CN113689081B - Automatic driving road test data quality determination method based on normal cloud model - Google Patents
Automatic driving road test data quality determination method based on normal cloud model Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113689081B CN113689081B CN202110864149.4A CN202110864149A CN113689081B CN 113689081 B CN113689081 B CN 113689081B CN 202110864149 A CN202110864149 A CN 202110864149A CN 113689081 B CN113689081 B CN 113689081B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- cloud
- test data
- data
- quality
- comprehensive
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/16—Matrix or vector computation, e.g. matrix-matrix or matrix-vector multiplication, matrix factorization
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Algebra (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a method and a system for determining the quality of test data of an automatic driving road based on a normal cloud model, wherein the method comprises the following steps: determining the weight of each evaluation index for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road by adopting an analytic hierarchy process; calculating a cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm; calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data; and determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data. The invention realizes the determination of the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of automatic driving tests, in particular to a method for determining the quality of test data of an automatic driving road based on a normal cloud model.
Background
The automatic driving technology enters a high-speed development stage, and mass data can be generated in the automatic driving road testing process. The massive road test data contains high potential value. However, the automatic driving road test data has the characteristics of multiple test main bodies, multiple test links and multiple acquisition devices, so that the quality of the data is to be improved, and the release of data value is limited. Therefore, in order to improve the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road, give full play to the data value and enable industrial development, a set of scientific and reasonable methods is needed to evaluate the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide an automatic driving road test data quality determination method based on a normal cloud model so as to determine the automatic driving road test data quality.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following scheme:
the invention provides an automatic driving road test data quality determination method based on a normal cloud model, which comprises the following steps:
determining the weight of each evaluation index for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road by adopting an analytic hierarchy process; the evaluation indexes comprise data correctness and qualification, data integrity, data uniqueness, data consistency and data effectiveness;
calculating a cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm;
calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data;
and determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data.
Optionally, the determining, by using an analytic hierarchy process, a weight of each evaluation index for determining the quality of the test data of the automated driving road specifically includes:
constructing an index evaluation system for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road, and determining an initial weight judgment matrix of the index evaluation system;
wherein, CR is a consistency ratio, CI is a consistency index,λmaxjudging the maximum characteristic value of the matrix for the weight, wherein r is the dimension of the matrix for the weight judgment, and RI is a random consistency index;
judging whether the consistency ratio is less than or equal to 0.01 or not, and obtaining a judgment result;
if the judgment result shows no, the weight judgment matrix is updated, and the step of 'utilizing the formula' is returnedCalculating a consistency ratio of the weight judgment matrix;
if the judgment result shows yes, judging a matrix according to the weight and utilizing a formula Calculating the weight of each evaluation index;
wherein, ω isiWeight representing the ith evaluation index, aijAnd (3) the (i, j) th element in the weight judgment matrix represents the risk importance degree of the i-th evaluation index relative to the j-th evaluation index.
Optionally, a reverse cloud emitter algorithm is adopted, and a cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data is calculated, which specifically includes:
respectively taking the test data of each vehicle as a subdata set to obtain K subdata sets;
respectively calculating the evaluation result of each subdata set under each evaluation index;
according to the evaluation result of each subdata set under each evaluation index, a reverse cloud emitter algorithm is adopted, and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data is calculated by using the following formula;
wherein, ExiIs the ith evaluationAn expectation of a cloud model of the index; eniEntropy of the cloud model being the ith evaluation index; heiIs the hyper-entropy of the cloud model for the ith evaluation index; c. CkiIs the evaluation result of the kth sub-data set under the ith evaluation index.
Optionally, the calculating the evaluation result of each sub data set under each evaluation index respectively specifically includes:
wherein, c1For data correctness of the subdata set, Fc1_1(n)、Fc1_2(n)、Fc1_3(n) and Fc1_4(N) the correctness of the instantaneous vehicle speed, the correctness of the instantaneous acceleration, the conformity of the acceleration and the correctness of the driving mode which are recorded in the nth record are respectively, and N represents the number of records in the sub data set;
distance(latn,lonn,latn+1,lonn+1) Calculating a function for distance (lat)n,lonn) Latitude and longitude coordinates for the nth entry, (lat)n+1,lonn+1) The longitude and latitude coordinates of the n +1 record are recorded; v. ofnAnd vn+1Are respectively the firstSpeed of n records and n +1 record; a isnAcceleration recorded for the nth bar; t is tnAnd tn+1Respectively time of the nth record and the (n + 1) th record;
wherein, c2For data integrity of the subdata sets, Fc2_1(n) and Fc2_2(n) data value missing and data time continuity of the nth record respectively;
l is a time interval threshold;
wherein, c3For data uniqueness of the subdata set, Fc3_1(n) is the uniqueness of the time variable value of the nth record, and the repeat _ ratio is the index repetition rate of the subdata set;
wherein, c4For data consistency of a subdata set, Fc4_1(n) and Fc4_2(n) the format consistency and precision consistency of the nth record respectively;
wherein, c5For data validity of a subdata set, Fc5_1(n) and Fc5_2(n) the data format validity and the longitude and latitude coordinate validity of the nth record are respectively recorded;
w is a longitude and latitude collection in the measuring area.
Optionally, the calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data specifically includes:
calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data by using the following formula according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter of each evaluation index of the test data;
wherein E isxTo test the expectations of the synthetic cloud of data, EnEntropy of the synthetic cloud to test data, HeHyper-entropy, omega, of a synthetic cloud for testing dataiThe weight of the i-th evaluation index is represented.
Optionally, the determining, according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data, the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model specifically includes:
taking the expectation of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as an expectation, and taking the super entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as a standard deviation to generate a first normal random number;
taking the entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as an expectation, and taking the first normal random number as a standard deviation to generate a second normal random number;
taking the expectation of the p-th quality level cloud as the expectation, and taking the super-entropy of the p-th quality level cloud as the standard deviation, and generating a third normal random number;
according to the second normal random number and the third normal random number, utilizing a formula Calculating a similarity evaluation result of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud;
wherein ξpmM-th similarity evaluation result, x, of the synthetic cloud representing the test data and the p-th quality class cloudimDenotes a second normal random number, EnpThe expectation that represents the pth quality class cloud isIt is expected that,represents a third normal random number;
increasing the value of M by 1, and returning to the step of generating a first normal random number by taking the expectation of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the expectation and the super-entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the standard deviation until M similarity evaluation results of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud are generated;
according to the M similarity evaluation results of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud, a formula xi is usedp=∑ξpmCalculating the comprehensive similarity of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud; wherein ξpRepresenting the comprehensive similarity of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud;
increasing the value of p by 1, initializing the value of m, and returning to the step of generating a first normal random number by taking the expectation of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the expectation and the super-entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the standard deviation until the comprehensive similarity of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and each quality grade cloud is obtained;
and determining the quality grade of the test data according to the comprehensive similarity between the comprehensive cloud of the test data and each quality grade cloud.
Optionally, the determining, according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data, the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model further includes:
calculating the cloud characteristic parameters of each quality grade cloud by using the following formula;
wherein E isxp(ii) a desire for a pth quality class cloud; enpEntropy of the p-th quality class cloud; hepThe super entropy of the p-th quality level cloud; top ispTaking an upper bound for the evaluation of the p-th grade; btmpAnd taking a lower bound for the evaluation of the p-th grade.
An autonomous driving road test data quality determination system based on a normal cloud model, the system comprising:
the weight determining module is used for determining the weight of each evaluation index for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road by adopting an analytic hierarchy process; the evaluation indexes comprise data correctness and qualification, data integrity, data uniqueness, data consistency and data effectiveness;
the cloud model characteristic parameter value calculation module is used for calculating the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm;
the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value calculation module is used for calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data;
and the quality determining module is used for determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data.
Optionally, the weight determining module specifically includes:
the initialization submodule is used for constructing an index evaluation system for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road and determining an initial weight judgment matrix of the index evaluation system;
a consistency ratio calculation submodule for using a formulaCalculating the consistency proportion of the weight judgment matrix;
wherein CR is a consistency ratio and CI isThe index of the consistency is that the consistency index,λmaxjudging the maximum characteristic value of the matrix for the weight, wherein r is the dimension of the matrix for the weight judgment, and RI is a random consistency index;
the consistency judging submodule is used for judging whether the consistency ratio is less than or equal to 0.01 or not and obtaining a judging result;
a weight judgment matrix updating submodule for updating the weight judgment matrix if the judgment result shows no, and returning to the step of using a formulaCalculating a consistency ratio of the weight judgment matrix;
a weight calculation submodule for judging a matrix according to the weight and using a formula if the judgment result shows yesCalculating the weight of each evaluation index;
wherein, ω isiWeight representing the ith evaluation index, aijAnd (3) the (i, j) th element in the weight judgment matrix represents the risk importance degree of the i-th evaluation index relative to the j-th evaluation index.
Optionally, the cloud model characteristic parameter value calculating module specifically includes:
the sub data set segmentation sub module is used for taking the test data of each vehicle as a sub data set to obtain n sub data sets;
the evaluation result calculation submodule is used for calculating the evaluation result of each subdata set under each evaluation index;
the cloud model characteristic parameter value calculation submodule is used for calculating the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm and utilizing the following formula according to the evaluation result of each subdata set under each evaluation index;
wherein E isxi(ii) an expectation of a cloud model that is the ith evaluation index; eniEntropy of the cloud model being the ith evaluation index; heiIs the hyper-entropy of the cloud model for the ith evaluation index; c. CkiIs the evaluation result of the kth sub-data set under the ith evaluation index.
According to the specific embodiment provided by the invention, the invention discloses the following technical effects:
the invention discloses a method for determining the quality of automatic driving road test data based on a normal cloud model, which comprises the following steps: determining the weight of each evaluation index for determining the quality of the automatic driving road test data by adopting an analytic hierarchy process; calculating a cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm; calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data; and determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data. The invention realizes the determination of the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road.
The invention provides data quality evaluation indexes, specific judgment criteria and a calculation method aiming at the specific characteristics of the test data of the automatic driving road, maps the quality evaluation scores to specific quality grades based on a normal cloud model method, can realize the reasonability and accuracy of evaluation results, and has the advantages of originality, scientificity, practicability and the like.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required to be used in the embodiments will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art that other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without inventive labor.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for determining the quality of data of an automatic driving road test based on a normal cloud model according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a method for determining the quality of data of an automatic driving road test based on a normal cloud model according to the present invention;
fig. 3 is a point cloud distribution diagram for drawing comprehensive evaluation cloud and cloud of each data quality grade provided by the invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be described clearly and completely with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
The invention aims to provide an automatic driving road test data quality determination method based on a normal cloud model so as to determine the automatic driving road test data quality.
In order to make the aforementioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention comprehensible, embodiments accompanied with figures are described in further detail below.
The invention provides an automatic driving road test data quality determination method based on a normal cloud model, which comprises the following steps:
Step 101 includes the following specific indicators and criteria:
data correctness c1The method mainly comprises the following judgment criteria:
according to longitude and latitude coordinates of two data before and after the time sequence, the calculated instantaneous vehicle speed is in a reasonable range, and the judgment function is as follows:
in the formula: fc1_1(n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, the value of 1 represents that the quality problem does not exist, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number; distance (lat)n,lonn,latn+1,lonn+1) Is a distance calculation function representing the latitude and longitude coordinate (lat) according to the nth recordn,lonn) And (2) latitude and longitude coordinates (lat) of the (n + 1) th recordn+1,lonn+1) Calculating to obtain the distance between the two points; t is tnTime, t, representing the nth datan+1Indicating the time of the (n + 1) th piece of data.
According to the vehicle speed record values of the two data before and after the time sequence, the calculated instantaneous acceleration is in a reasonable range, and the judgment function is as follows:
in the formula: fc1_2(n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, the value of 1 represents that the quality problem does not exist, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number;a vehicle speed record value representing the nth data,a vehicle speed record value representing the (n + 1) th data; t is tnTime, t, of the nth datan+1Indicating the time of the (n + 1) th piece of data.
According to the vehicle speed record values of two data before and after the time sequence, the calculated instantaneous acceleration needs to be matched with the record value of the acceleration, and the judgment function is as follows:
in the formula: fc1_3(n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, the value of 1 represents that the quality problem does not exist, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number;a vehicle speed record value representing the nth data,a vehicle speed record value representing the (n + 1) th data;the recorded value of the acceleration of the automobile representing the nth data,a recorded value of the automobile acceleration representing the (n + 1) th data; t is tnTime, t, indicating the nth piece of datan+1Indicating the time of the (n + 1) th piece of data.
The record of the driving mode is correct, and the judgment function is as follows:
in the formula: fc1_4(n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, and the value is1 represents that no quality problem exists, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number; and judging whether the driving mode record is the same as the actual condition or not, and adopting an automatic driving road test driving mode distinguishing method driven based on actual measurement data.
Combining the above criteria, data correctness c1The evaluation method (2) is as follows:
in the formula: n is the data number, and m is the total number of data in the data set.
Data integrity c2The method mainly comprises the following judgment criteria:
the data value is not missing, and the judgment function is as follows:
in the formula: fc2_1And (n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, the value of 1 represents that the quality problem does not exist, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number.
The data time is kept continuous, and the judgment function is as follows;
in the formula: fc2_2(n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, the value of 1 represents that the quality problem does not exist, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number; t is tnTime, t, indicating the nth piece of datanTime, k, of the n +1 th data1Are time intervals specified in the data description.
The integrity of data c is integrated with the above criteria2The evaluation method (2) is as follows:
in the formula: n is the data number, and m is the total number of data in the data set.
Data uniqueness c3The method mainly comprises the following judgment criteria:
the same time variable value does not exist, and the judgment function is as follows:
in the formula: fc3_1And (n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, the value of 1 represents that the quality problem does not exist, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number.
The evaluation method of the statistical indexes without the same name comprises the following steps:
in the formula: repeat _ ratio is the index repetition rate, and the repetition statistical index is calculated only once.
Combining the above criteria, data uniqueness c3The evaluation method (2) is as follows:
in the formula: n is the data number, and m is the total number of data in the data set.
Data consistency c4The method mainly comprises the following judgment criteria:
whether the data expression formats (fraction, decimal and percentage) are consistent or not is judged according to the following function:
in the formula: fc4_1And (n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, the value of 1 represents that the quality problem does not exist, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number.
Whether the data precision (several decimal places) is consistent or not is judged according to the following function:
in the formula: fc4_2And (n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, the value of 1 represents that the quality problem does not exist, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number.
Integrating the above criteria, data consistency c4The evaluation method (2) is as follows:
in the formula: n is the data number, and m is the total number of data in the data set.
Data validity c5The method mainly comprises the following judgment criteria:
the data format is valid (e.g. no text is included in the number), and the judgment function is as follows:
in the formula: fc5_1And (n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, the value of 1 represents that the quality problem does not exist, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number.
The longitude and latitude coordinates of the test vehicle are in the measuring area range, and the judgment function is as follows:
in the formula: fc5_2(n) is a judgment function of the nth data under the criterion, the value of 1 represents that the quality problem does not exist, the value of 0 represents that the quality problem exists, and n is a data number; latnDimension, lon, representing nth piece of datanRepresents the longitude of the nth piece of data; w represents a longitude and latitude collection in the measuring area.
Combining the above criteria, data validity c5The evaluation method (2) is as follows:
in the formula: n is the data number, and m is the total number of data in the data set.
constructing an index evaluation system for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road, and determining an initial weight judgment matrix of the index evaluation system;
determining the weight of each data quality evaluation index by expert method,
and establishing a paired judgment matrix by adopting a 1-9 scale method according to the importance degree of each data quality evaluation index in a pairwise comparison mode, and performing pairwise comparison by expert scoring. 1 to 9 scale method, as shown in Table 1, wherein aijIndicating how important i is relative to j.
Table 1 data quality evaluation index importance table
All the comparison results can be represented by a comparison matrix A:
note: wherein a isijRepresenting the risk importance of i relative to j, j when compared to i may be represented by the inverse of the scale value of i to j comparison.
Using formulasCalculating the consistency proportion of the weight judgment matrix; wherein CR is a consistency ratio, CI is a consistency index,λmaxjudging the maximum characteristic value of the matrix for the weight, wherein r is the dimension of the matrix for the weight judgment, and RI is a random consistency index; judging whether the consistency ratio is less than or equal to 0.01 or not, and obtaining a judgment result; if the judgment result shows no, the weight judgment matrix is updated, and the step of utilizing the formula is returnedAnd calculating the consistency ratio of the weight judgment matrix. For example when the weight decision matrix is shown in table 2,
RI is a random consistency index and can be obtained by looking up a table.
Table 2 data quality evaluation index weight judgment matrix
If the judgment result shows yes, judging a matrix according to the weight and utilizing a formula Calculating the weight of each evaluation index; wherein, ω isiWeight representing the ith evaluation index, aijAnd (3) the (i, j) th element in the weight judgment matrix represents the risk importance degree of the i-th evaluation index relative to the j-th evaluation index. For example, a weight determination matrix as shown in table 2. That is, CR is less than or equal to 0.10, indicating that the consistency of the decision matrix is acceptable.
And 102, calculating a cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm.
1. The test data set is cut. The autopilot roadway test data set used in an embodiment may be divided into 33 sub-data sets according to the test vehicle cut data.
2. And for each subdata set, calculating the evaluation result of each data quality evaluation index according to the judgment criterion of each evaluation index in the step one, as shown in table 3.
TABLE 3 data quality evaluation results of each data subset
3. Calculating the cloud model characteristic parameter value E of each evaluation index by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithmxi、 EniAnd HeiThe calculation method is as follows:
in the formula: exiIs the expectation of the ith evaluation index cloud model; eniIs the entropy of the ith evaluation index cloud model; heiThe entropy of the ith evaluation index cloud model is obtained; c. CkiIs the evaluation result of the kth data set under the ith evaluation index.
And 103, calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data.
Generating a comprehensive evaluation cloud, and calculating characteristic parameter values T (E) of the comprehensive evaluation cloudx,En,He) The calculation method is as follows:
in the formula: exiIs the expectation of the ith evaluation index cloud model; eniIs the entropy of the ith evaluation index cloud model; heiThe entropy of the ith evaluation index cloud model is obtained; omegaiIs the weight of the i-th evaluation index.
The cloud model characteristic parameter values of each index and the characteristic parameter value calculation results of the comprehensive evaluation cloud are shown in table 4 below.
Table 4 cloud model characteristic parameter values of each index and comprehensive evaluation cloud
E | E | H | |
Integrity of a memory cell | 94.03 | 3.21 | 1.02 |
Accuracy of measurement | 68.52 | 7.17 | 3.52 |
Uniqueness of | 75.20 | 1.61 | 0.58 |
Consistency | 90.72 | 2.43 | 0.66 |
Effectiveness of | 73.04 | 14.74 | 7.01 |
Comprehensive evaluation cloud T | 81.60 | 7.16 | 3.13 |
And step 104, determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data.
1. The quality grades are divided into five grades of 'good', 'medium', 'poor' and 'poor', the upper limit and the lower limit of the grade are graded, the suggested values of a plurality of experts are consulted, and finally the average value is taken to determine. Finally, the upper bound of the p-th grade is determined to be toppThe lower bound is btmpThe calculation method is as follows:
in the formula: top ispTaking an upper bound for the evaluation of the p-th grade; btmpTaking a lower bound for the evaluation of the p-th grade; top ispiTaking an upper bound for the evaluation of the p grade suggested by the ith expert; btmpiAnd (4) taking a lower bound for the evaluation of the p grade suggested by the ith expert.
2、Calculating cloud characteristic parameters T of each quality gradep(Exp,Enp,Hep) In which Exp、EnpAnd HepThe calculation method of (2) is as follows:
in the formula: exp(ii) a desire for a pth quality class cloud; enpEntropy of the p-th quality class cloud; hepThe super entropy of the p-th quality level cloud; top ispTaking an upper bound for the evaluation of the pth grade; btmpAnd taking a lower bound for evaluation of the p-th grade.
The data quality class cloud characteristic parameter value calculation results are shown in table 5.
TABLE 5 data quality class cloud characteristic parameter value calculation results
topp | btmp | E | E | | |
Good taste | |||||
100 | 85 | 92.5 | 2.50 | 0.015 | |
Is preferably used | 85 | 65 | 75 | 3.33 | 0.02 |
In | 65 | 40 | 52 | 4.17 | 0.025 |
Is poor | 40 | 15 | 27.5 | 4.17 | 0.025 |
Difference (D) | 15 | 0 | 7.5 | 2.50 | 0.015 |
3. And calculating the similarity of the comprehensive evaluation cloud and each grade cloud, and determining the quality grade of the test data of the automatic driving road according to the maximum similarity.
Computing data quality comprehensive evaluation cloud T (E)x,En,He) And each data quality grade cloud Tp(ENp,Enp,Hep) The calculation method of the similarity is as follows:
with EnTo expect, HeGenerating a normal random number E 'for the standard deviation'n;
Then with ExTo expect, E'nGenerating a normal random number x for the standard deviationi;
calculating the integrated similarity xip=∑ξpi/N。
The results of the similarity calculation between the comprehensive evaluation cloud and each data quality level cloud are shown in table 6:
table 6 comprehensive evaluation of the similarity between the cloud and each data quality class cloud
Quality of dataVolume rating | Good taste | Is better | In | Is poor | Difference (D) |
Degree of similarity | 0.09733 | 0.272443 | 0.004889 | 1.80×10-5 | 3.54×10-33 |
And drawing a point cloud distribution diagram of the comprehensive evaluation cloud and the cloud of each data quality grade, as shown in fig. 3.
And comprehensively considering the point cloud distribution diagram and the similarity calculation structure, and judging the data quality grade of the automatic driving road test data set to be a 'better' grade.
The invention also provides an automatic driving road test data quality determination system based on the normal cloud model, which comprises the following steps:
the weight determination module is used for determining the weight of each evaluation index for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road by adopting an analytic hierarchy process; the evaluation indexes comprise data correctness and qualification, data integrity, data uniqueness, data consistency and data effectiveness.
The weight determining module specifically includes: the initialization submodule is used for constructing an index evaluation system for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road and determining an initial weight judgment matrix of the index evaluation system; a consistency ratio calculation submodule for using a formulaComputingThe weight determines the consistency ratio of the matrix; wherein, CR is a consistency ratio, CI is a consistency index,λmaxjudging the maximum characteristic value of the matrix for the weight, wherein r is the dimension of the matrix for the weight judgment, and RI is a random consistency index; the consistency judgment submodule is used for judging whether the consistency ratio is less than or equal to 0.01 or not to obtain a judgment result; a weight judgment matrix updating submodule for updating the weight judgment matrix if the judgment result shows no, and returning to the step of using the formulaCalculating a consistency ratio of the weight judgment matrix; a weight calculation submodule for judging a matrix according to the weight and using a formula if the judgment result shows yesCalculating the weight of each evaluation index; wherein, ω isiWeight representing the ith evaluation index, aijAnd (3) the (i, j) th element in the weight judgment matrix represents the risk importance degree of the i-th evaluation index relative to the j-th evaluation index.
And the cloud model characteristic parameter value calculation module is used for calculating the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm.
The cloud model characteristic parameter value calculation module specifically includes: the sub data set segmentation sub module is used for taking the test data of each vehicle as a sub data set to obtain n sub data sets; the evaluation result calculation submodule is used for calculating the evaluation result of each subdata set under each evaluation index respectively; the cloud model characteristic parameter value calculation submodule is used for calculating the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm and utilizing the following formula according to the evaluation result of each subdata set under each evaluation index;
wherein E isxi(ii) an expectation of a cloud model that is the ith evaluation index; eniEntropy of the cloud model being the ith evaluation index; heiIs the hyper-entropy of the cloud model for the ith evaluation index; c. CkiIs the evaluation result of the kth sub-data set under the ith evaluation index.
The comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value calculation module is used for calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data;
and the quality determination module is used for determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data.
According to the specific embodiment provided by the invention, the invention discloses the following technical effects:
the invention discloses a method for determining the quality of automatic driving road test data based on a normal cloud model, which comprises the following steps: determining the weight of each evaluation index for determining the quality of the automatic driving road test data by adopting an analytic hierarchy process; calculating a cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm; calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data; and determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data. The invention realizes the determination of the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road.
The invention provides data quality evaluation indexes, specific judgment criteria and a calculation method aiming at the specific characteristics of the test data of the automatic driving road, maps the quality evaluation scores to specific quality grades based on a normal cloud model method, can realize the reasonability and accuracy of evaluation results, and has the advantages of originality, scientificity, practicability and the like.
The embodiments in the present description are described in a progressive manner, each embodiment focuses on differences from other embodiments, and the same and similar parts among the embodiments are referred to each other.
The principles and embodiments of the present invention have been described herein using specific examples, which are provided only to help understand the method and the core concept of the present invention; meanwhile, for a person skilled in the art, according to the idea of the present invention, the specific embodiments and the application range may be changed. In view of the above, the present disclosure should not be construed as limiting the invention.
Claims (9)
1. A method for determining the quality of automatic driving road test data based on a normal cloud model is characterized by comprising the following steps:
determining the weight of each evaluation index for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road by adopting an analytic hierarchy process; the evaluation indexes comprise data correctness, data integrity, data uniqueness, data consistency and data validity;
calculating a cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm;
calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data;
determining the quality of the test data based on a normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data;
the method for determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter values of the test data specifically comprises the following steps:
taking the expectation of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as an expectation, and taking the super entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as a standard deviation to generate a first normal random number;
taking the entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as an expectation, and taking the first normal random number as a standard deviation to generate a second normal random number;
taking the expectation of the p-th quality level cloud as the expectation, and taking the super-entropy of the p-th quality level cloud as the standard deviation, and generating a third normal random number;
according to the second normal random number and the third normal random number, utilizing a formula Calculating a similarity evaluation result of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud; wherein ξpmM-th similarity evaluation result, x, of the synthetic cloud representing the test data and the p-th quality class cloudimRepresents a second normal random number, EnpIndicating that the desire of the pth quality level cloud is desired,represents a third normal random number;
increasing the value of M by 1, returning to the step of generating a first normal random number by taking the expectation of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the expectation and the super-entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the standard deviation until M similarity evaluation results of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud are generated;
according to the M similarity evaluation results of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud, a formula xi is utilizedp=∑ξpmCalculating the comprehensive similarity of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud; wherein ξpSynthetic similarity of synthetic clouds representing test data to pth quality class cloudsDegree;
increasing the value of p by 1, initializing the value of m, and returning to the step of generating a first normal random number by taking the expectation of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the expectation and the super-entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the standard deviation until the comprehensive similarity of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and each quality grade cloud is obtained;
and determining the quality grade of the test data according to the comprehensive similarity between the comprehensive cloud of the test data and each quality grade cloud.
2. The method for determining the quality of the automatic driving road test data based on the normal cloud model according to claim 1, wherein the determining the weight of each evaluation index for determining the quality of the automatic driving road test data by using the analytic hierarchy process specifically comprises:
constructing an index evaluation system for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road, and determining an initial weight judgment matrix of the index evaluation system;
wherein CR is a consistency ratio, CI is a consistency index,λmaxjudging the maximum characteristic value of the matrix for the weight, wherein r is the dimension of the matrix for the weight judgment, and RI is a random consistency index;
judging whether the consistency ratio is less than or equal to 0.01 or not, and obtaining a judgment result;
if the judgment result shows no, the weight judgment matrix is updated, and the step of 'utilizing the formula' is returnedCalculating a consistency ratio of the weight judgment matrix;
if the judgment result shows yes, judging a matrix according to the weight and utilizing a formula Calculating the weight of each evaluation index;
wherein, ω isiWeight representing the ith evaluation index, aijAnd (3) the (i, j) th element in the weight judgment matrix represents the risk importance degree of the i-th evaluation index relative to the j-th evaluation index.
3. The method for determining the quality of the automatic driving road test data based on the normal cloud model according to claim 1, wherein a reverse cloud emitter algorithm is adopted to calculate the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data, and specifically comprises:
respectively taking the test data of each vehicle as a subdata set to obtain K subdata sets;
respectively calculating the evaluation result of each subdata set under each evaluation index;
according to the evaluation result of each subdata set under each evaluation index, a reverse cloud emitter algorithm is adopted, and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data is calculated by using the following formula:
wherein E isxi(ii) an expectation of a cloud model that is the ith evaluation index; eniEntropy of the cloud model being the ith evaluation index; heiIs the hyper-entropy of the cloud model for the ith evaluation index; c. CkiIs the evaluation result of the kth sub-data set under the ith evaluation index.
4. The method for determining the quality of the automatic driving road test data based on the normal cloud model according to claim 3, wherein the calculating the evaluation result of each sub data set under each evaluation index respectively specifically comprises:
wherein, c1For data correctness of the subdata set, Fc1_1(n)、Fc1_2(n)、Fc1_3(n) and Fc1_4(N) the correctness of the instantaneous vehicle speed, the correctness of the instantaneous acceleration, the conformity of the acceleration and the correctness of the driving mode which are recorded in the nth record are respectively, and N represents the number of records in the sub data set;
distance(latn,lonn,latn+1,lonn+1) Calculating a function for distance (lat)n,lonn) Latitude and longitude coordinates for the nth record, (lat)n+1,lonn+1) The longitude and latitude coordinates of the n +1 record are recorded; v. ofnAnd vn+1The speed of the nth record and the speed of the (n + 1) th record respectively; a isnAcceleration recorded for the nth bar; t is tnAnd tn+1Respectively time of the nth record and the (n + 1) th record;
wherein, c2For data integrity of the subdata sets, Fc2_1(n) and Fc2_2(n) data value missing and data time continuity of the nth record respectively;
l is a time interval threshold;
wherein, c3For data uniqueness of the subdata set, Fc3_1(n) is the uniqueness of the time variable value of the nth record, and the repeat _ ratio is the index repetition rate of the subdata set;
wherein, c4For data consistency of a subdata set, Fc4_1(n) and Fc4_2(n) the format consistency and precision consistency of the nth record respectively;
wherein, c5For data validity of a subdata set, Fc5_1(n) and Fc5_2(n) the data format validity and the longitude and latitude coordinate validity of the nth record are respectively recorded;
w is a longitude and latitude collection in the measuring area.
5. The method for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road based on the normal cloud model according to claim 3, wherein the step of calculating the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data specifically comprises:
according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data, calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data by using the following formula:
wherein E isxTo test the expectations of the synthetic cloud of data, EnEntropy of the synthetic cloud to test data, HeHyper-entropy, omega, of a synthetic cloud for testing dataiThe weight of the i-th evaluation index is represented.
6. The method for determining the quality of the automatic driving road test data based on the normal cloud model according to claim 3, wherein the method for determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data further comprises:
calculating the cloud characteristic parameters of each quality grade cloud by using the following formula:
wherein E isxp(ii) a desire for a pth quality class cloud; enpEntropy of the p-th quality class cloud; hepThe super entropy of the p-th quality level cloud; top ispTaking an upper bound for the evaluation of the p-th grade; btmpAnd taking a lower bound for the evaluation of the p-th grade.
7. An automatic driving road test data quality determination system based on a normal cloud model, characterized in that the system comprises:
the weight determination module is used for determining the weight of each evaluation index for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road by adopting an analytic hierarchy process; the evaluation indexes comprise data correctness, data integrity, data uniqueness, data consistency and data validity;
the cloud model characteristic parameter value calculation module is used for calculating the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm;
the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value calculation module is used for calculating a comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data according to the weight of each evaluation index and the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data;
the quality determination module is used for determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter value of the test data;
the method for determining the quality of the test data based on the normal cloud model according to the comprehensive cloud characteristic parameter values of the test data specifically comprises the following steps:
taking the expectation of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as an expectation, and taking the super entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as a standard deviation to generate a first normal random number;
taking the entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as an expectation, and taking the first normal random number as a standard deviation to generate a second normal random number;
taking the expectation of the p-th quality level cloud as the expectation, and taking the super-entropy of the p-th quality level cloud as the standard deviation, and generating a third normal random number;
according to the second normal random number and the third normal random number, utilizing a formula Calculating a similarity evaluation result of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud; wherein ξpmM-th similarity evaluation result, x, of the synthetic cloud representing the test data and the p-th quality class cloudimDenotes a second normal random number, EnpIndicating that the desire of the pth quality level cloud is desired,represents a third normal random number;
increasing the value of M by 1, returning to the step of generating a first normal random number by taking the expectation of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the expectation and the super-entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the standard deviation until M similarity evaluation results of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud are generated;
according to the M similarity evaluation results of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud, utilizing a formula xip=∑ξpmCalculating the comprehensive similarity of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud; wherein ξpRepresenting the comprehensive similarity of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and the p-th quality grade cloud;
increasing the value of p by 1, initializing the value of m, and returning to the step of generating a first normal random number by taking the expectation of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the expectation and the super-entropy of the comprehensive cloud of the test data as the standard deviation until the comprehensive similarity of the comprehensive cloud of the test data and each quality grade cloud is obtained;
and determining the quality grade of the test data according to the comprehensive similarity between the comprehensive cloud of the test data and each quality grade cloud.
8. The system for determining the quality of the automatic driving road test data based on the normal cloud model according to claim 7, wherein the weight determining module specifically comprises:
the initialization submodule is used for constructing an index evaluation system for determining the quality of the test data of the automatic driving road and determining an initial weight judgment matrix of the index evaluation system;
a consistency ratio calculation submodule for using a formulaCalculating the consistency proportion of the weight judgment matrix;
wherein CR is a consistency ratio, CI is a consistency index,λmaxthe maximum characteristic value of the weight judgment matrix is r, the dimension of the weight judgment matrix is r, and RI is a random consistency index;
the consistency judgment submodule is used for judging whether the consistency ratio is less than or equal to 0.01 or not to obtain a judgment result;
a weight judgment matrix updating submodule for updating the weight judgment matrix if the judgment result shows no, and returning to the step of using the formulaCalculating a consistency ratio of the weight judgment matrix;
a weight calculation submodule for judging a matrix according to the weight and using a formula if the judgment result shows yesCalculating the weight of each evaluation index;
wherein, ω isiWeight representing the ith evaluation index, aijAnd (3) the (i, j) th element in the weight judgment matrix represents the risk importance degree of the i-th evaluation index relative to the j-th evaluation index.
9. The system for determining the quality of the automatic driving road test data based on the normal cloud model according to claim 8, wherein the cloud model characteristic parameter value calculation module specifically includes:
the sub data set segmentation sub module is used for taking the test data of each vehicle as a sub data set to obtain n sub data sets;
the evaluation result calculation submodule is used for calculating the evaluation result of each subdata set under each evaluation index respectively;
the cloud model characteristic parameter value calculation submodule is used for calculating the cloud model characteristic parameter value of each evaluation index of the test data by adopting a reverse cloud emitter algorithm and utilizing the following formula according to the evaluation result of each subdata set under each evaluation index:
wherein E isxiExpectation of a cloud model that is the ith evaluation index; eniEntropy of the cloud model being the ith evaluation index; heiIs the hyper-entropy of the cloud model for the ith evaluation index; c. CkiIs the kth sub-datasetEvaluation results under the i-th evaluation index.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110864149.4A CN113689081B (en) | 2021-07-29 | 2021-07-29 | Automatic driving road test data quality determination method based on normal cloud model |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110864149.4A CN113689081B (en) | 2021-07-29 | 2021-07-29 | Automatic driving road test data quality determination method based on normal cloud model |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN113689081A CN113689081A (en) | 2021-11-23 |
CN113689081B true CN113689081B (en) | 2022-06-10 |
Family
ID=78578215
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110864149.4A Active CN113689081B (en) | 2021-07-29 | 2021-07-29 | Automatic driving road test data quality determination method based on normal cloud model |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN113689081B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN114996800A (en) * | 2022-05-05 | 2022-09-02 | 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司 | BIM software-based urban road safety assessment method and system |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108229813A (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-06-29 | 北京交通大学 | Industry integrated countermeasures system evaluation method based on objectivity cloud matter-element |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105096037A (en) * | 2015-07-16 | 2015-11-25 | 广东产品质量监督检验研究院 | Failure risk determination method of photovoltaic assembly |
CN105426656B (en) * | 2015-10-29 | 2018-01-26 | 浙江群力电气有限公司 | A kind of error calculation method and system |
CN110909983B (en) * | 2019-10-25 | 2022-01-25 | 浙江工业大学 | Multidimensional assessment method for electric energy quality of active power distribution network |
CN112396252A (en) * | 2020-12-04 | 2021-02-23 | 国网江苏省电力有限公司南京供电分公司 | Method for acquiring construction success evaluation values of double-creation park of power internet of things |
CN112966381A (en) * | 2021-03-10 | 2021-06-15 | 贵州大学 | Power transformer comprehensive state evaluation method based on evidence cloud matter element model |
-
2021
- 2021-07-29 CN CN202110864149.4A patent/CN113689081B/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108229813A (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-06-29 | 北京交通大学 | Industry integrated countermeasures system evaluation method based on objectivity cloud matter-element |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN113689081A (en) | 2021-11-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Pandey et al. | A decision tree algorithm pertaining to the student performance analysis and prediction | |
US11709979B1 (en) | Bridge damage identification method considering uncertainty | |
CN104866578A (en) | Hybrid filling method for incomplete data | |
CN109635010B (en) | User characteristic and characteristic factor extraction and query method and system | |
CN103810101A (en) | Software defect prediction method and system | |
CN106126613A (en) | One composition of digressing from the subject determines method and device | |
CN109886724B (en) | Robust resident travel track identification method | |
CN104463548A (en) | Carriage quantitative selection method influenced by multiple factors | |
CN108256699A (en) | Graduation whereabouts Forecasting Methodology and system based on college student stereo data | |
CN113689081B (en) | Automatic driving road test data quality determination method based on normal cloud model | |
CN105389505A (en) | Shilling attack detection method based on stack type sparse self-encoder | |
CN111143981A (en) | Virtual test model verification system and method | |
Putri et al. | Analysis of students graduation target based on academic data record using c4. 5 algorithm case study: Information systems students of telkom university | |
CN113393144B (en) | Evaluation method and evaluation device for risk classification of static elements of geological landslide | |
CN114580828A (en) | Safety evaluation method for numerical control machine during transportation process | |
CN109977131A (en) | A kind of house type matching system | |
CN117057190A (en) | Temperature rise prediction method for brake disc of railway vehicle | |
CN104834816A (en) | Short-term wind speed prediction method | |
Algur et al. | Educational data mining: RT and RF classification models for higher education professional courses | |
CN109063313B (en) | Train traction energy consumption calculation method based on machine learning | |
CN103164531B (en) | Based on the two-stage instance layer data integrating method of Fuzzy priority level | |
CN110020686A (en) | A kind of road surface method for detecting abnormality based on intelligent perception sensing data | |
CN114169426A (en) | Beidou position data-based highway traffic potential safety hazard investigation method | |
CN113808393A (en) | Method for eliminating influence of hybrid control object | |
CN112085421A (en) | Teacher teaching effect evaluation method based on deep BP neural network |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |