CN109255737B - Method and device for pushing precedent of court trial - Google Patents
Method and device for pushing precedent of court trial Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109255737B CN109255737B CN201710566553.7A CN201710566553A CN109255737B CN 109255737 B CN109255737 B CN 109255737B CN 201710566553 A CN201710566553 A CN 201710566553A CN 109255737 B CN109255737 B CN 109255737B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- court
- trial
- precedent
- target
- user
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 74
- 238000002372 labelling Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 241000218228 Humulus Species 0.000 description 5
- 241000282376 Panthera tigris Species 0.000 description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/18—Legal services
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)
Abstract
The application discloses a court trial precedent pushing method and device. The method comprises the following steps: determining a litigation jurisdiction of the user; receiving a retrieval condition input by a user; matching in a court trial precedent database by adopting retrieval conditions to obtain a target court trial precedent set; acquiring a jurisdiction table, wherein names and jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored in the jurisdiction table; searching whether the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdictional relation with the court of the litigation of the user in the jurisdictional relation table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the court of the litigation of the user to each target court trial precedent, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises an obedient relation and a reference relation; pushing the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdictions to each target court trial precedent. By the method and the device, the problem that the user cannot intuitively acquire the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by the retrieval website in the related technology is solved.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the field of pushing of court trial precedents, in particular to a method and a device for pushing the court trial precedents.
Background
At present, for a retrieval website of court trial cases, generally, the court trial cases matched with the search conditions are retrieved according to the search conditions input by the user, and then the retrieved court trial cases are pushed to the user. However, according to the court trial cases pushed by the search website, the user cannot intuitively acquire the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent.
Aiming at the problem that a user cannot intuitively acquire the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by a retrieval website in the related technology, an effective solution is not provided at present.
Disclosure of Invention
The application mainly aims to provide a method and a device for pushing court trial precedents, so as to solve the problem that a user cannot intuitively acquire the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by a retrieval website in the related art.
To achieve the above object, according to one aspect of the present application, a court trial precedent push method is provided. The method comprises the following steps: determining a litigation jurisdiction of the user; receiving a retrieval condition input by the user; matching in a court trial precedent database by adopting the retrieval conditions to obtain a target court trial precedent set, wherein the target court trial precedent set comprises a plurality of target court trial precedents; acquiring a jurisdiction table, wherein names and jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored in the jurisdiction table; searching whether the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdiction relationship with the court of litigation of the user in the jurisdiction relationship table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the court of litigation of the user to each target court trial precedent, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises a compliance relationship and a reference relationship; pushing the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdictional court to each target court trial precedent.
Further, after pushing the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdictional court to each target court trial precedent, the method further comprises: and generating a effectiveness coordinate graph of the user's litigation jurisdictional court for each target court trial precedent in the set of target court trial precedents based on the effectiveness applicability of the user's lities to each target court trial precedent, the name of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the name of the user's lities jurisdictional court.
Further, the jurisdiction table further includes the court level to which each court belongs, and after pushing the effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent, the method further includes: acquiring the court level to which the trial court belongs and the court level to which the litigation court of the user belongs, which correspond to each target court trial precedent in the jurisdictional relation table; and generating an effectiveness level graph of the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user on each target court trial precedent in the target court trial set based on the effectiveness applicability of the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user on each target court trial precedent, the name of the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user, the court level to which the court of the jurisdictional court of the user belongs and the court level to which the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user belongs.
Further, searching whether the court trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdiction relationship with the user's court trial court in the jurisdiction table to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the user's court trial court to each target court trial precedent comprises: searching whether the court of court trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent has a jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user in the jurisdiction relation table; determining effectiveness applicability between target court trial precedents corresponding to the trial court in which the jurisdiction relationship exists for the litigation court of the user as an adherence relationship; and determining the effectiveness applicability between target court trial precedents corresponding to the trial court without jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user as a reference relation.
Further, after generating a graph of the effectiveness level for each target court trial precedent in the set of target court trial precedents by the user's litigation jurisdiction court, the method further comprises: judging whether reference relations exist among the target court trial precedents in the target court trial precedent collection or not; and if the reference relationship exists among the target court trial precedents in the target court trial precedent set, marking the target court trial precedents with the reference relationship in the effectiveness grade coordinate graph.
Further, if the target court trial precedent with the reference relationship is a first target court trial precedent and a second target court trial precedent, wherein the first target court trial precedent of the first trial court refers to the second target court trial precedent of the second trial court, after labeling the target court trial precedents with the reference relationship in the effectiveness grade coordinate graph, the method further comprises the following steps: searching whether the first court has a jurisdiction relation with the litigation court of the user in the jurisdiction table; if the first court jurisdiction has a jurisdiction relationship with the user's litigation jurisdiction court, determining the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation court to a second target court trial precedent of the second court jurisdiction to be a compliance relationship; annotating, in the effectiveness level graph, an applicability of effectiveness of the user's litigation jurisdictional court to a second target court trial precedent of the second trial court as compliance with a relationship.
To achieve the above object, according to another aspect of the present application, a court trial precedent pushing device is provided. The device includes: a determining unit for determining a litigation jurisdiction court of the user; a receiving unit, configured to receive a search condition input by the user; the first acquisition unit is used for matching in a court trial precedent database by adopting the retrieval condition to acquire a target court trial precedent set, wherein the target court trial precedent set comprises a plurality of target court trial precedents; a second acquisition unit configured to acquire a jurisdiction table in which names and jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored; the searching unit is used for searching whether the court hearing court corresponding to each target court hearing precedent in the target court hearing precedent set has a jurisdiction relationship with the user's court hearing court in the jurisdiction relationship table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the user's court hearing court to each target court hearing precedent, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises an obedience relationship and a reference relationship; and the pushing unit is used for pushing the effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent.
Further, the apparatus further comprises: and the generating unit is used for generating a effectiveness coordinate graph of the user's litigation court on each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set based on the effectiveness applicability of the user's lities to each target court trial precedent, the name of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the name of the user's lities jurisdictional court after pushing the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdictions to each target court trial precedent.
To achieve the above object, according to another aspect of the present application, there is provided a storage medium including a stored program, wherein the program performs the court trial precedent push method of any one of the above.
To achieve the above object, according to another aspect of the present application, there is provided a processor for executing a program, where the program executes to perform the court trial precedent push method according to any one of the above.
Through the application, the following steps are adopted: determining a litigation jurisdiction of the user; receiving a retrieval condition input by the user; matching in a court trial precedent database by adopting the retrieval conditions to obtain a target court trial precedent set, wherein the target court trial precedent set comprises a plurality of target court trial precedents; acquiring a jurisdiction table, wherein names and jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored in the jurisdiction table; searching whether the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdiction relationship with the court of litigation of the user in the jurisdiction relationship table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the court of litigation of the user to each target court trial precedent, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises a compliance relationship and a reference relationship; the effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent is pushed, and the problem that the user cannot intuitively acquire the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by the retrieval website in the related technology is solved. By pushing the obtained effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent, the effect that the user can intuitively obtain the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by the retrieval website is achieved.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this application, illustrate embodiments of the application and, together with the description, serve to explain the application and are not intended to limit the application. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a push method for court trial precedent provided according to an embodiment of the application;
FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of a first graph of the effectiveness rating of a push method of a court trial precedent provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 3 is a graphical representation of a second graph of the effectiveness level of a push method of a court trial precedent provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present application; and
fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of a push device of a court trial precedent provided according to an embodiment of the application.
Detailed Description
It should be noted that the embodiments and features of the embodiments in the present application may be combined with each other without conflict. The present application will be described in detail below with reference to the embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
In order to make the technical solutions better understood by those skilled in the art, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only partial embodiments of the present application, but not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.
It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the description and claims of this application and in the drawings described above are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It should be understood that the data so used may be interchanged under appropriate circumstances such that embodiments of the application described herein may be used. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed, but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
For convenience of description, some terms or expressions referred to in the embodiments of the present application are explained below:
precedent court trial: the approved cases are validated and the review board determines the precedent efficacy rating by the precedent comprehensive review.
Precedent efficacy rating: the precedent efficacy rating refers to the efficacy rating of the case determined by the review board during the comprehensive review of the precedent, and comprises the following levels: basic precedent, middle college precedent, high college precedent and highest college precedent;
applicability of efficacy: the effectiveness applicability of precedent is divided into following and reference types, the reference relationship refers to the precedent of a peer court, a subordinate court or an extraterritorial court for similar cases, and the precedent can be referred to but is not restricted by the precedent in case examination; compliance with a relationship means that for similar cases, a subordinate court should comply with precedent of a superordinate court within the jurisdiction and a later similar case of the same court should comply with precedent of the court, unless there is sufficient reason to override and go through a special procedure
Efficacy rating scale coordinates: and determining the position of the coordinate system where each push precedent is located by utilizing a coordinate system display mode after the multiple precedents meeting the retrieval condition are calculated according to the effectiveness applicability algorithm.
According to an embodiment of the application, a court trial precedent pushing method is provided.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a push method of court trial precedent according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 1, the method comprises the steps of:
and step S101, determining the litigation court of the user.
When the court trial precedent needs to be pushed to the user, the court jurisdiction court of the user is determined firstly, and the court trial precedent with reference value suitable for the user can be recommended according to the court jurisdiction court of the user. For example, the litigation court of the user is the Humulus national court in Suzhou, Jiangsu province.
Since the trial court of the court trial precedent is also hierarchically related, for example, the highest people court is the highest, all the courts are managed, and so on, and the effectiveness levels of the court trial precedents made by the trial courts of different levels are also different, the method for pushing the court trial precedent provided by the embodiment of the present application further includes: analyzing the court trial precedents stored in the court trial precedent database to obtain the trial court corresponding to each court trial precedent; and determining the court level of the trial court corresponding to each court trial precedent, wherein the court level is used for determining the administration relationship among the trial courts.
According to the scheme, the court level of the trial courts corresponding to the court trial precets stored in the court trial precets database is determined, and the jurisdiction relation among the trial courts can be determined according to the court level subsequently.
It should be noted that, before determining the litigation court of the litigation of the user, the method further includes: analyzing the court trial precedents stored in the court trial precedent database to obtain the name of the court trial court corresponding to each court trial precedent.
The court trial precedents stored in the court trial precedent database are analyzed in advance to obtain the name of the court trial court corresponding to each court trial precedent, so that the accuracy of the name of the court trial court corresponding to the court trial precedent in the subsequent steps is ensured, and the processing efficiency is improved.
Step S102, receiving the search condition input by the user.
For example, the search conditions of the user input received in the search website are: copyright disputes.
And step S103, matching in the court trial precedent database by adopting the retrieval conditions to obtain a target court trial precedent set, wherein the target court trial precedent set comprises a plurality of target court trial precedents.
For example, matching is performed in the court trial precedent database according to the copyright dispute, a plurality of qualified court trial precedents are matched, and the plurality of qualified court trial precedents are used as a target court trial precedent set.
It should be noted that all valid trial cases are stored in the court trial precedent library, and the court trial precedent library can preset the number of court trial precedents which meet the conditions and are pushed to the user. For example, the push number is set to 30, and when matching is performed in the court trial precedent database using the search condition, the court trial precedent database pushes eligible court trial precedents to 30.
And step S104, acquiring a jurisdiction table, wherein the names and the jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored in the jurisdiction table.
For example, the jurisdictional relationship table includes information of the high-grade people's court in Beijing, the highest people's court, and the highest people's court that governs the high-grade people's court in Beijing.
It should be noted that, the jurisdiction table also stores the court levels to which the respective courts belong, for example, the jurisdiction table includes the high-level people court in beijing, the highest people court, the second court level to which the high-level people court in beijing belongs, and the first court level to which the highest people court belongs.
Step S105, whether the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdiction relationship with the litigation court of the user is searched in the jurisdiction relationship table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises a following relationship and a reference relationship.
Because the names and the jurisdictions of a plurality of courts exist in the jurisdictional relation table, whether the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has the jurisdiction relation with the court of the litigation of the user is searched in the jurisdictional relation table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the court of the litigation of the user to each target court trial precedent.
Specifically, in the method for pushing court trial precedents provided in the embodiment of the present application, searching for whether the court trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdiction relationship with the court of litigation of the user in the jurisdiction relationship table to obtain the applicability of the effectiveness of the court of litigation of the user to each target court trial precedent includes: searching whether the court administration court of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent has a jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user in a jurisdiction table; determining the effectiveness applicability between target court trial precedents corresponding to the trial court in which the jurisdiction relation exists for the litigation court of the user as an obedient relation; and determining the effectiveness applicability between target court trial precedents corresponding to the trial court without jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user as a reference relation.
For example, the court of jurisdiction of litigation of the user is a Humulan district people court in Suzhou city of Jiangsu province, the trial court corresponding to the precedent of target court of court is a senior people court in Jiangsu province, and the superior court of the senior people court in Jiangsu province belonging to the Humulan district people court in Suzhou city of Jiangsu province is found in the jurisdiction table, so that the jurisdiction relationship exists, and the effectiveness applicability of the court of litigation of the user to the precedent of target court corresponding to the senior people court in Jiangsu province is determined to be in compliance relationship.
For another example, the litigation court of the user is a Humulan people court in Suzhou city of Jiangsu province, the administration court corresponding to the target court trial precedent is a Fujian advanced people court, no jurisdiction relationship exists between the Fujian advanced people court and the Humulan people court in Suzhou city of Jiangsu province found in the jurisdiction relationship table, and the effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to the target court trial precedent corresponding to the Fujian advanced people court is determined as a reference relationship.
And step S106, pushing the effectiveness applicability of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user to each target court trial precedent.
The obtained effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent is pushed to the user, and the problem that the user cannot intuitively obtain the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by the retrieval website in the related technology is solved. The effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by the retrieval website can be intuitively obtained through the effectiveness applicability of the pushed litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent.
In order to facilitate a user to obtain effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by a retrieval website, in the method for pushing court trial precedents provided in the embodiment of the present application, after pushing effectiveness applicability of a litigation court of a litigation jurisdiction of the user to each target court trial precedent, the method further includes: and generating an effectiveness coordinate graph of each target court trial precedent in the set of the user's litigation court to the target court trial precedent based on the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation court to each target court trial precedent, the name of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the name of the user's litigation court.
Further, in the method for pushing court trial precedents provided in the embodiment of the present application, the jurisdiction table further includes a court level to which each court belongs, and after the validity of the court jurisdiction of the litigation of the pushing user for each target court trial precedent is applied, the method further includes: acquiring the court level to which the trial court belongs and the court level to which the litigation court of the user belongs, which correspond to each target court trial precedent, in the jurisdictional relation table; and generating a effectiveness level coordinate graph of each target court trial precedent in the set of the target court trial precedents of the lities of the users based on the effectiveness applicability of the court of the users to each target court trial precedent, the name of the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent, the name of the court of the users in the court of jurisdiction, the court level of the court of jurisdiction corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the court level of the court of jurisdiction of the users in the set of the court of jurisdiction to the target court trial precedent.
For example, the court of the litigation jurisdiction of the user is the national court of the tiger region in Suzhou city, Jiangsu province, and the retrieval conditions are as follows: copyright disputes. Retrieving 8 target court trial precedents related to copyright disputes, wherein the trial court of the first target court trial precedent is the highest people court, the court level is the highest, and all the courts are administered; the second space of the court trial precedent is the high-grade people court in Jiangsu province, belonging to the upper-grade jurisdiction court of the people court in the tiger region in Suzhou city in Jiangsu province; the third edition of the court trial precedent is the high-level jurisdictional court of Suzhou city, Jiangsu province, belonging to the high-level jurisdictional court of the tiger-hill region of Suzhou city, Jiangsu province; the third court of the court trial precedent is a peer court of a normal maturity area of Suzhou city, Jiangsu province, belonging to a tiger region of Suzhou city, Jiangsu province; the trial court of the fifth edition of the precedent court trial is a national court of tiger-hill region in Suzhou city, Jiangsu province, belonging to the same court; the trial court of the precedent court trial of the sixth section is the civilian court of Ministry of thought in Ministry of building, Fujian province, and has no jurisdiction relation with the civilian court of the tiger-hill region in Suzhou city, Jiangsu province; the trial court of the seventh edition of the court trial precedent is a senior people court in mansion city of Fujian province, and has no jurisdiction relation with the people court in the tiger region of Suzhou city of Jiangsu province; the trial court of the eighth-party trial precedent is a senior people court in Fujian province, has no jurisdiction relationship with people court in the tiger region of Suzhou city of Jiangsu province, and generates a graph of the effectiveness level of each target trial precedent in the set of target trial precedents of the user's trial jurisdiction court as shown in FIG. 2 based on the effectiveness applicability of the user's trial court to each target trial precedent, the name of the trial court corresponding to each target trial precedent, the name of the user's trial jurisdiction court, the hierarchy of the user's trial court to which the trial court belongs, and the hierarchy of the user's trial court to which the trial court belongs.
In order to enable a user to more intuitively obtain a reference relationship between target court trial precedents when reference relationships exist among the target court trial precedents, in the method for pushing court trial precedents provided in the embodiment of the present application, after generating an effectiveness level coordinate graph of the court jurisdiction court of the user on each target court trial precedent in a set of target court trial precedents, the method further includes: judging whether reference relations exist among the target court trial precedents in the target court trial precedent collection or not; and if the reference relationship exists between the target court trial precedents in the target court trial precedent set, marking the target court trial precedents with the reference relationship in the effectiveness grade coordinate graph.
The citation relationship can be maintained as one dimension of all court trial precedents, whether the citation relationship exists is judged by carrying out full-text analysis on all the court trial precedents, and if the citation relationship does not exist, whether the citation relationship exists can be judged manually again; and when the existence of the reference relationship is confirmed, further confirming whether the referenced court trial case is a court trial precedent.
In order to more accurately reflect the effectiveness applicability between the court trial court and the target court trial precedents of the user when a citation relationship exists between the court trial precedents, in the method for pushing the court trial precedents provided in the embodiment of the present application, if the court trial precedents having the citation relationship exist, the court trial precedents are a first target court trial precedent and a second target court trial precedent, where the first target court trial precedent of the first trial court cites the second target court trial precedent of the second trial court, and after labeling the court trial precedents having the citation relationship in the effectiveness level coordinate graph, the method further includes: searching whether the first audition court has a jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user in the jurisdiction relation table; if the first court jurisdiction has a jurisdiction relationship with the user's litigation jurisdiction court, determining that the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdiction court to the second target court precedent of the second court jurisdiction is a compliance relationship; the suitability of the user's litigation jurisdictional court for the second target court trial precedent of the second trial court is labeled in the effectiveness level graph following the relationship.
For example, the court of the litigation of the user is the Humulus district national court of Suzhou city of Jiangsu province, the Suzhou city middle-level national court of Jiangsu province is the superior court of the Humulus district national court of Jiangsu city, the two are in the superior jurisdiction, so that the effectiveness applicability between the Humulus district national court of Jiangsu province of the user and the court precedent of the Suzhou city middle-level national court of Jiangsu province of the user is determined to be the compliance relationship, and the effectiveness applicability between the Humulus district national court of Suzhou city of Jiangsu province and the court precedent of the Ministry court of Ministry court of Fujian province is determined to be the compliance relationship, and the effectiveness of the Suzhou city national court of Jiangsu city Ministry court of Suzhou city of Fujian province is determined to be the compliance relationship between the court of the Suzhou district national court of Suzhou province national court of Fujian city and the Sujian city Ministributen national court of Suzhou city The force level plot is labeled as shown in fig. 3. Through the information displayed in fig. 3, the user can intuitively obtain the effectiveness applicability between the court of the user and each court trial precedent pushed by the search website.
The method for pushing the court trial precedent provided by the embodiment of the application is used for displaying the reference and following relation of the court trial precedent by combining the indicator lamp and the visual style of the coordinate system, and displaying the reference relation of all the pushed court trial precedents by adopting the nested effectiveness level style in the two-dimensional coordinate system. The method is beneficial to more intuitively displaying the effectiveness applicability between the precedent effectiveness grade and the court jurisdiction of the litigation, and through a visual display mode, the user only needs to select the corresponding litigation court and input the retrieval condition, so that the court trial precedent meeting the search condition can be pushed to the user, and the effectiveness applicability of the court trial precedent is quickly displayed through the computing engine.
In summary, the method for pushing court trial precedent provided by the embodiment of the application determines the court jurisdiction of the litigation of the user; receiving a retrieval condition input by a user; matching in a court trial precedent database by adopting retrieval conditions to obtain a target court trial precedent set, wherein the target court trial precedent set comprises a plurality of target court trial precedents; acquiring effectiveness applicability between the litigation court of the user and each target court trial precedent based on the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises an obedient relationship and a reference relationship, and the effectiveness applicability comprises an obedient relationship and a reference relationship; based on the effectiveness applicability between the user's litigation court and each target court trial precedent, an effectiveness level coordinate graph of the user's litigation court to each target court trial precedent in the set of target court trial precedents is generated, and the problem that the user cannot intuitively acquire the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by the retrieval website in the related art is solved. By means of the effectiveness applicability between the user's litigation court and each target court trial precedent, an effectiveness level coordinate graph of the user's litigation court to each target court trial precedent in the set of target court trial precedents is generated, and therefore the effect that the user can visually acquire the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by the retrieval website is achieved.
It should be noted that the steps illustrated in the flowcharts of the figures may be performed in a computer system such as a set of computer-executable instructions and that, although a logical order is illustrated in the flowcharts, in some cases, the steps illustrated or described may be performed in an order different than presented herein.
The embodiments of the present application further provide a court trial precedent pushing device, and it should be noted that the court trial precedent pushing device according to the embodiments of the present application may be used to execute the pushing method for the court trial precedent provided by the embodiments of the present application. The pushing device of the court trial precedent provided by the embodiment of the application is described below.
Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of a push device of a court trial precedent according to an embodiment of the application. As shown in fig. 4, the apparatus includes: the device comprises a determination unit 10, a receiving unit 20, a first acquisition unit 30, a second acquisition unit 40, a search unit 50 and a push unit 60.
In particular, the determination unit 10 is configured to determine a litigation jurisdictional court of the user.
The receiving unit 20 is configured to receive a search condition input by a user.
The first obtaining unit 30 is configured to perform matching in the court trial precedent database by using the search condition to obtain a target court trial precedent set, where the target court trial precedent set includes a plurality of target court trial precedents.
A second obtaining unit 40, configured to obtain a jurisdiction table, where names and jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored in the jurisdiction table.
The searching unit 50 is configured to search, in the jurisdictional relationship table, whether the court trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdictional relationship with the court trial of the user, so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the court trial of the user to each target court trial precedent, where the effectiveness applicability includes a compliance relationship and a reference relationship.
And the pushing unit 60 is used for pushing the effectiveness applicability of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user to each target court trial precedent.
The pushing device for court trial precedent provided by the embodiment of the application determines the litigation court of the court jurisdiction of the user through the determining unit 10; the receiving unit 20 receives a retrieval condition input by a user; the first obtaining unit 30 matches in the court trial precedent database by using the search condition to obtain a target court trial precedent set, wherein the target court trial precedent set comprises a plurality of target court trial precedents; the second acquiring unit 40 acquires a jurisdictional relation table in which names and jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored; the searching unit 50 searches whether the court trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdiction relationship with the litigation court of the user in the jurisdiction relationship table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises an obedient relationship and a reference relationship; the pushing unit 60 pushes the effectiveness applicability of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user to each target court trial precedent, the problem that the user cannot intuitively acquire the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by the retrieval website in the related technology is solved, the effectiveness applicability of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user to each target court trial precedent is pushed by the pushing unit 60, and therefore the effect that the user can intuitively acquire the effectiveness applicability of each court trial precedent pushed by the retrieval website is achieved.
Optionally, in the push device for court trial precedent provided in the embodiment of the present application, the device further includes: and the generating unit is used for generating a effectiveness coordinate graph of each target court trial precedent in the set of the target court trial precedent by the litigation court of the user based on the effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent, the name of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the name of the litigation court of the user after pushing the effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent.
The court trial precedent push device comprises a processor and a memory, wherein the determining unit 10, the receiving unit 20, the first acquiring unit 30, the second acquiring unit 40, the searching unit 50, the push unit 60 and the like are stored in the memory as program units, and the processor executes the program units stored in the memory to realize corresponding functions.
The processor comprises a kernel, and the kernel calls the corresponding program unit from the memory. One or more than one kernel can be set, and court trial precedent is pushed by adjusting kernel parameters.
The memory may include volatile memory in a computer readable medium, Random Access Memory (RAM) and/or nonvolatile memory such as Read Only Memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM), and the memory includes at least one memory chip.
An embodiment of the present invention provides a storage medium, on which a program is stored, and when the program is executed by a processor, the program implements the push method for the court trial precedent.
The embodiment of the invention provides a processor, which is used for running a program, wherein the program executes the court trial precedent pushing method during running.
The embodiment of the invention provides equipment, which comprises a processor, a memory and a program which is stored on the memory and can run on the processor, wherein the processor executes the program and realizes the following steps: determining a litigation jurisdiction of the user; receiving a retrieval condition input by a user; matching in a court trial precedent database by adopting retrieval conditions to obtain a target court trial precedent set, wherein the target court trial precedent set comprises a plurality of target court trial precedents; acquiring a jurisdiction table, wherein names and jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored in the jurisdiction table; searching whether the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdictional relation with the court of the litigation of the user in the jurisdictional relation table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the court of the litigation of the user to each target court trial precedent, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises an obedient relation and a reference relation; pushing the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdictions to each target court trial precedent.
After pushing the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdictions to each target court trial precedent, the method further comprises: and generating an effectiveness coordinate graph of each target court trial precedent in the set of the user's litigation court to the target court trial precedent based on the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation court to each target court trial precedent, the name of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the name of the user's litigation court.
The jurisdictional relation table further comprises the court level to which each court belongs, and after the effectiveness applicability of the litigation jurisdictional court of the pushing user to each target court trial precedent, the method further comprises: acquiring the court level to which the trial court belongs and the court level to which the litigation court of the user belongs, which correspond to each target court trial precedent, in the jurisdictional relation table; and generating a effectiveness level coordinate graph of each target court trial precedent in the set of the target court trial precedents of the lities of the users based on the effectiveness applicability of the court of the users to each target court trial precedent, the name of the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent, the name of the court of the users in the court of jurisdiction, the court level of the court of jurisdiction corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the court level of the court of jurisdiction of the users in the set of the court of jurisdiction to the target court trial precedent.
Searching whether the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdictional relationship with the court of the litigation of the user in the jurisdictional relationship table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the court of the litigation of the user to each target court trial precedent comprises the following steps: searching whether the court administration court of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent has a jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user in a jurisdiction table; determining the effectiveness applicability between target court trial precedents corresponding to the trial court in which the jurisdiction relation exists for the litigation court of the user as an obedient relation; and determining the effectiveness applicability between target court trial precedents corresponding to the trial court without jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user as a reference relation.
After generating a graph of efficacy level for each target court trial precedent in the set of target court trial precedents by the litigation court of the user, the method further comprises: judging whether reference relations exist among the target court trial precedents in the target court trial precedent collection or not; and if the reference relationship exists between the target court trial precedents in the target court trial precedent set, marking the target court trial precedents with the reference relationship in the effectiveness grade coordinate graph.
If the target court trial precedents with the reference relationship exist as a first target court trial precedent and a second target court trial precedent, wherein the first target court trial precedent of the first trial court references a second target court trial precedent of the second trial court, after labeling the target court trial precedents with the reference relationship in the effectiveness grade coordinate graph, the method further comprises the following steps: searching whether the first audition court has a jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user in the jurisdiction relation table; if the first court jurisdiction has a jurisdiction relationship with the user's litigation jurisdiction court, determining that the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdiction court to the second target court precedent of the second court jurisdiction is a compliance relationship; the suitability of the user's litigation jurisdictional court for the second target court trial precedent of the second trial court is labeled in the effectiveness level graph following the relationship. The device herein may be a server, a PC, a PAD, a mobile phone, etc.
The present application further provides a computer program product adapted to perform a program for initializing the following method steps when executed on a data processing device: determining a litigation jurisdiction of the user; receiving a retrieval condition input by a user; matching in a court trial precedent database by adopting retrieval conditions to obtain a target court trial precedent set, wherein the target court trial precedent set comprises a plurality of target court trial precedents; acquiring a jurisdiction table, wherein names and jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored in the jurisdiction table; searching whether the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdictional relation with the court of the litigation of the user in the jurisdictional relation table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the court of the litigation of the user to each target court trial precedent, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises an obedient relation and a reference relation; pushing the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdictions to each target court trial precedent.
After pushing the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdictions to each target court trial precedent, the method further comprises: and generating an effectiveness coordinate graph of each target court trial precedent in the set of the user's litigation court to the target court trial precedent based on the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation court to each target court trial precedent, the name of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the name of the user's litigation court.
The jurisdictional relation table further comprises the court level to which each court belongs, and after the effectiveness applicability of the litigation jurisdictional court of the pushing user to each target court trial precedent, the method further comprises: acquiring the court level to which the trial court belongs and the court level to which the litigation court of the user belongs, which correspond to each target court trial precedent, in the jurisdictional relation table; and generating a effectiveness level coordinate graph of each target court trial precedent in the set of the target court trial precedents of the lities of the users based on the effectiveness applicability of the court of the users to each target court trial precedent, the name of the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent, the name of the court of the users in the court of jurisdiction, the court level of the court of jurisdiction corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the court level of the court of jurisdiction of the users in the set of the court of jurisdiction to the target court trial precedent.
Searching whether the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdictional relationship with the court of the litigation of the user in the jurisdictional relationship table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the court of the litigation of the user to each target court trial precedent comprises the following steps: searching whether the court administration court of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent has a jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user in a jurisdiction table; determining the effectiveness applicability between target court trial precedents corresponding to the trial court in which the jurisdiction relation exists for the litigation court of the user as an obedient relation; and determining the effectiveness applicability between target court trial precedents corresponding to the trial court without jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user as a reference relation.
After generating a graph of efficacy level for each target court trial precedent in the set of target court trial precedents by the litigation court of the user, the method further comprises: judging whether reference relations exist among the target court trial precedents in the target court trial precedent collection or not; and if the reference relationship exists between the target court trial precedents in the target court trial precedent set, marking the target court trial precedents with the reference relationship in the effectiveness grade coordinate graph.
If the target court trial precedents with the reference relationship exist as a first target court trial precedent and a second target court trial precedent, wherein the first target court trial precedent of the first trial court references a second target court trial precedent of the second trial court, after labeling the target court trial precedents with the reference relationship in the effectiveness grade coordinate graph, the method further comprises the following steps: searching whether the first audition court has a jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user in the jurisdiction relation table; if the first court jurisdiction has a jurisdiction relationship with the user's litigation jurisdiction court, determining that the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdiction court to the second target court precedent of the second court jurisdiction is a compliance relationship; the suitability of the user's litigation jurisdictional court for the second target court trial precedent of the second trial court is labeled in the effectiveness level graph following the relationship.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of the present application may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present application may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present application may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.
The present application is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the application. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flow diagrams and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
In a typical configuration, a computing device includes one or more processors (CPUs), input/output interfaces, network interfaces, and memory.
The memory may include forms of volatile memory in a computer readable medium, Random Access Memory (RAM) and/or non-volatile memory, such as Read Only Memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM). The memory is an example of a computer-readable medium.
Computer-readable media, including both non-transitory and non-transitory, removable and non-removable media, may implement information storage by any method or technology. The information may be computer readable instructions, data structures, modules of a program, or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), other types of Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disc read only memory (CD-ROM), Digital Versatile Discs (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other non-transmission medium that can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, a computer readable medium does not include a transitory computer readable medium such as a modulated data signal and a carrier wave.
It should also be noted that the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an … …" does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.
As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, embodiments of the present application may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present application may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present application may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.
The above are merely examples of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. Various modifications and changes may occur to those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application should be included in the scope of the claims of the present application.
Claims (9)
1. A court trial precedent pushing method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
determining a litigation jurisdiction of the user;
receiving a retrieval condition input by the user;
matching in a court trial precedent database by adopting the retrieval conditions to obtain a target court trial precedent set, wherein the target court trial precedent set comprises a plurality of target court trial precedents;
acquiring a jurisdiction table, wherein names and jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored in the jurisdiction table;
searching whether the court of trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set has a jurisdiction relationship with the court of litigation of the user in the jurisdiction relationship table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the court of litigation of the user to each target court trial precedent, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises a compliance relationship and a reference relationship;
pushing the effectiveness applicability of the litigation court of the user to each target court trial precedent;
wherein the jurisdiction table further includes the court level to which each court belongs, and after pushing the effectiveness applicability of the court in the litigation jurisdiction of the user to each target court trial precedent, the method further includes:
acquiring the court level to which the trial court belongs and the court level to which the litigation court of the user belongs, which correspond to each target court trial precedent in the jurisdictional relation table;
and generating an effectiveness level graph of the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user on each target court trial precedent in the target court trial set based on the effectiveness applicability of the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user on each target court trial precedent, the name of the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user, the court level to which the court of the jurisdictional court of the user belongs and the court level to which the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user belongs.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein after pushing the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdictions to each target court trial precedent, the method further comprises:
and generating a effectiveness coordinate graph of the user's litigation jurisdictional court for each target court trial precedent in the set of target court trial precedents based on the effectiveness applicability of the user's lities to each target court trial precedent, the name of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the name of the user's lities jurisdictional court.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein searching the jurisdictional table for a jurisdictional relationship between a trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent in the set of target court trial precedents and the user's litigation court to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation court to each target court trial precedent comprises:
searching whether the court of court trial corresponding to each target court trial precedent has a jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user in the jurisdiction relation table;
determining effectiveness applicability between target court trial precedents corresponding to the trial court in which the jurisdiction relationship exists for the litigation court of the user as an adherence relationship;
and determining the effectiveness applicability between target court trial precedents corresponding to the trial court without jurisdiction relation to the litigation court of the user as a reference relation.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein after generating the graph of the effectiveness level for each target court trial precedent in the set of target court trial precedents at the user's litigation court, the method further comprises:
judging whether reference relations exist among the target court trial precedents in the target court trial precedent collection or not;
and if the reference relationship exists among the target court trial precedents in the target court trial precedent set, marking the target court trial precedents with the reference relationship in the effectiveness grade coordinate graph.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein if the referring target court trial precedents are a first target court trial precedent and a second target court trial precedent, wherein the first target court trial precedent of the first trial court references the second target court trial precedent of the second trial court, after labeling between the referring target court trial precedents in the effectiveness grade coordinate graph, the method further comprises:
searching whether the first court has a jurisdiction relation with the litigation court of the user in the jurisdiction table;
if the first court jurisdiction has a jurisdiction relationship with the user's litigation jurisdiction court, determining the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation court to a second target court trial precedent of the second court jurisdiction to be a compliance relationship;
annotating, in the effectiveness level graph, an applicability of effectiveness of the user's litigation jurisdictional court to a second target court trial precedent of the second trial court as compliance with a relationship.
6. A court trial precedent pushing device is characterized by comprising:
a determining unit for determining a litigation jurisdiction court of the user;
a receiving unit, configured to receive a search condition input by the user;
the first acquisition unit is used for matching in a court trial precedent database by adopting the retrieval condition to acquire a target court trial precedent set, wherein the target court trial precedent set comprises a plurality of target court trial precedents;
a second acquisition unit configured to acquire a jurisdiction table in which names and jurisdictions of a plurality of courts are stored;
the searching unit is used for searching whether the court hearing court corresponding to each target court hearing precedent in the target court hearing precedent set has a jurisdiction relationship with the user's court hearing court in the jurisdiction relationship table so as to obtain the effectiveness applicability of the user's court hearing court to each target court hearing precedent, wherein the effectiveness applicability comprises an obedience relationship and a reference relationship;
the pushing unit is used for pushing the effectiveness applicability of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user to each target court trial precedent;
wherein, the jurisdiction table further includes the court level to which each court belongs, and after pushing the effectiveness applicability of the court in the litigation jurisdiction of the user to each target court trial precedent, the apparatus further includes:
acquiring the court level to which the trial court belongs and the court level to which the litigation court of the user belongs, which correspond to each target court trial precedent in the jurisdictional relation table;
and generating an effectiveness level graph of the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user on each target court trial precedent in the target court trial set based on the effectiveness applicability of the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user on each target court trial precedent, the name of the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user, the court level to which the court of the jurisdictional court of the user belongs and the court level to which the court of the litigation jurisdictional court of the user belongs.
7. The apparatus of claim 6, further comprising:
and the generating unit is used for generating a effectiveness coordinate graph of the user's litigation court on each target court trial precedent in the target court trial precedent set based on the effectiveness applicability of the user's lities to each target court trial precedent, the name of the trial court corresponding to each target court trial precedent and the name of the user's lities jurisdictional court after pushing the effectiveness applicability of the user's litigation jurisdictions to each target court trial precedent.
8. A storage medium characterized by comprising a stored program, wherein the program executes the court trial precedent push method according to any one of claims 1 to 5.
9. A processor, wherein the processor is configured to run a program, wherein the program is configured to execute the court trial precedent push method of any one of claims 1 to 5 when running.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710566553.7A CN109255737B (en) | 2017-07-12 | 2017-07-12 | Method and device for pushing precedent of court trial |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710566553.7A CN109255737B (en) | 2017-07-12 | 2017-07-12 | Method and device for pushing precedent of court trial |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109255737A CN109255737A (en) | 2019-01-22 |
| CN109255737B true CN109255737B (en) | 2022-04-12 |
Family
ID=65051509
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710566553.7A Active CN109255737B (en) | 2017-07-12 | 2017-07-12 | Method and device for pushing precedent of court trial |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109255737B (en) |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1965313A (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2007-05-16 | 汤姆森环球资源股份公司 | Systems, methods, software and interfaces for integration of case law with legal briefs, litigation documents, and/or other litigation-support documents |
| CN106502996A (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2017-03-15 | 深圳爱拼信息科技有限公司 | A kind of judgement document's search method and server based on semantic matches |
| CN106897334A (en) * | 2016-06-24 | 2017-06-27 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of question pushing method and equipment |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090076836A1 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2009-03-19 | Jeff Arvidson | Systems, methods, software and interfaces for reporting results derived from jury verdict summary content, court documents and other analytical and litigation materials |
-
2017
- 2017-07-12 CN CN201710566553.7A patent/CN109255737B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1965313A (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2007-05-16 | 汤姆森环球资源股份公司 | Systems, methods, software and interfaces for integration of case law with legal briefs, litigation documents, and/or other litigation-support documents |
| CN106897334A (en) * | 2016-06-24 | 2017-06-27 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of question pushing method and equipment |
| CN106502996A (en) * | 2016-12-13 | 2017-03-15 | 深圳爱拼信息科技有限公司 | A kind of judgement document's search method and server based on semantic matches |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 关于行政诉讼管辖制度的思考;崔更国等;《石家庄铁路职业技术学院学报》;20051231;第04卷(第04期);第92-95页 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN109255737A (en) | 2019-01-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10281284B2 (en) | Hybrid road network and grid based spatial-temporal indexing under missing road links | |
| Stropp et al. | Mapping ignorance: 300 years of collecting flowering plants in Africa | |
| CN107885873B (en) | Method and apparatus for outputting information | |
| KR101841180B1 (en) | Place-based image organization | |
| US10324710B2 (en) | Indicating a trait of a continuous delivery pipeline | |
| CN103927310B (en) | Generation method and device are suggested in a kind of search of map datum | |
| EP3436982B1 (en) | Modular electronic data analysis computing system | |
| US20160179921A1 (en) | Identifying join relationships based on transactional access patterns | |
| CN109472017B (en) | Method and device for obtaining relevant information of text court deeds of referee to be generated | |
| CN107330079B (en) | Method and device for presenting rumor splitting information based on artificial intelligence | |
| CN110209714A (en) | Report form generation method, device, computer equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| US20170116314A1 (en) | Integrating real-time news with historic events | |
| CN111224923A (en) | Detection method, device and system for counterfeit websites | |
| CN104123303A (en) | Method and device for providing data | |
| CN109255737B (en) | Method and device for pushing precedent of court trial | |
| CN110647459A (en) | Application testing method and device | |
| CN116775716A (en) | Data query method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| CN116186119A (en) | User behavior analysis method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115718824A (en) | Method for judging position of equipment and automatically pushing equipment information through space distance | |
| US20150170067A1 (en) | Determining analysis recommendations based on data analysis context | |
| CN110851431B (en) | Data processing method and device for data center station | |
| Medina Sada et al. | A preliminary investigation with twitter to augment cvd exposome research | |
| CN107066602A (en) | A kind of news information method for pushing and system | |
| CN109617734B (en) | Network operation capability analysis method and device | |
| CN111127065B (en) | User job site acquisition method and device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| CB02 | Change of applicant information |
Address after: 100083 No. 401, 4th Floor, Haitai Building, 229 North Fourth Ring Road, Haidian District, Beijing Applicant after: Beijing Guoshuang Technology Co.,Ltd. Address before: 100086 Cuigong Hotel, 76 Zhichun Road, Shuangyushu District, Haidian District, Beijing Applicant before: Beijing Guoshuang Technology Co.,Ltd. |
|
| CB02 | Change of applicant information | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |