CN106154241A - Tough parallel factorial analysis new algorithm under impulse noise environment - Google Patents

Tough parallel factorial analysis new algorithm under impulse noise environment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN106154241A
CN106154241A CN201610457636.8A CN201610457636A CN106154241A CN 106154241 A CN106154241 A CN 106154241A CN 201610457636 A CN201610457636 A CN 201610457636A CN 106154241 A CN106154241 A CN 106154241A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
algorithm
formula
impulse noise
parafac
criterion
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201610457636.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN106154241B (en
Inventor
李丽
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dalian University
Original Assignee
Dalian University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dalian University filed Critical Dalian University
Priority to CN201610457636.8A priority Critical patent/CN106154241B/en
Publication of CN106154241A publication Critical patent/CN106154241A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN106154241B publication Critical patent/CN106154241B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/41Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00 using analysis of echo signal for target characterisation; Target signature; Target cross-section

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to the tough parallel factorial analysis new algorithm under impulse noise environment, belong to Computer Applied Technology field.The present invention uses MCC criterion to improve cost function based on TALS criterion in PARAFAC algorithm, the bistatic MIMO radar target component Combined estimator new algorithm being applicable under impulse noise environment of having derived.Algorithm can not only effectively suppress the interference of impulse noise, has preferable estimated accuracy, and is capable of automatic matching.Emulation experiment shows, under impulse noise and Gaussian noise environment, compared with PARAFAC algorithm based on TLAS criterion, MCC_PARAFAC algorithm is respectively provided with good parameter estimation performance, especially the signal environment of sudden change is embodied more preferable adaptability.

Description

Tough parallel factorial analysis new algorithm under impulse noise environment
Technical field
The present invention relates to the tough parallel factorial analysis new algorithm under impulse noise environment, belong to Computer Applied Technology neck Territory.
Background technology
Bistatic MIMO (Multiple-Input Multiple-Output) radar is by MIMO technology and double-basis Rhizoma Anemones flaccidae A kind of new system radar that the technology of reaching combines[1-2].The echo that the most bistatic relevant MIMO radar utilizes receiving array to receive The coherence having between signal, and carry out Signal separator by matched filtering device, each battle array of emission array and receiving array Unit's spacing is less and concentrates placement, launches array element and launches mutually orthogonal signal, and the most all of transmitting reception antenna is to having phase Same RCS value.The present invention mainly studies the Parameter Estimation Problem of bistatic relevant MIMO radar.
Target component estimation and location are important contents of Radar Signal Processing.Document [3-5] have studied MUSIC, The MIMO radar ginsengs such as ESPRIT, dimensionality reduction Capon, propagation operator, method based on fraction Fourier conversion and polynomial rooting Number estimation method, has a preferable estimated accuracy, but can not the automatic matching of object of experiment parameter.Document [6-7] based on Transmitting-receiving angle and the Doppler frequency of target are estimated by three battle array models and the ESPRIT method of PARAFAC, it is possible to realize certainly Dynamic pairing.But this two documents is all assuming that noise circumstance carries out parameter estimation on the premise of being white Gaussian noise.Especially Ground, Zhang Jianyun is theoretical [6] based on parallel factor analysis, completes parameter and estimate from the matrix that three linear least-squares iteration obtain Meter.But this algorithm only has under white Gaussian noise environment and preferably estimates performance, very sensitive to impulse noise to calculate The performance of method decreases sharply under impulse noise environment.
But, theoretical research in recent years and actual measured results find, the actual of radar, sonar and wireless communication system is made an uproar Containing a large amount of pulse repetition in sound.The signal model using Gaussian noise in this case is inappropriate, and this noise like is suitableeer Share Alpha Stable distritation model and describe [8-10].Owing to Stable distritation noise does not exist limited second moment, therefore, exist Under impulse noise environment, above-mentioned method for parameter estimation performance degradation based on second-order statistic even lost efficacy.
Summary of the invention
In recent years, joint entropy, as the tolerance of a kind of new stochastic variable local similarity, receives significant attention [11- 12].Principe etc. prove that joint entropy can induce a distance measure (CIM, Correntropy Induced Metric), And maximal correlation entropy criterion (MCC, Maximum Correntropy Criterion) is proposed accordingly.It is different from traditional MSE accurate Then, MCC criterion embodies the adaptability to impulse noise circumstance.MCC criterion is applied under impulse noise environment by Principe Channel blind equalization problem.Aimin Song utilizes MCC criterion to solve the time delay estimadon problem [9] under Stable distritation noise.Zhang Jin MCC criterion is applied in projection approximation subspace tracking algorithm by phoenix.Emulation experiment shows that above-mentioned algorithm is to impulse noise circumstance Adaptability[10]
Being inspired by above-mentioned document, the present invention uses target letter based on TALS criterion in MCC criterion modification PARAFAC algorithm Number is allowed to be applicable to impulse noise environment, derives PARAFAC algorithm (MCC_PARAFAC algorithm) based on MCC criterion, and will This algorithm is applied in the estimation of bistatic MIMO radar target component, it is achieved that the Combined estimator of target component, and can be automatic Pairing.Emulation experiment shows, relative to TALS-PARAFAC algorithm, the new algorithm that the present invention proposes is in impulse noise environment following table Reveal good robustness.
The process of the present invention is described in detail below,
Signal model
Bistatic MIMO radar system structure used by the present invention is as shown in Figure 1.Launch in the pulse period at one, target Scattering resonance state (RCS) keep constant, and pulse and interpulse fluctuating are statistical iteration, and the RCS of different target Fluctuation is incoherent.Launching and receive array element number and be respectively M and N, array element distance is respectively dtAnd dr, divide in same distance Distinguish and on unit, there is P target,Represent the radar emission angle corresponding to i-th target and acceptance angle [6].Respectively launch battle array Unit launches mutually orthogonal phase-coded signal simultaneously, if the l pulse that m-th array element is launched is
sm.l(t)=sm(t '+lT), (1)
In formula, t and t ' the most corresponding slow time and fast time, T represents the pulse repetition period.smT () is that m-th launches battle array The baseband waveform of unit.Then during single goal observation, the n-th the l echo impulse receiving array element reception is
y n , l ( t - τ ) = Σ m = 1 M ρ l i s m , l ( t - τ ) exp ( jα n i + jβ m i ) exp ( j 2 πf d i ( t - τ ) ) + w n , l ( i ) , i = 1 , ... , P , - - - ( 2 )
N=1 in formula ..., N, l=1 ..., L, τ are the echo time delay of target, wn,lT () is for being that standard S α S Stable distritation is made an uproar Sound.ρliIt is the l and launches pulse scattering coefficient in i-th target.αni=2 π (n-1) drsinθi/ λ andIt is to receive steering vector and launch steering vector respectively.fdiDoppler's frequency for i-th target Rate.
The signal launched due to each transmitting array element is mutually orthogonal, the most satisfied:Wherein sq(t) and skT () represents that q-th and kth launch the transmitting signal of array element respectively, * is conjugate operation.Utilize M the transmitting launching array element The echo-signal that each reception array element is received by signal respectively carries out matched filtering, is separated by signal, can get at P mesh In the case of mark, the wave filter of the l time echo is output as
Wherein,B (θ)=[ar1),…,arP)],cl(fd)=[ρl1exp(j2πfd1Tl),…,ρlPexp(j2πfdPTl)], ⊙ is Khatri-Rao amasss.
Can be obtained under P target conditions by formula (3), the wave filter of L echo is output as
Wherein Y=[η12,…,ηL] be MN × L dimension output matrix.For P × The matrix vector of L dimension, it is the function scattering coefficient of target (assume be known) of Doppler frequency.From formula (4), right It is right that the estimation of the angle of departure of MIMO radar, acceptance angle and Doppler frequency can be converted intoB (θ) and C (fd) the estimating of 3 matrixes Meter.
Joint entropy
For two stochastic variable X and Y, its joint entropy is defined as:
Vσ(X, Y)=E [kσ(X-Y)], (5)
Wherein,For kernel function, σ > 0 it is the long parameter of core, E [] is mathematic expectaion.Document[12] Proving, joint entropy can be regarded a kind of degeneration of Renyi quadratic entropy based on Parzen kernel estimates as and represent, can reflect again two The similarity of individual stochastic variable.In actual application, the joint probability density of stochastic variable X with Y is the most unknown, can only be by limited Observed dataEstimate the joint entropy of stochastic variable X Yu Y
V σ ( X , Y ) = 1 N Σ i = 1 N κ σ ( x i - y i ) , - - - ( 6 )
From the definition of joint entropy it can be seen that joint entropy contains gaussian kernel function, thus to having significantly impulse Non-Gaussian noise has good inhibiting effect.By document[12]Understand, Vσ(X, Y) has following two character:
Vσ(X, Y)=Vσ(Y, X), (7)
0 ≤ V σ ( X , Y ) ≤ 1 2 π σ , - - - ( 8 )
During and if only if X=Y, the V in formula (8)σ(X, Y) obtains maximum.
MCC-PARAFAC new algorithm
It is as data analysis in physiology that parallel factor analysis (parallel factor, PARAFAC) is first suggested Instrument, is mainly used in Chemical Measurement, spectroscopy and chromatography etc., is a kind of method of multidimensional data analysis.In recent years, at letter Number process and the communications field, parallel factor technology is by extensive concern [13-15].Parallel transport is three battle arrays or multiaspect battle array The general name of low-rank decomposition, it processes three-dimensional data is theoretical based on three linear decomposition, parallel factor under the conditions of meeting Kruskal Model has unique identifiability, can obtain the matrix containing target component information so that parameter in a matrix decomposition Can automatic matching.
Consider matrixConstitute I × J × K and tie up three battle arrays X, then its any one unit Element can be decomposed into
x i , j , k = Σ f = 1 F a i , f b j , f c k , f i = 1 , ... , I , j = 1 , ... J , k = 1 , ... , K , - - - ( 9 )
A in formulai,f,bj,f,ck,fBeing respectively matrix A, the element of B, C, further, it is possible to obtain three matrixes, respectively IJ The matrix X of × K1'=[A ⊙ B] CT, the matrix X of KJ × I2'=[B ⊙ C] AT, the matrix X of KI × J3'=[C ⊙ A] BT, respectively will Three matrixes add noise matrix, then can get table below and reach formula
X1=[A ⊙ B] CT+W1, (10)
X2=[B ⊙ C] AT+W2, (11)
X3=[C ⊙ A] BT+W3, (12)
Wherein ⊙ is that Khatri-Rao amasss, W1, W2And W3It is noise.
Above three matrix alternately uses least square method to be iterated updating, until algorithmic statement, its step As follows:
(1) optionally random matrix initializesWithIteration serial number k=1,2,3 ....
(2) willSubstitution formula (13), seeks its least square solution, it is thus achieved that the kth of C time iterative estimate valueSuch as formula (114) shown in.
(3) willSubstitution formula (15), seeks its least square solution, it is thus achieved that kth time iterative estimate valueSuch as formula (16) Shown in.
(4) willSubstitution formula (17), seeks its least square solution, it is thus achieved that the kth of B time iterative estimate valueSuch as formula (18) Shown in, and calculateIf | δkk-1| > ε, ε be error threshold, then repeat step (2)-(4). If | δkk-1| < ε then goes to step (5)
(5) through above-mentioned iterative computation, the final estimated value of A, B and C is obtainedWith
It is known that least-squares algorithm is based on second-order statistic, and there is not second moment in impulsive noise, therefore exists The method for parameter estimation performance degradation using method of least square to be iterated under impulse noise environment even lost efficacy.
In order to improve the parameter estimation performance of TALS-PARAFAC algorithm in impulse noise environment, the present invention uses MCC accurate Then the cost function (13) of the iteration in algorithm is improved
In order to solve formula (19), can be by maximization problemIt is equivalent to minimization problem, then cost function is
Wherein
In like manner, the cost function in formula (15) and (17) is also adopted by the generation of the maximal correlation entropy criterion that the present invention proposes Valency function is replaced, thus has obtained the parallel factor analysis new algorithm based on MCC criterion under applicable impulse noise environment, Its step is as follows:
(1) optionally random matrix initializesWithIteration serial number k=1,2,3 ....
(2) willSubstitution formula (21), seeks maximal correlation entropy solution, it is thus achieved that the kth of C time iterative estimate valueSuch as formula (22) shown in.
(3) willSubstitution formula (23), seeks its least square solution, it is thus achieved that kth time iterative estimate valueSuch as formula (24) shown in.
(4) willSubstitution formula (25), seeks its least square solution, it is thus achieved that the kth of B time iterative estimate valueSuch as formula (26) Shown in, and calculateWherein Xi..=BDi[A]CT+W1.If | δkk-1| > ε, ε be Error threshold, then repeat step (2)-(4).If | δkk-1| < ε then goes to step (5)
(5) through above-mentioned iterative computation, the final estimated value of A, B and C is obtainedWith
Target component Combined estimator new method based on MCC-PARAFAC algorithm
The output of matched filtering deviceHaving three battle array model characteristics, therefore it can be with Y along recipient To, set of slices Y launched on direction and snap direction1,Y2,Y3Represent, wherein
In order to improve the parameter estimation performance of TALS-PARAFAC algorithm in impulse noise environment, the present invention uses MCC accurate Then the cost function of the iteration in algorithm is improved, it is proposed that PARAFAC new algorithm based on MCC criterion, and by this calculation Method is applied in the estimation of bistatic MIMO radar target component.
Concrete step is as follows:
(1) optionally random matrix initializesWithIteration serial number k=1,2,3 ....
(2) willSubstitution formula (28), seeks its maximal correlation entropy solution, it is thus achieved that the kth of B (θ) time iteration is estimated EvaluationAs shown in formula (29).
In order to solve formula (27), can be by maximization problemIt is equivalent to minimization problem, then cost function For
Wherein
(3) willSubstitution formula (30), seeks its maximal correlation entropy solution, it is thus achieved that kth time iterative estimate valueAs shown in formula (31).
(4) willSubstitution formula (32), seeks its maximal correlation entropy solution, it is thus achieved that C (fd) kth time iterative estimate valueAs shown in formula (33), and calculateWherein Dl[] represent by The diagonal matrix that the l row element of matrix is formed,If | δkk-1| > (ε is for by mistake for ε Difference thresholding), then repeat step (2)-(4).If | δkk-1| < ε then goes to step (5)
(5) through above-mentioned iterative computation, obtainB (θ) and C (fd) final estimated valueWith And makeIt is respectively jth row i-th column element of 3 estimated matrix, by formula (30)-(32) to each row The method that vector is averaging obtainsAngle () represents the phase angle computing taking element.
Beneficial effects of the present invention:
The present invention uses MCC criterion to improve cost function based on TALS criterion in PARAFAC algorithm, has derived and has been applicable to Bistatic MIMO radar target component Combined estimator new algorithm under impulse noise environment.Algorithm can not only effectively suppress impulse The interference of noise, has preferable estimated accuracy, and is capable of automatic matching.Emulation experiment shows, at impulse noise and Under Gaussian noise environment, compared with PARAFAC algorithm based on TLAS criterion, MCC_PARAFAC algorithm is respectively provided with well ginseng Number estimates performance, especially the signal environment of sudden change is embodied more preferable adaptability.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is bistatic MIMO radar Array Model.
Fig. 2 (a) Doppler frequency parameter estimation RMSE is with GSNR change curve;
Fig. 2 (b) DOD estimates that RMSE is with GSNR change curve;
Fig. 2 (c) DOA estimates that RMSE is with GSNR change curve;
Fig. 3 (a) Doppler frequency parameter estimation RMSE is with noise characteristic index α change curve;
Fig. 3 (b) DOD estimates that RMSE is with noise characteristic index α change curve;
Fig. 3 (c) DOA estimates that RMSE is with noise characteristic index α change curve;
Fig. 4 is the relation of MCC_PARAFAC algorithm performance and long parameter σ of core;
The accuracy rate of Fig. 5 (a) Doppler-frequency estimation is with GSNR change curve;
The accuracy rate that Fig. 5 (b) DOD estimates is with GSNR change curve;
The accuracy rate that Fig. 5 (c) DOA estimates is with GSNR change curve;
The accuracy rate of Fig. 6 (a) Doppler frequency parameter estimation is with noise characteristic index α change curve;
The accuracy rate that Fig. 6 (b) DOD estimates is with noise characteristic index α change curve;
The accuracy rate that Fig. 6 (c) DOA estimates is with noise characteristic index α change curve.
Detailed description of the invention
The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Being respectively M=6 and N=8 assuming that launch array element with receiving array element number, bistatic MIMO radar far field exists 2 Target, i.e. P=2, be respectively relative to the angle of departure launching array element and receive array element and acceptance angle Doppler frequency parameter fd1=160Hz, fd2=100Hz, echo number L=100.Respectively launch array element Launch phase code number Q=256 in mutually orthogonal Hadamard coding signal, and each repetition period.This section uses Broad sense signal to noise ratio [16] (Generalized Signal-to-Noise Ratio, GSNR) is as signal and the degree of impulse noise Amount.The definition of broad sense signal to noise ratio is
G S N R = 10 l g ( &sigma; s 2 / &gamma; ) ,
In formula,Representing the power of signal, γ is the coefficient of dispersion of S α S distribution.At identical conditions, with TALS- PARAFAC algorithm[6]Middle method for parameter estimation is contrasted, and all simulation results are by 500 Monte-Carlo experiment systems Meter obtains.
Experiment 1: in this trifle is tested, it is assumed that characteristic index α=1.4 of impulse noise, the model of broad sense signal to noise ratio GSNR Enclosing is 0≤GSNR≤30.Fig. 2 (a)-(c) provides the root-mean-square of inventive algorithm and the estimation of TALS-PARAFAC algorithm parameter by mistake Difference is with GSNR change curve.
By Fig. 2 (a) it is found that as GSNR >=10dB, the parameter estimation performance of inventive algorithm is substantially better than TALS- PARAFAC algorithm.By the curve of Fig. 2 (b) it is found that during GSNR >=12dB, inventive algorithm DOD parameter estimation Performance comparision Stablize, and the root-mean-square error of DOD parameter estimation is significantly less than TALS-PARAFAC algorithm.Curve table in Fig. 2 (c) understands Inventive algorithm, compared to TALS-PARAFAC algorithm, estimates have relatively low root-mean-square error about DOA.
Therefore, by the emulation experiment of this trifle, it will be seen that the performance of MCC_PARAFAC algorithm is better than TALS_ PARAFAC algorithm.This is because under impulse noise environment, there is not second-order statistic, so based on second-order statistic Young waiter in a wineshop or an inn's multiplication algorithm performance degradation.And MCC_PARAFAC algorithm, have employed maximal correlation entropy criterion as cost function, it can Well the interference of impulse noise mitigation, therefore has and preferably estimates performance.
Experiment 2: have studied the relation of parameter estimation performance and impulse noise characteristic index α.In this trifle, parameter is set as, Broad sense signal to noise ratio GSNR=15dB, the excursion of characteristic index α of impulse noise is 1≤α≤2.Fig. 3 (a)-(c) gives The relation of the RMSE and noise characteristic index α of two kinds of algorithm parameter estimations.
By Fig. 3 (a) it is found that when 1≤α≤2, the MCC-PARAFAC algorithm of the present invention is to Doppler frequency estimation RMSE be respectively less than TALS-PARAFAC algorithm, and when α >=1.3, it is stable that inventive algorithm parameter estimation obtains Performance comparision, There is RMSE more smoothly.By the curve of Fig. 3 (b) it can be seen that the parameter estimation performance of inventive algorithm is substantially better than TALS-PARAFAC algorithm.When 1≤α≤1.3, inventive algorithm reduces rapidly about the RMSE value of DOD parameter estimation, and becomes In steadily.Curve table in Fig. 3 (c) understands that inventive algorithm, compared to TALS-PARAFAC algorithm, estimates have relatively about DOA Low root-mean-square error.
Therefore, by the emulation experiment of this trifle, it can be appreciated that when α >=1.3, MCC_PARAFAC algorithm has relatively Good performance.The impulse of the least noise of α is the strongest, TALS_PARAFAC algorithm not inhibitory action to impulse noise, so When α is less, algorithm performance is poor, and when α=2, impulse noise is converted into Gaussian noise, so when α is close to 2, algorithm has There is estimation performance carefully.Visible TALS_PARAFAC algorithm is more sensitive to impulse noise ratio, should in the environment of impulse noise The parameter estimation Performance comparision of algorithm is poor.Therefore, by Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 it can be seen that under impulse noise environment MCC_PARAFAC The parameter estimation performance of algorithm is far superior to TALS_PARAFAC algorithm.
Experiment 3: this trifle have studied root-mean-square error RMSE and the pass of the long σ of core that MCC_PARAFAC algorithm parameter is estimated System.This trifle experiment in, parameter be set as broad sense signal to noise ratio GSNR=15dB, characteristic index α=1.4 of impulse noise, core The excursion of long parameter σ is 0.1≤σ≤2.From fig. 4, it can be seen that the performance that MCC_PARAFAC algorithm parameter is estimated is by core The impact of long parameter σ is little.
Experiment 4 have studied accuracy rate and broad sense signal to noise ratio GSNR and the relation of characteristic index α of parameter estimation.Parameter estimation Accuracy rate PaMay be defined asWherein D is actual value,For estimated value.The P when multiple targeta Estimate the meansigma methods of accuracy rate for multiple target components, the present invention is the meansigma methods of two target accuracys rate.Fig. 5 (a)-(c) shows Show the accuracy rate change curve with GSNR of parameter estimation.
Fig. 5 (a) shows the accuracy rate of Doppler frequency estimation and the relation of broad sense signal to noise ratio, MCC-as can be seen from Fig. The accuracy rate of PARAFAC algorithm is higher than TALS-PARAFAC algorithm.Fig. 5 (b) shows that accuracy rate that angle of departure DOD estimates is with extensively The variation relation of justice signal to noise ratio.Curve shows that the accuracy rate that inventive algorithm is estimated about DOD is calculated also above TALS-PARAFAC Method.Fig. 5 (c) shows the relation of accuracy rate that DOA estimates and broad sense signal to noise ratio, MCC-PARAFAC algorithm as can be seen from Fig. Accuracy rate higher than TALS-PARAFAC algorithm, especially particularly evident when broad sense signal to noise ratio is more than 15dB.
Fig. 6 shows the accuracy rate change curve with noise characteristic index α of parameter estimation.Fig. 6 (a) can be seen that when making an uproar Acoustic signature index less than 1.3 time, the pulse feature of noise is stronger, inventive algorithm about Doppler frequency estimation accuracy rate more Significantly higher than TALS-PARAFAC algorithm, along with noise characteristic index increases, the pulse feature of noise weakens, TALS-PARAFAC The performance of algorithm increases, but still less than inventive algorithm.Fig. 6 (b) shows that the accuracy rate that DOD estimates refers to noise characteristic The relation of number.As seen from the figure along with the increase of noise characteristic index, the accuracy rate of inventive algorithm and TALS-PARAFAC The gap of algorithm is also increasing, and the accuracy rate that this algorithm parameter is estimated is apparently higher than TALS-PARAFAC algorithm.Equally, Fig. 6 (c) Curve table understand the relation of accuracy rate that DOA estimates and noise characteristic index.By this figure it can be seen that along with noise characteristic refers to The increase of number, the accuracy rate of inventive algorithm is increasingly higher than TALS-PARAFAC algorithm.
Owing to MCC_PARAFAC algorithm considers the impact of impulse noise, use maximal correlation entropy criterion cost letter the most Number is iterated.And TALS_PARAFAC algorithm is based on second moment, there is not limited second moment in impulse noise, therefore TALS_PARAFAC algorithm performance under impulse noise environment can significantly be degenerated.Can from Fig. 5 (a)-(c) and Fig. 6 (a)-(c) Go out MCC_PARAFAC algorithm, than TALS_PARAFAC algorithm, there is higher accuracy rate.
The list of references that the present invention relates to
[1]FISHLER E,HAIMOVICH A,and BLUM R,et al.MIMO radar:an idea whose time has come in[C].Proceedings of the IEEE Radar Conference,Newark,NJ,USA, 26–29April 2004,71–78.
[2] Zheng Zhidong, Yuan Honggang, Zhang Jianyun. under impact noise background, bistatic MIMO radar based on rarefaction representation is many Target location [J]. electronics and information journal, 2014,36 (12): 3,001 3007.
[3] Xie Rong, Liu Zheng. bistatic MIMO radar multi-target orientation method [J] based on polynomial rooting. electronics and letter Breath journal, 2010,32 (9): 2197-2220.
[4]BENCHEIKH M L and WANG Y.Joint DOD-DOA estimation using combined ESPRIT-MUSIC approach in MIMO radar[J].Electronics Letters.2010,46(15):1081- 1083.
[5]YAN H,LI J,and LIAO G.Multitarget identification and localization using bistatic MIMO radar systems[J].EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing,2008,8(2):1-8.
[6] Zhang Jianyun, Zheng Zhidong, Li little Bo. the Combined estimator of bistatic MIMO radar transmitting-receiving angle and Doppler frequency is calculated Method [J]. electronics and information journal, 2010,32 (8): 1843-1848
[7]CHEN D F,CHEN B X,and QIN G D.Angle estimation using ESPRIT in MIMO radar[J].Electronics Letters,2008,44(12):770-771.
[8]CHEN Yunfei and CHEN Jiming.Novel alpha PDF Approximations and Their Applications in Wireless Signal Detection[J].IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,2015,14(2):1080–1091.
[9] Aimin Song, Qiu Tianshuan, Tong's happiness is remonstrated with. the joint entropy of symmetric-stable distribution and answering on time delay estimadon thereof With [J]. electronics and information journal, 2011,33 (2): 494-498.
[10] Zhang Jinfeng, Qiu Tianshuan, Li Sen. under impulse noise environment tough subspace based on maximal correlation entropy criterion with Track new algorithm [J]. electronic letters, vol, 2015,43 (3): 483-488.
[11]I,POKHAREL P P,and PRINCIPE J C.Generalized correlation function:definition,properties,and application to blind equalization[J].Signal Processing,IEEE Transactions on,2006,54(6):2187-2197.
[12]LIU W,POKHAREL P P,andJ C.Correntropy:properties and applications in non-Gaussian signal processing[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing,2007,55(11):5286-5298.
[13]SIDROPOULOS N D and GIANNAKIS G B.Parallel factor analysis in sensor array processing[J].IEEE Trans Signal Processing,2000,48(8):2377-2388.
[14]CAO Renzheng,ZHANG Xiaofei,and CHEN Weiyang.Compressed sensing parallel factor analysis-based joint angle and Doppler frequency estimation for monostatic multiple-input–multiple-output radar[J].IET Radar,Sonar& Navigation,2014,8(6):597-606.
[15]DU J H,YUAN C W,and ZHANG J B.Semi-blind parallel factor based receiver for joint symbol and channel estimation in amplify-and-forward multiple-input multiple-output relay systems[J].IET Communications,2015,9(6): 737-744.
[16]KOMATY A,BOUDRAA AO,and NOLAN J P,et al.On the Behavior of EMD and MEMD in Presence of Symmetric alpha-Stable Noise[J].IEEE Signal Processing Letters,2015,22(7):818-822.
For the ordinary skill in the art, the present invention is simply exemplarily described by specific embodiment, Obviously the present invention implements and is not subject to the restrictions described above, as long as the method design that have employed the present invention is entered with technical scheme The improvement of various unsubstantialities of row, or the most improved design by the present invention and technical scheme directly apply to other occasion , all within protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (1)

1. the tough parallel factorial analysis new algorithm under impulse noise environment, it is characterised in that: comprise the steps: that (1) is optional Random matrix initializesWithIteration serial number k=1,2,3 ...,
(2) willSubstitution formula (28), seeks its maximal correlation entropy solution, it is thus achieved that the kth of B (θ) time iterative estimate valueAs shown in formula (29),
In order to solve formula (27), can be by maximization problemIt is equivalent to minimization problem, then cost function is
Wherein
(3) willSubstitution formula (30), seeks its maximal correlation entropy solution, it is thus achieved that kth time iterative estimate valueAs Shown in formula (31).
(4) willSubstitution formula (32), seeks its maximal correlation entropy solution, it is thus achieved that C (fd) kth time iterative estimate valueAs shown in formula (33), and calculateWherein Dl[] represent by The diagonal matrix that the l row element of matrix is formed,If | δkk-1| > ε, ε be Error threshold, then repeat step (2)-(4).If | δkk-1| < ε then goes to step (5)
(5) through above-mentioned iterative computation, obtainB (θ) and C (fd) final estimated valueWithAnd make It is respectively jth row i-th column element of 3 estimated matrix, by formula (30)-(32) to each column vector The method being averaging obtains(i=1 ..., P), angle () represents the phase angle computing taking element,
CN201610457636.8A 2016-06-21 2016-06-21 Tough parallel factorial analysis algorithm under impulse noise environment Active CN106154241B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610457636.8A CN106154241B (en) 2016-06-21 2016-06-21 Tough parallel factorial analysis algorithm under impulse noise environment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610457636.8A CN106154241B (en) 2016-06-21 2016-06-21 Tough parallel factorial analysis algorithm under impulse noise environment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN106154241A true CN106154241A (en) 2016-11-23
CN106154241B CN106154241B (en) 2018-12-28

Family

ID=57353348

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201610457636.8A Active CN106154241B (en) 2016-06-21 2016-06-21 Tough parallel factorial analysis algorithm under impulse noise environment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN106154241B (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108416105A (en) * 2018-02-05 2018-08-17 大连理工大学 Steady adaptive beam-forming algorithm under pulse and Gaussian noise
CN109738877A (en) * 2019-01-30 2019-05-10 大连大学 Target component Combined estimator algorithm under impulsive noise environment
CN109782242A (en) * 2018-10-29 2019-05-21 中国传媒大学 A kind of object localization method based on parallel factor model in monostatic radar systems
CN113008239A (en) * 2021-03-01 2021-06-22 哈尔滨工程大学 Multi-AUV (autonomous Underwater vehicle) cooperative positioning robust delay filtering method

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102288951A (en) * 2011-07-17 2011-12-21 西安电子科技大学 Radar target parameter estimation method based on AIC (automatic information center) compression information acquisition and FBMP (fast Bayesian matching pursuit)
EP2442129A1 (en) * 2010-10-18 2012-04-18 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A method for processing an echo amplitude profile generated by a pulse-echo ranging system
CN103885050A (en) * 2014-03-20 2014-06-25 西安电子科技大学 Echo signal parameter estimation method based on scaled-down dictionary
CN104849708A (en) * 2015-05-18 2015-08-19 中国民航大学 High-speed maneuvering target parameter estimation method based on frequency domain polynomial phase transformation

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2442129A1 (en) * 2010-10-18 2012-04-18 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A method for processing an echo amplitude profile generated by a pulse-echo ranging system
CN102288951A (en) * 2011-07-17 2011-12-21 西安电子科技大学 Radar target parameter estimation method based on AIC (automatic information center) compression information acquisition and FBMP (fast Bayesian matching pursuit)
CN103885050A (en) * 2014-03-20 2014-06-25 西安电子科技大学 Echo signal parameter estimation method based on scaled-down dictionary
CN104849708A (en) * 2015-05-18 2015-08-19 中国民航大学 High-speed maneuvering target parameter estimation method based on frequency domain polynomial phase transformation

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
张金凤等: "冲激噪声环境下基于最大相关熵准则的韧性子空间跟踪新算法", 《电子学报》 *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108416105A (en) * 2018-02-05 2018-08-17 大连理工大学 Steady adaptive beam-forming algorithm under pulse and Gaussian noise
CN109782242A (en) * 2018-10-29 2019-05-21 中国传媒大学 A kind of object localization method based on parallel factor model in monostatic radar systems
CN109738877A (en) * 2019-01-30 2019-05-10 大连大学 Target component Combined estimator algorithm under impulsive noise environment
CN109738877B (en) * 2019-01-30 2023-03-31 大连大学 Target parameter joint estimation method under impact noise environment
CN113008239A (en) * 2021-03-01 2021-06-22 哈尔滨工程大学 Multi-AUV (autonomous Underwater vehicle) cooperative positioning robust delay filtering method
CN113008239B (en) * 2021-03-01 2023-01-03 哈尔滨工程大学 Multi-AUV (autonomous Underwater vehicle) cooperative positioning robust delay filtering method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN106154241B (en) 2018-12-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sira et al. Waveform-agile sensing for tracking
Jin et al. Time reversal in multiple-input multiple-output radar
Ma et al. Three-dimensional imaging of targets using colocated MIMO radar
CN106970369B (en) The broadband radar target detection method of knowledge based auxiliary
Gorji et al. Multiple unresolved target localization and tracking using colocated MIMO radars
Yang et al. Knowledge‐aided STAP with sparse‐recovery by exploiting spatio‐temporal sparsity
Liu et al. Persymmetric GLRT detection in MIMO radar
CN106154241A (en) Tough parallel factorial analysis new algorithm under impulse noise environment
CN106154242A (en) Target component Combined estimator new algorithm based on fractional lower-order class joint entropy
Han et al. Censoring outliers in radar data: an approximate ML approach and its analysis
CN108957387A (en) A kind of satellite-signal two-dimentional angle estimation method and system
Gerlach et al. Robust adaptive matched filtering using the FRACTA algorithm
Hamdollahzadeh et al. Moving target localization in bistatic forward scatter radars: Performance study and efficient estimators
Sangston et al. New results on coherent radar target detection in heavy-tailed compound-Gaussian clutter
Tohidi et al. Compressed-domain detection and estimation for colocated MIMO radar
Wang et al. An overview of parametric modeling and methods for radar target detection with limited data
RU2419107C1 (en) Method of selecting moving targets in pulse-wise carrier frequency tuning
Yanovsky et al. Ultrawideband signal processing algorithms for radars and sodars
Xinghua et al. Performance gain bounds of coherently combining multiple radars in a target-based calibration manner
Yang et al. Direct Data Domain Sparsity‐Based STAP Utilizing Subaperture Smoothing Techniques
Zhou et al. Waveform analysis and optimization for radar coincidence imaging with modeling error
Rojhani et al. Crlbs for location and velocity estimation for mimo radars in ces-distributed clutter
Dash et al. Time delay estimation issues for target detection and transmitter identification in multistatic radars
Sinitsyn Copula based detection algorithm for MIMO ultrawideband noise radars
Du et al. Clutter space‐time covariance matrix estimate based on multi‐polarised data

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant