CN114219201A

CN114219201A - Quantitative evaluation method, system, device and medium for employee safety consciousness

Info

Publication number: CN114219201A
Application number: CN202111286368.5A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 田震; 雷恬; 丁连树; 陈千千
Original assignee: South China University of Technology SCUT
Current assignee: South China University of Technology SCUT
Priority date: 2021-11-02
Filing date: 2021-11-02
Publication date: 2022-03-22

Abstract

The invention discloses a quantitative evaluation method, a system, a device and a medium for staff safety consciousness, wherein the method comprises the following steps: constructing a safety consciousness evaluating model, wherein the safety consciousness evaluating model comprises a risk consciousness module, a team consciousness module, a responsibility consciousness module, an execution consciousness module and a sharing consciousness module; testing the tested staff by adopting five modules to obtain evaluation scores corresponding to the five modules; and distributing the weight of each evaluation by adopting an entropy weight method, calculating a safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score according to the evaluation score after the weight is distributed, and generating a comprehensive safety consciousness report of the detected staff. According to the invention, the safety consciousness is divided into five modules by establishing the safety consciousness evaluation model, and the staff safety consciousness is quantitatively evaluated in a multi-dimensional manner, so that the problem of quantitative evaluation of the first-line staff safety consciousness is solved, an effective basis is provided for relevant enterprises to make countermeasures for improving the first-line staff safety consciousness, and the method can be widely applied to the technical field of safety.

Description

Quantitative evaluation method, system, device and medium for employee safety consciousness

Technical Field

The invention relates to the technical field of safety, in particular to a quantitative evaluation method, a system, a device and a medium for staff safety consciousness.

Background

The rate of safety accidents of first-line employees is high for many years, and accidents are often accompanied by unsafe behaviors of people, unsafe states of objects and defects of environment and management. About 80% -90% of accidents are statistically related to unsafe behaviors of people, and whether the behaviors of people are safe or not is closely related to the safety awareness of people.

Safety awareness is the basis of safety behaviors, and it is extremely important for front-line employees to have strong safety awareness. The safety consciousness of the staff is the psychological state of the staff for alertness and abstinence of all objective things which may hurt the staff or others in the production process, and is the reflection of the objective existence of the safety and health of the staff in the production activity. The weak security consciousness of the front-line staff is a common problem in the security management in the construction field, and the reason is that most staff do not receive systematic security education, have low cultural quality, have a lucky psychology in the operation process and neglect the existence of potential safety hazards, so the requirement of safe production is difficult to meet. In order to avoid the above problems, it is necessary to improve the safety awareness of front-line employees and quantitatively evaluate the safety awareness of the employees, so as to better realize the management and control of safety production. At present, safety education is mainly performed on employees, but a scheme for quantitatively evaluating safety consciousness of front-line employees is still lacked.

Disclosure of Invention

In order to solve at least one of the technical problems in the prior art to a certain extent, the invention aims to provide a method, a system, a device and a medium for quantitatively evaluating the safety consciousness of an employee.

The technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:

a quantitative evaluation method for employee safety consciousness comprises the following steps:

constructing a safety consciousness evaluating model, wherein the safety consciousness evaluating model comprises a risk consciousness module, a team consciousness module, a responsibility consciousness module, an execution consciousness module and a sharing consciousness module;

testing the tested staff by adopting five modules to obtain evaluation scores corresponding to the five modules;

distributing the weight of each evaluation by adopting an entropy weight method, calculating a safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score according to the evaluation score after the weight is distributed, and generating a comprehensive safety consciousness report of the detected staff;

the safety consciousness evaluating model comprises a risk knowledge question bank and a behavior evaluating unit for accident scene simulation; the team consciousness module comprises a questionnaire unit and a communication evaluation unit for accident scene simulation; the responsibility awareness module comprises a security responsibility question bank.

Further, after the tested employee is tested through the risk awareness module, an evaluation score A1 is obtained based on the risk knowledge question bank, and an evaluation score A2 is obtained based on the behavior evaluation unit of accident situation simulation;

after the staff to be tested is tested through the team consciousness module, an assessment score B1 is obtained based on the questionnaire unit, and an assessment score B2 is obtained based on the communication assessment unit of accident scene simulation;

after testing the tested staff through the responsibility consciousness module, obtaining an evaluation score C based on the safety responsibility question bank;

testing the tested staff through the executive consciousness module to obtain evaluation scores D in five different states;

testing the tested staff through the sharing consciousness module to obtain an evaluation score E;

the safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score S expression is as follows:

wherein, w_iRepresenting the corresponding weights of the different modules.

Further, the risk knowledge question bank is used for acquiring related knowledge points according to the post requirements of the detected staff and generating an evaluation test paper;

and the behavior evaluation unit for accident scene simulation is used for judging whether the emergency response is correct and scoring according to the emergency response of the staff to be tested before and after the accident occurs.

Further, the questionnaire unit is used for obtaining the response of the detected staff to the questionnaire and scoring by constructing the questionnaire;

and the communication evaluation unit for accident scene simulation is used for judging whether the communication condition is correct and scoring according to the communication condition of the staff to be tested before and after the accident.

Further, the safety responsibility question bank is constructed based on four aspects of responsibility knowledge, responsibility keeping and responsibility ending and is used for randomly composing the paper to generate the test paper.

Further, the execution consciousness module is used for respectively evaluating the work performance of the detected staff in fatigue, illness, driving, excitation and normal states to obtain evaluation scores D in five different states.

Further, the quantitative evaluation method further comprises the following steps:

acquiring the safety consciousness grade of the detected employee according to the safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score;

the safety consciousness level is divided into four levels, namely weak safety consciousness, medium safety consciousness, strong safety consciousness and strong safety consciousness.

The other technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:

a system for quantitative assessment of employee safety awareness, comprising:

the safety consciousness evaluating module comprises a risk consciousness module, a team consciousness module, a responsibility consciousness module, an execution consciousness module and a sharing consciousness module;

the employee testing module is used for testing the tested employees by adopting five modules to obtain evaluation scores corresponding to the five modules;

the evaluation calculation module is used for distributing the weight of each evaluation by adopting an entropy weight method, calculating the comprehensive evaluation score of the safety consciousness according to the evaluation score after the weight is distributed, and generating a comprehensive safety consciousness report of the staff to be tested;

The other technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:

a quantitative assessment device of employee safety awareness, comprising:

at least one processor;

at least one memory for storing at least one program;

when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to implement the method described above.

The other technical scheme adopted by the invention is as follows:

a computer readable storage medium in which a processor executable program is stored, which when executed by a processor is for performing the method as described above.

The invention has the beneficial effects that: according to the method, the safety consciousness evaluation model is established, the safety consciousness is divided into five modules of risk consciousness, team consciousness, responsibility consciousness, execution consciousness and sharing consciousness on the basis of the safety operation of the staff in the first line and the standard of the post safety behavior, the safety consciousness of the staff in the first line is quantitatively evaluated in a multi-dimensional mode, the problem of quantitative evaluation of the safety consciousness of the staff in the first line which is not available at present is solved, and an effective basis is provided for relevant enterprises to make countermeasure measures for improving the safety consciousness of the staff in the first line.

Drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following description is made on the drawings of the embodiments of the present invention or the related technical solutions in the prior art, and it should be understood that the drawings in the following description are only for convenience and clarity of describing some embodiments in the technical solutions of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art that other drawings can be obtained according to these drawings without creative efforts.

FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for quantitatively evaluating the safety awareness of an employee according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 2 is a flowchart of a specific implementation of the safety awareness assessment model according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description

Reference will now be made in detail to embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like or similar reference numerals refer to the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar function throughout. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are illustrative only for the purpose of explaining the present invention, and are not to be construed as limiting the present invention. The step numbers in the following embodiments are provided only for convenience of illustration, the order between the steps is not limited at all, and the execution order of each step in the embodiments can be adapted according to the understanding of those skilled in the art.

In the description of the present invention, it should be understood that the orientation or positional relationship referred to in the description of the orientation, such as the upper, lower, front, rear, left, right, etc., is based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the drawings, and is only for convenience of description and simplification of description, and does not indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a specific orientation, be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, and thus, should not be construed as limiting the present invention.

In the description of the present invention, the meaning of a plurality of means is one or more, the meaning of a plurality of means is two or more, and larger, smaller, larger, etc. are understood as excluding the number, and larger, smaller, inner, etc. are understood as including the number. If the first and second are described for the purpose of distinguishing technical features, they are not to be understood as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of technical features indicated or implicitly indicating the precedence of the technical features indicated.

In the description of the present invention, unless otherwise explicitly limited, terms such as arrangement, installation, connection and the like should be understood in a broad sense, and those skilled in the art can reasonably determine the specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention in combination with the specific contents of the technical solutions.

As shown in fig. 1, the present embodiment provides a quantitative assessment method for employee safety awareness, which adopts a continuously improved manner, follows the PDCA cycle principle, and is divided into four stages, namely planning, implementing, checking, and processing, and specifically includes the following steps:

and S1, identifying and verifying the identity of the employee to be tested.

S2, analyzing the operation property of the staff at the first line, and establishing a safety consciousness evaluation model; and obtaining a safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score and a comprehensive safety consciousness report according to the safety consciousness evaluation model.

And S3, performing data statistical analysis according to the comprehensive safety consciousness report.

S4, corresponding improvement suggestions and measures are proposed; and (4) carrying out safety education training on the staff regularly according to the improvement measures, returning to the S1 stage to carry out safety consciousness assessment again, and finally effectively improving the safety consciousness of the staff at the front line.

The safety consciousness evaluating model comprises a risk consciousness module, a team consciousness module, a responsibility consciousness module, an execution consciousness module and a sharing consciousness module. And obtaining a safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score according to the five modules of risk consciousness, team consciousness, responsibility consciousness, execution consciousness and sharing consciousness, obtaining a safety consciousness grade of the tested person according to the safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score, and generating a tested person comprehensive safety consciousness report, wherein the safety consciousness grade is matched with the safety consciousness requirement of the tested person.

The risk awareness module comprises a risk knowledge question bank and an accident situation simulation evaluation, wherein the risk knowledge question bank is constructed to obtain a risk knowledge evaluation score A1; obtaining an accident situation simulation evaluation score A2 through the accident situation simulation evaluation; and obtaining a risk awareness evaluation score A according to the risk knowledge evaluation score A1 and the accident situation simulation evaluation score A2. The team consciousness module comprises a questionnaire and accident scene simulation evaluation, wherein the questionnaire is established to obtain performance scores B1 of ordinary reminding, communication, help others and the like; obtaining an accident situation simulation evaluation score B2 through the accident situation simulation evaluation; and obtaining a team consciousness evaluation score B according to the performance score B1 of ordinary reminding, communication, helping others and the like and the accident situation simulation evaluation score B2. The responsibility consciousness module is used for evaluating by constructing a safety responsibility question bank to obtain a responsibility consciousness evaluation score C. The execution consciousness module obtains an execution consciousness evaluation score D based on behavior observation evaluation. The sharing consciousness module obtains a sharing consciousness evaluation score E based on an interactive learning mode. And obtaining a safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score S of the tested person according to the risk consciousness evaluation score A, the team consciousness evaluation score B, the responsibility consciousness evaluation score C, the execution consciousness evaluation score D, the sharing consciousness evaluation score E and the entropy weight method.

In some optional embodiments, determining the weight of each evaluation mode by using an entropy weight method specifically includes:

(1) data standardization, namely setting n objects to be evaluated, wherein each object has m evaluation modes, and setting an original data matrix X as (X)_ij)_n×mI ═ 1,2, …, n; 1,2, …, m having the structure:

in the formula: x is the number of_ijExpressing the score obtained by the jth evaluation mode of the ith object to be evaluated;

carrying out standardization processing on the raw data:

this results in a processed normalized matrix Z:

(2) calculating the specific gravity p of the jth evaluation mode of the ith object to be evaluated_ij：

(3) Calculating the entropy e of the jth evaluation mode_j：

(4) Calculating the utility value d of the jth evaluation mode_j：

d_j＝1-e_j

(5) Calculating the weight w of the jth evaluation mode_j：

The weights of all parts of the first-line employee safety consciousness assessment obtained through the steps are shown in the following table 1:

TABLE 1

In some optional embodiments, the safety awareness comprehensive evaluation score is used for deriving a safety awareness grade of the person under test, and a safety awareness report of the person under test is generated, wherein the safety awareness grade matches with a safety awareness requirement of the person under test, specifically:

and obtaining the safety consciousness level of the tested personnel according to the safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score, wherein the safety consciousness level is obtained by dividing the safety consciousness of the first-line staff into four levels, namely weak [0-70 ], medium [70-80 ], strong [80-90) and strong [90-100 ].

In some optional embodiments, the risk awareness module comprises a risk knowledge question bank and an accident situation simulation evaluation, wherein the risk knowledge question bank is constructed to obtain a risk knowledge evaluation score A1; the step of obtaining an accident scenario simulation evaluation score a2 through the accident scenario simulation evaluation specifically includes:

the risk knowledge question bank is constructed based on online test of knowledge points related to risks, different post requirements are matched, test paper is dynamically formed to generate test paper with a total score of 100, and a risk knowledge evaluation score A1 is obtained;

the accident situation simulation evaluation is based on emergency responses of employees before and after an accident, scoring is carried out through behavior observation, the total score is 100, and an accident situation simulation evaluation score A2 is obtained;

the risk awareness assessment score a is thus derived:

A＝A1w₁+A2w₂

in some optional embodiments, the team awareness module comprises a questionnaire and an accident situation simulation evaluation, wherein the questionnaire is formed to obtain a performance score B1 of ordinary reminding, communication, help others and the like; the step of obtaining an accident scenario simulation evaluation score B2 through the accident scenario simulation evaluation specifically includes:

by establishing a questionnaire, the other people score the performance of the tested person such as usual reminding, communication, help of the other people and the like, the total score is 100, and a team consciousness assessment score B1 is obtained. The accident situation simulation evaluation is based on the emergency response of the staff before and after the accident, and the staff communication and communication situation under the condition is scored, wherein the total score is 100, and the accident situation simulation evaluation score B2 is obtained.

Thus, a team consciousness assessment score B is obtained:

B＝B1w₃+B2w₄

in some optional embodiments, the responsibility consciousness module is a step of obtaining a responsibility consciousness evaluation score C by constructing a safety responsibility question bank for evaluation, and specifically includes:

and constructing a safety responsibility question bank based on four aspects of responsibility knowing, responsibility keeping and responsibility ending, randomly composing a paper to generate an evaluation test paper for evaluation, wherein the total score is 100, and acquiring a responsibility consciousness evaluation score C.

In some optional embodiments, the performing awareness module obtains a performing awareness evaluation score D based on the behavior observation evaluation, and specifically includes:

respectively evaluating the operation performance of a tested person in the states of fatigue, illness, driving, excitement, normal and the like to obtain an execution consciousness evaluation score D;

the achievement calculation formula of the tested person for executing the consciousness assessment score D is as follows:

in the formula, Di is the evaluation result of the tested person of the executive consciousness module in different states, and the value range of Di is [0,100 ].

In some optional embodiments, the sharing awareness module is based on an interactive learning mode, and the step of obtaining the sharing awareness evaluation score E specifically includes:

based on an interactive learning mode, evaluating the performance of individuals, wherein the total score is 100, and acquiring a sharing consciousness evaluation score E; the interactive learning mode refers to sharing and communication in the working process, and deep employees are encouraged to take lead and teach new employees in the aspect of experience training, namely 'old with new'; young employees are advocated in new technology, innovative ideas, and rationalized advice to help share to older employees, i.e., "new and old".

In some optional embodiments, the step of obtaining the safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score S of the person to be tested according to the risk consciousness evaluation score a, the team consciousness evaluation score B, the responsibility consciousness evaluation score C, the executive consciousness evaluation score D, the sharing consciousness evaluation score E and the entropy weight method specifically includes:

according to the evaluation scores of the five modules of risk consciousness, team consciousness, responsibility consciousness, execution consciousness and sharing consciousness, calculating according to the weight of each module score to obtain a safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score:

and obtaining a safety consciousness grade according to the safety consciousness comprehensive evaluation score to generate a comprehensive safety consciousness report of the tested personnel.

The above method is explained in detail below with reference to the drawings and specific embodiments.

As shown in fig. 2, the present embodiment provides a comprehensive, objective and effective quantitative assessment method for security awareness of front-line employees, which includes the following steps:

s201, dividing consciousness modules.

And S202, evaluating the consciousness module.

And S203, calculating the comprehensive evaluation score of the safety consciousness by using the evaluation scores of all consciousness modules.

And S204, obtaining the safety consciousness level of the employee according to the evaluation score to form a comprehensive report.

Preferably, in the step S201, the safety awareness is divided into five modules, namely risk awareness, team awareness, responsibility awareness, execution awareness and sharing awareness. The risk awareness is the idea that production built in the mind of employees must be safe, and the employees are in a mental state of giving up and being alert to various external environmental conditions that may cause harm to themselves or others during the production activity. The team consciousness is a physical concentration of the whole enterprise, namely the binding force of 1+1>2, and the centripetal force and cohesion of all members, and is represented by mutual reminding, communication, help and the like of the staff in daily work and production activities. The responsibility consciousness is that the staff clearly and clearly know what is the responsibility, and consciously and seriously fulfill the responsibility in the post responsibility and the production activity process, and converts the responsibility into the psychological characteristic of going on the move. The executive consciousness is the psychological state that the staff can complete the tasks according to quality, quantity and time, and work is done automatically, spontaneously, seriously and actively. The sharing consciousness refers to the consciousness that the staff shares experience, experience and the like with other people in the production activity.

Preferably, in the step S202, five consciousness modules of risk consciousness, team consciousness, responsibility consciousness, execution consciousness and sharing consciousness are evaluated in different manners.

The risk awareness module consists of a risk knowledge question bank test part and an accident situation simulation evaluation part, and the risk knowledge question bank is constructed to comprise safety knowledge points, safety events or disaster events and the like in the fields of production safety, public safety, natural disasters and the like; the accident scene simulation evaluation is a virtual scene simulation of a certain operation which needs to be completed by the cooperation of individuals or multiple persons, the speech behavior of the whole process of the detected employee is recorded, and each completed operation is compared with the correct step set by the background of the simulation system software to obtain a score.

The production safety refers to taking corresponding accident prevention and control measures in order to avoid accidents causing personal injury and property loss in the production and operation activities, so as to ensure the personal safety of workers and ensure the related activities of the production and operation activities which can be smoothly carried out. The method comprises the steps of building operation safety, coal mine production safety, hazardous chemical production safety, electric power operation safety, transportation safety and the like. The public safety refers to a stable external environment and order required by society and citizens to engage in and carry out normal life, learning, entertainment and communications. The method comprises the steps of information safety, food safety, public health safety, public travel rule safety, refugee behavior safety, personnel evacuation site safety, building safety, city lifeline safety, malicious and non-malicious personal safety, personnel evacuation and the like; the natural disaster safety refers to the safety of unforeseen or irresistible natural disasters or meteorological disasters, and comprises safety accidents such as earthquakes, typhoons, floods, debris flows, lightning strikes, avalanches, tsunamis, tornadoes and the like.

The team consciousness module comprises two parts of accident scene simulation evaluation and questionnaire construction, and the accident scene simulation evaluation is consistent with the flow of the risk consciousness module except for different set accident scenes; the formation of the questionnaire includes setting survey questions on the questionnaire stars, the distribution, filling, data statistics, etc., and is completed by the expert panel.

The responsibility consciousness module is used for evaluating by constructing a safety responsibility question bank and comprises knowledge contents in four aspects of responsibility knowing, responsibility keeping and responsibility ending, the responsibility knowing is a precondition of responsibility consciousness, and the importance of the responsibility is known by reinforcing a learning theory, knowledge, skills and the like; the responsibility is due to the responsibility consciousness, and the responsibility is born and bears a certain responsibility regardless of subjective will; the duty keeping is an effective guarantee of responsibility consciousness and is expressed by observing discipline, law and regulation; conscientity is the final manifestation of responsibility consciousness, and it is the spirit of active charge to fulfill its own duties with the best effort.

The executive consciousness module is used for observing and evaluating daily behaviors of the tested staff, respectively observing the operation performances of the tested staff under the states of fatigue, illness, driving, excitement, normal and the like, evaluating the operation performances under each state by a special group, and if no state exists, calculating and obtaining an executive consciousness evaluation score D according to the full score.

The sharing consciousness module is used for evaluating personal performance based on an interactive learning mode, and staff record communication sharing with other people in the daily sharing record table during working or production activities at ordinary times and take the communication sharing record table as a basis during evaluation; the interactive learning mode refers to sharing and communication in the working process, and deep employees are encouraged to take lead and teach new employees in the aspect of experience training, namely 'old with new'; young employees are advocated in new technology, innovative ideas, and rationalized advice to help share to older employees, i.e., "new and old".

Preferably, in step S203, a safety awareness comprehensive evaluation score is calculated:

preferably, in the step S204, a safety awareness level of the person to be tested is obtained according to the safety awareness comprehensive evaluation score, and the safety awareness level is obtained by dividing the safety awareness of the first-line employee into four levels, namely weak [0-70 ], medium [70-80 ], strong [80-90) and strong [90-100 ].

This embodiment still provides a staff safety consciousness's quantitative assessment device, includes:

at least one processor;

at least one memory for storing at least one program;

when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to implement the method as shown in fig. 1.

The quantitative evaluation system for the safety consciousness of the staff, provided by the embodiment of the method, can execute the quantitative evaluation method for the safety consciousness of the staff, can execute any combination implementation steps of the embodiment of the method, and has corresponding functions and beneficial effects of the method.

The embodiment of the application also discloses a computer program product or a computer program, which comprises computer instructions, and the computer instructions are stored in a computer readable storage medium. The computer instructions may be read by a processor of a computer device from a computer-readable storage medium, and executed by the processor to cause the computer device to perform the method illustrated in fig. 1.

The embodiment also provides a storage medium, which stores instructions or programs capable of executing the quantitative assessment method for the safety awareness of the employee, provided by the method embodiment of the invention, and when the instructions or the programs are run, the steps can be implemented by any combination of the method embodiments, and the method has corresponding functions and beneficial effects.

In alternative embodiments, the functions/acts noted in the block diagrams may occur out of the order noted in the operational illustrations. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved. Furthermore, the embodiments presented and described in the flow charts of the present invention are provided by way of example in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the technology. The disclosed methods are not limited to the operations and logic flows presented herein. Alternative embodiments are contemplated in which the order of various operations is changed and in which sub-operations described as part of larger operations are performed independently.

Furthermore, although the present invention is described in the context of functional modules, it should be understood that, unless otherwise stated to the contrary, one or more of the described functions and/or features may be integrated in a single physical device and/or software module, or one or more functions and/or features may be implemented in a separate physical device or software module. It will also be appreciated that a detailed discussion of the actual implementation of each module is not necessary for an understanding of the present invention. Rather, the actual implementation of the various functional modules in the apparatus disclosed herein will be understood within the ordinary skill of an engineer, given the nature, function, and internal relationship of the modules. Accordingly, those skilled in the art can, using ordinary skill, practice the invention as set forth in the claims without undue experimentation. It is also to be understood that the specific concepts disclosed are merely illustrative of and not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims and their full scope of equivalents.

The functions, if implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as a stand-alone product, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention may be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a storage medium and includes instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: a U-disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and other various media capable of storing program codes.

The logic and/or steps represented in the flowcharts or otherwise described herein, e.g., an ordered listing of executable instructions that can be considered to implement logical functions, can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device, such as a computer-based system, processor-containing system, or other system that can fetch the instructions from the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device and execute the instructions. For the purposes of this description, a "computer-readable medium" can be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer-readable medium would include the following: an electrical connection (electronic device) having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette (magnetic device), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber device, and a portable compact disc read-only memory (CDROM). Additionally, the computer-readable medium could even be paper or another suitable medium upon which the program is printed, as the program can be electronically captured, via for instance optical scanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted or otherwise processed in a suitable manner if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.

It should be understood that portions of the present invention may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, the various steps or methods may be implemented in software or firmware stored in memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented in hardware, as in another embodiment, any one or combination of the following techniques, which are known in the art, may be used: a discrete logic circuit having a logic gate circuit for implementing a logic function on a data signal, an application specific integrated circuit having an appropriate combinational logic gate circuit, a Programmable Gate Array (PGA), a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), or the like.

In the foregoing description of the specification, reference to the description of "one embodiment/example," "another embodiment/example," or "certain embodiments/examples," etc., means that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the invention. In this specification, schematic representations of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in any one or more embodiments or examples.

While embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that: various changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made to the embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined by the claims and their equivalents.

While the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A quantitative evaluation method for employee safety consciousness is characterized by comprising the following steps:

2. The method for quantitatively evaluating the safety consciousness of the employee according to claim 1, wherein after the employee to be tested is tested by the risk consciousness module, an evaluation score a1 is obtained based on the risk knowledge base, and an evaluation score a2 is obtained based on the behavior evaluation unit of the accident situation simulation;

wherein, w_iRepresenting the corresponding weights of the different modules.

3. The quantitative evaluation method for the safety consciousness of the staff as claimed in claim 2, wherein the risk knowledge question bank is used for acquiring related knowledge points according to the post requirements of the staff to be tested and generating an evaluation test paper;

4. The quantitative evaluation method for the safety awareness of the staff as claimed in claim 2, wherein the questionnaire unit is used for constructing questionnaires, obtaining the responses of the staff to the questionnaires and scoring the responses;

5. The quantitative assessment method for employee safety awareness according to claim 2, wherein the safety responsibility question bank is constructed based on four aspects of responsibility knowledge, responsibility guard and responsibility, and is used for randomly composing a paper to generate an assessment test paper.

6. The quantitative evaluation method for the staff safety awareness according to claim 2, wherein the executive awareness module is used for obtaining evaluation scores D in five different states by respectively evaluating the work performances of the staff under fatigue, illness, driving, excitement and normal states.

7. The quantitative assessment method for employee safety awareness, according to claim 2, further comprising the steps of:

8. A system for quantitatively evaluating safety awareness of an employee, comprising:

9. A quantitative assessment device of staff's safety consciousness, characterized by includes:

at least one processor;

at least one memory for storing at least one program;

when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to implement the method of any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, in which a program executable by a processor is stored, wherein the program executable by the processor is adapted to perform the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7 when executed by the processor.