activated sludge is present followed by aeration are widely used as the purification treatment process of waste water containing organic matter.
- the amount of excess sludge formed is lessened in some cases by employing the so-called long time aeration process wherein the capacity of the reaction tank is sufficiently increased to reduce the sludge load.
- the aerobic digestion process employed therefor which process effects the digestion of excess sludge under conditions where oxygen is sufficiently present, involves such a problem that the digestibility attained thereby is as low as about 2-4% per day and accordingly a large sized digestion tank must be used if the amount of excess sludge formed is large.
- the digestibility attained is as high as about 10% per day.
- This process involes such a problem that because undigested sludge aggregates and decreases in dehydration properties, disposal of the undigested sludge to be discarded becomes difficult, or a bad smell is emitted, or simplification of the equipment to be employed is hard to be contemplated.
- waste water treatment process wherein waste water containing organic matter is introduced into an aerated activated sludge reaction tank and the excess sludge formed in the reaction tank is then introduced into a sludge digestion tank to effect the digestion of said excess sludge, characterized in that the digestion tank is aerated with air intermittently to propagate facultative anaerobic bacteria in said tank, a part of the digestion tank liquid containing digested sludge is separated in an ultrafiltration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane into a filtrate and a retentate containing digested sludge, the filtrate is removed from the system and the retentate is recycled to the digestion tank to maintain the amount of the digestion tank liquid at a definite level, and the digestion tank liquid is recycled to the reaction tank in an amount of (0.2-0.8)W1 where W1 is the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank.
- the excess sludge from the reaction tank may be introduced into the digestion tank either continuously or intermittently according to
- waste water containing organic matter is introduced into an activated sludge reaction tank to be treated therewith, the excess sludge resulting therefrom is introduced into a sludge digestion tank, this digestion tank is aerated intermittently to propagate facultative anaerobic bacteria and thereby to digest the excess sludge and, at the same time, the digestion tank liquid containing the digested sludge is separated through an ultrafiltration apparatus into a filtrate and the digested sludge, the filtrate is removed outside the system and, at the same time, the retentate is recycled to the digestion tank, and a part of the digestion tank liquid is returned to the aforesaid reaction tank.
- Fig. 1 is a schematic view illustrating a continuous process for the treatment of waste water with activated sludge in accordance with the present invention.
- Waste water W containing organic matter to be treated is introduced by a feed pump P1 from a waste water storage tank 1 into an activated sludge reaction tank 2.
- activated sludge which is a suspension of aerobic microorganisms, is present, and the reaction tank 2 is aerated with an air A1 to carry out an activated sludge treatment within the reaction tank 2.
- excess sludge is formed within the reaction tank 2.
- the excess sludge thus formed is introduced by a feed pump P2 from the reaction tank 2 into an activated sludge digestion tank 3.
- the amount W1 of the reaction tank liquid containing the excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3 is desirably 1.5-20, preferably 3-10 times the amount (m3/day) obtained by converting the amount (dry weight) of the excess sludge formed in the reaction tank 2 without using the digestion tank 3 to the concentration of sludge of the reaction tank.
- reaction tank liquid from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3 it is also possible to pass said reaction tank liquid through an ultrafiltration apparatus (not shown) attached to said reaction tank, thus it becomes possible to adjust with ease the concentration of activated sludge in the reaction tank.
- the digestion tank 3 into which the reaction tank liquid w1 containing excess sludge has been introduced is aerated intermittently with air A2.
- the aeration with the air A2 is effected by repeating a cycle such that the aeration time is 0.1-10, preferably 1-10 hours and more preferably 3-6 hours, and the non-aeration time is 0.06-10, preferably 2-10 hours and more preferably 4-7 hours. If the non-aeration time for the digestion tank 3 is less than 0.06 hour, the dissolved oxygen content in the digestion tank liquid is difficult to decrease to a level of less than 0.5 mg/l and the retention of facultative anaerobic bacteria which will be mentioned later becomes difficult.
- non-aeration time it is not preferable to use such non-aeration time as no digestive ability can be maintained over an extended period.
- the use of the non-aeration exceeding 10 hours is not preferable since putrefaction takes place in the digestion tank and foul odor is apt to emanate therefrom.
- the facultative anaerobic bacteria are selectively propagated within the digestion tank, and the excess sludge is efficiently digested in the presence of the propagated facultative anaerobic bacteria.
- the sludge concentration in the digestion tank 3 is adjusted desirably to 2000-20000 mg/l, preferably 8000-15000 mg/l.
- the capacity of the digestion tank 3, i.e the real liquid volume [m3], is desirably 2-40, preferably 4-10 times the amount W1 of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced this digestion tank 3.
- the lower limit of the sludge concentration within the digestion tank 3 is necessarily the sludge concentration in the reaction tank 2, and this lower limit is usually about 2000 mg/l.
- the sludge concentration in the digestion tank 3 exceeds 20,000 mg/l, the digestion liquid excessively increases in viscosity and the filtration thereof becomes difficult, when subjected to ultrafiltration, thus attaining such a high sludge concentration in the digestion tank is not preferred.
- the capacity of the digestion tank 3 is less than 2 times the amount W1 of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced into the digestion tank 3, it becomes difficult to maintain the balance of sludge concentration in the digestion tank as the amount of sludge to be digested is small.
- the said capacity in excess of 40 times the said amount W1 is not preferred since the pH of the digestion liquid tank decreases to less than 4 and no digestive ability of the facultative anaerobic bacteria can be maintained for a long period of time.
- the digestion tank liquid in the digestion tank 3 desirably has pH 4-8, preferably 5-7, and the temperature of the digestion tank liquid is desirably 10-40°C, preferably 20-35°C.
- the digestion tank liquid W 2a containing the digested sludge within the digestion tank 3 is introduced by a feed pump P3 into a filtration apparatus having a ultrafiltration membrane, wherein the digestion tank liquid is separated into a filtrate W4 and the remainder W3 containing the digested sludge, and this remainder W3 containing the digested sludge is circulated again into the digestion tank 3.
- the filtrate W4 containing no sludge is excluded out of the system.
- the amount of the filtrate W4 excluded from the digestion tank 3 through the filtration apparatus 4 is desirably maintained so that said amount becomes almost equal to a value obtained by deducting the digestion tank liquid W 2b to be returned from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2 as will be mentioned later from the amount W1 of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3.
- the amount of the digestion tank liquid within the digestion tank 3 can be kept practically at a definite level.
- the digestion tank liquid W 2b containing the digested sludge is returned, either continuously or intermittently, by a feed pump P4 from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2. Because the digestion tank 3 is aerated intermittently with the air A2, the digestion tank liquid W 2b contains large amounts of the facultative anaerobic bacteria and this sludge is easily activated in an aerobic atmosphere in the reaction tank 2 and, at the same time, said sludge is more activated by contact with fresh waste water containing organic matter.
- the sludge of the digestion tank consists essentially of absolute anaerobic bacteria and said sludge is not activated even when it is returned to the reaction tank, exerting an adverse influence on the activated sludge reaction in the reaction tank.
- the sludge of the digestion tank consists essentially of aerobic bacteria and hence the digestibility decreases.
- the amount [m3/day] of the digestion tank liquid W 2b to be returned from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2 is desirably 0.2-0.8, preferably 0.3-0.5 times the amount W1 [m3/day] of the reaction tank liquid containing the excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3.
- a selfdigestibility coefficient [day _1 ] of the excess sludge can be maintained at 0.01 [day _1 ] or higher, preferably 0.05 [day _1 ] or higher.
- Waste water was introduced at a rate of 1.44 m3 day (60 1/h) containing 0.3 kg/day of BOD into a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 240 l, while maintaining a concentration of activated sludge in the reaction tank at 6000 mg/l.
- a reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge was sent under pressure at a rate of 30 l/day to a digestion tank having a capacity of 120 l, while maintaining the sludge concentration at 15,000 mg/l.
- a digestion tank liquid was returned at a rate of 6 l/day from the digestion tank to the reaction tank.
- the digestion tank liquid was passed through a filtration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane (Iris®, a product of Rhone-Poulenc) to effect circulation filtration of the sludge of the digestion tank so that the concentration of said sludge is maintained, and filtrate was withdrawn therefrom at a rate of 24 l/day.
- the aeration for 6 minutes and non-aeration for 4 minutes were repeated.
- Waste water was introduced at a rate of 1.44 m3/day (60 l/h) containing 0.3 kg/day of BOD into a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 240 1, while maintaining an activated sludge concentration (MLSS) in the reaction tank at 6000 mg/l.
- MMS activated sludge concentration
- a reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge was sent under pressure at a rate of 30 l/day from the reaction tank to a digestion tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 120 1, while maintaining the sludge concentration at 15,000 mg/l.
- A. digestion tank liquid was returned from the digestion tank at a rate of 6 l/day to the digestion tank.
- the reaction tank liquid was passed through a filtration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane (Iris®, a product of Rhone-Poulenc) to effect circulation filtration of the sludge of the digestion tank so that the concentration of said sludge is maintained, and the filtrate was withdrawn therefrom at a rate of 24 l/day.
- the aeration for 4 hours and non-aeration for 6 hours were repeated.
- waste water containing 200 mg/l of BOD (0.288 kg/day), 10 mg/l of the total nitrogen, 2 mg/l of the total phosphate and no suspended solids was continuously supplied to a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 270 l at a rate of 1.44 m3/day for 24 hours.
- the sludge concentration in the reaction tank was maintained at 5000 mg/l by passing a reaction tank liquid through an ultrafiltration apparatus (not shown in the drawing) attached to the reaction tank.
- the filtrate passed through the ultrafiltration apparatus contained BOD of a value of less than 5 mg/l.
- a reaction tank liquid was transferred from the reaction tank at a rate of 20 l/day to a digestion tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 120 1.
- the filtrate obtained by circulating a digestion tank liquid to the ultrafiltration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane was withdrawn at a rate of 9 l/day outside the system, and the remainder was recycled to the digestion tank.
- the digestion tank liquid was returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank at a rate of 11 l/day.
- the activated sludge concentration in the digestion tank became 8000 mg/l, and although the withdrawal of excess sludge from the system to the exterior was not effected even once, the sludge concentration in the digestion tank maintained practically the same value for 4 months. If the digestion in the digestion tank was not carried out at all, the activated sludge concentration in the digestion tank was calculated to become 18000 mg/l, thus the sludge digestion system of the present invention was demonstrated to be effective.
- the amount of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be withdrawn from the reaction tank every day was 2.5 l/day in order to maintain the liquid volume of the reaction tank and the activated sludge concentration at 5000 mg/l. Accordingly, the liquid amount of 20 l to be introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank corresponded to about 8 times the amount of excess sludge formed.
- Example 3 the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank was 5 l/day and the amount of the digestion tank liquid returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank was 4 l/day, whereupon the sludge concentration in the reaction tank gradually increased.
- Example 3 the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank was 40 l/day and the amount of the digestion tank liquid returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank was 6 l/day, whereupon the sludge concentration in the digestion tank gradually increased.
- Example 2 when the waste water used in Example 2 was treated with only the reaction tank without using the digestion tank at all, the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge had to be withdrawn every day from the reaction tank at a rate of 10 l/day in order to maintain the liquid volume of the reaction tank at 240 l and the activated sludge concentration at 6000 mg/l.
- the activated sludge treatment process of waste water of the present invention by virtue of treating waste water containing organic matter with the present process, the ultimate formation of excess sludge can be markedly reduced or completely inhibited. Accordingly, there is no need of dehydrating and drying the excess sludge, or there is no need of incinerating the dried excess sludge.
- the activated sludge treatment process of the present invention is quite effective in treating waste water containing organic matter.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)
- Activated Sludge Processes (AREA)
- Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to sludge treatment of waste water containing organic matter, wherein the waste water is purified by the use of activated sludge. More particularly, in a sludge treatment process where excess sludge formed in an activated sludge reaction tank (hereinafter called the reaction tank) is introduced into a sludge digestion tank (hereinafter called the digestion tank) to digest the excess sludge, the invention is concerned with lessening or completely inhibiting the ultimate formation of the excess sludge by employing specific conditions under which the process is carried out.
- So-called activated sludge treatment processes which comprise intoducing waste water into the reaction tank in which activated sludge is present followed by aeration are widely used as the purification treatment process of waste water containing organic matter.
- In the operation of the activated sludge treatment process, however, an excess sludge is formed inevitably in the reaction tank, necessitating treatment of the excess sludge by the use of the dehydrator. Because of the large amounts of excess sludge formed in the standard reaction tank, this process sometimes involves additionally the digestion treatment of the excess sludge under anaerobic and/or aerobic condition in a digestion tank. In this respect, refer to Journal of Sewage Association, 22 (248), 42 (1985), for example.
- Alternatively, the amount of excess sludge formed is lessened in some cases by employing the so-called long time aeration process wherein the capacity of the reaction tank is sufficiently increased to reduce the sludge load.
- In practicing the dehydration of sludge by the use of the dehydrator, however, the cost of initial equipment to be provided therefor is great and much skill is required in many cases for operating the dehydrator and, moreover, there is such a problem that for the disposal of the dehydrated sludge, there is no other alternative but to incinerate the dehydrated sludge to be disposed or use the same for land reclamation.
- In practicing the digestion of excess sludge, on the one hand, the aerobic digestion process employed therefor, which process effects the digestion of excess sludge under conditions where oxygen is sufficiently present, involves such a problem that the digestibility attained thereby is as low as about 2-4% per day and accordingly a large sized digestion tank must be used if the amount of excess sludge formed is large.
- Furthermore, in the anaerobic digestion process wherein the digestion of the formed excess sludge is carried out under conditions where oxygen is deficient, the digestibility attained is as high as about 10% per day. This process, however, involes such a problem that because undigested sludge aggregates and decreases in dehydration properties, disposal of the undigested sludge to be discarded becomes difficult, or a bad smell is emitted, or simplification of the equipment to be employed is hard to be contemplated. In either of the above-mentioned digestion processes, moreover, there is involved such a serious problem that the rate of digestion markedly decreases at the time when 45-50% of the excess sludge has been digested, and when the digested excess sludge exceeds 55%, the self-digestion coefficient decreases, resulting in practical nonfulfillment of digestive function.
- On that account, the above-mentioned prior art processes have the problem that even when the excess sludge is digested by the use of the digestion tank, about half of the amount of excess sludge formed in the reaction tank remains undigested.
- Where the long time aeration process is intended to treat the excess sludge, there is such a problem that a large-sized reaction tank must be used and consequently the space allotted to said reaction tank naturally becomes large and, moreover, a large energy consumption is needed for maintaining large amounts of aeration required for the purpose intended.
- The present invention is intended to solve such problems associated with the prior art processes as mentioned above
- Accordingly it provides a waste water treatment process wherein waste water containing organic matter is introduced into an aerated activated sludge reaction tank and the excess sludge formed in the reaction tank is then introduced into a sludge digestion tank to effect the digestion of said excess sludge, characterized in that the digestion tank is aerated with air intermittently to propagate facultative anaerobic bacteria in said tank, a part of the digestion tank liquid containing digested sludge is separated in an ultrafiltration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane into a filtrate and a retentate containing digested sludge, the filtrate is removed from the system and the retentate is recycled to the digestion tank to maintain the amount of the digestion tank liquid at a definite level, and the digestion tank liquid is recycled to the reaction tank in an amount of (0.2-0.8)W₁ where W₁ is the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank. The excess sludge from the reaction tank may be introduced into the digestion tank either continuously or intermittently according to a predetermined cycle.
- According to the present invention, it is possible to reduce the amount of excess sludge to be treated outside the system or dispense with such excess sludge since in the operation of an activated sludge system in accordance with the invention, waste water containing organic matter is introduced into an activated sludge reaction tank to be treated therewith, the excess sludge resulting therefrom is introduced into a sludge digestion tank, this digestion tank is aerated intermittently to propagate facultative anaerobic bacteria and thereby to digest the excess sludge and, at the same time, the digestion tank liquid containing the digested sludge is separated through an ultrafiltration apparatus into a filtrate and the digested sludge, the filtrate is removed outside the system and, at the same time, the retentate is recycled to the digestion tank, and a part of the digestion tank liquid is returned to the aforesaid reaction tank.
- Fig. 1 is a schematic view illustrating a continuous process for the treatment of waste water with activated sludge in accordance with the present invention.
- The present invention is illustrated below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawing.
- Waste water W containing organic matter to be treated is introduced by a feed pump P₁ from a waste water storage tank 1 into an activated sludge reaction tank 2. In this reaction tank 2, activated sludge, which is a suspension of aerobic microorganisms, is present, and the reaction tank 2 is aerated with an air A₁ to carry out an activated sludge treatment within the reaction tank 2.
- When the operation proceeds in this manner, excess sludge is formed within the reaction tank 2. The excess sludge thus formed is introduced by a feed pump P₂ from the reaction tank 2 into an activated sludge digestion tank 3. The amount W₁ of the reaction tank liquid containing the excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3 is desirably 1.5-20, preferably 3-10 times the amount (m³/day) obtained by converting the amount (dry weight) of the excess sludge formed in the reaction tank 2 without using the digestion tank 3 to the concentration of sludge of the reaction tank. In introducing the reaction tank liquid from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3, it is also possible to pass said reaction tank liquid through an ultrafiltration apparatus (not shown) attached to said reaction tank, thus it becomes possible to adjust with ease the concentration of activated sludge in the reaction tank.
- The digestion tank 3 into which the reaction tank liquid w₁ containing excess sludge has been introduced is aerated intermittently with air A₂. The aeration with the air A₂ is effected by repeating a cycle such that the aeration time is 0.1-10, preferably 1-10 hours and more preferably 3-6 hours, and the non-aeration time is 0.06-10, preferably 2-10 hours and more preferably 4-7 hours. If the non-aeration time for the digestion tank 3 is less than 0.06 hour, the dissolved oxygen content in the digestion tank liquid is difficult to decrease to a level of less than 0.5 mg/l and the retention of facultative anaerobic bacteria which will be mentioned later becomes difficult. Thus, it is not preferable to use such non-aeration time as no digestive ability can be maintained over an extended period. On the other hand, the use of the non-aeration exceeding 10 hours is not preferable since putrefaction takes place in the digestion tank and foul odor is apt to emanate therefrom.
- By virtue of the intermittent aeration with the air A₂ of the digestion tank 3 into which the reaction tank liquid W1 containing excess sludge has been introduced, the facultative anaerobic bacteria are selectively propagated within the digestion tank, and the excess sludge is efficiently digested in the presence of the propagated facultative anaerobic bacteria.
- The sludge concentration in the digestion tank 3 is adjusted desirably to 2000-20000 mg/l, preferably 8000-15000 mg/l. The capacity of the digestion tank 3, i.e the real liquid volume [m³], is desirably 2-40, preferably 4-10 times the amount W₁ of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced this digestion tank 3. By virtue of using the digestion tank having a capacity falling within the abovementioned ranges, the retention time of excess sludge in the digestion tank is decided and a favorable value of digestive efficiency can be attained.
- The lower limit of the sludge concentration within the digestion tank 3 is necessarily the sludge concentration in the reaction tank 2, and this lower limit is usually about 2000 mg/l. When the sludge concentration in the digestion tank 3 exceeds 20,000 mg/l, the digestion liquid excessively increases in viscosity and the filtration thereof becomes difficult, when subjected to ultrafiltration, thus attaining such a high sludge concentration in the digestion tank is not preferred. Where the capacity of the digestion tank 3 is less than 2 times the amount W₁ of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced into the digestion tank 3, it becomes difficult to maintain the balance of sludge concentration in the digestion tank as the amount of sludge to be digested is small. On the other hand, the said capacity in excess of 40 times the said amount W₁ is not preferred since the pH of the digestion liquid tank decreases to less than 4 and no digestive ability of the facultative anaerobic bacteria can be maintained for a long period of time.
- The digestion tank liquid in the digestion tank 3 desirably has pH 4-8, preferably 5-7, and the temperature of the digestion tank liquid is desirably 10-40°C, preferably 20-35°C.
- In this manner, the excess sludge within the digestion tank 3 is digested by the facultative anaerobic bacteria. In that case, the digestion tank liquid W2a containing the digested sludge within the digestion tank 3 is introduced by a feed pump P₃ into a filtration apparatus having a ultrafiltration membrane, wherein the digestion tank liquid is separated into a filtrate W₄ and the remainder W₃ containing the digested sludge, and this remainder W₃ containing the digested sludge is circulated again into the digestion tank 3. The filtrate W₄ containing no sludge is excluded out of the system.
- The amount of the filtrate W₄ excluded from the digestion tank 3 through the filtration apparatus 4 is desirably maintained so that said amount becomes almost equal to a value obtained by deducting the digestion tank liquid W2b to be returned from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2 as will be mentioned later from the amount W₁ of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3. By virtue of maintaining the amount of the filtrate W₄ in this manner, the amount of the digestion tank liquid within the digestion tank 3 can be kept practically at a definite level.
- In the present invention, moreover, the digestion tank liquid W2b containing the digested sludge is returned, either continuously or intermittently, by a feed pump P₄ from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2. Because the digestion tank 3 is aerated intermittently with the air A₂, the digestion tank liquid W2b contains large amounts of the facultative anaerobic bacteria and this sludge is easily activated in an aerobic atmosphere in the reaction tank 2 and, at the same time, said sludge is more activated by contact with fresh waste water containing organic matter.
- In the case where the digestion tank is not aerated at all, the sludge of the digestion tank consists essentially of absolute anaerobic bacteria and said sludge is not activated even when it is returned to the reaction tank, exerting an adverse influence on the activated sludge reaction in the reaction tank. Where the digestion tank is continuously aerated, the sludge of the digestion tank consists essentially of aerobic bacteria and hence the digestibility decreases.
- The amount [m³/day] of the digestion tank liquid W2b to be returned from the digestion tank 3 to the reaction tank 2 is desirably 0.2-0.8, preferably 0.3-0.5 times the amount W₁ [m³/day] of the reaction tank liquid containing the excess sludge to be introduced from the reaction tank 2 into the digestion tank 3. By virtue of maintaining the amount of the digestion tank liquid W2b in the above-mentioned range, a selfdigestibility coefficient [day_1] of the excess sludge can be maintained at 0.01 [day_1] or higher, preferably 0.05 [day_1] or higher.
- The present invention is illustrated below with reference to examples, but it should be construed that the invention is in no way limited to these examples.
- Waste water was introduced at a rate of 1.44 m³ day (60 1/h) containing 0.3 kg/day of BOD into a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 240 l, while maintaining a concentration of activated sludge in the reaction tank at 6000 mg/l.
- A reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge was sent under pressure at a rate of 30 l/day to a digestion tank having a capacity of 120 l, while maintaining the sludge concentration at 15,000 mg/l. A digestion tank liquid was returned at a rate of 6 l/day from the digestion tank to the reaction tank. The digestion tank liquid was passed through a filtration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane (Iris®, a product of Rhone-Poulenc) to effect circulation filtration of the sludge of the digestion tank so that the concentration of said sludge is maintained, and filtrate was withdrawn therefrom at a rate of 24 l/day. In the digestion tank, the aeration for 6 minutes and non-aeration for 4 minutes were repeated. As the result, facultative anaerobic bacteria were selectively propagated in the digestion tank, and an aerobic atmosphere was insured within the reaction tank. Even when the waste water of 1.44 m³/day was treated, the filtrate contained BOD of less than 5 mg/l with no sludge.
- Moreover, although the excess sludge was not withdrawn even once during a 30-day operation outside the system, no change in the total amount of sludges in the reaction tank and digestion tank was observed.
- Waste water was introduced at a rate of 1.44 m³/day (60 l/h) containing 0.3 kg/day of BOD into a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 240 1, while maintaining an activated sludge concentration (MLSS) in the reaction tank at 6000 mg/l.
- A reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge was sent under pressure at a rate of 30 l/day from the reaction tank to a digestion tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 120 1, while maintaining the sludge concentration at 15,000 mg/l. A. digestion tank liquid was returned from the digestion tank at a rate of 6 l/day to the digestion tank. The reaction tank liquid was passed through a filtration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane (Iris®, a product of Rhone-Poulenc) to effect circulation filtration of the sludge of the digestion tank so that the concentration of said sludge is maintained, and the filtrate was withdrawn therefrom at a rate of 24 l/day. In the digestion tank, the aeration for 4 hours and non-aeration for 6 hours were repeated.
- As the result, facultative anaerobic bacteria were selectively propagated in the digestion tank, and an aerobic atmosphere was insured within the reaction tank. Even when the waste water of 1.44 m³/day was treated, the filtrate contained BOD of less than 5 mg/l with no sludge contained.
- Moreover, although the excess sludge was not withdrawn even once during a 30-day operation outside the system, no change in the total amount of sludges in the reaction tank and digestion tank was observed.
- In a system similar to that of Example 2, waste water containing 200 mg/l of BOD (0.288 kg/day), 10 mg/l of the total nitrogen, 2 mg/l of the total phosphate and no suspended solids was continuously supplied to a reaction tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 270 l at a rate of 1.44 m³/day for 24 hours.
- The sludge concentration in the reaction tank was maintained at 5000 mg/l by passing a reaction tank liquid through an ultrafiltration apparatus (not shown in the drawing) attached to the reaction tank. The filtrate passed through the ultrafiltration apparatus contained BOD of a value of less than 5 mg/l.
- A reaction tank liquid was transferred from the reaction tank at a rate of 20 l/day to a digestion tank having a capacity of a real liquid volume of 120 1. The filtrate obtained by circulating a digestion tank liquid to the ultrafiltration apparatus having an ultrafiltration membrane was withdrawn at a rate of 9 l/day outside the system, and the remainder was recycled to the digestion tank.
- In the digestion tank, the aeration for 4 hours and non-aeration for 6 hours were repeated.
- The digestion tank liquid was returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank at a rate of 11 l/day.
- As the result, the activated sludge concentration in the digestion tank became 8000 mg/l, and although the withdrawal of excess sludge from the system to the exterior was not effected even once, the sludge concentration in the digestion tank maintained practically the same value for 4 months. If the digestion in the digestion tank was not carried out at all, the activated sludge concentration in the digestion tank was calculated to become 18000 mg/l, thus the sludge digestion system of the present invention was demonstrated to be effective.
- In this system, when the above-mentioned waste water was treated only with the reaction tank without using the digestion tank, the amount of the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge to be withdrawn from the reaction tank every day was 2.5 l/day in order to maintain the liquid volume of the reaction tank and the activated sludge concentration at 5000 mg/l. Accordingly, the liquid amount of 20 l to be introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank corresponded to about 8 times the amount of excess sludge formed.
- In Example 3, the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank was 5 l/day and the amount of the digestion tank liquid returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank was 4 l/day, whereupon the sludge concentration in the reaction tank gradually increased.
- In Example 3, the amount of the reaction tank liquid introduced from the reaction tank into the digestion tank was 40 l/day and the amount of the digestion tank liquid returned from the digestion tank to the reaction tank was 6 l/day, whereupon the sludge concentration in the digestion tank gradually increased.
- In Example 2, when the waste water used in Example 2 was treated with only the reaction tank without using the digestion tank at all, the reaction tank liquid containing excess sludge had to be withdrawn every day from the reaction tank at a rate of 10 l/day in order to maintain the liquid volume of the reaction tank at 240 l and the activated sludge concentration at 6000 mg/l.
- According to the activated sludge treatment process of waste water of the present invention, by virtue of treating waste water containing organic matter with the present process, the ultimate formation of excess sludge can be markedly reduced or completely inhibited. Accordingly, there is no need of dehydrating and drying the excess sludge, or there is no need of incinerating the dried excess sludge.
- In this manner, the activated sludge treatment process of the present invention is quite effective in treating waste water containing organic matter.
Claims (9)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP6867885 | 1985-04-01 | ||
JP68678/85 | 1985-04-01 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0217962A1 EP0217962A1 (en) | 1987-04-15 |
EP0217962A4 EP0217962A4 (en) | 1988-04-11 |
EP0217962B1 true EP0217962B1 (en) | 1991-05-08 |
Family
ID=13380616
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19860902031 Expired - Lifetime EP0217962B1 (en) | 1985-04-01 | 1986-03-28 | Method of treating active sludge in waste water |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4749494A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0217962B1 (en) |
KR (1) | KR930007806B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE3679139D1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1986005771A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (41)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5271845A (en) * | 1991-03-20 | 1993-12-21 | Sanexen Services Environmentaux Inc. | Aerobic biological process for treating waste sludges |
US5204001A (en) * | 1991-10-09 | 1993-04-20 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Membrane bioreactor system for treating synthetic metal-working fluids and oil-based products |
US5558774A (en) * | 1991-10-09 | 1996-09-24 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Aerated hot membrane bioreactor process for treating recalcitrant compounds |
JP2657763B2 (en) * | 1993-09-07 | 1997-09-24 | 財団法人地球環境産業技術研究機構 | Microbial hydrogen production |
DE4412890A1 (en) * | 1994-04-14 | 1995-10-19 | Herhof Umwelttechnik Gmbh | Method and device for cleaning water, in particular from a composting process |
US5545326A (en) * | 1994-12-27 | 1996-08-13 | Petering; John L. | Method and apparatus for the treatment of concentrated wastewater |
AU6637296A (en) * | 1995-08-28 | 1997-03-19 | Kurt Ingerle | Process for purifying waste water |
FR2762834B1 (en) * | 1997-05-05 | 1999-06-04 | Ete Europ De Traitement Des Ea | PROCESS AND PLANT FOR THE TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER AND THEIR APPLICATION TO WINE EFFLUENTS |
JP4801256B2 (en) * | 1998-03-04 | 2011-10-26 | マント、ミッケル、ジー | Surge anoxic mixed continuous batch reaction system |
FR2789987B1 (en) * | 1999-02-18 | 2001-04-20 | Degremont | IMPROVEMENTS IN THE TREATMENT OF RESIDUAL WATER BY ACTIVATED SLUDGE |
NL1013097C2 (en) * | 1999-09-20 | 2001-03-21 | Wijngaart Adriaan J Van Der | Manure processing and / or processing. |
US6361695B1 (en) | 1999-10-02 | 2002-03-26 | Zenon Environmental Inc. | Shipboard wastewater treatment system |
PT1127849E (en) * | 1999-10-26 | 2003-09-30 | Rochem Ultrafiltrations System | PROCESS FOR THE DEPURATION AND / OR TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC AND / OR INDUSTRIAL SERVED WATERS |
EP1322558A1 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2003-07-02 | Procorp Inc | Activated sludge wastewater treatment system and method |
US6426004B1 (en) * | 2000-09-14 | 2002-07-30 | Basf Corporation | Continuous flow completely mixed waste water treatment method |
GB0110282D0 (en) * | 2001-04-26 | 2001-06-20 | Hamworthy Kse Ltd | Liquid waste treatment system |
EP1409419A4 (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2009-06-24 | Biothane Corp | Anaerobic digestion apparatus, methods for anaerobic digestion a nd for minimizing the use of inhibitory polymers in digestion |
JP5197901B2 (en) * | 2001-07-23 | 2013-05-15 | 三菱化工機株式会社 | Waste water treatment apparatus and waste water treatment method |
JP2003080298A (en) * | 2001-09-10 | 2003-03-18 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Method of treating surplus sludge in wastewater treatment process |
EP1441989A2 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2004-08-04 | Technocon GmbH | Method for biological water treatment by addition of macromolecular carbohydrates |
US6723245B1 (en) * | 2002-01-04 | 2004-04-20 | Nalco Company | Method of using water soluble cationic polymers in membrane biological reactors |
US20040168980A1 (en) * | 2002-01-04 | 2004-09-02 | Musale Deepak A. | Combination polymer treatment for flux enhancement in MBR |
US20030132160A1 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2003-07-17 | Khudenko Boris M. | Membrane biotreatment |
JP3753429B2 (en) * | 2002-11-13 | 2006-03-08 | 東部町 | Sludge recycling treatment method |
JP2004216207A (en) * | 2003-01-09 | 2004-08-05 | Kuraray Co Ltd | Wastewater treatment method |
US8114293B2 (en) * | 2003-10-29 | 2012-02-14 | Zenon Technology Partnership | Method of operating a water treatment plant with immersed membranes |
US7879229B2 (en) * | 2003-10-29 | 2011-02-01 | Zenon Technology Partnership | Water treatment plant with immersed membranes |
US7118674B2 (en) | 2004-10-14 | 2006-10-10 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Energy-efficient biological treatment with membrane filtration |
US8017014B2 (en) * | 2005-06-01 | 2011-09-13 | Nalco Company | Method for improving flux in a membrane bioreactor |
US7531087B2 (en) * | 2005-08-23 | 2009-05-12 | Skyblue Waters Usa, Inc. | System for treating wastewater |
US20070045179A1 (en) * | 2005-08-23 | 2007-03-01 | Skyblue Waters Usa, Inc. | System and method for introducing high pressure air into a wastewater treatment system |
US7527735B2 (en) * | 2005-08-23 | 2009-05-05 | Skyblue Waters Usa, Inc. | System for treating wastewater |
US20070045178A1 (en) * | 2005-08-23 | 2007-03-01 | Skyblue Waters Usa, Inc. | System and method for wastewater treatment |
JP2008238042A (en) * | 2007-03-27 | 2008-10-09 | Unitika Ltd | Method for reducing amount of organic sludge |
US8889008B2 (en) * | 2008-05-02 | 2014-11-18 | Nalco Company | Method of conditioning a mixed liquor containing nonionic polysaccharides and/or nonionic organic molecules |
CN101885570B (en) * | 2009-05-15 | 2012-04-04 | 江西金达莱环保研发中心有限公司 | Sludge treatment method |
US8999170B2 (en) * | 2009-12-18 | 2015-04-07 | Ovivo Luxembourg S.Å.R.L. | Peak flow management in wastewater treatment using direct membrane filtration |
CN102553456B (en) * | 2011-12-26 | 2014-01-01 | 天津大学 | Surface modification method of mesh-shaped and non-woven fabric membrane material used for water treatment and application of surface modification method |
CN102674539A (en) * | 2012-05-09 | 2012-09-19 | 浙江清华长三角研究院 | Nitrified sludge efficient enriching culture system based on membrane bioreactor and method |
CN103951063B (en) * | 2014-05-27 | 2015-04-29 | 广州市市政工程设计研究院 | Energy-saving type treatment device for MBR (membrane biological reactor) oxidation ditch sewage |
CN105585117B (en) * | 2016-03-09 | 2017-11-17 | 中国矿业大学 | The device and its minimizing technology of jelly in a kind of Wastewater Treated by Activated Sludge Process lake water |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3701727A (en) * | 1971-07-19 | 1972-10-31 | Rex Chainbelt Inc | Two-stage aerobic and fucultative waste treatment |
US3961078A (en) * | 1973-01-24 | 1976-06-01 | Stitt Paul A | Soluble waste conversion process and pasteurized proteinaceous products |
DE2722401A1 (en) * | 1977-05-17 | 1978-11-30 | Bayer Ag | METHOD FOR BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF WASTE WATER |
US4200523A (en) * | 1978-03-23 | 1980-04-29 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Process for removing sulfate ions from aqueous streams |
JPS603873B2 (en) * | 1978-03-31 | 1985-01-31 | 東レ株式会社 | Water treatment method |
JPS584599B2 (en) * | 1978-05-06 | 1983-01-27 | 三井造船株式会社 | How to digest organic sludge |
DE2852544C2 (en) * | 1978-12-05 | 1982-11-04 | Menzel Gmbh & Co, 7000 Stuttgart | Process for stabilizing and largely sanitizing sewage sludge from sewage treatment plants |
US4246101A (en) * | 1978-12-28 | 1981-01-20 | Pure Cycle Corporation | Water recycling system |
DE3024813A1 (en) * | 1980-07-01 | 1982-01-28 | Gebrüder Weiss KG, 6340 Dillenburg | METHOD FOR COMPOSTING ROTTAGE FROM ORGANIC WASTE AND / OR CLEANING SLUDGE IN TWO PROCESS STEPS |
-
1986
- 1986-03-28 EP EP19860902031 patent/EP0217962B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1986-03-28 WO PCT/JP1986/000150 patent/WO1986005771A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1986-03-28 KR KR1019860700817A patent/KR930007806B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1986-03-28 US US06/940,000 patent/US4749494A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1986-03-28 DE DE8686902031T patent/DE3679139D1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US4749494A (en) | 1988-06-07 |
KR870700575A (en) | 1987-12-30 |
KR930007806B1 (en) | 1993-08-20 |
EP0217962A4 (en) | 1988-04-11 |
EP0217962A1 (en) | 1987-04-15 |
DE3679139D1 (en) | 1991-06-13 |
WO1986005771A1 (en) | 1986-10-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0217962B1 (en) | Method of treating active sludge in waste water | |
US5399266A (en) | Microbial media and waste water treatment method using same | |
US4162153A (en) | High nitrogen and phosphorous content biomass produced by treatment of a BOD-containing material | |
US4431543A (en) | Method of removing phosphorus from organic waste liquids | |
US4370235A (en) | Method of treating excess sludge | |
CA1228433A (en) | Removal of phosphates and bod from wastewaters | |
US5182021A (en) | Biological process for enhanced removal of ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, and phosphate from wastewater | |
US6692642B2 (en) | Organic slurry treatment process | |
US3957632A (en) | Waste-water purification | |
US4443337A (en) | Biological treatment of waste water | |
CA2093765A1 (en) | Process for the biological treatment of wastewater | |
US5248422A (en) | Process for treating wastewater to remove BOD and nutrients | |
US4552663A (en) | Process for the removal of ammoniacal nitrogen in the BOD sorption zone of a wastewater treatment plant | |
US2562510A (en) | Process for sewage treatment | |
US3794582A (en) | Process for aerating biological suspensions | |
KR100271942B1 (en) | Method for treating high density waste water and apparatus therefore using soil microbe with do controlling aeration tank | |
US4257897A (en) | Process for reabsorption and retention of phosphorous by activated biomass | |
CA1219384A (en) | Waste water treatment | |
JPH0947781A (en) | Treatment of organic material related to bod, nitrogen and phosphorus in waste water | |
GB1589552A (en) | Activated sludge process for waste water purification | |
JPH0461999A (en) | Treatment of high concentration organic polluted waste water | |
JP2834765B2 (en) | Wastewater treatment method | |
JPS59206092A (en) | Treating process of waste water | |
JPS6356838B2 (en) | ||
JPH044098A (en) | Treatment of night soil-based sewage |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19870216 |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 19880411 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19890517 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3679139 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19910613 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CD |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Free format text: MITSUI SEKIYU KAGAKU KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA TRANSFER- MITSUI CHEMICALS, INC. |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20020312 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20020327 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20020404 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20020412 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030328 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030331 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20031001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20030328 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20031127 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |