CN113344527A

CN113344527A - Method and platform for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information

Info

Publication number: CN113344527A
Application number: CN202110626231.3A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 李文志; 毕晨
Original assignee: Xilin Gol League Intermediate People's Court Of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region
Current assignee: Xilin Gol League Intermediate People's Court Of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region
Priority date: 2021-06-04
Filing date: 2021-06-04
Publication date: 2021-09-03
Anticipated expiration: 2041-06-04
Also published as: CN113344527B

Abstract

The application provides a method and a device for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information. The method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information comprises the following steps: acquiring a to-be-approved judicial suggestion, wherein the to-be-approved judicial suggestion comprises to-be-approved judicial suggestion information; program classification is carried out on the judicial advice to be examined and approved according to the judicial advice information to be examined and approved, and the program classification at least comprises general judicial advice and special judicial advice; acquiring corresponding approval processes according to the program classification, wherein the approval processes comprise a general approval process and a special approval process, the general approval process corresponds to the general judicial suggestions, and the special approval process corresponds to the special judicial suggestions; and according to the approval process, approving the judicial advice to be approved. The method for integrally managing and storing the judicial advice information standardizes the approval process of the judicial advice to be approved, so that the judicial advice enters standardized management and informatization management.

Description

Method and platform for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information

Technical Field

The application belongs to the technical field of judicial advice, and particularly relates to a method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information and a platform for integrally managing and storing the judicial advice information.

Background

The judicial suggestion is an important responsibility given to the people's court by law, is an important component of the work of the people's court, and is an important way to fully play the role of the judging function. In recent years, each grade of people's court' serves a large bureau and serves people's judicial law', the judging function is continuously extended, and according to the problems of work omission, system loss, hidden danger risks and the like commonly existing in relevant units in the judging execution work, judicial suggestions are timely provided, so that scientific decision, perfect management, hidden danger elimination, work improvement and normative behaviors of the relevant units are promoted, and the scientific management level is continuously improved.

The judicial suggestions sent by the research and analysis court are significant for promoting the modernization of social governance and the development of economic society at present and maintaining the social harmony and stability. However, the current judicial suggestions also have the problems of nonstandard programs, low document quality and the like in the aspect of management.

The prior art has the following disadvantages:

1. lack of a uniform judicial advice storage platform; at the present stage, from national courts, a set of unified judicial advice information system is not established at present, and a specific and feasible judicial advice information management and storage platform cannot be formed;

2. a unified judicial advice informatization statistical system is lacked; from the national court, no special statistics on judicial recommendations have been required.

3. The judicial suggestion management program is simple and does not realize flow informatization; although the judicial advice does not belong to the official document, the official document made by the judicial advice also has certain program requirements, at present, the judicial advice sent by the court is mainly issued by paper, and the issuing program is not uniform and standard.

Accordingly, a technical solution is desired to overcome or at least alleviate at least one of the above-mentioned drawbacks of the prior art.

Disclosure of Invention

The present application is directed to a method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information, so as to solve at least one of the above problems.

In a first aspect of the present application, a method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information is provided, where the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information includes:

acquiring a to-be-approved judicial suggestion, wherein the to-be-approved judicial suggestion comprises to-be-approved judicial suggestion information, and the to-be-approved judicial suggestion information at least comprises the following information:

judicial advice questions, numbering information, main sending unit information, copying unit information, drafting date, signing and issuing date, sending date, judicial advice documents, individual case judicial proposal according to case information, case by information, drafter information and signer information;

program classification is carried out on the judicial advice to be examined and approved according to the judicial advice information to be examined and approved, and the program classification at least comprises general judicial advice and special judicial advice;

acquiring corresponding approval processes according to the program classification, wherein the approval processes comprise a general approval process and a special approval process, the general approval process corresponds to the general judicial suggestions, and the special approval process corresponds to the special judicial suggestions;

and according to the approval process, approving the judicial advice to be approved.

Optionally, the court judicial advice information approval method further includes:

acquiring a storage classification table;

performing storage classification according to the to-be-approved judicial advice information and the storage classification table so as to obtain the storage type of the to-be-approved judicial advice;

acquiring a storage database, wherein the storage database comprises a plurality of storage sub-libraries, and each storage sub-library corresponds to one storage type;

and storing the judicial suggestions to be approved into corresponding storage sub-libraries according to the storage types of the judicial suggestions to be approved.

Optionally, before the obtaining of the judicial advice information to be approved, the method for integrally managing and storing the judicial advice information further includes:

and generating the judicial suggestion to be examined and approved.

Optionally, the generating the pending judicial advice comprises:

acquiring a judicial suggestion document style database, wherein the judicial suggestion document style database comprises a plurality of document styles;

obtaining a corpus database of a document, wherein the corpus database of the document comprises a plurality of corpus features, one document style is associated with at least one corpus feature, and one corpus feature is associated with only one document style;

acquiring judicial advice questions, number information, main sending unit information, copying unit information, drafting date, issuing date, delivery date, case-based information, drafter information and issuer information required by the to-be-examined judicial advice;

identifying the judicial suggested questions so as to obtain basic corpora of the judicial suggested questions;

respectively carrying out similarity calculation on the basic corpora of the judicial suggestion questions and the corpus features in each text corpus database so as to obtain similarity values;

judging whether one similarity value in the similarity values is larger than a first similarity threshold value, if so, acquiring a document style associated with the corpus feature corresponding to the similarity value;

acquiring judicial suggestion specific content;

and generating a judicial suggestion document according to the judicial suggestion specific content and the document style.

Optionally, the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information further includes:

and associating at least one link information for each of the judicial suggestions to be approved, wherein the judicial suggestions to be approved can be obtained through the link information.

acquiring judicial suggestion feedback information, wherein the judicial suggestion feedback information comprises a judicial suggestion feedback question and feedback information;

comparing the similarity of the judicial suggestion feedback questions with the judicial suggestion questions in the to-be-examined judicial suggestion information in each storage sub-library to obtain feedback similarity values;

and judging whether one feedback similarity value in the feedback similarity values is larger than a second similarity threshold value, if so, associating the judicial suggestion feedback information corresponding to the feedback similarity value with the to-be-approved judicial suggestion information.

Optionally, the judicial advice information to be approved further includes issuing department information, advice object information, and judicial advice type information;

the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information further comprises the following steps:

acquiring a statistical database, wherein the statistical database comprises a plurality of sending department statistical data tables, each sending department statistical data table comprises sending department information, and the sending department information in each sending department statistical data table is different from the sending department information in other sending department statistical data tables;

traversing each to-be-examined judicial suggestion in the storage database, and acquiring to-be-examined judicial suggestion information of each to-be-examined judicial suggestion;

acquiring sending department information in each to-be-examined and approved judicial suggestion information;

and performing the following operations for each piece of judicial advice information to be examined and approved:

judging whether the sending department information of the judicial advice information to be examined and approved is the same as the sending department information of one sending department statistical data table in each sending department statistical data table, if so, judging that the sending department information of the judicial advice information to be examined and approved is the same as the sending department information of one sending department statistical data table in each sending department statistical data table

And filling at least one piece of information in other information in the judicial advice information to be approved into a sending department statistical data table which is the same as the information of the sending department.

Optionally, the statistical database further includes a plurality of suggested object statistical data tables, the suggested object statistical data tables include suggested object information, and the suggested object information in each suggested object statistical data table is different from the suggested object information in other suggested object statistical data tables;

acquiring the information of the recommended objects in the to-be-approved judicial recommended information;

judging whether the proposed object information of the judicial proposed information to be examined and approved is the same as the proposed object information of one proposed object statistical data table in each proposed object statistical data table, if so, judging that the proposed object information of the judicial proposed information to be examined and approved is the same as the proposed object information of one proposed object statistical data table in each proposed object statistical data table

And filling at least one piece of information in other information in the judicial advice information to be approved into an advice object statistical data table which is the same as the advice object information.

Optionally, the statistical database further includes a plurality of judicial suggestion type statistical data tables, each of the judicial suggestion type statistical data tables includes judicial suggestion type information, and the judicial suggestion type information in each of the judicial suggestion type statistical data tables is different from the judicial suggestion type information in other judicial suggestion type statistical data tables;

acquiring judicial suggestion type information in each to-be-approved judicial suggestion information;

judging whether the judicial advice type information of the judicial advice information to be examined and approved is the same as the judicial advice type information of one of the judicial advice type statistical data tables, if so, judging whether the judicial advice type information of the judicial advice type statistical data tables to be examined and approved is the same as the judicial advice type information of one of the judicial advice type statistical data tables to be examined and approved, if so, judging whether

And filling at least one piece of other information in the to-be-approved judicial suggestion information into a judicial suggestion type statistical data table which is the same as the judicial suggestion type information.

acquiring each judicial suggestion to be examined and approved in a storage database;

acquiring case routing information in the judicial advice information to be examined and approved;

identifying case language material in each case language information;

generating a case routing information relation graph according to the case routing information;

respectively carrying out similarity calculation on the case linguistic data in each case information and the case linguistic data in other case information so as to obtain case similarity values;

acquiring a pattern similarity value exceeding a pattern similarity threshold;

associating case information corresponding to the case similarity value exceeding the case similarity threshold value in the case information relationship graph so as to obtain the associated case information relationship graph;

clustering pattern routing information in the pattern routing information relation graph, clustering the pattern routing information with association relation to form a pattern routing cluster group, wherein one piece of pattern routing information in each pattern routing cluster group at least has association relation with at least one piece of pattern routing information in other pattern routing information in the pattern routing cluster group;

acquiring a judicial suggested keyword database, wherein the judicial suggested keyword database comprises a plurality of judicial suggested keywords;

for each case, the cluster group performs the following operations:

extracting judicial suggestion documents in the to-be-examined and approved judicial suggestion information corresponding to each case routing information in the case routing cluster;

judging whether each judicial suggestion document has the judicial suggestion keyword, if so, judging whether each judicial suggestion document has the judicial suggestion keyword

And extracting sentences containing the judicial suggestion keywords in each judicial suggestion document.

acquiring the information of the recommended objects in each to-be-approved judicial recommendation;

identifying a suggested object corpus in each piece of suggested object information;

generating a suggested object information relation graph according to the suggested object information;

similarity calculation is carried out on the corpus of the suggestion object in each piece of suggestion object information and the corpus of the suggestion object in other pieces of suggestion object information respectively, so that a similarity value of the suggestion object is obtained;

acquiring a suggested object similarity value exceeding a suggested object similarity threshold;

associating the suggested object information corresponding to each suggested object similarity value exceeding the suggested object similarity threshold value in the suggested object information relation graph so as to obtain the associated suggested object information relation graph;

clustering the recommendation object information in the recommendation object information relationship graph, clustering all recommendation object information with association relationship together to form recommendation object cluster groups, wherein one recommendation object information in each recommendation object cluster group at least has association relationship with at least one recommendation object information in other recommendation object information in the recommendation object cluster group;

the following is performed for each recommendation object cluster:

extracting judicial suggestion documents in the to-be-examined and approved judicial suggestion information corresponding to each piece of information of the suggestion objects in the suggestion object cluster group;

obtaining a question type database, wherein the question type database comprises at least one question feature;

acquiring each approval judicial suggestion to be examined in a storage database;

acquiring judicial suggestion documents in each piece of judicial suggestion information to be examined;

for each judicial proposal document the following steps are carried out:

judging whether the judicial advice documents have the problem characteristics, if so, judging whether the judicial advice documents have the problem characteristics

And generating the problem label of the judicial advice document for the judicial advice document with the problem feature as the problem label.

the judging whether each judicial advice document has the problem feature or not is carried out, and if the judicial advice document has a plurality of the problem features, the judging is carried out

And acquiring the occurrence frequency of each problem feature appearing in the judicial advice document, and taking the problem feature with the highest occurrence frequency as a problem label of the judicial advice document.

obtaining problem labels of the to-be-examined and approved judicial suggestions;

generating a pending approval judicial advice relational graph according to each piece of pending approval judicial advice information, wherein the pending approval judicial advice information is used as one unit in the relational graph, and each unit comprises the problem label;

comparing the problem label of each unit with the problem labels of other units respectively so as to judge whether the problem labels are the same;

associating the units with the same problem label in the to-be-approved judicial suggestion relational graph;

clustering the units in the problem label relation graph according to the problem labels so as to obtain at least one problem label clustering group, wherein the units in each problem label clustering group have the same problem label;

the following operations are performed for each problem tag cluster:

extracting judicial suggestion documents in each to-be-examined and approved judicial suggestion information in the problem label clustering group;

acquiring a judicial suggestion animation database, wherein the judicial suggestion animation database comprises multi-frame judicial suggestion animations;

obtaining an animation keyword database, wherein the animation keyword database comprises a plurality of animation keywords, and each animation keyword is associated with at least one frame of animation;

acquiring judicial suggestion documents in each to-be-examined judicial suggestion in a storage database;

performing the following for each acquired judicial advice document:

clauses are carried out on the judicial suggestion documents, so that clauses of the judicial suggestion documents are obtained;

judging whether each judicial suggestion document clause comprises at least one animation keyword, if so, judging whether each judicial suggestion document clause comprises at least one animation keyword, and if only one animation keyword is included, judging whether each judicial suggestion document clause comprises at least one animation keyword

Acquiring judicial suggestion animation associated with the animation keyword of the judicial suggestion text clause with the animation keyword;

acquiring animation flow logic, wherein the animation flow logic comprises a plurality of logic nodes, each logic node is provided with at least one logic keyword, and each logic node is at least associated with one of other logic nodes;

judging whether the animation keywords in each judicial suggestion document clause are the same as the logic keywords on the logic node, if so, associating the judicial suggestion document clause with the animation keywords with the logic node;

judging whether each logic node in each logic node associated with the judicial advice documents is associated with at least one logic node, if so, judging whether each logic node is associated with at least one logic node

Arranging all logic nodes by taking any one of the logic nodes as a starting point so as to form a logic main line, wherein each logic node in the logic has an incidence relation with the adjacent logic nodes;

and acquiring the judicial suggestion animation associated with the judicial suggestion document associated with each logic node in the logic mainline so as to form the judicial suggestion document animation.

The application also provides a platform for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information, which comprises:

the system comprises a to-be-approved judicial advice information acquisition module, a to-be-approved judicial advice information acquisition module and a to-be-approved judicial advice information acquisition module, wherein the to-be-approved judicial advice information acquisition module is used for acquiring to-be-approved judicial advice information;

the program classification module is used for carrying out program classification on the judicial advice to be examined according to the judicial advice information to be examined, and the program classification at least comprises general judicial advice and special judicial advice;

the approval process acquisition module is used for acquiring approval processes according to the program classification, and the approval processes comprise a general approval process and a special approval process;

and the approval module is used for approving the judicial advice information to be approved according to the approval process.

The application has at least the following beneficial technical effects:

the method for integrally managing and storing the judicial advice information standardizes the approval process of the judicial advice to be approved, so that the judicial advice enters standardized management and informatization management.

Drawings

Fig. 1 is a schematic flowchart of a method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 2 is an electronic device for implementing the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information shown in fig. 1.

Detailed Description

In order to make the implementation objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be described in more detail below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. In the drawings, the same or similar reference numerals denote the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar functions throughout. The described embodiments are a subset of the embodiments in the present application and not all embodiments in the present application. The embodiments described below with reference to the drawings are exemplary and intended to be used for explaining the present application and should not be construed as limiting the present application. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application. Embodiments of the present application will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

It should be noted that the terms "first" and "second" in the description of the present invention are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance.

Fig. 1 is a schematic flowchart of a method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information according to an embodiment of the present application.

The method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information shown in fig. 1 comprises the following steps:

step 1: acquiring a to-be-approved judicial suggestion, wherein the to-be-approved judicial suggestion comprises to-be-approved judicial suggestion information;

step 2: carrying out program classification on the judicial advice to be approved according to the judicial advice information to be approved, wherein the program classification at least comprises general judicial advice and special judicial advice;

and step 3: acquiring corresponding approval processes according to program classification, wherein the approval processes comprise a general approval process and a special approval process, the general approval process corresponds to a general judicial suggestion, and the special approval process corresponds to the special judicial suggestion;

and 4, step 4: and examining and approving the judicial advice to be examined and approved according to the examination and approval process.

In this embodiment, the pending judicial advice information at least includes the following information:

judicial advice title, numbering information, main sending unit information, copying unit information, drafting date, signing and issuing date, sending date, judicial advice document, individual case and law recommendation basis case information, case and case information, drafter information and signer information.

For example, the proposed information for a pending judicial application may include the following information:

judicial advice questions: XXX national institute of justice recommendation (questions about the reporting of executions by units in the course of an audition);

number information: 0001;

information of a master sending unit: the district XX government;

copying unit information: XXX advanced people's court;

the drafting date is as follows: 31/3/2021;

the issue date is as follows: 31/4/2021;

delivery date: 31/5/2021;

judicial advice documents: the specifics of judicial advice (omitted here);

case information is used for individual case law proposal: x province 0112 criminal beginning No. 177 (case No.);

the case information: theft (illustration)

Drafter information: the second Wangxiang;

information of the issuer: zhang Xiao III.

In this embodiment, the program classification is divided into two modes, one is an approval process of a general judicial advice, and the other is an approval process of a judicial advice issued to a government or other departments, and the approval process is a special type of judicial advice.

In this embodiment, obtaining the corresponding approval process according to the program classification includes:

1. the general judicial proposal approval process is as follows: the method comprises the following steps of drafting by workers, leading by departments to check manuscripts, and issuing by a manager;

2. the process proposed by the special judicial is as follows: the workers draft, the departments lead and check the draft, the branch management yardmaster signs and checks and approves.

According to the method and the system, whether the judicial advice is provided to a government department or other departments can be known by identifying the information of the main sending unit in the judicial advice information to be approved, so that the programs are classified, after the acquired programs are classified, the corresponding approval process is acquired according to the classification of the programs, and finally, the judicial advice to be approved is approved according to the approval process.

In this embodiment, the court-to-judicial advice information approval method further includes:

acquiring a storage classification table;

and storing the approval suggestions to be approved into the corresponding storage sub-libraries according to the storage types of the approval suggestions to be approved.

In this embodiment, the storage classification table may be classified according to program classification, that is, the general-class judicial advice is used as one class, and the special-class judicial advice is used as one class, that is, the storage database includes two storage sub-databases, one storage sub-database is used to store the approval advice information to be approved belonging to the general-class judicial advice, and the other storage sub-database is used to store the approval advice information to be approved belonging to the special-class judicial advice.

In one embodiment, the storage classification table includes serial numbers and types, where the serial numbers correspond to the number of the storage sub-libraries, one serial number represents one storage sub-library, each serial number corresponds to one type, and the types include special-class judicial suggestions and general-class judicial suggestions.

In this embodiment, before obtaining the judicial advice information to be approved, the method for integrally managing and storing the judicial advice information further includes: and generating the approval judicial advice to be examined.

Specifically, in this embodiment, generating the pending judicial advice includes:

acquiring a corpus database, wherein the corpus database comprises a plurality of corpus features, one corpus pattern is associated with at least one corpus feature, and one corpus feature is associated with only one corpus pattern;

identifying judicial suggestion questions so as to obtain basic corpora of the judicial suggestion questions;

judging whether one similarity value in all similarity values is larger than a first similarity threshold value, if so, acquiring a document style associated with the corpus feature corresponding to the similarity value;

acquiring judicial suggestion specific content;

In actual work, the judicial proposal documents in different courts and different regions have different templates and writing habits, so that the judicial proposal documents are various and have various formats.

In this embodiment, the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information further includes: and associating at least one link information for each approval judicial suggestion to be examined, and acquiring the approval judicial suggestions to be examined through the link information.

In practical work, the information of the to-be-approved judicial advice in each to-be-approved judicial advice in the storage database of the application may be placed on the internet for the user to browse, and it is unlikely that each to-be-approved judicial advice information is directly placed on one web page no matter the user browses by using an internal local area network or an external network, so that a link information needs to be associated with each to-be-approved judicial advice, and when the user clicks the link information, the user can directly jump to a page displaying the to-be-approved judicial advice information of the to-be-approved judicial advice or retrieve the to-be-approved judicial advice information of the to-be-approved judicial advice.

acquiring judicial suggestion feedback information, wherein the judicial suggestion feedback information comprises judicial suggestion feedback questions and feedback information;

In actual work, possibly, the unit receiving the judicial advice to be approved can feed back the judicial advice to be approved according to the self condition, at the moment, judicial advice feedback information is generated, and for convenience of management, the judicial advice feedback information is associated with the related judicial advice to be approved, so that the management of a user is facilitated.

In this embodiment, the judicial advice information to be approved further includes information of the issuing department, information of the advice object, and information of the judicial advice type;

acquiring the information of a sending department in each piece of judicial advice information to be examined;

the following operations are carried out for each piece of approval judicial advice information to be examined:

judging whether the sending department information of the judicial advice information to be examined is the same as the sending department information of one sending department statistical data table in each sending department statistical data table, if so, judging whether the sending department information of the judicial advice information to be examined is the same as the sending department information of one sending department statistical data table in each sending department statistical data table or not

And filling at least one piece of information in other information in the judicial advice information to be approved into the sending department statistical data table which is the same as the sending department information.

By adopting the mode, each to-be-examined judicial suggestion can be classified and counted by taking the issuing department as a category, other information (such as one or more of judicial suggestion title, serial number information, main sending unit information, copying unit information, drafting date, signing date, sending date, judicial suggestion documents and individual case judicial advices according to case information, sponsor information and issuer information) in the to-be-examined judicial suggestion information is put into the issuing department statistical data table, and when a user needs to count or look up each to-be-examined judicial suggestion by taking the issuing department as a category, the issuing department statistical data table can be acquired for viewing.

In this embodiment, the statistical database further includes a plurality of recommended object statistical data tables, where the recommended object statistical data tables include recommended object information, and the recommended object information in each recommended object statistical data table is different from the recommended object information in other recommended object statistical data tables;

acquiring the recommendation object information in each piece of to-be-approved judicial recommendation information;

judging whether the proposed object information of the judicial proposed information to be examined and approved is the same as the proposed object information of one proposed object statistical data table in each proposed object statistical data table, if so, judging whether the proposed object information of the judicial proposed information to be examined and approved is the same as the proposed object information of one proposed object statistical data table in each proposed object statistical data table

And filling at least one piece of information in other information in the judicial advice information to be approved into an advice object statistical data table which is the same as the advice object information of the judicial advice information.

By adopting the method, the proposed objects are taken as the categories, each to-be-examined judicial suggestion can be classified and counted, other information (such as one or more of judicial suggestion title, serial number information, main sending unit information, copying unit information, drafting date, signing date, delivery date, judicial suggestion documents, case-based information, draftsman information and signer information) in the to-be-examined judicial suggestion information is put into the proposed object statistical data table, and when a user needs to count or look up each to-be-examined judicial suggestion by taking the proposed object as the category, the proposed object statistical data table can be obtained for viewing.

In this embodiment, the statistical database further includes a plurality of judicial suggestion type statistical data tables, each judicial suggestion type statistical data table includes judicial suggestion type information, and the judicial suggestion type information in each judicial suggestion type statistical data table is different from the judicial suggestion type information in other judicial suggestion type statistical data tables;

acquiring judicial suggestion type information in each piece of judicial suggestion information to be examined;

judging whether the judicial advice type information of the judicial advice information to be examined is the same as the judicial advice type information of one of the judicial advice type statistical data tables, if so, judging whether the judicial advice type information of the judicial advice information to be examined is the same as the judicial advice type information of one of the judicial advice type statistical data tables

Filling at least one piece of other information in the to-be-approved judicial suggestion information into a judicial suggestion type statistical data table which is the same as the judicial suggestion type information.

By adopting the mode, the judicial suggestions can be used as categories, each judicial suggestion to be examined is classified and counted, other information (such as one or more of judicial suggestion title, serial number information, main sending unit information, copying unit information, drafting date, signing date, delivery date, judicial suggestion document, individual case judicial proposal according to case information, draftsman information and signer information) in the judicial suggestion information to be examined is put into a judicial suggestion statistical data table, and when a user needs to count or look up each judicial suggestion to be examined by using the judicial suggestions as categories, the judicial suggestion statistical data table can be obtained for viewing.

In this embodiment, the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information further includes:

acquiring each judicial suggestion to be examined in a storage database;

acquiring case routing information in each piece of approval judicial advice information to be examined;

identifying case-by linguistic data in each case-by information;

acquiring a pattern similarity value exceeding a pattern similarity threshold;

associating the case information corresponding to the case similarity value exceeding the case similarity threshold in the case information relationship graph so as to obtain the associated case information relationship graph;

clustering pattern routing information in the pattern routing information relation graph, clustering the pattern routing information with association relation to form a pattern routing cluster, wherein one piece of pattern routing information in each pattern routing cluster at least has association relation with at least one piece of pattern routing information in other pattern routing information in the pattern routing cluster;

for each case, the cluster group performs the following operations:

judging whether each judicial suggestion document has the judicial suggestion keywords or not, if so, judging whether each judicial suggestion document has the judicial suggestion keywords or not

And extracting sentences containing judicial suggestion keywords in each judicial suggestion document.

In addition, sentences related to the judicial suggestion keywords in the judicial suggestion documents in the judicial suggestion information to be examined can be extracted through the preset judicial suggestion keywords, so that a user can check key sentences in any judicial suggestion document according to the preset judicial suggestion keywords without reading the whole judicial suggestion document.

acquiring the information of the proposal object in each to-be-examined judicial proposal;

the following is performed for each recommendation object cluster:

In addition, sentences related to the judicial suggestion keywords in the judicial suggestion documents in the judicial suggestion information to be reviewed can be extracted through the preset judicial suggestion keywords, so that a user can check key sentences in any judicial suggestion document according to the preset judicial suggestion keywords without reading the whole judicial suggestion document.

obtaining a problem type database, wherein the problem type database comprises at least one problem characteristic;

for each judicial proposal document the following steps are carried out:

By adopting the method, a problem label can be set for each judicial suggestion document, when a user needs to search through problems, the problem label can be directly searched, and in addition, the user can know the approximate problem content of the judicial suggestion document through simply inquiring the problem label.

In this embodiment, the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information further includes: judging whether each judicial suggestion document has the problem characteristics, and if the judicial suggestion document has a plurality of problem characteristics, judging whether each judicial suggestion document has the problem characteristics

acquiring each judicial suggestion to be examined in a storage database;

obtaining problem labels of all to-be-examined judicial suggestions;

generating a pending approval judicial suggestion relationship graph according to each piece of pending approval judicial suggestion information, wherein the pending approval judicial suggestion information is used as one unit in the relationship graph, and each unit comprises a problem label;

associating the units with the same problem label in the approval judicial suggestion relational graph to be examined;

clustering units in the problem label relation graph according to the problem labels so as to obtain at least one problem label clustering group, wherein the units in each problem label clustering group have the same problem label;

the following operations are performed for each problem tag cluster:

By adopting the method, sentences containing judicial suggestion keywords in each judicial suggestion document can be automatically extracted according to the problem labels, so that automatic statistics of the user is realized.

acquiring an animation keyword database, wherein the animation keyword database comprises a plurality of animation keywords, and each animation keyword is associated with at least one frame of animation;

performing the following for each acquired judicial advice document:

judging whether each judicial suggestion document clause comprises at least one animation keyword, if so, judging whether each judicial suggestion document clause comprises at least one animation keyword, and if only one animation keyword is included, judging whether each animation keyword is included in each judicial suggestion document clause

judging whether each logic node in each logic node associated with the judicial advice documents is associated with at least one logic node, if so, judging whether each logic node in each logic node associated with the judicial advice documents is associated with at least one logic node

In this way, a judicial advice document animation can be generated for each judicial advice document, so that the user can publicize the judicial advice document animation, especially for young people.

The judicial suggested animation portion of the present application is hereinafter schematically illustrated by way of example, and it is to be understood that this example does not constitute any limitation of the present application.

Taking the judicial advice of the advanced people's court of province A on increasing the force of fighting against drug crimes, standardizing drug case detection activities and improving case handling quality as an example, the contents of the judicial proposal are as follows:

a province and public security hall:

in the case of examining criminals B and criminals C and selling drugs, the hospital finds that the police bureau D and the police bureau E have serious negligence in the investigation work of the case. In order to increase the force of fighting against drug crimes, standardize the drug case detection activities and improve the case quality, evidence problems existing in the case are reported

For example, the judicial suggestion animation database includes 10 frames of judicial suggestion animations, which are respectively referred to as a first judicial suggestion animation, a second judicial suggestion animation, a third judicial suggestion animation, a fourth judicial suggestion animation, a fifth judicial suggestion animation, a sixth judicial suggestion animation, a seventh judicial suggestion animation, an eighth judicial suggestion animation, a ninth judicial suggestion animation, and a tenth judicial suggestion animation.

An animation keyword database is obtained, the animation keyword database comprising a plurality of animation keywords, each animation keyword being associated with at least one frame of animation, for example, the animation keywords comprising a report, a drug, etc., wherein the report is associated with a first judicial suggestion animation and the drug is associated with a second judicial suggestion animation.

Acquiring judicial suggestion documents (i.e. documents in the above example) in each pending judicial suggestion stored in the database, and assuming that one judicial suggestion document is acquired, performing the following operations:

for example, after the judicial suggestion document is divided into sentences, a total of 100 sentences of the judicial suggestion document clauses are obtained, wherein the sentence includes at least the following four sentences:

1. in the scheme, four report materials are provided;

2. the hospital examines criminals B and C and sells drugs.

Judging whether each judicial suggestion text clause comprises at least one animation keyword, if so, acquiring the judicial suggestion animation associated with the animation keyword of the judicial suggestion text clause with the animation keyword;

for example, 1, a total of four pieces of reporting material in the present case have the animation keyword of reporting;

2. the hospital has an animation keyword of the drug in a case that criminals B and C sell the drug;

acquiring animation flow logic, wherein the animation flow logic comprises a plurality of logic nodes, each logic node is provided with at least one logic keyword, and each logic node is at least associated with one of other logic nodes; in this embodiment, the logical nodes include 2, which are a first logical node and a second logical node, respectively, wherein,

the first logic node has a logic keyword report;

the second logic node has a logic keyword drug.

For example, a first logical node is associated with a second logical node.

Judging whether the animation keywords in each judicial suggestion text clause are the same as the logic keywords on the logic node, if so, associating the judicial suggestion text clause with the animation keywords with the logic node, for example,

1. in the scheme, a total of four reporting materials have the animation keyword which is reported, and the report is the same as the logic keyword of the first logic node;

2. the hospital has an animation keyword of the drug in a case that criminals B and C sell the drug, and the case is the same as the logic keyword of the second logic node; then the process of the first step is carried out,

associating the judicial suggestion text clause with the animation keyword with the logic node, namely 1, associating four report materials in the scheme with the first logic node;

2. the hospital is associated with the second logic node on the basis of examining and managing a case that criminals B and C sell drugs.

Arranging all logic nodes by taking any one of the logic nodes as a starting point so as to form a logic main line, wherein each logic node in the logic has an incidence relation with the adjacent logic nodes.

For example, a logic main line is formed according to the sequence of a first logic node and a second logic node by taking the first logic node as a starting point, judicial suggestion animations associated with the judicial suggestion documents associated with each logic node in the logic main line, namely the first judicial suggestion animation and the second judicial suggestion animation, are obtained, and the first judicial suggestion animation and the second judicial suggestion animation are sequenced according to the sequence of each logic node in the logic main line, so that the judicial suggestion document animation is formed.

The application also provides a platform for integrally managing and storing the judicial advice information, which comprises an approval to-be-approved judicial advice information acquisition module, a program classification module, an approval process acquisition module and an approval module, wherein the approval to-be-approved judicial advice information acquisition module is used for acquiring the approval to-be-approved judicial advice information; the program classification module is used for performing program classification on the judicial advice to be approved according to the judicial advice information to be approved, and the program classification at least comprises general judicial advice and special judicial advice; the approval process acquisition module is used for acquiring approval processes according to program classification, and the approval processes comprise a general approval process and a special approval process; and the approval module is used for approving the judicial advice information to be approved according to the approval process.

The application also provides an electronic device, which comprises a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to realize the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information.

The present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, is capable of implementing the method of integrally managing and storing judicial advice information as described above.

Fig. 2 is an exemplary block diagram of an electronic device capable of implementing a method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information provided according to an embodiment of the present application.

As shown in fig. 2, the electronic device includes an input device 501, an input interface 502, a central processor 503, a memory 504, an output interface 505, and an output device 506. The input interface 502, the central processing unit 503, the memory 504 and the output interface 505 are connected to each other through a bus 507, and the input device 501 and the output device 506 are connected to the bus 507 through the input interface 502 and the output interface 505, respectively, and further connected to other components of the electronic device. Specifically, the input device 504 receives input information from the outside and transmits the input information to the central processor 503 through the input interface 502; the central processor 503 processes input information based on computer-executable instructions stored in the memory 504 to generate output information, temporarily or permanently stores the output information in the memory 504, and then transmits the output information to the output device 506 through the output interface 505; the output device 506 outputs the output information to the outside of the electronic device for use by the user.

That is, the electronic device shown in fig. 2 may also be implemented to include: a memory storing computer-executable instructions; and one or more processors that, when executing the computer-executable instructions, may implement the method of integrally managing storage of judicial advice information described in connection with fig. 1.

In one embodiment, the electronic device shown in fig. 2 may be implemented to include: a memory 504 configured to store executable program code; one or more processors 503 configured to execute the executable program code stored in the memory 504 to perform the method of integrally managing and storing judicial advice information in the above-described embodiments.

In a typical configuration, a computing device includes one or more processors (CPUs), input/output interfaces, network interfaces, and memory.

The memory may include forms of volatile memory in a computer readable medium, Random Access Memory (RAM) and/or non-volatile memory, such as Read Only Memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM). Memory is an example of a computer-readable medium.

Computer-readable media include both non-transitory and non-transitory, removable and non-removable media that implement information storage by any method or technology. The information may be computer readable instructions, data structures, modules of a program, or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), other types of Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disc read only memory (CD-ROM), Digital Versatile Discs (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other non-transmission medium that can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of the present application may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present application may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present application may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.

Furthermore, it will be obvious that the term "comprising" does not exclude other elements or steps. A plurality of units, modules or devices recited in the device claims may also be implemented by one unit or overall device by software or hardware. The terms first, second, etc. are used to identify names, but not any particular order.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present application. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks identified in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems which perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.

The Processor in this embodiment may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), other general purpose Processor, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), an off-the-shelf Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or other Programmable logic device, a discrete Gate or transistor logic device, a discrete hardware component, and so on. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like.

The memory may be used to store computer programs and/or modules, and the processor may implement various functions of the apparatus/terminal device by running or executing the computer programs and/or modules stored in the memory, as well as by invoking data stored in the memory. The memory may mainly include a storage program area and a storage data area, wherein the storage program area may store an operating system, an application program required by at least one function (such as a sound playing function, an image playing function, etc.), and the like; the storage data area may store data (such as audio data, a phonebook, etc.) created according to the use of the cellular phone, and the like. In addition, the memory may include high speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, a memory, a plug-in hard disk, a Smart Media Card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) Card, a Flash memory Card (Flash Card), at least one magnetic disk storage device, a Flash memory device, or other volatile solid state storage device.

In this embodiment, the module/unit integrated with the apparatus/terminal device may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium if it is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a separate product. Based on such understanding, all or part of the flow in the method according to the embodiments of the present invention may also be implemented by a computer program to instruct related hardware, where the computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the computer program may implement the steps of the embodiments of the method. Wherein the computer program comprises computer program code, which may be in the form of source code, object code, an executable file or some intermediate form, etc. The computer readable medium may include: any entity or device capable of carrying computer program code, recording medium, U.S. disk, removable hard disk, magnetic disk, optical disk, computer Memory, Read-Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), electrical carrier wave signals, telecommunications signals, software distribution media, and the like. It should be noted that the computer readable medium may contain content that is appropriately increased or decreased as required by legislation and patent practice in the jurisdiction.

Finally, it should be pointed out that: the above examples are only for illustrating the technical solutions of the present invention, and are not limited thereto. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that: the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments may still be modified, or some technical features may be equivalently replaced; and such modifications or substitutions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the corresponding technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information is characterized by comprising the following steps:

acquiring a to-be-approved judicial suggestion, wherein the to-be-approved judicial suggestion comprises to-be-approved judicial suggestion information, and the to-be-approved judicial suggestion information at least comprises the following information: judicial advice questions, numbering information, main sending unit information, copying unit information, drafting date, signing and issuing date, sending date, judicial advice documents, individual case judicial proposal according to case information, case by information, drafter information and signer information;

2. The court-compliant advice information approval method of claim 1, wherein the court-compliant advice information approval method further comprises:

acquiring a storage classification table;

3. The method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information according to claim 2, wherein before the obtaining of the judicial advice information to be approved, the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information further comprises:

and generating the judicial suggestion to be examined and approved.

4. The method of integrally managing storage judicial advice information according to claim 3, wherein said generating the pending judicial advice comprises:

acquiring judicial suggestion specific content;

5. The method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information according to claim 4, wherein the court-of-law judicial advice information approval method further comprises:

6. The method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information according to claim 5, wherein the judicial advice information to be approved further comprises issuing department information, advice object information, and judicial advice type information;

Filling at least one piece of information in other information in the judicial advice information to be approved into a sending department statistical data table which is the same as the information of the sending department;

the statistical database further comprises a plurality of suggested object statistical data tables, the suggested object statistical data tables comprise suggested object information, and the suggested object information in each suggested object statistical data table is different from the suggested object information in other suggested object statistical data tables;

Filling at least one piece of other information in the judicial advice information to be approved into an advice object statistical data table which is the same as the advice object information;

the statistical database further comprises a plurality of judicial suggestion type statistical data tables, each judicial suggestion type statistical data table comprises judicial suggestion type information, and the judicial suggestion type information in each judicial suggestion type statistical data table is different from the judicial suggestion type information in other judicial suggestion type statistical data tables;

judging whether the judicial advice type information of the judicial advice information to be examined and approved is the same as the judicial advice type information of one of the judicial advice type statistical data tables, if so, judging whether the judicial advice type information of the judicial advice type statistical data tables to be examined and approved is the same as the judicial advice type information of one of the judicial advice type statistical data tables to be examined and approved

7. The method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information according to claim 6, wherein the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information further comprises:

identifying case language material in each case language information;

acquiring a pattern similarity value exceeding a pattern similarity threshold;

for each case, the cluster group performs the following operations:

Extracting sentences containing the judicial suggestion keywords in each judicial suggestion document;

the following is performed for each recommendation object cluster:

for each judicial proposal document the following steps are carried out:

8. The method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information according to claim 7, wherein the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information further comprises:

Acquiring the occurrence frequency of each problem feature appearing in the judicial advice document, and taking the problem feature with the highest occurrence frequency as a problem label of the judicial advice document;

the following operations are performed for each problem tag cluster:

9. The method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information according to claim 8, wherein the method for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information further comprises:

performing the following for each acquired judicial advice document:

10. The platform for integrally managing and storing judicial advice information is characterized by comprising the following steps: