CN113536608B - Train control center dynamic baking machine test system and method - Google Patents
Train control center dynamic baking machine test system and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113536608B CN113536608B CN202111083398.6A CN202111083398A CN113536608B CN 113536608 B CN113536608 B CN 113536608B CN 202111083398 A CN202111083398 A CN 202111083398A CN 113536608 B CN113536608 B CN 113536608B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- speed limit
- simulation platform
- control center
- train control
- setting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 117
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 170
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012430 stability testing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/40—Business processes related to the transportation industry
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
Abstract
The application provides a dynamic baking machine test system and method for a train control center, wherein the system comprises a baking machine subsystem, a simulation platform and a tested train control center; the system comprises a baking machine subsystem and a tested train control center, wherein the baking machine subsystem comprises a test state polling control module, a speed limit automatic setting module and an automatic trigger signal permission change module, the test state polling control module is used for circularly controlling the speed limit automatic setting module to issue maximum capacity speed limit and cancel all speed limits, the automatic trigger signal permission change module issues a test scene capable of triggering the tested train control center to generate maximum capacity signal permission and cancel all signal permission, a simulation platform is used for respectively generating simulation signals based on the maximum capacity speed limit, canceling all speed limits, triggering and canceling all signal permission, and the tested train control center is used for running based on the simulation signals. Thus, it is possible to determine whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the train control center under test can be stably operated under repeated execution over a long period.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the technical field of simulation testing, in particular to a system and a method for testing a dynamic baking machine of a train control center.
Background
The Train Control Center (TCC) is an important component of the Chinese Train Control System (CTCS). Before the TCC equipment is put into the open operation of a station, the software and data in the TCC need to be ensured to accurately and reliably operate stably on site, namely, the TCC is ensured to have correct functions and stable performance in long-term operation. Therefore, long-term stability testing is an essential link for TCC indoor testing.
In the prior art, a static grill method is generally used. Specifically, before the TCC equipment leaves a factory, a TCC cabinet is electrified indoors in advance, and is connected with a simulation platform or a peripheral simulator, and then the TCC is operated for a plurality of days. And then check whether the TCC can work normally during the running process through a maintenance station of the TCC and the like. Only after long-term and stable work of the TCC is determined indoors, the TCC is put into a station for formal use.
However, according to the conventional oven method, it is impossible to repeatedly execute functions such as a speed limit process and a Signal permission (SA) process of the TCC for a long period, and further it is impossible to check whether the TCC can be stably operated even when the speed limit process function, the SA process function, and the like of the TCC are repeatedly executed for a long period, and further, the oven test of the TCC before the TCC is actually put into use is not comprehensive.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the application aims to provide a train control center dynamic baking machine testing system and method, which can be used for checking whether the TCC can still stably run under the repeated execution of a long period, such as a speed limit processing function, an SA processing function and the like of the TCC.
In order to solve the above technical problem, an embodiment of the present application provides the following technical solutions:
the first aspect of the application provides a test system for a dynamic baking machine of a column control center, which comprises a baking machine subsystem, a simulation platform and a tested column control center; the system comprises a baking machine subsystem, a simulation platform, a tested train control center and a power supply subsystem, wherein the baking machine subsystem is connected with the simulation platform, and the simulation platform is connected with the tested train control center;
the toaster subsystem comprises: the device comprises a test state polling control module, a speed limit automatic setting module and an automatic trigger signal permission change module; the test state polling control module is respectively connected with the speed limit automatic setting module and the automatic trigger signal permission change module;
the test state polling control module is used for circularly controlling the speed limit automatic setting module to issue a maximum capacity speed limit and cancel all speed limits, and the automatic trigger signal permission change module issues a test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate a maximum capacity signal permission and cancel all signal permissions;
the automatic speed limit setting module is used for sequentially issuing the maximum capacity speed limit and all speed limits to the simulation platform, and the automatic trigger signal permission changing module is used for sequentially issuing a test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate the maximum capacity signal permission and all signal permissions to the simulation platform;
the simulation platform is used for generating simulation signals respectively based on the maximum capacity speed limit, the cancellation of all speed limits, the maximum capacity signal permission and the cancellation of all signal permission, and sending the simulation signals to the tested train control center;
and the tested train control center is used for operating based on the simulation signal and displaying an operation result on a maintenance platform of the tested train control center, so that whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center can stably operate under long-period repeated execution is determined according to whether the operation result is consistent with the corresponding maximum capacity speed limit, all speed limits cancellation, maximum capacity signal permission and all signals cancellation.
The second aspect of the application provides a method for testing a dynamic baking machine of a column control center, which is applied to a test system of the dynamic baking machine of the column control center; the train control center dynamic baking machine test system comprises a baking machine subsystem, a simulation platform and a tested train control center; the toaster subsystem comprises: the device comprises a test state polling control module, a speed limit automatic setting module and an automatic trigger signal permission change module;
the test state polling control module controls the speed limit automatic setting module to issue the maximum capacity speed limit and cancel all the speed limits in a circulating way, and the automatic trigger signal permission change module issues a test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate the maximum capacity signal permission and cancel all the signal permissions;
the automatic speed limit setting module sequentially issues the maximum capacity speed limit and all speed limits cancellation to the simulation platform, and the automatic trigger signal permission change module is used for sequentially issuing a test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate the maximum capacity signal permission and all the signal permissions cancellation to the simulation platform;
the simulation platform generates simulation signals respectively based on the maximum capacity speed limit, the cancellation of all speed limits, the maximum capacity signal permission and the cancellation of all signal permission, and sends the simulation signals to the tested train control center;
and the tested train control center operates based on the simulation signal and displays an operation result on a maintenance platform of the tested train control center, so that whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center can stably operate under the repeated execution of a long period is determined according to whether the operation result is consistent with the corresponding maximum capacity speed limit, all speed limits cancellation, maximum capacity signal permission and all signals cancellation.
Compared with the prior art, the test system for the dynamic column control center of the application comprises a baking machine subsystem, a simulation platform and a tested column control center. The toaster subsystem comprises: the device comprises a test state polling control module, a speed limit automatic setting module and an automatic trigger signal permission change module. When the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center need to be detected whether to stably run for a long time, the speed limit automatic setting module is controlled by the test state polling control module in the baking machine subsystem to sequentially send the speed limit to the simulation platform, the automatic trigger signal permission changing module is further controlled to sequentially trigger the test scenes for generating the signal permission to be set in the simulation platform, the automatic trigger signal permission changing module is further controlled to trigger the test scenes for canceling all the signal permissions to be set in the simulation platform, the automatic speed limit setting module is further controlled to send all the speed limits to the simulation platform, the simulation platform is based on the maximum capacity speed limit, the maximum capacity signal permission, all the signal permissions are cancelled, all the speed limits are cancelled, and the tested train control center runs based on the signals in the simulation platform. Therefore, the tested train control center can repeatedly process the speed limit and the signal permission for a long time, and further can determine whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center can stably operate under the repeated execution of a long period according to the operation result on the maintenance platform of the tested train control center, so that the coverage range of the function of the test of the baking machine is enlarged.
The test method for the column control center dynamic baking machine provided by the second aspect of the application has the same or similar beneficial effects as the test system for the column control center dynamic baking machine provided by the first aspect.
Drawings
The above and other objects, features and advantages of exemplary embodiments of the present application will become readily apparent from the following detailed description read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Several embodiments of the present application are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar or corresponding parts and in which:
FIG. 1 is a first schematic structural diagram of a test system of a column control center dynamic baking machine in an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 2 is a second schematic structural diagram of a test system of a column control center dynamic state machine in an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 3 is a schematic flow chart illustrating the operation of the test system of the train control center dynamic roaster according to the embodiment of the present application;
fig. 4 is a schematic flow chart illustrating a method for testing a column control center dynamic baking machine according to an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
Exemplary embodiments of the present application will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. While exemplary embodiments of the present application are shown in the drawings, it should be understood that the present application may be embodied in various forms and should not be limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the disclosure to those skilled in the art.
It is to be noted that, unless otherwise specified, technical or scientific terms used herein shall have the ordinary meaning as understood by those skilled in the art to which this application belongs.
Fig. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of a test system of a dynamic column control center in the embodiment of the present application, and referring to fig. 1, the system may include a baking sub-system 11, a simulation platform 12, and a column control center 13 to be tested. The baking machine subsystem 11 is connected with a simulation platform 12, and the simulation platform 12 is connected with a tested train control center 13.
The toaster subsystem 11 may include: a test state polling control module 111, a speed limit automatic setting module 112 and an automatic trigger signal permission change module 113. The test state polling control module 111 is connected to the speed limit automatic setting module 112 and the automatic trigger signal permission changing module 113, respectively.
The following describes specific cases of the above-described components.
The baking machine subsystem 11 is used for dynamically and circularly issuing a speed limit, a trigger signal permission generation scene, a speed limit cancellation and a trigger signal permission scene to the simulation platform 12, so that the tested train control center 13 connected with the simulation platform 12 can realize the functions of speed limit processing and signal permission processing in the baking machine process.
In the toaster subsystem 11, comprising: a test state polling control module 111, a speed limit automatic setting module 112 and an automatic trigger signal permission change module 113.
The test state polling control module 111 is used for the automatic cycle control speed limit setting module 112 to issue the maximum capacity speed limit and cancel all the speed limits, and for the automatic cycle control trigger signal permission changing module 113 to issue the test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate the maximum capacity signal permission and cancel all the signal permissions to the tested train control center 13.
In practical applications, the test status polling control module 111 may be any device having a control signal transmission function. The specific type of the test status polling control module 111 is not limited herein.
And the automatic speed limit setting module 112 is used for sequentially issuing the maximum capacity speed limit and the command of canceling all the speed limits to the simulation platform 12.
In practical applications, the automatic speed limit setting module 112 may be any device capable of generating or acquiring a limit and issuing a speed limit. The specific type of the speed limit automatic setting module 112 is not limited herein.
And the automatic trigger signal permission change module 113 is configured to issue a test scenario that can trigger the train control center to generate a maximum capacity signal permission and cancel all signal permissions to the simulation platform 12 in sequence.
In practical applications, the automatic trigger signal permission change module 113 may be any device capable of generating a signal permission and issuing the signal permission. The specific type of the automatic trigger permission change module 113 is not limited herein.
And the simulation platform 12 is used for generating simulation signals based on the maximum capacity speed limit, the cancellation of all speed limits, the maximum capacity signal permission and the cancellation of all signal permissions respectively, and sending the simulation signals to the tested train control center 13.
Specifically, the simulation platform 12 is a device or software capable of simulating the actual situation of the station and the route. After the simulation platform 12 operates, the actual scene of the station and the line can be simulated. When the simulation platform 12 receives the issued speed limit, the trigger generated signal permission, the trigger cancellation signal permission and the cancellation speed limit, the scenes of speed limit, signal permission and the like in the station and the line can be simulated.
And the tested train control center 13 is used for operating based on the simulation signals and displaying the operation result on a maintenance platform of the tested train control center 13, so that whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center 13 can stably operate under the long-period repeated execution is determined according to whether the operation result is consistent with the corresponding maximum capacity speed limit, all speed limits are cancelled, the maximum capacity signal permission is cancelled, and all signals are cancelled.
Specifically, the train control center 13 to be tested is the object to be tested in the baking process. It is necessary to detect whether the train control center 13 under test can stably operate for a long period of time for the functions of speed limit processing and signal permission processing.
In a specific implementation process, in the process of performing the baking operation on the tested column control center 13, when it is required to detect whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested column control center 13 can stably operate for a long time, first, the test status polling control module 111 in the baking sub-system 11 controls the automatic speed limit setting module 112 to sequentially issue the speed limit to the simulation platform 12, and the tested column control center 13 operates based on the speed limit in the simulation platform 12. Then, the test status polling control module 111 in the toaster subsystem 11 controls the automatic trigger signal permission change module 113 to set the test scenario that the triggerable signal permission is generated in the simulation platform 12 in sequence, and the tested train control center 13 operates based on the scenario that the trigger signal permission is generated in the simulation platform 12. Next, the test status polling control module 111 in the toaster subsystem 11 controls the automatic trigger signal permission change module 113 to set all the cancellation signal permissions in the simulation platform 12, and the tested train control center 13 operates based on all the cancellation signal permissions in the simulation platform 12. Then, the test status polling control module 111 in the toaster subsystem 11 controls the automatic speed limit setting module 112 to issue all the speed limits to be cancelled to the simulation platform 12, and the tested train control center 13 operates based on all the speed limits to be cancelled in the simulation platform 12. In the operation process of the tested train control center 13, the maximum capacity speed limit, the maximum capacity signal permission, all signal permission cancellation and all speed limits are displayed on the maintenance platform of the tested train control center 13 at corresponding time intervals. Comparing the operation result displayed on the maintenance platform of the tested train control center 13 with the maximum capacity speed limit, the maximum capacity signal permission, all signal permission cancellation and all speed limits cancellation issued by the automatic speed limit setting module 112 and the automatic trigger signal permission change module 113, and if the comparison is consistent, determining that the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center 13 can stably operate under the repeated execution of a long period. If the comparison is inconsistent, it is determined that the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the train control center 13 under test cannot be stably operated under repeated execution for a long period.
It should be noted here that the test status polling control module 111 in the toaster subsystem 11 can control the speed limit automatic setting module 112 and the automatic trigger signal permission changing module 113 to issue the maximum capacity speed limit, the maximum capacity signal permission, cancel all the signal permissions, and cancel all the speed limits in a cyclic reciprocating manner.
From the above, the train control center dynamic oven test system provided by the embodiment of the application includes an oven subsystem, a simulation platform and a tested train control center. The toaster subsystem comprises: the device comprises a test state polling control module, a speed limit automatic setting module and an automatic trigger signal permission change module. When the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center need to be detected whether to stably run for a long time, the speed limit automatic setting module is controlled by the test state polling control module in the baking machine subsystem to sequentially send the speed limit to the simulation platform, the automatic trigger signal permission changing module is further controlled to sequentially trigger the test scenes for generating the signal permission to be set in the simulation platform, the automatic trigger signal permission changing module is further controlled to trigger the test scenes for canceling all the signal permissions to be set in the simulation platform, the automatic speed limit setting module is further controlled to send all the speed limits to the simulation platform, the simulation platform operates based on the signals in the simulation platform, and the tested train control center 13 operates based on the signals in the simulation platform. Therefore, the tested train control center can repeatedly process the speed limit and the signal permission for a long time, and further can determine whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center can stably operate under the repeated execution of a long period according to the operation result on the maintenance platform of the tested train control center, so that the coverage range of the function of the test of the baking machine is enlarged.
Further, as refinement and expansion of the method shown in fig. 1, the embodiment of the present application further provides a train control center dynamic oven test system. Fig. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of a second dynamic oven test system of a column control center in the embodiment of the present application, and referring to fig. 2, the system may include an oven subsystem 21, a simulation platform 22, and a column control center 23 to be tested.
The toaster subsystem 21 may include: a test status polling control module 211, a speed limit automatic setting module 212 and an automatic trigger signal permission change module 213.
Here, the toaster subsystem 21, the simulation platform 22, the train control center 23 under test, the test status polling control module 211, the speed limit automatic setting module 212, and the automatic trigger signal permission changing module 213 have the same connection relationship and function as the toaster subsystem 11, the simulation platform 12, the train control center 13 under test, the test status polling control module 111, the speed limit automatic setting module 112, and the automatic trigger signal permission changing module 113, and are not described herein again.
The following description mainly describes specific structures and operating mechanisms of the test state polling control module 211, the speed limit automatic setting module 212, and the automatic trigger signal permission changing module 213 from each specific state of speed limit and signal permission in the process of baking the machine.
The test status polling control module 211 includes: a timer 2111 and a state machine 2112.
The timer 2111 is connected to the state machine 2112.
Here, the timer 2111 is used for counting time.
The state machine 2112 is configured to obtain the setting states of the speed limit automatic setting module 212 and the automatic trigger signal permission change module 213, and control the speed limit automatic setting module 212 and the automatic trigger signal permission change module 213 to execute issuing the maximum capacity speed limit again, issue a test scenario in which the maximum capacity signal permission is generated by trigger, issue a test scenario in which all signal permissions are cancelled, and cancel all speed limits after the setting state indicates that issuing the maximum capacity speed limit, triggering to generate the maximum capacity signal permission, triggering to cancel all speed limits has been executed once, and after the timer 2111 reaches a third time.
In the implementation, the state machine 2112 polls the state of the entire toaster test at intervals according to the timing of the timer 2111. That is, the state machine 2112 polls the state of the current oven test execution to which of the maximum capacity speed limit issued, the test scenario in which the trigger generates the maximum capacity signal permission, the test scenario in which the trigger cancels all the signal permissions, and all the speed limits cancelled. When the state machine 2112 determines that one round of issuing the maximum capacity speed limit, issuing a test scene for generating the maximum capacity signal permission by triggering, issuing a test scene for canceling all signal permissions by triggering and canceling all speed limits is finished, the automatic speed limit setting module 212 and the automatic trigger signal permission changing module 213 are continuously controlled to execute one round of circulation again, namely, the automatic speed limit setting module 212 and the automatic trigger signal permission changing module 213 are controlled to execute the test scene for issuing the maximum capacity speed limit, generating the maximum capacity signal permission by triggering again, the test scene for canceling all signal permissions by triggering and canceling all speed limits again. Thus, the train control center 13 under test can be ensured to continuously and repeatedly execute the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function in a circulating manner.
In practical applications, the state machine 2112 may poll the status of the entire toaster test every 10 milliseconds, depending on the timing of the timer 2111. Of course, other intervals such as 5 milliseconds, 20 milliseconds, etc. are also possible. The specific value of the interval time is not limited herein.
Firstly, issuing a maximum capacity limit speed.
The speed limit automatic setting module 212 may include: a speed limit reading unit 2121, a speed limit transmitting unit 2122, a speed limit setting timer 2123, and a speed limit setting counter 2124.
The speed limit reading unit 2121 is connected to the speed limit sending unit 2122, the speed limit setting timer 2123 is connected to the speed limit sending unit 2122 and the simulation platform 22, and the speed limit setting counter 2124 is connected to the speed limit sending unit 2122 and the simulation platform 22.
Here, the speed limit reading unit 2121 is used to read a configuration file.
In the configuration file, the maximum number of speed limits that the train control center 23 under test can simultaneously exist and the corresponding speed limit are filled. According to the relevant technical specifications of the train control center, each direction line transponder can be provided with 3 speed limits. For example: the tested station A only communicates with the adjacent station B and the adjacent station C. Then, station a to station B, station B to station a, station a to station C, station C to station a, there are 4 direction gates in total for the station a to be tested, and then for the positive line transponder, the column control center may have 3 × 4=12 speed limits in the execution state.
In practical applications, the configuration file may exist in the form of a table. The following table is an illustration of a certain profile. Of course, the configuration file may also exist in other forms. The specific form of the configuration file is not limited herein.
The speed limit setting timer 2123 is used for timing.
The speed limit setting counter 2124 is used for counting.
The speed limit sending unit 2122 is configured to send the current speed limit read by the speed limit reading unit 2121 from the configuration file to the simulation platform 22, and control the speed limit setting timer 2123 to start timing, and if a successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 is received within the first time, continue to send the next speed limit to the simulation platform 22; if a successful receipt for the simulation platform 22 is not received after the first time, the next speed limit is sent to the simulation platform 22 after the first time.
The speed limit sending unit 2122 is further configured to control the speed limit setting counter 2124 to add 1 if a successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 is received; if no successful receipt is received by the simulation platform 22 within the first time, the current speed limit is again sent to the simulation platform 22.
In a specific implementation process, the speed limit reading unit 2121 reads the speed limit in the configuration file and sequentially sends the speed limit to the speed limit sending unit 2122. The speed limit sending unit 2122 sends the current speed limit to the simulation platform 22, and controls the speed limit setting timer 2123 to start timing. If a successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 is received within the first time timed by the speed limit setting timer 2123, which indicates that the simulation platform 22 has completed setting the current speed limit, the speed limit sending unit 2122 continues to send the next speed limit to the simulation platform 22, and controls the speed limit setting counter 2124 to add 1. If the successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 is not received within the first time timed by the speed limit setting timer 2123, which indicates that the simulation platform 22 does not successfully complete the setting of the current speed limit, the current speed limit is sent to the simulation platform 22 again. Until the first time, if a successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 has not been received, it is indicated that a problem occurs in the setting of the current speed limit, and in order to not affect the processing of the subsequent speed limit and enable the speed limit processing to be continuously executed, the next speed limit is sent to the simulation platform 22 after the first time.
When the number of the speed limit setting counter 2124 reaches the maximum capacity speed limit number in the configuration file, the test state polling control module 211 controls the test of the baking machine to enter a state of setting a maximum capacity signal permission, that is, updates the current state in the state machine 2112 to a state of completing setting the maximum capacity speed limit.
And secondly, triggering the maximum capacity signal permission.
The auto trigger signal permission change module 213 may include: a normal occupation state setting unit 2131, a first direction port execution counter 2132, and a first section execution counter 2133.
The normal occupation state setting unit 2131 is connected to the first direction port execution counter 2132 and the first segment execution counter 2133, respectively.
Here, the normal occupancy state setting unit 2131 is configured to simulate a process of departure from a station, and sequentially set each segment in each direction port of the station to a normal occupancy state.
Specifically, the process of departure from the station is simulated corresponding to each block subarea, all the sections are occupied to the boundary in sequence, and the section at the tail end of the route and all the sections after the departure are cleared. That is, each block in the block partition is occupied in turn, and after the next block is occupied, the previous block is cleared.
The first segment execution counter is configured to set the number of segments of one direction port to be increased by 1 after the normal occupation state setting unit 2131 sets one segment of one direction port to be in the normal occupation state.
The first direction port execution counter 2132 is configured to add 1 to the set number of direction ports after the normal occupancy state setting unit 2131 sets all segments of one direction port to the normal occupancy state in sequence.
In a specific implementation process, for each directional port, the normal occupation state setting unit 2131 occupies each segment in each directional port in sequence, that is, sets the segment to be in a normal occupation state. After the normal occupation state setting unit 2131 occupies one segment of the direction port, the first segment execution counter adds 1 to the number of occupied segments of the direction port. The normal occupancy state setting unit 2131 then proceeds to occupy the next segment of the directional hole. After the normal occupation state setting unit 2131 occupies all segments in the current direction port, the first direction port execution counter 2132 adds 1 to the set number of direction ports, and the normal occupation state setting unit 2131 continues to occupy each segment in the next direction port.
When the number of the first direction port execution counters 2132 reaches the number of the direction ports of the station, the test status polling control module 211 controls the test of the oven to enter the state of canceling the maximum capacity signal permission, that is, updates the current status in the state machine 2112 to the state of completing setting the maximum capacity signal permission.
And thirdly, triggering to cancel all signal permissions.
The auto-trigger permission change module 213 further includes: an idle state setting unit 2134, a second direction port execution counter 2135, and a second section execution counter 2136.
The idle state setting unit 2134 is connected to the second port execution counter 2135 and the second segment execution counter 2136, respectively.
Here, the idle state setting unit 2134 is configured to simulate a process of receiving vehicles from an adjacent station, and set each segment in each direction port of the station in turn to be in an idle state.
Specifically, first, the sectors are occupied in sequence to the current directional local station boundary. Then, the adjacent station is simulated to receive the train, that is, the boundary occupation of the station is set on the simulation platform 22, and the signal permission number of the corresponding boundary is set to be the same as the signal permission number of the tested train control center 23. And finally, sequentially clearing each section and the boundary.
The second section execution counter 2136 is used for setting the number of the sections of one direction port to be increased by 1 after the idle state setting unit 2134 sets one section of one direction port to be in the idle state.
The second direction port execution counter 2135 is configured to add 1 to the direction port setting number after the idle state setting unit 2134 sets all segments of one direction port to the idle state in sequence.
In a specific implementation process, for each directional port, the idle state setting unit 2134 sequentially cancels normal occupation of each segment in each directional port, that is, sets the segment to be in an idle state. After each time the idle state setting unit 2134 cancels one segment occupying the direction port, the second segment execution counter 2136 adds 1 to the segment idle number of the direction port. The idle state setting unit 2134 then continues to seize the next segment of the directional port. After the idle state setting unit 2134 cancels occupation of all segments in the current direction port, the second direction port execution counter 2135 adds 1 to the set number of direction ports, and the idle state setting unit 2134 continues to cancel occupation of each segment in the next direction port, that is, idle state setting.
Here, the first direction port execution counter 2132 and the second direction port execution counter 2135 may be the same counter or two different counters. Similarly, the first block execution counter 2133 and the second block execution counter 2136 may be the same counter or two different counters.
When the number of the second direction port execution counters 2135 reaches the number of the direction ports of the station, the test status polling control module 211 controls the test of the toaster to enter a maximum capacity speed limit cancellation state, that is, updates the current status in the state machine 2112 to a maximum capacity signal permission cancellation state.
Fourthly, canceling all speed limits.
The automatic speed limit setting module 212 further includes: a speed limit cancellation unit 2125, a speed limit cancellation timer 2126, and a speed limit cancellation counter 2127.
The speed limit canceling unit 2125 is connected to the speed limit reading unit 2121, the speed limit canceling timer 2126 is connected to the speed limit canceling unit 2125 and the simulation platform 22, and the speed limit canceling counter 2127 is connected to the speed limit canceling unit 2125 and the simulation platform 22.
Here, the speed limit cancellation timer 2126 is used for timing.
The speed limit cancellation counter 2127 is used for counting.
The speed limit canceling unit 2125 is configured to send a canceling signal corresponding to the current speed limit read by the speed limit reading unit 2121 from the configuration file to the simulation platform 22, control the speed limit canceling timer 2126 to start timing, and continue to send a canceling signal corresponding to the next speed limit to the simulation platform 22 if a successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 is received within the second time; if the successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 is not received after the second time, the cancellation signal corresponding to the next speed limit is sent to the simulation platform 22 after the second time.
The speed limit canceling unit 2125 is further configured to send a canceling signal corresponding to the current speed limit to the simulation platform 22, and if a successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 is received, control the speed limit canceling counter 2127 to add 1; if no successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 is received within the second time, the cancellation signal corresponding to the current speed limit is sent to the simulation platform 22 again.
In a specific implementation process, the speed limit reading unit 2121 reads the speed limit in the configuration file, and the speed limit canceling unit 2125 sends a canceling signal corresponding to the speed limit read by the reading unit to the simulation platform 22 and controls the speed limit canceling timer 2126 to start timing. If a successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 is received within the second time counted by the speed limit cancellation timer 2126, which indicates that the simulation platform 22 has completed the cancellation of the current speed limit, the speed limit cancellation unit 2125 continues to send a cancellation signal corresponding to the next speed limit to the simulation platform 22, and controls the speed limit cancellation counter 2127 to add 1. If the successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 is not received within the second time timed by the speed limit cancellation timer 2126, which indicates that the simulation platform 22 does not successfully cancel the current speed limit, the cancellation signal corresponding to the current speed limit is sent to the simulation platform 22 again. Until the second time, if the successful receipt of the simulation platform 22 has not been received yet, it is indicated that the current speed limit is cancelled, and in order to not affect the subsequent speed limit processing and enable the speed limit processing to be continuously executed, the cancellation signal corresponding to the next speed limit is sent to the simulation platform 22 after the second time.
It should be noted that the speed limit sending unit 2122 and the speed limit canceling unit 2125 may be the same unit or two different units. Similarly, the speed limit setting timer 2123 and the speed limit cancellation timer 2126 may be the same timer or two different timers. The speed limit setting counter 2124 and the speed limit cancellation counter 2127 may be the same counter or two different counters.
When the number of the speed limit cancellation counters 2127 reaches the maximum capacity speed limit number in the configuration file, the test state polling control module 211 controls the oven to enter a state of issuing all the speed limits, that is, updates the current state in the state machine 2112 to the state of completing cancellation of the maximum capacity speed limit.
The speed limit reading unit, the speed limit sending unit, the normal occupation state setting unit, the normal occupation state canceling unit and the speed limit canceling unit can realize the issuing and canceling of the speed limit and the triggering generation and canceling of the signal permission. And through the timers and the counters, the continuous issuing and cancellation of each speed limit and the continuous triggering generation and cancellation of each signal permission can be ensured, and the uninterrupted processing of the speed limit and the signal permission is ensured. And the state machine can poll the real-time state of the current baking machine, so that long-term cycle execution of speed limit processing and signal permission processing is realized, the tested train control center can repeatedly process speed limit and signal permission for a long time, and whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center can stably operate under long-term repeated execution can be determined according to the operation result on the maintenance platform of the tested train control center, so that the coverage range of the function of the baking machine test is enlarged.
Fig. 3 is a schematic flow chart of the operation of the dynamic oven test system of the column control center in the embodiment of the present application, and referring to fig. 3, in the process of one-time speed limit processing and signal permission processing, first, the test state polling control module in the oven subsystem needs to control the speed limit automatic setting module to issue the maximum capacity speed limit. Then, the test status polling control module needs to control the test scenario in which the automatic trigger signal permission change module sets the maximum capacity signal permission. Then, the test status polling control module needs to control the automatic trigger signal permission change module to cancel all signal permissions. And finally, the test state polling control module needs to control the automatic speed limit setting module to cancel all speed limits. Thus, the process of one speed limit processing and signal permission processing is completed. Then, the test state polling control module needs to control the speed limit automatic setting module again to issue the maximum capacity speed limit so as to perform the processes of the next round of speed limit processing and signal permission processing.
Based on the same inventive concept, as an implementation of the system, the embodiment of the application further provides a test method for the dynamic baking machine of the train control center. Fig. 4 is a schematic flow chart of a test method of a train control center dynamic oven in the embodiment of the present application, and referring to fig. 4, the method is applied to a test system of a train control center dynamic oven. The dynamic baking machine test system of the train control center comprises a baking machine subsystem, a simulation platform and a tested train control center. The toaster subsystem comprises: the device comprises a test state polling control module, a speed limit automatic setting module and an automatic trigger signal permission change module. The method can comprise the following steps:
s401: the test state polling control module circularly controls the speed limit automatic setting module to issue the maximum capacity speed limit and cancel all the speed limits, and the automatic trigger signal permission change module issues a test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate the maximum capacity signal permission and cancel all the signal permissions;
s402: the automatic speed limit setting module sequentially issues the maximum capacity speed limit and all speed limits cancellation to the simulation platform, and the automatic trigger signal permission change module is used for sequentially issuing a test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate the maximum capacity signal permission and all the signal permissions cancellation to the simulation platform;
s403: the simulation platform generates simulation signals respectively based on the maximum capacity speed limit, the cancellation of all speed limits, the maximum capacity signal permission and the cancellation of all signal permission, and sends the simulation signals to the tested train control center;
s404: and the tested train control center operates based on the simulation signal and displays an operation result on a maintenance platform of the tested train control center, so that whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center can stably operate under long-period repeated execution is determined according to whether the operation result is consistent with the corresponding maximum capacity speed limit, all speed limits cancellation, maximum capacity signal permission and all signals cancellation.
In other embodiments of the present application, the automatic speed limit setting module includes: the device comprises a speed limit reading unit, a speed limit sending unit and a speed limit setting timer;
the speed limit reading unit reads a configuration file, and the configuration file is filled with the maximum number of speed limits which can exist in the tested train control center at the same time and corresponding speed limits;
the speed limit sending unit is used for sending the current speed limit read by the speed limit reading unit from the configuration file to the simulation platform, controlling the speed limit setting timer to start timing, and continuing to send the next speed limit to the simulation platform if a successful receipt of the simulation platform is received within the first time; and if the successful receipt of the simulation platform is not received after the first time, sending the next speed limit to the simulation platform after the first time.
In other embodiments of the present application, the automatic speed limit setting module further includes: a speed limit setting counter;
if the speed limit sending unit receives a successful receipt of the simulation platform, the speed limit setting counter is controlled to be increased by 1; and if the successful receipt of the simulation platform is not received within the first time, sending the current speed limit to the simulation platform again.
In other embodiments of the present application, the auto-trigger signal permission change module includes: the system comprises a normal occupation state setting unit, a first direction port execution counter and a first section execution counter;
the normal occupation state setting unit simulates the process of departure from the station and sequentially sets each section in each direction port of the station to be in a normal occupation state;
the first sector execution counter sets the number of the sectors of one direction port to be added by 1 after the normal occupation state setting unit sets one sector of one direction port to be in the normal occupation state;
and the first direction port execution counter adds 1 to the set number of the direction ports after the normal occupation state setting unit sets all the sections of one direction port to be in the normal occupation state in sequence.
In other embodiments of the present application, the automatic trigger signal permission change module further comprises: an idle state setting unit, a second direction port execution counter and a second section execution counter;
the idle state setting unit simulates the process of receiving vehicles by an adjacent station and sets each section in each direction port of the station to be in an idle state in sequence;
the second sector execution counter sets a sector of one direction port to be in an idle state after the idle state setting unit sets the sector of the one direction port to be in an idle state, and then the number of the sectors of the one direction port is increased by 1;
and the second direction port execution counter adds 1 to the set number of the direction ports after the idle state setting unit sets all the sections of one direction port to be in the idle state in sequence.
In other embodiments of the present application, the automatic speed limit setting module includes: the speed limit reading unit, the speed limit canceling unit and the speed limit canceling timer are arranged on the vehicle body;
the speed limit reading unit reads a configuration file, and the configuration file is filled with the maximum number of speed limits which can exist in the tested train control center at the same time and corresponding speed limits;
the speed limit canceling unit sends a canceling signal corresponding to the current speed limit read by the speed limit reading unit from the configuration file to the simulation platform, controls the speed limit canceling timer to start timing, and continues to send a canceling signal corresponding to the next speed limit to the simulation platform if a successful receipt of the simulation platform is received within a second time; and if the successful receipt of the simulation platform is not received after the second time, sending a cancellation signal corresponding to the next speed limit to the simulation platform after the second time.
In other embodiments of the present application, the automatic speed limit setting module further includes: a speed limit cancellation counter;
the speed limit canceling unit sends a canceling signal corresponding to the current speed limit to the simulation platform, and controls the speed limit canceling counter to be increased by 1 if a successful receipt of the simulation platform is received; and if the successful receipt of the simulation platform is not received within the second time, sending the cancellation signal corresponding to the current speed limit to the simulation platform again.
In other embodiments of the present application, the test status polling control module comprises: a timer and a state machine;
the state machine is used for acquiring the setting states of the speed limit automatic setting module and the automatic trigger signal permission change module, and controlling the speed limit automatic setting module and the automatic trigger signal permission change module to execute the maximum capacity speed limit issuing again, trigger the maximum capacity signal permission generation, trigger the cancellation of all the signal permissions and cancel all the speed limits after the setting state indicates that the maximum capacity speed limit issuing, the maximum capacity signal permission setting, the cancellation of all the signal permissions and the cancellation of all the speed limits are executed for one time and the timer reaches a third time.
It is noted here that the above description of the method embodiment, similar to the above description of the system embodiment, has similar advantageous effects as the system embodiment. For technical details not disclosed in the method embodiments of the present application, reference is made to the description of the embodiments of the system of the present application for understanding.
The above description is only for the specific embodiments of the present application, but the scope of the present application is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of the changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present application, and shall be covered by the scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.
Claims (8)
1. A train control center dynamic baking machine test system is characterized by comprising a baking machine subsystem, a simulation platform and a tested train control center; the system comprises a baking machine subsystem, a simulation platform, a tested train control center and a power supply subsystem, wherein the baking machine subsystem is connected with the simulation platform, and the simulation platform is connected with the tested train control center;
the toaster subsystem comprises: the device comprises a test state polling control module, a speed limit automatic setting module and an automatic trigger signal permission change module; the test state polling control module is respectively connected with the speed limit automatic setting module and the automatic trigger signal permission change module;
the test state polling control module is used for circularly controlling the speed limit automatic setting module to issue a maximum capacity speed limit and cancel all speed limits, and the automatic trigger signal permission change module issues a test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate a maximum capacity signal permission and cancel all signal permissions;
the automatic speed limit setting module is used for sequentially issuing the maximum capacity speed limit and all speed limits to the simulation platform, and the automatic trigger signal permission changing module is used for sequentially issuing a test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate the maximum capacity signal permission and all signal permissions to the simulation platform;
the simulation platform is used for generating simulation signals respectively based on the maximum capacity speed limit, the cancellation of all speed limits, the maximum capacity signal permission and the cancellation of all signal permission, and sending the simulation signals to the tested train control center;
the tested train control center is used for operating based on the simulation signal and displaying an operating result on a maintenance platform of the tested train control center, so that whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center can stably operate under the repeated execution of a long period is determined according to whether the operating result is consistent with the corresponding maximum capacity speed limit, all speed limits cancellation, maximum capacity signal permission and all signals cancellation;
wherein, the automatic setting module of speed limit includes: the device comprises a speed limit reading unit, a speed limit sending unit and a speed limit setting timer; the speed limit reading unit is connected with the speed limit sending unit, and the speed limit setting timer is respectively connected with the speed limit sending unit and the simulation platform;
the speed limit reading unit is used for reading a configuration file, and the configuration file is filled with the maximum number of speed limits which can exist in the tested train control center at the same time and corresponding speed limits;
the speed limit setting timer is used for timing;
the speed limit sending unit is used for sending the current speed limit read by the speed limit reading unit from the configuration file to the simulation platform, controlling the speed limit setting timer to start timing, and continuing to send the next speed limit to the simulation platform if a successful receipt of the simulation platform is received within the first time; and if the successful receipt of the simulation platform is not received after the first time, sending the next speed limit to the simulation platform after the first time.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the automatic speed limit setting module further comprises: a speed limit setting counter; the speed limit setting counter is respectively connected with the speed limit sending unit and the simulation platform;
wherein, the speed limit setting counter is used for counting;
the speed limit sending unit is used for controlling the speed limit setting counter to be increased by 1 if a successful receipt of the simulation platform is received; and if the successful receipt of the simulation platform is not received within the first time, sending the current speed limit to the simulation platform again.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the auto-trigger signal permission change module comprises: the system comprises a normal occupation state setting unit, a first direction port execution counter and a first section execution counter; the normal occupation state setting unit is respectively connected with the first direction port execution counter and the first section execution counter;
the normal occupation state setting unit is used for simulating the process of departure from the station and sequentially setting all sections in each direction port of the station to be in a normal occupation state;
the first sector execution counter is used for setting the number of the sectors of one direction port to be added by 1 after the normal occupation state setting unit sets one sector of one direction port to be in the normal occupation state;
the first direction port execution counter is used for setting the number of the direction ports to be increased by 1 after the normal occupation state setting unit sets all the sections of one direction port to be in the normal occupation state in sequence.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the auto-trigger signal permission change module further comprises: an idle state setting unit, a second direction port execution counter and a second section execution counter; the idle state setting unit is respectively connected with the second direction port execution counter and the second section execution counter;
the idle state setting unit is used for simulating the process of receiving vehicles by an adjacent station and sequentially setting each section in each direction port of the station to be in an idle state;
the second sector execution counter is used for setting the number of the sectors of one direction port to be added by 1 after the idle state setting unit sets one sector of one direction port to be in an idle state;
and the second direction port execution counter is used for adding 1 to the set number of the direction ports after the idle state setting unit sets all the sections of one direction port to be in the idle state in sequence.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the automatic speed limit setting module comprises: the speed limit reading unit, the speed limit canceling unit and the speed limit canceling timer are arranged on the vehicle body; the speed-limit reading unit is connected with the speed-limit canceling unit, and the speed-limit canceling timer is respectively connected with the speed-limit canceling unit and the simulation platform;
the speed limit reading unit is used for reading a configuration file, and the configuration file is filled with the maximum number of speed limits which can exist in the tested train control center at the same time and corresponding speed limits;
the speed limit cancellation timer is used for timing;
the speed limit canceling unit is used for sending a canceling signal corresponding to the current speed limit read by the speed limit reading unit from the configuration file to the simulation platform, controlling the speed limit canceling timer to start timing, and continuing to send a canceling signal corresponding to the next speed limit to the simulation platform if a successful receipt of the simulation platform is received within a second time; and if the successful receipt of the simulation platform is not received after the second time, sending a cancellation signal corresponding to the next speed limit to the simulation platform after the second time.
6. The system of claim 5, wherein the automatic speed limit setting module further comprises: a speed limit cancellation counter; the speed limit cancellation counter is respectively connected with the speed limit cancellation unit and the simulation platform;
wherein, the speed limit cancellation counter is used for counting;
the speed limit canceling unit is used for sending a canceling signal corresponding to the current speed limit to the simulation platform, and controlling the speed limit canceling counter to be increased by 1 if a successful receipt of the simulation platform is received; and if the successful receipt of the simulation platform is not received within the second time, sending the cancellation signal corresponding to the current speed limit to the simulation platform again.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the test status polling control module comprises: a timer and a state machine; wherein the timer is connected with the state machine;
wherein, the timer is used for timing;
the state machine is used for acquiring the setting states of the speed limit automatic setting module and the automatic trigger signal permission change module, and controlling the speed limit automatic setting module and the automatic trigger signal permission change module to execute the maximum capacity speed issuing, the maximum capacity speed limit setting, the maximum capacity signal permission canceling and all the speed limiting again after the timer reaches a third time after the setting state indicates that the maximum capacity speed limit issuing, the maximum capacity signal permission setting, the maximum capacity signal permission canceling and all the speed limiting are executed for one time.
8. A method for testing a dynamic baking machine of a train control center is characterized in that the method is applied to a test system of the dynamic baking machine of the train control center; the train control center dynamic baking machine test system comprises a baking machine subsystem, a simulation platform and a tested train control center; the toaster subsystem comprises: the device comprises a test state polling control module, a speed limit automatic setting module and an automatic trigger signal permission change module;
the test state polling control module controls the speed limit automatic setting module to issue the maximum capacity speed limit and cancel all the speed limits in a circulating way, and the automatic trigger signal permission change module issues a test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate the maximum capacity signal permission and cancel all the signal permissions;
the automatic speed limit setting module sequentially issues the maximum capacity speed limit and all speed limits cancellation to the simulation platform, and the automatic trigger signal permission change module is used for sequentially issuing a test scene which can trigger the tested train control center to generate the maximum capacity signal permission and all the signal permissions cancellation to the simulation platform;
the simulation platform generates simulation signals respectively based on the maximum capacity speed limit, the cancellation of all speed limits, the maximum capacity signal permission and the cancellation of all signal permission, and sends the simulation signals to the tested train control center;
the tested train control center operates based on the simulation signal and displays an operation result on a maintenance platform of the tested train control center, so that whether the speed limit processing function and the signal permission processing function of the tested train control center can stably operate under the repeated execution of a long period is determined according to whether the operation result is consistent with the corresponding maximum capacity speed limit, all speed limits cancellation, maximum capacity signal permission and all signals cancellation;
wherein, the automatic setting module of speed limit includes: the device comprises a speed limit reading unit, a speed limit sending unit and a speed limit setting timer;
the speed limit reading unit reads a configuration file, and the configuration file is filled with the maximum number of speed limits which can exist in the tested train control center at the same time and corresponding speed limits;
the speed limit sending unit is used for sending the current speed limit read by the speed limit reading unit from the configuration file to the simulation platform, controlling the speed limit setting timer to start timing, and continuing to send the next speed limit to the simulation platform if a successful receipt of the simulation platform is received within the first time; and if the successful receipt of the simulation platform is not received after the first time, sending the next speed limit to the simulation platform after the first time.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111083398.6A CN113536608B (en) | 2021-09-16 | 2021-09-16 | Train control center dynamic baking machine test system and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111083398.6A CN113536608B (en) | 2021-09-16 | 2021-09-16 | Train control center dynamic baking machine test system and method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN113536608A CN113536608A (en) | 2021-10-22 |
| CN113536608B true CN113536608B (en) | 2021-12-24 |
Family
ID=78123177
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202111083398.6A Active CN113536608B (en) | 2021-09-16 | 2021-09-16 | Train control center dynamic baking machine test system and method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN113536608B (en) |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102069825A (en) * | 2010-12-08 | 2011-05-25 | 北京交通大学 | Method for improving safety of CTCS-3 (Chinese train control system-3) train control system |
| CN103257650A (en) * | 2013-04-17 | 2013-08-21 | 北京全路通信信号研究设计院有限公司 | Check system used for function test of train control system |
| CN107450353A (en) * | 2017-09-22 | 2017-12-08 | 北京中科智汇科技有限公司 | Row control ground installation emulation test system and method |
| CN109298648A (en) * | 2018-11-28 | 2019-02-01 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | A kind of train control center emulation Auto-Test System |
| EP3712032A1 (en) * | 2017-11-13 | 2020-09-23 | CRSC Research & Design Institute Group Co., Ltd. | Method for reproducing scenario, simulation device and system, and computer readable storage medium |
-
2021
- 2021-09-16 CN CN202111083398.6A patent/CN113536608B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102069825A (en) * | 2010-12-08 | 2011-05-25 | 北京交通大学 | Method for improving safety of CTCS-3 (Chinese train control system-3) train control system |
| CN103257650A (en) * | 2013-04-17 | 2013-08-21 | 北京全路通信信号研究设计院有限公司 | Check system used for function test of train control system |
| CN107450353A (en) * | 2017-09-22 | 2017-12-08 | 北京中科智汇科技有限公司 | Row control ground installation emulation test system and method |
| EP3712032A1 (en) * | 2017-11-13 | 2020-09-23 | CRSC Research & Design Institute Group Co., Ltd. | Method for reproducing scenario, simulation device and system, and computer readable storage medium |
| CN109298648A (en) * | 2018-11-28 | 2019-02-01 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | A kind of train control center emulation Auto-Test System |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 列控中心仿真测试***接口软件的设计与实现;徐锦豪;《中国优秀博硕士学位论文全文数据库(硕士)工程科技Ⅱ辑》;20200315;全文 * |
| 高速铁路调度集中一体化仿真测试平台的设计与实现;赵随海 等;《铁道运输与经济》;20180810;全文 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN113536608A (en) | 2021-10-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN102645930B (en) | Hardware in-loop simulation test system for traffic signal control system | |
| Bullock et al. | A real-time simulation environment for evaluating traffic signal systems | |
| CN112099478A (en) | Automatic test method and device for temporary speed limit message of train control center | |
| CN109923483B (en) | Simulation device and simulation method | |
| RU2331096C1 (en) | Method to simulate control over hardware and simulation system | |
| CN102991535A (en) | Automatic test method for unlocking logic of entering section in interlocking system | |
| CN113536608B (en) | Train control center dynamic baking machine test system and method | |
| CN103885647B (en) | Self-adapting restoring method for touch screen device and touch screen device | |
| EP1106504A2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for generating maintenance messages | |
| RU2487386C2 (en) | Method of simulating processes for centralised control of equipment and system for realising said method (versions) | |
| CN105389200A (en) | Multi-group stimulation batch simulation method and system applied to super-large scale chip verification | |
| CN112865996B (en) | Equipment testing method and system based on simulation card and simulation card | |
| WO1998012687A1 (en) | A device for real time stimulation | |
| CN105992234B (en) | Method and system for simulating boundary-free network channel environment | |
| CN203276260U (en) | Detector of artillery control system computer | |
| CN114281626A (en) | Train control center communication interface validity detection method and system | |
| KR101850394B1 (en) | Scenario based RF threat generation method and equipment | |
| RU198966U1 (en) | A device for evaluating the probabilistic and temporal characteristics of signal formation in information management systems | |
| CN103997430B (en) | Laboratory verification test method for directional communication networking capability | |
| CN113771919B (en) | Urban rail project interlocking dual-computer test method based on interlocking simulation system | |
| SU1121696A1 (en) | Training system for radiotelegraph operator | |
| CA1260572A (en) | Diagnostic method for addressing arrangement verification | |
| SU868762A1 (en) | Stand for monitoring and control of processor | |
| CN109949645B (en) | Nuclear power station DCS instrument control communication fault diagnosis method | |
| CN115453457A (en) | Long-baseline base station networking method and system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |