CN108051142A - 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods - Google Patents

3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108051142A
CN108051142A CN201711245825.XA CN201711245825A CN108051142A CN 108051142 A CN108051142 A CN 108051142A CN 201711245825 A CN201711245825 A CN 201711245825A CN 108051142 A CN108051142 A CN 108051142A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
standard
standard test
measurement platform
centroid measurement
test weight
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201711245825.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108051142B (en
Inventor
陈勉
杜晨
赵科
徐在峰
王洪鑫
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Institute of Spacecraft Environment Engineering
Original Assignee
Beijing Institute of Spacecraft Environment Engineering
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Institute of Spacecraft Environment Engineering filed Critical Beijing Institute of Spacecraft Environment Engineering
Priority to CN201711245825.XA priority Critical patent/CN108051142B/en
Publication of CN108051142A publication Critical patent/CN108051142A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108051142B publication Critical patent/CN108051142B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M1/00Testing static or dynamic balance of machines or structures
    • G01M1/12Static balancing; Determining position of centre of gravity
    • G01M1/122Determining position of centre of gravity
    • G01M1/125Determining position of centre of gravity of aircraft

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Force Measurement Appropriate To Specific Purposes (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods, classification calibration is integrally carried out to barycenter test desk using the standard test weight through metering, then carry out torque accuracy calibrating according to 8 checking methods and weighing precision calibrating is carried out according to multi-times measurement method.The present invention had not only considered demarcates single sensor ignored coupling factor influence respectively, but also avoids frequently dismounting barycenter test desk, so as to improve calibration calibration accuracy and efficiency.

Description

3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods
Technical field
The invention belongs to spacecraft technical field of measurement and test, in particular it relates to which a kind of be used for 3 dynamometry The multistage integral calibrating method of formula centroid measurement platform.
Background technology
Mass property parameter is a series of object mechanics parameters related with quality.Mass property includes quality, matter Heart position, rotary inertia and the product of inertia compared with given coordinate system are the basic inherent characteristic ginsengs for describing product mechanical characteristic Number.In the development of spacecraft, it is necessary to by testing to determine these parameters, and must to the progress of these parameters according to design requirement The adjustment wanted.
3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platforms that the country uses at present measure the quality of spacecraft, centroid position.Three Point force-measuring type centroid measurement platform structure is as shown in 3 dynamometry barycenter platforms of patent 3*3 formulas.Since sensor becomes after stress Shape, with the increase of number of use, precision may decline, simultaneously because the high reliability request of space product is, it is necessary to periodically right Centroid measurement platform is demarcated, examined and determine, to verify whether its precision reaches original design accuracy.Wherein calibration refers to calculate and pass The code value coefficient of sensor, i.e., the variation of the indicating value (being also code value) after by standard quality pressure and the ratio of standard quality value.Inspection Surely refer to whether meet required precision by certain method validation centroid measurement platform indices.
The content of the invention
In order to verify whether 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform precision reach its nominal precision, the present inventor is whole with multistage Calibration technique demarcates barycenter test desk, and with 8 Calibration Technologies, torque accuracy determination method, weighing precision judgement side Method examines equipment precision, so as to complete the present invention.
Present invention employs following technical solutions:
3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods of the present invention, comprise the following steps:
1) after in 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platforms, installation is complete, first order calibration uses the standard test weight through metering, profit Positioned with central shaft, be placed on centroid measurement platform, calculate respectively the respective code value increment of three sensors and standard test weight and in The gross mass of mandrel (is denoted as m1) Mass Distribution on a sensor ratio, be less than m as when test specimen quality1When each sensor Calibration coefficient;It is equally positioned using central shaft using the standard test weight by metering when the second level is demarcated, is placed on the first order On standard test weight, the gross mass of the respective code value increment of three sensors and second level standard test weight and central shaft is calculated respectively (it is denoted as m2) Mass Distribution on a sensor ratio, be more than m as when test specimen quality1Less than m1+m2When each sensor mark Determine coefficient;And so on, calculate the 6th grade of calibration coefficient of sensor;
2) on the basis of the quality and eccentric moment that measure all standard test weights, with a standard rider, (quality is denoted as m0), It is placed sequentially on standard test weight eight and is distributed on radius as r0In calibration hole on reference circle, eight position riders are measured respectively The eccentric moment of generation;
3) with the eccentric moment measured value M of rideri(i=1,2,3 ..., 8) in 0.88m0r0To 1.12m0r0Between, sentence Fixed 8 points of calibrating eccentric moments size measurement is qualified, i.e., using 8 points of calibrating hole centers as the center of circle, radius r=0.12*r0For radius A circumference is drawn, does two tangent lines to the circumference from standard rotor center of circle O for starting point, the angle between two tangent lines is torque side To deviation allowed band, that is, torque direction is measured in αiIt is qualified in the range of ± 6.8 °;If torque size and direction are qualified, And m0r0Less than centroid measurement platform nominal torque accuracy, then its torque accuracy qualification is judged;
4) to choose the standard test weight of 10%~20% mass of centroid measurement platform range, duplicate measurements three times, measured value with Standard test weight metered mass maximum measured deviation is denoted as Δ mi(i=1,2,3);To choose centroid measurement platform range 80%~90% The standard test weight of quality, three times, measured value is denoted as Δ m with standard test weight metered mass maximum measured deviation for duplicate measurementsi(i= 4,5,6), if Δ mi(i=1 ... 6) is respectively less than the weighing precision of centroid measurement platform nominal, then judges its weighing precision qualification.
Wherein, αi=0 ° of+n × 45 ° n=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7.
The present invention had not only considered demarcates single sensor ignored coupling factor influence respectively, but also avoids confronting Heart test desk frequently dismounts, so as to improve calibration calibration accuracy and efficiency.
Specific embodiment
The specific embodiment of the present invention is described in detail below, which is exemplary, not It is intended to carry out any restriction to protection scope of the present invention.
3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods of the present invention are for existing 3 force-measuring type matter What heart test desk carried out, including multiple demarcating steps, specifically include procedure below:
Multistage entirety coefficient calibration:
1. measuring barycenter platform zero-bit, three sensor code values are respectively 0,0,0.
2. demarcate first order coefficient.
A) first order standard rotor is lifted into upper barycenter platform, central shaft positioning.
B) computer input rotor standard quality (axis containing centralized positioning) standard value m1=3000kg.
C) computer reads each sensor code value variation after instrument indicating value to be tested is stablized, and is respectively 992,990,1002.
D) each transducer calibration coefficient of the first order is calculated, is respectively 1.008064516 (=m13 ÷ 992 of ÷), 1.01010101 (=m13 ÷ 990 of ÷), 0.998003992 (=m1÷3÷1002)。
3. demarcate second level coefficient.
A) second level standard rotor is lifted on first order rotor, central shaft positioning.
B) rotor quality (axis containing centralized positioning) standard value m is inputted2=3003kg.
C) computer reads each sensor code value variation after instrument indicating value to be tested is stablized, and is respectively 997,993,1005.
D) each transducer calibration coefficient in the second level is calculated, is respectively 1.004012036 (=m23 ÷ 997 of ÷), 1.008056395 (=m23 ÷ 993 of ÷), 0.9960199 (=m2÷3÷1005)。
4. it is carried out successively until the 6th grade.
5. nominal data is deposited and printed.
6. all standard rotors are hung into barycenter platform.
8 Calibration Technologies:
A. computer enters 8 validation programs, measures barycenter platform zero-bit.Three sensor code values are respectively 0,0,0.
B. two standard rotor m are chosen1、m2, gross weight 6003kg, weight weighs the 10% of full scale in equipment (1700kg) in the range of 90% (15300kg), barycenter platform central shaft positions in lifting.
C. rotor quadrant is aligned with barycenter platform quadrant.
D. it is m to choose a quality0The rider of=0.4kg, travelling radius r0=0.5m by standard rotor upper Positioning holes position Put decision so that m0r0≤ M (centroid measurement platform nominal torque accuracy, 0.25kgm).
E. the quality of measurement standard rotor and eccentric moment value, deposit after being measured.
F. successively by rider be inserted into standard rotor on reference radius be 0.5m, positioned at 0 °, 45 °, 90 °, 135 °, 180 °, The location hole of eight on 225 °, 270 °, 315 °, and eccentric moment M is measured respectivelyi(i=1,2,3 ..., 8) are respectively M1= 0.194kgm, M2=0.198kgm, M3=0.212kgm, M4=0.203kgm, M1=0.198kgm, M1=0.189kgm, M1= 0.182kgm, M1=0.187kgm.Torque accuracy determination method:
A. eccentric moment measured value Mi(i=1,2,3 ..., 8) are in 0.88m0r0(=0.176) is to 1.12m0r0(= 0.224) between, 8 points of calibrating eccentric moment size measurements are qualified.
B. eccentric moment direction is respectively 4.5 °, 44.8 °, 90.2 °, 134.0 °, 179.3 °, 225.6 °, 269.8 °, 315.9 °, positioned in αi±6.8°(αi=0 °, 45 °, 90 °, 135 °, 180 °, 225 °, 270 °, 315 °) in the range of, 8 points of calibratings Eccentric moment orientation measurement is qualified.
C. all qualified then 8 points of calibratings are qualification to torque size and Orientation.
Weighing precision determination method:
A. one or a set of standard rotor is chosen, weight 3000kg weighs the 10%~20% of full scale in equipment, into Row is weighed, and is repeated 3 times, and records measured value, is respectively 3000.1kg, 2999.8kg, 3000.2kg.Calculate measured value and standard value Error amount Δ mi(i=1,2,3).
B. one or a set of standard rotor is chosen, weight 15003kg weighs full scale 80%~90% in equipment, into Row is weighed, and is repeated 3 times, and records measured value, is respectively 15002.8kg, 15003.1kg, 15003.3kg.Calculate measured value and mark The error amount Δ m of quasi- valuei(i=4,5,6).
C. as Δ mi(i=1 ... 6)≤Δ m (weighing precision of centroid measurement platform nominal is herein 0.5kg), weighing precision It is qualified.
Technical scheme is described in detail in embodiments described above, it should be understood that described above Only specific embodiments of the present invention are not intended to limit the invention, it is all done in the spirit of the present invention any repair Change, supplement or similar fashion substitute etc., should be included within the scope of the present invention.

Claims (2)

1. 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods, comprise the following steps:
1) after in 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platforms, installation is complete, first order calibration uses the standard test weight through metering, in utilization Mandrel positions, and is placed on centroid measurement platform, calculates the respective code value increment of three sensors and standard test weight and central shaft respectively Gross mass (be denoted as m1) Mass Distribution on a sensor ratio, be less than m as when test specimen quality1When each sensor mark Determine coefficient;It is equally positioned using central shaft using the standard test weight by metering when the second level is demarcated, is placed on first order standard On counterweight, the respective code value increment of three sensors and the gross mass of second level standard test weight and central shaft (note are calculated respectively Make m2) Mass Distribution on a sensor ratio, be more than m as when test specimen quality1Less than m1+m2When each sensor calibration Coefficient;And so on, calculate the 6th grade of calibration coefficient of sensor;
2) on the basis of the quality and eccentric moment that measure all standard test weights, with a standard rider, (quality is denoted as m0), it puts successively It puts on standard test weight eight and is distributed on radius as r0In calibration hole on reference circle, measure what eight position riders generated respectively Eccentric moment;
3) with the eccentric moment measured value M of rideri(i=1,2,3 ..., 8) in 0.88m0r0To 1.12m0r0Between, judge eight Point calibrating eccentric moment size measurement is qualified, i.e., using 8 points of calibrating hole centers as the center of circle, radius r=0.12*r0It is drawn for radius One circumference does two tangent lines for starting point from standard rotor center of circle O to the circumference, and the angle between two tangent lines is that torque direction is inclined Poor allowed band measures torque direction in αiIt is qualified in the range of ± 6.8 °;If torque size and direction are qualified, and m0r0Less than centroid measurement platform nominal torque accuracy, then its torque accuracy qualification is judged;
4) to choose the standard test weight of 10%~20% mass of centroid measurement platform range, duplicate measurements three times, measured value and standard Counterweight metered mass maximum measured deviation is denoted as Δ mi(i=1,2,3);To choose 80%~90% mass of centroid measurement platform range Standard test weight, three times, measured value and standard test weight metered mass maximum measured deviation are denoted as Δ m for duplicate measurementsi(i=4,5, 6), if Δ mi(i=1 ... 6) is respectively less than the weighing precision of centroid measurement platform nominal, then judges its weighing precision qualification.
2. the method for claim 1, wherein αi=0 ° of+n × 45 ° n=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7.
CN201711245825.XA 2017-11-30 2017-11-30 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods Active CN108051142B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711245825.XA CN108051142B (en) 2017-11-30 2017-11-30 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711245825.XA CN108051142B (en) 2017-11-30 2017-11-30 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108051142A true CN108051142A (en) 2018-05-18
CN108051142B CN108051142B (en) 2019-07-05

Family

ID=62121021

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201711245825.XA Active CN108051142B (en) 2017-11-30 2017-11-30 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108051142B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115752898A (en) * 2022-12-06 2023-03-07 深圳劢亚科技有限公司 High-precision mass and mass center testing device for satellite mass characteristic test
CN115931223A (en) * 2022-12-26 2023-04-07 二重(德阳)重型装备有限公司 High-precision mass center measurement process method for large special-shaped structural part

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101398339A (en) * 2008-10-23 2009-04-01 北京星达技术开发公司 Component quality characteristic integration test equipment and test method
CN101413840A (en) * 2007-12-27 2009-04-22 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 Device and method for measuring object mass center
CN103353374A (en) * 2013-07-10 2013-10-16 北京卫星环境工程研究所 3*3 type three-point dynamometric center-of-mass table system
EP2657670A1 (en) * 2012-04-24 2013-10-30 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Reference standard for calibrating a moment weight scale
CN103900763A (en) * 2012-12-28 2014-07-02 软控股份有限公司 Tire multistage rim unbalance calibration method
CN105092155A (en) * 2015-05-13 2015-11-25 长春理工大学 Calibration method for center of mass of revolving body

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101413840A (en) * 2007-12-27 2009-04-22 奇瑞汽车股份有限公司 Device and method for measuring object mass center
CN101398339A (en) * 2008-10-23 2009-04-01 北京星达技术开发公司 Component quality characteristic integration test equipment and test method
EP2657670A1 (en) * 2012-04-24 2013-10-30 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Reference standard for calibrating a moment weight scale
CN103900763A (en) * 2012-12-28 2014-07-02 软控股份有限公司 Tire multistage rim unbalance calibration method
CN103353374A (en) * 2013-07-10 2013-10-16 北京卫星环境工程研究所 3*3 type three-point dynamometric center-of-mass table system
CN105092155A (en) * 2015-05-13 2015-11-25 长春理工大学 Calibration method for center of mass of revolving body

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
杜晨 等: "卫星质量特性测试新方法研究", 《航天器护环境工程》 *
陈勉 等: "标准砝码计量误差对三点测力式质心台测量精度的影响", 《航天器环境工程》 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115752898A (en) * 2022-12-06 2023-03-07 深圳劢亚科技有限公司 High-precision mass and mass center testing device for satellite mass characteristic test
CN115931223A (en) * 2022-12-26 2023-04-07 二重(德阳)重型装备有限公司 High-precision mass center measurement process method for large special-shaped structural part
CN115931223B (en) * 2022-12-26 2024-05-28 二重(德阳)重型装备有限公司 High-precision centroid measurement process method for large special-shaped structural member

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108051142B (en) 2019-07-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6431550B2 (en) How to determine the amount of unbalance in the rotor
CN102175297B (en) Method and system for checking precision of electronic belt scale
CN108051142B (en) 3 force-measuring type centroid measurement platform multistage integral calibrating methods
CN104990670B (en) A kind of method of adjustment of main shaft Built-in mechanical on-line dynamic balancing system
CN106990263B (en) The test method and device of accelerometer resolution ratio
CN108613730A (en) A kind of production line dynamic weighing online calibration method
CN109115408B (en) Dynamic balance test method of large hydroelectric generating set based on centrifugal force equation
CN107091713A (en) Can Moving master body and center mass measuring device calibration method
CN104697712B (en) A kind of revolving body workpieces barycenter method of inspection
CN105092155A (en) Calibration method for center of mass of revolving body
CN107102172B (en) The test method and device of accelerometer resolution ratio
CN107101800B (en) Wind power measuring equipment and method for power transmission iron tower model
CN105466631B (en) A kind of calibration method and calibrating installation of piston gage piston effective area
CN109871658A (en) The multi-pose optimal estimation method measured for guided missile warhead rotary inertia and the product of inertia
CN106289492B (en) A kind of counterweight magnitude component combination checking method
JP5191520B2 (en) Weight measuring device
CN110319910B (en) Belt scale automatic code adding online checking method and checking system thereof
CN106226066B (en) A kind of calibration method of tracking-driven elevator coefficient of balance detector
CN210293395U (en) Automatic code adding on-line checking system of belt scale
CN110686997A (en) Calibration method of abrasion resistance tester
CN104316157A (en) Method for automatically monitoring indication error changes of belt weighers in blending ore accumulation system
CN114413931B (en) I angle measuring method of horizontal alignment accompany detector
CN109353937A (en) A kind of container front side weighing system of crane
Li et al. Analysis of the piston pressure gauge factor
CN111521253A (en) Precision detection method for aircraft weighing instrument system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Chen Mian

Inventor after: Du Chen

Inventor after: Zhao Ke

Inventor after: Yan Rongxin

Inventor after: Zhang Jungang

Inventor after: Xu Zaifeng

Inventor after: Wang Hongxin

Inventor before: Chen Mian

Inventor before: Du Chen

Inventor before: Zhao Ke

Inventor before: Xu Zaifeng

Inventor before: Wang Hongxin

CB03 Change of inventor or designer information
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant