EP0085718A4 - Selectively calcined dehydrogenation catalyst. - Google Patents
Selectively calcined dehydrogenation catalyst.Info
- Publication number
- EP0085718A4 EP0085718A4 EP19820903004 EP82903004A EP0085718A4 EP 0085718 A4 EP0085718 A4 EP 0085718A4 EP 19820903004 EP19820903004 EP 19820903004 EP 82903004 A EP82903004 A EP 82903004A EP 0085718 A4 EP0085718 A4 EP 0085718A4
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- catalyst
- dehydrogenation
- weight
- steam
- hours
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
- C07C5/00—Preparation of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbons containing the same number of carbon atoms
- C07C5/32—Preparation of hydrocarbons from hydrocarbons containing the same number of carbon atoms by dehydrogenation with formation of free hydrogen
- C07C5/327—Formation of non-aromatic carbon-to-carbon double bonds only
- C07C5/333—Catalytic processes
- C07C5/3332—Catalytic processes with metal oxides or metal sulfides
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J23/00—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
- B01J23/70—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
- B01J23/76—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
- B01J23/84—Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36 with arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
- B01J23/85—Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
- B01J23/86—Chromium
- B01J23/862—Iron and chromium
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to 5 catalysts particularly useful for the production of olefins by dehydrogenatin and more specifically to the composition and method of manufacture and use of improved dehydrogenation catalyst. 10 Considerable research has been directed in the past toward improving the production of olefins by dehydrogenation. Background Art
- Steam active dehydrogenation catalysts 15 are widely used in the dehydrogenation to olefins and diolefins, e.g., butanes to butadienes; alkyl aromatics to alkenyl aromatics, e.g., ethylbenzene to styrene.
- olefins and diolefins e.g., butanes to butadienes
- alkyl aromatics to alkenyl aromatics, e.g., ethylbenzene to styrene.
- Various catalysts and the dehydrogenation 20 conditions and other operating data are disclosed in Pitzer, U.S. Patent Nos. 2,866,790 and 2,866,781; Gutzeit, U.S. Patent No. 2,408,140, and Eggertsen, et al., U.S.
- Patent No. 3,360,579 and Sie U.S. Patent
- Pitzer discloses a catalyst where the catalyst which contains about 50% K-CO-., up to 10% Cr_0, and the balance Fe*® ? is heat treated at at least 1000 degrees or
- the steam active alkalized iron dehydrogenation catalysts disclosed in these patents contain various amounts ' of iron oxide and potassium carbonate with a minor but effective amount of chromium oxide incorporated therein as a stablizer or structural promoter.
- Facilities for dehydrogenation are advantageously operated at the highest practical throughput rates and small improvements in selectivity and activity of dehydrogenation catalyst can result in substantial savings.
- SUBSTITUTE SHEET ⁇ IP high selectivity and high activity because generally, high selectivity is accompanied by low activity and vice versa.
- Activity, of the catalyst is defined as the percent of the starting material, e.g., ethylbenzene, which is converted from the original state during the dehydrogenation process.
- Selectivity of the catalyst is defined as the ratio of the amount of the desired product produced in the process, for example styrene, to the total feedstock converted.
- a high conversion by catalytic dehydrogenation is generally favored by a high temperature and a low pressure.
- dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene there are also undesirable side reactions which simultaneously occur to produce benzene and toluene.
- the side reactions go to completion and are not limited by equilibrium considerations.
- the benzene produced can be recycled for later processing but the toluene cannot and must be disposed of. Accordingly, in the evaluation of a system where the. by products are produced, the production of benzene as opposed to toluene is preferred.
- the present invention provides a new and useful catalyst for the production of olefinic
- the present invention also provides a method for production of a catalyst for the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene at low steam to oil ratios where the catalyst maintains stability at lower steam/oil ratios and where, unexpectedly, the relative production of toluene is substantially diminished over a wide range of steam/oil weight ratios.
- catalysts in accordance with the present invention provide longer operating periods between regeneration cycles even at lower steam/ oil ratios and reaction temperatures. It has been further found that catalysts provided by the present invention unexpectedly
- SUE S T ⁇ TUTE SHEET provide good activity and selectivity in the dehydrogenation of diethylbenzene ethyltoluene, propylbenzene, butylbenzene and other alkyl substituted benzenes.
- the present invention provides a catalyst found to be particularly effective in the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene, diethylbenzene, and ethyltoluene, to olefinic compounds or
- the catalysts includes iron oxide, at least 20% by weight alkali water gas promoter and at least 1.0% by weight chromium oxide where the catalyst is formed into pellets of selected configuration
- Figure 1 is an illustration of a Mercury Porosimetry Evaluation of a catalyst within the scope of the present invention
- FIG 2 is an illustration of the result of a Mercury Porose itry Evaluation of a comparison catalyst calcined in accordance with the present invention
- Figure 3 is an illustration of the result of Mercury Porosimetry Evaluation of a catalyst within the scope of the present invention and one having the same composition but calcined for a different length of time
- Figures 4a-4b are comparative illustrations of selectivity of a catalyst within the scope of the present invention and a prior art catalyst calcined for a longer time at higher temperatures
- Figure 5 is a comparison of a catalyst shown in Figure 1 illustrating benzene/ toluene ratios in the effluent
- Figure 6 is a graphic illustration of the conversion or activity of the catalysts of Figures 4a-4b over a period of time.
- the method of the present invention provides a dehydrogenation catalyst including iron oxide, at least 25% by weight of potassium carbonate and at least 1.3% by weight chromium oxide.
- the composition is formed into pellets of selected size and heat treated at 950 degrees to 1100 degrees for 15 minutes to 8 hours to provide the pore volume characteristics found to be beneficial in the subject invention, in that the catalyst unexpectedly yields excellent selectivity and longer catalyst life at lower steam to oil ratios, all as discussed hereinafter.
- the iron oxide customarily is of pigmentary grade but may also be prepared by the thermal decomposition of ferric nitrate, ferric oxalate, ferrous sulfate and the like.
- the iron oxide in the finished catalyst is usually in the alpha form.
- the iron oxide may constitute up to 53.5% by weight of the catalyst but is preferably within the range from about 25% to about 45%.
- One example of a catalyst of the present invention was prepared with the following analysis by dry mixing the necessary ingredients and calcining at 1000-1100 ⁇ F for 2 hours:
- the concentration of alkali water gas promotor may vary from 20% to 55% and the proportion of chromium oxide may vary from 1.3% to 5.0% with the balance of the composition iron oxide.
- the catalyst represented by curve A was calcined in air at 1100 degrees for 24 hours.
- the catalyst represented by curve 3 was calcined in accordance with the present invention at 15 900 degrees 1100 degrees for 2 hours.
- the steam to oil (or feedstock) ratio was varied between 6:1 to 0.6:1 by weight as described hereinafter at liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 1.0 to 2.0 as indicated hereinafter.
- LHSV liquid hourly space velocity
- Table I illustrates that even in an extended heat run, reaction conditions can be modified then returned to initial conditions without adverse effect on catalyst performance.
- Table II provides the results of tests to demonstrate performance of the invention catalyst and the aforementioned comparison catalyst in the dehydrogenation of diethylbenzene (DEB) to divinylbenze (DVB) and ethylvinyl benzene (EVB) at the indicated conditions.
- DEB diethylbenzene
- DVD divinylbenze
- EVB ethylvinyl benzene
- reaction temperature was varied stepwise between 1050°F; 1100° F; and 1150°F; steam/oil ratio varied from 2.5:1 to 6.0:1 and pressure varied from OPSIG to PSIG.
- steam/oil ratio varied from 2.5:1 to 6.0:1
- pressure varied from OPSIG to PSIG.
- catalyst in accordance with the present invention is useful in dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene and unexpectedly provides improved characteristics as described hereinafter.
- Table III is a tabulation of the results of the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene over the invention catalyst previously described at the conditions noted.
- Figure 4a graphically illustrates the selectivity of ethylbenzene conversion to styrene using the catalyst of the invention - at indicated steam/oil ratios by weight while Figure 4b indicates selectivity for the comparison catalyst.
- Figure 5 is a graphic representation of the benzene/toluene ratio for selected conditions utilizing the catalyst of the
- Figure 6 illustrates one of the unexpected advantages of the present invention; that is that the difference between the conversion rate of the catalyst diminishes with lower steam oil ratios and the catalyst of the present invention provides satisfactory and stable conversion at steam/oil ratios of 0.8 and 0.6 over an extended period of time where the comparison catalyst becomes unsatable at 1.0 S/O.
- this advantage is important because the lower steam/oil ratios permit energy cost savings.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
- Low-Molecular Organic Synthesis Reactions Using Catalysts (AREA)
Abstract
A catalyst found to be particularly effective in the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene, diethylbenzene, and ethyltoluene, to olefinic compounds or vinyl aromatics where the catalyst includes iron oxide, at least 20% by weight alkali water gas promoter and at least 1.3% by weight chromium oxide where the catalyst is formed into pellets of selected configuration which are calcined at 900<o>F to 1110<o>F for 15 minutes to 8 hours.
Description
Description Selectively Calcined Dehydrogenation Catalyst Technical Field
This invention relates generally to 5 catalysts particularly useful for the production of olefins by dehydrogenatin and more specifically to the composition and method of manufacture and use of improved dehydrogenation catalyst. 10 Considerable research has been directed in the past toward improving the production of olefins by dehydrogenation. Background Art
Steam active dehydrogenation catalysts 15 are widely used in the dehydrogenation to olefins and diolefins, e.g., butanes to butadienes; alkyl aromatics to alkenyl aromatics, e.g., ethylbenzene to styrene. Various catalysts and the dehydrogenation 20 conditions and other operating data are disclosed in Pitzer, U.S. Patent Nos. 2,866,790 and 2,866,781; Gutzeit, U.S. Patent No. 2,408,140, and Eggertsen, et al., U.S.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
Patent No. 2,414,585, Hills, et al,; U.S.
Patent No. 3,360,579 and Sie , U.S. Patent
No. 3,364,277.
Pitzer discloses a catalyst where the catalyst which contains about 50% K-CO-., up to 10% Cr_0, and the balance Fe*®? is heat treated at at least 1000 degrees or
(in terms of the Pitzer specifications) 16 to 24 hours. Siem teaches calcining a similar catalyst at 600 degrees C to 650 degrees C.
U.S. Patent No. 3,360,579 teaches calcination at 800 degrees to 1 00 degrees
The steam active alkalized iron dehydrogenation catalysts disclosed in these patents contain various amounts'of iron oxide and potassium carbonate with a minor but effective amount of chromium oxide incorporated therein as a stablizer or structural promoter. Facilities for dehydrogenation are advantageously operated at the highest practical throughput rates and small improvements in selectivity and activity of dehydrogenation catalyst can result in substantial savings. However, it is very difficult to obtain a catalyst which has both
OMP
SUBSTITUTE SHEET Λ. IP
high selectivity and high activity because generally, high selectivity is accompanied by low activity and vice versa. Activity, of the catalyst is defined as the percent of the starting material, e.g., ethylbenzene, which is converted from the original state during the dehydrogenation process.
Selectivity of the catalyst is defined as the ratio of the amount of the desired product produced in the process, for example styrene, to the total feedstock converted.
A high conversion by catalytic dehydrogenation is generally favored by a high temperature and a low pressure. In the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene there are also undesirable side reactions which simultaneously occur to produce benzene and toluene. The side reactions go to completion and are not limited by equilibrium considerations. The benzene produced can be recycled for later processing but the toluene cannot and must be disposed of. Accordingly, in the evaluation of a system where the. by products are produced, the production of benzene as opposed to toluene is preferred.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET OMPI
In catalyst dehydrogenation processes, steam is mixed with the feed stock in varying ratios, commonly referred to as the steam/oil (s/o) ratio, where the rate of steam usage directly affects the process cost. In the present environment with increasing cost of energy, processing costs are increased accordingly, so that a catalyst operable at a lower steam/oil ratio is desirable. In prior catalysts the conversion rate or activity of the catalyst has diminished more rapidly with on stream time at low steam/oil ratios than at higher ratios so it has not been feasible, using prior art catalyst to utilize lower steam to oil ratios to economize on steam usage because the lower steam/oil ratios involve more frequent shutdowns for catalyst regeneration or, more importantly, permanent deactivation. Disclosure of Invention
The present invention provides a new and useful catalyst for the production of olefinic
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
/,,
components by dehydrogenation of more saturated materials, where the catalyst maintains both a high activity and a high selectivity in the dehydrogenation. The present invention also provides a method for production of a catalyst for the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene at low steam to oil ratios where the catalyst maintains stability at lower steam/oil ratios and where, unexpectedly, the relative production of toluene is substantially diminished over a wide range of steam/oil weight ratios. Moreover, catalysts in accordance with the present invention provide longer operating periods between regeneration cycles even at lower steam/ oil ratios and reaction temperatures. It has been further found that catalysts provided by the present invention unexpectedly
SUESTϊTUTE SHEET
provide good activity and selectivity in the dehydrogenation of diethylbenzene ethyltoluene, propylbenzene, butylbenzene and other alkyl substituted benzenes.
5 More particularly, the present invention provides a catalyst found to be particularly effective in the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene, diethylbenzene, and ethyltoluene, to olefinic compounds or
10 vinyl aromatics where the catalysts includes iron oxide, at least 20% by weight alkali water gas promoter and at least 1.0% by weight chromium oxide where the catalyst is formed into pellets of selected configuration
15 which are calcined at 900 degrees to 1110 degrees for 15 minutes to 8 hours.
The present invention is described in the following specification with reference to several examples but it will be understood
20 that such examples are by way of illustration only and the scope of the invention is limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto and the equivalent thereof.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
25 Illustrations of the characteristics of catalysts within the scope of the present
SUBSTITUTE SHEET OMPI
invention are illustrated in the Figures wherein;
Figure 1 is an illustration of a Mercury Porosimetry Evaluation of a catalyst within the scope of the present invention;
Figure 2 is an illustration of the result of a Mercury Porose itry Evaluation of a comparison catalyst calcined in accordance with the present invention; Figure 3 is an illustration of the result of Mercury Porosimetry Evaluation of a catalyst within the scope of the present invention and one having the same composition but calcined for a different length of time; Figures 4a-4b are comparative illustrations of selectivity of a catalyst within the scope of the present invention and a prior art catalyst calcined for a longer time at higher temperatures; Figure 5 is a comparison of a catalyst shown in Figure 1 illustrating benzene/ toluene ratios in the effluent; and
Figure 6 is a graphic illustration of the conversion or activity of the catalysts of Figures 4a-4b over a period of time.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention The method of the present invention provides a dehydrogenation catalyst including iron oxide, at least 25% by weight of potassium carbonate and at least 1.3% by weight chromium oxide. The composition is formed into pellets of selected size and heat treated at 950 degrees to 1100 degrees for 15 minutes to 8 hours to provide the pore volume characteristics found to be beneficial in the subject invention, in that the catalyst unexpectedly yields excellent selectivity and longer catalyst life at lower steam to oil ratios, all as discussed hereinafter. The iron oxide customarily is of pigmentary grade but may also be prepared by the thermal decomposition of ferric nitrate, ferric oxalate, ferrous sulfate and the like. The iron oxide in the finished catalyst is usually in the alpha form. The iron oxide may constitute up to 53.5% by weight of the catalyst but is preferably within the range from about 25% to about 45%.
Compounds of the alkali metals such as the oxides, hydroxides, carbonates, and
SUBSTITUTE"SHEET
OMP
to about 55% by weight of the water gas promoter.
One example of a catalyst of the present invention was prepared with the following analysis by dry mixing the necessary ingredients and calcining at 1000-1100§F for 2 hours:
Analysis: 50.0% K2C03
(weight) 2.8% Cr203
46.0% Fe-O-
The percentage of the components may vary, it having been found that within the scope of the present invention, the concentration of alkali water gas promotor may vary from 20% to 55% and the proportion of chromium oxide may vary from 1.3% to 5.0% with the balance of the composition iron oxide.
The characteristics of the example Of the invention catalyst, after calcining were determined by Mercury Porosimetry evaluation- and the results presented in graphical form in Figure 1. It can be seen in the chart that mercury penetration in cc/g vs. equivalent pore diameter provides a curve of specific characteristics different from the curve illustrated in Figure 2 for a first comparison catalyst with the same components which was calcined at 1700§F for 2 hours. It will be seen that the high temperature calcining significantly increased the slope of the curve so most of the penetration occured in the
_O
range of 0.1 to 0.6 micron equivalent pore diameter. On the other hand, with the catalyst of the present invention the curve sloped smoothly throughout the penetration range.
Figure 3 is an illustration of the pore volume distribution of two catalysts of similar composition in a Mercury Porosemetry evaluation, each catalyst including equivalent amounts of Fe~0,, K-CO.. and Cr-O...
The catalyst represented by curve A was calcined in air at 1100 degrees for 24 hours. The catalyst represented by curve 3 was calcined in acordance with the present invention at 15 900 degrees 1100 degrees for 2 hours.
While the differences are not as marked as in Figures 1 and 2 the effect of longer calcining time can be seen in curve A where the curve is steeper
It has been found that calcining the catalyst at 95G degrees-1100 degrees for 15 minutes to a maximum of 8 hours provides the desired pore distribution as indicated by the test results in the Mercury Porosimetry
Evaluation. As discussed hereinafter it is believed that the improved performance
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
characteristics of the catalyst of the present invention are related to the pore volume distribution of the catalyst.
A catalyst in accordance with the present invention as described above was placed in a reactor, for example a tubular reactor (in the following examples lOOcc of catalyst was used for each test in a 1" stainless steel reactor) where the feedstock, for example ethylbenzene, diethylbenzene, or ethlytoluene, was fed through the reactor with selected proportions of steam.
In the example of the present invention the steam to oil (or feedstock) ratio was varied between 6:1 to 0.6:1 by weight as described hereinafter at liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 1.0 to 2.0 as indicated hereinafter.
Each of the feed stocks were tested with the catalyst above described and the results are shown in TABLES I-III.
TABLE I is a tabulation of the results of the dehydrogenation of ethyltoluene to vinyltoluene over the catalyst previously described at the conditions noted.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET __O
TABLE I
-
ETHYLTOLUENE
DEHYDROGENATION PERFORMANCE DATA
Hours Temp. Steam/ % % % on °F Oil Con- Yield Selec¬
Steam (wgt. ) vers. tivity
4.0 1150 2.0 41.3 37.7 91.3
21.5 1150 2.0 51.5 48.2 93.5
45.0 1150 2.0 54.9 51.1 92.2
69.0 1150 2.0 60.9 56.2 92^4
92.5 1150 2.0 60.3 55.4 92.0
117.5 1150 2.0 60.7 56.0 92.3
141.0 1150 2.0 60.3 55.8 92.5
166.0 1150 2.0 62.9 58.1 92.3
171.0 1150 2.0 63.2 57.8 91.4
171.0 1150 2.0 63.2 57.8 91.4
189.0 1150 2.0 63.8 57.4 89.9
213.5 1150 2.0 63.0 58.1 92.2
238.0 1150 2.0 64.6 59.1 91.4
260.5 1150 2.0 64.6 59.1 91.y
285.5 1150 2.0 64.0 59.0 92.1
309.5 1150 2.0 64.4 59.1 91.8
334.0 1150 2.0 63.1 58.1 92.1
357.5 1150 2.0 66.1 60.3 91.3
380.0 1150 2.0 59.7 55.2 92.6
403.5 1150 2.0 59.0 54.6 92.6
432.5 1150 2.0 61.2 56.3 91.9
456.5 1150 2.0 64.5 59.0 91.6
474.5 1150 2.0 63.7 58.5 91.9
501.0 1150 2.0 60.8 56.0 92.1
521.0 1150 2.4) 61.1 56.5 92.4
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
TABLE I (continued)
Hours Temp. Steam/ % % % on °F Oil Con- Yield Selec¬
Steam (wgt. ) vers. tivity
546.0 1150 2.0 63.2 58.1 92.0
570.0 1150 2.0 62.0 57.2 92.2
571.0 Decreased reactor temperature to 1100 >° F.
575.0 1100 2.0 49.6 46.8 94.3
594.0 1100 2.0 49.6 46.7 94.2
617.5 1100 2.0 49.3 46.8 95.0
641.0 1100 2.0 49.1 46.3 94.3
641.5 Decreased reactor temperature to 1050 °F.
647.0 1050 2.0 32.5 31.0 95.5
662.0 1050 2.0 32.4 31.0 95.6
690.0 1050 2.0 31.2 30.5 97.8
714.5 1050 2.0 27.4 27.1 98.7
720.0 1050 2.0 28.0 27.1 96.8
739.5 1050 2.0 26.8 25.7 96.0
763.5 1050 2.0 30.6 29.3 96.6
768.5 1050 2.0 30.6 29.6 97.7
788.0 1050 2.0 2.7.2 26.6 97.8
813.5 1050 2.0 32.0 30.5 95.4
836.5 1050 2.0 30.5 30.0 98.1
859.5 1050 2.0 30.6 30.0 98.2
884.0 1050 2.0 24.4 24.3 99.4
906.0 1050 2.0 28.8 27.2 94.5
930.0 1050 2.0 31.2 30.0 96.2
955.0 1050 2.0 31.8 30.5 95.9
956.5 Reduced 3/0 to 1.8
960.0 1050 1.8 31.2 29.8 95.7
983.0 1050 1.8 28.7 27.5 95.8
1002.5 1050 1.8 28.2 26.8 95.2
1026.0 1050 1.8 29.5 28.3 95.9
1050.0 1050 1.8 29.4 28.2 95.8
1074.0 1050 1.8. 29.3 28.1 95.8
1075.0 Reduced S/O to 1.5
1079.5 1050 . 1.5 23.9 22.9 96.0
1123.0 1050 1.5 18.6 17.9 96.4
1148.0 1050 1.5 21.1 20.1 95.3
1172.0 1050 1.5 20.0 95.8 95.8
1195.0 1050 1.5 20.8 20.0 96.2
1197.0 Increased reactor ■temperature to 1150c 'F. and S/O to 2.0
1201.0 1150 2.0 51.8 47.6 91.6
1222.0 1150 2.0 59.3 54.4 91.8
1226.0 1150 2.0 60.9 56.2 92.3
1247.5 1150 2.0 61.8 56.5 91.5
1267-5 1150 2.0 60.0 55.1 91.7
Constant Test Conditions:
1.0 LHSV, 0 psig, 100 cc catal}St
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
The data in Table I illustrates that not only is conversion responsive to temperature but that even at the lowest test temperature (1050° F) where any tendency toward catalyst instability is most apparent, the catalyst will permit a reduction of steam to oil ratio to 1.8:1 without adverse effect on conversion or selectivity. The date in Table I further illustrates that a steam to oil ratio as low as 1.5:1 results in steady performance.
Likewise, (by comparing data at hours 21-570 and 1201-1267.5) Table I illustrates that even in an extended heat run, reaction conditions can be modified then returned to initial conditions without adverse effect on catalyst performance.
Table II provides the results of tests to demonstrate performance of the invention catalyst and the aforementioned comparison catalyst in the dehydrogenation of diethylbenzene (DEB) to divinylbenze (DVB) and ethylvinyl benzene (EVB) at the indicated conditions.
O
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
Run Temp. Steam/ Press, % Conv, .% Yield %Se.lectivity
Hours (°F) Oil (psig) of DEB 1 of DVB 2 of DVB+ to DVB 4 to DVE +
( t) EVB 3 EVB 5
46.0 1150 3.0 0 82.0 43.4 74.1 52.9 90.3
70.0 1150 3.0 0 82.6 43.2 75.2 52.3 91.0
93.5 1150 3.0 0 83.3 43.2 75.0 51.9 90.1
117.5 1150 3.0 0 82.4 43.4 75.9 52.7 92.1
142.5 1100 3.0 0 63.9 24.2 62.1 37.9 97.2
165.5 1100 3.0 0 64.3 24.3 62.4 37.8 97.0
189.5 1100 3.0 0 64.2 24.1 62.1 37.5 96.7
215.5 1050 3.0 0 41.5 9.3 40.7 22.4 98.1
238.0 1050 3.0 0 40.9 9.3 39.8 22.7 97.4 tΛ 261.5 1050 3.0 0 40.4 9.4 40.0 23.3 98.9 C 286.5 1100. 3.0 0 66.1 25.9 63.5 39.2 96.0 ro 310.0 1100 ω 3.0 4 64.8 23.3 60.0 36.0 92.5
H 334.0 1100 3.0 4 65.4 24.4 62.2 37.3 95.1 1
357.5 1100 3.0 9 62.9 21.2 59.6 33.7 94.7 y
-I c 380.5 1100 3.0 9 61.0 19.7 57.8 32.3 94.7 1
405.5 1100 3.0 9 61.6 20.3 57.6 33.0 93.5 rπ 429.5 1100 3.0 9 61.9 20.4 58.5 33.0 94.6
455.0 1100 6.0 9 58.3 20.6 55.2 35.3 94.7
(0
:c 478.0 1100 6.0 9 58.0 20.4 55.4 45.2 95.5 rπ 502.5 1100 2.5 9 47.8 12.6 45.9 26.4 96.1 m 526.0 1100 2.5 9 53.6 15.3 50.8 28.5 94.7 H 550.5 1100 2.5 9 54.1 15.7 51.5 29.0 95.3
574.0 1100 2.5 9 53.3 15.5 51.3 29.1 96.2
COMPARISON CATALYST
24.0 1150 3.0 0 87.5 40.5 68.6 46.2 78.4
48.0 1150 3.0 0 87.0 40.4 69.1 46.5 79.2
71.5 1150 3.0 0 83.0 38.4 68.9 46.3 83.1
95.5 1150 3.0 0 78.7 35.6 65.5 45.2 83.2
119.0 1150 3.0 0 71.3 32.2 62.5 45.2 83.2
143.5 1150 3.0 0 68.7 31.2 60.7 45.5 88.4
167.5 1150 3.0 0 66.6 30.5 59.8 45.8 89.8 Constant Test Conditions: 1.0 LHSV, 100 cc catalyst
As shown in Table II reaction temperature was varied stepwise between 1050°F; 1100° F; and 1150°F; steam/oil ratio varied from 2.5:1 to 6.0:1 and pressure varied from OPSIG to PSIG. In the process several characteristics of the present invention catalyst are found.
First, by comparing results obtained at 1150°F (hours 46.0 - 117.5) 1100°F (hours 142.5-189.5), and 1050°F (hours
215.5-261.5), it is obvious that not only is there significant reduction in total conversion at reduced temperature but also a aked increase in the ratio of EVB to DVB in the product. Further, it has been found that at low positive pressures 0-9 (opsig) conversion is satisfactory at approximately 3:1 steam to oil ratio whereas the aforementioned comparison catalyst exhibited a significant decline in conversion with time on steam when operated at a steam to oil ratio of 3:1. Further prior art catalysts provide satisfactory performance only when operated at significant higher steam to oil ratios (usually in the range of 6:1) and even when operating at these higher steam oil ratios
SUBSTITUTE SHEET OM j WIP
require periodic steam regeneration which is unexpectedly not required by the catalyst in accordance with the present invention as shown by the extended test periods without regeneration.
Finally, it has been found that catalyst in accordance with the present invention is useful in dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene and unexpectedly provides improved characteristics as described hereinafter.
Table III is a tabulation of the results of the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene over the invention catalyst previously described at the conditions noted.
SUBSTITUTE"SHEET OM Λ, WIP
TABLE III
PERFORMANCE OF CATALYST IN
DEHYDROGENATION OF ETHYLBENZENE (EB)
Run Steam/ Temp. %Con- %Yld % Benzene
Hrs. Oil °F versiont Sel. Toluene ( t) of EB ( t)
25.0 2.5 1150 65.8 60.8 92.8 0.53
45.0 2.5 1150 67.8 62.8 95.6 0.50
76.0 2.5 1150 64.9 60.6 93.4 0.47
96.5 2.5 1150 64.8 60.8 93.8 0.49
102.0 1.5 1100 43.7 42.0 96.1 0.57
121.0 1.5 1100 44.5 42.6 95.8 0.56
145.0 1.5 1100 45.1 43.2 95.9 0.56
168.5 1.5 1100 43.3 41.6 96.1 0.56
193.0 1.5 1100 44.8 43.0 95.6 0.56
197.5 1.25 1100 43.4 43.0 95.8 0.56
219.0 1.25 1100 44.2 42.4 95.9 0.56
241.5 1.25 1100 43.5 41.8 96.1 0.56
266.5 1.25 1100 42.5 40.8 96.0 0.55
290.5 1.25 1100 42.6 40.9 96.0 0.54
314.5 1.0 1100 42.3 40.5 95.7 0.55
338.0 1.0 1100 41.9 40.1 95.8 0.57
361.5 1.0 1100 42.7 40.8 95.7 0.53
387.5 1.0 1100 42.6 40.8" 95.8 0.53
409.5 1.0 1100 42.2 40.1 95.1 0.58
433.5 1.0 1100 " 42.3 40.6 95.8 0.56
439.5 0.8 1100 40.9 39.2 95.7 0.58
459.0 0.8 1100 40.1 38.5 95.8 0.54
482.5 0.8 1100 40.1 38.6 96.2 0.60
507.0 0.8 1100 ' 38.6 37.2 96.3 0.61
531.0 0.8 1100 39.9 38.4 96.3 0.60
554.C \J « O llυυ U.5 38.9 96.1 0.55
578.0 0.6 1100 36.6 35.3 96.5 0.64
601.5 0.6 1100 34.3 33.3 96.9 0.68
626.0 0.6 1100 33.8 32.8 97.0 0.69
650.0 0.6 1100 33.6 32.6 97.0 0.69
675.5 0.6 1100 33.9 32.9 96.9 0.68
697.5 0.6 1100 34.2 33.1 96.8 0.65
Constant Test Conditions:
2.0 LHSV, 4 psig, 100 cc catalyst
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
The same conditions were then utilized for comparison using a catalyst which included the same components but which had been heat treated at 1700°F. with the pore 5 distribution curve shown in Figure 2,
(Comparison Catalyst) for dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene and the results shown in Table IV were obtained.
TABLE IV
PERFORMANCE OF COMPARISON CATALYST
Run Steam / Temp. %Con. %Yld. %Sel Benzene
Hrs. Oil °F Toluene (wt) (wt)
69.5 2.5 1150 73.2 64.4 88.0 0.40
71.0 ...Reduced Reactor temperature to 1100°F and S/O to 1
93.5 . 1.5 1100 55.0 50.7 • 92.0 0.45
118.0 1.5 1100 53.5 49.4 92.3 0.44
142.5 1.5 1100 54.4 50.2 92.2 0.43
166.0 1.5 1100 53.9 49.7 92.4 0.43
237.0 1.5 1100 53.1 49.1 92.4 0.43
239.0 ...Reduced S/O to 1.25
262.0 1.25 1100 51.6 47.5 92.0 0.44
286.5 1.25 1100 50.2 46.3 92.3 0.43
310.0 1.25 1100 49.6 45.9 92.6 0.41
334.5 1.25 1100 49.4 45.6 92.4 0.44
378.5 1.25 1100 49.7 46.0 92.5 0.44
403.5 1.25 1100 49.1 46.5 92.7 0.44
405.5 ...Reduced S/O to 1.0
414.0 1.0 1100 46.7 43.1 92.3 0.45
432.0 1.0 1100 47.9 44.2 92.4 0.46
454.5 1.0 1100 46.2 42.9 92.9 0.46
478.5 1.0 1100 44.5 41.8 '94.3 0.50
502.0 1.0 1100 40.3 38.2 94.6 0.50
574.0 1.0 1100 37.6 35.8 95.2 0.52
575.5 ...Terminated Run...
Constant Test Conditions:
2.0 LHSV, 4 psig, 100 cc catalyst
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
/M. IIPPOO
The results of the test shown in Table III and Table IV are shown graphically in Figures 4-6 and will be considered with respect to these Figures. Figure 4a graphically illustrates the selectivity of ethylbenzene conversion to styrene using the catalyst of the invention - at indicated steam/oil ratios by weight while Figure 4b indicates selectivity for the comparison catalyst.
Figures 4a and 4b illustrate that the selectivity of catalysts within the scope of the present invention is superior to the selectivity of the comparison catalyst. In the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene the principal by-products are benzene and toluene. The benzene is the more desirable by-product because it can be recycled whereas toluene cannot. Accordingly, the benzene/toluene distribution in the. dehydrogenation product is important as an indication of lost raw material, namely toluene.
Figure 5 is a graphic representation of the benzene/toluene ratio for selected conditions utilizing the catalyst of the
SUBSTITUTE SHEET O
invention and the comparison catalyst.
Accordingly, in use of the catalyst of the present invention, while conversion may in some instances be lower, the benefit derived from improved selectivity results in less by-product production and as illustrated in Figure 5 even the by-product produced contains a greater proportion of the more desirable benzene. Finally, Figure 6 is a comparison of the conversion achieved utilizing the catalyst of the invention and the comparison catalyst. While the conversion provided by the invention catalyst is initially lower at 1.5 and 1.25 steam/oil than the comparison catalyst, Figure 6 illustrates one of the unexpected advantages of the present invention; that is that the difference between the conversion rate of the catalyst diminishes with lower steam oil ratios and the catalyst of the present invention provides satisfactory and stable conversion at steam/oil ratios of 0.8 and 0.6 over an extended period of time where the comparison catalyst becomes unsatable at 1.0 S/O. As previously stated this advantage is important because the lower steam/oil ratios permit energy cost savings.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
Specifically, Figure 6 illustrates that the conversion of ethylbenzene provided by the comparison catalyst diminishes to the point that the conversion provided by the catalyst of the invention catalyst at 0.8 steam/oil ratio is equivalent to the conversion provided by the comparison catalyst at 1.0 steam/oil.
It will be noted in Figure 5 that the difference in conversion provided by the two catalysts unexpectedly converge because of the conversion rate for the comparison catalyst drops off sharply even though the steam/oil ratio is maintained at 1:1. Conversely, when the steam/oil ratio for the catalyst of the invention was decreased to 0.8:1 the conversion rate was nearly equivalent to the rate for the comparison catalyst at a steam/oil ratio 1:1.
Extrapolation of the results shown in Figure 5 show that with time the conversion for the catalyst of the invention would surpass the conversion characteristics of the comparison catalyst even at a steam/oil ratio of 1:1 because of the inability of the comparison catalyst to operate in a stable manner at steam/oil ratios much below 1.25.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET OMP
Claims
Claims
1. A catalyst found to be particularly effective in the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene, diethylbenzene, and ethyltoluene, to olefinic compounds or vinyl aromatics where the catalysts includes iron oxide, at least 20% by weight alkali water gas promoter and at least 1.3% by weight chromium oxide where the catalyst is formed into pellets of selected configuration which are calcined at 900°F to 1110°F for 15 minutes to 8 hours.
2. The invention of Claim 1 wherein the proportion of potassium carbonate is between 50% and 60% by weight.
3. The Invention of Claim 1 wherein the proportion of chromium oxide is between 1% and 4% by weight.
4. A process for the dehydrogenation of alkyl aromatic to a vinyl aromatic comprising contacting steam and the alkyl aromatic at a weight ratio of about 0.6:1 to 1:2 with a catalyst containg iron oxide, at least 20% by weight potassium carbonate and at least 1% by weight
SUBSTITUTE SHEET
chromium oxide where the catalyst is formed into pellets of selected configuration which are calcined at 900°F for a period of between 15 minutes and 8 hours and the dehydrogenation occurs. The invention of Claim 4 wherein the average pressure of the dehydrogenation reaction is between 0 and 10 pounds per
10 square inch gauge.
The invention of Claim 4 wherein the alky aromic is principally ethylbenzene. The invention of Claim 4 wherein the alkyl aromatic is principally
15 diethylbenzene.
The invention of Claim 4 wherein the alkyl aromatic is principally ethyltoluene.
The invention of Claim 8 wherein said
20 ethyltoluene includes selected proportions of paraethytoluene..
SUBSTITUTE SHEET O Λ- WI
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US29329981A | 1981-08-17 | 1981-08-17 | |
US293299 | 1981-08-17 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0085718A1 EP0085718A1 (en) | 1983-08-17 |
EP0085718A4 true EP0085718A4 (en) | 1984-01-10 |
Family
ID=23128526
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19820903004 Withdrawn EP0085718A4 (en) | 1981-08-17 | 1982-08-17 | Selectively calcined dehydrogenation catalyst. |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0085718A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS58501272A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1983000687A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4504594A (en) * | 1982-12-15 | 1985-03-12 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Catalysts for para-ethyltoluene dehydrogenation |
US4720604A (en) * | 1982-12-15 | 1988-01-19 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Process for dehydrogenation of alkylaromatics |
US4593134A (en) * | 1982-12-15 | 1986-06-03 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Process for para-ethyltoluene dehydrogenation |
US4503163A (en) * | 1982-12-15 | 1985-03-05 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Catalysts for para-ethyltoluene dehydrogenation |
US4496662A (en) * | 1982-12-23 | 1985-01-29 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Catalysts for para-ethyltoluene dehydrogenation |
DE3319024A1 (en) * | 1983-05-26 | 1984-11-29 | Deggendorfer Werft Und Eisenbau Gmbh, 8360 Deggendorf | METHOD FOR PRODUCING STYRENE BY DEHYDRATING AETHYLBENZENE |
US4982030A (en) * | 1985-07-26 | 1991-01-01 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Process for preparation of para-divinylbenzene |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2870228A (en) * | 1956-12-24 | 1959-01-20 | Shell Dev | Dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons |
US2866790A (en) * | 1957-02-18 | 1958-12-30 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Catalyst and dehydrogenation process |
US2916531A (en) * | 1959-02-17 | 1959-12-08 | Shell Dev | Dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons |
US3360579A (en) * | 1965-05-21 | 1967-12-26 | Shell Oil Co | Catalytic dehydrogenation of alkylaromatics |
BE790702A (en) * | 1970-07-10 | 1973-04-27 | Dow Chemical Co | PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING A DEHYDROGENATION CATALYST, CATALYST OBTAINED AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE MANUFACTURE OF VINYLAROMATIC HYDROCARBONS |
-
1982
- 1982-08-17 JP JP57502980A patent/JPS58501272A/en active Pending
- 1982-08-17 WO PCT/US1982/001120 patent/WO1983000687A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1982-08-17 EP EP19820903004 patent/EP0085718A4/en not_active Withdrawn
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
No relevant documents have been disclosed. * |
See also references of WO8300687A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO1983000687A1 (en) | 1983-03-03 |
EP0085718A1 (en) | 1983-08-17 |
JPS58501272A (en) | 1983-08-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4220560A (en) | Spinel dehydrogenation catalyst | |
EP0297685B2 (en) | Dehydrogenation catalyst | |
US3845156A (en) | Processes for dehydrogenation of organic compounds | |
US2408140A (en) | Dehydrogenation catalyst | |
JP2004283834A (en) | Catalyst and method for dehydrogenating alkane | |
US3810953A (en) | Dehydrogenation of organic compounds | |
PL159228B1 (en) | Dehydrogenation catalyst | |
CA1269222A (en) | Copper aluminum borate | |
JP2647159B2 (en) | New dehydrogenation catalyst composition | |
US4467046A (en) | Dehydrogenation catalyst | |
US4310717A (en) | Oxidative dehydrogenation and catalyst | |
US3725493A (en) | Oxidative dehydrogenation | |
US3784483A (en) | Cobalt,iron,phosphorus and oxygen containing oxidatice dehydrogenation catalyst | |
US2870228A (en) | Dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons | |
US3907916A (en) | Dehydrogenation of alkyl aromatic hydrocarbons | |
EP0085718A4 (en) | Selectively calcined dehydrogenation catalyst. | |
US4010114A (en) | Oxidative dehydrogenation catalyst | |
US3793225A (en) | Oxidative dehydrogenation catalyst | |
EP0336622B1 (en) | Hydrocarbon dehydrogenation reactions | |
CA1212374A (en) | Dehydrogenation catalyst composition | |
US3790500A (en) | Oxidative dehydrogenation catalyst | |
US3626021A (en) | Dehydrogenation of aliphatics over alkali metal oxide-chromia-zinc aluminate spinel catalyst | |
US3789017A (en) | Oxidative dehydrogenation catalysts | |
EP0093518B1 (en) | Catalysts for para-ethyltoluene dehydrogenation | |
EP1251961A1 (en) | Hydrocarbon dehydrogenation catalyst and process |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19830415 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): BE DE |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 19850418 |