CN113297750B - Cable model selection method and system for offshore wind power plant - Google Patents
Cable model selection method and system for offshore wind power plant Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN113297750B CN113297750B CN202110633254.7A CN202110633254A CN113297750B CN 113297750 B CN113297750 B CN 113297750B CN 202110633254 A CN202110633254 A CN 202110633254A CN 113297750 B CN113297750 B CN 113297750B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- cable
- superconducting
- cost
- direct current
- converter station
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000010187 selection method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 17
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 36
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims description 147
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 126
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 93
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 76
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 claims description 44
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 44
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 44
- 239000003344 environmental pollutant Substances 0.000 claims description 42
- 231100000719 pollutant Toxicity 0.000 claims description 41
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 claims description 19
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen(.) Chemical compound [N] QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004513 sizing Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008092 positive effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 17
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005057 refrigeration Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000004703 cross-linked polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920003020 cross-linked polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000019800 disodium phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004378 air conditioning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007728 cost analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000802 evaporation-induced self-assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009413 insulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009423 ventilation Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/17—Mechanical parametric or variational design
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2111/00—Details relating to CAD techniques
- G06F2111/06—Multi-objective optimisation, e.g. Pareto optimisation using simulated annealing [SA], ant colony algorithms or genetic algorithms [GA]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2113/00—Details relating to the application field
- G06F2113/16—Cables, cable trees or wire harnesses
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Superconductors And Manufacturing Methods Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a cable model selection method and a cable model selection system for an offshore wind farm, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring related parameters of a superconducting direct current cable, related parameters of an HVDC cable, related parameters of an HVAC cable, related parameters of a refrigerator and element parameters; establishing a cable model selection model according to the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, the related parameters of the HVDC cable, the related parameters of the HVAC cable, the related parameters of the refrigerator and the element parameters; acquiring the length of a cable to be laid of an offshore wind farm; and inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model, and outputting a cable model selection result. The invention provides a relatively comprehensive quantification method for selecting the grid-connected mode of the offshore wind farm, and has a positive effect on the practical application of propelling the superconducting cable.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of cable model selection, in particular to a cable model selection method and system for an offshore wind farm.
Background
The superconducting direct current cable has different electrical characteristics from the common cable, and the comparison between the operation benefit and the modification and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current cable and the conventional power transmission mode judges whether the superconducting direct current cable can be applied to a wind power plant in a large scale. It is necessary to analyze the economic feasibility of the offshore wind power adopting a superconducting direct current cable access mode.
At present, a selection method of an offshore wind farm grid-connection mode has a certain research foundation, but most of the research works do not consider a grid-connection scheme of a superconducting direct current cable, cost composition analysis on access of the superconducting cable in the research work which considers the grid-connection scheme of the superconducting direct current cable in a small amount is often simpler, a cost calculation method for applying the superconducting direct current cable to the offshore wind farm grid-connection is still relatively deficient, and finally obtained boundary conditions are often single and have lower reliability.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the existing problems, the invention provides a cable type selection method and a cable type selection system for an offshore wind farm.
The invention provides a cable type selection method for an offshore wind farm in a first aspect, which comprises the following steps:
acquiring related parameters of a superconducting direct current cable, related parameters of an HVDC cable, related parameters of an HVAC cable, related parameters of a refrigerator and element parameters; establishing a cable model selection model according to the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, the related parameters of the HVDC cable, the related parameters of the HVAC cable, the related parameters of the refrigerator and the element parameters;
acquiring the length of a cable needing to be laid of an offshore wind farm; inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model, and outputting a cable model selection result;
wherein the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable comprise: the method comprises the following steps of (1) construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, loss of the superconducting direct current converter station, pollutant discharge amount of a superconducting direct current grid-connected system, rated current of a superconducting direct current cable, purchase price of the superconducting direct current cable and laying cost of the superconducting direct current cable in unit length;
the HVDC cable related parameters comprise: the method comprises the following steps of high-voltage direct current converter station construction cost, high-voltage direct current converter station operation and maintenance cost, HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emission, HVDC cable purchase price, unit length HVDC cable laying cost, unit length HVDC cable loss and high-voltage direct current converter station loss;
the HVAC cable related parameters include: the method comprises the following steps of (1) constructing cost of a high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, HVAC reactive compensation cost, HVAC cable purchase price, HVAC cable laying cost per unit length, HVAC cable loss per unit length and pollutant discharge amount of an HVAC grid-connected system;
the chiller-related parameters include: refrigerator performance parameters and refrigerator purchase price;
the element parameters include: current lead loss, joint resistance loss, excess conductor loss, cryogenic vessel loss, dewar pipe joint loss, liquid nitrogen flow loss, wind farm operating load factor, electricity price, operating time discount factor, blowdown cost factor.
Further, the cable model selection model comprises: a cable length minimum model and a cable length maximum model; wherein,
the cable length minimum model is:
A1=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substation-AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenance-AReactive compensation;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lminIs the minimum value of the cable length, A1For the first cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substationFor the construction cost of high-voltage AC substations, AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenanceFor the operation and maintenance cost of high voltage AC transformer station, AReactive compensationFor HVAC reactive compensation costs, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeFor Dewar tube losses, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the cost coefficient of pollution discharge, QHTSFor superconducting DC grid-connected system pollutant discharge, QHVACFor HVAC grid-tied system pollutant emissions, XHVACPurchase price for HVAC Cable, AHVAC installation per unit lengthCost of HVAC cabling per unit length, PHVAC Unit line lossFor unit length of HVAC cable loss, IHTSFor the rated current, X, of a superconducting DC cableHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingThe laying cost of the superconducting direct current cable is unit length;
the maximum model of the cable length is as follows:
A2=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+ASuperconducting materialOperation and maintenance of direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter station-AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct-current converter station;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lmaxAt maximum cable length, A2For the second cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter stationFor the construction costs of the HVDC converter station, AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage direct-current converter station, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeFor Dewar tube losses, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the cost coefficient of pollution discharge, QHTSFor superconducting DC grid-connected system pollutant discharge, QHVDCFor HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emissions, PHigh voltage direct current converter station lossFor losses in HVDC converter stations, XHVDCPurchase price for HVDC cables, AHVDC laying per unit lengthFor unit length HVDC cable laying cost, PHVDC Unit line lossFor unit length of HVDC cable loss, IHTSFor the rated current, X, of a superconducting DC cableHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingFor unit length superconducting DC cable coatingAnd setting cost.
Further, the inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model and outputting a cable model selection result includes:
judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the minimum value of the length of the cable;
if the length of the cable to be laid is smaller than the minimum value of the length of the cable, the output cable is an HVAC cable in a type selection result;
if the length of the cable to be laid is larger than the minimum value of the length of the cable, judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the maximum value of the length of the cable; if the length of the cable to be laid is greater than the maximum length of the cable, the output cable is an HVDC cable;
and if the length of the cable to be laid is not less than the minimum length of the cable and not more than the maximum length of the cable, the type selection result of the output cable is the superconducting direct current cable.
Further, the construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station is calculated by the following formula:
Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station=2*PHTS Total Capacity*ACost of superconducting DC converter station;
Wherein A isConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationFor the construction costs, P, of superconducting direct current converter stationsHTS Total CapacityFor total capacity of superconducting DC transmission, ACost of superconducting DC converter stationThe cost of the superconducting direct current converter station.
Further, the operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter station is calculated by the following formula:
Aoperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station=m*kOperation and maintenance*AConstruction of superconducting DC converter station;
Wherein A isOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationM is annual capital value coefficient, k is the operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter stationOperation and maintenanceFor maintenance rates of operation, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationThe construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station is reduced.
Further, the HVAC reactive compensation cost is calculated by the following formula:
Areactive compensation=ACost per unit of reactive power compensation*Q;
Wherein A isReactive power compensationFor HVAC reactive compensation costs, ACost per unit of reactive power compensationIs the HVAC reactive compensation cost per unit length, and Q is the reactive compensation capacity required by the HVAC transmission system.
Further, the construction cost of the high-voltage alternating-current substation is calculated by the following formula:
Aconstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substation=2*PHVAC Total Capacity*ACost of high voltage AC substation;
Wherein A isConstruction of high-voltage alternating-current transformer substationFor the construction cost of high-voltage AC substations, PHVAC Total CapacityFor total capacity of high-voltage AC transmission, AHigh voltage ac substation costThe cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation is reduced.
Further, the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current substation is calculated by the following formula:
Ahigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenance=m*(2*kOperation and maintenance*PHVDC Total Capacity+2*AHigh voltage AC substation communication+2*AHigh voltage ac substation operation);
Wherein A isOperation and maintenance of AC transformer substationFor the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage AC transformer station, m is the annual fund present value coefficient, kOperation and maintenanceFor maintenance of the operation, PHVDC Total CapacityFor the total capacity of HVDC transmission, AHigh voltage AC substation communicationFor the maintenance cost of the communication equipment of the high-voltage direct-current transformer substation, AHigh voltage ac substation operationThe operation cost of the high-voltage direct-current transformer substation is reduced.
The invention provides a cable type selection system of an offshore wind farm, which comprises:
the cable model selection model establishing module is used for acquiring related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, related parameters of the HVDC cable, related parameters of the HVAC cable, related parameters of the refrigerator and element parameters; establishing a cable model selection model according to the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, the related parameters of the HVDC cable, the related parameters of the HVAC cable, the related parameters of the refrigerator and the element parameters;
the cable model selection result output module is used for acquiring the length of a cable needing to be laid in the offshore wind farm; inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model, and outputting a cable model selection result;
wherein the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable comprise: the method comprises the following steps of (1) construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, loss of the superconducting direct current converter station, pollutant discharge amount of a superconducting direct current grid-connected system, rated current of a superconducting direct current cable, purchase price of the superconducting direct current cable and laying cost of the superconducting direct current cable in unit length;
the HVDC cable related parameters comprise: the method comprises the following steps of high-voltage direct current converter station construction cost, high-voltage direct current converter station operation and maintenance cost, HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emission, HVDC cable purchase price, unit length HVDC cable laying cost, unit length HVDC cable loss and high-voltage direct current converter station loss;
the HVAC cable related parameters include: the method comprises the following steps of (1) constructing cost of a high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, HVAC reactive compensation cost, HVAC cable purchase price, HVAC cable laying cost per unit length, HVAC cable loss per unit length and pollutant discharge amount of an HVAC grid-connected system;
the chiller-related parameters include: refrigerator performance parameters and refrigerator purchase price;
the element parameters include: current lead loss, joint resistance loss, excess conductor loss, cryogenic vessel loss, dewar pipe joint loss, liquid nitrogen flow loss, wind farm operating load factor, electricity price, operating time discount factor, blowdown cost factor.
Further, the cable model selection model comprises: a cable length minimum model and a cable length maximum model; wherein,
the cable length minimum model is:
A1=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substation-AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenance-AReactive compensation;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lminIs the minimum value of the cable length, A1For the first cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substationFor the construction costs of high-voltage AC substations, AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenanceFor the operation and maintenance cost of high voltage AC transformer station, AReactive compensationFor HVAC reactive compensation costs, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeFor Dewar tube losses, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the pollution discharge cost coefficient, QHTSFor superconducting DC grid-connected system pollutant discharge, QHVACFor HVAC grid-tied system pollutant emissions, XHVACPurchase price for HVAC Cable, AUnit length HVACLaying as a unit length HVAC cabling cost, PHVAC unit line lossFor unit length of HVAC cable loss, IHTSIs a superconducting DC cableRated current, XHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingThe laying cost of the unit length of the superconducting direct current cable is calculated;
the maximum model of the cable length is as follows:
A2=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter station-AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct-current converter station;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lmaxAt maximum cable length, A2For the second cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter stationFor the construction costs of the HVDC converter station, AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct-current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage direct-current converter station, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeFor Dewar tube losses, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the cost coefficient of pollution discharge, QHTSIs a superconducting wireFlow and grid system pollutant discharge amount, QHVDCFor HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emissions, PHigh voltage direct current converter station lossFor losses in the HVDC converter station, XHVDCPurchase price for HVDC cables, AHVDC laying per unit lengthFor unit length HVDC cable laying cost, PHVDC Unit line lossFor unit length of HVDC cable loss, IHTSFor the rated current, X, of a superconducting DC cableHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingThe cost is the laying cost of the unit length of the superconducting direct current cable.
Further, the cable type selection result output module includes a cable length judgment submodule configured to:
judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the minimum value of the length of the cable; if the length of the cable to be laid is smaller than the minimum value of the length of the cable, the output cable is an HVAC cable in a type selection result; if the length of the cable to be laid is larger than the minimum value of the length of the cable, judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the maximum value of the length of the cable; if the length of the cable to be laid is greater than the maximum length of the cable, the output cable is an HVDC cable; and if the length of the cable to be laid is not less than the minimum length of the cable and not more than the maximum length of the cable, the type selection result of the output cable is the superconducting direct current cable.
Compared with the prior art, the embodiment of the invention has the beneficial effects that:
the invention provides a cable model selection method and a cable model selection system for an offshore wind farm, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring related parameters of a superconducting direct current cable, related parameters of an HVDC cable, related parameters of an HVAC cable, related parameters of a refrigerator and element parameters; establishing a cable model selection model according to the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, the related parameters of the HVDC cable, the related parameters of the HVAC cable, the related parameters of the refrigerator and the element parameters; acquiring the length of a cable to be laid of an offshore wind farm; and inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model, and outputting a cable model selection result. The invention provides a relatively comprehensive quantification method for selecting the grid-connected mode of the offshore wind farm, and has a positive effect on the practical application of propelling the superconducting cable.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art that other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a cable model selection method for an offshore wind farm according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a graph comparing the life cycle cost of a superconducting DC cable and an HVAC cable provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a graph comparing life cycle costs of a superconducting DC cable and a HVDC cable provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a graph comparing life cycle costs of superconducting DC cables of different transport capacities and HVAC cables provided by one embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a diagram of an apparatus for a cable sizing system for an offshore wind farm according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a diagram of an apparatus for a cable sizing system for an offshore wind farm according to another embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 7 is a block diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It should be understood that the step numbers used herein are only for convenience of description and are not used as limitations on the order in which the steps are performed.
It is to be understood that the terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms "a", "an", and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
The terms "comprises" and "comprising" indicate the presence of the described features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The term "and/or" refers to and includes any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
A first aspect.
Referring to fig. 1, an embodiment of the present invention provides a cable model selection method for an offshore wind farm, including:
s10, acquiring related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, related parameters of the HVDC cable, related parameters of the HVAC cable, related parameters of the refrigerator and parameters of elements; and establishing a cable model selection model according to the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, the related parameters of the HVDC cable, the related parameters of the HVAC cable, the related parameters of the refrigerating machine and the element parameters.
Wherein the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable comprise: the method comprises the following steps of (1) construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, loss of the superconducting direct current converter station, pollutant discharge amount of a superconducting direct current grid-connected system, rated current of a superconducting direct current cable, purchase price of the superconducting direct current cable and laying cost of the superconducting direct current cable in unit length;
the HVDC cable related parameters comprise: the method comprises the following steps of high-voltage direct current converter station construction cost, high-voltage direct current converter station operation and maintenance cost, HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emission, HVDC cable purchase price, unit length HVDC cable laying cost, unit length HVDC cable loss and high-voltage direct current converter station loss;
the HVAC cable related parameters include: the method comprises the following steps of (1) constructing cost of a high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, HVAC reactive compensation cost, HVAC cable purchase price, HVAC cable laying cost per unit length, HVAC cable loss per unit length and pollutant discharge amount of an HVAC grid-connected system;
the chiller-related parameters include: refrigerator performance parameters and refrigerator purchase price;
the element parameters include: current lead loss, joint resistance loss, excess conductor loss, cryogenic vessel loss, dewar pipe joint loss, liquid nitrogen flow loss, wind farm operating load factor, electricity price, operating time discount factor, blowdown cost factor.
In a specific embodiment, the cable model selection model includes: a cable length minimum model and a cable length maximum model; wherein,
the cable length minimum model is:
A1=Aconstruction of superconducting direct current converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substation-AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenance-AReactive compensation;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lminIs the minimum value of the cable length, A1For the first cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substationIs highConstruction cost of AC-voltage substation, AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenanceFor the operation and maintenance cost of high voltage AC transformer station, AReactive compensationFor HVAC reactive compensation costs, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeFor Dewar tube losses, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the cost coefficient of pollution discharge, QHTSFor superconducting DC grid-connected system pollutant discharge, QHVACFor HVAC grid-tied system pollutant emissions, XHVACPurchase price for HVAC Cable, AHVAC installation per unit lengthFor unit length of HVAC cabling cost, PHVAC unit line lossFor unit length of HVAC cable loss, IHTSFor the rated current, X, of a superconducting DC cableHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingThe laying cost of the unit length of the superconducting direct current cable is calculated;
the maximum model of the cable length is as follows:
A2=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter station-AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct-current converter station;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipeJoint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lmaxAt maximum cable length, A2For the second cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter stationFor the construction costs of the HVDC converter station, AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct-current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage direct-current converter station, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeFor Dewar tube losses, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the cost coefficient of pollution discharge, QHTSFor superconducting DC grid-connected system pollutant discharge, QHVDCFor HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emissions, PHigh voltage direct current converter station lossFor losses in HVDC converter stations, XHVDCPurchase price for HVDC cables, AHVDC laying per unit lengthFor unit length HVDC cable laying cost, PHVDC Unit line lossFor unit length of HVDC cable loss, IHTSFor the rated current, X, of a superconducting DC cableHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingThe cost is the unit length of the superconducting direct current cable.
Specifically, the method comprises the following steps:
the operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter station is calculated by the following formula:
Aoperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station=m*kOperation and maintenance*AConstruction of superconducting DC converter station;
Wherein A isOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor operation of superconducting dc converter stationsDimension cost, m is the annual fund present value coefficient, kOperation and maintenanceFor operation maintenance rates, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationThe construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station is reduced.
The HVAC reactive compensation cost is calculated by the following formula:
Areactive compensation=AUnit reactive compensation cost*Q;
Wherein, AReactive compensationFor HVAC reactive compensation costs, ACost per unit of reactive power compensationQ is the reactive compensation capacity required by the HVAC transmission system for a unit length of HVAC reactive compensation cost.
The construction cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation is calculated by the following formula:
Aconstruction of high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation=2*PHVAC Total Capacity*AHigh voltage ac substation cost;
Wherein A isConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substationFor the construction cost of high-voltage AC substations, PHVAC Total CapacityFor total capacity of high-voltage AC transmission, ACost of high voltage AC substationThe cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation is reduced.
The operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation is calculated by the following formula:
Ahigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenance=m*(2*kOperation and maintenance*PHVDC Total Capacity+2*AHigh voltage AC substation communication+2*AHigh voltage ac substation operation);
Wherein A isOperation and maintenance of AC transformer substationThe operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, m is the annual fund present value coefficient, kOperation and maintenanceFor maintenance of the operation, PHVDC Total CapacityFor the total capacity of HVDC transmission, AHigh voltage AC substation communicationFor the maintenance cost of the communication equipment of the high-voltage direct-current transformer substation, AHigh voltage ac substation operationThe operation cost of the high-voltage direct-current transformer substation is reduced.
S20, acquiring the length of a cable required to be laid of the offshore wind farm; and inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model, and outputting a cable model selection result.
In a specific embodiment, the step S20 includes:
judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the minimum value of the length of the cable;
if the length of the cable to be laid is smaller than the minimum value of the length of the cable, the output cable is an HVAC cable in a type selection result;
if the length of the cable to be laid is larger than the minimum value of the length of the cable, judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the maximum value of the length of the cable; if the length of the cable to be laid is greater than the maximum length of the cable, the output cable is an HVDC cable;
and if the length of the cable to be laid is not less than the minimum length of the cable and not more than the maximum length of the cable, the type selection result of the output cable is the superconducting direct current cable.
The invention provides a cable model selection method for an offshore wind farm, which comprises the following steps: acquiring related parameters of a superconducting direct current cable, related parameters of an HVDC cable, related parameters of an HVAC cable, related parameters of a refrigerator and element parameters; establishing a cable model selection model according to the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, the related parameters of the HVDC cable, the related parameters of the HVAC cable, the related parameters of the refrigerator and the element parameters; acquiring the length of a cable to be laid of an offshore wind farm; and inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model, and outputting a cable model selection result. The invention provides a relatively comprehensive quantification method for selecting the grid-connected mode of the offshore wind farm, and has a positive effect on the practical application of propelling the superconducting cable.
In a specific embodiment, the life cycle cost calculation shows that the power transmission distance is an important influence factor of the life cycle cost of the three power transmission modes. The invention takes an offshore wind farm in south China as an example, and obtains the boundary condition and the corresponding critical length when the superconducting direct current cable is applied to an offshore wind farm by comparing the life cycle cost of three power transmission modes.
(1) Offshore wind farm and associated cost parameters
The total capacity of the offshore wind power station is 600 MW. Superconducting direct current cable miningWith bipolar supply, rated capacity PH600MW rated voltage UH35kV, 2 for loop number n, rated current IH4.3kA, 2I for each cable to satisfy the N-1 principleH8.6 kA; the HVAC transmission mode selects four-loop 220kV three-core XLPE submarine cable, the submarine cable structure type is HYJQ41-F127/220kV +24C photoelectric composite cable, the conductor sectional area is 3 multiplied by 500mm2[52]Rated current of cable IHA492A; the HVDC power transmission mode adopts bipolar power supply, and three-circuit 200kV direct current HYJQ41-F +/-200 kV +24C photoelectric composite cables are selected; the cross-sectional area of the conductor is 500mm2Rated current of cable IHD=500A。
Other required parameters: superconducting direct current cable reference unit price X HTS1400 rLm; the reference unit price of the refrigerator is r-4900; HVAC Cable Purchase price of XHVAC606.5 ═ m; HVDC Cable purchase price is XHVDC335.6 ═ m; the superconducting cable has a laying cost of AHTS installation of unit length350 ═ m; HVAC Cabling cost is taken as AHVAC installation per unit length1000 ═ m; HVDC cable laying cost is taken from AHVDC laying per unit length800 ═ m; the unit capacity reactive compensation cost is AUnit reactive compensation cost5.33W/MVar; construction cost A of unit capacity AC transformer substationCost of AC substation30.29W/MVA; construction cost A of unit capacity high-voltage direct-current converter stationCost of high voltage direct current converter station=140W¥/MVA。
(2) Lifecycle cost comparison for different power transmission modes
1) Life cycle cost comparison of superconducting DC cable and HVAC cable transmission modes
By combining the data and the calculation method provided in the foregoing, the life cycle costs of the two power transmission modes can be respectively found and compared:
AHTS=AHVAC*R
wherein R is the ratio of the rated power transmitted by the superconducting direct current cable and the HVAC cable, and R is 1 for the same wind power plant.
Substituting into a life cycle cost calculation formula to obtain the life cycle cost of the superconducting direct current cable lower than the critical length of the HVAC, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
the important influencing factors are as follows: the system comprises an electric power meter, a wind power station, a generator, a wind power station, a generator.
At present, the purchase unit price of the superconducting cable, the unit price of the refrigerating machine and the refrigerating efficiency of the refrigerating machine are higher, so that the purchase cost of the superconducting cable and the refrigerating machine is higher, and in addition, the construction cost of the direct current converter station is higher than that of a transformer substation, so that the four factors become main influence factors of the critical length.
And analyzing the boundary condition of the critical length, namely the denominator of the calculation formula is positive, and the condition that the life cycle cost of the superconducting cable is superior to that of the common alternating current cable exists only when the denominator is positive. The boundary conditions are shown below:
4*XHVAC+4*AHVAC installation per unit length+0.086εdPHVAC unit line loss*μ-8*XHTS*IH-4*AHTS unit length laying-(0.086*ε*ρ*d+r)*(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen)>0
Taking 0.7 Rc/kW.h as the related condition epsilon of the current superconducting cable, taking 14.3 as d when the superconducting cable has an operation life of 40 years, taking 19 as rho, and taking other parameters as described above. Under this parameter condition, the denominator is calculated negative and there is no advantage of the superconducting cable over the conventional HVAC cable.
Under the prior art conditions, the critical length of the superconducting cable superior to the common HVAC cable does not exist due to the factors of low purchase cost of the superconducting cable, low purchase cost of the refrigerator, low efficiency of the refrigerator, low system load rate and the like. However, with the development of the technology in the future, after the cost is further reduced, the critical length boundary condition of the superconducting cable applied to the wind power plant compared with the common HVAC cable can be met, the critical length is gradually shortened, and the superconducting direct current transmission technology is expected to be widely applied.
Substituting the relevant fixed cost parameters into a life cycle cost calculation formula, neglecting the part with more than three orders of magnitude difference, and obtaining the life cycle cost (unit: element) of the superconducting cable as follows:
AHTS=(34.4*XHTS+1400+4.24*r+4.91*ρ)*l+(459*u+40)*r+944.49M+8M*μ
the HVAC cable lifecycle cost can be derived by the same token as:
AHVAC=(7236.16+128.69*μ)*l+502.634M
the boundary condition at this time is
5836.16+128.69*μ-34.4*XHTS-4.91*ρ-4.24*r>0
When the system load rate, the superconducting cable unit price, the refrigerating machine refrigeration coefficient and the refrigerating machine unit price meet the boundary conditions, the critical length exists that the superconducting direct current cable grid-connected cost is lower than the HVAC grid-connected cost.
2) The life cycle cost of superconducting direct current cables is compared with that of HVDC cables.
By combining the data and the calculation method provided by the foregoing, the life cycle costs of the two power supply modes can be respectively obtained and compared:
AHTS=AHVDC*R
wherein R is the ratio of the rated power transmitted by the superconducting direct current cable and the HVDC cable, and R is 1 for the same wind power plant.
Substituting the life cycle cost calculation formula into the life cycle cost calculation formula to obtain the life cycle cost of the superconducting direct current cable lower than the critical length of the HVDC, wherein the calculation formula is as follows:
the important influencing factors are as follows: the system comprises an electric power meter, a wind power station, a generator, a wind power station, a generator.
Similar to a common HVAC cable, four factors, namely purchase price of a superconducting cable, purchase price of a refrigerator, refrigeration efficiency of the refrigerator and construction cost of a direct current converter station, are main influence factors of critical length. The boundary conditions are shown below:
6*XHVDC+6*AHVDC laying per unit length+0.086εdPHVDC Unit line loss*μ-8*XHTS*IH-4*AHTS unit length laying-(0.086*ε*ρ*d+r)*(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen)=0
Under the current conditions: ε was 0.7 kW.h, d was 14.3 and ρ was 19, all other parameters were as described above, with an operating life of 40 years.
Under the condition of the parameters, the life cycle cost variation rule of the two power transmission modes is opposite to that of the HVAC power transmission mode, when the power transmission distance is less than the critical length, the economy of the HTS cable is better, and when the power transmission distance is greater than the critical length, the HVDC cable is superior in the economic aspect. Similar to the above HVAC calculations, substituting the relevant parameters, one can obtain the HVDC cable life cycle cost (unit: yuan) as:
AHVDC=(6814+64.195*μ)*l+138.71M*μ+1849.34M
the boundary conditions at this time are:
5414+64.195*μ-34.4*XHTS-4.91*ρ-4.24*r=0
when the system load factor, the superconducting cable unit price, the refrigerating coefficient of the refrigerating machine and the refrigerating machine unit price meet the boundary conditions, the critical length exists when the superconducting direct current cable grid-connected cost is lower than the HVDC grid-connected cost.
(3) Life cycle cost analysis of different power transmission modes
In a superconducting cable unit price X HTS1400 rRm, the unit price of the refrigerator is 4900 Rm, the performance coefficient of the refrigerator is ρ 19, and the load factor μ is 0.5 (average output of offshore wind farm), under the existing production parameter conditions, the 40-year life cycle cost (cost unit: yuan) (transmission distance unit: meter) of the three cables is:
AHTS=70429.3*l+949.81M
AHVAC=7300.5*l+502.634M
AHVDC=6878.2*l+1918.7M
for the offshore wind power plant with the capacity of 600MW, three grid-connected schemes are assumed to be respectively:
1) HTS: two loops of 600MW superconducting direct current cable bipolar power transmission with rated voltage of 35 kV.
2) HVAC: and four-circuit 200MW three-core XLPE alternating current cable with rated voltage of 220kV is used for power transmission.
3) HVDC: and the two poles of the XLPE direct current cable with 300MW and 200kV rated voltage are supplied with power.
It can be seen that the HVDC power transmission cost per unit length is lower than the HVAC power transmission under the existing power transmission modes and parameters. Because the HVDC cable adopts a bipolar power supply mode, the number of required cables is large, the cable laying cost is high, and the cost advantage per unit length is not expected to be large.
The cost per unit length of the superconducting direct current transmission is far higher than that of the other two conventional power transmission modes due to the factors of higher cable purchase cost, higher refrigerator purchase cost, lower refrigerator efficiency and the like, and the situation that the economic aspect of the superconducting direct current transmission is superior to that of HVAC does not exist; compared with HVDC, superconducting DC transmission is superior only in the case of relatively low transmission distance, and the critical length is 15.25 km.
The superconducting direct current cable has the main advantages that the transmission loss is zero in an offshore wind power plant grid-connected scene, the operation loss of the superconducting direct current cable cannot be ignored due to the large heat loss of a superconducting refrigeration system, and the operation loss of the three power transmission modes is compared and analyzed in the section.
Under the parameter conditions that ρ is 19 and u is 1, the energy loss of each of the three transmission methods is:
PHTS=80.56W/m*l+6.96*106W
PHVAC=111.3W/m*l
PHVDC=55.5W/m*l+15.6*106W
the part of the above equation proportional to the transmission length l (unit: m) is mainly the cable run loss and the constant part independent of l is mainly the converter station loss.
It can be seen that under this parameter, the loss per unit length of the HVDC cable is the smallest, only 49.9% of that of the HVAC cable, but the loss per unit length of the HTS cable is now as high as 80.56W, which is much higher than the expected loss situation, because the refrigerator coefficient of performance ρ of 19, which is required to consume 19W of electrical energy per 1W of heat load removed by the refrigerator, is only 4.24W per unit length of heat load, and on the basis of the prior art, the actual coefficient of performance ρ ranges from 18 to 26, which means that the superconducting direct current transmission technique is not dominant even in terms of loss of electrical energy per unit length.
Only by reducing the performance coefficient of the refrigerating machine to 11.09, namely, by improving the efficiency of the refrigerating machine to about 27.3%, and reducing the heat load of the unit length of the superconducting direct current system, the superconducting direct current cable can be advantageous in the aspect of electric energy loss of the unit length, but the efficiency of the existing refrigerating machine is only 11.7% -19.8%.
Because the heat loss of the unit length of the superconducting direct current cable is irrelevant to the load rate, if the load rate of the wind power plant is reduced due to output fluctuation, the superconducting direct current cable is less dominant at the moment. If the average output of the offshore wind farm is 50% (mu is 0.5), the efficiency of the refrigerator needs to be increased to about 54.6% to make the unit length loss of the superconducting direct current cable lower than that of the other two conventional transmission modes.
Under the current technical conditions, the grid-connected life cycle cost of the superconducting direct current cable for the offshore wind power plant is higher, and the superconducting direct current cable is not dominant in the economic aspect compared with HVDC and HVAC power transmission modes, which is caused by the factors of higher unit price of the superconducting direct current cable, overhigh heat loss of a refrigerating system, higher unit price of a refrigerating machine, unsatisfactory efficiency of the refrigerating machine and the like. The section provides an improvement scheme for a superconducting direct current cable power transmission system, so that the life cycle cost of superconducting direct current power transmission is reduced.
(1) The power transmission voltage is properly increased, so that the rated current of the cable is reduced.
Because the purchase cost of the superconducting direct current cable is in direct proportion to the current-carrying capacity, the power transmission voltage is improved, and the purchase cost of the superconducting direct current cable can be greatly reduced by reducing the rated current of the cable. When the superconductive direct current transmission voltage is increased to 150kV, the rated current of the cable is reduced to 1kA, and the required current-carrying capacity of the cable is reduced to 2 kA. However, this method may cause the construction and operation and maintenance costs of the superconducting dc converter station to increase.
(2) The rated capacity of a single cable is reduced, and the cost loss of redundant cables is reduced.
Reducing the capacity of a single cable reduces the purchase cost of redundant cables arranged to satisfy the N-1 principle. The rated capacity of a single cable is reduced to 300MW, three times of transmission are carried out, two improvement modes are considered together, at the moment, the rated current of the superconducting cable is reduced to 666.7A, and the current-carrying capacity required by the cable is reduced to 1 kA. However, this method results in increased cabling costs and increased cable heat loss.
(3) The unit price of the superconducting cable is reduced, the unit price of the refrigerator is reduced, and the refrigerating efficiency of the refrigerator is improved.
The critical lengths of the superconducting cable and the two transmission methods deduced in the foregoing show that reducing the purchase price of the refrigerator (about 500 rmb/W, which is predicted to be reduced to around this level after 5 years according to the industry), improving the efficiency of the refrigerator (to about 27% or more, and the superconducting direct current cable will be dominant in loss when the value is reached by the foregoing analysis) will contribute to the popularization of the superconducting cable in this scenario.
(4) The heat leakage of the superconducting cable refrigeration equipment is reduced.
The superconducting direct-current transmission heat insulation technology is improved, the unit length heat loss of the Dewar type pipe is reduced to 0.75W, the unit length heat loss of the Dewar type pipe is reduced to 2.67W/pipe, and meanwhile, the design that a single-return bipolar cable uses the same refrigeration pipeline is adopted. The improvement technology can reduce the heat loss per unit length of the single-loop superconducting direct current cable to 0.81W/m.
After the measures are comprehensively adopted, the superconducting direct current transmission life cycle cost when the load factor mu is 0.5 (the average output of the wind power plant is calculated according to 50% of the rated capacity) is as follows:
AHTS=(6*XHTS+3406)*l+1457.2M
(1) in this case, the boundary condition obtained by comparison with the HVAC transmission system is XHTS649.1 Rm, when the boundary condition is satisfied, the transmission distance is less than the critical length, the cost of HVAC cable is lower; the transmission distance is greater than that of the adjacentThe boundary length is long, and the cost of the HTS cable is low; HVAC cable costs are always lower than HTS cables when boundary conditions are not met. The superconducting dc cable versus HVAC transmission cost versus transmission distance is shown in fig. 2.
In the offshore wind farm grid-connected scene, the superconducting direct current cable is compared with the HVAC power transmission mode, and the applicable evaluation criterion of the superconducting direct current cable is given as shown in Table 1. When the conditions described in the table are met, the economics of superconducting dc cables will be better than normal HVAC cables.
TABLE 1 superconducting DC Transmission Life-cycle cost over HVAC boundary conditions and critical Length
(2) Compared with the HVDC transmission mode, the cost change rule of the HVDC and superconducting direct current transmission life cycle and the cost change rule of the HVAC and superconducting direct current transmission life cycle are just opposite when the improved conditions are met, and when the boundary condition X is metHTSWhen the power transmission distance is more than or equal to 578.7 Rm/kA.m, the power transmission distance is less than the critical length, and the cost of the HTS cable is lower; the transmission distance is greater than the critical length, so that the HVDC cable has lower cost; HTS cables are always less costly than HVDC cables when boundary conditions are not met.
The main reasons for this difference are: compared with HVDC, superconducting direct current transmission has lower voltage grade, lower construction cost and operation and maintenance cost of a converter station, and the opposite is realized for HVAC. The relation between the transmission cost and the transmission distance of the superconducting direct current cable and the HVDC is shown in fig. 3.
In the offshore wind farm grid-connected scene, the superconducting direct current cable is compared with the HVDC power transmission mode, and the applicable evaluation criterion of the superconducting direct current cable is shown in table 2. When the conditions described in the table are met, the economy of the superconducting direct current cable is better than that of the HVDC cable, and particularly, when the related cost of the superconducting direct current cable is reduced, the cost of a superconducting direct current cable transmission mode under any length is better than that of an HVDC cable transmission mode due to factors such as low construction cost of a converter station and the like.
TABLE 2 boundary conditions and critical lengths for superconducting direct current transmission lifecycle cost superior to HVDC
(3) Analysis of economic impact of wind power plant capacity on different power transmission modes
In the previous calculation in this chapter, a 600MW offshore wind farm is taken as an example, if the capacity of the wind farm is increased to 1200MW, the voltage levels of three power transmission modes of superconducting direct current, HVAC and HVDC are unchanged, only the number of cable loops and the sectional area of a superconducting cable are increased, and the life cycle costs of the three power transmission modes are obtained by the calculation mode as above:
AHTS=(12*XHTS+3406)*l+2914.4M
AHVAC=12849.9*l+975.22M
AHVDC=11433*l+3716.7M
at this time, the relationship between the life cycle cost, the transmission distance and the transmission capacity of the superconducting direct current cable and the HVAC cable is shown in fig. 4.
Comparing two power transmission modes of a superconducting direct current cable and an HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) to obtain the following result: the boundary condition for the existence of the applicable critical length of the superconducting cable is XHTS787/kAm is less than or equal to. With XHTSFor example, 500 rah/kA · m, the critical length of the superconducting dc cable transmission system is 563km, which is better than the HVAC system. And after comparing the two transmission modes of the superconducting direct current cable and the HVDC, the following results are obtained: the unit price boundary condition of the superconducting direct current cable is XHTS≥668.9¥/kAm。
Therefore, with the increase of the capacity of the wind power plant, the application of the superconducting direct current transmission technology is more facilitated. The relation between the unit length heat loss of the superconducting direct current cable and the capacity and rated current of the cable is small, and the unit length transmission loss of the conventional power transmission mode is in positive correlation with the system capacity.
(4) Life cycle cost impact factor summary
The factors influencing the life cycle cost of the superconducting direct current cable transmission mode mainly comprise cable length, cable manufacturing cost, refrigerating machine efficiency, load rate, direct current converter station construction cost, electricity price, time period and the like, wherein the factors influencing the cost comparison result of the superconducting cable transmission mode and the HVAC and HVDC transmission modes are shown in table 3, wherein the arrow is upwards to indicate that the superconducting cable transmission mode is more beneficial, and the arrow is downwards to indicate that the superconducting cable transmission mode is more unfavorable.
TABLE 3 Life cycle cost influencing factors
According to the life cycle cost calculation model of applying the superconducting direct current cable to offshore wind power plant grid connection, boundary conditions and critical lengths of the superconducting direct current cable applied to offshore wind power plant grid connection scenes are obtained finally through cost comparison of different power transmission modes, and a calculation method of the boundary conditions and the critical lengths is obtained. When the offshore wind farm grid-connected scheme containing the superconducting direct current cable is selected, the critical length of the superconducting direct current cable with the predominant economy exists only when the boundary condition is met. When the critical length is met, the superconducting direct current cable can be selected as a grid-connected scheme of the offshore wind farm. The boundary conditions and the critical lengths provided by the invention are calculated under typical parameter conditions, relevant parameters will change along with the development of the superconducting direct current cable and the offshore wind power plant, and the boundary conditions and the critical lengths under different parameter conditions can be obtained by applying the calculation method provided by the invention.
The research content of the invention provides a relatively comprehensive quantification method for selecting the offshore wind power plant grid-connected mode in consideration of the superconducting direct current cable, and the method has a positive effect on promoting the practical application of the superconducting cable.
A second aspect.
Referring to fig. 5-6, an embodiment of the present invention provides a cable type selection system for an offshore wind farm, including:
a cable model selection model establishing module 10, configured to obtain related parameters of a superconducting direct current cable, related parameters of an HVDC cable, related parameters of an HVAC cable, related parameters of a refrigerator, and parameters of elements; and establishing a cable model selection model according to the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, the related parameters of the HVDC cable, the related parameters of the HVAC cable, the related parameters of the refrigerating machine and the element parameters.
Wherein the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable comprise: the method comprises the following steps of (1) construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, loss of the superconducting direct current converter station, pollutant discharge amount of a superconducting direct current grid-connected system, rated current of a superconducting direct current cable, purchase price of the superconducting direct current cable and laying cost of the superconducting direct current cable in unit length;
the HVDC cable related parameters comprise: the method comprises the following steps of high-voltage direct current converter station construction cost, high-voltage direct current converter station operation and maintenance cost, HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emission, HVDC cable purchase price, unit length HVDC cable laying cost, unit length HVDC cable loss and high-voltage direct current converter station loss;
the HVAC cable related parameters include: the method comprises the following steps of (1) constructing cost of a high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, HVAC reactive compensation cost, HVAC cable purchase price, HVAC cable laying cost per unit length, HVAC cable loss per unit length and pollutant discharge amount of an HVAC grid-connected system;
the refrigerator-related parameters include: refrigerator performance parameters and refrigerator purchase price;
the element parameters include: current lead loss, joint resistance loss, excess conductor loss, cryogenic vessel loss, dewar pipe joint loss, liquid nitrogen flow loss, wind farm operating load factor, electricity price, operating time discount factor, blowdown cost factor.
In a specific embodiment, the cable model selection model includes: a cable length minimum model and a cable length maximum model; wherein,
the cable length minimum model is:
A1=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation constructionIs provided with-AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation-AReactive power compensation;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lminIs the minimum value of the cable length, A1For the first cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substationFor the construction costs of high-voltage AC substations, AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenanceFor the operation and maintenance cost of high voltage AC transformer station, AReactive compensationFor HVAC reactive compensation costs, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow-temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeIs a dewar pipe loss, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the cost coefficient of pollution discharge, QHTSFor superconducting DC grid-connected system pollutant discharge, QHVACFor HVAC grid-tied system pollutant emissions, XHVACPurchase price for HVAC Cable, AHVAC installation per unit lengthFor unit length of HVAC cabling cost, PHVAC unit line lossFor unit length of HVAC cable loss, IHTSFor the rated current, X, of a superconducting DC cableHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingThe laying cost of the unit length of the superconducting direct current cable is calculated;
the maximum model of the cable length is as follows:
A2=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter station-AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct-current converter station;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lmaxAt maximum cable length, A2For the second cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter stationFor the construction costs of HVDC converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct-current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage direct-current converter station, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeFor Dewar tube losses, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the cost coefficient of pollution discharge, QHTSPollutant discharge amount Q for superconducting direct current grid-connected systemHVDCFor HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emissions, PHigh voltage direct current converter station lossFor losses in the HVDC converter station, XHVDCIs HVDCPurchase price of cable, AHVDC laying per unit lengthFor unit length HVDC cable laying cost, PHVDC Unit line lossFor unit length of HVDC cable loss, IHTSFor the rated current, X, of a superconducting DC cableHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingThe cost is the unit length of the superconducting direct current cable.
Specifically, the method comprises the following steps:
the operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter station is calculated by the following formula:
Aoperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station=m*kOperation and maintenance*AConstruction of superconducting DC converter station;
Wherein A isOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationM is annual capital value coefficient, k is the operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter stationOperation and maintenanceFor maintenance rates of operation, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationThe construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station is reduced.
The HVAC reactive compensation cost is calculated by the following formula:
Areactive compensation=ACost per unit of reactive power compensation*Q;
Wherein, AReactive power compensationFor HVAC reactive compensation costs, AUnit reactive compensation costIs the HVAC reactive compensation cost per unit length, and Q is the reactive compensation capacity required by the HVAC transmission system.
The construction cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation is calculated by the following formula:
Aconstruction of high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation=2*PHVAC Total Capacity*ACost of high voltage AC substation;
Wherein A isConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substationFor the construction cost of high-voltage AC substations, PHVAC Total CapacityFor total capacity of high-voltage AC transmission, AHigh voltage ac substation costThe cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation is low.
The operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation is calculated by the following formula:
Aoperation and maintenance of high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation=m*(2*kOperation and maintenance*PHVDC Total Capacity+2*AHigh voltage AC substation communication+2*AHigh voltage ac substation operation);
Wherein A isOperation and maintenance of AC transformer substationFor the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage AC transformer station, m is the annual fund present value coefficient, kOperation and maintenanceFor maintenance of the operation, PHVDC Total CapacityFor the total capacity of HVDC transmission, AHigh voltage AC substation communicationFor the maintenance cost of the communication equipment of the high-voltage direct-current transformer substation, AHigh voltage ac substation operationThe operation cost of the high-voltage direct-current transformer substation is reduced.
The cable model selection result output module 20 is used for acquiring the length of a cable to be laid of the offshore wind farm; inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model, and outputting a cable model selection result;
in a specific embodiment, the cable type selection result output module 20 includes a cable length determining submodule 21, configured to:
judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the minimum value of the length of the cable; if the length of the cable to be laid is smaller than the minimum length of the cable, the output cable is an HVAC cable in the type selection result; if the length of the cable to be laid is larger than the minimum value of the length of the cable, judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the maximum value of the length of the cable; if the length of the cable to be laid is greater than the maximum length of the cable, the output cable is an HVDC cable; and if the length of the cable to be laid is not less than the minimum length of the cable and not more than the maximum length of the cable, the output cable is the superconducting direct current cable according to the model selection result.
In a third aspect.
The present invention provides an electronic device, including:
a processor, a memory, and a bus;
the bus is used for connecting the processor and the memory;
the memory is used for storing operation instructions;
the processor is configured to call the operation instruction, and the executable instruction enables the processor to perform an operation corresponding to the cable type selection method for the offshore wind farm shown in the first aspect of the present application.
In an alternative embodiment, an electronic device is provided, as shown in fig. 7, the electronic device 5000 shown in fig. 7 includes: a processor 5001 and a memory 5003. The processor 5001 and the memory 5003 are coupled, such as via a bus 5002. Optionally, the electronic device 5000 may also include a transceiver 5004. It should be noted that the transceiver 5004 is not limited to one in practical application, and the structure of the electronic device 5000 is not limited to the embodiment of the present application.
The processor 5001 may be a CPU, general purpose processor, DSP, ASIC, FPGA or other programmable logic device, transistor logic device, hardware component, or any combination thereof. Which may implement or perform the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the disclosure. The processor 5001 may also be a combination of processors implementing computing functionality, e.g., a combination comprising one or more microprocessors, a combination of DSPs and microprocessors, or the like.
The memory 5003 may be, but is not limited to, a ROM or other type of static storage device that can store static information and instructions, a RAM or other type of dynamic storage device that can store information and instructions, an EEPROM, a CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, optical disk storage (including compact disk, laser disk, optical disk, digital versatile disk, blu-ray disk, etc.), magnetic disk storage media or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer.
The memory 5003 is used for storing application program codes for executing the present solution, and the execution is controlled by the processor 5001. The processor 5001 is configured to execute application program code stored in the memory 5003 to implement aspects illustrated in any of the method embodiments described previously.
Among them, electronic devices include but are not limited to: mobile terminals such as mobile phones, notebook computers, digital broadcast receivers, PDAs (personal digital assistants), PADs (tablet computers), PMPs (portable multimedia players), in-vehicle terminals (e.g., in-vehicle navigation terminals), and the like, and fixed terminals such as digital TVs, desktop computers, and the like.
A fourth aspect.
The present invention provides a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements a method for cable typing for an offshore wind farm as set forth in the first aspect of the present application.
Yet another embodiment of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when run on a computer, enables the computer to perform the corresponding content in the aforementioned method embodiments.
Claims (7)
1. A cable type selection method for an offshore wind farm is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring related parameters of a superconducting direct current cable, related parameters of an HVDC cable, related parameters of an HVAC cable, related parameters of a refrigerator and element parameters; establishing a cable model selection model according to the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, the related parameters of the HVDC cable, the related parameters of the HVAC cable, the related parameters of the refrigerator and the element parameters;
acquiring the length of a cable to be laid of an offshore wind farm; inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model, and outputting a cable model selection result;
wherein, the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable comprise: the method comprises the following steps of (1) construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, loss of the superconducting direct current converter station, pollutant discharge amount of a superconducting direct current grid-connected system, rated current of a superconducting direct current cable, purchase price of the superconducting direct current cable and laying cost of the superconducting direct current cable in unit length;
the HVDC cable related parameters comprise: the method comprises the following steps of high-voltage direct current converter station construction cost, high-voltage direct current converter station operation and maintenance cost, HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emission, HVDC cable purchase price, unit length HVDC cable laying cost, unit length HVDC cable loss and high-voltage direct current converter station loss;
the HVAC cable related parameters include: the method comprises the following steps of (1) constructing cost of a high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, HVAC reactive compensation cost, HVAC cable purchase price, HVAC cable laying cost per unit length, HVAC cable loss per unit length and pollutant discharge amount of an HVAC grid-connected system;
the chiller-related parameters include: refrigerator performance parameters and refrigerator purchase price;
the element parameters include: current lead loss, joint resistance loss, excess conductor loss, cryogenic vessel loss, dewar pipe joint loss, liquid nitrogen flow loss, wind farm operating load rate, electricity price, operating time discount factor, pollution discharge cost coefficient;
the cable model selection model comprises: a cable length minimum model and a cable length maximum model; wherein,
the cable length minimum model is:
A1=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substation-AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenance-AReactive compensation;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein,lminis the minimum value of the cable length, A1For the first cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substationFor the construction cost of high-voltage AC substations, AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenanceFor the operation and maintenance cost of high voltage AC transformer station, AReactive compensationFor HVAC reactive compensation costs, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeFor Dewar tube losses, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the cost coefficient of pollution discharge, QHTSFor superconducting DC grid-connected system pollutant discharge, QHVACFor HVAC grid-tied system pollutant emissions, XHVACPurchase price for HVAC Cable, AHVAC installation per unit lengthFor unit length of HVAC cabling cost, PHVAC unit line lossFor unit length of HVAC cable loss, IHTSFor the rated current, X, of a superconducting DC cableHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingThe laying cost of the superconducting direct current cable is unit length;
the maximum model of the cable length is as follows:
A2=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter station-AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct-current converter station;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow-temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lmaxAt maximum cable length, A2For the second cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter stationFor the construction costs of the HVDC converter station, AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage direct-current converter station, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeFor Dewar tube losses, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the cost coefficient of pollution discharge, QHTSFor superconducting DC grid-connected system pollutant discharge, QHVDCFor HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emissions, PHigh voltage direct current converter station lossFor losses in the HVDC converter station, XHVDCPurchase price for HVDC cables, AHVDC laying per unit lengthFor unit length HVDC cable laying cost, PHVDC Unit line lossFor unit length of HVDC cable loss, IHTSRated current, X, for superconducting DC cablesHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length lay-upThe laying cost of the unit length of the superconducting direct current cable is calculated;
the inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model and outputting a cable model selection result comprise:
judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the minimum value of the length of the cable;
if the length of the cable to be laid is smaller than the minimum value of the length of the cable, the output cable is an HVAC cable in a type selection result;
if the length of the cable to be laid is larger than the minimum value of the length of the cable, judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the maximum value of the length of the cable; if the length of the cable to be laid is greater than the maximum length of the cable, the output cable is an HVDC cable;
and if the length of the cable to be laid is not less than the minimum length of the cable and not more than the maximum length of the cable, the type selection result of the output cable is the superconducting direct current cable.
2. The cable model selection method for offshore wind farms according to claim 1, wherein the construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station is calculated by the following formula:
Aconstruction of superconducting direct current converter station=2*PHTS Total Capacity*ACost of superconducting DC converter station;
Wherein A isConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationFor the construction costs, P, of superconducting direct current converter stationsHTS Total CapacityFor total capacity of superconducting DC transmission, ACost of superconducting DC converter stationThe cost of the superconducting direct current converter station.
3. The cable model selection method for the offshore wind farm according to claim 1, wherein the operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter station is calculated by the following formula:
Aoperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station=m*kOperation and maintenance*AConstruction of superconducting DC converter station;
Wherein A isOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationM is annual capital value coefficient, k is the operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter stationOperation and maintenanceFor maintenance rates of operation, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationFor construction of superconducting DC converter stationsAnd (4) cost.
4. The cable sizing method for offshore wind farms according to claim 1, wherein the HVAC reactive compensation cost is calculated by the formula:
Areactive compensation=ACost per unit of reactive power compensation*Q;
Wherein A isReactive power compensationFor HVAC reactive compensation costs, ACost per unit of reactive power compensationIs the HVAC reactive compensation cost per unit length, and Q is the reactive compensation capacity required by the HVAC transmission system.
5. The cable type selection method for the offshore wind farm according to claim 1, wherein the construction cost of the high-voltage alternating-current substation is calculated by the following formula:
Aconstruction of high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation=2*PHVAC Total Capacity*ACost of high voltage AC substation;
Wherein, AConstruction of high-voltage alternating-current transformer substationFor the construction cost of high-voltage AC substations, PHVAC Total CapacityFor the total capacity of the high-voltage AC transmission, ACost of high voltage AC substationThe cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation is low.
6. The cable type selection method for the offshore wind farm according to claim 1, wherein the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current substation is calculated by the following formula:
Ahigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenance=m*(2*kOperation and maintenance*PHVDC Total Capacity+2*AHigh voltage AC substation communication+2*AHigh voltage ac substation operation);
Wherein A isOperation and maintenance of AC transformer substationFor the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage AC transformer station, m is the annual fund present value coefficient, kOperation and maintenanceFor maintenance of the operation, PHVDC Total CapacityFor the total capacity of HVDC transmission, AHigh voltage AC substation communicationFor the maintenance cost of the communication equipment of the high-voltage direct-current transformer substation, AHigh voltage ac substation operationFor high-voltage direct-current transformer substationThe cost of operation.
7. A cable model selection system of an offshore wind farm, comprising:
the cable model selection model establishing module is used for acquiring related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, related parameters of the HVDC cable, related parameters of the HVAC cable, related parameters of the refrigerator and element parameters; establishing a cable model selection model according to the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable, the related parameters of the HVDC cable, the related parameters of the HVAC cable, the related parameters of the refrigerator and the element parameters;
the cable model selection result output module is used for acquiring the length of a cable needing to be laid in the offshore wind farm; inputting the length of the cable to be laid into the cable model selection model, and outputting a cable model selection result;
wherein the related parameters of the superconducting direct current cable comprise: the method comprises the following steps of (1) construction cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, operation and maintenance cost of the superconducting direct current converter station, loss of the superconducting direct current converter station, pollutant discharge amount of a superconducting direct current grid-connected system, rated current of a superconducting direct current cable, purchase price of the superconducting direct current cable and laying cost of the superconducting direct current cable in unit length;
the HVDC cable related parameters include: the method comprises the following steps of high-voltage direct current converter station construction cost, high-voltage direct current converter station operation and maintenance cost, HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emission, HVDC cable purchase price, unit length HVDC cable laying cost, unit length HVDC cable loss and high-voltage direct current converter station loss;
the HVAC cable related parameters include: the method comprises the following steps of (1) constructing cost of a high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage alternating-current transformer substation, HVAC reactive compensation cost, HVAC cable purchase price, HVAC cable laying cost per unit length, HVAC cable loss per unit length and pollutant discharge amount of an HVAC grid-connected system;
the refrigerator-related parameters include: refrigerator performance parameters and refrigerator purchase price;
the element parameters include: current lead loss, joint resistance loss, excess conductor loss, cryogenic vessel loss, dewar pipe joint loss, liquid nitrogen flow loss, wind farm operating load rate, electricity price, operating time discount factor, pollution discharge cost coefficient;
the cable model selection model comprises: a cable length minimum model and a cable length maximum model; wherein,
the cable length minimum model is:
A1=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substation-AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenance-AReactive compensation;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lminIs the minimum value of the cable length, A1For the first cost, AConstruction of superconducting DC converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage AC transformer substationFor the construction cost of high-voltage AC substations, AHigh-voltage AC transformer substation operation and maintenanceFor the operation and maintenance cost of high voltage AC transformer station, AReactive power compensationFor HVAC reactive compensation costs, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorFor resistive losses of the joint, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeIs a dewar pipe loss,PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the pollution discharge cost coefficient, QHTSFor superconducting DC grid-connected system pollutant discharge, QHVACFor HVAC grid-tied system pollutant emissions, XHVACPurchase price for HVAC Cable, AHVAC installation per unit lengthFor unit length of HVAC cabling cost, PHVAC unit line lossHVAC Cable loss per unit length, IHTSFor the rated current, X, of a superconducting DC cableHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingThe laying cost of the unit length of the superconducting direct current cable is calculated;
the maximum model of the cable length is as follows:
A2=Aconstruction of superconducting DC converter station+AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter station-AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter station-AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct-current converter station;
P1=ρ[μ(PCurrent lead+PJoint resistor+PTransition conductor)+PLow temperature container]+2μPSuperconducting converter station losses;
P2=(0.086εdρ+r)(PDewar pipe+PDewar pipe joint+PFlow of liquid nitrogen);
Wherein lmaxAt maximum cable length, A2For the second cost, AConstruction of superconducting direct current converter stationConstruction costs for superconducting direct current converter stations, AOperation and maintenance of superconducting direct current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance costs of superconducting DC converter stations, AConstruction of high-voltage direct current converter stationFor the construction costs of the HVDC converter station, AOperation and maintenance of high-voltage direct-current converter stationFor the operation and maintenance cost of the high-voltage direct-current converter station, P1Is the first loss, rho is the refrigerator performance parameter, mu is the wind farm operating load factor, PCurrent leadFor current lead loss, PJoint resistorTo connect electricallyResistance loss, PTransition conductorFor excessive conductor loss, PLow temperature containerFor cryogenic vessel depletion, PSuperconducting converter station lossesFor superconducting DC converter station losses, P2For the second loss, ε is the electricity price, d is the running time discount factor, r is the refrigerator purchase price, PDewar pipeFor Dewar tube losses, PDewar pipe jointFor a loss of a Dewar coupling, PFlow of liquid nitrogenIs the flow loss of liquid nitrogen, k is the cost coefficient of pollution discharge, QHTSFor superconducting DC grid-connected system pollutant discharge, QHVDCFor HVDC grid-connected system pollutant emissions, PHigh voltage direct current converter station lossFor losses in the HVDC converter station, XHVDCPurchase price for HVDC cables, AHVDC laying per unit lengthFor unit length HVDC cable laying cost, PHVDC Unit line lossFor unit length of HVDC cable loss, IHTSFor the rated current, X, of a superconducting DC cableHTSPurchase price for superconducting DC cables, AHTS unit length layingThe laying cost of the unit length of the superconducting direct current cable is calculated;
the cable type selection result output module comprises a cable length judgment submodule for:
judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the minimum value of the length of the cable; if the length of the cable to be laid is smaller than the minimum value of the length of the cable, the output cable is an HVAC cable in a type selection result; if the length of the cable to be laid is larger than the minimum value of the length of the cable, judging the size relation between the length of the cable to be laid and the maximum value of the length of the cable; if the length of the cable to be laid is greater than the maximum length of the cable, the output cable is an HVDC cable; and if the length of the cable to be laid is not less than the minimum length of the cable and not more than the maximum length of the cable, the type selection result of the output cable is the superconducting direct current cable.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110633254.7A CN113297750B (en) | 2021-06-07 | 2021-06-07 | Cable model selection method and system for offshore wind power plant |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110633254.7A CN113297750B (en) | 2021-06-07 | 2021-06-07 | Cable model selection method and system for offshore wind power plant |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN113297750A CN113297750A (en) | 2021-08-24 |
CN113297750B true CN113297750B (en) | 2022-06-10 |
Family
ID=77327364
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202110633254.7A Active CN113297750B (en) | 2021-06-07 | 2021-06-07 | Cable model selection method and system for offshore wind power plant |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN113297750B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113705010B (en) * | 2021-08-31 | 2023-11-10 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Cable type selection method and system for low-voltage high-current direct-current load power supply |
CN116777533A (en) * | 2023-08-24 | 2023-09-19 | 国网浙江省电力有限公司宁波供电公司 | Power cable type selection method, device and storage medium |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106712076A (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2017-05-24 | 上海电力学院 | Power transmission system optimization method on offshore wind farm cluster scale |
CN108108871A (en) * | 2017-11-09 | 2018-06-01 | 甘肃省电力公司风电技术中心 | The selection method of wind farm group transmission facility |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104281737B (en) * | 2014-08-06 | 2018-07-20 | 华南理工大学 | A kind of wind power collection system of offshore wind power plant topological structure selection method |
AU2016388442B2 (en) * | 2016-01-22 | 2022-09-15 | Biarri Networks Pty Ltd | Method and system for designing an electricity distribution network |
CN106355284B (en) * | 2016-09-06 | 2019-11-12 | 东南大学 | A kind of wind power plant submitting line optimized Selection method |
CN106528944A (en) * | 2016-10-14 | 2017-03-22 | 华南理工大学 | Analysis method for obtaining maximum transient overvoltage of single feeder line of offshore wind power plant under asymmetric short circuit fault |
CN112464545B (en) * | 2020-11-18 | 2022-05-03 | 上海电气风电集团股份有限公司 | Layout method, system, equipment and medium for cables and transformer substation of offshore wind farm |
-
2021
- 2021-06-07 CN CN202110633254.7A patent/CN113297750B/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106712076A (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2017-05-24 | 上海电力学院 | Power transmission system optimization method on offshore wind farm cluster scale |
CN108108871A (en) * | 2017-11-09 | 2018-06-01 | 甘肃省电力公司风电技术中心 | The selection method of wind farm group transmission facility |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN113297750A (en) | 2021-08-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Van Hertem et al. | HVDC grids: for offshore and supergrid of the future | |
Chen et al. | Modelling and performance analysis of advanced combined co‐phase traction power supply system in electrified railway | |
Xiao et al. | Available transfer capability enhancement using FACTS devices | |
Sode-Yome et al. | Static voltage stability margin enhancement using STATCOM, TCSC and SSSC | |
CN113297750B (en) | Cable model selection method and system for offshore wind power plant | |
CN112564175B (en) | New energy multi-station short circuit ratio calculation method and device and storage medium | |
Ogbuefi et al. | A power flow analysis of the Nigerian 330 kV electric power system | |
CN112751326B (en) | Technical economy assessment method for medium-low voltage direct current power distribution and utilization system | |
Iioka et al. | Voltage reduction due to reverse power flow in distribution feeder with photovoltaic system | |
Li et al. | Voltage balancing in low‐voltage radial feeders using Scott transformers | |
Thukaram et al. | Optimal reactive power dispatch in a large power system with AC–DC and FACTS controllers | |
Bidram et al. | Capacitor design considering first swing stability of distributed generations | |
Thukaram et al. | Optimum allocation of reactive power for voltage stability improvement in AC–DC power systems | |
CN114819693A (en) | New energy bearing capacity assessment method and device for multi-direct-current feed-in power grid | |
Yang et al. | A novel assessment index of LCC-HVDC system impact on short-term voltage stability of the receiving-end AC system | |
Kongtrakul et al. | Comprehensive review and a novel technique on voltage unbalance compensation | |
Zhao et al. | HVDC in the future power systems | |
Yang | Three‐phase power flow calculations by direct ZLOOP method for microgrids with electric vehicle charging demands | |
Gatta et al. | Analytical methods for series compensation of a transmission line | |
Mahmoodi et al. | Control systems for independent operation of parallel dg units in dc distribution systems | |
Kareem et al. | Power flow analysis in power system planning. case study | |
Saidi et al. | Impact of large scale photovoltaic generation on voltage stability in distribution networks | |
Lesage-Landry et al. | A second-order cone model of transmission planning with alternating and direct current lines | |
CN112736913B (en) | Method for analyzing influence factors of power optimization mode of power distribution network containing distributed power supply | |
Dalali et al. | Modified Thevenin‐based voltage instability indicator and load shedding approach for MCF connected network |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |