CN106782702B - A kind of reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method - Google Patents
A kind of reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106782702B CN106782702B CN201611231909.3A CN201611231909A CN106782702B CN 106782702 B CN106782702 B CN 106782702B CN 201611231909 A CN201611231909 A CN 201611231909A CN 106782702 B CN106782702 B CN 106782702B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- relay
- signal
- lptcommand
- control unit
- safety level
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
- G21C—NUCLEAR REACTORS
- G21C17/00—Monitoring; Testing ; Maintaining
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E30/00—Energy generation of nuclear origin
- Y02E30/30—Nuclear fission reactors
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)
Abstract
The invention belongs to nuclear reactor protection technical fields; more particularly to a kind of reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method, and it is an object of the present invention to provide a kind of can eliminate the reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method that the experiment of output connection signal causes third party system equipment malfunction to make risk outside totally digitilized reactor protection system.The present invention extends stimulus interval time while the elimination of upper one experiment feedback signal is confirmed before the test of each stimulus; thus fundamentally solves the risk that the experiment of output connection signal causes third party system equipment malfunction to be made outside totally digitilized reactor protection system; the shutdown shutdown risk that routine test generates during power of the assembling unit operation is effectively prevent, effectively increases the reliability of totally digitilized reactor protection system.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to nuclear reactor protection technical fields, and in particular to a kind of reactor protection system external output signal
Test loop design method.
Background technology
Reactor protection system is to ensure reactor three safety curtains (fuel can, primary Ioops pressure boundary, safety
Shell) integrality, limited reactions, which pile up, runs or alleviates damage sequence in allowed band, protection reactor, environment and people
The important control system of member's safety.Reactor protection system receives the signal from process instrument and carries out data acquisition, calculating, threshold
Value the logical process such as compares and ensures the safety and stability of reactor so as to generate shutdown signal or engineered safeguards features action signal
Operation.In order to ensure the availability of reactor protection system protection channel and the ability of the safe driving function of execution and verification are protected
The availability that protecting system is connected to external third-parties system hardwire, will according to safety-related systems and equipment routine test supervision
It asks, needs to carry out output joint test outside reactor protection system.
As shown in Figure 1, output joint test (Loop Test) is shown from safety level outside Digital Reactor Protection System
With in control unit (SVDU) trigger after just according to design program carry out automatically, result of the test is directly shown on SVDU.Experiment
SVDU can send out two test commands of LPTCOMMAND_1 and LPTCOMMAND_2 to each protection channel after triggering, then each
Protection channel is issued to the drive signal of third party system equipment again, and program is by comparing the feedback signal of third party system equipment
Carry out validation test success or not.Combinations different with LPTCOMMAND_2 LPTCOMMAND_1 represent different experiment moulds respectively
Formula:
Stimulus switch logic is carried out according to 00 → 01 → 10 → 11 → 00 sequence, will not theoretically trigger true letter
Number action, but since the signal switching interval time is a scan period, once the on-the-spot test actuating of relay it is relatively slow or because
For " clinging ", program is not purged confirmation to previous experiment feedback signal, this can all cause to touch in next drive test trial signal
After hair, which does not restore yet to normal mode, this will all trigger actual signal, and third party system equipment is caused to be missed
Action.
Invention content
The purpose of the present invention is to provide one kind can eliminate output connection letter outside totally digitilized reactor protection system
Number experiment causes third party system equipment malfunction to make the reactor protection system external output signal test loop design side of risk
Method.
The invention is realized in this way:
A kind of reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method, specifically comprises the following steps:
Step 1:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal
Sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and relay 1, relay 2 and relay 3 are motionless
Make;
Step 2:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal
Sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 01 " to relay, and trigger relay 1 acts, relay 2 and relay
Device 3 is failure to actuate;Relay 1 is shown to safety level and control unit sends out experiment feedback signal, and safety level is shown and control unit
Confirm that 1 working condition of relay is normal after receiving experiment feedback signal;
Step 3:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal
Sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and output signal is restored to original state, relay
Device 1, relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate;
Step 4:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal
Sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 10 " to relay, and trigger relay 2 acts, relay 1 and relay
Device 3 is failure to actuate;Relay 2 is shown to safety level and control unit sends out experiment feedback signal, and safety level is shown and control unit
Confirm that 2 working condition of relay is normal after receiving experiment feedback signal;
Step 5:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal
Sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and output signal is restored to original state, relay
Device 1, relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate;
Step 6:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal
Sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 11 " to relay, and trigger relay 3 acts, relay 1 and relay
Device 2 is failure to actuate;Relay 3 is shown to safety level and control unit sends out experiment feedback signal, and safety level is shown and control unit
Confirm that 3 working condition of relay is normal after receiving experiment feedback signal;
Step 7:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal
Sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and output signal is restored to original state, relay
Device 1, relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate.
The beneficial effects of the invention are as follows:
It is anti-to upper one experiment before the test of each stimulus simultaneously that the present invention extends stimulus interval time
The elimination of feedback signal is confirmed thus fundamentally solve output connection outside totally digitilized reactor protection system
Signal experiment causes the risk that third party system equipment malfunction is made, and effectively prevent routine test generation during power of the assembling unit operation
Shutdown risk is shut down, effectively increases the reliability of totally digitilized reactor protection system.
Description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is output connection signal experiment process schematic diagram outside reactor protective system.
Specific embodiment
The present invention is described further with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples.
A kind of reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method, specifically comprises the following steps:
Step 1:As shown in Figure 1, safety level is shown and control unit (SVDU) controls the first signal transmitting module
LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, relay 1,
Relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate.
Step 2:Safety level is shown and control unit (SVDU) controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and the
Binary signal sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 01 " to relay, and trigger relay 1 acts, relay 2
It is failure to actuate with relay 3.Relay 1 is shown to safety level and control unit (SVDU) sends out experiment feedback signal, and safety level is shown
Show and confirm that 1 working condition of relay is normal after receiving experiment feedback signal with control unit (SVDU).
Step 3:Safety level is shown and control unit (SVDU) controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and the
Binary signal sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and output signal is restored to initial shape
State, relay 1, relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate.
Step 4:Safety level is shown and control unit (SVDU) controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and the
Binary signal sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 10 " to relay, and trigger relay 2 acts, relay 1
It is failure to actuate with relay 3.Relay 2 is shown to safety level and control unit (SVDU) sends out experiment feedback signal, and safety level is shown
Show and confirm that 2 working condition of relay is normal after receiving experiment feedback signal with control unit (SVDU).
Step 5:Safety level is shown and control unit (SVDU) controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and the
Binary signal sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and output signal is restored to initial shape
State, relay 1, relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate.
Step 6:Safety level is shown and control unit (SVDU) controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and the
Binary signal sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 11 " to relay, and trigger relay 3 acts, relay 1
It is failure to actuate with relay 2.Relay 3 is shown to safety level and control unit (SVDU) sends out experiment feedback signal, and safety level is shown
Show and confirm that 3 working condition of relay is normal after receiving experiment feedback signal with control unit (SVDU).
Step 7:Safety level is shown and control unit (SVDU) controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and the
Binary signal sending module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and output signal is restored to initial shape
State, relay 1, relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate.
According to original design program, after triggering stimulus on SVDU, LPTCOMMAND_1 and LPTCOMMAND_2 are pressed
Stimulus is sent out according to 00 → 01 → 10 → 11 → 00 logical order so as to the circuit actuating of relay be corresponded to, so as to complete to each
The test of a actuating of relay situation.But since time interval is shorter, in the situation that first stimulus does not completely disappear also
Under, once second stimulus triggering may result in the triggering of actual signal and make so as to cause equipment malfunction.Or in relay
In the case of " clinging " occurs for device, the triggering that other any road stimulus also will all lead to actual signal is triggered.
Improvements of the present invention is to have modified the logical order that stimulus issues and increase that stimulus disappears sentences
Conclusion sentence.The short situation of signal interval is tested for each road test, logical order has been changed to 00 by us in test procedure →
01 → 00 → 10 → 00 → 11 → 00, it sends out by the automatic clear after each stimulus is sent out and then again second again and tests
Signal thus considerably increases the interval time of stimulus, eliminates and accidentally opens since stimulus interval time is short
The risk of tripartite's system equipment.The situation of " clinging " failure that may occur for busy relay simultaneously, we increase examination
The disappearance for testing signal feedback judges sentence, we pass through an experiment feedback signal on confirming before each stimulus is sent out
It has been disappeared that, be thus inherently eliminated output joint test outside totally digitilized reactor protection system and accidentally opened third party
The risk of system equipment substantially increases the reliability of totally digitilized reactor protection system.
The implementation of the present invention is explained in detail above in conjunction with embodiment, but the present invention is not limited to above-mentioned realities
Example is applied, it within the knowledge of a person skilled in the art, can also be under the premise of present inventive concept not be departed from
Various changes can be made.The prior art may be used in the content not being described in detail in description of the invention.
Claims (1)
1. a kind of reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method, specifically comprises the following steps:
Step 1:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal to send
Module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and relay 1, relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate;
Step 2:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal to send
Module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 01 " to relay, and trigger relay 1 acts, and relay 2 and relay 3 are not
Action;Relay 1 is shown to safety level and control unit sends out experiment feedback signal, and safety level is shown and control unit receives examination
Confirm that 1 working condition of relay is normal after testing feedback signal;
Step 3:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal to send
Module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and output signal is restored to original state, relay 1,
Relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate;
Step 4:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal to send
Module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 10 " to relay, and trigger relay 2 acts, and relay 1 and relay 3 are not
Action;Relay 2 is shown to safety level and control unit sends out experiment feedback signal, and safety level is shown and control unit receives examination
Confirm that 2 working condition of relay is normal after testing feedback signal;
Step 5:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal to send
Module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and output signal is restored to original state, relay 1,
Relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate;
Step 6:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal to send
Module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 11 " to relay, and trigger relay 3 acts, and relay 1 and relay 2 are not
Action;Relay 3 is shown to safety level and control unit sends out experiment feedback signal, and safety level is shown and control unit receives examination
Confirm that 3 working condition of relay is normal after testing feedback signal;
Step 7:Safety level is shown and control unit controls the first signal transmitting module LPTCOMMAND_1 and second signal to send
Module LPTCOMMAND_2 sends out the stimulus of " 00 " to relay, and output signal is restored to original state, relay 1,
Relay 2 and relay 3 are failure to actuate.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611231909.3A CN106782702B (en) | 2016-12-28 | 2016-12-28 | A kind of reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611231909.3A CN106782702B (en) | 2016-12-28 | 2016-12-28 | A kind of reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106782702A CN106782702A (en) | 2017-05-31 |
CN106782702B true CN106782702B (en) | 2018-07-06 |
Family
ID=58921206
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611231909.3A Active CN106782702B (en) | 2016-12-28 | 2016-12-28 | A kind of reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106782702B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107799191B (en) * | 2017-09-29 | 2019-11-26 | 北京广利核***工程有限公司 | Nuclear power station security level output control circuit test method and system |
CN113726628B (en) * | 2020-05-26 | 2023-03-28 | 北京广利核***工程有限公司 | Reactor protection cabinet interface test system and method |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5586156A (en) * | 1995-07-14 | 1996-12-17 | General Electric Company | Reactor protection system with automatic self-testing and diagnostic |
CN104485140A (en) * | 2014-11-13 | 2015-04-01 | 大亚湾核电运营管理有限责任公司 | Nuclear power station reactor protection system testing method and apparatus thereof |
CN105788687A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-07-20 | 中国核动力研究设计院 | Reactor protection system two-out-of-three conforming maintenance bypass system |
CN105931679A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-09-07 | 中国核动力研究设计院 | One-out-of-two conformation maintenance bypass device of reactor protection system |
CN106205755A (en) * | 2016-07-26 | 2016-12-07 | 中广核工程有限公司 | Reactor protection system Channel Response Time Intelligentized test system and method |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR100909762B1 (en) * | 2007-11-27 | 2009-07-29 | 한국원자력연구원 | Test apparatus and control method of digital reactor protection system |
-
2016
- 2016-12-28 CN CN201611231909.3A patent/CN106782702B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5586156A (en) * | 1995-07-14 | 1996-12-17 | General Electric Company | Reactor protection system with automatic self-testing and diagnostic |
CN104485140A (en) * | 2014-11-13 | 2015-04-01 | 大亚湾核电运营管理有限责任公司 | Nuclear power station reactor protection system testing method and apparatus thereof |
CN105788687A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-07-20 | 中国核动力研究设计院 | Reactor protection system two-out-of-three conforming maintenance bypass system |
CN105931679A (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2016-09-07 | 中国核动力研究设计院 | One-out-of-two conformation maintenance bypass device of reactor protection system |
CN106205755A (en) * | 2016-07-26 | 2016-12-07 | 中广核工程有限公司 | Reactor protection system Channel Response Time Intelligentized test system and method |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
CPR1000核电机组反应堆保护***定期试验***改进研究;陈通 等;《自动化与仪器仪表》;20151231(第9期);全文 * |
基于TRICON和SVDU安全级平台的PLM T3试验;蔡晓涛 等;《电脑知识与技术》;20130430;第9卷(第10期);全文 * |
福清核电厂数字化保护***定期试验方案及可行性分析;杨汝贞 等;《自动化博览》;20121231;全文 * |
秦二厂3号、4号机组反应堆保护***T3试验改进;王武士 等;《核电子学与探测技术》;20150430;第35卷(第4期);全文 * |
红沿河核电厂反应堆保护***定期试验方案设计;朱攀 等;《核动力工程》;20150430;第36卷(第2期);全文 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106782702A (en) | 2017-05-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106782702B (en) | A kind of reactor protection system external output signal test loop design method | |
CN111614157B (en) | Sequence control system and method for switching operation of transformer substation | |
CN107884672B (en) | Periodic test method for nuclear power plant reactor protection system connection loop | |
CN113688521B (en) | High-reliability reactor protection system test permission function design method and system | |
CN110428919A (en) | The design method of PWR nuclear power plant reactivity control strategy based on sign | |
CN107563227A (en) | The terminal device that anti-data are stolen secret information | |
US20110125302A1 (en) | Method and system for formal safety verification of manufacturing automation systems | |
US20120323341A1 (en) | Control device | |
CN104485140A (en) | Nuclear power station reactor protection system testing method and apparatus thereof | |
CN105137474B (en) | A kind of routine test method for source range neutron detector power supply control function | |
CN110308695B (en) | System and method for diagnosing locking state of periodic test output of nuclear safety level optimization module | |
Todd et al. | The architecture, design and realisation of the LHC beam interlock system | |
CN108519891B (en) | Nuclear power station equipment structure optimization device and processing method | |
CN108418699B (en) | Communication point-to-point system and method for substation automation equipment | |
CN110673565A (en) | Output lockout test device and test method suitable for safety-level DCS (distributed control System) | |
CN101794633B (en) | Nuclear power station electronic soft key system | |
CN111274124B (en) | Fault injection device and method for indoor test of interconnection CBTC (communication based train control) system | |
CN106200544B (en) | A kind of protection system and method for preventing PLC controller from crashing | |
CN108766602B (en) | Nuclear power plant reactor protection system channel test method | |
CN114137408B (en) | Method and device for testing effectiveness of over-limit tripping function of black module number of valve control system | |
Armstrong | Techniques and measures to manage functional safety and other risks with regard to electromagnetic disturbances | |
CN214226184U (en) | Platform for automatically simulating nuclear power reactor protection system accident | |
CN108614458B (en) | Trigger, and method and device for determining output state of trigger | |
CN108281205A (en) | A kind of reactor protection system function logic joint verification method | |
CN108918954A (en) | Range signal processing method and system among a kind of Nuclear Instrument measuring system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |