CN115114172A - Interface test verification method and device - Google Patents

Interface test verification method and device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN115114172A
CN115114172A CN202210888580.7A CN202210888580A CN115114172A CN 115114172 A CN115114172 A CN 115114172A CN 202210888580 A CN202210888580 A CN 202210888580A CN 115114172 A CN115114172 A CN 115114172A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
tested
verification
points
functional
set threshold
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202210888580.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
钟师
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ava Electronic Technology Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Ava Electronic Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ava Electronic Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Ava Electronic Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN202210888580.7A priority Critical patent/CN115114172A/en
Publication of CN115114172A publication Critical patent/CN115114172A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3604—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668—Software testing
    • G06F11/3672—Test management
    • G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668—Software testing
    • G06F11/3672—Test management
    • G06F11/3692—Test management for test results analysis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/906—Clustering; Classification

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to an interface test verification method and device, after acquiring a function point to be tested of an interface to be tested, executing preset classification on the function point to be tested to obtain two or more types of function points to be tested, executing automatic test according to the function point to be tested, and acquiring an automatic test verification result of the function point to be tested, and when the number of times of verification failure of the function point to be tested under one classification type is greater than a set threshold value, interrupting the automatic test and determining the function point to be tested which fails verification. Based on the method, the functional points to be tested are classified and set, interrupt processing is executed by different set thresholds, so that the interrupt of the automatic test is conveniently subjected to priority setting, the influence of frequent interrupt on the automatic test of the interface is reduced, and the problems encountered by the automatic test of the interface are conveniently and accurately determined in an efficient manner.

Description

Interface test verification method and device
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of software testing, in particular to an interface testing and verifying method and device.
Background
Software testing is the process described to facilitate the identification of the correctness, integrity, security, and quality of software. The interface test is a part of software test, the main object of the test is the interface, and the interface test is a test for testing the interfaces among the components of the system. The interface test is generally used for interactive development among multiple systems or test of development of an application system with multiple subsystems. The interface test is suitable for an underlying framework system and a central service system which provide services for other systems, and mainly tests interfaces provided by the systems to the outside to verify the correctness and stability of the interfaces.
In the interface automation test, a plurality of assertions are added to verify whether the function is correct or not, when the assertions fail in the running process of the script, the program is interrupted, and the verification fails possibly at some secondary functions, so that the main function to be verified later stops without running the automation test. In the initial stage of testing, there may be many problems, and if the automated testing is interrupted as soon as it encounters a problem, it is not easy to find the problem of the main function, which directly affects the efficiency and accuracy of the interface automated testing.
Disclosure of Invention
Therefore, it is necessary to provide an interface test verification method and apparatus for the deficiency that the automatic test is interrupted as soon as a problem occurs, which affects the efficiency and accuracy of the interface automatic test.
An interface test verification method comprises the following steps:
acquiring a function point to be tested of an interface to be tested;
executing preset classification on the functional points to be detected to obtain two or more types of functional points to be detected; the functional points to be tested correspond to the classification types one by one;
executing automatic test according to the functional point to be tested, and acquiring an automatic test verification result of the functional point to be tested; wherein the automatic test verification result comprises verification passing or verification failing;
when the verification failure times of the function points to be tested under one classification type are larger than a set threshold, interrupting the automatic test and determining the function points to be tested which fail to pass the verification; and the set threshold corresponds to the classification type one to one.
According to the interface test verification method, after the function points to be tested of the interface to be tested are obtained, preset classification is carried out on the function points to be tested, two or more types of function points to be tested are obtained, automatic test is carried out according to the function points to be tested, the automatic test verification result of the function points to be tested is obtained, when the verification failure times of the function points to be tested under one classification type are larger than the set threshold value, the automatic test is interrupted, and the function points to be tested which are not verified are determined. Based on the method, the functional points to be tested are classified and set, interrupt processing is executed by different set thresholds, so that the interrupt of the automatic test is conveniently subjected to priority setting, the influence of frequent interrupt on the automatic test of the interface is reduced, and the problems encountered by the automatic test of the interface are conveniently and accurately determined in an efficient manner.
In one embodiment, the process of performing preset classification on the function points to be tested to obtain two or more types of function points to be tested includes the steps of:
classifying the functional points to be detected into main functional points, secondary functional points and small functional points; wherein the primary function point, the secondary function point, and the small function point are classified types.
In one embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the primary functional point is greater than the set threshold corresponding to the secondary functional point, and the set threshold corresponding to the secondary functional point is greater than the set threshold corresponding to the small functional point.
In one embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the primary function point is 1 to 4.
In one embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the secondary function point is 2 to 7.
In one embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the small function point is 8 to 12.
In one embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the primary function point is 2, the set threshold corresponding to the secondary function point is 5, and the set threshold corresponding to the small function point is 10.
In one embodiment, when the verification failure times of the function point to be tested under one of the classification types is greater than a set threshold, the process of interrupting the automatic test and determining the function point to be tested that fails to be verified includes the steps of:
and acquiring an execution log of the functional point to be tested with the verification failure times larger than a set threshold in the automatic test, and determining the reason of the verification failure according to the execution log.
An interface test validation apparatus comprising:
the function point acquisition module is used for acquiring a function point to be tested of the interface to be tested;
the function point classification module is used for executing preset classification on the function points to be detected to obtain two or more types of function points to be detected; the functional points to be tested correspond to the classification types one by one;
the test result acquisition module is used for executing automatic test according to the functional point to be tested and acquiring an automatic test verification result of the functional point to be tested; wherein the automatic test verification result comprises verification passing or verification failing;
the test verification module is used for interrupting the automatic test and determining the functional points to be tested which are not verified when the verification failure times of the functional points to be tested under one classification type are larger than a set threshold; and the set threshold corresponds to the classification type one to one.
According to the interface test verification device, after the function points to be tested of the interface to be tested are obtained, preset classification is carried out on the function points to be tested, two or more types of function points to be tested are obtained, automatic test is carried out according to the function points to be tested, the automatic test verification result of the function points to be tested is obtained, when the verification failure times of the function points to be tested under one classification type are larger than the set threshold value, the automatic test is interrupted, and the function points to be tested which are not verified are determined. Based on the method, the functional points to be tested are classified and set, interrupt processing is executed by different set thresholds, so that the interrupt of the automatic test is conveniently subjected to priority setting, the influence of frequent interrupt on the automatic test of the interface is reduced, and the problems encountered by the automatic test of the interface are conveniently and accurately determined in an efficient manner.
A computer storage medium having stored thereon computer instructions which, when executed by a processor, implement the interface test validation method of any of the above embodiments.
After the function points to be tested of the interface to be tested are obtained, the computer storage medium performs preset classification on the function points to be tested to obtain two or more types of function points to be tested, performs automatic testing according to the function points to be tested, obtains an automatic testing verification result of the function points to be tested, interrupts the automatic testing when the number of times of verification failure of the function points to be tested under one classification type is larger than a set threshold value, and determines the function points to be tested which fail the verification. Based on the method, the functional points to be tested are classified and set, interrupt processing is executed by different set thresholds, so that the interrupt of the automatic test is conveniently subjected to priority setting, the influence of frequent interrupt on the automatic test of the interface is reduced, and the problems encountered by the automatic test of the interface are conveniently and accurately determined in an efficient manner.
A computer device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, the processor implementing the interface test validation method of any of the above embodiments when executing the program.
According to the computer equipment, after the function points to be tested of the interface to be tested are obtained, the function points to be tested are subjected to preset classification, two or more types of function points to be tested are obtained, automatic testing is performed according to the function points to be tested, the automatic testing verification result of the function points to be tested is obtained, when the verification failure times of the function points to be tested under one classification type are larger than the set threshold value, the automatic testing is interrupted, and the function points to be tested, which are not verified, are determined. Based on the method, the functional points to be tested are classified and set, interrupt processing is executed by different set thresholds, so that the interrupt of the automatic test is conveniently subjected to priority setting, the influence of frequent interrupt on the automatic test of the interface is reduced, and the problems encountered by the automatic test of the interface are conveniently and accurately determined in an efficient manner.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of a method for interface test verification according to an embodiment;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a method for testing and verifying an interface according to another embodiment;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an interface test and verification apparatus according to an embodiment;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an internal structure of a computer according to an embodiment.
Detailed Description
For better understanding of the objects, technical solutions and effects of the present invention, the present invention will be further explained with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples. Meanwhile, the following described examples are only for explaining the present invention, and are not intended to limit the present invention.
The embodiment of the invention provides an interface test verification method.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart illustrating an interface test verification method according to an embodiment, and as shown in fig. 1, the interface test verification method according to an embodiment includes steps S100 to S103:
s100, acquiring a function point to be tested of the interface to be tested;
s101, executing preset classification on the functional points to be tested to obtain two or more types of functional points to be tested; the functional points to be tested correspond to the classification types one by one;
s102, executing automatic test according to the functional point to be tested, and acquiring an automatic test verification result of the functional point to be tested; wherein the automatic test verification result comprises verification passing or verification failing;
s103, when the verification failure times of the function points to be tested under one classification type are larger than a set threshold value, interrupting the automatic test and determining the function points to be tested which are not verified; and the set threshold corresponds to the classification type one to one.
The interface test is mainly used for detecting interaction points between external systems and between internal subsystems. Based on this, the function point to be tested is the representation of the function test of the interface test. According to the priority of the function test, the importance and the influence range of the function test represented by the function point to be tested are different.
And summarizing the functional points to be tested and performing classification, classifying the functional points to be tested with the similar significance and influence range of the representation into one class, combing the main functional points to be tested and the secondary functional points to be tested, and performing quantity division determination of classification types according to the range of interface test.
In one embodiment, fig. 2 is a flowchart of an interface test verification method according to another embodiment, and as shown in fig. 2, a process of performing preset classification on the functional points to be tested in step S101 to obtain two or more types of functional points to be tested includes step S200:
s200, classifying the functional points to be detected into primary functional points, secondary functional points and small functional points; wherein the primary function point, the secondary function point, and the small function point are classified types.
And according to the importance and the influence range of the representation of the function point to be measured, carrying out stage division in sequence from large to small according to the proportion, and dividing the stage division into a main function point, a secondary function point and a small function point. As a preferred embodiment, the ratio of the number of the primary function points, the secondary function points and the small function points is 1:2: 4. It should be noted that the ratio of the number of the primary function points, the secondary function points and the small function points can be flexibly determined according to the coverage and the type of the function test, and the above embodiment does not represent the only limitation.
Based on the method, the automatic test verification result of the functional point to be tested under the automatic test is monitored, a count is accumulated every time verification fails, the verification failure times of the total times are obtained, the automatic test is not interrupted in the whole process, and the automatic test is not interrupted until the verification failure times are larger than a set threshold value.
And the automatic test of the functional points to be tested is executed based on the automatic test platform.
In one embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the primary function point is 1 to 4. And when the verification failure times of the main function points are larger than the set threshold value, interrupting the automatic test. As a preferred embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the main function point is 2.
In one embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the secondary function point is 2 to 7. And when the verification failure times of the secondary function points are larger than the set threshold value, interrupting the automatic test. As a preferred embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the secondary function point is 5.
In one embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the small function point is 8 to 12. And when the verification failure times of the small functional points are larger than the set threshold, interrupting the automatic test. As a preferred embodiment, the set threshold corresponding to the small function point is 10.
And when the verification failure times are less than or equal to the set threshold, continuously executing the automatic test. And when the verification failure times are larger than the set threshold value, interrupting the automatic test to determine the reason of the functional point to be tested which fails in verification.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 2, when the verification failure times of the function point to be tested under one classification type in step S103 is greater than the set threshold, the process of interrupting the automatic test and determining the function point to be tested whose verification fails includes step S201:
s201, obtaining an execution log of the functional point to be tested with the verification failure times larger than a set threshold in the automatic test, and determining the reason of the verification failure according to the execution log.
After the automatic test is interrupted, determining the reason of the failure of the verification according to the acquired execution log, such as the execution log of the automatic test platform, so as to determine the reason of the failure of the verification, and completing the analysis of the automatic test problem. Compared with the traditional mode that verification is not passed, namely interruption, the method of the embodiment can effectively improve the analysis efficiency, and the type of the functional test problem which is not passed through verification is quickly determined through the classification type.
In the interface test verification method according to any of the embodiments, after the function point to be tested of the interface to be tested is obtained, the preset classification is performed on the function point to be tested to obtain two or more types of function points to be tested, the automatic test is performed according to the function point to be tested, the automatic test verification result of the function point to be tested is obtained, when the number of times of verification failure of the function point to be tested in one classification type is greater than the set threshold value, the automatic test is interrupted, and the function point to be tested, for which verification failure is not achieved, is determined. Based on the method, the functional points to be tested are classified and set, interrupt processing is executed by different set thresholds, so that the interrupt of the automatic test is conveniently subjected to priority setting, the influence of frequent interrupt on the automatic test of the interface is reduced, and the problems encountered by the automatic test of the interface are conveniently and accurately determined in an efficient manner.
The embodiment of the invention also provides an interface test verification device.
Fig. 3 is a block diagram of an interface test verification apparatus according to an embodiment, and as shown in fig. 3, the interface test verification apparatus according to an embodiment includes:
a function point obtaining module 100, configured to obtain a function point to be tested of an interface to be tested;
a function point classification module 101, configured to perform preset classification on the function points to be tested, so as to obtain two or more types of function points to be tested; wherein. The functional points to be tested correspond to the classification types one by one;
a test result obtaining module 102, configured to execute an automatic test according to the function point to be tested, and obtain an automatic test verification result of the function point to be tested; wherein the automatic test verification result comprises verification passing or verification failing;
the test verification module 103 is configured to interrupt the automatic test and determine a functional point to be tested, which fails verification, when the number of times of failing verification of the functional point to be tested in one of the classification types is greater than a set threshold; and the set threshold corresponds to the classification type one to one.
According to the interface test verification device, after the function points to be tested of the interface to be tested are obtained, preset classification is carried out on the function points to be tested, two or more types of function points to be tested are obtained, automatic test is carried out according to the function points to be tested, the automatic test verification result of the function points to be tested is obtained, when the verification failure times of the function points to be tested under one classification type are larger than the set threshold value, the automatic test is interrupted, and the function points to be tested which are not verified are determined. Based on the method, the functional points to be tested are classified and set, interrupt processing is executed by different set thresholds, so that the interrupt of the automatic test is conveniently subjected to priority setting, the influence of frequent interrupt on the automatic test of the interface is reduced, and the problems encountered by the automatic test of the interface are conveniently and accurately determined in an efficient manner.
The embodiment of the invention also provides a computer storage medium, wherein computer instructions are stored on the computer storage medium, and when the instructions are executed by a processor, the interface test verification method of any embodiment is realized.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that all or part of the processes of the methods of the embodiments described above can be implemented by hardware related to instructions of a computer program, which can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, the computer program can include the processes of the embodiments of the methods described above. Any reference to memory, storage, database, or other medium used in the embodiments provided herein may include non-volatile and/or volatile memory, among others. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ROM), Programmable ROM (PROM), Electrically Programmable ROM (EPROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable ROM (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory can include Random Access Memory (RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in a variety of forms, such as Static RAM (SRAM), Dynamic RAM (DRAM), Synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), Double Data Rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), Enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous link (Synchlink) DRAM (SLDRAM), scratch attribute information memory bus (Rambus) direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM).
Alternatively, the integrated unit of the present invention may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium if it is implemented in the form of a software functional module and sold or used as a separate product. Based on such understanding, the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention or portions thereof that contribute to the related art may be embodied in the form of a software product, where the computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions for enabling a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a terminal, or a network device) to execute all or part of the methods of the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: a removable storage device, a RAM, a ROM, a magnetic or optical disk, or various other media that can store program code.
Corresponding to the computer storage medium, in one embodiment, a computer device is further provided, where the computer device includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, and the processor executes the computer program to implement any one of the interface test verification methods in the embodiments.
The computer device may be a terminal, and its internal structure diagram may be as shown in fig. 4. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, a network interface, a display screen, and an input device connected by a system bus. Wherein the processor of the computer device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device comprises a nonvolatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of an operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage medium. The network interface of the computer device is used for communicating with an external terminal through a network connection. The computer program is executed by a processor to implement an interface test validation method. The display screen of the computer equipment can be a liquid crystal display screen or an electronic ink display screen, and the input device of the computer equipment can be a touch layer covered on the display screen, a key, a track ball or a touch pad arranged on a shell of the computer equipment, an external keyboard, a touch pad or a mouse and the like.
According to the computer equipment, after the function points to be tested of the interface to be tested are obtained, the function points to be tested are subjected to preset classification, two or more types of function points to be tested are obtained, automatic testing is performed according to the function points to be tested, the automatic testing verification result of the function points to be tested is obtained, when the verification failure times of the function points to be tested under one classification type are larger than the set threshold value, the automatic testing is interrupted, and the function points to be tested, which are not verified, are determined. Based on the method, the functional points to be tested are classified and set, interrupt processing is executed by different set thresholds, so that the interrupt of the automatic test is conveniently subjected to priority setting, the influence of frequent interrupt on the automatic test of the interface is reduced, and the problems encountered by the automatic test of the interface are conveniently and accurately determined in an efficient manner.
The technical features of the above embodiments can be arbitrarily combined, and for the sake of brevity, all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are not described, but should be considered as the scope of the present specification as long as there is no contradiction between the combinations of the technical features.
The above examples only show some embodiments of the present invention, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but not construed as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that, for a person skilled in the art, several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the inventive concept, which falls within the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present patent should be subject to the appended claims.

Claims (10)

1. An interface test verification method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring a function point to be tested of an interface to be tested;
executing preset classification on the functional points to be detected to obtain two or more types of functional points to be detected; the functional points to be tested are in one-to-one correspondence with the classification types;
executing automatic test according to the functional point to be tested, and acquiring an automatic test verification result of the functional point to be tested; wherein the automatic test verification result comprises verification passing or verification failing;
when the verification failure times of the function points to be tested under one classification type are larger than a set threshold, interrupting the automatic test and determining the function points to be tested which fail to pass the verification; and the set threshold corresponds to the classification type one to one.
2. The interface test verification method according to claim 1, wherein the process of performing a preset classification on the functional points to be tested to obtain two or more types of functional points to be tested includes the steps of:
classifying the functional points to be detected into main functional points, secondary functional points and small functional points; wherein the primary function point, the secondary function point, and the small function point are classified types.
3. The interface test verification method according to claim 2, wherein the set threshold corresponding to the primary function point is greater than the set threshold corresponding to the secondary function point, and the set threshold corresponding to the secondary function point is greater than the set threshold corresponding to the small function point.
4. The interface test verification method according to claim 2, wherein the set threshold corresponding to the secondary function point is 2 to 7.
5. The interface test verification method according to claim 2, wherein the set threshold corresponding to the small function point is 8 to 12.
6. The interface test verification method according to any one of claims 2 to 5, wherein the set threshold corresponding to the primary function point is 2, the set threshold corresponding to the secondary function point is 5, and the set threshold corresponding to the small function point is 10.
7. The interface test verification method according to claim 1, wherein the process of interrupting the automatic test and determining the functional point to be tested that fails verification when the number of times of failing verification of the functional point to be tested in one of the classification types is greater than a set threshold value includes the steps of:
and acquiring an execution log of the functional point to be tested with the verification failure times larger than a set threshold in the automatic test, and determining the reason of the verification failure according to the execution log.
8. An interface test validation apparatus, comprising:
the function point acquisition module is used for acquiring a function point to be tested of the interface to be tested;
the function point classification module is used for executing preset classification on the function points to be detected to obtain two or more types of function points to be detected; the functional points to be tested correspond to the classification types one by one;
the test result acquisition module is used for executing automatic test according to the functional point to be tested and acquiring an automatic test verification result of the functional point to be tested; wherein the automatic test verification result comprises verification passing or verification failing;
the test verification module is used for interrupting the automatic test and determining the functional points to be tested which are not verified when the verification failure times of the functional points to be tested under one classification type are larger than a set threshold; and the set threshold corresponds to the classification type one to one.
9. A computer storage medium having computer instructions stored thereon, wherein the computer instructions, when executed by a processor, implement the interface test validation method of any of claims 1 to 7.
10. A computer device comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor, when executing the program, implements the interface test validation method of any one of claims 1 to 7.
CN202210888580.7A 2022-07-25 2022-07-25 Interface test verification method and device Pending CN115114172A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210888580.7A CN115114172A (en) 2022-07-25 2022-07-25 Interface test verification method and device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210888580.7A CN115114172A (en) 2022-07-25 2022-07-25 Interface test verification method and device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN115114172A true CN115114172A (en) 2022-09-27

Family

ID=83333784

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210888580.7A Pending CN115114172A (en) 2022-07-25 2022-07-25 Interface test verification method and device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN115114172A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8397104B2 (en) Creation of test plans
US20140033174A1 (en) Software bug predicting
Paterson et al. An empirical study on the use of defect prediction for test case prioritization
US9208451B2 (en) Automatic identification of information useful for generation-based functional verification
US20210056009A1 (en) Risk-focused testing
CN110096430B (en) Third party SDK access test method, device, terminal and storage medium
CN112199293A (en) Software quality evaluation method and device, terminal equipment and storage medium
CN113287009A (en) Techniques for evaluating performance of analytical instruments
CN112286828B (en) Testing method and system for intelligent contracts of block chains
CN109643271B (en) Identifying unstable testing
KR102588856B1 (en) Method for verifying software and apparatus therefor
CN112181800A (en) Vehicle function testing device and control method thereof
Kadry A new proposed technique to improve software regression testing cost
CN111897727A (en) Software testing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN111382077A (en) Application program crash reason positioning method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
US11520689B2 (en) System and method for automatic program repair using fast-result test cases
CN105653455A (en) Program vulnerability detection method and detection system
CN112817847A (en) Data processing task testing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN108763092B (en) Code defect detection method and device based on cross validation
CN115114172A (en) Interface test verification method and device
CN116415258A (en) Vulnerability detection method, device, equipment, medium and program product
CN116627804A (en) Test method, system, electronic equipment and storage medium based on artificial intelligence
CN110059012B (en) Program test control method, device, storage medium and platform
Harder et al. Specification coverage as a measure of test suite quality
CN113434408B (en) Unit test case sequencing method based on test prediction

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination