CN118121609A - Application of Kenparone in preparation of medicines for preventing and treating coronavirus infection - Google Patents

Application of Kenparone in preparation of medicines for preventing and treating coronavirus infection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN118121609A
CN118121609A CN202410261955.6A CN202410261955A CN118121609A CN 118121609 A CN118121609 A CN 118121609A CN 202410261955 A CN202410261955 A CN 202410261955A CN 118121609 A CN118121609 A CN 118121609A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
cov
kenpaullone
group
sads
pedv
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202410261955.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
曹永长
张灏
彭欧阳
夏雨
何伊虹
耿瑞
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sun Yat Sen University
Original Assignee
Sun Yat Sen University
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sun Yat Sen University filed Critical Sun Yat Sen University
Publication of CN118121609A publication Critical patent/CN118121609A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

The invention discloses application of Kenparone in preparing a medicine for preventing and treating coronavirus infection. The invention discovers that Kenparone has activity of resisting coronavirus for the first time, and the coronavirus comprises SADS-CoV, PEDV, PDCoV, IBV and SARS-CoV-2; experiments prove that the kenstring has the activity of resisting SADS-CoV, PEDV, PDCoV, IBV and SARS-CoV-2, can inhibit the proliferation of SADS-CoV, PEDV, PDCoV, IBV and SARS-CoV-2, and shows dose dependency, and shows the potential of the kenstring in treating acute diarrhea syndrome, porcine epidemic diarrhea, porcine delta coronavirus disease, avian infectious bronchitis and novel coronavirus infection of pigs. And the Kenparone has definite structure, no toxicity or side effect and good application prospect in the aspect of preventing and treating various coronaviruses.

Description

Application of Kenparone in preparation of medicines for preventing and treating coronavirus infection
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of biological medicines, and particularly relates to application of Kenparone in preparation of medicines for preventing and treating coronavirus infection.
Background
Porcine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus, SADS-CoV) is the etiology of porcine acute diarrhea syndrome, SADS-CoV belongs to the genus coronavirus (Coronavirus) of the family coronaviridae (Coronaviridae), and is a enveloped single-stranded positive-strand RNA virus. SADS-CoV can cause diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration and death in newborn piglets, and is also a potential threat to human health and public health as an RNA virus with high variability and ability to spread across species. Aiming at SADS-CoV, no effective vaccine and medicine can be put into production practice at present, and pig breeding enterprises mainly depend on biosafety prevention and control to prevent the transmission and infection of the virus at present. The strict biological safety prevention and control greatly increases the cost of the breeding enterprises, and the virus still continuously causes huge economic loss in the pig breeding industry at present.
Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) is a causative agent of Porcine epidemic diarrhea, PEDV belongs to the family coronaviridae (Coronaviridae), genus alphacoronavirus (Alphacoronavirus), and is a enveloped single-stranded positive-strand RNA virus. PEDV brings a huge economic loss to the pig industry worldwide and has become one of the most threatening viral diseases of pigs. The prevention and control means of PEDV mainly depend on vaccine to generate mucosal immunity, however, the main victim group of PEDV is a suckling piglet with a mucosal immune system which is not yet developed completely, so the current immune effect is not ideal.
Porcine delta coronavirus (Porcine deltacoronavirus, PDCoV) is a novel enteropathogenic coronavirus belonging to the genus Deltacoronavirus (Deltacoronavirus) of the family Coronaviridae (Coronaviridae) and is a single-stranded positive strand RNA virus with an envelope. PDCoV can infect pigs of different ages, is more susceptible to newborn piglets, and has clinical symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, appetite reduction and the like. Histopathology manifests as intestinal lesions, proximal jejunum to ileum multifocal to diffuse villus atrophy. PDCoV has higher morbidity and mortality, causes diarrhea of large-scale piglets, and causes great economic loss for the global pig industry. Scientists have detected and isolated PDCoV from three febrile children serum samples at sea as reported by Nature, indicating that PDCoV can spread across species. At present, no effective PDCoV vaccine exists, and for PDCoV prevention and control, biological safety prevention and control is mainly relied on in production to prevent the transmission and infection of the virus, so that the cost of a breeding enterprise is greatly increased.
Avian infectious bronchitis (Infectious bronchitis, IB) is one of the B/II infectious diseases of poultry regulated by International epidemic prevention and control agency and China, is caused by infection of avian infectious bronchitis virus (Infectious bronchitis virus, IBV), and is an acute and high-contact infectious disease of chickens which are widely popular at present. IBV mainly infects the respiratory tract, kidneys, reproductive system of birds, and can cause respiratory discomfort, kidney injury, and decreased laying rate in host animals. In recent years, IB has serious disease occurrence in laying hens and hens, and particularly under the condition of large-scale feeding, the infectious bronchitis has higher infection rate, more complicated disease type, larger prevention and control difficulty and more severe harm. Aiming at IBV, the vaccine has poor immune effect at present, and no effective medicine is available. IBV has a large number of variant strains, and only part or all of serotypes have no cross protection effect, so that great difficulty is brought to the prevention and treatment of the disease. Poultry farming enterprises currently rely mainly on biosafety to prevent the transmission and infection of this virus. The strict biosafety prevention and control greatly increases the cost of the breeding enterprises, and the virus still continuously causes huge economic loss in the poultry breeding industry at present.
The novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) is a highly transmitted acute respiratory infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2). The transmission mode of SARS-CoV-2 is mainly the close contact of respiratory tract spray and crowd, and its clinical symptoms are fever, cough, force, dyspnea, etc. The virus has been found to be a variety of variants since its emergence, including Alpha, beta, omnicron, gamma, della. With continuous variation of SARS-CoV-2, new variants are frequent. In view of the above, in order to cope with the evolution mutation of viruses, research on prevention, control and treatment of novel coronaviruses and variants thereof is still significant.
Therefore, there is an urgent need for a drug capable of effectively inhibiting SADS-CoV, PEDV, PDCoV, IBV, SARS-CoV-2.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide application of Kenparone in preparing medicines for preventing and/or treating diseases caused by coronaviruses; wherein the structure of the Kenparone is as follows:
The technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:
In a first aspect of the invention there is provided the use of Kenparone in any of the following:
(a) Preparing a medicament for preventing and/or treating diseases caused by coronaviruses;
(b) Preparing coronavirus inhibitor.
Preferably, the coronavirus comprises at least one of SADS-CoV, PEDV, PDCoV, IBV, SARS-CoV-2.
Preferably, the SARS-CoV-2 also includes, for example, SARS-CoV-2Delta mutant, SARS-CoV-2Alpha mutant, SARS-CoV-2Beta mutant, SARS-CoV-2Gamma mutant, SARS-CoV-2Omicron mutant, etc.
Preferably, the disease caused by coronavirus comprises diarrhea, bronchitis and/or pneumonia.
Preferably, the medicament or inhibitor further comprises pharmaceutically acceptable excipients.
Preferably, the pharmaceutically acceptable excipients include: at least one of a diluent, binder, wetting agent, lubricant, disintegrant, solvent, emulsifier, co-solvent, solubilizer, preservative, pH regulator, osmotic pressure regulator, surfactant, coating material, antioxidant, bacteriostat or buffer.
Preferably, the dosage form of the drug or inhibitor comprises at least one of suspension, granule, capsule, powder, tablet, emulsion, solution, drop pill, injection, oral preparation, suppository, enema, aerosol, patch or drop.
Preferably, the route of administration of the drug or inhibitor comprises at least one of intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, oral administration, sublingual administration, nasal administration, nebulized administration or transdermal administration.
Preferably, the medicament or inhibitor further comprises an active ingredient for preventing and/or treating diseases associated with coronavirus infection.
Preferably, the medicament or inhibitor contains an effective dose of Kenparone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
In a second aspect the invention provides a product comprising as its major component Kenparone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof; the function of the product is to prevent and/or treat diseases caused by coronaviruses and/or inhibit the proliferation of coronaviruses; the coronavirus comprises at least one of PEDV, PDCoV, IBV, SARS-CoV-2 and SADS-CoV.
Preferably, the disease caused by coronavirus comprises diarrhea, bronchitis and/or pneumonia.
Preferably, the product comprises a drug or inhibitor.
In a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for preventing or treating a coronavirus infection or a disease associated with a coronavirus infection in a subject.
Preferably, the subject may be poultry (e.g., pigs, chickens, etc.), but is not so limited. The subject includes a human subject.
Preferably, the medicament of the invention may be administered to a subject by any suitable route of administration. Such routes of administration include, but are not limited to, oral, buccal, sublingual, topical, parenteral, rectal, intrathecal, or nasal routes.
In the present invention, a suitable daily dosage range of Kenparone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is 1 μg to 1g/kg body weight; the above-mentioned dosages may be administered in one dosage unit or in several dosage units, depending on the clinical experience of the physician and the dosage regimen involved in the application of other therapeutic means.
In the present invention, kenparone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof may be used to inhibit replication of coronavirus in a cellular assay; wherein, the working concentration of the Kenparone or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof comprises 0.1-100 mu m; preferably 1 to 50. Mu.m.
The beneficial effects of the invention are as follows:
The invention discovers that Kenparone Kenpaullone has activity of resisting coronaviruses for the first time, wherein the coronaviruses comprise SADS-CoV, PEDV, PDCoV, IBV and SARS-CoV-2; experiments show that Kenpaullone has the activity of resisting SADS-CoV, PEDV, PDCoV, IBV and SARS-CoV-2, can inhibit the proliferation of SADS-CoV, PEDV, PDCoV, IBV and SARS-CoV-2, and shows dose dependence, and shows Kenpaullone potential for treating acute diarrhea syndrome of pigs, porcine epidemic diarrhea, porcine delta coronavirus disease, avian infectious bronchitis and novel coronavirus infection; and Kenpaullone has definite structure, no toxicity or side effect, and has good application prospect in the aspect of preventing and treating coronavirus.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the results of proteomics and phosphoproteomics analysis by Vero-E6 cells 12h, 24h, and 36h after infection and non-infection with SADS-CoV. Wherein A is the establishment of SADS-CoV infected Vero-E6 cell model and the analysis flow chart of proteomics and phosphorylation proteomics; the left graph in B is the PCA scattergram of the proteomic sequencing data, and the right graph is the PCA scattergram of the phosphorylated proteomic sequencing data; the left graph in C is protein with obvious difference screened by Fold change >1.5 and P-value <0.05, and the total number is 674, and the right graph is phosphorylated protein with obvious difference screened by Fold change >2 and P-value <0.05, and the total number is 709; d is a statistical analysis of phosphokinase upregulated expression at least 1 time point post-infection, co-identifying 19 phosphokinase enzymes including WNK3, MARK2 and CDK 7; upstream kinases of phosphorylated peptide were predicted and counted, E being the top 10-position phosphorylated kinase.
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the effect of Kenpaullone on SADS-CoV replication in Vero-E6 cells. Wherein A is Kenpaullone cytotoxicity detection result of Vero-E6; b is Kenpaullone IC 50 results that inhibit SADS-CoV; c is the effect of IFA assay Kenpaullone on SADS-CoV replication; d is RT-qPCR to detect the influence of different concentrations Kenpaullone on SADS-CoV replication; e is RT-qPCR to detect the effect of identical concentration Kenpaullone on SADS-CoV replication at different time points after SADS-CoV infection; f is WB to detect the effect of different concentrations Kenpaullone on SADS-CoV replication; g is RT-qPCR to examine the effect of identical concentrations Kenpaullone on SADS-CoV replication at different time points after SADS-CoV infection.
Fig. 3 is a graph of piglet treatment experiment clinical score data statistics and viral load determination results. Wherein A is a survival curve of piglets; b is the weight change condition of piglets after 7 days of toxin expelling; c is a piglet clinical scoring data statistical graph; d is detection of piglet enterotissue viral load of the virus attacking group and the virus attacking treatment group.
Fig. 4 is the results of the pathological section of the piglet treatment experiment tissue.
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the effect of Kenpaullone on PEDV replication in Vero-E6 cells. Wherein A is Kenpaullone cytotoxicity detection result of Vero-E6; b is the IC 50 result of Kenpaullone inhibiting PEDV; c is TCID 50 to detect the effect of different concentrations of Kenpaullone on PEDV replication; d is RT-qPCR to detect the influence of different concentrations Kenpaullone on PEDV replication; e is RT-qPCR to examine the effect of the same concentration Kenpaullone on PEDV replication at different time points after PEDV infection.
Fig. 6 is a graph of piglet treatment experiment clinical score data statistics and viral load determination results. Wherein A is a piglet survival curve; b is the weight change condition of piglets after 7 days of toxin expelling; c is a piglet clinical scoring data statistical graph; d is detection of piglet enterotissue viral load of the virus attacking group and the virus attacking treatment group.
Fig. 7 shows the results of the pathological section of the tissue of the piglet treatment experiment.
FIG. 8 is a graph showing the effect of Kenpaullone on PDCoV replication in LLC-PK1 cells. Wherein A is Kenpaullone to LLC-PK1 cytotoxicity detection result; b is RT-qPCR to detect the influence of Kenpaullone of different concentrations on PDCoV replication; c is TCID 50 to detect the effect of different concentrations Kenpaullone on PDCoV replication.
Fig. 9 is a graph of clinical data statistics and viral load measurement results of piglet treatment experiments. Wherein A is a piglet clinical scoring data statistical graph; b is weight change; c is a survival curve; d is the detection of the jejunum, ileum and duodenum tissue viral loads of piglets in the virus-attack group and the virus-attack treatment group.
Fig. 10 is a graph showing the results of pathological sections of the tissues of the piglet treatment experiment.
FIG. 11 is a graph showing the effect of Kenpaullone on IBV replication in chicken embryos, specifically the effect of RT-qPCR on IBV replication at different concentrations Kenpaullone.
Fig. 12 is a graph of chicken treatment experiment clinical scores, survival curve statistics, and tissue viral load determination results. Wherein A is the clinical score of the chicks; b is weight change; c is a survival curve; and D is the detection of viral load in kidney and bronchus tissues of the toxicity attacking group and the toxicity attacking treatment group.
FIG. 13 is a graph of the effect of Kenpaullone on SARS-CoV-2 replication in Vero cells, the effect of different concentrations of Kenpaullone on SARS-CoV-2 replication was detected by RT-qPCR.
Detailed Description
The conception and the technical effects produced by the present invention will be clearly and completely described in conjunction with the embodiments below to fully understand the objects, features and effects of the present invention. It is apparent that the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, but not all embodiments, and that other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without inventive effort are within the scope of the present invention based on the embodiments of the present invention.
The experimental procedure of this example is summarized as follows:
1. First, SADS-CoV was infected with Vero-E6 cells at moi=0.1, cells were collected at 12, 24 and 36 hours after infection (early post-infection, exponential growth phase and plateau phase), proteomics and phosphorylated proteomics were studied using a super-resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometer (Q Exactive HF-X), proteomics and phosphorylated proteomics data were analyzed by bioinformatics methods, and phosphorylated proteins significantly up-regulated at least at one time point and kinases upstream of phosphorylated peptide fragments were predicted and counted. Subsequently, the antiviral effects of these kinase inhibitors were explored and one inhibitor Kenpaullone was screened from them, which was found to significantly inhibit the viral replication of SADS-CoV. Therefore, kenpaullone was tested on passable African green monkey kidney cell line (Vero) for inhibition of SADS-CoV replication, and animal experiments were performed to administer treatment of SADS-CoV infected piglets and test Kenpaullone for clinical therapeutic effect.
2. The inhibition of PEDV replication by Kenpaullone was verified on passable african green monkey kidney cell line (Vero-E6) and animal experiments were performed to administer piglets infected with PEDV and examine the clinical therapeutic effect of Kenpaullone.
3. The inhibition of PDCoV replication by Kenpaullone was verified on a passable LLC-PK1 cell line, and animal experiments were performed to administer piglets infected with PDCoV and to examine the clinical therapeutic effect of Kenpaullone.
4. The inhibitory effect of Kenpaullone on IBV replication was verified on chick embryos, and animal experiments were performed to administer treatment to chicks infected with IBV and examine the clinical therapeutic effect of Kenpaullone.
5. The inhibitory effect of Kenpaullone on SARS-CoV-2 replication was demonstrated on passable African green monkey kidney cell line (Vero-E6).
The materials used in this experiment were as follows:
(1) Cells and viruses
SADS-CoV, PEDV, PDCoV, IBV, vero, LLC-PK1 cells of African green monkey kidney cells are preserved by the laboratory, and the strain and the cells are conventional strains and cells which are disclosed in the prior art, and SARS-CoV-2 strain refers to SARS-CoV-2Mpro inhibitors with antiviral activity in a transgenic mouse model; SPF chickens and 1 day old SPF chick embryos were purchased from the SPF laboratory animal center of Wen Shida Hua nong Biotechnology Co., ltd.
(2) Main reagent
Kenpaullone for in vivo and in vitro experiments were purchased from MedChemExpress; the enhanced CCK8 kit was purchased from bi yun-tian biotechnology limited; dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was purchased from Sigma; EZ-press RNA Purification Kit kit was purchased from EZBioscience; /(I) V C58P2Multiplex One Step RT-qPCR Probe Kit (UDG Plus) was purchased from the following holy organism; other reagents are prepared by methods conventional in the art.
Example 1Kenpaullone use in the preparation of a medicament for inhibiting SADS-CoV replication
Vero-E6 cells were divided into control and infected groups, 3 replicates each, vero-E6 cells were infected with SADS-CoV strain at moi=0.1, cells were collected at 12, 24 and 36 hours post infection (early post infection, exponential growth phase and plateau phase), proteomic and phosphoproteomic assays were performed using a super resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometer (Q Exactive HF-X), and the results are shown in fig. 1.
Statistical analysis of phosphorylated kinases up-regulated at least 1 time point after infection, while predicting and counting upstream kinases of phosphorylated peptide fragments using GPS 5.0 software, found that members of multiple kinase families were significantly up-regulated, likely playing an important role in the infectious replication process of SADS-CoV. Through screening the inhibitors of these kinases, kenpaullone was found to have a significant antiviral effect.
Example 2Kenpaullone Effect on SADS-CoV replication
(1) Kenpaullone test for detecting cytotoxicity of Vero-E6
Cytotoxicity of Kenpaullone to Vero-E6 was determined using CCK8 cytotoxicity assay, as follows:
A96-well plate was seeded with a 6X 10 5 cells/mL cell suspension (100. Mu.L/well) leaving a column of uninoculated cells. The cells were cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until they were completely confluent. The medium was aspirated, washed 3 times with PBS, kenpaullone dissolved in DMSO and diluted with DMEM medium to different concentrations (0.01. Mu.M, 0.1. Mu.M, 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, 10. Mu.M, 25. Mu.M, 50. Mu.M), 3 replicates per concentration, 100. Mu.L/well.
After incubation at 37℃for 24h with 5% CO 2, the drug solution was aspirated, washed 3 times with PBS, 10% (v/v) CCK8 solution was added to 96-well plates (100. Mu.L/well) with DMEM medium, incubated at 37℃for 1h with 5% CO 2, absorbance (lambda=450 nm) was measured with a microplate reader and cell viability was calculated after 24h treatment with different concentrations of drug solution.
As a result, the maximum safe concentration of Kenpaullone to Vero-E6 was 10. Mu.M, as shown in FIG. 2A.
(2) Kenpaullone detection of IC 50 inhibiting SADS-CoV replication
1ML of the cell suspension was inoculated at a cell concentration of 3X 10 5 cells/mL in a 12-well cell culture plate, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent. The culture medium in the 6-well plate was discarded, washed 3 times with PBS, and the cells were treated with DMEM medium at Kenpaullone concentration of 0. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 0.01. Mu.M, 0.1. Mu.M, 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, and 10. Mu.M for 1 hour, and the treated solution was discarded, and SADS-CoV virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to the wells from which the negative control was removed, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 for 24 hours.
UsingEZ-press RNA Purification Kit kit extracts RNA according to the instruction, and then according to the/>, of the following holothuriansV C58P2Multiplex One Step RT-qPCR Probe Kit (UDG Plus) protocol RT-qPCR was performed to detect SADS-CoV-N mRNA expression levels in cells. The primer and probe sequences are as follows
SADS-CoV-N-F:5’-CTGACTGTTGTTGAGGTTAC-3’(SEQ ID NO.1);
SADS-CoV-N-R:5’-TCTGCCAAAGCTTGTTTAAC-3’(SEQ ID NO.2);
SADS-CoV-N-Probe:5’-FAM-TCACAGTCTCGTTCTCGCAATCA-TAMRA-3’(SEQ ID NO.3)。
The reaction is according to the following holy living beingsV C58P2Multiplex One Step RT-qPCR Probe Kit (UDG Plus) instruction manual, the reaction system is: 15 mu L/>V C58P2MP Buffer、1.2μL/>VC58P2 Enzyme Mix, 3. Mu.L Primer/Probe Mix (2.5. Mu.M), 1. Mu.L template RNA, 9.8. Mu. L RNASE FREE H 2 O. The system was assembled in 3 replicates per sample, 30 μl per well was added to 384 well plates and the reaction was performed on an ABI 7300Real time PCR instrument, the reaction procedure being: reverse transcription is carried out at 50 ℃ for 20min; pre-denaturation at 95℃for 5min; the amplification reaction was carried out at 95℃for 15s and at 60℃for 30s for 40 cycles.
The data were processed using Graphpad software to give an IC 50 value of 0.15 μm and the results are shown as B in figure 2.
(3) IFA determination of the fluorescence intensity of SADS-CoV-N protein after treatment of Vero cells with Kenpaullone at 10. Mu.M
1. 1ML of the cell suspension was inoculated at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in a 12-well cell culture plate, 4 wells were inoculated, and the cells were cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent.
2. The medium in the 12-well plate was discarded, washed 3 times with PBS, and after treatment with Kenpaullone. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 10. Mu.M (drug-loaded control) and 10. Mu.M (drug-loaded control) DMEM medium for 1 hour, SADS-CoV (MOI=0.1) was added to each of the 4 wells with cells, and the wells were incubated at 37℃under 5% CO 2 for 24 hours.
3. The treatment solution was discarded, washed 3 times with PBST for 5min each, and incubated with 4% paraformaldehyde pre-chilled at 4℃for 15min at room temperature at 500. Mu.L per well.
4. Washing with PBST for 3 times each for 5min, adding 0.4% Triton X-100 solution, and incubating at room temperature for 10-20min.
5. Wash 3 times with PBST for 5min each, add 3% BSA, 500 μl per well, incubate for 1h at room temperature.
6. The SADS-CoV-N protein primary antibody was diluted 1:1000 in PBST solution with 1% BSA 3 times with PBST for 5min, and incubated at 37℃for 1h at 300. Mu.L per well.
7. The primary antibody was recovered and washed 3 times with PBST for 5min each, FITC fluorescent secondary antibody was diluted 1:500 with PBST and incubated at 37℃in the dark for 1h at 300. Mu.L per well.
8. The DAPI fluorochromes were diluted 1:1000 with PBST 3 times each for 5min under light-protected conditions, 300. Mu.L per well incubated at 37℃for 7min in light-protected conditions.
9. Under the condition of avoiding light, PBST is used for washing 5-7 times, 500 mu L of PBST is added to each hole, and fluorescence intensity is observed by a fluorescence microscope and photographed.
As shown in FIG. 2C, the proliferation of SADS-CoV virus after Kenpaullone treatment was detected by indirect Immunofluorescence (IFA), and the specific fluorescence of SADS-CoV-N protein was gradually decreased in comparison with that of the positive control group after 24 hours of drug treatment.
(4) Kenpaullone Effect on SADS-CoV replication on Vero-E6
1. Effect of different concentrations Kenpaullone on SADS-CoV replication
2ML of the cell suspension was inoculated at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in a 6-well cell culture plate, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent. The culture medium in the 6-well plate was discarded, washed 3 times with PBS, and the cells were treated with Kenpaullone M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, and 10. Mu.M DMEM medium for 1 hour, and the treated solution was discarded, and SADS-CoV virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to the wells from which the negative control was removed, and incubated at 37℃under 5% CO 2 for 24 hours.
UsingEZ-press RNA Purification Kit kit extracts RNA according to the instruction, and then according to the/>, of the following holothuriansV C58P2Multiplex One Step RT-qPCR Probekit (UDG Plus) protocol RT-qPCR was performed, and the levels of SADS-CoV-N mRNA expression in cells were detected as in (2).
RNA copy number was calculated from the standard curve and the results are shown in FIG. 2D.
2. Effect of identical concentrations Kenpaullone on SADS-CoV replication at different time points after SADS-CoV infection
2ML of the cell suspension was simultaneously inoculated at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in 3 6-well cell culture plates, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent. At the same time, the medium in the 6-well plate was discarded, washed 3 times with PBS, and the cells were treated with Kenpaullone. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control) and 10. Mu.M DMEM medium for 1 hour in each of 3 wells of each plate, the treated solution was discarded, and SADS-CoV virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to the wells excluding the negative control, and cultured under conditions of 37℃and 5% CO 2. And respectively collecting samples at 12h, 24h and 36h after the virus liquid is added.
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR were performed as described above.
Finally, RNA copy number was calculated from the standard curve, and the results are shown in FIG. 2E.
(5) Kenpaullone Effect on SADS-CoV replication on Vero-E6-western blot
1. Effect of different concentrations Kenpaullone on SADS-CoV replication
2ML of the cell suspension was inoculated at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in a 6-well cell culture plate, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent. The culture medium in the 6-well plate was discarded, washed 3 times with PBS, and the cells were treated with Kenpaullone M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, and 10. Mu.M DMEM medium for 1 hour, and the treated solution was discarded, and SADS-CoV virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to the wells from which the negative control was removed, and incubated at 37℃under 5% CO 2 for 24 hours.
Discarding the treatment solution, washing 3 times with PBS, adding 200 mu L of RIPA lysate into each hole, lysing for 10min on ice, blowing and mixing cell precipitates, transferring to a 1.5mL sterile EP tube, centrifuging for 5min at 12000r/min, sucking 180 mu L of supernatant, mixing with 36 mu L of 5×loading buffer (5-fold concentration loading buffer), and performing water bath at 100deg.C for 10min to obtain a western blot protein sample.
Protein samples were obtained in the same manner at 0. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 10. Mu. M Kenpaullone, pretreated and infected with SADS-CoV (MOI=0.1) for 12h, 24h, 36 h.
Electrophoresis was performed with 10-well, 10% pre-cast gel, loading sequence: samples were treated with Marker, 0. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, 10. Mu. M Kenpaullone.
The program of the electrophoresis apparatus is set for 80V electrophoresis for 30min and 120V electrophoresis for 1h. After electrophoresis, a semi-dry film transfer system is used for assembling the film transfer system, and the assembling sequence is as follows: after the black surface (negative electrode) -sponge-filter paper-albumin glue-PVDF film-filter paper-sponge-white surface (positive electrode) is assembled, bubbles are removed by using a clean test tube or a glass rod, and a film transferring instrument program is set to 15V film transferring for 40min. And taking out the PVDF film after the film transfer, washing for 5min by using TBST, and sealing for 1h at room temperature in 5% skimmed milk powder.
The blocking solution was decanted and washed three times with TBST for 5min each. Then taking out the membrane, wrapping the membrane with a clean preservative film, cutting the membrane containing 46kDa SADS-CoV-N protein and 36kDa GAPDH, placing the membrane in a corresponding primary antibody, placing the primary antibody on a shaking table for 40r/min, and incubating the primary antibody at 4 ℃ overnight. After the incubation, primary antibodies were recovered and washed three times with TBST for 5min each. Two membranes were placed in HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody solution diluted with TBST (dilution ratio 1:10000), placed on a shaking table, 40r/min, and incubated for 1h at room temperature. Recovering secondary anti-dilution liquid, washing the membrane with TBST for 3 times and 5min each time, soaking the membrane in TBST, preparing ECL color development liquid under the condition of avoiding light, and developing and photographing by using a gel scanning system.
The results are shown as F in FIG. 2, and the proliferation of SADS-CoV virus after Kenpaullone treatment was detected using Western Blotting (WB): after Kenpaullone treatments, the corresponding SADS-CoV-N protein size bands gradually fade with increasing drug concentration, and show dose dependence, indicating that Kenpaullone has an inhibitory effect on SADS-CoV proliferation.
2. Effect of identical concentrations Kenpaullone on SADS-CoV replication at different time points after SADS-CoV infection
2ML of the cell suspension was simultaneously inoculated at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in 3 6-well cell culture plates, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent. At the same time, the medium in the 6-well plate was discarded, washed 3 times with PBS, and the cells were treated with Kenpaullone. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control) and 10. Mu.M DMEM medium for 1 hour in each of 3 wells of each plate, the treated solution was discarded, and SADS-CoV virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to the wells excluding the negative control, and cultured under conditions of 37℃and 5% CO 2. Samples are collected at 12h, 24h and 36h after the virus liquid is added respectively.
The procedure for protein extraction and western blot was the same as above. The results are shown as G in fig. 2.
The above results demonstrate that Kenpaullone successfully inhibited the replication of SADS-CoV in passable african green monkey kidney cell line (Vero) and exhibited a dose-dependent, showing the potential of Kenpaullone for the treatment of acute diarrhea syndrome in pigs.
EXAMPLE 3Kenpaullone therapeutic Effect on SADS-CoV infected piglets
(1) Piglet treatment experiment design
Commercial piglets (purchased from Wenshi food group Co., ltd.) of 20 days old 3 days old were tested by ELISA and PCR, and were negative for PEAV, PEDV, PDCoV and TGEV antibodies and antigens, respectively. The random groups were 4 groups (5 heads per group), specifically:
The first group is a blank control group (mock), and each pig orally attacks an equal volume of DMEM with an agent amount, and the administration group starts treatment and simultaneously carries out intravenous injection of an equal volume of empty solvent (DMSO);
The second group is a dosing control group (Kenpaullone), and each pig orally attacks an equal volume of DMEM with an equal volume of Kenpaullone solution in the treatment stage;
The third group is an attack virus group (SADS-CoV), each pig is orally administered with SADS-CoV virus solution of 1X 10 7TCID50 dose, and the administration group is simultaneously and intravenously injected with equal volume of empty solvent (DMSO);
The fourth group was the challenge treatment group (SADS-CoV+ Kenpaullone), each pig was orally administered 1X 10 7TCID50 doses of SADS-CoV virus solution, and a dose of Kenpaullone solution of 6mg/kg body weight was intravenously injected on the first and third days after challenge.
Kenpaullone solution formula: 3.2ml DMSO is dissolved in 300mg Kenpaullone.
Experiment and sampling arrangement:
After the piglets are transported to an experimental site after disinfection, the piglets are randomly divided into 4 groups and placed on different sites, oral stomach-filling and toxin-counteracting are carried out on a third group and a fourth group, and simultaneously, the first group and the second group are orally treated with the same volume of DMEM. Kenpaullone dosing treatments were performed on the first and third days after challenge, and the second and fourth groups of piglets were given intravenous Kenpaullone solutions at a dose of 6mg/kg body weight. The clinical symptoms of each group of piglets, including body weight, diarrhea status, feeding status, mental status, etc., were continuously monitored.
Immediately dissecting the dead pigs after the toxin is attacked, and completely dissecting the rest pigs only on the seventh day after the toxin is attacked:
① Observing intestinal lesions of piglets in an experimental group and a control group, checking whether intestinal wall thinning and transparency occur in intestinal tracts or not, and recording clinical scoring conditions when pathological changes such as water sample contents occur;
② Different piglet small intestine tissues (jejunum, ileum, duodenum) were collected:
One part was kept at 4 degrees after 48h fixation with 10% formaldehyde and sent to the company for paraffin embedded sections for HE staining and immunohistochemistry. Lesions of intestinal tissue were observed under a microscope, including intestinal villus morphology, villus shedding, villus height and crypt depth ratio.
100Mg of intestinal tissue sample is weighed, 1ml of PBS and 2 grinding steel balls are added, balanced, and fully ground in a grinder. After finishing grinding, centrifuging at 4deg.C and 12000r/min for 10min, collecting supernatant, sub-packaging into 200 μl/tube, and preserving at-80deg.C for subsequent extraction of RNA, and detecting viral load in tissue.
(2) Clinical symptoms
One dead pig was present on each of the third, fourth and fifth days during the experiment, and one dead pig was present on the third day during the treatment group, and the survival curves are shown in fig. 3 a. The weight change is shown as B in fig. 3, and the weight loss of piglets in the toxin-attacking group is caused by diarrhea, while the weight of piglets in the toxin-attacking administration group is obviously improved. The clinical scoring results are shown as C in fig. 3, and the results show that Kenpaullone administration treatment significantly weakens diarrhea symptoms of piglets in the treatment group, and the mental states of the piglets are superior to those of piglets in the toxicity attack group.
(3) Ileum, jejunum and duodenum tissue sample viral load detection
Immediately dissecting the dead pigs after the toxicity attack, completely dissecting the rest pigs only on the seventh day after the toxicity attack, collecting three tissue samples of ileum, jejunum and duodenum which are easy to be infected by SADS-CoV and generating lesions, and measuring the mRNA expression level of the SADS-CoV-N by adopting a qRT-PCR method, wherein the method comprises the following steps of:
After tissue thawing, transferring about 1g of tissue sample to a special tube of a tissue breaker, adding 1mL of Trizol, adding sterilized ceramic beads, placing the tissue breaker, carrying out severe shaking and breaking for 3 times and 20 s/time, and then placing the tissue breaker on ice for cracking for 20min; centrifuging at 12000rpm for 5min, transferring supernatant to a clean RNase-free EP tube, adding 200 μl of chloroform, shaking with vigorous vortex, standing for delamination, and centrifuging at 12000rpm for 10min; transferring the supernatant to a new RNase-free EP tube, adding equal volume of isopropanol, mixing well, and precipitating at-20deg.C for 1 hr; centrifuging at 12000rpm for 15min, discarding supernatant to obtain RNA precipitate; rinsing with 75% alcohol for 2 times, air-drying for 5min, adding 50 μl RNase-FREE WATER for dissolving, and measuring concentration and OD value. According to the next holy living things V C58P2Multiplex One Step RT-qPCR Probekit (UDG Plus) protocol RT-qPCR was performed and the levels of SADS-CoV-N mRNA expression in tissue samples were measured as described above.
The results are shown in D in FIG. 3, and the significant reduction of SADS-CoV-N mRNA in the ileum, jejunum and duodenum of piglets after Kenpaullone treatment compared to the challenge group indicates that Kenpaullone has an in vivo inhibitory effect on SADS-CoV replication.
(4) Pathological changes of tissue
Removing tissue blocks not more than 4mm multiplied by 2cm 2 from the collected ileum, jejunum and duodenum, and fixing with 4% paraformaldehyde; alcohol gradient dehydration; the dimethylbenzene is transparent; embedding paraffin; repairing the sheet; slicing; hematoxylin, eosin staining. Intestinal tissue sections were visualized under a mirror.
The results are shown in FIG. 4: the ileum, jejunum and duodenum tissue sections of the administration control group have no lesions, which shows that Kenpaullone has no obvious influence on host organs; compared with a control group, the intestinal tissue section of the toxicity attack group can be seen to have obvious thinning of intestinal walls, intestinal villus Mao Tuola and the like, and belongs to the characteristic pathological phenomenon after acute coronavirus infection of pigs; the thickness of the intestinal wall of the treatment group for counteracting toxic substances is recovered to be normal, and no obvious intestinal villus shedding condition exists. These results indicate Kenpaullone treatment effectively reduced the damage to tissue by SADS-CoV.
In summary, kenpaullone is taken as an inhibitor molecule in a piglet treatment experiment, and has the advantages of no toxicity and no side effect in a dosing control group; in the toxin-counteracting piglets, kenpaullone obviously relieves the symptoms of diarrhea, vomiting and the like of the piglets; and Kenpaullone treatment greatly reduces the viral load in jejunum, ileum and duodenum of infected piglets, and reduces the tissue damage of small intestine. And Kenpaullone has definite structure, no toxicity and no side effect.
Example 4Kenpaullone use of the preparation of a medicament for inhibiting replication of PEDV
(1) Kenpaullone test for detecting cytotoxicity of Vero-E6
Cytotoxicity of Kenpaullone to Vero-E6 was determined using CCK8 cytotoxicity assay, as follows:
a96-well plate was seeded with a 6X 10 5 cells/mL cell suspension (100. Mu.L/well) leaving a column of uninoculated cells. The cells were cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until they were completely confluent. The medium was aspirated, washed 3 times with PBS, kenpaullone dissolved in DMSO and diluted with DMEM medium to different concentrations (0.1. Mu.M, 1. Mu.M, 10. Mu.M, 25. Mu.M, 50. Mu.M, 100. Mu.M), 3 replicates per concentration, 100. Mu.L/well. After incubation at 37℃for 24h with 5% CO 2, the drug solution was aspirated, washed 3 times with PBS, 10% (v/v) CCK8 solution was added to 96-well plates (100. Mu.L/well) with DMEM medium, incubated at 37℃for 1h with 5% CO 2, absorbance (lambda=450 nm) was measured with a microplate reader and cell viability was calculated after 24h treatment with different concentrations of drug solution.
As a result, the maximum safe concentration of Kenpaullone to Vero-E6 was 10. Mu.M, as shown in FIG. 5A.
(2) Kenpaullone IC 50 assay to inhibit PEDV replication
1ML of the cell suspension was inoculated at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in a 12-well cell culture plate, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent. The culture medium in the 6-well plate was discarded, washed 3 times with PBS, and cells were treated with DMEM medium at Kenpaullone concentration of 0. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 0.01. Mu.M, 0.1. Mu.M, 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, and 10. Mu.M for 1 hour, and the treated solution was discarded, and PEDV virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to the wells from which the negative control was removed, and incubated at 37℃under 5% CO 2 for 24 hours.
UsingEZ-press RNA Purification Kit kit extracts RNA according to the instruction, and then according to the/>, of the following holothuriansV C58P2Multiplex One Step RT-qPCR Probe Kit (UDG Plus) protocol RT-qPCR was performed to detect PEDV-N mRNA expression levels in tissue samples. The primer and probe sequences were as follows:
PEDV-N-F:5’-CAGGACACATTCTTGGTGGTCTT-3’(SEQ ID NO.4);
PEDV-N-R:5’-CAGGACACATTCTTGGTGGTCTT-3’(SEQ ID NO.5);
PEDV-N-Probe:5’-FAM-ACGCGCTTCTCACTAC-MGB-3’(SEQ ID NO.6);
the reaction is according to the following holy living beings V C58P2Multiplex One Step RT-qPCR Probe Kit (UDG Plus) instruction manual, the reaction system is: 15 mu L/>V C58P2MP Buffer、1.2μL/>VC58P2 Enzyme Mix, 3. Mu.L Primer/Probe Mix (2.5. Mu.M), 1. Mu.L template RNA, 9.8. Mu. L RNASE FREE H2O. The system was assembled in 3 replicates per sample, 30 μl per well was added to 384 well plates and the reaction was performed on an ABI 7300Real time PCR instrument, the reaction procedure being: reverse transcription is carried out at 50 ℃ for 20min; pre-denaturation at 95℃for 5min; the amplification reaction was carried out at 95℃for 15s and at 60℃for 30s for 40 cycles.
The data were processed using Graphpad software to give an IC 50 value of 0.2 μm and the results are shown as B in figure 5.
(3) Kenpaullone Effect on PEDV replication on Vero-E6-TCID 50
1ML of cells were inoculated per well at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in a 12-well cell culture plate, and DMEM medium having Kenpaullone concentration of 0. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, 10. Mu.M was added to each of the 5 wells; the treatment liquid is discarded after the medicine treatment for 1 h. PEDV virus solution (moi=0.1) was added to the wells excluding the negative control, and incubated at 37 ℃ under 5% co 2 for 24 hours. Taking out the cell culture plate, sealing with sealing film, freezing and thawing at-80deg.C for 3 times, collecting the frozen and thawed culture in sterile 1.5mL EP tube, centrifuging at 4 deg.C for 5min at 10000r/min with high speed centrifuge, collecting supernatant in new 1.5mL EP tube, and preserving at-80deg.C.
The cells are planted in 5 96-well plates according to the cell concentration of 6 multiplied by 10 5 cells/mL, 100 mu L of each well is cultivated to complete confluence of the cells under the conditions of 37 ℃ and 5 percent CO 2, the 96-well plates with the well cells are washed 3 times by PBS, the collected samples are diluted by 10 times for 0 to 10 -7 times, the diluted samples are added into the cell wells with the corresponding dilution times, 8-well of each gradient is repeated, 100 mu L of each well is cultivated under the conditions of 37 ℃ and 5 percent CO 2 for 5 to 7d.
The virus titer of PEDV infection for 24h after treatment of Vero-E6 cells with different concentrations of PEDV and its inhibitor Kenpaullone was calculated by IFA assay in combination with Reed-Muench method.
As shown in FIG. 5C, kenpaullone treated Vero-E6 cells were able to reduce the viral titer of PEDV and were dose dependent.
(4) Kenpaullone Effect on PEDV replication on Vero-E6
1. Effect of different concentrations Kenpaullone on PEDV replication
2ML of the cell suspension was inoculated at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in a 6-well cell culture plate, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent. The culture medium in the 6-well plate was discarded, washed 3 times with PBS, and cells were treated with Kenpaullone cells in each of the 5 wells at a concentration of 0. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, and 10. Mu.M in DMEM medium for 1 hour, the treated solution was discarded, and PEDV virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to the wells from which the negative control was removed, and incubated at 37℃under 5% CO 2 for 24 hours.
UsingEZ-press RNA Purification Kit kit extracts RNA according to the instruction, and then according to the/>, of the following holothuriansV C58P2Multiplex One Step RT-qPCR Probekit (UDG Plus) protocol RT-qPCR was performed, and the experimental procedure was the same as (2), detecting the level of PEDV-N mRNA expression in cells.
RNA copy number was calculated from the standard curve and the results are shown in FIG. 5D.
2. Effect of identical concentrations Kenpaullone on PEDV replication at different time points after PEDV infection
1ML of the cell suspension was simultaneously inoculated at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in 3 6-well cell culture plates, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent. At the same time, the medium in the 6-well plate was discarded and washed 3 times with PBS, and the cells were treated with Kenpaullone. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control) and 10. Mu.M DMEM medium for 1 hour in each of 3 wells of each plate, and the treated solution was discarded, and then PEDV virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to the wells from which the negative control was removed, and incubated at 37℃under 5% CO 2. And (5) respectively collecting samples at 12h, 24h and 36h after the virus liquid is added.
RNA extraction and RT-qPCR were performed as described above.
Finally, RNA copy number was calculated from the standard curve, and the results are shown in FIG. 5E.
The results of the above experiments demonstrate Kenpaullone that having anti-PEDV activity, using Kenpaullone successfully inhibited PEDV replication in passable african green monkey kidney cell line (Vero-E6) and exhibited dose dependence.
Example 5Kenpaullone therapeutic Effect on PEDV infected piglets
(1) Piglet treatment experiment design
Commercial piglets (purchased from Wen food Co., ltd.) of 20 days old, were tested by ELISA and PCR, and were negative for PEDV, PEDV, TGEV and SADS-CoV antibodies and antigens, respectively. The random groups were 4 groups (5 heads per group), specifically:
The first group is a blank control group (mock), and each pig orally attacks an equal volume of DMEM with an agent amount, and the administration group starts treatment and simultaneously carries out intravenous injection of an equal volume of empty solvent (DMSO);
The second group is a dosing control group (Kenpaullone), and each pig orally attacks an equal volume of DMEM with an equal volume of Kenpaullone solution in the treatment stage;
The third group is a virus attack group (PEDV), 2mL of PEDV virus solution with the titer of 1x10 6TCID50/mL is orally taken by each pig, and the same volume of empty solvent (DMSO) is simultaneously injected intravenously during treatment of the administration group;
The fourth group is a treatment group for challenge, 2mL of PEDV virus solution with a titer of 1x10 6TCID50/mL is orally administered to each pig, and Kenpaullone solution with a dose of 6mg/kg body weight is intravenously injected on the first and third days after challenge.
Kenpaullone solution formula: 3.2mL of DMSO was dissolved in 300mg Kenpaullone.
Experiment and sampling arrangement:
after the piglets are transported to an experimental site after disinfection, the piglets are randomly divided into 4 groups and placed on different sites, oral stomach-filling and toxin-counteracting are carried out on a third group and a fourth group, and simultaneously, the first group and the second group are orally treated with the same volume of DMEM. Kenpaullone dosing treatments were performed on the first and third days after challenge, and the second and fourth groups of piglets were given intravenous Kenpaullone solutions at a dose of 6mg/kg body weight. The survival, clinical symptoms including weight, diarrhea, feeding, mental status, etc. of each group of piglets are continuously monitored.
Immediately dissecting the dead pigs after the toxin is attacked, and completely dissecting the rest pigs only on the seventh day after the toxin is attacked:
① Observing intestinal lesions of piglets in an experimental group and a control group, checking whether intestinal wall thinning, transparency and flatulence occur in intestinal tracts or not, and recording clinical scoring conditions when pathological changes such as water sample contents occur;
② Different piglet small intestine tissues (jejunum, ileum, duodenum) were collected:
One part was fixed with 10% formaldehyde for 48h and stored at 4℃and sent to the company for paraffin embedded sections for HE staining and immunohistochemistry. Lesions of intestinal tissue were observed under a microscope, including intestinal villus morphology, villus shedding, villus height and crypt depth ratio.
100Mg of intestinal tissue sample is weighed, 1mL of PBS and 2 grinding steel balls are added, balanced, and fully ground in a grinder. After finishing grinding, centrifuging at 4deg.C and 12000r/min for 10min, collecting supernatant, sub-packaging into 200 μL/tube, and preserving at-80deg.C for subsequent extraction of RNA and protein, and detecting viral load in tissue.
(2) Clinical symptoms
One dead pig was in each of the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh days of the challenge group during the experiment, and two dead pigs were in the fifth day of the challenge group. The survival curves are shown in figure 6 a. Weight change as shown in fig. 6B, the weight loss of piglets in the challenge group resulted from diarrhea, while the weight of piglets in the challenge administration group was significantly improved. The clinical scoring results are shown in fig. 6C. The results show that Kenpaullone administration treatment significantly reduces diarrhea symptoms of piglets in the treatment group, and the mental states of the piglets are superior to those of piglets in the toxicity attack group.
(3) Ileum, jejunum and duodenum tissue sample viral load detection
Immediately dissecting the dead pigs after the virus attack, completely dissecting the rest pigs only on the seventh day after the virus attack, collecting three tissue samples of ileum, jejunum and duodenum which are easy to be infected by PEDV and lesions, and measuring the expression level of PEDV-NmRNA by adopting a qRT-PCR method, wherein the following specific steps are as follows:
After tissue thawing, transferring about 1g of tissue sample to a special tube of a tissue breaker, adding 1mL of Trizol, adding sterilized ceramic beads, placing the tissue breaker, carrying out severe shaking and breaking for 3 times and 20 s/time, and then placing the tissue breaker on ice for cracking for 20min; centrifuging at 12000rpm for 5min, transferring supernatant to a clean RNase-free EP tube, adding 200 μl of chloroform, shaking with vigorous vortex, standing for delamination, and centrifuging at 12000rpm for 10min; transferring the supernatant to a new RNase-free EP tube, adding equal volume of isopropanol, mixing well, and precipitating at-20deg.C for 1 hr; centrifuging at 12000rpm for 15min, discarding supernatant to obtain RNA precipitate; rinsing with 75% alcohol for 2 times, air-drying for 5min, adding 50 μl RNase-FREE WATER for dissolving, and measuring concentration and OD value. According to the next holy living things V C58P2 Multiplex One Step RT-qPCR Probekit (UDG Plus) protocol RT-qPCR was performed and the level of PEDV-N mRNA expression in tissue samples was measured as described above.
The results are shown in panel D of fig. 6, and the significant reduction of PEDV-N mRNA in the ileum, jejunum, and duodenum of piglets after Kenpaullone treatment compared to the challenge group, indicates that Kenpaullone has an in vivo inhibitory effect on PEDV replication.
(4) Pathological changes of tissue
Removing tissue blocks not more than 4mm multiplied by 2cm 2 from the collected ileum, jejunum and duodenum, and fixing with 4% paraformaldehyde; alcohol gradient dehydration; the dimethylbenzene is transparent; embedding paraffin; repairing the sheet; slicing; hematoxylin, eosin staining. Intestinal tissue sections were visualized under a mirror.
The results are shown in FIG. 7: the ileum, jejunum and duodenum tissue sections of the administration control group have no lesions, which shows that Kenpaullone has no obvious influence on host organs; compared with a control group, the intestinal tissue section of the toxicity attack group can be seen to have obvious thinning of intestinal walls, intestinal villus Mao Tuola and the like, and belongs to the characteristic pathological phenomenon of pigs after epidemic diarrhea infection; the thickness of the intestinal wall of the treatment group for counteracting toxic substances is recovered to be normal, and no obvious intestinal villus shedding condition exists. These results indicate that Kenpaullone treatment effectively reduced the damage to tissue by PEDV.
The experimental results show that Kenpaullone is taken as an inhibitor molecule in a piglet treatment experiment, and has the advantages of no toxicity and no side effect in a dosing control group; in the toxin-counteracting piglets, kenpaullone obviously relieves the symptoms of diarrhea, vomiting and the like of the piglets; and Kenpaullone treatment greatly reduces the viral load in jejunum, ileum and duodenum of infected piglets, and reduces the tissue damage of small intestine; and Kenpaullone has definite structure, no toxicity and no side effect.
Example 6Kenpaullone use of A medicament for inhibiting PDCoV replication
(1) Kenpaullone cytotoxicity test against LLC-PK1
Cytotoxicity of Kenpaullone to LLC-PK1 was determined using the CCK8 cytotoxicity assay, as follows:
Cell suspensions of 6X 10 5 cells/mL (100. Mu.L/well) were seeded in 96-well plates leaving a list of uninoculated cells. The cells were cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until they were completely confluent. The medium was aspirated, washed 3 times with PBS, kenpaullone dissolved in DMSO and diluted with DMEM medium to different concentrations (0.01. Mu.M, 0.1. Mu.M, 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, 10. Mu.M, 25. Mu.M, 50. Mu.M), 3 replicates per concentration, 100. Mu.L/well. After incubation at 37℃for 24h with 5% CO 2, the drug solution was aspirated, washed 3 times with PBS, 10% (v/v) CCK8 solution was added to 96-well plates (100. Mu.L/well) with DMEM medium, incubated at 37℃for 1h with 5% CO 2, absorbance (lambda=450 nm) was measured with a microplate reader and cell viability was calculated after 24h treatment with different concentrations of drug solution.
As a result, the maximum safe concentration of Kenpaullone to LLC-PK1 was 10. Mu.M as shown in A in FIG. 8.
(2) Influence of Kenpaullone on LLC-PK1 on PDCoV replication-RT-qPCR
2ML of the cell suspension was inoculated at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in a 6-well cell culture plate and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent. The culture medium in the 6-well plate was discarded, washed 3 times with PBS, and cells were treated with Kenpaullone cells in concentration of 0. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, 10. Mu.M DMEM medium for 1 hour, the treated solution was discarded, PDCoV virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to all wells except the wells of the negative control, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 for 24 hours.
UsingThe EZ-press RNA Purification Kit kit extracts RNA according to the requirements of the specification,
According to TarakaReverse transcription was performed by RT Master Mix (PERFECT REAL TIME) instruction manual, and the product was frozen at-80℃and stored for further use.
And detecting the mRNA expression level of PDCoV-N in the tissue sample by using the cDNA as a template through real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR. The primer sequences were as follows:
PDCoV-N-F:5’-CGTCGTAAGACCCAGCATCAAGC-3’(SEQ ID NO.7);
PDCoV-N-R:5’-GATTATGCTGTACCCTCGATCGT-3’(SEQ ID NO.8);
The PCR reaction was performed according to PERFECTSTART GREEN QPCR Supermix specification of full gold, the reaction system was: 1. Mu.L of cDNA, 5. Mu.L of 2X PERFECTSTART GREEN QPCR Supermix, 0.2. Mu. L PASSIVE REFERENCE DYE (50X), 10. Mu.M upstream and downstream primers each 0.2. Mu.L, 3.4. Mu. L RNASE FREE WATER. The system was assembled in 3 replicates per sample, 10 μl per well was added to 384 well plates and the reaction was performed on an ABI 7300Real time PCR instrument, the reaction procedure being: pre-denaturation at 95℃for 2min;95 ℃ for 15s and 61 ℃ for 31min, and 40 cycles are total. RNA copy number was calculated from the standard curve and the results are shown in FIG. 8B.
(3) Effect of Kenpaullone on LLC-PK1 on PDCoV replication-TCID 50
1ML of cells were inoculated per well at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in a 12-well cell culture plate, and cells were treated with DMEM medium at Kenpaullone concentration of 0. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 1. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, 10. Mu.M, respectively, for 1 hour in 5 wells with cells; the treatment liquid is discarded after the medicine treatment for 1 h. Then PDCoV virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to all wells except the wells of the negative control, and the cells were incubated at 37℃under 5% CO 2 for 24 hours. Taking out the cell culture plate, sealing with sealing film, freezing and thawing at-80deg.C for 3 times, collecting the frozen and thawed culture in sterile 1.5mL EP tube, centrifuging at 4 deg.C for 5min at 10000r/min with high speed centrifuge, collecting supernatant in new 1.5mL EP tube, and preserving at-80deg.C.
The cells are planted in 5 96-well plates according to the cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL, 100 mu L of each well is cultivated to complete confluence under the conditions of 37 ℃ and 5% CO 2, the 96-well plates with the well cells are washed 3 times by PBS, the collected samples are diluted by 10 times for 0 to 10 -7 times of gradient, the diluted samples are added into the cell wells with the corresponding dilution times, 8-well of each gradient is repeated, 100 mu L of each well is cultivated under the conditions of 37 ℃ and 5% CO 2 for 3 to 5d. The virus titer was calculated using the Reed-Muench method.
As shown in FIG. 8C, kenpaullone was able to reduce PDCoV virus titer and was dose dependent after treatment of LLC-PK1 cells.
The above results demonstrate that Kenpaullone has anti-PDCoV activity, successfully inhibits PDCoV replication in passable porcine kidney cells (LLC-PK 1) using Kenpaullone, and exhibits dose dependence.
Example 7Kenpaullone therapeutic Effect on PDCoV infected piglets
(1) Piglet treatment experiment design
The 20 first 3-day-old commercial piglets (purchased from Wen food group Co., ltd.) were tested by ELISA and PCR, respectively, and were negative for SADS-CoV, PEDV, TGEV and PDCoV antibodies and antigens. The random groups were 4 groups (5 heads per group), specifically:
the first group is a blank control group (Mock), and each pig orally attacks an equal volume of DMEM with an equal volume of empty solvent (DMSO) simultaneously injected intravenously when the administration group starts treatment;
The second group is a dosing control group (Kenpaullone), and each pig orally attacks an equal volume of DMEM with an equal volume of Kenpaullone solution in the treatment stage;
The third group is a virus-attacking group (PDCoV), each pig is orally administered with 2mL of PDCoV virus liquid with the titer of 1x10 6 TCID50/mL, and the administration group is simultaneously injected with equal volume of no-load solvent (DMSO) in an intravenous way during treatment;
the fourth group was a challenge treatment group (PDCoV + Kenpaullone) with 2mL of PDCoV virus solution with a titre of 1X10 6TCID50/mL administered orally to each pig, and a dose of Kenpaullone solution of 6mg/kg body weight was intravenously injected on the first and third days after challenge.
Kenpaullone solution formula: 3.2mL of DMSO was dissolved in 300mg Kenpaullone.
Experiment and sampling arrangement:
After the piglets are transported to the experimental site after disinfection, the piglets are randomly divided into 4 groups and placed on different sites, the third group and the fourth group are subjected to oral stomach-filling and toxin-eliminating, and the first group and the second group are subjected to oral DMEM with the same volume. Kenpaullone dosing treatments were performed on the first and third days after challenge, and a second group, fourth group, piglets were given intravenous doses of Kenpaullone solution at a dose of 6mg/kg body weight. Clinical symptoms of each group of piglets, including body weight, diarrhea status, feeding status, mental status, etc., were continuously monitored, and clinical scores were recorded.
Immediately dissecting the dead pigs after the toxin is attacked, and completely dissecting the rest pigs only on the seventh day after the toxin is attacked:
③ Observing intestinal lesions of piglets in an experimental group and a control group, and checking whether pathological changes such as intestinal distension, mesenteric congestion, thinning of intestinal walls, yellow-filled liquid and the like appear in intestinal tracts;
④ Different piglet small intestine tissues (jejunum, ileum, duodenum) were collected:
One part was fixed with 10% formaldehyde for 48h and stored at 4℃and sent to the company for paraffin embedded sections for HE staining and immunohistochemistry. Lesions of intestinal tissue were observed under a microscope, including intestinal villus morphology, villus shedding, villus height and crypt depth ratio.
100Mg of intestinal tissue sample is weighed, 1mL of PBS and 2 grinding steel balls are added, balanced, and fully ground in a grinder. After finishing grinding, centrifuging at 4deg.C and 12000r/min for 10min, collecting supernatant, sub-packaging into 200 μL/tube, and preserving at-80deg.C for subsequent extraction of RNA, and detecting viral load in tissue.
(2) Clinical symptoms
Clinical scores for the treatment group and the challenge group during the experiment are shown as a in fig. 9, with significant reduction in clinical symptoms in the treatment group. The weight loss of the offending group was significantly reduced due to diarrhea and vomiting, and the change in the body weight of each treatment group was shown as B in fig. 9. One dead pig was found in the challenge group on the third, fourth, fifth and sixth days, and one dead pig was found in the challenge treatment group on the third day, and the survival curve is shown as C in fig. 9. The results show that Kenpaullone administration treatment significantly weakens diarrhea symptoms of piglets in treatment groups, and the mental states of the piglets are superior to those of piglets in toxin-attacking groups.
(3) Ileum, jejunum and duodenum tissue sample viral load detection
Immediately dissecting the dead pigs after the virus attack, completely dissecting the rest pigs only on the seventh day after the virus attack, collecting tissue samples of ileum, jejunum and duodenum PDCoV infected with pathological changes, and measuring the mRNA expression level of PDCoV-N by adopting a qRT-PCR method, wherein the method comprises the following steps:
after tissue thawing, transferring about 1g of tissue sample to a special tube of a tissue breaker, adding 1mL of Trizol, adding sterilized ceramic beads, placing the tissue breaker, carrying out severe shaking and breaking for 3 times and 20 s/time, and then placing the tissue breaker on ice for cracking for 20min; centrifuging at 12000rpm for 5min, transferring supernatant to a clean RNase-free EP tube, adding 200 μl of chloroform, shaking with vigorous vortex, standing for delamination, and centrifuging at 12000rpm for 10min; transferring the supernatant to a new RNase-free EP tube, adding equal volume of isopropanol, mixing well, and precipitating at-20deg.C for 1 hr; centrifuging at 12000rpm for 15min, discarding supernatant to obtain RNA precipitate; rinsing with 75% alcohol for 2 times, air-drying for 5min, adding 50 μl RNase-FREE WATER for dissolving, and measuring concentration and OD value. Reverse transcription was performed according to the PRIMESCRIPT RT MASTER Mix (Perfect Real Time) instructions of Taraka, the reverse transcription system being: 2. Mu.L of 5X PRIMESCRIPT RT MASTER Mix,500ng of total RNA, RNASE FREE DDH 2 O to 10. Mu.L of total RNA were added and mixed well, and then reverse transcription was performed on a PCR apparatus, the reaction procedure being: 15min at 37 ℃; and 5s at 85 ℃. Freezing the product at-80deg.C, and storing for use.
And detecting the mRNA expression level of PDCoV-N in the tissue sample by using the cDNA as a template through real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR. The test procedure was as described in example 1 (2), and the copy number of PDCoV-NRNA was calculated for each tissue sample based on the standard curve.
The results are shown in figure 9D, with significantly reduced PDCoV-N mRNA levels in the ileum, jejunum and duodenum of piglets after Kenpaullone treatment compared to the challenge group, indicating that Kenpaullone has an in vivo inhibitory effect on PDCoV replication.
(5) Pathological changes of tissue
Removing tissue blocks not more than 4mm multiplied by 2cm 2 from the collected ileum, jejunum and duodenum, and fixing with 4% paraformaldehyde; alcohol gradient dehydration; the dimethylbenzene is transparent; embedding paraffin; repairing the sheet; slicing; hematoxylin, eosin staining. Intestinal tissue sections were visualized under a mirror.
The results are shown in FIG. 10: the ileum, jejunum and duodenum tissue sections of the administration control group have no lesions, which shows that Kenpaullone has no obvious influence on host organs; compared with a control group, the intestinal tissue section of the toxicity attack group can be seen in pathological phenomena after the infection of pig delta coronavirus such as obvious intestinal villus shedding, shortening and the like; the wall thickness of the intestines of the treatment group for counteracting toxic substances is recovered to be normal, and the conditions of shortening, fusing, falling-off and the like of the intestinal villi are avoided obviously. These results indicate that Kenpaullone treatment effectively reduced PDCoV damage to the tissue.
The results show that Kenpaullone is taken as an inhibitor molecule in a piglet treatment experiment, and has the advantages of no toxicity and no side effect in a administration control group; in the treatment of Kenpaullone of the toxin-counteracting piglets, the symptoms of diarrhea, dehydration and the like of the piglets are obviously relieved; and Kenpaullone treatment greatly reduces the viral load in jejunum, ileum and duodenum of infected piglets, reduces intestinal tissue damage, has definite Kenpaullone structure, and has no toxic or side effect.
Example 8Kenpaullone use of the preparation of a medicament for inhibiting IBV replication
Kenpaullone Effect on IBV replication on chick embryo
(1) Kenpaullone determination of safe concentration on chick embryo
The method comprises the following steps:
Taking 60 9-day-old chick embryos, randomly dividing the chick embryos into 6 groups, namely 50 mu M group, 10 mu M group, 1 mu M group and 0.1 mu M group, injecting a solvent control group (DMSO group) and a blank group; 10 for each group.
Kenpaullone (50. Mu.M, 10. Mu.M, 1. Mu.M, 0.1. Mu.M) was formulated at various concentrations.
Each group of chick embryos is injected with the liquid medicine with the corresponding concentration in the allantoic cavity according to 0.2 mL/piece, the control group is injected with the drug solvent with the same volume, the blank group is not treated, the chick embryos are incubated in a constant temperature incubator at 37 ℃, dead chick embryos in 24h are discarded, and the number of the live chick embryos in each group is recorded for 24h-72h and during the incubation period.
As a result, the maximum safe concentration of Kenpaullone on chick embryos was 10. Mu.M, as shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
(2) Kenpaullone effect of inhibiting IBV proliferation in chick embryo
60 9-Day-old chick embryos are randomly divided into 6 groups, namely, a virus group, a 10 mu M Kenpaullone group, a 10 mu MKenpaullone + virus group, a 1 mu M Kenpaullone + virus group, a 0.1 mu M Kenpaullone + virus group and a blank group, wherein 10 chick embryos are used for each group.
Kenpaullone (10. Mu.M, 1. Mu.M, 0.1. Mu.M) was formulated at various concentrations.
The virus group is injected with virus liquid in the allantoic cavity according to 0.2 mL/piece, kenpaullone groups are injected with Kenpaullone with equal volume, kenpaullone + virus groups, the medicine and the virus liquid are firstly mixed and then injected into the allantoic cavity, the blank groups are not treated, dead embryos occurring in 24 hours are discarded, and the number of each group of living embryos during 24 hours to 72 hours and incubation period is recorded and observed.
As shown in Table 2, kenpaullone can significantly inhibit IBV viral replication in chicken embryos.
TABLE 2
(3) Kenpaullone Effect on IBV replication in chick embryo-RT-qPCR
Collecting allantoic fluid of 72h in (2), extracting RNA according to specification requirements by using EZBioscience EZ-press RNA Puriification Kit kit, performing reverse transcription according to PRIMESCRIPT RT MASTER Mix (Perfect Real Time) specification operation of Taraka, and freezing the product at-80deg.C for later use.
Using the cDNA as a template, detecting Kenpaullone influence on IBV-NmRNA expression in chicken embryo by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR, and the primer sequences are as follows:
IBV-N-F:5’-CGAACCGAGACCAAAGTCAC-3’(SEQ ID NO.9);
IBV-N-R:5’-TCCTTCTTTGGGCGTTGTTG-3’(SEQ ID NO.10);
The PCR reaction was performed according to PERFECTSTART GREEN QPCR Supermix specification of full gold, the reaction system was: 1. Mu.L of cDNA, 5. Mu.L of 2X PERFECTSTART GREEN QPCR Supermix, 0.2. Mu. L PASSIVE REFERENCE DYE (50X), 10. Mu.M upstream and downstream primers each 0.2. Mu.L, 3.4. Mu. L RNASE FREE WATER. The system was assembled in 3 replicates per sample, 10 μl per well was added to 384 well plates and the reaction was performed on an ABI 7300Real time PCR instrument, the reaction procedure being: pre-denaturation at 95℃for 2min;95 ℃ for 15s and 61 ℃ for 31min, and 40 cycles are total. . RNA copy number was calculated from the standard curve and the results are shown in FIG. 11.
Results show that Kenpaullone can significantly inhibit viral replication of IBV in chick embryos and are dose dependent.
The above results demonstrate Kenpaullone has the activity of inhibiting IBV proliferation, successful inhibition of IBV replication in chick embryos using Kenpaullone, and shows dose dependence.
EXAMPLE 9Kenpaullone therapeutic Effect on IBV infected chicks
(1) Design of chick treatment experiment
80 Chicks with the age of 10 days are respectively detected by ELISA and PCR, and the IBV, the NDV antibodies and the antigens are negative. The random number was divided into 4 groups (20 per group), specifically:
the first group is a blank control group, each chicken is inoculated with sterile PBS with the same dosage as the virus liquid by eye drop and nose drop, and the administration group is simultaneously injected with equal volume of empty solvent (DMSO) by muscle when the treatment is started;
The second group is a dosing control group, each chicken is inoculated with sterile PBS with the same dosage as the virus liquid by eye drop and nose drop, and the same volume of Kenpaullone solution is injected into muscle in the treatment stage;
The third group is a virus attacking group, each chicken is inoculated with 10 3.5EID50 IBV virus liquid by eye and nose dropping, and the same volume of no-load solvent (DMSO) is injected into the muscle during the treatment of the administration group;
The fourth group is a treatment group for challenge, each chicken was inoculated with 10 3.5EID50 IBV virus solution by eye and nose drops, and 7.5mg/kg body weight of Kenpaullone solution was intramuscular injected on the first and third days after challenge.
Kenpaullone solution formula: 3.2mL of DMSO was dissolved in 300mg Kenpaullone.
Experiment and sampling arrangement:
Chickens are transported to the experimental site after disinfection, are randomly divided into 4 groups and placed on different sites, the third group and the fourth group are subjected to eye-dropping and nose-dropping and poison-tapping, and meanwhile, the first group and the second group are subjected to eye-dropping and nose-dropping with equal volume of sterile PBS. Kenpaullone doses of Kenpaullone solution at 7.5mg/kg body weight were administered to the second and fourth groups of chicks intramuscularly on the first and third days after challenge. The chicks of each group were continuously monitored for mental, feeding, drinking, excretion, etc., and clinical scores were recorded.
Immediately dissecting the dead chicken after the toxin is attacked, and totally dissecting the rest chicken on the seventh day after the toxin is attacked:
① Observing the respiratory tract and kidney pathological changes of the chicks in the experimental group and the control group;
② Different chicken lesion tissues (kidney, bronchi) were collected:
100mg of tissue sample is weighed, 1mL of PBS and 2 grinding steel balls are added, balanced, and the mixture is placed into a grinder for full grinding. After finishing grinding, centrifuging at 4deg.C and 12000r/min for 10min, collecting supernatant, sub-packaging into 200 μL/tube, and preserving at-80deg.C for subsequent extraction of RNA, and detecting viral load in tissue.
(2) Clinical symptoms
Clinical scores of chickens according to their clinical symptoms are shown in fig. 12a, and fig. 12B shows the weight change of chickens, and the weight gain of the challenge group is significantly slower. During the experiment, the administration control group and the blank control group have no dead chicken, and the toxicity attack group dies 8 animals from the fourth day; one dead chicken was present on each of the fourth and fifth days of the challenge treatment group, and the survival curve results are shown as C in fig. 12. The results show that Kenpaullone administration treatment significantly reduces respiratory symptoms of the chickens in the treatment group, and the mental state of the chickens in the treatment group is superior to that of the chickens in the toxin-attacking group.
(3) Viral load detection for lesion tissue samples
Immediately dissecting the dead chicken after the virus attack, totally dissecting the rest chicken on the seventh day after the virus attack, collecting three tissue samples of kidney and bronchus which are easy to be infected by IBV and generate pathological changes, and measuring the expression level of IBV-N mRNA by adopting a qRT-PCR method, wherein the following concrete steps are as follows:
After tissue thawing, transferring about 1g of tissue sample to a special tube of a tissue breaker, adding 1mL of Trizol, adding sterilized ceramic beads, placing the tissue breaker, carrying out severe shaking and breaking for 3 times and 20 s/time, and then placing the tissue breaker on ice for cracking for 20min; centrifuging at 12000rpm for 5min, transferring supernatant to a clean RNase-free EP tube, adding 200 μl of chloroform, shaking with vigorous vortex, standing for delamination, and centrifuging at 12000rpm for 10min; transferring the supernatant to a new RNase-free EP tube, adding equal volume of isopropanol, mixing well, and precipitating at-20deg.C for 1 hr; centrifuging at 12000rpm for 15min, discarding supernatant to obtain RNA precipitate; rinsing with 75% alcohol for 2 times, air-drying for 5min, adding 50 μl RNase-FREE WATER for dissolving, and measuring concentration and OD value. Reverse transcription was performed according to the PRIMESCRIPTTM MASTER Mix (Perfect Real Time) instructions of Taraka, the reverse transcription system being: 2. Mu.L of 5X PRIMESCRIPT RT MASTER Mix,500ng of total RNA, RNASE FREE WATER to 10. Mu.L of total RNA were added and mixed well, and then reverse transcription was performed on a PCR apparatus, the reaction procedure being: 15min at 37 ℃; and 5s at 85 ℃. Freezing the product at-80deg.C, and storing for use.
Using the cDNA as a template, real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR was performed to detect the mRNA expression level of IBV-N in tissue samples, and the copy number of IBV-N RNA in each tissue sample was calculated according to a standard curve as described in (3) of example 1.
The results are shown in D in fig. 12, and the IBV-N mRNA levels of Kenpaullone treated chicks kidney, bronchi were significantly reduced compared to the challenge group, indicating that Kenpaullone had an effect of inhibiting IBV replication in vivo.
The results show that Kenpaullone is taken as an inhibitor molecule in the chick treatment experiment, and has the advantages of no toxicity and no side effect in the administration control group; in the toxin-counteracting chickens, kenpaullone treatment obviously relieves the respiratory symptoms of the chickens; and Kenpaullone treatment greatly reduces viral load in kidneys and bronchi of infected chickens. And Kenpaullone has definite structure, no toxicity and no side effect.
Example 10Kenpaullone inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication
Effect of different concentrations Kenpaullone on SARS-CoV-2 replication:
1mL of the cell suspension was inoculated at a cell concentration of 6X 10 5 cells/mL in a 12-well cell culture plate, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 until the cells were completely confluent. The medium in the 12-well plate was discarded, washed 3 times with PBS, and the cells were treated with DMEM medium at Kenpaullone concentration of 0. Mu.M (negative control), 0. Mu.M (positive control), 0.16. Mu.M, 0.32. Mu.M, 0.63. Mu.M, 1.25. Mu.M, 2.5. Mu.M, 5. Mu.M, 10. Mu.M, 20. Mu.M, and then treated with SARS-CoV-2 virus solution (MOI=0.1) was added to the wells from which the negative control was removed, and cultured at 37℃under 5% CO 2 for 24 hours.
UsingThe EZ-press RNA Purification Kit kit extracts RNA according to the requirements of the specification,
According to the next holy living thingsV C58P2Multiplex One Step RT-qPCR Probekit (UDG Plus) protocol RT-qPCR was performed, and the level of SARS-CoV-2-N mRNA expression in cells was detected (cf. SARS-CoV-2Mpro inhibitors with antiviral activity in a transgenic mouse model) as described above.
RNA copy number was calculated from the standard curve and the results are shown in FIG. 13. The results show Kenpaullone that inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication.
The present invention has been described in detail in the above embodiments, but the present invention is not limited to the above examples, and various changes can be made within the knowledge of those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Furthermore, embodiments of the invention and features of the embodiments may be combined with each other without conflict.

Claims (10)

1. Use of kenPardone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof in the manufacture of a medicament for the prevention and/or treatment of a disease caused by coronavirus; the coronavirus comprises at least one of PEDV, PDCoV, IBV, SARS-CoV-2 and SADS-CoV.
2. The use according to claim 1, wherein the disease caused by coronavirus comprises at least one of diarrhea, bronchitis, pneumonia.
3. Use of Kenparone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof in the preparation of a coronavirus inhibitor; the coronavirus comprises at least one of PEDV, PDCoV, IBV, SARS-CoV-2 and SADS-CoV.
4. Use according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the medicament or inhibitor further comprises an active ingredient for preventing and/or treating diseases caused by coronaviruses and/or inhibiting the proliferation of coronaviruses.
5. The use according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the medicament or inhibitor further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable adjuvant.
6. The use according to claim 5, wherein the pharmaceutically acceptable excipients comprise: at least one of a diluent, binder, wetting agent, lubricant, disintegrant, solvent, emulsifier, co-solvent, solubilizer, preservative, pH regulator, osmotic pressure regulator, surfactant, coating material, antioxidant, bacteriostat or buffer.
7. The use according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the pharmaceutical or inhibitor dosage form comprises at least one of a suspension, a granule, a capsule, a powder, a tablet, an emulsion, a solution, a drop pill, an injection, an oral preparation, a suppository, an enema, an aerosol, a patch or a drop.
8. The use according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the route of administration of the drug or inhibitor comprises at least one of intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection, intramuscular injection, subcutaneous injection, oral administration, sublingual administration, nasal administration, nebulized administration or transdermal administration.
9. A product comprising as a major component colpitone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof; the function of the product is to prevent and/or treat diseases caused by coronaviruses and/or inhibit the proliferation of coronaviruses; the coronavirus comprises at least one of PEDV, PDCoV, IBV, SARS-CoV-2 and SADS-CoV.
10. The product of claim 9, wherein the product comprises a drug or an inhibitor.
CN202410261955.6A 2024-03-07 Application of Kenparone in preparation of medicines for preventing and treating coronavirus infection Pending CN118121609A (en)

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN118121609A true CN118121609A (en) 2024-06-04

Family

ID=

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ma et al. Novel genotype of infectious bronchitis virus isolated in China
CN103451158B (en) The substance and method controlled for respiratory disease in canid
An et al. Novel goose-origin astrovirus infection in geese: the effect of age at infection
Grgiæ et al. Pathogenicity of infectious bronchitis virus isolates from Ontario chickens
Wang et al. Comparative study on physical–chemical and biological characteristics of grass carp reovirus from different genotypes
KR20110038181A (en) Infectious bronchitis vaccines derived from ib-qx-like strains
CN114794018A (en) Mumps virus counteracting animal model and establishment method thereof
Zhou et al. Characterization of an avian infectious bronchitis virus isolated in China from chickens with nephritis
US20120198578A1 (en) Viral assay
WO2021196666A1 (en) Use of homoharringtonine in preparation of human body beta-coronavirus replication inhibitor
Feng et al. Combined effect of Shegandilong granule and doxycycline on immune responses and protection against avian infectious bronchitis virus in broilers
CN105802921B (en) Recombinant pseudorabies virus variant strain for expressing classical swine fever virus E2protein and construction method and application thereof
Gao et al. Inhibitory effects of recombinant porcine interferon-α on porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus infections in TGEV-seronegative piglets
CN114796193B (en) Traditional Chinese medicine monomer for resisting bovine viral diarrhea virus
CN118121609A (en) Application of Kenparone in preparation of medicines for preventing and treating coronavirus infection
Hewson et al. The presence of viral subpopulations in an infectious bronchitis virus vaccine with differing pathogenicity–a preliminary study
Sunjian et al. Application of a recombinant replicase to localize the Trionyx sinensis hemorrhagic syndrome virus and evaluate its effects on antiviral genes of T. sinensis
He et al. Attenuation of a Highly Pathogenic Porcine Deltacoronavirus Strain CZ2020 by a Serial Passage In Vitro
CN105624122A (en) Avian infectious bronchitis virus natural mutant
Tsai et al. Duck hepatitis
Cowley et al. Molecular biology and pathogenesis of roniviruses
WO2014061914A1 (en) Infectious bronchitis virus k40/09 strain, and vaccine for infectious bronchitis using same
Rafique Seroprevalence and molecular characterization of Infectious bronchitis virus variants from poultry in Pakistan
CN114410594B (en) Avian infectious bronchitis virus suitable for cell replication and proliferation and application thereof
Rasool et al. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Outbreak in China: From Local Epidemics to Global Pandemics

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication