CN109409654A - A kind of method, terminal and memory for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index - Google Patents
A kind of method, terminal and memory for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109409654A CN109409654A CN201811076222.6A CN201811076222A CN109409654A CN 109409654 A CN109409654 A CN 109409654A CN 201811076222 A CN201811076222 A CN 201811076222A CN 109409654 A CN109409654 A CN 109409654A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- nuclear power
- power station
- risk index
- occupational exposure
- annual dose
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 206010073310 Occupational exposures Diseases 0.000 title claims abstract description 68
- 231100000675 occupational exposure Toxicity 0.000 title claims abstract description 68
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 39
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 12
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 241000208340 Araliaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005035 Panax pseudoginseng ssp. pseudoginseng Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000003140 Panax quinquefolius Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000008434 ginseng Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Measurement Of Radiation (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to a kind of method, terminal and memories for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index.This method comprises: S1, in annual exposure total number of persons C0 count annual dose be greater than the first default annual dose and be less than or equal to the second default annual dose first radiation number C1, statistics annual dose be greater than the second default annual dose and be less than or equal to third preset annual dose second radiation number C2；It counts annual dose and is greater than the third radiation number C3 that third presets annual dose；S2, formula I is utilizedidcr=(C1*A1+C2*A2+C3*A3) * R1*k/C0 is calculated, wherein A1, the corresponding weighted value of A2, A3 C1, C2, C3, and R1 is EPD dosage alarm ratio, and k is constant.The present invention provides a kind of index for capableing of comprehensive, effective, quantization evaluation occupational exposure risk, and each unit or nuclear power station occupational exposure control risk size are measured by the index.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to nuclear power fields, more specifically to a kind of side for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index
Method, terminal and memory.
Background technique
Nuclear power station is the important component of electric system, provides endlessly electric power resource for people.Although nuclear power
The radiation stood has been in reduced levels, but the safety to guarantee nuclear power staff, need to be monitored dose of radiation and
Control.
Within the scope of nuclear power station, it mainly includes two dimensions that personal dose, which manages control, first is that work on the spot management controls, it is right
Electron dosimeter (referred to as " EPD ") setting odd-numbered day alarm threshold value, it is dry for controlling staff's odd-numbered day acceptable radioactive dose
Pre-value；Second is that a man-year intergal dose management control, tracks everyone and rolls annual intergal dose, set the ginseng of year personal dose
The personaldoselimit that horizontal and action level effectively to control year is examined, evaluation analysis occupational exposure personal dose is managed
Risk is currently without a kind of standard effectively evaluating method.
Summary of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention is that in view of the above drawbacks of the prior art, providing a kind of evaluation nuclear power station
Method, terminal and the memory of occupational exposure risk index.
The technical solution adopted by the present invention to solve the technical problems is: constructing a kind of evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk
The method of index, comprising:
S1, annual dose is counted greater than the first default annual dose in nuclear power station year exposure total number of persons C0 and is less than or waits
First in the second default annual dose radiates number C1；
Annual dose is counted to be greater than the described second default annual dose and be less than or equal to the second radiation that third presets annual dose
Number C2；
It counts annual dose and is greater than the third radiation number C3 that the third presets annual dose；Wherein, the described first default year
Dosage < the second default annual dose < third presets annual dose；
S2, occupational exposure risk index I is calculated using following formulaidcr:
Iidcr=(C1*A1+C2*A2+C3*A3) * R1*k/C0
Wherein, the A1 is the weighted value of the first radiation number C1, and the A2 is the weighted value of the second radiation number C2, institute
Stating A3 is the weighted value that third radiates number C3；The R1 is EPD dosage alarm ratio, and k is constant.
Further, the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present invention, the EPD dosage alarm ratio
Example R1 refers to the percentage of the total access times of superthreshold alarm times Zhan, the value range of the EPD dosage alarm ratio R1 are as follows:
0 < R1 < 100%；
The constant k is natural number.
Further, the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present invention, the described first default year agent
Amount, the second default annual dose and third preset the weighted value and the described first default annual dose, the second default annual dose of annual dose
The size for presetting annual dose with third is proportional.
Preferably, the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present invention, the described first default year agent
Amount is 10mSv, and the second default annual dose is 12mSv, and it is 15mSv that the third, which presets annual dose,；
The weighted value A1 of the first radiation number C1 is 1, and the weighted value A2 of the second radiation number C2 is 5, described
The weighted value A3 that third radiates number C3 is 20.
Preferably, the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present invention, the EPD dosage alarm ratio
Example R1 is 2%；
The constant k takes 106。
Further, the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present invention, is calculating the occupation
Irradiate risk index IidcrAfterwards further include:
The step S1 and step S2 is repeated, the occupational exposure risk index I of each nuclear power station is calculatedidcr；
According to the occupational exposure risk index IidcrThe dosage control risk of each nuclear power station is evaluated, is reported
Industry irradiates risk index IidcrIt is proportional with the dosage control risk of nuclear power station.
Further, the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present invention, is calculating the occupation
Irradiate risk index IidcrAfterwards further include:
Each nuclear power station is according to the occupational exposure risk index IidcrAnd modification is formulated in default corrective measure.
Further, the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present invention, is calculating the occupation
Irradiate risk index IidcrAfterwards further include:
Judge the occupational exposure risk index IidcrWhether default secure threshold is reached；
If so, issuing safety alert information.
In addition, the terminal includes processor the present invention also provides a kind of terminal, the processor is for executing in memory
The step of method such as above-mentioned evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index is realized when the computer program of storage.
In addition, being stored thereon with computer program, the computer program is by processor the present invention also provides a kind of memory
The method such as above-mentioned evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index is realized when execution.
Implement method, terminal and the memory of a kind of evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the invention, have with
It is lower the utility model has the advantages that this method comprises: S1, count in annual exposure total number of persons C0 annual dose be greater than the first default annual dose and
Less than or equal to the second default annual dose first radiate number C1, statistics annual dose be greater than the second default annual dose and be less than or
Equal to the second radiation number C2 that third presets annual dose；It counts annual dose and is greater than the third radiation number that third presets annual dose
C3；S2, formula I is utilizedidcr=(C1*A1+C2*A2+C3*A3) * R1*k/C0 is calculated, wherein A1, A2, A3 C1, C2, C3 couple
The weighted value answered, R1 are EPD dosage alarm ratios, and k is constant.The present invention provides one kind being capable of comprehensive, effective, quantization evaluation
The index of occupational exposure risk measures each unit or nuclear power station occupational exposure control risk size by the index.
Detailed description of the invention
Present invention will be further explained below with reference to the attached drawings and examples, in attached drawing:
Fig. 1 is a kind of method flow chart of first embodiment for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present invention；
Fig. 2 is a kind of method fourth embodiment flow chart for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present invention；
Fig. 3 is a kind of the 5th embodiment flow chart of method for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present invention；
Fig. 4 is a kind of structural schematic diagram of terminal of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
For a clearer understanding of the technical characteristics, objects and effects of the present invention, now control attached drawing is described in detail
A specific embodiment of the invention.
First embodiment
With reference to Fig. 1, the method that nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index is evaluated in the present embodiment includes:
S1, annual dose is counted greater than the first default annual dose in nuclear power station year exposure total number of persons C0 and is less than or waits
First in the second default annual dose radiates number C1；Annual dose is counted to be greater than the second default annual dose and be less than or equal to third
Second radiation number C2 of default annual dose；It counts annual dose and is greater than the third radiation number C3 that third presets annual dose；Wherein,
The first default default annual dose < third of annual dose < the second presets annual dose.
S2, occupational exposure risk index I is calculated using following formulaidcr:
Iidcr=(C1*A1+C2*A2+C3*A3) * R1*k/C0
Wherein, A1 is the weighted value of the first radiation number C1, and A2 is the weighted value of the second radiation number C2, and A3 is third spoke
Penetrate the weighted value of number C3.
R1 is EPD dosage alarm ratio, and EPD dosage alarm ratio R1 refers to the total access times of superthreshold alarm times Zhan
Percentage, the value range of EPD dosage alarm ratio R1 are as follows: 0 < R1 < 100%.
K is constant, and constant k is natural number.
Further, the first default annual dose, the second default annual dose and third preset the weighted value and first of annual dose in advance
If the size that annual dose, the second default annual dose and third preset annual dose is proportional, i.e., the value of default annual dose is smaller,
Its corresponding weighted value is smaller；The value of default annual dose is bigger, and corresponding weighted value is bigger.
It is appreciated that the present embodiment has counted the first radiation number C1, the second radiation number C2, third radiation number C3,
On the basis of the present embodiment, by increaseing or decreasing the quantity in radiation section, protection scope of the present invention is belonged to.
Second embodiment
On the basis of first embodiment, in the method for the evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present embodiment, if
Setting the first default annual dose is 10mSv, and the second default annual dose is 12mSv, and it is 15mSv that third, which presets annual dose,.In nuclear power station
Annual exposure total number of persons C0 is 3250, and through counting, it is 85 that 10mSv < annual dosage≤12mSv first, which radiates number C1,
It is 25 that 12mSv < year dosage≤15mSv second, which radiates number C2, and the third radiation number C3 of annual dosage > 15mSv is
2.Further, the weighted value A1 of the first radiation of setting number C1 is 1, and the weighted value A2 of the second radiation number C2 is 5, third radiation
The weighted value A3 of number C3 is 20.EPD dosage alarm ratio R1 is 2%；Constant k takes 106。
Bring above-mentioned parameter into formula:
Iidcr=(C1*A1+C2*A2+C3*A3) * R1*k/C0
Occupational exposure risk index I is calculatedidcrIt is 15.38.
3rd embodiment
On the basis of first embodiment, in the method for the evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present embodiment,
Calculating occupational exposure risk index IidcrAfterwards further include:
Step S1 and step S2 are repeated, the occupational exposure risk index I of each nuclear power station is calculatedidcr。
According to occupational exposure risk index IidcrThe dosage control risk of each nuclear power station is evaluated, occupational exposure wind
Dangerous index IidcrProportional, the i.e. occupational exposure risk index I with the dosage control risk of nuclear power stationidcrValue it is bigger, nuclear power
It is higher that the personal dose to stand manages risk；Occupational exposure risk index IidcrValue it is smaller, the personal dose of nuclear power station manages wind
Danger is lower.
Further, occupational exposure risk index I is being calculatedidcrAfterwards further include: each nuclear power station is according to occupational exposure wind
Dangerous index IidcrAnd modification is formulated in default corrective measure.
Fourth embodiment
With reference to Fig. 2, in the method for the evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the present embodiment, occupational exposure is being calculated
Risk index IidcrAfterwards further include:
S3, judge occupational exposure risk index IidcrWhether reach default secure threshold, presets secure threshold according to industry
Standard or nuclear power station specific requirement are set.
If S4, occupational exposure risk index IidcrReach default secure threshold, then issues safety alert information.Preferably,
Security alarm information includes but is not limited to text prompt information alarm, light warning, audible alarm, vibration alarm etc..
5th embodiment
By taking certain nuclear power station 1, certain nuclear power station 2, certain nuclear power station 3, certain nuclear power station 4 as an example, each nuclear power station is counted respectively
Annual dose > 10mSv number C1, annual dose > 12mSv number C2, annual dose > 15mSv number C3, year by according to total number of persons C0,
And EPD dosage alarm ratio, the personal dose that each nuclear power station is calculated manage risk index.With reference to Fig. 3, tied from calculating
From the point of view of fruit, it is successively certain nuclear power station 1, certain nuclear power station 2, certain nuclear power station 4, certain nuclear power station 3 from high to low that personal dose, which manages risk,.
With reference to Fig. 4, the present invention also provides a kind of terminal, terminal includes processor, and processor is deposited for executing in memory
The step of method such as above-mentioned evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index is realized when the computer program of storage.
In addition, being stored thereon with computer program the present invention also provides a kind of memory, computer program is executed by processor
The method of Shi Shixian for example above-mentioned evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index.
The present invention provide it is a kind of be capable of comprehensively, effectively, the index of the evaluation occupational exposure risk of quantization, by the index come
Measure each unit or nuclear power station occupational exposure control risk size.
Above embodiments only technical concepts and features to illustrate the invention, its object is to allow person skilled in the art
Scholar can understand the contents of the present invention and implement accordingly, can not limit the scope of the invention.It is all to be wanted with right of the present invention
The equivalent changes and modifications that range is done are sought, should belong to the covering scope of the claims in the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. a kind of method for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index characterized by comprising
S1, annual dose is counted in nuclear power station year exposure total number of persons C0 be greater than the first default annual dose and be less than or equal to the
First radiation number C1 of two default annual doses；
Annual dose is counted to be greater than the described second default annual dose and be less than or equal to the second radiation number that third presets annual dose
C2；
It counts annual dose and is greater than the third radiation number C3 that the third presets annual dose；Wherein, the described first default annual dose
Third described in second default annual dose < described in < presets annual dose；
S2, occupational exposure risk index I is calculated using following formulaidcr:
Iidcr=(C1*A1+C2*A2+C3*A3) * R1*k/C0
Wherein, the A1 is the weighted value of the first radiation number C1, and the A2 is the weighted value of the second radiation number C2, the A3
The weighted value of number C3 is radiated for third；The R1 is EPD dosage alarm ratio, and k is constant.
2. the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index according to claim 1, which is characterized in that the EPD
Dosage alarm ratio R1 refers to the percentage of the total access times of superthreshold alarm times Zhan, the EPD dosage alarm ratio R1's
Value range are as follows: 0 < R1 < 100%；
The constant k is natural number.
3. the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index according to claim 1, which is characterized in that described first
Default annual dose, the weighted value of the second default annual dose and the default annual dose of third and the described first default annual dose, second are in advance
If the size that annual dose and third preset annual dose is proportional.
4. the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index according to claim 1, which is characterized in that described first
Default annual dose is 10mSv, and the second default annual dose is 12mSv, and it is 15mSv that the third, which presets annual dose,；
The weighted value A1 of the first radiation number C1 is 1, and the weighted value A2 of the second radiation number C2 is 5, the third
The weighted value A3 of radiation number C3 is 20.
5. the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index according to claim 4, which is characterized in that the EPD
Dosage alarm ratio R1 is 2%；
The constant k takes 106。
6. the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index according to claim 1, which is characterized in that calculating
The occupational exposure risk index IidcrAfterwards further include:
The step S1 and step S2 is repeated, the occupational exposure risk index I of each nuclear power station is calculatedidcr；
According to the occupational exposure risk index IidcrThe dosage control risk of each nuclear power station is evaluated, the occupation is shone
Penetrate risk index IidcrIt is proportional with the dosage control risk of nuclear power station.
7. the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index according to claim 1, which is characterized in that calculating
The occupational exposure risk index IidcrAfterwards further include:
Each nuclear power station is according to the occupational exposure risk index IidcrAnd modification is formulated in default corrective measure.
8. the method for evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index according to claim 1, which is characterized in that calculating
The occupational exposure risk index IidcrAfterwards further include:
Judge the occupational exposure risk index IidcrWhether default secure threshold is reached；
If so, issuing safety alert information.
9. a kind of terminal, which is characterized in that the terminal includes processor, and the processor is used to execute to store in memory
The method of the evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index as described in any one of claim 1-8 is realized when computer program
The step of.
10. a kind of memory, is stored thereon with computer program, it is characterised in that: the computer program is executed by processor
The method of evaluation nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index of the Shi Shixian as described in any one of claim 1-8.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811076222.6A CN109409654A (en) | 2018-09-14 | 2018-09-14 | A kind of method, terminal and memory for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811076222.6A CN109409654A (en) | 2018-09-14 | 2018-09-14 | A kind of method, terminal and memory for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109409654A true CN109409654A (en) | 2019-03-01 |
Family
ID=65464055
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811076222.6A Pending CN109409654A (en) | 2018-09-14 | 2018-09-14 | A kind of method, terminal and memory for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109409654A (en) |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20110010119A1 (en) * | 2008-01-23 | 2011-01-13 | Hsu Pi-Lin | Apparatus for monitoring the maintenance of systems in a nuclear power plant |
| CN104463363A (en) * | 2014-12-03 | 2015-03-25 | 浙江图讯科技有限公司 | Method, device and system for giving early warning about production risk |
| CN106570636A (en) * | 2016-10-28 | 2017-04-19 | 中国核电工程有限公司 | Nuclear power plant work personnel occupational exposure analysis method |
-
2018
- 2018-09-14 CN CN201811076222.6A patent/CN109409654A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20110010119A1 (en) * | 2008-01-23 | 2011-01-13 | Hsu Pi-Lin | Apparatus for monitoring the maintenance of systems in a nuclear power plant |
| CN104463363A (en) * | 2014-12-03 | 2015-03-25 | 浙江图讯科技有限公司 | Method, device and system for giving early warning about production risk |
| CN106570636A (en) * | 2016-10-28 | 2017-04-19 | 中国核电工程有限公司 | Nuclear power plant work personnel occupational exposure analysis method |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 樊治国 等: "大亚湾核电站 1994 ～ 2002 年职业性照射个人剂量监测和评价", 《辐射防护》 * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Clairand et al. | Use of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology and cardiology: Tests in laboratory conditions and recommendations-ORAMED project | |
| EP2331985A2 (en) | Neutron dosimeter | |
| Blake et al. | Characterization of optical transport effects on EPID dosimetry using Geant4 | |
| Pozzi et al. | Correlated neutron emissions from 252Cf | |
| Villegas et al. | Monte Carlo calculated microdosimetric spread for cell nucleus-sized targets exposed to brachytherapy 125I and 192Ir sources and 60Co cell irradiation | |
| Ding et al. | Beam characteristics and stopping-power ratios of small radiosurgery photon beams | |
| Ghal–Eh et al. | Replacement of Bonner spheres with polyethylene cylinders for the unfolding of an 241Am–Be neutron energy spectrum | |
| Di Fulvio et al. | Superheated emulsions and track etch detectors for photoneutron measurements | |
| Gallo et al. | Development of a georeferencing software for radiological diffusion in order to improve the safety and security of first responders | |
| CN109409654A (en) | A kind of method, terminal and memory for evaluating nuclear power station occupational exposure risk index | |
| Mirzajani et al. | Analysis of the application of the shadow cone technique for the determination of neutron spectrum with Bonner sphere spectrometer | |
| CN109214615A (en) | A method of suitable for the group's heap dosage risk control of high temperature gas cooled reactor nuclear power plant | |
| Sutton et al. | Accounting for the ion recombination factor in relative dosimetry of flattening filter free photon radiation | |
| Fan et al. | Trends of annual whole-body occupational radiation exposure for industrial practices in China (2009–2018) | |
| Fonseca et al. | MaMP and FeMP: computational mesh phantoms applied for studying the variation of WBC efficiency using a NaI (Tl) detector | |
| McNaughton et al. | Gamma-ray dose from an overhead plume | |
| Ji et al. | A new approach for the determination of dose rate and radioactivity for detected gamma nuclides using an environmental radiation monitor based on an NaI (Tl) detector | |
| Carjan et al. | Nonadiabatic transition of the fissioning nucleus at scission: the time scale | |
| Manocchi et al. | Radon exposure at a radioactive waste storage facility | |
| JP6228024B2 (en) | Radioactivity evaluation method and radioactivity evaluation program | |
| Calatayud-Jordán et al. | Influence of the simultaneous calibration of multiple ring dosimeters on the individual absorbed dose | |
| Fernandes et al. | The radiation field characteristics of a 137Cs source used for calibration of radiation protection instruments | |
| KR102217203B1 (en) | Materials screening apparatus and method thereof | |
| Thomas et al. | A reappraisal of the reported dose equivalents at the boundary of the University of California Radiation Laboratory during the early days of Bevatron operation | |
| GB2619579A (en) | Method of determining minimum criticality accident source term |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information |
Address after: 518000 Guangdong city of Shenzhen province Futian District Lotus Street No. 2002 Shennan Avenue South 14 CGN building room 1401 Applicant after: CGN (Shenzhen) operation technology and radiation monitoring Co., Ltd Applicant after: SUZHOU NUCLEAR POWER Research Institute Applicant after: CHINA GENERAL NUCLEAR POWER Corp. Applicant after: CGN POWER Co.,Ltd. Address before: 518000 Guangdong city of Shenzhen province Futian District Lotus Street No. 2002 Shennan Avenue South 14 CGN building room 1401 Applicant before: CGN (SHENZHEN) RADIATION MONITORING TECHNOLOGY Co.,Ltd. Applicant before: SUZHOU NUCLEAR POWER Research Institute Applicant before: CHINA GENERAL NUCLEAR POWER Corp. Applicant before: CGN POWER Co.,Ltd. |
|
| CB02 | Change of applicant information | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20190301 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |