CN108288267B - Dark channel-based non-reference evaluation method for image definition of scanning electron microscope - Google Patents
Dark channel-based non-reference evaluation method for image definition of scanning electron microscope Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108288267B CN108288267B CN201810042657.2A CN201810042657A CN108288267B CN 108288267 B CN108288267 B CN 108288267B CN 201810042657 A CN201810042657 A CN 201810042657A CN 108288267 B CN108288267 B CN 108288267B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- image
- scanning electron
- electron microscope
- edge
- dark channel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 14
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 238000001000 micrograph Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 abstract description 12
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 abstract description 6
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/10—Segmentation; Edge detection
- G06T7/13—Edge detection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10056—Microscopic image
- G06T2207/10061—Microscopic image from scanning electron microscope
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30168—Image quality inspection
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Image Processing (AREA)
- Image Analysis (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a dark channel-based non-reference evaluation method for image definition of a scanning electron microscope, which comprises the following steps of: carrying out dark channel preprocessing on the original scanning electron microscope blurred image, calculating the edge of the preprocessed image again, carrying out enhanced denoising on the edge by using an edge-preserving filter based on weighted multiplication, and finally, taking the weighting of the maximum gradient and the average gradient as the quality fraction of the image according to the visual characteristics of human beings. The invention applies the dark channel to the quality evaluation of the scanning electron microscope image for the first time, and the performance of the proposed method is superior to that of the current typical fuzzy image quality evaluation method.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of image quality evaluation, in particular to a non-reference evaluation method for the image definition of a scanning electron microscope based on a dark channel.
Background
The scanning electron microscope images broaden human vision and provide a way for acquiring fine structure information. Various types of distortions can be caused in the process of acquiring the scanning electron microscope image, and the distortions directly influence the judgment of human beings on the researched object, so that the quality evaluation of the scanning electron microscope image has very important significance, but the quality evaluation of the scanning electron microscope image is not concerned at present. The definition of the scanning electron microscope image is the most important technical index in the imaging process, and generally, a clear image needs to be obtained by repeatedly adjusting imaging parameters and setting, which is time-consuming and labor-consuming, so that a method specially for evaluating the definition of the scanning electron microscope is urgently needed.
There are many methods for evaluating image sharpness, and these methods are described below.
Definition no-reference quality evaluation: some image blur evaluation algorithms have been proposed in recent years. The document Marziliano [1] et al first proposed to detect image edges with the Sobel operator and then calculate the edge width. Ferzli [2] et al propose Just Noticeable Blur (JNB) methods that can predict the relative blur amount of images of different contents by combining the concept of JNB with a probability sum model. Niranjan [3] et al, based on human fuzzy perception studies of different contrast values, calculate the fuzzy probability of each edge and propose a method for detecting fuzzy Cumulative Probability (CPBD), which improves the JNB method. Bahrami [4] et al in the literature define the maximum local difference (MLV) of each pixel as the maximum intensity difference of this pixel from its 8-neighborhood, and the standard deviation of the MLV distribution of each pixel is a representation of sharpness.
The methods are not designed aiming at the scanning electron microscope image, and the performance of the methods in the aspect of evaluating the quality of the scanning electron microscope image is not ideal through experiments, so that a method for specially evaluating the definition of the scanning electron microscope image is urgently needed.
[1]Marziliano P,Dufaux F,Winkler S,et al.Perceptual blur and ringing metrics:application to JPEG2000[J].Signal processing:Image communication,2004,19(2):163-172.
[2]Ferzli R,Karam L J.A no-reference objective image sharpness metric based on the notion of just noticeable blur(JNB)[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2009,18(4):717-728.
[3]Narvekar N D,Karam L J.A no-reference image blur metric based on the cumulative probability of blur detection(CPBD)[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2011,20(9):2678-2683.
[4]Bahrami K,Kot A C.A fast approach for no-reference image sharpness assessment based on maximum local variation[J].IEEE Signal Processing Letters,2014,21(6):751-755.
Disclosure of Invention
The purpose of the invention is as follows: the invention provides a method specially for evaluating the definition of a scanning electron microscope image, which aims at the problem that the existing definition evaluation method is not suitable for the scanning electron microscope image, and discloses a non-reference evaluation method for the definition of the scanning electron microscope image based on a dark channel.
The technical scheme is as follows: the technical scheme provided by the invention is as follows:
a non-reference evaluation method for the definition of a scanning electron microscope image based on a dark channel comprises the following steps:
(1) acquiring a scanning electron microscope blurred image I, and performing dark channel pretreatment on the I;
(2) extracting an edge image of the image subjected to dark channel preprocessing by using a Sobel edge operator;
(3) filtering the edge image by using an edge-preserving smoothing filter based on a weighted least square method;
(4) and weighting the maximum gradient and the average gradient of the filtered image to be used as an objective quality score for evaluating the scanning electron microscope blurred image I.
Further, the expression of performing dark channel preprocessing on the image I in the step (1) is as follows:
wherein, s (I) represents the image after the image I is subjected to dark channel preprocessing, and s (I), (t) represents the pixel value at the pixel point t in s (I); Ω (t) represents a window of m × m with the pixel point t as the center, and m is the width of the window; i (z) represents the pixel value at pixel point z in image I.
Further, the expression of the edge image extracted in step (2) is as follows:
g(x,y)=|Δxh(x,y)|+|Δyv(x,y)| (2)
Δxh(x,y)=s(x+1,y-1)+2s(x+1,y)+s(x+1,y+1)-s(x-1,y-1)-2s(x-1,y)-s(x-1,y+1)
Δyv(x,y)=s(x-1,y+1)+2s(x,y+1)+s(x+1,y+1)-s(x-1,y-1)-2s(x,y-1)-s(x+1,y-1)
wherein g represents an edge image, g (x, y) represents a pixel value at a pixel point (x, y) in the edge image g, and Δxh (x, y) and Δyv (x, y) represents the first derivative of the image s (i) in the horizontal direction and the first derivative in the vertical direction, respectively.
Further, the step (3) of filtering the edge image with an edge-preserving smoothing filter based on a weighted least square method specifically includes:
(4-1) constructing an objective function:
wherein u represents the target image, upRepresents the pixel value at a point p on the image u; λ is a regularization term parameter, axP (g) and ay,p(g) Respectively representing a smoothing weight in the horizontal direction and a smoothing weight in the vertical direction; l represents the logarithmic luminance channel of the edge image g; alpha is an exponent, and epsilon is a very small constant;
(4-2) converting the objective function into a matrix form:
in the formula, AxFor diagonal matrices containing smooth weights in the horizontal direction, AyIs a diagonal matrix containing smooth weights in the vertical direction; dxAnd DyRespectively a horizontal direction discrete difference operator and a vertical direction discrete difference operator;
(4-3) solving u which minimizes the objective function.
Further, the step of solving u that minimizes the objective function is:
let the objective function equal to 0, convert the objective function to:
(Q+λLg)u=g (5)
wherein L isgIs a five-point space anisotropic Laplacian matrix which is used for deriving a piecewise smooth adjustment graph from a sparse constraint set,is a reaction of with DxThe backward difference operator in the opposite direction is,is a reaction of with DyBackward difference operators in opposite directions; q is an identity matrix;
u can be calculated according to the formula (5).
Further, the maximum gradient and the average gradient of the image filtered in the step (4) are respectively as follows:
MG=max(u(x,y))
AG=(∑x,yu(x,y)/(w×h))
in the formula, MG and AG are the maximum gradient and average gradient of the filtered image respectively, and w and h are the length and width of the filtered image respectively;
the objective quality fraction of the scanning electron microscope blurred image I is as follows: iQA ═ MG × AG-α。
Has the advantages that: compared with the existing definition non-reference image quality evaluation method, the method provided by the invention has the advantages that the dark channel is used for the quality evaluation of the scanning electron microscope image for the first time, and the performance is obviously improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical scheme of the invention is further explained by combining the drawings and the embodiment.
The invention relates to a dark channel-based non-reference evaluation method for image definition of a scanning electron microscope. Because there is no scanning electron microscope image database, this embodiment first constructs a database with 650 scanning electron microscope images, obtains the subjective quality score of the image through subjective experiments, extracts 150 blurred images and their corresponding subjective quality scores from 650 scanning electron microscope images, then performs dark channel preprocessing on the original scanning electron microscope blurred image, calculates its edge on the preprocessed image again, uses an edge preserving filter based on weighted multiplication to perform enhanced denoising after obtaining the edge, and finally takes the weighting of the maximum gradient and the average gradient as the objective quality score of the image according to the human visual characteristics. The invention applies the dark channel to the image quality evaluation for the first time, and the performance of the proposed method is superior to that of the current typical fuzzy image quality evaluation method.
The invention will be further described with reference to fig. 1.
The method comprises the following steps: 150 scanning electron microscope blurred images IiI1, 2, … … 150, pair IiDark channel pre-processing is performed. For image IiThe dark channel is defined as:
s(Ii) (x) is the image after dark channel preprocessing; omega (t) represents a window of m multiplied by m with the pixel point t as the center, and m is most suitable for taking a value of 15 through experiments; min in the formula represents the minimum value operation;representing an image IiThe pixel value at pixel point z on the chrominance component c. Because the scanning electron microscopic images are all gray level images and only have one channel, the inventionI.e. the formula for the dark channel is:
step two: extracting an edge image of the image after dark channel preprocessing by using a Sobel edge operator:
gi(x,y)=|Δxhi(x,y)|+|Δyvi(x,y)|
Δxhi(x,y)=si(x+1,y-1)+2si(x+1,y)+si(x+1,y+1)-si(x-1,y-1)-2si(x-1,y)-si(x-1,y+1)
Δyvi(x,y)=si(x-1,y+1)+2si(x,y+1)+si(x+1,y+1)-si(x-1,y-1)-2si(x,y-1)-si(x+1,y-1)
in the formula, gi(x, y) denotes an edge image giPixel value, Δ, at the middle pixel point (x, y)xhi(x, y) and Δyvi(x, y) respectively denote the dark channel preprocessed image si(I) The first derivative in the horizontal direction and the first derivative in the vertical direction.
Step three: edge image g using edge-preserving smoothing filter based on weighted least square methodi(x, y) is enhanced while removing noise. For the input image giWe set the target image to ui. On the one hand, we want it to be as close as possible to giAt the same time, uiExcept that in giSome regions where the edge gradient changes more greatly should be as smooth as possible in their entirety. Therefore, the specific step of filtering the edge image by the edge-preserving smoothing filter based on the weighted least square method includes:
a solution is solved that minimizes the following objective function.
Wherein,
in the formula, the first term (u) of the objective functionip-gip)2For making the input image and the output image more similar, the better, the second term is a regular term, by minimizing uiSuch that the smoother the output image, the better. λ is a regularization term parameter, which balances the specific gravity of the two, and the larger λ is, the smoother the image is. The smoothed weights are each ax,p(gi) And ay,p(gi). Wherein liIs to be transportedInput image giThe logarithmic luminance channel of (a) is exponential and epsilon is a very small constant (typically 0.0001).
Writing the above equation in matrix form:
here, AixAnd AiyIs a diagonal matrix containing smoothing weights, DixAnd DiyIs a discrete difference operator.
Let the objective function equal to 0, convert the objective function to:
(Q+λLig)ui=gi
wherein L isigIs a five-point spatial anisotropic laplacian matrix,the method is mainly used for deriving a piecewise smoothing adjustment graph from a sparse constraint set;andis a backward difference operator.
Step four: and finally, weighting the maximum gradient and the average gradient of the filtered image to serve as the quality score of the evaluated image. The maximum and average gradients of the image are defined as:
MGi=max(ui(x,y))
AGi=(∑x,yui(x,y)/(wi×hi))
wherein, MGiAnd AGiThe maximum and average gradients of the image after filtering, w and h are the length and width of the filtered image, respectively.
Scanning electron microscope blurred image IiThe objective mass fraction of (a) is:
IQAi=MGi×AGi -α
experimental tests have shown that the results are optimal when alpha is 0.4366.
Experimental results and performance:
in order to verify the performance of the method provided by the invention, the objective quality score obtained by prediction in the embodiment is compared with the subjective quality score, namely whether the result obtained by the technical scheme is consistent with the human visual sense is judged. Since the objective quality score and the subjective quality score obtained by the implementation are nonlinear, the objective quality score is subjected to appropriate nonlinear transformation, namely, the image objective quality score is mapped to the same scale as the subjective quality score through a nonlinear fitting function. Usually, a five-parameter fitting function is selected, v is set to represent the objective quality score, and f (v) is expressed as follows:
wherein, tauiAnd i is 1,2,3,4 and 5 as fitting parameters.
After nonlinear fitting, three common indexes can be selected to judge the performance of the invention. Defining the subjective quality fraction and the objective quality fraction after nonlinear conversion of the ith scanning electron microscope image as kiAnd q isiThe calculation processes of the three indexes are described below.
(1) Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficient (PLCC):
wherein N represents the number of scanning electron microscope images,andrespectively representing N scanning electron microscope imagesThe subjective mass fraction mean and the objective mass fraction mean.
(2) Root Mean Square Error (RMSE):
(3) spearman correlation coefficient (SRCC):
wherein d isiShowing scanning Electron microscope image IiThe subjective quality score and the objective quality score of (1).
The performance of the technical scheme is judged from the two aspects of prediction accuracy and monotonicity by the three performance indexes, wherein PLCC and RMSE are indexes of the algorithm prediction accuracy, and the higher the PLCC and SRCC are, the higher the algorithm prediction accuracy is. The prediction monotonicity index of the checking algorithm is RMSE, the lower the RMSE is, the more consistent the algorithm can be kept with subjective evaluation, and the better the performance of the algorithm is on the whole.
Table 1 compares the performance of the present invention and 11 exemplary sharpness non-reference evaluation methods, the best performance being shown in bold for ease of viewing.
TABLE 1 Performance comparison of the method of the present invention and existing sharpness non-reference image quality evaluation algorithms
From the above table, we can obtain the obvious advantage of the proposed method compared with the existing typical sharpness non-reference image quality evaluation method, i.e. the PLCC/SRCC value is obviously higher than all methods, and the RMSE is the lowest.
The above description is only of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, and it should be noted that: it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and adaptations can be made without departing from the principles of the invention and these are intended to be within the scope of the invention.
Claims (3)
1. A non-reference evaluation method for the definition of a scanning electron microscope image based on a dark channel is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) acquiring a scanning electron microscope blurred image I, and performing dark channel pretreatment on the I;
wherein, s (I) represents the image after the image I is subjected to dark channel preprocessing, and s (I), (t) represents the pixel value at the pixel point t in s (I); Ω (t) represents a window of m × m with the pixel point t as the center, and m is the width of the window; i (z) represents the pixel value at pixel point z in image I;
(2) extracting an edge image of the image subjected to dark channel preprocessing by using a Sobel edge operator;
(3) filtering the edge image by using an edge-preserving smoothing filter based on a weighted least square method; the method comprises the following specific steps:
31) constructing an objective function:
wherein u represents the target image, upRepresents the pixel value at a point p on the image u; λ is a regularization term parameter, ax,p(g) And ay,p(g) Respectively representing the smoothing weight in the horizontal direction and the smoothing weight in the vertical directionWeighing; l represents the logarithmic luminance channel of the edge image g; alpha is an exponent, and epsilon is a very small constant;
32) converting the objective function to a matrix form:
in the formula, AxFor diagonal matrices containing smooth weights in the horizontal direction, AyIs a diagonal matrix containing smooth weights in the vertical direction; dxAnd DyRespectively a horizontal direction discrete difference operator and a vertical direction discrete difference operator;is a reaction of with DxThe backward difference operator in the opposite direction is,is a reaction of with DyBackward difference operators in opposite directions;
33) solving for u that minimizes the objective function;
(4) weighting the maximum gradient and the average gradient of the filtered image to be used as objective quality scores for evaluating the scanning electron microscope fuzzy image I; the maximum gradient and the average gradient of the filtered image are respectively:
MG=max(u(x,y))
AG=(∑x,yu(x,y)/(w×h))
in the formula, MG and AG are the maximum gradient and average gradient of the filtered image respectively, and w and h are the length and width of the filtered image respectively;
the objective quality fraction of the scanning electron microscope blurred image I is as follows: iQA ═ MG × AG-α。
2. The method for non-reference evaluation of the definition of a scanning electron microscope image based on a dark channel according to claim 1, wherein the edge image extracted in the step (2) has an expression as follows:
g(x,y)=|Δxh(x,y)+|Δyv(x,y)| (2)
Δxh(x,y)=s(x+1,y-1)+2s(x+1,y)+s(x+1,y+1)-s(x-1,y-1)-2s(x-1,y)-s(x-1,y+1)
Δyv(x,y)=s(x-1,y+1)+2s(x,y+1)+s(x+1,y+1)-s(x-1,y-1)-2s(x,y-1)-s(x+1,y-1)
wherein g represents an edge image, g (x, y) represents a pixel value at a pixel point (x, y) in the edge image g, and Δxh (x, y) and Δyv (x, y) represents the first derivative of the image s (i) in the horizontal direction and the first derivative in the vertical direction, respectively.
3. The method for non-reference evaluation of the definition of a scanning electron microscope image based on a dark channel according to claim 2, wherein the step of solving u that minimizes the objective function is:
let the objective function equal to 0, convert the objective function to:
(Q+λLg)u=g (5)
wherein L isgIs a five-point space anisotropic Laplacian matrix which is used for deriving a piecewise smooth adjustment graph from a sparse constraint set, is a reaction of with DxThe backward difference operator in the opposite direction is,is a reaction of with DyBackward difference operators in opposite directions; q is an identity matrix;
u is calculated according to equation (5).
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810042657.2A CN108288267B (en) | 2018-01-17 | 2018-01-17 | Dark channel-based non-reference evaluation method for image definition of scanning electron microscope |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810042657.2A CN108288267B (en) | 2018-01-17 | 2018-01-17 | Dark channel-based non-reference evaluation method for image definition of scanning electron microscope |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN108288267A CN108288267A (en) | 2018-07-17 |
CN108288267B true CN108288267B (en) | 2022-04-05 |
Family
ID=62835521
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201810042657.2A Active CN108288267B (en) | 2018-01-17 | 2018-01-17 | Dark channel-based non-reference evaluation method for image definition of scanning electron microscope |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN108288267B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111273581B (en) * | 2020-01-23 | 2021-11-09 | 深圳市大拿科技有限公司 | Control method of intelligent wardrobe and related product |
CN117934384A (en) * | 2023-12-28 | 2024-04-26 | 北京中科科仪光电科技有限公司 | Image quality evaluation method and device suitable for scanning electron microscope |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104637064A (en) * | 2015-02-28 | 2015-05-20 | 中国科学院光电技术研究所 | Defocus blurred image definition detection method based on edge intensity weight |
US20160071244A1 (en) * | 2014-09-04 | 2016-03-10 | National Taipei University Of Technology | Method and system for image haze removal based on hybrid dark channel prior |
CN106934770A (en) * | 2017-02-08 | 2017-07-07 | 中国矿业大学 | A kind of method and apparatus for evaluating haze image defog effect |
-
2018
- 2018-01-17 CN CN201810042657.2A patent/CN108288267B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160071244A1 (en) * | 2014-09-04 | 2016-03-10 | National Taipei University Of Technology | Method and system for image haze removal based on hybrid dark channel prior |
CN104637064A (en) * | 2015-02-28 | 2015-05-20 | 中国科学院光电技术研究所 | Defocus blurred image definition detection method based on edge intensity weight |
CN106934770A (en) * | 2017-02-08 | 2017-07-07 | 中国矿业大学 | A kind of method and apparatus for evaluating haze image defog effect |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN108288267A (en) | 2018-07-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10339643B2 (en) | Algorithm and device for image processing | |
JP5389903B2 (en) | Optimal video selection | |
CN107507173B (en) | No-reference definition evaluation method and system for full-slice image | |
CN101877127B (en) | Image reference-free quality evaluation method and system based on gradient profile | |
US8908989B2 (en) | Recursive conditional means image denoising | |
Zheng et al. | No-reference quality assessment for screen content images based on hybrid region features fusion | |
CN111932510B (en) | Method and device for determining image definition | |
Harb et al. | Improved image magnification algorithm based on Otsu thresholding | |
CN110796615A (en) | Image denoising method and device and storage medium | |
CN106651792B (en) | Method and device for removing stripe noise of satellite image | |
Smith et al. | Effect of pre-processing on binarization | |
CN111445058B (en) | Data analysis method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
CN108288267B (en) | Dark channel-based non-reference evaluation method for image definition of scanning electron microscope | |
CN108830829B (en) | Non-reference quality evaluation algorithm combining multiple edge detection operators | |
Das et al. | A comparative study of single image fog removal methods | |
US20120224783A1 (en) | Methods and Systems for Document-Image Correction | |
CN112651945A (en) | Multi-feature-based multi-exposure image perception quality evaluation method | |
CN114820394A (en) | Image noise filtering method and device based on robust parameter estimation | |
CN112819739A (en) | Scanning electron microscope image processing method and system | |
CN111445435A (en) | No-reference image quality evaluation method based on multi-block wavelet transform | |
CN115294035B (en) | Bright spot positioning method, bright spot positioning device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
CN115424107A (en) | Underwater pier apparent disease detection method based on image fusion and deep learning | |
CN115482178A (en) | Multi-focus image fusion method and system based on significant feature difference | |
CN114862762A (en) | Quality evaluation method and device for human body scanning image | |
Zhang et al. | Reduced-reference image quality assessment based on entropy differences in DCT domain |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |