EP0076025A1 - Fire-resistant door leaf - Google Patents

Fire-resistant door leaf Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0076025A1
EP0076025A1 EP82303922A EP82303922A EP0076025A1 EP 0076025 A1 EP0076025 A1 EP 0076025A1 EP 82303922 A EP82303922 A EP 82303922A EP 82303922 A EP82303922 A EP 82303922A EP 0076025 A1 EP0076025 A1 EP 0076025A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
door leaf
membrane
panels
core
panel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP82303922A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Eric Reginald Maizey
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
HI-SPAN Ltd
Original Assignee
HI-SPAN Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by HI-SPAN Ltd filed Critical HI-SPAN Ltd
Publication of EP0076025A1 publication Critical patent/EP0076025A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B5/00Doors, windows, or like closures for special purposes; Border constructions therefor
    • E06B5/10Doors, windows, or like closures for special purposes; Border constructions therefor for protection against air-raid or other war-like action; for other protective purposes
    • E06B5/16Fireproof doors or similar closures; Adaptations of fixed constructions therefor
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B3/00Window sashes, door leaves, or like elements for closing wall or like openings; Layout of fixed or moving closures, e.g. windows in wall or like openings; Features of rigidly-mounted outer frames relating to the mounting of wing frames
    • E06B3/70Door leaves
    • E06B3/7015Door leaves characterised by the filling between two external panels
    • E06B2003/7019Door leaves characterised by the filling between two external panels of corrugated type
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B3/00Window sashes, door leaves, or like elements for closing wall or like openings; Layout of fixed or moving closures, e.g. windows in wall or like openings; Features of rigidly-mounted outer frames relating to the mounting of wing frames
    • E06B3/70Door leaves
    • E06B3/7015Door leaves characterised by the filling between two external panels
    • E06B2003/7028Door leaves characterised by the filling between two external panels of cementituous type, e.g. concrete
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06BFIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B3/00Window sashes, door leaves, or like elements for closing wall or like openings; Layout of fixed or moving closures, e.g. windows in wall or like openings; Features of rigidly-mounted outer frames relating to the mounting of wing frames
    • E06B3/70Door leaves
    • E06B3/7015Door leaves characterised by the filling between two external panels
    • E06B2003/703Door leaves characterised by the filling between two external panels containing a metallic layer

Definitions

  • the invention relates to fire-resistant door assemblies and in particular to door assemblies for use in closing openings in marine bulkheads.
  • the construction and properties of such door assemblies is governed, in the case of United Kingdom registered ships, by Merchant Shipping Regulations issued by the United Kingdom Department of Trade.
  • a door which is intended to be used to close-off openings in "A" Class Divisions is, in general, required to be subjected to a standard fire test.
  • the door leaf and frame are installed in a steel bulkhead, insulated on its unexposed side with material of the same standard as that which the door is intended to achieve, and when the division is exposed to a standard fire test the door must prevent the passage of smoke and flame to the end of the test; and the average temperature on the unexposed side of the division must not increase by more than a stated amount above the initial temperature, nor must the temperature at any point rise more than a similarly stated amount above the initial temperature within the test time.
  • test time is sixty minutes.
  • test time is thirty minutes.
  • the temperature limits are 139 degrees centigrade average temperature rise above the initial temperature, and 180 degrees centigrade maximum rise above the initial temperature at any one point, within the applicable test times.
  • the door leaf comprises a heat-resistant core of, for example, Vermiculite, sandwiched between two steel panels.
  • the core is fairly thick in comparison with the two panels. If a fire occurs on one side of the door, the Vermiculite core cuts down the rate of heat transfer from one steel panel to the other.
  • the core relatively easily damaged, is also protected in use by the stronger and more resilient outer panels, which can be painted and to which door furniture such as locks, latches and hinges can be secured.
  • a fire-resistant door leaf embodying the invention also comprises a core sandwiched between two panels, but the core in this case is the main leaf-stiffening membrane, and the panels between which it is sandwiched constitute the main heat-resisting medium.
  • the core has a much higher flexural rigidity than either of the outer panels, whilst the panels each have a much lower thermal conductivity than the core.
  • the core membrane will be much thinner than either of the outer panels.
  • the door leaf Because only one of the relatively heavy membranes is used, rather than two, the door leaf will be less heavy than a similarly-sized and similarly-rated conventional leaf. It will also be less expensive, and the money saved can be used to furnish the door leaf with, for example, stainless steel fittings and/or peripheral capping channels which are less prone to rust and are thus particularly advantageous in a marine environment.
  • the heat-resistant outer panels can be selected from modern materials such as fibre-reinforced cement, although more conventional materials might equally well be used in some circumstances. Such panels can be self-coloured without necessarily needing painting, thus saving future maintenance costs. Other advantages will become apparent to those skilled in this specialist field.
  • the core membrane may advantageously be corrugated, with corrugations running from side to side or from top to bottom of the door leaf. This will increase the flexural rigidity of the door whilst enabling a relatively thin and lightweight membrane to be used.
  • An air gap may deliberately be created between the panels of heat-resistant material, so that the panels are separated by the air gap as well as by the core membrane, and the air gap forms part of the core region of the door leaf.
  • the core membrane will be much thinner than either of the outer panels in normal cases, the thickness of the core region (including the air gap) need not necessarily be less than a panel thickness, and may advantageously be at least equal to a panel thickness. Because air is a good heat insulator, the presence of an air gap at the core region increases the fire-resistant properties of the door leaf yet farther and gives added protection to the relatively high-thermal-conductivity core membrane.
  • One especially advantageous door leaf construction em-bodying the invention uses fibre-reinforced cement panels each of which has an outer skin of higher density than the rest of the panel.
  • Such panels are currently available commercially, and lend themselves ideally to the construction of a door leaf embodying the invention.
  • the outer skin protects the rest of the panel from impact, and door furniture such as locks, latches and bolts can be screwed direct to it without necessarily having to be screwed through to the core membrane.
  • a capping channel extends around the periphery of the door leaf, it may advantageously be made of material which is compatible with the core membrane so that it can be heat-welded through to the core membrane. This will increase the flexural rigidity of the door still farther, will protect the panel edges, and can do away with any need to bond the panels to the membrane itself.
  • the membrane may be of tray form, with tray walls formed around any two opposite edges or around all four edges of the membrane. This could provide the advantageous air gap between the heat-resistant panels of the door leaf without necessarily having to corrugate the membrane. It could also have a capping channel heat-welded to it around the entire periphery of the leaf, in the case where a four-wall tray was used, whereas an unwalled corrugated membrane could normally only be welded to the capping channel along two of the membrane's opposite edges.
  • the corrugations are advantageously straight-walled rather than curve- walled in form, and the acute angle between the wall and the base is preferably within the range 30 degrees to 90 degrees. Angles outside the limits of this range will be less resistant to buckling.
  • an especially advantageous range of angle is between 45 degrees and 90 degrees to give optimum strength to the corrugated membrane.
  • the corrugations preferably run across the door leaf, i.e. from side to side rather than from top to bottom, since the leaf is then flexurally more rigid in the directions in which it is most likely to be subject to bending forces in use.
  • Figures 3 and 4 are drawn to a larger scale than Figures 1 and 2, and they are each sections along the line B-B of Figure 2.
  • the door leaf comprises a corrugated mild steel folded plate sandwiched between two fibre-reinforced cement panels and bounded by a stainless steel peripheral capping channel.
  • the steel membrane, referenced 11 has corrugations extending across the width of the door leaf.
  • the corrugations are straight-walled, and the reflex angle between the wall and base of each corrugation is 135 degrees; so that the acute angle defined between each wall and base is 45 degrees in this particular embodiment.
  • the fibre-reinforced cement panels each have the same reference 12 and are each glued to respective channel base portions of the corrugated steel plate membrane 11.
  • Each panel 12 is of uniform density for the greater part of its thickness, but each exhibits a hard skin region of much higher density on its outward-facing surface.
  • the skin region is referenced 12a in each case.
  • the capping channel 13 is U-shaped in cross-section. It extends around the periphery of the composite rectangular panel-core membrane-panel "sandwich", and it is corner-mitred and welded into a rectangular framework. It is made, in this particular embodiment, of stainless steel.
  • the opposite top and bottom edges of the core membrane 11 are turned over at 90 degrees to the general plane of the membrane, so that they constitute flanges abutting the adjacent inner face of the capping channel 13. Holes are formed in the channel 13 at points spaced along its length where it abuts the membrane- edge flanges just referred to. The membrane-edges are then spot-welded to the capping channel 13 through these holes, and the welds later ground flat against the outer face of the channel.
  • an air gap 14 is created between the two fibre-reinforced cement panels 12.
  • the core membrane is folded from mild steel plate 1.6 mm thick.
  • Each of the panels has an overall thickness of 15 mm and the hard outer-facing skin of each panel is 2 mm thick.
  • the door leaf overall is 2440 mm high x 1200 mm wide.
  • the construction of the door frame surrounding the leaf is not of the essence of the invention, and can readily be settled by those skilled in this field. Essentially, however, as shown in Figures 3 and 4 the frame uprights 15 are steel Z-rails which are bolted direct to the steel bulkhead 16 in which the door opening is formed.
  • the latch and hinge construction is similarly not of the essence of the invention, and can readily be settled by the skilled reader, but it is clear from Figure 3 that one of the hinge plates 17 is welded to a reinforcing plate 18 on the door leaf whilst the other hinge plate, not shown, is welded to the door frame upright 15; and the reinforcing plate 18 is L-shaped and is welded inside the capping channel 13 and to the core membrane 11 at each of the three hinge points along the relevant edge of the door leaf.
  • a U-shaped spine 19 sits in the air gap between the two heat-resistant panels 12 and is welded to the membrane 11 along the length of the spine.
  • the spine 19 extends almost the full length of the door leaf.
  • the fibre-reinforced panels illustrated and referenced 12 have an average density of 1.1 tonnes per cubic metre to within plus or minus 15 per cent.
  • the greater thickness of the panel has a density of 0.8 tonnes per cubic metre, whilst the 2 mm-thick skins have densities of 1.6 tonnes per cubic metre, again all to within plus or minus 15 per cent.
  • These panels are pre-manufactured as rigid skinned boards and are currently available under the trade mark VELMAC in the United Kingdom from Tarmac Industrial Holdings Limited, of Ettingshall, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
  • the panels 12 are glued to the core membrane by an adhesive manufactured in the United Kingdom by Joseph Crossfield and Sons Limited, of Warrington, Cheshire, United Kingdom and known as Claysil No 1 Adhesive.
  • the panels 12 are relatively light in weight but their hard outer skins have high impact resistance and are hard enough for door furniture to be screwed direct to them. They are waterproof and rot-proof, they cut down noise transmission, and they are self-coloured although they can be painted if desired.
  • the door leaf illustrated passes an A60 standard fire test and is some 20 per cent lighter in weight than a similarly-sized and similarly-rated A60 door of conventional steel outer panel - heat-resistant core construction.
  • the fibre-reinforced cement could be sprayed onto each side of the corrugated core membrane 11 and then left to set into a rigid panel. The 'air gap 14 would then not be present, but if the material were sprayed thick enough the necessary fire-resistant qualities could still be achieved.
  • One form of fibre-reinforced cement (or GRC as it is usually called) which could be sprayed in this manner is currently marketed in the United Kingdom by Thyssen (Great Britain) Limited of Bynea, Llanelli, Dyfed, United Kingdom.
  • the three hinges which hang the door on its frame could consist of two plain hinges and one self-closing hinge. One of these hinges could be replaced by a dog bolt and still conform to Regulations. There are three latches spaced along the non-hinged edge of the door, each latch opposite a respective hinge.
  • FIGs 5A to 5E show diagrammatically various forms the corrugated core membrane 11 might take.
  • the corrugations are straight-walled and are regularly spaced from one another.
  • Figure 5B they are relatively widely spaced. In each of these two cases the corrugations are angular in form.
  • successive corrugations may be right-angled and again may be regularly spaced (Figure 5C) or relatively widely spaced (Figure 5D) to define in either case a series of "top hat” sections along or across the membrane 11.
  • the membrane may have to be made of steel, but in any door leaf embodying the invention the materials will be chosen according to the degree of fire resistance required.
  • the tray-form membrane of Figure 6 has upturned walls along its two opposite longitudinal edges, and "top hat” reinforcing channels running across it at each of three spaced positions where the hinges will be installed down one door edge.
  • Figure 7 shows a similar arrangement in which the stiffening reinforcing sections are localised around the three hinge regions, and around a single latch region on the opposite edge of the membrane, and in which the membrane this time has walls along each of its four edges.
  • Figure 8 is a section through one of the reinforced hinge regions of the completed door leaf using the Figure 7 membrane.
  • the localised reinforcing sections are each screwed through the floor of the tray-form membrane to one of the outer heat-resisting panels.
  • the non-screwed end of the reinforcing section may be welded, glued, riveted or otherwise secured to the upturned wall of the tray-form membrane.
  • it could simply be left to bear unsecured against the underside of the inturned wall of the membrane if the membrane and reinforcing section were each sufficiently rigid.
  • two tray-form membranes could be secured back to back. Each could be folded up around an outer panel of heat-resistant material, and when two such membrane-and-panel assemblies were secured back to back, the door leaf assembly of membrane and outer panels would be completed. If the heat-resistant panels were in the form of pre-manufactured rigid boards, they could be left unglued within the membranes, and be kept in place by the folded-over tray walls.
  • a capping channel could still be fitted around the four edges of the assembled back to back panels and membranes if desired.
  • Figure 9 shows a door leaf assembly in which the heat-resistant outer panels are rigid boards and are separated by individual core membrane elements glued and/or screwed into position on the inward-facing surfaces of the panels.
  • a capping channel of stainless steel is glued and/or screwed to the boards or is alternatively welded up around the boards as a framework without being secured to them.
  • the core region contains an air gap as well as containing individual core elements, and the individual elements together constitute the required leaf-stiffening membrane.
  • Figures 10, 11 and 12 illustrate various ways in which the channel may be secured in position.
  • the channel is through-welded to the walls of a tray-form membrane.
  • the walls of the channel are screwed to the heat-resistant boards which are themselves separated by a continuous corrugated membrane or a series of individual core elements which together constitute a membrane. In each of these two cases there is an air gap between the outer panels and the air gap forms part of the core region.
  • the core region consists solely of a relatively stiff membrane faced on each of its opposite sides with heat-resistant material and with a capping channel welded up around the four edges of the resulting door leaf assembly.
  • the capping channel is not secured to the membrane, nor is it secured to the heat-resistant outer panels. Its corners are mitred and welded to hold the panels and the membrane in place inside it.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Securing Of Glass Panes Or The Like (AREA)
  • Special Wing (AREA)

Abstract

A fire-resistant door leaf for use in an "A" Class marine bulkhead door assembly comprises a core sandwiched between two panels. The core is a corrugated steel membrane (11) whilst each of the two panels is a pre-formed rigid board (12) of fibre-reinforced cement. An air gap (14) is created between the panels (12) by the corrugated core (11). A U-section capping channel (13) extends around the periphery of the door leaf and is corner-mitred and welded into a rigid framework enclosing the panels (12) and corrugated core membrane (1).
The membrane (11) is spot-welded to the top and bottom rails of the capping channel (13), and the panels (12) are glued to respective corrugations of the membrane (11).
The door leaf thereby derives its main flexural rigidity from its core region, and its main heat-resistance from its outer panels.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to fire-resistant door assemblies and in particular to door assemblies for use in closing openings in marine bulkheads. The construction and properties of such door assemblies is governed, in the case of United Kingdom registered ships, by Merchant Shipping Regulations issued by the United Kingdom Department of Trade.
  • The UK Department of Trade Regulations conform to an Internationally accepted set of Regulations in compliance with the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS Regulations), which are in turn interpreted by an Exchange of Notes Treaty signed by the governments of the countries concerned. Thus the design and construction of what are called, in the United Kingdom, "A" Class Marine Fire Doors must conform to an essentially Internationally accepted set of Regulations.
  • A door which is intended to be used to close-off openings in "A" Class Divisions is, in general, required to be subjected to a standard fire test. The door leaf and frame are installed in a steel bulkhead, insulated on its unexposed side with material of the same standard as that which the door is intended to achieve, and when the division is exposed to a standard fire test the door must prevent the passage of smoke and flame to the end of the test; and the average temperature on the unexposed side of the division must not increase by more than a stated amount above the initial temperature, nor must the temperature at any point rise more than a similarly stated amount above the initial temperature within the test time.
  • For a'so-called "A60" door,the test time is sixty minutes. For an "A30" standard door, the test time is thirty minutes. Currently, the temperature limits are 139 degrees centigrade average temperature rise above the initial temperature, and 180 degrees centigrade maximum rise above the initial temperature at any one point, within the applicable test times.
  • REVIEW OF THE PRIOR ART
  • The Regulations applicable to this special field of fire-resistant marine bulkheads specify that the door leaf shall comprise, inter alia, a steel membrane. In all relevant prior art currently known to the applicant, this requirement for a steel membrane has always been interpreted to mean an external steel panel.
  • In conventional marine bulkhead "A" Class fire doors, therefore, the door leaf comprises a heat-resistant core of, for example, Vermiculite, sandwiched between two steel panels. The core is fairly thick in comparison with the two panels. If a fire occurs on one side of the door, the Vermiculite core cuts down the rate of heat transfer from one steel panel to the other. The core, relatively easily damaged, is also protected in use by the stronger and more resilient outer panels, which can be painted and to which door furniture such as locks, latches and hinges can be secured.
  • Thus the conventional "A" Class door leaf derives its main flexural stiffness from its outer panel "membranes", and its main heat resistance from its core region.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • A fire-resistant door leaf embodying the invention also comprises a core sandwiched between two panels, but the core in this case is the main leaf-stiffening membrane, and the panels between which it is sandwiched constitute the main heat-resisting medium. Thus the core has a much higher flexural rigidity than either of the outer panels, whilst the panels each have a much lower thermal conductivity than the core. Also, the core membrane will be much thinner than either of the outer panels.
  • Such a door leaf, deriving its main flexural stiffness from its core region and its main heat resistance from its outer panels, is thus a complete reversal of conventional thinking in the field of fire-resistant marine doors.
  • Many advantages flow from such a construction. Because only one of the relatively heavy membranes is used, rather than two, the door leaf will be less heavy than a similarly-sized and similarly-rated conventional leaf. It will also be less expensive, and the money saved can be used to furnish the door leaf with, for example, stainless steel fittings and/or peripheral capping channels which are less prone to rust and are thus particularly advantageous in a marine environment. The heat-resistant outer panels can be selected from modern materials such as fibre-reinforced cement, although more conventional materials might equally well be used in some circumstances. Such panels can be self-coloured without necessarily needing painting, thus saving future maintenance costs. Other advantages will become apparent to those skilled in this specialist field.
  • The core membrane may advantageously be corrugated, with corrugations running from side to side or from top to bottom of the door leaf. This will increase the flexural rigidity of the door whilst enabling a relatively thin and lightweight membrane to be used.
  • An air gap may deliberately be created between the panels of heat-resistant material, so that the panels are separated by the air gap as well as by the core membrane, and the air gap forms part of the core region of the door leaf. Although the core membrane will be much thinner than either of the outer panels in normal cases, the thickness of the core region (including the air gap) need not necessarily be less than a panel thickness, and may advantageously be at least equal to a panel thickness. Because air is a good heat insulator, the presence of an air gap at the core region increases the fire-resistant properties of the door leaf yet farther and gives added protection to the relatively high-thermal-conductivity core membrane.
  • One especially advantageous door leaf construction em-bodying the invention, to be described in detail hereafter, uses fibre-reinforced cement panels each of which has an outer skin of higher density than the rest of the panel. Such panels are currently available commercially, and lend themselves ideally to the construction of a door leaf embodying the invention. The outer skin protects the rest of the panel from impact, and door furniture such as locks, latches and bolts can be screwed direct to it without necessarily having to be screwed through to the core membrane.
  • If a capping channel extends around the periphery of the door leaf, it may advantageously be made of material which is compatible with the core membrane so that it can be heat-welded through to the core membrane. This will increase the flexural rigidity of the door still farther, will protect the panel edges, and can do away with any need to bond the panels to the membrane itself.
  • The membrane may be of tray form, with tray walls formed around any two opposite edges or around all four edges of the membrane. This could provide the advantageous air gap between the heat-resistant panels of the door leaf without necessarily having to corrugate the membrane. It could also have a capping channel heat-welded to it around the entire periphery of the leaf, in the case where a four-wall tray was used, whereas an unwalled corrugated membrane could normally only be welded to the capping channel along two of the membrane's opposite edges.
  • Where a corrugated membrane is used, the corrugations are advantageously straight-walled rather than curve- walled in form, and the acute angle between the wall and the base is preferably within the range 30 degrees to 90 degrees. Angles outside the limits of this range will be less resistant to buckling.
  • In the case just outlined, an especially advantageous range of angle is between 45 degrees and 90 degrees to give optimum strength to the corrugated membrane.
  • Where a corrugated membrane is used, the corrugations preferably run across the door leaf, i.e. from side to side rather than from top to bottom, since the leaf is then flexurally more rigid in the directions in which it is most likely to be subject to bending forces in use.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • In the accompanying drawings:
    • Figure 1 shows a door leaf embodying the invention, in plan cross-section;
    • Figure 2 shows the door leaf of Figure 1 in front elevation when installed in its surrounding door frame;
    • Figures 3 and 4 show respectively the hinge-end and latch-end of the door leaf in plan cross-section, and also show part of the door frame in each case;
    • Figures 5A to 5E are diagrammatic illustrations of different forms which the core membrane of the door leaf might take within the scope of the invention; and
    • Figures 6 to 12 are similarly diagrammatic illustrations of ways in which the door leaf might be modified within the scope of the invention.
  • Figures 3 and 4 are drawn to a larger scale than Figures 1 and 2, and they are each sections along the line B-B of Figure 2.
  • DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The door assembly illustrated, and its possible modifications, will now be described with reference to the drawing. The door leaf itself is only one of several forms which the invention might take. It is, however, the best form currently known to the applicant of putting the invention into practice.
  • The door leaf comprises a corrugated mild steel folded plate sandwiched between two fibre-reinforced cement panels and bounded by a stainless steel peripheral capping channel. The steel membrane, referenced 11, has corrugations extending across the width of the door leaf. The corrugations are straight-walled, and the reflex angle between the wall and base of each corrugation is 135 degrees; so that the acute angle defined between each wall and base is 45 degrees in this particular embodiment.
  • The fibre-reinforced cement panels each have the same reference 12 and are each glued to respective channel base portions of the corrugated steel plate membrane 11. Each panel 12 is of uniform density for the greater part of its thickness, but each exhibits a hard skin region of much higher density on its outward-facing surface. The skin region is referenced 12a in each case.
  • The capping channel 13 is U-shaped in cross-section. It extends around the periphery of the composite rectangular panel-core membrane-panel "sandwich", and it is corner-mitred and welded into a rectangular framework. It is made, in this particular embodiment, of stainless steel.
  • The opposite top and bottom edges of the core membrane 11 are turned over at 90 degrees to the general plane of the membrane, so that they constitute flanges abutting the adjacent inner face of the capping channel 13. Holes are formed in the channel 13 at points spaced along its length where it abuts the membrane- edge flanges just referred to. The membrane-edges are then spot-welded to the capping channel 13 through these holes, and the welds later ground flat against the outer face of the channel.
  • Because the core membrane 11 is corrugated, an air gap 14 is created between the two fibre-reinforced cement panels 12. In the particular embodiment illustrated, there is a 20 mm spacing between the non-skinned facing inner surfaces of the two panels 12. The core membrane is folded from mild steel plate 1.6 mm thick. Each of the panels has an overall thickness of 15 mm and the hard outer-facing skin of each panel is 2 mm thick. The door leaf overall is 2440 mm high x 1200 mm wide.
  • The construction of the door frame surrounding the leaf is not of the essence of the invention, and can readily be settled by those skilled in this field. Essentially, however, as shown in Figures 3 and 4 the frame uprights 15 are steel Z-rails which are bolted direct to the steel bulkhead 16 in which the door opening is formed.
  • The latch and hinge construction is similarly not of the essence of the invention, and can readily be settled by the skilled reader, but it is clear from Figure 3 that one of the hinge plates 17 is welded to a reinforcing plate 18 on the door leaf whilst the other hinge plate, not shown, is welded to the door frame upright 15; and the reinforcing plate 18 is L-shaped and is welded inside the capping channel 13 and to the core membrane 11 at each of the three hinge points along the relevant edge of the door leaf.
  • A U-shaped spine 19 sits in the air gap between the two heat-resistant panels 12 and is welded to the membrane 11 along the length of the spine. The spine 19 extends almost the full length of the door leaf.
  • The fibre-reinforced panels illustrated and referenced 12 have an average density of 1.1 tonnes per cubic metre to within plus or minus 15 per cent. The greater thickness of the panel has a density of 0.8 tonnes per cubic metre, whilst the 2 mm-thick skins have densities of 1.6 tonnes per cubic metre, again all to within plus or minus 15 per cent. These panels are pre-manufactured as rigid skinned boards and are currently available under the trade mark VELMAC in the United Kingdom from Tarmac Industrial Holdings Limited, of Ettingshall, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom. They are glued to the core membrane by an adhesive manufactured in the United Kingdom by Joseph Crossfield and Sons Limited, of Warrington, Cheshire, United Kingdom and known as Claysil No 1 Adhesive. The panels 12 are relatively light in weight but their hard outer skins have high impact resistance and are hard enough for door furniture to be screwed direct to them. They are waterproof and rot-proof, they cut down noise transmission, and they are self-coloured although they can be painted if desired.
  • The door leaf illustrated passes an A60 standard fire test and is some 20 per cent lighter in weight than a similarly-sized and similarly-rated A60 door of conventional steel outer panel - heat-resistant core construction.
  • Instead of using pre-manufactured boards for the panels 12, the fibre-reinforced cement could be sprayed onto each side of the corrugated core membrane 11 and then left to set into a rigid panel. The 'air gap 14 would then not be present, but if the material were sprayed thick enough the necessary fire-resistant qualities could still be achieved. One form of fibre-reinforced cement (or GRC as it is usually called) which could be sprayed in this manner is currently marketed in the United Kingdom by Thyssen (Great Britain) Limited of Bynea, Llanelli, Dyfed, United Kingdom.
  • The three hinges which hang the door on its frame could consist of two plain hinges and one self-closing hinge. One of these hinges could be replaced by a dog bolt and still conform to Regulations. There are three latches spaced along the non-hinged edge of the door, each latch opposite a respective hinge.
  • Figures 5A to 5E show diagrammatically various forms the corrugated core membrane 11 might take. In Figure 5A the corrugations are straight-walled and are regularly spaced from one another. In Figure 5B they are relatively widely spaced. In each of these two cases the corrugations are angular in form.
  • Instead of being angular in form, successive corrugations may be right-angled and again may be regularly spaced (Figure 5C) or relatively widely spaced (Figure 5D) to define in either case a series of "top hat" sections along or across the membrane 11.
  • It is even conceivable that a curved corrugated regularly-spaced or irregularly-spaced form (Figure 5E) could be used. To give such a form sufficient rigidity, the membrane may have to be made of steel, but in any door leaf embodying the invention the materials will be chosen according to the degree of fire resistance required.
  • The tray-form membrane of Figure 6 has upturned walls along its two opposite longitudinal edges, and "top hat" reinforcing channels running across it at each of three spaced positions where the hinges will be installed down one door edge. Figure 7 shows a similar arrangement in which the stiffening reinforcing sections are localised around the three hinge regions, and around a single latch region on the opposite edge of the membrane, and in which the membrane this time has walls along each of its four edges.
  • Figure 8 is a section through one of the reinforced hinge regions of the completed door leaf using the Figure 7 membrane. The localised reinforcing sections are each screwed through the floor of the tray-form membrane to one of the outer heat-resisting panels. The non-screwed end of the reinforcing section may be welded, glued, riveted or otherwise secured to the upturned wall of the tray-form membrane. Alternatively, as shown in Figure 8, it could simply be left to bear unsecured against the underside of the inturned wall of the membrane if the membrane and reinforcing section were each sufficiently rigid.
  • Instead of using a capping channel such as 13 illustrated in Figures 3 and 4, two tray-form membranes could be secured back to back. Each could be folded up around an outer panel of heat-resistant material, and when two such membrane-and-panel assemblies were secured back to back, the door leaf assembly of membrane and outer panels would be completed. If the heat-resistant panels were in the form of pre-manufactured rigid boards, they could be left unglued within the membranes, and be kept in place by the folded-over tray walls.
  • In the arrangement just outlined, a capping channel could still be fitted around the four edges of the assembled back to back panels and membranes if desired.
  • Figure 9 shows a door leaf assembly in which the heat-resistant outer panels are rigid boards and are separated by individual core membrane elements glued and/or screwed into position on the inward-facing surfaces of the panels. A capping channel of stainless steel is glued and/or screwed to the boards or is alternatively welded up around the boards as a framework without being secured to them. The core region contains an air gap as well as containing individual core elements, and the individual elements together constitute the required leaf-stiffening membrane.
  • In arrangements where a capping channel is used, Figures 10, 11 and 12 illustrate various ways in which the channel may be secured in position. In Figure 10 the channel is through-welded to the walls of a tray-form membrane. In Figure 11 the walls of the channel are screwed to the heat-resistant boards which are themselves separated by a continuous corrugated membrane or a series of individual core elements which together constitute a membrane. In each of these two cases there is an air gap between the outer panels and the air gap forms part of the core region.
  • In Figure 12 there is no air gap. The core region consists solely of a relatively stiff membrane faced on each of its opposite sides with heat-resistant material and with a capping channel welded up around the four edges of the resulting door leaf assembly. The capping channel is not secured to the membrane, nor is it secured to the heat-resistant outer panels. Its corners are mitred and welded to hold the panels and the membrane in place inside it.

Claims (10)

1. A fire-resistant door leaf suitable for closing-off an opening in a marine bulkhead, the door leaf comprising a core sandwiched between two panels, and characterised in that the core region contains a membrane (11) of relatively high flexural rigidity and high.thermal conductivity whilst the panels (12) each exhibit a thermal conductivity which is much lower than that of the core membrane (11) and are each much thicker than the core membrane (11).
2. A door leaf according to Claim 1 and characterised in that the core membrane (11) is corrugated.
3. A door leaf according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 and characterised in that there is an air gap (14) between the two outer panels (12) in the core region of the door leaf.
4. A door leaf according to any of the preceding Claims and characterised in that the panels (12) are each composed of fibre-reinforced cement material exhibiting an outward-facing skin (12a) of higher density than the rest of the panel.
5. A door leaf according to any of the preceding Claims and characterised in that a capping channel (13) extends around the periphery of the door leaf, in that the channel (13) is made of material which is heat- weldable to the core membrane (11), and in that the channel (13) is heat-welded through to the core membrane (11).
6. A door leaf according to any of the preceding Claims and characterised in that the core membrane (11) is a tray-form membrane with upturned walls along opposite edges of the tray.
7. A door leaf according to any of Claims 2 to 6 and characterised in that the corrugations are straight-walled and in that the walls of the corrugations are angled between 90 degrees and 150 degrees to the base of the corrugations.
8. A door leaf according to Claim 7 and characterised in that the said angle is within the range 90 degrees to 135 degrees.
9. A door leaf according to any of Claims 2 to 8 and characterised in that the corrugations run across the width of the door leaf.
10. A door leaf suitable for use in closing-off an opening in a marine bulkhead, characterised in that the door leaf comprises a corrugated steel membrane (11) sandwiched between two fibre-reinforced cement panel boards (12) with an air gap (14) created between the panels (12) by the corrugated membrane (11) and with each panel (12) being of substantially identical thickness and spaced apart by at least a panel thickness by the air gap (14) and with each panel having on its outward-facing surface a skin whose density is approximately twice that of the rest of the panel.
EP82303922A 1981-07-24 1982-07-23 Fire-resistant door leaf Withdrawn EP0076025A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8122922 1981-07-24
GB8122922 1981-07-24

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0076025A1 true EP0076025A1 (en) 1983-04-06

Family

ID=10523481

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP82303922A Withdrawn EP0076025A1 (en) 1981-07-24 1982-07-23 Fire-resistant door leaf

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0076025A1 (en)
AU (1) AU8731182A (en)
WO (1) WO1983000355A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2654129A1 (en) * 1989-11-03 1991-05-10 Electricite De France Panel made of composite material which is resistant to fire and impacts, leakproof and acoustically absorbent
EP1154117A3 (en) * 2000-05-11 2002-10-02 Huurre Group Oy Construction method for a door
WO2012056117A1 (en) * 2010-10-27 2012-05-03 BAUMERT TECHNOLOGIES (Société par Actions Simplifiée Unipersonnelle) Watertight fire door
EP2537563A1 (en) * 2011-06-23 2012-12-26 Rf-Technologies nv Smoke evacuation shutter
CN103352617A (en) * 2013-06-30 2013-10-16 天长市远洋船舶设备有限公司 Steel, rapid open/close, watertight and fireproof door
CN105971467A (en) * 2016-07-08 2016-09-28 南京溧水振兴船舶附件有限公司 Quick opening and closing type heat insulation pressure-proof watertight door
CN112407145A (en) * 2020-11-18 2021-02-26 江西朝阳机械有限公司 Sound insulation fireproof door

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102817540B (en) * 2012-08-12 2014-09-03 阴继庞 Protective air-tight door with profiled steel sheet concrete composite structure
GB2523144B (en) * 2014-02-14 2018-02-28 Nanya Plastics Corp Door structure meeting enhanced security performance requirements
CN111119704A (en) * 2020-01-03 2020-05-08 河南五方合创建筑设计有限公司 Thin lightweight energy-saving passive window and profile

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB190923022A (en) * 1909-10-08 1909-12-31 Fireproof Doors Ltd Improvements in Fireproof Doors and Partitions.
GB191109822A (en) * 1911-04-22 1912-02-08 William Ernest Cato Liebert Improvements in and relating to Fire Proof Doors and the like.
GB191314114A (en) * 1913-06-18 1913-12-24 James Augustus Wheeler Improvements in Fireproof Doors.
US2196781A (en) * 1939-04-13 1940-04-09 Felix H Saino Fire wall, bulkhead, and panel
GB728984A (en) * 1952-02-15 1955-04-27 Mannesmann Ag Improvements in or relating to a door for employment upon air-raid shelters
BE830581A (en) * 1974-07-29 1975-10-16 INSULATED OR FIRE-RESISTANT METAL SLIDING DOOR OR GATE
FR2380407A1 (en) * 1977-02-11 1978-09-08 Jungbluth Otto FIRE RESISTANT DOOR

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB190923022A (en) * 1909-10-08 1909-12-31 Fireproof Doors Ltd Improvements in Fireproof Doors and Partitions.
GB191109822A (en) * 1911-04-22 1912-02-08 William Ernest Cato Liebert Improvements in and relating to Fire Proof Doors and the like.
GB191314114A (en) * 1913-06-18 1913-12-24 James Augustus Wheeler Improvements in Fireproof Doors.
US2196781A (en) * 1939-04-13 1940-04-09 Felix H Saino Fire wall, bulkhead, and panel
GB728984A (en) * 1952-02-15 1955-04-27 Mannesmann Ag Improvements in or relating to a door for employment upon air-raid shelters
BE830581A (en) * 1974-07-29 1975-10-16 INSULATED OR FIRE-RESISTANT METAL SLIDING DOOR OR GATE
FR2380407A1 (en) * 1977-02-11 1978-09-08 Jungbluth Otto FIRE RESISTANT DOOR

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2654129A1 (en) * 1989-11-03 1991-05-10 Electricite De France Panel made of composite material which is resistant to fire and impacts, leakproof and acoustically absorbent
EP1154117A3 (en) * 2000-05-11 2002-10-02 Huurre Group Oy Construction method for a door
WO2012056117A1 (en) * 2010-10-27 2012-05-03 BAUMERT TECHNOLOGIES (Société par Actions Simplifiée Unipersonnelle) Watertight fire door
CN103189588A (en) * 2010-10-27 2013-07-03 博脉特(有限公司) Watertight fire door and fire protection layer thereof
RU2563213C2 (en) * 2010-10-27 2015-09-20 БОМЕР (Сосьете пар аксьон самплифье униперсонель) Fluid-tight fire-resistant door
US9359810B2 (en) 2010-10-27 2016-06-07 Baumert Technologies Fluidtight fire door
CN103189588B (en) * 2010-10-27 2016-07-06 博脉特(有限公司) Waterproof fireproofing door
EP2537563A1 (en) * 2011-06-23 2012-12-26 Rf-Technologies nv Smoke evacuation shutter
CN103352617A (en) * 2013-06-30 2013-10-16 天长市远洋船舶设备有限公司 Steel, rapid open/close, watertight and fireproof door
CN105971467A (en) * 2016-07-08 2016-09-28 南京溧水振兴船舶附件有限公司 Quick opening and closing type heat insulation pressure-proof watertight door
CN112407145A (en) * 2020-11-18 2021-02-26 江西朝阳机械有限公司 Sound insulation fireproof door

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1983000355A1 (en) 1983-02-03
AU8731182A (en) 1983-03-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0076025A1 (en) Fire-resistant door leaf
US4748790A (en) Shelter with armoring composite walls and doors
EP2189612B1 (en) A fireproof door panel structure
US4922987A (en) Secure type folding door
GB2163802A (en) Security window or door
CN109790737B (en) Bulletproof rolling door
US20080017442A1 (en) System for joining acoustic cellular panel sections in edge-to-edge relation
GB1560212A (en) Door
US5783775A (en) Transformer door with corrosion resistant bottom strip
KR100538079B1 (en) Wall structure
US3319738A (en) Sound attenuating door and panel construction
GB2102869A (en) Fire-resistant door leaf
US4118543A (en) Reflectant foil insulated steel doors
US4776484A (en) Unitized cabinet design
CA1176506A (en) Light weight vault door
EP2339105B1 (en) Security door comprising an observation window
US20210055080A1 (en) Composite door systems
WO1989011007A1 (en) Pressure relief panel
EP0272454B1 (en) Lightweight construction element
GB2129475A (en) Fire door made of g.r.c. only
GB2315288A (en) Explosion-resistant wall
WO2007057513A1 (en) Wall structure
GB2268213A (en) Door structure
US20040216400A1 (en) Plate-like cover element for the opening of a building
EP0684052B1 (en) A frame for a fire damper

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR GB IT NL SE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19840315

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: MAIZEY, ERIC REGINALD