CN115455746A - Nuclear power device operation monitoring data anomaly detection and correction integrated method - Google Patents
Nuclear power device operation monitoring data anomaly detection and correction integrated method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115455746A CN115455746A CN202211402303.7A CN202211402303A CN115455746A CN 115455746 A CN115455746 A CN 115455746A CN 202211402303 A CN202211402303 A CN 202211402303A CN 115455746 A CN115455746 A CN 115455746A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- nuclear power
- value
- monitoring data
- operation monitoring
- data
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/27—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using machine learning, e.g. artificial intelligence, neural networks, support vector machines [SVM] or training a model
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/14—Force analysis or force optimisation, e.g. static or dynamic forces
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E30/00—Energy generation of nuclear origin
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows: a nuclear power plant operation monitoring data abnormity detection and correction integrated method comprises the following steps: reading a collection value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment; the GRU model generates a predicted value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment; judging whether the acquisition value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the current moment is normal or not by the MLP model according to the predicted value and the acquisition value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the current moment; if the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data is judged to be normal, the acquisition value of the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data at the current moment is used as the verification value of the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data at the moment for storage; and if the operation monitoring data is judged to be abnormal, storing the predicted value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment as the approved value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the moment.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of nuclear power devices, and particularly relates to a nuclear power device operation monitoring data anomaly detection and correction integrated method.
Background
Processing and analysis capabilities are also increasing. In recent years, with the increasing maturity of technologies such as machine learning and deep learning, a method for diagnosing and predicting operation faults of a nuclear power plant based on data analysis becomes a research hotspot. Various methods proposed at present are analyzed, and the general application premise of the methods is that the operation data acquired by the I & C system is accurate and complete. However, the working environment of data acquisition, transmission and storage equipment in the I & C system is severe, and equipment failure and external interference can cause data quality problems such as missing, drifting and jumping of operation monitoring data. The analysis result obtained from the wrong operation monitoring data may cause the operator to make a misjudgment on the operation state of the device or cause the automatic controller to output a wrong control signal. Therefore, there is a need to develop a feasible and efficient method for detecting and correcting abnormal values occurring in the nuclear power plant operating parameter monitoring data.
At present, research on an abnormal detection method of operation monitoring data of a nuclear power plant is not common, and some schemes adopt Multivariate State Estimation (MSET) and Sequential Probability Ratio (SPRT) technologies to estimate, predict and judge the abnormal variables of a plant system. Some schemes establish a system reliability model by monitoring the internal reliability correlation of a plurality of related devices, thereby predicting the reliability state of the whole system and further discovering the abnormal state of system parameters. He Yana and the like establish a system reliability model by monitoring the internal reliability correlation of a plurality of related devices, thereby predicting the reliability state of the whole system and further discovering the abnormal state of system parameters. In some schemes, a time series model prediction analysis method is used for predicting noise signals generated by the leakage working condition of the steam generator, and the prediction signals are compared with original signals to judge and find data abnormity, so that the specific time of heat transfer pipeline leakage is further determined. In the prior art, a nuclear power plant abnormal operation state monitoring method based on a dynamic Hopfield artificial neural network also exists, and the method has good parameter abnormal change detection capability.
However, the purpose of data anomaly detection is to find and correct data anomalies, so that detection and correction algorithms for anomalous data should be studied at the same time, and most of the currently studied methods separate anomaly detection and correction functions, occupy large computing resources, and are relatively inefficient.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the defects of the background technology and provides an integrated method for detecting and correcting the abnormal operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows: a nuclear power plant operation monitoring data abnormity detection and correction integrated method comprises the following steps:
reading a collection value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment;
the GRU model generates a predicted value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment;
judging whether the acquisition value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the current moment is normal or not by the MLP model according to the predicted value and the acquisition value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the current moment;
if the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data is judged to be normal, storing the acquisition value of the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data at the current moment as the verification value of the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data at the moment;
and if the abnormal condition is judged, storing the predicted value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment as the approved value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment.
In the above technical solution, the GRU model generates the predicted value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant at the current time based on the approval value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant at the historical time period corresponding to the current time.
In the technical scheme, the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant has time-varying characteristics and is easy to fluctuate, and the parameter values are generated in the operation process of a nuclear power plant system and equipment and reflect the operation state of the nuclear power plant system and the equipment, and comprise the temperature, the pressure and the flow of fluid in a pipeline, the rotating speed of a rotating machine and the operation current of electrical equipment.
In the technical scheme, a GRU model and an MLP model corresponding to each parameter in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant are respectively constructed, and the acquired value of each parameter is input into the corresponding GRU model to obtain the predicted value of the parameter; and inputting the acquired value and the predicted value of each parameter into the corresponding MLP model to obtain a judgment result of whether the parameter is normal, and selecting the acquired value or the predicted value of the parameter as a check value according to the judgment result.
In the above technical solution, the process of constructing the single parameter GRU model includes: acquiring historical data a (t) of a certain parameter in operation monitoring data of a nuclear power plant, wherein the data sampling period is tau, a window with the length of q slides backwards along the time sequence, and the starting point of the window is set as t = t 0 Then the end point is t = t 0 + (q-1) τ; data a (t) in the window 0 )~a(t 0 + (q-1) τ) input GRU model, with a (t) 0 + qt) as result labels, performing iterative training; the time window slides backwards according to the time sequence, and the time window slides for one time unit tau each time, and training is carried out in sequence until the convergence of the GRU model reaches the expectation finally, and the GRU model is used as the GRU model of the parameter; the historical data of the parameter is a value which is preset to be correct and has no deviation and is used for reflecting the objective and actual running state of the nuclear power device; and constructing GRU models corresponding to all parameters in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant by adopting the process.
In the above technical solution, the construction process of the MLP model with a single parameter includes: acquiring historical data a (t) of a certain parameter in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant, and taking the window data of a certain section as a true value and an acquisition value of the window data of the section; inputting the true value of the parameter into the GRU model which completes training to obtain the predicted value of the window data of the section; constructing a sample set based on the segment of window data; a single sample of the sample set comprises two parts, namely input data and a training label corresponding to the input data; the input data comprises a predicted value of a GRU model to a parameter at a certain moment and an acquired value of the parameter at the moment, and the training label is a mark for judging whether the parameter is abnormal at the moment; training an MLP model through a sample set to obtain the MLP model of the parameters; and constructing the MLP model corresponding to all the parameters in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant by adopting the process.
In the technical scheme, the approval value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment is stored in a historical database; the GRU model obtains a nuclear power device operation monitoring data verification value corresponding to a window time period with the end point being the current moment from a historical database, and the nuclear power device operation monitoring data verification value is used for generating a predicted value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the next moment.
In the technical scheme, in the training process of the MLP model, firstly, the difference value between the predicted value and the acquired value in a single training sample is obtained, the difference value and the training label in the training sample are input into the MLP model for training, and the training of the MLP model is completed after the difference value and the training label in the training sample are converged;
in the use process of the MLP model, firstly, the difference value between the input predicted value and the input collection value is obtained, and the difference value is input into the trained MLP model, so that the identification conclusion can be obtained.
The invention has the beneficial effects that: the invention effectively solves the data quality problems of deletion, drift, jump and the like in the operation data acquired or stored by the instrument control system of the nuclear power plant, so as to provide more reliable input for operation data analysis and an automatic controller. The invention provides a nuclear power plant operation monitoring parameter abnormity detection and correction method based on a gated cycle unit and a multilayer perceptron hybrid model (GRU-MLP). Firstly, a short-time prediction algorithm of the operational monitoring data based on the GRU model is provided, a reference basis is provided for the abnormal detection and correction of the operational monitoring data, and a real-time correction mechanism is designed to improve the prediction accuracy of the GRU model to the operational data containing the abnormality. Then, by utilizing the nonlinear fitting capacity of the MLP model, a fixed threshold used under a prediction-anomaly detection mechanism is optimized to be a dynamic threshold, and the anomaly detection accuracy of the designed method is improved through the nonlinear fitting capacity of the MLP model. The invention provides a method for integrally transmitting the monitoring data prediction and the abnormality detection of the nuclear power device to the correction, which effectively saves the computing resources and improves the overall operation efficiency.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a logic diagram of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of three pressure curves of the potentiostat at random jump;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of data anomaly detection accuracy rate curve under random jump;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of three curves of the water level of the constant-offset voltage stabilizer;
FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating data anomaly detection accuracy at a fixed offset;
FIG. 7 is a graph of three curves of potentiostat pressure over linear increase;
FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating data anomaly detection accuracy under linear growth;
FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of three graphs illustrating the average temperature of the loop under polynomial growth;
FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating data anomaly detection accuracy under polynomial growth;
FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of three pressure curves of a potentiostat under logarithmic growth;
FIG. 12 is a graph illustrating data anomaly detection accuracy for logarithmic growth;
FIG. 13 is a graph illustrating the actual pressure curve of the pressure stabilizer;
FIG. 14 is a graph illustrating pressure collection values of the pressure stabilizer;
FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram of the GRU model prediction effect without real-time correction;
fig. 16 is a diagram illustrating the predicted effect of the real-time correction GRU model.
Detailed Description
The invention will be further described in detail with reference to the following drawings and specific examples, which are not intended to limit the invention, but are for clear understanding.
As shown in fig. 1, the invention provides an integrated method for detecting and correcting the abnormal operation monitoring data of a nuclear power device, which comprises the following steps:
reading a collection value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment;
the GRU model generates a predicted value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment; the GRU model generates a predicted value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the current time based on the nuclear power device operation monitoring data of the historical time period corresponding to the current time; storing the approved value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment into a historical database; the GRU model acquires a check value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data corresponding to a window time period with the end point being the current moment from a historical database, and the check value is used for generating a predicted value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the next moment;
judging whether the acquisition value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the current moment is normal or not by the MLP model according to the predicted value and the acquisition value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the current moment;
if the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data is judged to be normal, the acquisition value of the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data at the current moment is used as the verification value of the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data at the moment for storage;
and if the operation monitoring data is judged to be abnormal, storing the predicted value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment as the approved value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the moment.
The nuclear power plant operating data is typically time series data. The nuclear power plant operation monitoring data are parameter values reflecting the operation states of the nuclear power plant system and the equipment generated in the operation process, such as the temperature, the pressure and the flow of fluid in a pipeline, the rotating speed of a rotating machine, the operation current of electrical equipment and other parameter values. The data has time-varying characteristics and is subject to fluctuations. The data has two expressions of real value and collected value. The true value refers to the objective actual data state of the operation parameter of a certain nuclear power device, and the acquired value refers to the data value obtained by observing the operation parameter through data acquisition equipment such as a sensor, a transmitter and the like. There is a deviation between the collected value and the true value. This deviation is considered acceptable when the sensor, transmitter, etc. is operating properly, and therefore the collected value is usually used as the true value. When data acquisition equipment such as a detector and a sensor breaks down, the acquired value and the true value are greatly deviated, and the acquired value is regarded as abnormal.
The actual value used in this embodiment is a value that is preset to be correct and free of deviation, and the acquired value is a value acquired when the detection device fails. Model training uses the collected values and predicted values.
The GRU model extracts short-time memory information contained in the historical hidden information by using a reset gate r; updating the content of the new moment to the historical hidden information by using an updating gate z, wherein the opening degrees of z and r are calculated as shown in formulas (1) and (2):
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
，W r 、W z the weight matrices for the update gate and reset gate respectively for the GRU unit,
as an input vector x t Hidden state vector h output at last moment t-1 The mosaic matrix of (1). z e (0,1), (1-z) represents forgetting, (1-z) e (0,1), thus realizing the combination of the "memory-forgetting" step. The final output of the GRU model is the current moment conclusion y t And hidden information h transmitted to next time t As shown in formulas (3) and (4).
Wherein "", indicates a corresponding multiplication of matrix elements and "+" indicates a matrix addition.
Indicating hidden history information
The short-time memory content extracted after the processing of the reset gate r;
to express an integrated short-term memory
Externally inputting information with the current time
And forming current time information.
The GRU method focuses on processing prediction on time series data, and is not suitable for directly detecting data abnormality. It is thus improved using a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) approach. The MLP is one of the simplest BP neural network models, is composed of a large number of simplest neuron structures, and realizes the approximation of nonlinear mapping from an input state space to an output state space by utilizing the function superposition of a large number of neurons. Compared with the traditional abnormity identification method, the method adopts the GRU model to improve the nonlinear judgment capability of the GRU model to judge whether the data is abnormal or not by using the fixed threshold value.
Respectively constructing a GRU model and an MLP model corresponding to each parameter in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant, and inputting the true value of each parameter into the corresponding GRU model to obtain the predicted value of the parameter; and inputting the acquired value and the predicted value of each parameter into the corresponding MLP model to obtain a judgment result of whether the parameter is normal, and selecting the acquired value or the predicted value of the parameter as a check value according to the judgment result.
The purpose of predicting the nuclear power plant parameters through the GRU model is two: firstly, providing a reference basis for detecting the abnormity of the acquired value; and repairing the data points determined as abnormal values. The basic strategy of the designed prediction algorithm is as follows: and predicting a future value of a certain parameter by using the historical data of the parameter as a basis, and training the GRU model by adopting a sliding window method.
The GRU model construction process of the single parameter comprises the following steps: assuming a certain parameter in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plantIs composed ofa(t) a data sampling period ofτIn the length of time ofqIs slid backwards in time sequence, the starting point of the window is set to t = t 0 Then the end point time is t = t 0 +(q-1)τ. Data in windowa (t 0 )~ a (t 0 +(q-1)τ) Input GRU model toa (t 0 +qτ) And performing iterative training for result marking. That is, a single sample of the training set of the GRU model includes the actual value of the parameter at a certain time as an input element and the actual value of the parameter at the next time as a training label. The time window is slid backwards in time sequence, one time unit at a timeτAnd training in sequence until the convergence of the GRU model reaches the expectation finally, and obtaining the GRU model corresponding to the parameter. And constructing GRU models corresponding to all parameters in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant by adopting the process.
When GRU model training is executed to complete the prediction function, a section of length taking the current time as a terminal point is inputlThe predicted value of the parameter at the next time can be obtained by the parameter verification value data.
The construction process of the single-parameter MLP model comprises the following steps: acquiring historical data a (t) of a certain parameter in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant, and taking the window data of a certain section as the true value of the window data of the section; inputting the historical data of the parameter into the GRU model which is trained to obtain the predicted value of the window data of the section; constructing a sample set based on the segment of window data; a single sample of the sample set comprises two parts, namely input data and a training label corresponding to the input data; the input data comprises a predicted value of a GRU model to a parameter at a certain moment and an acquired value of the parameter at the moment, and the training label is a mark for judging whether the parameter is abnormal at the moment; training an MLP model through a sample set to obtain the MLP model of the parameters; and constructing the MLP model corresponding to all the parameters in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant by adopting the process. The training labels are set manually.
In the training process of the MLP model, firstly, the difference value between the predicted value and the acquired value in a single training sample is obtained, the difference value and the training label in the training sample are input into the MLP model for training, and the training of the MLP model is completed after the difference value and the training label in the training sample are converged;
in the use process of the MLP model, firstly, the difference value between the input predicted value and the input collection value is obtained, and the difference value is input into the trained MLP model, so that the identification conclusion can be obtained.
And on the basis of obtaining the detection conclusion of the abnormal acquisition value, replacing the identified abnormal value with the prediction result of the GRU model, thereby realizing the correction of the abnormal acquisition value of the operation parameter of the nuclear power plant. The overall algorithm flow is shown in fig. 2.
The nuclear power plant operation monitors data anomalies, typically manifested as random jumps in data value, fixed value drift, incremental drift, three of which are most common, manifested as linear incremental drift, polynomial incremental drift, and logarithmic incremental drift.
In the embodiment, the actual operation data of a certain type of nuclear power plant is used as experimental data to carry out experiments to verify the correctness of the invention, and the experimental design is shown in table 1. In order to facilitate observation and comparison, the real value, the acquisition index and the predicted value of the used operation monitoring data are normalized. The normalization formula is shown in formula (6):
wherein X represents original data comprising a true value, an acquired value and a predicted value; y represents that the normalized data a is the maximum value and b is the minimum value.
And (5) training the GRU model by adopting the real value. The acquisition value, the predicted value and a manually set label are used as a sample data set of the MLP model, the sample data set is divided, and 65% of the data are taken to form a training set to train the MLP model; the remaining 35% comprise the test set, which is tested for its ability to identify anomalies.
Finally, the effect of data anomaly detection is evaluated by using detection accuracy, and the value of the detection accuracy is the ratio of the number of correct points for anomaly state judgment to the total number of abnormal data points.
Table 1 abnormal data detection experiment set-up
The abnormal change form is not applied to the model construction stage, and is used for explaining that the algorithm can obtain high abnormal detection accuracy rate for various types of abnormal conditions, and the superiority is highlighted. As can be seen from analyzing the images in fig. 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11, the prediction algorithm of the present embodiment has high accuracy, and the maximum relative error occurring in all experimental processes is 0.001487645. As can be seen from the data anomaly detection experiment results shown in fig. 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12, the designed GRU-MLP algorithm has a high accuracy for detecting the random jump drift anomaly and the fixed value drift anomaly, and has a slightly inferior detection effect on the growth drift, but the final accuracy mostly exceeds 90% and is not lower than 85% at least, and as the data amount is accumulated, the data change patterns are increased, and the accuracy is further improved. The training curve is used for showing the training process of the construction of the MLP and GRU models. The test curve shows the using effect display process of the trained MLP and GRU models.
The correction effect and the important function of the real-time correction algorithm are verified by designing a comparison experiment. FIGS. 13 and 14 show the collected and actual values of the pressurizer pressure in 600 seconds, respectively. Experiments were performed according to this data.
FIGS. 15 and 16 are graphs comparing the results of two experiments. FIG. 15 is a graph of GRU model predicted effect without real-time correction. Fig. 16 shows the prediction effect of using the GRU model in the case of performing real-time correction using the MLP algorithm on abnormal data detected in the prediction process. Compared with two groups of experimental results, the real-time correction algorithm designed by the invention can effectively reduce the interference of outliers to the prediction effect and improve the prediction precision.
The superiority of the calculated method in performance is verified through a comparison experiment. Two sets of comparative experiments were designed and the experimental content settings are shown in table 2.
TABLE 2 Experimental setup
The GRU-MLP method is compared with a window center (WinCen) value method and an ARIMA method, and the indexes are the state judgment accuracy and the abnormal data detection rate respectively. The results of the experiment are shown in tables 3 and 4. The state judgment accuracy is the ratio of the number of points judged to be correct (including normal state and abnormal state) to the total data number. The abnormal data detection rate represents a ratio of the number of detected abnormal data points to the total number of abnormal points.
TABLE 3 State judgment accuracy
TABLE 4 abnormal detection Rate
As can be seen from comparing tables 3 and 4, the performance of the designed GRU-MLP method is far better than that of the other two methods. Particularly in terms of the detection rate of anomalous data. The main reasons are as follows:
(1) Compared with the common method, the designed GRU-MLP method utilizes the prediction value to correct the detected abnormal data in real time so as to weaken the interference of the abnormal data on the output conclusion of the prediction algorithm layer. However, the WinCen algorithm and the ARIMA algorithm do not correct abnormal data in time, resulting in an error in prediction results. Specifically, the WinCen algorithm and the ARIMA algorithm have good prediction on normal data in a fixed value offset experiment, but the abnormal detection rate is low.
(2) The WinCen algorithm and the ARIMA algorithm adopt a fixed threshold strategy when abnormal data detection is carried out. Therefore, in its design process, the designer must relax the decision criteria to avoid identifying normal fluctuations in the data as anomalous. In the method designed by the invention, the dynamic adjustment of the detection threshold is realized by adopting an MLP model dynamic nonlinear fitting mode, so that the accuracy of the anomaly detection is improved.
In conclusion, compared with the conventional methods such as WinCen and ARIMA, the operation parameter prediction and abnormality detection method of the nuclear power device based on the GRU-MLP model has the remarkable advantages of high accuracy, real-time correction of data and the like. The method can be effectively applied to the engineering practice of abnormal detection and correction of the monitoring data of the nuclear power device, thereby improving the quality of the monitoring data and being used for fault-tolerant control of the measurement channel fault.
The innovation of the invention is the improvement of the operation mechanism. The supplement of the characteristics of the operating data of the nuclear power plant has already been elucidated in the aforesaid answer. The strong time-varying characteristics of the operating data of the nuclear power plant make it highly demanding on the real-time performance of the algorithm. The method improves the traditional operation mechanism of separating the abnormal detection and the data correction, and corrects the data which is judged to be abnormal in real time while detecting the abnormal. Input data of the general GRU model are static data, and when the data are abnormal, wrong data acquisition values can be used for inputting the GRU model, so that wrong prediction results are generated, and the accuracy of abnormal detection is influenced. The mechanism is applied to the nuclear power plant operation data with strong time variability, and unacceptable deviation can be generated, so that the nuclear safety is influenced. The method improves the operation mechanism of the GRU model aiming at the problem, and improves a 'prediction-abnormity detection' mechanism into a 'prediction-abnormity detection-real-time correction' mechanism, so that the prediction result of the GRU model can be used for inputting the abnormity detection of the MLP model, and can also be used as the basis for correcting the data which is identified as abnormity by the MLP model, thereby being suitable for the requirements of the data abnormity detection and correction of the nuclear power plant operation data.
Those not described in detail in this specification are within the skill of the art.
Claims (8)
1. A nuclear power plant operation monitoring data anomaly detection and correction integrated method is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:
reading a collection value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment;
the GRU model generates a predicted value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment;
judging whether the acquisition value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the current moment is normal or not by the MLP model according to the prediction value and the acquisition value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the current moment;
if the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data is judged to be normal, the acquisition value of the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data at the current moment is used as the verification value of the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data at the moment for storage;
and if the operation monitoring data is judged to be abnormal, storing the predicted value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment as the approved value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the moment.
2. A method according to claim 1, characterized by: and the GRU model generates a predicted value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the current time based on the nuclear power device operation monitoring data of the historical time period corresponding to the current time.
3. A method according to claim 1, characterized by: the nuclear power plant operation monitoring data has time-varying characteristics and is easy to fluctuate, and is parameter values which are generated in the operation process of a nuclear power plant system and equipment and reflect the operation state of the nuclear power plant system and the equipment, wherein the parameter values comprise the temperature, the pressure and the flow of fluid in a pipeline, the rotating speed of a rotating machine and the operation current of electrical equipment.
4. A method according to claim 3, characterized by: respectively constructing a GRU model and an MLP model corresponding to each parameter in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant, and inputting the acquired value of each parameter into the corresponding GRU model to obtain the predicted value of the parameter; and inputting the acquired value and the predicted value of each parameter into the corresponding MLP model to obtain a judgment result of whether the parameter is normal, and selecting the acquired value or the predicted value of the parameter as a check value according to the judgment result.
5. A method according to claim 4, characterized in that: the construction process of the single parameter GRU model comprises the following steps: acquiring historical data a (t) of a certain parameter in operation monitoring data of a nuclear power plant, wherein the data sampling period is tau, a window with the length of q slides backwards along the time sequence, and the starting point of the window is set as t = t 0 Then the end point is t = t 0 + (q-1) τ; data a (t) in the window 0 )~a(t 0 + (q-1) τ) input GRU model, with a (t) 0 + q tau) as result mark, and carrying out iterative training; the time window slides backwards according to the time sequence, and the time window slides for one time unit tau each time, and training is carried out in sequence until the convergence of the GRU model reaches the expectation finally, and the GRU model is used as the GRU model of the parameter; the historical data of the parameter is a value which is preset to be correct and has no deviation and is used for reflecting the objective and actual running state of the nuclear power device; and constructing GRU models corresponding to all parameters in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant by adopting the process.
6. A method according to claim 5, characterized in that: the construction process of the single-parameter MLP model comprises the following steps: acquiring historical data a (t) of a certain parameter in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant, and taking the window data of a certain section as a true value and an acquisition value of the window data of the section; inputting the true value of the parameter into the GRU model which completes training to obtain the predicted value of the window data of the section; constructing a sample set based on the segment of window data; a single sample of the sample set comprises two parts, namely input data and a training label corresponding to the input data; the input data comprises a predicted value of a GRU model to a parameter at a certain moment and an acquired value of the parameter at the moment, and the training label is a mark for judging whether the parameter is abnormal at the moment; training an MLP model through a sample set to obtain the MLP model of the parameters; and constructing the MLP model corresponding to all the parameters in the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power plant by adopting the process.
7. A method according to claim 4, characterized in that: storing the approved value of the operation monitoring data of the nuclear power device at the current moment into a historical database; the GRU model obtains a nuclear power device operation monitoring data verification value corresponding to a window time period with the end point being the current moment from a historical database, and the nuclear power device operation monitoring data verification value is used for generating a predicted value of the nuclear power device operation monitoring data at the next moment.
8. A method according to claim 4, characterized in that: in the training process of the MLP model, firstly, the difference value between the predicted value and the acquired value in a single training sample is obtained, the difference value and the training label in the training sample are input into the MLP model for training, and the training of the MLP model is completed after the difference value and the training label in the training sample are converged;
in the use process of the MLP model, firstly, the difference value between the input predicted value and the input collection value is obtained, and the difference value is input into the trained MLP model, so that the identification conclusion can be obtained.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211402303.7A CN115455746B (en) | 2022-11-10 | 2022-11-10 | Nuclear power device operation monitoring data anomaly detection and correction integrated method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211402303.7A CN115455746B (en) | 2022-11-10 | 2022-11-10 | Nuclear power device operation monitoring data anomaly detection and correction integrated method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115455746A true CN115455746A (en) | 2022-12-09 |
| CN115455746B CN115455746B (en) | 2023-04-07 |
Family
ID=84295685
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211402303.7A Active CN115455746B (en) | 2022-11-10 | 2022-11-10 | Nuclear power device operation monitoring data anomaly detection and correction integrated method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115455746B (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116522088A (en) * | 2023-04-27 | 2023-08-01 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Nuclear power plant operation data analysis method and system based on machine learning |
| CN116705364A (en) * | 2023-05-23 | 2023-09-05 | 上海发电设备成套设计研究院有限责任公司 | Reliability monitoring platform suitable for in-service nuclear power unit and nuclear turbine |
Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112668870A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-16 | 苏州热工研究院有限公司 | Online intelligent monitoring method for equipment state of nuclear power plant and computer terminal |
| CN112703457A (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2021-04-23 | 强力物联网投资组合2016有限公司 | Method and system for data collection, learning and machine signal streaming for analysis and maintenance using industrial internet of things |
| WO2021179572A1 (en) * | 2020-03-12 | 2021-09-16 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Operation and maintenance system anomaly index detection model optimization method and apparatus, and storage medium |
| CN113569992A (en) * | 2021-08-26 | 2021-10-29 | 中国电子信息产业集团有限公司第六研究所 | Abnormal data identification method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN113657454A (en) * | 2021-07-23 | 2021-11-16 | 杭州安脉盛智能技术有限公司 | Autoregressive BiGRU-based nuclear power rotating machine state monitoring method |
| CN114519382A (en) * | 2022-01-05 | 2022-05-20 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Nuclear power plant key operation parameter extraction and abnormity monitoring method |
| CN115081629A (en) * | 2022-08-16 | 2022-09-20 | 杭州比智科技有限公司 | Deep learning method and system for sensitive data discovery and identification |
| CN115274009A (en) * | 2022-08-01 | 2022-11-01 | 东华大学 | Polyester melt quality online prediction method based on semi-supervised GRU regression model |
-
2022
- 2022-11-10 CN CN202211402303.7A patent/CN115455746B/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112703457A (en) * | 2018-05-07 | 2021-04-23 | 强力物联网投资组合2016有限公司 | Method and system for data collection, learning and machine signal streaming for analysis and maintenance using industrial internet of things |
| WO2021179572A1 (en) * | 2020-03-12 | 2021-09-16 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Operation and maintenance system anomaly index detection model optimization method and apparatus, and storage medium |
| CN112668870A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-16 | 苏州热工研究院有限公司 | Online intelligent monitoring method for equipment state of nuclear power plant and computer terminal |
| CN113657454A (en) * | 2021-07-23 | 2021-11-16 | 杭州安脉盛智能技术有限公司 | Autoregressive BiGRU-based nuclear power rotating machine state monitoring method |
| CN113569992A (en) * | 2021-08-26 | 2021-10-29 | 中国电子信息产业集团有限公司第六研究所 | Abnormal data identification method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN114519382A (en) * | 2022-01-05 | 2022-05-20 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Nuclear power plant key operation parameter extraction and abnormity monitoring method |
| CN115274009A (en) * | 2022-08-01 | 2022-11-01 | 东华大学 | Polyester melt quality online prediction method based on semi-supervised GRU regression model |
| CN115081629A (en) * | 2022-08-16 | 2022-09-20 | 杭州比智科技有限公司 | Deep learning method and system for sensitive data discovery and identification |
Non-Patent Citations (8)
| Title |
|---|
| REN YU, TIANSHU WANG, XIAOSEN SONG, W. MAO: "Method Research of Operation Data Anomaly Detection and Correction of Nuclear Power Plant", 《SSRN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL》 * |
| REN YU;TIANSHU WANG;QIAO PENG: "The Discussion of the Development Route of Intelligent Instrument and Control System in Nuclear Power Plant", 《2020 39TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC)》 * |
| XIAOSEN SONG;REN YU;WEI MAO;TIANSHU WANG;DI WANG;SHAOXUAN YIN: "Research Progress in Autonomous Control Strategy of Miniature nuclear reactor", 《2022 41ST CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC)》 * |
| 余刃等: "基于运行数据分析的核动力装置异常运行状态监测技术研究", 《核动力工程》 * |
| 刘亮辉等: "核动力装置测量仪表在线检测与校准技术研究", 《自动化与仪表》 * |
| 王天舒等: "核动力装置运行故障诊断***设计研究", 《核动力工程》 * |
| 谢旭阳，余刃，王天舒，彭俏，陈玉昇: "基于卷积神经网络和迁移学习的电动泵故障诊断方法研究", 《兵器装备工程学报》 * |
| 陈浩等: "核电厂故障检测与报警***的发展概况", 《原子能科学技术》 * |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN116522088A (en) * | 2023-04-27 | 2023-08-01 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Nuclear power plant operation data analysis method and system based on machine learning |
| CN116522088B (en) * | 2023-04-27 | 2024-01-26 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Nuclear power plant operation data analysis method and system based on machine learning |
| CN116705364A (en) * | 2023-05-23 | 2023-09-05 | 上海发电设备成套设计研究院有限责任公司 | Reliability monitoring platform suitable for in-service nuclear power unit and nuclear turbine |
| CN116705364B (en) * | 2023-05-23 | 2024-01-02 | 上海发电设备成套设计研究院有限责任公司 | Reliability monitoring platform suitable for in-service nuclear power unit and nuclear turbine |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN115455746B (en) | 2023-04-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN115455746B (en) | Nuclear power device operation monitoring data anomaly detection and correction integrated method | |
| US11507049B2 (en) | Method for detecting abnormity in unsupervised industrial system based on deep transfer learning | |
| CN109842373B (en) | Photovoltaic array fault diagnosis method and device based on space-time distribution characteristics | |
| CN109146246B (en) | Fault detection method based on automatic encoder and Bayesian network | |
| CN111914873A (en) | Two-stage cloud server unsupervised anomaly prediction method | |
| CN110334740A (en) | The electrical equipment fault of artificial intelligence reasoning fusion detects localization method | |
| CN109934130A (en) | The in-orbit real-time fault diagnosis method of satellite failure and system based on deep learning | |
| CN111723925B (en) | Fault diagnosis method, device, equipment and medium for on-road intelligent train air conditioning unit | |
| CN110705812A (en) | Industrial fault analysis system based on fuzzy neural network | |
| CN109543743B (en) | Multi-sensor fault diagnosis method for refrigerating unit based on reconstructed prediction residual error | |
| CN105468850A (en) | Multi-residual error regression prediction algorithm based electronic product degradation trend prediction method | |
| CN115791174B (en) | Rolling bearing abnormality diagnosis method, system, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111079348B (en) | Method and device for detecting slowly-varying signal | |
| CN115392782A (en) | Method and system for monitoring and diagnosing health state of process system of nuclear power plant | |
| Xu et al. | Anomaly detection with gru based bi-autoencoder for industrial multimode process | |
| CN115204272A (en) | Industrial system fault diagnosis method and equipment based on multi-sampling rate data | |
| CN114611409A (en) | Method and device for establishing power distribution terminal abnormity detection model | |
| CN110209145A (en) | One kind being based on the approximate carbon dioxide absorption tower method for diagnosing faults of nuclear matrix | |
| CN117556347A (en) | Power equipment fault prediction and health management method based on industrial big data | |
| CN116244596A (en) | Industrial time sequence data anomaly detection method based on TCN and attention mechanism | |
| KR102389317B1 (en) | Method of Determining Whether A Smart Farm Sensor has failed using a Recurrent Neural Network(RNN) | |
| CN114548701A (en) | Process early warning method and system for analyzing and estimating coupling structure of full-scale measuring point | |
| Won et al. | Prediction of remaining useful lifetime of membrane using machine learning | |
| Guo-Jian et al. | Self-recovery method based on auto-associative neural network for intelligent sensors | |
| CN117499199B (en) | VAE-based information enhanced decoupling network fault diagnosis method and system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |