CN110111025B - Weapon equipment system evaluation method and device - Google Patents
Weapon equipment system evaluation method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110111025B CN110111025B CN201910422939.XA CN201910422939A CN110111025B CN 110111025 B CN110111025 B CN 110111025B CN 201910422939 A CN201910422939 A CN 201910422939A CN 110111025 B CN110111025 B CN 110111025B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- capacity
- existing
- weaponry
- weapon
- systems
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims description 19
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 44
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000006854 communication Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007474 system interaction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012938 design process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012357 Gap analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008485 antagonism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010485 coping Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008846 dynamic interplay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008054 signal transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to the technical field of intelligent demonstration of combat ability. The embodiment of the invention provides a method and a device for evaluating a weapon equipment system, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring a combat service, and defining a desired combat capability architecture required by the combat service, wherein the desired combat capability architecture comprises a plurality of coordinated weapon systems; analyzing expected weapon equipment capacity corresponding to the expected combat capability architecture, and analyzing existing weapon equipment capacity indicated by an existing weapon equipment system; comparing the expected weaponry capacity and the existing weaponry capacity to evaluate the existing weaponry systems. Therefore, the multiple coordinated weapon systems are assessed and evaluated on the basis of the overall capacity architecture required by the operation business, and the accuracy of the planning demonstration result can be improved.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of intelligent demonstration of operational capacity, in particular to a weapon equipment system evaluation method and device.
Background
The modern war model has risen from single-soldier single-platform fighting to multi-armed multi-system joint combat system fighting. The direct impact resulting from this revolution is the transition from "threat-based" to "capability-based" in the conceptual design and construction planning of weaponry. The fighting capacity is the main embodiment of the fighting capacity of a country, and the weapon system which is planned based on the capacity and finally developed can better meet the requirement of fighting business. China's equipment demonstration unit has started to use a ' capability-based ' system demonstration method, however, there are certain limitations in the demonstration process, which are shown in the following two points:
firstly, the capacity design refers to the experiences of the army and the army in a large quantity, a forward design method is lacked, and the support for the national situation and the national strategy of China is not comprehensive enough. The forward design is a process of capacity definition from top to bottom according to the characteristics of the battle demands of the forward design and by combining the coping modes aiming at different threat targets.
Secondly, it is not accurate to evaluate the satisfaction degree of a certain operational capability directly by the weapon system function in the weapon storehouse: the systematic combat is not the accumulation and superposition of various simple weapon systems, but the established combat tasks are completed in a mutually complementary and matched manner under the control rule of the integrated combat. Therefore, the weapon system is required to be adapted to a combat command control system under a new system, and an extremely flexible communication interface exists between the weapon system and other systems; the weapons satisfaction of the ability must take into account these interface relationships while verifying that the logic interacting with each other is able to satisfy the combat business.
Therefore, a method for planning and evaluating operational capability based on architecture model to support future equipment demonstration and system concept design is a technical problem to be solved in the industry at present.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the invention aims to provide a method and a device for evaluating a weaponry system, which are used for at least solving the problem that the planning precision is limited due to the fact that the stacking and superposition of various weapon systems in modern combat cannot be considered in the current combat capability planning technology.
In order to achieve the above object, an aspect of the embodiments of the present invention provides a weaponry system evaluation method, including: acquiring a combat service, and defining a desired combat capability architecture required by the combat service, wherein the desired combat capability architecture comprises a plurality of coordinated weapon systems; analyzing expected weapon equipment capacity corresponding to the expected combat capability architecture and analyzing existing weapon equipment capacity indicated by an existing weapon equipment system; comparing the expected weaponry capacity to the existing weaponry capacity to evaluate the existing weaponry systems.
Optionally, the analyzing the expected weaponry capacity corresponding to the expected combat capability framework includes: acquiring a desired weaponry capability required by a desired operational capability architecture, wherein the weaponry capability is determined based on weapons systems function modules including one or more of: the system comprises a perception module, a tracking module, an identification module and a decision-making module; and determining the expected weaponry capacity based on the acquired expected weaponry capacity.
Optionally, the sensing module includes one or more of: the system comprises a radar satellite communication unit, an infrared satellite communication unit and a hyperspectral satellite communication unit.
Optionally, the analyzing the existing weaponry capacity indicated by the existing weaponry system includes: selecting existing weapon systems aiming at the operational capacity from all existing weapon systems under the existing weapon equipment system, and constructing a weapon cooperation matrix according to the selected existing weapon systems; extracting system simulation data generated when each existing weapon system in the weapon cooperation matrix executes a real combined combat task; from the system simulation data, an existing weaponry capacity indicated by the existing weaponry system is determined.
Optionally, the comparing the expected weaponry capacity to the existing weaponry capacity to evaluate the existing weaponry systems includes: comparing the existing weapon equipment capacity corresponding to the weapon cooperation matrix with the expected weapon equipment capacity, and normalizing the comparison result to generate a corresponding capacity gap matrix; based on the capability gap matrix, the existing weaponry systems are evaluated.
Optionally, after the evaluating the existing weaponry systems based on the capability gap matrix, the method further includes: and planning a planned development period of the existing weapon equipment fighting capacity aiming at the defect that the capacity gap matrix is different from the expected weapon equipment fighting capacity based on the capacity gap matrix.
In another aspect, an embodiment of the present invention further provides an weapon equipment system evaluation apparatus, including: the system comprises a defining module, a judging module and a judging module, wherein the defining module is used for acquiring a combat business and defining an expected combat capability architecture required by the combat business, and the expected combat capability architecture comprises a plurality of coordinated weapon systems; the first analysis module is used for analyzing expected weaponry capacity corresponding to the expected operational capacity architecture; the second analysis module is used for analyzing the existing weaponry capacity indicated by the existing weaponry system; a comparison module for comparing the expected weaponry capacity and the existing weaponry capacity to evaluate the existing weaponry systems.
Optionally, the first parsing module is further configured to obtain a desired weaponry capability required by the desired combat capability architecture, where the weaponry capability is determined based on weapons systems function modules that include one or more of: the system comprises a perception module, a tracking module, an identification module and a decision module, and determines the expected weaponry capacity according to the acquired expected weaponry capacity.
Optionally, the second parsing module includes: the matrix construction unit is used for selecting the existing weapon systems aiming at the fighting capacity from the existing weapon systems under the existing weapon equipment system and constructing a weapon cooperation matrix according to the selected existing weapon systems; the simulation unit is used for extracting system simulation data generated when each existing weapon system in the weapon cooperation matrix executes a real combined combat task; and the existing combat power determining unit is used for determining the existing weapon combat power indicated by the existing weapon rig system according to the system simulation data.
Optionally, the apparatus further comprises: and the development planning module is used for planning a planned development period of the existing weapon equipment fighting capacity aiming at the defect that the capacity gap matrix is different from the expected weapon equipment fighting capacity.
Through the technical scheme, the capacity planning and evaluating method based on the system architecture model is provided, the combat ideas in each combat area can be converted into the combat mission list according to the national strategy, and the combat capacity can be defined and decomposed positively according to the combat list, the combat environment, the enemy threat target and the like. And then, evaluating the capacity gap by using the analysis and demonstration results of the system interaction visual angle in the system architecture model, and finally making a capacity planning scheme suitable for national strategic tasks and operational business. Therefore, the accuracy of capacity planning based is greatly improved, and a better theoretical basis is provided for the construction and development of future equipment.
Additional features and advantages of embodiments of the invention will be set forth in the detailed description which follows.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the embodiments of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the embodiments of the invention without limiting the embodiments of the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a weaponry system evaluation method of an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of weapon function definition and interactive logic design process under system view in the weapons equipment system assessment method of an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart for resolving existing weaponry capacity in a weaponry system assessment method of an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a weaponry hierarchy evaluation method of an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the definition of operational capabilities based on operational services in an architectural model;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing a demand table for sensing modules in a weapons system under different operational events;
FIG. 7 illustrates a schematic diagram of the resolution and dependency analysis of combat capabilities;
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating a system logical interaction relationship validation process;
FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an analysis of capacity gaps in an architectural model based on a system perspective to operational capacity mapping;
FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating a scenario for capacity planning based on different capacity gaps;
fig. 11 is a block diagram showing the structure of a weaponry system evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The following detailed description of embodiments of the invention refers to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration and explanation only, not limitation.
As shown in fig. 1, a method for evaluating a weaponry system according to an embodiment of the present invention includes:
s11, acquiring a combat service, and defining a desired combat capability architecture required by the combat service, wherein the desired combat capability architecture comprises a plurality of coordinated weapon systems.
The execution subject of the method of the embodiment of the present invention may be any terminal or server, and the weapon equipment system evaluation method of the embodiment of the present invention is executed by modifying a controller or a processor on the terminal or server, for example, by software or hardware modification, and all of them are within the protection scope of the present invention.
The acquisition mode of the battle service can be the battle service obtained by manual input or signal transmission, and can also be active acquisition or passive reception, and all belong to the protection scope of the invention; in addition, the battle service may refer to various forms of battle services, such as an island-climbing battle service, a precise batting battle service, and the like, which should not be limited herein.
It should be noted that, in various combat missions in modern war, cooperative combat among various weapon systems is generally required, such as weapon radar system and weapon target identification system, and the different systems also need to complete combat operations through interactive communication, but the present combat capability evaluation system can only complete the combat capability evaluation and accumulation of individual weapon equipment, which obviously cannot meet the overall requirements of structured combat. Therefore, in the embodiment, the architecture including multiple coordinated weapon systems required by the battle business can be autonomously defined, and the definition process can be performed according to the preset national strategy, so that the evaluation process can be more accurate and can better conform to the national strategic idea.
And S12, analyzing expected weapon equipment capacity corresponding to the expected combat ability architecture.
It should be noted that the expected combat capability architecture and expected weaponry capacity required by different combat operations may be different. For example, in an island-boarding combat business, it may require an "island landing weapon system" like "air-make right dominates the weapon system", "sea-make right dominates the weapon system", which can preferably complete the combat business only by cooperating, and may require each weapon system to have different weaponry capacity, such as perception capacity, recognition capacity, decision-making capacity, etc.; therefore, the expected weapon equipment combat power corresponding to the framework is analyzed, the required objective equipment combat power can be obtained, and errors or omission caused by artificial subjective calculation are avoided.
And S13, analyzing the existing weapon fighting capacity indicated by the existing weapon equipment system.
The method can be used for examining and evaluating various combat abilities of an existing weaponry system, so that the corresponding existing weaponry combat abilities can be analyzed, and whether the existing weaponry systems have sensing ability, recognition ability, decision-making ability and the like or not can be counted.
And S14, comparing the expected weapon equipment capacity with the existing weapon equipment capacity to evaluate an existing weapon equipment system.
Specifically, it may be determined whether the existing weaponry capacity has met the requirement of the expected weaponry capacity, for example, whether various capabilities corresponding to the existing weaponry capacity have included the expected weaponry capacity (for example, infrared sensing, etc.), or whether the capabilities corresponding to the existing weaponry capacity (for example, a sensing distance of 4 km) can meet the expected weaponry capacity (a sensing distance of more than 5 km, etc.). Thus, the existing weaponry systems can be evaluated.
In some embodiments, resolving the desired weaponry capacity may be accomplished by performing operations including: obtaining a desired weapons capability required by a desired operational capability architecture, wherein the weapons capability is determined based on weapons systems function modules that include one or more of: the system comprises a perception module, a tracking module, an identification module and a decision-making module; and determining a desired weaponry capacity based on the obtained desired weaponry capacity. Wherein the perception module comprises one or more of: the system comprises a radar satellite communication unit, an infrared satellite communication unit and a hyperspectral satellite communication unit.
In the embodiment of the invention, the capacity planning and evaluating method based on the system architecture model is provided, the combat ideas in each combat area can be converted into the combat mission list according to the national strategy, and the combat capacity can be defined and decomposed positively according to the combat list, the combat environment, the enemy threat target and the like. And then, evaluating the capacity gap by using the analysis and demonstration results of the system interaction visual angle in the system architecture model, and finally making a capacity planning scheme suitable for national strategic tasks and operational business. Therefore, the accuracy of capacity planning based is greatly improved, and a better theoretical basis is provided for the construction and development of future equipment.
The embodiment of the invention discloses a method for planning and evaluating the operational capacity based on a system architecture model, which designs and constructs the system architecture model according to national strategy and operational business requirements, designs and defines the operational capacity and measurement indexes thereof which meet operational business in a forward direction (taking early warning detection capacity as an example, because the A island is deployed with hostile targets, the measurement indexes can be set to be capable of early warning the attacking targets beyond 5000 kilometers of the national boundary line), evaluates the meeting degree of the overall system on the capacity by analyzing the functional composition, interface relationship and operation logic of each weapon system in the system view angle, and finally forms a reasonable capacity gap matrix, thereby completing the strategic evaluation and planning on the operational capacity.
By way of example, when the battle business is the target of early warning of enemies, the participating weapon systems include space-based infrared systems, early warning satellites, early warning machines deployed offshore, ground-based radars, and the like. As shown in fig. 2, the infrared scanning function of the space-based infrared system finds the enemy target attacking from a distance at the earliest, and transmits the target information to the early warning satellite through the relay satellite interface; and the early warning satellite starts to track and recognize the target according to the target information (the action is also the embodiment of the system function), transmits the target information to the offshore warning machine within a certain range, further identifies and tracks the action more finely, then transmits the target information to a command through an interface to send an attack instruction, and finally performs the final tracking and guidance functions by the roadbed radar.
Therefore, the process is described by a functional interaction flow chart of a group of weapon systems, the functions, interface relations, interaction logics and the like of each system are shown, and the early warning detection capability is finally realized, so that the actual early warning detection capability is determined by the operation parameters of each weapon system, and if the furthest distance of targets which can be found by a space-based infrared system is 4000 kilometers, a gap is formed between the scheme formed by the weapon systems and the actual operation service capability (5000 kilometers according to the target characteristic requirements or requirements of enemies), so that the existing weapon equipment system needs to be planned and improved.
In some embodiments, existing weaponry combat may be resolved by performing the operations shown in FIG. 3:
s31, existing weapon systems aiming at the operational capacity are selected from all existing weapon systems under existing weapon equipment systems, and a weapon cooperation matrix is constructed according to the selected existing weapon systems.
It should be noted that weapon systems required by different operational capabilities (such as early warning detection capability) may be different, so that an existing weapon system for the operational capability (or the operational capability required) is selected from the existing weapon systems, and a weapon cooperation matrix is constructed corresponding to a specific capability.
And S32, extracting system simulation data generated when each existing weapon system in the weapon cooperation matrix executes a real combined combat task.
And S33, determining the existing weaponry capacity indicated by the existing weaponry system according to the system simulation data.
In the embodiment, the existing weapon equipment capacity is determined according to the system simulation data generated when the existing weapon systems execute the real combined combat mission, which not only can consider the working performance of a single weapon system, but also can consider the performance of different weapon systems in interactive cooperation, so that the finally obtained existing weapon equipment capacity is more accurate.
In some embodiments, it may be that an existing weaponry system is evaluated by an operation that carefully includes: firstly, comparing the existing weapon equipment capacity corresponding to the weapon cooperation matrix with the expected weapon equipment capacity, and carrying out normalization processing on the comparison result to obtain a value between 0~1, thereby generating a corresponding capacity gap matrix; then, based on the capability gap matrix, the gap between each existing weapon system for capability relative to the desired weapon system can be seen, thereby evaluating the existing weaponry systems.
Further, planning a planned development cycle of the existing weapon equipment battle force aiming at the defect that the expected weapon equipment battle force has a gap based on the capacity gap matrix; thus, the corresponding planned development cycle can be planned through the performance of the existing weapon equipment capacity in the capacity gap matrix.
As shown in fig. 4, a method for evaluating a weaponry system according to an embodiment of the present invention includes:
and S41, defining the fighting capacity.
Specifically, a system architecture model meeting two standards of a system architecture framework DoDAF and a system architecture description language UPDM of the United states defense department is designed and constructed according to the operational service requirements, and the operational capability meeting the operational service requirements is defined positively through a CV (operational capability) view angle of the model, including the composition, decomposition and dependency relationship of the operational capability.
Fig. 5 shows an example of defining the fighting capabilities based on the fighting services in the architectural model, which subdivides the fighting services into different architectural systems (such as taking air-hold, sea-hold, and landing islands), and the corresponding expected weaponry capacities (such as sensing, recognition, sea-going, etc.) under the different architectural systems. FIG. 6 illustrates a table of demands on sensing modules in a weapons system under different combat operations; therefore, system strategic staging and top-level operational capacity definition are performed on the basis of operational tasks and system architecture planning, and the analysis of the satisfaction degree of the operational capacity to operational service requirements is completed, so that the defined operational capacity can better meet the national situation requirements of the country and meet the operational service of the country.
And S42, defining the measurement standard of the capability.
Specifically, the criteria for measuring these capabilities may be defined according to the capabilities given in S41, including the temporal factor, the antagonism factor, and the security factor, and taking the capability of "finding the target" as an example, its measurement indexes include "time of finding the target at the earliest time", "mode of resisting interference from the target", and "recovery time". Fig. 7 is a schematic diagram showing the analysis of the resolution and dependency relationship of the fighting capabilities, which is based on the top-level fighting capabilities defined in S41, and is divided into more detailed secondary and tertiary capabilities according to the characteristics of the fighting threat targets and the difference of the operation means, and the dependency relationship between the capabilities is determined according to the killer chain and the fighting rules.
And S43, analyzing the interactive operation logic of the system.
Specifically, system visual angles in a system architecture model are designed and analyzed, system function arrangement and definition (arrangement of existing equipment functions in a weapon base and definition of equipment functions to be researched), system external interface relation definition and system interaction logic operation analysis are completed, and under the premise that each system is in system operation, related operation tasks can be completed along with the advance of a killer chain. Therefore, the capability evaluation result obtained by the system visual angle analysis process has higher reliability than the past mode which only depends on expert experience. FIG. 2 shows an example of a weapon function definition and interaction logic design process from the perspective of an architectural model system, illustrating functionality and interaction information from the weapon system itself.
And S44, evaluating the analysis capability gap.
Specifically, a mapping matrix of the combat capability is established by each weapon under the system view angle in the S43, the performance of each weapon and the time slice of the interactive logic (serial and parallel execution tasks) are monitored according to the dynamic simulation process of the system, and the extraction of the relevant data of the specific capability under the real equipment combined combat is completed. The ability value is obtained from simulation data, a certain difference exists between the ability value and the designed measurement value in S42 (for example, the measurement standard of the early warning detection ability expected by the operation business is that an enemy target beyond 5000 kilometers can be found, continuous tracking is carried out for 7 x 24 hours, the level which can be reached by all the current weapon cooperation operation is that the found distance is 4000 kilometers, and tracking can be carried out only in the daytime), the target value and the real value are normalized according to a normalization algorithm and mapped to a comparison value in the interval 0~1, the operation ability under the actual simulation data is evaluated, and an ability difference matrix is formed. FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram showing a system logic interaction relationship verification process, wherein the dynamic interaction process of the system and the state change of each system itself confirm that the whole system meets the requirements of joint battle, so that the system can be used for evaluation analysis of capability; and, as shown in fig. 9, it shows a schematic diagram of capacity gap analysis after mapping from system view to operational capacity in the architecture model, where all listed systems are existing packaged weapons appearing in the system view of the architecture model, and thus the operational capacity not covered by the weapon system is the gap item.
And S45, planning a capacity development scheme.
Specifically, an ability planning scheme is formulated according to the ability gap matrix, the dependency relationship of operational ability and national strategy, and a basis for supporting a weapon system research and development strategy is formed. As shown in fig. 10, an example of a plan for planning the operational capacity according to different capacity gaps is shown, wherein planned development cycles for different capacities (such as perception, recognition, departure, and the like) are included, and the planned development cycles can represent capacity development routes planned according to the operational capacity gap matrix and the national strategy.
As shown in fig. 11, a weaponry system evaluation apparatus 110 according to an embodiment of the present invention includes: a defining module 1101, configured to acquire a campaign service, and define an expected campaign capability architecture required by the campaign service, where the expected campaign capability architecture includes multiple coordinated weapon systems; a first analyzing module 1102, configured to analyze expected weaponry capacity corresponding to the expected combat capability framework; a second parsing module 1103 for parsing the existing weaponry capacity indicated by the existing weaponry system; a comparison module 1104 for comparing the expected weaponry capacity and the existing weaponry capacity to evaluate the existing weaponry systems.
In some embodiments, the first parsing module 1102 is further configured to obtain a desired weapons capability required by a desired operational capability architecture, where weapons capability is determined based on weapons systems function modules including one or more of: the system comprises a perception module, a tracking module, an identification module and a decision module, and determines the expected weaponry capacity according to the acquired expected weaponry capacity.
In some embodiments, the second parsing module 1103 includes: a matrix construction unit (not shown) for selecting existing weapon systems for operational capability from among the existing weapon systems under the existing weapon equipment system, and constructing a weapon cooperation matrix according to the selected existing weapon systems; a simulation unit (not shown) for extracting system simulation data generated by each existing weapon system in the weapon cooperation matrix when performing a real joint combat mission; an existing weaponry capacity determination unit (not shown) for determining an existing weaponry capacity indicated by the existing weaponry systems based on the system simulation data.
In some embodiments, the apparatus 110 further comprises: a development planning module 1105 for planning a planned development cycle for the existing weaponry capacity for the deficiency in the gap from the expected weaponry capacity based on the capability gap matrix.
For more details of the weapon equipment system evaluation device of the present invention, reference may be made to the above description of the weapon equipment system evaluation method embodiment, and the same effects as the above method can be achieved, so that the details are not repeated herein.
Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, the embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the details of the above embodiments, and various simple modifications can be made to the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention within the technical idea of the embodiments of the present invention, and the simple modifications all belong to the protection scope of the embodiments of the present invention.
It should be noted that the various features described in the foregoing embodiments may be combined in any suitable manner without contradiction. In order to avoid unnecessary repetition, the embodiments of the present invention do not describe every possible combination.
Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps in the method according to the above embodiments may be implemented by a program, which is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to enable a single chip, a chip, or a processor (processor) to execute all or part of the steps in the method according to the embodiments of the present application. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: a U-disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk, and various media capable of storing program codes.
In addition, any combination of various different implementation manners of the embodiments of the present invention is also possible, and the embodiments of the present invention should be considered as disclosed in the embodiments of the present invention as long as the combination does not depart from the spirit of the embodiments of the present invention.
Claims (5)
1. A weaponry systems assessment method, comprising: acquiring a combat service, and defining a desired combat capability architecture required by the combat service, wherein the desired combat capability architecture comprises a plurality of coordinated weapon systems; analyzing the expected weaponry capacity corresponding to the expected operational capacity architecture comprises: acquiring a desired weaponry capability required by a desired operational capability architecture, wherein the weaponry capability is determined based on weapons systems function modules including one or more of: the system comprises a perception module, a tracking module, an identification module and a decision-making module; and determining the expected weaponry capacity based on the acquired expected weaponry capacity;
and resolving the existing weaponry capacity indicated by the existing weaponry systems includes: selecting existing weapon systems aiming at the operational capacity from all existing weapon systems under the existing weapon equipment systems, and constructing a weapon cooperation matrix according to the selected existing weapon systems; extracting system simulation data generated when each existing weapon system in the weapon cooperation matrix executes a real combined combat task; determining the existing weaponry capacity indicated by the existing weaponry system according to the system simulation data;
comparing the expected weapons equipment capacity and the existing weapons equipment capacity to evaluate the existing weapons equipment hierarchy includes: comparing the existing weapon equipment capacity corresponding to the weapon cooperation matrix with the expected weapon equipment capacity, and normalizing the comparison result to generate a corresponding capacity gap matrix; and evaluating the existing weaponry systems based on the capability gap matrix.
2. The weaponry system assessment method of claim 1, wherein the perception module includes one or more of: the system comprises a radar satellite communication unit, an infrared satellite communication unit and a hyperspectral satellite communication unit.
3. The weaponry equipment system evaluation method of claim 1, wherein after the existing weaponry equipment systems are evaluated based on the capability gap matrix, the method further comprises: planning a planned development cycle of the existing weaponry capacity for the defect that the capacity gap matrix is the gap from the expected weaponry capacity based on the capacity gap matrix.
4. A weaponry systems assessment apparatus, comprising: the system comprises a defining module, a judging module and a judging module, wherein the defining module is used for acquiring a fighting service and defining a desired fighting capacity architecture required by the fighting service, and the desired fighting capacity architecture comprises a plurality of coordinated weapon systems; a first parsing module, configured to parse expected weapons capacity corresponding to the expected operational capacity architecture and obtain an expected weapons capacity required by the expected operational capacity architecture, where the weapons capacity is determined based on weapons systems function modules that include one or more of: a perception module, a tracking module, an identification module, and a decision module, and determining the expected weaponry capacity based on the acquired expected weaponry capacity; the second analysis module is used for analyzing the existing weaponry capacity indicated by the existing weaponry system, and comprises the following components: the matrix construction unit is used for selecting the existing weapon systems aiming at the fighting capacity from the existing weapon systems under the existing weapon equipment systems, and constructing a weapon cooperation matrix according to the selected existing weapon systems; the simulation unit is used for extracting system simulation data generated when each existing weapon system in the weapon cooperation matrix executes a real combined combat mission; the existing combat power determining unit is used for determining the existing weapon combat power indicated by the existing weapon rig system according to the system simulation data; a comparison module for comparing the expected weaponry capacity and the existing weaponry capacity to evaluate the existing weaponry systems, comprising: comparing the existing weapon equipment capacity corresponding to the weapon cooperation matrix with the expected weapon equipment capacity, and normalizing the comparison result to generate a corresponding capacity gap matrix; and evaluating the existing weaponry systems based on the capability gap matrix.
5. The weaponry system evaluation device of claim 4, wherein the device further includes: and the development planning module is used for planning a planned development period of the existing weaponry capacity aiming at the defect that the capacity difference matrix exists between the existing weaponry capacity and the expected weaponry capacity.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910422939.XA CN110111025B (en) | 2019-05-21 | 2019-05-21 | Weapon equipment system evaluation method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910422939.XA CN110111025B (en) | 2019-05-21 | 2019-05-21 | Weapon equipment system evaluation method and device |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110111025A CN110111025A (en) | 2019-08-09 |
| CN110111025B true CN110111025B (en) | 2023-02-28 |
Family
ID=67491363
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910422939.XA Active CN110111025B (en) | 2019-05-21 | 2019-05-21 | Weapon equipment system evaluation method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110111025B (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111308907B (en) * | 2019-12-20 | 2023-04-18 | 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 | Automatic battle-level airplane simulation control method, control plug-in and simulation system |
| CN111753443A (en) * | 2020-07-29 | 2020-10-09 | 哈尔滨工业大学 | Weapon equipment combined test design method based on capability accumulation |
| CN111950881A (en) * | 2020-07-31 | 2020-11-17 | 上海卫星工程研究所 | System contribution rate evaluation method and system for imaging of remote sensing satellite on fixed target point |
| CN112395543B (en) * | 2020-10-12 | 2024-04-16 | 中国兵器科学研究院 | Equipment system reconnaissance capability assessment method, device, equipment and medium |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105306248A (en) * | 2015-07-03 | 2016-02-03 | 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 | Operation loop based operational effectiveness assessment method of weapon equipment system operation network |
| CN105808928A (en) * | 2016-03-02 | 2016-07-27 | 中国人民解放军装备学院 | Matrix sequence grey correlational assessment method for system efficiency of equipment |
-
2019
- 2019-05-21 CN CN201910422939.XA patent/CN110111025B/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105306248A (en) * | 2015-07-03 | 2016-02-03 | 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 | Operation loop based operational effectiveness assessment method of weapon equipment system operation network |
| CN105808928A (en) * | 2016-03-02 | 2016-07-27 | 中国人民解放军装备学院 | Matrix sequence grey correlational assessment method for system efficiency of equipment |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 基于任务-能力-结构-演化的武器装备体系贡献度评估与示例分析;罗小明等;《装备学院学报》;20160628(第03期);全文 * |
| 论武器装备体系研究的需求;游光荣等;《军事运筹与***工程》;20121215(第04期);全文 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN110111025A (en) | 2019-08-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110111025B (en) | Weapon equipment system evaluation method and device | |
| US7406199B2 (en) | Event capture and filtering system | |
| KR101537759B1 (en) | Simulator for ground unmaned system, and its operating method | |
| CN110968941A (en) | Unmanned aerial vehicle control platform and control method based on airspace safety assessment | |
| CN112380686A (en) | Weapon equipment system contribution calculation method based on discrete event simulation | |
| Hall et al. | Multisensor data fusion | |
| CN101937486A (en) | Information support capability evaluation analysis method of complex system | |
| CN116820121B (en) | Unmanned aerial vehicle group joint investigation strategy generation method and terminal | |
| CN113419517B (en) | Test method and device of aircraft prevention and control system, storage medium and computing equipment | |
| Naikar et al. | Cognitive work analysis for air defense applications in Australia | |
| CN106996789B (en) | Multi-airborne radar cooperative detection airway planning method | |
| Finn et al. | Evaluating autonomous ground‐robots | |
| CN109724472B (en) | Vehicle-mounted regional comprehensive defense system and method | |
| CN113111440A (en) | Logic relationship-based cluster unmanned aerial vehicle task model construction method | |
| Buede et al. | Issues in sensor management | |
| Nicholson | Defence applications of agent-based information fusion | |
| Liang et al. | Optimization of spatiotemporal clustering for target tracking from multisensor data | |
| Garvey et al. | Perceptual Reasoning in a Hostile Environment. | |
| Li et al. | Modeling method of combat mission based on OODA loop | |
| Diallo et al. | Examination of Emergent Behavior in the Ballistic Missile Defense System: A Modeling and Simulation Approach | |
| Yang et al. | Technology of situation awareness based on radar network in cyberspace | |
| CN117741696A (en) | Navigation countering situation analysis method based on Bayesian-tabu game algorithm | |
| CN114091358A (en) | Estimation method, device and system based on deduction simulation target area situation | |
| Zhang et al. | The design and implementation of cooperative surveillance task planning software for regional radar chain | |
| Yang et al. | Hierarchical planning for large numbers of unmanned vehicles |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |