CN105868496A - Method for determining assembly-oriented rectangular plane shape error evaluation parameters - Google Patents

Method for determining assembly-oriented rectangular plane shape error evaluation parameters Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105868496A
CN105868496A CN201610244256.6A CN201610244256A CN105868496A CN 105868496 A CN105868496 A CN 105868496A CN 201610244256 A CN201610244256 A CN 201610244256A CN 105868496 A CN105868496 A CN 105868496A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
plane
contact point
parameter
correlation
shape error
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201610244256.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN105868496B (en
Inventor
张发平
郭少伟
张体广
王戈
张田会
张凌雲
樊红丽
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Institute of Technology BIT
Original Assignee
Beijing Institute of Technology BIT
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Institute of Technology BIT filed Critical Beijing Institute of Technology BIT
Publication of CN105868496A publication Critical patent/CN105868496A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN105868496B publication Critical patent/CN105868496B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/17Mechanical parametric or variational design
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2119/00Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
    • G06F2119/18Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for determining assembly-oriented rectangular plane shape error evaluation parameters and belongs to the field of error evaluation. The method comprises: generating a cutting surface by non-Gaussian plane simulation method, acquiring a shape error surface via wavelet filtering, and extracting characterization parameters of surface shape error distribution; subjecting the shape error surface to simulation assembly through contact algorithm, calculating assembly precision of spatial orientation changes of a second part after assembly, determining a relation between surface characterization parameters and post-assembly part assembly precision through correlation analysis, thereby determining shape error evaluation parameters and enabling quantitative description for the relation between the surface distribution characterization parameters and assembly precision. Plane characteristic parameters having important impact on assembly precision are obtained, and scientific basis is provided for improving machining quality of mating planes and optimizing assembly process to improve assembly precision.

Description

A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, belong to error assessment Field.
Background technology
During the assembling of China's precision mechanical system, parts form error be impact assembling after parts at complete machine One of key factor of middle relative positional accuracy.In Modern Manufacturing Industry, assembly work amount averagely accounts for and manufactures amount of work 45%, assembly fee accounts for the 20-30% or higher manufacturing total cost.Processing, assembling link various factors (i.e. manufacturing characteristics) right After assembling, the Influencing Mechanism of systematic function, the research of coupled relation are increasingly becoming the focus studied both at home and abroad, are also to manufacture A Main way in urgent need of strengthening in technical research.
Existing form error evaluating, is to be evaluated from mismachining tolerance angle mostly, and the most usually makes Such phenomenon can occur, and i.e. in the case of whole parts machinings are up-to-standard, assembling yield rate is the lowest, produces after assembling Moral character can cannot meet design requirement, and very difficult batch comes into operation.Main cause is to precision mechanical system assembly precision shadow From the point of view of sound, there is the fitting plane of same shape error, due to the form error distribution that they are different, assembly precision will be produced Raw diverse impact.As depicted in figs. 1 and 2.The most how to reflect that the impact of assembly precision is exactly by surface shape error One important research contents.Yet with the complexity of three-dimensional surface, its characterization parameter has a lot, how to obtain and to assemble essence Spend relevant parameter relatively difficult.
Summary of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide a kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, the party Method obtains the plane characteristic parameter having a major impact assembly precision, for improving the crudy coordinating plane, improves assembling essence Degree provides foundation.
It is an object of the invention to be achieved through the following technical solutions.
A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, specifically comprises the following steps that
Step one, the form error of piece surface are obtained by following method: generate with non-gaussian plane simulation method Machining surface, wavelet filtering obtains form error surface afterwards;Utilize orthogonal experiment design method, arranged by orthogonal arrage Multiple influence factors, thus obtain many group form error surfaces.
The characterization parameter of the form error surface shape error distribution that step 2, extraction step one obtain;
Step 3, form error surface step one obtained all are simulated assembling with ideal surfaced;
(1) search peak, as first make contact;
(2) first make contact and four summits of rectangle are connected to form four planar deltas;
(3) calculate rectangle plane point in each planar delta drop shadow spread and first make contact is wired to corresponding three The angle of angle plane, in taking corresponding planar delta drop shadow spread, point is minimum with the angle being wired to planar delta of first make contact Point, as the second contact point, i.e. rotate to four direction around peak, the point touched at first is the point that angle is minimum.Four Individual planar delta i.e. can get four the second contact points;
(4) planar delta is forwarded to the second contact point around peak, form median surface;
(5) with the line of peak and the second contact point as axle, rotate and find the 3rd contact point.In search rectangular plane 3rd contact point, made the 3rd contact point and by peak and the vertical line of the line of the second contact point;Calculate the 3rd contact point Vertical line and by the angle of median surface, the point corresponding to angle minimum is the 3rd contact point, and same four triangular facets can find Four the 3rd contact points;
(6) connect first make contact, the second contact point and the 3rd contact point and obtain the equation of four contact surfaces;
(7) other constraintss are considered, such as the position relationship of assembly force position Yu contact point, thus from four contact surfaces Equation screens an optimum.
The assembly precision of the dimensional orientation change of part it is assembled after step 4, calculating assembling;Assembly precision is characterized as dress Being assembled the part plane locus relative to Norm part plane after joining, assembly precision is with after assembling six of part space The free degree is weighed:
Γ=[dx,dy,dzxyz] (1)
Wherein dx,dy,dzFor X, the skew in tri-directions of Y, Z;δxyzFor the rotation amount around three axles.
Step 5, determined the characterization parameter of step 2 and the relation of the assembly precision of step 4 by correlation analysis, thus Determine form error evaluating, it is achieved surface distributed characterization parameter and the quantitative description of assembly precision relation.
Described in step one with the method on non-gaussian plane simulation method generation machining surface it is: by given plane Auto-correlation function R and power spectral density Gzxy), obtain system transter H (ωxy), utilize Johnson to change System obtains the random column η ' with the non-gaussian distribution of certain deflection and kurtosis, utilizes computer coarse flat to generate non-gaussian Face.
Described in step one with the method on wavelet filtering acquisition form error surface it is: use wavelet analysis, use basic function Bior6.8, as the wavelet basis function decomposed, carries out multiple dimensioned separation to the characteristic information of part plane pattern, isolates shape Error plane.
The method of Orthogonal Experiment and Design described in step one is: use orthogonal experiment, six influence factors of orthogonal test Be respectively mean height of surface mu, standard deviation sd of apparent height, auto-correlation length bx in x direction, surface, y direction, surface from Correlation length by, degree of skewness skew on surface, kurtosis kurt on surface, select typical Orthogonal table to be analyzed, determine test time Number.Establishment orthogonal test scheme table, and then form error surface can be organized much.
Characterization parameter described in step 2 is: range parameter, spatial parameter, functional parameter and hybrid parameter;
Described in step 3, other constraintss are: be assembled part center of gravity all with in the position relationship of contact point and plane The position relationship of z is put in value zi of point and ideal plane.
It is assembled the position relationship of part center of gravity and contact point to meet and be assembled part center of gravity in the middle of three contact points. In plane put the position relationship of z on value zi a little and ideal plane and should meet all z values respectively less than zi, see formula 3, then say Bright three contact points now are one group of potential contact point.Three contact points are determined by constraints.Three contact points obtained For P (x1,y1,z1),Q(x2,y2,z2),R(x3,y3,z3) then equation be:
x - x 1 y - y 1 z - z 1 x 2 - x 1 y 2 - y 1 z 2 - z 1 x 3 - x 1 y 3 - y 1 z 3 - z 1 = 0 - - - ( 2 )
That is: Ax+By+Cz+D=0, A, B, C, D are equation coefficient, are derived from.
z ( i ) = D - Ax i - By i C ≤ z i - - - ( 3 )
The assembly precision of the dimensional orientation change of part it is assembled: after contact condition determines after calculating assembling described in step 4 The differential motion change being assembled part relative to Norm part can be calculated, three contact points can obtain ideal plane Equation Ax+By+Cz+D=0, i.e. can obtain the change of normal vector (A, B, C), and then can obtain three rotation (δxyz), Plane equation has been had to compare the skew (d that i.e. can obtain tri-directions of X, Y, Z with ideal planex,dy,dz), the most small rotation amount With small translational movement.Three skews are that the changes in coordinates at two coordinate system centers represents;Three rotation amounts are by plane equation Normal vector n=(A, B, C) asks for, and formula 4 is shown in three rotations.
δ x = arccos ( ( n × e x ) / ( | n | · | e x | ) ) δ y = arccos ( ( n × e y ) / ( | n | · | e y | ) ) δ z = arccos ( ( n × e z ) / ( | n | · | e z | ) ) - - - ( 4 )
Wherein n=(A, B, C) is planar process vector;ex,ey,ezFor X, the unit vector in tri-directions of Y, Z.
Correlation analysis method described in step 5 is:
(1) correlation analysis process of the test
Change input parameter by orthogonal test, obtain organizing the data of characterization parameter and assembly precision more;Data are carried out Correlation analysis.By the height correlation during relatively each coefficient obtains coefficient correlation as evaluating.
(2) characterization parameter and the correlation analysis of precision
The correlation of each component and characterization parameter is set up based on each component calculating characterization parameter and the assembly precision obtained Analytical formula, correlation analysis computing formula is
A = cov ( V , Γ ) D ( V ) · D ( Γ ) , V = [ v 1 , v 2 , ... , v l ] , Γ = [ d x , d y , d z , δ x , δ y , δ z ] - - - ( 5 )
Wherein V is expressed as representing characterization parameter, and l is characterization parameter number, and Γ represents assembly precision.Each by com-parison and analysis Height correlation in coefficient is as evaluating, i.e.
d x ∝ [ S 1 , S 2 , ... , S i ] δ x ∝ [ S 1 , S 2 , ... , S m ] d y ∝ [ S 1 , S 2 , ... , S j ] , δ y ∝ [ S 1 , S 2 , ... , S n ] d z ∝ [ S 1 , S 1 , ... , S k ] δ z ∝ [ S 1 , S 1 , ... , S p ] - - - ( 6 )
In formula, S is corresponding evaluating, and i, j, k, m, n, p are the number of each component correspondence evaluating.
The one group of parameter inputted by change, generation has the Rough Horizontal Plane of certain plane pattern and can change, after reconstructing The parameter extracted of plane also just corresponding change, therefore can arbitrarily be organized data;Data are carried out correlation analysis.From table Levying according to correlation analysis in parameter, the size of coefficient correlation has reacted degree of correlation between variable, is obtained by relatively each coefficient Height correlation in coefficient correlation (| ρ | " 0.6) as evaluating.
Beneficial effect
By considering that assembling is evaluated in the distribution of form error, determine the evaluation ginseng of the flat form error towards assembling Number, it is achieved the characterization parameter of surface shape error distribution and the quantitative description of assembly precision relation, i.e. obtains and has assembly precision The plane characteristic parameter of material impact, for improving the crudy coordinating plane, optimizes assembly technology thus improves assembly precision Scientific basis is provided.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the different distributions of same shape error delta;
Fig. 2 is the rigging error caused by the distribution of difformity error;
Fig. 3 is general frame figure;
Fig. 4 is assembly simulation flow chart;
Fig. 5 is the contact condition of plane.
Detailed description of the invention
The invention will be further described with embodiment below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Embodiment 1
A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, as it is shown on figure 3, concrete steps are such as Under:
Step one, the form error of piece surface are obtained by following method, generate with non-gaussian plane simulation method Machining surface, by the auto-correlation function R or power spectral density function G of given planezxy), obtain the biography of system Delivery function H (ωxy), utilize Johnson converting system to obtain the random column with the non-gaussian distribution of certain deflection and kurtosis η ', utilizes computer to generate non-gaussian Rough Horizontal Plane.Wavelet filtering obtains form error surface afterwards;Use wavelet analysis, Use basic function Bior6.8 as the wavelet basis function decomposed, the characteristic information of part plane pattern carried out multiple dimensioned separation, Isolate form error plane.Input parameter is shown in Table 1, utilizes orthogonal experiment design method, arranges multiple impact by orthogonal arrage Factor, is shown in Table 2, and six influence factors of orthogonal test are respectively mean height of surface mu, standard deviation sd of apparent height, surface Auto-correlation length bx in x direction, auto-correlation length by y direction, surface, degree of skewness skew on surface, kurtosis kurt on surface, Select typical Orthogonal table to be analyzed, be shown in Table 3.Determining test number (TN) 25, work out orthogonal test scheme table, often group carries out 50 examinations Test, and then 1250 groups of form error surfaces can be obtained.
Table 1 inputs parameter
Table 2 orthogonal test factor level table
Table 3 orthogonal test scheme table
The characterization parameter of the form error surface shape error distribution that step 2, extraction step one obtain;Described sign is joined Number is: range parameter, spatial parameter, functional parameter and hybrid parameter;
The following parameter of initial option calculates, and see table 4:
Table 4 characterization parameter table
Step 3, form error surface step one obtained all are simulated assembling with ideal surfaced;As shown in Figure 4.
(1) search peak, as first make contact;
(2) first make contact and four summits of rectangle are connected to form four planar deltas;
(3) calculate rectangle plane point in each planar delta drop shadow spread and first make contact is wired to corresponding three The angle of angle plane, in taking corresponding planar delta drop shadow spread, point is minimum with the angle being wired to planar delta of first make contact Point, as the second contact point, i.e. rotate to four direction around peak, the point touched at first is the point that angle is minimum.Four Individual planar delta i.e. can get four the second contact points;
(4) planar delta is forwarded to the second contact point around peak, form median surface;
(5) with the line of peak and the second contact point as axle, rotate and find the 3rd contact point.In search rectangular plane 3rd contact point, made the 3rd contact point and by peak and the vertical line of the line of the second contact point;Calculate the 3rd contact point Vertical line and by the angle of median surface, the point corresponding to angle minimum is the 3rd contact point, and same four triangular facets can find Four the 3rd contact points;
(6) connect first make contact, the second contact point and the 3rd contact point and obtain the equation of four contact surfaces;
(7) other constraintss are considered, such as the position relationship of assembly force position Yu contact point, thus from four contact surfaces Equation screens an optimum.
Described in step 3: other constraintss described are: be assembled part center of gravity and the position relationship of contact point and plane The position relationship of z is put on upper value zi a little and ideal plane.
It is assembled the position relationship of part center of gravity and contact point to meet and be assembled part center of gravity in the middle of three contact points. In plane put the position relationship of z on value zi a little and ideal plane and should meet all z values respectively less than zi, see formula 3, then say Bright three contact points now are one group of potential contact point.Three contact points are determined by constraints.Three contact points obtained For P (x1,y1,z1),Q(x2,y2,z2),R(x3,y3,z3) then equation be:
x - x 1 y - y 1 z - z 1 x 2 - x 1 y 2 - y 1 z 2 - z 1 x 3 - x 1 y 3 - y 1 z 3 - z 1 = 0 - - - ( 2 )
That is: Ax+By+Cz+D=0, A, B, C, D are equation coefficient, are derived from.
z ( i ) = D - Ax i - By i C ≤ z i - - - ( 3 )
The assembly precision of the dimensional orientation change of part it is assembled after step 4, calculating assembling;Assembly precision is characterized as dress Being assembled the part plane locus relative to Norm part plane after joining, assembly precision is with after assembling six of part space The free degree is weighed.
Γ=[dx,dy,dzxyz] (1)
Wherein dx,dy,dzFor X, the skew in tri-directions of Y, Z;δxyzFor the rotation amount around three axles.
Described in step 4: only consider the six-freedom degree of local, can calculate after determining based on above-mentioned contact condition and treat Assembly part changes relative to the differential motion of Norm part, three contact points can obtain ideal plane equation Ax+By+Cz + D=0, i.e. can obtain the change of normal vector (A, B, C), and then can obtain three rotation (δxyz), there is plane equation Skew (the d that i.e. can obtain tri-directions of X, Y, Z is compared with ideal planex,dy,dz), the most small rotation amount and small translation Amount.Three skews are that the changes in coordinates at two coordinate system centers represents;Three rotation amounts are by the normal vector n=of plane equation (A, B, C) asks for, and formula 4 is shown in three rotations.
δ x = arccos ( ( n × e x ) / ( | n | · | e x | ) ) δ y = arccos ( ( n × e y ) / ( | n | · | e y | ) ) δ z = arccos ( ( n × e z ) / ( | n | · | e z | ) ) - - - ( 4 )
Wherein n=(A, B, C) is planar process vector;ex,ey,ezFor X, the unit vector in tri-directions of Y, Z.
Step 5, determined the characterization parameter of step 2 and the relation of the assembly precision of step 4 by correlation analysis, to obtaining The 1250 groups of data taken carry out correlation analysis, computational representation parameter and the coefficient correlation of assembly precision, obtain big the commenting of correlation Valency parameter, so that it is determined that form error evaluating, it is achieved surface distributed characterization parameter and the quantitative description of assembly precision relation.
Correlation analysis method described in step 5 is:
(1) correlation analysis process of the test
Change input parameter by orthogonal test, obtain organizing the data of characterization parameter and assembly precision more;Data are carried out Correlation analysis.By the height correlation during relatively each coefficient obtains coefficient correlation as evaluating.
(2) characterization parameter and the correlation analysis of precision
The correlation of each component and characterization parameter is set up based on each component calculating characterization parameter and the assembly precision obtained Analytical formula, correlation analysis computing formula is
ρ i = cov ( V , Γ ) D ( V ) · D ( Γ ) , V = [ v 1 , v 2 , ... , v l ] Γ = [ d x , d y , d z , δ x , δ y , δ z ] - - - ( 5 )
Wherein V is expressed as representing characterization parameter, and l is characterization parameter number, and Γ represents assembly precision.Each by com-parison and analysis Height correlation in coefficient is as evaluating, i.e.
d x ∝ [ S 1 , S 2 , ... , S i ] δ x ∝ [ S 1 , S 2 , ... , S m ] d y ∝ [ S 1 , S 2 , ... , S j ] , δ y ∝ [ S 1 , S 2 , ... , S n ] d z ∝ [ S 1 , S 1 , ... , S k ] δ z ∝ [ S 1 , S 1 , ... , S p ] - - - ( 6 )
In formula, S is corresponding evaluating, and i, j, k, m, n, p are the number of each component correspondence evaluating.
The one group of parameter inputted by change, generation has the Rough Horizontal Plane of certain plane pattern and can change, after reconstructing The parameter extracted of plane also just corresponding change, therefore can arbitrarily be organized data;Data are carried out correlation analysis.From table Levying according to correlation analysis in parameter, the size of coefficient correlation has reacted degree of correlation between variable, is obtained by relatively each coefficient Height correlation in coefficient correlation (| ρ | " 0.6) as evaluating.
Characterization parameter is shown in Table 5 with the coefficient correlation of assembly precision
Table 5 correlation coefficient charts
From table it follows that in ten given parameters, summit density SdsRotation δ with assembly precision x, y directionxWith δyRelevant;Surface Root Mean Square deviation Sq, surface arithmetic average deviation Sa, 10, surface height Sz, surface maximum height Sp, surface Mean μ and surface variances sigma2With assembly precision z direction offset dzHighly dependent.That is:
δ x ∝ [ S ds ] δ y ∝ [ S ds ] d z ∝ [ S q , S a , S z , μ , σ 2 ] - - - ( 7 )

Claims (8)

1. the rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, it is characterised in that: specifically comprise the following steps that
Step one, the form error of piece surface are obtained by following method: generate cutting with non-gaussian plane simulation method Finished surface, wavelet filtering obtains form error surface afterwards;Utilize orthogonal experiment design method, arranged by orthogonal arrage multiple Influence factor, thus obtains many group form error surfaces;
The characterization parameter of the form error surface shape error distribution that step 2, extraction step one obtain;
Step 3, form error surface step one obtained all are simulated assembling with ideal surfaced;
(1) search peak, as first make contact;
(2) first make contact and four summits of rectangle are connected to form four planar deltas;
(3) calculate rectangle plane point in each planar delta drop shadow spread to put down to the corresponding triangle that is wired to of first make contact The angle in face, takes point in corresponding planar delta drop shadow spread minimum with the angle being wired to planar delta of first make contact Point, as the second contact point, i.e. rotates to four direction around peak, and the point touched at first is the point that angle is minimum;Four Planar delta i.e. can get four the second contact points;
(4) planar delta is forwarded to the second contact point around peak, form median surface;
(5) with the line of peak and the second contact point as axle, rotate and find the 3rd contact point;In search rectangular plane the 3rd Contact point, made the 3rd contact point and by peak and the vertical line of the line of the second contact point;Calculate the 3rd contact point vertical Line and by the angle of median surface, the point corresponding to angle minimum is the 3rd contact point, and same four triangular facets can find four 3rd contact point;
(6) connect first make contact, the second contact point and the 3rd contact point and obtain the equation of four contact surfaces;
(7) other constraintss are considered, such as the position relationship of assembly force position Yu contact point, thus from four contact surface equations One optimum of middle screening;
The assembly precision of the dimensional orientation change of part it is assembled after step 4, calculating assembling;After assembly precision is characterized as assembling Being assembled the part plane locus relative to Norm part plane, assembly precision is with six freedom in part space after assembling Degree is weighed:
Γ=[dx,dy,dzxyz] (1)
Wherein dx,dy,dzFor X, the skew in tri-directions of Y, Z;δxyzFor the rotation amount around three axles;
Step 5, determined the characterization parameter of step 2 and the relation of the assembly precision of step 4 by correlation analysis, so that it is determined that Form error evaluating, it is achieved surface distributed characterization parameter is quantitatively retouched with assembly precision relation.
A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, its feature Be: described in step one with non-gaussian plane simulation method generate machining surface method be: by given plane from Correlation function R and power spectral density Gzxy), obtain system transter H (ωxy), utilize Johnson to change system System obtains the random column η ' with the non-gaussian distribution of certain deflection and kurtosis, utilizes computer coarse flat to generate non-gaussian Face.
A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, its feature It is: described in step one with the method on wavelet filtering acquisition form error surface be: use wavelet analysis, use basic function Bior6.8, as the wavelet basis function decomposed, carries out multiple dimensioned separation to the characteristic information of part plane pattern, isolates shape Error plane.
A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, its feature Being: the method for Orthogonal Experiment and Design described in step one is: use orthogonal experiment, six influence factors of orthogonal test are respectively For mean height of surface mu, standard deviation sd of apparent height, auto-correlation length bx in x direction, surface, the auto-correlation in y direction, surface Length by, degree of skewness skew on surface, kurtosis kurt on surface, select typical Orthogonal table to be analyzed, determine test number (TN);Compile Orthogonal test scheme table processed, and then form error surface can be organized much.
A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, its feature It is: characterization parameter described in step 2 is: range parameter, spatial parameter, functional parameter and hybrid parameter.
A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, its feature It is: described in step 3, other constraintss are: be assembled in the position relationship of part center of gravity and contact point and plane institute a little Value zi and ideal plane on put the position relationship of z;
It is assembled the position relationship of part center of gravity and contact point to meet and be assembled part center of gravity in the middle of three contact points;Plane The position relationship putting z on upper value zi a little and ideal plane should meet all z values respectively less than zi, sees formula 3, then this is described Time three contact points be one group of potential contact point;Three contact points are determined by constraints;Three contact points obtained are P (x1,y1,z1),Q(x2,y2,z2),R(x3,y3,z3) then equation be:
| x - x 1 y - y 1 z - z 1 x 2 - x 1 y 2 - y 1 z 2 - z 1 x 3 - x 1 y 3 - y 1 z 3 - z 1 | = 0 - - - ( 2 )
That is: Ax+By+Cz+D=0, A, B, C, D are equation coefficient, are derived from;
z ( i ) = D - Ax i - By i C ≤ z i - - - ( 3 )
A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, its feature It is: be assembled the assembly precision of the dimensional orientation change of part after calculating assembling described in step 4: contact condition after determining is The differential motion change being assembled part relative to Norm part can be calculated, three contact points can obtain ideal plane side Journey Ax+B y+Cz+D=0, i.e. can obtain the change of normal vector (A, B, C), and then can obtain three rotation (δxyz), have Plane equation compares the skew (d that i.e. can obtain tri-directions of X, Y, Z with ideal planex,dy,dz), the most small rotation amount with Small translational movement;Three skews are that the changes in coordinates at two coordinate system centers represents;Three rotation amounts are by the method for plane equation Vector n=(A, B, C) asks for, and formula 4 is shown in three rotations;
δx=arccos ((n × ex)/(|n|·|ex|))
δy=arccos ((n × ey)/(|n|·|ey|)) (4)
δz=arccos ((n × ez)/(|n|·|ez|))
Wherein n=(A, B, C) is planar process vector;ex,ey,ezFor X, the unit vector in tri-directions of Y, Z.
A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembling, its feature It is: the correlation analysis method described in step 5 is:
(1) correlation analysis process of the test
Change input parameter by orthogonal test, obtain organizing the data of characterization parameter and assembly precision more;Data are correlated with Property analyze;By the height correlation during relatively each coefficient obtains coefficient correlation as evaluating;
(2) characterization parameter and the correlation analysis of precision
The correlation analysis of each component and characterization parameter is set up based on each component calculating characterization parameter and the assembly precision obtained Formula, correlation analysis computing formula is
ρ i = cov ( V , Γ ) D ( V ) · D ( Γ ) , V = [ v 1 , v 2 , ... , v l ] , Γ = [ d x , d y , d z , δ x , δ y , δ z ] - - - ( 5 )
Wherein V is expressed as representing characterization parameter, and l is characterization parameter number, and Γ represents assembly precision;By each coefficient of com-parison and analysis In height correlation as evaluating, i.e.
dx∝[S1,S2,…,Si] δx∝[S1,S2,…,Sm]
dy∝[S1,S2,…,Sj], δy∝[S1,S2,…,Sn] (6)
dz∝[S1,S1,…,Sk] δz∝[S1,S1,…,Sp]
In formula, S is corresponding evaluating, and i, j, k, m, n, p are the number of each component correspondence evaluating;
The one group of parameter inputted by change, generation has the Rough Horizontal Plane of certain plane pattern and can change, by putting down after reconstructing The parameter that face is extracted is also the most corresponding to be changed, and therefore can arbitrarily be organized data;Data are carried out correlation analysis;From characterizing ginseng According to correlation analysis in number, the size of coefficient correlation has reacted degree of correlation between variable, obtains relevant by relatively each coefficient Height correlation in coefficient (| ρ | " 0.6) as evaluating.
CN201610244256.6A 2016-04-14 2016-04-19 A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembly Expired - Fee Related CN105868496B (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN2016102293222 2016-04-14
CN201610229322 2016-04-14

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105868496A true CN105868496A (en) 2016-08-17
CN105868496B CN105868496B (en) 2019-01-01

Family

ID=56633361

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201610244256.6A Expired - Fee Related CN105868496B (en) 2016-04-14 2016-04-19 A kind of rectangular planar shape error assessment parameter determination method towards assembly

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105868496B (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107895061A (en) * 2017-09-30 2018-04-10 中国第汽车股份有限公司 The method for selecting of common-rail injector flat seal evaluation roughness parameter
CN109117460A (en) * 2018-09-12 2019-01-01 大连理工大学 A method of survey calculation rotor is jumped based on end and assembles axis deviation
CN110853134A (en) * 2019-10-25 2020-02-28 西安交通大学 Method for calculating contact state of assembly matching surface containing geometric errors
CN112179236A (en) * 2020-09-24 2021-01-05 青岛科技大学 Assembly-oriented plane assembly performance evaluation method based on minimum potential energy
CN112613084A (en) * 2020-12-10 2021-04-06 北京电子工程总体研究所 Error analysis method for connecting rod transmission mechanism

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006250690A (en) * 2005-03-10 2006-09-21 Seiko Epson Corp Scanning probe microscope, evaluation method of probe of scanning probe microscope, and program
CN101241004A (en) * 2007-02-06 2008-08-13 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 Shape error analytical system and method
CN102426615A (en) * 2011-09-01 2012-04-25 北京理工大学 Matching error calculation method for error transfer modeling of precision mechanical system
CN103047959A (en) * 2013-01-18 2013-04-17 北京理工大学 Plane shape error evaluating method aiming at precise assembling and based on entropy theory

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006250690A (en) * 2005-03-10 2006-09-21 Seiko Epson Corp Scanning probe microscope, evaluation method of probe of scanning probe microscope, and program
CN101241004A (en) * 2007-02-06 2008-08-13 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 Shape error analytical system and method
CN102426615A (en) * 2011-09-01 2012-04-25 北京理工大学 Matching error calculation method for error transfer modeling of precision mechanical system
CN103047959A (en) * 2013-01-18 2013-04-17 北京理工大学 Plane shape error evaluating method aiming at precise assembling and based on entropy theory

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
张静等: "基于标准件信息定义的快速装配技术研究", 《机械设计与制造》 *

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107895061A (en) * 2017-09-30 2018-04-10 中国第汽车股份有限公司 The method for selecting of common-rail injector flat seal evaluation roughness parameter
CN107895061B (en) * 2017-09-30 2021-06-25 中国第一汽车股份有限公司 Method for selecting roughness parameters for evaluating plane sealing performance of common rail injector
CN109117460A (en) * 2018-09-12 2019-01-01 大连理工大学 A method of survey calculation rotor is jumped based on end and assembles axis deviation
CN109117460B (en) * 2018-09-12 2021-05-07 大连理工大学 Method for calculating rotor assembly axis deflection based on end jump measurement
CN110853134A (en) * 2019-10-25 2020-02-28 西安交通大学 Method for calculating contact state of assembly matching surface containing geometric errors
CN112179236A (en) * 2020-09-24 2021-01-05 青岛科技大学 Assembly-oriented plane assembly performance evaluation method based on minimum potential energy
CN112179236B (en) * 2020-09-24 2022-06-24 青岛科技大学 Assembly-oriented plane assembly performance evaluation method based on minimum potential energy
CN112613084A (en) * 2020-12-10 2021-04-06 北京电子工程总体研究所 Error analysis method for connecting rod transmission mechanism

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN105868496B (en) 2019-01-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN105868496A (en) Method for determining assembly-oriented rectangular plane shape error evaluation parameters
CN100465580C (en) Analogue method for punching mould structure analysis value
CN103390082B (en) The sane excellent method of completing the square of a kind of gang tool geometric accuracy
CN102566424B (en) Method for executing layout optimization on model analysis measurable nodes of numerical control machining equipment
CN109145471B (en) Virtual assembly system and method based on CAD and measured data co-fusion model
Polini Geometric tolerance analysis
CN104268427B (en) Multi-position car body assembly process-oriented online multiple-deviation source diagnosing system and method
Ren et al. Invariant-feature-pattern-based form characterization for the measurement of ultraprecision freeform surfaces
CN106407567B (en) A kind of RV Parametric Design of Reducer modeling method
CN108052747A (en) A kind of geometric precision of machine tool optimization method based on Method of valuo analysis
CN105094047A (en) Extended Fourier amplitude based extraction method of machine tool important geometric error source
CN103198192A (en) Snapping method for virtually and quickly assembling three-dimensional components
CN104537153B (en) The modeling of Uniformly bounded formation lathe space error and Morris global variable sensitivity analysis methods based on spinor theory
CN115290650B (en) Method and system for detecting hole characteristics of composite material wallboard based on point cloud
CN105938093A (en) Oolong tea producing area discrimination method based on combination of genetic algorithm and support vector machine
CN109359333A (en) A kind of body Model construction method comprising multiple dimensioned shape characteristic
CN114969976B (en) Integrated structure virtual assembly method based on digital measured data
CN108763152A (en) A kind of precision machine tool computer aided tolerance analysis method based on stl file
CN104298814B (en) Parameter error accumulation based gear system performance reliability degree calculation method
CN115858940A (en) Steel structure welding process quality management recommendation method based on big data processing
CN101464205B (en) Test modal analysis method based on reduced-basis method
CN105956303B (en) It is a kind of to be fitted to each other face design method as the lathe of target to offset distortion inaccuracy
Yang et al. Influence of coal gangue volume mixing ratio on the system contact response when multiple coal gangue particles impacting the metal plate and the study of coal gangue mixing ratio recognition based on the metal plate contact response and the multi-information fusion
CN103268378B (en) A kind of globoid cam curve movement discrimination method based on multistage correlation analysis
CN107256565A (en) The measuring method and system of human body predominant body types parameter based on Kinect

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20190101

Termination date: 20190419