CN107464096A - A kind of systems, devices and methods of project management - Google Patents

A kind of systems, devices and methods of project management Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN107464096A
CN107464096A CN201710649852.7A CN201710649852A CN107464096A CN 107464096 A CN107464096 A CN 107464096A CN 201710649852 A CN201710649852 A CN 201710649852A CN 107464096 A CN107464096 A CN 107464096A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
unit
scoring
project
expert
project management
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201710649852.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
蒲兰芝
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hefei Zhe Cheng Project Management Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Hefei Zhe Cheng Project Management Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hefei Zhe Cheng Project Management Co Ltd filed Critical Hefei Zhe Cheng Project Management Co Ltd
Priority to CN201710649852.7A priority Critical patent/CN107464096A/en
Publication of CN107464096A publication Critical patent/CN107464096A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/103Workflow collaboration or project management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of system of project management, including:Database Unit, project control unit, display unit and automatic scoring unit, project is scored by automatic scoring unit, project control unit includes technocracy unit, project management unit, scoring administrative unit, examination & verification administrative unit and searching and managing unit, scoring administrative unit is scored destination item by the corresponding expert of technocracy unit selection, and contrasted with automatic scoring unit, the invention also discloses the device using said system and the application method of said system.The system can select expert's art to carry out product point to project with domain expert similar in project by technocracy unit, so that the evaluation result of project is more accurate, and the system can be by being contrasted between Auto-Evaluation System and expert analysis mode, judge the error of expert analysis mode, substantially increase the feasibility of the project implementation.

Description

A kind of systems, devices and methods of project management
Technical field
The present invention relates to project management field, specifically a kind of systems, devices and methods of project management.
Background technology
Project management is at present an emerging subject in China, and mainly project under construction is managed, avoids project Occur potential dangerous and cause evitable loss occurrence, project management at present China application than wide, also by The welcome of people, improve construction quality and avoid risk.
But existing project management system is in use, typically project implementation is scored by expert Evaluation, in practical operation, art and the project of expert are not close to, and cause the evaluation result of project not accurate enough, separately Outside, existing project management system can only be scored project by expert, real when the appraisal result of expert is not accurate enough There is potential danger in the project of applying, be unfavorable for protecting the personal safety of people.
The content of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide a kind of systems, devices and methods of project management, to solve above-mentioned background skill The problem of being proposed in art.
To achieve the above object, the present invention provides following technical scheme:
A kind of system of project management, including:
Database Unit, standard and automatic scoring system are used for storing expert info, scoring criterion and corresponding scoring The relative program and standard that system uses;The expert info includes special edition essential information and corresponding art;It is described from The relative program and standard that dynamic points-scoring system uses also include relevant parameter required during automatic scoring.
Project control unit, it includes technocracy unit, project management unit, scoring administrative unit, examination & verification management list Member and searching and managing unit, wherein:
Display unit, it is used for the relevant information and art that show expert in the technocracy unit;Project The relevant information of administrative unit;The auditing result of appraisal result and examination & verification administrative unit in the administrative unit that scores;
Power supply unit, it is used for system power supply, connects municipal circuit socket;
Automatic scoring unit, in addition to the relative program that uses of storage system and Auto-Evaluation System and standard, it is used for The destination item in project management unit is scored automatically in itself using system according to the program of correlation and standard, and according to Display unit shows appraisal result;
Comparative analysis unit, it is used to the result of scoring administrative unit and automatic scoring unit be analyzed, looked into See the error of relevant scoring.
As the further scheme of the present invention:Technocracy unit, including Procedure for selection, it is used for according to Database Unit In expert info and art project is evaluated from corresponding expert;
Project management unit, it is used for multiple project storages in systems, for choosing destination item therein, to project It is managed evaluation;
Score administrative unit, and it is used for according to the expert chosen in technocracy unit, to the mesh in project management unit Mark project scores destination item according to certain points-scoring system and criterion;
Administrative unit is audited, its appraisal result being used in scoring administrative unit, is audited, checked according to standard Whether destination item meets national corresponding policy of the law and rules and regulations;
Searching and managing unit, it is used for client and the auditing result in examination & verification administrative unit is inquired about, is convenient for people to Understand the associated schedule of destination item.
A kind of device of project management, include the system of above-mentioned project management.
A kind of method of project management, the system of above-mentioned project management, is concretely comprised the following steps:
S1, build Database Unit;
S2, using technocracy unit the expert of Database Unit memory storage is screened, chosen and project fields phase Near or identical expert;
S3, project management unit are used to choose destination item;
Corresponding scoring model is chosen in S4, scoring administrative unit, if expert analysis mode, if choosing is, using in step S The expert of selection scores the destination item in step S;
The scoring of S5, examination & verification administrative unit to expert is audited, and checks whether destination item meets the corresponding method of country Restrain policy and regulation system;
S6, auditing result and associated schedule for inquiring about destination item according to searching and managing unit;
In S7, step S whether expert analysis mode, if selection is no, the destination item in step S is entered using automatic scoring unit Row scoring;
S8, contrasted by the appraisal result in step S and the appraisal result in step S, if error is larger, error Small, then direct output result, error is big, then destination item is scored again using expert again by scoring administrative unit.
Compared with prior art, the beneficial effects of the invention are as follows:
The system can select expert's art with domain expert similar in project to project by technocracy unit Carry out product point so that the evaluation result of project is more accurate, and the system can by Auto-Evaluation System and expert analysis mode it Between contrasted, judge the error of expert analysis mode, substantially increase the feasibility of the project implementation.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the system principle diagram of project management.
Fig. 2 is the method flow diagram of project management.
In figure, 1- Database Unit;2- data updating units;3- project control units;4- display units;5- power supplies are single Member;6- automatic scoring units;7- comparative analysis units;31- technocracy units;32- project management units;33- scoring management Unit;34- audits administrative unit;35- searching and managing units.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in the embodiment of the present invention, the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention is carried out clear, complete Site preparation describes, it is clear that described embodiment is only part of the embodiment of the present invention, rather than whole embodiments.It is based on Embodiment in the present invention, those of ordinary skill in the art are obtained every other under the premise of creative work is not made Embodiment, belong to the scope of protection of the invention.
Referring to Fig. 1, in the embodiment of the present invention, a kind of system of project management, including:
Database Unit 1, standard and automatic scoring system are used for storing expert info, scoring criterion and corresponding scoring The relative program and standard that system uses;The expert info includes special edition essential information and corresponding art;It is described from The relative program and standard that dynamic points-scoring system uses also include relevant parameter required during automatic scoring.
Project control unit 3, it includes technocracy unit 31, project management unit 32, scoring administrative unit 33, examination & verification Administrative unit 34 and searching and managing unit 35, wherein:
Technocracy unit 31, including Procedure for selection, its expert info being used in Database Unit 1 and affiliated Project is evaluated from corresponding expert in field;
Project management unit 32, it is used for multiple project storages in systems, for choosing destination item therein, to item Mesh is managed evaluation;
Score administrative unit 33, and it is used for according to the expert chosen in technocracy unit 31, to project management unit 32 In destination item destination item is scored according to certain points-scoring system and criterion;
Administrative unit 34 is audited, its appraisal result being used in scoring administrative unit 33, is audited according to standard, Check whether destination item meets national corresponding policy of the law and rules and regulations;
Searching and managing unit 35, it is used for client and the auditing result in examination & verification administrative unit 34 is inquired about, convenient People understand the associated schedule of destination item;
Display unit 4, it is used for the relevant information and art that show expert in the technocracy unit 31; The relevant information of mesh administrative unit 32;The auditing result of appraisal result and examination & verification administrative unit 34 in the administrative unit 33 that scores;
Power supply unit 5, it is used for system power supply, connects municipal circuit socket;
Automatic scoring unit 6, in addition to the relative program that uses of storage system and Auto-Evaluation System and standard, it is used for The destination item in project management unit 32 is scored automatically in itself using system according to the program of correlation and standard, and root Appraisal result is shown according to display unit 4;
Comparative analysis unit 7, it is used to carry out to score the result of scoring administrative unit 33 and automatic scoring unit 6 Analysis, check the error of relevant scoring.
In the present invention, the system of the project management also includes data updating unit 2, and it is used for user data update Stored into the Database Unit 1;
Present invention also offers a kind of device of project management, include the system of above-mentioned project management.The device Can be mobile phone, PC, tablet personal computer.
Referring to Fig. 2, a kind of method of project management, includes the system of above-mentioned project management, concretely comprises the following steps:
S1, build Database Unit 1;
S2, using technocracy unit 31 expert of the memory storage of Database Unit 1 is screened, chosen and project fields Close or identical expert;
S3, project management unit 32 are used to choose destination item;
Corresponding scoring model is chosen in S4, scoring administrative unit 33, if expert analysis mode, if it is to utilize step to choose The expert chosen in S2 scores the destination item in step S3;
The scoring of S5, examination & verification administrative unit 34 to expert is audited, and it is national corresponding to check whether destination item meets Policy of the law and rules and regulations;
S6, auditing result and associated schedule for inquiring about destination item according to searching and managing unit 35;
In S7, step S4 whether expert analysis mode, if selection is no, using automatic scoring unit 6 to the target item in step S3 Mesh is scored;
S8, contrasted by the appraisal result in step S4 and the appraisal result in step S7, if error is larger, by mistake Difference is small, then direct output result, and error is big, then destination item is commented again using expert again by scoring administrative unit 33 Point.
It is obvious to a person skilled in the art that the invention is not restricted to the details of above-mentioned one exemplary embodiment, Er Qie In the case of without departing substantially from spirit or essential attributes of the invention, the present invention can be realized in other specific forms.Therefore, no matter From the point of view of which point, embodiment all should be regarded as exemplary, and be nonrestrictive, the scope of the present invention is by appended power Profit requires rather than described above limits, it is intended that all in the implication and scope of the equivalency of claim by falling Change is included in the present invention.Any reference in claim should not be considered as to the involved claim of limitation.
Moreover, it will be appreciated that although the present specification is described in terms of embodiments, not each embodiment is only wrapped Containing an independent technical scheme, this narrating mode of specification is only that those skilled in the art should for clarity Using specification as an entirety, the technical solutions in the various embodiments may also be suitably combined, forms those skilled in the art It is appreciated that other embodiment.

Claims (4)

  1. A kind of 1. system of project management, it is characterised in that including:
    Database Unit, made for storing expert info, scoring criterion and scoring accordingly using standard and Auto-Evaluation System Relative program and standard;The expert info includes special edition essential information and corresponding art;It is described to comment automatically The relative program and standard that subsystem uses also include relevant parameter required during automatic scoring;
    Project control unit, it include technocracy unit, project management unit, scoring administrative unit, examination & verification administrative unit and Searching and managing unit, wherein:
    Display unit, it is used for the relevant information and art that show expert in the technocracy unit;Project management The relevant information of unit;The auditing result of appraisal result and examination & verification administrative unit in the administrative unit that scores;
    Power supply unit, it is used for system power supply, connects municipal circuit socket;
    Automatic scoring unit, in addition to the relative program that uses of storage system and Auto-Evaluation System and standard, it is used for basis Related program and standard is scored the destination item in project management unit automatically in itself using system, and according to display Unit shows appraisal result;
    Comparative analysis unit, it is used to the result of scoring administrative unit and automatic scoring unit be analyzed, and checks phase Close the error of scoring.
  2. A kind of 2. system of project management according to claim 1, it is characterised in that
    Technocracy unit, including Procedure for selection, its expert info being used in Database Unit and art choosing Project is evaluated with corresponding expert;
    Project management unit, it is used for multiple project storages in systems, for choosing destination item therein, project is carried out Administrative evaluation;
    Score administrative unit, and it is used for according to the expert chosen in technocracy unit, to the target item in project management unit Mesh scores destination item according to certain points-scoring system and criterion;
    Administrative unit is audited, its appraisal result being used in scoring administrative unit, is audited according to standard, checks target Whether project meets national corresponding policy of the law and rules and regulations;
    Searching and managing unit, it is used for client and the auditing result in examination & verification administrative unit is inquired about, is convenient for people to understand The associated schedule of destination item.
  3. 3. a kind of device of project management, it is characterised in that including the project management as described in one of claim 1-2 System.
  4. A kind of 4. method of project management, it is characterised in that including the project management as described in one of claim 1-2 System, concretely comprise the following steps:
    S1, build Database Unit;
    S2, using technocracy unit the expert of Database Unit memory storage is screened, choose it is close with project fields or Identical expert;
    S3, project management unit are used to choose destination item;
    Corresponding scoring model is chosen in S4, scoring administrative unit, if expert analysis mode, if choosing is, using being chosen in step S Expert the destination item in step S is scored;
    The scoring of S5, examination & verification administrative unit to expert is audited, and checks whether destination item meets national corresponding law political affairs Plan and rules and regulations;
    S6, auditing result and associated schedule for inquiring about destination item according to searching and managing unit;
    In S7, step S whether expert analysis mode, if selection is no, the destination item in step S is commented using automatic scoring unit Point;
    S8, being contrasted by the appraisal result in step S and the appraisal result in step S, if error is larger, and error is small, Then direct output result, error is big, then destination item is scored again using expert again by scoring administrative unit.
CN201710649852.7A 2017-08-02 2017-08-02 A kind of systems, devices and methods of project management Pending CN107464096A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710649852.7A CN107464096A (en) 2017-08-02 2017-08-02 A kind of systems, devices and methods of project management

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710649852.7A CN107464096A (en) 2017-08-02 2017-08-02 A kind of systems, devices and methods of project management

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN107464096A true CN107464096A (en) 2017-12-12

Family

ID=60547329

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201710649852.7A Pending CN107464096A (en) 2017-08-02 2017-08-02 A kind of systems, devices and methods of project management

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN107464096A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108629518A (en) * 2018-05-08 2018-10-09 广西柳州市三集科技有限公司 A kind of engineering management promotion service system Internet-based
CN111754058A (en) * 2019-03-29 2020-10-09 上海忆尧信息技术有限公司 Project management system based on project audit
CN111798203A (en) * 2020-06-19 2020-10-20 中建一局集团建设发展有限公司 Block chain-based engineering construction achievement evaluation method and system

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105956817A (en) * 2016-07-22 2016-09-21 深圳市赛普爱德科技股份有限公司 Bidding management method for purchase supplier
CN106815663A (en) * 2015-11-28 2017-06-09 刘瑛 A kind of brand names management system and management value appraisal procedure
CN106886937A (en) * 2017-02-14 2017-06-23 克拉玛依融信智有信息技术有限责任公司 A kind of bidding management system
CN106886862A (en) * 2017-04-15 2017-06-23 湖南新邦软件股份有限公司 One kind bid and purchase management system and method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106815663A (en) * 2015-11-28 2017-06-09 刘瑛 A kind of brand names management system and management value appraisal procedure
CN105956817A (en) * 2016-07-22 2016-09-21 深圳市赛普爱德科技股份有限公司 Bidding management method for purchase supplier
CN106886937A (en) * 2017-02-14 2017-06-23 克拉玛依融信智有信息技术有限责任公司 A kind of bidding management system
CN106886862A (en) * 2017-04-15 2017-06-23 湖南新邦软件股份有限公司 One kind bid and purchase management system and method

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108629518A (en) * 2018-05-08 2018-10-09 广西柳州市三集科技有限公司 A kind of engineering management promotion service system Internet-based
CN111754058A (en) * 2019-03-29 2020-10-09 上海忆尧信息技术有限公司 Project management system based on project audit
CN111798203A (en) * 2020-06-19 2020-10-20 中建一局集团建设发展有限公司 Block chain-based engineering construction achievement evaluation method and system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Turner et al. The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia
Welle Donker et al. How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem?
Funk et al. Securing the climate benefits of stable forests
US9038014B2 (en) Intelligently recommending schemas based on user input
CN103383263B (en) Interactive dynamic cloud navigation system
CN107464096A (en) A kind of systems, devices and methods of project management
CN104361139A (en) Data importing device and method
CN107844425A (en) A kind of database statement inspection method and device
Mallinson et al. Policy and political learning: The development of medical marijuana policies in the states
US20100250313A1 (en) Systems and methods for enforcing fiduciary compliance
KR101917038B1 (en) Device of reference document integration management and procedure display for making nuclear power plant commissioning procedures
CN101354776A (en) Method and system for generating emergency scheme based on GIS platform
Domingues et al. New organisational issues and macroergonomics: integrating management systems
CN106022625A (en) Pig farm information management system and method
CN106202507A (en) Electric power first-aid rehearsal analogue system and method
CN110110072A (en) A kind of method, system, terminal and storage medium generating interactive electronic handbook
Ambler Scaling agile software development through lean governance
CN105138636B (en) Graph construction method and device for entity relationship
Gong Understanding institutional shareholder activism: A comparative study of the UK and China
CN103442016B (en) The method and system of white list are pushed based on website fingerprint
CN110516909B (en) Urban and rural resource management system based on big data analysis
Halbwirth et al. Information, knowledge and the organization of the Olympic Games
Cappelli¹ et al. Managing transparency guided by a maturity model
Gibson et al. Learning from error: Leading a culture of safety
Font et al. Environmental management systems in outdoor recreation: a case study of a forest enterprise (UK) site

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20171212

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication