CN114091806A - Method for evaluating operation efficiency of radar operator - Google Patents
Method for evaluating operation efficiency of radar operator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN114091806A CN114091806A CN202111180899.6A CN202111180899A CN114091806A CN 114091806 A CN114091806 A CN 114091806A CN 202111180899 A CN202111180899 A CN 202111180899A CN 114091806 A CN114091806 A CN 114091806A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test
- circle
- screen
- reaction
- target
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 31
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 121
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 41
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000003936 working memory Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 230000003930 cognitive ability Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 230000002688 persistence Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 230000036632 reaction speed Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 230000035484 reaction time Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000003825 pressing Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000006403 short-term memory Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000002195 synergetic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000006748 scratching Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002393 scratching effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000019771 cognition Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001149 cognitive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002996 emotional effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003935 attention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010482 emotional regulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004438 eyesight Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000005036 nerve Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a method for evaluating the operation efficiency of radar operators, which comprises the steps of testing the competence of the radar operators, wherein the evaluation comprises personality trait testing and psychological diathesis testing, and the testing of the competence of the radar operators also comprises cognitive ability testing, and comprises the following steps: step S1, testing digital sensitivity; step S2, attention span test; step S3, logic reasoning test; step S4, short-time memory test; step S5, testing the reaction speed; step S6, attention concentration and persistence test; step S7, working memory test; step S8, visual and spatial psychology conversion test. The invention forms a set of radar operator operation efficiency evaluation key technology, solves the problems of action and law of visual cognition in the radar operator post work, and provides support for design research and development of a radar operator simulation training system and field evaluation improvement thereof.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of simulation training, and particularly relates to a method for evaluating the operation efficiency of radar operators.
Background
The radar is a common electronic detection device, and because the electromagnetic environment in which the radar works is complex, it is necessary to perform analog simulation training and evaluate the operation efficiency for training a radar operator. An objective evaluation module for operation efficiency is lacked in the conventional radar simulation training system. The key performance of the radar operators refers to main assessment indexes for embodying the operational capability and level of the radar operators. The traditional daily training lacks a method for evaluating the operation efficiency, does not aim at the research on the aspects of establishment of a competence characteristic index system, design of an evaluation method and field evaluation and assessment, cannot solve the problems of the action and the rule of visual cognition in the post work of radar operators, and is difficult to provide support for the design, the research and the development of a simulation training system of the radar operators and the field evaluation and improvement of the simulation training system of the radar operators.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above, the present invention provides a method for evaluating the operation performance of a radar operator, so as to solve the problems of the role and rule of visual cognition in the post work of the radar operator and the lack of an objective test means in the process of evaluating the operation performance of the radar operator.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for evaluating the operation performance of a radar operator, including testing the competence of the radar operator, wherein the evaluation includes personality traits test and psychological diathesis test, and the testing the competence of the radar operator further includes cognitive ability test, including:
step S1, testing digital sensitivity;
step S2, attention span test;
step S3, logic reasoning test;
step S4, short-time memory test;
step S5, testing the reaction speed;
step S6, attention concentration and persistence test;
step S7, working memory test;
step S8, visual and spatial psychology conversion test.
Preferably, step S1 specifically includes:
evaluating the digital sensitivity of a tested object by adopting two tests of continuous addition and Webster digital breadth;
(1) continuous addition
The continuous addition test is used for inspecting the digital computing capability and the information processing speed cognitive ability of the tested object;
the output index includes:
(ii) successive addition accuracy
(2) Breadth of Webster
Presenting a digital sequence in the center of a screen at certain time intervals, requiring a subject to remember the digital sequence as much as possible, and immediately inputting the sequence which is just presented in sequence or reverse sequence after the sequence presentation is finished;
the output index includes:
a forward-to-back numerical breadth and an inverted-to-back numerical breadth.
Preferably, step S2 specifically includes:
6 tests of space attention span, multi-target tracking, moving circle center tracking, track tracking and distinguishing, visual search and moving target shooting are adopted to evaluate the attention span of the tested object;
(1) breadth of spatial attention
Firstly, a fixation point "+" is presented in the middle of the screen, a plurality of white dots randomly appear on the screen after the fixation point disappears, and a prompt appears after the dots disappear: please select the number of dots, and the tested object is selected by the mouse. If correct, then the green "√" will appear, and if wrong, the red "×";
the output index includes:
attention is paid to breadth score
(2) Multi-target tracking
The method comprises the steps that a plurality of small white dots are displayed on a screen, wherein N small white dots are targets to be tracked, the tracked targets are changed into red before tracking is started, all the dots are changed into white, the dots move in a random direction at a certain speed, the tracks of the N red dots are tracked simultaneously when the tested needs to track, the N red dots are found out after the dots stop moving, a mouse is used for clicking for selection after the N red dots are found out, then a submission button below the point is clicked, and the next round of testing is carried out;
outputting indexes:
firstly, tracking accuracy rate of multiple targets according to the number of balls;
multi-target tracking accuracy according to the test times;
thirdly, multi-target tracking reaction;
(3) moving circle center tracking
The center of the starting screen presents a 500ms fixation point "+", after the fixation point disappears, a white target circle and an aiming frame appear at the same time, the initial circle centers are all positioned at the central fixation point, the target small circle immediately starts to move at a certain speed, the direction is changed once the small circle moves at a certain distance, and a testee needs to control the circle center of the large circle to aim at the circle center of the small circle as far as possible through a keyboard key. The color of the big circle is green if the small circles are all arranged on the inner side of the big circle, otherwise, the big circle is red;
the output index is:
moving a circle center for tracking;
(4) trajectory tracking and discrimination
Firstly, a 500ms fixation point "+" is presented in the middle of the screen, a white target circle and an aiming frame appear after the fixation point disappears, the initial circle centers are all located at the central fixation point, the target small circle immediately starts to move at a certain speed, the direction is changed once when the target small circle moves for a certain distance, but the target small circle does not return to the middle of the screen, a testee needs to move a mouse to enable the circle center of the large circle to aim at the circle center of the small circle as far as possible, the color of the large circle is green when the small circle is all in the large circle, otherwise, the small circle is red, in the process of tracking the movement of the small circle, a letter A or S is presented at random in the middle of the screen at intervals, the testee needs to press a corresponding key to react as soon as possible after seeing, and if the letter A or S is pressed. Then a green color of √ will appear. X, appearing red if pressed wrong;
the output index includes:
tracking and distinguishing CD;
secondly, the track tracing and the accuracy of the identification are improved;
thirdly, track tracing and reaction time distinguishing;
(5) visual search
Firstly, a gazing point "+" is presented in the middle of a screen, a target image is presented in the center of the screen after the gazing point disappears, a blank screen is presented for a period of time after the target image disappears, then an image matrix is presented, and the image matrix to be judged is required to contain a plurality of target images, 1 is according to the 'A', and 2 is according to the 'L';
outputting indexes:
firstly, visual search accuracy;
secondly, visually searching reaction time;
(6) moving target shooting
A small ball enters a visual field from a certain side and moves along a path at a certain speed, the path is randomly generated by a system according to a certain rule, a shooting point s is arranged below the visual field, the right hand of a testee controls a left arrow and a right arrow on a keyboard to adjust the shooting direction, and the shooting time and the shooting direction are determined according to the judgment of the small ball;
the output index includes:
moving the average center distance of target shooting;
and the moving target shoots the minimum center distance.
Preferably, step S3 specifically includes:
evaluating the logic reasoning ability of the tested object by adopting a Revin test;
outputting indexes:
the total number of correct questions in the Reye.
Preferably, step S4 specifically includes:
the short-term memory ability of the test was evaluated using a transcoding test.
The output index includes:
code conversion accuracy rate;
② during the transcoding reaction.
Preferably, step S5 specifically includes:
evaluating the reaction speed of the test by adopting a selective reaction time test;
outputting indexes:
firstly, selecting the accuracy rate in reaction;
selecting reaction time.
Preferably, step S6 specifically includes:
3 tests such as one minute repeated key pressing, digital scratching and attention control are adopted to evaluate the concentration and the persistence of the attention of the tested person;
(1) one minute repeated key
The 60s countdown is presented on the screen, and the blank key is required to be pressed as soon as possible within 60s, the more times the blank key is pressed is the better,
the output index is:
firstly, the key pressing is repeated by one minute by the dominant hand;
secondly, the key pressing is repeated by the non-dominant hand in one minute;
③ repeatedly pressing the key for one minute in total;
(2) digital scratch pad
A number table is displayed on the screen, and a tested person needs to find the number 3 as much as possible in a specified time and click the number with a mouse to scratch the number;
the output index is:
scoring is performed by digital elimination;
(3) attention control
The tested right and left keys are pressed to judge the stimulus presented at the right and left positions, and the reaction and accuracy rate of the tested right and left positions under the non-synergetic condition of the stimulus presented position and the key reaction are obviously inferior to the achievement of the synergetic condition;
the output index is:
attention is paid to control accuracy cost;
② attention is paid to controlling the reaction time cost.
Preferably, step S7 specifically includes:
evaluating the working memory capacity of the tested work by adopting a working memory test;
the output index is:
firstly, working and memorizing the accuracy;
② work memory reaction.
