CN112182708A - Method for evaluating delivery rate of digital design result of urban rail transit engineering - Google Patents
Method for evaluating delivery rate of digital design result of urban rail transit engineering Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112182708A CN112182708A CN202011039947.5A CN202011039947A CN112182708A CN 112182708 A CN112182708 A CN 112182708A CN 202011039947 A CN202011039947 A CN 202011039947A CN 112182708 A CN112182708 A CN 112182708A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- digital design
- delivery rate
- design result
- delivery
- digital
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/13—Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/24—Querying
- G06F16/245—Query processing
- G06F16/2455—Query execution
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for evaluating the delivery rate of a digital design result of urban rail transit engineering, which comprises the following steps: the method comprises the steps of constructing a delivery rate evaluation standard system, obtaining a digital design result, carrying out classification processing on the digital design result, outputting a score report of the digital design result, and outputting the delivery rate of the digital design result. The method comprises the steps of constructing a delivery rate evaluation standard system, aiming at the designed digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering, selecting a design stage, outputting a delivery rate and a delivery report, and finishing the evaluation of the digital delivery rate of the digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering. The invention modularly outputs the delivery rate and the delivery report of the digital design result, provides the delivery opinion, provides the itemized comparison result support of visual data support for the delivery of the digital design result, improves the transparency of the delivery, ensures the delivery quality of the digital design result and improves the delivery evaluation efficiency of the digital design result.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of design evaluation of urban rail transit engineering, and particularly relates to a delivery rate evaluation method of an urban rail transit engineering digital design result.
Background
In recent years, the construction of urban rail transit engineering in China is developed on a large scale, and more serious challenges are provided for each stage in engineering design, construction, operation and maintenance. The traditional urban rail transit engineering is not closely linked in each stage of design, construction and operation, and lacks information circulation and interaction in the whole life cycle of an engineering project, so that the construction quality and the comprehensive benefit of operation of the urban rail project are influenced, and the urban rail transit engineering in China urgently needs more scientific and modern design, construction and operation modes. At present, the rail transit industry is actively promoting a digital construction system, and aims to provide help for solving the problems.
The quality of the digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering is a precondition for ensuring the stability of an engineering digital construction system. The core of the operation of each subsystem of the digital construction is a digital design result, but at present, the stability degree of the digital construction system is not high due to the fact that the quality difference of different digital design results of different engineering projects and participants is large. The effective method for evaluating the digital design result can improve the quality of the digital design result.
At present, the quality evaluation method for the traditional urban rail transit engineering digital design result has obvious defects: firstly, the evaluation method is not systematic enough, so that the evaluation result is biased and loses scientificity; secondly, the evaluation result is poor in intuition, so that the evaluation result cannot effectively guide the improvement of the quality of the design result; thirdly, the requirement on the technical level of professionals is high, the manual operation is heavy, and the evaluation precision and efficiency are low; fourthly, the informatization degree is low, the evaluation information cannot be effectively stored and transmitted, and the requirements for managing the evaluation data and mining the data are difficult to meet.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention is provided for solving the problems in the prior art, and aims to provide a method for evaluating the delivery rate of a digital design result of urban rail transit engineering.
The technical scheme of the invention is as follows: a method for evaluating the delivery rate of a digital design result of urban rail transit engineering comprises the following steps:
constructing a delivery rate evaluation standard system
Establishing standard parameters corresponding to the digital design result, summarizing and storing the standard parameters to establish a standard parameter database BS0；
Ii, acquiring digital design result
Acquiring a digital design result to be evaluated, and inputting the digital design result;
iii, classifying the digitalized design results
Classifying and sorting the input digital design results to obtain delivery comprehensive parameters and corresponding subentry content parameters, and caching and assembling the delivery comprehensive parameters to form a delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1The partial content parameter cache is assembled into a partial content parameter database BS2；
Iv, outputting scoring report of digital design result
Will deliver the integrated parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2With a standard parameter database BS0Comparing, and marking 'yes' or 'no' in corresponding list information;
v. outputting delivery rate of digital design result
Will deliver the integrated parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2With a standard parameter database BS0Weight calculation is carried out to obtain digitizationAnd designing the result delivery rate.
Further, the delivery rate evaluation standard system in step i further comprises a weighting factor database, wherein the factor coefficients in the weighting factor database and the standard parameter database BS0The standard parameters in (1) are in one-to-one correspondence.
Further, the delivery comprehensive parameters in the step iii are non-geometric parameter information in the digital design result, and the itemized content parameters are geometric parameter information in the digital design result.
Further, the standard parameter database BS in step i0The method comprises multi-stage data information, wherein the data information is divided according to the design stages of the urban rail transit engineering, and the design stages are orderly arranged, so that calculation and evaluation of the staged delivery rate and calculation and evaluation of the delivery rate of the whole engineering can be completed.
Further, step ii, reading the design stage of the digital design result in the input process of the digital design result to generate stage information, and using the stage information to the standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters in the middle and interior are called, and meanwhile, the clear marking is carried out when a scoring report is generated.
Further, step ii, in the process of inputting the digital design result, the attribute information of the digital design result needs to be stored, and the attribute information is displayed when the scoring report is generated.
Further, step v includes a comprehensive digital delivery rate score and a itemized digital delivery rate score in addition to the digital design result delivery rate.
Further, the integrated digital delivery rate score is provided by a delivery integrated parameter database BS1With a standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters are independently calculated by weight.
Further, the item digital delivery rate scores are calculated by an item content parameter database BS2With a standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters are independently calculated by weight.
The method comprises the steps of constructing a delivery rate evaluation standard system, aiming at the designed digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering, selecting a design stage, outputting a delivery rate and a delivery report, and finishing the evaluation of the digital delivery rate of the digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering.
The invention modularly outputs the delivery rate and the delivery report of the digital design result, provides the delivery opinion, provides the itemized comparison result support of visual data support for the delivery of the digital design result, improves the transparency of the delivery, ensures the delivery quality of the digital design result and improves the delivery evaluation efficiency of the digital design result.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention is described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples:
as shown in fig. 1, a method for evaluating a delivery rate of a digital design result of an urban rail transit engineering includes the following steps:
constructing a delivery rate evaluation standard system
Establishing standard parameters corresponding to the digital design result, summarizing and storing the standard parameters to establish a standard parameter database BS0；
Ii, acquiring digital design result
Acquiring a digital design result to be evaluated, and inputting the digital design result;
iii, classifying the digitalized design results
Classifying and sorting the input digital design results to obtain delivery comprehensive parameters and corresponding subentry content parameters, and caching and assembling the delivery comprehensive parameters to form a delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1The partial content parameter cache is assembled into a partial content parameter database BS2；
Iv, outputting scoring report of digital design result
Will deliver the integrated parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2Number of and quasi-parametersDatabase BS0Comparing, and marking 'yes' or 'no' in corresponding list information;
v. outputting delivery rate of digital design result
Will deliver the integrated parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2With a standard parameter database BS0And performing weight calculation to obtain the delivery rate of the digital design result.
The delivery rate evaluation standard system in the step i further comprises a weighting factor database, wherein the factor coefficients in the weighting factor database and the standard parameter database BS0The standard parameters in (1) are in one-to-one correspondence.
The delivery comprehensive parameters in the step iii are non-geometric parameter information in the digital design result, and the subentry content parameters are geometric parameter information in the digital design result.
Standard parameter database BS in step i0The method comprises multi-stage data information, wherein the data information is divided according to the design stages of the urban rail transit engineering, and the design stages are orderly arranged, so that calculation and evaluation of the staged delivery rate and calculation and evaluation of the delivery rate of the whole engineering can be completed.
Step ii, reading the design stage of the digital design result in the input process of the digital design result to generate stage information, and utilizing the stage information to the standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters in the middle and interior are called, and meanwhile, the clear marking is carried out when a scoring report is generated.
And step ii, saving the attribute information of the digital design result in the input process of the digital design result, and displaying the attribute information when generating a scoring report.
And step v, besides the digital design result delivery rate, the digital design result delivery rate also comprises comprehensive digital delivery rate scoring and itemized digital delivery rate scoring.
The integrated digital delivery rate score is provided by a delivery integrated parameter database BS1With a standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters are independently calculated by weight.
The itemized digital delivery rate scores are calculated by an itemized content parameter database BS2With a standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters are independently calculated by weight.
The method comprises the steps of setting design stage information in a delivery rate evaluation standard system, setting corresponding standard parameters in the corresponding design stage information, selecting a design stage according to related urban rail transit engineering design content, authenticating a digital design result, and determining that file attributes meet the requirements of loading into an autonomous research and development evaluation tool.
Wherein the delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2With a standard parameter database BS0The delivery comprehensive parameter database BS is used for carrying out weight calculation1A database of subentry content parameters BS2The parameters in the standard parameter database BS are accumulated to be used as molecular items0The parameters in the digital design result calculation method are used as denominator items, and therefore the digital design result delivery rate is calculated.
Preferably, the weighting factor and delivery integration parameter database BS in the weighting factor database1A database of subentry content parameters BS2The parameters are corresponding to each other, and the parameters are multiplied by the corresponding weight factors and then accumulated to be used as the molecular items of the delivery rate of the digital design result.
Wherein, the scoring report of the digital design result comprises and delivers the comprehensive parameter database BS1Delivery of integrated parameter reports and itemized content parameter database BS2Corresponding itemized content parameter report compositions.
The parameter name in the delivery comprehensive parameter report is the standard parameter name of the corresponding stage in the delivery rate evaluation standard system, the parameter name in the subentry content parameter report is also the standard parameter name of the corresponding stage in the delivery rate evaluation standard system, and the conclusion item is the delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1Item content parameter databaseBS2With a standard parameter database BS0The "yes" or "no" results of the parameter comparisons.
The attribute information of the digital design result may be, but is not limited to, name, modification time, file size, and file format.
Yet another embodiment
A method for evaluating the delivery rate of a digital design result of urban rail transit engineering comprises the following steps:
constructing a delivery rate evaluation standard system
Establishing standard parameters corresponding to the digital design result, summarizing and storing the standard parameters to establish a standard parameter database BS0；
Ii, acquiring digital design result
Acquiring a digital design result to be evaluated, and inputting the digital design result;
iii, classifying the digitalized design results
Classifying and sorting the input digital design results to obtain delivery comprehensive parameters and corresponding subentry content parameters, and caching and assembling the delivery comprehensive parameters to form a delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1The partial content parameter cache is assembled into a partial content parameter database BS2；
Iv, outputting scoring report of digital design result
Will deliver the integrated parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2And quasi-parameter database BS0Comparing, and marking 'yes' or 'no' in corresponding list information;
v. outputting delivery rate of digital design result
Will deliver the integrated parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2With a standard parameter database BS0And performing weight calculation to obtain the delivery rate of the digital design result.
The delivery rate evaluation standard system in the step i further comprises a weighting factor database, wherein the factor coefficients in the weighting factor database and the standard parameter database BS0The standard parameters in (1) are in one-to-one correspondence.
The delivery comprehensive parameters in the step iii are non-geometric parameter information in the digital design result, and the subentry content parameters are geometric parameter information in the digital design result.
Standard parameter database BS in step i0The method comprises multi-stage data information, wherein the data information is divided according to the design stages of the urban rail transit engineering, and the design stages are orderly arranged, so that calculation and evaluation of the staged delivery rate and calculation and evaluation of the delivery rate of the whole engineering can be completed.
Step ii, reading the design stage of the digital design result in the input process of the digital design result to generate stage information, and utilizing the stage information to the standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters in the middle and interior are called, and meanwhile, the clear marking is carried out when a scoring report is generated.
And step ii, saving the attribute information of the digital design result in the input process of the digital design result, and displaying the attribute information when generating a scoring report.
And step v, besides the digital design result delivery rate, the digital design result delivery rate also comprises comprehensive digital delivery rate scoring and itemized digital delivery rate scoring.
The integrated digital delivery rate score is provided by a delivery integrated parameter database BS1With a standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters are independently calculated by weight.
The itemized digital delivery rate scores are calculated by an itemized content parameter database BS2With a standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters are independently calculated by weight.
The method comprises the steps of setting design stage information in a delivery rate evaluation standard system, setting corresponding standard parameters in the corresponding design stage information, selecting a design stage according to related urban rail transit engineering design content, authenticating a digital design result, and determining that file attributes meet the requirements of loading into an autonomous research and development evaluation tool.
The parameter name in the delivery comprehensive parameter report is the standard parameter name of the corresponding stage in the delivery rate evaluation standard system, the parameter name in the subentry content parameter report is also the standard parameter name of the corresponding stage in the delivery rate evaluation standard system, and the conclusion item is the delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2With a standard parameter database BS0The "yes" or "no" results of the parameter comparisons.
The attribute information of the digital design result may be, but is not limited to, name, modification time, file size, and file format.
Wherein the delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2With a standard parameter database BS0The corresponding data are compared to form a comparison database BS3Will compare with the database BS3And performing weight calculation specifically as follows:
first, the delivery integrated parameter database BS is extracted1A database of subentry content parameters BS2The relevant parameters are aligned in order;
then, the related parameters of the above-mentioned order arrangement are matched with standard parameter database BS0Comparing the related parameters to obtain the comparison data of the corresponding parameters, arranging the comparison data to form a comparison database BS3。
Finally, the contrast database BS is called3The comparison data is subjected to weight calculation, so that the delivery rate of the digital design result is obtained, and meanwhile, a delivery comprehensive parameter database BS can be obtained1Delivery of integrated parameter delivery data and database BS for itemized content parameters2The itemized content parameter delivery data.
Preferably, the contrast database BS is formed as described above3And in the process of (2), the yes or no results of the correlation parameter comparison are output at the same time.
And directly producing in the delivery comprehensive parameter report and the itemized content parameter report according to the delivery comprehensive parameter delivery data, the parameter delivery data and the result data of yes and no.
On the basis of the two embodiments, the delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2The corresponding parameters form a structure of step-by-step classification of an index layer and a standard layer according to the relation between engineering speciality and information inclusion and inclusion, and the delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2Is a tree database with hierarchical relationship.
After step v, outputting the delivery rate of the digital design result, the method further comprises outputting a delivery conclusion, wherein the delivery conclusion is "delivery compliant", "deliverable", or "non-compliant". The delivery result is obtained by comparing the delivery rate and the parameter with a larger weight factor.
The specific corresponding numerical value of the digital design result delivery rate evaluation is that the numerical value of 90% or more is 'in-line delivery', the numerical value of 60% -90% is 'modified deliverable', and the numerical value of 0-60 is 'in-line delivery'.
The BIM model is used as an example to describe the following
Constructing a delivery rate evaluation standard system
Establishing standard parameters corresponding to the building information model BIM of the urban rail transit, summarizing and storing the standard parameters to establish a standard parameter database BS0；
Ii, acquiring digital design result
Acquiring an urban rail transit building information model BIM to be evaluated, and inputting the urban rail transit building information model BIM;
iii, classifying the digitalized design results
Classifying and sorting the input digital design results to obtain delivery comprehensive parameters and corresponding subentry content parameters;
the delivery comprehensive parameters are non-geometric information of the building information model BIM of the urban rail transit, and the information generated by applying the building information model is presented in a non-geometric information form;
the subentry content parameters are geometrical information of the building information model BIM of the urban rail transit.
The delivery comprehensive parameter cache is assembled to form a delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1The partial content parameter cache is assembled into a partial content parameter database BS2；
Iv, outputting scoring report of digital design result
Will deliver the integrated parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2And quasi-parameter database BS0Comparing, and marking 'yes' or 'no' in corresponding list information;
v. outputting delivery rate of digital design result
Will deliver the integrated parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2With a standard parameter database BS0And performing weight calculation to obtain the delivery rate of the digital design result.
The method comprises the steps of constructing a delivery rate evaluation standard system, aiming at the designed digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering, selecting a design stage, outputting a delivery rate and a delivery report, and finishing the evaluation of the digital delivery rate of the digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering.
The invention modularly outputs the delivery rate and the delivery report of the digital design result, provides the delivery opinion, provides the itemized comparison result support of visual data support for the delivery of the digital design result, improves the transparency of the delivery, ensures the delivery quality of the digital design result and improves the delivery evaluation efficiency of the digital design result.
Claims (9)
1. A method for evaluating the delivery rate of a digital design result of an urban rail transit engineering is characterized by comprising the following steps: the method comprises the following steps:
constructing a delivery rate evaluation standard system
Establishing standard parameters corresponding to digital design resultThe standard parameters are collected and stored to form a standard parameter database BS0；
(ii) obtaining digitized design results
Acquiring a digital design result to be evaluated, and inputting the digital design result;
(iii) classifying the digitized design results
Classifying and sorting the input digital design results to obtain delivery comprehensive parameters and corresponding subentry content parameters, and caching and assembling the delivery comprehensive parameters to form a delivery comprehensive parameter database BS1The partial content parameter cache is assembled into a partial content parameter database BS2；
(iv) outputting a scoring report of the digitized design result
Will deliver the integrated parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2With a standard parameter database BS0Comparing, and marking 'yes' or 'no' in corresponding list information;
(v) outputting the delivery rate of the digitized design result
Will deliver the integrated parameter database BS1A database of subentry content parameters BS2With a standard parameter database BS0And performing weight calculation to obtain the delivery rate of the digital design result.
2. The method for assessing the delivery rate of the digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the delivery rate evaluation standard system in the step (i) further comprises a weighting factor database, wherein the factor coefficients in the weighting factor database and the standard parameter database BS0The standard parameters in (1) are in one-to-one correspondence.
3. The method for assessing the delivery rate of the digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the delivery comprehensive parameters in the step (iii) are non-geometric parameter information in the digital design result, and the subentry content parameters are geometric parameter information in the digital design result.
4. The method for assessing the delivery rate of the digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the standard parameter database BS in step (i)0The method comprises multi-stage data information, wherein the data information is divided according to the design stages of the urban rail transit engineering, and the design stages are orderly arranged, so that calculation and evaluation of the staged delivery rate and calculation and evaluation of the delivery rate of the whole engineering can be completed.
5. The method for assessing the delivery rate of digital design results of urban rail transit engineering according to claim 4, wherein the method comprises the following steps: step (ii) reading the design stage of the digital design result in the input process of the digital design result to generate stage information, and using the stage information to the standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters in the middle and interior are called, and meanwhile, the clear marking is carried out when a scoring report is generated.
6. The method for assessing the delivery rate of the digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: and (ii) saving the attribute information of the digital design result in the input process of the digital design result, and displaying the attribute information when generating a scoring report.
7. The method for assessing the delivery rate of the digital design result of the urban rail transit engineering according to claim 1, wherein the method comprises the following steps: and (v) in addition to the digital design result delivery rate, the step (v) also comprises a comprehensive digital delivery rate score and a itemized digital delivery rate score.
8. The method for assessing the delivery rate of digital design results of urban rail transit engineering according to claim 7, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the integrated digital delivery rate score is provided by a delivery integrated parameter database BS1With a standard parameter database BS0Corresponding reference standardThe numbers are calculated by weight independently.
9. The method for assessing the delivery rate of digital design results of urban rail transit engineering according to claim 7, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the itemized digital delivery rate scores are calculated by an itemized content parameter database BS2With a standard parameter database BS0The corresponding standard parameters are independently calculated by weight.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011039947.5A CN112182708B (en) | 2020-09-28 | 2020-09-28 | Method for evaluating delivery rate of digital design result of urban rail transit engineering |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011039947.5A CN112182708B (en) | 2020-09-28 | 2020-09-28 | Method for evaluating delivery rate of digital design result of urban rail transit engineering |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112182708A true CN112182708A (en) | 2021-01-05 |
| CN112182708B CN112182708B (en) | 2023-02-17 |
Family
ID=73944448
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202011039947.5A Active CN112182708B (en) | 2020-09-28 | 2020-09-28 | Method for evaluating delivery rate of digital design result of urban rail transit engineering |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112182708B (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113298406A (en) * | 2021-06-07 | 2021-08-24 | 中国铁路设计集团有限公司 | Urban rail transit digital design and evaluation system and construction method thereof |
| CN116307937A (en) * | 2023-05-17 | 2023-06-23 | 天津大学 | Method and system for coordinating digital evaluation and design of productive urban rail engineering carbon neutralization |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101421757A (en) * | 2006-02-08 | 2009-04-29 | 比腾咨询有限公司 | The method and system that is used for one or more attributes of evaluation of tissue |
| CN102521710A (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2012-06-27 | 上海建科工程咨询有限公司 | Building construction quality safety online risk assessment system |
| CN103218695A (en) * | 2013-05-03 | 2013-07-24 | 国家电网公司 | Secondary equipment intelligence state evaluation diagnostic system and method thereof |
| CN104083174A (en) * | 2014-05-23 | 2014-10-08 | 奥美之路(北京)技术顾问有限公司 | Exercise ability evaluation model |
| CN109523154A (en) * | 2018-11-12 | 2019-03-26 | 山东省标准化研究院 | A kind of trace back data evaluation system and method |
-
2020
- 2020-09-28 CN CN202011039947.5A patent/CN112182708B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101421757A (en) * | 2006-02-08 | 2009-04-29 | 比腾咨询有限公司 | The method and system that is used for one or more attributes of evaluation of tissue |
| CN102521710A (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2012-06-27 | 上海建科工程咨询有限公司 | Building construction quality safety online risk assessment system |
| CN103218695A (en) * | 2013-05-03 | 2013-07-24 | 国家电网公司 | Secondary equipment intelligence state evaluation diagnostic system and method thereof |
| CN104083174A (en) * | 2014-05-23 | 2014-10-08 | 奥美之路(北京)技术顾问有限公司 | Exercise ability evaluation model |
| CN109523154A (en) * | 2018-11-12 | 2019-03-26 | 山东省标准化研究院 | A kind of trace back data evaluation system and method |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN113298406A (en) * | 2021-06-07 | 2021-08-24 | 中国铁路设计集团有限公司 | Urban rail transit digital design and evaluation system and construction method thereof |
| CN116307937A (en) * | 2023-05-17 | 2023-06-23 | 天津大学 | Method and system for coordinating digital evaluation and design of productive urban rail engineering carbon neutralization |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN112182708B (en) | 2023-02-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Wang et al. | What accounts for the rising sophistication of China's exports? | |
| CN112182708B (en) | Method for evaluating delivery rate of digital design result of urban rail transit engineering | |
| CN108304660B (en) | Automatic processing method for mapping real estate | |
| CN100474318C (en) | Automatic generation system for designing BOM | |
| JP2001274209A (en) | Semiconductor inspecting apparatus, semiconductor defect analyzer, semiconductor design data correcting apparatus, semiconductor inspection method, semiconductor defect analyzing method, semiconductor design data correcting method, and compute-readable recording medium | |
| CN111400354B (en) | Machine tool manufacturing BOM (Bill of Material) storage query and tree structure construction method based on MES (manufacturing execution System) | |
| CN112307153B (en) | Automatic construction method and device of industrial knowledge base and storage medium | |
| CN115713161A (en) | Building information management system based on BIM technology | |
| WO2024027437A1 (en) | Component parameter library-based method for integrated collaboration of prefabricated building design and construction | |
| CN112862446B (en) | BIM (building information modeling) intelligent engineering quantity list generation method based on feature recognition | |
| CN113837912B (en) | Analysis method for influence factors of carbon emission in construction industry | |
| EP4080429A1 (en) | Technology readiness level determination method and system based on science and technology big data | |
| CN114627210A (en) | Construction drawing correction method and system based on graphic recognition | |
| CN112559591B (en) | Outlier detection system and detection method for cold roll manufacturing process | |
| CN114510519A (en) | Visual analysis method and system based on industrial big data model | |
| CN117195356A (en) | BIM-based method for automatically outputting blank sheets of pseudo-classic architecture wood members | |
| CN110727986A (en) | BIM and weighted gray cloud clustering model-based ancient building maintenance model acquisition method | |
| CN114327607A (en) | Automatic generation method of BS code | |
| CN1755718A (en) | System for automatically generating bill of material for electronic product | |
| CN113010611A (en) | Method and system for automatically generating relations between relational database tables | |
| CN116028596B (en) | Method for realizing entity matching blocking | |
| JP5245481B2 (en) | Evaluation procedure generation method, apparatus and program | |
| JP2006178731A (en) | Method and apparatus for evaluating environmental influence of information communication service | |
| CN118261473A (en) | Construction and expression method of QBOM for complex equipment | |
| CN118378602A (en) | System and method for generating form data by automatically filling form according to data expansion |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |