CN104597892B - One kind is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults - Google Patents

One kind is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104597892B
CN104597892B CN201410785081.0A CN201410785081A CN104597892B CN 104597892 B CN104597892 B CN 104597892B CN 201410785081 A CN201410785081 A CN 201410785081A CN 104597892 B CN104597892 B CN 104597892B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fault
equipment
failure
model
stratification
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201410785081.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN104597892A (en
Inventor
余锋祥
蔡栋生
郑磊
郑永丰
陈斐
李泽明
蔄元臣
曹宇
宋元
贾召会
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Aerospace Measurement and Control Technology Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Beijing Aerospace Measurement and Control Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Aerospace Measurement and Control Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Beijing Aerospace Measurement and Control Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN201410785081.0A priority Critical patent/CN104597892B/en
Publication of CN104597892A publication Critical patent/CN104597892A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN104597892B publication Critical patent/CN104597892B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0218Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
    • G05B23/0243Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
    • G05B23/0245Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model based on a qualitative model, e.g. rule based; if-then decisions
    • G05B23/0251Abstraction hierarchy, e.g. "complex systems", i.e. system is divided in subsystems, subsystems are monitored and results are combined to decide on status of whole system

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Test And Diagnosis Of Digital Computers (AREA)

Abstract

One kind proposed by the present invention is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults, solves the problems such as existing weaponry and equipment fault diagnosis technology fault detect rate is low, fault coverage is not high, trouble isolation serviceability is poor.Step 1: equipment Failure Modes are analyzed:Assessed including equipment failure model construction, fault signature extraction, fault simulation and checking;Step 2: structure stratification fault model:Equipment Failure Modes analysis result is optimized according to the simulation results of step 1, and then reversely instructs system failure model hierarchyization to optimize;Step 3: structure fault diagnosis system:The failure mode analysis (FMA) result and stratification fault model obtained according to above-mentioned steps one and two, from software and hardware resources;Step 4: change system level fault diagnosis is verified:Complete the system level diagnostic test of equipment.

Description

One kind is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults
Technical field
The present invention relates to weaponry integration test diagnostic techniques field, more particularly to one kind to be used for electronic information equipment layer Secondaryization method for diagnosing faults.
Background technology
In integration test and diagnostic field, with the raising of electronic information weapon system-of-systems complexity, equipment configuration group Close into being contacted between complicated each subsystem, its failure has level, correlation and comprehensive feature, while conventional equipment event Barrier diagnosis thought, realize technological approaches, system constructive method, use software and hardware technology exist it is low to fault detect rate, The problems such as fault coverage is not high, trouble isolation serviceability is poor, false alarm rate is high, greatly limit the performance of Military Equipment Battling efficiency, nothing Method meets Maintenance for Equipment mission requirements.
The content of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the present invention is for existing weaponry and equipment fault diagnosis technology fault detect rate is low, failure covering The problems such as rate is not high, trouble isolation serviceability is poor, electronic information equipment Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions technology is broken through, builds the event of stratification Hinder diagnostic system, to improve the efficiency and accuracy of equipping diagnosis.
In order to solve the above technical problems, one kind proposed by the present invention is used for electronic information equipment stratification fault diagnosis side Method, comprise the following steps:
Step 1: equipment Failure Modes are analyzed:Including equipment failure model construction, fault signature extraction, fault simulation and Checking is assessed;First by user requirements analysis, equipment failure arrange and firsthand information collect to equipment carry out hierachical decomposition and Testability analysis obtains equipment Failure Modes and impact analysis FMEA reports, and establishes the system failure in TEAMS simulation softwares Model;With TEAMS simulation softwares according to FMEA simulated injection all kinds failures are equipped, to system failure feature extraction, and Testing and diagnosing is carried out to injection failure, and then verifies the testability of assessment system, obtains simulation results;
Step 2: structure stratification fault model:Equipment Failure Modes are analyzed according to the simulation results of step 1 As a result optimize, and then reversely instruct system failure model hierarchyization to optimize;
Step 3: structure fault diagnosis system:The failure mode analysis (FMA) result and layer obtained according to above-mentioned steps one and two Secondaryization fault model, examined from software and hardware resources, including direct fault location software and hardware configuration, test software and hardware configuration, structure failure Disconnected system;
Step 4: change system level fault diagnosis is verified:The equipment Failure Modes obtained according to above-mentioned steps one, two are analyzed As a result, direct fault location, fault signature extraction and fault reasoning is carried out to equipment with the fault diagnosis system of step 3 structure to obtain To change system fault diagnosis result, the software emulation result for contrasting step 1 is verified to change system level fault diagnosis, Complete the system level diagnostic test of equipment.
Beneficial effects of the present invention:
The present invention can utilize electronic information equipment self structure, the level feature of function, by propagating equipment failure The analysis and research of characteristic, system-level distinguishing hierarchy is carried out in terms of equipping with equipment Failure Modes two, establish stratification diagnosis mould Type, test data is obtained with reference to distributed BIT and outside ATE tests are equipped, is mutually tied with D-S evidence theory using BP neural network The information fusion algorithm of conjunction carries out fault reasoning, to realize the Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions of equipment.According in equipment and failure Contacting, with the selection in change system level hierarchical model specification fault mode space, equipment knowledge and expert are instructed into sex knowledge Failure diagnostic process is introduced so as to merge information of both equipment knowledge and fault knowledge, to instruct failure diagnostic process.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is electronic information equipment Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions technology overall plan schematic diagram of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is equipment Failure Modes analytical plan flow chart of the present invention;
Fig. 3 is change system level stratification Fault Diagnosis Strategy process schematic of the present invention;
Fig. 4 is that present system level fault diagnosis verifies system block diagram;
Fig. 5 is fault reasoning flow chart of the present invention.
Embodiment
The present invention is described in further detail with embodiment below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
(1) electronic information equipment failure mode analysis (FMA) is by the integrated information based on equipment, with reference to tested electronic information equipment Testable parameter deploys.Failure mode analysis (FMA) process include equipment failure model construction, fault signature extraction, fault simulation and Checking assessment etc..Effective foundation of electronic information equipment fault model can be fault diagnosis system testing algorithm generate and The application of corresponding fault simulation and inference technology provides the support on system mechanism.
(2) using equipping self structure, functional hierarchy feature, by the analysis and research to equipment failure propagation characteristic, Hierarchical Programming is carried out in terms of equipping with equipment Failure Modes two, according to equipment and the inner link between failure, establishes stratification Fault model, make fault diagnosis thinking methodization.
(3) fault diagnosis system is built according to electronic information equipment failure mode analysis (FMA) result, hardware platform is with portable survey Test instrument, PXI bus instruments, restocking instrument and Fault Insertion Equipment etc. form, and system software platform is to obtain equipment Test number According to input, the functions such as fault message fusion, fault reasoning diagnosis are realized.
(4) using actual electronic information equipment as identifying object, by the Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions to actually equipping, and therefore Hinder diagnostic system self-test, self diagnosis experiment, examine fault detect and failure of the fault diagnosis system to electronic information equipment to push away Reason ability, verify the reasonability of stratification method for diagnosing faults.
Fig. 1 is electronic information equipment Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions technology overall plan schematic diagram of the present invention.As illustrated, electronics Information equipment Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions technology is divided into the demand analysis of electronic information equipment testing and diagnosing, fault mode and influences to divide Analysis, stratification fault model structure and testability design optimization, Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions technique study and software are realized, are system-level Several respects research contents such as fault diagnosis system is built and fault diagnostic test is verified.Wherein, equipment failure model will combine Many equipment informations such as equipment configuration feature, equipment Test data, BIT data, equipment failure characteristic parameter, to equipment Demand analysis is carried out, and electronic information equipment fault model is subjected to stratification decomposition, structure equipment hierarchical model, is filled to be formed Standby stratification Fault Diagnosis Strategy provides support.
Fig. 2 is failure mode analysis (FMA) protocol procedures figure of the present invention, in electronic information equipment failure mode analysis (FMA), equipment failure Model construction is extremely important.Multi-signal flow graph model method can be applied to the testability design of complication system, failure mode effect With criticality analysis, fault diagnosis and testability assess etc..Knowledge base is the important component of fault diagnosis system, main It is used to deposit the fault signature that the special knowledge of domain expert obtains with emulation reasoning.Knowledge base is according to qualitative analysis With expertise knowledge, rule and obtain fault signature etc. in practice data form for information about, and with certain knowledge shape Formula represents.Knowledge base should constantly expand, changes, update, the increase and acquisition of particularly new fault knowledge.
Fig. 3 is present system level stratification Fault Diagnosis Strategy process schematic.First, according to the fault signature of acquisition Parameter, the system chosen in fault mode level carry out fault reasoning diagnosis, obtained corresponding to preliminary system and diagnostic result Node A;Equipment level model node S1 corresponding to node A is chosen, the section with node S1 interactions is determined by incidence relation Point;By the node chosen in hierarchical model is equipped, with reference to the Failure Characteristic Parameter and primary fault diagnostic message of acquisition, pair event Barrier hierarchical model progress is related to cut out, it is determined that corresponding to the node S1 ' of the second layer in equipment level, diagnosis here Journey corresponds to diagnosis process in the layer in hierarchy diagnosis;Chosen in the failure subpattern space for being cut out coming the in equipment level Two node layer S1 ' carry out fault reasoning diagnosis, obtain node B corresponding to failure level result, diagnosis process here corresponds to Interlayer diagnosis process in hierarchy diagnosis;Equipment level model node S2 corresponding to node B is chosen, is determined by incidence relation with saving Point S2 interaction node, with reference to acquisition Failure Characteristic Parameter and once, secondary failure diagnostic message, to failure level mould Type progress is related to cut out, it is determined that corresponding to the node S2 ' of third layer in equipment level, by electronic information equipment fault location To LRU/LRM.
Fig. 4 is invention Methods for Diagnosing System Level Malfunctions checking system block diagram.Using actual electronic information equipment as checking Object, constructing system level fault diagnosis checking system, as illustrated, checking system is mainly by tested equipment and fault diagnosis system Composition.
Fig. 5 is fault reasoning flow chart of the present invention.Tested equipment failure status data is gathered according to fault diagnosis system, will Major error parameter after feature extraction is as input layer, and fault mode is as output layer, and each layer is hidden layer among remaining.It is right first Various sign domains carry out artificial neural networks, and the local message that output result is carried out with D-S evidence theory merges, in system It is middle that single channel output is converted into Evidence Reasoning Model, i.e., normalized is passed through into the single channel output of neutral net, Directly as the basic probability assignment of each focus element, so as to avoid the complexity of construction Basic probability assignment function, then Gradually merge the diagnostic message of each passage with the rule of combination of D-S evidence theory, obtain the local diagnosis knot of the sign domain independence Fruit.
This method according to equipment failure between inner link, by system-level stratification analysis can provide one it is complete Space, make it is any diagnosis answer can be all found in this space, hierarchical structure can make equipment can during diagnosis The internal connection systematically reflected between each fault mode, and solve latent fault mode beneficial to according to explicit fault mode;This Method is based on equipment level, the malfunction reason for the ground analytical equipment that has levels comprehensively, and provides patrolling between associated failure The relation of collecting, the fault mode level equipped with clear complete expression, guidance is provided to detect, isolating and fix a breakdown;With Each main gene characteristic parameter acquired based on distributed BIT and outside ATE tests are equipped, is demonstrate,proved using BP neural network and D-S Carry out positive and negative diagnostic reasoning according to the information fusion method that is combined of theory, that is, be effectively combined diagnostic reasoning system efficiency and Completeness, so as to meet requirement of the fault diagnosis system to real-time and accuracy.

Claims (4)

1. one kind is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults, including equipment failure model construction, fault signature carry Take, fault simulation and checking are assessed, it is characterised in that further comprising the steps of:
Step 1: equipment Failure Modes are analyzed:Pass through user requirements analysis, equipment failure arrangement and firsthand information collection pair first Equipment carries out hierachical decomposition and testability analysis obtains equipment Failure Modes and impact analysis FMEA reports, and is emulated in TEAMS System failure model is established in software;With TEAMS simulation softwares according to equipment FMEA simulated injection all kinds failures, to being Fault signature of uniting extracts, and carries out testing and diagnosing to injection failure, and then verifies the testability of assessment system, obtains simulating, verifying As a result;
Step 2: structure stratification fault model:According to the simulation results of step 1 to equipment Failure Modes analysis result Optimize, and then reversely instruct system failure model hierarchyization to optimize;
Step 3: structure fault diagnosis system:The failure mode analysis (FMA) result obtained according to above-mentioned steps one and two and stratification Fault model, from software and hardware resources, including direct fault location software and hardware configuration, test software and hardware configuration, structure fault diagnosis system System;
Step 4: change system level fault diagnosis is verified:The equipment Failure Modes obtained according to above-mentioned steps one, two analyze knot Fruit, direct fault location, fault signature extraction and fault reasoning are carried out to equipment with the fault diagnosis system of step 3 structure and is obtained Change system fault diagnosis result, the software emulation result for contrasting step 1 is verified to change system level fault diagnosis, complete System level diagnostic into equipment is tested;
Fault reasoning wherein described in step 4 gathers tested equipment failure status data according to fault diagnosis system, and feature is carried Major error parameter after taking is as input layer, and fault mode is as output layer, and each layer is hidden layer among remaining;First to various signs Million domains carry out artificial neural networks, and the local message that output result is carried out with D-S evidence theory merges, in systems will be single Passage output is converted into Evidence Reasoning Model, i.e., the single channel output of neutral net is passed through into normalized, directly made For the basic probability assignment of each focus element, so as to avoid the complexity of construction Basic probability assignment function, then demonstrate,proved with D-S Gradually merge the diagnostic message of each passage according to the rule of combination of theory, obtain the local diagnosis result of the sign domain independence.
2. one kind as claimed in claim 1 is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults, it is characterised in that wherein It is more that described equipment failure model will combine equipment configuration feature, equipment Test data, BIT data, equipment failure characteristic parameter The equipment information of aspect, demand analysis is carried out to equipment.
3. one kind as claimed in claim 1 is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults, it is characterised in that described Fault diagnosis system also include knowledge base, for depositing the special knowledge and the obtained failure of emulation reasoning of domain expert Feature;Knowledge base is according to qualitative analysis and expertise knowledge, rule and obtains fault signature in practice for information about Data forms, and is represented with certain knowledge form.
4. one kind as claimed in claim 1 is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults, it is characterised in that wherein The optimization of stratification fault model comprises the following steps:
4.1 according to the Failure Characteristic Parameter of acquisition, and the system chosen in fault mode level carries out fault reasoning diagnosis, obtained just Node A corresponding to the system and diagnostic result of step;
4.2 choose equipment level model node S1 corresponding to node A, and the section with node S1 interactions is determined by incidence relation Point;
4.3 node by being chosen in stratification fault model, letter is diagnosed with reference to the Failure Characteristic Parameter and primary fault of acquisition Breath, it is related to the progress of stratification fault model to cut out, it is determined that the node S1 ' corresponding to the second layer in equipment level;
4.4 choose the second node layer S1 ' of equipment from the failure subpattern space for being cut out carries out fault reasoning diagnosis, obtains Node B corresponding to failure level result;
4.5 choose equipment level model node S2 corresponding to node B, and the section with node S2 interactions is determined by incidence relation Point, it is related to the progress of stratification fault model to cut out with reference to the Failure Characteristic Parameter and failure diagnosis information of acquisition, it is determined that Corresponding to the node S2 ' of third layer in equipment level, by electronic information equipment fault location.
CN201410785081.0A 2014-12-16 2014-12-16 One kind is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults Active CN104597892B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410785081.0A CN104597892B (en) 2014-12-16 2014-12-16 One kind is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201410785081.0A CN104597892B (en) 2014-12-16 2014-12-16 One kind is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104597892A CN104597892A (en) 2015-05-06
CN104597892B true CN104597892B (en) 2018-01-19

Family

ID=53123750

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201410785081.0A Active CN104597892B (en) 2014-12-16 2014-12-16 One kind is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104597892B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112631238A (en) * 2020-12-05 2021-04-09 中国人民解放军32181部队 Embedded diagnosis method for complex electronic system

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105067933B (en) * 2015-08-31 2018-08-31 中国人民解放军63908部队 General-purpose system and test method for electronics testability demonstration and assessment
CN105512195B (en) * 2015-11-26 2019-08-23 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 A kind of product F MECA report analysis decision assistant method
CN105574328B (en) * 2015-12-11 2018-07-03 中国航空工业集团公司西安航空计算技术研究所 A kind of integrated approach of on-board diagnostics model
CN106546850B (en) * 2016-10-30 2018-11-27 中国电子科技集团公司第二十九研究所 A kind of SRU fault confirmation method and device based on detection thermal station
CN107656518A (en) * 2016-11-30 2018-02-02 中国航空工业集团公司沈阳飞机设计研究所 A kind of system failure inference method
CN108241114B (en) * 2016-12-26 2020-05-26 北京邮电大学 Online fault detection method and device for hybrid circuit chip and fault detection circuit
CN108289031B (en) * 2017-01-09 2021-06-22 ***通信集团河北有限公司 Home broadband network fault diagnosis method and device
CN110991673B (en) * 2019-12-09 2023-10-31 中国航空工业集团公司上海航空测控技术研究所 Fault isolation and localization method for complex systems
CN111061253A (en) * 2019-12-27 2020-04-24 北京旋极信息技术股份有限公司 Fault diagnosis method, system and readable medium for electromechanical hybrid system
CN111176877A (en) * 2019-12-27 2020-05-19 北京旋极信息技术股份有限公司 Fault diagnosis method, system and readable medium for electronic information system
CN111273640A (en) * 2020-03-03 2020-06-12 中国船舶重工集团公司第七0七研究所九江分部 Automatic standby test system and method for control equipment
CN112035996A (en) * 2020-05-15 2020-12-04 中国人民解放军32181部队 Equipment testability integrated design and evaluation system
CN111898924B (en) * 2020-08-13 2024-07-12 中国人民解放军海军航空大学 Comprehensive evaluation method and system for equipment testability use
CN112528526B (en) * 2021-01-06 2023-05-09 中国人民解放军63856部队 Simulation technology-based light weapon fault reproduction method
CN113835411B (en) * 2021-09-07 2023-10-27 北京科技大学顺德研究生院 Comprehensive diagnosis method for quality abnormality of steel rolling process flow
CN114329910B (en) * 2021-12-06 2024-04-02 中国航空综合技术研究所 Fault simulation analysis method based on cross-layer modeling
CN115860123A (en) * 2023-03-02 2023-03-28 哈尔滨电机厂有限责任公司 Fault diagnosis reasoning and checking method for water turbine

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2002023841A (en) * 2000-07-04 2002-01-25 Asahi Eng Co Ltd Equipment diagnostic system
JP2009290349A (en) * 2008-05-27 2009-12-10 Denso Corp Failure diagnosis system
CN202522427U (en) * 2012-01-11 2012-11-07 北京航天测控技术有限公司 Portable automatic test and diagnosis equipment
CN102707712B (en) * 2012-06-06 2014-06-18 广州山锋测控技术有限公司 Electronic equipment fault diagnosis method and system
CN103558043A (en) * 2013-11-04 2014-02-05 北京航天测控技术有限公司 Test diagnosis method and device

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"电子装备层次化故障诊断技术研究";刘葆华;《计算机测量与控制》;20131231;第21卷(第2期);第297-299、311页 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112631238A (en) * 2020-12-05 2021-04-09 中国人民解放军32181部队 Embedded diagnosis method for complex electronic system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104597892A (en) 2015-05-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104597892B (en) One kind is used for electronic information equipment stratification method for diagnosing faults
CN104504248B (en) A kind of fault diagnosis modeling method analyzed based on design data
CN106452908B (en) A method of building onboard networks dynamically associate Fault Management System
CN105512011B (en) A kind of electronics testability modeling appraisal procedure
Assaf et al. Automatic generation of diagnostic expert systems from fault trees
KR20180099469A (en) Isolation management system and isolation management method
CN107966648B (en) A kind of embedded failure diagnosis method based on correlation matrix
Sutcliffe et al. Automating scenario analysis of human and system reliability
CN105868115A (en) Building method and system for software test model of software intensive system
CN106886620A (en) Spacecraft-testing resource optimization configuration method
CN116432442A (en) Three-dimensional integrated evaluation method for ground facility equipment of space launching field
CN112035996A (en) Equipment testability integrated design and evaluation system
CN112214912B (en) External automatic test system and airborne equipment test method
KR20230158787A (en) Prognostic and health management apparatus based on digital twin
CN104468196B (en) Virtual network method for diagnosing faults and device based on evidence screening
Alrawi et al. Investigating end user errors in oil and gas critical control systems
Axel Gran et al. Estimating dependability of programmable systems using BBNs
Prelipcean et al. Emerging applications of decision support systems (DSS) in crisis management
Gorin et al. Test design with higher order cognition in mind
Enand et al. A methodology for validating large knowledge bases
Ai et al. Software reliability evaluation method based on a software network
Ferrell et al. Modeling and performance considerations for automated fault isolation in complex systems
Zhu et al. Application of hazard analysis to software quality modelling
Wang et al. Identification and correlation analysis for performance shaping factors in flight crew operation
Kass Twenty-one parameters for rigorous, robust, and realistic operational testing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant