CN112033234B - Multi-missile cooperative guidance law design method - Google Patents
Multi-missile cooperative guidance law design method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112033234B CN112033234B CN202010825332.9A CN202010825332A CN112033234B CN 112033234 B CN112033234 B CN 112033234B CN 202010825332 A CN202010825332 A CN 202010825332A CN 112033234 B CN112033234 B CN 112033234B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- missile
- guidance
- section
- ballistic
- primary
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
- F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
- F42B15/00—Self-propelled projectiles or missiles, e.g. rockets; Guided missiles
- F42B15/01—Arrangements thereon for guidance or control
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
- F41G7/34—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on predetermined target position data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/15—Vehicle, aircraft or watercraft design
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2111/00—Details relating to CAD techniques
- G06F2111/04—Constraint-based CAD
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T90/00—Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for designing a multi-missile cooperative guidance law, which divides the flight process of each missile into a primary guidance section, a middle guidance section and a final guidance section.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of missile launching. More particularly, the method relates to a composite guidance strategy comprising initial guidance, intermediate guidance and final guidance, and a multi-missile cooperative guidance law design method under the constraint of a falling angle and the constraint of attack time.
Background
In order to improve the penetration capability of the aircraft, the document [ 1 ] Jeon I S, Lee J I, Tahk M J.Impact-time-Control guiding law for anti-ship missiles [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2006, 14(2): 260-.
Literature [ 2 ] Zhao J, Zhou S Y, Zhou r.distributed time-constrained using Nonlinear model predictive control [ J ]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2016; 84(3): 1399-.
The document [ 4 ] Wang Y J, Dong S, Ou L L, et al, cooperative Control of multi-mission systems [ J ]. IET Control the Theory of the invention and Applications, 2014,9(3): 441) 446. by means of the idea of feedback linearization, the cooperative guidance problem is transformed into the nonlinear system consistency problem, and the cooperative attack is realized by coordinating the projectile distance and the lead angle of a plurality of aircrafts.
Document [ 5 ] Hou D L, Wang Q, Sun X J, et al, finish-time cooperative identification law for multiple participation with access establishment constraints [ J ]. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2015. the problem of finite consistency of attack times in the case of acceleration command anti-saturation was investigated.
The document [ 6 ] Wang X L, Zhang Y A, Wu H L.distributed cooperative guidance of multiple anti-ship hybrids with arbitrary impact and geometry [ J ]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015.
The documents [ 7 ] Sun X J, Zhou R, Hou D L, et al, consensus of leader-followers system of multi-missile with time-delays and switching topologies [ J ]. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 2014, 125(3): 1202-.
The guidance law in the literature [ 1-8 ] can guide multiple aircrafts to achieve 'simultaneous shooting landing' attack, but only coordination and control on hit time are considered, in practical application, in order to obtain the optimal relative information measurement effect of the bullets, detection equipment such as an optical imaging seeker and a radio frequency seeker has special requirements on the intersection angle of the bullets, and therefore the falling angle needs to be controlled; document [ 9 ] wangxiang, hongxin, linhain a method of controlling multi-bullet coordinated attack time and angle [ J ]. ballistics bullets.2012, 24 (2): 1-5, and [ 10 ] Zhao Qilun, Cheng and Li Qingdong, etc. super weapons and conventional missile cooperative attack strategy feasible domain research [ J ] aviation bulletin 2015, 36(7): 2291-.
In an actual application scene, because an aircraft fights in a three-dimensional space, the problem of aircraft guidance in the three-dimensional space needs to be discussed, in addition, acceleration instructions are generated in the whole process of missile flight according to different missile-target relative information measurement means, guidance laws of an initial guidance section, a middle guidance section and a final guidance section need to be designed respectively, so that the cost of a single aircraft is reduced as far as possible while the final attack precision is met, and the cost effectiveness ratio is improved.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve at least one of the technical problems proposed in the background art, the invention provides a design method of a multi-missile cooperative guidance law, which divides the flight process of each missile into a primary guidance section, a middle guidance section and a final guidance section, and comprises the following steps:
s1, establishing a space rectangular coordinate system according to the initial positions of the target and each missile, and obtaining the initial value (x) of the target in the space rectangular coordinate system T ,y T ,z T ) Τ And initial value (x) of each missile i ,y i ,z i ) Τ Wherein the subscript i represents each missile number;
s2, calculating expected trajectory deflection angle of each guided missile primary guiding section based on the initial value of the target and the initial value of each guided missileAnd desired ballistic inclination
S3, judging whether each missile enters a final guidance segment at the current moment or not based on the working state of each missile guidance head, and when each missile is in the final guidance segment, determining the trajectory deflection angle psi of each missile at the current moment based on i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Calculating the acceleration instruction of each missile under the final guidance section, and when each missile is not in the final guidance section, each missile is in the intermediate guidance section or the primary guidance section;
s4, based on the trajectory deflection angle psi of each missile at the current moment i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Desired ballistic declination from the primary guiding sectionAnd desired ballistic inclinationJudging whether each missile is in a primary guidance section or a middle guidance section at the current moment, calculating the acceleration instruction of each missile under the primary guidance section when each missile is in the primary guidance section, and calculating the acceleration instruction of each missile under the middle guidance section when each missile is in the middle guidance section;
and S5, controlling each missile to hit the target at the same time according to the acceleration instruction of each missile at the current moment.
In some possible implementations, the desired trajectory deviation angle of the primary guidance segment of each missile in S2Obtained by the following formula:
expected ballistic inclination angle of primary guiding section of each missile in S2Obtained by the following formula:
wherein, c i A fall angle scaling factor is desired for initial guidance.
In some possible implementations, the determining, in S3, whether each missile enters the terminal segment at the current time based on the operating state of each missile seeker includes:
each missile seeker feeds back a preset signal, and each missile enters a final guidance section.
In some possible implementations, the ballistic deflection angle ψ of each missile at the current time in S3 and S4 i Obtained by the following formula:
ψ i =atan2(-V z,i /V x,i );
the trajectory inclination angle theta of each missile at the current moment in the S3 and S4 i Obtained by the following formula:
wherein, V x,i ,V y,i ,V z,i And the velocity components of the missile in the space rectangular coordinate system are respectively.
In some possible implementations, the calculating the acceleration command of each missile under the final guidance segment in S3 includes:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the transverse lateral plane is as follows:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the vertical plane is as follows:
wherein k is P ∈[3,6]Is the ratio of the navigation to the navigation,is the rate of approach of the projectile to the eye,is the line-of-sight azimuth rate,is the angular velocity of the line of sight, q e,i Is the elevation angle of the line of sight, k A Greater than 0 is the proportional coefficient of the falling angle constraint term of the vertical plane, t go,i The remaining flight time of the ith missile is shown,is the desired fall angle, g is the gravitational constant.
In some possible implementations, the trajectory deviation angle ψ of each missile based on the current time in S4 i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Desired ballistic declination from the primary guiding sectionAnd desired ballistic inclinationJudging whether each missile at the current moment is in the primary guidance section or the intermediate guidance section comprises the following steps:
ballistic deflection angle psi of each missile at current moment i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Desired ballistic declination from the primary guiding sectionAnd desired ballistic inclinationWhen the requirement of the following formula is met, each guided missile at the current moment is judged to be in the middle brake guide section,
wherein, delta b Error range allowed for ballistic declination, δ e Allowable error range for ballistic inclination;
Otherwise, judging that each missile is in the primary guidance section at the current moment.
In some possible implementations, the calculating the acceleration command of each missile in the preliminary guidance segment in S4 includes:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the transverse lateral plane is as follows:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the vertical plane is as follows:
wherein k is b K is a predetermined constant > 0 e And g is a gravity constant, and 0 is a preset constant.
In some possible implementations, the calculating the acceleration command of each missile in the middle guidance stage in S4 includes:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the transverse lateral plane is as follows:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the vertical plane is as follows:
wherein k is C > 0 is the time coordination term proportionality coefficient, Δ R i Is the distance of the eyes, V i Is the magnitude of the flying speed of the missile,the remaining time of flight of each missile is averaged.
In some of the possible implementations of the present invention,
wherein, θ min ,θ max Respectively the minimum probing angle and the maximum probing angle of the seeker.
In some possible implementations, the time t remaining for the ith missile go,i Obtained by the following formula:
wherein eta is e,i =q e,i -θ i Representing the lead angle and N is the total number of missiles.
The invention has the following beneficial effects:
the invention provides a design method of a multi-missile cooperative guidance law, which provides a possible solution for the problem of multi-missile composite cooperative guidance considering attack time and falling angle constraints in a three-dimensional space, utilizes a mode of decoupling control of a vertical surface and a transverse plane of a missile to respectively give an acceleration instruction of a vertical surface and a transverse plane of a primary, a middle and a final guidance section, can guide a plurality of missiles to simultaneously hit a target at an expected trajectory inclination angle in the three-dimensional space, has certain engineering realizability, can hit the target at the same time by a plurality of missiles at a specific falling angle, can improve the penetration capability of a warhead on a firm shelter and an armor, adopts the composite guidance strategy of primary guidance, middle guidance and final guidance, can reduce the requirement on the hardware capability of the aircraft as far as possible while ensuring the striking precision, and further improve the efficiency-cost ratio of combat
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art that other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.
Fig. 1 shows a flow chart of a multi-missile cooperative guidance law design method provided by the embodiment of the invention.
Fig. 2 shows a flight trajectory diagram of each missile in a rectangular coordinate system, which is proposed by the embodiment of the invention.
Fig. 3 shows the distance between each missile and the target according to the embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 4 shows a graph of the drop angles of each of the missiles as proposed by the embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 shows vertical plane acceleration commands for each missile according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 shows the lateral planar acceleration commands for each missile as proposed by an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order to make the technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more apparent, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As shown in fig. 1, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for designing a multi-missile cooperative guidance law, including:
s1, establishing a space rectangular coordinate system according to the initial positions of the target and each missile, and obtaining the initial value (x) of the target in the space rectangular coordinate system T ,y T ,z T ) Τ And each leadInitial value of bullet (x) i ,y i ,z i ) Τ Wherein the subscript i represents each missile number;
s2, calculating expected trajectory deflection angle of each guided missile primary guiding section based on the initial value of the target and the initial value of each guided missileAnd desired ballistic inclination angle theta i * ;
In some embodiments, step S2 includes the following sub-steps
S21, expected trajectory deflection angle of primary guiding section of each missileObtained by the following formula:
expected trajectory inclination angle theta of primary guiding section of each missile i * Obtained by the following formula:
wherein, c i In order to obtain the initial guidance expected falling angle scaling coefficient, the selection can be carried out according to the initial combat battle array positions of a plurality of aircrafts in practical application. c. C i One possible range of values for (a) is as follows:
s3, judging whether each missile enters a final guidance segment at the current moment or not based on the working state of each missile guidance head, and when each missile is in the final guidance segment, determining the trajectory deflection angle psi of each missile at the current moment based on i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Calculating the acceleration instruction of each guided missile under the final guidance section, and when each guided missile is not in the final guidance section, each guided missile is in the middleA guidance-making section or a preliminary guidance-making section;
in some embodiments, step S3 includes the following sub-steps
S31, judging whether each missile enters a final guide section at the current moment based on the working state of each missile guide head comprises the following steps: each missile seeker feeds back a preset signal, and each missile enters a final guidance section; for example, if the seeker sends out the steady tracking state word for a plurality of consecutive times (which may be 5 times, 6 times, etc., and this is not limited in this application), the aircraft proceeds to the final leader. The method for determining whether the guided missile enters the terminal guidance section is not limited to be realized by the feedback of the guided missile seeker information, and the judgment can be carried out by judging the distance between the guided missile and the target, for example, when the distance between the guided missile and the target is smaller than a preset threshold value, the guided missile is judged to enter the terminal guidance section.
S32, ballistic deflection angle psi of each missile at current moment i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Can be obtained by the following steps:
ballistic deflection angle psi of each missile at current moment i :
ψ i =atan2(-V z,i /V x,i );
Trajectory inclination angle theta of each missile at current moment i :
Wherein, V x,i ,V y,i ,V z,i Respectively are the velocity components of the missile in the navigation reference coordinate system.
S33, based on the trajectory deflection angle psi of each missile at the current moment i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Calculating the acceleration instruction of each missile under the final guidance section comprises the following steps:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the transverse lateral plane is as follows:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the vertical plane is as follows:
wherein k is P ∈[3,6]Is the ratio of the navigation to the navigation,is the rate of approach of the projectile to the eye,is the line-of-sight azimuth rate,is the angular velocity of the line of sight, q e,i Is the elevation angle of the line of sight, k A Greater than 0 is the proportional coefficient of the falling angle constraint term of the vertical plane, t go,i The remaining flight time of the ith missile is shown,is the desired fall angle and g is the gravitational constant.
wherein, theta min ,θ max Respectively the minimum probing angle and the maximum probing angle of the seeker.
In some embodiments, the time t remaining for the ith missile of the plurality of missiles go,i Can be obtained by the following formula:
wherein eta is e,i =q e,i -θ i Representing the lead angle;
s4, based on the trajectory deflection angle psi of each missile at the current moment i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Desired ballistic declination from the primary guiding sectionAnd desired ballistic inclinationJudging whether each missile is in a primary guidance section or a middle guidance section at the current moment, calculating the acceleration instruction of each missile under the primary guidance section when each missile is in the primary guidance section, and calculating the acceleration instruction of each missile under the middle guidance section when each missile is in the middle guidance section;
in some embodiments, step S4 includes the following sub-steps
S41, ballistic deflection angle psi of each missile at current moment i Obtained by the following formula:
ψ i =atan2(-V z,i /V x,i );
trajectory inclination angle theta of each missile at current moment i Obtained by the following formula:
wherein, V x,i ,V y,i ,V z,i Respectively is the velocity component of the missile under the navigation reference coordinate system;
s42, based on the trajectory deflection angle psi of each missile at the current moment i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Expected deviation angle of the primary guide section from the target trajectoryAnd desired ballistic inclinationJudging whether each missile at the current moment is in the primary guidance section or the intermediate guidance section comprises the following steps:
trajectory deviation of each missile at current momentAngle psi i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Desired ballistic declination from the primary guiding sectionAnd desired ballistic inclination angle theta i * When the requirement of the following formula is met, each guided missile at the current moment is judged to be in the middle brake guide section,
|θ i -θ i * |<δ e
wherein, delta b Error range allowed for ballistic declination, δ e Error range allowed for ballistic inclination angle, δ b And delta e In practice a small positive number, e.g. delta, may be used b =0.2°,δ e =0.2°;
Otherwise, judging that each missile is in the primary guidance section at the current moment.
It should be understood by those skilled in the art that after the missile enters the intermediate guidance section, the condition is no longer effective, that is, after the missile enters the intermediate guidance section, the missile only judges whether the missile is in the intermediate guidance section or the final guidance section, and the missile does not enter the initial guidance section.
S43, calculating the acceleration instruction of each missile under the primary guidance section comprises the following steps:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the transverse lateral plane is as follows:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the vertical plane is as follows:
a eI,i =-k e (θ i -θ i * )+g cos θ i
wherein k is b K is a predetermined constant > 0 e > 0 being a predetermined constant, e.g. k b =1,k e G is the gravity constant (g ≈ 9.807) 1.
S44, calculating the acceleration instruction of each missile under the middle guidance section comprises the following steps:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the transverse lateral plane is as follows:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the vertical plane is as follows:
wherein k is C > 0 is the time coordination term proportionality coefficient, Δ R i Is the distance of the eyes, V i Is the magnitude of the flying speed of the missile,the remaining time of flight of each missile is averaged.
wherein N is the total number of missiles.
And S5, controlling each missile to hit the target at the same time according to the acceleration instruction of each missile at the current moment.
Examples
This embodiment gives a specific example to verify the effect of the present application:
setting 3 missiles to attack the target, setting the position of the target in a space coordinate system as (0, 0, 10KM),
the initial conditions for 3 missiles are shown in table 1 below:
TABLE 1 missile initial conditions
The guidance law parameters take the following values:
a primary guide section: k is a radical of e =1,k b =1,δ e =δ b =0.01rad;
And (3) final guide section: k is a radical of P =4,k A =2。
The numerical simulation calculation results are shown in fig. 2-6, and it can be seen that the present invention can guide a plurality of aircrafts to hit a target at a specific landing angle at the same time, the variation of the generated acceleration instruction is relatively stable,
it should be understood that the above-described embodiments of the present invention are examples for clearly illustrating the invention, and are not to be construed as limiting the embodiments of the present invention, and it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made on the basis of the above description, and it is not intended to exhaust all embodiments, and obvious changes and modifications can be made on the basis of the technical solutions of the present invention.
Claims (9)
1. A multi-missile cooperative guidance law design method divides the flight process of each missile into a primary guidance section, a middle guidance section and a final guidance section, and is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, establishing a space rectangular coordinate system according to the initial positions of the target and each missile, and obtaining the initial value (x) of the target in the space rectangular coordinate system T ,y T ,z T ) T And initial value (x) of each missile i ,y i ,z i ) T Wherein, subscript i represents each missile serial number;
s2 radicalCalculating expected trajectory deflection angles of the primary guidance sections of all the missiles according to the initial values of the targets and the initial values of all the missilesAnd desired ballistic inclination
Wherein the expected trajectory deviation angle of the primary guiding section of each missileObtained by the following formula:
expected trajectory inclination angle of primary guiding section of each missileObtained by the following formula:
wherein, c i Desired landing angle scaling factor for initial guidance, c i The value ranges are as follows:
s3, judging whether each missile enters a final guidance segment at the current moment or not based on the working state of each missile guidance head, and when each missile is in the final guidance segment, determining the trajectory deflection angle psi of each missile at the current moment based on i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Calculating the acceleration instruction of each guided missile under the final guidance section, and when each guided missile is not in the final guidance section, each guided missile is in the intermediate guidance section or the primary guidance section;
s4, based on the trajectory deflection angle psi of each missile at the current moment i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Desired ballistic declination from the primary guiding sectionAnd desired ballistic inclinationJudging whether each missile is in a primary guidance section or a middle guidance section at the current moment, calculating an acceleration instruction of each missile under the primary guidance section when each missile is in the primary guidance section, and calculating an acceleration instruction of each missile under the middle guidance section when each missile is in the middle guidance section;
and S5, controlling each missile to hit the target at the same time according to the acceleration instruction of each missile at the current moment.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step S3 of determining whether each missile enters the terminal guidance segment at the current moment based on the operating state of each missile guidance head comprises:
each missile seeker feeds back a preset signal, and each missile enters a final guidance section.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the ballistic declination ψ of each missile at the current time in S3 and S4 i Obtained by the following formula:
ψ i =atan2(-V z,i /V x,i );
the trajectory inclination angle theta of each missile at the current moment in the S3 and S4 i Obtained by the following formula:
wherein, V x,i ,V y,i ,V z,i And the velocity components of the missile in the space rectangular coordinate system are respectively.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the step of calculating the acceleration command of each missile under the final guidance segment in S3 comprises the steps of:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the transverse lateral plane is as follows:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the vertical plane is as follows:
wherein k is P ∈[3,6]Is the ratio of the navigation to the navigation,is the rate of approach of the projectile to the eye,is the line-of-sight azimuth rate,is the angular velocity of the line of sight, q e,i Is the elevation angle of the line of sight, k A Greater than 0 is the proportional coefficient of the falling angle constraint term of the vertical plane, t go,i The remaining flight time of the ith missile is shown,is the desired fall angle and g is the gravitational constant.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the S4 is based on the ballistic deflection angle ψ of each missile at the current time i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Desired ballistic declination from the primary guidance segmentAnd desired ballistic inclinationJudging whether each missile at the current moment is in the primary guidance section or the intermediate guidance section comprises the following steps:
ballistic deflection angle psi of each missile at current moment i And ballistic inclination angle theta i Desired ballistic declination from the primary guiding sectionAnd desired ballistic inclinationWhen the requirement of the following formula is met, each guided missile at the current moment is judged to be in the middle brake guide section,
wherein, delta b Error range allowed for ballistic declination, δ e The allowable error range of the ballistic inclination angle;
otherwise, judging that each missile is in the primary guidance section at the current moment.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the step of calculating the acceleration command of each missile in the initial guidance segment in S4 comprises the following steps:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the transverse lateral plane is as follows:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the vertical plane is as follows:
wherein k is b K is a predetermined constant > 0 e And g is a gravity constant, and 0 is a preset constant.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of calculating the acceleration commands of the missiles in the middle guidance distance in S4 comprises the steps of:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the transverse lateral plane is as follows:
the acceleration instruction of the missile on the vertical plane is as follows:
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the time t remaining for the ith missile go,i Obtained by the following formula:
wherein eta is e,i =q e,i -θ i Representing the lead angle and N is the total number of missiles.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010825332.9A CN112033234B (en) | 2020-08-17 | 2020-08-17 | Multi-missile cooperative guidance law design method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010825332.9A CN112033234B (en) | 2020-08-17 | 2020-08-17 | Multi-missile cooperative guidance law design method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN112033234A CN112033234A (en) | 2020-12-04 |
CN112033234B true CN112033234B (en) | 2022-08-09 |
Family
ID=73578350
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010825332.9A Active CN112033234B (en) | 2020-08-17 | 2020-08-17 | Multi-missile cooperative guidance law design method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN112033234B (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112731965B (en) * | 2020-12-17 | 2022-04-08 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Guidance method based on target maneuver identification |
CN112799429B (en) * | 2021-01-05 | 2022-03-29 | 北京航空航天大学 | Multi-missile cooperative attack guidance law design method based on reinforcement learning |
CN112859921B (en) * | 2021-01-21 | 2022-02-22 | 北京航空航天大学 | Three-dimensional simultaneous attack robust cooperative guidance law design method |
CN113108653B (en) * | 2021-04-21 | 2022-02-22 | 中国人民解放军军事科学院国防科技创新研究院 | Missile cluster intelligent cooperation system and implementation method thereof |
CN114384808B (en) * | 2022-03-24 | 2022-07-15 | 西北工业大学 | Arrival time control three-dimensional guidance method based on adaptive neural network |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5435503A (en) * | 1993-08-27 | 1995-07-25 | Loral Vought Systems Corp. | Real time missile guidance system |
GB201300848D0 (en) * | 2013-01-15 | 2013-07-24 | Mbda Uk Ltd | A missile seeker and guidance method |
CN103245256A (en) * | 2013-04-25 | 2013-08-14 | 北京理工大学 | Multi-missile cooperative attack guidance law designing method |
CN106843265A (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2017-06-13 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Three-dimensional many guided missile cooperative guidance method and systems of finite time convergence control |
CN108168381A (en) * | 2018-01-04 | 2018-06-15 | 北京理工大学 | A kind of control method of more pieces of guided missile cooperations |
CN109597423A (en) * | 2019-01-08 | 2019-04-09 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of design method of the multiple constraint Terminal Guidance Laws based on reference sight angle signal |
CN110017729A (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2019-07-16 | 西安交通大学 | A kind of more guided missile time coordination method of guidance with impingement angle constraint |
CN111306998A (en) * | 2020-03-24 | 2020-06-19 | 北京理工大学 | Parameter perturbation self-adaptive guided rocket projectile vertical attack guidance method |
-
2020
- 2020-08-17 CN CN202010825332.9A patent/CN112033234B/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5435503A (en) * | 1993-08-27 | 1995-07-25 | Loral Vought Systems Corp. | Real time missile guidance system |
GB201300848D0 (en) * | 2013-01-15 | 2013-07-24 | Mbda Uk Ltd | A missile seeker and guidance method |
CN103245256A (en) * | 2013-04-25 | 2013-08-14 | 北京理工大学 | Multi-missile cooperative attack guidance law designing method |
CN106843265A (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2017-06-13 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Three-dimensional many guided missile cooperative guidance method and systems of finite time convergence control |
CN108168381A (en) * | 2018-01-04 | 2018-06-15 | 北京理工大学 | A kind of control method of more pieces of guided missile cooperations |
CN109597423A (en) * | 2019-01-08 | 2019-04-09 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of design method of the multiple constraint Terminal Guidance Laws based on reference sight angle signal |
CN110017729A (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2019-07-16 | 西安交通大学 | A kind of more guided missile time coordination method of guidance with impingement angle constraint |
CN111306998A (en) * | 2020-03-24 | 2020-06-19 | 北京理工大学 | Parameter perturbation self-adaptive guided rocket projectile vertical attack guidance method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN112033234A (en) | 2020-12-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN112033234B (en) | Multi-missile cooperative guidance law design method | |
CN112558631B (en) | Variable parameter guidance method with large falling angle constraint based on measurement information | |
US6064332A (en) | Proportional Guidance (PROGUIDE) and Augmented Proportional Guidance (Augmented PROGUIDE) | |
US4008869A (en) | Predicted - corrected projectile control system | |
CN111649624B (en) | Space miniature precise guided weapon control method | |
CN115857538A (en) | Multi-aircraft cooperative guidance method meeting falling angle constraint in three-dimensional space | |
US4086841A (en) | Helical path munitions delivery | |
CN112731965B (en) | Guidance method based on target maneuver identification | |
CN112815787B (en) | Missile guidance law for multiple missiles to attack maneuvering target simultaneously | |
CN112050692B (en) | Multi-missile cooperative guidance law design method | |
Fairfax et al. | Trajectory shaping for quasi-equilibrium glide in guided munitions | |
CN113639586B (en) | Guidance method, system and medium for resisting radar shutdown | |
CN115328206A (en) | Segmentation guidance method suitable for cooperative strike of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles | |
Zuoe et al. | Study on vertical attack penetration probability of anti-ship missile | |
CN114153226A (en) | Unmanned aerial vehicle view field keeping and guiding method and system assisted by dynamic sight line information | |
Palumbo | Guest editor’s introduction: homing missile guidance and control | |
Baba et al. | Air combat guidance law for an UCAV | |
CN112729015A (en) | Maneuvering penetration method based on interception bullet guidance law identification | |
Jeon | Impact-time-control guidance laws for cooperative attack of multiple missiles | |
Parwana et al. | An SDRE based impact and body angle constrained guidance against a stationary surface target | |
CN117891271B (en) | Three-dimensional collaborative guidance method for high-speed aircraft in consideration of time and angle constraints | |
Menon et al. | Integrated Guidance-Control Systems for Fixed-Aim Warhead Missiles | |
Nocoń et al. | Optimal compensator for anti-ship missile with vectorization of engine thrust | |
CN114608391B (en) | Cannonball guidance method and system with stealth effect | |
CN116579118B (en) | Online quick calculation method for three-dimensional dynamic emission area for combat in short-distance air combat |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |