CN109130191A - Test method, device and the computer equipment of 3D printer performance - Google Patents

Test method, device and the computer equipment of 3D printer performance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109130191A
CN109130191A CN201810843912.3A CN201810843912A CN109130191A CN 109130191 A CN109130191 A CN 109130191A CN 201810843912 A CN201810843912 A CN 201810843912A CN 109130191 A CN109130191 A CN 109130191A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
test result
printer
print parameters
model
default
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201810843912.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
秦海岩
俞辉
贾存锋
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Guangdong Jianheng Offshore Wind Power Testing And Certification Center Co Ltd
Zhang Bei Jian Heng Renewable Energy Technology Service Co Ltd
CHINA GENERAL CERTIFICATION CENTER
Original Assignee
Guangdong Jianheng Offshore Wind Power Testing And Certification Center Co Ltd
Zhang Bei Jian Heng Renewable Energy Technology Service Co Ltd
CHINA GENERAL CERTIFICATION CENTER
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guangdong Jianheng Offshore Wind Power Testing And Certification Center Co Ltd, Zhang Bei Jian Heng Renewable Energy Technology Service Co Ltd, CHINA GENERAL CERTIFICATION CENTER filed Critical Guangdong Jianheng Offshore Wind Power Testing And Certification Center Co Ltd
Priority to CN201810843912.3A priority Critical patent/CN109130191A/en
Publication of CN109130191A publication Critical patent/CN109130191A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29CSHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/30Auxiliary operations or equipment
    • B29C64/386Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33YADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y50/00Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)

Abstract

The present disclosure discloses test method, device and the computer equipment of a kind of 3D printer performance, method includes: by default 3D mode input into 3D printer, so that 3D printer print preset 3D model;After the completion of the printing of default 3D model, the print parameters of default 3D model are obtained, wherein print parameters include at least following one: print speed, printing precision, printing fine structure degree, bulk accuracy, printing stability, surface fineness;According to preset print parameters test result corresponding with test result contrast relationship acquisition print parameters;The performance of 3D printer is determined according to the total test result of 3D printer.The disclosure targetedly presets 3D model due to devising to have, the test to 3D printer performance can be completed by unified standard, and the performance of the 3D printer of any material extrusion molding can be tested, test process is quick, accurate, so that 3D printer industry more standardizes.

Description

Test method, device and the computer equipment of 3D printer performance
Technical field
This disclosure relates to 3D printing field, in particular to a kind of test method, device and the computer of 3D printer performance Equipment.
Background technique
What material extrusion molding 3D printer followed is increasing material manufacturing technique, this is different from traditional building materials manufacturing process. The threedimensional model of required part must be designed first before manufacturing part, it then according to the technological requirements, will using processing software The discrete model is a series of orderly units, is usually upwards layered it by certain thickness in Z axis, original three-dimensional CAD model is converted into a series of synusia;Further according to the profile information of each synusia, machined parameters are inputted, numerical control is automatically generated Code;A series of synusia are finally shaped by formation system and automatically link up them, obtain 3D solid.The 3D of the technology Printing Rapid Prototyping Manufacturing can generate various errors in principle, data processing and print procedure, lead to printer model quality Decline.
However, can not test and assess in the prior art to the performance of 3D printer, when using the 3D for not meeting performance requirement When printer carries out model manufacturing, the model quality manufactured is unable to reach the requirement of designer, causes to comment in progress product Outstanding product intention is abandoned when estimating.
Summary of the invention
In view of this, test method, device and computer that the embodiment of the present disclosure proposes a kind of 3D printer performance are set It is standby, to solve the problems, such as the as follows of the prior art: can not test and assess to the performance of 3D printer, be wanted when use does not meet performance When the 3D printer asked carries out model manufacturing, the model quality manufactured is unable to reach the requirement of designer, causes carrying out Outstanding product intention is abandoned when Product evaluation.
On the one hand, the embodiment of the present disclosure proposes a kind of test method of 3D printer performance, comprising: by default 3D model It is input in 3D printer, so that the 3D printer prints the default 3D model;It is completed in the default 3D model printing Afterwards, the print parameters of the default 3D model are obtained, wherein the print parameters include at least following one: print speed is beaten Print precision, printing fine structure degree, bulk accuracy, printing stability, surface fineness;Join according to preset printing Several test results corresponding with the test result contrast relationship acquisition print parameters;According to the total test of the 3D printer point Number determines the performance of the 3D printer.
In some embodiments, in the case where print parameters are multiple, according to the total test result of the 3D printer Determine the performance of the 3D printer, comprising: be added the test result of each print parameters, with determination total survey Try score;The property of the corresponding 3D printer of total test result is determined according to preset score and performance contrast relationship Energy.
In some embodiments, the print parameters pair are obtained according to preset print parameters and test result contrast relationship After the test result answered, further includes: according to the default weighted value of each print parameters and the test got point Number recalculates the test result of each print parameters.
In some embodiments, before by default 3D mode input into 3D printer, further includes: the setting default 3D The corresponding print parameters of model and test result contrast relationship, wherein the corresponding one section of parameter value range of each test result.
In some embodiments, the print parameters pair are obtained according to preset print parameters and test result contrast relationship The test result answered, comprising: determine parameter preset value range locating for the print parameters of the default 3D model;According to described Preset print parameters and test result contrast relationship obtain and the one-to-one test result of the preset parameter range.
On the other hand, the embodiment of the present disclosure proposes a kind of test device of 3D printer performance, comprising: input module, For by default 3D mode input into 3D printer so that the 3D printer prints the default 3D model;First obtains Module, for obtaining the print parameters of the default 3D model, wherein described to beat after the completion of default 3D model printing It prints parameter and includes at least following one: print speed, printing precision, printing fine structure degree, bulk accuracy, printing Stability, surface fineness;Second obtains module, for obtaining institute according to preset print parameters and test result contrast relationship State the corresponding test result of print parameters;Determining module, for determining the 3D according to the total test result of the 3D printer The performance of printer.
In some embodiments, the determining module, is specifically used for:, will be each in the case where print parameters are multiple The test result of the print parameters is added, with determination total test result;Pass is compareed with performance according to preset score System determines the performance of the corresponding 3D printer of total test result.
In some embodiments, further includes: computing module, for according to the default weighted values of each print parameters and The test result got recalculates the test result of each print parameters.
In some embodiments, described second module is obtained, is specifically used for: determines the print parameters of the default 3D model Locating parameter preset value range;It obtains according to the preset print parameters and test result contrast relationship and is preset with described The one-to-one test result of parameter area.
On the other hand, the embodiment of the present disclosure proposes a kind of computer equipment, includes at least memory, processor, described Computer program is stored on memory, the processor realizes above-mentioned side when executing the computer program on the memory The step of method.
The disclosure targetedly presets 3D model due to devising to have, and can be completed by unified standard to 3D printer The test of performance, and the performance of the 3D printer of any material extrusion molding can be tested, test process is quick, quasi- Really, solve the problems, such as that the prior art can not test and assess to 3D printer, so that 3D printer industry more standardizes.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is the flow chart of the test method for the 3D printer performance that the first embodiment of the present disclosure provides;
Fig. 2 is the structural schematic diagram of the test device for the 3D printer performance that the second embodiment of the present disclosure provides;
Fig. 3 is the design diagram for the model 1 that the third embodiment of the present disclosure provides;
Fig. 4 is the design diagram for the model 2 that the third embodiment of the present disclosure provides;
Fig. 5 is the design diagram for the model 3 that the third embodiment of the present disclosure provides;
Fig. 6 is the design diagram for the model 4 that the third embodiment of the present disclosure provides;
Fig. 7 is the design diagram for the model 5 that the third embodiment of the present disclosure provides;
Fig. 8 is the design diagram for the model 6 that the third embodiment of the present disclosure provides;
Fig. 9 is the design diagram for the model 7 that the third embodiment of the present disclosure provides.
Specific embodiment
In order to enable the purposes, technical schemes and advantages of the embodiment of the present disclosure are clearer, below in conjunction with disclosure reality The technical solution of the embodiment of the present disclosure is clearly and completely described in the attached drawing for applying example.Obviously, described embodiment is A part of this disclosure embodiment, instead of all the embodiments.Based on described embodiment of the disclosure, this field is common Technical staff's every other embodiment obtained under the premise of being not necessarily to creative work, belongs to the model of disclosure protection It encloses.
Unless otherwise defined, the technical term or scientific term that the disclosure uses should be tool in disclosure fields The ordinary meaning for thering is the personage of general technical ability to be understood." first ", " second " used in the disclosure and similar word are simultaneously Any sequence, quantity or importance are not indicated, and are used only to distinguish different component parts." comprising " or "comprising" etc. Similar word means that the element or object before the word occur covers the element or object for appearing in the word presented hereinafter And its it is equivalent, and it is not excluded for other elements or object.The similar word such as " connection " or " connected " is not limited to physics Or mechanical connection, but may include electrical connection, it is either direct or indirectly."upper", "lower", "left", "right" etc. is only used for indicating relative positional relationship, and after the absolute position for being described object changes, then the relative position is closed System may also correspondingly change.
In order to keep the following explanation of the embodiment of the present disclosure to understand and concise, known function and known portion is omitted in the disclosure The detailed description of part.
The first embodiment of the present disclosure provides a kind of test method of 3D printer performance, the process of this method such as Fig. 1 institute Show, including step S101 to S104:
S101, by default 3D mode input into 3D printer, so that 3D printer print preset 3D model.
In design, by being tested for the property then for 3D printer, therefore, the performance of test can according to need Design default 3D model.
S102 obtains the print parameters of default 3D model, wherein print parameters are extremely after the completion of the printing of default 3D model Less include following one: print speed, printing precision, printing fine structure degree, bulk accuracy, printing stability, Surface fineness.
What it is if necessary to test is print speed and printing precision, then can just combine and beat when designing default 3D model Two dimensions of print-out rate and printing precision carry out one 3D model of Joint Designing.After the completion of the printing of default 3D model, then it can obtain Each print parameters when the default 3D model printing are taken, for example, if presetting 3D model just for the performance of print speed It is tested, then print parameters relate only to print speed, if default 3D model is simultaneously for print speed, printing precision Integration test is carried out with the performance of printing fine structure degree, then print parameters are related to print speed, printing precision and printing Three aspect of fine structure degree.
When specific setting, the performance of determination 3D printer in order to be more accurate can want test for each respectively Performance design one corresponding default 3D model.
S103, according to preset print parameters test result corresponding with test result contrast relationship acquisition print parameters.
When specific implementation, those skilled in the art can be corresponding previously according to the above-mentioned default 3D model of experience or experimental setup Print parameters and test result contrast relationship, the contrast relationship can be the corresponding one specific test of specific print parameters numerical value In order to simplify operation complexity, the corresponding one section of parameter value range of each test result can be set certainly in score.
S104 determines the performance of 3D printer according to the total test result of 3D printer.
If carrying out integration test to print performance, therefore the usual more than one of print parameters is determining each printing After the corresponding test result of parameter, so that it may be added all test results, determine 3D printer according to total test result Performance, for example, gross score be more than how many points can then determine the 3D printer performance be it is excellent.
The embodiment of the present disclosure devises default 3D model, the default 3D model for need performance design to be tested, After 3D printer completes the printing of the default 3D model, so that it may which obtaining printing, this presets the printing ginseng that 3D model is related to Number, and the corresponding test result of each print parameters is determined with test result contrast relationship according to preset print parameters, into And the performance of 3D printer is determined according to total test result.The present embodiment targetedly presets 3D mould due to devising to have Type can complete the test to 3D printer performance by unified standard, and can be to the 3D printing of any material extrusion molding The performance of machine is tested, and quickly, accurately, solving the prior art can not be to the difficulty that 3D printer is tested and assessed for test process Topic, so that 3D printer industry more standardizes.
Under normal conditions, a score and performance contrast relationship can be preset, contrast relationship instruction is gross score The performance level that printer is corresponded in the case where being how many is other, for example, gross score is X1-X2 corresponding A grade performance, gross score B grades of performances are corresponded to for X2-X3, gross score is that X3-X4 corresponds to C grades of performances;In the case where print parameters are multiple, will each beat It, will be true according to preset score and performance contrast relationship after the test result phase Calais of print parameter determines total test result The performance of fixed total corresponding 3D printer of test result.
If preset print parameters are provided that one section of parameter value range is one corresponding with test result contrast relationship Test result, then according to the mistake of preset print parameters test result corresponding with test result contrast relationship acquisition print parameters Cheng Zhong can first determine parameter preset value range locating for the print parameters of default 3D model, join according still further to preset printing It is several to be obtained and the one-to-one test result of preset parameter range with test result contrast relationship.By the process, can protect Operation complexity is reduced while demonstrate,proving measuring accuracy.
Difference test user may more value performance in a certain respect, for example, it is desired to simultaneously to pursue different performances The performance of two aspects of test printing speed and printing precision, but more take notice of print speed, then it can in advance be corresponding printing One weighted value of parameter setting, then corresponding with test result contrast relationship acquisition print parameters according to preset print parameters After test result, so that it may be recalculated according to the default weighted value of each print parameters and the test result got each The test result of print parameters.For there is the print parameters of default weighted value, due to there is weight to participate, total Test result can from no weight participate in total test result it is different, as long as in advance be arranged again one have weight participate in the case of Score and performance contrast relationship both may be used.By the process, it can satisfy the different demands of different test users, bring user more Add diversified test experience.
The second embodiment of the present disclosure provides a kind of test device of 3D printer performance, and the structural representation of the device is as schemed Shown in 2, comprising:
Input module 10 is used for by default 3D mode input into 3D printer, so that 3D printer print preset 3D mould Type;First obtains module 20, couples with input module 10, for obtaining default 3D model after the completion of the printing of default 3D model Print parameters, wherein print parameters include at least following one: print speed, printing precision, printing fine structure degree, Bulk accuracy, printing stability, surface fineness;Second obtains module 30, couples, is used for the first acquisition module 20 According to preset print parameters test result corresponding with test result contrast relationship acquisition print parameters;Determining module 40, with Second, which obtains module 30, couples, for determining the performance of 3D printer according to the total test result of 3D printer.
In design, by being tested for the property then for 3D printer, therefore, the performance of test can according to need Design default 3D model.
What it is if necessary to test is print speed and printing precision, then can just combine and beat when designing default 3D model Two dimensions of print-out rate and printing precision carry out one 3D model of Joint Designing.After the completion of the printing of default 3D model, then it can obtain Each print parameters when the default 3D model printing are taken, for example, if presetting 3D model just for the performance of print speed It is tested, then print parameters relate only to print speed, if default 3D model is simultaneously for print speed, printing precision Integration test is carried out with the performance of printing fine structure degree, then print parameters are related to print speed, printing precision and printing Three aspect of fine structure degree.When specific setting, the performance of determination 3D printer in order to be more accurate can be respectively for every It is a to think performance design one to be tested corresponding default 3D model.
When specific implementation, those skilled in the art can be corresponding previously according to the above-mentioned default 3D model of experience or experimental setup Print parameters and test result contrast relationship, the contrast relationship can be the corresponding one specific test of specific print parameters numerical value In order to simplify operation complexity, the corresponding one section of parameter value range of each test result can be set certainly in score.
If carrying out integration test to print performance, therefore the usual more than one of print parameters is determining each printing After the corresponding test result of parameter, so that it may be added all test results, determine 3D printer according to total test result Performance, for example, gross score be more than how many points can then determine the 3D printer performance be it is excellent.
The embodiment of the present disclosure devises default 3D model, the default 3D model for need performance design to be tested, After 3D printer completes the printing of the default 3D model, so that it may which obtaining printing, this presets the printing ginseng that 3D model is related to Number, and the corresponding test result of each print parameters is determined with test result contrast relationship according to preset print parameters, into And the performance of 3D printer is determined according to total test result.The present embodiment targetedly presets 3D mould due to devising to have Type can complete the test to 3D printer performance by unified standard, and can be to the 3D printing of any material extrusion molding The performance of machine is tested, and quickly, accurately, solving the prior art can not be to the difficulty that 3D printer is tested and assessed for test process Topic, so that 3D printer industry more standardizes.
Under normal conditions, a score and performance contrast relationship can be preset, contrast relationship instruction is gross score The performance level that printer is corresponded in the case where being how many is other, and when realization, determining module 40 specifically can be used for: print In the case that parameter is multiple, the test result of each print parameters is added, with the total test result of determination;According to preset Score and performance contrast relationship determine the performance of the corresponding 3D printer of total test result.For example, preset score and performance Contrast relationship is that " gross score is X1-X2 corresponding A grade performance, and gross score is that X2-X3 corresponds to B grades of performances, and gross score is X3-X4 pairs Answer C grades of performances ", then when total test point is between X1-X2, corresponding performance is A grades.
Difference test user may more value performance in a certain respect, for example, it is desired to simultaneously to pursue different performances The performance of two aspects of test printing speed and printing precision, but more take notice of print speed, then it can in advance be corresponding printing One weighted value of parameter setting, therefore, above-mentioned apparatus can also include: computing module 50, obtain module 30 with second and determine Module 40 couples, for recalculating each printing with the test result got according to the default weighted value of each print parameters The test result of parameter.
For there is the print parameters of default weighted value, due to there is weight to participate, total test result can be with The total test result for not having weight to participate in is different, as long as the score and performance having in the case of weight participation is arranged again in advance Contrast relationship both may be used.By the way that above-mentioned computing module is arranged, it can satisfy the different demands of different test users, bring user more Diversified test experience.
If preset print parameters are provided that one section of parameter value range is one corresponding with test result contrast relationship Test result, then above-mentioned second acquisition module 30 specifically can be used for: preset locating for the print parameters for determining default 3D model Parameter value range;It is one-to-one with preset parameter range according to preset print parameters and the acquisition of test result contrast relationship Test result.By above-mentioned setting, operation complexity can be reduced while guaranteeing measuring accuracy.
Model evaluation is to evaluate one of the important method of material extrusion molding 3D printer performance, makes product by enterprise Model, be intended to its effect as far as possible close to actual product.The master of PRODUCT FORM DESIGN and modelling is engaged in modern enterprise If industrial design department, industrial designer will also assign product material, human-computer interaction while pursuing product form beauty The information such as mode, cultural connotation, therefore to the more demanding of product model.
The third embodiment of the present disclosure provides a kind of storage medium, and storage medium setting is including memory, processor Computer equipment among the storage medium realize when can exist with form of memory.Computer is stored in the storage medium Program, the computer program realize following steps when being executed by processor:
S1, by default 3D mode input into 3D printer, so that 3D printer print preset 3D model;
S2 obtains the print parameters of default 3D model, wherein print parameters are at least after the completion of the printing of default 3D model Including following one: print speed, printing precision, printing fine structure degree, bulk accuracy, printing stability, table Face fineness;
S3, according to preset print parameters test result corresponding with test result contrast relationship acquisition print parameters;
S4 determines the performance of 3D printer according to the total test result of 3D printer.
In the case where print parameters are multiple, above-mentioned computer program be executed by processor it is total according to 3D printer When test result determines the step of the performance of 3D printer, it is specifically done as follows step: by the test of each print parameters point Number is added, with the total test result of determination;Determine that total test result is corresponding with performance contrast relationship according to preset score The performance of 3D printer.
It is executed by processor to obtain according to preset print parameters and test result contrast relationship in computer program and print After the step of parameter corresponding test result, it is also executed by processor following steps: according to the default power of each print parameters Weight values and the test result got recalculate the test result of each print parameters.By the process, difference can satisfy The different demands for testing user, bring the more diversified test experience of user.
During realization, the step by default 3D mode input into 3D printer is executed by processor in computer program Before, following steps are also executed by processor: the default corresponding print parameters of 3D model and test result contrast relationship are set, In, the corresponding one section of parameter value range of each test result.
Based on above-mentioned setting, it is executed by processor in computer program and is compareed according to preset print parameters with test result It is specific to execute when the step of the corresponding test result of Relation acquisition print parameters: locating for the print parameters for determining default 3D model Parameter preset value range;It is obtained with preset parameter range one by one according to preset print parameters and test result contrast relationship Corresponding test result.By the process, operation complexity can be reduced while guaranteeing measuring accuracy.
In the following, the above process is described in detail in conjunction with attached drawing and specific example.
The embodiment of the present disclosure has separately designed 3D model for each performance to be tested, by allowing 3D printer to print Different 3D models tests different print parameters, the test result finally summarized, and utilizes pre-set score and property Can contrast relationship table determine the overall performance of 3D printer.Each default 3D model and preset print parameters and test result Contrast relationship is as follows:
(1) as shown in figure 3, being the print speed evaluation model being pre-designed, i.e. model 1.
The model is tested for print speed, but in order to avoid filling rate difference leads to print speed different problems, After printing, two sheet portion gaps in model 1 different from other parts of being subject to reach pre-set dimension, if up to not To pre-set dimension, then print speed gross score is denoted as 0.Certainly, if the printer for identical filling rate can be not provided with the mark It is quasi-.
Start to print to the print time for printing and terminating by presetting timing tool statistics, is determined and printed by the print time Speed, then test result is determined by preset print parameters and test result contrast relationship.
The print parameters of the present embodiment and test result contrast relationship it is following (it is merely illustrative, the disclosure is not constituted and is limited It is fixed):
It prints and completes in 1min, be scored at 5;
It prints and completes in 1-2min, be scored at 4;
It prints and completes in 2-3min, be scored at 3;
It prints and completes in 3-4min, be scored at 2;
It prints and completes in 4-5min, be scored at 1;
(2) as shown in figure 4, being the printing precision test model being pre-designed, i.e. model 2.
The model is tested for printing precision, when test, using thrust test platform, with the power no more than X newton solid Fixed left-half is released;Simultaneously, it is desirable that the diameter of 2 inner circular aperture of model meets in predetermined size range.
The print parameters of the present embodiment and test result contrast relationship it is following (it is merely illustrative, the disclosure is not constituted and is limited It is fixed):
If can not all take out, it is scored at 0;
If the part at the position X1mm can be released, it is scored at 1;
If the part at the position X1mm and X2mm can be released, it is scored at 2;
If the part at the position X1mm, X2mm and X3mm can be released, it is scored at 3;
If the part at the position X1mm, X2mm, X3mm and X4mm can be released, it is scored at 4;
If can all release, it is scored at 5.
(3) as shown in figure 5, being the printing fine structure test model being pre-designed, i.e. model 3.
The model is for printing fine structure test, and when test, the measurement of height can be to be obtained by micrometer.
The print parameters of the present embodiment and test result contrast relationship it is following (it is merely illustrative, the disclosure is not constituted and is limited It is fixed):
If model height is scored at 1 between Ymm-Y1mm.
If model height is scored at 2 between Y1mm-Y2mm.
If model height is scored at 3 between Y2mm-Y3mm.
If model height is scored at 4 between Y3mm-Y4mm.
If model height is scored at 5 in Y4mm or more.
(4) as shown in fig. 6, being the print space accuracy to size model being pre-designed, i.e. model 4.
The model is tested for bulk accuracy, and when test, six of the big triangle of miking can be used The sum of the error of point height and big triangle side length, it is, of course, also possible to measure otherwise, as long as can determine above-mentioned The sum of error.
The print parameters of the present embodiment and test result contrast relationship it is following (it is merely illustrative, the disclosure is not constituted and is limited It is fixed):
If error is greater than A1mm, it is scored at 1.
If error is scored at 2 between A1mm and A 2mm.
If error between A2mm and A3mm, is scored at 3.
If error is scored at 4 between A 3mm and A4mm.
If error between A4mm and A5mm, is scored at 5.
(5) as shown in fig. 7, being the printing stability test model being pre-designed, i.e. model 5.
The model prints stability test for XY axis, with four sizes (circular diameters, octagon of miking model And inscribed circle diameter, the square side length of hexagon) error, calculate the sum of error.It is, of course, also possible to otherwise Measurement, as long as can determine the sum of above-mentioned error.
The print parameters of the present embodiment and test result contrast relationship it is following (it is merely illustrative, the disclosure is not constituted and is limited It is fixed):
If error is greater than B1mm, it is scored at 1.
If error between B1mm and B2mm, is scored at 2.
If error between B2mm and B3mm, is scored at 3.
If error between B3mm and B4mm, is scored at 4.
If error between B4mm and B5mm, is scored at 5.
(6) as shown in figure 8, being the printing stability test model being pre-designed, i.e. model 6.
The model prints stability test for Z axis, with the thickness error in seven faces of miking model, calculates error The sum of.It is, of course, also possible to measure otherwise, as long as can determine the sum of above-mentioned error.
The print parameters of the present embodiment and test result contrast relationship it is following (it is merely illustrative, the disclosure is not constituted and is limited It is fixed):
If error is greater than C1mm, it is scored at 1.
If error between C1mm and C2mm, is scored at 2.
If error between C2mm and C3mm, is scored at 3.
If error between C3mm and C4mm, is scored at 4.
If error between C4mm and C5mm, is scored at 5.
(7) as shown in figure 9, being the print surface fineness test model being pre-designed, i.e. model 7.
The model is used for surface fineness performance test, measures three tables such as horizontal, vertical, 45 ° of faces using roughmeter The sum of surface roughness, calculate.It is, of course, also possible to measure otherwise, as long as can determine the sum of above-mentioned calculating.
The print parameters of the present embodiment and test result contrast relationship it is following (it is merely illustrative, the disclosure is not constituted and is limited It is fixed):
If roughness is greater than D, it is scored at 1.
If roughness within the scope of D-D1, is scored at 2.
If roughness within the scope of D1-D2, is scored at 3.
If roughness within the scope of D2-D3, is scored at 4.
If it is less than D3, it is scored at 5.
Finally, giving a mark according to the above evaluation and test principle, Assessment for classification is carried out to the print performance of product, principle of grading is pressed The performance evaluation hierarchical table of table 1 carries out.
Table 1
Fraction range Z-Z1 Z1-Z2 Z2-Z3 Z3-Z4 Z4-Z5 Z5-Z6
Rank A B C D E F
Certainly, when realizing, above-mentioned each 3D model can sum design in one file by boolean, and then pass through 3D printer prints on one substrate.
The 3D printer of the embodiment of the present disclosure needs to print the 3D model of different dimensions, and preset standards of grading finally obtain Total score, the rank for finally carrying out performance to printer according to table 1 are evaluated.Compared with prior art, the embodiment of the present disclosure proposes Method realizes that simply, evaluation is accurate and reliable, can lead to intuitively by printing the performance of the evaluation model evaluation printer of each dimension Partition of the level is crossed, rank evaluation is carried out to printer.
Optionally, in the present embodiment, above-mentioned storage medium can include but is not limited to: USB flash disk, read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), mobile hard disk, magnetic disk or The various media that can store program code such as CD.Optionally, in the present embodiment, processor has been deposited according in storage medium The program code of storage executes the method and step of above-described embodiment record.Optionally, the specific example in the present embodiment can refer to Example described in above-described embodiment and optional embodiment, details are not described herein for the present embodiment.Obviously, the technology of this field Personnel should be understood that each module of the above-mentioned disclosure or each step can be realized with general computing device, they can be with It is concentrated on a single computing device, or is distributed over a network of multiple computing devices, optionally, they can be used Computing device executable program code is realized, is held it is thus possible to be stored in storage device by computing device Row, and in some cases, can with the steps shown or described are performed in an order that is different from the one herein, or by they point It is not fabricated to each integrated circuit modules, or makes multiple modules or steps in them to single integrated circuit module It realizes.It is combined in this way, the disclosure is not limited to any specific hardware and software.
In addition, range includes any and all based on this public affairs although exemplary embodiment has been described herein That opens has equivalent element, modification, omission, combination (for example, scheme that various embodiments are intersected), reorganization or the implementation changed Example.Element in claims will be construed broadly as based on the language used in claim, however it is not limited in this explanation Described example, example are to be interpreted as nonexcludability in book or during the implementation of the application.Therefore, this specification and Example is intended to be to be considered only as example, and real scope and spirit are by following following claims and the full scope of its equivalent institute Instruction.
Above description is intended to illustrative rather than restrictive.For example, above-mentioned example (or one or more side Case) it can be in combination with one another.Such as other embodiments can be used when reading foregoing description in those of ordinary skill in the art. In addition, various features can be grouped together to simplify the disclosure in above-mentioned specific embodiment.This should not be construed as A kind of not claimed disclosed feature is necessary intention for any claim.On the contrary, the theme of the disclosure can be with Less than whole features of specific disclosed embodiment.To which following claims is incorporated to herein as example or embodiment In specific embodiment, wherein each claim is independently as individual embodiment, and consider that these embodiments can be with It is combined with each other with various combinations or arrangement.The scope of the present disclosure should refer to appended claims and these claims are entitled The full scope of equivalent form determines.
Above embodiments are only the exemplary embodiment of the disclosure, are not used in the limitation disclosure, the protection scope of the disclosure It is defined by the claims.Those skilled in the art can make respectively the disclosure in the essence and protection scope of the disclosure Kind modification or equivalent replacement, this modification or equivalent replacement also should be regarded as falling within the scope of the disclosure.

Claims (10)

1. a kind of test method of 3D printer performance characterized by comprising
By default 3D mode input into 3D printer, so that the 3D printer prints the default 3D model;
After the completion of default 3D model printing, the print parameters of the default 3D model are obtained, wherein the print parameters Including at least following one: print speed, printing precision, printing fine structure degree, bulk accuracy, printing are stablized Property, surface fineness;
According to preset print parameters test result corresponding with the test result contrast relationship acquisition print parameters;
The performance of the 3D printer is determined according to the total test result of the 3D printer.
2. test method as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that in the case where print parameters are multiple, according to described The total test result of 3D printer determines the performance of the 3D printer, comprising:
The test result of each print parameters is added, with determination total test result;
The performance of the corresponding 3D printer of total test result is determined according to preset score and performance contrast relationship.
3. test method as claimed in claim 2, which is characterized in that compare pass with test result according to preset print parameters System obtains after the corresponding test result of the print parameters, further includes:
Each described beat is recalculated according to the default weighted value of each print parameters and the test result that gets Print the test result of parameter.
4. test method as claimed any one in claims 1 to 3, which is characterized in that beat default 3D mode input to 3D Before in print machine, further includes:
The corresponding print parameters of the default 3D model and test result contrast relationship are set, wherein each test result is corresponding One section of parameter value range.
5. test method as claimed in claim 4, which is characterized in that compare pass with test result according to preset print parameters System obtains the corresponding test result of the print parameters, comprising:
Determine parameter preset value range locating for the print parameters of the default 3D model;
It is one-to-one with the preset parameter range according to the preset print parameters and the acquisition of test result contrast relationship Test result.
6. a kind of test device of 3D printer performance characterized by comprising
Input module is used for by default 3D mode input into 3D printer, so that the 3D printer prints the default 3D Model;
First obtains module, for obtaining the print parameters of the default 3D model after the completion of default 3D model printing, Wherein, the print parameters include at least following one: print speed, printing precision, printing fine structure degree, bulk Accuracy, printing stability, surface fineness;
Second obtains module, corresponding for obtaining the print parameters with test result contrast relationship according to preset print parameters Test result;
Determining module, for determining the performance of the 3D printer according to the total test result of the 3D printer.
7. test device as claimed in claim 6, which is characterized in that
The determining module, is specifically used for: in the case where print parameters are multiple, by the test of each print parameters point Number is added, with determination total test result;Total test point is determined according to preset score and performance contrast relationship The performance of the corresponding 3D printer of number.
8. test device as claimed in claim 7, which is characterized in that further include:
Computing module, by according to the default weighted values of each print parameters and the test result got again based on Calculate the test result of each print parameters.
9. the test device as described in any one of claim 6 to 8, which is characterized in that
Described second obtains module, is specifically used for: determining parameter preset value locating for the print parameters of the default 3D model Range;It is one-to-one with the preset parameter range according to the preset print parameters and the acquisition of test result contrast relationship Test result.
10. a kind of computer equipment includes at least memory, processor, is stored with computer program on the memory, special Sign is that the processor is realized described in any one of claims 1 to 5 when executing the computer program on the memory The step of method.
CN201810843912.3A 2018-07-27 2018-07-27 Test method, device and the computer equipment of 3D printer performance Pending CN109130191A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810843912.3A CN109130191A (en) 2018-07-27 2018-07-27 Test method, device and the computer equipment of 3D printer performance

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810843912.3A CN109130191A (en) 2018-07-27 2018-07-27 Test method, device and the computer equipment of 3D printer performance

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109130191A true CN109130191A (en) 2019-01-04

Family

ID=64798366

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810843912.3A Pending CN109130191A (en) 2018-07-27 2018-07-27 Test method, device and the computer equipment of 3D printer performance

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109130191A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111351737A (en) * 2020-04-01 2020-06-30 中国建筑第八工程局有限公司 Rheological property testing method of building 3D printing material
CN111347668A (en) * 2020-03-06 2020-06-30 上海酷鹰机器人科技有限公司 Method and device for acquiring printing time of 3D printer and 3D printer
CN111366495A (en) * 2020-04-01 2020-07-03 中国建筑第八工程局有限公司 Rheological property testing method of building 3D printing material
CN112284779A (en) * 2020-09-29 2021-01-29 汕头大学 Printer performance identification method and identification device
CN114442968A (en) * 2022-02-10 2022-05-06 中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司 3D printing engineering parameter matching method
WO2022161000A1 (en) * 2021-01-29 2022-08-04 苏州奇流信息科技有限公司 Training method and training apparatus for machine learning model, and evaluation system
CN115139525A (en) * 2022-06-28 2022-10-04 广东省珠海市质量计量监督检测所 Multi-material 3D printed product fusion testing method
CN115256948A (en) * 2022-07-29 2022-11-01 杭州易绘科技有限公司 Generation method and device for personalized 3D printing Luban lock

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103969075A (en) * 2014-05-23 2014-08-06 英华达(上海)科技有限公司 Self-testing method and system of 3D printing device
CN105150540A (en) * 2015-09-28 2015-12-16 常州大学 Printing applicability evaluation method for fuse deposition molding three-dimensional printing materials
CN106273445A (en) * 2015-06-02 2017-01-04 北京大业三维科技有限公司 The characteristic test method of a kind of 3D printer and device
EP3232349A1 (en) * 2016-04-12 2017-10-18 Sergei F. Burlatsky System and process for evaluating and validating additive manufacture operations
KR20170138618A (en) * 2016-06-07 2017-12-18 서울시립대학교 산학협력단 Quantitative evaluation method for 3D printer output and system
CN107943853A (en) * 2017-11-06 2018-04-20 浙江三米教育科技有限公司 Knowledge node selects test method and its institute's computation machine equipment and storage medium

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103969075A (en) * 2014-05-23 2014-08-06 英华达(上海)科技有限公司 Self-testing method and system of 3D printing device
CN106273445A (en) * 2015-06-02 2017-01-04 北京大业三维科技有限公司 The characteristic test method of a kind of 3D printer and device
CN105150540A (en) * 2015-09-28 2015-12-16 常州大学 Printing applicability evaluation method for fuse deposition molding three-dimensional printing materials
EP3232349A1 (en) * 2016-04-12 2017-10-18 Sergei F. Burlatsky System and process for evaluating and validating additive manufacture operations
KR20170138618A (en) * 2016-06-07 2017-12-18 서울시립대학교 산학협력단 Quantitative evaluation method for 3D printer output and system
CN107943853A (en) * 2017-11-06 2018-04-20 浙江三米教育科技有限公司 Knowledge node selects test method and its institute's computation machine equipment and storage medium

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
佚名: "***评估3D打印机性能的方法及3D打印机测试模型下载", 《HTTP://WWW.TTCAD.COM/NEWS/SDP/5846.HTML》 *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111347668A (en) * 2020-03-06 2020-06-30 上海酷鹰机器人科技有限公司 Method and device for acquiring printing time of 3D printer and 3D printer
CN111351737A (en) * 2020-04-01 2020-06-30 中国建筑第八工程局有限公司 Rheological property testing method of building 3D printing material
CN111366495A (en) * 2020-04-01 2020-07-03 中国建筑第八工程局有限公司 Rheological property testing method of building 3D printing material
CN112284779A (en) * 2020-09-29 2021-01-29 汕头大学 Printer performance identification method and identification device
CN112284779B (en) * 2020-09-29 2022-06-17 汕头大学 Printer performance identification method and identification device
WO2022161000A1 (en) * 2021-01-29 2022-08-04 苏州奇流信息科技有限公司 Training method and training apparatus for machine learning model, and evaluation system
CN114442968A (en) * 2022-02-10 2022-05-06 中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司 3D printing engineering parameter matching method
CN114442968B (en) * 2022-02-10 2023-09-22 中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司 3D printing engineering parameter matching method
CN115139525A (en) * 2022-06-28 2022-10-04 广东省珠海市质量计量监督检测所 Multi-material 3D printed product fusion testing method
CN115139525B (en) * 2022-06-28 2023-03-07 广东省珠海市质量计量监督检测所 Multi-material 3D printed product fusion testing method
CN115256948A (en) * 2022-07-29 2022-11-01 杭州易绘科技有限公司 Generation method and device for personalized 3D printing Luban lock

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109130191A (en) Test method, device and the computer equipment of 3D printer performance
JP4346021B2 (en) Rapid prototyping method and apparatus using V-CAD data
US20070016388A1 (en) Mass on model
TWI474208B (en) Method of generating a recipe for a manufacturing tool and system thereof
CN106558335A (en) Storage drive device and method
CN107729621A (en) A kind of verification tool of statical model
JPH07306887A (en) Modeling apparatus of integrated chip package and operating method
CN101543949A (en) Rapid gripping device manufacturing method based on rapid prototyping process
US8477133B2 (en) Method and apparatus for generating three-dimensional finite element mesh
CN102384849B (en) Car seat component dynamic-static equivalent test method
CN109508484B (en) Assembling and disassembling method and device
CN109522613B (en) Assembly method and device
EP0704811A2 (en) Method and apparatus for use in simulation of electrical characteristics of electronic device
CN109522675B (en) Method for simulating microstructure of tin-based binary eutectic alloy and finite element solving and analyzing method
CN109635365A (en) A kind of process of control casing cutting parts deformation
CN105022890B (en) Pass through the anti-method for pushing away its Young's modulus of the resonant frequency of loudspeaker vibration component
CN112861282B (en) System and method for realizing data transmission among multiple software
Wall et al. Making sense of prototyping technologies for product design
CN105138746A (en) Method for inversely deducing Young modulus of loudspeaker vibrating member by means of stiffness coefficient of loudspeaker vibrating member
WO2006109750A1 (en) Integrated circuit device evaluation device, evaluation method, and evaluation program
CN107273558A (en) The method and apparatus that mechanical performance for threedimensional model is verified
CN116227295B (en) Battery pack finite element modeling method, device, computer equipment and storage medium
Cappetti et al. Influence of control parameters on consumer FDM 3D printing
US20120316857A1 (en) Method for Circuit Simulation
CN108319644A (en) drawing search method and system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20190104