CN115689071B - Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining - Google Patents

Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN115689071B
CN115689071B CN202310001115.1A CN202310001115A CN115689071B CN 115689071 B CN115689071 B CN 115689071B CN 202310001115 A CN202310001115 A CN 202310001115A CN 115689071 B CN115689071 B CN 115689071B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fault
equipment
prediction result
current time
prediction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202310001115.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN115689071A (en
Inventor
孙佑春
陈宏兵
俞阳
戴永娟
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zhenjiang Anhua Electric Group Co ltd
Original Assignee
Nanjing University Of Technology Jinhong Energy Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nanjing University Of Technology Jinhong Energy Technology Co ltd filed Critical Nanjing University Of Technology Jinhong Energy Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN202310001115.1A priority Critical patent/CN115689071B/en
Publication of CN115689071A publication Critical patent/CN115689071A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN115689071B publication Critical patent/CN115689071B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a device fault fusion prediction method and a system based on associated parameter mining, and the method specifically comprises the following steps: collecting historical operation parameters and time sequence data of equipment; performing sequence normalization on each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set; constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the operation parameters of the current time, and taking the predicted abnormal working condition as a first prediction result; obtaining a second prediction result of the fault through another method step; and effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result. According to the method, the relevance of the operation parameters and the relevance of the time sequence are taken into consideration, more complete equipment abnormality information and more advanced and accurate prediction results can be obtained, and the rapid and efficient target of the fault prediction method can be achieved.

Description

Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of reliability maintenance engineering, in particular to a device fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining.
Background
The traditional industrial equipment fault early warning method mostly trains a fault prediction model based on a data set, then inputs relevant data into the trained prediction model to output a fault prediction result, for example, CN115186904A (country: china, publication date: 20221014) discloses a industrial equipment fault prediction method and device based on a Transformer, which is implemented by acquiring a time sequence data set corresponding to the health state of target industrial equipment; inputting the time sequence data set into a trained fault prediction model, and outputting a fault prediction value of the time sequence data set, wherein the fault prediction model is obtained by training based on a training sample carrying a fault prediction value label; and when the fault prediction value is larger than the fault threshold value, judging that the target industrial equipment is faulty, otherwise, judging that the target industrial equipment is normal in operation. Although the conventional fault prediction method is convenient and simple to apply, the running state of the equipment is not fixed in the running process of the industrial equipment, and the accuracy of the conventional prediction method is not high enough along with the increase of data updating, so that the prediction accuracy requirement in a complex industrial environment can not be met.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects in the prior art, the invention aims at providing the equipment fault fusion prediction method and the system based on the associated parameter mining aiming at the defects of low prediction efficiency, low accuracy and low instantaneity in the traditional industrial equipment fault prediction technology. The first prediction result obtained by the bipartite graph and the second prediction result obtained by the alternative method are effectively fused to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result, so that the failure prediction result can reach the aims of high speed, high efficiency and high accuracy.
The technical scheme is as follows: in order to achieve the aim of the invention, the invention adopts the following technical scheme: an equipment fault fusion prediction method based on associated parameter mining comprises the following steps:
s1, collecting historical operation parameters and time sequence data of equipment;
s2, carrying out sequence normalization on each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
s3, constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter feature nodes, and the connected edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes represent the relevance relationship between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes;
s4, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the running parameter of the current time, and taking the predicted abnormal working condition as a first prediction result;
s5, segment linearization vector representation is carried out on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x is X K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K -a }; k is the total number of sequential sequence segments, k=1, 2,; x is x 1 Operating parameter characteristics for the first time sequence segment; x is x 2 Operating parameter characteristics for the second time sequence segment; x is x k-1 Operating parameter characteristics for the (k-1) th time sequence segment; x is x k Is the kthOperating parameter characteristics of the time sequence section;
s6, assuming that the ith time sequence segment is in a fault-free state, the corresponding operation parameter characteristic is x i The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Assuming that the jth sequential sequence segment is in fault state, the corresponding operation parameter feature is x j
S7, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1 between:
Figure 869381DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
wherein
Figure 503624DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is a correction coefficient;
s8, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2 between:
Figure 7418DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 755360DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
representing the 2 norms of the vectors;
s9, integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment, and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
s10, effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
Further, the step S9 of predicting the abnormal working condition of the device by integrating the value ranges of D1 and D2, and taking the abnormal working condition as the second prediction result specifically includes:
operating parameter x for current time a a And x i Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure 53618DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Operating parameter x for current time a a And x j Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure 424425DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
When D1 is smaller than
Figure 466330DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is greater than
Figure 45341DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the equipment is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated to be in fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 576817DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is less than
Figure 857757DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 14937DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is greater than
Figure 697723DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the possibility of the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is smaller than
Figure 354094DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is less than
Figure 919068DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the device is in fault, the possibility of the device at the current time is indicated.
Further, the step S10 of effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result specifically comprises the step of fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result through a decision-making level model obtained by a machine learning method to obtain the final equipment failure prediction result.
Further, the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained through pre-training, and specifically comprises the following steps:
taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to perform data preprocessing to form a training set and a testing set;
training the decision-level model by utilizing the training set;
testing the decision-level model by using the test set;
and updating model parameters of the decision-making level model according to the test result, and obtaining the decision-making level model through iterative training.
Based on the same inventive concept, the equipment fault fusion prediction system based on the associated parameter mining disclosed by the invention comprises the following components:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring historical operation parameters and time sequence data of the equipment;
the system comprises a normalization module, a fault event sequence collection module and a fault event sequence collection module, wherein the normalization module is used for performing sequence normalization on each fault data based on time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
the construction module is used for constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter feature nodes, and the connected edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes represent the relevance relationship between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes;
the prediction module 1 is used for predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the running parameter of the current time and taking the predicted abnormal working condition as a first prediction result;
the segmentation module is used for carrying out piecewise linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x is X K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K -a }; k is the total number of sequential sequence segments, k=1, 2,; x is x 1 Operating parameter characteristics for the first time sequence segment; x is x 2 Operating parameter characteristics for the second time sequence segment; x is x k-1 Operating parameter characteristics for the (k-1) th time sequence segment; x is x k Operating parameter characteristics of the kth time sequence segment;
assuming that the ith sequential sequence segment is in a fault-free stateThe corresponding operation parameter is characterized as x i The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Assuming that the jth sequential sequence segment is in fault state, the corresponding operation parameter feature is x j
A calculation module 1 for calculating an operation parameter x of the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1 between:
Figure 99513DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
wherein
Figure 151652DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is a correction coefficient;
a calculation module 2 for calculating an operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2 between:
Figure 228192DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 546041DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
representing the 2 norms of the vectors;
the prediction module 2 is used for integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
and the fusion prediction module is used for effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
Further, the value ranges of D1 and D2 are synthesized, and the abnormal working condition of the device is predicted, and as a second prediction result, the method specifically includes:
operating parameter x for current time a a And x i Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure 218593DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Operating parameter x for current time a a And x j Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure 938287DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
When D1 is smaller than
Figure 169418DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
And D2 is greater than
Figure 974562DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the equipment is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated to be in fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 700073DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is less than
Figure 228269DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 443349DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is greater than
Figure 922741DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the possibility of the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is smaller than
Figure 451942DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is less than
Figure 615071DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the device is in fault, the possibility of the device at the current time is indicated.
Further, the first prediction result and the second prediction result are effectively fused to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result, and the method specifically comprises the step of fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result through a decision-making level model obtained through a machine learning method to obtain the final equipment failure prediction result.
Further, the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained through pre-training, and specifically comprises the following steps:
the preprocessing module is used for preprocessing data by taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to form a training set and a testing set;
the training module is used for training the decision-level model by utilizing the training set;
the test module is used for testing the decision-level model by utilizing the test set;
and the iterative training module is used for updating the model parameters of the decision-making level model according to the test result, and obtaining the decision-making level model through iterative training.
The beneficial effects are that:
1. the equipment fault fusion prediction method based on the associated parameter mining can be used for equipment fault prediction under complex industrial conditions. S1, collecting historical operation parameters and time sequence data of equipment; s2, carrying out sequence normalization on each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set; s3, constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; s4, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the running parameter of the current time, and taking the predicted abnormal working condition as a first prediction result; s5, carrying out piecewise linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance; s6, assuming that the ith time sequence segment is in a fault-free state, the corresponding operation parameter characteristic is x i The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Assuming that the jth sequential sequence segment is in fault state, the corresponding operation parameter feature is x j The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the S7, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x i A characteristic distance D1 therebetween; s8, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j A characteristic distance D2 therebetween; s9, integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment, and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result; s10, effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result. The method provided by the invention takes the relevance of the operation parameters and the relevance of the time sequence into consideration, so that more complete equipment abnormality information and more advanced prediction results can be obtained; innovative proposal of constructing a correlation bipartite graph of operation parameters and fault events, and converting the prediction problem of faults intoThe problem of bipartite graph prediction is solved, the advantages of bipartite graph are utilized to realize fault prediction, and a first prediction result and a second prediction result obtained by the bipartite graph are effectively fused to obtain a final equipment fault prediction result; the fault prediction method can achieve the aim of high speed and high efficiency.
2. According to the invention, the second prediction result is obtained by calculating the characteristic distance between the operation parameter at the current time and the operation parameter characteristics under the two pre-assumed fault states and comprehensively comparing the two characteristic distances, so that the prediction of the fault is realized, and the accuracy of the fault prediction is greatly improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the implementation of the steps of the method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present application is described in further detail below with reference to the drawings and examples. It is to be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not limiting of the invention. It should be noted that, for convenience of description, only the portions related to the invention are shown in the drawings.
The invention relates to an industrial equipment, in particular to an intelligent comprehensive energy-saving cabinet (intelligent voltage optimizing device), which integrates a three-phase magnetic balance technology and a compensation type voltage regulating and stabilizing technology, adopts a 'Z-shaped isolation compensation transformer' with an iron core and a plurality of windings and special wiring to be combined with a 'column type voltage regulating transformer', and is a novel environment-friendly energy-saving technology system designed for reducing equipment failure rate, prolonging equipment service life and saving electricity expenditure of users based on optimizing equipment working voltage. The normal use condition of the intelligent voltage optimizing device is as follows: (1) ambient temperature: -15-40 ℃; (2) altitude: not more than 1000 meters; and (3) injection: when the altitude exceeds 1000 meters, the load capacity of the regulated power supply will decrease with increasing altitude. (3) relative humidity: less than or equal to 90 percent; (4) The installation place should be free from gases, vapors, chemical deposits, dust, dirt and other explosive and aggressive media that seriously affect the insulating strength of the regulated power supply; (5) the installation site should be free of severe vibration or jolt. The intelligent voltage optimizing device is used for timely predicting and alarming abnormal conditions such as under-voltage, overload, overcurrent and over-temperature related to the intelligent comprehensive energy-saving cabinet (intelligent voltage optimizing device), and has important effect on use safety and reliability.
As shown in fig. 1, the present embodiment provides a device failure fusion prediction method based on associated parameter mining, which includes the following steps:
s1, collecting historical operation parameters and time sequence data of equipment;
specifically, historical operation parameters and corresponding time sequence data of the intelligent comprehensive energy-saving cabinet (intelligent voltage optimizing device) are collected; the operating parameters include: input voltage, output voltage, operating current, operating temperature, load conditions, and the like.
S2, carrying out sequence normalization on each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
specifically, the fault data are integrated according to the time sequence data to form a fault event sequence set.
S3, constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter feature nodes, and the connected edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes represent the relevance relationship between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes;
s4, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the running parameter of the current time, and taking the predicted abnormal working condition as a first prediction result;
s5, segment linearization vector representation is carried out on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x is X K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K -a }; k is the total number of sequential sequence segments, k=1, 2,; x is x 1 Operating parameter characteristics for the first time sequence segment; x is x 2 Operating parameter characteristics for the second time sequence segment; x is x k-1 Operating parameter characteristics for the (k-1) th time sequence segment; x is x k Operating parameter characteristics of the kth time sequence segment;
specifically, for example, if the time series data relates to data of 1 month, the time series division may be performed at intervals meeting the requirements such as every half minute, every 1 hour, or the like;
if the time series data relates to data of 1 whole year, the time series segmentation can be performed at intervals meeting requirements such as every 1 minute, every 1 hour, every 1 day, and the like.
S6, assuming that the ith time sequence segment is in a fault-free state, the corresponding operation parameter characteristic is x i The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Assuming that the jth sequential sequence segment is in fault state, the corresponding operation parameter feature is x j
S7, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1 between:
Figure 955047DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
wherein
Figure 734784DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is a correction coefficient;
s8, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2 between:
Figure 316944DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 334579DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
representing the 2 norms of the vectors;
s9, integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment, and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
s10, effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
Specifically, the step S9 of predicting the abnormal working condition of the device by integrating the value ranges of D1 and D2, and using the abnormal working condition as the second prediction result specifically includes:
operating parameter x for current time a a And x i The characteristic distance between the two is setThreshold value
Figure 314299DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Operating parameter x for current time a a And x j Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure 50173DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
When D1 is smaller than
Figure 717915DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is greater than
Figure 573744DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the equipment is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated to be in fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 504791DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is less than
Figure 681957DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 418969DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is greater than
Figure 614458DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the possibility of the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is smaller than
Figure 762411DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
And D2 is less than
Figure 676141DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
When the device is in fault, the possibility of the device at the current time is indicated.
The method specifically comprises the step of S10, effectively fusing a first prediction result and a second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result, wherein the first prediction result and the second prediction result are fused through a decision-making level model obtained through a machine learning method to obtain the final equipment failure prediction result.
Specifically, the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained through pre-training, and specifically comprises the following steps:
taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to perform data preprocessing to form a training set and a testing set; the sample data ratio of the training set to the test set is 4:1.
Training the decision-level model by utilizing the training set;
testing the decision-level model by using the test set;
and updating model parameters of the decision-making level model according to the test result, and obtaining the decision-making level model through iterative training.
Specifically, inputting a training set into a decision-level model for machine learning to preliminarily obtain a fault prediction model; and inputting the test set into the preliminarily obtained prediction model, and finally, carrying out parameter adjustment on the model according to the test accuracy, thereby obtaining the optimal decision-making model.
Based on the same inventive concept, the device fault fusion prediction system based on associated parameter mining disclosed in this embodiment includes:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring historical operation parameters and time sequence data of the equipment;
specifically, historical operation parameters and corresponding time sequence data of the intelligent comprehensive energy-saving cabinet (intelligent voltage optimizing device) are collected; the operating parameters include: input voltage, output voltage, operating current, operating temperature, load conditions, and the like.
The system comprises a normalization module, a fault event sequence collection module and a fault event sequence collection module, wherein the normalization module is used for performing sequence normalization on each fault data based on time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
specifically, the fault data are integrated according to the time sequence data to form a fault event sequence set.
The construction module is used for constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter feature nodes, and the connected edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes represent the relevance relationship between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes;
the prediction module 1 is used for predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the running parameter of the current time and taking the predicted abnormal working condition as a first prediction result;
the segmentation module is used for carrying out piecewise linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x is X K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K -a }; k is the total number of sequential sequence segments, k=1, 2,; x is x 1 Operating parameter characteristics for the first time sequence segment; x is x 2 Operating parameter characteristics for the second time sequence segment; x is x k-1 Operating parameter characteristics for the (k-1) th time sequence segment; x is x k Operating parameter characteristics of the kth time sequence segment;
specifically, for example, if the time series data relates to data of 1 month, the time series division may be performed at intervals meeting the requirements such as every half minute, every 1 hour, or the like;
if the time series data relates to data of 1 whole year, the time series segmentation can be performed at intervals meeting requirements such as every 1 minute, every 1 hour, every 1 day, and the like.
Specifically, assuming that the ith time sequence segment is in a fault-free state, the corresponding operating parameter characteristic is x i The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Assuming that the jth sequential sequence segment is in fault state, the corresponding operation parameter feature is x j
A calculation module 1 for calculating an operation parameter x of the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1 between:
Figure 951264DEST_PATH_IMAGE011
wherein
Figure 17572DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
Is a correction coefficient;
a calculation module 2 for calculating an operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2 between:
Figure 290421DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Figure 737452DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
representing the 2 norms of the vectors;
the prediction module 2 is used for integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
and the fusion prediction module is used for effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
Specifically, the method for predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment by integrating the value ranges of D1 and D2 and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result specifically comprises the following steps:
operating parameter x for current time a a And x i Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure 753949DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
Operating parameter x for current time a a And x j Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure 986348DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
When D1 is smaller than
Figure 915252DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
And D2 is greater than
Figure 69152DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
When the equipment is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated to be in fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 138608DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
And D2 is less than
Figure 225513DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is greater than
Figure 590898DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
And D2 is greater than
Figure 700936DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the possibility of the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is smaller than
Figure 574083DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
And D2 is less than
Figure 718757DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
When the device is in fault, the possibility of the device at the current time is indicated.
The method comprises the steps of fusing a first prediction result and a second prediction result through a decision-making level model obtained through a machine learning method to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result.
Specifically, the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained through pre-training, and specifically comprises the following steps:
the preprocessing module is used for preprocessing data by taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to form a training set and a testing set; the sample data ratio of the training set to the test set is 4:1.
The training module is used for training the decision-level model by utilizing the training set;
the test module is used for testing the decision-level model by utilizing the test set;
and the iterative training module is used for updating the model parameters of the decision-making level model according to the test result, and obtaining the decision-making level model through iterative training.
Specifically, inputting a training set into a decision-level model for machine learning to preliminarily obtain a fault prediction model; and inputting the test set into the preliminarily obtained prediction model, and finally, carrying out parameter adjustment on the model according to the test accuracy, thereby obtaining the optimal decision-making model.

Claims (6)

1. The equipment fault fusion prediction method based on the association parameter mining is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
s1, collecting historical operation parameters and time sequence data of equipment;
s2, carrying out sequence normalization on each fault data based on the time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
s3, constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter feature nodes, and the connected edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes represent the relevance relationship between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes;
s4, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the running parameter of the current time, and taking the predicted abnormal working condition as a first prediction result;
s5, segment linearization vector representation is carried out on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x is X K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K -a }; k is the total number of sequential sequence segments, k=1, 2,; x is x 1 Operating parameter characteristics for the first time sequence segment; x is x 2 Operating parameter characteristics for the second time sequence segment; x is x k-1 Operating parameter characteristics for the (k-1) th time sequence segment; x is x k Operating parameter characteristics of the kth time sequence segment;
s6, assuming that the ith time sequence segment is in a fault-free state, the corresponding operation parameter characteristic is x i The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Assuming that the jth sequential sequence segment is in fault state, the corresponding operation parameter feature is x j
S7, calculating the operation parameter of the current time ax a And x i Characteristic distance D1 between:
Figure QLYQS_1
wherein
Figure QLYQS_2
Is a correction coefficient;
s8, calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2 between:
Figure QLYQS_3
Figure QLYQS_4
representing the 2 norms of the vectors;
s9, integrating the value ranges of the D1 and the D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment, and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
s10, effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result;
s9, the value ranges of D1 and D2 are synthesized, the abnormal working condition of the equipment is predicted, and the abnormal working condition is used as a second prediction result, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
operating parameter x for current time a a And x i Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure QLYQS_5
Operating parameter x for current time a a And x j Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure QLYQS_6
When D1 is smaller than
Figure QLYQS_7
And D2 is greater than->
Figure QLYQS_8
When it is, then indicate the currentThe time equipment has no faults;
when D1 is greater than
Figure QLYQS_9
And D2 is less than->
Figure QLYQS_10
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is greater than
Figure QLYQS_11
And D2 is greater than->
Figure QLYQS_12
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the possibility of the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is smaller than
Figure QLYQS_13
And D2 is less than->
Figure QLYQS_14
When the device is in fault, the possibility of the device at the current time is indicated.
2. The method for predicting the equipment failure fusion based on the association parameter mining according to claim 1, wherein the step S10 is characterized in that the first prediction result and the second prediction result are effectively fused to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result, and specifically comprises the step of fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result through a decision-making level model obtained by a machine learning method to obtain the final equipment failure prediction result.
3. The method for predicting equipment failure fusion based on associated parameter mining according to claim 2, wherein the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained through pre-training, and specifically comprises the following steps:
taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to perform data preprocessing to form a training set and a testing set;
training the decision-level model by utilizing the training set;
testing the decision-level model by using the test set;
and updating model parameters of the decision-making level model according to the test result, and obtaining the decision-making level model through iterative training.
4. An equipment fault fusion prediction system based on associated parameter mining, which is characterized by comprising:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring historical operation parameters and time sequence data of the equipment;
the system comprises a normalization module, a fault event sequence collection module and a fault event sequence collection module, wherein the normalization module is used for performing sequence normalization on each fault data based on time sequence data to obtain a fault event sequence set;
the construction module is used for constructing a correlation bipartite graph of the operation parameters and the fault events based on the fault event sequence set; the nodes in the relevance bipartite graph comprise fault object nodes and operation parameter feature nodes, and the connected edges between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes represent the relevance relationship between the fault object nodes and the operation parameter feature nodes;
the first prediction module is used for predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment according to the relevance bipartite graph for the operation parameters of the current time and taking the predicted abnormal working condition as a first prediction result;
the segmentation module is used for carrying out piecewise linearization vector representation on the time sequence data according to a fixed time distance: x is X K ={x 1 ,x 2 ,…, x K-1 , x K -a }; k is the total number of sequential sequence segments, k=1, 2,; x is x 1 Operating parameter characteristics for the first time sequence segment; x is x 2 Operating parameter characteristics for the second time sequence segment; x is x k-1 Operating parameter characteristics for the (k-1) th time sequence segment; x is x k Operating parameter characteristics of the kth time sequence segment;
assuming that the ith time sequence segment is in a fault-free state, the corresponding operating parameter is characterized as x i The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Assuming the jth sequential sequence segment is in a faulty state, it is toThe corresponding operating parameter is characterized as x j
A first calculation module for calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x i Characteristic distance D1 between:
Figure QLYQS_15
wherein->
Figure QLYQS_16
Is a correction coefficient;
a second calculation module for calculating the operation parameter x of the current time a a And x j Characteristic distance D2 between:
Figure QLYQS_17
,/>
Figure QLYQS_18
representing the 2 norms of the vectors;
the second prediction module is used for synthesizing the value ranges of D1 and D2, predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result;
the fusion prediction module is used for effectively fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result;
the method for predicting the abnormal working condition of the equipment by integrating the value ranges of D1 and D2 and taking the abnormal working condition as a second prediction result specifically comprises the following steps:
operating parameter x for current time a a And x i Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure QLYQS_19
Operating parameter x for current time a a And x j Feature distance between, set threshold
Figure QLYQS_20
When D1 is smaller than
Figure QLYQS_21
And D2 is greater than->
Figure QLYQS_22
When the equipment is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated to be in fault;
when D1 is greater than
Figure QLYQS_23
And D2 is less than->
Figure QLYQS_24
When the equipment at the current time is in fault, the equipment at the current time is indicated;
when D1 is greater than
Figure QLYQS_25
And D2 is greater than->
Figure QLYQS_26
When the device is at the present time, the possibility of failure of the device is indicated>
When D1 is smaller than
Figure QLYQS_27
And D2 is less than->
Figure QLYQS_28
When the device is in fault, the possibility of the device at the current time is indicated.
5. The equipment failure fusion prediction system based on the association parameter mining, as set forth in claim 4, is characterized in that the first prediction result and the second prediction result are effectively fused to obtain a final equipment failure prediction result, and specifically comprises the steps of fusing the first prediction result and the second prediction result through a decision-making level model obtained by a machine learning method to obtain the final equipment failure prediction result.
6. The system for predicting equipment failure fusion based on associated parameter mining of claim 5, wherein the decision-level model obtained by the machine learning method is obtained through pre-training, and specifically comprises:
the preprocessing module is used for preprocessing data by taking fault data related to equipment history as training data to form a training set and a testing set;
the training module is used for training the decision-level model by utilizing the training set;
the test module is used for testing the decision-level model by utilizing the test set;
and the iterative training module is used for updating the model parameters of the decision-making level model according to the test result, and obtaining the decision-making level model through iterative training.
CN202310001115.1A 2023-01-03 2023-01-03 Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining Active CN115689071B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310001115.1A CN115689071B (en) 2023-01-03 2023-01-03 Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310001115.1A CN115689071B (en) 2023-01-03 2023-01-03 Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN115689071A CN115689071A (en) 2023-02-03
CN115689071B true CN115689071B (en) 2023-05-02

Family

ID=85057536

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202310001115.1A Active CN115689071B (en) 2023-01-03 2023-01-03 Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN115689071B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116755403B (en) * 2023-06-13 2024-03-26 英利新能源(宁夏)有限公司 Data acquisition method and system based on photovoltaic module production control system

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110008565A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-07-12 浙江大学 A kind of industrial process unusual service condition prediction technique based on operating parameter association analysis
CN112906969A (en) * 2021-03-01 2021-06-04 三一重工股份有限公司 Engine fault prediction method, engine fault prediction device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110018670B (en) * 2019-03-28 2020-07-10 浙江大学 Industrial process abnormal working condition prediction method based on dynamic association rule mining
CN110008253B (en) * 2019-03-28 2021-02-23 浙江大学 Industrial data association rule mining and abnormal working condition prediction method
CN112801426B (en) * 2021-04-06 2021-06-22 浙江浙能技术研究院有限公司 Industrial process fault fusion prediction method based on correlation parameter mining
CN114818515A (en) * 2022-06-24 2022-07-29 中国海洋大学 Multidimensional time sequence prediction method based on self-attention mechanism and graph convolution network

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110008565A (en) * 2019-03-28 2019-07-12 浙江大学 A kind of industrial process unusual service condition prediction technique based on operating parameter association analysis
CN112906969A (en) * 2021-03-01 2021-06-04 三一重工股份有限公司 Engine fault prediction method, engine fault prediction device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN115689071A (en) 2023-02-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Zhu et al. Imbalance learning machine-based power system short-term voltage stability assessment
CN111639921B (en) Intelligent equipment fault judgment and auxiliary disposal method based on expert system
CN115689071B (en) Equipment fault fusion prediction method and system based on associated parameter mining
CN104504607A (en) Method for diagnosing photovoltaic power station faults on the basis of fuzzy clustering algorithm
CN107844628B (en) Redundancy optimization method for large-scale offshore wind farm power collection system
CN106327359A (en) Electricity consumption mode analysis-based meter centralized reading data anomaly judgment method
CN116031867A (en) Power grid transient safety stability assessment method
CN114692787B (en) Multi-source data-based three-winding main transformer event analysis processing method and system
CN115358355B (en) Method and device for judging main transformer oil temperature gauge and top layer oil temperature abnormity
CN116204839A (en) Transformer oil temperature anomaly analysis method
Wang et al. State prediction of power transformer based on grey-lagrange method with weighted coefficient of variation
CN114355182A (en) Online monitoring and fault diagnosis method for high-voltage circuit breaker
Huang et al. Extracting substation cyber-physical architecture through intelligent electronic devices' data
CN112434955A (en) Distribution network line operation risk sensing method based on multi-data fusion
CN112529395A (en) Power transmission line typical ice wind disaster analysis method based on fusion of FCE and SVM
CN112001073A (en) Reliability analysis research method of traction power supply system
Qin et al. An Identification Method of Metering Anomaly Based on Line Loss Analysis of Low Voltage Station
de Oliveira et al. Voltage dips caused by faults in a transmission system: a monitoring case study of a sensitive industrial consumer
Xie et al. Large power transformer condition evaluation based on multilevel extension theory
Zeng et al. Fault Diagnosis Analysis of Distribution Network Based on Compound Statistics of Residual and Score
CN117648588B (en) Meteorological radar parameter anomaly identification method based on correlation network graph cluster analysis
CN118261577A (en) Operation state grading method for power equipment of substation in front-end system
Bai et al. Abnormal Detection Scheme of Substation Equipment based on Intelligent Fusion Terminal
Liu et al. A Multilevel Diagnosis Method for Large Transformer Fault Modes under Multi-sensor Information Fusion
Du et al. Fault Diagnosis Based on the Adaptive Network Fuzzy Inference System for Power System of Offshore Platform

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
TR01 Transfer of patent right

Effective date of registration: 20240208

Address after: No.198 GANGLONG Road, Yangzhong Development Zone, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province, 212000

Patentee after: Zhenjiang Anhua Electric Group Co.,Ltd.

Country or region after: China

Address before: Room 1001-3, Tower C, Zhimengyuan, 4 Gupinggang, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000

Patentee before: Nanjing University of Technology Jinhong Energy Technology Co.,Ltd.

Country or region before: China

TR01 Transfer of patent right