CN108828377A - A kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults - Google Patents

A kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108828377A
CN108828377A CN201811007817.6A CN201811007817A CN108828377A CN 108828377 A CN108828377 A CN 108828377A CN 201811007817 A CN201811007817 A CN 201811007817A CN 108828377 A CN108828377 A CN 108828377A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
transformer
fault
content
gas
ethylene
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201811007817.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
林盾
吴强
万信书
刘红岩
陈钦柱
余阳
全业生
欧华韶
刘雪洋
甘书宁
王学成
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Electric Power Research Institute of Hainan Power Grid Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Electric Power Research Institute of Hainan Power Grid Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Electric Power Research Institute of Hainan Power Grid Co Ltd filed Critical Electric Power Research Institute of Hainan Power Grid Co Ltd
Priority to CN201811007817.6A priority Critical patent/CN108828377A/en
Publication of CN108828377A publication Critical patent/CN108828377A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02Neural networks
    • G06N3/08Learning methods
    • G06N3/084Backpropagation, e.g. using gradient descent
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/20Administration of product repair or maintenance
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Housings And Mounting Of Transformers (AREA)
  • Testing Of Short-Circuits, Discontinuities, Leakage, Or Incorrect Line Connections (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention provides a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults, transformer fault diagnosis is carried out by the way of the combination of three-ratio method, BP neural network and reasoning of citing a precedent, substantially increase the accuracy of transformer fault judgement, it reduces maintenance cost, reduce maintenance risk, each professional preferably can be subjected to tissue, all kinds of status datas of equipment are effectively utilized, more accurately to determine equipment state and providing aid decision suggestion to provide technical support, also good technical foundation is established in the life-cycle management for realization power grid asset.For grid equipment is safe and stable, reliable, long period, high-quality operation provide reliable technology and management safeguard.

Description

A kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults
Technical field
The present invention relates to transformer fault diagnosis technical field more particularly to a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults.
Background technique
Transformer is the important equipment of electric system, and operating status directly affects the level of security of electric system.However Since transformer is the closing entirety for combining the multidisciplinary technologies such as mechanical, electrical, chemistry, thermodynamics, its failure is influenced The reason of it is intricate, fault diagnosis needs various data and knowledge, only according in a certain respect or several respects just subjectively under Conclusion necessarily causes to judge by accident or fail to judge.At present common method for diagnosing faults be three ratio in judgement methods, overheat electric discharge figure determining method, HAE axonometric projection determining method, characteristic gas method etc., every kind of single diagnostic method, although to certain specific fault recognition rates compared with Height, but there is also disadvantages.By taking ratio method as an example, the right judging rate that it belongs to overheat or electric discharge type to failure is higher, general energy Reach 90% or more.But for overheating type fault, belong to magnetic conductive loop or galvanic circle mistake further determining bottom When hot, accuracy is just substantially reduced, only rely on certain single method for diagnosing faults determine failure be it is less reliable, It is unable to satisfy engineering demand.And artificial neural network as it is a kind of in form close to human brain construct novel information processing system, With powerful parallel processing capability, distributed storage ability and adaptive learning ability, thus dissolved gas content in the oil It combines artificial neural network technology to carry out Insulation Fault on the basis of analysis result and has become research in recent years Hot spot, and make great progress, therefore, in order to ensure safe and reliable, the flexible coordination of Hainan Power Grid operation, high-quality height It imitates, is economic and environment-friendly, there is an urgent need for a kind of methods of energy accurate judgement transformer fault.
Summary of the invention
The purpose of the present invention is to provide a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults, mentioned above in the background art to solve Problem.
The present invention is achieved by the following technical solutions:A kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults, using three-ratio method, BP The mode of the combination of neural network and reasoning of citing a precedent carries out transformer fault diagnosis, and step is:
Whether S1, the content for detecting hydrogen, acetylene and total appropriate hydrocarbon gas ∑ C in transformer respectively are exceeded, and detect total hydrocarbon Whether gas production rate is exceeded;
S2, according to gas content result detected and total hydrocarbon gas production rate, judge whether transformer generates failure, when When transformer does not break down, verified using the method based on rough set;
S3, when transformer breaks down, use three is than value-based algorithm, BP neural algorithm and rationalistic method of citing a precedent to transformer Fault type carries out preliminary analysis, determines that transformer fault type is discharge fault or overheating fault;
S4, according to the Preliminary Analysis Results, continue using three than value-based algorithm, BP neural algorithm and rationalistic method pair of citing a precedent The fault type of transformer is further analyzed, and determines the discharge fault type or overheating fault type of transformer;
S5, the fault diagnosis result according to transformer, are verified using the method based on rough set.
Preferably, in step S2, when judging to have in aforementioned four condition more than one exceeded, that is, judge transformer Failure.
Preferably, in step S3, the transformer discharge failure includes being related to the discharge fault of solid insulation and not relating to And the discharge fault of solid insulation, the overheat fault of transformer include overheat of conducting circuit failure and magnetic conductive loop overheat event Barrier, the method for carrying out preliminary analysis to transformer fault type are:
S31, the content for obtaining hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane gas in transformer respectively, and adopted according to the data The fault type of transformer is tentatively judged with three ratio in judgement methods;
S32, according to the gas content of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide in transformer Data tentatively judge the fault type of transformer using BP neural algorithm;
S33, according to the content of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas in transformer Data tentatively judge the fault type of transformer using rationalistic method of citing a precedent;
S34, in summary three kinds of judging results, when there are two or more than two judging results be same fault type When, then tentatively judge transformer for the fault type.
Preferably, in step S4, the method that the fault type of transformer is further analyzed is:
S41, according to hydrogen in transformer, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas and total The content data of appropriate hydrocarbon gas ∑ C, the fault type of transformer is judged using three-ratio method;
S42, according to the gas content of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide in transformer Data judge the fault type of transformer using BP neural algorithm;
S43, according to the content of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas in transformer Data judge the fault type of transformer using rationalistic method of citing a precedent;
S44, in summary three kinds of judging results, when there are two or more than two judging results be same fault type When, then judge transformer for the fault type.
Preferably, in step S4, using following expression formula:Ethylene contents/∑ C, (methane content+ethylene contents)/∑ C, By above three ratio in judgement transformer overheat of conducting circuit event occurs for (carbon monoxide content+carbon dioxide content)/∑ C Barrier or magnetic conductive loop overheating fault, when meeting following expression formula:0.42<=ethylene contents/carbonaceous gas content<=0.68, And meet (methane content+ethylene contents)/carbonaceous gas content simultaneously>=0.86, and (methane content+ethylene contents)/carbon containing Gas content<It when 30, can determine that magnetic conductive loop failure occurs for transformer, otherwise determine that thermally conductive circuit overheat event occurs for transformer Barrier.
Preferably, in step S4, for seal transformer, when carbon dioxide content/carbon monoxide content<When=2, sentence Determine transformer and be related to the discharge fault of solid insulation, otherwise not to be related to the discharge fault of solid insulation, for open Transformer, work as carbon monoxide content>400 and carbon dioxide content/carbon monoxide content<=3 or carbon dioxide content>4500 And carbon dioxide content/carbon monoxide content<When=3, then determine that transformer is related to the discharge fault of solid insulation, otherwise Not to be related to the discharge fault of solid insulation.
Preferably, in step S3 and S4, using three independent list hidden layer BP neural network ANN1, ANN2 and ANN3 to change Depressor failure is judged, determines that discharge fault or overheating fault occur for transformer by ANN1 neural network, using ANN2 nerve Network determines that the type of overheating fault occurs for transformer, determines that the class of discharge fault occurs for transformer using ANN3 neural network Type.
Preferably, in step S3 and S4, when carrying out fault diagnosis using BP neural algorithm, need to hydrogen collected, Acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas are normalized, and processing method is:
S311, to seven kinds of characteristic gas (hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide), preferentially A kind of characteristic gas is selected, all content datas of the gas are ranked up by size, then by the gas content after sequence Data are divided into several groups according to size;
S312, statistics fall into the frequency Δ r in each groupjWith frequency wj, wherein wj=Δ rj/ n, n are collected feature gas Volume data number;
S313, the cumulative frequency value F for calculating i-th group of dataj
In formula, rjFor the cumulative frequency terminated to i-th group, the calculated F of institutejInput as BP neural algorithm;
S314, it repeats the above steps, obtains the cumulative frequency value of other characteristic gas.
Preferably, in step S5, when judging the fault type of transformer using rationalistic method of citing a precedent, electric discharge and overheat need to be established Fault signature collection, overheat of conducting circuit failure and magnetic conductive loop overheating fault feature set are related to solid insulation discharge fault feature Collection.
Compared with prior art, what the present invention reached has the beneficial effect that:
A kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults provided by the invention, using the failure classes of a variety of method comprehensive descision transformers Type substantially increases the accuracy of transformer fault judgement, reduces maintenance cost, reduces maintenance risk, can preferably will be each Professional carries out tissue, and all kinds of status datas of equipment are effectively utilized, more accurately to determine equipment state and mentioning Technical support is provided for aid decision suggestion, also good technical foundation is established in the life-cycle management for realization power grid asset. For grid equipment is safe and stable, reliable, long period, high-quality operation provide reliable technology and management safeguard.
Detailed description of the invention
To describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention more clearly, make required in being described below to embodiment Attached drawing is briefly described, it should be apparent that, the accompanying drawings in the following description is only the preferred embodiment of the present invention, for For those of ordinary skill in the art, without any creative labor, it can also be obtained according to these attached drawings His attached drawing.
Fig. 1 is a kind of flow chart of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults provided by the invention;
Fig. 2 is three-ratio method judgment rule provided by the embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 3 is BP neural network topological structure provided by the embodiment of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
In order to be best understood from the technology of the present invention content, be provided below specific embodiment, and in conjunction with attached drawing to the present invention do into The explanation of one step.
Referring to Fig. 1, a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults, by the way of the combination of BP neural network and reasoning of citing a precedent into Line transformer fault diagnosis, step are:
Whether S1, the content for detecting hydrogen, acetylene and total appropriate hydrocarbon gas ∑ C in transformer respectively are exceeded, and detect total hydrocarbon Whether gas production rate is exceeded;
S2, according to gas content result detected and total hydrocarbon gas production rate, judge whether transformer generates failure, when When transformer does not break down, verified using the method based on rough set;
S3, when transformer breaks down, use three is than value-based algorithm, BP neural algorithm and rationalistic method of citing a precedent to transformer Fault type carries out preliminary analysis, determines that discharge fault type is discharge fault or overheating fault;
S4, according to the Preliminary Analysis Results, continue using three than value-based algorithm, BP neural algorithm and rationalistic method pair of citing a precedent The fault type of transformer is further analyzed, and determines the discharge fault type or overheating fault type of transformer;
S5, the fault diagnosis result according to transformer, are verified using the method based on rough set.
Specifically, collecting containing for hydrogen in transformer, acetylene and total appropriate hydrocarbon gas ∑ C first when carrying out breakdown judge Amount and total hydrocarbon gas production rate, when aforementioned four condition have one it is exceeded when, then can determine whether transformer generate failure.
When transformer determine generate failure when, it is first determined the fault type of transformer be transformer discharge failure still Overheat fault of transformer, secondly, determining that discharge fault is specially to be related to the discharge fault of solid insulation and not to be related to solid exhausted The discharge fault of edge;Determine that overheating fault specially includes overheat of conducting circuit failure and magnetic conductive loop overheating fault, and to change Depressor fault type carries out preliminary analysis:
S31, the content for obtaining hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane gas in transformer respectively, and adopted according to the data The fault type of transformer is tentatively judged with three ratio in judgement methods, and transformer is specifically carried out using judgment rule as shown in Figure 2 Fault type judgement;
S32, according to the gas content of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide in transformer Data tentatively judge the fault type of transformer using BP neural algorithm;
S33, according to the content of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas in transformer Data tentatively judge the fault type of transformer using rationalistic method of citing a precedent;
S34, in summary three kinds of judging results, when there are two or more than two judging results be same fault type When, then tentatively judge transformer for the fault type.
Specifically, the method that the fault type of transformer is further analyzed is:
S41, according to hydrogen in transformer, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas and total The content data of appropriate hydrocarbon gas ∑ C, the fault type of transformer is judged using three-ratio method;
S42, according to the gas content of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide in transformer Data judge the fault type of transformer using BP neural algorithm;
S43, according to the content of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas in transformer Data judge the fault type of transformer using rationalistic method of citing a precedent;
S44, in summary three kinds of judging results, when there are two or more than two judging results be same fault type When, then judge transformer for the fault type.
Specifically, when judging whether transformer occurs overheating fault, since in magnetic-circuit fault, iron core failure accounts for big absolutely It is most.Usually in iron core failure, ethylene and methane account for larger specific gravity, rule of thumb the summary of case, and ethylene accounts for the ratio of total hydrocarbon Rate is about 45%~68%, while the content of acetylene is often lower or does not change;Further, since overheat of conducting circuit often may be used Insulating paper can be caused to decomposite carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and magnetic conductive loop is mostly bare metal overheat, is not easy to cause an oxidation Carbon, carbon dioxide content are substantially change, therefore, for using ethylene contents/∑ C, (methane content+ethylene contents)/∑ C, (one Content of carbon oxide+carbon dioxide content)/∑ C above three ratio as judge transformer generation overheat of conducting circuit failure also It is the foundation of magnetic conductive loop overheating fault, when meeting following expression formula:0.42<=ethylene contents/carbonaceous gas content<= 0.68, and meet (methane content+ethylene contents)/carbonaceous gas content simultaneously>=0.86, and (methane content+ethylene contents)/ Carbonaceous gas content<It when 30, can determine that magnetic conductive loop failure occurs for transformer, otherwise determine that thermally conductive circuit overheat occurs for transformer Failure.It tests using 213 magnetic circuit overheats and 175 circuit overheat chromatographic datas as sample, after inspection result is verified As shown in Table 1:
1 overheating fault verification result of table
Fault type Sample number Correctly judge quantity Right judging rate
Magnetic circuit overheated type failure 213 130 61%
Circuit overheated type failure 175 107 61%
Specifically, when judging that the type of discharge fault occurs for transformer judgement, it is absolute based on carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide Value content and its ratio judge whether failure has been directed to solid insulation.For seal transformer, when carbon dioxide content/ Carbon monoxide content<When=2, determine that transformer is related to the discharge fault of solid insulation, otherwise not to be related to solid insulation Discharge fault carbon monoxide content is worked as open type transformer>400 or carbon dioxide content>4500 and carbon dioxide contain Amount/carbon monoxide content<When=3, then determine that transformer is related to the discharge fault of solid insulation, otherwise not to be related to solid The discharge fault of insulation.It is not related to solid insulation and 84 are related to Solid Insulator Breakdown of Electric case and test as sample using 191, Its inspection result is as shown in table 2.
2 discharge fault verification result of table
Fault type Sample number Correctly judge quantity Right judging rate
It is related to solid insulation type failure 191 142 74%
It is not related to solid insulation type failure 84 48 60%
Specifically, when carrying out transformer fault judgement using BP neural algorithm, using the error back propagation of single hidden layer Feed-forward type BP neural network, topological structure are as shown in Figure 3.The excitation function of each neuron node usually chooses S type function.
Secondly, needing that transformer fault data are normalized, normalized is not only for extraction failure Feature is also beneficial to the search to weight space.Therefore need to by seven kinds of characteristic gas hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, Carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas content data be normalized, specific step is as follows:
S311, to seven kinds of characteristic gas (hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide), preferentially A kind of characteristic gas is selected, all content datas of the gas are ranked up by size, then by the gas content after sequence Data are divided into several groups according to size;
S312, statistics fall into the frequency Δ r in each groupjWith frequency wj, wherein wj=Δ rj/ n, n are collected feature gas Volume data number;
S313, the cumulative frequency value F for calculating i-th group of dataj
In formula, rjFor the cumulative frequency terminated to i-th group, the calculated F of institutejInput as BP neural algorithm;
S314, it repeats the above steps, obtains the cumulative frequency value of other characteristic gas.
According to above-mentioned normalization data, three independent single hidden layer BP neural network ANN1, ANN2 and ANN3 couple can be built Transformer fault is judged, determines that discharge fault or overheating fault occur for transformer by ANN1 neural network, using ANN2 mind Determine that the type of overheating fault occurs for transformer through network, determines that the class of discharge fault occurs for transformer using ANN3 neural network Type, BP neural network ANN1, ANN2 and the ANN3 built be all made of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, The output layer node number of input quantity of the normalized value of carbon dioxide gas content as BP neural network, three networks is final Be determined as two, and its hidden node number is identified as 15,10,10, three constructed neural network specific structures with Parameter is as shown in table 3:
The parameter and structure of table 3BP neural network
Specifically, when judging the fault type of transformer using rationalistic method of citing a precedent, using the retrieval based on fuzzy mathematics Algorithm finds search space where current sample.Using transformer fault as domain, corresponding sub- failure classes are as each fuzzy Subset, the accident defect collection established are combined into electric discharge and overheating fault feature set, overheat of conducting circuit failure and magnetic conductive loop mistake Thermal fault feature set is related to solid insulation discharge fault feature set.Compared test repeatedly, this system is selected for different defects Corresponding retrieval character, it is specific as shown in table 4:
4 characteristic key of table is selected
After the search space and the retrieval character that determine follow-up sample, sought in this search space according to certain search method The source example most like with follow-up sample is looked for, using the concept of approach degree in fuzzy mathematics, finds and calculates similarity.It first calculates and works as The approach degree of each sample, selects ratio when calculating the index of approach degree in preceding sample and this search space:Acetylene/ethylene, first Then alkane/hydrogen, ethylene/ethane, carbon dioxide/carbon monoxide select maximum three samples of approach degree according to Similarity Principle Solution be current solution.This solution is the fail result of transformer.
According in summary three kinds of judging results, when there are two or more than two judging results be same fault type When, then judge that transformer for overheating fault or discharge fault, and determines overheating fault type and discharge fault type.
After obtaining above-mentioned transformer diagnosis result, the method for continuing to be taken based on rough set carries out result verification, with event Barrier sign is conditional attribute and using failure as decision attribute, for statistical analysis to the Power Transformer Faults data collected, And with reference to more successful failure modes collection in experience before, conditional attribute set and decision attribute set such as table 5,6 institute of table are obtained Show:
5 conditional attribute set of table
Number Failure symptom (conditional attribute) Number Failure symptom (conditional attribute)
C1 Light gas movement C14 Oily micro-water content increases
C2 Grave gas movement C15 Infrared detection is abnormal
C3 Differential protection movement C16 Winding temperature increases
C4 Back-up protection movement C17 Winding deformation test abnormality
C5 The insulation resistance of winding declines C18 Insulating oil dielectric loss angle tangent is abnormal
C6 The D.C. resistance of winding is abnormal C19 CO2, CO content or CO2/ CO is abnormal
C7 Winding no-load voltage ratio is abnormal C20 Factor of created gase increases
C8 DC leakage-current is exceeded C21 DGA shows low, medium temperature overheat
C9 Iron core grounding current is exceeded C22 DGA shows hyperthermia and superheating
C10 The decline of core insulation resistance C23 DGA shows low energy electric discharge
C11 Short-circuit impedance is abnormal C24 DGA shows high-energy discharge
C12 No-load test is abnormal C25 Air content is abnormal
C13 PD test abnormality C26 Oil flow electrification degree is abnormal
6 decision attribute set of table
According to historical experience, and then the fundamental relation of transformer fault and failure symptom is obtained, it is specific such as table 7, table 8, table 9, shown in table 10:
Table 7 is related to the failure symptom table of solid insulation electric discharge
The failure symptom that table 8 is not related to solid insulation electric discharge corresponds to table
The failure symptom of 9 circuit of table overheat corresponds to table
The failure symptom of 10 magnetic circuit of table overheat corresponds to table
According to the fundamental relation of above-mentioned transformer fault and failure symptom, transformer fault judging result is verified, Finally obtain accurate transformer fault type.
The foregoing is merely illustrative of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, is not intended to limit the invention, all in essence of the invention Within mind and principle, any modification, equivalent substitution, improvement and etc. done be should be included within the scope of the present invention.

Claims (9)

1. a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults, which is characterized in that using three-ratio method, the knot of BP neural network and reasoning of citing a precedent The mode of conjunction carries out transformer fault diagnosis, and step is:
Whether S1, the content for detecting hydrogen, acetylene and total appropriate hydrocarbon gas ∑ C in transformer respectively are exceeded, and detect total hydrocarbon and produce gas Whether rate is exceeded;
S2, according to gas content result detected and total hydrocarbon gas production rate, judge whether transformer generates failure, work as transformation When device does not break down, verified using the method based on rough set;
S3, when transformer breaks down, use three is than value-based algorithm, BP neural algorithm and rationalistic method of citing a precedent to transformer fault Type carries out preliminary analysis, determines that transformer fault type is discharge fault or overheating fault;
S4, according to the Preliminary Analysis Results, continue using three than value-based algorithm, BP neural algorithm and rationalistic method of citing a precedent to transformation The fault type of device is further analyzed, and determines the discharge fault type or overheating fault type of transformer;
S5, the fault diagnosis result according to transformer, are verified using the method based on rough set.
2. a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults according to claim 1, which is characterized in that in step S2, when in judgement State have in four conditions more than one it is exceeded when, that is, judge that transformer breaks down.
3. a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults according to claim 1, which is characterized in that in step S3, the transformation Device discharge fault includes being related to the discharge fault of solid insulation and not being related to the discharge fault of solid insulation, the transformer mistake Thermal fault includes overheat of conducting circuit failure and magnetic conductive loop overheating fault, carries out preliminary analysis to transformer fault type Method is:
S31, the content for obtaining hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane gas in transformer respectively, and three are used according to the data Ratio in judgement method tentatively judges the fault type of transformer;
S32, according to the gas content data of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide in transformer, The fault type of transformer is tentatively judged using BP neural algorithm;
S33, according to the content data of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas in transformer, The fault type of transformer is tentatively judged using rationalistic method of citing a precedent;
S34, in summary three kinds of judging results, when there are two or more than two judging results be same fault type when, then Tentatively judge transformer for the fault type.
4. a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults according to claim 3, which is characterized in that in step S4, to transformer The method that is further analyzed of fault type be:
S41, according to hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas and total hydrocarbon gas in transformer The content data of body ∑ C, the fault type of transformer is judged using three-ratio method;
S42, according to the gas content data of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide in transformer, The fault type of transformer is judged using BP neural algorithm;
S43, according to the content data of hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide gas in transformer, The fault type of transformer is judged using rationalistic method of citing a precedent;
S44, in summary three kinds of judging results, when there are two or more than two judging results be same fault type when, then Judge transformer for the fault type.
5. a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults according to claim 4, which is characterized in that in step S4, use is following Expression formula:Ethylene contents/∑ C, (methane content+ethylene contents)/∑ C, (carbon monoxide content+carbon dioxide content)/∑ C, Overheat of conducting circuit failure or magnetic conductive loop overheating fault occurs by above three ratio in judgement transformer, it is following when meeting Expression formula:0.42<=ethylene contents/carbonaceous gas content<=0.68, and meet (methane content+ethylene contents)/carbon containing simultaneously Gas content>=0.86, and (methane content+ethylene contents)/carbonaceous gas content<When 30, it can determine that magnetic conduction occurs for transformer Otherwise loop fault determines that thermally conductive circuit overheating fault occurs for transformer.
6. a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults according to claim 5, which is characterized in that in step S4, for closing Formula transformer, when carbon dioxide content/carbon monoxide content<When=2, determine that transformer is related to the electric discharge event of solid insulation Barrier, otherwise not to be related to the discharge fault of solid insulation, for open type transformer, works as carbon monoxide content>400 and titanium dioxide Carbon content/carbon monoxide content<=3 or carbon dioxide content>4500 and carbon dioxide content/carbon monoxide content<When=3, Then determine that transformer is related to the discharge fault of solid insulation, otherwise not to be related to the discharge fault of solid insulation.
7. a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults according to claim 3, which is characterized in that in step S3 and S4, use Three independent list hidden layer BP neural network ANN1, ANN2 and ANN3 judge transformer fault, by ANN1 neural network Determine that discharge fault or overheating fault occur for transformer, determines that the class of overheating fault occurs for transformer using ANN2 neural network Type determines that the type of discharge fault occurs for transformer using ANN3 neural network.
8. a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults according to claim 7, which is characterized in that in step S3 and S4, adopting It, need to be to hydrogen collected, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, dioxy when carrying out fault diagnosis with BP neural algorithm Change carbon gas to be normalized, processing method is:
S311, to seven kinds of characteristic gas (hydrogen, acetylene, ethylene, methane, ethane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide), it is preferential selected All content datas of the gas are ranked up by a kind of characteristic gas by size, then by the gas content data after sequence It is divided into several groups according to size;
S312, statistics fall into the frequency Δ r in each groupjWith frequency wj, wherein wj=Δ rj/ n, n are collected characteristic gas number According to number;
S313, the cumulative frequency value F for calculating i-th group of dataj
In formula, rjFor the cumulative frequency terminated to i-th group, the calculated F of institutejInput as BP neural algorithm;
S314, it repeats the above steps, obtains the cumulative frequency value of other characteristic gas.
9. a kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults according to claim 1, which is characterized in that in step S5, using citing a precedent When rationalistic method judges the fault type of transformer, electric discharge and overheating fault feature set, overheat of conducting circuit failure need to be established and led Magnetic loop overheating fault feature set is related to solid insulation discharge fault feature set.
CN201811007817.6A 2018-08-31 2018-08-31 A kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults Pending CN108828377A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201811007817.6A CN108828377A (en) 2018-08-31 2018-08-31 A kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201811007817.6A CN108828377A (en) 2018-08-31 2018-08-31 A kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108828377A true CN108828377A (en) 2018-11-16

Family

ID=64151857

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201811007817.6A Pending CN108828377A (en) 2018-08-31 2018-08-31 A kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108828377A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111060221A (en) * 2019-12-31 2020-04-24 云领电气智能科技(苏州)有限公司 Transformer overheating fault early warning method based on cyclic neural network
CN114325495A (en) * 2021-12-20 2022-04-12 山东汇能电气有限公司 Operation protection method for distribution transformer based on loss comparison
CN114924209A (en) * 2022-04-18 2022-08-19 云南电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 Transformer winding deformation monitoring system and method

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103513125A (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-01-15 上海翔骋电气设备有限公司 Integrated intelligent diagnosis system and method of above-220KV transformers
CN104730378A (en) * 2015-02-13 2015-06-24 国家电网公司 Internal transformer composite-defect fuzzy diagnostic method based on gas dissolved in oil
CN105259435A (en) * 2015-09-23 2016-01-20 国网山东莒县供电公司 Transformer monitoring device and fault diagnosis method

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103513125A (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-01-15 上海翔骋电气设备有限公司 Integrated intelligent diagnosis system and method of above-220KV transformers
CN104730378A (en) * 2015-02-13 2015-06-24 国家电网公司 Internal transformer composite-defect fuzzy diagnostic method based on gas dissolved in oil
CN105259435A (en) * 2015-09-23 2016-01-20 国网山东莒县供电公司 Transformer monitoring device and fault diagnosis method

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
张炜: "基于状态评价及风险评估的变电设备状态检修方法研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库(电子期刊)》 *
武国亮等: "山西电网输变电状态监测中心的设计实现", 《山西电网》 *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111060221A (en) * 2019-12-31 2020-04-24 云领电气智能科技(苏州)有限公司 Transformer overheating fault early warning method based on cyclic neural network
CN114325495A (en) * 2021-12-20 2022-04-12 山东汇能电气有限公司 Operation protection method for distribution transformer based on loss comparison
CN114325495B (en) * 2021-12-20 2022-09-13 山东汇能电气有限公司 Operation protection method for distribution transformer based on loss comparison
CN114924209A (en) * 2022-04-18 2022-08-19 云南电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 Transformer winding deformation monitoring system and method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Li et al. Optimal dissolved gas ratios selected by genetic algorithm for power transformer fault diagnosis based on support vector machine
Ghoneim et al. A new approach of DGA interpretation technique for transformer fault diagnosis
Senoussaoui et al. Combining and comparing various machine‐learning algorithms to improve dissolved gas analysis interpretation
Abu-Siada et al. A new fuzzy logic approach for consistent interpretation of dissolved gas-in-oil analysis
Lin et al. Grey clustering analysis for incipient fault diagnosis in oil-immersed transformers
CN108875783A (en) A kind of extreme learning machine Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults towards unbalanced dataset
CN108828377A (en) A kind of Diagnosis Method of Transformer Faults
CN107132310B (en) Transformer equipment health status method of discrimination based on gauss hybrid models
Flores et al. Expert system for the assessment of power transformer insulation condition based on type-2 fuzzy logic systems
CN107907783A (en) Transformer fault integrated diagnostic system and diagnostic method based on fuzzy association rules
Guo et al. Transformer failure diagnosis using fuzzy association rule mining combined with case‐based reasoning
CN104655948A (en) Novel multistage fault diagnosis method for power transformer
CN109490685B (en) Early defect early warning method of transformer based on-line monitoring of dissolved gas in oil
WO2012029154A1 (en) Internal abnormality diagnosis method, internal abnormality diagnosis system, and decision tree generating method for internal abnormality diagnosis of oil-filled electric apparatus utilizing gas concentration in oil
CN110188309A (en) Oil-immersed power transformer defect method for early warning based on Hidden Markov Model
Zhao et al. A novel approach to transformer fault diagnosis using IDM and naive credal classifier
Gouda et al. Enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of DGA techniques based on IEC-TC10 and related databases
Dhote et al. Improvement in transformer diagnosis by DGA using fuzzy logic
CN107103361B (en) Transformer fault diagnosis method and system based on rough set and answer set
CN112183610A (en) Transformer fault prediction method and transformer fault prediction device
Bakar et al. Improvement of DGA interpretation using scoring index method
CN110059773A (en) A kind of compound diagnostic method of transformer fault
CN108845074B (en) State evaluation method for oil-immersed transformer
CN108508319A (en) Transformer fault kind identification method based on linked character between fault characteristic gases
MansourLakouraj et al. Event classification in active distribution grids using physics-informed graph neural network and PMU measurements

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20181116

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication