CN110648068A - Personnel trial period evaluation method and system - Google Patents

Personnel trial period evaluation method and system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110648068A
CN110648068A CN201910905471.XA CN201910905471A CN110648068A CN 110648068 A CN110648068 A CN 110648068A CN 201910905471 A CN201910905471 A CN 201910905471A CN 110648068 A CN110648068 A CN 110648068A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
personnel
period
trial period
risk
trial
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201910905471.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
焦学宁
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
SHENZHEN EEBOCHINA TECHNOLOGY Co Ltd
Original Assignee
SHENZHEN EEBOCHINA TECHNOLOGY Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by SHENZHEN EEBOCHINA TECHNOLOGY Co Ltd filed Critical SHENZHEN EEBOCHINA TECHNOLOGY Co Ltd
Priority to CN201910905471.XA priority Critical patent/CN110648068A/en
Publication of CN110648068A publication Critical patent/CN110648068A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/105—Human resources
    • G06Q10/1053—Employment or hiring

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The application provides a personnel trial period evaluation method and a system, wherein the evaluation method comprises the following processes: acquiring trial period information, personnel type information and contract period information of each personnel; extracting the number of persons/personnel under the items of the first risk point and the second risk point; calculating a first fractional risk value and a second fractional risk value; and calculating a total risk value, wherein the total risk value is the sum of all the subentry risk values. The evaluation system comprises an input unit, an extraction unit and an operation unit which are connected in sequence. By adopting the personnel trial period evaluation method and the personnel trial period evaluation system, effective risk evaluation can be carried out on the relevant period and information of the trial period of the personnel of the company, the company can be prompted to monitor whether the personnel trial period has risks or not more timely and effectively, and the personnel trial period evaluation method and the system have positive significance on the overall operation of the company.

Description

Personnel trial period evaluation method and system
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of computers, in particular to a personnel trial period evaluation method and a personnel trial period evaluation system.
Background
With the development of social economy, more and more enterprises and companies participate in market competition, more and more industry selection channels enable labor forms of workers to be more diversified, time periods of labor are flexible and changeable, various information of the company personnel is numerous and miscellaneous, requirements of different labor forms on trial periods are different, and whether the trial periods agreed by the enterprises and different employees are correct or not reasonably directly affects management risks of the companies. For whether an enterprise supervises the trial period deadline/time limit of personnel in a standard way, the prior art does not provide an effective method for monitoring, only workers carry out periodic inspection on the trial period term of the personnel, and in the process, the condition that the trial period deadline does not meet the legal regulation requirement due to poor handling inevitably occurs, so that risks are brought to the benefits of the enterprise and enterprise staff.
Disclosure of Invention
According to a first aspect of the present application, there is provided a trial period evaluation method for a person, comprising the processes of:
acquiring trial period information, personnel type information and contract period information of each personnel;
extracting the number of persons/personnel under the items of the first risk point and the second risk point; the first risk point is that a trial period should be appointed but the appointment of the trial period is unreasonable; the second risk point is that the trial period should not be appointed but is appointed;
calculating a first fractional risk value and a second fractional risk value; the first fractional risk value is: multiplying the number of persons who should but should not agree reasonably in the trial period by the risk coefficient corresponding to the first risk point; the second sub-risk value is: multiplying the number of persons who should not agree on the trial period but have the agreement on the trial period by a risk coefficient corresponding to the second risk point;
and calculating a total risk value, wherein the total risk value is the sum of all the subentry risk values.
According to a second aspect of the present application, a personnel trial period evaluation system is provided, which comprises an input unit, an extraction unit and an arithmetic unit which are connected in sequence; the input unit is used for acquiring the trial period information, the personnel type information and the contract period information of each personnel; the extraction unit is used for extracting the number of the persons/persons under the items of the first risk point and the second risk point; the first risk point is that a trial period should be appointed but the appointment of the trial period is unreasonable; the second risk point is that the trial period should not be appointed but is appointed; the operation unit is used for calculating a first item risk value and a second item risk value; the first fractional risk value is: multiplying the number of persons who should but should not agree reasonably in the trial period by the risk coefficient corresponding to the first risk point; the second sub-risk value is: multiplying the number of persons who should not agree on the trial period but have the agreement on the trial period by a risk coefficient corresponding to the second risk point; the operation unit is also used for calculating a total risk value, and the total risk value is the sum of all the subentry risk values.
By adopting the personnel trial period evaluation method and the personnel trial period evaluation system, the relevant period and information of the trial period of the personnel of the company can be effectively evaluated for risks, so that the company can be prompted to more effectively monitor whether the personnel trial period has risks or not in time, and the personnel trial period evaluation method and the personnel trial period evaluation system have positive significance for the overall operation of the company.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a method for evaluating a human trial period according to the first embodiment;
FIG. 2 is a system for evaluating a trial period of a person according to a first embodiment;
FIG. 3 is a step of extracting the personnel under the first risk point and the second risk point according to the first embodiment;
fig. 4 is a step of extracting the person under the first risk point and the second risk point in the second embodiment.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. Wherein like elements in different embodiments are numbered with like associated elements. In the following description, numerous details are set forth in order to provide a better understanding of the present application. However, those skilled in the art will readily recognize that some of the features may be omitted or replaced with other elements, materials, methods in different instances. In some instances, certain operations related to the present application have not been shown or described in detail in order to avoid obscuring the core of the present application from excessive description, and it is not necessary for those skilled in the art to describe these operations in detail, so that they may be fully understood from the description in the specification and the general knowledge in the art.
Furthermore, the features, operations, or characteristics described in the specification may be combined in any suitable manner to form various embodiments. Also, the various steps or actions in the method descriptions may be transposed or transposed in order, as will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. Thus, the various sequences in the specification and drawings are for the purpose of describing certain embodiments only and are not intended to imply a required sequence unless otherwise indicated where such sequence must be followed.
The numbering of the components as such, e.g., "first", "second", etc., is used herein only to distinguish the objects as described, and does not have any sequential or technical meaning. The term "connected" and "coupled" when used in this application, unless otherwise indicated, includes both direct and indirect connections (couplings).
The first embodiment is as follows:
fig. 1 shows a trial period evaluation method of the person of the present embodiment, which is completed by a trial period evaluation system of the person shown in fig. 2, the system includes an input unit 10, an extraction unit 20, an arithmetic unit 30 and a display unit 40 connected in sequence, a determination unit 50 connected to the arithmetic unit 30 and the display unit 40, and an inquiry unit 60 connected to the arithmetic unit 30 and the determination unit 50. The extracting unit 20, the calculating unit 30 and the judging unit 50 can jointly form a server; the input unit 10, the query unit 60 and the display unit 40 may together constitute a client. The system can also be provided with a control unit which is connected with the input unit, the extraction unit, the operation unit, the judgment unit, the display unit and the query unit independently and is used for carrying out coordination control on the operation of each unit.
The evaluation method of the present embodiment includes the following processes:
st1, the input unit acquires trial period information, person type information, and contract period information of each person;
the trial period information comprises an appointed trial period limit; the personnel types comprise full time and non-full time, the full time mainly comprises full-day labor, and the non-full time mainly comprises practice, non-full-day labor, labor dispatching, labor, employment, borrowing and the like. In other embodiments, the non-full-time job may also include a job that has renewed a work contract with the company, such a job having contracted a trial period with the company in a previous work contract, the previous contract terminated, and the company continuing to contract the work contract, but being unable to contract the trial period in compliance.
Specifically, the user may issue an instruction to acquire the trial period information of the person, the type information of the person, and the contract term information at the input unit 10 of the client, and the input unit 10 of the client acquires the trial period information, the type information of the person, and the contract term information of each person from the database based on the instruction of the user, and digitizes the relevant information. Alternatively, the user directly inputs trial period information, person type information, and contract term information of each person at the input unit 10.
The information can be in the form of data information of filling, checking and clicking, a document scanning piece, an electronic version file or the like.
The submitting mode of the information can be filling, file importing or file uploading and the like.
The contract made by each person with the company/unit in the present application may be various forms of contracts such as labor contracts, employment contracts, and practice agreements.
St2, the extraction unit 20 extracts the persons under the first risk point and the second risk point.
The first risk point is that a trial period should be appointed but the appointment of the trial period is unreasonable; the second risk point is that no trial period should be agreed upon but there is a trial period agreement.
As shown in fig. 3, the extraction unit performs the following operations for each person, respectively:
st2.1, judging the personnel type of the current personnel;
if the personnel type of the personnel is full time, St2.2 is executed;
st2.4 if the personnel type of the current personnel is non-full-time;
st2.2, judging whether the trial period deadline of the personnel meets the preset legal provision; the preset legal provision includes provision about labor term such as law (e.g., labor law, labor contract law), regulation, and judicial interpretation;
if the trial period of the personnel meets the preset legal regulation, St2.6 is executed;
if the trial period of the personnel does not meet the preset legal regulation, St2.3 is executed;
the nineteenth rule of the existing labor contract law stipulates that the labor contract period is less than three months and less than one year, and the trial period is not more than one month; the labor contract period is more than one year and less than three years, and the trial period is not more than two months; the trial period of the labor contract with a fixed period of more than three years and without the fixed period can not exceed six months. The same person and the same worker can only agree on one trial period. Labor contracts with certain work tasks as period completion or labor contracts with period less than three months, and trial period' must not be appointed.
Thus, the step St2.2 determines whether the person's trial period deadline meets a preset legal requirement in the following manner:
that is, the extraction unit judges whether the trial period duration and the contract period duration of the person satisfy any one of the following preset conditions:
the contract period is less than three months and no trial period exists; the contract period is more than three months and is less than one year, and the trial period does not exceed one month; the contract period is more than one year and less than three years, and the trial period does not exceed two months; the contract period is more than three years or the contract period is no fixed period and the trial period does not exceed six months.
As long as any preset condition is met, the trial period deadline of the personnel meets the preset legal provision; if all preset conditions are not met, the trial period of the person does not meet the preset legal requirements.
Alternatively, in other embodiments of the present application, the step of st2.2 is performed in the following manner to determine whether the trial period of the person meets the preset legal requirements:
namely, the extraction unit judges whether the contract period of the personnel is less than three months and has no trial period; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three months and less than one year and the trial period does not exceed one month; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than one year and less than three years and the trial period of the personnel is not more than two months; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three years or whether the contract period is a non-fixed period and the trial period does not exceed six months; if not, the trial period of the personnel does not meet the preset legal requirements. As long as any preset condition is met, the trial period deadline of the person meets the preset legal provision.
Alternatively, in other embodiments of the present application, the step of st2.2 is performed in the following manner to determine whether the trial period of the person meets the preset legal requirements:
namely, the extraction unit judges whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three years or the contract period is no fixed period and the trial period does not exceed six months; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than one year and less than three years and the trial period of the personnel is not more than two months; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three months and less than one year and the trial period does not exceed one month; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is less than three months and no trial period is available; if not, the trial period of the personnel does not meet the preset legal requirements. As long as any preset condition is met, the trial period of the person meets the preset legal regulations
St2.3, extracting the person to a first risk point;
st2.4, judging whether the person has a trial period;
if the person has a trial period, executing St2.5;
if the person does not have the period of the trial period, executing St2.6;
st2.5, extracting the person to a second risk point;
and St2.6, the person does not have the condition that the trial period should be agreed but the trial period agreement is unreasonable or does not agree but the trial period agreement exists, and the person does not belong to the first risk point or the second risk point, namely the person does not extract the first risk point or the second risk point, and the execution is finished.
For example, a labor contract term of three years together with a trial appointment of six months, a labor contract term of one year with a trial appointment of three months, a jin Yi is a college student to practice by a company with a trial appointment of fifteen days.
Then, the condition that the trial period agrees with the labor law and does not belong to the first risk point or the second risk point is met; if the certain trial period agreement does not meet the labor law, the first risk point item is extracted; if the gold should not agree on a trial period, it should be extracted under the item of the second risk point.
St3, the arithmetic unit 30 calculates a first and a second fractional risk value.
The first fractional risk value is: the number of persons who should but not reasonably agree on the trial period is multiplied by the risk coefficient corresponding to the first risk point.
For example, if the first risk point corresponds to a risk coefficient of "3", and the number of persons for whom a trial period should be agreed but the trial period is not reasonable is x equal to 6, the first risk point corresponds to a risk coefficient of "18".
The second sub-risk value is: multiplying the number of persons who should not agree on the trial period but have the agreement on the trial period by a risk coefficient corresponding to the second risk point;
for example, if the risk coefficient corresponding to the second risk point is "2", and the number of persons who should not agree to the trial period but who agree to the trial period is y equal to 10, the second sub-risk value is 2y, that is, "20".
St4, the arithmetic unit 30 calculates a total risk value (i.e., a total evaluation value) which is a sum of all the subentry risk values and is a total risk evaluation value of the whole company obtained according to the weight values of the subentry risk items.
For example, the total risk value of the embodiment is calculated as
T＝3x+2y (1)
Wherein T is a total risk value, x is the number of people who should agree on a trial period but have an unreasonable agreement on the trial period, and y is the number of people who should not agree on the trial period but have an agreement on the trial period.
Let x be 6 for the number of persons who should but not reasonably agree to a trial period, and y be 10 for the number of persons who should not but agree to a trial period.
Then T is 3 × 6+2 × 10 ═ 38 (2)
The total risk assessment for the company is 38.
St5, the user may make a query request in the query unit 60 according to his/her needs, for example, click a corresponding query icon/button/dialog box/title, and the display unit 40 expands and displays the query result according to the query request of the user. Alternatively, the display unit 40 automatically displays the result information without a request from the user. The display unit 40 may display the total risk value, the itemized risk values, the risk points, the corresponding number of persons/persons under the selected risk point item, the risk points existing in the selected persons, and the number of persons/persons at the risk points.
For example, in the embodiment, the display unit 40 displays that the total risk value is "38", the first sub-risk value is "15", the second sub-risk value is "20", the persons corresponding to the first risk point item include jiang, zheng, wu, liu, etc., the number of the persons corresponding to the first risk point item is 6, the persons include two of the first risk point and the second risk point, the person only includes one of the first risk point, and the persons having the risk point include 12 persons of jiang, zheng, li, etc.
St6, the determination unit 50 determines whether the total risk value exceeds a risk threshold, and if so, executes St7 to display a risk value warning prompt on the display unit 40.
In another embodiment, the determining unit 50 may determine whether the selected risk score (for example, the first risk score corresponding to the first risk point) exceeds a risk threshold, and if so, execute step St 7.
St7, the display unit 40 displays an early warning prompt to indicate to the manager that the company is at risk in terms of the period of the trial period of the staff.
For example, the total risk threshold is set to "60", and the determining unit determines that the total risk value "38" of the embodiment does not exceed the total risk threshold, so no special warning is made; in another embodiment, if the determination unit determines that the total risk value "67" exceeds the total risk threshold, the display unit displays a red blazed total risk value warning prompt.
Or for example, if the judging unit judges that the first item risk value "18" exceeds the set item risk threshold value "10", the display unit displays a purple shining first risk early warning prompt.
The content needing judgment and warning can be flexibly set by the technical personnel in the field according to the actual condition of the company.
The St2 process of this embodiment may extract persons who have not met the labor law for the trial period agreed on by the labor contract, or may extract practice persons, labor persons, or employment persons who should not agree on the trial period but actually have the trial period agreed on.
Example two:
the St2 process of the present embodiment extracts persons under the first risk point and the second risk point items for the extraction unit 10, and specifically, as shown in fig. 4, the present embodiment differs from the first embodiment in that the extraction unit 10 performs the following operations for each person, respectively:
st2.1, judging whether the current personnel have the period of the trial period;
if the current personnel have the period of the trial period, St2.2 is executed;
if the current personnel do not have the period of the trial period, St2.6 is executed;
st2.2, judging the personnel type of the personnel;
if the personnel type of the personnel is full time, St2.3 is executed;
if the personnel type of the personnel is non-full-time, St2.5 is executed;
st2.3, judging whether the trial period deadline of the personnel meets the preset legal provision;
if the trial period of the personnel does not meet the preset legal regulation, St2.4 is executed;
if the trial period of the personnel meets the preset legal regulation, St2.6 is executed;
st2.4, extracting the person to a first risk point;
st2.5, extracting the person to a second risk point;
and St2.6, the person does not have the condition that the trial period should be agreed but the trial period agreement is unreasonable or does not agree but the trial period agreement exists, and the person does not belong to the first risk point or the second risk point, namely the person does not extract the first risk point or the second risk point, and the execution is finished.
For example, a certain labor contract period is three years and the trial period is agreed to be six months, a certain labor contract period is one year and the trial period is agreed to be three months, a jin certain is an undergraduate to practice the company and the trial period is agreed to be fifteen days, a thank certain is a full-day labor worker but the labor contract does not agree to the trial period, and a tang certain is an undergraduate to practice the company and does not agree to the trial period.
Then, the condition that the trial period agrees with the labor law and does not belong to the first risk point or the second risk point is met; if the certain trial period agreement does not meet the labor law, the first risk point item is extracted; if the gold should not agree with a trial period, the gold should be extracted to the item of the second risk point; thank you and tang you do not agree on a trial period to comply with the regulations of the labor law and not belong to the situation of the first risk point or the second risk point.
Other technical features of the present embodiment are consistent with those of the present embodiment, and thus are not described in detail.
By adopting the personnel trial period evaluation method and the personnel trial period evaluation system, the relevant period and information of the trial period of the personnel of a company (or organizations such as a unit, a organ, a group, an enterprise and the like) can be effectively filed, the company can be prompted to more reasonably formulate the trial period regulation through risk evaluation, whether the period of the trial period of each personnel has risks or not can be more effectively monitored in time, various types of personnel can be managed more normatively, the contract supervision quality of the company can be improved, and the personnel trial period evaluation method and the system have positive significance for the whole operation of the company.
The present invention has been described in terms of specific examples, which are provided to aid understanding of the invention and are not intended to be limiting. For a person skilled in the art to which the invention pertains, several simple deductions, modifications or substitutions may be made according to the idea of the invention.

Claims (10)

1. A personnel trial period evaluation method is characterized in that,
acquiring trial period information, personnel type information and contract period information of each personnel;
extracting the number of persons/personnel under the items of the first risk point and the second risk point; the first risk point is that a trial period should be appointed but the appointment of the trial period is unreasonable; the second risk point is that a trial period should not be appointed but is appointed;
calculating a first fractional risk value and a second fractional risk value; the first fractional risk value is: multiplying the number of persons who should but should not agree reasonably in the trial period by the risk coefficient corresponding to the first risk point; the second sub-risk value is: multiplying the number of persons who should not agree on the trial period but have the agreement on the trial period by a risk coefficient corresponding to the second risk point;
and calculating a total risk value, wherein the total risk value is the sum of all the subentry risk values.
2. The method of claim 1,
the trial period information comprises an appointed trial period limit;
the personnel types include full time and non-full time, the non-full time including practice, non-full day work, labor dispatch, labor, employment, and/or borrowing;
the method further comprises a display process, or the method further comprises a query process and a display process;
the query process comprises the following steps:
receiving a query request for displaying a total risk value, a subentry risk value, a risk point, the number of corresponding personnel/personnel under the selected risk point item, the risk point existing in the selected personnel and the number of personnel/personnel with the risk point;
the display process is as follows:
and displaying the total risk value, the subentry risk value, the risk points, the corresponding number of the persons/persons under the selected risk point item, the risk points existing in the selected persons and the number of the persons/persons with the risk points.
3. The method of claim 2,
the number of persons/persons under the items of extracting the first risk points and the second risk points is as follows:
respectively judging the personnel type of each personnel;
if the personnel type of the current personnel is full-time, judging whether the trial period deadline of the personnel meets the preset legal provision; if the trial period of the personnel does not meet the preset legal regulation, extracting the personnel to a first risk point item;
if the personnel type of the current personnel is non-full-time, judging whether the personnel has a trial period; if the person has the period of the trial period, extracting the person to a second risk point item;
or the number of persons/persons under the item of extracting the first risk point and the second risk point is as follows:
respectively judging whether each person has a trial period;
if the current personnel have the period of the trial period, judging the personnel type of the personnel;
if the personnel type of the personnel is full-time, judging whether the trial period deadline of the personnel meets the preset legal provision; if the trial period of the personnel does not meet the preset legal regulation, extracting the personnel to a first risk point item;
and if the personnel type of the personnel is non-full time, extracting the personnel to a second risk point item.
4. The method of claim 3,
and judging whether the trial period deadline of the personnel meets the preset legal regulation:
judging whether the trial period duration and the contract duration of the personnel meet any one of the following preset conditions:
the contract period is less than three months and no trial period exists; the contract period is more than three months and is less than one year, and the trial period does not exceed one month; the contract period is more than one year and less than three years, and the trial period does not exceed two months; the contract period is more than three years or the contract period is no fixed period and the trial period does not exceed six months;
or, the judgment of whether the trial period deadline of the person meets the preset legal regulation is as follows:
judging whether the contract period of the personnel is less than three months and no trial period is available; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three months and less than one year and the trial period does not exceed one month; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than one year and less than three years and the trial period of the personnel is not more than two months; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three years or whether the contract period is a non-fixed period and the trial period does not exceed six months; if not, the trial period deadline of the personnel does not meet the preset legal regulation;
or, the judgment of whether the trial period deadline of the person meets the preset legal regulation is as follows:
judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three years or whether the contract period is a non-fixed period and the trial period does not exceed six months; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than one year and less than three years and the trial period of the personnel is not more than two months; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three months and less than one year and the trial period does not exceed one month; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is less than three months and no trial period is available; if not, the trial period of the personnel does not meet the preset legal requirements.
5. The method of any one of claims 1 to 4,
the method further comprises the following steps:
judging whether the total risk value or the selected subentry risk value exceeds a risk threshold value;
and if so, displaying an early warning prompt.
6. A system for evaluating a trial period of a person,
the device comprises an input unit, an extraction unit and an operation unit which are connected in sequence;
the input unit is used for acquiring the trial period information, the personnel type information and the contract period information of each personnel;
the extraction unit is used for extracting the number of the persons/persons under the items of the first risk point and the second risk point; the first risk point is that a trial period should be appointed but the appointment of the trial period is unreasonable; the second risk point is that a trial period should not be appointed but is appointed;
the arithmetic unit is used for calculating a first item risk value and a second item risk value; the first fractional risk value is: multiplying the number of persons who should but should not agree reasonably in the trial period by the risk coefficient corresponding to the first risk point; the second sub-risk value is: multiplying the number of persons who should not agree on the trial period but have the agreement on the trial period by a risk coefficient corresponding to the second risk point;
the operation unit is also used for calculating a total risk value, and the total risk value is the sum of all the subentry risk values.
7. The system of claim 6,
the trial period information comprises an appointed trial period limit;
the personnel types include full time and non-full time, the non-full time including practice, non-full day work, labor dispatch, labor, employment, and/or borrowing;
the system further comprises a display unit connected to the arithmetic unit;
or, the system further comprises a query unit and a display unit connected to the arithmetic unit;
the query unit is used for receiving a query request for requesting display of a total risk value, a subentry risk value, a risk point, the number of corresponding personnel/personnel under a selected risk point item, a risk point existing in the selected personnel and the number of personnel/personnel with the risk point;
the display unit is used for displaying the total risk value, the sub-item risk value, the risk points, the corresponding number of the persons/persons under the selected risk point item, the risk points existing in the selected persons and the number of the persons/persons with the risk points.
8. The system of claim 7,
the extraction unit is configured to:
respectively judging the personnel type of each personnel;
if the personnel type of the current personnel is full-time, judging whether the trial period deadline of the personnel meets the preset legal provision; if the trial period of the personnel does not meet the preset legal regulation, extracting the personnel to a first risk point item;
if the personnel type of the current personnel is non-full-time, judging whether the personnel has a trial period; if the person has the period of the trial period, extracting the person to a second risk point item;
or, the extraction unit is configured to:
respectively judging whether each person has a trial period;
if the current personnel have the period of the trial period, judging the personnel type of the personnel;
if the personnel type of the personnel is full-time, judging whether the trial period deadline of the personnel meets the preset legal provision; if the trial period of the personnel does not meet the preset legal regulation, extracting the personnel to a first risk point item;
and if the personnel type of the personnel is non-full time, extracting the personnel to a second risk point item.
9. The system of claim 8,
and judging whether the trial period deadline of the personnel meets the preset legal regulation:
the extraction unit judges whether the trial period duration and the contract duration of the personnel meet any one of the following preset conditions:
the contract period is less than three months and no trial period exists; the contract period is more than three months and is less than one year, and the trial period does not exceed one month; the contract period is more than one year and less than three years, and the trial period does not exceed two months; the contract period is more than three years or the contract period is no fixed period and the trial period does not exceed six months;
or, the judgment of whether the trial period deadline of the person meets the preset legal regulation is as follows:
the extraction unit judges whether the contract period of the personnel is less than three months and has no trial period; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three months and less than one year and the trial period does not exceed one month; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than one year and less than three years and the trial period of the personnel is not more than two months; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three years or whether the contract period is a non-fixed period and the trial period does not exceed six months; if not, the trial period deadline of the personnel does not meet the preset legal regulation;
or, the judgment of whether the trial period deadline of the person meets the preset legal regulation is as follows:
the extraction unit judges whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three years or the contract period is no fixed period and the trial period does not exceed six months; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than one year and less than three years and the trial period of the personnel is not more than two months; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is more than three months and less than one year and the trial period does not exceed one month; if not, judging whether the contract period of the personnel is less than three months and no trial period is available; if not, the trial period of the personnel does not meet the preset legal requirements.
10. The system of any one of claims 6-9,
the device also comprises a judging unit connected to the arithmetic unit and the display unit;
the judging unit is used for judging whether the total risk value or the selected subentry risk value exceeds a risk threshold value;
and if the number exceeds the preset value, the display unit displays an early warning prompt.
CN201910905471.XA 2019-09-24 2019-09-24 Personnel trial period evaluation method and system Pending CN110648068A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910905471.XA CN110648068A (en) 2019-09-24 2019-09-24 Personnel trial period evaluation method and system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910905471.XA CN110648068A (en) 2019-09-24 2019-09-24 Personnel trial period evaluation method and system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110648068A true CN110648068A (en) 2020-01-03

Family

ID=68992454

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910905471.XA Pending CN110648068A (en) 2019-09-24 2019-09-24 Personnel trial period evaluation method and system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110648068A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111476481A (en) * 2020-04-03 2020-07-31 青岛鲨鱼汇信息技术有限公司 Advance work flow combining intelligent labor risk management

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111476481A (en) * 2020-04-03 2020-07-31 青岛鲨鱼汇信息技术有限公司 Advance work flow combining intelligent labor risk management

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ray et al. The measurement and evaluation of white‐collar productivity
TWI403964B (en) Project management system
US20070136731A1 (en) Systems and methods for prioritizing tasks
CN103460228A (en) Method and apparatus for improving business process management systems
GB2416882A (en) Project management method assigning business objectives to employees
Agyekum et al. The role of project managers (PMs) in construction health and safety implementation in Ghana
CN110610324A (en) Recruitment risk assessment method and system
JP2010198194A (en) Security management support system
CN110648068A (en) Personnel trial period evaluation method and system
Kheni et al. A study of challenges faced by regulatory authorities for implementing health and safety compliance in the Ghana construction industry context
Liu et al. A multi-agent-based mould due date setting approach in stochastic production
JP7133126B2 (en) Trademark value calculator
CN110555629A (en) Contract information evaluation method and system for employees in work
JP5611542B2 (en) Work time summary system and work time summary method
Avianto et al. THE EFFECT OF MONOPOLY POWER AND INTEGRITY ON THE TENDENCY TO COMMIT FRAUD IN E-PROCUREMENT
Naumova et al. Effective internal audit service organisation in health clinics
Porananond et al. Project risk management for new product development
JP2004185158A (en) Working management system
JP2004310564A (en) Physical distribution operation analysis system
Srinivasan Application of information technology and statistical process control in pharmaceutical quality assurance & compliance
Medha et al. Labour productivity improvement using hybrid Maynard operation sequence technique and ergonomic assessment
JP2004046629A5 (en)
JP2017059240A (en) Industrial hygiene management support system, industrial hygiene management support method, and industrial hygiene management support program
Cass Earned value programs for DOE projects
Santacroce Budget, Cost, and Performance Improvement Approaches Used by a Highly Effective ME Department

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20200103