CN111723470B - Automatic driving control method based on calibration optimization RSS model - Google Patents
Automatic driving control method based on calibration optimization RSS model Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111723470B CN111723470B CN202010456689.4A CN202010456689A CN111723470B CN 111723470 B CN111723470 B CN 111723470B CN 202010456689 A CN202010456689 A CN 202010456689A CN 111723470 B CN111723470 B CN 111723470B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- following
- rss
- model
- dangerous
- automatic driving
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tungsten Chemical compound [W] WFKWXMTUELFFGS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052721 tungsten Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000010937 tungsten Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000020990 adrenal cortex carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 10
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000035484 reaction time Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/27—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using machine learning, e.g. artificial intelligence, neural networks, support vector machines [SVM] or training a model
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/01—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
- G08G1/0104—Measuring and analyzing of parameters relative to traffic conditions
- G08G1/0125—Traffic data processing
- G08G1/0129—Traffic data processing for creating historical data or processing based on historical data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/16—Anti-collision systems
- G08G1/166—Anti-collision systems for active traffic, e.g. moving vehicles, pedestrians, bikes
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T10/00—Road transport of goods or passengers
- Y02T10/10—Internal combustion engine [ICE] based vehicles
- Y02T10/40—Engine management systems
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to an automatic driving control method based on a calibration optimization RSS model, which is used for calibrating parameters of an existing responsibility sensitive safety model, and the method is a program embedded in a computer and comprises the following steps: step 1: screening dangerous events under the following scenes from the natural driving database to obtain dangerous event data under the following scenes; step 2: using the dangerous event data obtained in the step 1 to reappear dangerous events in a simulation platform to obtain rear vehicle driving track data; step 3: establishing an objective function and constructing a multi-objective optimization problem; step 4: solving an objective function to obtain an objective function solution set; step 5: and obtaining an optimal solution from the objective function solution set to serve as a final calibration result of the RSS model. Compared with the prior art, the method has the advantages of low complexity, comprehensive consideration of the safety and conservation degree of the model, high safety, practical applicability and the like.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of automatic driving decision methods, in particular to an automatic driving control method based on a calibration optimization RSS model.
Background
To ensure the Safety and reliability of an autonomous vehicle, a strict mathematical model was established, and in 2017, a Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS) model has been proposed by mobile researchers, which has become the core of the automated vehicle model decision standard IEEE 2846 formulated by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The RSS model calculates the safety distance between the AV and other traffic participants in real time, and helps the AV to reasonably deal with emergency scenes. The safe distance is calculated by assuming a "worst case scenario", i.e. as long as the safe distance is obeyed, the AV does not cause an accident without taking the maximum deceleration when the surrounding vehicle takes extreme actions, such as sudden deceleration.
The RSS model has the following advantages: (1) RSS is a strict mathematical model covering three main tasks of AV: sensing, planning and decision making; (2) The "worst scenario" assumption eliminates the necessity of predicting the intent of other traffic participants; (3) According to whether the traffic participation main body makes proper risk avoidance measures when the safety distance is not met, the RSS model can help judge the responsibility attribution of the accident; (4) The RSS model can fully cover various driving scenes such as following, changing lanes, overtaking and the like. The related research of the existing RSS model has the following defects: (1) Default parameters are used, and the conservation degree of the model is large. (2) The scenes used for the simulation test are all set manually, and support of actual driving behavior data is lacked.
At present, research on reducing the conservation degree of an RSS model is also continuously carried out, for example, china patent CN110928319A discloses a control method, a device, a vehicle and a storage medium for an automatic driving vehicle, wherein the control method in the patent controls the vehicle by adding a calculation process of a safety risk parameter in the RSS model and a method with the minimum safety coefficient, and the method lightens the conservation degree of the RSS model, increases the complexity of an algorithm and prolongs the processing time of the algorithm.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects of the prior art and provide the automatic driving control method based on the calibration optimization RSS model, which has low complexity, high safety and practical applicability by comprehensively considering the safety and conservation degree of the model.
The aim of the invention can be achieved by the following technical scheme:
an automatic driving control method based on a calibration optimization RSS model, which is a program embedded in a computer and comprises the following steps:
step 1: screening dangerous events under the following scenes from the natural driving database to obtain dangerous event data under the following scenes;
step 2: using the dangerous event data obtained in the step 1 to reappear dangerous events in a simulation platform to obtain rear vehicle driving track data;
step 3: establishing an objective function and constructing a multi-objective optimization problem;
step 4: solving an objective function to obtain an objective function solution set;
step 5: obtaining an optimal solution from the objective function solution set as a final calibration result of the RSS model;
step 6: and performing automatic driving control on the automatic driving vehicle by using the RSS model subjected to calibration optimization.
Preferably, the step 1 utilizes a threshold method to screen dangerous events under the following scenes from a natural driving database.
Preferably, the step 2 specifically includes:
and (3) reproducing the dangerous event in the following scene screened in the step (1) in a simulation platform, wherein the initial speed and initial position of the rear vehicle, the track of the front vehicle, the central line of the road and the width of the road are all real data of the dangerous event obtained in the step (1), setting the rear vehicle as an automatic driving vehicle AV controlled by the adaptive cruise ACC and the responsibility sensitive safety model RSS in the simulation platform, and obtaining driving track data of the rear vehicle through simulation.
Preferably, the step 3 specifically includes:
the safety performance and conservation degree of the model are synthesized, and a multi-objective function is established:
Ω=(max f Safety ,min f Conservativeness )
wherein max f Safety For the first sub-target, min f Conservativeness Is the second sub-target.
More preferably, the first sub-target max f Safety The method comprises the following steps:
wherein N is the dangerous following event number extracted from natural driving data; TIT (tungsten inert gas) i A TIT value for the ith dangerous following event; TTC (TTC) i (t) is the ith dangerous heelTTC value of the vehicle event at time t; τ SC Is a simulation time step; t C * Is the threshold for TTC.
More preferably, the second sub-target min f Conservativeness The method comprises the following steps:
wherein ,Δdi For measuring the degree of conservation of event i;represents the RSS safe distance d min Is greater than the actual following distance d relative Is equal to d relative In comparison, d min The larger the RSS model, the earlier the trigger time will be, forcing the AV to minimum comfort deceleration a min,brake The speed is reduced, and the conservation degree of the model is higher.
Preferably, the step 4 specifically includes:
the non-dominant ordered genetic algorithm NSGA-II with elite strategy is used for solving the multi-objective optimization problem established in the step 3.
More preferably, the NSGA-II algorithm comprises the following steps:
step 4-1: randomly generating an initial population, wherein the individuals represent a random parameter set of the RSS model;
step 4-2: mutation and crossover are carried out on randomly selected individuals to generate subgroups;
step 4-3: combining the parent and the offspring;
step 4-4: layering the individuals according to the dominant relationship by using a rapid non-dominant ranking algorithm;
step 4-5: calculating the crowding degree i of an individual layer by layer d Sorting the individuals according to the degree of congestion,selecting proper individuals to form a new parent;
step 4-6: repeating the steps 2-5 until the average relative weight change of the fitness function among the generations is smaller than a preset tolerance or the iteration number reaches the maximum value, and stopping iteration.
More preferably, the congestion degree i in the step 4-5 d The calculation method of (1) is as follows:
wherein ,a j-th objective function value representing point i+1; />The j-th objective function value at the i-1 th point is represented.
Preferably, the step 5 specifically includes:
selecting a first sub-target max f from the target function solution set obtained in the step 4 Safety The set of data with the largest value is used as the final calibration result of the RSS model.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following advantages:
1. the complexity is low, and the safety and conservation degree of the model are comprehensively considered: according to the automatic driving control method, the RSS model is calibrated, the algorithm complexity is low, the safety and conservation degree of the model are comprehensively considered, a multi-objective function is built, the best safety performance of the model is ensured, the conservation degree is considered, and road resources can be effectively utilized.
2. The safety is high: according to the automatic driving control method, on the basis of comprehensively considering the safety and conservation degree of the model, the solution with the highest safety performance is selected from the solution set to serve as the parameter calibration value of the RSS model, and the safety performance is not affected.
3. The method has practical applicability: according to the automatic driving control method, when the RSS model is calibrated, a simulation scene is constructed based on actual driving behavior data, and the simulation is performed by using real events, so that the calibrated model has more practical applicability.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of an algorithm of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the NSGA-II algorithm of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an objective function solution set obtained in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a TIT distribution diagram obtained by simulation of a rear vehicle using a human driver model in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a TIT distribution diagram obtained by simulating a rear vehicle using an autonomous vehicle without an RSS model ACC in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a TIT distribution diagram obtained by simulating a rear vehicle using an autonomous vehicle embedded with a default RSS model ACC in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a TIT distribution diagram obtained by simulating a rear vehicle using an autonomous vehicle embedded with a calibration RSS model ACC in an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 8 is a schematic diagram of obtaining a relative distance between a rear vehicle and a front vehicle when four rear vehicle models used in the embodiment of the present invention are simulated.
Detailed Description
The following description of the embodiments of the present invention will be made clearly and fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which it is evident that the embodiments described are some, but not all embodiments of the invention. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the present invention without making any inventive effort, shall fall within the scope of the present invention.
An automatic driving control method based on a calibration optimization RSS model, the flow of which is shown in figure 1, comprises the following steps:
step 1: the dangerous event under the following scene is screened from the Shanghai natural driving experimental data by using a threshold method, and the threshold is set for the vehicle kinematic parameters, wherein the threshold is specifically set in the embodiment as follows: longitudinal acceleration is less than-0.45 g and collision time is less than 4s;
in order to avoid false alarm of a threshold method, manual verification is further arranged in the embodiment to determine the effectiveness of the event;
step 2: using the dangerous event data obtained in the step 1, reproducing a dangerous event in a simulation platform, and setting a rear vehicle as an automatic driving vehicle commonly controlled by ACC and RSS;
the method specifically comprises the following steps: the dangerous event under the following scene screened in the step 1 is reproduced in a MATLAB Simulink simulation platform, the initial speed and the initial position of a rear vehicle, the track of a front vehicle, the central line of a road and the width of the road are all real data of the dangerous event obtained in the step 1, and the rear vehicle is set as an automatic driving vehicle AV controlled by the adaptive cruise ACC and the responsibility sensitive safety model RSS in the simulation platform; and obtaining the motion trail data of the rear vehicle through the simulation.
The running principle of the RSS model is to calculate in real time the safe distance that the AV needs to keep with the preceding vehicle, and if the actual following distance does not meet the safe distance, the AV decelerates with a predefined minimum deceleration, i.e. a comfortable deceleration. The core idea of calculating the safe distance is: suppose that the preceding vehicle suddenly assumes the maximum deceleration a at the present moment max,brake AV is at maximum acceleration a within the reaction time ρ max,accel Acceleration is carried out with minimum comfortable deceleration a after reaction time min,brake The minimum safe distance for deceleration, which does not collide in the above case, is RSS safe distance d min The calculation formula is as follows:
wherein ,[x]+ =max{x,0};v a and vl The speeds of the AV and the current moment of the front vehicle are respectively; ρ, a max,accel 、a min,brake and amax,brake Is four parameters to be calibrated.
Step 3: and (3) integrating the safety performance and conservation degree of the model, establishing an objective function, and constructing a multi-objective optimization problem. Where security performance is measured by the TTC's collective indicator TIT, the goal is that AV produces the minimum total TIT in all dangerous following events. The conservation degree of the model is taken into consideration to avoid that the algorithm generates an excessive following distance for obtaining a safer result, so that the utilization rate of road resources is too low.
The multi-objective function is specifically:
Ω=(max f Safety ,min f Conservativeness )
wherein max f Safety For the first sub-target, min f Conservativeness Is the second sub-target.
First sub-target max f Safety The method comprises the following steps:
wherein N is the dangerous following event number extracted from natural driving data; TIT (tungsten inert gas) i The TIT value of the ith dangerous following event is a measure index of safety performance, and the accumulated TTC less than a certain threshold value in a period of time is measured, wherein the unit is s 2 ;TTC i (t) is the TTC value of the ith dangerous following event at the moment t, specifically the ratio of the relative distance between the AV at the moment t and the front vehicle to the relative speed; τ SC Is a simulation time step; t C * A threshold value for TTC;
second sub-target min f Conservativeness The method comprises the following steps:
wherein ,Δdi For measuring the degree of conservation of event i;represents the RSS safe distance d min Is greater than the actual following distance d relative Is equal to d relative In comparison, d min The larger the RSS model, the earlier the trigger time will be, forcing the AV to minimum comfort deceleration a min,brake Speed reduction is carried out, so that the conservation degree of the model is higher; Δd i Metric d min Exceeding d relative To the extent that d is not present min Greater than d relative And Δd i The value is 0.
Step 4: solving an objective function by using a non-dominant ranking genetic algorithm NSGA-II with elite strategy, wherein the flow is shown in figure 2, and the specific steps comprise:
step 4-1: randomly generating an initial population, wherein the individuals represent a random parameter set of the RSS model;
step 4-2: mutation and crossover are carried out on randomly selected individuals to generate subgroups;
step 4-3: combining the parent and the offspring;
step 4-4: layering the individuals according to the dominant relationship by using a rapid non-dominant ranking algorithm;
the dominance relationship refers to: n target components f for multi-target minimization problem i (i=1, 2,) nArbitrary given two decision variables->If and only if, for->All have->Then->Innervating->
The specific steps of the rapid dominant ranking algorithm are: assuming the population is P, the algorithm needs to calculate two parameters n for each individual P in P p and Sp, wherein np For the number of individuals in the population that dominate p, S p Is the set of individuals in the population that are dominated by individuals p.
(1) Find all n in the population p Individual=0 and is stored in the current set F 1 In (a) and (b);
(2) For the current set F 1 Each individual i of the group of individuals is S i Traversing S i Each individual l of (1), execute n l =n l -1, if n l Individual l is saved in set H, =0;
(3) Record F 1 The obtained individuals are individuals of the first non-dominant layer, H is used as a current set, and the operation is repeated until the whole population is classified;
step 4-5: calculating the crowding degree i of an individual layer by layer d Sorting individuals according to the degree of congestion, and selecting proper individuals to form a new parent;
the method for calculating the crowding degree comprises the following steps:
wherein ,a j-th objective function value representing point i+1; />A j-th objective function value representing the i-1 th point;
step 4-6: repeating the steps 2-5 until the termination condition is met, namely that the average relative weight change of the fitness function among generations is smaller than a preset tolerance or the iteration number reaches the maximum value; the average relative weight variation preset margin set in this embodiment is 10 -6 The iteration number reaches 300;
step 5: selecting a first sub-target max f from a solution set of target functions Safety The set of data with the maximum value is used as a final calibration result of the RSS model, and the calibrated RSS model is obtained;
step 6: and performing automatic driving control on the automatic driving vehicle by using the RSS model subjected to calibration optimization.
A specific example is provided below:
default parameters for uncalibrated RSS model are shown in table 1.
Table 1 default parameter values for RSS model
Parameters (Unit) | Value taking |
ρ(s) | 1 |
a max,accel (m/s 2 ) | 2 |
a min,brake (m/s 2 ) | -3 |
a max,brake (m/s 2 ) | -8 |
Based on Shanghai natural driving experimental data, extracting 223 dangerous following events, solving a multi-objective optimization problem by using an NSGA-II algorithm to obtain a solution set containing 105 groups of parameter combinations, selecting a solution with the largest first sub-target value from the solution set generated by the NSGA-II as a final calibration result of an RSS model, wherein the corresponding parameter values and objective function values are shown in a table 2.
Table 2 RSS calibration parameter values
The calibrated RSS safe distance expression is as follows:
in this embodiment, three rear vehicle models are selected for comparison test, and the selected rear vehicle models are respectively:
(1) A human driver rear vehicle model;
(2) An autonomous vehicle AV embedded with an auto-cruise system ACC;
(3) An autonomous vehicle AV embedded with an auto-cruise system ACC in which an RSS model using default parameters is embedded;
(4) An autonomous vehicle AV with an autonomous cruise system ACC embedded with a calibrated RSS model.
The three rear vehicle models are used for simulation, and a TIT distribution map is obtained respectively, as shown in figures 4 to 7. Analysis finds that the TIT value of the automatic driving vehicle AV embedded with the calibrated RSS model is concentrated in [0,5 ]]s 2 Compared with human drivers and ACCs not embedded with the RSS model, the TIT value of the automatic driving vehicle AV embedded with the RSS model is obviously reduced.The TIT average value of the three models is 4.37s respectively 2 、4.93s 2 、2.23s 2 and 2.65s2 。
The relative distances between the rear vehicle and the front vehicle obtained when the four rear vehicle models are simulated are shown in FIG. 8, although the average TIT value of the embedded default RSS model AV is 2.23s 2 The average TIT value of the embedded calibrated RSS model AV is 2.65s 2 The two data are relatively close, but as can be seen from analysis of fig. 8, the average relative distance between the AV embedded with the default RSS model and the front vehicle is 20.86m, the average relative distance between the AV embedded with the calibrated RSS model and the front vehicle is 12.71m, the average following distance between the AV embedded with the calibrated RSS model and the front vehicle is 7.43m, so that the RSS model using the default parameters is too conservative, the following distance between the RSS model and the front vehicle is too large, and the waste of road resources is caused, and the RSS model is not suitable for the actual driving environment.
While the invention has been described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and substitutions of equivalents may be made and equivalents will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the invention is subject to the protection scope of the claims.
Claims (6)
1. An automatic driving control method based on a calibration optimization RSS model, which is a program embedded in a computer, is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1: screening dangerous events under the following scenes from the natural driving database to obtain dangerous event data under the following scenes;
step 2: using the dangerous event data obtained in the step 1 to reappear dangerous events in a simulation platform to obtain rear vehicle driving track data;
the step 2 specifically comprises the following steps:
the dangerous event under the following scene screened in the step 1 is reproduced in a simulation platform, the initial speed and initial position of the rear vehicle, the track of the front vehicle, the central line of the road and the width of the road are all real data of the dangerous event obtained in the step 1, the rear vehicle is set as an automatic driving vehicle AV controlled by the adaptive cruise ACC and the responsibility sensitive safety model RSS in the simulation platform, and the driving track data of the rear vehicle is obtained through simulation;
step 3: establishing an objective function and constructing a multi-objective optimization problem;
step 4: solving an objective function to obtain an objective function solution set;
step 5: obtaining an optimal solution from the objective function solution set as a final calibration result of the RSS model;
step 6: performing automatic driving control on the automatic driving vehicle by using the RSS model subjected to calibration optimization;
the step 3 specifically comprises the following steps:
the safety performance and conservation degree of the model are synthesized, and a multi-objective function is established:
Ω=(max f Safety ,min f Conservativeness )
wherein max f Safety For the first sub-target, min f Conservativeness Is the second sub-target;
the first sub-target max f Safety The method comprises the following steps:
wherein N is the dangerous following event number extracted from natural driving data; TIT (tungsten inert gas) i A TIT value for the ith dangerous following event; TTC (TTC) i (t) is the TTC value of the ith dangerous following event at time t; τ SC Is a simulation time step; t C * A threshold value for TTC;
the second sub-target min f Conservativeness The method comprises the following steps:
wherein ,Δdi For measuring the degree of conservation of event i;represents the RSS safe distance d min Is greater than the actual following distance d relative Is equal to d relative In comparison, d min The larger the RSS model, the earlier the trigger time will be, forcing the AV to minimum comfort deceleration a min,brake The speed is reduced, and the conservation degree of the model is higher.
2. The automatic driving control method based on the calibration optimization RSS model according to claim 1, wherein the step 1 uses a thresholding method to screen dangerous events in a following scene from a natural driving database.
3. The automatic driving control method based on the calibration optimization RSS model according to claim 1, wherein the step 4 specifically includes:
the non-dominant ordered genetic algorithm NSGA-II with elite strategy is used for solving the multi-objective optimization problem established in the step 3.
4. An automatic driving control method based on a calibration optimized RSS model according to claim 3, wherein the NSGA-II algorithm includes the following steps:
step 4-1: randomly generating an initial population, wherein the individuals represent a random parameter set of the RSS model;
step 4-2: mutation and crossover are carried out on randomly selected individuals to generate subgroups;
step 4-3: combining the parent and the offspring;
step 4-4: layering the individuals according to the dominant relationship by using a rapid non-dominant ranking algorithm;
step 4-5: calculating the crowding degree i of an individual layer by layer d Sorting individuals according to the degree of congestion, and selecting proper individuals to form a new parent;
step 4-6: repeating the steps 2-5 until the average relative weight change of the fitness function among the generations is smaller than a preset tolerance or the iteration number reaches the maximum value, and stopping iteration.
5. The automatic driving control method based on the calibration optimization RSS model according to claim 4, wherein the congestion degree i in the steps 4-5 is as follows d The calculation method of (1) is as follows:
6. The automatic driving control method based on the calibration optimization RSS model according to claim 1, wherein the step 5 specifically includes:
selecting a first sub-target max f from the target function solution set obtained in the step 4 Safety The set of data with the largest value is used as the final calibration result of the RSS model.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010456689.4A CN111723470B (en) | 2020-05-26 | 2020-05-26 | Automatic driving control method based on calibration optimization RSS model |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010456689.4A CN111723470B (en) | 2020-05-26 | 2020-05-26 | Automatic driving control method based on calibration optimization RSS model |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111723470A CN111723470A (en) | 2020-09-29 |
CN111723470B true CN111723470B (en) | 2023-05-02 |
Family
ID=72565190
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010456689.4A Active CN111723470B (en) | 2020-05-26 | 2020-05-26 | Automatic driving control method based on calibration optimization RSS model |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111723470B (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN113111004B (en) * | 2021-01-11 | 2022-05-17 | 北京赛目科技有限公司 | Scene-independent unmanned driving simulation test evaluation method and device |
CN113911131A (en) * | 2021-09-24 | 2022-01-11 | 同济大学 | Responsibility sensitive safety model calibration method for human-vehicle conflict in automatic driving environment |
CN113954874B (en) * | 2021-11-03 | 2023-04-28 | 同济大学 | Automatic driving control method based on improved intelligent driver model |
CN114116454A (en) * | 2021-11-03 | 2022-03-01 | 同济大学 | Calibration method for vehicle automatic emergency brake model in mechanical and non-conflict scene |
CN115017742B (en) * | 2022-08-08 | 2022-12-13 | 西安深信科创信息技术有限公司 | Automatic driving test scene generation method, device, equipment and storage medium |
CN115080450B (en) * | 2022-08-22 | 2022-11-11 | 深圳慧拓无限科技有限公司 | Automatic driving test data generation method and system, electronic device and storage medium |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016169290A1 (en) * | 2015-04-21 | 2016-10-27 | 华南理工大学 | Decision-making supporting system and method oriented towards emergency disposal of road traffic accidents |
WO2019213980A1 (en) * | 2018-05-08 | 2019-11-14 | 清华大学 | Intelligent vehicle safety decision-making method employing driving safety field |
CN110641470A (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2020-01-03 | 福州大学 | Pure electric vehicle driving auxiliary system optimization method integrating driver preference |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9946818B2 (en) * | 2013-07-30 | 2018-04-17 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | System and method for automated model calibration, sensitivity analysis, and optimization |
-
2020
- 2020-05-26 CN CN202010456689.4A patent/CN111723470B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016169290A1 (en) * | 2015-04-21 | 2016-10-27 | 华南理工大学 | Decision-making supporting system and method oriented towards emergency disposal of road traffic accidents |
WO2019213980A1 (en) * | 2018-05-08 | 2019-11-14 | 清华大学 | Intelligent vehicle safety decision-making method employing driving safety field |
CN110641470A (en) * | 2019-09-30 | 2020-01-03 | 福州大学 | Pure electric vehicle driving auxiliary system optimization method integrating driver preference |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN111723470A (en) | 2020-09-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN111723470B (en) | Automatic driving control method based on calibration optimization RSS model | |
CN110610260B (en) | Driving energy consumption prediction system, method, storage medium and equipment | |
Talebpour et al. | Speed harmonization: Evaluation of effectiveness under congested conditions | |
CN108960426A (en) | Road grade Synthesize estimation system based on BP neural network | |
CN104851280B (en) | A kind of vehicle travel control method, device, system and relevant device | |
CN111081067B (en) | Vehicle collision early warning system and method based on IGA-BP neural network under vehicle networking environment | |
CN110941902A (en) | Lightning stroke fault early warning method and system for power transmission line | |
CN114132341A (en) | Ramp track planning model for automatically-driven vehicle in Internet of vehicles environment | |
CN113312733B (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for calibrating simulation model parameters of signal-controlled roundabout | |
Yang et al. | An adaptive cruise control method based on improved variable time headway strategy and particle swarm optimization algorithm | |
CN113360412A (en) | Test scene selection method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
Liu et al. | Trade-offs between bus and private vehicle delays at signalized intersections: Case study of a multiobjective model | |
CN112731806B (en) | Intelligent networking automobile random model prediction control real-time optimization method | |
CN116588123A (en) | Risk perception early warning strategy method based on safety potential field model | |
CN114896754B (en) | Automatic driving system performance evaluation method oriented to logic scene full parameter space | |
CN113095584B (en) | Intersection safety level short-time prediction method, system, terminal and readable storage medium based on traffic flow characteristics | |
KR102006755B1 (en) | In-vehicle external data intrusion detection apparatus by comparing information entropy and operating method thereof | |
CN115973179A (en) | Model training method, vehicle control method, device, electronic equipment and vehicle | |
CN113887131A (en) | Responsibility sensitive safety model calibration method facing vehicle cut-in scene | |
EP4339051A1 (en) | Driving strategy determination method and apparatus, device, and vehicle | |
CN112572606B (en) | Working condition fusion road sense simulation method based on SVM (support vector machine) and BP (back propagation) neural network | |
CN115447605A (en) | Autonomous vehicle, and control method and control device for same | |
CN114148349A (en) | Vehicle personalized following control method based on generation countermeasure simulation learning | |
CN113673146A (en) | NSGA-II-based vehicle safety multi-objective optimization method | |
CN113837211A (en) | Driving decision method and device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |