CN113887019A - Foundation pit integral early warning state evaluation method based on grey correlation - Google Patents

Foundation pit integral early warning state evaluation method based on grey correlation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN113887019A
CN113887019A CN202111061641.4A CN202111061641A CN113887019A CN 113887019 A CN113887019 A CN 113887019A CN 202111061641 A CN202111061641 A CN 202111061641A CN 113887019 A CN113887019 A CN 113887019A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
early warning
foundation pit
probability
index
sensor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202111061641.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
陈聪
王晋
吴为民
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zhejiang Ruibangkete Testing Co ltd
Original Assignee
Zhejiang Ruibangkete Testing Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Zhejiang Ruibangkete Testing Co ltd filed Critical Zhejiang Ruibangkete Testing Co ltd
Priority to CN202111061641.4A priority Critical patent/CN113887019A/en
Publication of CN113887019A publication Critical patent/CN113887019A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/103Workflow collaboration or project management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01DMEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01D21/00Measuring or testing not otherwise provided for
    • G01D21/02Measuring two or more variables by means not covered by a single other subclass
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Testing Or Calibration Of Command Recording Devices (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to an automatic monitoring technology, and provides a foundation pit integral early warning state evaluation method based on grey correlation, which comprises the following steps: according to the specific requirements of an entrusting party or a construction party and related units, a monitoring scheme is formulated, and monitoring point positions are determined; confirming monitoring point positions on site, and installing monitoring sensors and wireless gateways; performing index association on the sensor for monitoring the point location, and calculating the importance PX of the index X associated with the sensorj(ii) a Collecting sensor data and transmitting the sensor data to a management platform, and determining whether the sensor gives an early warning according to an early warning threshold value of the sensor; scoring the early warning state of the early warning sensor, calculating the index importance probability and obtaining the structural state scoreValue Ns(ii) a Performing overall early warning by integrating the structural state score of the foundation pit; according to the invention, the state is scored according to the rule through the importance of the early warning index of the foundation pit, so that the state score of the structure is obtained, and the whole early warning of the foundation pit is carried out according to the rule, so that the whole early warning method of the foundation pit structure is provided.

Description

Foundation pit integral early warning state evaluation method based on grey correlation
Technical Field
The invention relates to an automatic monitoring technology, in particular to a foundation pit integral early warning state evaluation method.
Background
With the rapid advance of urbanization and the increasing number of urban engineering projects, the safety problem of foundation pit engineering gradually draws attention of people, and due to the complexity and uncertainty of the foundation pit engineering, foundation pit monitoring becomes an important means for preventing foundation pit safety accidents.
Traditional foundation ditch engineering monitoring is generally detected through manual operation instrument, and the detection condition is influenced by the environment greatly, the timeliness is poor, adopts automatic monitoring can effectively avoid the unfavorable environment of artifical detection, higher monitoring frequency can guarantee the real-time of parameter early warning, avoids the instantaneous accident of collapsing, can use manpower sparingly simultaneously the cost, guarantees the security of monitoring engineering to can realize data automatic analysis and report to the police, guarantee construction safety. However, the existing alarm mechanism for automatic monitoring of the foundation pit engineering mainly alarms according to measured parameters of a single sensor. Chinese patent document CN112686566A discloses an early warning method, device, system, computer device and storage medium for a deep foundation pit, which compares target monitoring data corresponding to a foundation pit collecting device with a preset alarm threshold value to determine that the foundation pit collecting device is in an alarm state; however, the above patent can only be used for judging the alarm state of a single collecting device, and cannot judge the alarm state of the whole foundation pit. The existing method for the overall alarm state of the foundation pit is mainly an engineering structure safety assessment method and comprises an expert assessment method, a fuzzy evaluation method, an analytic hierarchy process and the like. Chinese patent document CN110807576A discloses safety of an ultra-deep soft soil foundation pit based on a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and a three-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is adopted to establish a safety evaluation model of a soft soil deep foundation pit project, but the method is too complex, more calculation parameters are required in practical application, and the applicability to a large number of projects needs to be discussed.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above disadvantages of the prior art, an object of the present invention is to provide a practical evaluation method for an overall early warning state of a foundation pit based on gray correlation, which is used to solve the technical problems in the prior art.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme:
the invention provides a method for evaluating the overall early warning state of a foundation pit based on gray correlation, which comprises the following steps:
(1) according to the specific requirements of an entrusting party or a construction party and related units, a monitoring scheme is formulated, and monitoring point positions are determined;
(2) confirming monitoring point positions on site, and installing monitoring sensors and wireless gateways;
(3) performing index association on the sensor for monitoring the point location, and calculating the importance PX of the index X associated with the sensorj
(4) Collecting sensor data and transmitting the sensor data to a management platform, and determining whether the sensor gives an early warning according to an early warning threshold value of the sensor;
(5) scoring the early warning state of the early warning sensor, calculating the index importance degree probability and obtaining the structural state score Ns
(6) And (5) integrating the structural state score of the foundation pit to perform integral early warning.
Further, the index X comprises horizontal displacement of the top of the enclosure wall or the side slope, vertical displacement of the top of the enclosure wall or the side slope, horizontal displacement of the bottom of the enclosure wall or the side slope, deep horizontal displacement, uplift or rebound of the pit bottom, vertical displacement of a soil body layer, lateral soil pressure, water level or bearing water level of an observation well, underground water level, pore water pressure, vertical displacement of an upright post, internal force of an anchor rod, internal force of an upright post, internal force of a support, internal force of the enclosure wall, internal force of a soil nail, vertical displacement of a peripheral building, inclination of the peripheral building, horizontal displacement of the peripheral building, ground surface cracks, vertical displacement of the peripheral ground surface and deformation of a peripheral pipeline.
Preferably, the monitoring point position sensors are arranged according to technical building foundation pit engineering monitoring specifications (GB50497-2009), the sensors are associated with the indexes, for example, a fixed inclinometer sensor is associated with deep horizontal displacement of the indexes, and the association between the sensors and the indexes is associated according to common knowledge.
The specific process of the step (3) is as follows:
(3.1) building a foundation pit early warning fault tree;
establishing a foundation pit fault tree, determining a minimal cut set Q by a Boolean algebra method, wherein n bottom events are provided in totaliM, i.e. 1, 2, …, m;
(3.2) calculating the probability of a bottom event PBottom
PBottom=PSystem+PSpecially for cleaning(formula 1)
Wherein, PSystemCalculating and counting the occurrence probability of the bottom event according to the actual engineering case;
Pspecially for cleaningProbability obtained by expert survey method; the probability of the expert survey method is obtained according to an effective questionnaire;
the effective questionnaire is scored according to the importance evaluation of the experts on the foundation pit early warning according to indexes, wherein the important is 4 points, the important is 3 points, the more important is 2 points, the general important is 1 point, and the unimportant is 0 point, the total score of each index is counted and is divided by the sum of all index scores to obtain the index expert survey probability PSpecially for cleaning
(3.3) calculating the probability of occurrence of a top event PTop roof
According to the bottom event probability PBottomObtaining the minimum cut set probability P according to the fault tree series-parallel probability calculation principlei
According to the minimum cut set probability PiObtaining the probability P of occurrence of the top eventTop roof
PTop roof=1-∏(1-Pi) (formula 2)
Wherein i is the serial number of the minimal cut set, i is 1, 2, …, m;
(3.4) calculating the structural importance E of the bottom eventj
Ej=∑Pi/PTop roof(formula 3)
Wherein j is the serial number of the bottom event, and j is 1, 2.
∑PiThe sum of the probabilities of all the minimal cut sets containing the jth bottom event is obtained;
(3.5) calculating the bottom event to form a fault feature vector [ XR];
The feature vector [ X ]R]At all minimal cut sets QiIn the corresponding ith row, the composed bottom event j corresponds to the element X at the positionRi(j) Is 1, the elements at the other positions are 0, then the bottom event constitutes a fault feature vector [ XR]Comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0003256838380000041
(3.6) the bottom event structure importance EjForm a vector [ X ] to be examinedT],
[XT]={E1,E2,...,En} (equation 5)
Wherein j is the serial number of the bottom event, and j is 1, 2.
(3.7) calculating the Grey correlation degree gamma of the bottom eventj
According to the characteristic vector and the vector to be detected,
Figure BDA0003256838380000042
wherein j is the serial number of the bottom event, and j is 1, 2.
m is the minimum cut set number;
ρ is the resolution coefficient;
εi(j) is the gray correlation coefficient;
Δi(j) is the column element difference;
Figure BDA0003256838380000051
Δi(j)=|XRi(j)-Ejl (equation 8)
Figure BDA0003256838380000052
And
Figure BDA0003256838380000053
respectively representing the minimum in the vector row and the minimum in the vector column
Figure BDA0003256838380000054
And
Figure BDA0003256838380000055
respectively representing the maximum value in the vector row and the maximum value in the vector column; (ii) a
(3.8) correlating the bottom events with a degree of gammajNormalizing to obtain importance PXj
Figure BDA0003256838380000056
Further, in the step (4), the early warning of the sensor adopts a third-level early warning, the third-level early warning includes a yellow early warning, an orange early warning, and a red early warning, the early warning value of the red early warning is a maximum limit value specified in building foundation pit engineering monitoring technical specification (GB 50497-.
Further, in the step (5), the early warning state scoring standards include 0 score of safety state, 1 score of yellow early warning, 2 scores of orange early warning and 4 scores of red early warning.
Further, the number q of the early warning sensors is set, and the q early warning sensors are subjected to early warning scoring according to the early warning state scoring standard, and the number N of the early warning sensors is setkWherein k is the serial number of the early warning sensor, and k is 1, 2, … and q;
when the number q of the early warning sensors is more than or equal to 2, the index importance PX associated with the early warning sensorskNormalization processing is carried out to obtain index importance degree probability PXk':
Figure BDA0003256838380000061
Structural State score NsComprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0003256838380000062
when the number q of the early warning sensors is 1 and the indexes associated with the early warning sensors are not lateral soil pressure, selecting the index importance PX associated with the early warning sensors, and scoring the early warning sensors according to the pre-warning state scoring standard as N, wherein the importance probability PX' is as follows:
Figure BDA0003256838380000063
structural State score NsComprises the following steps:
NsPX' × N (formula 11.1)
When the number l of the early warning sensors is 1 and the index associated with the early warning sensors is lateral soil pressure, the structural state score N is obtainedsComprises the following steps:
Nsequal to N (formula 11.2)
I.e. structural state score NsNamely the early warning state score N of the sensor.
In step (6), according to the structural state score NsCarrying out integral early warning:
Figure BDA0003256838380000071
1) according to the invention, the state is scored according to the rule through the importance of the early warning index of the foundation pit, so that the state score of the structure is obtained, and the whole early warning of the foundation pit is carried out according to the rule, so that the whole early warning method of the foundation pit structure is provided.
2) The operation process of the invention is simple and convenient, and the integral quick early warning of the project can be realized.
3) By combining with engineering practice, the method is applied to the actual foundation pit engineering project, provides reference and reference significance for enterprises in the integral early warning of the actual foundation pit engineering project, and has good popularization value.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the evaluation method of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a foundation pit early warning fault tree established by the invention.
Fig. 3 is a diagram of the location arrangement of a certain pit project monitoring point.
Detailed Description
The following detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention is provided in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and it should be noted that the embodiments are merely illustrative of the present invention and should not be considered as limiting the invention, and the purpose of the embodiments is to make those skilled in the art better understand and reproduce the technical solutions of the present invention, and the protection scope of the present invention should be subject to the scope defined by the claims.
As shown in fig. 1, the invention provides a method for evaluating the overall early warning state of a foundation pit based on gray correlation, which comprises the following steps:
s1, formulating a monitoring scheme according to the specific requirements of the entrusting party or the construction party and the related units, and determining monitoring point positions;
s2, confirming the monitoring point location on site, and installing a monitoring sensor and a wireless gateway;
s3, performing index correlation on the sensor for monitoring the point location, and calculating the importance PX of the index X related to the sensorj
The index X comprises horizontal displacement of the top of the enclosure wall or the side slope, vertical displacement of the top of the enclosure wall or the side slope, horizontal displacement of the bottom of the enclosure wall or the side slope, deep horizontal displacement, pit bottom uplift or rebound, vertical displacement of soil body layering, lateral soil pressure, water level or pressure-bearing water level of an observation well, underground water level, pore water pressure, vertical displacement of a stand column, internal force of an anchor rod, internal force of the stand column, internal force of a support, internal force of the enclosure wall, internal force of a soil nail, vertical displacement of a peripheral building, inclination of the peripheral building, horizontal displacement of the peripheral building, ground surface cracks, vertical displacement of the peripheral ground surface and deformation of a peripheral pipeline.
Preferably, the monitoring point position sensors are arranged according to the technical specification of building foundation pit engineering monitoring (GB 50497-.
The specific process of step S3 is:
s3.1, building a foundation pit early warning fault tree;
as shown in fig. 2, a foundation pit fault tree is established, the number of bottom events is 22, and the minimum cut sets are determined to be 6 by using a boolean algebra method, that is, the minimum cut set is QiThe value of i in (1) is as follows: 1, 2, …, 6;
specifically Q1={X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6};
Q2={X7};
Q3={X8,X9,X10};
Q4={X11};
Q5={X12,X13,X14,X15,X16};
Q6={X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22};
S3.2 calculating the bottom event probability PBottom
PBottom=PSystem+PSpecially for cleaning(formula 1)
Wherein, PSystemCalculating and counting the occurrence probability of the bottom event according to the actual engineering case;
Pspecially for cleaningThe probability is obtained by an expert survey method, and the probability is obtained according to an effective questionnaire;
the effective questionnaire is scored according to the importance evaluation of the experts on the foundation pit early warning according to indexes, wherein the important is 4 points, the important is 3 points, the more important is 2 points, the general important is 1 point, and the unimportant is 0 point, the total score of each index is counted and is divided by the sum of all index scores to obtain the index expert survey probability PSpecially for cleaning
S3.3 calculating the probability of occurrence of a Top event PTop roof
According to the bottom event probability PBottomObtaining the minimum cut set probability P according to the fault tree series-parallel probability calculation principlei
Obtaining the minimum cut set probability according to the bottom event probability as shown in a graph 1;
TABLE 1 minimum cut set probability
Figure BDA0003256838380000091
According to the minimum cut set probability PiObtaining the probability P of occurrence of the top eventTop roof
PTop roof=1-∏(1-Pi) (formula 2)
Wherein i is the serial number of the minimal cut set, i is 1, 2, …, 6;
s3.4 calculating the bottom event structure importance Ej
Ej=∑Pi/PTop roof(formula 3)
Where j is the sequence number of the bottom event, j is 1, 2, 3.
∑PiThe sum of the probabilities of all the minimal cut sets containing the jth bottom event is obtained;
s3.5 calculating bottom event to form fault feature vector XR];
The feature vector [ X ]R]At all minimal cut sets QiIn the corresponding ith row, the composed bottom event j corresponds to the element X at the positionRi(j) Is 1, the elements at the other positions are 0, then the bottom event constitutes a fault feature vector [ XR]Comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0003256838380000101
s3.6 bottom event structure importance EjForm a vector [ X ] to be examinedT],
[XT]={E1,E2,...,En} (equation 5)
Wherein j is the serial number of the bottom event, and j is 1, 2.
S3.7 calculating the Grey relevance Gamma of the bottom eventj
According to the characteristic vector and the vector to be detected,
Figure BDA0003256838380000102
wherein j is the serial number of the bottom event, and j is 1, 2.
m is the minimum cut set number;
ρ is the resolution coefficient;
εi(j) is the gray correlation coefficient;
Δi(j) is the column element difference;
Figure BDA0003256838380000111
Δi(j)=|XRi(j)-Ejl (equation 8)
Figure BDA0003256838380000112
And
Figure BDA0003256838380000113
respectively representing the minimum value in the vector row and the minimum value in the vector column;
Figure BDA0003256838380000114
and
Figure BDA0003256838380000115
respectively representing the maximum value in the vector row and the maximum value in the vector column;
s3.8 relating bottom event to degree gammajNormalizing to obtain importance PXj
Figure BDA0003256838380000116
According to the technical specification of monitoring of building foundation pit engineering (GB 50497-.
TABLE 2 monitoring index and Grey correlation
Figure BDA0003256838380000117
Figure BDA0003256838380000121
S4, collecting sensor data and transmitting the sensor data to a management platform, and determining whether the sensor gives an early warning according to an early warning threshold value of the sensor;
the early warning of the sensor adopts three levels of early warnings, wherein the three levels of early warnings comprise a yellow early warning, an orange early warning and a red early warning, the early warning value of the red early warning is the maximum limit value specified in building foundation pit engineering monitoring technical specification (GB 50497-.
S5, scoring the early warning state of the early warning sensor, calculating the index importance degree probability and obtaining the structural state score Ns
The early warning state scoring standards are that the safety state is 0 score, the yellow early warning is 1 score, the orange early warning is 2 score, and the red early warning is 4 score.
Setting the number q of early warning sensors to carry out early warning scoring on the q early warning sensors according to the early warning state scoring standard, and NkWherein k is the serial number of the early warning sensor, and k is 1, 2, … and q;
when the number q of the early warning sensors is more than or equal to 2, the early warning sensors are usedIndex importance PX associated with a devicekNormalization processing is carried out to obtain index importance degree probability PXk':
Figure BDA0003256838380000131
Structural State score NsComprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0003256838380000132
when the number q of the early warning sensors is 1 and the indexes associated with the early warning sensors are not lateral soil pressure, selecting the index importance PX associated with the early warning sensors, and scoring the early warning sensors according to the pre-warning state scoring standard as N, wherein the importance probability PX' is as follows:
Figure BDA0003256838380000133
structural State score NsComprises the following steps:
NsPX' × N (formula 11.1)
When the number q of the early warning sensors is 1 and the index associated with the early warning sensors is lateral soil pressure, the structural state score N is obtainedsComprises the following steps:
Nsequal to N (formula 11.2)
I.e. structural state score NsNamely the early warning state score N of the sensor.
And S6, performing overall early warning by integrating the structural state score of the foundation pit.
Score by structural state NsCarrying out integral early warning:
Figure BDA0003256838380000141
example (b):
the project address of a commercial office building of the junior political affairs stock out (2018) No. 8 plot is located in the Suo Tailu No. 128 street of the Shushan mountain in Hangzhou city, Zhejiang province. Entrusted by the owner, the foundation pit project is automatically monitored.
Firstly, a monitoring scheme is formulated, monitoring point positions are determined, as shown in figure 3, 8 fixed inclinometers, 8 static levels, 4 inclinometers, 8 stressometers and 1 water level meter are installed at the monitoring point positions.
Index correlation was performed on the installed sensors as shown in table 3.
TABLE 3 sensor index correlation
Figure BDA0003256838380000142
Data are collected and monitored for a long time, in the monitoring process, a fixed inclinometer CXYCH08AD1001 generates orange early warning, an inclinometer 2106RB0902 generates yellow early warning, a stress meter 2106RB0907 generates yellow early warning, early warning states of early-warning sensors are scored, the scores and the associated index importance are shown in a table 4, the sensor importance probability is calculated according to a formula (10), and the calculation result is shown in the table 4.
TABLE 4 sensor index correlation
Figure BDA0003256838380000151
Since the number q of the early warning sensors is 4 and is more than 2, the method is based on
Figure BDA0003256838380000152
Calculated to obtain the structural state score Ns=2×0.284+1×0.284+1×0.432=1.284;
By
Figure BDA0003256838380000153
It can be seen that the structural status score Ns1.283, in the yellow warning range, because the whole structure carries out yellow warning.
While the preferred embodiments of the present application have been described, additional variations and modifications in those embodiments may occur to those skilled in the art once they learn of the basic inventive concepts. Therefore, it is intended that the appended claims be interpreted as including preferred embodiments and all alterations and modifications as fall within the scope of the application.

Claims (7)

1. A method for evaluating the overall early warning state of a foundation pit based on gray correlation is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) according to the specific requirements of an entrusting party or a construction party and related units, a monitoring scheme is formulated, and monitoring point positions are determined;
(2) confirming monitoring point positions on site, and installing monitoring sensors and wireless gateways;
(3) performing index association on the sensor for monitoring the point location, and calculating the importance PX of the index X associated with the sensorj
(4) Collecting sensor data and transmitting the sensor data to a management platform, and determining whether the sensor gives an early warning according to an early warning threshold value of the sensor;
(5) scoring the early warning state of the early warning sensor, calculating the index importance degree probability and obtaining the structural state score Ns
(6) And (5) integrating the structural state score of the foundation pit to perform integral early warning.
2. The method for evaluating the overall early warning state of the foundation pit based on the grey correlation according to claim 1, wherein the index X comprises horizontal displacement of the top of the enclosure wall or the side slope, vertical displacement of the top of the enclosure wall or the side slope, horizontal displacement of the bottom of the enclosure wall or the side slope, horizontal displacement of a deep layer, uplift or rebound of the pit bottom, vertical displacement of a soil body layer, lateral soil pressure, water level or pressure bearing water level of an observation well, underground water level, pore water pressure, vertical displacement of a stand column, internal force of an anchor rod, internal force of a stand column, internal force of a support, internal force of the enclosure wall, internal force of a soil nail, vertical displacement of a peripheral building, inclination of the peripheral building, horizontal displacement of the peripheral building, cracks of the ground surface, vertical displacement of the peripheral ground surface and deformation of a peripheral pipeline.
3. The method for evaluating the overall early warning state of the foundation pit based on the grey correlation according to claim 1, wherein the specific process of the step (3) is as follows:
(3.1) building a foundation pit early warning fault tree;
establishing a foundation pit fault tree, determining a minimal cut set Q by a Boolean algebra method, wherein n bottom events are provided in totaliM, i.e. 1, 2, …, m;
(3.2) calculating the probability of a bottom event PBottom
PBottom=PSystem+PSpecially for cleaning(formula 1)
Wherein, PSystemCalculating and counting the occurrence probability of the bottom event according to the actual engineering case;
Pspecially for cleaningThe probability is obtained by an expert survey method, and the probability is obtained according to an effective questionnaire;
the effective questionnaire is scored according to the importance evaluation of the experts on the foundation pit early warning according to indexes, wherein the important is 4 points, the important is 3 points, the more important is 2 points, the general important is 1 point, and the unimportant is 0 point, the total score of each index is counted and is divided by the sum of all index scores to obtain the index expert survey probability PSpecially for cleaning
(3.3) calculating the probability of occurrence of a top event PTop roof
According to the bottom event probability PBottomObtaining the minimum cut set probability P according to the fault tree series-parallel probability calculation principlei
According to the minimum cut set probability PiObtaining the probability P of occurrence of the top eventTop roof
PTop roof=1-∏(1-Pi) (formula 2)
Wherein i is the serial number of the minimal cut set, i is 1, 2, …, m;
(3.4) calculating the structural importance E of the bottom eventj
Ej=∑Pi/PTop roof(formula 3)
Wherein j is the serial number of the bottom event, and j is 1, 2.
∑PiThe sum of the probabilities of all the minimal cut sets containing the jth bottom event is obtained;
(3.5) calculating the bottom event to form a fault feature vector [ XR];
The feature vector [ X ]R]At all minimal cut sets QiIn the corresponding ith row, the composed bottom event j corresponds to the element X at the positionRi(j) Is 1, the elements at the other positions are 0, then the bottom event constitutes a fault feature vector [ XR]Comprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0003256838370000031
(3.6) the bottom event structure importance EjForm a vector [ X ] to be examinedT],
[XT]={E1,E2,...,En} (equation 5)
Wherein j is the serial number of the bottom event, and j is 1, 2.
(3.7) calculating the Grey correlation degree gamma of the bottom eventj
According to the characteristic vector and the vector to be detected,
Figure FDA0003256838370000032
wherein j is the serial number of the bottom event, and j is 1, 2.
m is the minimum cut set number;
ρ is the resolution coefficient;
εi(j) is the gray correlation coefficient;
Δi(j) is the column element difference;
Figure FDA0003256838370000033
Δi(j)=|XRi(j)-Ejl (equation 8)
Figure FDA0003256838370000041
And
Figure FDA0003256838370000042
respectively representing the minimum value in the vector row and the minimum value in the vector column;
Figure FDA0003256838370000043
and
Figure FDA0003256838370000044
respectively representing the maximum value in the vector row and the maximum value in the vector column;
(3.8) correlating the bottom events with a degree of gammajNormalizing to obtain importance PXj
Figure FDA0003256838370000045
4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein in the step (4), the early warning of the sensor is performed by using a three-level early warning, the three-level early warning includes a yellow early warning, an orange early warning, and a red early warning, the early warning value of the red early warning is a maximum limit value specified in building pit engineering monitoring technical specification (GB 50497-.
5. The method for evaluating the overall early warning state of the foundation pit based on the grey correlation according to claim 1, wherein in the step (5), the early warning state scoring standards are that the safety state is scored 0, the yellow early warning is scored 1, the orange early warning is scored 2, and the red early warning is scored 4.
6. The method for evaluating the overall early warning state of the foundation pit based on the grey correlation according to claim 1, wherein the specific process of the step (5) is as follows:
setting the number q of early warning sensors, and carrying out early warning scoring on the q early warning sensors according to the early warning state scoring standard NkWherein k is the serial number of the early warning sensor, and k is 1, 2, … and q;
when the number q of the early warning sensors is more than or equal to 2, the index importance PX associated with the early warning sensorskNormalization processing is carried out to obtain index importance degree probability PXk':
Figure FDA0003256838370000051
Structural State score NsComprises the following steps:
Figure FDA0003256838370000052
when the number q of the early warning sensors is 1 and the indexes associated with the early warning sensors are not lateral soil pressure, selecting the index importance PX associated with the early warning sensors, and scoring the early warning sensors according to the pre-warning state scoring standard as N, wherein the importance probability PX' is as follows:
Figure FDA0003256838370000053
structural State score NsComprises the following steps:
NsPX' × N (formula 11.1)
When the number q of the early warning sensors is 1 and the index associated with the early warning sensors is lateral soil pressure, the structural state score N is obtainedsComprises the following steps:
Nsequal to N (formula 11.2)
I.e. structural state score NsNamely the early warning state score N of the sensor.
7. The method for evaluating the overall early warning state of the foundation pit based on the grey correlation as claimed in claim 1, wherein in the step (6), the score N is calculated according to the structural statesCarrying out integral early warning:
Figure FDA0003256838370000054
CN202111061641.4A 2021-09-10 2021-09-10 Foundation pit integral early warning state evaluation method based on grey correlation Pending CN113887019A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111061641.4A CN113887019A (en) 2021-09-10 2021-09-10 Foundation pit integral early warning state evaluation method based on grey correlation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202111061641.4A CN113887019A (en) 2021-09-10 2021-09-10 Foundation pit integral early warning state evaluation method based on grey correlation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN113887019A true CN113887019A (en) 2022-01-04

Family

ID=79008739

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202111061641.4A Pending CN113887019A (en) 2021-09-10 2021-09-10 Foundation pit integral early warning state evaluation method based on grey correlation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN113887019A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117057632A (en) * 2023-10-11 2023-11-14 北京城建勘测设计研究院有限责任公司 Method for evaluating precipitation recharging feasibility of pebble layer deep foundation pit

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN117057632A (en) * 2023-10-11 2023-11-14 北京城建勘测设计研究院有限责任公司 Method for evaluating precipitation recharging feasibility of pebble layer deep foundation pit
CN117057632B (en) * 2023-10-11 2024-01-19 北京城建勘测设计研究院有限责任公司 Method for evaluating precipitation recharging feasibility of pebble layer deep foundation pit

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN103743441B (en) The polynary of a kind of side slope safety is coupling in line monitoring system and method
CN106021875B (en) Multi-scale debris flow risk assessment method for seismic disturbance zone
WO2022242435A1 (en) Rapid evaluation method of site seismic liquefaction disaster based on artificial intelligence
CN111042143B (en) Foundation pit engineering early warning method and system based on analysis of large amount of monitoring data
CN111932120B (en) Method and system for evaluating explosion risk of gas pipe network leakage under geological disaster
CN113779835A (en) AI and intelligent monitoring system based deep and large foundation pit safety early warning method
CN104281920A (en) Tailing pond layered index safety assessment and early-warning method and system
CN112330002A (en) Urban ground collapse disaster comprehensive monitoring and early warning method and system
CN111259335B (en) Tunnel underpass road construction risk analysis system and method
CN116011816A (en) Building structure-oriented multi-disaster monitoring and early warning method and device
CN113191605A (en) House risk assessment method and device
CN113887019A (en) Foundation pit integral early warning state evaluation method based on grey correlation
CN115909662A (en) Check dam flood control early warning method and system
CN116295637A (en) Intelligent monitoring method and system for safety of high-altitude building
CN116378123A (en) BIM-based foundation pit health monitoring system
CN105427189A (en) Power grid vulnerability evaluation method under landslide hazard
JP7141309B2 (en) Quantitative evaluation system for disaster occurrence risk caused by ground displacement, its method, and its program
CN116824807A (en) Multi-disaster early warning and alarming method and system
CN108364129A (en) A kind of region ecology safety early alarming and forecasting method based on remote sensing big data
CN114997671A (en) Foundation pit deformation safety risk assessment method based on artificial neural network and entropy method
CN108549713B (en) Building monitoring method and system based on artificial intelligence and expert interaction
CN102004915B (en) Earthquake-damaged construction remote sensing quick extraction technique based on textural feature space
CN113591347A (en) Dynamic monitoring method and early warning system in high slope construction process
CN212782253U (en) Geological disaster monitoring group device
CN115830812B (en) Intelligent early warning system and method for abnormal settlement of pump station building

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination