EP0038204B1 - Metal anchor and a structure comprising a metal surface and a plurality of refractory anchors - Google Patents

Metal anchor and a structure comprising a metal surface and a plurality of refractory anchors Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0038204B1
EP0038204B1 EP81301620A EP81301620A EP0038204B1 EP 0038204 B1 EP0038204 B1 EP 0038204B1 EP 81301620 A EP81301620 A EP 81301620A EP 81301620 A EP81301620 A EP 81301620A EP 0038204 B1 EP0038204 B1 EP 0038204B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
refractory
anchors
anchor
metal
arms
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP81301620A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0038204A1 (en
Inventor
Michael Summers Crowley
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BP Corp North America Inc
Original Assignee
Standard Oil Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Standard Oil Co filed Critical Standard Oil Co
Publication of EP0038204A1 publication Critical patent/EP0038204A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0038204B1 publication Critical patent/EP0038204B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F27FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
    • F27DDETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS, OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
    • F27D1/00Casings; Linings; Walls; Roofs
    • F27D1/14Supports for linings
    • F27D1/141Anchors therefor

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a structure comprising a metal surface, a monolithic refractory and a plurality of refractory anchors.
  • this invention relates to the installation of monolithic refractory linings in process vessels or equipment such as reactors, conduits, furnaces, incinerators and the like and more particularly to an improved anchor which is inexpensive to form and install which not only secures the refractory lining in place but also provides protection of the refractory from mechanical erosion.
  • Refractory liners have been used for many years in process vessels, reactors, conduits, furnaces and the like to provide thermal insulation and in environments such as fluidized catalytic reactors or regenerators or stacks to provide resistance to abrasion or erosion.
  • Such liners can serve not only to thermally insulate a shell or other surface but also to prolong its service life by shielding it from erosion by abrasion.
  • fluid catalytic cracking units for petroleum hydrocarbons quite high fluid velocities which may be on the order of 15.24 to 21.34 m/second occur and the abrasive effect of entrained cracking catalyst is very pronounced.
  • a preferred anchorage arrangement which also provided erosion protection was the use of hexagonal steel grating which was welded to the vessel or conduit wall.
  • the grating had the same depth as the refractory liner to be applied and the refractory was deposited in the hexagonal spaces defined by the grating.
  • the grating provided the desired erosion resistance for the refractory by projecting to the exposed surface of the refractory.
  • the disadvantages of hexagonal grating are its relatively high cost, lack of flexibility which makes it difficult or impossible to apply to curved surfaces, its tendency to separate from the vessel or conduit wall over relatively large areas when welds fail and its unsuitability for use with fiber reinforced refractories or with refractory concretes containing coarse aggregate particles.
  • weldable studs such as those described in United States Patent 3,657,851 to Chambers et al and United States Patent 3,336,712 to Bartley have been proposed. Such studs are suitable for use with fiber reinforced refractory or with refractory concrete but do ' not provide erosion protection for the refractory.
  • One object of this invention is to provide an inexpensive anchoring arrangement suitable for use with fiber or needle reinforced refractory cement or concrete and which provides protection of the refractory from erosion.
  • a second object is to provide an anchor arrangement which may be utilized on relatively highly curved surfaces such as within cyclones or conduits such as riser reactors or transfer lines.
  • a further object is to provide an anchor which is appropriately shaped that it may be installed in an array with other like anchors to provide erosion protection from streams in any direction.
  • the present invention provides a structure comprising a metal surface, a monolithic refractory, and a plurality of metal anchors welded to the surface in spaced relationship to each other for providing anchorage for the refractory to the surface, each of the anchors being formed from a metal strip having its width substantially equal to the thickness of the refractory applied to the surface and its length at least twice its width and having cut away portions at each end on the side welded to the surface whereby there is provided at each end of the anchor an extending arm, the extending arms together with the intermediate portion of the anchor providing an erosion-resistant barrier for the protection of the refractory;and the cut away portions adjacent the arms providing room for the refractory to be deposited between the arms and the surface.
  • the extended arms are curved in opposite directions away from the plane of the intermediate portion, the shape of the anchor approximating the shape of the letter S.
  • the metal anchors are arranged in rows on the metal surface with the anchors in alternate rows being disposed at substantially different angles.
  • the preferred embodiment of the anchor 10 is shown in Figures 1 and 2 of the drawings.
  • the anchor 10 is preferably stamped from a strip of metal having its width equivalent to the thickness of the refractory liner to be applied. By stamping or otherwise cutting alternate anchors with the extended arms 11 on opposite sides of the strip considerable metal can be saved. This result can be achieved by rotating the strip about its long axis 180 degrees each time an anchor is stamped. At the time of stamping a hole 12 and projecting tab 13 are formed in the central intermediate portion 14 of the strip. If desired no holes or a plurality of holes can be provided and the holes optionally can be with or without tabs. As will be described the holes and tabs perform useful functions in the application of the refractory and in most cases their incorporation in the anchor will be desirable.
  • the arms 11 of the anchor 10 may be bent to the curvature illustrated in Figure 1 at the time of stamping or cutting of the anchors or in a subsequent operation depending on the availability of appropriate equipment.
  • the size of the anchors can be varied according to the surface to be refractory lined, the thickness and type of refractory to be employed.
  • a convenient anchor for securing a refractory 2.54 cm thick is made from 16 gauge Type 304 stainless steel strip 2.54 cm wide.
  • the length of the anchor prior to bending the arms 11 is approximately 15.24 cm and each arm is bent to a 1.27 cm radius.
  • the width of the arms 11 can be 0.635 to 1.27 cm as desired.
  • the spacing of the anchors when they are welded to the surface to be refractory coated is a function of the size of the anchors.
  • the anchors should be spaced apart over the surface upon 7.62 cms centers. Thus it will be seen that spacing should generally be on centers spaced apart approximately one half the unbent length of the anchor.
  • Thicker linings may have anchor spacings of 2 to 3 times the thickness, i.e. the anchor height.
  • the anchor 10 is shown welded to a surface 15 with the weld being indicated at 16.
  • a similar weld can be utilized on the back side of the anchor.
  • Two layers of refractory 17. and 18 are shown.
  • the layer 17 next to the surface 15 is preferably of a refractory material having a high insulating value and the other layer 18 has a higher resistance to abrasion and erosion.
  • Either or both of these layers can be reinforced by fibers (sometimes referred to as needles) which are preferably formed of stainless steel.
  • the fibers will be approximately 1.905 to 3.81 cm in length and about 0.0762 cm in diameter.
  • the quantity of fibers usually employed is between about 2 and 6% by weight of the refractory on a dry basis.
  • the aggregate can be expanded shale or vermiculite in the layer 17 having high insulating value and tabular alumina in the layer 18 having high resistance to abrasion.
  • the projecting tabs 13 can be used as very convenient indicators as to the desired thickness of the insulating layer 17. This ability to conveniently measure the thickness of the applied layer is particularly useful when very thick (up to about 12.7 cm layers of total refractory are involved).
  • FIG 4 the preferred composite structure is illustrated.
  • the individual anchors 10 are affixed to the surface 15 to be protected by the refractory.
  • alternate rows of the anchors are disposed at substantially different angles to each other and because of the curving arms 11 an effective grid of metal is provided over the surface for preventing erosion.
  • the preferred angular difference between the anchors of adjacent rows is 45° or somewhere between 30° and 60° for achieving maximum erosion protection with a minimum number of anchors.
  • the anchors can be held in the desired position by means of a small bar having a slot in one end to receive the intermediate portion 14 of the anchor and welded to the surface 15 by forming the welding bead 16 on one or both sides.
  • the bar is pulled free for use to hold the next anchor.
  • multiple tack welding or brazing if appropriate to the metals involved, may be employed.
  • the layer or layers of refractory cement, refractory concrete or fiber reinforced refractory can be applied utilizing conventional procedures such as depositing and trowelling or pneumatic application such as the Gunnite procedure.
  • Suitable refractories are the hydraulic calcium aluminate cements and the high alumina phosphate bonded materials which are heat setting and have superior erosion resistance.
  • hexagonal grating can provide erosion protection but has relatively little holding power to secure the refractory to the surface which is being protected. Moreover, when such gratings separate from the surface large sections are likely to pull loose from the surface. With the anchors of this invention any failures tend to be localized and may not necessitate shut down of the process unit.
  • the array selected may be varied to suit known flow conditions.
  • the anchors can be disposed with their long dimensions parallel to the axis of the barrel and thus transverse to the flow pattern. In such cases it is frequently preferable not to curve the ends of the anchors so as to obtain maximum blockage against erosion.
  • Figure 5 another embodiment 10a of the anchor of this invention having non-curving ends 11 a is shown.
  • a pair of anchor members are appropriately slotted as shown at 20 so as to be interlockable in the form of a cross.
  • the pair of anchors 10a can be welded to a surface (not shown) to be protected in the same manner as is the anchor shown in Figure 3.
  • the anchors 10a shown in Figure 5 may be readily arrayed upon a surface with the arms 11 a of adjacent assemblies lying in non-touching but overlapping relationship to obtain a very high degree of protection from erosion similar to that obtainable with hexagonal grating but without the disadvantages of continuous gratings.
  • the anchors of the structure of this invention are particularly useful in effecting repairs or patches in existing units for only affected areas need be patched and the repair consists merely of stripping away damaged refractory to have access to the vessel or conduit surface, welding anchors to the thus exposed surface, and redepositing refractory.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Furnace Housings, Linings, Walls, And Ceilings (AREA)

Description

  • This invention relates to a structure comprising a metal surface, a monolithic refractory and a plurality of refractory anchors.
  • More particularly this invention relates to the installation of monolithic refractory linings in process vessels or equipment such as reactors, conduits, furnaces, incinerators and the like and more particularly to an improved anchor which is inexpensive to form and install which not only secures the refractory lining in place but also provides protection of the refractory from mechanical erosion.
  • Refractory liners have been used for many years in process vessels, reactors, conduits, furnaces and the like to provide thermal insulation and in environments such as fluidized catalytic reactors or regenerators or stacks to provide resistance to abrasion or erosion. Thus such liners can serve not only to thermally insulate a shell or other surface but also to prolong its service life by shielding it from erosion by abrasion. In fluid catalytic cracking units for petroleum hydrocarbons quite high fluid velocities which may be on the order of 15.24 to 21.34 m/second occur and the abrasive effect of entrained cracking catalyst is very pronounced. Moreover, high temperatures are involved, for example in the regenerator the temperature of gases exiting through the cyclones may be on the order of 676°C-733°C and in the reactor the temperature may be 426°C-483°C. Accordingly, the usual practice has been to line all vessels, conduits and cyclone separators through which fluid with entrained catalyst flows with refractory liner to prevent erosion of the metal surfaces and to provide thermal insulation. To retain the refractory which may be a refractory cement, a concrete cement-aggregate mixture, a reinforced cement or concrete, various anchoring arrangements have been employed. United States Patent 3,076,481 to Wygant, which is hereby incorporated by reference, contains a description of certain of the problems involved in anchoring refractory concrete linings and of a particular anchorage arrangement.
  • Heretofore, a preferred anchorage arrangement which also provided erosion protection was the use of hexagonal steel grating which was welded to the vessel or conduit wall. The grating had the same depth as the refractory liner to be applied and the refractory was deposited in the hexagonal spaces defined by the grating. Thus the grating provided the desired erosion resistance for the refractory by projecting to the exposed surface of the refractory. The disadvantages of hexagonal grating are its relatively high cost, lack of flexibility which makes it difficult or impossible to apply to curved surfaces, its tendency to separate from the vessel or conduit wall over relatively large areas when welds fail and its unsuitability for use with fiber reinforced refractories or with refractory concretes containing coarse aggregate particles.
  • In situations where hexagonal grating is not suitable weldable studs such as those described in United States Patent 3,657,851 to Chambers et al and United States Patent 3,336,712 to Bartley have been proposed. Such studs are suitable for use with fiber reinforced refractory or with refractory concrete but do' not provide erosion protection for the refractory.
  • One object of this invention is to provide an inexpensive anchoring arrangement suitable for use with fiber or needle reinforced refractory cement or concrete and which provides protection of the refractory from erosion.
  • A second object is to provide an anchor arrangement which may be utilized on relatively highly curved surfaces such as within cyclones or conduits such as riser reactors or transfer lines.
  • A further object is to provide an anchor which is appropriately shaped that it may be installed in an array with other like anchors to provide erosion protection from streams in any direction.
  • Other objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent to one skilled in the art based upon the ensuing description.
  • The present invention provides a structure comprising a metal surface, a monolithic refractory, and a plurality of metal anchors welded to the surface in spaced relationship to each other for providing anchorage for the refractory to the surface, each of the anchors being formed from a metal strip having its width substantially equal to the thickness of the refractory applied to the surface and its length at least twice its width and having cut away portions at each end on the side welded to the surface whereby there is provided at each end of the anchor an extending arm, the extending arms together with the intermediate portion of the anchor providing an erosion-resistant barrier for the protection of the refractory;and the cut away portions adjacent the arms providing room for the refractory to be deposited between the arms and the surface.
  • In a preferred embodiment the extended arms are curved in opposite directions away from the plane of the intermediate portion, the shape of the anchor approximating the shape of the letter S. Preferably the metal anchors are arranged in rows on the metal surface with the anchors in alternate rows being disposed at substantially different angles.
  • With reference to the accompanying drawings,
    • Figure 1 is a view of the preferred form of the anchor of this invention from the side adapted to be welded to the surface to which the refractory is to be applied.
    • Figure 2 is a side view of the anchor.
    • Figure 3 is a sectional view showing the anchor welded to the surface with the refractory in place.
    • Figure 4 is an isometric view showing the preferred array of the anchors attached to a surface with the refractory in place.
    • Figure 5 is an isometric view showing another embodiment of the anchor of this invention.
  • The preferred embodiment of the anchor 10 is shown in Figures 1 and 2 of the drawings. The anchor 10 is preferably stamped from a strip of metal having its width equivalent to the thickness of the refractory liner to be applied. By stamping or otherwise cutting alternate anchors with the extended arms 11 on opposite sides of the strip considerable metal can be saved. This result can be achieved by rotating the strip about its long axis 180 degrees each time an anchor is stamped. At the time of stamping a hole 12 and projecting tab 13 are formed in the central intermediate portion 14 of the strip. If desired no holes or a plurality of holes can be provided and the holes optionally can be with or without tabs. As will be described the holes and tabs perform useful functions in the application of the refractory and in most cases their incorporation in the anchor will be desirable. The arms 11 of the anchor 10 may be bent to the curvature illustrated in Figure 1 at the time of stamping or cutting of the anchors or in a subsequent operation depending on the availability of appropriate equipment.
  • The size of the anchors can be varied according to the surface to be refractory lined, the thickness and type of refractory to be employed. A convenient anchor for securing a refractory 2.54 cm thick is made from 16 gauge Type 304 stainless steel strip 2.54 cm wide. The length of the anchor prior to bending the arms 11 is approximately 15.24 cm and each arm is bent to a 1.27 cm radius. The width of the arms 11 can be 0.635 to 1.27 cm as desired. The spacing of the anchors when they are welded to the surface to be refractory coated is a function of the size of the anchors. For the above described size anchor the anchors should be spaced apart over the surface upon 7.62 cms centers. Thus it will be seen that spacing should generally be on centers spaced apart approximately one half the unbent length of the anchor. Thicker linings may have anchor spacings of 2 to 3 times the thickness, i.e. the anchor height.
  • In Figure 3 the anchor 10 is shown welded to a surface 15 with the weld being indicated at 16. A similar weld can be utilized on the back side of the anchor. Two layers of refractory 17. and 18 are shown. The layer 17 next to the surface 15 is preferably of a refractory material having a high insulating value and the other layer 18 has a higher resistance to abrasion and erosion. Either or both of these layers can be reinforced by fibers (sometimes referred to as needles) which are preferably formed of stainless steel. Typically the fibers will be approximately 1.905 to 3.81 cm in length and about 0.0762 cm in diameter. The quantity of fibers usually employed is between about 2 and 6% by weight of the refractory on a dry basis.
  • In cases where it is desired to utilize a refractory concrete the aggregate can be expanded shale or vermiculite in the layer 17 having high insulating value and tabular alumina in the layer 18 having high resistance to abrasion. In such cases the projecting tabs 13 (or holes 12) can be used as very convenient indicators as to the desired thickness of the insulating layer 17. This ability to conveniently measure the thickness of the applied layer is particularly useful when very thick (up to about 12.7 cm layers of total refractory are involved).
  • In Figure 4 the preferred composite structure is illustrated. Initially the individual anchors 10 are affixed to the surface 15 to be protected by the refractory. As shown alternate rows of the anchors are disposed at substantially different angles to each other and because of the curving arms 11 an effective grid of metal is provided over the surface for preventing erosion. The preferred angular difference between the anchors of adjacent rows is 45° or somewhere between 30° and 60° for achieving maximum erosion protection with a minimum number of anchors.
  • To effect attachment of the anchors they can be held in the desired position by means of a small bar having a slot in one end to receive the intermediate portion 14 of the anchor and welded to the surface 15 by forming the welding bead 16 on one or both sides. When the weld is completed the bar is pulled free for use to hold the next anchor. Alternatively, multiple tack welding or brazing, if appropriate to the metals involved, may be employed. When the anchors are all attached, the layer or layers of refractory cement, refractory concrete or fiber reinforced refractory can be applied utilizing conventional procedures such as depositing and trowelling or pneumatic application such as the Gunnite procedure.
  • Suitable refractories are the hydraulic calcium aluminate cements and the high alumina phosphate bonded materials which are heat setting and have superior erosion resistance. Once the refractory layer or layers have been applied and cured they are very effectively held in place by the anchors 10 of this invention, for the refractory is held against the surface 15 by the arms 11 and the tabs 13 and is continuous through the hole 12. The fact that the anchors 10 are not interconnected and . have relative flexibility in their structure permits thermal expansion and contraction to occur on a localized basis. Moreover, the protective blocking effected by the anchors prevents abrasive erosion especially by streams of particulates such as fluidized catalyst which move transverse to the surface of the refractory. In contrast the use of hexagonal grating can provide erosion protection but has relatively little holding power to secure the refractory to the surface which is being protected. Moreover, when such gratings separate from the surface large sections are likely to pull loose from the surface. With the anchors of this invention any failures tend to be localized and may not necessitate shut down of the process unit.
  • Another feature of the anchors of the structure of this invention is that the array selected may be varied to suit known flow conditions. For example within cyclones where it is known that the flow pattern will be circular or helical within the barrel the anchors can be disposed with their long dimensions parallel to the axis of the barrel and thus transverse to the flow pattern. In such cases it is frequently preferable not to curve the ends of the anchors so as to obtain maximum blockage against erosion. In Figure 5 another embodiment 10a of the anchor of this invention having non-curving ends 11 a is shown. In this embodiment a pair of anchor members are appropriately slotted as shown at 20 so as to be interlockable in the form of a cross. Assembled in this manner the pair of anchors 10a can be welded to a surface (not shown) to be protected in the same manner as is the anchor shown in Figure 3. The anchors 10a shown in Figure 5 may be readily arrayed upon a surface with the arms 11 a of adjacent assemblies lying in non-touching but overlapping relationship to obtain a very high degree of protection from erosion similar to that obtainable with hexagonal grating but without the disadvantages of continuous gratings.
  • The anchors of the structure of this invention are particularly useful in effecting repairs or patches in existing units for only affected areas need be patched and the repair consists merely of stripping away damaged refractory to have access to the vessel or conduit surface, welding anchors to the thus exposed surface, and redepositing refractory.

Claims (5)

1. A structure comprising a metal surface, a monolithic refractory, and a plurality of metal anchors welded to the surface in spaced relationship to each other for providing anchorage for the refractory to the surface, each of the anchors being formed from a metal strip having its width substantially equal to the thickness of the refractory applied to the surface and its length at least twice its width and having cut away portions at each end on the side welded to the surface whereby there is provided at each end of the anchor an extending arm, the extending arms together with the intermediate portion of the anchor providing an erosion-resistant barrier for the protection of the refractory and the cut away portions adjacent the arms providing room for the refractory to be deposited between the arms and the surface.
2. A structure according to Claim 1, wherein the metal anchors are arranged in rows on the surface with the anchors in alternate rows being disposed at angles between 30° and 60°.
3. A structure according to Claim 2, wherein the extending arms on each of the anchors are bent in opposite directions away from the plane of the intermediate portion.
4. A structure according to Claim 3, wherein the extending arms are bent on curves, the shape of the anchors approximating the shape of the letter S.
5. A structure according to any of Claims 1 to 4 provided with a metal fiber reinforced refractory lining.
EP81301620A 1980-04-14 1981-04-13 Metal anchor and a structure comprising a metal surface and a plurality of refractory anchors Expired EP0038204B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14017480A 1980-04-14 1980-04-14
US140174 1998-08-25

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0038204A1 EP0038204A1 (en) 1981-10-21
EP0038204B1 true EP0038204B1 (en) 1984-07-11

Family

ID=22490065

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP81301620A Expired EP0038204B1 (en) 1980-04-14 1981-04-13 Metal anchor and a structure comprising a metal surface and a plurality of refractory anchors

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0038204B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS6045792B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1165115A (en)
DE (1) DE3164674D1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA812304B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107073428A (en) * 2014-11-07 2017-08-18 道达尔炼油化学公司 For the element for the chamber inner wall that erosion resistant coatings are anchored into FCC unit

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS59180729U (en) * 1983-05-21 1984-12-03 東和耐火工業株式会社 Supporting fittings for wear-resistant fire-resistant linings of internal pressure vessels and valves, etc.
JPH0133155Y2 (en) * 1984-11-20 1989-10-09
JPS6198998U (en) * 1984-12-04 1986-06-25

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1783391A (en) * 1926-10-30 1930-12-02 Commw Electric Company Insert
GB385419A (en) * 1931-12-09 1932-12-29 Trussed Concrete Steel Co An improved method of and means for forming a key or holding means on the surface ofconcrete structures
GB524210A (en) * 1938-11-07 1940-08-01 Plibrico Jointless Firebrick C Improvements in and relating to wall anchors for furnace structures
US2270297A (en) * 1939-05-05 1942-01-20 Universal Oil Prod Co Construction of heaters
US3077058A (en) * 1957-12-30 1963-02-12 Universal Oil Prod Co Insulated chamber
NL131186C (en) * 1964-12-24 1900-01-01

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107073428A (en) * 2014-11-07 2017-08-18 道达尔炼油化学公司 For the element for the chamber inner wall that erosion resistant coatings are anchored into FCC unit
CN107073428B (en) * 2014-11-07 2021-07-06 道达尔炼油化学公司 Element for anchoring an erosion-resistant coating to the inner wall of a chamber of an FCC unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS6045792B2 (en) 1985-10-12
EP0038204A1 (en) 1981-10-21
DE3164674D1 (en) 1984-08-16
JPS56151875A (en) 1981-11-25
CA1165115A (en) 1984-04-10
ZA812304B (en) 1982-04-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4479337A (en) Refractory anchor
US4680908A (en) Refractory anchor
US4581867A (en) Refractory anchor
US3587198A (en) Heat protected metal wall
US4753053A (en) Anchor for erosion resistant refractory lining
US4852324A (en) Variable angle refractory anchor for connecting surfaces
US4450872A (en) Fiber pipe protection for water cooled pipes in reheat furnaces
US6143107A (en) Hard-faced insulating refractory fiber linings
EP0038204B1 (en) Metal anchor and a structure comprising a metal surface and a plurality of refractory anchors
US5010706A (en) Insulation and the provision thereof
KR101246593B1 (en) Refractory tile, in particular for gasifier
GB2114282A (en) Cooling device for wall arch structures of industrial furnaces
AU767351B2 (en) Anchoring system for ceramic lining tile
US4918894A (en) Refractory supporting anchoring system
US4063344A (en) Methods for forming a high temperature and shock resistant insulated pipe
CA1332220C (en) Erosion resistant, ceramic fiber lining
US4897977A (en) S-bar refractory anchors with elliptical tab
US4528672A (en) Weld insert and refractory anchor
WO2007137189A2 (en) Refractory tiles for heat exchangers
US5031665A (en) Curved pipe section having refractory lining and central section of flexible insulating material
US4802425A (en) High temperature fiber system with controlled shrinkage and stress resistance
US20180320972A1 (en) Refractory anchor assembly
KR100469549B1 (en) Refractory tile system for boiler tube/heat exchanger protection
US4984405A (en) Insulation and the provision thereof
AU606870B2 (en) Insulation and the provision thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19820327

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: BARZANO' E ZANARDO ROMA S.P.A.

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3164674

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19840816

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
NLT1 Nl: modifications of names registered in virtue of documents presented to the patent office pursuant to art. 16 a, paragraph 1

Owner name: AMOCO CORPORATION TE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, VER. ST. V

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19910325

Year of fee payment: 11

ITTA It: last paid annual fee
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19910430

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19910628

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19921101

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19921230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19930101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20000317

Year of fee payment: 20

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20010412

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Effective date: 20010412