CN107133719A - A kind of supplier's value assessment method - Google Patents
A kind of supplier's value assessment method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107133719A CN107133719A CN201710248756.1A CN201710248756A CN107133719A CN 107133719 A CN107133719 A CN 107133719A CN 201710248756 A CN201710248756 A CN 201710248756A CN 107133719 A CN107133719 A CN 107133719A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- supplier
- bid
- score
- value
- evaluation index
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention provides a kind of supplier's value assessment method, and supplier's value assessment result can be made more objective and accurate.Methods described includes：Supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment is built, supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment of structure is three-level evaluation index；According to the three-level evaluation index of structure, supplier's Value appraisal system of stratification is set up, supplier's Value appraisal system includes：One-level evaluation index, two-level appraisement index, three-level evaluation index, the one-level evaluation index include：Supplier is worth, and the two-level appraisement index includes：Supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplier's availability；According to the three-level evaluation index of structure, determine that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, the score of supplier's availability respectively；Situation, the score of supplier's availability, overall merit supplier value are participated according to supplier's qualification of determination, supplier's bid.The present invention relates to supply chain management field.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to supply chain management field, a kind of supplier's value assessment method is particularly related to.
Background technology
In recent years, supply chain management can be greatly shortened with the speed to respond to the market of enterprise and met consumer demand
Time, so that enterprise obtains the competitive advantage that can not be replicated in this fast-changing world.Increasing enterprise is
Implement the big advantages that supply chain management is brought through recognizing, the selection of supplier is the base of supply chain partnership operation
Plinth.For production enterprise, the quality of supplier directly influences the cost of product, quality and delivery date and supply chain
Whole Performance.Therefore, science, rationally, objectively evaluate and select supplier be core enterprise in supply chain important process it
One.
But, in the prior art, typically supplier's value is estimated using many evaluation indexes of single level, adopted
When being estimated with many evaluation indexes of single level to supplier's value, determining the multi objective weight of single level has stronger
Subjectivity it is strong, cause supplier's value assessment result accurately low, wherein, many evaluation indexes of the single level are low level
Many evaluation indexes.
The content of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention is to provide a kind of supplier's value assessment method, deposited with solving prior art
Supplier's value assessment result it is accurate low the problem of.
In order to solve the above technical problems, the embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of supplier's value assessment method, including：
Supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment is built, supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment of structure is three-level evaluation index；
According to the three-level evaluation index of structure, supplier's Value appraisal system of stratification, supplier's value are set up
Appraisement system includes：One-level evaluation index, two-level appraisement index, three-level evaluation index, the one-level evaluation index include：Supply
Business is worth, and the two-level appraisement index includes：Supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplier's availability；
According to the three-level evaluation index of structure, determine that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplier respectively
The score of availability；
Situation, the score of supplier's availability are participated according to supplier's qualification of determination, supplier's bid, it is comprehensive
Close and evaluate supplier's value.
Further, supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment includes：Registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type, registration
Duration, acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, recently bid liveness, exchange hour interval, trading frequency, average friendship twice
Easy volume, guarantee fund.
Further, the three-level evaluation index according to structure, determines supplier's qualification, supplier's bid ginseng respectively
Include with the score of situation, supplier's availability：
Registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length in three-level evaluation index, determine supplier
The score of qualification；
Acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid liveness in three-level evaluation index, determine that supplier recruits
The score of bid participation situation；
Exchange hour interval, trading frequency, average deal size, guarantee fund twice recently in three-level evaluation index,
Determine the score of supplier's availability.
Further, the enterprise attributes, the data type of vendor or type are nominal type；
Registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length in the evaluation index according to three-level, it is determined that for
Answering the score of business's qualification includes：
The enterprise attributes, the nominal type data of vendor or type are quantized, the enterprise attributes, supplier is obtained
The score value of type；
The registered capital, registration time length are given a mark by equisection method, the registered capital, registration time length is obtained
Score value；
Using Delphi method, the power of registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length is determined by expert
Weight；
According to the obtained enterprise attributes, vendor or type, registered capital, the score value of registration time length and determination
Registered capital, enterprise attributes, the weight of vendor or type and registration time length, using weighted sum mode, obtain supplier's qualification
Score.
Further, it is described that the registered capital, registration time length are given a mark by equisection method, obtain the registration money
Originally, the score value of registration time length includes：
Interval decile is carried out to registered capital, registration time length respectively using equisection method；
According to predetermined step-length, each interval score value is determined.
Further, in the evaluation index according to three-level acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid liveness,
Determining the score of supplier's bid participation situation includes：
Acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid liveness in three-level evaluation index, are calculated by TOPSIS
Method, determines that supplier's bid participates in situation score.
Further, exchange hour interval, trading frequency, the average friendship twice recently in the evaluation index according to three-level
Easy volume, guarantee fund, determining the score of supplier's availability includes：
Based on RFMD models, by equisection method to exchange hour interval, trading frequency, the average transaction twice recently
Volume, guarantee fund are scored；
Obtained scoring score value is added up and obtains supplier's availability score.
Further, the supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participation situation, supplier according to determination is supplied
The score of ability, overall merit supplier value includes：
Determine that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, the weight of supplier's availability；
According to supplier's qualification of determination, supplier bid participate in situation, the weight of supplier's availability and
Supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participation situation, the score of supplier's availability determined, using weighted sum side
Formula, obtains supplier's value score.
Further, it is described to determine that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplier's availability
Weight includes：
Using Delphi method, determine that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplier's availability
Weight.
The above-mentioned technical proposal of the present invention has the beneficial effect that：
In such scheme, supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment is built, supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment of structure is three-level
Evaluation index；According to the three-level evaluation index of structure, supplier's Value appraisal system of stratification, supplier's value are set up
Appraisement system includes：One-level evaluation index, two-level appraisement index, three hierarchical systems of three-level evaluation index, the one-level evaluation
Index includes：Supplier is worth, and the two-level appraisement index includes：Supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supply
Business's availability；According to the three-level evaluation index of structure, determine that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplied respectively
Answer the score of business's availability；Situation, supplier's supply of material energy are participated according to supplier's qualification of determination, supplier's bid
The score of power, overall merit supplier value.So, can be right by supplier's Value appraisal system of the stratification of foundation
The value of supplier carries out stratification comprehensive analysis, and multi-level analysis method avoids many evaluation criterion weights of low level and determined
Subjectivity, make supplier's value assessment result more objective and accurate, more meet reality, can for supplier of enterprise selection provide
With reference to.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the schematic flow sheet of supplier's value assessment method provided in an embodiment of the present invention；
Fig. 2 is schematic diagram when registered capital provided in an embodiment of the present invention does not remove outlier；
Fig. 3 is that registered capital provided in an embodiment of the present invention removes the schematic diagram after outlier；
Fig. 4 is supplier's qualification score schematic diagram provided in an embodiment of the present invention.
Embodiment
To make the technical problem to be solved in the present invention, technical scheme and advantage clearer, below in conjunction with accompanying drawing and tool
Body embodiment is described in detail.
The present invention is directed to the problem of existing supplier's value assessment result is accurate low, and there is provided a kind of supplier's value assessment
Method.
As shown in figure 1, supplier's value assessment method provided in an embodiment of the present invention, including：
S101, builds supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment, and supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment of structure refers to for three-level evaluation
Mark；
S102, according to the three-level evaluation index of structure, sets up supplier's Value appraisal system of stratification, the supplier
Value appraisal system includes：One-level evaluation index, two-level appraisement index, three-level evaluation index, the one-level evaluation index include：
Supplier is worth, and the two-level appraisement index includes：Supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplier's supply of material energy
Power；
S103, according to the three-level evaluation index of structure, determine respectively supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation,
The score of supplier's availability；
S104, according to supplier's qualification of determination, supplier bid participate in situation, supplier's availability
Point, overall merit supplier value.
Supplier's value assessment method described in the embodiment of the present invention, builds supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment, the institute of structure
Supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment is stated for three-level evaluation index；According to the three-level evaluation index of structure, the supplier for setting up stratification
Value appraisal system, supplier's Value appraisal system includes：One-level evaluation index, two-level appraisement index, three-level evaluation refer to
Three hierarchical systems are marked, the one-level evaluation index includes：Supplier is worth, and the two-level appraisement index includes：Supplier provides
Matter, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplier's availability；According to the three-level evaluation index of structure, supplier is determined respectively
Qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, the score of supplier's availability；According to supplier's qualification of determination, supply
Business's bid participates in situation, the score of supplier's availability, overall merit supplier value.So, the level of foundation is passed through
Supplier's Value appraisal system of change, can carry out stratification comprehensive analysis, multi-level analysis method to the value of supplier
The subjectivity that many evaluation criterion weights of low level are determined is avoided, makes supplier's value assessment result more objective and accurate, more accords with
Close actual, reference can be provided for supplier of enterprise selection.
In the present embodiment, the three-level evaluation index is the evaluation index of low level.
In the present embodiment, supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment (three-level evaluation index) of structure includes but not limited：Registration
Capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type, registration time length, acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid liveness, nearest two
Secondary exchange hour interval, trading frequency, average deal size, guarantee fund, using supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment, set up level
Change supplier's Value appraisal system, the stratification supplier Value appraisal system of foundation is as shown in table 1：
The stratification supplier Value appraisal system of table 1
In the present embodiment, the data description of supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment is as shown in table 2：
The data description of the supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment of table 2
In the embodiment of foregoing supplier's value assessment method, further, the three-level according to structure
Evaluation index, determines that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participation situation, the score of supplier's availability include respectively：
Registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length in three-level evaluation index, determine supplier
The score of qualification；
Acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid liveness in three-level evaluation index, determine that supplier recruits
The score of bid participation situation；
Exchange hour interval, trading frequency, average deal size, guarantee fund twice recently in three-level evaluation index,
Determine the score of supplier's availability.
In the embodiment of foregoing supplier's value assessment method, further, the enterprise attributes, supplier
The data type of type is nominal type；
Registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length in the evaluation index according to three-level, it is determined that for
Answering the score of business's qualification includes：
The enterprise attributes, the nominal type data of vendor or type are quantized, the enterprise attributes, supplier is obtained
The score value of type；
The registered capital, registration time length are given a mark by equisection method, the registered capital, registration time length is obtained
Score value；
Using Delphi method, the power of registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length is determined by expert
Weight；
According to the obtained enterprise attributes, vendor or type, registered capital, the score value of registration time length and determination
Registered capital, enterprise attributes, the weight of vendor or type and registration time length, using weighted sum mode, obtain supplier's qualification
Score.
As shown in table 2, in the present embodiment, the enterprise attributes, the data type of vendor or type are nominal type；For three
Registered capital, enterprise attributes in level evaluation index, vendor or type, registration time length four indices, first by enterprise attributes, are supplied
Answer the nominal type data of business's type to be quantized, obtain the score value of the enterprise attributes, vendor or type, it is preferable that by with
Each expert's discussion, final is that enterprise attributes and vendor or type stamp the score value that 1-100 divides, and correspondence score value is as shown in table 3：
The enterprise attributes of table 3, vendor or type score value
In the present embodiment, also registered capital, registration time length are given a mark by equisection method, obtain the registered capital,
The score value of registration time length, it is preferable that by the score value of the obtained registered capital, registration time length be mapped to 1-100/；Tool
Body, registered capital, the Annual distribution of registration time length can be first checked, by taking registered capital as an example, it handles front cabinet figure such as Fig. 2 institutes
Show, registered capital has outlier (outlier refers to as seen from Figure 2：As IQR (four of the registered capital numerical value more than 1.5 times
Quantile extreme difference) when, i.e., the beard more than box figure is outlier, is up and down non-outlier in beard) exist, to avoid this
Registered capital outlier widens overall registered capital level, and registered capital outlier is included into the maximum in addition to itself, obtained
Box figure after to processing, as shown in Figure 3.
In the present embodiment, obtain after the enterprise attributes, vendor or type, registered capital, the score value of registration time length, also profit
With Delphi method, the weight of registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length is determined by expert, such as the institute of table 4
Show：
The index weights of table 4
| Supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment | Index weights |
| Registered capital | 40% |
| Enterprise attributes | 10% |
| Vendor or type | 30% |
| Registration time length | 20% |
In the present embodiment, according to the obtained enterprise attributes, vendor or type, registered capital, registration time length score value
With the weight of the registered capital of determination, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length, using weighted sum mode, obtain
To supplier's qualification score, obtained supplier's qualification score is as shown in Figure 4.
In the present embodiment, for registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type, registration time length four indices, Dare is utilized
Luxuriant and rich with fragrance method evaluates supplier's qualification.The evaluation method mainly drafts application form by investigator, according to blas, with the side of letters
Formula is seeked the opinion of to panel member respectively；And panel member submits opinion in the way of anonymous, by levying repeatedly several times
Ask and feed back, the opinion of panel member progressively tends to concentrate, and finally obtains the weighted value with very high-accuracy.
In the embodiment of foregoing supplier's value assessment method, further, it is described by equisection method to institute
State registered capital, registration time length to be given a mark, obtain the registered capital, the score value of registration time length includes：
Interval decile is carried out to registered capital, registration time length respectively using equisection method；
According to predetermined step-length, each interval score value is determined.
In the present embodiment, for example, it is possible to use equisection method carries out interval 5 decile to registered capital, registration time length respectively, and
With 20 points for step-length, each interval score value is obtained, as shown in table 5：
The interval score value of table 5
| Registered capital | (1600,20000] | (1200,1600] | (8030,1.200] | (4040,8030] | (0,4040] |
| Registration time length | (1210,1390] | (1020,1210] | (836,1020] | (650,836] | (464,650] |
| Score value | 100 | 80 | 60 | 40 | 20 |
It is further, described to be referred to according to three-level evaluation in the embodiment of foregoing supplier's value assessment method
Acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid liveness in mark, determining the score of supplier's bid participation situation includes：
Acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid liveness in three-level evaluation index, are calculated by TOPSIS
Method, determines that supplier's bid participates in situation score.
In the present embodiment, by TOPSIS algorithms, for the acceptance of the bid number of times in three-level evaluation index, bid number of times, acceptance of the bid
Rate, this four indices of bid liveness participate in situation to supplier's bid and scored, the distribution of its plus-minus ideal solutions and weight
As shown in table 6：
The plus-minus ideal solutions of table 6 are distributed and weight
In the present embodiment, based on table 6, the basic thought of TOPSIS algorithms is utilized：To the raw data matrix after normalization,
The preferred plan and worst scheme in ideal solution are determined based on weight, then by obtain it is each commented scheme and preferred plan and
The distance between worst scheme, draws the degree of closeness of the program and preferred plan, and excellent in this, as each assessed object is evaluated
Bad foundation.The obtained degree of closeness for being commented scheme and preferred plan is as shown in table 7：
Table 7 is commented the degree of closeness (partial data) of scheme and preferred plan
| Ranking | Customs Assigned Number | Relative proximities |
| 1 | 3013214 | 0.746129376 |
| 2 | 3006362 | 0.633830614 |
| 3 | 1015100 | 0.618669283 |
| 4 | 3007625 | 0.509334333 |
| 5 | 3002255 | 0.48798121 |
| 6 | 3009967 | 0.476805782 |
| 7 | 3010014 | 0.418480027 |
| 8 | 3009895 | 0.396128479 |
| 9 | 3010248 | 0.389632977 |
| 10 | 3016443 | 0.374086573 |
| 11 | 3002934 | 0.371930712 |
| … | … | … |
In the present embodiment, by relative proximities be mapped as 1-100/, be used as supplier bid to participate in situation point
Value, final result is as shown in table 8：
Table 8 is mapped as 1-100 points of result
| Ranking | Customs Assigned Number | Relative proximities | Map score value |
| 1 | 3013214 | 0.746129376 | 100 |
| 2 | 3006362 | 0.633830614 | 84.94916 |
| 3 | 1015100 | 0.618669283 | 82.91716 |
| 4 | 3007625 | 0.509334333 | 68.26354 |
| 5 | 3002255 | 0.48798121 | 65.40169 |
| 6 | 3009967 | 0.476805782 | 63.9039 |
| 7 | 3010014 | 0.418480027 | 56.08679 |
| 8 | 3009895 | 0.396128479 | 53.09112 |
| 9 | 3010248 | 0.389632977 | 52.22057 |
| 10 | 3016443 | 0.374086573 | 50.13696 |
| 11 | 3002934 | 0.371930712 | 49.84802 |
| … | … | … | … |
It is further, described to be referred to according to three-level evaluation in the embodiment of foregoing supplier's value assessment method
Exchange hour interval, trading frequency, average deal size, guarantee fund twice recently in mark, determine supplier's availability
Dividing includes：
Based on RFMD models, by equisection method to exchange hour interval, trading frequency, the average transaction twice recently
Volume, guarantee fund are scored；
Obtained scoring score value is added up and obtains supplier's availability score.
In the present embodiment, based on traditional RFM models, supply quotient is combined on the basis of original tri- indexs of R, F, M
Section 4 index D- suppliers are added according to feature and pay guarantee fund, RFMD models are obtained, with RFMD model evaluations supplier's
Availability, wherein, each index is as shown in table 9 in RFM models and RFMD models：
Index in the RFM models of table 9 and RFMD models
In the present embodiment, for exchange hour interval, trading frequency, the average transaction twice recently in three-level evaluation index
Volume, guarantee fund, can use RFMD models, using equisection method to exchange hour interval, trading frequency, average transaction twice recently
Volume, guarantee fund this four indices are scored respectively, and will scoring score value is cumulative obtains supplier's availability score, use
As shown in table 10, after RFMD models, the score value and total score of each obtained index are such as raw data table before RFMD models
Shown in table 11.
Table 10 uses the raw data table (partial data) before RFMD models
| Supplier identifies | R | F | M | D |
| 3012918 | 65761023 | 2 | 1433020 | 2775000 |
| 3013789 | 42258498 | 2 | 126016.28 | 160992.56 |
| 3017223 | 36459934 | 2 | 45669.82 | 91339.65 |
| 3007393 | 31103186 | 4 | 122440.98 | 355053.92 |
| 3010687 | 29028251 | 2 | 281466.69 | 520673.38 |
| 3006695 | 29028251 | 7 | 93424.77 | 520673.38 |
| 3012849 | 28833059 | 3 | 1575866.53 | 2680381.84 |
| 3011386 | 28457875 | 5 | 320244.44 | 381799.9 |
| 3012743 | 26616503 | 6 | 129322.05 | 684892.3 |
| 3013168 | 25229596 | 4 | 22760 | 91040 |
| 3015059 | 22399705 | 4 | 1829693.53 | 5540969.06 |
| 3012887 | 20984038 | 5 | 859486.1 | 1350386.5 |
| 3000660 | 20983254 | 6 | 101030.2 | 116670.4 |
Table 11 uses the appraisal result (partial data) obtained after RFMD models
In the present embodiment, it is preferable that the total score in table 11 is mapped between 1-100 score values, supplier's supply of material energy is obtained
Power score.
It is further, described according to determination in the embodiment of foregoing supplier's value assessment method
Supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, the score of supplier's availability, and overall merit supplier value includes：
Determine that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, the weight of supplier's availability；
According to supplier's qualification of determination, supplier bid participate in situation, the weight of supplier's availability and
Supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participation situation, the score of supplier's availability determined, using weighted sum side
Formula, obtains supplier's value score.
In the present embodiment, it is possible to use Delphi method determines that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplied
Answer the weight of three indexs of business's availability, it is determined that supplier's qualification, supplier bid participates in situation, supplier and supplies
The weight of three indexs of goods ability is as shown in table 12：
The supplier's qualification of table 12, bid participate in situation, the weight of availability
| Supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment | Weight |
| Supplier's qualification | 30% |
| Bid participates in situation | 40% |
| Availability | 30% |
In the present embodiment, situation, supplier's supply of material energy are participated according to supplier's qualification of determination, supplier's bid
The weight of power and the supplier's qualification determined, supplier's bid participate in situation, the score of supplier's availability, use
Weighted sum mode, obtains supplier's value score, as shown in table 13, it is achieved thereby that the value to each supplier has carried out layer
Secondaryization overall merit.
The supplier of table 13 value score (partial data)
Described above is the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is noted that for those skilled in the art
For, on the premise of principle of the present invention is not departed from, some improvements and modifications can also be made, these improvements and modifications
It should be regarded as protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (9)
1. a kind of supplier's value assessment method, it is characterised in that including：
Supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment is built, supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment of structure is three-level evaluation index；
According to the three-level evaluation index of structure, supplier's Value appraisal system of stratification, supplier's value assessment are set up
System includes：One-level evaluation index, two-level appraisement index, three-level evaluation index, the one-level evaluation index include：Supplier's valency
Value, the two-level appraisement index includes：Supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplier's availability；
According to the three-level evaluation index of structure, determine that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, supplier's supply of material respectively
The score of ability；
Situation, the score of supplier's availability are participated according to supplier's qualification of determination, supplier's bid, synthesis is commented
Valency supplier is worth.
2. supplier's value assessment method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that supplier's Indexes of Value Assessment
Including：Registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type, registration time length, acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid are active
Degree, recently exchange hour interval, trading frequency, average deal size, guarantee fund twice.
3. supplier's value assessment method according to claim 2, it is characterised in that the three-level evaluation according to structure
Index, determines that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participation situation, the score of supplier's availability include respectively：
Registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length in three-level evaluation index, determine supplier's qualification
Score；
Acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid liveness in three-level evaluation index, determine supplier's bid
The score of participation situation；
Exchange hour interval, trading frequency, average deal size, guarantee fund twice recently in three-level evaluation index, it is determined that
The score of supplier's availability.
4. supplier's value assessment method according to claim 3, it is characterised in that the enterprise attributes, vendor class
The data type of type is nominal type；
Registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length in the evaluation index according to three-level, determine supplier
The score of qualification includes：
The enterprise attributes, the nominal type data of vendor or type are quantized, the enterprise attributes, vendor or type is obtained
Score value；
The registered capital, registration time length are given a mark by equisection method, the registered capital, point of registration time length is obtained
Value；
Using Delphi method, the weight of registered capital, enterprise attributes, vendor or type and registration time length is determined by expert；
According to the obtained enterprise attributes, vendor or type, registered capital, the score value of registration time length and the registration of determination
Capital, enterprise attributes, the weight of vendor or type and registration time length, using weighted sum mode, obtain supplier's qualification score.
5. supplier's value assessment method according to claim 4, it is characterised in that it is described by equisection method to the note
Volume capital, registration time length are given a mark, and obtain the registered capital, the score value of registration time length includes：
Interval decile is carried out to registered capital, registration time length respectively using equisection method；
According to predetermined step-length, each interval score value is determined.
6. supplier's value assessment method according to claim 3, it is characterised in that in the evaluation index according to three-level
Acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid liveness, determine that supplier bid participates in the score of situation and included：
Acceptance of the bid number of times, bid number of times, win bit rate, bid liveness in three-level evaluation index, by TOPSIS algorithms, really
Determine supplier's bid and participate in situation score.
7. supplier's value assessment method according to claim 3, it is characterised in that in the evaluation index according to three-level
Exchange hour interval, trading frequency, average deal size, guarantee fund twice recently, determine supplier's availability subpackage
Include：
Based on RFMD models, by equisection method to exchange hour interval, trading frequency, average deal size, the guarantor twice recently
Card gold is scored；
Obtained scoring score value is added up and obtains supplier's availability score.
8. supplier's value assessment method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that the supply according to determination
Business's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, the score of supplier's availability, and overall merit supplier value includes：
Determine that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, the weight of supplier's availability；
Situation, the weight of supplier's availability and determination are participated according to supplier's qualification of determination, supplier's bid
Supplier's qualification, supplier bid participate in situation, the score of supplier's availability, using weighted sum mode,
Obtain supplier's value score.
9. supplier's value assessment method according to claim 8, it is characterised in that determination supplier's money
Matter, supplier's bid participation situation, the weight of supplier's availability include：
Using Delphi method, determine that supplier's qualification, supplier's bid participate in situation, the power of supplier's availability
Weight.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710248756.1A CN107133719A (en) | 2017-04-17 | 2017-04-17 | A kind of supplier's value assessment method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710248756.1A CN107133719A (en) | 2017-04-17 | 2017-04-17 | A kind of supplier's value assessment method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107133719A true CN107133719A (en) | 2017-09-05 |
Family
ID=59715843
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710248756.1A Pending CN107133719A (en) | 2017-04-17 | 2017-04-17 | A kind of supplier's value assessment method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107133719A (en) |
Cited By (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108090681A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2018-05-29 | 广州供电局有限公司 | Electricity provider evaluation optimization method, system, storage medium and computer equipment |
| CN109242562A (en) * | 2018-08-31 | 2019-01-18 | 万翼科技有限公司 | Ranking method, device and the storage medium of supplier |
| CN109962882A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2019-07-02 | 中国科学院数据与通信保护研究教育中心 | A kind of managing network identities service confidence level appraisal procedure and system |
| CN111797307A (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2020-10-20 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Portrayal method and device for enterprise users |
| CN111798265A (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2020-10-20 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Accurate marketing method and device suitable for enterprise users |
| CN112529456A (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2021-03-19 | 海尔数字科技(青岛)有限公司 | Supplier evaluation system, supplier evaluation method, background equipment and storage medium |
| CN112700300A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-23 | 山东众阳健康科技集团有限公司 | Intelligent auditing and controlling method, system, storage medium and equipment for supplier qualification |
| JP2021068435A (en) * | 2019-10-17 | 2021-04-30 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Supplier evaluation device and supplier evaluation method |
| CN112948667A (en) * | 2021-02-03 | 2021-06-11 | 北京优易惠技术有限公司 | Supplier recommendation system and method based on bidding |
| CN113379318A (en) * | 2021-07-02 | 2021-09-10 | 广州交信投科技股份有限公司 | Method and device for evaluating operation service quality of public transport system and computer equipment |
| CN114997842A (en) * | 2022-07-18 | 2022-09-02 | 国网浙江省电力有限公司 | Intelligent evaluation method and system for digital purchase data |
| CN111798265B (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2024-07-26 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Accurate marketing method and device suitable for enterprise users |
-
2017
- 2017-04-17 CN CN201710248756.1A patent/CN107133719A/en active Pending
Cited By (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109962882B (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2021-09-21 | 中国科学院数据与通信保护研究教育中心 | Network identity management service credibility grade evaluation method and system |
| CN109962882A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2019-07-02 | 中国科学院数据与通信保护研究教育中心 | A kind of managing network identities service confidence level appraisal procedure and system |
| CN108090681A (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2018-05-29 | 广州供电局有限公司 | Electricity provider evaluation optimization method, system, storage medium and computer equipment |
| CN109242562A (en) * | 2018-08-31 | 2019-01-18 | 万翼科技有限公司 | Ranking method, device and the storage medium of supplier |
| JP2021068435A (en) * | 2019-10-17 | 2021-04-30 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Supplier evaluation device and supplier evaluation method |
| CN111797307A (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2020-10-20 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Portrayal method and device for enterprise users |
| CN111798265A (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2020-10-20 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Accurate marketing method and device suitable for enterprise users |
| CN111798265B (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2024-07-26 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Accurate marketing method and device suitable for enterprise users |
| CN111797307B (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2024-05-17 | 北京国电通网络技术有限公司 | Portrayal method and device for enterprise users |
| CN112529456A (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2021-03-19 | 海尔数字科技(青岛)有限公司 | Supplier evaluation system, supplier evaluation method, background equipment and storage medium |
| CN112700300A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-23 | 山东众阳健康科技集团有限公司 | Intelligent auditing and controlling method, system, storage medium and equipment for supplier qualification |
| CN112948667A (en) * | 2021-02-03 | 2021-06-11 | 北京优易惠技术有限公司 | Supplier recommendation system and method based on bidding |
| CN113379318A (en) * | 2021-07-02 | 2021-09-10 | 广州交信投科技股份有限公司 | Method and device for evaluating operation service quality of public transport system and computer equipment |
| CN114997842A (en) * | 2022-07-18 | 2022-09-02 | 国网浙江省电力有限公司 | Intelligent evaluation method and system for digital purchase data |
| CN114997842B (en) * | 2022-07-18 | 2022-10-25 | 国网浙江省电力有限公司 | Intelligent evaluation method and system for digital purchase data |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107133719A (en) | A kind of supplier's value assessment method | |
| Osipov et al. | Institutional analysis of public administration system | |
| Gelb et al. | Can communist economies transform incrementally? The experience of China | |
| Adelman et al. | An econometric model of socio-economic and political change in underdeveloped countries | |
| Mrak | Globalization: trends, challenges and opportunitess for countries in transition | |
| Jiang et al. | The mystery of zombie enterprises–“stiff but deathless” | |
| Duffie et al. | Arrow and general equilibrium theory | |
| Eichengreen et al. | Emerging giants: China and India in the world economy | |
| Cipollone et al. | Entrepreneurs meet financiers: Evidence from the business angel market | |
| CN104156784A (en) | Bid evaluation method based on unascertained measurement comprehensive evaluation | |
| CN109166046A (en) | A kind of highly-safe inauguration investment system | |
| CN109345287A (en) | The processing method of enterprise's valuation | |
| Xaba et al. | Efficiency evaluation of agricultural cooperatives in Mpumalanga: An empirical study using the DEA approach | |
| Yuen et al. | Privatization and Deregulation in ASEAN: An Overview | |
| Muhoya | The influence of knowledge management practices on performance of selected global audit firms in Kenya | |
| Osipov et al. | FINANCIAL PROVISION OF QUALITY: STATE FINANCING OF INNOVATIONS VS. DIRECT FOREIGN INVESTMENTS. | |
| Osipov et al. | Dysfunctions of Public Administration System: Analysis of Institutional Reforms | |
| OU | The impact of statutory money supply management and commercial bank loans and advances (CBLA) on economic growth: An empirical evidence in Nigeria | |
| CN101763618A (en) | Financial investment decision information quality inspection method | |
| Yan et al. | Financial risk assessment based on entropy weight topsis method: take the internet insurance industry as an example | |
| Gao | Value Creation in Private Equity-Sponsored Leveraged Buyouts: Estimating a Many-to-Many Matching Game | |
| Osipov et al. | Public Administration System: Crisis In Leadership And The Need Of Institutional Reforms In Russia | |
| Drabenstott | An effective overhaul of federal economic development policy: Response to Markusen and Glasmeier | |
| Sarris | A macro-micro framework for analysis of the impact of structural adjustment on the poor in sub-Saharan Africa | |
| Dernberger | Mainland China’s Economic System: A New Model or Variations on an Old Theme? |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20170905 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |