CN107180161B - Stratum contrast result integration method and device - Google Patents
Stratum contrast result integration method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107180161B CN107180161B CN201710512816.6A CN201710512816A CN107180161B CN 107180161 B CN107180161 B CN 107180161B CN 201710512816 A CN201710512816 A CN 201710512816A CN 107180161 B CN107180161 B CN 107180161B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- result
- layering
- combination
- results
- comparison
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 52
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 35
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 35
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005055 memory storage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16Z—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G16Z99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other main groups of this subclass
Landscapes
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
The embodiment of the application discloses a stratum comparison result integration method and device. The method is provided with at least two stratum contrast result sets, wherein each stratum contrast result set comprises at least one layering result, and each layering result comprises a contrast position and a certainty value corresponding to the contrast position; the method comprises the following steps: setting a corresponding weight value for each stratum comparison result set; grouping the layering results in each stratum comparison result set to obtain at least one layering result combination; integrating each layering result combination based on the weight value and the determined value to obtain combined layering results respectively corresponding to each layering result combination; wherein each of the merged results comprises: and combining the comparison positions and the combination certainty values corresponding to the combination comparison positions. According to the technical scheme, the reliability of the stratum contrast result can be improved.
Description
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to technologies for integrating formation comparison results, and particularly, to a method and an apparatus for integrating formation comparison results.
Background
In the stratum contrast process, a plurality of possible contrast positions can be determined on a well with uncertain layering positions in a section by a stratum contrast method based on uncertainty, one contrast position corresponds to one certainty value, and the plurality of contrast positions and the certainty values thereof can be respectively used as different layering results, namely a stratum contrast result set. Since a stratigraphic comparison result set is obtained by a single geological researcher and may be influenced by personal subjective factors, only the stratigraphic comparison result set is used as a final stratigraphic comparison result, which may cause the reliability of the determined stratigraphic comparison result to be reduced, and further influence subsequent geological work.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the application aims to provide a method and a device for integrating formation comparison results so as to improve the reliability of the formation comparison results.
In order to solve the above technical problem, an embodiment of the present application provides a method and an apparatus for integrating formation comparison results, which are implemented as follows:
a stratum contrast result integration method is provided with at least two stratum contrast result sets, wherein each stratum contrast result set comprises at least one layering result, and each layering result comprises a contrast position and a certainty value corresponding to the contrast position; the method comprises the following steps:
setting a corresponding weight value for each stratum comparison result set;
grouping the layering results in each stratum comparison result set to obtain at least one layering result combination;
integrating each layering result combination based on the weight value and the determined value to obtain combined layering results respectively corresponding to each layering result combination; wherein each of the merged results comprises: and combining the comparison positions and the combination certainty values corresponding to the combination comparison positions.
In a preferred embodiment, the grouping the layered results in each stratum contrast result set to obtain at least one layered result combination includes:
based on the comparison position of the layering result, sequencing the layering result according to a preset depth sequence;
calculating the distance between the comparison positions of any two adjacent layered results in the sorted results;
grouping the layering results based on the distance and a specified first distance threshold to obtain at least one layering result combination; wherein a distance between two closest hierarchical results in any two adjacent hierarchical result combinations is greater than the specified first distance threshold.
In a preferred embodiment, the grouping the layered results based on the distance and a specified first distance threshold to obtain at least one layered result combination includes:
for two adjacent hierarchical results, when the distance between the two adjacent hierarchical results is greater than the specified first distance threshold, dividing the two adjacent hierarchical results into the same hierarchical result combination; when the distance between the two adjacent hierarchical results is less than or equal to the specified first distance threshold, the two adjacent hierarchical results are divided into two different hierarchical result combinations.
In a preferred embodiment, the preset first distance threshold is 1 meter.
In a preferred embodiment, the grouping the layered results in each stratum contrast result set to obtain at least one layered result combination further includes:
and traversing each layering result combination, and if the maximum intra-group distance in the current layering result combination is greater than or equal to a specified second distance threshold, splitting the current layering result combination to obtain a splitting set corresponding to the current layering result combination, wherein the splitting set comprises at least two sub-layering result combinations, and each sub-layering result combination is a subset of the current layering result combination.
In a preferred embodiment, the splitting processing on the current hierarchical result combination to obtain a splitting set corresponding to the current hierarchical result combination includes:
and splitting the current layering result combination so that the obtained splitting combination comprises the maximum intra-group distance of any sub-layering result combination in at least two sub-layering result combinations, which is smaller than a specified second distance threshold value.
In a preferred embodiment, when the splitting processing is performed on the current layering result combination at least twice, the splitting sets with the least number of sub-layering result combinations are combined into the splitting set corresponding to the current layering result combination.
In a preferred embodiment, the preset second distance threshold is 2 meters.
In a preferred embodiment, the integrating, based on the weight value and the certainty value, each of the hierarchical result combinations to obtain a merged hierarchical result corresponding to each of the hierarchical result combinations includes:
calculating the average value of the stratum depth at the comparison position of each layering result in the designated layering result combination aiming at any designated layering result combination in each layering result combination, and taking the average value as the stratum depth at the combination comparison position of the combined layering result corresponding to the layering result combination;
calculating the sum of the weighted certainty values of each layering result in the appointed layering result combination aiming at any appointed layering result combination in each layering result combination, and taking the sum of the weighted certainty values as the combined certainty value of the combined layering result corresponding to the appointed layering result combination; the weighted certainty value is the product of the weight value and the certainty value of a hierarchical result in the designated hierarchical result combination.
The stratum contrast result integration device is used for providing at least two stratum contrast result sets, wherein each stratum contrast result set comprises at least one layering result, and each layering result comprises a contrast position and a determination value corresponding to the contrast position; the formation comparison result integrating device comprises: the device comprises a weight value setting module, a grouping processing module and an integration processing module; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the weight value setting module is used for setting a corresponding weight value for each stratum comparison result set;
the grouping processing module is used for grouping the layering results in each stratum comparison result set to obtain at least one layering result combination;
the integration processing module is configured to perform integration processing on each of the hierarchical result combinations based on the weight values and the certainty values to obtain merged hierarchical results corresponding to each of the hierarchical result combinations; wherein each of the merged results comprises: and combining the comparison positions and the combination certainty values corresponding to the combination comparison positions.
In a preferred embodiment, the packet processing module includes: the device comprises a sorting module, a distance calculation module and a layering result combination determination module; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the sorting module is used for sorting the layering results according to a preset depth sequence based on the comparison positions of the layering results;
the distance calculation module is used for calculating the distance between the comparison positions of any two adjacent layered results in the sorted results;
the layering result combination determining module is used for grouping the layering results based on the distance and a specified first distance threshold value to obtain at least one layering result combination; wherein a distance between two closest hierarchical results in any two adjacent hierarchical result combinations is greater than the specified first distance threshold.
In a preferred embodiment, the integrated processing module includes: a merging comparison position determining module and a merging certainty value determining module; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the merging comparison position determining module is used for calculating the average value of the stratum depths at the comparison positions of each layering result in the specified layering result combination aiming at any specified layering result combination in each layering result combination, and taking the average value as the stratum depth at the merging comparison positions of the merging layering results corresponding to the layering result combination;
the merging certainty value determining module is used for calculating the sum of the weighted certainty values of each layering result in the appointed layering result combination aiming at any appointed layering result combination in each layering result combination, and taking the sum of the weighted certainty values as the merging certainty value of the merging layering result corresponding to the appointed layering result combination; the weighted certainty value is the product of the weight value and the certainty value of a hierarchical result in the designated hierarchical result combination.
The embodiment of the application provides a method and a device for integrating stratum comparison results, which can set a corresponding weight value for each stratum comparison result set; grouping the layering results in each stratum comparison result set to obtain at least one layering result combination; based on the weight values and the certainty values, the combination of the layering results can be integrated, and merged layering results respectively corresponding to the combination of the layering results can be obtained; wherein each of the merged hierarchical results may include: and combining the comparison positions and the combination certainty values corresponding to the combination comparison positions. Therefore, a plurality of stratum comparison result sets of a plurality of geological researchers are comprehensively considered, the influence of individual subjective factors of a single geological researcher can be avoided, and the reliability of the stratum comparison result is improved.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings needed to be used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments described in the present application, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without any creative effort.
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a plurality of stratigraphic comparison result sets in an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a formation comparison result integration method of the present application;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the merged results of the integration process in the embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an embodiment of an apparatus for integrating formation comparison results according to the present application;
FIG. 5 is an embodiment of a stratigraphic comparison result integration apparatus of the present application;
FIG. 6 is an embodiment of a stratigraphic comparison result integration apparatus of the present application.
Detailed Description
The embodiment of the application provides a stratum comparison result integration method and device.
In order to make those skilled in the art better understand the technical solutions in the present application, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.
The application provides a formation comparison result integration method, wherein the method can provide at least two formation comparison result sets. Each stratum contrast result set can comprise at least one layering result, and each layering result can comprise a contrast position and a certainty value corresponding to the contrast position.
In one embodiment, the one stratigraphic comparison result set may be obtained by an uncertainty-based stratigraphic comparison method. In particular, during formation mapping, a plurality of possible mapping locations may be determined at a well whose stratigraphic position in the profile is uncertain. A plurality of said contrast locations may be assigned quantitative certainty values. For example, in a formation mapping process, when a well is encountered with an uncertainty in the layered location, several possible mapping locations may be set up on the well, and each mapping location may be assigned a quantitative (e.g., 0.1, 0.5, 0.8, etc.) certainty value. A comparison location and its corresponding certainty value may be used as a hierarchical result. Thus, a plurality of stratigraphic comparison result sets can be obtained based on the stratigraphic comparison method of uncertainty. A stratigraphic comparison result set may include: at least one hierarchical result.
In one embodiment, when a stratigraphic comparison result set includes a single layered result, the comparison position of the layered result corresponds to a certainty value of 1.
For example, FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a plurality of stratigraphic comparison result sets in an embodiment of the present application. FIG. 1 lists a set of 6 stratigraphic comparisons of 6 geological researchers to a well Z1 formation. Fig. 1 includes 4 data traces, which are a formation depth trace 1, a comparison location trace 2, a formation comparison result set name trace 3, and a certainty trace 4. In the order from small to large, each of the compared positions in the compared position track 2 may be sorted and numbered, which are compared positions 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29, respectively. Meanwhile, the depth value of the stratum at each contrast position is also labeled in the contrast position trace 2. Stratigraphic comparison result set name lanes may be used to label different stratigraphic comparison result sets for the Z1 layers. As shown in fig. 1, as can be seen from the name of the stratigraphic comparison result set 3, the stratigraphic comparison result set 1 may include three layered results, which are the stratigraphic comparison result set 1 layered result 1, the stratigraphic comparison result set 1 layered result 2, and the stratigraphic comparison result set 1 layered result 3. The comparison positions of the three layered results are comparison positions 21, 24 and 28, respectively, and the corresponding certainty values are 0.2, 0.6 and 0.2, respectively. Stratigraphic comparison result set 3 may include two stratigraphic results, and stratigraphic comparison result sets 2, 4, 5, and 6 all include only one stratigraphic result.
Fig. 2 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a formation comparison result integration method according to the present application. As shown in fig. 2, the stratigraphic comparison result integration method comprises the following steps.
Step S101: and setting a corresponding weight value for each stratum comparison result set.
In one embodiment, a respective confidence value may be assigned to each geological researcher based on information about the geological researcher's working age, technical title, etc. One geological researcher corresponds to one stratigraphic comparison result set. Based on the confidence values, a respective weight value may be set for each of the formation comparison result sets. For example, a confidence value of 40 is assigned to geologist a and a confidence value of 60 is assigned to geologist b based on the working years and technical titles of two geologists, and thus, based on the confidence values, a weight value of 40/(40+60) ═ 0.4 may be set for the stratigraphic comparison result set corresponding to geologist a, and a weight value of 60/(40+60) × -0.6 may be set for the stratigraphic comparison result set corresponding to geologist b.
In one embodiment, the weight values of different stratigraphic results included in a stratigraphic comparison result set are the same and are the weight values of the stratigraphic comparison result set.
For example, the weighted values may be set for each of the 6 stratigraphic comparison result sets according to the information of the working years, technical titles, and the like of the 6 geological researchers listed in fig. 1. The weight value of the formation comparison result set 1 may be 0.1, the weight value of the formation comparison result set 2 may be 0.1, the weight value of the formation comparison result set 3 may be 0.2, the weight value of the formation comparison result set 4 may be 0.3, the weight value of the formation comparison result set 5 may be 0.1, and the weight value of the formation comparison result set 6 may be 0.1.
Step S102: and grouping the layering results in each stratum comparison result set to obtain at least one layering result combination.
In one embodiment, grouping the layered results in each stratigraphic comparison result set may result in at least one layered result combination. Specifically, based on the comparison position of the hierarchical result, the hierarchical result may be sorted in a preset depth order. The distance between the compared positions of any two adjacent layered results in the sorted results can be calculated. Based on the distance and a specified first distance threshold, the layering results may be grouped, and at least one layering result combination may be obtained. Wherein a distance between two closest hierarchical results in any two adjacent hierarchical result combinations is greater than the specified first distance threshold. The specified first distance threshold may be 1 meter. The preset depth sequence can be a sequence of stratum depths from small to large or a sequence of stratum depths from large to small.
In one embodiment, based on the distance and a specified first distance threshold, the layered results may be grouped, and at least one combination of layered results may be obtained. Specifically, for two adjacent layered results, when the distance between the two adjacent layered results is less than or equal to the specified first distance threshold, the two adjacent layered results may be divided into the same layered result combination. When the distance between the two adjacent layered results is greater than the specified first distance threshold, the two adjacent layered results may be partitioned into two different combinations of layered results.
In an embodiment, grouping the layering results in each of the stratum comparison result sets may obtain at least one layering result combination, and specifically, the method may further include traversing each of the layering result combinations, and if a maximum intra-group distance in the current layering result combination is greater than or equal to a specified second distance threshold, performing splitting processing on the current layering result combination to obtain a splitting set corresponding to the current layering result combination, where the splitting set may include at least two sub-layering result combinations, and each of the sub-layering result combinations is a subset of the current layering result combination. If the maximum intra-group distance in the current hierarchical result combination is smaller than the specified second distance threshold, no processing may be performed.
In an embodiment, performing split processing on the current combination of layered results to obtain a split set corresponding to the current combination of layered results may specifically include performing split processing on the current combination of layered results, so that the obtained split set includes that a maximum intra-group distance of any sub-combination of layered results in at least two sub-combinations of layered results is smaller than a specified second distance threshold. The specified second distance threshold may be 2 meters.
In one embodiment, when the splitting process is performed at least twice on the current layering result combination, the splitting sets with the least number of included sub-layering result combinations can be combined into the splitting set corresponding to the current layering result combination.
For example, the specified first distance threshold may be 1 meter and the specified second distance threshold may be 2 meters. Each of the compared locations in the compared location track 2 in fig. 1 may be sorted and numbered in order of increasing formation depth, namely compared locations 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29. According to the sequence of stratum depths from small to large, the distances between the comparison position 21 of the layering result 1 in the stratum comparison result set 1 and the comparison position 22 of the stratum comparison result set 2 and the distances between the comparison position 22 of the stratum comparison result set 2 and the comparison position 23 of the layering result 1 in the stratum comparison result set 3 can be respectively calculated to be 0.5 meter and 0.7 meter, and the distances can be judged to be smaller than the preset first distance threshold value (1 meter). And the distance between the comparison position 2 of the layering result 1 in the stratum comparison result set 3 and the comparison position 24 of the layering result 2 in the stratum comparison result set 1 is calculated to be 1.8 m, and the distance can be judged to be greater than the specified first distance threshold value (1 m). Thus, the stratigraphic comparison result set 1, the stratigraphic comparison result set 2 and the stratigraphic comparison result set 3, the layering result 1 can be used as a layering result combination, and the stratigraphic comparison result set 1, the layering result 2 can be used as the top-ranked layering result in the next layering result combination. The maximum intra-group distance of the combination of the layering results is the distance between the comparison position 21 of the layering result 1 in the stratigraphic comparison result set 1 and the comparison position 23 of the layering result 1 in the stratigraphic comparison result set 3, the maximum intra-group distance is calculated to be 1.2 meters, and the maximum intra-group distance can be judged to be smaller than the specified second distance threshold (2 meters). Thus, the one hierarchical result can be combined as one merged hierarchical combined result.
Then, according to the sequence of the stratum depths from small to large, the distance between the contrast position 24 of the layering result 2 of the stratum contrast result set 1 and the contrast position 25 of the stratum contrast result set 4, the distance between the contrast position 25 of the stratum contrast result set 4 and the contrast position set 26 of the layering result 2 of the stratum contrast result set 3, the distance between the contrast position 26 of the layering result 2 of the stratum contrast result set 3 and the contrast position 27 of the stratum contrast result set 5, and the distance between the contrast position 27 of the stratum contrast result set 5 and the contrast position 28 of the layering result 3 of the stratum contrast result set 1 can be continuously and respectively calculated, the distances between the contrast position 28 of the stratigraphic comparison result set 1 and the contrast position 29 of the stratigraphic comparison result set 6 of the layering result 3 are respectively 0.5 meter, 0.8 meter, 0.2 meter and 0.5 meter, and the distances can be judged to be less than the specified first distance threshold value (1 meter). In this way, the stratigraphic comparison result set 1, the stratigraphic comparison result set 2, the stratigraphic comparison result set 4, the stratigraphic comparison result set 3, the stratigraphic comparison result set 5, the stratigraphic comparison result set 1, the stratigraphic comparison result set 3, and the stratigraphic comparison result set 6 may be combined as another stratigraphic result. The maximum intra-group distance of the combination of the layering results is the distance between the comparison position 24 of the layering result 2 in the stratum comparison result set 1 and the comparison position 29 of the stratum comparison result set 6, the maximum intra-group distance of the combination of the layering results is calculated to be 2.5 meters, and the maximum intra-group distance can be judged to be greater than the specified second distance threshold (2 meters). Thus, splitting processing needs to be performed on the layering result combination, and a splitting set corresponding to the layering result combination can be obtained. The stratigraphic comparison result set 1, the stratigraphic comparison result set 4 and the stratigraphic comparison result set 3, the stratigraphic comparison result set 2 can be used as one sub-stratigraphic result combination in the split set, and the stratigraphic comparison result set 5, the stratigraphic comparison result set 1, the stratigraphic comparison result set 3 and the stratigraphic comparison result set 6 can be used as the other sub-stratigraphic result combination in the split set. The maximum intra-group distance of any one of the two sub-hierarchical result combinations corresponding to the hierarchical result combination is smaller than the specified second distance threshold, and the split set corresponding to the hierarchical result combination contains the minimum number of sub-hierarchical result combinations.
Step S103: and integrating the layering result combinations based on the weight values and the determination values to obtain combined layering results respectively corresponding to the layering result combinations.
The merging the layered results may include: and combining the comparison positions and the combination certainty values corresponding to the combination comparison positions.
In one embodiment, for any one of the designated combination of layered results, an average value of the stratigraphic depths at the comparison positions of each of the designated combination of layered results may be calculated, and the average value may be used as the stratigraphic depth at the combination comparison position of the combined layered result corresponding to the combination of layered results. For any given one of the given hierarchical result combinations, a sum of the weighted certainty values of each of the given hierarchical result combinations may be calculated, and the sum of the weighted certainty values is used as the combined certainty value of the combined hierarchical result corresponding to the given hierarchical result combination. The weighted certainty value may be a product of a weight value and a certainty value of a hierarchical outcome of the specified combination of hierarchical outcomes.
For example, fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a merged layering result after integration processing in the embodiment of the present application. Fig. 3 includes, in addition to the 4 data tracks in fig. 1, a formation depth track 1, a comparison position track 2, a formation comparison result set name track 3, and a determination degree track 4, and also includes another 4 data tracks corresponding to fig. 1, which are a weight track 5, a merged comparison position track 6, a merged layering result name track 7, and a merged determination degree track 8. The weight value trace may represent a weight value of each stratigraphic comparison result set of fig. 3. The merging comparison position track, the merging layering result name track and the merging certainty track respectively represent certainty values corresponding to the merging comparison position, the name and the merging comparison position of the merging layering result. As shown in fig. 3, with the method of the present application, 9 layering results can be integrated into 3 combined layering results, which are respectively combined layering result 1, combined layering result 2, and combined layering result 3, the combined comparison positions of the 3 combined layering results are the positions of the strata with the depths of 302.7 m, 305.5 m, and 307.1 m, and the corresponding combined certainty values are 0.22, 0.46, and.032, respectively. Therefore, a plurality of stratum comparison result sets of a plurality of geological researchers are comprehensively considered, the influence of individual subjective factors of a single geological researcher can be avoided, and the reliability of the stratum comparison result is improved.
The stratum contrast result integration method may set a corresponding weight value for each stratum contrast result set; grouping the layering results in each stratum comparison result set to obtain at least one layering result combination; based on the weight values and the certainty values, the combination of the layering results can be integrated, and merged layering results respectively corresponding to the combination of the layering results can be obtained; wherein each of the merged hierarchical results may include: and combining the comparison positions and the combination certainty values corresponding to the combination comparison positions. Therefore, a plurality of stratum comparison result sets of a plurality of geological researchers are comprehensively considered, the influence of individual subjective factors of a single geological researcher can be avoided, and the reliability of the stratum comparison result is improved.
Fig. 4 is a structural diagram of the formation comparison result integration device according to an embodiment of the present application. The formation comparison result integrating device may be configured to provide at least two formation comparison result sets, where each of the formation comparison result sets includes at least one layered result, and each of the layered results includes a comparison position and a determination value corresponding to the comparison position. The formation comparison result integrating device may include: a weight value setting module 100, a packet processing module 200, and an integration processing module 300.
The weight value setting module 100 may be configured to set a corresponding weight value for each formation comparison result set.
The grouping processing module 200 may be configured to perform grouping processing on the layering results in each stratum comparison result set to obtain at least one layering result combination.
The integration processing module 300 may be configured to perform integration processing on each of the hierarchical result combinations based on the weight values and the certainty values, so as to obtain merged hierarchical results corresponding to each of the hierarchical result combinations; wherein each of the merged hierarchical results may include: and combining the comparison positions and the combination certainty values corresponding to the combination comparison positions.
Fig. 5 is a structural diagram of a grouping processing module in an embodiment of the device for integrating stratigraphic comparison results according to the present application. As shown in fig. 5, the packet processing module 200 in fig. 4 may include: an ordering module 210, a distance calculation module 220, and a hierarchical result combination determination module 230.
The sorting module 210 may be configured to sort the layering results according to a preset depth order based on the comparison positions of the layering results.
The distance calculating module 220 may be configured to calculate a distance between comparison positions of any two adjacent layered results in the sorted results.
The layering result combination determining module 230 may be configured to perform grouping processing on the layering results based on the distance and a specified first distance threshold, so as to obtain at least one layering result combination; wherein a distance between two closest hierarchical results in any two adjacent hierarchical result combinations is greater than the specified first distance threshold.
Fig. 6 is a structural diagram of an integrated processing module in an embodiment of the device for integrating stratigraphic comparison results according to the present application. As shown in fig. 6, the integrated processing module 300 in fig. 4 may include: a combined contrast position determination module 310 and a combined certainty value determination module 320.
The merged comparing position determining module 310 may be configured to, for any one of the designated layering result combinations, calculate an average value of the stratum depths at the comparing positions of each of the designated layering result combinations, and use the average value as the stratum depth at the merged comparing position of the merged layering result corresponding to the layering result combination.
The merging certainty value determining module 320 may be configured to calculate, for any one of the designated hierarchical result combinations, a sum of weighted certainty values of each of the designated hierarchical result combinations, and use the sum of the weighted certainty values as the merging certainty value of the merging hierarchical result corresponding to the designated hierarchical result combination; the weighted certainty value may be a product of a weight value and a certainty value of a hierarchical outcome of the specified combination of hierarchical outcomes.
The embodiment of the stratum contrast result integration device corresponds to the embodiment of the stratum contrast result integration device, so that the embodiment of the method can be realized, and the technical effect of the embodiment of the method can be achieved.
In the 90 s of the 20 th century, improvements in a technology could clearly distinguish between improvements in hardware (e.g., improvements in circuit structures such as diodes, transistors, switches, etc.) and improvements in software (improvements in process flow). However, as technology advances, many of today's process flow improvements have been seen as direct improvements in hardware circuit architecture. Designers almost always obtain the corresponding hardware circuit structure by programming an improved method flow into the hardware circuit. Thus, it cannot be said that an improvement in the process flow cannot be realized by hardware physical modules. For example, a Programmable Logic Device (PLD), such as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), is an integrated circuit whose Logic functions are determined by programming the Device by a user. A digital system is "integrated" on a PLD by the designer's own programming without requiring the chip manufacturer to design and fabricate application-specific integrated circuit chips. Furthermore, nowadays, instead of manually making an integrated Circuit chip, such Programming is often implemented by "logic compiler" software, which is similar to a software compiler used in program development and writing, but the original code before compiling is also written by a specific Programming Language, which is called Hardware Description Language (HDL), and HDL is not only one but many, such as abel (advanced Boolean Expression Language), ahdl (alternate Language Description Language), traffic, pl (core unified Programming Language), HDCal, JHDL (Java Hardware Description Language), langue, Lola, HDL, laspam, hardsradware (Hardware Description Language), vhjhd (Hardware Description Language), and vhigh-Language, which are currently used in most popular applications. It will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that hardware circuitry that implements the logical method flows can be readily obtained by merely slightly programming the method flows into an integrated circuit using the hardware description languages described above.
Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that, in addition to implementing the controller as pure computer readable program code, the same functionality can be implemented by logically programming method steps such that the controller is in the form of logic gates, switches, application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic controllers, embedded microcontrollers and the like. Such a controller may thus be considered a hardware component, and the means included therein for performing the various functions may also be considered as a structure within the hardware component. Or even means for performing the functions may be regarded as being both a software module for performing the method and a structure within a hardware component.
The apparatuses and modules illustrated in the above embodiments may be implemented by a computer chip or an entity, or by a product with certain functions.
For convenience of description, the above devices are described as being divided into various modules by functions, and are described separately. Of course, the functionality of the various modules may be implemented in the same one or more software and/or hardware implementations as the present application.
From the above description of the embodiments, it is clear to those skilled in the art that the present application can be implemented by software plus necessary general hardware platform. With this understanding in mind, the present solution, or portions thereof that contribute to the prior art, may be embodied in the form of a software product, which in a typical configuration includes one or more processors (CPUs), input/output interfaces, network interfaces, and memory. The computer software product may include instructions for causing a computing device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to perform the methods described in the various embodiments or portions of embodiments of the present application. The computer software product may be stored in a memory, which may include forms of volatile memory in a computer readable medium, Random Access Memory (RAM) and/or non-volatile memory, such as Read Only Memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM). Memory is an example of a computer-readable medium. Computer-readable media, including both non-transitory and non-transitory, removable and non-removable media, may implement information storage by any method or technology. The information may be computer readable instructions, data structures, modules of a program, or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), other types of Random Access Memory (RAM), Read Only Memory (ROM), Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disc read only memory (CD-ROM), Digital Versatile Discs (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other non-transmission medium that can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, computer readable media does not include transitory computer readable media (transient media), such as modulated data signals and carrier waves.
The embodiments in the present specification are described in a progressive manner, and the same and similar parts among the embodiments are referred to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from the other embodiments. In particular, as for the apparatus embodiment, since it is substantially similar to the method embodiment, the description is relatively simple, and for the relevant points, reference may be made to the partial description of the method embodiment.
The application is operational with numerous general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. For example: personal computers, server computers, hand-held or portable devices, tablet-type devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
The application may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The application may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
While the present application has been described with examples, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that there are numerous variations and permutations of the present application without departing from the spirit of the application, and it is intended that the appended claims encompass such variations and permutations without departing from the spirit of the application.
Claims (12)
1. The stratum contrast result integration method is characterized in that at least two stratum contrast result sets are provided, wherein each stratum contrast result set comprises at least one layering result, and each layering result comprises a contrast position and a determination value corresponding to the contrast position; the method comprises the following steps:
setting a corresponding weight value for each stratum comparison result set;
grouping the layering results in each stratum comparison result set to obtain at least one layering result combination;
integrating each layering result combination based on the weight value and the determined value to obtain combined layering results respectively corresponding to each layering result combination; wherein each of the merged results comprises: and combining the comparison positions and the combination certainty values corresponding to the combination comparison positions.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said grouping the layered results in each of the stratigraphic comparison result sets to obtain at least one layered result combination comprises:
based on the comparison position of the layering result, sequencing the layering result according to a preset depth sequence;
calculating the distance between the comparison positions of any two adjacent layered results in the sorted results;
grouping the layering results based on the distance and a specified first distance threshold to obtain at least one layering result combination; wherein a distance between two closest hierarchical results in any two adjacent hierarchical result combinations is greater than the specified first distance threshold.
3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein said grouping the layered results based on the distance and a specified first distance threshold to obtain at least one layered result combination comprises:
for two adjacent hierarchical results, when the distance between the two adjacent hierarchical results is less than or equal to the specified first distance threshold, dividing the two adjacent hierarchical results into the same hierarchical result combination; when the distance between the two adjacent hierarchical results is greater than the specified first distance threshold, the two adjacent hierarchical results are divided into two different hierarchical result combinations.
4. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the predetermined first distance threshold is 1 meter.
5. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the grouping of the layered results in each set of the stratigraphic comparison results to obtain at least one combination of layered results further comprises:
and traversing each layering result combination, and if the maximum intra-group distance in the current layering result combination is greater than or equal to a specified second distance threshold, splitting the current layering result combination to obtain a splitting set corresponding to the current layering result combination, wherein the splitting set comprises at least two sub-layering result combinations, and each sub-layering result combination is a subset of the current layering result combination.
6. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the splitting processing the current layering result combination to obtain a splitting set corresponding to the current layering result combination comprises:
and splitting the current layering result combination so that the obtained splitting combination comprises the maximum intra-group distance of any sub-layering result combination in at least two sub-layering result combinations, which is smaller than a specified second distance threshold value.
7. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein when the splitting process is performed at least twice on the current combination of layered results, the splitting sets with the least number of sub-combinations of layered results are combined into the splitting set corresponding to the current combination of layered results.
8. The method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the predetermined second distance threshold is 2 meters.
9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the integrating, based on the weight value and the certainty value, each of the combination of layered results to obtain a merged layered result corresponding to each of the combination of layered results comprises:
calculating the average value of the stratum depth at the comparison position of each layering result in the designated layering result combination aiming at any designated layering result combination in each layering result combination, and taking the average value as the stratum depth at the combination comparison position of the combined layering result corresponding to the layering result combination;
calculating the sum of the weighted certainty values of each layering result in the appointed layering result combination aiming at any appointed layering result combination in each layering result combination, and taking the sum of the weighted certainty values as the combined certainty value of the combined layering result corresponding to the appointed layering result combination; the weighted certainty value is the product of the weight value and the certainty value of a hierarchical result in the designated hierarchical result combination.
10. The stratum contrast result integration device is characterized by being provided with at least two stratum contrast result sets, wherein each stratum contrast result set comprises at least one layering result, and each layering result comprises a contrast position and a determination value corresponding to the contrast position; the formation comparison result integrating device comprises: the device comprises a weight value setting module, a grouping processing module and an integration processing module; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the weight value setting module is used for setting a corresponding weight value for each stratum comparison result set;
the grouping processing module is used for grouping the layering results in each stratum comparison result set to obtain at least one layering result combination;
the integration processing module is configured to perform integration processing on each of the hierarchical result combinations based on the weight values and the certainty values to obtain merged hierarchical results corresponding to each of the hierarchical result combinations; wherein each of the merged results comprises: and combining the comparison positions and the combination certainty values corresponding to the combination comparison positions.
11. The formation comparison result integration device as claimed in claim 10, wherein the grouping processing module comprises: the device comprises a sorting module, a distance calculation module and a layering result combination determination module; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the sorting module is used for sorting the layering results according to a preset depth sequence based on the comparison positions of the layering results;
the distance calculation module is used for calculating the distance between the comparison positions of any two adjacent layered results in the sorted results;
the layering result combination determining module is used for grouping the layering results based on the distance and a specified first distance threshold value to obtain at least one layering result combination; wherein a distance between two closest hierarchical results in any two adjacent hierarchical result combinations is greater than the specified first distance threshold.
12. The formation comparison result integration device as claimed in claim 10, wherein the integration processing module comprises: a merging comparison position determining module and a merging certainty value determining module; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the merging comparison position determining module is used for calculating the average value of the stratum depths at the comparison positions of each layering result in the specified layering result combination aiming at any specified layering result combination in each layering result combination, and taking the average value as the stratum depth at the merging comparison positions of the merging layering results corresponding to the layering result combination;
the merging certainty value determining module is used for calculating the sum of the weighted certainty values of each layering result in the appointed layering result combination aiming at any appointed layering result combination in each layering result combination, and taking the sum of the weighted certainty values as the merging certainty value of the merging layering result corresponding to the appointed layering result combination; the weighted certainty value is the product of the weight value and the certainty value of a hierarchical result in the designated hierarchical result combination.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710512816.6A CN107180161B (en) | 2017-06-29 | 2017-06-29 | Stratum contrast result integration method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710512816.6A CN107180161B (en) | 2017-06-29 | 2017-06-29 | Stratum contrast result integration method and device |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107180161A CN107180161A (en) | 2017-09-19 |
| CN107180161B true CN107180161B (en) | 2020-04-24 |
Family
ID=59844594
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710512816.6A Active CN107180161B (en) | 2017-06-29 | 2017-06-29 | Stratum contrast result integration method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107180161B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108828666B (en) * | 2018-08-07 | 2019-12-27 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Method for recovering buried history of stratum near normal fault |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105089658A (en) * | 2015-07-01 | 2015-11-25 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Stratum contrast method and device based on uncertainty |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10746899B2 (en) * | 2010-03-12 | 2020-08-18 | Mark C. Robinson | 3D-well log invention |
-
2017
- 2017-06-29 CN CN201710512816.6A patent/CN107180161B/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105089658A (en) * | 2015-07-01 | 2015-11-25 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Stratum contrast method and device based on uncertainty |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 《Correlation methods of base-level cycle based on wavelet neural network》;XU Xiangjun 等;《The 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Engineering》;20101231;全文 * |
| 《High-Resolution Geophysical Core Logging Data from Marine Sediment Core Samples》;Carter L. Gehman 等;《MTS/IEEE Oceanside 2001》;20020807;全文 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN107180161A (en) | 2017-09-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110069626B (en) | Target address identification method, classification model training method and equipment | |
| CN109992771B (en) | Text generation method and device | |
| CN107563297B (en) | Waveform matching method and device | |
| CN108019205B (en) | Method and device for determining fracturing index of reservoir | |
| US11307049B2 (en) | Methods, apparatuses, systems, and storage media for storing and loading visual localization maps | |
| US10641822B2 (en) | Critical path architect | |
| CN107944126B (en) | Method and device for determining water content of water-drive reservoir | |
| CN112672184A (en) | Video auditing and publishing method | |
| US11125898B2 (en) | Method and system for positioning seismic source in microseism monitoring | |
| CN105488068A (en) | Methods and apparatuses for searching music and establishing index, and search result judgment method | |
| CN113434533A (en) | Data tracing tool construction method, data processing method, device and equipment | |
| CN108763059A (en) | A kind of method for detecting abnormality, device and equipment | |
| CN107180161B (en) | Stratum contrast result integration method and device | |
| CN111413741B (en) | Sandstone-type uranium ore resource amount calculation method and device | |
| CN107704685B (en) | Mesh division method and device | |
| CN108492014B (en) | Data processing method and device for determining geological resource amount | |
| CN110795562A (en) | Map optimization method, device, terminal and storage medium | |
| CN109902178A (en) | A kind of multistage file classification method and system | |
| US10671644B1 (en) | Adaptive column set composition | |
| CN107605472B (en) | Method and device for determining oil reservoir recovery ratio | |
| CN107563617B (en) | Method and device for determining oil and gas amount on oil and gas migration path | |
| US20130067338A1 (en) | Dynamic navigation region based on site usage | |
| WO2020192291A1 (en) | Method and system for generating statistical information, and electronic device | |
| CN110321433B (en) | Method and device for determining text category | |
| CN109903165B (en) | Model merging method and device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |