CN106933097B - Chemical process fault diagnosis method based on multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG - Google Patents
Chemical process fault diagnosis method based on multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106933097B CN106933097B CN201710339420.6A CN201710339420A CN106933097B CN 106933097 B CN106933097 B CN 106933097B CN 201710339420 A CN201710339420 A CN 201710339420A CN 106933097 B CN106933097 B CN 106933097B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- fault
- sdg
- pcc
- variables
- correlation coefficient
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0205—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system
- G05B13/024—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a chemical process fault diagnosis method based on multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG. The method comprises the steps of primarily optimizing selected variables by using a Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) statistical index by taking a network topological structure of the whole process as a reference point, then selecting special variables with larger weights from a multi-layer correlation coefficient set by using a PCA weight thought, establishing an optimal PCC-SDG network by combining a Sign Directed Graph (SDG), and finally performing fault diagnosis on a rule for establishing an aggregation weight coefficient Q aiming at the optimal PCC-SDG. The invention provides a new fault diagnosis method, perfects an SDG modeling method, improves the efficiency of detecting multivariable states by workers, avoids the influence of time lag and other non-information synchronization factors, more effectively reduces the false alarm rate, accurately identifies the type of fault and greatly reduces the occurrence of production safety accidents.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of chemical process fault diagnosis, and particularly relates to a process fault diagnosis method based on multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG.
Background
With the increasing expansion of modern industrial scale and the increasing complexity of systems, the requirements of chemical process systems for identifying and detecting faults are higher and higher. At present, quantitative modeling of a Symbol Directed Graph (SDG) is difficult, the fault diagnosis effect of the whole process is not obvious based on a simple correlation rule, although simple mathematical model analysis can carry out certain diagnosis on the fault, the diagnosis rule is not deeply discussed, the locality is strong, the whole factor is deficient, the safety and the stability of the system cannot be guaranteed, and the application is difficult.
The normal operation of the chemical system process follows the first law, so that the process variables present complex correlation characteristics, the schema abstract characteristics of the SDG on the process and equipment can represent the complex causal influence relationship among the whole process variables, and the SDG theory has been successfully applied to the industrial process, the method is mature, but the research on the SDG quantitative modeling method is less. The correlation coefficient fault diagnosis is a new fault detection method in the chemical field, fault identification and detection are carried out by combining Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) with a Sign Directed Graph (SDG), the internal influence process of the fault in a complex system can be excavated to the maximum extent, and the fault can be diagnosed more comprehensively to ensure the safety of the system.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the problems in the prior art, the invention provides a qualitative (SDG) and quantitative (PCC) fault diagnosis method based on a full flow, which can replace the traditional fault diagnosis method and has better fault diagnosis effect.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme:
the chemical process fault diagnosis method based on the multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG comprises the steps of performing correlation analysis on PCC modeling, performing variable optimization on the SDG and the like, and comprises the following specific steps:
(1) selecting variables for a specific chemical engineering process by using a Symbol Directed Graph (SDG) to establish an SDG initial network;
(2) extracting real-time data segments of variables, constructing a data vector set for correlation analysis, formulating a correlation coefficient acceptance standard, and determining an initial threshold;
(3) selecting an initial characteristic variable by using a Pearson correlation coefficient for correlation analysis, and establishing a variable correlation coefficient group for weight analysis;
(4) determining a final optimization variable according to the weight analysis and the process analysis of the correlation coefficient groups, and selecting a correlation coefficient set with a larger weight from the multilayer correlation coefficient groups to construct a PCC-SDG optimization graph;
(5) faults are detected according to the aggregate weight factor Qrule and the relative degree of difference between states is used to identify which type of fault.
(6) When the parameter Q is larger than 1, namely the system has a fault, determining the fault type by using the relevant difference degree to search a fault source in one step, and if not, in a normal state, extracting data again to detect.
The method can completely identify the running state of the process system, search the fault source and solve the fault, and is a new idea for solving the system fault in the chemical process.
The invention has the following beneficial effects:
(1) the invention provides a chemical fault multilayer optimization method based on qualitative SDG and quantitative PCC, which can accurately judge the fault state and improve the SDG modeling method, and can provide a new thought in the field of chemical process fault diagnosis, deeply dig process flow information, improve the working efficiency of operators, and prevent the problems of unplanned shutdown and the like of the production process caused by fault hidden trouble.
(2) The method is determined by the variable detection value in a certain time period, can have a certain filtering effect on the abnormal measurement value of random interference, and can ensure the normal and effective operation of a chemical process system so as to reduce the economic loss caused by non-safety factors as much as possible.
Description of the drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of a multi-layer optimized PCC-SDG process;
figure 2SDG initial network schematic;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an optimal PCC-SDG network;
FIG. 4 is a graph comparing the normal state and fault state aggregate weight coefficients Q;
TABLE 2 optimization variables MovContinuously measuring a set of variable related coefficients;
table 3Q parameter for fault 1;
table 4Q parameter for fault 8;
table 5Q parameter for fault 13;
table 6Q parameter for fault 16.
Detailed Description
In order to make the technical solutions of the present invention better understood, the following description is provided clearly and completely, and other similar embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative efforts shall fall within the protection scope of the present application based on the embodiments in the present application.
The first embodiment is as follows:
as shown in fig. 1, a fault diagnosis method for a chemical process of a multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG is described in a flow diagram form, including deep mining of process information by the SDG, quantitative optimization fault diagnosis of PCC, and the like, and specifically includes the following steps:
(1) analyzing the TE (Tennessee Eastman) process, selecting 22 continuous measurement variables, and establishing a Symbol Directed Graph (SDG) initial network;
(2) extracting real-time data segments of TE process variables to construct a data vector set, analyzing correlation coefficients, establishing a correlation coefficient acceptance standard, and determining an initial threshold;
(3) selecting an initial characteristic variable by using a Pearson correlation coefficient for correlation analysis, and establishing a variable correlation coefficient group for weight analysis;
(4) determining a final optimization variable through weight analysis and process analysis of the TE process correlation coefficient group, and selecting a correlation coefficient set with a larger weight from the multilayer correlation coefficient groups to construct a PCC-SDG optimization graph;
(5) and detecting faults according to an aggregation weight coefficient Q rule established by a process correlation rule, and identifying the type of the faults by using the correlation difference between the states.
(6) When the parameter Q is larger than 1, namely the system has a fault, determining the fault type by using the relevant difference degree to search a fault source in one step, and if not, in a normal state, extracting data again to detect.
The variables in the steps (1) and (2) are selected, and data acquisition and the like are as follows:
the TE process includes 12 operating variables, 41 measured variables, 20 preset faults, and 6 control modes. Taking 22 continuous measurement variables from the measurement variables as an example, dividing the TE process into three parts for analysis: the device comprises a reactor, a condenser, a gas-liquid separator, a circulating compressor and a desorption tower. Table 1 includes information of 22 continuous measurement variables, and normal values thereof are values under basic conditions. Each training data includes 480 sets of sample data, and test data 960 sets of sample data. Fig. 2 is a Symbol Directed Graph (SDG) initial network.
The weight analysis result of the variable correlation coefficient group obtained in the step (3) is shown in table 2;
the PCC-SDG optimization graph constructed in the step (4) is shown in FIG. 3;
the fault detection information required in the steps (5) and (6) is shown in tables 3-6, and the detection result is shown in fig. 4;
the analysis of the results in steps (5) and (6) is specifically as follows:
as shown in tables 3-6, the normal state and four fault state optimal variables MfnThe Q parameter has obvious difference, the normal state and the fault state are effectively separated from each other by comparing the Q value in the figure 4, and the fault state is above a fault tolerance numerical value line, and the correlation difference degree of the state is further determined, for example, as can be seen from faults 1 and 8, the correlation difference degrees of the normal state and the faults 1 and 8 are respectively 6 and 7, and the correlation difference degrees of the faults 1 and the faults 8 are 4, so that the types of the faults can be accurately distinguished, and the fault source can be confirmed. The results show that the optimum variable M formed by the PCC-SDG methodfnThe normal state and the fault state can be accurately distinguished, and the effect is obvious.
Tables 1-6 are as follows:
TABLE 1TE Process continuous measurement variables
TABLE 2 optimization variables MovContinuously measuring a set of variable related coefficients
TABLE 3Q parameter for Fault 1
TABLE 4Q parameter for Fault 8
TABLE 5Q parameter for Fault 13
TABLE 6Q parameter for Fault 16
And at this point, the multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG fault diagnosis method is successfully finished.
Furthermore, it should be understood that although the present description refers to embodiments, not every embodiment may contain only a single embodiment, and such description is for clarity only, and those skilled in the art should integrate the description, and the embodiments may be combined as appropriate to form other embodiments understood by those skilled in the art.
Claims (1)
1. A chemical process fault diagnosis method based on multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG is characterized by comprising the following steps:
(1) analyzing the TE process, selecting 22 continuous measurement variables, and establishing a symbol directed graph initial network;
(2) extracting real-time data segments of TE process variables to construct a data vector set, analyzing correlation coefficients, establishing a correlation coefficient acceptance standard, and determining an initial threshold;
(3) selecting an initial characteristic variable by using a Pearson correlation coefficient for correlation analysis, and establishing a variable correlation coefficient group for weight analysis;
(4) determining a final optimization variable through weight analysis and process analysis of the TE process correlation coefficient group, and selecting a correlation coefficient set with a larger weight from the multilayer correlation coefficient groups to construct a PCC-SDG optimization graph;
(5) detecting faults according to an aggregation weight coefficient Q rule established by a correlation rule of the process, and identifying the type of the faults by using the correlation difference between the states;
(6) when the parameter Q is larger than 1, namely the system has a fault, determining the fault type by using the relevant difference degree to search a fault source in one step, and if not, determining the fault type to be in a normal state and extracting data again to detect;
variables in the steps (1) and (2) are selected, and data acquisition is specifically as follows:
in step (1), the TE process is divided into three parts for analysis: the method comprises the following steps of (1) a reactor, a condenser, a gas-liquid separator, a circulating compressor and a desorption tower, wherein the table 1 comprises information of 22 continuously measured variables, and normal values of the continuously measured variables are numerical values under basic working conditions;
the weight analysis result of the variable correlation coefficient group obtained in the step (3) is shown in table 2;
the fault detection information required in steps (5) (6) is shown in tables 3-6;
tables 1-6 are as follows:
TABLE 1TE Process continuous measurement variables
TABLE 2 set of correlation coefficients for continuous measurement variables of the optimized variables Mov
TABLE 3Q parameter for Fault 1
TABLE 4Q parameter for Fault 8
TABLE 5Q parameter for Fault 13
TABLE 6Q parameter for Fault 16
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710339420.6A CN106933097B (en) | 2017-05-15 | 2017-05-15 | Chemical process fault diagnosis method based on multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710339420.6A CN106933097B (en) | 2017-05-15 | 2017-05-15 | Chemical process fault diagnosis method based on multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106933097A CN106933097A (en) | 2017-07-07 |
CN106933097B true CN106933097B (en) | 2021-07-20 |
Family
ID=59430613
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710339420.6A Active CN106933097B (en) | 2017-05-15 | 2017-05-15 | Chemical process fault diagnosis method based on multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106933097B (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108572552B (en) * | 2018-04-24 | 2021-04-27 | 杭州电子科技大学 | Mixed passive/H based on fault alarm∞In a hybrid control method |
CN113126582B (en) * | 2021-04-20 | 2022-07-12 | 万华化学集团股份有限公司 | Intermittent process production time control method, storage medium and system |
CN114327662A (en) * | 2021-12-30 | 2022-04-12 | 山石网科通信技术股份有限公司 | Operating system processing method and device, storage medium and processor |
CN114166988B (en) * | 2022-02-09 | 2022-04-19 | 华谱科仪(北京)科技有限公司 | Chromatograph cluster fault detection method and device |
CN114879636A (en) * | 2022-05-15 | 2022-08-09 | 浙江工业大学 | Chemical process fault isolation method based on fault interpreter |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103713628B (en) * | 2013-12-31 | 2017-01-18 | 上海交通大学 | Fault diagnosis method based on signed directed graph and data constitution |
US20160071004A1 (en) * | 2015-10-23 | 2016-03-10 | Sarkhoon and Qeshm LLC | Method and system for predictive maintenance of control valves |
CN105893700B (en) * | 2016-04-26 | 2019-05-31 | 陆新建 | Based on the online fault detection and diagnosis technology of physics-big data mixed model Chemical Manufacture |
-
2017
- 2017-05-15 CN CN201710339420.6A patent/CN106933097B/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106933097A (en) | 2017-07-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106933097B (en) | Chemical process fault diagnosis method based on multi-layer optimization PCC-SDG | |
CN109193650B (en) | Power grid weak point evaluation method based on high-dimensional random matrix theory | |
JP6141235B2 (en) | How to detect anomalies in time series data | |
CN104360677A (en) | Cigarette processing quality evaluation and diagnosis method | |
CN107038167A (en) | Big data excavating analysis system and its analysis method based on model evaluation | |
CN116304766B (en) | Multi-sensor-based quick assessment method for state of switch cabinet | |
CN107862324B (en) | MWSPCA-based CBR prediction model intelligent early warning method | |
CN111160791A (en) | Abnormal user identification method based on GBDT algorithm and factor fusion | |
CN105404280A (en) | Industrial process fault detection method based on autoregression dynamic hidden variable model | |
CN114757380B (en) | Fault early warning system and method for thermal power plant, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
US11120350B2 (en) | Multilevel pattern monitoring method for industry processes | |
CN111861211A (en) | System with double-layer anti-electricity-stealing model | |
CN102789676A (en) | Method for designing industrial alarm on basis of alarm evidence fusion | |
CN103389701A (en) | Plant-level process fault detection and diagnosis method based on distributed data model | |
CN108197254B (en) | A kind of data recovery method based on neighbour | |
CN107103425B (en) | Intelligent energy evaluation system for power generation equipment running state computer | |
CN104615123B (en) | K-nearest neighbor based sensor fault isolation method | |
CN117560300B (en) | Intelligent internet of things flow prediction and optimization system | |
CN103529337B (en) | The recognition methods of nonlinear correlation relation between equipment failure and electric quantity information | |
CN108956041A (en) | Sintering machine based on the unilateral detection method of spectrum signature leaks out on-line fault diagnosis method | |
CN104950873A (en) | Method for detecting intermittent oscillation of industrial control circuits in online manner | |
CN114519382A (en) | Nuclear power plant key operation parameter extraction and abnormity monitoring method | |
CN116704729A (en) | Industrial kiln early warning system and method based on big data analysis | |
CN105607477B (en) | A kind of process control loops detection method of oscillations decomposed based on improvement local mean value | |
CN104503441B (en) | Process fault monitoring method based on improved dynamic visible graph |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |