EP0105138A1 - High efficiency reduction carburization and sintering method - Google Patents

High efficiency reduction carburization and sintering method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0105138A1
EP0105138A1 EP83107859A EP83107859A EP0105138A1 EP 0105138 A1 EP0105138 A1 EP 0105138A1 EP 83107859 A EP83107859 A EP 83107859A EP 83107859 A EP83107859 A EP 83107859A EP 0105138 A1 EP0105138 A1 EP 0105138A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
preform
zone
temperature
carbon
carburizing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP83107859A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0105138B1 (en
Inventor
Larry Byrnes
Jon Gabrielsen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Federal Mogul LLC
Original Assignee
Federal Mogul LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Federal Mogul LLC filed Critical Federal Mogul LLC
Priority to AT83107859T priority Critical patent/ATE44983T1/en
Publication of EP0105138A1 publication Critical patent/EP0105138A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0105138B1 publication Critical patent/EP0105138B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C8/00Solid state diffusion of only non-metal elements into metallic material surfaces; Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive gas, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C8/06Solid state diffusion of only non-metal elements into metallic material surfaces; Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive gas, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using gases
    • C23C8/08Solid state diffusion of only non-metal elements into metallic material surfaces; Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive gas, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using gases only one element being applied
    • C23C8/20Carburising
    • C23C8/22Carburising of ferrous surfaces
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F3/00Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
    • B22F3/10Sintering only
    • B22F3/1003Use of special medium during sintering, e.g. sintering aid
    • B22F3/1007Atmosphere
    • B22F3/101Changing atmosphere
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F3/00Manufacture of workpieces or articles from metallic powder characterised by the manner of compacting or sintering; Apparatus specially adapted therefor ; Presses and furnaces
    • B22F3/24After-treatment of workpieces or articles
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method for reducing, sintering and carburizing pre-alloyed, ferrous-base powder metal forging preforms.
  • pre-alloyed powder is cold pressed, sintered, and then forged.
  • oxides in the powder are reduced to acceptable levels.
  • This forging preform is lubricated, heated to an appropriate forging temperature, and forged to a close tolerance configuration. After forging, the part is normally quenched and stress relieved.
  • a number of powder metal parts require a post forging machining operation, such as grinding. In such cases, it is necessary to insure that the carbon case introduced during carburizing has adequate depth and composition to permit the removal of material during machining while maintaining the specified surface carbon content.
  • the carbon gradient produced by current powder metallurgy techniques has not been adequate for certain applications in which relatively high post-machining surface carbon is required.
  • the object of this invention is to provide a method for making powder metal forging preforms of high strength ferrous-base alloys in which the times and temperatures for reducing, sintering and carburizing such preforms are substantially reduced.
  • the present invention therefore provides a method for simultaneously sintering and carburizing a pre-alloyed, ferrous-base, powder metal forging preform characterized by the steps of preheating the preform in the preheat zone of a continuous furnace for a period of no longer than is required to burn off lubricants and to induce rapid heating of the preform to a temperature which approaches sintering/carburizing temperature, simultaneously sintering and carburizing the preform in the hot zone of the furnace in a carburizing atmosphere and having a carbon potential greater than the desired surface carbon content at a temperature substantially within the range below 1093°C (2000°F) and above the solubility temperature of carbon in austenitic iron at the carbon potential of the atmosphere and for a period of time sufficient to reduce oxides and to produce a case carbon gradient in the preform having a surface carbon content approximately equal to the desired case carbon content and which decreases relatively constantly to a depth of about 0.050 cm.
  • This invention involves an improved process for producing forging preforms, that is, a powder metal part which has been cold pressed, sintered, and carburized in preparation for the forging step.
  • the process produces a forging preform having an acceptable carbon gradient, but at times and temperatures substantially below those generally recognized as necessary to do so.
  • the invention is directed to hardenable alloy steels which contain one or more alloying additions of molybdenum, nickel, manganese, chromium and the like.
  • Carburized forging preforms have been produced by this process from pre-alloyed powder similar in composition to the AISI 4600 series steel at temperatures below 1093°C (2000°F) with a total time above austenitic temperatures of about 35 minutes or less.
  • this process is capable of reducing oxides to acceptable levels, that is, less than 1,000 ppm 0 2 .
  • current sintering/carburizing process for comparable alloys which are conducted at 1121°C (2050°F) and with times above austenitic temperatures of approximately 60 minutes. Consequently, the cost of producing forging preforms is substantially reduced because production time is substantially reduced and energy requirements are reduced.
  • the process includes a step for modifying the carbon gradient to produce an improved forging preform for applications which require a relatively high surface carbon content after machining.
  • the carbon gradient is modified to produce a plateau having a depth of at least 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches) over which the carbon content decreases by no more than about 0.10%. (Compositions are given throughout in weight percent.)
  • This carbon gradient permits the removal of up to about 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches) of stock during machining without reducing the surface carbon content below an acceptable level.
  • This feature of the invention appears to be particularly important in the production of races for rolling contact bearings from powder metal since these races have ground surfaces which require relatively high postgrinding surface hardness.
  • the sintering/carburizing process according to the invention is conducted in a fairly conventional belt-type sintering furnace which includes a preheat zone, a hot zone, and a cooling zone. Sintering and carburizing are performed simultaneously in the hot zone. A short diffusion zone may be added immediately following the hot zone when it is desired to modify the carbon gradient from that which is obtained during primary carburization in the hot zone.
  • the cold pressed preform is heated to burn off lubricants, such as zinc stearate, stearic acid, and waxes, the convention function of the preheat zone.
  • lubricants such as zinc stearate, stearic acid, and waxes
  • the preheat zone is maintained at a temperature significantly higher than usual to rapidly heat the preform to a predetermined sintering/carburizing temperature. More specifically, while the preheat zone in conventional practice is typically heated to temperatures up to 816°C (1500°F), temperatures as high as 1093°C (2000°F) could be employed in accordance with this invention. It should be noted, however, that the temperature of the preheat zone is determined in light of the process temperature. Hence, if the sintering/ carburizing temperature is lowered to 954°C (1750°F), the temperature in the preheat zone would also be lowered. The time inthepreheat zone is also reduced. While conventional sintering practice specifies a time in the preheat zone of about 15 to 30 minutes, the time in the preheat zone according to the instant invention may be 10 minutes or less.
  • the preform moves into the hot zone in which it is simultaneously sintered and carburized.
  • the hot zone is maintained at a temperature below 1093°C (2000°F) which is at least 27°C (50°F) below temperatures normally recommended for prealloyed powders of this type.
  • An atmosphere having a high carbon potential is used in the hot zone, that is, an atmosphere having a carbon potential which is higher than the desired surface carbon content.
  • the preform is maintained in the hot zone for approximately 20 minutes.
  • the preform is moved from the hot zone into a first cooling zone in which the preform is rapidly cooled (within approximately five minutes) to begin the austenitic trans-, formation to freeze the case carbon gradient obtained during carburization.
  • the preform is then cooled in a second cooling zone to a temperature below about 260°C (500°F) to prevent detrimental oxidation.
  • the preform is moved from the hot zone into a diffusion zone for modifying the shape of the carbon gradient obtained in the hot zone.
  • the diffusion zone is heated by the product moving through the zone so that the temperature upon entry is approximately equal to the temperature of the hot zone.
  • the diffusion zone is insulated so that the temperature of the preform does not fall below the austenitic transformation temperature.
  • a carburizing atmosphere of a desired carbon potential is maintained in the diffusion zone. The atmosphere is controlled independently from the atmosphere in the sintering/carburizing zone and has a carbon potential which is below the carbon potential of the hot zone and is at, or slightly below, the desired surface carbon content of the preform.
  • the preform is maintained in the diffusion zone for up to about five minutes to change the carbon gradient to one with a plateau which extends to a depth of at least 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches) with no more than about a 0.10% decrease in carbon content.
  • the preform is then rapidly cooled in the first cooling zone to begin the austenitic transformation and thereby freeze the carbon gradient in the case. Thereafter, the preform is moved through the second cooling zone under conditions similar to those described with respect to the first embodiment.
  • Time and temperature are considered to be inversely related with respect to sintering and carburizing processes. That is, if the temperature is reduced, the time must be increased, and vice versa.
  • the diffusion rate of carbon in the powder metal preform does not increase, but is fairly constant over the temperature range 843°C to 1066°C (1550°F to 1950°F). Moreover, and more significantly, the diffusion rate is substantially higher in the powder metal preform over this temperature range than the diffusion rate in wrought material. At temperatures above 1066°C (1950°F) the rate of diffusion begins increasing rapidly and beyond 1093°C (2000°F) the rates of diffusion become approximately equal for both materials so that advantage attained at lower temperatures is lost. Therefore, the instant invention is designed to operate over the temperature range of about 843°C to about 1066°C (about 1550°F to about 1950°F).
  • Figure 1 shows the rate of diffusion of carbon in powder metal and wrought material as a function of temperature. While the rate of diffusion in wrought material is very dependent on temperature, as is expected, the rate of diffusion in powder metal is nearly insensitive to temperature over the temperature range 843°C-1066°C (1550°F-1950°F) .
  • the diffusion rate in the powder metal preform is substantially higher over this temperature range than in the wrought material. Above 1066°C (1950°F) the rate of diffusion in powder metal seems to behave similarly to that in wrought material.
  • oxide levels Due to recent improvements in the manufacture of ferrous-base, pre-alloyed powders, oxide levels have been substantially reduced. If such improvements continue, it is quite likely that the oxide level can be reduced below the maximum level specified for forged powder metal parts, that is, below 1000 ppm 0 2 . When this occurs, the reduction of oxides can also be ignored. In the meantime, a temperature is selected which, in conjunction with a reducing atmosphere, is capable of reducing oxides to the required levels. For example, at 1010°C (1850°F) the oxides in the powder can be reduced to a level of about 900 ppm 0 2 which is below the specified maximum. Time at temperature can also be shortened due to the improved powders which have lower oxide contents to begin with.
  • the furnace employed in carrying out the process is, for the most part, a conventional, belt-type, continuous furnace typical of those used in the powder metal parts industry. Special modifications and features will be apparent from the more detailed description of the furnace which follows.
  • the furnace is divided into four functional zones. With reference to the schematic shown in Figure 4, these comprise a preheat zone 10, a sinter/carburize zone 12, a first cooling zone 14 and a second cooling zone 16.
  • the furnace may be heated electrically or with gas and the work is moved through it on a continuous mesh belt.
  • the furnace also has the necessary plumbing for maintaining a desired carburizing atmosphere in the sinter/carburize zone 12. oter features of the furnace will be described in connection with the description of the process.
  • Pre-alloyed ferrous-base powder metal is first cold pressed into green forging preforms having a shape generally similar to the final forged part. This is done according to standard powder metallurgy practice and will not be described in greater detail.
  • the pre- alloyed powder is one of the high strength ferrous-base alloys similar to AISI 4600 series with a predetermined base carbon content generally between 0.15 and 0.25% carbon. As previously noted, these powders include alloy additions which are believed to require high temperatures and relatively long process times.
  • the powder has the lowest oxide content economically attainable, currently 1500-2500 ppm 0 2 .
  • the cold-pressed briquette typically has a density of 6.2-6.8g/cm 3 .
  • the green forging preforms are loaded onto the charge end of the furnace and are conveyed into the preheat zone 10.
  • waxes and lubricants are burned out of the green preform.
  • the preform is heated rapidly to a temperature which at least approaches the sintering/carburizing temperature. For example, if a sintering/carburizing temperature of 1066°C (1950°F) is selected, the preheat zone is heated to at least 1010°C (1850°F) so that the temperature of the green preform is near this temperature by the time it traverses the preheat zone.
  • a belt speed of at least 30.5 cm. (12 inches) per minute is maintained so that each green preform resides in the preheat zone for a period no longer than about 10 minutes.
  • the forging preform is moved into the sinter/carburize zone 12.
  • This zone is referred to as the "hot" zone in convention sintering furnaces.
  • the preform is sintered, carburized and reduced.
  • a carburizing atmosphere for example, an endotheremic gas, is maintained at a carbon potential which is greater than the desired surface carbon content. It should be recognized, however, that other carburizing atmospheres can be used. For example, if a surface carbon content of 0.85%-1.00%C is required, a carbon potential of up to the saturation level of carbon is austenite at the specified temperature is maintained in the sinter/carburize zone; e.g. approximately 1.9% at 1066°C (1950°F).
  • the carbon potential of the atmosphere can be controlled in a number of known manners including, for example, maintaining a constant analyzed methane level in the zone using infrared analyzers. Since sintering furnaces vary in design and operating characteristics, it may be necessary empirically to correlate methane level and carbon potential, however, once the relationship is established, it is quite easy to maintain the desired methane level using standard control equipment.
  • the temperature of the sinter/carburize zone 12 is maintained at a temperature below 1093°C (2000°F), the upper limit.
  • the lower limit for the temperature is determined in light of two main considerations: the sintered preform strength and the ability to reduce oxides to acceptable levels. Due to the oxide levels of currently available powders, the ability to reduce oxides is the more restrictive consideration. With currently available powders, temperatures below 1010°C (1850°F) are not recommended. If a temperature of 1066°C (1950°F) is selected to insure oxide reduction well below 1000 ppm 0 2' preforms with adequate strength for subsequent forging are produced. However, as the oxide content of the powder is reduced in the starting powder, the preform strength limits will ultimately control the lower limit for temperature. In any event, from our studies we conclude that the optimum temperature range for the process is from about 843°C-1066°C (1550°F-1950°F).
  • the time period during which the forging preform resides in the sintering/carburizing zone is short compared to recognized practice. Since the belt speed is at least 30.5 cm. (12 inches) per minute, the period of time in this zone is no longer than 20 minutes.
  • a case carbon gradient is produced in the forging preform having a surface carbon content which is below the carbon potential of the atmosphere, but approximately equal to the desired surface carbon content.
  • the carbon content decreases relatively constantly with distance from the surface to a depth of at least 0.050 cm. (0.020 inches) after which the carbon content falls off less rapidly and nonlinearly to the core carbon content.
  • Curve A in Figure 2 is characteristic of this shape of the carbon gradient produced in the sintering/carburizing zone.
  • the preform is sintered. Although sintering is time and temperature dependent, it has been found that adequate strength can be imparted under the conditions described to produce an acceptable forging preform.
  • the preform After the sinter/carburize zone, the preform is moved into a first cooling zone 14 in which it is rapidly cooled to begin the austenitic transformation to fix, or freeze, the carbon gradient obtained in the hot zone.
  • the temperature in the carbon case of the preform must be reduced to a temperature below the austenitic transformation temperature within a period of no longer than approximately five minutes. This is achieved by providing a water jacket around the first cooling section. At a belt speed of 30.5 cm. (12 inches) per minute, the water jacket provides enough cooling to reduce the temperature below the austenitic transformation temperature within the first five feet of this section.
  • the atmosphere is not separately controlled, but consists of the atmosphere which flows from the sinter/carburize zone.
  • the forging preform is moved into a second cooling zone 16.
  • the second cooling zone 16 comprises successively the remainder of the water jacketed section, a forced circulation section and another water jacketed section.
  • the preform is gradually cooled to a temperature below about 260°C (500°F). If the forging preform is exposed to an oxidizing atmosphere at a temperature above about 260°C (500°F), unacceptable oxidation and scaling will occur.
  • a diffusion zone 22 is added between the sinter/carburize zone 20 and the first cooling zone 24.
  • the remainder of the furnace is the same as the one described with respect to the first embodiment, that is, it also includes a preheat zone 18 and a second cooling zone 26.
  • the manner in which the preforms are processed is also the same through the sinter/carburize zone so the description will not be repeated.
  • the diffusion zone 22 is used to modify the carbon gradient obtained in the sintering/carburizing zone 20 by forming a plateau which extends to a depth of at least 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches). This plateau produces a case of high carbon which is deep enough to permit surface grinding to a depth of 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches) while maintaining the required surface carbon content, and, hence, the required surface hardness.
  • the diffusion zone 22 comprises a furnace section which is insulated to prevent heat loss. It is similar in construction to the buffer zone commonly used in sintering furnace design. However, unlike conventional sintering furnace design, the diffusion zone includes means for controlling the atmosphere. The atmosphere in the diffusion zone is controlled to produce a carbon potential at or slightly below the desired surface carbon content. Typically, the carbon potential of the atmosphere in the diffusion zone is lower than the carbon potential of the atmosphere in the sintering/carburizing zone. In tests conducted using forging preforms made of a pre-alloyed powder similar to AISI 4618 alloy steel, the carbon potential of the sinter/carburize zone was established to produce a surface carbon content of over 1.2% carbon. The atmosphere in the diffusion zone 22 was controlled to produce a final carbon content at the surface of between 1.00% and 1.10% carbon.
  • Figure 3 is a graph showing carbon content as a function of depth in a preform.
  • Curve A is typical of the carbon gradient produced in the sinter/carburize zone of the furnace. That is, the carbon content decreases relatively constantly to a depth of approximately 0.050 cm. (0.020 inches) from the surface of the preform after which the carbon content decreases nonlinearly toward the core carbon content.
  • the carbon gradient is modified to produce a plateau having at the surface of the preform the desired carbon content and extending to a depth of approximately 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches) with no more than about a ten point (0.1%) decrease in carbon content.
  • a typical carbon gradient produced inthe diffusion zone is illustrated by Curve B of Figure 3. This carbon gradient profile is more acceptable for certain forged parts which must be machined, e.g., ground after forging.
  • the preform After moving through the diffusion zone 22, the preform enters the first cooling zone 24 in which at least the carbon case is cooled to a temperature below the austenitic transformation temperature within a period of no longer than about five minutes to freeze the case carbon gradient. The preform is then further cooled in the second cooling zone 26 for a period of twenty to twenty-five minutes to a temperature below about 260°C (500°F).
  • the invention provides a significantly imporoved process for producing powder metal forging preforms.
  • the invention permits such preforms to be produced at times and temperatures substantially below those currently employed and, therefore, reduces the cost of production.
  • an improved carbon gradient is produced in the preform which facilitates subsequent machining of the preform.

Abstract

The invention involves a method for making powder metal forging preforms of high strength ferrous-base alloys in which the times and temperatures for reducing oxides, sintering, and carburizing are substantially reduced as compared to conventional techniques. The method includes simultaneously sintering and carburizing the preforms in the hot zone of a sintering furnace at temperatures below 1093°C. (2000°F.) and for a period of time above austenitic temperature not exceeding about 35 minutes. After carburizing the preforms are rapidly cooled to freeze the case carbon gradient obtained in the hot zone.

Description

  • This invention relates to a method for reducing, sintering and carburizing pre-alloyed, ferrous-base powder metal forging preforms.
  • In the production of high strength, ferrous-base powder metal parts, pre-alloyed powder is cold pressed, sintered, and then forged. During sintering, oxides in the powder are reduced to acceptable levels. For parts which require case carburizing, it has been found advantageous to carburize the part prior to forging, preferably in the sintering furnace. Consequently, the sintering furnace produces an in-process product which may be described as a sintered and carburized forging preform. This forging preform is lubricated, heated to an appropriate forging temperature, and forged to a close tolerance configuration. After forging, the part is normally quenched and stress relieved.
  • A number of powder metal parts require a post forging machining operation, such as grinding. In such cases, it is necessary to insure that the carbon case introduced during carburizing has adequate depth and composition to permit the removal of material during machining while maintaining the specified surface carbon content. The carbon gradient produced by current powder metallurgy techniques has not been adequate for certain applications in which relatively high post-machining surface carbon is required.
  • In addition to the physical properties of forged powder metal parts, another important consideration is cost. The growth in the popularity of powder metal parts has been due, in many cases, to lower manufacturing costs as compared to the more conventionally manufactured products, such as machined-from-wrought parts. In other words, while it is recognized that powder metal and machined parts are, in many instances, comparable in physical properties, powder metal parts have been able to replace or compete with machined parts due to lower manufacturing costs. While lower manufacturing costs are generally the case, the difference in cost between powder metal and machined parts for higher strength applications, such as components for transmissions and axles, is smaller. This narrowing of the cost advantage is due, in part, to the more sophisticated process used to manufacture forged powder metal parts. Consequently, competition between forged powder metal parts and machined parts for these applications is severe. Improvements which lower the cost of manufacturing forged powder metal parts are quite important to enable these produces successfully to compete with machined products.
  • Accordingly the object of this invention is to provide a method for making powder metal forging preforms of high strength ferrous-base alloys in which the times and temperatures for reducing, sintering and carburizing such preforms are substantially reduced.
  • The present invention therefore provides a method for simultaneously sintering and carburizing a pre-alloyed, ferrous-base, powder metal forging preform characterized by the steps of preheating the preform in the preheat zone of a continuous furnace for a period of no longer than is required to burn off lubricants and to induce rapid heating of the preform to a temperature which approaches sintering/carburizing temperature, simultaneously sintering and carburizing the preform in the hot zone of the furnace in a carburizing atmosphere and having a carbon potential greater than the desired surface carbon content at a temperature substantially within the range below 1093°C (2000°F) and above the solubility temperature of carbon in austenitic iron at the carbon potential of the atmosphere and for a period of time sufficient to reduce oxides and to produce a case carbon gradient in the preform having a surface carbon content approximately equal to the desired case carbon content and which decreases relatively constantly to a depth of about 0.050 cm. (0.020 inches), cooling the preform in a first cooling zone of the furnace at a rate rapid enough to beging transformation of the austenitic phase in the case thereby freezing the case carbon gradient, and further cooling the preform in a second cooling zone of the furnace to a temperature below about 260°C (500°F), whereby a sintered and case carburized preform is produced in minimum time at temperatures above the austenitic temperature and at a maximum temperature less than about 1093°C (2000°F).
  • This invention involves an improved process for producing forging preforms, that is, a powder metal part which has been cold pressed, sintered, and carburized in preparation for the forging step. In one embodiment of the invention the process produces a forging preform having an acceptable carbon gradient, but at times and temperatures substantially below those generally recognized as necessary to do so. In this regard, it is pointed out that the invention is directed to hardenable alloy steels which contain one or more alloying additions of molybdenum, nickel, manganese, chromium and the like. Carburized forging preforms have been produced by this process from pre-alloyed powder similar in composition to the AISI 4600 series steel at temperatures below 1093°C (2000°F) with a total time above austenitic temperatures of about 35 minutes or less. In addition to producing an adequate carbon case, this process is capable of reducing oxides to acceptable levels, that is, less than 1,000 ppm 02. This is contrasted with current sintering/carburizing process for comparable alloys which are conducted at 1121°C (2050°F) and with times above austenitic temperatures of approximately 60 minutes. Consequently, the cost of producing forging preforms is substantially reduced because production time is substantially reduced and energy requirements are reduced.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, the process includes a step for modifying the carbon gradient to produce an improved forging preform for applications which require a relatively high surface carbon content after machining. The carbon gradient is modified to produce a plateau having a depth of at least 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches) over which the carbon content decreases by no more than about 0.10%. (Compositions are given throughout in weight percent.) This carbon gradient permits the removal of up to about 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches) of stock during machining without reducing the surface carbon content below an acceptable level. This feature of the invention appears to be particularly important in the production of races for rolling contact bearings from powder metal since these races have ground surfaces which require relatively high postgrinding surface hardness.
  • The sintering/carburizing process according to the invention is conducted in a fairly conventional belt-type sintering furnace which includes a preheat zone, a hot zone, and a cooling zone. Sintering and carburizing are performed simultaneously in the hot zone. A short diffusion zone may be added immediately following the hot zone when it is desired to modify the carbon gradient from that which is obtained during primary carburization in the hot zone.
  • In the preheat zone the cold pressed preform is heated to burn off lubricants, such as zinc stearate, stearic acid, and waxes, the convention function of the preheat zone.
  • Contrary to conventional practice, the preheat zone is maintained at a temperature significantly higher than usual to rapidly heat the preform to a predetermined sintering/carburizing temperature. More specifically, while the preheat zone in conventional practice is typically heated to temperatures up to 816°C (1500°F), temperatures as high as 1093°C (2000°F) could be employed in accordance with this invention. It should be noted, however, that the temperature of the preheat zone is determined in light of the process temperature. Hence, if the sintering/ carburizing temperature is lowered to 954°C (1750°F), the temperature in the preheat zone would also be lowered. The time inthepreheat zone is also reduced. While conventional sintering practice specifies a time in the preheat zone of about 15 to 30 minutes, the time in the preheat zone according to the instant invention may be 10 minutes or less.
  • After preheating, the preform moves into the hot zone in which it is simultaneously sintered and carburized. The hot zone is maintained at a temperature below 1093°C (2000°F) which is at least 27°C (50°F) below temperatures normally recommended for prealloyed powders of this type. An atmosphere having a high carbon potential is used in the hot zone, that is, an atmosphere having a carbon potential which is higher than the desired surface carbon content. The preform is maintained in the hot zone for approximately 20 minutes.
  • In one embodiment of the invention the preform is moved from the hot zone into a first cooling zone in which the preform is rapidly cooled (within approximately five minutes) to begin the austenitic trans-, formation to freeze the case carbon gradient obtained during carburization. The preform is then cooled in a second cooling zone to a temperature below about 260°C (500°F) to prevent detrimental oxidation.
  • In another embodiment of the invention the preform is moved from the hot zone into a diffusion zone for modifying the shape of the carbon gradient obtained in the hot zone. The diffusion zone is heated by the product moving through the zone so that the temperature upon entry is approximately equal to the temperature of the hot zone. The diffusion zone is insulated so that the temperature of the preform does not fall below the austenitic transformation temperature. A carburizing atmosphere of a desired carbon potential is maintained in the diffusion zone. The atmosphere is controlled independently from the atmosphere in the sintering/carburizing zone and has a carbon potential which is below the carbon potential of the hot zone and is at, or slightly below, the desired surface carbon content of the preform. The preform is maintained in the diffusion zone for up to about five minutes to change the carbon gradient to one with a plateau which extends to a depth of at least 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches) with no more than about a 0.10% decrease in carbon content. The preform is then rapidly cooled in the first cooling zone to begin the austenitic transformation and thereby freeze the carbon gradient in the case. Thereafter, the preform is moved through the second cooling zone under conditions similar to those described with respect to the first embodiment.
  • In the drawings:
    • Figure 1 is a graph showing the change in diffusion rate of carbon in wrought and powder metal preforms over the temperature range 760°-1093°C (1400°-2000°F);
    • Figure 2 is a graph showing the carbon gradient obtained in powder metal preforms according to the first embodiment of the invention;
    • Figure 3 is a graph showing the carbon gradient obtained in powder metal preforms according to the second embodiment of the invention;
    • Figure 4 is a flow chart of a first sintering/carburizing process in accordance with the instant invention; and
    • Figure 5 is a flow chart of a second sintering/ carburizing process in accordance with the instant invention.
  • The concept of reducing both time and temperature in a sintering/carburizing process is contrary to conventional metallurgical principles. Time and temperature are considered to be inversely related with respect to sintering and carburizing processes. That is, if the temperature is reduced, the time must be increased, and vice versa.
  • Studies by the inventors have indicated that this rule, while applying to the carburization of wrought material, does not apply over all temperature ranges to the carburization of cold-pressed powder metal compacts. The inventors have discovered that the diffusion rate of carbon in the powder metal preform does not increase, but is fairly constant over the temperature range 843°C to 1066°C (1550°F to 1950°F). Moreover, and more significantly, the diffusion rate is substantially higher in the powder metal preform over this temperature range than the diffusion rate in wrought material. At temperatures above 1066°C (1950°F) the rate of diffusion begins increasing rapidly and beyond 1093°C (2000°F) the rates of diffusion become approximately equal for both materials so that advantage attained at lower temperatures is lost. Therefore, the instant invention is designed to operate over the temperature range of about 843°C to about 1066°C (about 1550°F to about 1950°F).
  • The results of these studies are summarized in Figure 1 which shows the rate of diffusion of carbon in powder metal and wrought material as a function of temperature. While the rate of diffusion in wrought material is very dependent on temperature, as is expected, the rate of diffusion in powder metal is nearly insensitive to temperature over the temperature range 843°C-1066°C (1550°F-1950°F) .
  • Moreover, the diffusion rate in the powder metal preform is substantially higher over this temperature range than in the wrought material. Above 1066°C (1950°F) the rate of diffusion in powder metal seems to behave similarly to that in wrought material.
  • The phenomenon illustrated in Figure 1 relaxes some significant restrictions on the sintering/carburizing process. The temperature can be reduced without causing a serious drop in the diffusion rate. Moreover, since relatively high rates of diffusion can be achieved, the time for carburization can be reduced. The time and temperature for the process can then be established based solely on the two remaining objectives of the process, reduction of oxides and adequate sintering.
  • Due to recent improvements in the manufacture of ferrous-base, pre-alloyed powders, oxide levels have been substantially reduced. If such improvements continue, it is quite likely that the oxide level can be reduced below the maximum level specified for forged powder metal parts, that is, below 1000 ppm 02. When this occurs, the reduction of oxides can also be ignored. In the meantime, a temperature is selected which, in conjunction with a reducing atmosphere, is capable of reducing oxides to the required levels. For example, at 1010°C (1850°F) the oxides in the powder can be reduced to a level of about 900 ppm 02 which is below the specified maximum. Time at temperature can also be shortened due to the improved powders which have lower oxide contents to begin with.
  • Based on the foregoing, it was recognized that satisfactory forging preforms could be produced at lower temperatures and shorter times than accepted practice indicates. As a result, a new process for reducing, sintering and carburizing a ferrous-base foring preform was developed. This new process is capable of producing forging preforms in markedly shorter times and with lower energy requirements than heretofore known processes.
  • The furnace employed in carrying out the process is, for the most part, a conventional, belt-type, continuous furnace typical of those used in the powder metal parts industry. Special modifications and features will be apparent from the more detailed description of the furnace which follows.
  • According to one embodiment of the invention, the furnace is divided into four functional zones. With reference to the schematic shown in Figure 4, these comprise a preheat zone 10, a sinter/carburize zone 12, a first cooling zone 14 and a second cooling zone 16. The furnace may be heated electrically or with gas and the work is moved through it on a continuous mesh belt. The furnace also has the necessary plumbing for maintaining a desired carburizing atmosphere in the sinter/carburize zone 12. oter features of the furnace will be described in connection with the description of the process.
  • Pre-alloyed ferrous-base powder metal is first cold pressed into green forging preforms having a shape generally similar to the final forged part. This is done according to standard powder metallurgy practice and will not be described in greater detail. The pre- alloyed powder is one of the high strength ferrous-base alloys similar to AISI 4600 series with a predetermined base carbon content generally between 0.15 and 0.25% carbon. As previously noted, these powders include alloy additions which are believed to require high temperatures and relatively long process times. Preferably, the powder has the lowest oxide content economically attainable, currently 1500-2500 ppm 02. The cold-pressed briquette typically has a density of 6.2-6.8g/cm3.
  • The green forging preforms are loaded onto the charge end of the furnace and are conveyed into the preheat zone 10. In the preheat zone waxes and lubricants are burned out of the green preform. Additionally, the preform is heated rapidly to a temperature which at least approaches the sintering/carburizing temperature. For example, if a sintering/carburizing temperature of 1066°C (1950°F) is selected, the preheat zone is heated to at least 1010°C (1850°F) so that the temperature of the green preform is near this temperature by the time it traverses the preheat zone. A belt speed of at least 30.5 cm. (12 inches) per minute is maintained so that each green preform resides in the preheat zone for a period no longer than about 10 minutes.
  • A high methane content is observed in the atmosphere of the preheat zone due to the hydrocarbons in the wax. Consequently, there is a tendency for carbon soot to collect on the heating elements. If electric heating elements are employed, the soot can eventually cause a short circuit. In order to relieve this problem, coated, silicon carbide heating elements (glo-bars) are used in the preheat zone. These heating elements are less susceptible to carbon penetration than convention heating elements. As will be described a high methane condition also exists in the sintering/carburizing zone so this type of heating element is used there as well.
  • After preheating, the forging preform is moved into the sinter/carburize zone 12. This zone is referred to as the "hot" zone in convention sintering furnaces. In this zone the preform is sintered, carburized and reduced. A carburizing atmosphere, for example, an endotheremic gas, is maintained at a carbon potential which is greater than the desired surface carbon content. It should be recognized, however, that other carburizing atmospheres can be used. For example, if a surface carbon content of 0.85%-1.00%C is required, a carbon potential of up to the saturation level of carbon is austenite at the specified temperature is maintained in the sinter/carburize zone; e.g. approximately 1.9% at 1066°C (1950°F). The carbon potential of the atmosphere can be controlled in a number of known manners including, for example, maintaining a constant analyzed methane level in the zone using infrared analyzers. Since sintering furnaces vary in design and operating characteristics, it may be necessary empirically to correlate methane level and carbon potential, however, once the relationship is established, it is quite easy to maintain the desired methane level using standard control equipment.
  • The temperature of the sinter/carburize zone 12 is maintained at a temperature below 1093°C (2000°F), the upper limit. The lower limit for the temperature is determined in light of two main considerations: the sintered preform strength and the ability to reduce oxides to acceptable levels. Due to the oxide levels of currently available powders, the ability to reduce oxides is the more restrictive consideration. With currently available powders, temperatures below 1010°C (1850°F) are not recommended. If a temperature of 1066°C (1950°F) is selected to insure oxide reduction well below 1000 ppm 02' preforms with adequate strength for subsequent forging are produced. However, as the oxide content of the powder is reduced in the starting powder, the preform strength limits will ultimately control the lower limit for temperature. In any event, from our studies we conclude that the optimum temperature range for the process is from about 843°C-1066°C (1550°F-1950°F).
  • The problem of sooting caused by the high methane content of the atmosphere is circumvented by using coated silicon carbide heating elements, as in the preheat zone. Another problem which must be addressed is atmosphere consistency. Due to the high carbon potential in the sintering/carburizing zone, it is difficult to maintain a consistent atmosphere throughout this zone. A consistent atmosphere is believed to be necessary to produce predictable carbon gradients. Therefore, it is further believed that this zone requires forces circulation to insure a consistent atmosphere. High temperature,.water-cooled fans have been employed and were found suitable for forcing circulation and maintaining a consistent atmosphere.
  • The time period during which the forging preform resides in the sintering/carburizing zone is short compared to recognized practice. Since the belt speed is at least 30.5 cm. (12 inches) per minute, the period of time in this zone is no longer than 20 minutes.
  • Under the conditions described, a case carbon gradient is produced in the forging preform having a surface carbon content which is below the carbon potential of the atmosphere, but approximately equal to the desired surface carbon content. The carbon content decreases relatively constantly with distance from the surface to a depth of at least 0.050 cm. (0.020 inches) after which the carbon content falls off less rapidly and nonlinearly to the core carbon content. Curve A in Figure 2 is characteristic of this shape of the carbon gradient produced in the sintering/carburizing zone.
  • In addition to carburizing the forging preform and reducing oxides, the preform is sintered. Although sintering is time and temperature dependent, it has been found that adequate strength can be imparted under the conditions described to produce an acceptable forging preform.
  • After the sinter/carburize zone, the preform is moved into a first cooling zone 14 in which it is rapidly cooled to begin the austenitic transformation to fix, or freeze, the carbon gradient obtained in the hot zone. To obtain the desired carbon gradient, the temperature in the carbon case of the preform must be reduced to a temperature below the austenitic transformation temperature within a period of no longer than approximately five minutes. This is achieved by providing a water jacket around the first cooling section. At a belt speed of 30.5 cm. (12 inches) per minute, the water jacket provides enough cooling to reduce the temperature below the austenitic transformation temperature within the first five feet of this section. In this embodiment of the invention, the atmosphere is not separately controlled, but consists of the atmosphere which flows from the sinter/carburize zone. Once the carbon gradient is fixed, the preform can be cooled at any rate to a desired exit temperature.
  • After the first cooling zone the forging preform is moved into a second cooling zone 16. The second cooling zone 16 comprises successively the remainder of the water jacketed section, a forced circulation section and another water jacketed section. In the second cooling zone the preform is gradually cooled to a temperature below about 260°C (500°F). If the forging preform is exposed to an oxidizing atmosphere at a temperature above about 260°C (500°F), unacceptable oxidation and scaling will occur.
  • At a belt speed of 30.5 cm. (12 inches) per minute forging preforms are provided by the described process in approximately 87 minutes or less. Since faster belt speeds have been used under similar conditions, it is possible to reduce the time of production even more. Belt speeds of over 12 inches per minute have been used successfully. It is believed that belt speeds of up to 24 inches per minute can be achieved. Forging preforms made in accordance with the invention have been subsequently forged with excellent success.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, and with reference to Figure 5, a diffusion zone 22 is added between the sinter/carburize zone 20 and the first cooling zone 24. The remainder of the furnace is the same as the one described with respect to the first embodiment, that is, it also includes a preheat zone 18 and a second cooling zone 26. The manner in which the preforms are processed is also the same through the sinter/carburize zone so the description will not be repeated. The diffusion zone 22 is used to modify the carbon gradient obtained in the sintering/carburizing zone 20 by forming a plateau which extends to a depth of at least 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches). This plateau produces a case of high carbon which is deep enough to permit surface grinding to a depth of 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches) while maintaining the required surface carbon content, and, hence, the required surface hardness.
  • The diffusion zone 22 comprises a furnace section which is insulated to prevent heat loss. It is similar in construction to the buffer zone commonly used in sintering furnace design. However, unlike conventional sintering furnace design, the diffusion zone includes means for controlling the atmosphere. The atmosphere in the diffusion zone is controlled to produce a carbon potential at or slightly below the desired surface carbon content. Typically, the carbon potential of the atmosphere in the diffusion zone is lower than the carbon potential of the atmosphere in the sintering/carburizing zone. In tests conducted using forging preforms made of a pre-alloyed powder similar to AISI 4618 alloy steel, the carbon potential of the sinter/carburize zone was established to produce a surface carbon content of over 1.2% carbon. The atmosphere in the diffusion zone 22 was controlled to produce a final carbon content at the surface of between 1.00% and 1.10% carbon.
  • Figure 3 is a graph showing carbon content as a function of depth in a preform. Curve A is typical of the carbon gradient produced in the sinter/carburize zone of the furnace. That is, the carbon content decreases relatively constantly to a depth of approximately 0.050 cm. (0.020 inches) from the surface of the preform after which the carbon content decreases nonlinearly toward the core carbon content.
  • In the diffusion zone the carbon gradient is modified to produce a plateau having at the surface of the preform the desired carbon content and extending to a depth of approximately 0.025 cm. (0.010 inches) with no more than about a ten point (0.1%) decrease in carbon content. A typical carbon gradient produced inthe diffusion zone is illustrated by Curve B of Figure 3. This carbon gradient profile is more acceptable for certain forged parts which must be machined, e.g., ground after forging.
  • After moving through the diffusion zone 22, the preform enters the first cooling zone 24 in which at least the carbon case is cooled to a temperature below the austenitic transformation temperature within a period of no longer than about five minutes to freeze the case carbon gradient. The preform is then further cooled in the second cooling zone 26 for a period of twenty to twenty-five minutes to a temperature below about 260°C (500°F).
  • In summary, the invention provides a significantly imporoved process for producing powder metal forging preforms. The invention permits such preforms to be produced at times and temperatures substantially below those currently employed and, therefore, reduces the cost of production. However, in one embodiment of the invention, an improved carbon gradient is produced in the preform which facilitates subsequent machining of the preform.
  • The invention has been described in an illustrative manner and it is to be understood that the terminology which has been used is intended to be the nature of words of description rather than limitation. Modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the teachings contained herein.

Claims (4)

1. A method for simultaneously sintering and carburizing a pre-alloyed, ferrous-base, powder metal forging preform,characterized by the steps of preheating the preform in the preheat zone of a continous furnace for a period no longer than is required to burn off lubricants and to induce rapid heating of the preform to a temperature which approaches sintering/carburizing temperature, simultaneously sintering and carburizing the preform in the hot zone of the furnace in a carburizing atmosphere and having a carbon potential greater than the desired surface carbon content at a temperature substantially within the range below 1093°C. (2000°F.) and above the solubility temperature of carbon in austenitic iron at the carbon potential of the atmosphere and for a period of time sufficient to reduce oxides and to produce a case carbon gradient in the preform having a surface carbon content approximately equal to the desired case carbon content and which decreases relatively constantly to a depth of about 0.050 Cm. (0.020 inches), cooling the preform in a first cooling zone of the furnace at a rate rapid enough to begin transformation of the austenitic phase in the case thereby freezing the case carbon gradient, and further cooling the preform in a second cooling zone of the furnace to a temperature below about 260°C. (500°F.), whereby a sintered and case carburized preform is produced in minimum time at temperatures above the austenitic temperature and at a maximum temperature less than about 1093°C. (2000°F.).
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the preform is preheated in the preheat zone for a period no longer than about 10 minutes, the preform is sintered and carburized in the hot zone for a period no longer than 20 minutes, and the preform is cooled in the first cooling zone for a period of approximately five minutes,whereby the sintered and case carburized preform is produced within a total time of 35 minutes.
3. The method set forth in Claim 1 or 2, characterized by forcing the circulation of the atmosphere in the hot zone.
4. The method according to claim 1,2 or 3, characterized by modifying the carbon gradient in a diffusion zone of the furnace following said hot zone and before said first cooling zone, said diffusion zone having a temperature approximately equal to the temperature of the hot zone on entry and decreasing with distance from the hot zone to a temperature not below the austenitic temperature inacarburizing atmosphere having a carbon potential at or below the desired surface carbon content for a period of time sufficient to produce a final case carbon gradient with a carbon plateau having at the surface of the preform the desired carbon content and extending to a depth of approximately 0.025 Cm. (0.010 inches) with no more than about a ten point (0.10%) decrease in carbon content.
EP83107859A 1982-08-09 1983-08-09 High efficiency reduction carburization and sintering method Expired EP0105138B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT83107859T ATE44983T1 (en) 1982-08-09 1983-08-09 PROCESS FOR SINTERING WITH REDUCING CARBONIZATION.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US40665882A 1982-08-09 1982-08-09
US406658 1982-08-09

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0105138A1 true EP0105138A1 (en) 1984-04-11
EP0105138B1 EP0105138B1 (en) 1989-07-26

Family

ID=23608936

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP83107859A Expired EP0105138B1 (en) 1982-08-09 1983-08-09 High efficiency reduction carburization and sintering method

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0105138B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS59133301A (en)
AT (1) ATE44983T1 (en)
CA (1) CA1225536A (en)
DE (1) DE3380264D1 (en)
MX (1) MX156818A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0723034A3 (en) * 1995-01-20 1996-12-11 Dowa Mining Co A gas carburising process and an apparatus therefor
WO1998053939A1 (en) * 1997-05-27 1998-12-03 Höganäs Ab Method of monitoring and controlling the composition of sintering atmosphere
US7431777B1 (en) 2003-05-20 2008-10-07 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Composition gradient cermets and reactive heat treatment process for preparing same
US8535605B2 (en) 2007-09-03 2013-09-17 Miba Sinter Austria Gmbh Method of producing a sinter-hardened component
EP3043135A1 (en) * 2015-01-08 2016-07-13 Linde Aktiengesellschaft Apparatus and method for controlling a sintering process
CN108296480A (en) * 2018-03-23 2018-07-20 厦门理工学院 A kind of preparation method of high-purity refractory metal block

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE112016003760T5 (en) * 2015-08-17 2018-05-03 Ntn Corporation Sliding element and method for its production

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB665794A (en) * 1949-09-27 1952-01-30 Isthmian Metals Inc Powder metallurgy process for producing steel parts
DE2550428A1 (en) * 1974-11-09 1976-05-20 Toyo Kogyo Co SLIDING PART AND SINTERING PROCESS FOR ITS PRODUCTION
US3992763A (en) * 1974-09-13 1976-11-23 Federal-Mogul Corporation Method of making powdered metal parts
GB2007719A (en) * 1977-11-15 1979-05-23 British Steel Corp Production of sintered steel strip

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB665794A (en) * 1949-09-27 1952-01-30 Isthmian Metals Inc Powder metallurgy process for producing steel parts
US3992763A (en) * 1974-09-13 1976-11-23 Federal-Mogul Corporation Method of making powdered metal parts
DE2550428A1 (en) * 1974-11-09 1976-05-20 Toyo Kogyo Co SLIDING PART AND SINTERING PROCESS FOR ITS PRODUCTION
GB2007719A (en) * 1977-11-15 1979-05-23 British Steel Corp Production of sintered steel strip

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0723034A3 (en) * 1995-01-20 1996-12-11 Dowa Mining Co A gas carburising process and an apparatus therefor
WO1998053939A1 (en) * 1997-05-27 1998-12-03 Höganäs Ab Method of monitoring and controlling the composition of sintering atmosphere
US6303077B1 (en) 1997-05-27 2001-10-16 Höganäs Ab Method of monitoring and controlling the composition of sintering atmosphere
KR100566650B1 (en) * 1997-05-27 2006-04-03 회가내스 아베 Method of monitoring and controlling the composition of sintering atmosphere
US7431777B1 (en) 2003-05-20 2008-10-07 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Composition gradient cermets and reactive heat treatment process for preparing same
US8535605B2 (en) 2007-09-03 2013-09-17 Miba Sinter Austria Gmbh Method of producing a sinter-hardened component
EP2200769B1 (en) 2007-09-03 2018-10-31 Miba Sinter Austria GmbH Method of producing a sinter-hardened component
EP3043135A1 (en) * 2015-01-08 2016-07-13 Linde Aktiengesellschaft Apparatus and method for controlling a sintering process
CN108296480A (en) * 2018-03-23 2018-07-20 厦门理工学院 A kind of preparation method of high-purity refractory metal block

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
MX156818A (en) 1988-10-05
JPH0211644B2 (en) 1990-03-15
ATE44983T1 (en) 1989-08-15
EP0105138B1 (en) 1989-07-26
CA1225536A (en) 1987-08-18
JPS59133301A (en) 1984-07-31
DE3380264D1 (en) 1989-08-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3992763A (en) Method of making powdered metal parts
CA1114208A (en) Method of making selectively carburized forged powder metal parts
US4393563A (en) Cold forced sintered powder metal annular bearing ring blanks
US5613180A (en) High density ferrous power metal alloy
US6630101B2 (en) Method for producing powder metal gears
US4063940A (en) Making of articles from metallic powder
US4253874A (en) Alloys steel powders
US4002471A (en) Method of making a through-hardened scale-free forged powdered metal article without heat treatment after forging
WO2013146217A1 (en) Sintered member, pinion gear for starter, and method for manufacturing both
EP0105138B1 (en) High efficiency reduction carburization and sintering method
US2342799A (en) Process of manufacturing shaped bodies from iron powders
US20090129964A1 (en) Method of forming powder metal components having surface densification
CN106399861B (en) For the alloy and its forging method of the 8th grade of partition board outer shroud of high pressure
US5562786A (en) Process for producing heat-treated sintered iron alloy part
US3894892A (en) Process for heating and sintering ferrous powder metal compacts with radio frequency magnetic field
US4655853A (en) Method for making powder metal forging preforms of high-strength ferrous-base alloys
US7722803B2 (en) High carbon surface densified sintered steel products and method of production therefor
US3331686A (en) Method of heating and forming powdered metals
US4018632A (en) Machinable powder metal parts
Huppmann et al. The steel powder-forging process—a general review
US6500384B1 (en) Process for the hardening treatment of sintered members
US8444781B1 (en) Method of strengthening metal parts through ausizing
GB2222414A (en) A method of manufacturing steel elements designed to withstand high stress, such as roller bearing elements
CA1150027A (en) Sintering of coated briquette
JPH07138613A (en) Production of heat-treated ferrous sintered alloy parts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19841001

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19890726

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19890726

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19890726

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19890726

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19890726

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 44983

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19890815

Kind code of ref document: T

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19890831

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3380264

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19890831

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19890926

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: SOCIETA' ITALIANA BREVETTI S.P.A.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

R20 Corrections of a patent specification

Effective date: 19891110

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19900710

Year of fee payment: 8

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19900716

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 19900718

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19900721

Year of fee payment: 8

ITTA It: last paid annual fee
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 728C

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19910810

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 728W

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19920430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19920501

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 83107859.7

Effective date: 19920306