Preferably, step S8 specifically includes:
adopting visual angle conversion and psychological rotation 2 tests based on visual presentation to evaluate the tested visual and spatial psychological conversion capability;
(1) visual presentation based perspective conversion
Some articles are presented on the left side of the screen, the prompt words can inform the position and the orientation of the tested object, the task of the tested object is to judge which direction another article is in, answer the object on the ring on the right side of the screen, and the corresponding direction is clicked by a mouse;
outputting indexes:
firstly, converting the accuracy of a visual angle;
view angle conversion reaction;
(2) psychological rotation
Two three-dimensional building block images are presented on the left side and the right side of a screen, the two three-dimensional building block images can be obtained by rotating completely same building blocks by X, Y or Z axis by 0, 50, 100 or 180 degrees, or can be obtained by rotating two building blocks which are mirror images of each other by the same rule, whether the two images come from the same building block or not is judged by psychological rotation within a set time, if the images are the same, an L key is pressed for reaction, and if the images are the same, an A key is pressed for reaction;
outputting indexes:
firstly, the psychological rotation accuracy rate;
② psychological rotation reaction.
In a second aspect, the present invention also provides an electronic device, including:
at least one processor; and the number of the first and second groups,
a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, the instructions being executable by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the method of assessing operational performance of a radar operator according to any one of the first aspect.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following beneficial effects:
the invention forms a set of radar operator operation efficiency evaluation key technology, solves the problems of action and law of visual cognition in the radar operator post work, and provides support for design research and development of a radar operator simulation training system and field evaluation improvement thereof.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a sequential addition method for testing provided by an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the Wechsler numerical breadth for testing provided by embodiments of the present application;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a spatial attention span provided for testing by an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a mobile circle center tracking for testing according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of trace tracking and identification for testing provided by embodiments of the present application;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a visual search provided for testing by an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a moving target shooting for testing provided by an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 8 is a graph of reaction rates provided for testing by embodiments of the present application;
FIG. 9 is a schematic view of an attention control system provided for testing in an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram of working memory provided for testing in accordance with an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 11 is a schematic view of a view angle conversion provided for testing according to an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.
The method for evaluating the operation efficiency of the radar operator mainly comprises a method for evaluating the competence of the radar operator.
The competence of the radar operator consists of 3 aspects of personality traits, psychological traits and cognitive competence, wherein the personality traits comprise aspects of openness, accountability, extroversion, humanity and nerve traits, the psychological traits comprise aspects of learning adaptability, psychological elasticity, emotional stability, emotional regulation capability, emotional perception capability, social ability, confidence courage and the like, and the cognitive competence comprises aspects of digital sensitivity, space attention span, logical reasoning, short-term memory capability, reaction speed, operation sensitivity, digital span, selection reaction time, moving target shooting, work memory, psychological rotation, digital elimination, visual angle conversion, visual search and the like. The radar operator competency evaluation tools for each dimension are shown in table 4, and the evaluation tools for personality and psychological diathesis are from published mature questionnaires, and need not be described herein.
TABLE 1 competency assessment content and tools
The test of cognitive ability adopts a series of psychological cognition tests to evaluate the cognitive ability of the tested people in the aspects of digital sensitivity, attention span, logical reasoning, short-term memory, reaction speed, attention concentration and persistence, working memory, vision and space psychology conversion and the like.
The cognitive ability testing process provided by the embodiment comprises the following steps:
1 digital sensitivity
The digital sensitivity of the test subjects was evaluated using a continuous addition and a Webster digital breadth 2 test.
(1) Continuous addition
The continuous addition test is used to examine the digital computation ability and the recognition ability such as the information processing speed of the test subject. As shown in fig. 1. The test contents are continuously added by single digit, and the result is filled in the corresponding box, with the title as "4 +3+1+8+0+1+0+2+0+ 1". The total number of the obtained crystals was 20.
Outputting indexes:
(ii) successive addition accuracy
(2) Breadth of Webster
As shown in fig. 2, a number sequence is presented in the center of the screen at certain time intervals, and it is required that the subject tries to memorize the number sequence as much as possible and input the sequence that has just been presented in order or reverse order immediately after the presentation of the sequence is completed. The formal experiment had 9 tries on the back and 8 tries on the back. All the subjects start from item 1 (practice experiment), the practice experiment feeds back correct answers after the input of the subjects is completed, each subject has two trials, the two trials can be added after one trial passes, the two trials stop after failure, and scoring is carried out according to the number digit which has passed. The highest 12 points along the back and the highest 10 points along the back. The input screen presents a countdown. The input to be tested is allowed to be modified, and if the input is wrong, the input can be re-input after being deleted according to backspace.
The numbers in the figure are examples, and a non-repetitive and discontinuous table of numbers needs to be regenerated for each test. The first (two trials) of the forward and backward movements were used as training materials, and the others were used as official materials.
Outputting indexes:
front-to-back digital breadth (number)
② digital breadth (number)
The attention span of the tested object is evaluated by adopting 6 tests such as space attention span, multi-target tracking, moving circle center tracking, track tracking and distinguishing, visual search, moving target shooting and the like.
(1) Breadth of spatial attention
Firstly, a fixation point "+" is presented in the middle of the screen, a plurality of white dots randomly appear on the screen after the fixation point disappears, and a prompt appears after the dots disappear: please select the number of dots, and the tested object is selected by the mouse. Then, if correct, it will appear as "check mark" in green, and if wrong, it will appear as "x" in red. The next trial is then presented. No reaction is done within 8 seconds and the next trim (no fixation point in between) automatically starts to be presented. A simple schematic is shown in fig. 3.
Outputting indexes:
attention is paid to breadth score
(2) Multi-target tracking
The method comprises the steps that a plurality of white small dots are displayed on a screen, N small dots are targets to be tracked, the tracking targets are changed into red before tracking is started, all the dots are changed into white, the dots move in a random direction at a certain speed, the tested targets need to track tracks of N red dots at the same time, the N red dots are found out after the dots stop moving, a mouse is used for clicking and selecting the dots after the dots are found out, then a submission button below the mouse is clicked, and the next round of testing is carried out.
Outputting indexes:
multiple target tracking accuracy (number of balls)
② multiple target tracking accuracy (test times)
Multiple target tracing reaction time
(3) Moving circle center tracking
A 500ms gazing point "+" appears in the middle of the starting screen, and a white target circle and a sighting box (big circle) appear after the gazing point disappears. The initial circle centers are all positioned at the central fixation point, and the target small circle immediately starts to move at a certain speed. The direction is changed once the tested person moves a certain distance (step length), and the tested person needs to control the circle center of the large circle to aim at the circle center of the small circle as much as possible through the keyboard keys. The small circles are all inside the large circle (sight box). The great circle is green in color, otherwise it is red. A simple schematic is shown in fig. 4.
Outputting indexes:
moving circle center tracking
(4) Trajectory tracking and discrimination
Firstly, a 500ms fixation point "+" is presented in the middle of the screen, after the fixation point disappears, a white target circle and a aiming frame appear at the same time, the initial circle centers of the target circle and the aiming frame are both positioned at the central fixation point, and the target small circle starts to move at a certain speed immediately. The direction changes once every certain distance (step) of movement, but does not return to the very center of the screen. The testee needs to move the mouse to aim the center of the large circle at the center of the small circle as much as possible. The color of the big circle (aiming box) is green if the small circle is totally arranged in the big circle, and is red if the small circle is not arranged in the big circle. In the process of tracking the movement of the small circle, a letter A or S is randomly presented in the middle of the screen at intervals, and a testee needs to press a corresponding key to react as soon as possible after seeing the letter A or S, if the letter A or S is pressed, the testee presses the corresponding key to react. Then a green color of √ will appear. Appear red x when wrong. A simple schematic is shown in fig. 5.
Outputting indexes:
track tracing and CD distinguishing
Accuracy of track tracing and identification
Third, tracing and distinguishing reaction time
(5) Visual search
As shown in fig. 6, a gazing point "+" is first displayed in the middle of the screen, a target image is displayed in the center of the screen after the gazing point disappears, a blank screen is displayed for a period of time after the target image disappears, and then an image matrix is displayed, wherein the image matrix to be judged is required to contain a plurality of target images, 1 is in a "form, and 2 is in a" L "form (refer to the example diagram and the flow chart). The 8 trials were practiced, and the case where the number of target images in the square matrix was 1/2 was presented 4 times each. There are 4 targets in the formal experimental material, 1/2 targets may exist in the square matrix, 1/2 targets are randomly presented for each trial, and the position of each target in the square matrix is random. And entering a fixation point interface of the next real after the tested response is made. The exercise phase gives correct/wrong/time-out feedback.
Outputting indexes:
visual search accuracy
② visual search reaction time
(6) Moving target shooting
Referring to fig. 7, a ball enters the visual field from a certain side, moves along the path at a certain speed, the path is randomly generated according to a certain rule by the system, a shooting point s is arranged below the visual field, the right hand of a subject controls the left and right arrows on the keyboard to adjust the shooting direction, and determines when and in which direction to shoot according to own judgment, and the subject has 3 shooting opportunities on each tertiary.
Outputting indexes:
moving target shooting average center distance
② minimum distance between centers of circles for shooting moving target
3 logical reasoning
The tested logical reasoning ability was evaluated using the reynolds test.
The test is B, C, D, E total four-component test, each group contains 6 questions, and the total number of the questions is 24; and in the practice stage, the component A test is adopted, and six questions are total. The test is required to select the most suitable one for filling the large image from a plurality of given small images, wherein each selection is 1 point to one subject, the selection is wrong and not points, each subject has no time limit, but the total testing time is limited to 15 min.
Outputting indexes:
total number of correct questions in all of the Chinese characters
4 short-term memory
The short-term memory ability of the test was evaluated using a transcoding test.
Firstly, presenting a word list to be tested, memorizing the word list for a period of time, then presenting one word, requiring the tested input of corresponding numbers, testing and presenting all words, but presenting in random order; then the same word list is presented again, the tested object is made to continue memorizing, and then the test is carried out again, and the method is the same as the above; the memory-test procedure is then repeated once more. The 3 times of learning are different in duration, and the 3 times of testing are different in sequence. The exercise test is 1 deal, and the word list contains only two words. Formally testing 4 dials, each word list containing 8 words. The exercise test gives immediate feedback of correctness and incorrectness when the answer is given, but does not inform correct answer, and the official test does not give feedback. After the tested input is finished, the enter key is pressed for confirmation. Note: both numbers are tested to be input correctly. When the same word list is repeatedly learned, the presentation sequence of the word pairs is not changed, and when repeated testing is carried out, the presentation sequence is random.
Outputting indexes:
code conversion accuracy
② during transcoding reaction
5 reaction rate
The reaction rate of the test is evaluated using a selective reaction test.
As shown in fig. 8, when the preliminary signal occurs, the subject is ready to react. The target signals of the four colors are then randomly presented. The subject makes a selection according to the presented color block, the reaction key is dfjk. The screen has the prompt of color blocks and corresponding keys when the test is exercised, and the prompt is not given when the test is formal.
Outputting indexes:
selecting the accuracy of reaction
② selecting reaction time
6 concentration and persistence of attention
The concentration and persistence of the attentions tested were evaluated using 3 tests of one minute repeat keying, digital scratch-out, and attention control.
(1) One minute repeated key
The 60s countdown is presented on the screen, and the blank key is required to be pressed as soon as possible within 60s, wherein the more times the blank key is pressed, the better the blank key is.
Outputting indexes:
one minute repeat key (dominant hand)
② one minute repeated push-button (non-dominant hand)
③ one minute repeat press key (general)
(2) Digital scratch pad
A list of numbers will be presented on the screen and the subject needs to find the number "3" as much as possible within the prescribed time and scratch it out with a mouse click. And after the numbers are scratched out, the numbers can be clicked again to cancel the reselection. The digital tables of the practice test and the formal test have the advantages that the occurrence rate of the practice test number '3' is 10%, the occurrence rate of the formal test number '3' is 5%, the distribution of the target numbers in the whole digital table is uniform and irregular, and no adjacent '3' exists in the horizontal direction and the vertical direction.
Outputting indexes:
figure eliminating score
(3) Attention control
As shown in fig. 9, the test results show that the response and accuracy rate of the test results in the non-cooperative condition of the stimulus presentation position and the key press response (e.g., the right key is pressed to the left stimulus) are significantly worse than the performance of the cooperative condition (e.g., the right key is pressed to the right stimulus). In the test, an arrow pointing upwards (↓) or downwards (↓) is presented on the screen, when the arrow pointing upwards appears, the tested person needs to press the A key by using the left index finger, and when the arrow pointing downwards appears, the tested person needs to press the L key by using the right index finger. The reaction is required to be fast and accurate.
Outputting indexes:
attention is paid to control accuracy rate cost
② attention is paid to controlling reaction time cost
7 working memory
And evaluating the working memory capacity of the tested object by adopting a working memory test.
As shown in FIG. 10, the n-back paradigm requires that the stimulus that has just appeared be the same as the previous nth stimulus, i.e., L for the same stimulus and A for a different stimulus. The load is manipulated by controlling the number of stimuli that the current stimulus is separated from the target stimulus. The first n stimuli of each test were not used as responses. 2-back schematic:
outputting indexes:
working memory accuracy
② work memory reaction
8 visual and spatial psychology conversion
Visual angle conversion and psychological rotation 2 tests based on visual presentation were used to evaluate the visual and spatial psychological conversion abilities of the subjects.
(1) Visual presentation based perspective conversion
As shown in fig. 11, items are presented to the left of the screen and a reminder will tell where the test is now and in what orientation. The task to be tested is to determine in which direction another object is, and to answer on the ring on the right side of the screen, and to click the corresponding direction with the mouse.
Outputting indexes:
view angle conversion accuracy
② view angle conversion reaction
(2) Psychological rotation
Two three-dimensional building block images are displayed on the left side and the right side of the screen, the two three-dimensional building block images can be obtained by rotating the same building block by X, Y or Z axis by 0, 50, 100 or 180 degrees, or can be obtained by rotating the two building blocks which are mirror images of each other by the same rule, whether the two images come from the same building block or not is judged by psychological rotation within a set time, if the images are the same, an L key is pressed for reaction, and if the images are the same, an A key is pressed for reaction.
Outputting indexes:
firstly, the psychological rotation accuracy rate;
② psychological rotation reaction.
The present embodiment also provides an electronic device, including:
at least one processor; and the number of the first and second groups,
a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor, and the instructions are executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to execute the method for assessing the operational performance of a radar operator in any one of the implementations of the embodiment.
The disclosed embodiments also provide a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions for causing a computer to execute the method for evaluating the operation performance of a radar operator in any one of the implementations of the foregoing embodiments.
The disclosed embodiments also provide a computer program product comprising a computer program stored on a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, the computer program comprising program instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform the method for radar operator performance assessment in any of the implementations of the foregoing embodiments.
The above description is only an example of the present application and is not intended to limit the present application. Various modifications and changes may occur to those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application should be included in the scope of the claims of the present application.
Claims (10)
1. A radar operator operation performance evaluation method comprises the following steps of testing competency of a radar operator, wherein the evaluation comprises a personality trait test and a psychological quality test, and the evaluation is characterized in that:
the testing of radar operator competency further includes cognitive ability testing, including:
step S1, testing digital sensitivity;
step S2, attention span test;
step S3, logic reasoning test;
step S4, short-time memory test;
step S5, testing the reaction speed;
step S6, attention concentration and persistence test;
step S7, working memory test;
step S8, visual and spatial psychology conversion test.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein:
step S1 specifically includes:
evaluating the digital sensitivity of a tested object by adopting two tests of continuous addition and Webster digital breadth;
(1) continuous addition
The continuous addition test is used for inspecting the digital computing capability and the information processing speed cognitive ability of the tested object;
the output index includes:
(ii) successive addition accuracy
(2) Breadth of Webster
Presenting a digital sequence in the center of a screen at certain time intervals, requiring a subject to remember the digital sequence as much as possible, and immediately inputting the sequence which is just presented in sequence or reverse sequence after the sequence presentation is finished;
the output index includes:
a forward-to-back numerical breadth and an inverted-to-back numerical breadth.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein:
step S2 specifically includes:
6 tests of space attention span, multi-target tracking, moving circle center tracking, track tracking and distinguishing, visual search and moving target shooting are adopted to evaluate the attention span of the tested object;
(1) breadth of spatial attention
Firstly, a fixation point "+" is presented in the middle of the screen, a plurality of white dots randomly appear on the screen after the fixation point disappears, and a prompt appears after the dots disappear: please select the number of dots, and the tested object is selected by the mouse. If correct, then the green "√" will appear, and if wrong, the red "×";
the output index includes:
attention is paid to breadth score
(2) Multi-target tracking
The method comprises the steps that a plurality of small white dots are displayed on a screen, wherein N small white dots are targets to be tracked, the tracked targets are changed into red before tracking is started, all the dots are changed into white, the dots move in a random direction at a certain speed, the tracks of the N red dots are tracked simultaneously when the tested needs to track, the N red dots are found out after the dots stop moving, a mouse is used for clicking for selection after the N red dots are found out, then a submission button below the point is clicked, and the next round of testing is carried out;
outputting indexes:
firstly, tracking accuracy rate of multiple targets according to the number of balls;
multi-target tracking accuracy according to the test times;
thirdly, multi-target tracking reaction;
(3) moving circle center tracking
The center of the starting screen presents a 500ms fixation point "+", after the fixation point disappears, a white target circle and an aiming frame appear at the same time, the initial circle centers are all positioned at the central fixation point, the target small circle immediately starts to move at a certain speed, the direction is changed once the small circle moves at a certain distance, and a testee needs to control the circle center of the large circle to aim at the circle center of the small circle as far as possible through a keyboard key. The color of the big circle is green if the small circles are all arranged on the inner side of the big circle, otherwise, the big circle is red;
the output index is:
moving a circle center for tracking;
(4) trajectory tracking and discrimination
Firstly, a 500ms fixation point "+" is presented in the middle of the screen, a white target circle and an aiming frame appear after the fixation point disappears, the initial circle centers are all located at the central fixation point, the target small circle immediately starts to move at a certain speed, the direction is changed once when the target small circle moves for a certain distance, but the target small circle does not return to the middle of the screen, a testee needs to move a mouse to enable the circle center of the large circle to aim at the circle center of the small circle as far as possible, the color of the large circle is green when the small circle is all in the large circle, otherwise, the small circle is red, in the process of tracking the movement of the small circle, a letter A or S is presented at random in the middle of the screen at intervals, the testee needs to press a corresponding key to react as soon as possible after seeing, and if the letter A or S is pressed. Then a green color of √ will appear. X, appearing red if pressed wrong;
the output index includes:
tracking and distinguishing CD;
secondly, the track tracing and the accuracy of the identification are improved;
thirdly, track tracing and reaction time distinguishing;
(5) visual search
Firstly, a gazing point "+" is presented in the middle of a screen, a target image is presented in the center of the screen after the gazing point disappears, a blank screen is presented for a period of time after the target image disappears, then an image matrix is presented, and the image matrix to be judged is required to contain a plurality of target images, 1 is according to the 'A', and 2 is according to the 'L';
outputting indexes:
firstly, visual search accuracy;
secondly, visually searching reaction time;
(6) moving target shooting
A small ball enters a visual field from a certain side and moves along a path at a certain speed, the path is randomly generated by a system according to a certain rule, a shooting point s is arranged below the visual field, the right hand of a testee controls a left arrow and a right arrow on a keyboard to adjust the shooting direction, and the shooting time and the shooting direction are determined according to the judgment of the small ball;
the output index includes:
moving the average center distance of target shooting;
and the moving target shoots the minimum center distance.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein:
step S3 specifically includes:
evaluating the logic reasoning ability of the tested object by adopting a Revin test;
outputting indexes:
the total number of correct questions in the Reye.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein:
step S4 specifically includes:
the short-term memory ability of the test was evaluated using a transcoding test.
The output index includes:
code conversion accuracy rate;
② during the transcoding reaction.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein:
step S5 specifically includes:
evaluating the reaction speed of the test by adopting a selective reaction time test;
outputting indexes:
firstly, selecting the accuracy rate in reaction;
selecting reaction time.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein:
step S6 specifically includes:
3 tests such as one minute repeated key pressing, digital scratching and attention control are adopted to evaluate the concentration and the persistence of the attention of the tested person;
(1) one minute repeated key
The 60s countdown is presented on the screen, and the blank key is required to be pressed as soon as possible within 60s, the more times the blank key is pressed is the better,
the output index is:
firstly, the key pressing is repeated by one minute by the dominant hand;
secondly, the key pressing is repeated by the non-dominant hand in one minute;
③ repeatedly pressing the key for one minute in total;
(2) digital scratch pad
A number table is displayed on the screen, and a tested person needs to find the number 3 as much as possible in a specified time and click the number with a mouse to scratch the number;
the output index is:
scoring is performed by digital elimination;
(3) attention control
The tested right and left keys are pressed to judge the stimulus presented at the right and left positions, and the reaction and accuracy rate of the tested right and left positions under the non-synergetic condition of the stimulus presented position and the key reaction are obviously inferior to the achievement of the synergetic condition;
the output index is:
attention is paid to control accuracy cost;
② attention is paid to controlling the reaction time cost.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein:
step S7 specifically includes:
evaluating the working memory capacity of the tested work by adopting a working memory test;
the output index is:
firstly, working and memorizing the accuracy;
② work memory reaction.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein:
step S8 specifically includes:
adopting visual angle conversion and psychological rotation 2 tests based on visual presentation to evaluate the tested visual and spatial psychological conversion capability;
(1) visual presentation based perspective conversion
Some articles are presented on the left side of the screen, the prompt words can inform the position and the orientation of the tested object, the task of the tested object is to judge which direction another article is in, answer the object on the ring on the right side of the screen, and the corresponding direction is clicked by a mouse;
outputting indexes:
firstly, converting the accuracy of a visual angle;
view angle conversion reaction;
(2) psychological rotation
Two three-dimensional building block images are presented on the left side and the right side of a screen, the two three-dimensional building block images can be obtained by rotating completely same building blocks by X, Y or Z axis by 0, 50, 100 or 180 degrees, or can be obtained by rotating two building blocks which are mirror images of each other by the same rule, whether the two images come from the same building block or not is judged by psychological rotation within a set time, if the images are the same, an L key is pressed for reaction, and if the images are the same, an A key is pressed for reaction;
outputting indexes:
firstly, the psychological rotation accuracy rate;
② psychological rotation reaction.
10. An electronic device, comprising:
at least one processor; and the number of the first and second groups,
a memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the memory stores instructions executable by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the radar operator performance evaluation method of any one of claims 1-9.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111180899.6A CN114091806A (en) | 2021-10-11 | 2021-10-11 | Method for evaluating operation efficiency of radar operator |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111180899.6A CN114091806A (en) | 2021-10-11 | 2021-10-11 | Method for evaluating operation efficiency of radar operator |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN114091806A true CN114091806A (en) | 2022-02-25 |
Family
ID=80296876
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111180899.6A Pending CN114091806A (en) | 2021-10-11 | 2021-10-11 | Method for evaluating operation efficiency of radar operator |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN114091806A (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107146034A (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2017-09-08 | 国网上海市电力公司 | A kind of post competency assessment method |
| CN107224291A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2017-10-03 | 西南交通大学 | Dispatcher's capacity test system |
| CN110610291A (en) * | 2019-08-08 | 2019-12-24 | 北京远航通信息技术有限公司 | Method and device for evaluating ability of aviation personnel, electronic equipment and medium |
| CN111627289A (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2020-09-04 | 西北工业大学 | Evaluation method for simulation training effect of navigation radar |
| CN113128869A (en) * | 2021-04-20 | 2021-07-16 | 广州宏途教育网络科技有限公司 | Occupational competence evaluation method |
| CN113476046A (en) * | 2021-08-20 | 2021-10-08 | 中国民航大学 | Psychological and kinetic ability evaluation method based on multi-target tracking paradigm |
-
2021
- 2021-10-11 CN CN202111180899.6A patent/CN114091806A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107146034A (en) * | 2017-05-18 | 2017-09-08 | 国网上海市电力公司 | A kind of post competency assessment method |
| CN107224291A (en) * | 2017-05-27 | 2017-10-03 | 西南交通大学 | Dispatcher's capacity test system |
| CN110610291A (en) * | 2019-08-08 | 2019-12-24 | 北京远航通信息技术有限公司 | Method and device for evaluating ability of aviation personnel, electronic equipment and medium |
| CN111627289A (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2020-09-04 | 西北工业大学 | Evaluation method for simulation training effect of navigation radar |
| CN113128869A (en) * | 2021-04-20 | 2021-07-16 | 广州宏途教育网络科技有限公司 | Occupational competence evaluation method |
| CN113476046A (en) * | 2021-08-20 | 2021-10-08 | 中国民航大学 | Psychological and kinetic ability evaluation method based on multi-target tracking paradigm |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| 杨永平 编著: "《公司招聘面试录用与培训》", 31 December 2005, pages: 184 * |
| 水藏玺 等: "《胜任力模型开发与应用》", 30 July 2019, pages: 3 * |
| 詹皓 等: "雷达作业人员白班后工作绩效和主观工作负荷的变化", 《中华航空航天医学杂志》, 30 June 2010 (2010-06-30), pages 100 - 102 * |
| 邓朝晖 等: "雷达部队电磁辐射对作业人员神经行为功能的影响", 《中国辐射卫生》, 30 June 2008 (2008-06-30), pages 136 - 137 * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Stadler | On learning complex procedural knowledge. | |
| CN101419758B (en) | Learning capability test device | |
| Englund et al. | Unified tri-service cognitive performance assessment battery (UTC-PAB) I. Design and Specification of the Battery | |
| Biswas et al. | Data mining methods for assessing self-regulated learning | |
| CN113476046B (en) | Psychological and kinetic ability evaluation method based on multi-target tracking paradigm | |
| Mason et al. | Effects of immediate versus delayed feedback on error detection accuracy in a quality control simulation | |
| Matthews et al. | Predictors of individual differences in mail-coding skills and their variation with ability level. | |
| TW201827009A (en) | Recognition and brain wave inspection recording method capable of rapidly and effectively analyzing and training recognition capability | |
| Brebner | Personality theory and movement | |
| Tyler | The intelligence we test—an evolving concept | |
| CN114091806A (en) | Method for evaluating operation efficiency of radar operator | |
| CN113053490A (en) | Psychological behavior feedback system and method based on sensory characteristics of young people | |
| US20230054579A1 (en) | Psychomotor ability assessment method based on multi-target tracking paradigm | |
| Liu et al. | Student performance prediction by LMS data and classroom videos | |
| Taylor | Human engineering and psychology. | |
| Cory et al. | Using computerized tests to measure new dimensions of abilities: An exploratory study | |
| Peebles et al. | Graph-based reasoning: From task analysis to cognitive explanation | |
| King | Trail Making performance as related to psychotic state, age, intelligence, education and fine psychomotor ability | |
| CN113222794A (en) | Education training personnel management system and management method | |
| RU2407061C1 (en) | Method of training operator to type on computer keyboard | |
| Hirashima et al. | Model-based approach for educational big data analysis of learners thinking with process data | |
| Okawa et al. | Proposal of Learning Support Model for Teacher-Type Robot Supporting Learning According to Learner’s Perplexed Facial Expressions | |
| Carmody et al. | Don’t judge a book by its coVR: Learning and training in virtual reality: The effects of two levels of immersion | |
| Fishman et al. | Research on Consistent Pattern of Development of the Educators’ Ability to Self-Improvement | |
| Shepperd et al. | Pitfalls in teaching judgment heuristics |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |