CN107067287A - With the balanced pricing method of net about car rideshare of " fixed price " for the upper limit - Google Patents
With the balanced pricing method of net about car rideshare of " fixed price " for the upper limit Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107067287A CN107067287A CN201710397469.7A CN201710397469A CN107067287A CN 107067287 A CN107067287 A CN 107067287A CN 201710397469 A CN201710397469 A CN 201710397469A CN 107067287 A CN107067287 A CN 107067287A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- mrow
- msup
- passenger
- rideshare
- driver
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 15
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0283—Price estimation or determination
- G06Q30/0284—Time or distance, e.g. usage of parking meters or taximeters
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/40—Business processes related to the transportation industry
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)
Abstract
One kind is with the balanced pricing method of net about car rideshare of " fixed price " for the upper limit, this method is to realize the dynamic adjustment that passenger pays with " fixed price " for the upper limit, the expense ratio fairness doctrine equal with driver's revenue growth ratio is saved as the evaluation basis of net about car rideshare valuation using passenger side, suitable λ value is determined by the historical data of net about car rideshare, effectively to solve driver to the unsuccessful misgivings of rideshare, improve the desire of driver's rideshare, so that valuation is more fair, so that entirety (driver and passenger) fairness of guarantee system.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to one kind be used for net about car rideshare when, calculate every passenger method for dealing with fare, and in particular to one
Kind it is the upper limit based on " fairness doctrine is the saving expense ratio and driver's revenue growth ratio phase of passenger side with " fixed price "
Deng " the balanced pricing method of net about car rideshare.
Background technology
Taxi business refers to that route same or like two or multidigit passenger take same taxi jointly
Trip, system is according to factors such as rideshare number, riding time, actual paths, and the fare that every passenger is calculated respectively is (generally low
In the fare each solely taken the opportunity).The fare summation that driver's income then pays for all passengers.The business can not increase operation
Transport power is improved in the case of vehicle fleet, contribute to alleviation call a taxi difficulty the problem of, and passenger's Trip Costs can be reduced, simultaneously
Improve driver's income.
The rideshare valuation model of current net about car, use " fixed price " pattern, i.e. system estimates car according to historical data more
Take, be shown as " fixed price " (generally 80%), if passenger receives the quotation, no matter whether have conjunction in actual riding process
Multiply, settled accounts by this fixed price.When rideshare passenger is more, driver's revenue growth is more, but for passenger, the stand-by period or around
The row time increases, and competitively priced is not improved so that passenger's loss increase and trigger passenger to be discontented with；If whole process can not be constituted
Rideshare, driver's income is then reduced, and triggers driver to be discontented with.
The content of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide a kind of net about car rideshare pricing method, assessment of this method from rideshare valuation model
Principle is set out, and is devised and is with " fixed price (" fixed price " mentioned in the present invention refers to 80% that passenger solely multiplies theoretical paying) "
The balanced valuation model of the upper limit, can effectively solve passenger and be discontented with driver caused by " fixed price " valuation model, improve passenger
With satisfaction of the driver to rideshare share-car, increase rideshare ratio.
The present inventor is exactly " unjust for passenger and the driver key reason discontented to current " fixed price " valuation model
It is flat ".For example, when rideshare passenger increase, passenger will undertake more time costs (stand-by period, the time of detouring), but its is preferential
Degree is constant, and driver's income is doubled and redoubled, and by contrast, passenger mentality is more uneven.Therefore, under the premise of herein, this hair
The bright valuation evaluation criterion of the rideshare based on " fairness doctrine " proposed with " fixed price " for the upper limit, the fairness doctrine is " to multiply
The saving expense ratio of visitor side " is equal with " driver's revenue growth ratio ".
Specifically, the technical solution adopted in the present invention is：It is a kind of balanced for the net about car rideshare of the upper limit with " fixed price "
Pricing method, this method is to be used as net using the saving expense ratio fairness doctrine equal with driver's revenue growth ratio of passenger side
The evaluation of about car rideshare valuation is basic；
When two people P1 and P2 carry out net about car single rideshare, the theoretical beelines of passenger P1 are set as D1, solely multiply theory
Pay as FP1 '；Passenger P2 theory beelines are D2, and it is FP2 ' solely to multiply theoretical pay；Driver is connected to passenger P1 during two people's rideshares
It is D to the total distance of traveling for being all sent to passenger P1 and passenger P2, theoretical receivable fare is T ', and it is to multiply that real revenue, which is T,
Objective P1 and passenger P2 pays fare sum in fact, according to the fairness doctrine, " the saving expense ratio of passenger side " and " driver during single rideshare
Revenue growth ratio " is equal, i.e.,
The real revenue T for obtaining driver is calculated by formula (1), formula (2) is seen below
Therefore, the passenger P1 fare FP1 that actually deals with isThe passenger P2 fare FP1 that actually deals with isIf the passenger P1 or passenger P2 fare of actually dealing with that calculate each solely multiply theory more than " fixed price "
80% paid, then passenger P1 or P2 fare of actually dealing be adjusted to each solely to multiply the 80% of theoretical paying；If calculating
Passenger P1's or P2 actually deals with fare less than each solely multiplying the 80% of theoretical paying, then passenger P1 fare of actually dealing with is
FP1's, passenger P2 actually deals with fare for FP1；
But when there is non-rideshare situation (i.e. driver only carries passenger P1 or passenger P2), passenger has enjoyed the payment expense upper limit
Solely to multiply 80% guarantee of theoretical paying, and the expense that driver assume responsibility for the risk of non-rideshare, i.e. passenger side saves ratio height
In driver's revenue growth ratio, therefore, driver's revenue growth ratio when rideshare is produced need to be adjusted, makes driver's revenue growth ratio
Slightly above the expense of passenger side saves ratio, that is, causes：
So that after the income of all drivers of a period of time Intranet about car rideshare is recalculated according to the λ value gained the section
All driver's revenue growth ratios in time are equal to the saving expense ratio of all passengers of this section of time Intranet about car rideshare,
Require that λ meets the constraints of formula (4) within this time, thus during by improving single rideshare driver revenue growth ratio
To ensure the overall fairness doctrine of Prognostic factors；
When net about car rideshare number is more than 3 people or 3 people, formula (3) is then rewritten as：
In formula (5), FP ' represents that whole passengers solely multiply theoretical paying sum；T is driver's real revenue；T ' is that driver is theoretical
Receivable fare；
Then every passenger should actually to pay fare calculation formula as follows：
In formula (6), FPiRepresent that i-th passenger's should actually pay fare, DiRepresent the theoretical most short distance of i-th of passenger
From T is driver's real revenue；If the actual delivery fare for having passenger is more than 80% that it solely multiplies theoretical paying, adjust in fact
Border pays fare and solely multiplies the 80% of theoretical paying for it.
It should be at least two months as above-mentioned a period of time referred to, i.e., be pushed up 2 months by this month, preferably be 2
- 3 years moons, as this month, pushes up 2 months -3 years.
It is of the invention to have with " fixed price " for the balanced valuation model of the upper limit compared with existing " fixed price " valuation model
Have the advantage that：
1) realize that passenger pays the dynamic adjustment of expense
Because being that, for the upper limit, it is the preferential of " fixed price " that passenger, which has directly enjoyed the payment expense upper limit, with " fixed price ".
Under balanced adjustable strategies, if rideshare number increase, its actual delivery expense is gradually reduced, preferential ratio can be higher, increases passenger
Rideshare desire.And for " fixed price " valuation model, with the increase of rideshare number, not only to undertake more stand-by period with
Detoured distance, and in-car comfort level is also reduced, but its preferential constant rate, and causing passenger to be not intended to many people's rideshares (has two people conjunction
Multiply and then may be used, it is undesirable to the third party, the addition of the 4th people).
2) it is more fair to valuate
Balanced valuation model ensure that " the saving expense ratio of passenger side " and " driver's revenue growth ratio based on the fairness doctrine
Rate " is equal, and both sides' psychology is all balanced.And in traditional " fixed price " pattern, with the increase of rideshare number, driver's revenue growth ratio
Dramatically increase, cause passenger's " furious " (psychologically upset).
On the other hand, balanced valuation model improves driver's revenue growth ratio during single rideshare by adjusting λ value,
Ensure that driver will not lose money from the overall fair angle of system, effectively solve driver to the unsuccessful misgivings of certain rideshare, improve
The desire of driver's rideshare, it is ensured that entirety (driver and passenger) fairness of system.
Embodiment
The present invention is a kind of with the balanced pricing method of net about car rideshare that " fixed price " is the upper limit, and it is based on " fair former
The about car rideshare valuation evaluation criterion of net then ".The fairness doctrine is " the saving expense ratio of passenger side " and " driver's revenue growth ratio
Rate " is equal.
By taking two people P1 and P2 nets about car single rideshare as an example, passenger P1 theory beelines are D1, solely multiply theoretical pay and are
FP1’；Passenger P2 theory beelines are D2, and it is FP2 ' solely to multiply theoretical pay.During passenger's P1 and P2 rideshare, driver is connected to first
Individual passenger P1 is D to the total distance of traveling for being all sent to two passengers P1 and P2, and theoretical receivable fare is T ', and the reality of driver
Border income is T (T is equal to two passengers P1 and P2 and pays fare sum in fact).According to the fairness doctrine, " the section of passenger side during single rideshare
Save expense ratio " it is equal with " driver's revenue growth ratio ", i.e.,
For single rideshare, FP1 ', FP2 ', T ' are known terms, and the real revenue T of driver can be tried to achieve by formula (1),
T also pays fare sum in fact for two passengers P1 and P2 simultaneously：
Therefore, passenger P1 should actually pay fare and bePassenger P2 should actually pay fareDue to using with the balanced valuation model that " fixed price " is the upper limit, if the actual delivery car of certain passenger
Take more than " fixed price " expense, then it is " fixed price " that dynamic (or pressure), which adjusts its actual delivery fare, and what is even calculated multiplies
Objective P1 or passenger P2 fare of actually dealing with is more than and each solely multiplies the 80% of theoretical paying, then passenger P1 or P2 actually deals with car
Expense is adjusted to each solely to multiply the 80% of theoretical paying；If the passenger P1 or P2 that calculate actually deal with fare be less than each solely multiply
The 80% of theory paying, then passenger P1 fare of actually dealing with is FP1, and passenger P2's actually deals with fare for FP1.
Above-mentioned calculation is embodied：Net about car rideshare when, passenger has enjoyed the payment expense upper limit for " fixed price "
Ensure, but driver assume responsibility for may non-rideshare risk.I.e. that is, in spite of the situation for non-rideshare occur, Cheng Kejun
The payment expense upper limit can be enjoyed and be the guarantee of " fixed price ", but the situation of non-rideshare once occur, this time driver during non-rideshare
Income can but be reduced, then the expense of passenger side during this time non-rideshare will certainly be caused to save ratio and be higher than driver's revenue growth ratio
Rate, in this way, it is just unfair for driver, do not meet the fairness doctrine.Therefore, driver's income when rideshare is produced need to be adjusted to increase
Plus ratio, the expense that driver's revenue growth ratio is slightly above passenger side is saved ratio, make：
So that being recalculated according to the λ value all in this time of gained after all drivers income in a period of time
The revenue growth ratio of driver is equal to the saving expense ratio of all passenger sides in this time, that is, requires λ in this time
Inside meet the constraints of formula (4)：
It should be at least two months as above-mentioned a period of time referred to, i.e., be pushed up 2 months by this month, preferably be 2
- 3 years moons, as this month, pushes up 2 months -3 years.
In this way, suitable λ value is determined according to the about car rideshare historical data of the net in a period of time, can be by improving single
The revenue growth ratio of driver during rideshare, so as to ensure the overall fairness doctrine of Prognostic factors.
When net about car rideshare number is more than 3 people or 3 people, because this pricing mode uses " the saving expense of passenger side
Ratio "/" driver's revenue growth ratio " is equal to λ principle, therefore, and for three people or three people's situation above, formula (3) is rewritten
For：
FP ' represents that whole passengers solely multiply theoretical paying sum in formula (5)；T is that driver's real revenue is that all passenger reals are paid
Fare sum；T ' is still the theoretical receivable fare of driver ibid.Driver real revenue T is obtained in this way, can be calculated by formula (5), together
When T also for all passenger reals pay fare sum.It is as follows that every passenger should actually pay fare calculation formula：
In formula (6), FPiRepresent that i-th passenger's should actually pay fare, DiRepresent the theoretical most short distance of i-th of passenger
From T is driver's real revenue.Due to using with the balanced valuation model that " fixed price " is the upper limit, if the reality of certain passenger
Pay fare and be more than " fixed price " expense, then it is " fixed price " to force to adjust its actual delivery fare.
Embodiment 1
Assuming that the Origin And Destination of every passenger is identical, and everyone expense that need to be paid by bus alone (solely multiplies theoretical pay
Take) it is 100 yuan, " fixed price " ratio is 80%.Table 1 and table 2 sets forth net about car single rideshare when existing " fixed price "
Valuation model is with the present invention with the valuation result (table 1 below-table 3 of " fixed price " for the balanced valuation model both of which of the upper limit
In passenger side refer to all passengers).
This rideshare that existing " fixed price " valuation model of table 1 is calculated is detailed
| Rideshare number | Every passenger pays | Passenger side saves expense ratio | Driver takes in | Driver's revenue growth ratio |
| 1 | 80 yuan | 20% | 80 yuan | - 20% |
| 2 | 80 yuan | 20% | 160 yuan | 60% |
| 3 | 80 yuan | 20% | 240 yuan | 140% |
" fixed price " of the present invention of table 2 is detailed for this rideshare that the balanced valuation model of the upper limit is calculated
| Rideshare number | Every passenger pays | Passenger side saves expense ratio | Driver takes in | Driver's revenue growth ratio |
| 1 | 80 yuan | 20% | 80 yuan | - 20% |
| 2 | 66.65 yuan | 33.3% | 133.3 it is first | 33.3% |
| 3 | 50 yuan | 50% | 150 yuan | 50% |
Obviously, using " fixed price " valuation model, when rideshare number increase, driver's income is sharply increased, and passenger is to more
People's rideshare wish declines.And when using " fixed price " for the balanced valuation model of the upper limit, with the increase of rideshare number, passenger pays
Take decline, driver's revenue growth, and passenger side and save expense ratio and driver's revenue growth ratio unanimously, both sides' rideshare wish
Strengthen.
If further being illustrated with being pushed up in month over 3 months where previous embodiment, according to all history of 3 months
Data determine that obtained λ value is 0.5, then this rideshare is with valuation of " fixed price " of the present invention for the balanced valuation model of the upper limit
As a result 3 be see the table below.
This rideshare valency table that " fixed price " of the present invention of table 3 calculates for the balanced valuation model of the upper limit
| Rideshare number | Every passenger pays | Passenger side saves expense ratio | Driver takes in | Driver's revenue growth ratio |
| 1 | 80 yuan | 20% | 80 yuan | - 20% |
| 2 | 75 yuan | 25% | 150 yuan | 50% |
| 3 | 60 yuan | 40% | 180 yuan | 80% |
In this way, by improving driver's revenue growth ratio during single rideshare, department is ensured from the overall fair angle of system
Machine will not lose money, and effectively solve driver to the unsuccessful misgivings of certain rideshare, improve the desire of driver's rideshare, it is ensured that system
Entirety (driver and passenger) fairness.
Claims (1)
1. it is a kind of with the balanced pricing method of net about car rideshare of " fixed price " for the upper limit, it is characterised in that this method is with passenger
Side saves the expense ratio fairness doctrine equal with driver's revenue growth ratio as the evaluation basis of net about car rideshare valuation；
When two people P1 and P2 carry out net about car single rideshare, set the theoretical beelines of passenger P1 and multiply theoretical paying as D1, solely
For FP1 '；Passenger P2 theory beelines are D2, and it is FP2 ' solely to multiply theoretical pay；Driver is connected to passenger P1 and extremely will during two people's rideshares
The total distance of traveling that passenger P1 and passenger P2 are all sent to is D, and theoretical receivable fare is T ', and it is passenger P1 that real revenue, which is T,
Fare sum is paid in fact with passenger P2；According to the fairness doctrine, " the saving expense ratio of passenger side " and " driver's income during single rideshare
Increase ratio " it is equal, i.e.,
<mrow>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>T</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<msup>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<mo>-</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
The real revenue T for obtaining driver is calculated by formula (1), formula (2) is seen below
<mrow>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<msup>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>+</mo>
<msup>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>-</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
Therefore, the passenger P1 fare FP1 that actually deals with isThe passenger P2 fare FP1 that actually deals with isIf the passenger P1 or passenger P2 fare of actually dealing with that calculate solely multiply what theory was paid more than respective
80%, then passenger P1 or P2 fare of actually dealing be adjusted to each solely to multiply the 80% of theoretical paying；
When non-rideshare situation occurs in this rideshare, solely multiply for " fixed price " because passenger P1 or P2 have enjoyed the payment expense upper limit
80% guarantee that theory is paid, and the expense that driver assume responsibility for the risk of non-rideshare, i.e. passenger side saves ratio higher than driver
Revenue growth ratio, therefore, need to adjust driver's revenue growth ratio when rideshare is produced, be slightly above driver's revenue growth ratio
The expense of passenger side saves ratio, that is, causes：
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>T</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>+</mo>
<mi>F</mi>
<mi>P</mi>
<msup>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
<mo>/</mo>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<msup>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
<mo>=</mo>
<mi>&lambda;</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&lambda;</mi>
<mo><</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>)</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mn>3</mn>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
So that after the income of the drivers all in history of a period of time Intranet about car rideshare is recalculated according to the λ value gained should
The revenue growth ratio of section time Intranet about all drivers of car rideshare is equal to the institute in history of this section of time Intranet about car rideshare
Have the saving expense ratio of passenger, that is, require that λ meets the constraints of (4), thus during by improving single rideshare driver receipts
Enter increase than to ensure the overall fairness doctrines of Prognostic factors；
When net about car rideshare number is more than 3 people or 3 people, formula (3) is then rewritten as：
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>FP</mi>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>T</mi>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>FP</mi>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
<mo>/</mo>
<mo>(</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<msup>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
</mrow>
<msup>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>&prime;</mo>
</msup>
</mfrac>
<mo>)</mo>
<mo>=</mo>
<mi>&lambda;</mi>
<mo>,</mo>
<mo>(</mo>
<mi>&lambda;</mi>
<mo><</mo>
<mn>1</mn>
<mo>)</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mn>5</mn>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
In formula (5), FP ' represents that whole passengers solely multiply theoretical paying sum；T is driver's real revenue；T ' is that driver's theory is receivable
Fare；
Then every passenger should actually to pay fare calculation formula as follows：
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>FP</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<msub>
<mi>D</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
<mrow>
<msub>
<mi>&Sigma;D</mi>
<mi>i</mi>
</msub>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
<mo>&times;</mo>
<mi>T</mi>
<mo>-</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mo>-</mo>
<mrow>
<mo>(</mo>
<mn>6</mn>
<mo>)</mo>
</mrow>
</mrow>
1
In formula (6), FPiRepresent that i-th passenger's should actually pay fare, DiThe theoretical beeline of i-th of passenger is represented, T is
Driver's real revenue；If the actual delivery fare for having passenger is more than 80% that the passenger solely multiplies theoretical paying, the passenger is adjusted
Actual delivery fare solely multiply the 80% of theoretical paying for the passenger.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710397469.7A CN107067287A (en) | 2017-05-31 | 2017-05-31 | With the balanced pricing method of net about car rideshare of " fixed price " for the upper limit |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710397469.7A CN107067287A (en) | 2017-05-31 | 2017-05-31 | With the balanced pricing method of net about car rideshare of " fixed price " for the upper limit |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107067287A true CN107067287A (en) | 2017-08-18 |
Family
ID=59615992
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201710397469.7A Pending CN107067287A (en) | 2017-05-31 | 2017-05-31 | With the balanced pricing method of net about car rideshare of " fixed price " for the upper limit |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107067287A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108876156A (en) * | 2018-06-25 | 2018-11-23 | 清华大学 | Share-car and user's order processing method, system and the equipment being applicable in |
| CN110689631A (en) * | 2018-07-05 | 2020-01-14 | 丰田自动车株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and storage medium |
| CN111199334A (en) * | 2018-11-19 | 2020-05-26 | 丰田自动车株式会社 | Information processing system, recording medium, and information processing method |
| CN112446696A (en) * | 2019-08-28 | 2021-03-05 | 本田技研工业株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing system, information processing method, and storage medium |
-
2017
- 2017-05-31 CN CN201710397469.7A patent/CN107067287A/en active Pending
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108876156A (en) * | 2018-06-25 | 2018-11-23 | 清华大学 | Share-car and user's order processing method, system and the equipment being applicable in |
| CN108876156B (en) * | 2018-06-25 | 2021-03-05 | 交叉信息核心技术研究院(西安)有限公司 | Car sharing and user order processing method and system and applicable equipment |
| CN110689631A (en) * | 2018-07-05 | 2020-01-14 | 丰田自动车株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and storage medium |
| CN111199334A (en) * | 2018-11-19 | 2020-05-26 | 丰田自动车株式会社 | Information processing system, recording medium, and information processing method |
| CN112446696A (en) * | 2019-08-28 | 2021-03-05 | 本田技研工业株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing system, information processing method, and storage medium |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107067287A (en) | With the balanced pricing method of net about car rideshare of " fixed price " for the upper limit | |
| Esposito et al. | Foreign competition and domestic industry profitability | |
| Nilsson | Restructuring Sweden’s railways: The unintentional deregulation | |
| US20100138332A1 (en) | Method and system for creating and marketing employee stock option mirror image warrants | |
| Ray | Economic performance of Indian automobile industry: An econometric appraisal | |
| Saito | A microeconomic analysis of Bitcoin and illegal activities | |
| CN107316091A (en) | Private car online order rideshare trip operation system and method | |
| Cape et al. | VAT and brexit: The past, present and future | |
| Walters et al. | The South African experience with negotiated versus competitively tendered bus contracts | |
| Harcourt et al. | The quantitative effect of basing company taxation on replacement costs | |
| Tadesse | Road Freight Transport in Ethiopia with Special Emphasis on Addis Ababa–Djibouti Corridor | |
| Madden | Central Fiscal Dominance, Collaborative Federalism, and Economic Reform | |
| US20090099958A1 (en) | Method for use in determining the value of an automobile | |
| Löffler | Miles-Ezzell's WACC Approach Yields Arbitrage | |
| Dodgson | The bus industry and the cases of Australia, The USA and the UK | |
| Micossi et al. | Efficient Taxation of Multi-national Enterprises in the European Union | |
| Pautsch et al. | Railroad Grain Car Pricing and Supply Models | |
| Teicher | Unions and wages policies | |
| Richards et al. | Operator and organizational issues | |
| Katolik | Impact of fiscalization at the height of calculated value added tax | |
| Zhao et al. | Research on Railway Public Welfare Transport Compensation Mechanism | |
| Tansill | Tax Aspects of Intercompany Profits in Inventories | |
| Findlay et al. | Open Streets or taken for a ride? Reforming Australia's taxi markets | |
| Ghee et al. | Addressing the Singapore-Johor Causeway Cross-borderhigh Toll Charges | |
| Perkins | Wealth Fare Systems in the European Union: Obstacles to a Common Approach |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20170818 |
|
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |