CN111191886A - Cross-basin water transfer efficiency assessment method - Google Patents
Cross-basin water transfer efficiency assessment method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111191886A CN111191886A CN201911301957.9A CN201911301957A CN111191886A CN 111191886 A CN111191886 A CN 111191886A CN 201911301957 A CN201911301957 A CN 201911301957A CN 111191886 A CN111191886 A CN 111191886A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- water
- basin
- cross
- regional
- transfer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 332
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 98
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 21
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 claims description 43
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002352 surface water Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06313—Resource planning in a project environment
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Sewage (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a cross-basin water transfer efficiency assessment method based on regional water resource simulation, which identifies the positive influence of cross-basin water transfer on a water resource beneficial area and the negative influence on a water resource damaged area under a complex environment change background through simulating the influence range and the intensity of water transfer engineering on regional water resource pressure, systematically measures the cross-basin water transfer efficiency under the complex environment change environment, provides water transfer efficiency evaluation indexes such as 'difference between a transfer-in ratio and a transfer-out ratio' and 'water resource pressure relief index', and provides a simple and effective solution for quantitative comparison of consistency of different cross-basin water transfer efficiencies under different hydrogeology and economic social backgrounds.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of cross-basin water transfer efficiency, in particular to a cross-basin water transfer efficiency evaluation method.
Background
Currently, cross-basin water transfer projects are widely used worldwide to relieve water resource pressure in water-deficient areas. Many scholars have read and measure the benefits and negative effects of a single water transfer project from different resource or environmental perspectives, however, systematically balancing the range and intensity of the effects of water transfer projects on regional water resource pressures remains a challenging task due to the difficulty in identifying the effects of multiple environmental and human factors in complex water systems. Existing water diversion projects involve different hydrogeology, economic society, and ecological environmental backgrounds. The projects are connected with rivers and lakes of natural basins through artificial channels, and the original inter-regional water resource relation formed by physical processes of river runoff, water intake, water use, water return and the like is changed. Especially in large watersheds, the non-linear response process of the water resource supply of the downstream region to the upstream environmental changes and the human water can be more profound and complicated. However, in the conventional cross-basin water diversion evaluation, the interaction relationship between water diversion projects, development and utilization of regional water resources, and natural basin water circulation and the response of the interaction relationship to the changing environment are not well reflected. Therefore, in order to reasonably evaluate the role and efficiency of water diversion across the drainage basin in relieving the pressure of regional water resources, an evaluation method which comprehensively considers the positive and negative influences of water diversion under a changing environment on regional water resources is needed.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a cross-basin water transfer efficiency evaluation method, aiming at solving the problem that the function and efficiency of cross-basin water transfer in relieving regional water resource pressure cannot be reasonably evaluated in the conventional cross-basin water transfer evaluation.
In order to achieve the above purpose, the technical means adopted is as follows:
a cross-basin water transfer efficiency assessment method comprises the following steps:
s1, setting different environment backgrounds of a cross-basin water transfer project according to an evaluation purpose, respectively collecting data of a basin runoff process under each environment background and calculating corresponding regional water resource amount;
s2, setting an efficiency evaluation index of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency when the influences of the water receiving area and the downstream of the water supply area of the cross-basin water transfer project are not considered, and constructing an evaluation model of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency according to the efficiency evaluation index;
s3, setting influence evaluation indexes of the downstream influences of the water receiving area and the water supply area of the cross-basin water transfer project, and constructing a total evaluation model of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency according to the influence evaluation indexes;
and S4, inputting the data and the regional water resource quantity collected in the step S1 into the evaluation model in the step S2 or the overall evaluation model in the step S3 so as to obtain a corresponding cross-basin water transfer efficiency evaluation result.
Preferably, the different environmental contexts of the cross-basin water diversion project of step S1 include: natural scenes, representing no human activity interference; the scene after water transfer shows the influence of the cross-basin water transfer project; a post-water consumption scenario, representing exposure to upstream consumable water; the situation after water consumption and water transfer shows that the situation is influenced by the upstream consumable water and the cross-basin water transfer engineering.
Preferably, the step S1 of calculating the corresponding regional water resource amount specifically includes:
regional water resource under natural scenarios:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiThe amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin is N, and the total number of the upstream basins is N;
regional water resource amount under the scene after water diversion:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiFor the amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin, N is the total number of upstream basins, TjThe water regulating quantity of the jth related cross-basin water regulating project is obtained, and M is the total number of the cross-basin water regulating projects;
regional water resource volume under post-water consumption scenarios:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiFor the amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin, N is the total number of upstream basins, CiThe water consumption is the water consumption occurring in the ith upstream drainage basin, namely the difference value between the water intake and the water return occurring in the ith upstream drainage basin;
regional water resource amount under the scene after water consumption and water transfer:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiFor the amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin, N is the total number of upstream basins, TjThe water regulating quantity of the jth related cross-basin water regulating project, M is the total number of the cross-basin water regulating projects, CiIs the water consumption that occurs in the ith upstream basin.
Preferably, the efficiency evaluation index in step S2 is a difference between a water receiving area call-in ratio and a water supply area call-out ratio in each cross-basin water diversion project, where the call-in ratio is a ratio of a water diversion amount to a regional water resource amount of the water receiving area in a natural scene, and the call-out ratio is a ratio of the water diversion amount to a regional water resource amount of the water supply area in a natural scene.
Preferably, the evaluation model of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency without considering the downstream influence of the area in step S2 is:
wherein TI and TO respectively represent call-in ratio and call-out ratio, T is water regulation amount, TFm(r) and TFm(s) the regional water resource amount of the water receiving area and the water supply area under the natural scene respectively;
DIO＝TI-TO
wherein DIO is the difference between the input ratio of a water receiving area and the output ratio of a water supply area in the cross-basin water transfer project, TI represents the input ratio, and TO represents the output ratio;
in the evaluation model, the larger the numerical value of DIO, the greater the cross-basin water transfer efficiency without considering the downstream influence of the zone.
Preferably, the influence evaluation index in step S3 includes an area covered by a water receiving area and a water supply area in the cross-basin water diversion project, population, and regional water resource pressure change caused by the cross-basin water diversion project:
wherein the calculation of regional water resource pressure change is:
wherein WD is the regional water demand, TFctAnd TFcThe regional water resource amounts in the water consumption and post-water-transfer scenarios and in the post-water-consumption scenario, respectively.
Preferably, the overall evaluation model in step S3 is specifically:
wherein SRI is water resource pressure relief index, PiFor the ith population in the watershed affected by diversion, Δ WSiSlow release index lambda of water resource pressure of ith area for water regulationiThe pre-assigned area weight coefficient is T, and the water regulation amount is T;
in the overall evaluation model, the larger the value of the SRI, the greater the efficiency of the cross-basin water diversion project under the comprehensive consideration of the downstream influence of the water supply area and the water receiving area.
Compared with the prior art, the technical scheme of the invention has the beneficial effects that:
the invention simulates the regional surface water resource amount under different environmental backgrounds of several cross-basin water transfer projects of nature, after water transfer, after water consumption and after water transfer, and provides the index of the transfer ratio and the transfer ratio reflecting the interference degree of the cross-basin water transfer to the water resource of the water receiving area and the water supply area on the basis, thereby measuring the efficiency of the cross-basin water transfer projects through the difference of the transfer ratio and the transfer ratio. Secondly, based on upstream and downstream hydraulic connection between regions and regional water resource pressure assessment before and after water transfer, a water resource pressure relieving index which reflects the overall influence of cross-basin water transfer on a water resource system is provided, so that the cross-basin water transfer efficiency under different hydrogeology and economic society backgrounds is scientifically measured by comprehensively investigating the influence range and strength of water transfer engineering on the water resource pressure of different regions.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The drawings are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the patent;
for the purpose of better illustrating the embodiments, certain features of the drawings may be omitted, enlarged or reduced, and do not represent the size of an actual product;
it will be understood by those skilled in the art that certain well-known structures in the drawings and descriptions thereof may be omitted.
The technical solution of the present invention is further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples.
A cross-basin water transfer efficiency assessment method is shown in FIG. 1, and comprises the following steps:
s1, setting different environment backgrounds of a cross-basin water transfer project according to an evaluation purpose, respectively collecting data of a basin runoff process under each environment background and calculating corresponding regional water resource amount; the step analyzes the individual influence and the combined influence of upstream consumable water and cross-basin water transfer projects on the regional water resource quantity by comparing the regional water resource quantity under different environmental backgrounds. The method comprises the following specific steps:
the different environmental backgrounds of the set cross-basin water transfer project comprise: natural scenes, representing no human activity interference; the scene after water transfer shows the influence of the cross-basin water transfer project; a post-water consumption scenario, representing exposure to upstream consumable water; the situation after water consumption and water transfer shows that the situation is influenced by the upstream consumable water and the cross-basin water transfer engineering. The calculation of the corresponding regional water resource amount under each scene specifically comprises the following steps:
regional water resource under natural scenarios:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiThe amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin is N, and the total number of the upstream basins is N;
regional water resource amount under the scene after water diversion:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiFor the amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin, N is the total number of upstream basins, TjThe water regulating quantity of the jth related cross-basin water regulating project is obtained, and M is the total number of the cross-basin water regulating projects;
regional water resource volume under post-water consumption scenarios:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiFor the amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin, N is the total number of upstream basins, CiThe water consumption is the water consumption occurring in the ith upstream drainage basin, namely the difference value between the water intake and the water return occurring in the ith upstream drainage basin;
regional water resource amount under the scene after water consumption and water transfer:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiFor the amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin, N is the total number of upstream basins, TjThe water regulating quantity of the jth related cross-basin water regulating project, M is the total number of the cross-basin water regulating projects, CiIs the water consumption that occurs in the ith upstream basin.
S2, setting an efficiency evaluation index of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency when the influences of the water receiving area and the downstream of the water supply area of the cross-basin water transfer project are not considered, and constructing an evaluation model of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency according to the efficiency evaluation index; this step, the established model, is used to evaluate the efficiency of the cross-basin water transfer project without regard to its downstream impact. The method comprises the following specific steps:
the efficiency evaluation index is the difference between the input ratio of the water receiving area and the output ratio of the water supply area in each cross-basin water transfer project, wherein the input ratio is the ratio of the water transfer amount to the regional water resource amount of the water receiving area under the natural scene, and the output ratio is the ratio of the water transfer amount to the regional water resource amount of the water supply area under the natural scene;
the evaluation model of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency without considering the influence of the downstream of the region is as follows:
wherein TI and TO respectively represent call-in ratio and call-out ratio, T is water regulation amount, TFm(r) and TFm(s) the regional water resource amount of the water receiving area and the water supply area under the natural scene respectively;
DIO＝TI-TO
wherein DIO is the difference between the input ratio of a water receiving area and the output ratio of a water supply area in the cross-basin water transfer project, TI represents the input ratio, and TO represents the output ratio;
in the evaluation model, the larger the numerical value of DIO, the greater the cross-basin water transfer efficiency without considering the downstream influence of the zone.
S3, setting influence evaluation indexes of the downstream influences of the water receiving area and the water supply area of the cross-basin water transfer project, and constructing a total evaluation model of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency according to the influence evaluation indexes; the model established in the step is based on upstream and downstream hydraulic connection between regions and regional water resource pressure assessment before and after water transfer, and the overall influence of cross-basin water transfer engineering on a water resource system and the efficiency of relieving water resource shortage through water transfer are assessed by using a water resource pressure relieving index. The method comprises the following specific steps:
the influence evaluation indexes comprise the area covered by a water receiving area and a water supply area in the cross-basin water transfer project, population and regional water resource pressure change caused by the cross-basin water transfer project:
wherein the calculation of regional water resource pressure change is:
wherein WD is the regional water demand, TFctAnd TFcThe regional water resource amounts in the water consumption and post-water-transfer scenarios and in the post-water-consumption scenario, respectively.
The overall evaluation model of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency specifically comprises the following steps:
wherein SRI is water resource pressure relief index, PiFor the ith population in the watershed affected by diversion, Δ WSiSlow release index lambda of water resource pressure of ith area for water regulationiThe pre-assigned regional weight coefficients can be assigned according to the vulnerability of water resources in different regions or the priority of water resource management; t is water regulation amount;
in the overall evaluation model, the larger the value of the SRI, the greater the efficiency of the cross-basin water diversion project under the comprehensive consideration of the downstream influence of the water supply area and the water receiving area.
And S4, inputting the data and the regional water resource quantity collected in the step S1 into the evaluation model in the step S2 or the overall evaluation model in the step S3 so as to obtain a corresponding cross-basin water transfer efficiency evaluation result.
The terms describing positional relationships in the drawings are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting the patent;
it should be understood that the above-described embodiments of the present invention are merely examples for clearly illustrating the present invention, and are not intended to limit the embodiments of the present invention. Other variations and modifications will be apparent to persons skilled in the art in light of the above description. And are neither required nor exhaustive of all embodiments. Any modification, equivalent replacement, and improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the claims of the present invention.
Claims (7)
1. A cross-basin water transfer efficiency assessment method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, setting different environment backgrounds of a cross-basin water transfer project according to an evaluation purpose, respectively collecting data of a basin runoff process under each environment background and calculating corresponding regional water resource amount;
s2, setting an efficiency evaluation index of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency when the influences of the water receiving area and the downstream of the water supply area of the cross-basin water transfer project are not considered, and constructing an evaluation model of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency according to the efficiency evaluation index;
s3, setting influence evaluation indexes of the downstream influences of the water receiving area and the water supply area of the cross-basin water transfer project, and constructing a total evaluation model of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency according to the influence evaluation indexes;
and S4, inputting the data and the regional water resource quantity collected in the step S1 into the evaluation model in the step S2 or the overall evaluation model in the step S3 so as to obtain a corresponding cross-basin water transfer efficiency evaluation result.
2. The method for evaluating the efficiency of water diversion across the watershed according to claim 1, wherein the different environmental contexts of the water diversion project of step S1 include: natural scenes, representing no human activity interference; the scene after water transfer shows the influence of the cross-basin water transfer project; a post-water consumption scenario, representing exposure to upstream consumable water; the situation after water consumption and water transfer shows that the situation is influenced by the upstream consumable water and the cross-basin water transfer engineering.
3. The method for evaluating the cross-basin water transfer efficiency according to claim 2, wherein the step S1 is specifically configured to calculate the corresponding regional water resource amount as follows:
regional water resource under natural scenarios:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiThe amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin is N, and the total number of the upstream basins is N;
regional water resource amount under the scene after water diversion:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiFor the amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin, N is the total number of upstream basins, TjThe water regulating quantity of the jth related cross-basin water regulating project is obtained, and M is the total number of the cross-basin water regulating projects;
regional water resource volume under post-water consumption scenarios:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiFor the amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin, N is the total number of upstream basins, CiThe water consumption is the water consumption occurring in the ith upstream drainage basin, namely the difference value between the water intake and the water return occurring in the ith upstream drainage basin;
regional water resource amount under the scene after water consumption and water transfer:
wherein LF is the water yield of this region, UFiFor the amount of water collected from the ith upstream basin, N is the total number of upstream basins, TjThe water regulating quantity of the jth related cross-basin water regulating project, M is the total number of the cross-basin water regulating projects, CiIs the water consumption that occurs in the ith upstream basin.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the efficiency evaluation index of step S2 is a difference between a water receiving area call-in ratio and a water supply area call-out ratio in each cross-basin water transfer project, wherein the call-in ratio is a ratio of a water transfer amount to a regional water resource amount of the water receiving area in a natural scene, and the call-out ratio is a ratio of the water transfer amount to the regional water resource amount of the water supply area in the natural scene.
5. The cross-basin water transfer efficiency assessment method according to claim 4, wherein the evaluation model of the cross-basin water transfer efficiency without considering the area downstream influence in step S2 is:
wherein TI and TO respectively represent call-in ratio and call-out ratio, T is water regulation amount, TFm(r) and TFm(s) the regional water resource amount of the water receiving area and the water supply area under the natural scene respectively;
DIO＝TI-TO
wherein DIO is the difference between the input ratio of a water receiving area and the output ratio of a water supply area in the cross-basin water transfer project, TI represents the input ratio, and TO represents the output ratio;
in the evaluation model, the larger the numerical value of DIO, the greater the cross-basin water transfer efficiency without considering the downstream influence of the zone.
6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the evaluation indexes of influence include the area covered by the water receiving area and the water supply area in the cross-basin water diversion project, population, and regional water resource pressure changes caused by the cross-basin water diversion project in step S3:
wherein the calculation of regional water resource pressure change is:
wherein WD is the regional water demand, TFctAnd TFcThe regional water resource amounts in the water consumption and post-water-transfer scenarios and in the post-water-consumption scenario, respectively.
7. The cross-basin water transfer efficiency assessment method according to claim 6, wherein the overall evaluation model of step S3 is specifically:
wherein SRI is water resource pressure relief index, PiFor the ith population in the watershed affected by diversion, Δ WSiSlow release index lambda of water resource pressure of ith area for water regulationiThe pre-assigned area weight coefficient is T, and the water regulation amount is T;
in the overall evaluation model, the larger the value of the SRI, the greater the efficiency of the cross-basin water diversion project under the comprehensive consideration of the downstream influence of the water supply area and the water receiving area.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911301957.9A CN111191886B (en) | 2019-12-17 | 2019-12-17 | Cross-river basin water diversion efficiency evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911301957.9A CN111191886B (en) | 2019-12-17 | 2019-12-17 | Cross-river basin water diversion efficiency evaluation method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111191886A true CN111191886A (en) | 2020-05-22 |
| CN111191886B CN111191886B (en) | 2023-05-02 |
Family
ID=70709821
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911301957.9A Active CN111191886B (en) | 2019-12-17 | 2019-12-17 | Cross-river basin water diversion efficiency evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111191886B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112417554A (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-02-26 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Method for identifying local flood control influence risk factors by adopting fishbone map to carry out cross-basin water transfer engineering |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105260820A (en) * | 2015-09-22 | 2016-01-20 | 北京市水科学技术研究院 | Water ecological system risk evaluation method for water-receiving region of water transfer project |
| CN107730110A (en) * | 2017-10-12 | 2018-02-23 | 水利部交通运输部国家能源局南京水利科学研究院 | A kind of Flood Prevention water supply water environment improves integrated dispatch assessment technology method |
| CN108960616A (en) * | 2018-06-29 | 2018-12-07 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Strong anthropic zone's Water resources security diagnosis space atlas calculation based on county domain |
| CN109409721A (en) * | 2018-10-17 | 2019-03-01 | 中水东北勘测设计研究有限责任公司 | A kind of two-way across basin service reservoir group combined scheduling method |
-
2019
- 2019-12-17 CN CN201911301957.9A patent/CN111191886B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105260820A (en) * | 2015-09-22 | 2016-01-20 | 北京市水科学技术研究院 | Water ecological system risk evaluation method for water-receiving region of water transfer project |
| CN107730110A (en) * | 2017-10-12 | 2018-02-23 | 水利部交通运输部国家能源局南京水利科学研究院 | A kind of Flood Prevention water supply water environment improves integrated dispatch assessment technology method |
| CN108960616A (en) * | 2018-06-29 | 2018-12-07 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Strong anthropic zone's Water resources security diagnosis space atlas calculation based on county domain |
| CN109409721A (en) * | 2018-10-17 | 2019-03-01 | 中水东北勘测设计研究有限责任公司 | A kind of two-way across basin service reservoir group combined scheduling method |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112417554A (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-02-26 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Method for identifying local flood control influence risk factors by adopting fishbone map to carry out cross-basin water transfer engineering |
| CN112417554B (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-11-09 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Method for identifying local flood control influence risk factors by adopting fishbone map to carry out cross-basin water transfer engineering |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111191886B (en) | 2023-05-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Książek et al. | Combined use of the hydraulic and hydrological methods to calculate the environmental flow: Wisloka river, Poland: case study | |
| Molden | Accounting for water use and productivity | |
| Yang et al. | Comprehensive evaluation and scenario simulation for the water resources carrying capacity in Xi'an city, China | |
| Wang et al. | Water environment carrying capacity in Bosten Lake basin | |
| Li et al. | An uncertainty-based framework for agricultural water-land resources allocation and risk evaluation | |
| Li et al. | An efficient irrigation water allocation model under uncertainty | |
| Bakken et al. | Water consumption from hydropower plants–review of published estimates and an assessment of the concept | |
| Divakar et al. | Optimal allocation of bulk water supplies to competing use sectors based on economic criterion–An application to the Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand | |
| Saadatpour et al. | Meta-model assisted 2D hydrodynamic and thermal simulation model (CE-QUAL-W2) in deriving optimal reservoir operational strategy in selective withdrawal scheme | |
| Awulachew et al. | The Nile Basin: tapping the unmet agricultural potential of Nile waters | |
| Sun et al. | Multistage analysis of hydrologic alterations in the Yellow River, China | |
| Fabre et al. | Simulating past changes in the balance between water demand and availability and assessing their main drivers at the river basin scale | |
| Wu et al. | Reuse of return flows and its scale effect in irrigation systems based on modified SWAT model | |
| Karimi et al. | Environmental flows | |
| CN111191886A (en) | Cross-basin water transfer efficiency assessment method | |
| CN112906762A (en) | Method and system for defining and identifying critical state of water resource system | |
| Le Coarer et al. | Horizontal ramping rate framework to quantify hydropeaking stranding risk for fish | |
| Anamaghi et al. | A resilience-based framework for evaluating the carrying capacity of water and environmental resources under the climate change | |
| McCartney et al. | Estimating environmental flow requirements downstream of the Chara Chara weir on the Blue Nile River | |
| Khan et al. | A comparison of Quadratic Regression and Artificial Neural Networks for the estimation of quantiles at ungauged sites in regional frequency analysis. | |
| McKay et al. | Application of effective discharge analysis to environmental flow decision-making | |
| Okungu et al. | Scenario analysis of water supply and demand using WEAP model: a case of Yala Catchment, Kenya | |
| CN109360121A (en) | Karst area water resource vulnerability quantization regulation method and system | |
| Pahl-Wostl et al. | The role of global change research for aquatic sciences | |
| King et al. | Determination of “Holding” Environmental Flow Requirement for the Upper and Middle Kafue River |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |