CN109266719B - Method for evaluating hydrolysis capacity of malt starch - Google Patents
Method for evaluating hydrolysis capacity of malt starch Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109266719B CN109266719B CN201811204926.7A CN201811204926A CN109266719B CN 109266719 B CN109266719 B CN 109266719B CN 201811204926 A CN201811204926 A CN 201811204926A CN 109266719 B CN109266719 B CN 109266719B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- amylase
- activity
- malt
- alpha
- beta
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- GXCLVBGFBYZDAG-UHFFFAOYSA-N N-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]-N-methylprop-2-en-1-amine Chemical compound CN(CCC1=CNC2=C1C=CC=C2)CC=C GXCLVBGFBYZDAG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 130
- 229920002472 Starch Polymers 0.000 title claims abstract description 96
- 239000008107 starch Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 96
- 235000019698 starch Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 96
- 230000007062 hydrolysis Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 86
- 238000006460 hydrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 86
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 108090000637 alpha-Amylases Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 144
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 121
- 108010019077 beta-Amylase Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 82
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 81
- 102000004139 alpha-Amylases Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 74
- 229940024171 alpha-amylase Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 74
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 229940088598 enzyme Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 229920001353 Dextrin Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 239000004375 Dextrin Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 235000019425 dextrin Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000000611 regression analysis Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 claims description 26
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 150000008163 sugars Chemical class 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000000287 crude extract Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000002835 absorbance Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000011536 extraction buffer Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000011259 mixed solution Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 235000013405 beer Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 8
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 abstract description 6
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 27
- 102000013142 Amylases Human genes 0.000 description 16
- 108010065511 Amylases Proteins 0.000 description 16
- 235000019418 amylase Nutrition 0.000 description 16
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 15
- 230000003301 hydrolyzing effect Effects 0.000 description 13
- 239000004382 Amylase Substances 0.000 description 11
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 11
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 description 8
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 6
- OWEGMIWEEQEYGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 100676-05-9 Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OCC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(OC2C(OC(O)C(O)C2O)CO)O1 OWEGMIWEEQEYGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-PICCSMPSSA-N Maltose Natural products O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](CO)OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-PICCSMPSSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 229940025131 amylases Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000012086 standard solution Substances 0.000 description 5
- BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-REOHCLBHSA-N (S)-malic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](O)CC(O)=O BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-REOHCLBHSA-N 0.000 description 4
- ZCYVEMRRCGMTRW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 7553-56-2 Chemical compound [I] ZCYVEMRRCGMTRW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- OFOBLEOULBTSOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propanedioic acid Natural products OC(=O)CC(O)=O OFOBLEOULBTSOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000013024 dilution buffer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 150000002016 disaccharides Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000706 filtrate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000011389 fruit/vegetable juice Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910052740 iodine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000011630 iodine Substances 0.000 description 4
- VZCYOOQTPOCHFL-UPHRSURJSA-N maleic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)\C=C/C(O)=O VZCYOOQTPOCHFL-UPHRSURJSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000011976 maleic acid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 150000002772 monosaccharides Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000010183 spectrum analysis Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 4
- VZCYOOQTPOCHFL-UHFFFAOYSA-N trans-butenedioic acid Natural products OC(=O)C=CC(O)=O VZCYOOQTPOCHFL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tris Chemical compound OCC(N)(CO)CO LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 150000004043 trisaccharides Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- DBTMGCOVALSLOR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 32-alpha-galactosyl-3-alpha-galactosyl-galactose Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OC1C(O)C(OC2C(C(CO)OC(O)C2O)O)OC(CO)C1O DBTMGCOVALSLOR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- RXVWSYJTUUKTEA-UHFFFAOYSA-N D-maltotriose Natural products OC1C(O)C(OC(C(O)CO)C(O)C(O)C=O)OC(CO)C1OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(CO)O1 RXVWSYJTUUKTEA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 3
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N beta-D-glucose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N 0.000 description 3
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-QUYVBRFLSA-N beta-maltose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@H](O[C@H]2[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)O[C@@H]2CO)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-QUYVBRFLSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 3
- FYGDTMLNYKFZSV-UHFFFAOYSA-N mannotriose Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OC1C(CO)OC(OC2C(OC(O)C(O)C2O)CO)C(O)C1O FYGDTMLNYKFZSV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000005360 mashing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- AKHNMLFCWUSKQB-UHFFFAOYSA-L sodium thiosulfate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=S AKHNMLFCWUSKQB-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 3
- 235000019345 sodium thiosulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 150000004044 tetrasaccharides Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- FYGDTMLNYKFZSV-BYLHFPJWSA-N β-1,4-galactotrioside Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@H](CO)O[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H](O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O FYGDTMLNYKFZSV-BYLHFPJWSA-N 0.000 description 3
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 2
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 240000005979 Hordeum vulgare Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000007340 Hordeum vulgare Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LUEWUZLMQUOBSB-UHFFFAOYSA-N UNPD55895 Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OC1C(CO)OC(OC2C(OC(OC3C(OC(O)C(O)C3O)CO)C(O)C2O)CO)C(O)C1O LUEWUZLMQUOBSB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N alpha-hydroxysuccinic acid Natural products OC(=O)C(O)CC(O)=O BJEPYKJPYRNKOW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000013312 flour Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000036252 glycation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005342 ion exchange Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000031700 light absorption Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000001630 malic acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000011090 malic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000004890 malting Methods 0.000 description 2
- UYQJCPNSAVWAFU-UHFFFAOYSA-N malto-tetraose Natural products OC1C(O)C(OC(C(O)CO)C(O)C(O)C=O)OC(CO)C1OC1C(O)C(O)C(OC2C(C(O)C(O)C(CO)O2)O)C(CO)O1 UYQJCPNSAVWAFU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LUEWUZLMQUOBSB-OUBHKODOSA-N maltotetraose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@H](CO)O[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H](O[C@@H](O[C@@H]3[C@@H](O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]3O)CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)CO)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O LUEWUZLMQUOBSB-OUBHKODOSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000011056 performance test Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001542 size-exclusion chromatography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000001488 sodium phosphate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012089 stop solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004448 titration Methods 0.000 description 2
- RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K trisodium phosphate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 2
- 229910000406 trisodium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 235000019801 trisodium phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920000945 Amylopectin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000742 Cotton Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229930091371 Fructose Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 239000005715 Fructose Substances 0.000 description 1
- RFSUNEUAIZKAJO-ARQDHWQXSA-N Fructose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@](O)(CO)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O RFSUNEUAIZKAJO-ARQDHWQXSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000004157 Hydrolases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000604 Hydrolases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 239000012496 blank sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013124 brewing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108010061330 glucan 1,4-alpha-maltohydrolase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 150000004676 glycans Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000035790 physiological processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001282 polysaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005017 polysaccharide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008092 positive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004321 preservation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007974 sodium acetate buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- BHZOKUMUHVTPBX-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium acetic acid acetate Chemical compound [Na+].CC(O)=O.CC([O-])=O BHZOKUMUHVTPBX-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002195 synergetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/34—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving hydrolase
- C12Q1/40—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving hydrolase involving amylase
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a method for evaluating the hydrolysis capacity of malt starch, belongs to the technical field of beer, and can solve the technical problem that the saccharification capacity evaluation index cannot accurately reflect the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch. The technical scheme comprises the following steps: measuring the activity of alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrin enzyme; establishing a relation between the alpha-amylase activity, the beta-amylase activity, the limit dextrin enzyme activity and the proportion of fermentable sugar through regression analysis, and establishing a wort fermentable sugar proportion formula; establishing a malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient calculation formula by combining the coefficients of alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase in the wort fermentable sugar proportion formula; and judging the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch by using the coefficient of the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch and the activity of the limiting dextrinase. The method can more accurately evaluate the starch hydrolysis capacity of the malt so as to guide a brewer to adjust the formula and the process according to the real starch hydrolysis capacity, and improve the consistency of the product flavor.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of beer, and particularly relates to a method for evaluating the hydrolysis capacity of malt starch.
Background
Barley is the main raw material for brewing beer, various hydrolase activities are activated through malting, and water-insoluble substances in the malt are gradually hydrolyzed into micromolecular water-soluble nutrient substances in the saccharification process for yeast fermentation to generate alcohol and various flavor substances. In order to increase the efficiency of malt utilization, 60% of the barley is starch and the alcohol in beer is fermented from sugar, it is necessary to hydrolyze as much starch as possible completely into fermentable sugars (maltose, glucose, maltotriose, fructose and sucrose) that can be absorbed and utilized by yeast and non-fermentable sugar dextrin that does not cause iodine stain. Therefore, starch hydrolysis ability is one of the important indicators for evaluating malt quality.
As agricultural products, malt is easily fluctuated by the influence of years, planting areas, climate and varieties, the physiological state of yeast and the brewing performance in the fermentation process and the flavor consistency of final products are directly influenced, and the variety and the quality of the malt also influence the utilization rate of raw materials and determine the economy of the brewing process. Therefore, an accurate method for evaluating the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch is established, and a brewing engineer can be better guided to adjust the process and the formula so as to ensure the consistency of the components of the wort and the stability of the flavor of the product. At present, the saccharifying power of malt is taken as an evaluation index of the hydrolyzing capability of malt starch, but more and more researches show that the hydrolyzing degrees of the starch of the malt with the same saccharifying power are different, the contents of generated fermentable sugars are inconsistent, and the hydrolyzing capability of the malt starch cannot be accurately reflected.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides an evaluation method capable of accurately evaluating the hydrolysis capacity of malt starch aiming at the technical problem that the saccharification ability evaluation index cannot accurately reflect the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch.
In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a method for evaluating the hydrolysis ability of malt starch, comprising the steps of:
measuring the activity of alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrin enzyme;
establishing a relation between the alpha-amylase activity, the beta-amylase activity, the limit dextrin enzyme activity and the proportion of fermentable sugar through regression analysis, and establishing a wort fermentable sugar proportion formula;
establishing a malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient calculation formula by combining the coefficients of alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase in the wort fermentable sugar proportion formula;
and judging the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch by using the coefficient of the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch and the activity of the limiting dextrinase.
Preferably, the alpha-amylase activity, the beta-amylase activity and the limit dextrin enzyme activity are obtained by the following methods:
respectively extracting alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase crude extract by using alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase extraction buffer;
respectively adding an alpha-amylase substrate, a beta-amylase substrate and a limit dextrinase substrate into the alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase crude extract, and respectively adding an alpha-amylase termination solution, a beta-amylase termination solution and a limit dextrinase termination solution to terminate the reaction after the reaction;
and respectively measuring the absorbance values of the mixed solutions after the reaction is terminated to obtain the activities of the alpha-amylase, the beta-amylase and the limit dextrinase.
Preferably, the formula for establishing the proportion of fermentable sugars in wort is as follows:
fermentable sugar ratio (%) (69.2 + 0.0101) limit dextrin enzyme activity +0.00347 · α -amylase activity +0.000286 · β -amylase activity).
Preferably, the calculation formula of the malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient is as follows:
the malt starch hydrolysis ability coefficient (1.01 × + limit dextrinase activity +0.347 ×. alpha-amylase activity +0.0286 ×. beta-amylase activity)/100.
Preferably, the method for judging the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch by using the coefficient of the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch and the limiting dextrinase activity comprises the following steps:
when the malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient is less than or equal to 3 and the limit dextrinase activity is less than or equal to 200mU/g, the proportion of fermentable sugar is less than 72 percent, and the malt has low fermentation degree and poor hydrolysis effect when used;
when the malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient is more than or equal to 4.5 and the limit dextrinase activity is more than or equal to 370mU/g, the proportion of fermentable sugar is more than 74 percent, the fermentation degree is high when the malt is used, and the hydrolysis effect is good;
when the hydrolysis capacity coefficient of the malt starch is 3-4.5 and the limit dextrin enzyme activity is 200-.
Compared with the prior art, the method has the advantages and positive effects that the starch hydrolysis capability of the malt can be more accurately evaluated by establishing the malt starch hydrolysis capability evaluation method taking the activities of three amylases as the core, so that a brewer can be guided to adjust the formula and the process according to the real starch hydrolysis capability, and the consistency of the product flavor is improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic plot of the fermentable sugar ratio of wort versus the limiting dextrinase activity according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic view showing the relationship between the ratio of fermentable sugars and the activity of alpha-amylase in wort according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic scatter plot of the relationship between the fermentable sugar ratio of wort and beta-amylase activity according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
The embodiment of the invention provides a method for evaluating the hydrolysis capacity of malt starch, which comprises the following steps:
s1: and (3) measuring the activity of the alpha-amylase, the activity of the beta-amylase and the activity of the limit dextrin enzyme of the malt.
In the step, the activity of the malt alpha-amylase, the activity of the malt beta-amylase and the activity of the ultimate dextrinase are determined, because the alpha-amylase, the beta-amylase and the ultimate dextrinase are three main enzymes which influence the proportion of fermentable sugars of wort, and the three enzymes synergistically hydrolyze starch. Wherein 70% of starch in the malt is amylopectin, the limit dextrinase is the amylase which has the lowest content in the malt and is only used for decomposing alpha-1, 6-glycosidic bonds, and the alpha-amylase and the beta-amylase can be continuously hydrolyzed only after the limit dextrinase hydrolyzes the alpha-1, 6-glycosidic bonds of the starch, so the limit dextrinase is the rate-limiting enzyme of starch hydrolysis; alpha-amylase randomly cleaves alpha-1, 4-glycosidic bonds, providing a substrate for further hydrolysis by the limiting dextrinase and beta-amylase; beta-amylase is the most abundant enzyme that cleaves alpha-1, 4-glucosidic bonds to produce maltose. Therefore, the proper proportion of the three enzymes is the key for ensuring the complete hydrolysis of the starch.
S2: establishing the relationship between the alpha-amylase activity, the beta-amylase activity, the limit dextrin enzyme activity and the proportion of the fermentable sugar through regression analysis, and establishing a wort fermentable sugar proportion formula.
In the step, a formula of the proportion of fermentable sugars in the wort is established, because in order to ensure the sufficient nutrient substances of the yeast and the taste of the beer in the fermentation process, on one hand, enough fermentable sugars which can be absorbed and utilized by the yeast need to be ensured, and on the other hand, a part of non-fermentable sugars (polysaccharides which are greater than or equal to tetrasaccharide) which cannot be absorbed and utilized by the yeast also need to be remained in the beer, so that the taste of the beer is ensured. Therefore, depending on the kind of yeast and beer, the fermentation degree of wort, i.e., the ratio of fermentable sugars, must be controlled during production. The alpha-amylase, the beta-amylase and the limit dextrinase are three main enzymes which influence the proportion of fermentable sugar in the wort, and a regression equation formula of the proportion of the fermentable sugar in the wort and the three amylase activities is established by establishing the relationship among the alpha-amylase activity, the beta-amylase activity, the limit dextrinase activity and the proportion of the fermentable sugar, so that the aim of predicting the proportion of the fermentable sugar in the wort according to the alpha-amylase activity, the beta-amylase activity and the limit dextrinase activity is fulfilled, and a basis is provided for further establishing a method for accurately evaluating the starch hydrolysis capacity.
S3: and establishing a malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient calculation formula by combining the coefficients of alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase in the wort fermentable sugar ratio formula.
In the step, a calculation formula of the malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient is established through the coefficients of alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase in a wort fermentable sugar proportion formula, the reason is that the wort fermentable sugar proportion is an important parameter for reflecting the malt starch hydrolysis capacity, and the fermentable sugar in the wort is mainly obtained by gradually hydrolyzing starch in malt under the synergistic action of an amylase system. The starch hydrolyzing enzymes in malt mainly comprise alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase, and the content and the proportion of the three enzymes in the malt are different, so that the proportion of fermentable sugar in the wort is different. Thus, all three enzymes affect the degree of starch hydrolysis, which is related to the starch hydrolyzing ability of malt, but in different degrees. By establishing a regression equation of the ratio of the three enzyme activities to the fermentable sugar, the influence degree and the importance of the three enzymes on the ratio of the fermentable sugar can be seen in the coefficient of the regression equation.
S4: and judging the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch by using the coefficient of the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch and the activity of the limiting dextrinase.
By analyzing the activity of a large number of malt amylase systems of different varieties, producing areas, years and malting processes, a scatter diagram of the ratio of the three amylase activities to the fermentable sugar of the wort is drawn, as shown in fig. 1, 2 and 3, the scatter diagram shows that the correlation between the ratio of the limiting dextrinase and the fermentable sugar is strongest, the correlation between the limiting dextrinase and the fermentable sugar is weak, and the correlation between the limiting dextrinase and the fermentable sugar is weak. In the step, the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch is judged by utilizing the hydrolysis capacity coefficient of the malt starch and the activity of the limit dextrinase, and the method has the advantages that the saccharification force is mainly taken as an index for evaluating the hydrolysis capacity of the starch in the conventional index at present, but the saccharification force mainly reflects the activity of the beta-amylase in the malt, and the correlation with the limit dextrinase and the alpha-amylase is weak. However, in practice, the fermentable sugars of wort are affected most by the limiting dextrinase enzyme, and secondly by the alpha-amylase, which has the least effect. Therefore, in the actual production, there was no difference in the saccharifying ability of malt, but the starch hydrolyzing ability of malt was very different (as in example 2). Therefore, the present invention can effectively reflect the actual starch hydrolyzing ability of malt.
In a preferred embodiment, the α -amylase activity, β -amylase activity and limit dextrin enzyme activity are obtained by:
respectively extracting alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase crude extract by using alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase extraction buffer;
respectively adding an alpha-amylase substrate, a beta-amylase substrate and a limit dextrinase substrate into the alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase crude extract, and respectively adding an alpha-amylase termination solution, a beta-amylase termination solution and a limit dextrinase termination solution to terminate the reaction after the reaction;
and respectively measuring the absorbance values of the mixed solutions after the reaction is terminated to obtain the activities of the alpha-amylase, the beta-amylase and the limit dextrinase.
In this embodiment, the methods for measuring the α -amylase activity, the β -amylase activity, and the limit dextrin enzyme activity are specifically defined, and it is understood that the methods for measuring the α -amylase activity, the β -amylase activity, and the limit dextrin enzyme activity in the embodiments are not limited to those listed in the above embodiments, and may be other methods reasonably selected and adjusted in the art by those skilled in the art according to common knowledge.
In a preferred embodiment, the formula for establishing the fermentable sugar ratio of wort is as follows:
fermentable sugar ratio (%) (69.2 + 0.0101) limit dextrin enzyme activity +0.00347 · α -amylase activity +0.000286 · β -amylase activity).
In this example, a regression equation of wort fermentable sugar ratio and three enzyme activities can be established in combination with the measured α -amylase activity, β -amylase activity, and limiting dextrinase activity, and the fermentable sugar ratio of wort. Meanwhile, the coefficients of three different amylases in the calculation formula of the ratio of the fermentable sugars of the wort can reflect the influence degree of the three amylases on the ratio of the fermentable sugars of the wort.
In a preferred embodiment, the calculation formula of the maltostarch hydrolysis capacity coefficient is as follows:
the malt starch hydrolysis ability coefficient (1.01 × + limit dextrinase activity +0.347 ×. alpha-amylase activity +0.0286 ×. beta-amylase activity)/100.
In this embodiment, a calculation formula of the hydrolysis capacity coefficient of the malt starch is established by combining the coefficients of the alpha-amylase, the beta-amylase and the limit dextrinase in the formula of the fermentable sugar ratio of the malt juice, it should be noted that the coefficients of the alpha-amylase, the beta-amylase and the limit dextrinase in the formula of the fermentable sugar ratio of the malt juice reflect the degree of influence of the three amylases on the ratio of the fermentable sugar of the malt juice, the ratio of the fermentable sugar of the malt juice is an important parameter reflecting the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch, and the calculation formula of the hydrolysis capacity coefficient of the malt starch is established by using the coefficients of the alpha-amylase, the beta-amylase and the limit dextrinase in the formula of the fermentable sugar ratio, so that the hydrolysis capacity coefficient of the malt starch can be more accurately calculated by using the activities of the three amylases.
In a preferred embodiment, the method for determining the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch by using the coefficient of the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch and the limiting dextrinase activity comprises the following specific steps:
when the hydrolysis capacity coefficient of the malt starch is less than or equal to 3 and the limit dextrinase activity is less than or equal to 200mU/g, the proportion of fermentable sugar is less than 72 percent, the malt has low fermentation degree and poor hydrolysis effect when being used;
when the malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient is more than or equal to 4.5 and the limit dextrinase activity is more than or equal to 370mU/g, the proportion of fermentable sugar is more than 74 percent, the fermentation degree is high when the malt is used, and the hydrolysis effect is good;
when the hydrolysis capacity coefficient of the malt starch is 3-4.5 and the limit dextrin enzyme activity is 200-.
In the embodiment, a method for judging the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch is specifically provided, and it should be noted that the ratio of fermentable sugars is obtained by combining the coefficient of the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch and the activity of the limiting dextrinase, so that the hydrolysis capacity of the starch is judged. In addition, the judgment method of the embodiment is obtained by counting the amylase system, the starch hydrolysis capacity and the ratio of fermentable sugars of the wort of more than 60 batches of different malts, so that the accuracy of the judgment method is ensured.
In order to more clearly describe the method for evaluating the hydrolysis ability of malt starch provided in the examples of the present invention in detail, the following description will be given with reference to the specific examples.
Example 1
Relationship between different varieties, different batches of maltogenic amylase systems and proportion of fermentable sugars
1. Sample source: 55 malts of different factories and different varieties
2. Malt Amylase Activity analysis
1) 300mg (. + -. 25mg) of malt powder was weighed into a 10mL EP tube and the exact powder mass was recorded. Weighing 2 parts of each sample, one part for measuring alpha/beta-amylase activity (mass M1) and one part for measuring limit dextrinase activity (mass M2);
2) 5mL of an alpha/beta-amylase extraction buffer (100mM maleic acid, pH 5.5) was added to 1 part, and a limiting dextrinase extraction buffer (100mM maleic acid, 25mM DTT, pH 5.5) was added to 1 part, followed by mixing, placing in a metal water bath, and shaking at 20 ℃ for 16 hours. Centrifuging at 12000rpm for 10min, and collecting supernatant as alpha/beta-amylase extractive solution and limit dextrinase extractive solution.
3) The crude alpha/beta-amylase extract was diluted 250-fold with alpha-amylase dilution buffer (50mM malic acid, 3.5g/L sodium hydroxide, 3g/L sodium chloride, 2.95g calcium chloride, pH 5.4). Adding 50 mu L of the alpha-amylase substrate into a 2mL centrifuge tube, carrying out warm bath at 40 ℃ for 2min, adding 50 mu L of the alpha-amylase substrate (Megazyme), reacting at 40 ℃ for 10min, adding 750 mu L of alpha-amylase termination solution (1% trisodium phosphate, pH 11), uniformly mixing, and measuring the absorbance at 405nm (OD405), namely alpha-amylase O.D.
α -amylase activity (U/g absolute malt) ═ α -amylase o.d. 17 dilution factor 100 × 5000/181/(100-moisture)/M1.
4) The crude alpha/beta-amylase extract was diluted 25-fold with beta-amylase dilution buffer (11.6g/L maleic acid, 0.37g/L EDTA, 1g/L BSA, pH 6.2). Adding 50 mu L of the mixture into a 2mL centrifuge tube, carrying out warm bath at 40 ℃ for 2min, adding 50 mu L of beta-amylase substrate, reacting at 40 ℃ for 10min, adding 750 mu L of beta-amylase termination solution (1% Trizma), uniformly mixing, and measuring the light absorption value (OD405) at 405nm to obtain the beta-amylase O.D.
Beta-amylase activity (U/g absolute malt) ═ beta-amylase o.d. 17 dilution factor 5860 × 5000/181/(100-moisture)/M1.
5) Putting 11.5-12.5mg into a 2mL centrifuge tube, carrying out water bath at 40 ℃ for 2min, accurately taking 100 mu L of limit dextrinase crude extract, adding the limit dextrinase crude extract into the centrifuge tube filled with a substrate, carrying out accurate reaction at 40 ℃ for 10min, adding 1mL of limit dextrinase stop solution (1% Trizma), carrying out normal-temperature centrifugation at 12000rpm for 40min, sucking out the supernatant, and measuring the absorbance value (OD595) at 595nm to obtain the limit dextrinase O.D.
Limit dextrinase (mU/g absolute malt) 11.2 limit dextrinase o.d. 500000 2 5/(100-moisture)/M2.
3. Analysis of proportion of fermentable sugar in wort
Protocol preparation method of wort: a50.0 g malt flour sample is accurately weighed into a saccharifying cup with known weight, 200mL water with 45 ℃ is added, and the temperature is kept for 30min in a water bath with 45 ℃ under continuous stirring. Heating the mash to 70 ℃ within 25min by heating the water bath at the speed of 1 ℃/min, adding 100mL of water at 70 ℃ into the cup, keeping the mash at 70 ℃ for 1h, and rapidly cooling to room temperature within 10-15 min. The stirrer was rinsed with water, the outer wall of the mashing cup was wiped dry, and water was added to accurately weigh 450.0g of its contents. The mash was agitated with a glass rod and filtered through a medium speed filter paper, and about 100mL of the initially collected filtrate was returned to the refilter and the filtrate was collected in a dry beaker.
Sugar spectrum analysis: and (3) separating and quantitatively detecting the contents of glucose, maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose and the above sugars in the wort by adopting size exclusion chromatography and combining an ion exchange mode.
The fermentable sugar ratio is (monosaccharide + disaccharide + trisaccharide) × 100/(monosaccharide + disaccharide + trisaccharide + tetrasaccharide and above).
4. Relationship and regression equation of activity of fermentable sugar and amylase in wort
Regression analysis is carried out on the ratio of the alpha-amylase activity, the beta-amylase activity and the limit dextrin enzyme activity obtained by the method to the fermentable sugar in the wort, and a regression equation is obtained by the regression analysis as follows:
fermentable sugar ratio (%) (69.2 + 0.0101) limit dextrin enzyme activity +0.00347 · α -amylase activity +0.000286 · β -amylase activity
5. Hydrolysis coefficient of malt starch
The principle of starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient is formulated as follows: and (3) taking the coefficient of the proportion of each amylase to the fermentable sugar in the regression equation as the influence degree of each amylase on the starch hydrolysis capacity. Thus, the malt starch hydrolysis capacity factor (1.01 × (limit) dextrinase +0.347 × (α -amylase + 0.0286) × (β -amylase)/100
Standard formulation principle: when the proportion of fermentable sugar is less than 72 percent, the hydrolysis capacity coefficients of the maltostarch are all less than or equal to 3, and the activity of the limit dextrin enzyme is less than or equal to 200 mU/g; when the proportion of fermentable sugar is more than or equal to 74 percent, the hydrolysis capacity coefficients of the malt starch are all more than or equal to 4.5, and the activity of the limiting dextrinase is more than or equal to 370 mU/g.
Example 2
Evaluation of hydrolysis Capacity of malt starch of the same variety and different manufacturers
1. Sample source: malt samples from different suppliers of the same cultivar, Canadian malt Copeland.
2. Conventional index of starch hydrolysis capacity: analysis of glycation power
A20.0 g sample of fine malt was weighed into a mashing cup of known weight for use. 450-. Cooling to 20 + -0.5 deg.C, adding 20 + -0.5 deg.C distilled water to make the content weight of the saccharifying cup reach 520.0g, and filtering with double-layer medium speed filter paper.
100mL of starch solution is respectively added into a 200mL volumetric flask, then 5mL of acetic acid-sodium acetate buffer solution is added, and the mixture is placed into a water bath with the temperature of 20 +/-0.1 ℃ for heat preservation for 20 min. Adding 5mL of malt extract, keeping the temperature in a water bath at 20 +/-0.1 ℃ for 30min, adding 4mL of sodium hydroxide solution, shaking up, fixing the volume to the scale with distilled water, and shaking up. 2.35mL of sodium hydroxide solution is firstly added into the blank sample, then 5.00mL of malt extract is added, the mixture is shaken up, and the volume is determined to the scale by distilled water.
The solution in each 50mL volumetric flask was pipetted into 4 250mL iodine vials, and 3mL sodium hydroxide solution and 25mL iodine standard solution were added, respectively, and the vials were put in the dark with a lid for 15 min. After the dark reaction was complete, 4.5mL of sulfuric acid solution was added to each vial and immediately titrated with sodium thiosulfate standard solution until the blue color disappeared. The glycation power was calculated according to the following formula.
Wherein D is the saccharifying power of 100g of anhydrous malt, WK;
V1-mL consumption of sodium thiosulfate standard solution by blank titration;
v2-sample titration consumed milliliters, mL, of standard solution of sodium thiosulfate;
concentration of N-sodium thiosulfate standard solution, mol/L;
wc-mass fraction of sample water,%;
342-20 g of malt sample, 0.171X 200/50X 500/5X 100/20, where 0.171 is the mass of maltose, g, equivalent to 1mL of 0.05mol/L iodine solution.
3. Malt amylase series analysis
1) 300mg (. + -. 25mg) of malt powder was weighed into a 10mL EP tube and the exact powder mass was recorded. Weighing 2 parts of each sample, one part for measuring alpha/beta-amylase activity (mass M1) and one part for measuring limit dextrinase activity (mass M2);
2) 5mL of an alpha/beta-amylase extraction buffer (100mM maleic acid, pH 5.5) was added to 1 part, and a limiting dextrinase extraction buffer (100mM maleic acid, 25mM DTT, pH 5.5) was added to 1 part, followed by mixing, placing in a metal water bath, and shaking at 20 ℃ for 16 hours. Centrifuging at 12000rpm for 10min, and collecting supernatant as alpha/beta-amylase extractive solution and limit dextrinase extractive solution.
3) The crude alpha/beta-amylase extract was diluted 250-fold with alpha-amylase dilution buffer (50mM malic acid, 3.5g/L sodium hydroxide, 3g/L sodium chloride, 2.95g calcium chloride, pH 5.4). Adding 50 mu L of the alpha-amylase substrate into a 2mL centrifuge tube, carrying out warm bath at 40 ℃ for 2min, adding 50 mu L of the alpha-amylase substrate (Megazyme), reacting at 40 ℃ for 10min, adding 750 mu L of alpha-amylase termination solution (1% trisodium phosphate, pH 11), uniformly mixing, and measuring the absorbance at 405nm (OD405), namely alpha-amylase O.D.
α -amylase activity (U/g absolute malt) ═ α -amylase o.d. 17 dilution factor 100 × 5000/181/(100-moisture)/M1.
4) The crude alpha/beta-amylase extract was diluted 25-fold with beta-amylase dilution buffer (11.6g/L maleic acid, 0.37g/L EDTA, 1g/L BSA, pH 6.2). Adding 50 mu L of the mixture into a 2mL centrifuge tube, carrying out warm bath at 40 ℃ for 2min, adding 50 mu L of beta-amylase substrate, reacting at 40 ℃ for 10min, adding 750 mu L of beta-amylase termination solution (1% Trizma), uniformly mixing, and measuring the light absorption value (OD405) at 405nm to obtain the beta-amylase O.D.
Beta-amylase activity (U/g absolute malt) ═ beta-amylase o.d. 17 dilution factor 5860 × 5000/181/(100-moisture)/M1.
5) Putting 11.5-12.5mg into a 2mL centrifuge tube, carrying out water bath at 40 ℃ for 2min, accurately taking 100 mu L of limit dextrinase crude extract, adding the limit dextrinase crude extract into the centrifuge tube filled with a substrate, carrying out accurate reaction at 40 ℃ for 10min, adding 1mL of limit dextrinase stop solution (1% Trizma), carrying out normal-temperature centrifugation at 12000rpm for 40min, sucking out the supernatant, and measuring the absorbance value (OD595) at 595nm to obtain the limit dextrinase O.D.
Limit dextrinase (mU/g absolute malt) 11.2 limit dextrinase o.d. 500000 2 5/(100-moisture)/M2
4. Analysis of proportion of fermentable sugar in wort
Protocol preparation method of wort: a50.0 g malt flour sample is accurately weighed into a saccharifying cup with known weight, 200mL water with 45 ℃ is added, and the temperature is kept for 30min in a water bath with 45 ℃ under continuous stirring. Heating the mash to 70 ℃ within 25min by heating the water bath at the speed of 1 ℃/min, adding 100mL of water at 70 ℃ into the cup, keeping the mash at 70 ℃ for 1h, and rapidly cooling to room temperature within 10-15 min. The stirrer was rinsed with water, the outer wall of the mashing cup was wiped dry, and water was added to accurately weigh 450.0g of its contents. The mash was agitated with a glass rod and filtered through a medium speed filter paper, and about 100mL of the initially collected filtrate was returned to the refilter and the filtrate was collected in a dry beaker.
Sugar spectrum analysis: and (3) separating and quantitatively detecting the contents of glucose, maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose and the above sugars in the wort by adopting size exclusion chromatography and combining an ion exchange mode.
Fermentable sugar ratio (monosaccharide + disaccharide + trisaccharide) 100/(monosaccharide + disaccharide + trisaccharide + tetrasaccharide and above)
5. Analysis of malt plant use Effect
The malt to be analyzed is taken, and mass production and material feeding brewing are carried out according to the same formula and process. In the mass production, the malt is 50-100% in proportion, the material and water are crushed and then the crushed material and water are put into the mixture according to the material-water ratio of 1 to (2-5) for saccharification, the saccharification temperature is 60-68 ℃, the saccharification time is 40-80min, the wort is filtered after the saccharification is finished, the same amount of hop is added into the wort for boiling for 30-80min, and the wort is cooled after the boiling is finished, so that the required wort is obtained.
Analysis of fermentation degree of cold wort: 100mL of wort sample is weighed, boiled in water for 10min, transferred to a 500mL triangular flask, added with 20.0g of yeast cake with water absorbed by filter paper, plugged with a cotton plug, placed in a shaking table, at 18 ℃, at 150rpm, and shaken for 16 h. After the fermentation is finished, the fermentation liquor is filtered by double-layer medium-speed filter paper, and the filtered fermentation liquor is used for measuring the ultimate fermentation degree by Anto Parr.
6. Malt Performance evaluation
The data of the performance test are shown in table 1, and according to the results in the table, it can be found that:
1) from the conventional index of the malt, the saccharifying power is more than 300 for 7 malts, and the starch hydrolyzing capability is consistent.
2) According to the starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient and the judgment standard of the ultimate dextrin enzyme activity: no. 1 malt is low starch hydrolyzing ability malt, No. 2-5 malt is medium starch hydrolyzing ability malt; no. 6-7 shows high starch hydrolyzing ability. As a result of sugar spectrum analysis, the proportion of fermentable sugar in No. 1 malt is less than 72%, that of No. 2 malt is 73-74%, and that of No. 5 malt is more than 74%. The starch hydrolysis ability is consistent with the result of sugar spectrum analysis.
3) From the actual plant performance: the fermentation degree of No. 1 malt is low, the fermentation degree of No. 2-5 malt is moderate, and the fermentation degree of No. 6-7 malt is high. In accordance with the new evaluation criteria for starch hydrolyzing ability.
TABLE 1 malt Performance test results
According to the new evaluation method, the brewer can adjust the formula and process according to the real starch hydrolysis capability. For example, the No. 1 malt needs to be matched with the malt with high starch hydrolysis capability, so that the saccharification time is prolonged, and the saccharification temperature is adjusted; no. 6-7 malt can shorten saccharification time and is used together with malt with low starch hydrolysis capability. The evaluation measures powerfully reduce the instability of sugar spectrum and fermentation degree caused by malt fluctuation and improve the consistency of product flavor.
Claims (2)
1. The method for evaluating the hydrolysis capacity of malt starch is characterized by comprising the following steps:
measuring the activity of alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrin enzyme;
establishing a relation between the alpha-amylase activity, the beta-amylase activity, the limit dextrin enzyme activity and the proportion of fermentable sugar through regression analysis, and establishing a wort fermentable sugar proportion formula;
establishing a malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient calculation formula by combining the coefficients of alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase in the wort fermentable sugar proportion formula;
the hydrolysis capacity of the malt starch is judged by utilizing the hydrolysis capacity coefficient of the malt starch and the activity of the limiting dextrinase, and the method specifically comprises the following steps:
when the malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient is less than or equal to 3 and the limit dextrinase activity is less than or equal to 200mU/g, the proportion of fermentable sugar is less than 72 percent, and the malt has low fermentation degree and poor hydrolysis effect when used;
when the malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient is more than or equal to 4.5 and the limit dextrinase activity is more than or equal to 370mU/g, the proportion of fermentable sugar is more than 74 percent, the fermentation degree is high when the malt is used, and the hydrolysis effect is good;
when the hydrolysis capacity coefficient of the malt starch is 3-4.5 and the limit dextrin enzyme activity is 200-;
wherein, the established formula of the proportion of the fermentable sugars of the wort is as follows:
fermentable sugar ratio (%) =69.2+ 0.0101: +0.00347 · α -amylase activity +0.000286 · β -amylase activity;
the established calculation formula of the malt starch hydrolysis capacity coefficient is as follows:
malt starch hydrolysis ability coefficient = (1.01:limitdextrinase activity + 0.347:α -amylase activity + 0.0286:β -amylase activity)/100.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the α -amylase activity, β -amylase activity and limit dextrin enzyme activity are obtained by:
respectively extracting alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase crude extract by using alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase extraction buffer;
respectively adding an alpha-amylase substrate, a beta-amylase substrate and a limit dextrinase substrate into the alpha-amylase, beta-amylase and limit dextrinase crude extract, and respectively adding an alpha-amylase termination solution, a beta-amylase termination solution and a limit dextrinase termination solution to terminate the reaction after the reaction;
and respectively measuring the absorbance values of the mixed solutions after the reaction is terminated to obtain the activities of the alpha-amylase, the beta-amylase and the limit dextrinase.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811204926.7A CN109266719B (en) | 2018-10-16 | 2018-10-16 | Method for evaluating hydrolysis capacity of malt starch |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811204926.7A CN109266719B (en) | 2018-10-16 | 2018-10-16 | Method for evaluating hydrolysis capacity of malt starch |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN109266719A CN109266719A (en) | 2019-01-25 |
CN109266719B true CN109266719B (en) | 2021-11-09 |
Family
ID=65197365
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201811204926.7A Active CN109266719B (en) | 2018-10-16 | 2018-10-16 | Method for evaluating hydrolysis capacity of malt starch |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN109266719B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN116466029B (en) * | 2023-03-13 | 2024-06-04 | 粤海永顺泰(广州)麦芽有限公司 | Method for rapidly evaluating variety characteristics of beer barley |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102093936A (en) * | 2009-12-14 | 2011-06-15 | 青岛啤酒股份有限公司 | Method for preparing pale malt containing high-activity limit dextrinase |
-
2018
- 2018-10-16 CN CN201811204926.7A patent/CN109266719B/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102093936A (en) * | 2009-12-14 | 2011-06-15 | 青岛啤酒股份有限公司 | Method for preparing pale malt containing high-activity limit dextrinase |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
啤酒生产过程中淀粉酶系变化动态、淀粉酶系及蛋白酶系对糖化产物影响的研究;郝灵珍;《中国优秀硕士学位论文数据库工程科技Ⅰ辑》;20130215;B024-342 * |
麦芽搭配及淀粉酶系活力对麦汁糖组分的影响;韩智立等;《食品与发酵工业》;20171110;第44卷(第2期);40—47 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN109266719A (en) | 2019-01-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Saini et al. | Amylases: Characteristics and industrial applications | |
CN102220192B (en) | Mashing process | |
CN102292437B (en) | Process for production of an enzyme product | |
JP6604849B2 (en) | Fermented malt beverage and method for producing the same | |
EP0227159B1 (en) | Improvements in and relating to the production of beer | |
CN101918525A (en) | Mashing process | |
CN104736702A (en) | Enzymes | |
BR112014005873B1 (en) | COMPOSITION, USE OF A COMPOSITION, METHOD OF CHANGING FILTRABILITY, METHOD OF REDUCING ACCUMULATED PRESSURE, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A FOOD, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A BRASSAGE PASTE AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A BIOFUEEL | |
CN102482657A (en) | Enzyme complex from trichoderma reesei and p. funiculosum enzymes | |
Novellie | Kaffircorn malting and brewing studies. III.–Determination of amylases in kaffircorn malts | |
CN109266719B (en) | Method for evaluating hydrolysis capacity of malt starch | |
CN112779296A (en) | Enzyme preparation adding process for promoting fermentation of starch grains | |
CN101352203B (en) | Method for preparing liquid complex enzyme for feeding | |
Charmier et al. | Diastatic power and maltose value: a method for the measurement of amylolytic enzymes in malt | |
JP2010051279A (en) | Method for producing color-controlled beer-flavored alcoholic beverage | |
JPH0870842A (en) | Saccharide for brewing use and its production | |
McCleary | Measurement of Polysaccharide Degrading Enzymes Using Chromogenic and Colorimetric | |
Owuama | Evaluation of brewing potentials of grains, malts and worts of some sweet sorghum and sorghum varieties | |
CN109182452B (en) | Method for adjusting malt formula based on malt starch hydrolysis capacity | |
Skerritt et al. | New diagnostics in crop sciences | |
JP2014121292A (en) | Beer-like alcoholic drink and method for producing the same | |
CN106636037B (en) | A kind of complex enzyme formulation and the preparation method and application thereof | |
CN110823939A (en) | Method for efficiently and quickly detecting α -glucosidase activity | |
CN105623937A (en) | Saccharifying method | |
JP2002272446A (en) | Malt alcohol beverage and method of producing the same |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |