CN105427042A - PEM project evaluation management system and control method thereof - Google Patents
PEM project evaluation management system and control method thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105427042A CN105427042A CN201510807981.5A CN201510807981A CN105427042A CN 105427042 A CN105427042 A CN 105427042A CN 201510807981 A CN201510807981 A CN 201510807981A CN 105427042 A CN105427042 A CN 105427042A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- unit
- evaluation
- project
- responsible official
- scoring
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a PEM project evaluation management system and a control method thereof. The system comprises a management terminal server, a peripheral terminal server and a communication system, wherein a source material database, an evaluation standard database, an evaluation staff database, a scoring mechanism database, a scoring system, a ranking system, a file system and an information searching system are arranged in the management terminal server; after working drawings are evaluated and scored, scores of designers and design organizations and a ranking list are published, the designers and the design organizations are evaluated by construction units through a search engine and data, and pressure of project design defects is directly transmitted to each designer. The PEM project evaluation management system has the advantages that evaluation of the project design working drawings can be objectively and accurately completed on line, and working condition of the designers and the design units are objectively evaluated by scores and ranking, thus solving six problems in the construction industry.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to building trade engineering review administrative skill field, specifically, is a kind of PEM engineering review management system and control method thereof.
Background technology
In building and real estate industry, there are six hang-ups can not effectively solve: one is that designing unit and individual scoring are open online always, the pressure of engineering design defect cannot be directly transferred to each designer, thus be difficult to ensure designing quality, be difficult to construction unit and effectively control cost, reduce the duration, reduce customer complaint risk; Two is design industry mechanisms for the survival of the fittest without datumization, and managerial decision is often with sensation and interpersonal relation; Three be construction unit select designing unit time, owing to there is no the data reference of objective justice, be often difficult to judge; Four is construction units when eliminating designing unit, and owing to not having the data reference of objective justice, which family is difficult to determine the end eliminates; Five is that designing unit selects designer can not make and the most objectively selecting; Six is that designing unit can not objectively make a decision when eliminating designer.
Therefore, someone creates following traditional solution:
Method 1: the design contract compensation undercontract amount of money.But shortcoming is not easily to define to know indemnity; Easily intensify both sides' contradiction; The obstruction from Party A Geng Gao administration and supervision authorities may be subject to; Affect Party A vivid in the industry;
Method 2: strengthen Party A's criterion design review.But shortcoming is that Party A's design management personnel routine matter is more, not easily strictly carries out check of drawings; Party A's design management personnel check of drawings scarce capacity; Detail mistake is difficult to check;
Method 3: standardized designs.But shortcoming is that building under ground portion cannot standardization; Business and villa are difficult to standardization; Standard product is proportional restriction in whole project, can not be too much.
Method 4: sheet format point system under line.Construction unit utilizes simple form to mark and rank to result of design.Shortcoming is scoring usually with sensation instead of data; Artificial interference factor is too much; Chronically to designer's build-up of pressure, thus its sense of responsibility and designed capacity cannot be promoted; Large data cannot be formed, effective, long-term evaluation is formed to designer.
Summary of the invention
For the deficiencies in the prior art, the object of this invention is to provide a kind of PEM engineering review management system and control method thereof, the working drawing that completes that can not only be objective and accurate is online evaluated, and utilize mark and rank, found digitizing " survival of the fittest " ecosphere of building trade, solve six hang-ups of puzzlement building trade simultaneously.
For achieving the above object, the technical solution used in the present invention is as follows:
A kind of PEM engineering review management system, its key is: comprise terminal management server and peripheral terminal server and communication system, source data bases is provided with in terminal management server, evaluation benchmark database, reviewer's database, and scoring database, points-scoring system, ranking system, archives economy and information search system;
Described source data bases comprises drawing and the explanatory note material such as architectural working drawing, structural working drawing, electrical construction document, HVAC working drawing, water supply and drainage construction figure that designing unit submits to;
Described evaluation benchmark database mainly comprises the Key points for auditing in each working drawing;
Described reviewer's database, mainly comprise construction unit Project design responsible official, construction unit expert engineer, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit expert engineer and or the identity information of/independent third party unit specialty responsible official, evaluation qualification and qualification grade authority;
Described scoring database is for storing scoring;
Described points-scoring system is used for according to review result and scoring, marks to the individual involved by working drawing, project, designing unit;
Described ranking system is used for carrying out rank to the appraisal result of individual, project, designing unit;
Described archives economy is for storing each evaluation course record, review result, appraisal result and ranking;
Described information search system is used for inquiring about the evaluation situation of designing unit expert engineer in system, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit, project, scoring situation and ranking according to user's request.
Further, described identity information comprises Real Name, sex, age, identification card number, cell-phone number, conventional mailbox, working unit property, working organization, technical title, practicing requirements, length of service, is engaged in specialty.
Further, the Real Name in described identity information, sex, age, identification card number are and can not revise information, and all the other are for revising information.
Further, described construction unit Project design responsible official, construction unit expert engineer, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit expert engineer and or/independent third party unit specialty responsible official there is different authorities, wherein said construction unit Project design responsible official super-ordinate right, project can be created, amendment organizational structure, charter, company standard, evaluation main points, and initiate check of drawings; All the other personnel are common authority, can only check organizational structure, evaluation main points, charter and enterprise definitely.
Further, described scoring comprises individual scoring, project comprehensive grading mechanism, the annual scoring of designing unit in same company and the designing unit annual scoring in the multiple project in same city.
Further, in described individual scoring, each professional full marks are all 100 points, and adopt deduction of points mechanism, respectively according to 10 points, serious problems button, 5 points, major issue button, 1 point, general considerations button.
Further, described project comprehensive grading mechanism calculates according to following formula: project comprehensive grading=building score * 0.3+ structure scores * 0.4+ water specialty score * 0.1+ HVAC score * 0.1+ electric score * 0.1=designing unit project leader score.
According to above-mentioned PEM engineering review management system, the present invention goes back a kind of control method based on this system of bidding documents, it is characterized in that carrying out according to following steps:
Step 1: construction unit Project design responsible official, construction unit expert engineer, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit expert engineer and or/independent third party unit specialty responsible official respectively by peripheral terminal server according to self-identity information Accreditation System account;
Step 2: described construction unit Project design responsible official login system account, the organizational structure of set up item evaluation team, and the identity information of every participant in cuit;
Step 3: typing source book data, each member according to the evaluation main points that system provides, carries out the evaluation of each side in identical platform, accumulates original large data;
Step 4: after finished item evaluation, system is marked to the original large data of project appraisal according to scoring, and appraisal result is carried out rank;
Step 5: appraisal result and ranking result are uploaded by system online, and each professional responsible official initiated a message in notify items by communication system.
Further technical scheme is, the concrete steps of evaluation described in step 3 are as follows:
Step 3-1: described construction unit Project design responsible official initiates check of drawings flow process, and with designing unit and or/independent third party unit reach an agreement on beginning and ending time in each stage in check of drawings flow process, system sends participants all in message notice project automatically;
Step 3-2: designing unit expert engineer described in each carries out one by one from examine according to " table is examined in designing unit's working drawing school " to working drawing according to self specialty;
Step 3-3: designing unit specialty responsible official carries out one by one school according to " table is examined in designing unit's working drawing school " and examines, and system sends all participants of message notice automatically when closing time, discloses school and examines progress;
Step 3-4: construction unit expert engineer carries out one by one school according to " construction unit's design portion working drawing evaluation table " and examines; If there is independent third party unit to exercise supervision examination, then independent third party unit specialty responsible official carries out one by one school according to " the third party working drawing evaluation table " and examines, and system sends all participants of message notice automatically when closing time, disclose school and examine progress;
Step 3-5: construction unit Project design responsible official authorizes according to " construction unit's design portion working drawing evaluation table " and " the third party working drawing evaluation table ", and carry out ruling according to the reply suggestion of designing unit, complete designing unit expert engineer, the final evaluation of designing unit specialty responsible official;
Step 3-6: after completing whole specialized review, system automatically initiates a message and notifies the evaluation situation of all participants of constituent parts;
Step 3-7: according to construction concrete condition, change if exist, then according to changed content, return step 3-1 and again carry out check of drawings flow process; Otherwise using the mark after final acceptance of construction as final review result, and all participants of notice constituent parts that automatically initiate a message.
As preferably, message described in step 5 can be in mail, note, micro-letter, QQ message one or more.
The present invention is by setting up a nationwide internet common platform, announce designer and designing unit's mark, ranking list, construction unit is evaluated designer and designing unit by search engine and data, the pressure of engineering design defect is directly transferred to each designer, farthest strengthen its sense of responsibility, thus farthest improve designing quality, for construction unit effectively controls cost, reduces the duration, reduces customer complaint risk.
Remarkable result of the present invention is: the engineering design figure that completes that can not only be objective and accurate online evaluates, and utilize mark and rank is objective evaluates designer, designing unit's working condition, found digitizing " survival of the fittest " ecosphere of building trade, solve six hang-ups of puzzlement building trade simultaneously.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is algorithm flow chart of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is the process flow diagram of described evaluation;
Fig. 3 is described organizational structure schematic diagram;
Fig. 4 is scoring rank schematic diagram;
Fig. 5 is personal search result figure;
Tu6Shi unit search results map;
Fig. 7 is project search result figure.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, the specific embodiment of the present invention and principle of work are described in further detail.
As shown in Figure 1, a kind of PEM engineering review management system, comprise terminal management server and peripheral terminal server and communication system, source data bases is provided with in terminal management server, evaluation benchmark database, reviewer's database, and scoring database, points-scoring system, ranking system, archives economy and information search system;
Described source data bases comprises drawing and the explanatory note material such as architectural working drawing, structural working drawing, electrical construction document, HVAC working drawing, water supply and drainage construction figure that designing unit submits to;
Described evaluation benchmark database mainly comprises the Key points for auditing in each working drawing, described evaluation main points (being described for electric field in the present embodiment) as shown in the table:
In above statistical form, should be able to embody villa and complicated business be main, common multi-rise building is that main, multiple industry situation mixes this three kinds of parameters.
Described reviewer's database, mainly comprise construction unit Project design responsible official, construction unit expert engineer, designing unit specialty responsible official, the identity information of designing unit expert engineer and independent third party unit specialty responsible official, evaluation qualification and qualification grade authority, described identity information comprises Real Name, sex, age, identification card number, cell-phone number, conventional mailbox, working unit property, working organization, technical title, practicing requirements, length of service, be engaged in specialty, Real Name in described identity information, sex, age, identification card number is can not revise information, all the other are for can revise information,
Described scoring database is for storing scoring, and described scoring comprises individual scoring, project comprehensive grading mechanism, the annual scoring of designing unit in same company and the designing unit annual scoring in the multiple project in same city.In described individual scoring, each professional full marks are all 100 points, and adopt deduction of points mechanism, respectively according to 10 points, serious problems button, 5 points, major issue button, 1 point, general considerations button; Described project comprehensive grading mechanism calculates according to following formula: project comprehensive grading=building score * 0.3+ structure scores * 0.4+ water specialty score * 0.1+ HVAC score * 0.1+ electric score * 0.1=designing unit project leader score; The arithmetic mean of the annual scoring of described designing unit in same company all design item appraisal result that is this designing unit in same company 1 year; Described designing unit is the arithmetic mean of this designing unit multiple project appraisal result in same city at the annual scoring of the multiple project in same city.
Described points-scoring system is used for according to review result and scoring, marks to the individual involved by working drawing, project, designing unit;
Described ranking system is used for carrying out rank to the appraisal result of individual, project, designing unit;
Described archives economy is for storing each evaluation course record, review result, appraisal result and ranking;
Described information search system is used for inquiring about the evaluation situation of designing unit expert engineer in system, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit, project, scoring situation and ranking according to user's request.
Described construction unit Project design responsible official, construction unit expert engineer, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit expert engineer and independent third party unit specialty responsible official have different authorities, wherein said construction unit Project design responsible official super-ordinate right, project can be created, amendment organizational structure, charter, company standard, evaluation main points, and initiate check of drawings; All the other personnel are common authority, can only check organizational structure, evaluation main points, charter and enterprise definitely.
As shown in Figure 1, the present invention also describes a kind of control method of above-mentioned PEM engineering review management system, and concrete steps are as follows:
Step 1: construction unit Project design responsible official, construction unit expert engineer, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit expert engineer and independent third party unit specialty responsible official respectively by peripheral terminal server according to self-identity information Accreditation System account;
Step 2: described construction unit Project design responsible official login system account, the organizational structure of set up item evaluation team, as shown in Figure 3, and the identity information of every participant in cuit;
Step 3: typing source book data, each member according to the evaluation main points that system provides, carries out the evaluation of each side in identical platform, accumulates original large data;
See accompanying drawing 2, the concrete steps of described evaluation are as follows:
Step 3-1: described construction unit Project design responsible official initiates check of drawings flow process, and reach an agreement on the beginning and ending time in each stage in check of drawings flow process with designing unit and independent third party unit, system sends participants all in message notice project automatically;
Step 3-2: designing unit expert engineer described in each carries out one by one from examine according to " table is examined in designing unit's working drawing school " to working drawing according to self specialty;
Step 3-3: designing unit specialty responsible official carries out one by one school according to " table is examined in designing unit's working drawing school " and examines, and system sends all participants of message notice automatically when closing time, discloses school and examines progress;
Step 3-4: construction unit expert engineer carries out one by one school according to " construction unit's design portion working drawing evaluation table " and examines; Independent third party unit specialty responsible official carries out one by one school according to " the third party working drawing evaluation table " and examines, and system sends all participants of message notice automatically when closing time, disclose school and examine progress;
Step 3-5: construction unit Project design responsible official authorizes according to " construction unit's design portion working drawing evaluation table " and " the third party working drawing evaluation table ", and carry out ruling according to the reply suggestion of designing unit, complete designing unit expert engineer, the final evaluation of designing unit specialty responsible official;
Step 3-6: after completing whole specialized review, system automatically initiates a message and notifies the evaluation situation of all participants of constituent parts;
Step 3-7: according to construction concrete condition, change if exist, then according to changed content, return step 3-1 and again carry out check of drawings flow process; Otherwise using the mark after final acceptance of construction as final review result, and all participants of notice constituent parts that automatically initiate a message.
Step 4: after finished item evaluation, system is marked to the original large data of project appraisal according to scoring, and appraisal result is carried out rank, as shown in Figure 4;
Step 5: appraisal result and ranking result are uploaded by system online, and each professional responsible official initiated a message in notify items by communication system.
In this example, described in step 5, message is preferably mail, and its transmit mechanism is except sending the closing time in evaluation, also follows following rule:
Annual January 5, previous year " individual reports " is sent to designing unit first and leads mailbox; Annual January 5, previous year " designing unit's report " is sent to designing unit first and leads mailbox; Annual January 5, previous year " project report " is sent to construction unit Project design responsible official and designing unit project leader mailbox; Annual January 5, previous year " construction unit's report " is sent to design portion of construction unit first and leads mailbox.
After appraisal result and ranking are uploaded, user inquires about the evaluation situation of designing unit expert engineer in system, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit, project, scoring situation and ranking by described information search system.When searching for designing unit expert engineer or designing unit specialty responsible official individual, Search Results as shown in Figure 5; When searching for designing unit, Search Results as shown in Figure 6; When search relates to project, Search Results as shown in Figure 7.
Claims (10)
1. a PEM engineering review management system, it is characterized in that: comprise terminal management server and peripheral terminal server and communication system, source data bases is provided with in terminal management server, evaluation benchmark database, reviewer's database, and scoring database, points-scoring system, ranking system, archives economy and information search system;
Described source data bases comprises drawing and the explanatory note material such as architectural working drawing, structural working drawing, electrical construction document, HVAC working drawing, water supply and drainage construction figure that designing unit submits to;
Described evaluation benchmark database mainly comprises the Key points for auditing in each working drawing;
Described reviewer's database, mainly comprise construction unit Project design responsible official, construction unit expert engineer, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit expert engineer and or the identity information of/independent third party unit specialty responsible official, evaluation qualification and qualification grade authority;
Described scoring database is for storing scoring;
Described points-scoring system is used for according to review result and scoring, marks to the individual involved by working drawing, project, designing unit;
Described ranking system is used for carrying out rank to the appraisal result of individual, project, designing unit;
Described archives economy is for storing each evaluation course record, review result, appraisal result and ranking;
Described information search system is used for inquiring about the evaluation situation of designing unit expert engineer in system, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit, project, scoring situation and ranking according to user's request.
2. PEM engineering review management system as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that: described identity information comprises Real Name, sex, age, identification card number, cell-phone number, conventional mailbox, working unit property, working organization, technical title, practicing requirements, length of service, is engaged in specialty.
3. PEM engineering review management system according to claim 2, is characterized in that: the Real Name in described identity information, sex, age, identification card number are and can not revise information, and all the other are for revising information.
4. PEM engineering review management system according to claim 1, it is characterized in that: described construction unit Project design responsible official, construction unit expert engineer, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit expert engineer and or/independent third party unit specialty responsible official there is different authorities, wherein said construction unit Project design responsible official super-ordinate right, project can be created, amendment organizational structure, charter, company standard, evaluation main points, and initiate check of drawings; All the other personnel are common authority, can only check organizational structure, evaluation main points, charter and enterprise definitely.
5. PEM engineering review management system according to claim 1, is characterized in that: described scoring comprises individual scoring, project comprehensive grading mechanism, the annual scoring of designing unit in same company and the designing unit annual scoring in the multiple project in same city.
6. PEM engineering review management system according to claim 5, it is characterized in that: in described individual scoring, each professional full marks are all 100 points, and adopt deduction of points mechanism, respectively according to 10 points, serious problems button, 5 points, major issue button, 1 point, general considerations button.
7. PEM engineering review management system according to claim 5, is characterized in that: described project comprehensive grading mechanism calculates according to following formula: project comprehensive grading=building score * 0.3+ structure scores * 0.4+ water specialty score * 0.1+ HVAC score * 0.1+ electric score * 0.1=designing unit project leader score.
8. a control method for PEM engineering review management system as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that carrying out according to following steps:
Step 1: construction unit Project design responsible official, construction unit expert engineer, designing unit specialty responsible official, designing unit expert engineer and or/independent third party unit specialty responsible official respectively by peripheral terminal server according to self-identity information Accreditation System account;
Step 2: described construction unit Project design responsible official login system account, the organizational structure of set up item evaluation team, and the identity information of every participant in cuit;
Step 3: typing source book data, each member according to the evaluation main points that system provides, carries out the evaluation of each side in identical platform, accumulates original large data;
Step 4: after finished item evaluation, system is marked to the original large data of project appraisal according to scoring, and appraisal result is carried out rank;
Step 5: appraisal result and ranking result are uploaded by system online, and each professional responsible official initiated a message in notify items by communication system.
9. the control method of PEM engineering review management system according to claim 8, is characterized in that: the concrete steps of evaluation described in step 3 are as follows:
Step 3-1: described construction unit Project design responsible official initiates check of drawings flow process, and with designing unit and or/independent third party unit reach an agreement on beginning and ending time in each stage in check of drawings flow process, system sends participants all in message notice project automatically;
Step 3-2: designing unit expert engineer described in each carries out one by one from examine according to " table is examined in designing unit's working drawing school " to working drawing according to self specialty;
Step 3-3: designing unit specialty responsible official carries out one by one school according to " table is examined in designing unit's working drawing school " and examines, and system sends all participants of message notice automatically when closing time, discloses school and examines progress;
Step 3-4: construction unit expert engineer carries out one by one school according to " construction unit's design portion working drawing evaluation table " and examines; If there is independent third party unit to exercise supervision examination, then independent third party unit specialty responsible official carries out one by one school according to " the third party working drawing evaluation table " and examines, and system sends all participants of message notice automatically when closing time, disclose school and examine progress;
Step 3-5: construction unit Project design responsible official authorizes according to " construction unit's design portion working drawing evaluation table " and " the third party working drawing evaluation table ", and carry out ruling according to the reply suggestion of designing unit, complete designing unit expert engineer, the final evaluation of designing unit specialty responsible official;
Step 3-6: after completing whole specialized review, system automatically initiates a message and notifies the evaluation situation of all participants of constituent parts;
Step 3-7: according to construction concrete condition, change if exist, then according to changed content, return step 3-1 and again carry out check of drawings flow process; Otherwise using the mark after final acceptance of construction as final review result, and all participants of notice constituent parts that automatically initiate a message.
10. the control method of PEM engineering review management system according to claim 8, is characterized in that: message described in step 5 can be in mail, note, micro-letter, QQ message one or more.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510807981.5A CN105427042A (en) | 2015-11-20 | 2015-11-20 | PEM project evaluation management system and control method thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510807981.5A CN105427042A (en) | 2015-11-20 | 2015-11-20 | PEM project evaluation management system and control method thereof |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105427042A true CN105427042A (en) | 2016-03-23 |
Family
ID=55505235
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510807981.5A Pending CN105427042A (en) | 2015-11-20 | 2015-11-20 | PEM project evaluation management system and control method thereof |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105427042A (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108733851A (en) * | 2018-08-14 | 2018-11-02 | 合肥诚踏建筑机械服务有限公司 | A kind of construction machinery equipment secure data analysis and evaluation system |
| CN109034565A (en) * | 2018-07-10 | 2018-12-18 | 苏州赛维新机电检测技术服务有限公司 | A kind of intelligence enterprise qualification assessment system |
| CN109784876A (en) * | 2019-03-04 | 2019-05-21 | 上海会米策信息科技有限公司 | Review system and method on line |
| CN109801045A (en) * | 2019-03-15 | 2019-05-24 | 山东省农业机械科学研究院 | A kind of agricultural equipment collaborative design method of Distributed Parallel Computing |
| CN110738427A (en) * | 2019-10-21 | 2020-01-31 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | electric power part work quality scoring system |
| CN111080252A (en) * | 2019-12-11 | 2020-04-28 | 河南省公共资源交易中心 | Online label opening method and system |
-
2015
- 2015-11-20 CN CN201510807981.5A patent/CN105427042A/en active Pending
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109034565A (en) * | 2018-07-10 | 2018-12-18 | 苏州赛维新机电检测技术服务有限公司 | A kind of intelligence enterprise qualification assessment system |
| CN108733851A (en) * | 2018-08-14 | 2018-11-02 | 合肥诚踏建筑机械服务有限公司 | A kind of construction machinery equipment secure data analysis and evaluation system |
| CN109784876A (en) * | 2019-03-04 | 2019-05-21 | 上海会米策信息科技有限公司 | Review system and method on line |
| CN109801045A (en) * | 2019-03-15 | 2019-05-24 | 山东省农业机械科学研究院 | A kind of agricultural equipment collaborative design method of Distributed Parallel Computing |
| CN110738427A (en) * | 2019-10-21 | 2020-01-31 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | electric power part work quality scoring system |
| CN111080252A (en) * | 2019-12-11 | 2020-04-28 | 河南省公共资源交易中心 | Online label opening method and system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN105427042A (en) | PEM project evaluation management system and control method thereof | |
| Baron et al. | Technology standards and standard setting organizations: Introduction to the searle center database | |
| Channuntapipat et al. | Variation in sustainability assurance practice: An analysis of accounting versus non-accounting providers | |
| Carrillo | Lessons learned practices in the engineering, procurement and construction sector | |
| Domingues et al. | Analysis of integrated management systems from various perspectives | |
| Fong Boh et al. | Knowledge transfer across dissimilar cultures | |
| Williamson | Efficient labour organization | |
| Barraket et al. | Social procurement and its implications for social enterprise: a literature review [Working Paper No. CPNS48] | |
| Al-Sabah et al. | Evaluating impact of construction risks in the Arabian Gulf Region from perspective of multinational architecture, engineering and construction firms | |
| Agostino et al. | The New Public Management in hybrid settings: New challenges for performance measures | |
| CN101303750A (en) | System for managing enterprise performance evaluation | |
| Sadikin et al. | IT governance self assessment in higher education Based on COBIT case study: University of Mercu Buana | |
| Lewis | The over‐training of apprentices by employers in advanced manufacturing: a theoretical and policy analysis | |
| Zhang et al. | Exploring relationships between first‐line nurse manager's safety attitudes and safety factors in Henan, China | |
| Walentynowicz | Lean organizational culture as an example of a positive organizational culture | |
| Wang et al. | Development of the Q uality of A ustralian N ursing D ocumentation in A ged C are (QANDAC) instrument to assess paper‐based and electronic resident records | |
| CN101976399A (en) | Integrated reviewing method based on reviewing work system | |
| Muhoya | The influence of knowledge management practices on performance of selected global audit firms in Kenya | |
| Rada et al. | Standardizing management of software engineering projects | |
| Diyagama et al. | Managing external stakeholders influences in mega construction projects | |
| CHAN et al. | Development of professional system in the construction industry of China | |
| Bowornwathana et al. | Managing reforms: The politics of organizing reform work | |
| Fang et al. | Sharing construction safety knowledge through social networks | |
| Madamala et al. | Current and planned shared service arrangements in Wisconsin local and tribal health departments | |
| Vasudevan et al. | Effective Communication Management in Remote Working Environment on Project Management Success |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20160323 |